SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA
SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA
SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>RTCA</strong> Paper No. 021-13/<strong>SC</strong><strong>226</strong>-010<br />
February 6, 2013<br />
(2) Paragraph 2.2.3 Sensitivity<br />
Sennheiser offered to check with company physicists to determine what the theoretical performance of<br />
their microphones under low pressure conditions would be expected to be.<br />
B/E Aerospace can coordinate test activities to try to determine what the effect on the acoustic source<br />
and the microphone under test would be under altitude conditions.<br />
The same issues pertain to Temperature and Temperature Variation except that the test specifically<br />
refers to the microphone preamplifier (independently of the microphone?). The committee had a range<br />
of interpretations.<br />
2.5.2 Temperature Variation Test<br />
The equipment shall be subjected to the test conditions as specified<br />
in <strong>RTCA</strong>/DO-160x, Section 5.0.<br />
a. Aircraft Microphones (Except Carbon):<br />
The microphone preamplifier, as a component of the microphone<br />
assembly shall be subjected to this test. During the test, the following<br />
requirements shall be met:<br />
(1) Subparagraph 2.2.2.1 Distortion Characteristics<br />
(2) Subparagraph 2.2.3.1 Sensitivity<br />
Bosch offered to check with the test equipment manufacturer to determine what the performance of<br />
the artificial voice would be expected to be under temperature and temperature variation test<br />
conditions.<br />
Additional question: Why are the Aircraft Headsets, Handsets and Loudspeakers excluded from the<br />
temperature variation test. Bosch, Sennheiser and Bose were asked to check with their engineering<br />
departments to determine a valid reason.<br />
Discussion on RF Interference and 2V/M relaxed noise allowance in Section 2.5.11.<br />
Another issue is the title of “sustained ambient” and “transient”. These do not align with the current<br />
version of DO-160.<br />
The “sustained ambient” and “transient” sections should be combined into one.<br />
Radio Frequency Susceptibility Test (Radiated and Conducted)<br />
Page 13 of 20