Here's a copy of the Aiken pretrial order. - Insurance Coverage Blog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P-35: Hearsay, relevance, Fed. R. Evid. 702-704 P-37: Relevance P-38: Relevance P-39: Relevance P-40: No objections if this is USAA CIC’s damage itemization; otherwise, cannot identify – all objections reserved P-41: No objections if this is USAA CIC’s itemization; otherwise, cannot identify – all objections reserved P-42: Failure to identify exhibit with particularity such that objections can be formed – all objections reserved P-43: Failure to identify exhibit with particularity such that objections can be formed – all objections reserved P-44: Failure to identify exhibit with particularity such that objections can be formed – all objections reserved P-45a: Relevance, hearsay, Rule 403, violation of court’s in limine ruling P-46: Hearsay, relevance, cannot identify as produced in discovery-all objections reserved; P-47: Failure to identify exhibit with particularity such that objection can be formed-all objections reserved; P-48: Certain exhibits listed are not appropriate during the underlying liability phase of the trial, and USAA CIC objects to introduction of such exhibits during the underlying liability phase of the case. -34-
P-50: Relevance P-51: Relevance P-52: Relevance P-53: Relevance P-54: Relevance P-55: Relevance P-56: Relevance as to materials supplied by Rimkus to Chapa, and Hearsay as to Chapa P-58: Relevance P-59: Relevance P-60: Relevance P-62: Relevance b. To be offered by the Defendant, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and James W. Jordan: Please see attached Exhibit List. Exhibits Objected to by the Plaintiff: Exhibit No. DU-2 DU-3 DU-5 DU-6 DU-7 DU-8 DU-9 DU-10 Objection Proper predicate Proper predicate Proper predicate proper predicate wind only proper predicate proper predicate & accuracy proper predicate & accuracy -35-
Page 1 and 2: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Page 3 and 4: 7. The following motions remain pen
Page 5 and 6: 1. Compensatory damages; 2. Punitiv
Page 7 and 8: NOAA; a compilation of data accesse
Page 9 and 10: meteorological evidence and determi
Page 11 and 12: which was in effect the date of Hur
Page 13 and 14: of Hurricane Katrina. The policy pr
Page 15 and 16: entitled to recover? b. Whether the
Page 17 and 18: a. Whether a tornado occurred at Pl
Page 19 and 20: Plaintiffs suffered damage. o. Whet
Page 21 and 22: to USAA CIC. l. Whether USAA CIC is
Page 23 and 24: Rimkus and Jordan also adopt by ref
Page 25 and 26: 17. Whether Plaintiffs are entitled
Page 27 and 28: P-29 Plaintiff Expert Report of Nan
Page 29 and 30: Plaintiff reserves the right to int
Page 31 and 32: P-43 failure to identify exhibit wi
Page 33: P-12: Hearsay as to contract liabil
Page 37 and 38: DU-46 proper predicate, hearsay & n
Page 39 and 40: DU-71.01-.07 proper predicate, hear
Page 41 and 42: Exhibit No. DU-2 DU-3 DU-5 DU-6 DU-
Page 43 and 44: DU-51.01-.02 proper predicate, hear
Page 45 and 46: DU-78 DU-79.01-79.03 proper predica
Page 47 and 48: Marilyn Aiken X Fact/Liability Dama
Page 49 and 50: Russ Smith (may call live if presen
Page 51 and 52: Paul Colman X Fact Rimkus Consultin
Page 53 and 54: Roverto Chapa (if not called live b
Page 55 and 56: Andrew Snyder X Fact, Expert Liabil
Page 57: corrections or additions prior to s

Here's a copy of the Aiken pretrial order. - Insurance Coverage Blog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?