Here's a copy of the Aiken pretrial order. - Insurance Coverage Blog

v. In the event the Court overrules USAA CIC’s objections as to relevance, what is
the cost to replace Plaintiffs’ house?
11. The contested issues of law are as follows:
By Plaintiffs:
1. Whether the actions of Rimkus, Jordan and USAA amount to civil conspiracy,
tortuous interference with contract, fraud or bad faith under Mississippi Law.
2. Whether Defendants can mention or refer to flood insurance payments made to
Dr. and Mrs. Aiken.
3. Those inherent in the statement of contested issues of fact preceding and in the
Complaint.
By Defendant, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and James W. Jordan:
1. Whether Rimkus is liable to Plaintiffs on the basis of fraud
2. Whether Jordan is liable to Plaintiffs on the basis of fraud.
3. Whether Rimkus is an agent of USAA.
4. Whether Jordan is an agent of USAA.
5. Whether flood payments reduce the amount the Plaintiffs can claim as
damages.
6. Whether Plaintiffs’ live pleadings state a cause of action for tortious interference
with contract.
7. Whether Plaintiffs can maintain a cause of action against Rimkus and Jordan
based upon alleged violations of the guidelines promulgated by NSPE or the
Mississippi rules and regulations governing the practice of engineering.
-22-