04.11.2012 Views

Invoicing in 16 European countries - Itella Corporation

Invoicing in 16 European countries - Itella Corporation

Invoicing in 16 European countries - Itella Corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Itella</strong> Information survey:<br />

<strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong><br />

<strong>countries</strong><br />

A quantitative study based on comparative surveys of 9 037 consumers<br />

and 4 765 <strong>in</strong>voice decision-makers from enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g sales and purchase <strong>in</strong>voices. Executed <strong>in</strong> cooperation with<br />

Add Value Research F<strong>in</strong>land and <strong>Itella</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong>.


Content<br />

Targets and realisation .............................................................. 2<br />

What is an electronic <strong>in</strong>voice? ................................................... 2<br />

The present and future of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong> enterprises ............................................................ 3<br />

Consumers as <strong>in</strong>voice receivers ................................................. 6<br />

Summary and conclusions ........................................................ 9


<strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> survey<br />

The electronification of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g has become a more and more important research subject. However, the use of and markets<br />

for electronic <strong>in</strong>voices are difficult to specify. The normal approach, even among experts, has been not only too broad, but also<br />

too narrow. It has been too broad <strong>in</strong> the sense that value is only attached to comprehensive solutions whose security solutions<br />

cover both <strong>in</strong>voice transfers and payments. It has been too narrow <strong>in</strong> the sense that the pursuit of comprehensiveness has failed<br />

to take <strong>in</strong>to account the silent change <strong>in</strong> the markets. So, beh<strong>in</strong>d-the-scenes email <strong>in</strong>voices have become more popular than<br />

fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, which have been considered more desirable. This is the ma<strong>in</strong> result of the research to be presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> this paper, but before go<strong>in</strong>g on to consider the results the concept of the electronic <strong>in</strong>voice must be exam<strong>in</strong>ed more closely.<br />

Targets and realisation<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> target of this research is to exam<strong>in</strong>e the present state<br />

of, future plans for, and prerequisites of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong>. This approach covers the ma<strong>in</strong> types of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

from paper to different electronic channels, such as email, Internet<br />

bank<strong>in</strong>g and direct transfer to the recipient’s <strong>in</strong>voice process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system.<br />

The enterprise part of this study presents a general overview of<br />

electronic and paper <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> and <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

both outgo<strong>in</strong>g sales and <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g purchase <strong>in</strong>voices. The survey<br />

was directed comprehensively at large, medium-size and smallish<br />

enterprises, although micro-bus<strong>in</strong>esses with less than five employees<br />

were left out of the study. The consumer part of the study concentrates<br />

on <strong>in</strong>voice reception.<br />

This quantitative study is based on comparative surveys us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

representative enterprise and consumer samples from each country.<br />

All <strong>in</strong> all, 9037 consumers and 4765 <strong>in</strong>voice decision-makers from<br />

enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> were <strong>in</strong>terviewed by phone <strong>in</strong><br />

their native language. Representative country samples varied from<br />

487 to 1009 for consumers, and from 200 to 457 for enterprises.<br />

What is an electronic <strong>in</strong>voice?<br />

There is often news of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> the media. However, much<br />

of this news is not about electronic <strong>in</strong>voices but other phenomena<br />

related to the electronification of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. For this reason it is<br />

important to def<strong>in</strong>e what an electronic <strong>in</strong>voice is. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

<strong>European</strong> Commission, electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g - e-<strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> - is the<br />

electronic transfer of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation (bill<strong>in</strong>g and payment)<br />

between bus<strong>in</strong>ess partners (supplier and buyer). The po<strong>in</strong>t of view of<br />

the Commission is quite juridical, and on their web pages electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is especially related to directives on value added tax and<br />

electronic signatures.<br />

The implementation of the electronic <strong>in</strong>voice presentment and<br />

payment (EIPP) solution, also called electronic bill presentment<br />

Figure 1. Percentages of enterprises send<strong>in</strong>g fully electronic and email <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 4765).<br />

<strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> | 2


and payment (EBPP), is usually set as a target <strong>in</strong> the development<br />

of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. The ma<strong>in</strong> terms of e-<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g slang are<br />

very reveal<strong>in</strong>g. They reveal that electronification is mostly looked<br />

at from the po<strong>in</strong>t of view of banks, and the transfer of messages is<br />

not considered to be very important. However, it should be noted<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g paper <strong>in</strong>voices that nobody <strong>in</strong>cludes payment <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>voice and its delivery.<br />

The focus of this study is on the delivery and transference of<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices, for which reason the payment and security solutions related<br />

to them are outside of the core area of this study. Then aga<strong>in</strong>, an<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice can be more realistically and less restrictedly<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed, and as a result a more comprehensive picture of the present<br />

market situation can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed, and will be more reliably measured<br />

<strong>in</strong> the survey research. Here we use the follow<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ition: an<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice is an <strong>in</strong>voice that is transferred <strong>in</strong> electronic format<br />

from the sender to the recipient directly, without be<strong>in</strong>g written or<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ted on paper. Because this def<strong>in</strong>ition has a broader semantic<br />

area than the general concept of an e-<strong>in</strong>voice, <strong>in</strong> this study the term<br />

“electronic <strong>in</strong>voice” will be regularly used <strong>in</strong> a general sense, and its<br />

subcategory “e-<strong>in</strong>voice” (as it is usually called) will be the term for a<br />

fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voice.<br />

In this def<strong>in</strong>ition, the necessary and sufficient condition of an<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice is that it is an electronic operation from end to end.<br />

In addition to this, one may require <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that the <strong>in</strong>voice can be<br />

paid on the basis of this electronic document although, however, the<br />

transferr<strong>in</strong>g of the <strong>in</strong>voice does not necessarily <strong>in</strong>volve payment. An<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this way will not become non-electronic if<br />

a parallel paper <strong>in</strong>voice is sent, or, for example, at the end of the year<br />

a paper summary is sent to the tax authorities. However, the so-called<br />

hybrid solutions <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>voices received on paper are scanned to<br />

become electronic, or paper <strong>in</strong>voices pr<strong>in</strong>ted from electronic data,<br />

are not electronic <strong>in</strong>voices. Solutions of this k<strong>in</strong>d can still support the<br />

electronification of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

3 | <strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

The present and future of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> enterprises<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the development of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong> enterprises.<br />

Companies <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> send 65% of their<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices to other companies and 35% to consumers. An enterprise<br />

sends a monthly average of 510 <strong>in</strong>voices, and receives 362 <strong>in</strong>voices.<br />

Most <strong>in</strong>voices are delivered as paper letters, but the different k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voices are also extensively used <strong>in</strong> enterprises.<br />

About half of the <strong>European</strong> companies <strong>in</strong>terviewed both send and<br />

receive at least one electronic <strong>in</strong>voice a month, which can be, for<br />

example, an email <strong>in</strong>voice. Both electronic sales and purchase <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

use varies considerably <strong>in</strong> different <strong>countries</strong>. The largest number of<br />

electronic sales <strong>in</strong>voice users is found <strong>in</strong> the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, Estonia<br />

and Denmark. At the top <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction of electronic purchase<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices are the Baltic <strong>countries</strong> and Denmark. The lowest number<br />

of both sales and purchase <strong>in</strong>voices are transferred electronically <strong>in</strong><br />

Poland (figures 1 and 2).<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> forms of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g are the email <strong>in</strong>voice and<br />

the fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voice, and the latter can be an Internet <strong>in</strong>voice,<br />

EDI <strong>in</strong>voice or other <strong>in</strong>ter-company electronically transferred <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

data. Almost every second enterprise sends and receives at least one<br />

email <strong>in</strong>voice <strong>in</strong> a month. Every fourth enterprise sends at least one<br />

fully electronic sales <strong>in</strong>voice, and every sixth receives at least one<br />

electronic purchase <strong>in</strong>voice <strong>in</strong> a month. As the size of a company<br />

grows, the proportion of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices it sends and receives also<br />

grows. The size effect is strongest <strong>in</strong> the send<strong>in</strong>g of fully electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices. The effect of company size is slightly smaller <strong>in</strong> purchase<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices, particularly <strong>in</strong> fully electronic ones.<br />

The wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g use of email <strong>in</strong>voices is the most surpris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of this study. The email <strong>in</strong>voice is not only a m<strong>in</strong>or solution<br />

for small enterprises; it is comprehensively used <strong>in</strong> all size classes.<br />

It has twice as many users as have fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, which,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the narrow traditional def<strong>in</strong>itions, are the only real<br />

Figure 2. Percentages of enterprises receiv<strong>in</strong>g fully electronic and email <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 4765).


Figure 3. Invoices sent by enterprises accord<strong>in</strong>g to delivery and process<strong>in</strong>g channels, % of <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 4765).<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, or e-<strong>in</strong>voices.<br />

What is beh<strong>in</strong>d this surpris<strong>in</strong>g popularity? The email <strong>in</strong>voice is<br />

fast and flexible. It needs no expensive and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

system implementations. It is immediately available for most<br />

enterprises. Email may be the only electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g channel for<br />

small enterprises, but it can also be used as a complement to fully<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g solutions <strong>in</strong> any enterprise. The email <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

does not necessarily totally execute the <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g process, but it<br />

enables and quickens many transactions, which would not perhaps<br />

even have occurred without email <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Because electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is still <strong>in</strong> its transition stage, the share<br />

of companies which use electronic <strong>in</strong>voices is dist<strong>in</strong>ctly greater than<br />

the share of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices. Even though 50% of the enterprises<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewed send electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, the share of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

sent cont<strong>in</strong>ues to rema<strong>in</strong> under 30%. The share of email <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

is clearly larger than the share of fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices sent <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe, and it is email <strong>in</strong>voices that dom<strong>in</strong>ate electronification <strong>in</strong><br />

most <strong>countries</strong>, which is additional proof of the surpris<strong>in</strong>g popularity<br />

of email <strong>in</strong>voices (figure 3).<br />

<strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> are at quite different stages <strong>in</strong> the<br />

electronification of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g and the outsourc<strong>in</strong>g of pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. Fully<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voices are stressed <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />

Email <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is emphasized <strong>in</strong> Estonia and aga<strong>in</strong> the United<br />

K<strong>in</strong>gdom. The greatest emphasis on outsourced pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g is found <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land and Sweden. Sales <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is least electronified <strong>in</strong> Poland,<br />

the Czech Republic, Russia and other Eastern <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong>.<br />

Enterprises can be segmented accord<strong>in</strong>g to their pr<strong>in</strong>cipal ways<br />

of send<strong>in</strong>g sales <strong>in</strong>voices. Cluster analysis (k-means clusters <strong>in</strong> the<br />

SPSS) was used for this, and the best solution split enterprises <strong>in</strong>to<br />

five segments. It proved that about 69% of all enterprises are senders<br />

of <strong>in</strong>-house pr<strong>in</strong>t. Because the <strong>in</strong>voice volumes of these enterprises<br />

are below average, they send only 66% of all <strong>in</strong>voices. The first<br />

segment of <strong>in</strong>-house pr<strong>in</strong>t senders sends <strong>in</strong>voices almost exclusively<br />

to other enterprises, the second segment ma<strong>in</strong>ly to consumers. B2B<br />

<strong>in</strong>-house pr<strong>in</strong>t senders are emphasized <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

and ma<strong>in</strong>ly B2C <strong>in</strong>-house pr<strong>in</strong>t senders are stressed <strong>in</strong> the public<br />

sector and small, five-to-n<strong>in</strong>e-employee companies with a turnover<br />

of less than €400,000. Both <strong>in</strong>-house pr<strong>in</strong>t sender segments have<br />

an over 60% share <strong>in</strong> all other <strong>countries</strong> except the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

and Estonia, and a share of more than 90% <strong>in</strong> Poland, Slovakia and<br />

Lithuania.<br />

The third segment, senders of outsourced pr<strong>in</strong>t, is formed of quite a<br />

small share of enterprises. The companies belong<strong>in</strong>g to this segment<br />

send their <strong>in</strong>voices evenly both to consumers and enterprises. Invoice<br />

volumes are above average and this solution is emphasized <strong>in</strong> the<br />

trade branch. It is also known that <strong>in</strong> the real world outsourced<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t is especially used for consumer <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g, and a few consumer<br />

<strong>in</strong>voicers with huge volumes also use outsourced pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, although<br />

these were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the sample for this research. The senders<br />

of outsourced pr<strong>in</strong>t had the highest share <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two segments send ma<strong>in</strong>ly electronic <strong>in</strong>voices,<br />

and have almost the same share of enterprises <strong>in</strong> Europe. In the<br />

fourth segment, email senders, <strong>in</strong>voice volumes are average, which<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> reflects the usability of email <strong>in</strong>voices, regardless of company<br />

size. Emails are sent ma<strong>in</strong>ly to other companies, but enterprises <strong>in</strong><br />

this segment belong to all branches of <strong>in</strong>dustry and enterprise size<br />

classes. The email segment is clearly the largest <strong>in</strong> Estonia, cover<strong>in</strong>g<br />

almost every second enterprise.<br />

The fifth segment, electronic <strong>in</strong>voicers, sends about half of its<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> fully electronic format, although they have to use other<br />

methods for the other half of their sales <strong>in</strong>voices. Invoice volumes<br />

are clearly higher <strong>in</strong> this segment <strong>in</strong> which enterprises have usually<br />

implemented electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g systems and use them ma<strong>in</strong>ly for<br />

B2B <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. This segment is emphasized <strong>in</strong> bigger enterprises with<br />

more than 50 employees and a turnover of over €10,000,000. The<br />

segment of electronic <strong>in</strong>voicers is biggest <strong>in</strong> Denmark, F<strong>in</strong>land and<br />

<strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> | 4


Figure 4. Invoices received by enterprises accord<strong>in</strong>g to delivery and process<strong>in</strong>g channels, % of <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 4765).<br />

the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom.<br />

The shares of electronic purchase <strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> Europe are quite<br />

similar to those of sales <strong>in</strong>voices. About 52% of enterprises receive<br />

electronic purchase <strong>in</strong>voices, and their share of <strong>in</strong>voices is less<br />

than 30% <strong>in</strong> Europe. Email <strong>in</strong>voices also dom<strong>in</strong>ate the reception<br />

of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, and aga<strong>in</strong> there are quite large differences<br />

between <strong>countries</strong>. Email has a significant share <strong>in</strong> Austria, Estonia,<br />

Germany and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. On the other hand, the focus is on<br />

fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voice reception <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and Denmark (figure 4).<br />

The scann<strong>in</strong>g of received paper <strong>in</strong>voices for electronic process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is particularly emphasized <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong>. Elsewhere <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe most scann<strong>in</strong>g is ma<strong>in</strong>ly done just for archiv<strong>in</strong>g. Scann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is used more by enterprises that have large volumes of <strong>in</strong>voices,<br />

and companies receiv<strong>in</strong>g most <strong>in</strong>voices directly <strong>in</strong> their electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g system also do the most scann<strong>in</strong>g for process<strong>in</strong>g. Email<br />

receivers scan primarily for archiv<strong>in</strong>g purposes, and those receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly paper <strong>in</strong>voices scan the least, and mostly for archiv<strong>in</strong>g, too.<br />

Enterprises can also be segmented accord<strong>in</strong>g to their ma<strong>in</strong> ways<br />

of receiv<strong>in</strong>g purchase <strong>in</strong>voices. In this case, the best cluster solution<br />

divided companies <strong>in</strong>to three segments. The first and biggest segment<br />

receives almost all their <strong>in</strong>voices on paper. Because <strong>in</strong>voice volumes<br />

to these companies are below average, their share of <strong>in</strong>voices is only<br />

61%, though their share of enterprises is 71%. Paper reception is<br />

emphasized <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g branch and smallish enterprises<br />

with 10–49 employees and a turnover of €400,000–2,000,000.<br />

The paper reception segment has a share of clearly over 60% <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>countries</strong> other than Estonia and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. It has a share<br />

of over 90%<strong>in</strong> Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two segments receive ma<strong>in</strong>ly electronic <strong>in</strong>voices,<br />

and it should be noted that the more <strong>in</strong>voices an enterprise receives,<br />

the more advanced will be the electronification of their reception.<br />

Enterprises us<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly full electronic reception get almost twice<br />

as many <strong>in</strong>voices as those receiv<strong>in</strong>g almost all <strong>in</strong>voices on paper.<br />

5 | <strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

Even those enterprises receiv<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>voices ma<strong>in</strong>ly via email have<br />

<strong>in</strong>voice volumes clearly above average. In total, 29% of companies<br />

receive ma<strong>in</strong>ly electronic <strong>in</strong>voices, but the proportion of <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

these companies receive is no less than 39% of the total volume of<br />

all <strong>in</strong>voices received by companies. The fully electronic reception<br />

segment is emphasized <strong>in</strong> the public sector, and accord<strong>in</strong>g to country<br />

it is biggest <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, Denmark and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. The email<br />

segment is stressed <strong>in</strong> the construction and trade branches, and it<br />

is clearly greatest <strong>in</strong> Estonia.<br />

The larger enterprises are more advanced <strong>in</strong> electronification.<br />

Furthermore, <strong>in</strong> these companies there is confidence that<br />

electronification will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to advance faster. Trust <strong>in</strong><br />

electronification also becomes stronger the more a company’s own<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g is electronified. Enterprises that send and receive ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices are confident of a more electronic future, next<br />

come high-level senders and receivers of email <strong>in</strong>voices, whereas<br />

those who send and receive ma<strong>in</strong>ly paper <strong>in</strong>voices make up the tail<br />

end.<br />

The most optimistic expectations of the progression of<br />

electronification are to be found <strong>in</strong> the Nordic and Baltic <strong>countries</strong>.<br />

Slower electronification is forecast for Germany and Eastern Europe.<br />

Comparison with the earlier <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g study of five <strong>countries</strong> illustrates<br />

that the share of fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices has clearly <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

2008 <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong>, but not so much <strong>in</strong> Germany. The change<br />

<strong>in</strong> the use of email <strong>in</strong>voices is not known because the share of email<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices was not measured <strong>in</strong> the previous study. Further, trust <strong>in</strong><br />

the future <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> electronification has grown remarkably and is<br />

most evident <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong>. In Germany similar progress<br />

could not be found.<br />

Table 1 sums up the evaluations of change. Expectations concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the progress of electronification are compared to the present state<br />

of electronification <strong>in</strong> each country, and <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

are ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to that difference <strong>in</strong> both sales and purchase


<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. The fastest change is expected <strong>in</strong> the Nordic and Baltic<br />

<strong>countries</strong> <strong>in</strong> both send<strong>in</strong>g and receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voices, and the slowest<br />

progress is awaited <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe, Germany and Austria. It seems<br />

that trust <strong>in</strong> the speed of change is greater <strong>in</strong> those <strong>countries</strong> <strong>in</strong> which<br />

there is a more advanced <strong>in</strong>frastructure for electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The transfer to electronic mode of those enterprises us<strong>in</strong>g paper<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices alone may be a challenge. However, the most obvious<br />

alternative to the paper letter has been email, both <strong>in</strong> send<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voices. A much bigger threshold <strong>in</strong> this case is<br />

the <strong>in</strong>troduction of fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g systems, and steer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

paper <strong>in</strong>voice users to adopt these will not necessarily occur without<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative decisions or additional fees for paper <strong>in</strong>voices.<br />

Every second enterprise <strong>in</strong> Europe has at least partly outsourced<br />

some f<strong>in</strong>ancial activities connected with <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. Outsourc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

has been most popular <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, and<br />

least used <strong>in</strong> Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia. Every fourth<br />

enterprise has outsourced its bookkeep<strong>in</strong>g. One fifth of enterprises<br />

have outsourced debt collection, and the same proportion payroll,<br />

travel and expenditure <strong>in</strong>voices. Less-frequently outsourced activities<br />

are sales <strong>in</strong>voice pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, purchase <strong>in</strong>voice scann<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

archiv<strong>in</strong>g, each outsourced by every n<strong>in</strong>th company.<br />

Enterprises were asked how important they evaluate some targets<br />

<strong>in</strong> their <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g development projects to be over the next 2–3 years.<br />

It was not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs proved to be one of the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

targets. However, it was strik<strong>in</strong>g that sav<strong>in</strong>g the environment by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g was considered an equally important target <strong>in</strong><br />

purchase <strong>in</strong>voice projects, and even the most important target <strong>in</strong> sales<br />

<strong>in</strong>voice projects. Green values seem to be a good way of market<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g projects to both customers and suppliers.<br />

Three targets were situated <strong>in</strong> the middle on the estimation scale.<br />

The development of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g systems was considered<br />

Table 1. Enterprise evaluations for <strong>in</strong>crease of electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2-3 years time<br />

slightly more important for sales <strong>in</strong>voice projects. On the other hand,<br />

centraliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g to one service unit, FSSC, and decreas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

manual work and personnel were estimated to be slightly more<br />

important for purchase <strong>in</strong>voice projects.<br />

Regardless of the fact that every second enterprise has outsourced<br />

at least some f<strong>in</strong>ancial operations, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />

was considered clearly the least important target. Maybe companies<br />

prefer to buy <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g services and are less <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to outsource<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g activities, <strong>in</strong> spite of the fact that the difference can <strong>in</strong> some<br />

cases be likened to a l<strong>in</strong>e drawn through water. However, there are<br />

two prerequisites which make outsourc<strong>in</strong>g more desirable. Firstly, of<br />

those companies that ma<strong>in</strong>ly send and receive electronic <strong>in</strong>voices,<br />

more than half consider outsourc<strong>in</strong>g projects of <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g important.<br />

Secondly, <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> outsourc<strong>in</strong>g also grows when someth<strong>in</strong>g else<br />

has already been outsourced <strong>in</strong> the company and thus a threshold<br />

has been overcome.<br />

Consumers as <strong>in</strong>voice receivers<br />

Consumers receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> Europe get an average of seven<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices a month. The figure is slightly smaller for the Baltic <strong>countries</strong>,<br />

Russia and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. Most consumers still receive paper<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> all <strong>countries</strong>, although those who no longer receive <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

letters can actually be found. In Denmark and Estonia every fifth<br />

consumer says they receive their <strong>in</strong>voices only electronically.<br />

Two fifths of consumers receive at least one electronic <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of a month. Those who receive at least one <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

electronically are a majority <strong>in</strong> six of the sixteen <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

studied. The Internet, email, and both side by side are fairly evenly<br />

used as channels for receiv<strong>in</strong>g electronic <strong>in</strong>voices (figure 5).<br />

The 41% share of consumers us<strong>in</strong>g electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g means<br />

that we are still at quite an early stage of adoption, and for this<br />

reason the share of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices is dist<strong>in</strong>ctly smaller, at 26%.<br />

The proportions of email <strong>in</strong>voices and <strong>in</strong>voices received through<br />

the Web are quite close to each other. The s<strong>in</strong>gle most popular<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice format is the email <strong>in</strong>voice. On the Web the most<br />

popular format is that of <strong>in</strong>voices received directly to the recipient’s<br />

own Internet bank. The least used are generic <strong>in</strong>voice portals, and<br />

the reception to a seller’s separate web site is quite unpopular, too.<br />

Electronically received <strong>in</strong>voices have the highest share <strong>in</strong> the Baltic<br />

<strong>countries</strong>, Denmark and Norway. They are least used <strong>in</strong> Russia, Poland<br />

and elsewhere <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe. Email has the biggest share of<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong> most <strong>countries</strong>, and it is especially popular<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Baltic <strong>countries</strong> and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. An exception is the<br />

Nordic <strong>countries</strong>, where most electronic <strong>in</strong>voices are those directly<br />

entered <strong>in</strong>to the customer’s Internet bank (figure 6). Reception of<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voices has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, Sweden and especially<br />

<strong>in</strong> Norway s<strong>in</strong>ce 2006. No similar change has taken place <strong>in</strong> Germany;<br />

there this study has already been carried out three times.<br />

Besides present channels of <strong>in</strong>voice reception, channel preferences<br />

for the next 2–3 years were also studied. In seven <strong>countries</strong> there is a<br />

preference for the majority of <strong>in</strong>voices to be transferred to electronic<br />

reception channels, and <strong>in</strong> all <strong>countries</strong> it is hoped to electronify at<br />

least one fifth of <strong>in</strong>voices. The most popular electronic channel is still<br />

email, and only <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong> is it the Internet bank (figure<br />

7). The future preference for electronic <strong>in</strong>voices is highest <strong>in</strong> Denmark<br />

and Norway, and it has <strong>in</strong>creased most s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008 <strong>in</strong> Denmark and<br />

Norway, too.<br />

A comparison of correlation coefficients between present use and<br />

future preferences for <strong>in</strong>voice reception channels reveals <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dependencies. It was found that the reception of several <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

through any channel tends to <strong>in</strong>crease the desire to use this channel<br />

<strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> | 6


Figure 5. Percentages of consumers receiv<strong>in</strong>g fully electronic and email <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 9037).<br />

Figure 6. Consumers’ present use of <strong>in</strong>voice reception channels, % <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 9037).<br />

<strong>in</strong> the future, too. This is particularly true of email reception. On<br />

the other hand, gett<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>voice through one electronic channel<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases the chances of receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voices through other electronic<br />

channels as well. Clearly, the strongest confrontation <strong>in</strong> preferences is<br />

between paper letters and email. Those favor<strong>in</strong>g email <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g wish<br />

7 | <strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

to dispense with paper letters, and those favor<strong>in</strong>g paper letters do not<br />

want to receive their <strong>in</strong>voices, at least, by email. On the other hand,<br />

all electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g channels are now used partly <strong>in</strong> complement,<br />

and some preference for parallel use <strong>in</strong> the future was also found.<br />

The general picture can be clarified by segment<strong>in</strong>g use and


Figure 7. Consumers’ future preferences for <strong>in</strong>voice reception channels, % <strong>in</strong>voices (n = 9037).<br />

Table 2. Consumer segments of <strong>in</strong>voice reception change <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong>.<br />

preference groups. This was done by k-means cluster analysis,<br />

with the result that the best solution divided <strong>European</strong> consumers<br />

<strong>in</strong>to three <strong>in</strong>voice reception change segments. The first and largest<br />

segment consists of paper graspers, who now receive almost all<br />

of their <strong>in</strong>voices as paper letters and would prefer to cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

do so <strong>in</strong> the future. Almost two thirds of consumers belong to the<br />

paper grasper segment, and especially females and over-55-yearold<br />

consumers are emphasized <strong>in</strong> this segment.<br />

The second segment is email movers, who now receive many<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices on paper and some via email, and would prefer to receive<br />

<strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> | 8


most of their <strong>in</strong>voices via email <strong>in</strong> the future. Every fifth consumer<br />

is situated <strong>in</strong> this segment and their share of <strong>in</strong>voices is almost<br />

one quarter. The third segment is Internet bank movers, who now<br />

receive some <strong>in</strong>voices on paper, some through an Internet bank,<br />

some through other net services, and even some via email. In the<br />

future this smallest segment would prefer to receive most of their<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices through Internet bank, but are also prepared to accept other<br />

electronic reception channels. Internet bank movers represent <strong>16</strong>%<br />

of consumers and 18% of <strong>in</strong>voices.<br />

The paper letter is still used <strong>in</strong> all three segments, but <strong>in</strong> the mover<br />

segments consumers are will<strong>in</strong>g to give it up. Particularly those<br />

consumers who receive more <strong>in</strong>voices than average wish to change<br />

to electronic reception, which can be seen from the fact that, while<br />

the share of these movers is about 36%, they receive about as many<br />

as 41% of <strong>in</strong>voices. Those most eagerly mov<strong>in</strong>g to electronic <strong>in</strong>voice<br />

reception are male and under 35 years of age.<br />

Each country has its own profile <strong>in</strong> this change. The Nordic <strong>countries</strong><br />

are rapidly transferr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>voice reception to Internet bank<strong>in</strong>g, F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

is, though, beh<strong>in</strong>d Scand<strong>in</strong>avia <strong>in</strong> this respect. In the Baltic <strong>countries</strong>,<br />

Poland and the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, email is clearly considered the most<br />

convenient electronic reception channel for <strong>in</strong>voices. However, <strong>in</strong><br />

most <strong>countries</strong> the majority of consumers would still prefer to also<br />

stick to paper <strong>in</strong> the future. Most paper graspers are to be found <strong>in</strong><br />

the bigger <strong>countries</strong> and Eastern Europe (table 2).<br />

Summary and conclusions<br />

Every second company <strong>in</strong> Europe sends and receives at least one<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voice a month. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, over 40% of consumers<br />

receive at least one electronic <strong>in</strong>voice <strong>in</strong> the same time period.<br />

However, the share of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices rema<strong>in</strong>s below 30%,<br />

because paper <strong>in</strong>voices still dom<strong>in</strong>ate the <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g markets.<br />

There are big differences between <strong>countries</strong>. In general, Nordic and<br />

Baltic <strong>countries</strong> are the most electronified, and Eastern Europe the<br />

least electronified. Advanced <strong>in</strong>frastructure seems to have presented<br />

better prerequisites for adopt<strong>in</strong>g electronic <strong>in</strong>voices. Good examples<br />

of this are Denmark and Norway, where two thirds of consumers<br />

already receive <strong>in</strong>voices through the banks’ co-operative Internet<br />

bank service.<br />

Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, email <strong>in</strong>voices are used more than fully electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>voices, which <strong>in</strong>clude safety solutions and payment systems. The<br />

share of sent and received email <strong>in</strong>voices is almost 20% <strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong><br />

enterprises, but the share of fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voices is only about<br />

10%.<br />

Easily available email offers speed and flexibility, which is needed<br />

<strong>in</strong> daily bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Email <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g needs no expensive and timeconsum<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>voice system implementation. It can be the only<br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g channel for small enterprises, but can also<br />

be used as a complement to fully electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g solutions <strong>in</strong><br />

any enterprise. The typical email <strong>in</strong>voice is delivered without an<br />

electronic signature, and it is possible to send parallel paper <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

for bookkeep<strong>in</strong>g or a summary on paper for the tax authorities at the<br />

end of the year.<br />

Less than 10% of enterprises use transition-phase hybrid solutions.<br />

Sales <strong>in</strong>voice data are sent for pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to an outside service provider<br />

mostly <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and Sweden, whereas <strong>in</strong> many other <strong>countries</strong><br />

this service is not used at all. On the other hand, purchase <strong>in</strong>voices<br />

received on paper are scanned to become electronic for further<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g and approval mostly <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong>, and least of<br />

all <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe.<br />

There is a strong conviction <strong>in</strong> the speedy electronification of<br />

9 | <strong>Itella</strong> Information survey: <strong>Invoic<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>16</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nordic and Baltic enterprises. Trust <strong>in</strong> electronification<br />

of <strong>in</strong>voices has grown remarkably <strong>in</strong> the Nordic <strong>countries</strong> where<br />

comparable enterprise results from 2008 were available for this<br />

research. A slower electronification prognosis with cont<strong>in</strong>ued reliance<br />

on paper <strong>in</strong>voices prevails <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe and also to some extent<br />

<strong>in</strong> Austria and Germany.<br />

The use of electronic <strong>in</strong>voices and will<strong>in</strong>gness to <strong>in</strong>crease their<br />

use grows as the number of <strong>in</strong>voices <strong>in</strong>creases. This is easily<br />

understandable <strong>in</strong> the case of the high variance of <strong>in</strong>voice volumes<br />

between companies, but the same is also true for quite homogeneous<br />

consumers, of whom 92% receive 1–15 <strong>in</strong>voices a month.<br />

At present, almost 75% of consumer <strong>in</strong>voices are on paper,<br />

but consumers are ready to accept that <strong>in</strong> two or three years time<br />

the proportion of paper <strong>in</strong>voices will have fallen to around 60%.<br />

Electronification paths for <strong>in</strong>voices are country-specific. The Nordic<br />

<strong>countries</strong> are firmly chang<strong>in</strong>g to Internet bank reception of <strong>in</strong>voices. In<br />

the Baltic <strong>countries</strong> and Eastern Europe consumers are now chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to email reception. However, <strong>in</strong> Eastern Europe, Germany and the<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom the high preference for paper <strong>in</strong>voices is likely to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue.<br />

Payment of <strong>in</strong>voices through the Internet provides a natural<br />

platform for electronic reception, and those consumers already pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

through the Internet are those most prepared to transfer to electronic<br />

<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g. Nevertheless, only 30% of Internet bank <strong>in</strong>voice payers <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe wish to transfer to net reception. Around 35% of Internet bank<br />

payers believe that the email <strong>in</strong>voice is the best option for them, and<br />

even the paper <strong>in</strong>voice is considered just as good an alternative by<br />

another 35%. However, of those prepared to transfer to net reception,<br />

most prefer just Internet bank reception. Therefore, <strong>in</strong> the long run it<br />

seems that the ma<strong>in</strong> current will flow <strong>in</strong> the direction of Internet bank<br />

reception <strong>in</strong> spite of the fact that the path will be long and stony.


Text: Kari Elkelä, Research Manager, <strong>Itella</strong> Group, Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Intelligence<br />

Study executed <strong>in</strong> cooperation with Add Value Rasearch F<strong>in</strong>land and <strong>Itella</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong>. The research results and conclusions do not necessarily<br />

represent the official op<strong>in</strong>ion of <strong>Itella</strong> Group.


<strong>Itella</strong> Information boosts the efficiency of f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>formation flows and leads the way <strong>in</strong><br />

electronic <strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Europe. <strong>Itella</strong> Information operates <strong>in</strong> 15 <strong>European</strong> <strong>countries</strong> with<br />

a staff of circa 2,000 professionals. Net sales <strong>in</strong> 2009 amounted to EUR 247 million. <strong>Itella</strong><br />

Information bus<strong>in</strong>ess group is part of <strong>Itella</strong> Group. For further <strong>in</strong>formation, please visit<br />

www.itella.com/<strong>in</strong>formationlogistics.<br />

Contact <strong>in</strong>fo:<br />

<strong>Itella</strong> Information<br />

Keilaranta 13, 02150 Espoo, F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Telephone +358 20 452 3000<br />

kari.elkela@itella.com<br />

Add Value Research F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Pohjo<strong>in</strong>en Makasi<strong>in</strong>ikatu 4, 00130 Hels<strong>in</strong>ki, F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Telephone +358 9 342 4900<br />

www.addvalue.fi<br />

Rights reserved to make changes without prior notice.<br />

© 2010 <strong>Itella</strong> Information 5/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!