11.11.2014 Views

Acute Pain - final version - Faculty of pain medicine - Australian and ...

Acute Pain - final version - Faculty of pain medicine - Australian and ...

Acute Pain - final version - Faculty of pain medicine - Australian and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.


<br />


<br />

Adjuvant drugs<br />

The
efficacy
<strong>of</strong>
adding
<strong>of</strong>
adjuvant
drugs
such
as
adrenaline
(epinephrine),
clonidine,
ketamine,
<br />

midazolam,
neostigmine
<strong>and</strong>
magnesium
to
solutions
used
for
epidural
analgesia
has
also
<br />

been
investigated
(see
Section
5.3).
<br />

7.2.3 Patient-controlled epidural analgesia<br />

The
use
<strong>of</strong>
patient‐controlled
epidural
analgesia
(PCEA)
has
become
increasingly
popular;
<br />

it
is
based
on
similar
concepts
as
for
other
patient‐controlled
techniques.

<br />

Comparison with continuous epidural infusions<br />

A
meta‐analysis
comparing
PCEA,
continuous
epidural
infusions
<strong>and</strong>
IV
PCA
opioids
after
<br />

surgery
showed
that
both
forms
<strong>of</strong>
epidural
analgesia
(with
the
exception
<strong>of</strong>
hydrophilic
<br />

opioid‐only
epidural
regimens)
provided
better
<strong>pain</strong>
relief
with
rest
<strong>and</strong>
with
activity
than
PCA
<br />

opioids,
but
that
analgesia
with
a
continuous
epidural
infusion
was
superior
to
PCEA,
although
<br />

the
incidence
<strong>of</strong>
nausea,
vomiting
<strong>and</strong>
motor
block
was
higher
(Wu
et
al,
2005
Level
I).

<br />

However,
results
from
other
more
recent
studies
are
conflicting.
In
a
large
study
looking
<br />

specifically
at
patients
after
colonic
resection,
PCEA
was
superior
to
continuous
epidural
<br />

infusion
with
regard
to
<strong>pain</strong>
control,
requirements
for
top‐ups
<strong>and</strong>
systemic
analgesia
as
well
<br />

as
patient
satisfaction
(Nightingale
et
al,
2007
Level
II).
In
contrast,
comparisons
<strong>of</strong>
PCEA
<strong>and</strong>
<br />

continuous
epidural
infusions
for
<strong>pain</strong>
relief
after
thoracotomy
using
both
high
(5
mg/mL)
<strong>and</strong>
<br />

low
(1.5
mg/mL)
concentrations
<strong>of</strong>
levobupivacaine
showed
no
differences
in
quality
<strong>of</strong>
<br />

analgesia,
morphine
consumption
or
satisfaction;
more
patients
in
the
high
concentration
<br />

continuous
epidural
infusion
group
had
significant
motor
blockade
(Dernedde
et
al,
2006
<br />

Level
II).

<br />

For
<strong>pain</strong>
relief
during
labour,
a
comparison
<strong>of</strong>
dem<strong>and</strong>
dose‐only
PCEA,
PCEA
with
a
<br />

continuous
infusion,
<strong>and</strong>
a
continuous
epidural
infusion
only
during
labour,
showed
that

<br />

dose‐only
PCEA
resulted
in
less
total
epidural
dose
compared
with
the
other
modalities;
<br />

no
differences
were
noted
with
respect
to
<strong>pain</strong>
scores,
motor
block,
duration
<strong>of</strong>
labour,
<br />

number
<strong>of</strong>
staff
interventions,
delivery
outcome,
<strong>and</strong>
maternal
satisfaction
score
(Vallejo
et
al,
<br />

2007
Level
II).

<br />

Concurrent background (continuous) infusions<br />

The
addition
<strong>of</strong>
a
continuous
background
infusion
to
PCEA
using
bupivacaine
<strong>and</strong>
fentanyl
<br />

following
gastrectomy
resulted
in
significantly
better
dynamic
<strong>pain</strong>
scores,
higher
total
doses
<br />

<strong>and</strong>
a
greater
incidence
<strong>of</strong>
pruritus
than
PCEA‐bolus
dose
only
(Komatsu
et
al,
1998
Level
II).
<br />

The
use
<strong>of</strong>
a
night‐time‐only
infusion
with
PCEA
bupivacaine‐fentanyl,
also
in
postgastrectomy
<br />

patients,
resulted
in
better
sleep,
but
total
cumulative
doses
were
similar
<strong>and</strong>
<strong>pain</strong>
scores
<br />

were
only
better
in
the
morning
<strong>of</strong>
the
second
postoperative
day
(Komatsu
et
al,
2001
Level
II).

<br />

However,
<strong>pain</strong>
relief
is
not
always
improved.
After
lower
abdominal
surgery
there
was
no
<br />

difference
in
<strong>pain</strong>
scores,
but
higher
total
cumulative
doses
<strong>and</strong>
incidence
<strong>of</strong>
side
effects
when
<br />

a
background
infusion
was
added
to
PCEA
with
ropivacaine
<strong>and</strong>
fentanyl
(Wong
et
al,
2000
<br />

Level
II).
The
addition
<strong>of</strong>
a
background
infusion
to
bupivacaine‐fentanyl
PCEA
did
not
improve
<br />

<strong>pain</strong>
relief
after
pelvic
reconstruction
(Nolan
et
al,
1992
Level
II).
<br />

In
a
systematic
review
<strong>of</strong>
PCEA
in
labour
analgesia,
the
use
<strong>of</strong>
a
continuous
background
<br />

epidural
infusion
combined
with
PCEA
resulted
in
improved
maternal
analgesia
<strong>and</strong>
reduced
<br />

unscheduled
clinician
interventions
(Halpern
&
Carvalho
2009,
Level
I).
<br />

CHAPTER
7
<br />


 <strong>Acute</strong>
<strong>pain</strong>
management:
scientific
evidence
 185


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!