11.11.2014 Views

Fuller Brook Executive Summary - Town of Wellesley

Fuller Brook Executive Summary - Town of Wellesley

Fuller Brook Executive Summary - Town of Wellesley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong> Park Preservation Project<br />

<strong>Wellesley</strong>, Massachusetts<br />

Path<br />

Options explored for the <strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong> path include width,<br />

surface, alignment, and grade changes to meet universal<br />

access standards.<br />

Width<br />

The path width varies enormously along the length <strong>of</strong> the Park,<br />

from a 12” wide beaten footpath to areas that exceed 12’ in<br />

width. The 2009 Preservation Master Plan recommended a<br />

consistent 8’ wide path throughout the Park. Based on public<br />

input, several path widths 4’, 5’, 6’, 8’ and 10’ were explored<br />

generally related to the degree <strong>of</strong> access and use they afforded.<br />

Collapsed concrete liners in <strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong>, Segment 1.<br />

Sediment in Caroline <strong>Brook</strong>, Segment 4.<br />

Upland flooding<br />

Options considered to mitigate seasonal flooding in areas where<br />

the active floodplain extends into the portions <strong>of</strong> the Park where<br />

the path is located, include the development <strong>of</strong> vegetated<br />

detention areas such as wet meadows, bioswales, and rain<br />

gardens.<br />

Park Boundary<br />

<strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong> Park has an irregular boundary that is largely<br />

adjacent to residential properties. In many places, this ambiguity<br />

means that park users cannot tell where the edge <strong>of</strong> the Park is<br />

and private land begins, so that much <strong>of</strong> the Park is unusable.<br />

There are also a few instances where abutters have<br />

inadvertently landscaped or added fences within the park<br />

boundary. Options to address the ambiguity <strong>of</strong> the park<br />

boundary should be developed in concert with adjacent<br />

landowners and may vary depending on specific site conditions.<br />

Three alternatives for the delineation <strong>of</strong> the park boundary were<br />

considered: granite boundary markers, buffer planting, and splitrail<br />

fence.<br />

Surface<br />

Path surface also varies for each segment and <strong>of</strong>ten within each<br />

segment. Existing surfaces included dirt, gravel, bituminous<br />

concrete, wood chips and synthetic boardwalk. Alternative path<br />

surfaces considered and evaluated for <strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong> Park<br />

included wood chips, gravel/crushed stone, stonedust, stabilized<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t surface, bituminous concrete (standard, permeable, rolled<br />

stone), and boardwalk.<br />

Universal Access<br />

A few existing areas along the path exceed the recommended<br />

grade for universal access (5%), most <strong>of</strong> which relate to the<br />

slopes approaching street crossings. However, with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> the bituminous path in Segment 2, most <strong>of</strong> the path<br />

in the Park does not meet current universal design standards for<br />

slip-resistant surfaces. Since one <strong>of</strong> the design criteria for Phase<br />

2 is improving universal access, the alternatives considered a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> access from no change to full compliance with the<br />

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).<br />

Narrow section <strong>of</strong> dirt path in <strong>Fuller</strong> <strong>Brook</strong> Park, Segment 4. This is an<br />

example <strong>of</strong> a path that does not meet universal access standards due<br />

to width and surface material.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!