13.11.2014 Views

SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA

SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA

SC-226 MEETING MINUTES Working Group JANUARY 14 ... - RTCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>RTCA</strong> Paper No. 021-13/<strong>SC</strong><strong>226</strong>-010<br />

February 6, 2013<br />

(2) Paragraph 2.2.3 Sensitivity<br />

Sennheiser offered to check with company physicists to determine what the theoretical performance of<br />

their microphones under low pressure conditions would be expected to be.<br />

B/E Aerospace can coordinate test activities to try to determine what the effect on the acoustic source<br />

and the microphone under test would be under altitude conditions.<br />

The same issues pertain to Temperature and Temperature Variation except that the test specifically<br />

refers to the microphone preamplifier (independently of the microphone?). The committee had a range<br />

of interpretations.<br />

2.5.2 Temperature Variation Test<br />

The equipment shall be subjected to the test conditions as specified<br />

in <strong>RTCA</strong>/DO-160x, Section 5.0.<br />

a. Aircraft Microphones (Except Carbon):<br />

The microphone preamplifier, as a component of the microphone<br />

assembly shall be subjected to this test. During the test, the following<br />

requirements shall be met:<br />

(1) Subparagraph 2.2.2.1 Distortion Characteristics<br />

(2) Subparagraph 2.2.3.1 Sensitivity<br />

Bosch offered to check with the test equipment manufacturer to determine what the performance of<br />

the artificial voice would be expected to be under temperature and temperature variation test<br />

conditions.<br />

Additional question: Why are the Aircraft Headsets, Handsets and Loudspeakers excluded from the<br />

temperature variation test. Bosch, Sennheiser and Bose were asked to check with their engineering<br />

departments to determine a valid reason.<br />

Discussion on RF Interference and 2V/M relaxed noise allowance in Section 2.5.11.<br />

Another issue is the title of “sustained ambient” and “transient”. These do not align with the current<br />

version of DO-160.<br />

The “sustained ambient” and “transient” sections should be combined into one.<br />

Radio Frequency Susceptibility Test (Radiated and Conducted)<br />

Page 13 of 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!