14.11.2014 Views

Australian Cottongrower - Greenmount Press

Australian Cottongrower - Greenmount Press

Australian Cottongrower - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Print Post Approved Publication No. PP 424022/1583<br />

April–May 2012<br />

www.cottongrower.com.au<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong><br />

P.O. Box 766, Toowoomba, 4350.<br />

Ph: (07) 4659 3555. Fax (07) 4638 4520.<br />

Email: cotton@greenmountpress.com.au<br />

Website: www.cottongrower.com.au<br />

DELIVERIES: 120 Herries St, Toowoomba, Qld. 4350.<br />

EDITOR:<br />

David Dowling<br />

ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Lloyd O’Connell<br />

GROUP SALES MANAGER: Norm Neeld<br />

PRODUCTION MANAGER: Mick Allan<br />

OFFICE MANAGER: Catherine O’Connell<br />

ADVERTISING: Norm Neeld<br />

Ph: (07) 5450 1720<br />

Fax: (07) 5450 1102<br />

Mobile: 0428 794 801<br />

CONTENTS OF ADVERTISEMENTS are the responsibility of the<br />

advertisers. All statements and opinions expressed in The <strong>Australian</strong><br />

<strong>Cottongrower</strong> are published after due consideration of information<br />

gained from sources believed to be authentic. The following of<br />

advice given is at the reader’s own risk, and no responsibility is<br />

accepted for the accuracy of the matter published herein. No portion<br />

in whole or part may be reproduced without permission of the<br />

publisher. Copyright 2012.<br />

Published by Berekua Pty. Ltd., 40 Creek Street, Brisbane.<br />

Registered by Australia Post Print Post Approved Publication<br />

number<br />

PP 405518/00026. ISSN 1442–5289.<br />

PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY, APRIL, JUNE, AUGUST, OCTOBER,<br />

DECEMBER. COTTON YEARBOOK PUBLISHED IN SEPTEMBER.<br />

Divine Dinner Plain...<br />

Bring the family,<br />

enjoy the<br />

wonderful<br />

snow that is<br />

still falling,<br />

it’s perfect!<br />

Skiing, boarding,<br />

cross country<br />

skiing or just<br />

enjoy the<br />

fantastic<br />

At Dinner Plain atmosphere the that<br />

At Dinner Plain the<br />

is Dinner Plain<br />

pace is<br />

pace<br />

easy<br />

is easy going...<br />

Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />

be together by the fireside or miles apart<br />

Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />

exploring the cross-country trail network.<br />

be together Where by the you Where fireside stroll you stroll the or the snow miles treelined covered apart streets<br />

simply for the sights to meet<br />

exploring the tree cross-country lined streets trail simply network. for the<br />

friends for a restaurant dinner or<br />

sights or to meet friends for a<br />

Where you stroll drinks the at treelined the bar. The village streets itself<br />

restaurant dinner helps or set the drinks community at the<br />

simply bar. The for village the<br />

atmosphere,<br />

sights itself or helps natural<br />

to<br />

building<br />

meet set the<br />

friends community for a materials restaurant atmosphere, and earthy dinner tones cosy blur or<br />

the line between man made and<br />

drinks lights at the sparkle bar. and<br />

alpine The entice<br />

environment. village you<br />

Over itself into<br />

200<br />

their warmth.<br />

helps<br />

lodges Snow<br />

set the<br />

and chalets lined,<br />

community<br />

with natural all the<br />

buildings and conveniences earthy of tones a modern blur resort. the<br />

line atmosphere, between man natural made building and alpine<br />

Dinner Plain is the place<br />

environment. materials and for Over earthy your 200 next tones lodges holiday. blur and<br />

the chalets line between with all the man conveniences made and of<br />

Explore our website at<br />

a modern resort.<br />

alpine environment. www.dinnerplain.com Over 200<br />

or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />

lodges and chalets with all the<br />

or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />

conveniences of a modern resort.<br />

What are you waiting for...<br />

Contents<br />

Editorial 2<br />

Cotton Research Roundup 4<br />

New focus on cotton education and human capacity 8<br />

Focus on China at <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Conference 12<br />

Future of cotton research boosted by $35 million 14<br />

SLW – wet conditions, late crops and displaced populations 16<br />

Converting mm to money – How does irrigated wheat stack up? 19<br />

Local insects make a meal of mealybugs 21<br />

Precision Farming & Guidance Feature…<br />

Making sure you yield monitors are ready to go 23<br />

Growers to take precision ag to the next level 25<br />

New features for guidance systems 26<br />

Water Matters…<br />

Precision irrigation in the cotton industry through adaptive<br />

control 27<br />

Marketing…<br />

World Commodity Watch 32<br />

The World Cotton Market 34<br />

Ginning & Fibre Series…<br />

New gin in the Murrumbidgee nears completion 36<br />

Cruiser fund brings industry benefits 38<br />

It pays to optimise N fertiliser inputs 40<br />

Cotton seed N indicates fertiliser use-efficiency 44<br />

Cotton gets nanotech and biotech treatment 46<br />

Plants use circadian rhythms to prepare for battle with insects 48<br />

Classic Tractor Tales…<br />

The good gear 49<br />

Germinating Ideas 52<br />

News & New Products 54<br />

District Reports 60<br />

Front Cover…<br />

APRIL–MAY 2012<br />

Volume 33, No.2 $6.60<br />

Dinner Plain is the place<br />

for your next holiday.<br />

Explore our website at<br />

www.dinnerplain.com<br />

or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />

or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />

j/24d01072/270808<br />

INSIDE<br />

Focus on New gin<br />

China at in the<br />

Cotton Murrumbidgee<br />

Conference<br />

Cotton<br />

research<br />

boosted<br />

by $35m<br />

A three year research project has shown<br />

that natural insect predators are very<br />

effective at controlling mealybugs in<br />

cotton.<br />

See story page 21.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 1


Professional Recruiters<br />

of Agribusiness<br />

Professionals<br />

SYDNEY<br />

Lucy Purcell Steve Badgery<br />

Tim Vidler Suzie Ward<br />

Al Kellaway<br />

02 9223 9944<br />

BRISBANE<br />

Dominica Carolan – 07 3832 9866<br />

MELBOURNE<br />

David Reid – 03 9866 6133<br />

Agribusiness Recruiters –<br />

LEADING THE WAY SINCE 1979<br />

www.agri.com.au<br />

U78496<br />

Editorial…<br />

David Dowling, Editor<br />

Ah, the good old days. For those with long enough<br />

memories, this was the time of year you could usually look<br />

forward to a gin opening celebration – sometimes more than<br />

one in a good year. The beer and wine flowed freely, there<br />

were plenty of prawns and other tasty morsels and sometimes<br />

a bit of entertainment.<br />

The drought has a lot to answer for – it changed the nature of the industry.<br />

One change is that no new cotton gins have been built in Australia for at least<br />

10 years – so no gin openings either.<br />

Well the good news is that 2012 will see a new gin in southern NSW, at<br />

Whitton, near Griffith.<br />

A consortium of local growers is close to doing what many thought<br />

impossible. They have raised the funds, battled floods and done a mountain<br />

of hard work which is about to culminate in the completion of a 200,000 bale<br />

plus gin in an area which sorely needs it.<br />

But there are unlikely to be any prawns and champagne until November at<br />

the earliest. As soon as this gin is finished it will start processing the massive<br />

2012 crop from the Murrumbidgee.<br />

Despite the lack of celebration, the new gin is a major sign of the<br />

resurgence of the cotton industry in this country. It has taken a couple of years,<br />

but we may now be putting the nightmare of the drought behind us. And the<br />

way the industry keeps expanding in southern NSW, there may be more good<br />

news to come.<br />

On the other side of the coin, the Cotton CRC which, in various forms,<br />

has provided many millions of dollars of cotton industry research over the<br />

past 18 years, will close down at the end of June. Without a doubt, this is a<br />

major setback, but the industry had a great research program before the CRC<br />

and will undoubtedly have a great one in the future. And the current period<br />

of huge crops will ensure the continuation of the most important research<br />

programs for the next few years at least.<br />

In part, the explosion of the industry in southern NSW is further evidence of<br />

the importance of this research. Twenty years ago, there was no possibility of<br />

a sustainable cotton industry in the Murrumbidgee. It was too cold, the season<br />

was too short and so on. They are now growing 12 bale per hectare crops on<br />

a regular basis and it looks like the industry is there to stay. Good research has<br />

played an important role in this story.<br />

SMK CONSULTANTS PTY. LTD.<br />

surveying – irrigation – environmental<br />

• FARM LAYOUT & MAPPING<br />

• IRRIGATION PLANNING & DESIGN<br />

• EM & GRID SURVEYS<br />

• FARM GPS PROCESSING<br />

• WATER STORAGE INVESTIGATION & DESIGN<br />

• WATER STORAGE CAPACITY SURVEYS<br />

• ASSESSMENT FOR FUNDING APPLICATIONS<br />

• ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES<br />

SERVING NSW, QLD, NT & INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS<br />

MOREE<br />

39 Frome Street, PO Box 774, Moree NSW 2400<br />

Ph (02) 6752 1640; Fax (02) 6752 5070<br />

Contact: Paul Covell, Peter Taylor<br />

Email: ptaylor@smk.com.au<br />

GOONDIWINDI<br />

9 Pratten St, PO Box 422, Goondiwindi Qld 4390<br />

Ph (07) 4671 2445; Fax (07) 4671 2561<br />

Contact Ralph Kinsella, Mike Henderson<br />

Email: qld@smk.com.au<br />

2 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Introduction & symptoms key<br />

Diseases<br />

Biosecurity threats<br />

Herbicides<br />

Insect damage<br />

Soil constraints & planting management<br />

Environmental & other symptoms<br />

Nutrition deficiency/toxicity<br />

A production of<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Industry<br />

Development & Delivery Team<br />

EDITORS: Susan Maas, Stephen Allen and Duncan Weir<br />

1st Edition 2012 $14.90 incl GST<br />

In this issue...<br />

New focus on cotton education and<br />

human capacity<br />

Recent figures showing Aussie school<br />

kids really don’t know much about<br />

agriculture came as little surprise to<br />

Cotton Australia, which has already embarked on an ambitious<br />

program of education and human capacity building.<br />

See story ....................................................................... Page 8<br />

Focus on China at Cotton Conference<br />

With China now purchasing almost 70<br />

per cent of Australia’s cotton crop each<br />

year, the <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Conference<br />

will this year host a “Focus on China”<br />

session to closely examine a country<br />

that has become the industry’s biggest customer.<br />

See story ..................................................................... Page 12<br />

Cotton research boosted by $35 million<br />

CSIRO and Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD) have<br />

announced a five-year, $35 million extension<br />

to their existing agreement, to fund projects<br />

through the Cotton Breeding Australia joint<br />

venture, which has been running since 2007.<br />

See story ..................................................................... Page 14<br />

Precision Farming & Guidance<br />

Feature<br />

Make sure your yield monitors are ready to go<br />

– some things to keep in mind this year with<br />

regards to cotton yield monitoring.<br />

Stories start ................................................................ Page 23<br />

New gin in the Murrumbidgee<br />

The first new cotton gin to be built in<br />

Australia for over a decade is expected to<br />

gin its first bales by the middle of May.<br />

The gin at Whitton, 35 km southeast of<br />

Griffith, is expected to process around<br />

200,000 bales of the anticipated 350,000<br />

bales to come out of the Murrumbidgee Valley this season.<br />

See story ..................................................................... Page 36<br />

Cruiser fund brings industry benefits<br />

Investing in and applying the products of research Cotton Symptoms<br />

Guide<br />

The guide to symptoms of<br />

and development is a hallmark of the success for<br />

diseases and disorders<br />

in <strong>Australian</strong> cotton<br />

the <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry. Investing in R&D is<br />

not without risk and by its very nature confers long<br />

term commitment to invest resources of today for<br />

a potential outcome realisable down the track.<br />

See story ..................................................................... Page 38<br />

E R G 0 0 1 0 _ O H P L _ 1 2 5 x 1 8 . p d f P a g e 3 1 4 / 0 3 / 1 2 , 1 1 : 5 2 A M<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 3


Cotton<br />

Research<br />

Roundup…<br />

Bruce Finney<br />

Bruce Pyke<br />

Workforce wake-up call on graduates<br />

There is increasing concern across the cotton industry about<br />

how it might address the increasing void between jobs and<br />

candidates emerging as graduates from <strong>Australian</strong> universities.<br />

CRDC began addressing this key need formally in 2008 with the<br />

implementation of the 2008–13 Strategic R&D Plan in which<br />

human capacity investments become one of three strategies.<br />

A study was commissioned by the CRDC in late 2011 into<br />

the human capacity needs of agribusiness servicing the cotton<br />

industry. The report conducted by Gordon Stone & Associates in<br />

Toowoomba contains a very sobering message – “we are going<br />

to run out of people.”<br />

The study estimates that before 2016, an extra 65 agronomists<br />

will be needed, and these will be among 110 new people with<br />

appropriate academic qualifications.<br />

Alarmingly, this figure does not take into account those<br />

who will be retiring or departing the industry in the normal<br />

course of events. This figure also does not take into account<br />

numbers required to eventually meet senior/strategic professional<br />

management staff, researchers, farm managers, business<br />

advisors, IT and electronics staff or company director positions.<br />

CRDC believes this report is a wake-up call for a new and<br />

integrated industry response to strategically address workforce<br />

requirements from now onward. The report is unequivocal<br />

– a future crop of graduates with locked in and future job<br />

placements is required to begin studies in 2013 for the cotton<br />

industry. This means the remainder of 2012 is key for the industry<br />

to kick-start this process, the report concludes. In short, the<br />

cotton industry needs:<br />

■■<br />

An integrated supply chain system with dedicated resources<br />

and investments if it is to meet its human capacity<br />

requirements within five years;<br />

■■<br />

An actionable plan rolled out mid-year 2012 to meet needs;<br />

■■<br />

Employers acting in 2012 to secure their future staff needs; and,<br />

■■<br />

A five-year supply chain of Year 11 and 12 students to begin<br />

in 2013.<br />

Contact Bruce Pyke at CRDC for further information.<br />

Environmental assessment underway<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry has long valued the importance<br />

of a capacity to demonstrate its sustainability together with a<br />

commitment to continuous improvement to productivity.<br />

In response, the CRDC has commissioned the industry’s third<br />

environmental assessment to help inform future priorities for<br />

future R&D investment.<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry laid the foundations for<br />

environmental stewardship with the previous environmental audits<br />

undertaken in 1991 and 2003. The 2003 audit found that of the 69<br />

recommendations from the 1991 audit, all had been implemented.<br />

Recommendations arising from these reviews contributed to<br />

significant ongoing improvements in the industry’s environmental<br />

footprint over the 20 years spanning the reviews. Ongoing<br />

research, changes to legislation, increased environmental<br />

awareness and the introduction of myBMP are outcomes of these<br />

reviews and audits. Key recommendations from the 2003 review<br />

and audit covered the BMP scheme existing at the time, water<br />

use and management, pesticides and non-pesticide chemicals,<br />

waste and vegetation management.<br />

For the 2012 assessment, CRDC commissioned Canberra-<br />

The first meeting to initiate the start of the Cotton Industry Strategic Environmental Review 2012 – Steering committee<br />

members Ken Flower D&D Team, Cotton CRC’s Jane Trindall, Angela Bradburn Cotton Australia, Guy Roth Roth Rural and<br />

Regional, Boggabri farmer John Watson, CRDC’s Bruce Pyke and project co-ordinator Rachel Holloway with Brian Ramsey and<br />

Ken Moore from Inovact Consulting.<br />

4 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


We’re with you<br />

from the beginning<br />

For over 40 years, Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD)<br />

has had a proud heritage of supporting <strong>Australian</strong><br />

Cotton Growers.<br />

Being grower owned and controlled, no one knows<br />

the needs of the <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Grower like CSD.<br />

CSD actively invests in local research and breeding<br />

to ensure the <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Growers are leaders<br />

in the field in a competitive global market.<br />

Experience, integrity and local knowledge, CSD<br />

delivers what <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Growers need.<br />

For more information on CSD visit www.csd.net.au or phone (02) 6795 0000


ased Inovact Consulting who began their work began in March.<br />

Among the first tasks has been a phone survey designed to<br />

establish the industry’s environmental performance. This first<br />

look is from an industry viewpoint and taken from a regional and<br />

farm perspective. The survey sought growers’ input on what they<br />

consider to be current and emerging environmental issues.<br />

CRDC and Cotton Australia encouraged growers who are<br />

contacted to be involved in this important project and thank<br />

them for their input.<br />

Further interviews and an on-line survey of key stakeholders<br />

including state, federal government agencies, community, nongovernment<br />

organisations and key industry representatives from<br />

all sectors will also be conducted.<br />

An industry steering committee has been engaged to guide<br />

the assessment team and support the subsequent report that will<br />

reach the industry in July 2012. The steering committee members<br />

are Bruce Pyke, Rachel Holloway, CRDC; Angela Bradburn of<br />

Cotton Australia; growers Nigel Corish and John Watson, Jane<br />

Macfarlane, Cotton CRC; independent consultant Guy Roth and<br />

Ken Flower, myBMP.<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry has a strong history of taking<br />

ownership of areas where it is having environmental impacts<br />

and minimising them through the implementation of improved<br />

management based on sound R&D.<br />

But despite past achievements, the long term success of the<br />

industry continues to depend on how its practices, products and<br />

reputation are perceived by customers and the wider community,<br />

so it cannot rest on its laurels.<br />

Further information contact CRDC project co-ordinator Rachel Holloway, 0429<br />

434949 Email: rachel@shoalhaven.net.au, or Ken Moore, Project Manager,<br />

Inovact Consulting 02 6140 3900 Email: ken.moore@inovact.com.au<br />

CONVEY-ALL ®<br />

Leading in innovative conveyor designs for over 25 years<br />

28 YEARS EXPERIENCE | FAST & GENTLE HANDLING<br />

UP TO 300T PER HOUR | VERY DURABLE & EFFICIENT | LONG LIFE<br />

UP TO<br />

120’<br />

LONG<br />

UP TO<br />

300<br />

TONNE/HOUR<br />

PTO or<br />

DIESEL<br />

POWERED<br />

HIGHLY<br />

MANOEUVRABLE<br />

TCH 1400/1000 – Huge capacity, PTO or electric,<br />

swingaway or drive over hopper available<br />

TCH 1085 – 100% self-contained,<br />

diesel powered, available with self-propelled kit<br />

TCSNH 1045 45’ to 85’ – Totally self-contained unit<br />

with hydraulic belt drive and self propelled kit<br />

Drive-over Conveyor Hopper –<br />

High capacity, ideal for B-doubles and road trains<br />

Fast, Gentle Handling<br />

Long life, very durable, low power requirements, complete clean-out<br />

Contact Roland Schmelzer on 07 3878 9338 or 1800 635 199<br />

or visit us online at www.convey-all.com<br />

Discussion was lively and productive at a CRDC workshop<br />

held during the Cotton CRC’s Science Forum in Narrabri<br />

recently.<br />

Planning cotton R&D for the future<br />

Being able to connect the collective thinking of all sectors of<br />

the industry is a challenging but powerful process. It’s something<br />

that has become part of the culture of our industry and a key<br />

aspect of what makes it successful.<br />

A large group of researchers actively participated in a CRDC<br />

planning forum held in conjunction with the recent Cotton CRC<br />

Science Review in Narrabri. The forum was chaired by CRDC<br />

Chair Mike Logan and facilitated by Deputy Chair Mary Corbett.<br />

The researchers were asked two questions.<br />

■■<br />

The first was what are the big issues likely to challenge the<br />

industry in the future?<br />

The researchers workshopped these questions in groups and<br />

then were asked to identify the top five issues. They identified<br />

human capacity, competition for resources from mining/energy,<br />

water, research capacity and biosecurity as the most important.<br />

Most groups shared common items on their list of concerns.<br />

■■<br />

The second question was what research could be undertaken<br />

to solve those challenges?<br />

In relation to the lack of human capacity resources, groups<br />

identified opportunities for better education of students within<br />

the industry, mentoring of young people and becoming an<br />

employer of choice as solutions. Automation of farming practices<br />

was also suggested.<br />

Education also extended to the public and other industries<br />

when dealing with the competition for water and land resources<br />

in use by the industry and its effect on them.<br />

Exploring efficiency gains as well as new energy sources and<br />

secondary fuels was suggested as a way of addressing rising<br />

energy costs. Addressing biosecurity and pest challenges could<br />

require development of protocols, biochemistry and novel non<br />

GM approaches.<br />

Succession planning and increased longevity of research<br />

projects were common themes. It was thought that this would<br />

enable better career development and research outcomes.<br />

Bruce Finney, CRDC Executive Director, provided an overview<br />

of the stages of development for its new strategic plan which will<br />

commence in July 2012. Researchers were invited to continue to<br />

be involved in the development of the new strategic plan and<br />

to contact the CRDC with any suggestions.<br />

6 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


3 Year warranty 3% Finance 3 Month limited offer<br />

The offer to end all offers<br />

Ends June 30 2012<br />

The summer’s biggest blockbuster will be even bigger in autumn. From April through to June 2012, you can take<br />

advantage of an unbelievable offer across our entire tractor range – from our utility TT through to the broadacre<br />

powerhouse T9 4EWD. You’ll marvel at the standard 3-year warranty – be awed by our 3% fi nance rate*. Critics<br />

say the styling, ergonomics and technology of our range is ‘inspiring’, ‘award winning’, ‘the best yet’. But there’s only<br />

one way to fi nd out for yourself. Visit brightfuture.com.au/3Dsuperdeals now and see how you<br />

can take part in all the action. But hurry, these must - see super deals are only around for 3 short months.<br />

Own a bright future<br />

*30% deposit, 3 year term monthly repayments. Offer is available to business customers only and subject to credit approval. Terms and conditions apply. Contact your local dealership for full details.


New focus on cotton education<br />

and human capacity<br />

Recent figures showing Aussie school kids really don’t<br />

know much about agriculture came as little surprise to<br />

Cotton Australia, which has already embarked on an<br />

ambitious program of education and human capacity building.<br />

The research from PIEF (Primary Industries Education<br />

Foundation) found 45 per cent of school students could not<br />

identify that everyday lunchbox items such as a banana, bread<br />

Cotton Australia Policy Officer Angela Bradburn.<br />

and cheese originated from farms. Around 27 per cent think<br />

yoghurt is a plant product/grows on trees and 40 per cent believe<br />

that farming damages the environment.<br />

A cotton industry forum last November identified education as<br />

playing a pivotal role in inducting potential cotton workers of the<br />

future. The forum also considered the need to attract and retain<br />

the existing cotton workforce.<br />

Cotton Australia Policy Officer Angela Bradburn says this is<br />

an exciting time developing a whole of industry human capacity<br />

framework with a plan to address the industry’s needs in the<br />

medium to long term.<br />

“We are aiming to use data generated by a number of current<br />

CRDC research projects, backed by the legacy of the Cotton CRC<br />

in developing the plan which will have broad industry support<br />

and input.”<br />

Angela says the first order of business is a joint program<br />

between Cotton Australia and the CRDC to get behind the<br />

Primary Industry Education Foundation (PIEF).<br />

“PIEF will be pushing to make sure information on cotton<br />

is included in the national curriculum as well as making cotton<br />

resources available to educators and students through a webbased<br />

platform.<br />

“This work comes on top of a joint CRDC and Cotton<br />

Australia plan to co-fund a number of new projects covering<br />

school education, curriculum development, career path<br />

development and industry leadership.”<br />

Cotton Australia plans to build an up-to-date and practical<br />

suite of education resources throughout the year that will be<br />

made available through a new ‘Cotton Classroom’ section on a<br />

revamped Cotton Australia website.<br />

Cotton Australia will this year become a major sponsor of the<br />

very popular, school based competition Art4Agriculture program<br />

which is open to primary and secondary schools.<br />

At least nine schools, based in NSW and Queensland will focus<br />

on cotton for their entry in the competition and to give them a<br />

TACKLE • BAIT • ICE<br />

AT CHARLTONS FISHING YOU’RE<br />

IN THE BEST COMPANY...<br />

Minnkota<br />

Daiwa<br />

Humminbird<br />

Shimano<br />

Abu Garcia<br />

G-loomis<br />

Penn<br />

Jackall<br />

18 Kerwick Street Redbank Q 4301 Ph: 3818 1677 www.charltonsfishing.com.au<br />

Charltons GrnMnt<strong>Press</strong>.indd 1<br />

MAIL<br />

ORDER<br />

WELCOME<br />

1/09/2010 11:54:49 PM<br />

8 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


WIDEN YOUR EXPECTATIONS<br />

Now with adjustable wheel track<br />

We’ve listened<br />

You wanted a self propelled sprayer with adjustable<br />

wheel track to improve productivity and efficiency.<br />

We’ve delivered<br />

Go from 2.0m to 3.0m wheel track centres in<br />

seconds with Goldacres’ Crop Cruiser Evolution push<br />

button ‘on-the-fly’ control to move seamlessly<br />

between cropping programs – row crop or cereal.<br />

With efficient direct drive offering increased power<br />

and low fuel consumption per hectare, Crop Cruiser<br />

is fitted with a super stable TriTech boom and Euro<br />

style cab for day long productivity.<br />

Designed for local farmers and<br />

local conditions. Talk to your<br />

Goldacres dealer now to learn<br />

more about Crop Cruiser Evolution.<br />

Why risk anything else?<br />

Scan to watch video<br />

Phone 1300 301 853 for your local dealer<br />

goldacres.com.au


flying start these schools will be provided with a range of cotton<br />

resources and information as they undertake a major project<br />

examining the cotton industry and then developing student<br />

resources to tell the cotton story.<br />

Some of the entries might include powerpoint presentations,<br />

on-line blogs and YouTube videos that will be shared with other<br />

schools via the internet. The centre-piece is the decoration of a<br />

life-sized fiberglass cow that also carries the cotton theme, and<br />

that will eventually go on display at a range of venues in Sydney<br />

and throughout the bush.<br />

Angela Bradburn says social media and the opportunity for<br />

these students to share their projects online will allow a positive<br />

message about cotton to spread into school rooms far beyond<br />

the nine targeted schools.<br />

“We all know that today’s school students learn in an<br />

online and very interactive environment, which is why the<br />

Art4Agriculture program engages all these various types of social<br />

media. They help students gain a more accurate understanding<br />

about the importance of agriculture in all our lives.”<br />

Leadership training<br />

Cotton Australia has also been working on ensuring we have<br />

the right people to lead the cotton industry in the future, who<br />

have been given appropriate leadership training at each stage of<br />

their career.<br />

Recently in Narrabri the latest round of participants in the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Future Cotton Leaders program began an intensive<br />

training program.<br />

The Future Cotton Leaders program is an eight month long<br />

leadership and personal development course for 15 participants,<br />

taking a range of young people from sectors as varied as cotton<br />

merchants, research, agribusiness and extension along with a<br />

representative group of young cotton growers, then putting<br />

them together to learn from each other and from exposure to<br />

experienced managers and leaders<br />

As part of the program, participants will all be matched and<br />

mentored by already established and well recognised cotton<br />

industry leaders.<br />

Stage one of the Future Cotton Leaders program was held<br />

in Narrabri with participants given some practical experience in<br />

leadership styles including activities ranging from an intensive<br />

leadership session with Cotton Australia CEO Adam Kay all the<br />

way to a leadership boot camp held on the river’s edge.<br />

Each participant will work on their own integrated leadership<br />

project, designed to both deliver real benefits to the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

cotton industry while giving participants the chance to practice<br />

and develop their leadership skills.<br />

The projects included in the 2012 Future Cotton Leaders<br />

program include an examination of how regional partnership<br />

building could increase the profile of the cotton industry, an<br />

investigation into the whole supply chain in China and sub<br />

continent regions and promoting agricultural career pathways in<br />

cotton. Another participant is looking at existing approaches to<br />

enhance the communication between research, extension and<br />

growers.<br />

Course co-ordinator Jo Eady says the broad range of projects<br />

nominated by participants shows the varied backgrounds and<br />

future interests of participants in this year’s <strong>Australian</strong> Future<br />

Cotton Leaders Program.<br />

Jo Eady says the next stage for participants will be the<br />

opportunity to be matched with experienced mentors who will<br />

include some people beyond the cotton industry.<br />

“Then after working with their mentors, the Future Cotton<br />

Leaders will present the findings and results of their projects at<br />

their next face to face meeting being held as part of this year’s<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Conference on the Gold Coast.”<br />

David Bone from Cotton Australia takes Future Cotton Leaders through a leadership boot camp.<br />

10 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


CASE IH PRESENTS<br />

THE FIVE STAR DEAL<br />

0% FINANCE FOR FIVE YEARS *<br />

FIVE YEARS/ 2,500 HOURS<br />

RED COVER WARRANTY<br />

$5,000 FREE DIESEL FUEL<br />

ON EVERY NEW QUADRAC, STEIGER, OR MAGNUM<br />

FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY.<br />

DON’T DELAY - VISIT YOUR LOCAL CASE IH DEALER TODAY!<br />

*Only applicable to new Steiger, Quadtrac and Magnum tractor families. Retail order period is from 1st April 2012 till 31st May 2012 for delivery<br />

on or prior to 31st December 2012. Promotion is subject to availability and some models may not be deliverable within the specified time frame.<br />

0% Finance over a five year/60 month term, 30% minimum deposit, fixed interest rate, annual repayments, GST repaid in 4th month, no balloon<br />

payments, deposit as a % of total RRP. Offer only available to business customers and subject to credit approval. 0% finance is based on each<br />

annual repayment being paid by the due date. Default interest may be applied to late payments. Five years/2,500 hours REDCover warranty<br />

includes the standard twelve month warranty plus four years extended cover (REDCover) free of charge. Total warranty period is five years from date<br />

of original purchase OR 2,500 hours - whichever occurs first. Standard REDCover terms and conditions apply during the extended warranty period.<br />

This offer cannot be used with any other Case IH wholegoods or finance program. Contact your local dealership for full terms and conditions.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 11<br />

www.caseih.com 1800 227 344


Focus on China at <strong>Australian</strong><br />

Cotton Conference<br />

With China now purchasing almost 70 per cent of<br />

Australia’s cotton crop each year, the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

Cotton Conference will this year host a “Focus on<br />

China” session to closely examine a country that has become the<br />

industry’s biggest customer.<br />

According to Cotton Conference Committee Vice Chairman<br />

and <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Shippers Association (ACSA) director<br />

Arthur Spellson, this will be a great opportunity to get an<br />

explanation of the factors that influence the Chinese market and<br />

the ramifications for Australia’s cotton industry.<br />

“A panel of speakers who know the Chinese market will<br />

talk about what affects domestic production and consumption,<br />

government influences and why <strong>Australian</strong> cotton is so attractive<br />

in China,” Arthur said.<br />

Arthur has just returned from China where a delegation<br />

of ACSA members was joined by Cotton Australia grower<br />

representatives and CSIRO scientists to update the Chinese<br />

market on the <strong>Australian</strong> cotton situation. The last time such a<br />

delegation went to China was in 2005 when China was on the<br />

rise, but Indonesia was Australia’s largest cotton customer.<br />

Two seminars were hosted by ACSA and assisted by the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Trade Commission – one in Qingdao in Shandong<br />

province and the other in Shanghai. Qingdao is located in China’s<br />

biggest cotton consumption area and is a major port that houses<br />

LEFT-HAND PAGE<br />

many of the free trade zone bonded warehouses; while Shanghai<br />

is an area where many major spinners are located.<br />

“We had over 400 spinners, warehouse managers and traders<br />

attend two seminars to get an update on Australia’s positive<br />

production outlook, ginning and shipping capacity, quality<br />

improvements, classing system, the role of Cotton Australia, myBMP<br />

and an update on our plant breeding program,” Arthur said.<br />

“These numbers indicate China’s insatiable appetite for cotton<br />

and confirms the need for us to understand this market because it<br />

affects all of our businesses, whether we’re growers or merchants.<br />

The “Focus on China” session provides that opportunity.<br />

“China’s demand for high grade <strong>Australian</strong> cotton stems from<br />

a few factors including the demise of the Californian cotton<br />

industry as it moves into other crops like almonds and tomatoes<br />

and also difficulties in sourcing high-grade Chinese production<br />

from the western areas due to the government purchasing these<br />

supplies for strategic stocks.<br />

“As textile capacity in China matures and government<br />

interference in China’s domestic market continues, more mills are<br />

looking to use imported cotton to avoid having to deal with these<br />

challenges.<br />

“This gives Australia an ideal opportunity to position ourselves<br />

as a reliable supplier of high grade, machine picked cotton that<br />

can be shipped quickly at the right times of year for China, when<br />

Don’t stuff<br />

it all up<br />

now<br />

After investing so much in growing<br />

great cotton, don’t risk an inferior<br />

defoliant causing leaf freeze and turning<br />

your potentially rich pickings to trash.<br />

BCC0069<br />

www.bayercropscience.com.au<br />

Bayer CropScience Pty Ltd, ABN 87 000 226 022.<br />

391– 393 Tooronga Road, Hawthorn East, Victoria 3123.<br />

Technical Enquiries: 1800 804 479. Dropp ® is a Registered Trademark of Bayer. UltraMAX is a Trademark of Bayer.


supplies from other markets are running short in the second and<br />

third quarters,” Arthur said.<br />

China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of<br />

cotton. Don’t miss the “Focus on China” session at the Cotton<br />

Conference that will include fascinating presentations from:<br />

■■<br />

Madam Zhang Fangchum of the China National Cotton Group<br />

Corporation who will present an overview on the Chinese<br />

Cotton Market.<br />

■■<br />

Australia’s fit within the Chinese market.<br />

■■<br />

Political dynamics and government policy – effect on<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> cotton.<br />

■■<br />

Surviving volatile times – a spinner’s yarn.<br />

To find out more about China, and a multitude of other interesting<br />

topics, register now for the <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Conference at www.<br />

australiancottonconference.com.au<br />

Early Bird registrations are open until 30 June, 2012.<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> delegation presented two seminars in China.<br />

RIGHT-HAND PAGE<br />

You can rely on Dropp ® UltraMAX <br />

cotton defoliant to clean up your<br />

crop and protect its high quality,<br />

maximise yield and help secure<br />

the profit you deserve.<br />

Your trusted partner in defoliation


Future of cotton research boosted<br />

by $35 million<br />

CSIRO and Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD) have announced<br />

a five-year, $35 million extension to their existing<br />

agreement, to fund projects through the Cotton Breeding<br />

Australia joint venture, which has been running since 2007.<br />

The Cotton Breeding Australia (CBA) joint venture funds<br />

research into many aspects of cotton breeding including<br />

improved quality; higher yields; drought and heat tolerance;<br />

water use efficiency and pest and disease resistance.<br />

CSIRO Division of Plant Industry’s Chief, Dr Jeremy Burdon,<br />

said the new agreement is building on the valuable research<br />

which has already delivered major benefits to cotton growers.<br />

“The extension of the agreement underlines the huge benefits<br />

Cotton Breeding Australia’s research is having for the cotton<br />

industry. A clear example is the future development of cotton<br />

varieties with elevated resistance to mites and whitefly, which will<br />

reduce costs and reliance on pesticides,“ Jeremy said.<br />

“We have also developed molecular markers for resistance to<br />

diseases such as cotton bunchy top (CBT) virus, which will allow<br />

us to develop resistant varieties, and we are similarly researching<br />

resistance to black root rot and Alternaria fungi.<br />

”The Cotton Breeding Australia joint venture is a remarkable<br />

collaboration between breeders, biotechnology research,<br />

pathology and post-harvest processing that is ensuring the best<br />

performance in our new varieties,” Jeremy said.<br />

The new agreement extends the collaboration for a further<br />

five years, from its current termination date of 2017 to 2022.<br />

“The joint venture has continued to deliver yield increases<br />

which have averaged around 1.5 per cent each year over the past<br />

20 years. Scientific research requires a long term commitment<br />

and the current high performing varieties are the results of years,<br />

sometimes decades, of research and development,” Jeremy said.<br />

Finding new sources of resistance to fusarium wilt.<br />

Symptoms of wilting in a resistant variety (MCU-5) and a<br />

susceptible variety (Siokra 1-4) after two weeks growing<br />

in Fusarium infested soil. Using this assay on a population<br />

from a cross between these two varieties allows scientists<br />

to ‘map’ the locations in the cotton genome contributing to<br />

this resistance. Markers close to these regions can then be<br />

used to help breed for better disease resistant varieties.<br />

“CSIRO-bred varieties currently comprise the entire <strong>Australian</strong><br />

market and we are pleased our expertise in biotechnology and<br />

core breeding is delivering results in the field,” he said.<br />

CSD has been working with CSIRO for nearly 30 years and<br />

Cotton Seed Distributor’s managing director, Peter Graham says<br />

the collaboration with CSIRO and industry has been rewarding.<br />

“Continued investment in research and development is<br />

required for Australia to remain globally competitive,” says Peter.<br />

“Our past achievements include new varieties with improved<br />

yield, disease resistance and fibre quality. The high rate of<br />

adoption of the new varieties by cotton growers shows that the<br />

breeding and research by Cotton Breeding Australia is benefitting<br />

growers’ bottom lines.<br />

“We also recognise the importance of the CRDC and Cotton<br />

Australia’s (as the ACGRA) prior contribution to the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

cotton breeding program.”<br />

The CBA joint venture concentrates on a number of significant<br />

areas of research:<br />

Core breeding project<br />

The core cotton breeding project has a large crossing and<br />

regional evaluation program – up to 16 sites are used across<br />

the industry’s geographical spread. The majority of experiments<br />

are located on growers’ farms and so receive commercial<br />

management.<br />

The breeding team has developed new varieties with improved<br />

yield, adaptation, disease resistance and fibre quality.<br />

The varieties have been developed with the inclusion of a<br />

range of insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits such as<br />

Bollgard II, Roundup Ready Flex or Liberty Link.<br />

A key focus of this program is breeding for pest and disease<br />

resistance.<br />

Scientists are now making progress breeding varieties for<br />

resistance to bacterial blight, Verticillium wilt and Fusarium wilt.<br />

In collaboration with the biotechnology team, molecular markers<br />

are now being used to more rapidly develop CBT resistant<br />

varieties. Active scoping research is underway for breeding<br />

resistance to black root rot and Alternaria.<br />

Core biotechnology project<br />

The biotech team has developed streamlined processes for<br />

screening transgenic breeding lines for commercial traits, which<br />

will help deliver key new transgenic varieties to the industry.<br />

Varieties such as Sicot71BRF are now contributing to the next<br />

varieties with BGIII and CBT resistance. The team also routinely<br />

contributes towards many of the other CBA projects through<br />

molecular analysis of both conventional and transgenic plants,<br />

production of mutagenised seeds and in assisting with the<br />

production of transgenic cotton plants containing a variety of<br />

experimental traits.<br />

This is an incubator project for new ideas and the team<br />

gathers preliminary data to help in the formulation of new<br />

biotech projects within CBA.<br />

Host plant resistance project<br />

This project has discovered new sources of resistance to spider<br />

mites and silverleaf whitefly in a range of cotton genotypes and<br />

14 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


species. While the mechanisms of these resistance traits have not<br />

been completely determined, some biochemical traits (jasmonate,<br />

salicylate) and some morphological traits have been implicated.<br />

The first stage of getting mite resistance into an upland cotton<br />

background has commenced in the core breeding project, with<br />

the expected outcome of mite resistant material that can be<br />

used in the breeding program. Assuming this is successful, the<br />

long term result will be cotton varieties with elevated levels of<br />

resistance to mites and whitefly.<br />

Heat stress project<br />

Research is identifying differences between cotton genotypes for<br />

tolerance to high temperature stress, to provide a framework for<br />

integration of stress tolerance into the CSIRO breeding program.<br />

Recent highlights include the improvement of approaches<br />

to undertake rapid screens for respiratory enzyme viability,<br />

chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf temperature on genotypes<br />

grown in the field.<br />

Scientists have identified significant variation in progeny of a<br />

‘heat tolerant’ by ‘heat susceptible’ cross, and these results were<br />

generally consistent for three generations of evaluation in the<br />

glasshouse and field.<br />

Researchers are also evaluating the use of these screening<br />

approaches in the different climates of Narrabri, Moree, Mungindi<br />

and St George. Complementing the screening of advanced<br />

conventional CSIRO germplasm, studies are continuing to<br />

investigate the heat tolerance of genotypes from diverse origins.<br />

Improving cotton fibre (cotton fibre<br />

development) project<br />

Critical regulatory genes (transcription factors) in the initiation<br />

of fibre development on the cotton seed have been identified<br />

and are being manipulated to try to improve cotton fibre yield.<br />

Early results are promising with transgenic plants being produced<br />

that have more fibre initials at the start of fibre development. As<br />

it is difficult to measure yield components on individual plants,<br />

an OGTR application for a field trial of various combinations of<br />

the plants over-producing these transcription factors has been<br />

submitted, which should allow field assessment of fibre yield and<br />

quality over the next two of years.<br />

Designer fibres project<br />

A top <strong>Australian</strong> cell wall chemist has been recruited to<br />

research and develop analytical methods for studying cotton<br />

fibre cell wall composition. This will help our molecular biologists<br />

select gene targets for genetic modification. Already the scientists<br />

are measuring differences in composition of many of the minor<br />

polymer components of the cell walls, but more research is<br />

needed to relate these to differences in fibre properties. If the<br />

right genes can be identified, this approach could eventually<br />

make fibres with novel cell wall compositions that could give<br />

Australia a competitive advantage in the global fibre market.<br />

Cell wall pectin project<br />

This project has identified differences in the pectin composition<br />

in the fibre cell walls of pima and upland cotton. Transgenic<br />

cotton plants with more or less of the cell wall enzymes are being<br />

produced to measure changes to fibre quality. Early results are<br />

promising, and plants over-producing these pectin modifying<br />

enzymes had a more rapid early elongation. But more analysis<br />

needs to be done to confirm whether this translates into fibres of<br />

better quality, and that the changes are caused by alterations in<br />

the structure of the pectin in fibre cell walls.<br />

Cotton molecular marker project<br />

The aim of this project is the identification of DNA markers<br />

that can be used as substitutes for field disease screening in early<br />

generation cotton breeding. This project is scoping modern high<br />

throughput marker technologies based on the cotton genome<br />

that should accelerate the pace of breeding in the future. Using<br />

markers identified from partially re-sequencing the genomes of<br />

many varieties varying in disease resistance, the group hopes<br />

to be able to develop screening DNA chips that will help the<br />

breeding program maintain and advance the tolerance of our<br />

cultivars to fungal diseases like Fusarium and Verticillium wilt but<br />

also eventually to other important agronomic traits.<br />

The team has identified a marker for CBT resistance, which is<br />

now being routinely used for screening breeding lines from the<br />

core breeding project in Narrabri.<br />

RNA silencing project<br />

This project’s main objective is to identify a role for natural<br />

plant gene silencing pathways in defence against fungal diseases<br />

and to develop better disease tolerance. These mechanisms<br />

of gene silencing were known to be important for conferring<br />

resistance to virus diseases in plants, but this was the first time<br />

that those pathways were shown to be important for defense<br />

against fungal diseases like fusarium wilt. While most of the work<br />

was done in a model plant, Arabidopsis, the same mechanisms<br />

will be tested in cotton and for application to the management of<br />

Fusarium wilt.<br />

Cotton mutant project<br />

This project has developed several different mutant<br />

populations in cotton that are being screened for plants that will<br />

help us understand cotton fibre quality and other agronomic<br />

characteristics. The first short and immature fibre mutants<br />

have been found, and are being studied at the biochemical<br />

and molecular levels using techniques being developed in the<br />

Designer Fibres project. Those populations are also being bulked<br />

up as a resource for future screening to find other novel<br />

mutants in fibre or other plant attributes.<br />

Dr Filomena Pettolino is using state-of-the-art GC-MS<br />

instruments to examine the composition of polymers in the<br />

walls of the cotton fibre as part of a long term project to<br />

develop varieties with novel fibre properties. The wall of the<br />

fibre is made up of a complex mixture of polymers mostly<br />

cellulose and some xyloglucans embedded in a matrix<br />

of pectin and other sugar polymers that are all potential<br />

targets for manipulation using breeding, mutagenesis or<br />

genetic engineering.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 15


SLW – wet conditions, late crops<br />

and displaced populations<br />

■■By Ian Taylor, Richard Sequeira, Paul Grundy and Lewis Wilson<br />

Whitefly numbers increased in most cotton growing<br />

regions during February. But infestations are variable<br />

– some fields had zero leaves infested while others<br />

had 80 per cent infested. Though cool conditions mean fewer<br />

generations of whitefly have developed, the regular rainfall<br />

has maintained widespread growth of suitable hosts which has<br />

probably sustained widespread low whitefly infestations.<br />

Now, as these hosts mature and as fallow fields and pastures<br />

are sprayed with herbicide, it is likely that whitefly are seeking<br />

more palatable hosts such as cotton. The migration of SLW from<br />

surrounding weeds, sprayed out crop lands or defoliated crops<br />

poses an additional challenge for crop managers – particularly for<br />

those crops already delayed by flooding or wet weather.<br />

Management of whitefly this season will be challenging due to<br />

the wide spread of crop maturity both between and within each<br />

region. The flooding and inundation that has occurred in both<br />

November and again in February means some cotton crops will<br />

mature on time, while others may have been set back by as much<br />

as six weeks due to flooding/waterlogging and cool overcast<br />

conditions.<br />

Temperatures during autumn have remained high and so we<br />

expect whitefly numbers to increase in crops and as whitefly<br />

continue to migrate from senescing or herbicide treated<br />

alternative hosts.<br />

The threshold matrix should be used to guide whitefly<br />

management decisions for crops that are on time, or close to it<br />

Honeydew sheen on lower leaves indicating corrective action<br />

is required.<br />

(the day degrees calculator found at http://CottASSIST.cottoncrc.<br />

org.au can assist with assessing whether crops are maturing<br />

on time). Refer to pages 26–28 of the 2011–12 Cotton Pest<br />

Management Guide for control recommendations using the<br />

threshold matrix. This matrix provides an excellent measure of<br />

projected population build up and action thresholds for crops<br />

that are on time and not subject to mass SLW migrations from<br />

surrounding areas.<br />

What if my crop is late?<br />

Control of whitefly in later maturing crops is more complex.<br />

Whitefly that may occur in these crops are likely to be a<br />

combination of both the resident population and those that have<br />

dispersed from earlier maturing defoliated crops or sprayed out<br />

winter cropping lands. In these instances the threshold matrix<br />

MAY NOT be an accurate predictor of SLW population build up.<br />

Firstly, the day-degrees that a crop accumulates may no longer<br />

align well with the matrix if it is late developing due to flood<br />

damage. Secondly, the matrix is predicated primarily on SLW<br />

populations having built up in the crop without additional mid<br />

to late season influxes from surrounding areas. Agronomists and<br />

consultants will need to adjust their management strategy to one<br />

that accounts for open bolls and honey dew build up as opposed<br />

to the direct use of the chart.<br />

A crop manager faced with these scenarios should aim to<br />

avoid honey dew contamination of open bolls. This means that<br />

high populations of displaced whiteflies prior to open bolls can<br />

be tolerated. The delay of treatment for as long as possible on<br />

late crops may also be advantageous as cooler temperatures<br />

will slow whitefly population growth and further reduce their<br />

capacity to generate honeydew.<br />

Purposeful treatment delay also allows more settling time for<br />

the likely inward flow of whiteflies before treatment is applied.<br />

Treating too early maybe partially ineffective due to further crop<br />

re-invasion by adult whitefly as the treatment’s efficacy declines<br />

and so increases the risk of having to re-treat.<br />

16 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 17


For developmentally delayed crops or those fields that suffer<br />

influxes, control decisions should be primarily based on four<br />

factors:<br />

■■<br />

Presence of whitefly and open bolls;<br />

■■<br />

Expected time until defoliation leaf drop;<br />

■■<br />

The rate of honey dew accumulation on the crop canopy and<br />

lint; and,<br />

■■<br />

The likely efficacy and residual impact of the chosen<br />

insecticide.<br />

Product choices for SLW are primarily limited to knockdowns<br />

such as Pegasus (Diafenthiuron) and Pyrethroids (Bifenthrin)<br />

or the slower acting IGR’s such as Admiral (Pyrproxifen) and<br />

Movento (Spirotetramat). Resistance is a threat to these products,<br />

so follow the IRMS. Admiral can only be applied once.<br />

Crops with very low whitefly populations (less than 10 per<br />

cent infested) and little honeydew at boll opening should not<br />

require control. But numbers and honeydew should continue to<br />

be monitored and if there is a sudden increase in whitefly, due<br />

to an influx from neighbouring fields, control with a knockdown<br />

may be warranted. Crops with moderate to high numbers at boll<br />

opening (over 30 per cent infestation), may require treatment.<br />

Treatment options will depend on the origin and numbers of<br />

SLW, level of honey dew and rate of change and time left till<br />

defoliated leaf drop and relevant product withholding periods<br />

(WHP’s).<br />

If numbers are moderate to high and defoliated leaf drop is<br />

three or more weeks away, an IGR may be the best control option<br />

as Pyriproxyfen has excellent residual and will mostly prevent the<br />

With heavy honey dew contamination and the appearance of<br />

sooty mould on bolls, growers should delay harvest.<br />

Honeydew accumulation should be monitored.<br />

continued buildup of resident and immigrant SLW. The Central<br />

Queensland experience strongly suggests that Pyriproxyfen<br />

(Admiral) works even better at lower autumn temperatures<br />

than it does in summer and is capable of cleaning up dense<br />

whitefly populations on late cotton very effectively with a single<br />

application. Again, continue to monitor whitefly numbers and<br />

honeydew. If adult numbers begin to rebuild a knockdown may<br />

be required – use the threshold matrix as a guide.<br />

If the crop is less than two weeks from defoliation and an<br />

influx of adult SLW occurs, a knockdown type product may<br />

provide better value, keeping in mind relevant WHPs. Again<br />

monitor honeydew and revise control decisions accordingly. In<br />

each scenario, if whitefly numbers are beginning to recover and<br />

cause honeydew close to defoliation then consider defoliating<br />

a few days earlier. Once defoliant is applied, adult whitefly will<br />

generally leave the crop and falling leaves will take the nymphs<br />

with them.<br />

In terms of monitoring honey dew, it is difficult to determine<br />

at exactly what point levels may become problematic once<br />

bolls begin to open. In CQ and during later outbreaks on the<br />

Darling Downs, honeydew was considered to be nearing levels<br />

that maybe problematic when leaves on the lower canopy start<br />

becoming heavily speckled with honeydew. If the leaves are at<br />

or get beyond this level and develop a honeydew ‘sheen’ then<br />

corrective action is required immediately.<br />

In some instances a crop will have an earlier and later maturing<br />

phase of bolls in the crop. It is important to manage whitefly to<br />

reduce the risk of contamination of the earlier bolls. The basic<br />

strategies outlined above should be used in relation to the earlier<br />

bolls eg, delaying the first treatment as late as possible, but not<br />

later than five per cent open bolls. But with ongoing monitoring<br />

of whitefly and honeydew as a guide, a second application of<br />

an insecticide from a different group may be required. Earlier<br />

defoliation may also be beneficial.<br />

If, despite efforts to manage whitefly, crops end up with<br />

significant honeydew contamination – for example, lower bolls<br />

dark with sooty moulds – then picking should be delayed as long<br />

as possible to expose the lint to maximum weathering, especially<br />

rainfall, which will help reduce honeydew levels.<br />

In general, the costs of preventing the problem will be far<br />

less than the potential grade penalties for weathered lint – so<br />

proactive management is the best option.<br />

18 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Converting mm to money – How<br />

does irrigated wheat stack up?<br />

■■By The CSD Extension and Development Team<br />

In the previous issue of <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> magazine<br />

(Feb-Mar, Vol 33, No. 1, Pg 22) research results from ‘The High<br />

Yielding Irrigated Grains in Cotton Farming Systems” and the<br />

‘Achievable Yields for Irrigated Grains’ projects revealed seasonal<br />

crop water demand estimates when targeting eight tonne per<br />

hectare irrigated wheat yields. The collaborative research was<br />

initiated by the cotton and grains industries in the recognition of<br />

irrigated wheat as a viable alternate rotation crop for irrigated<br />

cotton systems in north western NSW and south east Queensland.<br />

Similarly, in the past three seasons, the CSD Extension and<br />

Development team has been trying to get a better understanding<br />

of the evaporative demand of cotton crops to assess the<br />

performance of different varieties, technologies and farming<br />

systems – especially semi-irrigated skip row plantings and dryland<br />

production systems. The publication of these evaporative demand<br />

figures for irrigated wheat provides an opportunity to compare<br />

the water use of both cotton and wheat and the return for each<br />

mm of water each crop uses.<br />

For the cotton industry in the central region, these figures are<br />

of great benefit, as they allow comparisons between the irrigated<br />

cotton and wheat systems purely on a return for water used. This<br />

removes the reliance on data generated in cooler, more southern<br />

climatic zones, hearsay and influences of in-crop rainfall which<br />

may affect the seasonal water requirements for both systems.<br />

Using evaporative demand is a better way of looking at water<br />

use, as relying on the number of irrigations or budgeted water has<br />

led to confusion in the past as it does not take into the account<br />

all sources of water used to produce the crop. This method<br />

concentrates solely on the crop water use and does not factor in<br />

other system constraints such as irrigation type or farm water use<br />

efficiency which is site specific and not repeatable seasonally.<br />

Knowing the water needed to mature a crop, regardless of<br />

the source or seasonal conditions, allows analysis of the potential<br />

Austral Ropes, the oldest<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> rope company has<br />

been producing the benchmark<br />

in cotton module ropes from<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> cotton for 30 years.<br />

We plan, predict and produce to<br />

ensure on-time deliveries for the<br />

cotton picking window.<br />

For your peace of mind buy the<br />

strength…<br />

Ph: 03 9580 8921 Fax: 03 9580 1871<br />

E: ausropes@primusonline.com.au<br />

14–16 Avlona street,<br />

Mordialloc, Victoria Australia<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 19


Table 1: Comparison between gross margins of<br />

high input and low input irrigated wheat and<br />

irrigated cottonn<br />

Irrigated wheat Irrigated cotton<br />

Low High<br />

yield yield<br />

Sicot 74BRF<br />

Yield (t and bale/ha) 6.8 8.7 12.3<br />

Estimated ML required 2.5 4 7<br />

Water use (Etc mm) 410 490 760<br />

WUE (kg/mm) 16.58 17.75 3.66<br />

Commodity price $243/t (delivered) $450 (bale)<br />

Variable costs ($/ha) $942 $1,371 $2354<br />

GM ($/ha) $717 $752 $3168<br />

GM ($/ML) $287 $167 $453<br />

GM ($/mm) $1.75 $1.53 $4.17<br />

returns of that crop, highlighting those commodities which return<br />

the most for the water resource. In essence we are comparing<br />

apples with apples.<br />

In March 2008, CSD E&D published a gross margin analysis<br />

comparing the returns of irrigated wheat and cotton. Back then,<br />

in the middle of the drought, water was scarce and wheat was<br />

hitting a record price ($470 per tonne). Regardless of this, the<br />

conclusion reached in that analysis was that irrigated cotton was<br />

in front of irrigated wheat in both return per hectare and per ML.<br />

But this analysis had a downfall in that we estimated/guesstimated<br />

crop water requirements based on the best available information<br />

at the time, which when comparing crops across winter and<br />

summer growing seasons was full of uncertainties.<br />

Table 1 gives a summary of the revamped analysis, the crop<br />

evaporative demand for the wheat having been lifted from the<br />

Goondiwindi example of the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> article.<br />

This represents a similar locality to the area where the cotton<br />

evaporative demand figures were also sourced. The cotton figures<br />

are taken from 11 CSD agronomic and variety trials and the<br />

evaporative demand is calculated from time between planting<br />

and defoliation. Economic data has been spliced from the original<br />

CSD analysis which was based on the NSW DPI publication<br />

Growing eight tonnes a hectare of irrigated wheat in southern<br />

NSW by Lacy and Giblin, 2006.<br />

Although it is not a true reflection on the yield/water use<br />

relationship in wheat, we have allocated the lower yield range with<br />

the lowest water use and vice versa for the high yield scenario.<br />

As with the previous 2008 analysis conclusion, irrigated cotton<br />

is still in front on a return per hectare, and also per ML applied.<br />

But with the additional information now available on evaporative<br />

demand, we are truly able to examine the return per mm of<br />

moisture within each crop, regardless of whether it is from stored<br />

soil moisture, captured in-crop rainfall, irrigation water from onfarm<br />

storages or pumped from the river or a bore. Under present<br />

yield, pricing and water use scenarios, irrigated cotton provides a<br />

2.3–2.7 times greater return per mm of that water resource than<br />

irrigated wheat.<br />

This analysis highlights the need to ensure that the water<br />

resource is used on the crop which will return the most – in this<br />

scenario it is cotton. Only if wheat prices return to record highs is<br />

it likely to again become competitive.<br />

But this analysis also poses another question – what additional<br />

benefits will irrigated wheat bring to a rotation over and<br />

above a crop of dryland wheat?<br />

CHEMICAL ACCREDITATION<br />

COURSES<br />

Dalby 30/5, Toowoomba 31/5, Biloela 29/6, Theodore 29/6,<br />

Emerald 28/6, Moura 28/6, Goondiwindi 30/8, Moree 31/8,<br />

Narrabri 11/9, Wee Waa 11/9, Gunnedah 23/7, Warren 10/9,<br />

Narromine 4/9, Trangie 4/9, Bourke 3/9, St George 21/8,<br />

Dirranbandi 22/8, Mungindi 23/8.<br />

If dates/location do not suit please advise of your<br />

requirements to enable future planning<br />

Accreditation is valid for 5 years – New & Update courses available<br />

Supervision Skills COURSE<br />

Goondiwindi 24–25th July<br />

Formal management training for managers, supervisors,<br />

leading hands or foremen<br />

Key Topics:<br />

Time Management, Delegation, Establishing people as “People<br />

Managers”, Developing “results-oriented” employees, How to develop<br />

team work, Coaching & Counselling, Disciplining, Praising, Conducting<br />

Staff Appraisals, Occupational Health & Safety, Setting Objectives<br />

In-house courses can be arranged<br />

* Please call for updated information on course schedules *<br />

* Courses can be arranged elsewhere if required *<br />

Inquiries and Bookings:<br />

Geoff Paton 1800 626 681<br />

Countryco Training Pty Ltd<br />

20 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Local insects make a meal of<br />

mealybugs<br />

Natural insect predators have shown themselves to be<br />

very effective in controlling mealybugs in Queensland<br />

cotton crops.<br />

That’s one of the findings of a three-year research project<br />

being conducted by DEEDI (Department of Employment,<br />

Economic Development and Innovation) and industry into how to<br />

best combat the mealybug problem.<br />

The Solenopsis mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis) was first<br />

identified in Australia from cotton crops in the Burdekin region in<br />

2009 and then in Emerald in February 2010.<br />

DEEDI researchers have been working closely with the<br />

Queensland cotton industry to determine the impact of<br />

Solenopsis mealybug on cotton growth and yield, and develop<br />

integrated pest management (IPM) strategies.<br />

DEEDI’s Dr Moazzem Khan is leading the project, funded<br />

by DEEDI and Cotton Research and Development Corporation<br />

(CRDC), with a team of specialists from Emerald and Toowoomba.<br />

“We are looking at mealybug damage, categorising it and<br />

quantifying it, so we can develop action thresholds for the<br />

mealybug to determine when they warrant control and with<br />

what tactic,” Moazzem said.<br />

“We’re also focussing on different approaches including<br />

chemical options that fit into existing IPM strategies, so that it’s<br />

less disruptive, and maximising the use of beneficial insects.<br />

“In Emerald and the Burdekin, natural enemies have proven<br />

to be very effective at reducing high mealybug populations, and<br />

minimising the build up of populations in crops.<br />

“In some instances, these beneficial insects were so abundant<br />

Fast Facts…<br />

■■<br />

Description: Female adults are around 3 mm long. Female<br />

adults and nymphs are oval-shaped and covered by a<br />

white waxy coating giving them a mealy appearance. They<br />

form colonies on shoots, stems, leaves and peanut kernels,<br />

developing into white masses. Males are small aphid-like<br />

winged insects.<br />

■■<br />

Damage: Mealybugs pierce and suck on plant tissue. Infested<br />

plants are stunted. Peanut kernels often collapse and turn<br />

black when mealybugs are in high numbers.<br />

■■<br />

Monitoring: Can affect any stage. Infestations are often<br />

close to paddock edges or in poorly drained areas. In<br />

peanuts, colonies are often found at the base of plants on<br />

the taproot and pods.<br />

THE LINDSAY ADVANTAGE<br />

PROVEN STRENGTH.<br />

LEADING TECHNOLOGY.<br />

SUPERIOR COTTON YIELDS.<br />

Zimmatic ® by Lindsay offers proven systems and products that are<br />

built to be strong, long lasting, durable and easy to use for cotton<br />

growers who need highly efficient irrigation choices.<br />

Growers across Australia rely on Zimmatic’s innovative technology<br />

supported by a network of knowledgeable dealers to add value,<br />

reduce risk and take full advantage of every growing season.<br />

To find out how a Zimmatic by Lindsay irrigation system can help<br />

increase your cotton yields, or to request a free cotton profitability<br />

brochure, see your local dealer, email infoaustralia@lindsay.com<br />

or call 0458 967 424.<br />

Industry-Leading<br />

Irrigation Management Technology<br />

• FieldNET ® by Lindsay gives you the<br />

power to monitor and control pivots from<br />

your phone or Web-enabled devices<br />

including FieldNET Mobile – designed<br />

exclusively for smartphones.<br />

• Growsmart ® by Lindsay Precision VRI<br />

(Variable Rate Irrigation) applies the right<br />

amount of water/chemicals defined by<br />

zone or individual sprinkler.<br />

Scan this QR code with your smartphone to view a FieldNET<br />

Mobile video, or visit www.youtube.com/LindsayIrrigation.<br />

LINDSAY AUSTRALIA WAREHOUSE: Lindsay International (ANZ) Pty Ltd • 19 Spencer Street, Toowoomba QLD 4350<br />

© 2012 Lindsay. All rights reserved. Zimmatic, Growsmart and FieldNET are trademarks of the Lindsay Corporation.<br />

April–May<br />

LI-INT-0138_AD_Aust<strong>Cottongrower</strong>_Feb2012_1.9.12.indd<br />

2012<br />

1<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong><br />

1/9/12 9:10<br />

—<br />

AM<br />

21


and effective that they decimated mealybug populations,<br />

meaning that growers have not needed to apply insecticide.<br />

“Ladybirds, lacewings, earwigs and cockroaches are some<br />

of the important predators of mealybug and DEEDI trials will<br />

determine which are the most effective and how much impact<br />

they can have on mealybug populations.”<br />

Moazzem said research suggested mealybugs were now<br />

widely distributed throughout the cotton and horticultural<br />

production regions of Queensland at low densities, including at<br />

Byee in the South Burnett.<br />

“Cotton and a wide range of other cultivated plants (e.g.<br />

tomatoes, eggplant, chilli, melons, potatoes) and broadleaf<br />

weeds are hosts of these small white, sucking insects,” he said.<br />

“Outbreaks may be triggered by host availability (allowing<br />

population build up), climatic conditions, use of broad-spectrum<br />

insecticides, water stress, high levels of nitrogen fertiliser use, or<br />

limited natural enemy activity.”<br />

Moazzem said current DEEDI trials in Byee and Emerald were<br />

determining how much crop loss the mealybug could cause.<br />

“These trials will form the basis of economic thresholds to<br />

guide grower and consultant decisions about if and when control<br />

is needed,” he said.<br />

As part of the project activities, DEEDI Crop Protection<br />

scientists are looking at mealybug ecology and behaviour.<br />

Moazzem said adults and nymphs pierced and sucked the sap<br />

from both soft and hard plant tissue, which stunted the plants.<br />

“Infested plants often show distorted terminal growth with<br />

short internode and crinkled and bunchy leaves, and in severe<br />

cases the plant dies,” he said.<br />

“The team has been evaluating the effectiveness of<br />

insecticides, including conventional chemistry (synthetic<br />

insecticides), fungal pathogens (diseases) as well as oils and<br />

soaps.<br />

“It’s early days but trials have shown some promising results<br />

in terms of effective insecticides, which aren’t yet registered for<br />

mealybug.<br />

“Farm hygiene is also very important to minimise outbreaks<br />

of this pest. Before farmers even sow a cotton crop, minimising<br />

mealybug populations in weeds and volunteer hosts will limit the<br />

size of infestations, and the overall impact of this pest in crops.”<br />

Moazzem said it was still not known what prompted the<br />

Solenopsis mealybug outbreaks in Queensland. To date, they<br />

have not been found in the cotton growing areas of NSW.<br />

“We can’t pinpoint why there was an outbreak, but we do<br />

know they can be transmitted by wind, rain and floodwater, and<br />

it’s possible floodwater brought it to Byee,” Moazzem said.<br />

For more information visit www.deedi.qld.gov.au or call 13 25 23.<br />

Independent<br />

cotton classing services<br />

Services include:<br />

4 Manual classing for colour and leaf grade.<br />

4 Instrument fibre testing using world leading Uster HVI<br />

technology.<br />

4 Conditioning of classing samples for correct moisture<br />

content, essential for accurate fibre quality results.<br />

4 Third party review classing and testing.<br />

4 Tendering of uncommitted cotton.<br />

4 Reporting tailored to individual client requirements.<br />

4 <strong>Australian</strong> BMP and USDA certified cotton classing<br />

laboratory.<br />

4 Servicing all cotton growing regions for both committed and<br />

uncommitted cotton.<br />

To maximise your returns through Independent classing contact:<br />

Stuart Thompson<br />

Phone: 0488 714 777<br />

Fax: 07 4671 1206<br />

Email: stuart@1stclassing.com<br />

1ST Class Pty Ltd<br />

Carrington Cotton Classing Office<br />

Boggabilla Lane, Goondiwindi Qld 4390<br />

Dr Moazzem Khan working in Mealybug culture room at<br />

DEEDI Toowoomba.<br />

22 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Making sure your<br />

yield monitors<br />

are ready to go<br />

■■By Andrew Smart, Precision Cropping Technologies<br />

Here are some things to keep in mind this year with<br />

regards to cotton yield monitoring.<br />

Hardware<br />

Check the earth cable on the Agleader sensors on plastic<br />

chute machines – even think about replacing the ends and<br />

reconnecting to be safe. A bad earth can fry the monitors and<br />

sensors.<br />

Agleader sensors are light based so they will get dirty. Take<br />

them off and give them a clean – just a damp cloth will do as some<br />

cleaners can damage the plastic lenses. You can buy new eye covers<br />

so talk to your nearest Agleader dealer. Replace them if you haven’t<br />

before, because they are probably scratched and worn out.<br />

The battery in the Agleader monitor is important. If they are<br />

flat then your data may have the date of 2008. Change the<br />

battery and fix the date in the monitor, at the very least make<br />

sure your card is clean so this season’s data can’t be confused<br />

with previous year’s data.<br />

Data cards are always a problem. Do not format an Agleader<br />

card in any operating system XP or later. These cards are hard to<br />

Precision farming<br />

& guidance<br />

feature…<br />

come by and this can render them useless. Make sure you cut the<br />

files from the card and paste onto your computer.<br />

Older cards are called PCMCIA and are about the size of<br />

a credit card. Often getting a card reader in the first place is<br />

difficult. One solution is to buy second hand Toughbooks. These<br />

are less than $1000 and are typically refurbished and in excellent<br />

condition. They still have full size card readers and serial ports<br />

which are good for checking GPS units.<br />

They are very good for contractors and although sound like<br />

an expensive card reader they do have other uses. They will run<br />

programs such as Apex for downloading.<br />

PCT provide a data card download program for free. This is<br />

especially useful for John Deere picker owners who don’t have<br />

Apex.<br />

Calibration is useful and important, but don’t spend too much<br />

time on it. If you are going to do it, try it about 1 to 2pm in the day.<br />

If you’re doing it in the morning or late in the afternoon moisture<br />

will have an impact. It’s very important to leave the calibration once<br />

its set and post calibrate the data after picking. With more than one<br />

machine it’s likely they will be different and require post calibration,<br />

so don’t spend time trying to get them the same.<br />

With cotton yield monitoring you will see yields change during<br />

Unbeatable<br />

Global<br />

Coverage<br />

OmniSTAR is the market leader in providing<br />

real-time satellite delivered positioning solutions.<br />

OmniSTAR’s reliable, accurate services benefit<br />

machine guidance and precision farming, providing:<br />

• Repeatable Positioning<br />

• Worldwide Coverage<br />

• Real-time Positioning On The Move<br />

Reliability, Accuracy, Customer Service - Precisely<br />

www.omnistar.com.au | 1800 062 221<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 23


Precision farming &<br />

guidance<br />

feature…<br />

Figure 2: Cleaned but uncorrected data<br />

the day. Generally this is dependent on how much moisture is<br />

absorbed by the crop during the night and how long it takes to<br />

dry down.<br />

Defoliation can have an additional impact on this effect. A clean<br />

crop will only show this effect for short periods of time, whereas a<br />

crop with residual leaf can have an influence for much longer.<br />

With the ability of the new pickers to pick longer hours, this<br />

issue has become more important.<br />

The light at the end of the tunnel is that PCT has a post<br />

calibration process which can minimise this problem.<br />

Figure 1 shows the changes in harvest time. In this case not<br />

only is there variation in the days but between days as well.<br />

Figure 2 shows the yield data before correction and there are<br />

some very obvious patterns related to time.<br />

Figure 3 shows the yield after correction. This process is very<br />

important for all cotton yield monitoring equipment regardless of<br />

the manufacture.<br />

Further information can be obtained by emailing Andrew Smart on<br />

andrew@pct-ag.com<br />

Figure 1: Harvest collection time<br />

Figure 3: Cleaned and corrected data<br />

24 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Growers to take<br />

precision ag to<br />

the next level<br />

The vast majority of <strong>Australian</strong> farmers could dramatically<br />

increase their yields and profits by taking advantage of<br />

the full potential of their existing precision agriculture<br />

technology, according to Case IH Product Manager for Precision<br />

Agriculture, Liam Connolly.<br />

“At present, most <strong>Australian</strong> growers are only using 20 per<br />

cent of the information collected via precision ag technology,”<br />

said Liam.<br />

“While some farmers might engage the services of an<br />

agronomist to assist in the analysis of the precision ag data<br />

collected during peak times such as seeding or harvest, others<br />

struggle to know what to do with the wealth of information<br />

they’ve collected. Once the information is downloaded onto a<br />

home computer, the big question is what next?”<br />

A new partnership between Case IH and SGS will enable<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> growers to take precision farming in Australia to<br />

the next level to maximise yields and fertiliser inputs, minimise<br />

unnecessary chemical applications and dramatically improve<br />

farming efficiency.<br />

The partnership will provide farmers with a range of after<br />

sales support options to simplify the process of analysing data<br />

collected in-field via systems such as the Case IH AFS Pro 700.<br />

“The new partnership with SGS will provide growers with<br />

professional training and support on our AFS precision farming<br />

desktop software, which will enable growers to more effectively<br />

use in-field data they’ve gathered, like yield mapping and other<br />

data, for maximum efficiency and productivity,” said Liam.<br />

SGS is a global company that specialises in a range of<br />

Precision farming<br />

& guidance<br />

feature…<br />

agricultural services from soil and seed testing to feed testing.<br />

With 60 offices and labs around Australia and 67,000 staff in<br />

more than 1,250 offices globally, the partnership will provide<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> growers with access to wealth of international experts.<br />

Under the partnership, Case IH customers can sign up for a<br />

range of options from one day classroom training plus online<br />

support, to a ‘flying doctor’ style service where a support<br />

engineer will provide on-farm one-on-one training. SGS will also<br />

provide a number of specialised training events during the year<br />

which will be delivered via live online, webinar technology.<br />

“The flexible service will cater for the needs of all growers –<br />

from the beginner to the expert,” said Liam.<br />

“Our aim is to enable online sign up via the Case IH AFS portal<br />

and while costs will vary depending on the level of service required,<br />

cost effectiveness is a key consideration. At present we are looking<br />

at packages which start from just $650 for 24 months.”<br />

Case IH and SGS will also develop additional support packages<br />

that contribute to good practice precision farming. “The services<br />

will extend to the provision of agronomical advice for the creation<br />

of variable rate applications on fertilisers, sprayers and planters to<br />

soil sampling and analysis along with agronomical and analytical<br />

services. These services could be purchased individually or<br />

bundled with an AFS support and training package, depending<br />

on the individual growers’ needs,” said Liam.<br />

“Our overall aim will be to assist our customers move from basic<br />

precision farming to the brave new world of prescription farming.<br />

It is really just the start when you think about the enormous<br />

capabilities of precision agriculture. I anticipate that in the next<br />

five to 10 years all farming will be precision farming!”<br />

With most farmers only just touching the surface when it comes to analysing the wealth of data collected via precision ag<br />

technology such as the AFS Pro 700, Case IH has developed a new partnership that will offer farmers varying levels of after<br />

sales support to take precision ag to the next level.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 25


Precision farming &<br />

guidance<br />

feature…<br />

New features<br />

for guidance<br />

systems<br />

Leica Geosystems has announced additional features for<br />

the Leica mojoMINI and Leica mojo3D to further enhance<br />

product usability and compatibility. Upgrades include an<br />

improved look and feel of the mojoMINI display, data import and<br />

export for the Leica mojo3D and an extra lightbar option for both<br />

products.<br />

Leica mojoMINI<br />

The 4.3 inch touch screen has undertaken several<br />

modifications. It now displays the speed on the main screen in<br />

km/h and mph to assist customers without a speed compensated<br />

rate control. Additionally the menu buttons vanish after 20<br />

seconds of inactivity to provide a full screen view of the field.<br />

With a simple touch of the screen the buttons re-appear instantly.<br />

The Leica mojoMINI now offers two lightbar modes: the<br />

traditional cross track only lightbar and the Leica smart lightbar.<br />

Using the added cross track lightbar mode, farmers can<br />

customise the distance from the line which is represented by each<br />

lightbar segment. Whereas the established Leica smart lightbar<br />

provides an easy to follow path to the line.<br />

For more flexibility the new WAAS/EGNOS activation control<br />

allows farmers to choose the use of WAAS and EGNOS satellites<br />

or to deactivate them, if desired. Plus, the added support for kml<br />

files gives users of the Leica mojoMINI the ability to export data of<br />

the most recent work, such as coverage, boundary and wayline,<br />

for viewing in Google Earth or import into a Leica mojo3D.<br />

Leica mojo3D<br />

The latest steering update allows steering of all Leica<br />

SteerDirect kits which are supported by the Leica mojoXact, using<br />

just the Leica mojo3D and the Leica twist. To enable these extra<br />

steering options a Leica mojo3D SteerDirect kit is required.<br />

Like the Leica mojoMINI, the Leica mojo3D gained an extra<br />

lightbar option and now offers the cross track only lightbar<br />

as well as the Leica smart lightbar. To further increase the<br />

compatibility of the guidance display, the support for kml and<br />

shape files has been introduced. This makes it easy for customers<br />

to import and export field data and vehicle setups to another<br />

Leica mojo3D or different applications, such as SST Summit or<br />

Apex.<br />

Furthermore the support of direct section control Agrotronix<br />

Pulvix 8X00 has been added to the range of section controls.<br />

For more information about Leica Geosystems agriculture products<br />

visit www.AgGuidance.com<br />

EM surveys for:<br />

l Placement of moisture probes.<br />

l Soil sampling<br />

l Storage and channel leakage<br />

l Variable rate<br />

Elevation<br />

surveys for:<br />

l Earthworks budgeting<br />

l Earthworks design<br />

l Storage volume<br />

Imagery for:<br />

l Variable rate in-crop<br />

l Crop scouting<br />

Yield processing for:<br />

l Soil type revenue analysis<br />

l Earthworks cost benefit<br />

l Variable rate cost benefit<br />

Precision Cropping Technologies Pty Ltd<br />

“sharpening the cutting egde”<br />

Contact: Andrew Smart – Mob: 0428 922 638, E: andrew@pct-ag.com<br />

Brook Sauer – Mob: 0427 090 279, E: brooke@pct-ag.com<br />

Software for:<br />

l Viewing and analysing data layers<br />

l Placing probes, soil and leaf testing sites<br />

l Variable rate inputs<br />

l Earthmoving design<br />

l Variable rate irrigation for pivots<br />

GRDC Northern<br />

Region Training:<br />

l For agronomists, growers and industry<br />

TerraCutta:<br />

l The latest in elevation collection,<br />

earthworks design and iGrade<br />

control. All in-cab on a Windows tablet.<br />

l Talk to you local John Deere Dealer<br />

or contact PCT<br />

26 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Water Matters…<br />

Series supported by Valmont<br />

Precision irrigation in the cotton<br />

industry through adaptive control<br />

■■By Rod Smith 1 and Alison McCarthy 1<br />

The traditional irrigation application systems (surface<br />

and pressurised) are at the limit of their irrigation<br />

performance under current management practices. But<br />

future gains in performance can be achieved through the use<br />

of advanced technologies and management, in particular the<br />

use of adaptive control, thus converting them to precision<br />

irrigation systems.<br />

A 2010 review of precision irrigation conducted by the<br />

Figure 1: Surface irrigation as a precision irrigation method<br />

Climate data<br />

Whole season<br />

Spacial pattern of<br />

soil moisture deficit<br />

Decision software including crop model and<br />

expert knowledge (eg grower) applied at<br />

relevant spatial scale<br />

Update prediction of yield and seasonal WUE &<br />

irrigation management strategy to maximise WUE<br />

Timing of next irrigation<br />

Individual irrigation<br />

Spacial pattern of<br />

depths applied for<br />

each set of<br />

furrows or bays<br />

Sequencing of sets<br />

(furrows or bays)<br />

Optimisation target for<br />

individual irrigation including<br />

depth to be applied<br />

Control software<br />

Actuate<br />

next set<br />

Actuate<br />

cut-off<br />

Optimisation of irrigation<br />

in real time including<br />

spatial variation in<br />

infiltration and deficit<br />

Surface irrigation<br />

simulation model<br />

WATER<br />

Sense flow rate and<br />

advance during event<br />

Sense crop<br />

response and soil<br />

moisture<br />

CROP<br />

Initial characterisation of field<br />

(geometry, flow rate and soil<br />

infiltration characteristic)<br />

Precision Irrigation Made Easy<br />

CENTRE PIVOT and<br />

LATERAL MOVE IRRIGATION<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 27


National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture described precision<br />

irrigation systems as those that can:<br />

■■<br />

Determine the timing, magnitude and spatial pattern of<br />

applications for the next irrigation to give the best chance of<br />

meeting the farmer’s seasonal objective (that is, maximisation<br />

of yield, water use efficiency or profitability);<br />

■■<br />

Be controlled to apply exactly (or as close as possible to) what<br />

is required;<br />

■■<br />

Through simulation or direct measurement know the<br />

magnitude and spatial pattern of the actual irrigation<br />

applications and the soil and crop responses to those<br />

applications; and,<br />

■■<br />

Utilise these responses to best plan the next irrigation.<br />

In other words, a precision application system:<br />

■■<br />

Knows what to do;<br />

■■<br />

Knows how to do it;<br />

■■<br />

Knows what it has done; and<br />

■■<br />

Learns from what it has done.<br />

Precision irrigation requires real-time knowledge of the<br />

factors which are limiting production at any time in all areas of<br />

the field. The experience from precision agriculture suggests<br />

that the variables controlling crop yield are those that require<br />

within season management (such as water, nitrogen, pests<br />

and diseases). It is possible to address all of these factors with<br />

an automated response. The precision agriculture experience<br />

also suggests that the temporal variations (within and between<br />

seasons) are greater than the spatial variability that the variable<br />

rate technologies attempt to address.<br />

Precision irrigation implies a system that can adapt to the<br />

prevailing conditions. Also implied is the idea that the system will<br />

be managed to achieve a specific target which, for example, may<br />

be maximum water use efficiency, maximum yield or maximum<br />

profitability. This requires access to detailed data regarding the<br />

crop, soil, weather, environment and other production inputs,the<br />

MAXIMISE $/ML<br />

Get the very best from your water with<br />

qualified experienced advice on:<br />

- existing system performance<br />

- system upgrades and alterations<br />

- full system design<br />

- whole farm water balance<br />

- storage surveys<br />

- water management plans<br />

- environmental studies<br />

- flood studies<br />

Contact: Jim, Anthony, Liam, Jonathan or Kieran<br />

NARRABRI<br />

Ph: 02 6792 1265<br />

Fax: 02 6792 4570<br />

WARREN<br />

Ph: 02 6847 3446<br />

Fax: 02 6847 3392<br />

www.aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />

office@aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />

interaction of these variables and the agronomic responses to<br />

these inputs at the relevant spatial scale.<br />

Crop simulation models provide the first step towards<br />

the identification of optimal strategies. These models are an<br />

essential part of the real-time decision systems required for<br />

precision irrigation by incorporation into controllers on irrigation<br />

application systems. Models able to simulate the behaviour and<br />

performance of the application system are another necessary<br />

feature of the precision irrigation ‘toolkit’.<br />

Surface irrigation as a precision method<br />

To demonstrate that the idea of precision irrigation<br />

can be extended to any irrigation application method, the<br />

conceptualisation of surface irrigation as a precision system is<br />

provided in Figure 1. In this case, ‘smart’ automation involving<br />

real-time optimisation of individual irrigation events is used to<br />

manage, optimise and control each set of furrows.<br />

To optimise seasonal WUE, a further layer of decision support<br />

is required. The crop response to the irrigations needs to be<br />

monitored and modelled continuously through the season to<br />

determine the irrigation timing and amounts that give the desired<br />

response. This information also helps to determine the preferred<br />

strategy for management of the individual irrigation events and<br />

to account for the effects of spatial variability along the length of<br />

the furrows.<br />

Real-time optimisation of furrow irrigation<br />

The widely used surface irrigation methods of border check (or<br />

bay) and furrow irrigation are variously claimed to be as efficient<br />

as any other method or blamed for the perceived low efficiencies<br />

of <strong>Australian</strong> irrigation. However true these opposing claims may<br />

be, it is true that there is considerable scope for improvement<br />

in both the efficiency and uniformity of surface irrigation<br />

applications and that management strategies and technologies<br />

are available to start to achieve these improvements.<br />

Improvement of furrow irrigation performance through the<br />

process of evaluation and simulation with the Irrimate suite<br />

of tools developed by NCEA has been widely adopted in the<br />

cotton industry. Adaptive real-time optimisation builds on these<br />

existing tools and processes and can provide an even higher<br />

level of irrigation performance. When coupled with automation,<br />

substantial labour savings can also be provided.<br />

The automated real-time optimisation system developed at<br />

NCEA involves:<br />

■■<br />

Automatic commencement of the furrow inflow and<br />

automatic continuous measurement of the inflow;<br />

■■<br />

Measurement of the advance down the furrows mid-way<br />

through each irrigation;<br />

■■<br />

Real-time estimation of the current soil infiltration<br />

characteristic from this single irrigation advance observation;<br />

■■<br />

Real-time simulation and optimisation of the irrigation to<br />

select the time to cut-off that gives maximum performance for<br />

that set of furrows for that irrigation, taking into account the<br />

current soil moisture deficit and the variation in the infiltration<br />

characteristic across the set of furrows; and,<br />

■■<br />

Automatic cut off of the inflow at the designated time.<br />

Decision support software is an essential part of the system<br />

and the software has to perform steps 3 and 4 without user<br />

intervention.<br />

Trials of this system were undertaken on a furrow irrigated<br />

cotton property at St George in south-western Queensland. Four<br />

irrigations in the summer season of 2010-11 were monitored<br />

in a section of the field that used pipes-through-the-bank (PTB)<br />

28 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Valley®<br />

Strongest in the industry<br />

Gearboxes that dominate the lay of the land.<br />

The Valley ®<br />

Gearbox is designed and built to<br />

work under even the most demanding growing<br />

conditions. The stronger, heavier bull gear,<br />

pre-loaded worm gear and advanced shaft seals<br />

all contribute to the durability these gearboxes are<br />

known for. Built with engineering expertise in the<br />

USA, Valley gives customers peace of mind.<br />

So call today and learn for yourself how Valley<br />

equipment outperforms in the field.<br />

VALMONT AUSTRALIA<br />

PO BOX 225 Carole Park<br />

QLD 4300<br />

PH 07 3879 3622<br />

Fax 07 3879 3655<br />

www.valleyirrigation.com<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 29


A centre pivot-irrigated cotton field with<br />

spatially varying soil properties shown in<br />

figure below was simulated with two irrigation<br />

machine uniformity distributions.<br />

The field used for the case study simulations<br />

Case studies<br />

Case study A: Effect of irrigation application<br />

uniformity<br />

40 mm every 6 days<br />

High uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 5.6 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 132 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.5 bales/ML<br />

60 mm every 6 days<br />

High uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 6.2 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 196 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.4 bales/ML<br />

40 mm every 6 days<br />

Low uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 6.4 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 134 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.6 bales/ML<br />

60 mm every 6 days<br />

Low uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 6.2 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 200 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.4 bales/ML<br />

Legend<br />

Case study B: Effect of soil moisture sensor location on irrigation performance<br />

Triggered by Point 1<br />

High uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 7.0 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 126 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.7 bales/ML<br />

Triggered by Point 2<br />

High uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 7.1 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 111 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.8 bales/ML<br />

Triggered by Point 3<br />

High uniformity machine<br />

Yield = 7.4 bales/ha<br />

Irrigation supplied = 103 ML<br />

IWUI = 0.9 bales/ML<br />

30 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


to supply groups of 11 furrows that were 970 metres long and<br />

spaced one metre apart. The results showed that the irrigation<br />

times predicted by the system were shorter than those used by<br />

the farmer in irrigating the remainder of the field. This translated<br />

to reduced runoff and deep percolation and higher application<br />

efficiencies as a direct result of the real-time optimisation.<br />

The trials have proven the concept and established the<br />

basis for commercialisation of the system. Development and<br />

adoption of a successful commercial system will deliver irrigation<br />

performance and labour savings similar to the pressurised systems<br />

used within the industry but at greatly reduced capital and energy<br />

costs. The integration of the NCEA real-time optimisation with a<br />

commercially available automation system is the subject of future<br />

work on the system. Further work is also proposed to adapt the<br />

optimisation system to bay irrigation and to trial the system in<br />

Victoria and in the USA.<br />

Adaptive control of centre pivot and lateral move<br />

irrigation<br />

Precision irrigation is also possible using CPLM systems where<br />

the amount of irrigation can be varied spatially. But precision<br />

management of such systems requires new adaptive control<br />

techniques.<br />

A simulation framework,VARIwise, was created to develop,<br />

simulate and evaluate uniform and site-specific irrigation control<br />

strategies that may be applied to precision CPLM systems.<br />

This is the first step in the development of a system for the<br />

management and adaptive control of spatially varied CPLM<br />

irrigation. The continuing work on VARIwise is directed toward<br />

this purpose.<br />

Crop models (the cotton model OZCOT and the generic<br />

simulation framework APSIM) are used in VARIwise to provide<br />

data to the control strategy simulations. In VARIwise, the field is<br />

divided into cells with a minimum area of one square metre to<br />

accommodate spatial variability. The software allows for:<br />

■■<br />

The inclusion of field-scale variations in input parameters (such<br />

as crop response, crop age, target yield and management<br />

constraints);<br />

■■<br />

The input of data at a range of temporal scales; and,<br />

■■<br />

The ability to apply the various levels of control strategies for<br />

variable-rate irrigation at different spatial scales.<br />

VARIwise can be used to evaluate the performance of existing<br />

irrigation control strategies with different field and irrigation system<br />

properties. For example, the uniformity of irrigation application from<br />

an irrigation system can affect the spatial variability of crop yield<br />

across a field (case study A).<br />

The amount of irrigation applied also interacts with the irrigation<br />

system uniformity, and in some cases a low uniformity system which<br />

applies large volumes of irrigation in some areas of the field may<br />

result in higher yields.<br />

One irrigation strategy that may currently be applied is to<br />

initiate an irrigation event when the measured soil moisture<br />

reaches a set value. But in a field with spatially variable soil<br />

properties, the optimal location for determining this moisture<br />

content may not be clear. From case study B,the location of the<br />

trigger point used to initiate irrigation events significantly affected<br />

the simulated yield. The spatial variability of the yield was a<br />

function of the non-uniformity of the irrigation machine and the<br />

relationship between the location of the trigger point and the<br />

machine.<br />

1<br />

National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture (NCEA) University of<br />

Southern Queensland<br />

Long term quality control<br />

against wire worm...<br />

and other nasty suckers<br />

Easy to use, Lock & Load feature improves<br />

handling and gets you into the field faster.<br />

FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL 07 3727 3000<br />

BARMAC PTY LTD ABN 21 009 674 953<br />

17 Machinery St, Darra QLD 4076 AUSTRALIA<br />

P: 07 3727 3000 W: www.barmac.com.au<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 31


World COMModity Watch<br />

US<br />

Despite the USDA’s Planting Intentions<br />

Report having already been released,<br />

acreage between cotton and soybeans<br />

will continue to fluctuate over the coming<br />

month. But one thing is sure – the USDA’s<br />

forecast of 13.2 million acres is the<br />

maximum acreage cotton will see in this<br />

upcoming 2012–13 season. An earlier<br />

than usual spring has spurred some early<br />

planting across parts of Arizona, Alabama<br />

and South Texas. West Texas has received<br />

some nice rainfall and despite still being in<br />

severe drought conditions, are in a much<br />

better shape than last year. Old crop is<br />

now virtually sold out and growers now<br />

switch their attention to marketing of the<br />

upcoming crop. But uncertainty around<br />

production and market direction is making<br />

for a slow start to the marketing year.<br />

Brazil<br />

Weather conditions in Mato Grosso and<br />

Bahia remain favourable with adequate<br />

moisture and sunshine for crop growth.<br />

In line with historical weather patterns,<br />

rainfall is becoming less frequent so rainfall<br />

amounts between now and the end of April<br />

will influence yield and quality. Prospects<br />

at this stage remain high with the yield<br />

forecast at a slight increase (2% above<br />

previous crop) to 1426 kg per hectare.<br />

New York cotton futures<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> dollar vs US dollar<br />

<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

From the field to t<br />

Queensland Cotto<br />

Queensland Cotton has the longest supply


World COMModity Watch<br />

India<br />

Speculation around the Indian government’s export ban continues as a<br />

Government Official Meeting to discuss the further release of registered<br />

cotton for export is again postponed. Multiple sources now agree that the<br />

crop in India is significantly lower than that pinned by ICAC and USDA.<br />

This may be a reason for support found in their domestic market of<br />

late, coupled with the fact that the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) has<br />

recently announced its intent to build up reserves of the 2012–13 crop.<br />

China<br />

The Chinese Reserve has now concluded<br />

its procurement program, having<br />

accumulated around 14.5 million bales<br />

of domestic cotton and approximately<br />

4.5 million bales of imported cotton. This<br />

successful procurement program was<br />

thought to be an underlying factor of<br />

support in the market over the past six<br />

months, so all eyes are watching this space<br />

for the Reserve’s announcement as to how<br />

the next program will work, having returned<br />

to the markets after their Lunar New Year<br />

break with renewed vigor. Domestic prices<br />

are supported, and the China National<br />

Cotton Monitoring Price has now risen for<br />

29 straight sessions to its 13 week high<br />

(currently at 19,309 yuan per tonne). There<br />

is an increasing number of reports of the<br />

Chinese returning to market, looking to top<br />

up their low running inventories.<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> cotton price*<br />

<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> basis*<br />

<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Australia<br />

Ideal picking weather continues across the<br />

board with growers in central Queensland,<br />

the Darling Downs, and south west<br />

Queensland now in full swing, with a<br />

slower more variable picking date profile<br />

for those south of the Macintyre. Quality<br />

from Emerald has been unfortunately less<br />

than ‘base’ grade on the whole due to the<br />

generally cooler and more variable growing<br />

season. Thankfully, yield and quality for<br />

growers in the Dawson has been kind, with<br />

many growers enjoying 4 bales per acre and<br />

above. Everyone in the industry is holding<br />

out for another six weeks of fine weather.<br />

* Ex-gin price bids and basis for<br />

middling 1 1/8 inch cotton<br />

he shirt you wear,<br />

n is at every step.<br />

chain in the <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry.<br />

55 Wyandra Street, Newstead<br />

Queensland Australia 4006,<br />

Tel: 61 7 3250 3300<br />

Fax: 61 7 3852 1600


marketing<br />

The World Cotton Market<br />

■■By Michael Edwards, Cotton Outlook<br />

World raw cotton prices have continued to move<br />

within fairly narrow margins during the two months or<br />

so since we last contributed to the <strong>Cottongrower</strong>. The<br />

Cotlook A Index has fluctuated either side of the US$1.00 per lb<br />

mark – still a high value by historical comparison.<br />

That prices should have been sustained at such a level may<br />

seem surprising, given the recent direction of global supply<br />

and demand fundamentals. The sharp contraction of demand<br />

during the 2010–11 season meant that a net addition to<br />

world stocks occurred during that season, in contrast to earlier<br />

Figure 1: Cotlook A Index since January 2012<br />

Specialists in the<br />

Sale and Valuation<br />

of Rural Properties<br />

• Rural Properties • Cargill Cotton Agents<br />

• Town Sales<br />

• Registered Valuers<br />

• Property Management • Auctions<br />

• Clearing Sales<br />

MOREE REAL ESTATE<br />

www.moreerealestate.com.au<br />

Phone: 02 7651 1100<br />

Fax: 02 6751 1766<br />

After Hours:<br />

Paul Kelly 0428 281 428<br />

Cliff Brown 02 6752 3970<br />

Allan Gobbert 0428 523 375<br />

expectations of a further reduction. Consumption has declined<br />

modestly further during the current, 2011–12 season, whereas<br />

production, stimulated by recent price levels, seems poised to<br />

set a new record. As a result, world supply is forecast to expand<br />

this season by a massive four million tonnes. In February, Cotton<br />

Outlook published initial (and, at this early stage, necessarily very<br />

tentative) forecasts of production and consumption during the<br />

2012–13 season. Despite a reduction in production forecasts<br />

and an increase in consumption, supply is projected to exceed<br />

demand for the third successive season.<br />

The upshot is that current statistics point to an addition to<br />

world supply, over the three seasons described, in excess of seven<br />

million tonnes.<br />

World prices would no doubt by now already have succumbed<br />

to the weight of that excess supply, were it not for the creation<br />

by China of a de facto buffer stock. Habitual readers of this<br />

column will know that, under the system implemented for the<br />

first time this season, Beijing is committed to purchasing from<br />

the domestic crop, between September and March, at a predetermined<br />

intervention price of 19,800 yuan per tonne (roughly<br />

equivalent, when taxes and other adjustments have been taken<br />

into account, to 120 US cents per lb, cost and freight China).<br />

With the procurement process almost at an end for this season,<br />

Cargill’s Cotton Division –<br />

Buying cotton bales<br />

direct from the grower<br />

Phil Sloan<br />

PO Box 1203<br />

GOONDIWINDI Qld 4390<br />

Ph: (07) 4671 0222<br />

Fax: (07) 4671 3833<br />

AGENTS:<br />

Pete Johnson<br />

Left Field Solutions<br />

Mob: 0409 893 139<br />

Paul Kelly<br />

Moree Real Estate<br />

Moree<br />

Ph: (02) 6751 1100<br />

David Dugan<br />

Trangie<br />

Ph: (02) 6888 7122<br />

Roger McCumstie<br />

Brisbane<br />

Ph: (07) 3367 2629<br />

cotton_aust@cargill.com<br />

www.cargill.com.au<br />

34 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


over three million tonnes have been brought under the control<br />

of the state reserves corporation, in addition to imported cotton<br />

estimated at perhaps a further one million tonnes.<br />

The question now exercising the market is: what happens<br />

now? The acquisition of what by any measure is a huge volume<br />

of cotton does not of course remove it from the global balance<br />

sheet. While the strategic objectives of Chinese policy are fairly<br />

clear – support production and promote market stability – the<br />

manner in which policy-makers choose to pursue those twin<br />

goals has yet to become clear.<br />

Although replenishment of the depleted state reserve<br />

is doubtless considered desirable from the government’s<br />

perspective, observers doubt that the entire volume purchased<br />

can be retained beyond this season. A reserve price for next<br />

season has already been announced (some three per cent higher<br />

than this season’s value), and it is presumed that, on logistical<br />

and perhaps financial grounds, some room must be made for the<br />

supply that the government is committed to procure between<br />

September 2012 and March 2013.<br />

One hypothesis is therefore that Beijing will opt to restrict new<br />

import quotas, and thereby the supply of foreign cotton to mills<br />

over the coming months, in order that the local market can rise<br />

toward the intervention price, and a part at least of the cotton<br />

can be fed back to the market, the Chinese exchequer incurring<br />

little or no ‘trading loss’ in the process. This course would deprive<br />

the global market, during the coming months, of its major source<br />

of recent import demand.<br />

The implications of a slowdown or even total absence of<br />

Chinese demand are clearly not bullish. But, selling pressure<br />

from most origins may not immediately be brought to bear on<br />

marketing<br />

the market, since (not least as a result of earlier Chinese buying),<br />

the 2011–12 crops are already well committed in most major<br />

exporting countries. India has for the time being suspended<br />

further exports (though considerable unsold quantities remain in<br />

transit or on consignment). Much of the available, uncommitted<br />

supply resides in Central Asia, where the effect of rigid, stateinspired<br />

marketing systems has been to limit the volumes moving<br />

into export marketing channels so far this season.<br />

As for the demand side of the market, outside China, most<br />

mill buyers have shown extreme reluctance to depart from a<br />

hand-to-mouth approach to covering their requirements. This no<br />

doubt reflects their risk-aversion following the volatility of the<br />

past 18 months, the awareness that global supplies have been<br />

rising, and the lacklustre nature of demand from the downstream<br />

textile sectors. But the consequence has been that few spinners<br />

are well covered for the second and third quarters of 2012.<br />

The foregoing factors may, at least in the short term, restrict<br />

downward pressure on the market. But if world supply and<br />

demand fundamentals remain bearish by the time the movement<br />

of the main Northern Hemisphere crops is imminent in the later<br />

months of this year, it remains to be seen whether cotton at or<br />

near a dollar will prove sustainable.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 35


Ginning & fibre quality<br />

Series supported by ECOM Commodities<br />

New gin in the Murrumbidgee<br />

nears completion<br />

The first new cotton gin to be built in Australia for over a<br />

decade is expected to gin its first bales by the middle of<br />

May. The gin at Whitton, 35 km southeast of Griffith, is<br />

expected to process around 200,000 bales of the anticipated<br />

350,000 bales to come out of the Murrumbidgee Valley this<br />

season.<br />

The project is the brainchild of local farmers Roger and Tim<br />

Commins who are building the gin in conjunction with Gerrard<br />

and John Toscan, Scott Hogan and Larry Walsh – all pioneering<br />

cotton growers in this rapidly expanding cotton region. Roger<br />

has subdivided 60 hectares from his farm to build the gin, and<br />

despite the setbacks from the recent floods, the syndicate is on<br />

track to complete a project which many experts doubted could<br />

be completed in the time available.<br />

The Murrumbidgee valley has experienced a remarkable<br />

expansion in cotton area over the past couple of years as good<br />

rainfall has replenished the major water storages. Newer cotton<br />

varieties suited to the area have changed the economics of<br />

cropping in the Murrumbidgee so that cotton is now the highest<br />

gross margin summer crop by a considerable amount.<br />

In 2009–10, there were 4000 hectares, then 15,000 hectares<br />

in 2010–11 and 35,000 hectares this season. And although it is a<br />

short season area, the lack of summer cloud means high levels of<br />

radiation, and yields in most years are well into the 10 to 12 bale<br />

per hectare range.<br />

In 2010–11, there was not enough capacity for all the<br />

Murrumbidgee cotton in the gin at Hillston in the nearby Lachlan<br />

Valley, which has also experienced a production increase. So a lot<br />

of cotton had to take the long and expensive journey to gins in<br />

the Macquarie Valley, with a freight cost of around $70 a bale.<br />

During the 2010–11 season, the Commins brothers, who<br />

now grow 1500 hectares of cotton, realised that good prices and<br />

full dams could mean they may not be able to get their cotton<br />

ginned anywhere, even if they were prepared for the high freight<br />

costs.<br />

“We started lobbying all of the <strong>Australian</strong> processors and<br />

Tim Commins, Gerard Toscan, Larry Walsh, Scott Hogan, John Toscan and Roger Commins in front of one of the new Lummus<br />

gin stands.<br />

Ginning & Fibre Quality<br />

proudly brought to you with the support of…<br />

A tradition of service since 1849<br />

36 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


merchants to see if we could get someone to commit to building<br />

a gin in the Murrumbidgee,” says Roger Commins. “They all<br />

thought it was a good idea but no-one was prepared to invest so<br />

much money. Most of them had downsized and shed staff over<br />

the previous seasons and were not in a position to expand.<br />

“The other issue was timing. They didn’t think they would be<br />

able to get a gin up and running in time. In hindsight, they were<br />

probably right, but we had an extra personal incentive to get it<br />

finished for this season,” says Roger.<br />

Originally the Commins brothers wanted to get a small second<br />

hand gin to process their own crop and maybe a bit more. And<br />

they found one available in Greece which could do the job. But<br />

some of their friends and neighbours realised they too would<br />

need some ginning capacity and the project grew.<br />

“We decided to build a new gin,” says Roger. “It went from a<br />

three stand gin to a four stand high capacity gin with 222 saws<br />

per stand, with overall capacity of 1700 bales per day. We had to<br />

make the final go-ahead decision in May last year when we gave<br />

a commitment to Lummus for the equipment.”<br />

The ginning season is expected to go for five months and<br />

the group has commitments for up to 200,000 bales this year.<br />

This could expand if yields in the area exceed expectations. This<br />

will still leave much of the Murrumbidgee production to go to<br />

Hillston or the Macquarie Valley. The Whitton gin intends to<br />

charge more than most other <strong>Australian</strong> gins, but growers will<br />

reap the considerable benefit of not paying large freight costs.<br />

“We didn’t start any major works until August 25 last year,”<br />

says Roger. “We now (mid April) have all the buildings completed<br />

and 90 per cent of the equipment installed. We expect modules<br />

to start arriving in 10 days or so and be ready to start ginning by<br />

mid May.<br />

“The timetable is tight, and it was made worse by the flood<br />

which put us back by at least two weeks. We had electrical<br />

equipment being built in Wagga which was flooded, then we<br />

had an overland flood locally and a river flood at Darlington Point<br />

which kept most of the workforce off the site. The railway was<br />

also washed out which delayed the delivery of some equipment.”<br />

Despite the headaches involved in bringing such a massive<br />

project together in such a short time, Roger continues to be<br />

excited about the role of the gin and cotton production generally<br />

in the local economy.<br />

“There may be another 10,000 hectares of cotton in the area<br />

next season,” he says. “New growers who grew 100 hectares this<br />

year are already talking about 250 or 300 hectares next season<br />

while others are progressing to 400 to 500 hectares.<br />

“It has been a hell of an experience, but it will be so good<br />

for the local economy. At current prices, cotton will inject about<br />

$180 million into our local area this year and it will continue to<br />

increase.”<br />

Cotton Trade Desk<br />

Matthew Bradd<br />

Scott Biffin<br />

Shipping and Logistics Manager<br />

Monique Lewis<br />

Head Office<br />

Suite 801, Level 8<br />

15 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2001<br />

GPO Box 29 Sydney NSW 2001<br />

Ph: 02 9223 3631<br />

Fax: 02 9233 6206<br />

Agents:<br />

Namoi Valley, Gwydir Valley &<br />

Macquarie Valley<br />

Steve Dalton<br />

AgVantage Commodities Pty Ltd<br />

Ph: 02 6792 2962<br />

MacIntyre Valley<br />

Geoff Webb<br />

AgVantage Commodities Pty Ltd<br />

Ph: 07 4671 1225<br />

Darling Downs<br />

Simon Donaldson<br />

Gebar Farming<br />

Ph: 0428 636 924<br />

St George & Dirranbandi<br />

Kelvin Bella<br />

Our-Tek Pty Ltd<br />

Ph: 0428 717 284<br />

Central Highlands & Dawson–Callide<br />

Don Cooper<br />

Cooper Consulting<br />

Ph: 0428 794 698<br />

Riverina<br />

Ross Harvie<br />

Ph: 0458 567 776<br />

Waiting for the first bales to arrive at the new gin.<br />

www.ecomtrading.com<br />

www.ecomcommodities.com.au<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 37


Cruiser fund brings industry<br />

benefits<br />

■■By Steve Ainsworth, CSD<br />

Investing in and applying<br />

the products of research and<br />

development is a hallmark of<br />

the success for the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

cotton industry.<br />

Investing in R&D is not without<br />

risk and by its very nature confers<br />

long term commitment to invest<br />

resources of today for a potential<br />

outcome realisable down the track.<br />

Unfortunately, sometimes (often<br />

with very good reason) investment<br />

priorities change and some areas Steve Ainsworth.<br />

of research become less important and the willingness to invest<br />

for the long haul also changes.<br />

If we cast our eye back to 2007, the cotton industry was<br />

facing unparalleled challenges. Record drought, low production<br />

and hardship were being experienced across industry and in<br />

cotton communities. Certainly a challenging environment for<br />

growers but equally so for the provision of R&D. It was with this<br />

background that in 2007, Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD) and<br />

Syngenta agreed to re-affirm their long term commitment and<br />

established the Cruiser R&D Fund. The R&D activities resourced<br />

by the fund are explicitly focused on an outcome of ‘improving<br />

cotton plant stands’. A good uniform plant stand is recognised<br />

as the foundation of high yields – so this is an important area of<br />

R&D with outcomes that are immediately applicable to growers<br />

and of course to their bottom lines.<br />

The Cruiser R&D Fund is self funding with contributions made<br />

by CSD and Syngenta which equate to $1.40 per bag of Cruiser<br />

treated planting seed. The Cruiser R&D fund is managed by a<br />

joint committee of both companies, is chaired by eminent plant<br />

pathologist Dr Stephen Allen and has invested in research to<br />

understand how to improve cotton establishment. A key focus<br />

has been to establish a better understanding of the interaction<br />

between diseases and to examine novel seed applied chemistry<br />

to provide new management solutions as part of an integrated<br />

approach.<br />

Five years on and the Cruiser R&D Fund goes from strength<br />

to strength. We have jointly developed the product Bion and in<br />

combination with the seed applied fungicide, Dynasty Complete<br />

has become a very popular choice for management of a range<br />

of intractable diseases including Fusarium wilt, black root rot,<br />

Pythium and Rhyzoctonia. Examples of other projects supported<br />

include resistance screening for a range of insects, improving<br />

our understanding of the ecology for important insects such as<br />

thrips and the purchase of discrete equipment to allow industry<br />

plant pathologists access to new research methods and materials.<br />

Importantly, we have supported the industry’s Cotton Symptoms<br />

Guide to ensure that growers and consultants are well informed<br />

on this important area of crop production.<br />

The Cotton Symptoms Guide was produced by the Cotton<br />

CRC Development and Delivery Team and published by<br />

Cotton Symptoms<br />

Guide<br />

The guide to symptoms of<br />

diseases and disorders<br />

in <strong>Australian</strong> cotton<br />

Introduction & symptoms key<br />

Diseases<br />

Biosecurity threats<br />

Herbicides<br />

Insect damage<br />

Soil constraints & planting management<br />

Environmental & other symptoms<br />

Nutrition deficiency/toxicity<br />

A production of<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton Industry<br />

Development & Delivery Team<br />

EDITORS: Susan Maas, Stephen Allen and Duncan Weir<br />

1st Edition 2012 $14.90 incl GST<br />

<strong>Greenmount</strong> <strong>Press</strong>. The Symptoms Guide was launched at the<br />

recent Science Forum held by the Cotton CRC at Narrabri.<br />

The Symptoms Guide is partly an update of the industry<br />

disease guide produced several years ago, but it is also much<br />

more. It is a diagnostic tool covering diseases, herbicide damage,<br />

insect damage, soil constraints, environmental symptoms and<br />

nutrient imbalances.<br />

For growers and consultants, it should be the first port<br />

of call when faced with damage symptoms in a crop – to be<br />

supplemented by more in-depth investigation. The Symptoms<br />

Guide will be also available as a smart-phone app which will<br />

point to more detailed information.<br />

Apart from the Cruiser Fund, The Symptoms Guide was<br />

made available by the support of a number of cotton industry<br />

distributors – B&W Rural, CGS, Elders, IHD (AgNVet, McGregor<br />

Gourlay, Pursehouse Rural, MIA Rural Services, Darling Irrigation)<br />

and Landmark.<br />

As always, we appreciate feedback on specific research opportunities as this<br />

helps to guide project selection and long term funding. The CSD Extension and<br />

Development team is your first port of call and can be contacted on<br />

02 6795 0000 or via www.csd.net.au.<br />

38 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Healthy crop. Healthy industry.<br />

The Cotton Symptoms Field Guide and the Mobile App were both sponsored by the Cruiser R&D fund.<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry<br />

congratulates the Cruiser R&D Fund<br />

for sponsoring this Field Guide and the<br />

Mobile APP. The Cruiser R&D Fund has<br />

been established by Syngenta and Cotton<br />

Seed Distributors to support research into<br />

finding solutions to improve cotton stand<br />

establishment.<br />

The R&D fund receives $1.40 per bag<br />

of cotton seed sold with Cruiser seed<br />

treatment. This helps with funding<br />

establishment research projects such as<br />

this Field Guide and the Mobile APP.<br />

Contact your local CSD E&D<br />

Agronomist or Syngenta’s Peter<br />

Chapman on 0417 443 243<br />

NAMOI<br />

GWYDIR<br />

SOUTHERN NSW<br />

BORDER RIVERS<br />

DARLING DOWNS<br />

Rob Eveleigh<br />

James Quinn<br />

Bob Ford<br />

Alex North<br />

John Marshall<br />

0427 915 921<br />

0428 950 028<br />

0428 950 015<br />

0428 950 021<br />

0428 950 010


It pays to optimise N fertiliser<br />

inputs<br />

■■By Ian Rochester and the Cotton CRC Development and Delivery Team<br />

N<br />

use-efficiency (NUE) has been researched in cotton<br />

crops for many years now. The response of cotton to<br />

applied N fertiliser is well known and the response curves<br />

shown in Figure 1 are indicative of the rotation systems typically<br />

used by cotton growers.<br />

The economic optimum N fertiliser rate can be determined<br />

based on the cost of each kg of N fertiliser and the return for<br />

each kg of lint. The amount of over or under-use of N fertiliser<br />

can be determined for each N rate used. Cotton following faba<br />

beans needed no N fertiliser and cotton following cotton or<br />

wheat needed between 100 and 150 kg N per hectare.<br />

Where the optimum N fertiliser rate was exceeded, the cost<br />

of more N fertiliser lint yield exceeded the return from lint and<br />

seed; so the crop gross margin was reduced. Interestingly, the<br />

CRC survey of August 2011 indicated that of the 177 growers<br />

surveyed (about 20 of the growers in that season), the average N<br />

fertiliser application was 217 kg N per hectare, with the highest<br />

rate of 534 kg N per hectare and lowest rate was 30 kg N per<br />

hectare.<br />

Profitability<br />

An economic (gross margin) analysis was performed on the<br />

2010 cotton crop following wheat depicted in Figure 1. This<br />

accounted for the estimated costs (or savings) of N fertiliser, and<br />

the yield forgone by not optimising N fertiliser inputs.<br />

The prices received for lint and seed were $450 per bale and<br />

$150 per tonne respectively. Nitrogen fertiliser cost $1300 per<br />

Figure 1: The yield response of cotton to N<br />

fertiliser in three rotation systems<br />

Stars represent the economic optimum N fertiliser rate for each rotation system. Cotton<br />

following wheat was used for economic analysis of the response to N fertiliser.<br />

In Brief…<br />

■■<br />

Under use of N fertiliser reduced gross margin by $725 per<br />

hectare<br />

■■<br />

Over–use of N fertiliser reduced gross margin by $265 per<br />

hectare<br />

■■<br />

Use the tools available to optimise N fertiliser inputs and<br />

maximise profits<br />

tonne of N. Where cotton growth is excessively vegetative, the<br />

additional costs for applying growth regulators to control this<br />

growth may be incurred as well as for additional insecticides and<br />

defoliants. This may amount to $135 per hectare, but these costs<br />

were not included in this analysis. The change in gross margin ($<br />

per hectare), relative to optimum N fertiliser application, is shown<br />

in Figure 2.<br />

This analysis shows that it was just as costly to under-fertilise<br />

as over-use N fertiliser. Importantly, the cost of the additional N<br />

fertiliser applied (or saved) was of relatively small impact, as was<br />

the loss of revenue from seed, compared with the value of the<br />

lint yield foregone.<br />

The magnitude of the reduction in gross margin is noteworthy<br />

and this analysis emphasises the importance of getting N fertiliser<br />

management right. Where the optimum N fertiliser application<br />

rate was out by 100 kg N per hectare or more, the gross margin<br />

was reduced by more than $400 per hectare.<br />

Crop N use-efficiency<br />

Crop NUE was determined at the end of the season by<br />

dividing the lint yield by the crop N uptake. Crop N uptake<br />

is measured by sampling one metre of crop row, drying and<br />

weighing the biomass and analysing the whole plant for N. The<br />

optimum crop NUE has been measured as 12±2 kg lint/kg crop<br />

N uptake by assessing the lint yield of cotton crops subjected to<br />

numerous rates of N fertiliser; this allows the economic optimum<br />

N fertiliser rate to be determined. Crop NUE was then calibrated<br />

with N fertiliser use in those experiments over several years, as<br />

shown in Figure 3. To optimise cotton production, crops need to<br />

have been fertilised within 50 kg N per hectare of the optimal N<br />

fertiliser rate.<br />

Survey of cotton crops<br />

Between 2007 and 2009, the cotton extension team assisted<br />

in sampling commercial cotton crops in three valleys (Macquarie,<br />

Namoi and Gwydir) to assess NUE. In all, 80 crops were surveyed<br />

in the three seasons. Crop NUE was calculated and it was shown<br />

that about 61 per cent of fields were potentially over-fertilised<br />

with N, 30 per cent received optimal N fertiliser and nine per cent<br />

showed that too little N was applied (Figure 4).<br />

High NUE is normally associated with low N uptake, which<br />

can be a consequence of too little N fertiliser applied, but more<br />

commonly as a result of a deficiency of another nutrient, such as<br />

phosphorus, which can limit crop N uptake more than lint yield.<br />

40 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Figure 5 shows the mean lint yield determined in the three<br />

groups of crops surveyed. While lower lint yield may be expected<br />

where insufficient N fertiliser is applied, it is just as important to<br />

recognise that over-fertilising can depress yields as well. Lint yield<br />

was 270 kg per hectare lower in the over-fertilised group. By<br />

using the relationship in Figure 3, it was estimated that the group<br />

of over-fertilised crops received on average 104 kg N per hectare<br />

in excess of the optimum N fertiliser required. As well, gross<br />

Figure 2: The reduction in gross margin ($/ha) relative to receiving optimal N fertiliser based on the<br />

N fertiliser response by cotton following wheat depicted in Figure 1 and the relative importance of<br />

reduced lint and seed revenue and cost of N fertiliser<br />

LOW COST<br />

Ratch-e-tarp ®<br />

FOR MODULES & ROUND BALES<br />

EMERGENCY<br />

ROUND BALE COVER<br />

FOR ON-FARM AND<br />

GIN FILM SPLITS<br />

… AND BULK<br />

STORAGE COVERS<br />

Keeping you covered … rain, hail or shine<br />

Phone: 1300 059 003<br />

Fax: 1300 858 626<br />

Email: info@polytex.net.au<br />

www.polytex.net.au<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 41<br />

cttngrwr312.indd 1<br />

27/03/12 10:32 AM


margin was reduced by $265 per hectare in this group of overfertilised<br />

crops when the same costs were applied as described<br />

previously. The consequence of applying more N fertiliser than is<br />

required by the crop is potentially profound. Applying excess N<br />

stimulates vegetative growth in favour of fruit, as demonstrated<br />

by the excessive N uptake in the over-fertilised crops in Figure 5.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This research strongly supports the importance of getting N<br />

fertiliser management right and the value of measuring NUE to<br />

improve crop nutrition, yield and gross margin. A relatively wide<br />

window of N fertiliser rates exists to optimise cotton production,<br />

but the survey data indicate this may only occur in half of our<br />

cotton crops. Initially, soil testing before N fertiliser is applied will<br />

suggest an appropriate N fertiliser rate that may be modified<br />

after in-crop leaf analyses indicate insufficient N to optimise yield.<br />

Development Corporation and the Cotton Catchment Communities CRC is<br />

gratefully acknowledged, as well as the many cooperating farmers. Kellie<br />

Gordon, Jo Price, Bern Onus, Greg Roberts, Jim Wark, Dallas King and Steve<br />

Madden provided technical assistance with crop sampling and N analyses.<br />

Further reading: Cotton Catchment Communities CRC <strong>Cottongrower</strong> Survey<br />

(2011) GHD Hassell.<br />

Rochester I, Ceeney S, Maas S, Gordon R, Hanna L, Hill J (2009) Monitoring<br />

nitrogen use efficiency in cotton crops. <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong><br />

magazine. (May 2009 p42).<br />

Figure 5: Mean lint yield, crop N uptake and<br />

reduction in gross margin determined in the<br />

commercial fields surveyed<br />

Acknowledgements: Ms Janine Powell provided in-depth assistance<br />

with economic analyses. Financial support from the Cotton Research and<br />

Figure 3: The relationship between crop NUE<br />

and N fertiliser applied relative to the economic<br />

optimum N rate<br />

Figure 4: The number of commercial cotton<br />

crops with high, low or optimal crop NUE –<br />

optimal NUE is 10–14 kg lint/kg crop N uptake<br />

42 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


3100% <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton<br />

3100% <strong>Australian</strong> Owned<br />

Wee Waa Trangie Moree Goondiwindi Toowoomba<br />

Ph: 02 6790 3000 Ph: 02 6888 9611 Ph: 02 6752 5599 Ph: 07 4671 6900 Ph: 07 4631 6100<br />

Fax: 02 6795 4036 Fax: 02 6888 9678 Fax: 02 6752 5357 Fax: 07 4671 6999 Fax: 07 4631 6190<br />

www.namoicotton.com.au<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 43


Cotton seed N indicates fertiliser<br />

use-efficiency<br />

■■Ian Rochester and the Cotton CRC Development and Delivery Team<br />

Recent research has shown that cotton crop N nutrition is<br />

closely related to the N concentration in fuzzy cotton seed.<br />

Crops that have been over-supplied with N have a high<br />

seed N concentration, and under-fertilised crops have lower seed<br />

N concentration.<br />

Seed N concentration and nitrogen fertiliser useefficiency<br />

(NUE)<br />

It is impractical to measure crop NUE routinely, because it is<br />

a slow and laborious task that requires destructive sampling of<br />

whole plants, drying those samples and then analysing them for<br />

N concentration. So, a new approach was developed. Crop NUE<br />

can be estimated by measuring the N concentration in the seed<br />

at the end of the season. But further, the N concentration in the<br />

seed is indicative of the N status of the cotton crop and can be<br />

used to assess whether N fertiliser has been applied inadequately<br />

or in excess.<br />

Figure 1: Relationship between fuzzy<br />

cotton seed N concentration and N fertiliser<br />

application<br />

In Brief…<br />

■■<br />

Seed N concentration indicates where N fertiliser is used<br />

efficiently.<br />

■■<br />

Seed N concentration also indicates the degree that N<br />

fertiliser has been under or over-applied.<br />

We are currently appraising whether this technology to<br />

measure seed N concentration can be installed at a commercial<br />

gin. This procedure would test fuzzy seed as it is produced during<br />

the ginning process. It may be possible to conduct multiple<br />

measurements on each bale to ensure accuracy and thus provide<br />

growers with information on seed N concentration, as well as<br />

fibre quality and gin out-turn data.<br />

This will give growers some feedback on crop NUE and<br />

indicate how efficiently N fertiliser was managed on each field,.<br />

Where crop N nutrition has been optimised to maximise lint yield<br />

seed N concentration will be between 3.3 and 3.7 per cent N.<br />

Seed N concentrations above 3.7 per cent indicate more than 50<br />

kg N per hectare was applied in excess of the crop’s requirement.<br />

Seed N concentration below 3.3 per cent indicates inadequate N<br />

Figure 2: Relationship between fuzzy cotton<br />

seed N concentration and lint yield in nine<br />

fields on a farm in the Namoi valley<br />

Table 1: Numbers of modules identified with high, low and optimum seed N concentration in three<br />

valleys<br />

Region Modules sampled Low seed N% (< 3.3 %N) Ideal seed N% (3.3 to 3.7) High seed N% (>3.7 %N)<br />

All modules 449 45 (10%) 201 (45%) 203 (45%)<br />

St George 85 5 (6%) 22 (26%) 58 (68%)<br />

Gwydir 85 4 (5%) 36 (42%) 45 (53%)<br />

Namoi 88 21 (24%) 58 (66%) 9 (10%)<br />

A farm (Namoi) 189 24 (12%) 94 (50%) 71 (38%)<br />

44 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


cent and lower yield may have been constrained by factors other<br />

than N nutrition, but it remains that those two fields received<br />

excess N fertiliser that may have contributed to reduced lint yield,<br />

as reported in the N fertiliser response curves in the previous<br />

article in this magazine.<br />

Conclusion<br />

This study has demonstrated that cotton seed N concentration<br />

can be used to assess crop N use-efficiency and indicate where<br />

N fertiliser management can be improved to benefit irrigated<br />

cotton production. In fields where excessive N fertiliser is applied,<br />

it is possible to achieve higher lint yields if N fertiliser is managed<br />

more carefully.<br />

Applying too much N can be just as bad as too little.<br />

fertiliser was applied. Figure 1 indicates the relationship between<br />

seed N concentration and whether excess or inadequate N<br />

fertiliser was applied to the crop. This information was generated<br />

from N fertiliser rate experiments conducted over several years<br />

and identified the optimal N rates and measured crop NUE along<br />

with seed N concentration.<br />

This methodology is still being evaluated for commercial<br />

delivery to help growers manage N fertiliser more efficiently. It<br />

should be used in combination with other proven tools i.e. prefertilising<br />

soil analyses that determine appropriate N fertiliser rates<br />

and in-crop leaf analyses to assess nutrient levels (not just N) in<br />

the crop.<br />

Testing seed N concentrations in 2010<br />

In 2010, seed N concentrations were determined in 449<br />

commercial cotton modules sampled from 61 fields in three<br />

cotton-growing regions. Using 3.5 per cent seed N as the optimal<br />

value the investigation showed that seed N concentrations were<br />

above optimal in 203 modules (45 per cent), optimal in 201<br />

modules (45 per cent) and below optimal in 45 modules (10 per<br />

cent), as shown in Table 1.<br />

Seed N per cent averaged 3.65 for all modules, suggesting<br />

that about 25 kg N per hectare too much N fertiliser was applied.<br />

For the modules that indicated high seed N concentration, seed<br />

averaged 3.88 per cent N, suggesting that about 83 kg N per<br />

hectare too much N had been applied. This may have cost those<br />

growers $350 per hectare profit on average, according to<br />

Figure 2 on page 41.<br />

Importantly, low seed N is indicative of poor N uptake by<br />

the crop, and this may not only be attributed to inadequate N<br />

fertiliser application, but also, a deficiency of another nutrient<br />

that may restrict N uptake. So low seed N highlights the need for<br />

more intensive nutrient monitoring to direct changes in nutrient<br />

management.<br />

Yield data from one of the Namoi farms shows that high seed<br />

N per cent was correlated with lower lint yield (Figure 2). At this<br />

farm, seven fields had N fertiliser applied at optimal rates, but<br />

seed N analysis indicated that two fields were over-fertilised, and<br />

showed yield was depressed by 1.8 bales per hectare (16 per<br />

cent), relative to the optimally fertilised fields. This suggests that<br />

the gross margins for these two crops were reduced by about<br />

$1000 (reduced lint and seed worth $810 and $90 and added<br />

cost of N fertiliser $130).<br />

Figure 2 demonstrates the value of the technology to the<br />

grower. It is possible that the two fields that had high seed N per<br />

Acknowledgements: Financial support from the Cotton Research and<br />

Development Corporation and the Cotton Catchment Communities CRC is<br />

gratefully acknowledged, as well as the many cooperating farmers. Kellie<br />

Gordon, Jo Price, Bern Onus, Greg Roberts, Jim Wark, Dallas King and Steve<br />

Madden provided technical assistance with crop sampling and N analyses.<br />

Further reading: Cotton Catchment Communities CRC <strong>Cottongrower</strong> Survey<br />

(2011) GHD Hassell.<br />

Rochester IJ (20 12). Using seed nitrogen concentration to estimate crop N use<br />

efficiency in high-yielding irrigated cotton.<br />

Field Crops Research 127, 140-145. DOI 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.018<br />

THE PERFECT GIFT – OR<br />

SIMPLY FOR YOURSELF<br />

Order your autographed copy of<br />

‘TRACTORS KALASHNIKOVS and GREEN TEA’ now<br />

NAME:<br />

ADDRESS:<br />

TELEPHONE:............................................................<br />

Hard cover, 320 pages,<br />

liberally illustrated.<br />

NO. OF COPIES……@ $39.50 each. Cost: $………… Plus postage (total) $ 9.50<br />

TOTAL REMITTANCE: Cheque or postal money order (sorry – no card facility)<br />

$…………<br />

Please send order form with remittance to:<br />

IAN M. JOHNSTON, PO BOX 322, TUNCURRY, NSW, 2428.<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 45


Cotton gets nanotech and biotech<br />

treatment<br />

■■By Jan Suszkiw, USDA–ARS<br />

Scientists at the Agricultural Research Service’s Cotton<br />

Chemistry and Utilization Research Unit (CCUR) in New<br />

Orleans, Louisiana, have a long history of research successes<br />

leading to advances in the use, manufacturing, and quality of<br />

cotton fibre.<br />

For example, groundbreaking studies led by chemist<br />

Ruth Benerito at the Cotton Chemical Reactions Laboratory<br />

(CCUR’s predecessor), starting in the 1950s, gave rise to easycare,<br />

permanent-press clothing and other consumer-friendly<br />

improvements that helped cotton better compete with synthetic<br />

fibres, like polyester and nylon.<br />

New challenges and consumer demands have since emerged,<br />

but the ARS lab’s tradition of excellence and innovation in<br />

research continues.<br />

Under the leadership of Brian Condon, CCUR researchers<br />

today are leveraging the latest developments in nanotechnology<br />

to bring cotton into the 21st century.<br />

Foreseeable applications range from the purely functional –<br />

like better shrink resistance – to the truly futuristic, such as fabrics<br />

made of cotton-optical fibre blends that can change color.<br />

Flame-retardant coating<br />

In one ongoing project, Condon and CCUR chemist SeChin<br />

Chang are collaborating with Texas A&M University (TAMU)<br />

scientists to evaluate a first-of-its-kind, environmentally friendly<br />

flame retardant for cotton apparel and durable goods.<br />

Halogenated flame retardants have been among the most<br />

widely used chemical treatments for cotton. But there’s been a<br />

push to find alternatives that are not only more benign, but that<br />

also avoid imparting the same stiffness to fabric characteristic<br />

of some chemical treatments. For these and other reasons, “the<br />

textiles industry would like to move away from using halogenated<br />

flame retardants,” says Brian.<br />

Made of water-soluble polymers, nanoscale clay particles,<br />

and other ‘green’ ingredients, the ARS-TAMU flame retardant<br />

is applied as a nanocoating that reacts to open flame by rapidly<br />

forming a swollen, charred surface layer. This process, known<br />

as ‘intumescence’, stops the flame from reaching underlying or<br />

adjacent fibres.<br />

A team led by Jaime Grunlan at TAMU’s Department of<br />

Mechanical Engineering, in College Station, Texas, originally<br />

developed the intumescent nanocoating using a layer-by-layer<br />

assembly. In this procedure, alternating layers of positively and<br />

negatively charged ingredients, including clay particles 50-100<br />

nanometers wide, are deposited onto the surface of a desired<br />

material. The result is a striated nanocoating that, when viewed<br />

under a scanning electron or other high-powered microscope,<br />

resembles the stacked layers of a brick wall.<br />

Brian’s interest was piqued after listening to Jaime discuss his<br />

team’s research at a recent American Chemical Society meeting,<br />

and he approached the TAMU professor about potential benefits<br />

to cotton. That conversation, in turn, led to a cooperative<br />

research project enabling Brian and SeChin to evaluate the<br />

nanocoating at CCUR.<br />

Treating cotton for flame resistance isn’t a recent concept,<br />

adds Brian, whose lab is part of the ARS Southern Regional<br />

Research Center in New Orleans. In fact, some of the most<br />

successful early treatments were born of research conducted by<br />

Benerito and colleagues there several decades ago.<br />

Brian coauthored a 2011 ACS Nano paper on the potential<br />

Cross-section of a cotton fibre with clay nanoparticles<br />

attached. Magnification about 11,000x, with transmission<br />

electron microscope.<br />

Closer view of a clay nanoparticle coating. (Photos on this<br />

page courtesy of Jaime Grunlan, Texas A&M University. Colorisation by<br />

Stephen Ausmus.)<br />

46 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


of intumescent coatings together with SeChin, Jaime and his<br />

TAMU team, and Alexander Morgan of the University of Dayton<br />

Research Institute in Ohio.<br />

Early trials of the nanocoating using standard flame-resistance<br />

tests are promising. In one case, 95 per cent of treated cotton<br />

fabric remained intact after exposure to flame, whereas the<br />

untreated fabric used for comparison was completely destroyed.<br />

“What we’re investigating now is how well it will perform<br />

after repeated launderings of treated fabric,” says Brian. “After<br />

all, the coating contains clay, and that’s something detergents are<br />

made to remove.”<br />

Even if the coating does eventually wash out and the treated<br />

fabric loses its flame resistance, the nanotech approach could<br />

still be used to protect textiles and durable goods that aren’t<br />

frequently washed, such as upholstery, mattress pads, box spring<br />

covers, automotive interiors, and firefighter coats.<br />

Tapping silver’s antimicrobial properties<br />

On another nanotech front, Brian and CCUR engineer<br />

Sunghyun Nam are investigating a way to inhibit microbial<br />

growth in cotton using silver particles ranging in size from about<br />

two to six nanometers. Silver nanoparticles have been used as an<br />

antimicrobial agent in many products, including clothes, plastic<br />

food containers, and medical textiles. The methods of producing<br />

them, however, have mostly relied on the use of toxic agents and<br />

organic solvents.<br />

Brian’s team has explored an alternative approach using an<br />

environmentally friendly agent, polyethylene glycol, and water as<br />

a solvent to generate silver nanoparticles of the desired size. Brian<br />

and Nam reported on this method in the Journal of Nanoparticle<br />

Research together with engineer Dharnidhar Parikh, formerly<br />

with CCUR. Also under investigation is a new method by which<br />

the nanoparticles form directly on cotton fibre, eliminating<br />

handling and storage of the particles before application. “This<br />

is a leg up for cotton over the synthetics,” which have not been<br />

amenable to silver nanoparticle treatment, says Brian.<br />

Chemist Sunghyun Nam examines suspensions of<br />

silver nanoparticles. Fabrics can be treated with these<br />

nanoparticles to add antimicrobial qualities. (Photo SeChin Chang)<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 47


From nanotech to biotech<br />

The CCUR scientists have also been busy on the biotech front.<br />

In one project, CCUR chemist Vince Edwards, together with<br />

Brian, devised a treatment for impregnating nonwoven cotton<br />

fabrics with lysozyme, an enzyme that slices open the cell walls<br />

of microorganisms, killing them – including microbes that cause<br />

infection or odor. That same cell-slicing capacity may also be<br />

used for biodefense applications that deactivate nerve agents –<br />

essentially by chewing them up, or ‘hydrolyzing’ them, he adds.<br />

By adding the lysozyme to cottons, the resulting nonwovens<br />

could have these bactericidal and detoxifying properties.<br />

In another biotech project, Brian and CCUR chemist Michael<br />

Easson are experimenting with equipment that generates an<br />

ultrasonic field of mechanical energy (similar to that used to clean<br />

jewelry) to improve the biobased processing of raw, or ‘greige’,<br />

cotton using enzymes, like cellulase. Chemical processing agents<br />

are now used to strip away waxes, pectins, fats, and other fibre<br />

components that can hinder subsequent dying procedures and<br />

diminish the quality of finished cotton products. But the waste<br />

these ‘wet chemistry’ methods generate is a concern.<br />

“We’re interested in enzymes as an environmentally friendly<br />

alternative, and we found that subjecting a solution of the<br />

enzymes to a field of ultrasonic energy can speed up their<br />

reaction rates,” says Brian.<br />

In experiments with lint fibres, for example, use of ultrasonic<br />

energy increased the bioprocessing efficiency of cellulase by<br />

22 per cent. The same concept can also work to improve the<br />

conversion of cotton sugars into biofuels – a potential valueadded<br />

market for two million tonnes of US cotton gin waste<br />

generated annually.<br />

Besides publishing their findings in scientific journals, Brian’s<br />

team is actively seeking commercial partners to help usher these<br />

advances into the marketplace – all with an eye towards assuring<br />

the viability of America’s $25 billion cotton industry at a time<br />

of increasing production costs, dwindling resources, and global<br />

competition.<br />

This research is part of Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products, an ARS<br />

national program (#306) described at www.nps.ars.usda.gov.<br />

Brian Condon is in the USDA-ARS Cotton Chemistry Research Unit, Southern<br />

Regional Research Center, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124;<br />

(504) 286-4540, brian.condon@ars.usda.gov.<br />

This article was originally published in the Agricultural Research<br />

Magazine, April 2012.<br />

Using circadian<br />

rhythms to<br />

battle insects<br />

In recent years, scientists have begun to apply powerful genetic<br />

tools to the study of plant circadian rhythms. Researchers have<br />

found that as many as one-third of the genes in Arabidopsis<br />

thaliana – a widely studied species in plant biology – are activated<br />

by the circadian cycle. Rice biochemist Michael Covington<br />

found that some of these circadian-regulated genes were also<br />

connected to wounding responses.<br />

“We wondered whether some of these circadian-regulated<br />

genes might allow plants to anticipate attacks from insects,<br />

in much the same way that they anticipate the sunrise,” said<br />

Michael, now at the University of California, Davis.<br />

Danielle Goodspeed, a graduate student in biochemistry and<br />

cell biology, designed a clever experiment to answer the question.<br />

She used 12-hour light cycles to entrain the circadian clocks of<br />

both Arabidopsis plants and cabbage loopers, a type of caterpillar<br />

that eats Arabidopsis.<br />

Half of the plants were placed with caterpillars on a regular<br />

day-night cycle, and the other half were placed with ‘out-ofphase’<br />

caterpillars whose internal clocks were set to daytime<br />

mode during the hours that the plants were in nighttime mode.<br />

“We found that the plants whose clocks were in phase with<br />

the insects were relatively resistant, whereas the plants whose<br />

clocks were out of phase were decimated by the insects feeding<br />

on them,” Danielle said.<br />

Wassim Chehab, a Rice Faculty Fellow in biochemistry and cell<br />

biology, helped Goodspeed design a follow-up experiment to<br />

understand how plants used their internal clocks to resist insect<br />

attacks. Wassim and Danielle examined the accumulation of the<br />

hormone jasmonate, which plants use to regulate the production<br />

of metabolites that interfere with insect digestion.<br />

They found that Arabidopsis uses its circadian clock to increase<br />

jasmonate production during the day, when insects like cabbage<br />

loopers feed the most. They also found that the plants used<br />

their internal clocks to regulate the production of other chemical<br />

defenses, including those that protect against bacterial infections.<br />

“Jasmonate defenses are employed by virtually all plants,<br />

including tomatoes, rice and corn,” Wassim said. “Understanding<br />

how plants regulate these hormones could be important for<br />

understanding why some pests are more damaging than others,<br />

and it could help suggest new strategies for insect resistance.”<br />

Following flame exposure, the untreated fabric<br />

(top) is completely destroyed, but the fabric<br />

treated with clay nanoparticles is intact. (Photo Brian Condon)<br />

Rice University biologists Janet Braam, Danielle Goodspeed<br />

and Wassim Chehab, have worked with colleagues to show<br />

that plants use circadian rhythms to both anticipate raids<br />

by hungry insects and to time the production of defensive<br />

hormones that fend off such attacks.<br />

48 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


The good gear<br />

■■By Ian M. Johnston<br />

CLASSIC TRACTOR TALES<br />

Seven months after placing the order, I recently took<br />

delivery of a diesel fuelled European car equipped with<br />

one of these new high tech twin clutch semi-automatic<br />

transmissions. I have to admit, the brochure was right! The<br />

seamless gear changes can often only be detected by a<br />

close scrutiny of the rev counter.<br />

Mind you, I have been subjected to ridicule from a handful<br />

of my car club alleged mates, who persist with the belief that a<br />

real driver prefers to change gears manually. Yet put them in a<br />

1940s Austin truck, or my old 1928 Talbot, or better still – a 1920s<br />

Fordson Model F, with their soul destroying crash gearboxes and<br />

my car club compatriots would likely be in a state of extreme<br />

trepidation. But of course, no problems for we ageing tractor folk!<br />

Frankly, in the year 2012 I am surprised that anyone desires to<br />

own a modern family car with a manual-change gear box. After<br />

all, automatic transmissions have come a long way since the<br />

chewing gum autos of the 1960s.<br />

So having vented my views relating to car transmissions,<br />

predictively my thoughts now turn to tractors and the 20 forward<br />

and 12 reverse gears that I originally thought was an overkill in<br />

my Landini. But guess what – I use every one of them!<br />

But I can assure you, there were some wacky transmission<br />

designs in many of the early tractors.<br />

In the beginning<br />

Apart from a few experimental machines, internal combustion<br />

engined tractors commenced their irrevocable march across the<br />

rural landscape during the first decade of the 20th century. In<br />

the main they were obstreperous, clattering and often dangerous<br />

contraptions of mammoth proportions. The philosophy inherited<br />

from their steam powered cousins prevailed. In other words, it<br />

was believed the new generation oil powered tractors had to<br />

equate the weight and size of steam traction engines in order to<br />

be capable of pulling the broadacre implements of the era.<br />

For example, a tractor weighing around 10 tons with a huge<br />

but inefficient engine (by today’s standards) producing a mere<br />

20 hp, required at least half its power to simply propel the unit<br />

without a load.<br />

The transmissions of these first tractors were crude in the<br />

extreme. Rough castiron gears were exposed to mud and grit,<br />

with the resultant rapid deterioration one would expect. Few<br />

manufacturers considered the frivolous idea of encasing the gears<br />

and having them running in oil!<br />

Initially most tractors were only offered with one forward and<br />

one reverse gear, providing a plough speed of around two mph<br />

Eventually two forward speeds became the rule.<br />

Three examples of the more idiosyncratic early tractor<br />

transmissions are examined hereunder.<br />

International friction drive<br />

International Harvester’s first tractor was based on a design<br />

patented in 1903 by an engineer named Morton, who had<br />

established a factory in Chicago specialising in the design of<br />

tractor chassis and transmissions, to which customers could add<br />

an engine of their choice.<br />

The International marketing team saw this as a rapid way of<br />

entering the tractor business, thus bypassing much of the design<br />

development. All that was necessary was to adapt their well<br />

accepted single cylinder open crankshaft 15 hp Famous engine<br />

to the Morton chassis. The massive engine featured an 8 inch<br />

bore and 14 inch stroke and developed its 15 hp at 240 rpm, the<br />

speed being regulated by a hit-and-miss spark governor.<br />

But what made the big tractor technically fascinating was<br />

the method of delivering the power from the engine to both<br />

the forward and reverse drives. The operator was required to<br />

manipulate two large levers positioned by his left hand, the first of<br />

which actually moved the engine either forward or backward along<br />

the chassis, thus engaging the flywheel by friction to the forward<br />

drive. The second lever smoothly engaged the reverse drive.<br />

A 1906 International Friction Drive owned by Les Noll of<br />

Toowoomba. Note the crude chain steering. (Photo IMJ)<br />

The operator’s platform of an International Friction Drive.<br />

Note the cylinder head and the forward and reverse levers.<br />

(Photo IMJ)<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 49


Surprisingly the Friction Drive was a pleasure to operate,<br />

requiring very little physical effort compared to conventional<br />

power trains utilising the heavy clutch designs of the period. The<br />

action could be likened to that of a modern hydraulic shuttle<br />

control, such was the ease and smoothness of the operation.<br />

Ronaldson Tippett Super Drive<br />

The Victorian Ballarat firm of Ronaldson Bros. & Tippett<br />

introduced their Super Drive 18-30 in 1924. The design was<br />

based on the Illinois 18-30 produced in America by The Illinois<br />

Silo and Tractor Company of Bloomington. The unit was powered<br />

by a 30 hp Wisconsin engine, featuring four cylinders in two<br />

banks of two.<br />

Operating in Australia’s torrid summer weather the tractor<br />

immediately encountered over heating difficulties. The problem<br />

was overcome by increasing the capacity of the radiator. The<br />

modified tractors were instantly recognisable by the profile of the<br />

heightened radiator header tank.<br />

Interestingly, <strong>Australian</strong> engineers designed a special manifold<br />

which enabled the engine to be run on crude oil fuel, following<br />

the initial warm up with petrol. This added considerably to the<br />

appeal of the tractor, as crude oil was cheaper than petrol and<br />

even kerosene.<br />

But undoubtedly the most interesting feature of the Super<br />

Drive was its 96 speed gearbox! Well – potentially 96 gears.<br />

You see ostensibly the gear box provided two forward and one<br />

reverse speeds. But this could be augmented by first removing<br />

a cover on the left side of the transmission and swapping the<br />

position of two ‘pick-off’ gears. This now offered the choice of<br />

four forward and two reverse speeds.<br />

But that is not all. Ronaldson Tippett could supply an extensive<br />

range of ‘pick-off’ gears which, according to the operator’s<br />

manual, could provide no less than 48 speeds under 6.6 mph<br />

(The mind boggles!)<br />

But wait – there is more. A choice of two rear wheel diameters<br />

was also available. So if one does the maths, there were<br />

theoretically 96 forward and 48 rear speeds. Undoubtedly a<br />

world record for any type of transportation.<br />

The control of the clutch was also interesting. As the clutch<br />

was engaged, the engine revolutions were automatically<br />

increased. This was supposed to overcome the problem of the<br />

engine stalling when the clutch picked up the load. The downside<br />

was, the operator who was perched on a narrow wooden<br />

platform at the rear of the machine, had to really hang on as the<br />

machine jerked forward or be in serious risk of being jolted off –<br />

right in the path of the plough!<br />

Fortunately most of the Super Drives were sold to grain<br />

farmers whose agricultural land was relatively flat and accordingly<br />

seldom had to apply the horrendous braking system.<br />

If a gear was disengaged the brake would not operate!<br />

Think about it. Imagine a Super Drive negotiating a hill, either<br />

up or down, and it became necessary to change down to the<br />

lower gear. The perilous procedure would be to firstly apply<br />

the foot brake (there was no hand brake) with the hand clutch<br />

disengaged but the gear still engaged. Then, presumably with<br />

the aid of an offsider, a block would be placed against the wheel,<br />

preventing the tractor from taking off whilst the operator moved<br />

the gear shift through neutral and into the other gear. Scary<br />

stuff!<br />

Fowler rein drive<br />

In the 1920s the horse still reigned supreme on <strong>Australian</strong><br />

farms. Even the bargain basement price of a Fordson was<br />

not a sufficient inducement for the average farmer to retire<br />

his team to back paddock and invest in one of these new<br />

fangled intimidating tractors. I mean to say, one would have to<br />

comprehend the incomprehensible gearbox-clutch routine whilst<br />

wrestling with a steering wheel! And then there were all these<br />

leavers and do-dahs to worry about!<br />

On the other hand, it is a well known fact that the only<br />

controls necessary for the horse is a pair of reins. Such was the<br />

reasoning of the many farmers who were nervous of tractors.<br />

Then up sprung Cornelius Murname, a design engineer from<br />

Melbourne. He had a weird but clever idea of how to overcome<br />

this farmer resistance to the complications of driving a tractor.<br />

He presented his patents to John Fowler and Company of Leeds,<br />

England, who were in the business of manufacturing very large<br />

heavy weight tractors and thus were losing business to the<br />

multitudes of lighter machines that were becoming increasingly<br />

popular.<br />

In 1924 the Fowler Rein Drive was unveiled at The Royal<br />

Agricultural Show at Leicester, where it won a gold medal. But<br />

that was its one and only day of fame. It turned out that, in fact,<br />

farmers were not enamoured by the prospect of driving a tractor<br />

This magnificent specimen, being driven by the author, of a<br />

Ronaldson Tippett Super Drive has been restored by Master<br />

Restorer Newton Williams of The Pioneer Village Museum,<br />

Swan Hill. The cover for the pick-off gears can be seen just<br />

forward of the rear wheel. (Photo M. Daw)<br />

A Super Drive in full flight. Taken some years ago at<br />

a twilight tractor pull at the excellent North Western<br />

Agricultural Machinery Museum, Warracknabeal, Vic. (Photo IMJ)<br />

50 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


The extraordinary Fowler Rein Drive photographed outside<br />

the Pioneer Park Museum, Parkes, NSW.<br />

The operator’s platform of a Super Drive provides the<br />

opportunity to sit or stand. (Photo IMJ)<br />

solely by means of a pair of reins, because whilst the driver was<br />

obliged to be perched on a sort of trailing buggy or astride a<br />

trailed implement, a rope rein was the only contact he had with<br />

the tractor. Different tugs on either the left or right rein controlled<br />

the clutch, gearbox and steering.<br />

Considering the overall dimensions of the rig, it was powered<br />

by an engine of somewhat alarming proportions. It was a liquid<br />

cooled V twin configuration with a 5.75 x 7.5 inch bore and<br />

stroke and developed 32 hp at 1000 rpm. Designed by Fowler,<br />

it was virtually half an engine that was originally deployed for<br />

propelling a military tank.<br />

The accompanying illustration is of possibly the sole remaining<br />

Rein Drive and is on public display at the Pioneer Park Museum at<br />

Parkes, NSW. This rare exhibit was restored by Stewart Nash and<br />

is but one of scores of magnificent tractor artefacts lovingly cared<br />

for by a team of dedicated enthusiasts.<br />

A few years ago I was offered a drive of the Parkes Rein Drive.<br />

Despite the fact that I have been privileged to have operated<br />

untold numbers of weird old tractors around the world, this was<br />

the scariest I have ever encountered. I mean – a pair of reins!!!<br />

What if the rope broke?<br />

It is no small wonder that the Fowler Rein Drive was a<br />

commercial flop.<br />

Ian’s Mystery Tractor QUIZ<br />

Question: Can you identify this popular tractor of the 1930s?<br />

Clue: The colour is significant.<br />

Degree of difficulty: They don’t come any easier than this!<br />

Answer: See page 64.<br />

A Rein Drive hauling a seven ton load. (IMJ archives)<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 51


Germinating<br />

ideas<br />

■■By CSD Extension and Development Team<br />

In this edition of Germinating Ideas we will look at the dryland<br />

cotton production system and why it continues to grow.<br />

A number of key events have occurred in the cotton<br />

history that have made dryland cotton production accessible to<br />

many broadacre farmers. The keys have been in the introduction<br />

of new varieties with high yield and better quality and the<br />

introduction of transgenic traits.<br />

When comparing long term dryland yields and quality of<br />

Siokra V16BR, which was a consistent dryland performer from<br />

2003 to 2008, to the new varieties Sicala 340BRF, Sicot 74BRF<br />

and Sicot 71BRF, there are differences.<br />

Table 1: Dryland cotton varieties, yield and<br />

quality parameters over the past decade<br />

Siokra<br />

V16BR#<br />

Sicot<br />

71BRF*<br />

Sicala<br />

340BRF*<br />

Sicot<br />

74BRF*<br />

Yield 3.13 3.66 3.34 3.67<br />

Length 37 38 40 38<br />

Micronaire 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.4<br />

Trials 23 21 21 21<br />

#23 trials from 2003–08<br />

*Trials are not head to head comparison with Siokra 16BR<br />

*21 trials from 2010–11<br />

Yields have gone up and quality, particularly staple length, has<br />

got longer with new varieties. To the point where today we have<br />

a variety Sicala 340BRF that is consistently achieving lengths in<br />

dryland of 1.24 inches or manual grade of 40.<br />

This has allowed many growers the confidence that if they do<br />

grow dryland cotton, the industry has varieties that will fit the<br />

system without too many fibre quality discounts.<br />

The other innovation that has helped expand the area grown<br />

to dryland cotton is transgenic cotton. Growers find it much<br />

easier and simpler to grow dryland cotton because they do not<br />

have to worry about spraying for insects as much, due to Bollgard<br />

II technology. And most of the weed problems can be eliminated<br />

using Roundup Ready Flex technology.<br />

In the 1999 season, which up until the 2010 season was the<br />

largest dryland plant of around 110,000 hectares, insect pressure<br />

and resistance to the main chemical groups meant high costs<br />

for insect control which ultimately led to reduced dryland cotton<br />

acreages in subsequent years. Conventional cotton was around<br />

70 per cent of the industry and single gene Ingard cotton was at<br />

30 per cent.<br />

With the introduction of two gene Bollgard II cotton the<br />

number of insect sprays has dramatically dropped – in most cases<br />

heliothis are not being sprayed during the season. This is allowing<br />

growers to concentrate on getting timeliness of operations<br />

associated with planting, herbicide application, nutrition,<br />

defoliation and picking right. Better management in combination<br />

with better varieties and the transgenic technologies has resulted<br />

in higher yields and better fibre quality.<br />

Table 2: In crop cotton operations in dryland<br />

Average number of in-crop dryland operations 14 CSD<br />

Bollgard II dryland trials 2008 and 2009<br />

Groundrig insecticide for sucking pests 2.1<br />

Groundrig Roundup Ready herbicide 1.2<br />

Shielded sprayer – Roundup + residual 0.9<br />

Inter-row cultivation 0.6<br />

Chipping 0.1<br />

The keys in terms of dryland cotton management have not<br />

changed that much and but timeliness of operations has become<br />

more efficient. Importantly, the seven main rules that CSD has<br />

promoted over the past five years for success in dryland have<br />

remained unchanged.<br />

n Choose the right soil type<br />

Most dryland cotton is grown on self cracking clays and<br />

loams. These soil types give the crop the best opportunity<br />

in terms of cotton plant growth and typically have better<br />

moisture holding capacity.<br />

n Choose an appropriate variety for your region<br />

CSD has many years of trials comparing variety<br />

performance by region. The use of the Variety<br />

Performance Comparison Tool on the CSD website<br />

enables growers to assess the performance of varieties<br />

that best suit their situation (www.csd.net.au).<br />

n Plant on full soil moisture<br />

A full profile of moisture gives assurance to growers that<br />

the crop can grow through to the next rain fall event,<br />

which in some districts can be as long as January. It is a<br />

must, particularly in regions of reduced summer rainfall,<br />

such as in the western areas of the Namoi Valley.<br />

n Select a an appropriate row spacing<br />

Row spacing is very important in allowing the crop<br />

to grow to its full potential. Select a row spacing<br />

that represents the soil and climatic situation on your<br />

farm. Typically, the further west the wider the row<br />

configuration due to less rainfall and soils that have<br />

less water holding ability at depth. For example, soils at<br />

Moree can be 180 mm in depth compared to western<br />

Namoi soils of 130 mm. Moree grow double skip row<br />

configuration in many cases while western Namoi grows<br />

super single configuration.<br />

52 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Row spacing is very important in allowing the crop to grow<br />

to its full potential.<br />

n Create a good even plant stand<br />

The problem with having gaps through a plant stand<br />

in dryland is that there are also gaps due to the row<br />

configuration either side of the plant row. So a gappy<br />

stand combined with the skip row in dryland exacerbates<br />

yield loss. If the seed bed is not ideal, increase the<br />

planting rate to create an even stand.<br />

n Use stubble cover<br />

The use of stubble cover is a proven way of retaining soil<br />

moisture. The use of wheat stubble or millet has been<br />

used in the past to great effect and in many cases allows<br />

for good soil moisture at planting.<br />

n Use an experienced agronomist<br />

Having an experienced agronomist will help with key<br />

decisions through the season such as defoliation and<br />

insect control and they will help with advice on some<br />

of the important management decisions as mentioned<br />

above.<br />

By keeping to these simple rules this gives dryland cotton the<br />

best opportunity to maximise yield potential.<br />

New potential regions<br />

One of major questions that has been asked over the past<br />

couple of years is whether dryland cotton will have a fit into non<br />

traditional regions. Areas such as the Macquarie, Spring Ridge near<br />

Quirindi, western NSW – and there may even be a potential for<br />

dryland cotton in coastal regions due to the availability of rainfall.<br />

Some of these questions are currently being answered with<br />

farmer and CSD trials in many of these regions.<br />

The basics still remain the same but the main restriction in<br />

many of the cases is in season rainfall which determines effective<br />

yield in dryland.<br />

In the more traditional dryland regions we see significant<br />

rainfall falling in the summer. Further south and west, in-season<br />

rainfall is less, and more importantly, January and February rainfall<br />

is significantly less. This period of a crops life is very important<br />

as this is peak flowering and this period of the crops life will<br />

determine final yield.<br />

So if cotton is to grow in these regions where there is less<br />

rainfall it is important to keep to the rules of having a full profile<br />

of moisture at planting and have a row spacing that allows the<br />

plant to grow and survive to the next rainfall event. Effectively<br />

by increasing row spacing it is creating a bigger ‘bucket” for the<br />

crop to draw on from the soil. For example, a soil that is 150 mm<br />

deep on double skip row configuration has effectively 300 mm of<br />

soil to draw on for moisture. A similar soil depth on super single<br />

row configuration has 450 mm and a greater area for the roots<br />

to explore and draw moisture from.<br />

It must be remembered that the wider the row spacing places<br />

a cap on potential yield. In other words, solid row configuration<br />

has the best potential in terms of high yield and other<br />

configurations have lower yield potential due to the row spacing.<br />

But to grow cotton in areas with less in-season rainfall, it is a<br />

must to use the wider row spacings for insurance against hot dry<br />

periods through the season.<br />

Trial results will be available at the end of the season in these<br />

regions. For those growers contemplating growing dryland<br />

cotton it must be remembered that the most ideal situation is to<br />

have clean fallows with stubble cover with no residual group B<br />

or C herbicides in the soil. This has been one of the issues with<br />

first time growers who have already put down these residuals,<br />

effectively stopping them from growing cotton the next season.<br />

Figure 1: In-season rainfall across cotton growing regions<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 53


Cotton has a number of major benefits over other crops that<br />

make it very competitive:<br />

■■<br />

Cotton indeterminacy: The cotton plant, unlike wheat and<br />

sorghum, has a strong indeterminate growth pattern. It<br />

accumulates fruit and yield over a long flowering period. This<br />

is a major advantage as it allows the plant to benefit from<br />

rainfall when it eventually falls. The plant will continue to grow<br />

and put on fruit as long as it has moisture.<br />

■■<br />

Cotton’s taproot: Cotton has a strong tap root that will<br />

go looking for both moisture and nutrition. This is a benefit<br />

particularly with nutrition and moisture at depth where some<br />

crops with a fibrous root system will struggle to pick this up.<br />

■■<br />

Gross margin: The dryland cotton gross margin is consistently<br />

better over many years against sorghum and wheat and over<br />

60 per cent of the costs associated with growing cotton fall at<br />

the end season just before or just after payment from ginning<br />

(see Table 3).<br />

■■<br />

Cotton marketing: Cotton has a range of marketing tools<br />

that can be used to hedge against future volatility in market<br />

prices.<br />

For further information in relation to any of the new or current commercial<br />

dryland varieties please contact your local CSD Extension and<br />

Development Agronomist or visit the web site www.csd.net.au<br />

Table 3: Growing costs for dryland cotton<br />

Growing costs<br />

Cotton<br />

super single<br />

Cotton<br />

double skip<br />

Consultant $35 $35<br />

Planting $50 $60<br />

Weed and insects $182 $191<br />

Defoliation $30 $37<br />

Harvest/transport $185 $210<br />

Post crop $80 $80<br />

Technology licence $130 $198<br />

Total per hectare $692 $811<br />

news & new products<br />

Sharing cotton<br />

lessons with<br />

West Africa<br />

In a new partnership with sub-Saharan Africa, <strong>Australian</strong><br />

scientists and farmers have hosted a delegation of key African<br />

cotton industry representatives and researchers to share their<br />

knowledge and insight to help improve farming practices and<br />

thereby reduce poverty in West Africa.<br />

The <strong>Australian</strong> cotton industry has a world-wide reputation for<br />

its high yields and quality fibre and can offer vital assistance to West<br />

and Central Africa where cotton is an important income source.<br />

The largest cotton producing countries in the region are<br />

Chad, Benin, Mali and Burkina Faso (often called the Cotton-4<br />

countries). Six representatives from these countries have spent<br />

two weeks touring the cotton growing regions of Queensland<br />

and New South Wales with <strong>Australian</strong> scientists from the CSIRO,<br />

cotton industry representatives and farmers.<br />

Dr. Peter Carberry, Deputy Director of CSIRO’s Sustainable<br />

Agriculture flagship, said non-staple crops like cotton are<br />

extremely important for West Africa.<br />

“These crops provide small holder farmers with cash to either<br />

purchase food or buy farm inputs that can be used to grow<br />

other food crops like maize and sorghum. Cash crops also offer<br />

important income sources for things like school fees and medical<br />

expenses,” Peter said.<br />

Funded by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry<br />

and Fisheries (DAFF), through its International Agricultural<br />

Cooperation program, with support from Conservation Farmers<br />

Inc (CFI), the team exchanged lessons on how to improve West<br />

and Central Africa’s cotton production systems, particularly<br />

cotton seed production.<br />

“‘There are some important commonalities between the<br />

production systems in West and Central Africa and Australia.<br />

The crops we grow are similar and we both struggle with highly<br />

variable climates,” Peter said.<br />

Dr. Ousmane Ndoye, a researcher from Senegal and Program<br />

Manager from West and Central Africa’s CORAF/WECARD is<br />

excited by this partnership.<br />

“Australia has been able to overcome so many similar issues<br />

and is now the world’s third largest exporter of cotton, producing<br />

4.2 million bales of cotton in 2011, which is around double the<br />

Cotton-4 countries,” Ousmane said.<br />

“The team from West and Central Africa are keen to learn the<br />

lessons from Australia to really help our farmers understand how<br />

to improve their yields.<br />

“We took the group from Toowoomba to Narrabri, training<br />

on-farm with <strong>Australian</strong> farmers and industry representatives.<br />

We covered cotton agronomy based on the <strong>Australian</strong> Cotton<br />

Industry’s Best Management Practices, visited cotton seed<br />

production and storage facilities and engaged with cotton<br />

researchers at Myall Vale,” Michael Burgis, CEO of CFI, said.<br />

Ousmane is expecting big results. “After our visit to Australia,<br />

this small group will return to our respective countries and train<br />

at least 25 industry workers and farming representatives,”<br />

he said.<br />

54 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


A<br />

pilot project to enhance the job skills and employment<br />

rates of Aboriginal workers, while also boosting<br />

biodiversity on local farms, has been launched in<br />

the Narrabri district by the Cotton Catchment Communities<br />

Cooperative Research Centre (CRC).<br />

The CRC Cotton Trainee program will create farm based<br />

employment opportunities for local Aboriginal people as part of<br />

the industry’s commitment to ‘closing the gap’.<br />

The project has been made possible by funding from the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> Government’s Caring for our Country initiative, and<br />

aims to promote the conservation of biodiversity on cotton farms<br />

across the country. Aboriginal ‘Cotton Trainees’ will play a key<br />

role in implementing critical revegetation projects while building<br />

their skills in natural resource management.<br />

Trainees will take on environmental rehabilitation projects<br />

in local bushland and along rivers and creeks. They will also be<br />

trained through host farm placements in agricultural activities<br />

such as machinery maintenance, irrigation system operation, crop<br />

planting and harvesting.<br />

CRC Cotton Trainee George Lamb says working on the<br />

host farms has been far more enjoyable than other jobs and<br />

employment programs he’s been involved in, “There’s a big range<br />

of things to do on a farm so that it keeps the job interesting. It<br />

doesn’t get repetitive and monotonous.” Since the project began<br />

in February, George has already tried his hand at irrigating cotton<br />

and working with sheep, mustering, drenching and moving<br />

stock, and he’s revelling in the wide variety of work each day<br />

presents.<br />

“It’s challenging and interesting. Before I started I thought<br />

it would be just hard work. Instead it is hard work but it’s also<br />

interesting work and it keeps you motivated. This is heaps<br />

better than sitting around and not working.” George Lamb,<br />

Gus Mason, Shane Toomey, and Blake Hilderson are the first<br />

four recruits to take on the 12 month Cotton Traineeships<br />

course which will culminate in a Certificate II in Rural Production<br />

qualification.<br />

Sally Knight is the CRC’s liaison officer between trainees,<br />

TAFE, and host farmers, “It’s been wonderful to see how excited<br />

the boys are about starting work on local farms. They’re a<br />

great group and they’re enthusiasm has been matched by the<br />

host farms who’ve welcomed the boys in to their workplaces.”<br />

The Sydney University Wheat Breeding Institute, the <strong>Australian</strong><br />

Cotton Research Institute and Cotton Seed Distributors farming<br />

operation have all taken on trainees. The host farms have been<br />

fully supported by the CRC with trainee wages subsidised<br />

through the Caring for our Country initiative and administered by<br />

the Narrabri Local Aboriginal Land Council.<br />

Sally Knight believes the project will have multiple beneficial<br />

outcomes, “These young men will become role models for their<br />

peers. With the increase in mining and full water storages in the<br />

irrigation sector boosting crop prospects, the trainees are gaining<br />

qualifications that will give them a stake in a very competitive<br />

labour market.<br />

“They’re also leading the way for their friends and family to<br />

see agriculture as a viable career path. If we can skill up and<br />

news & new products<br />

Aboriginal cotton trainees start<br />

work in Narrabri<br />

mobilise a largely untapped labor force, this can be a win-win for<br />

everyone in the community from local Aboriginal families looking<br />

for economic security to rural businesses struggling with labour<br />

shortages,” explained Sally.<br />

Training is provided by the TAFE NSW New England Institute<br />

as part of a flexible program negotiated with the host farm<br />

businesses to ensure trainees are in the workplace when they’re<br />

needed most.<br />

The CRC Cotton Traineeship pilot is not only increasing the<br />

supply of skilled workers for the agricultural sector, it’s also<br />

designed to improve environmental biodiversity and on farm<br />

sustainability. The Namoi Catchment Management Authority is<br />

assisting with the planning and management of revegetation and<br />

rehabilitation strategies to be undertaken by trainees.<br />

The CRC welcomes the tremendous support the project<br />

has already received, and would like to thank the many local<br />

companies and organisations who have been part of the project<br />

including Joblink Plus which has taken on the recruitment process<br />

in Narrabri and the <strong>Australian</strong> Business Ltd Apprenticeships<br />

Centre in Moree which assisted with implementation of the new<br />

traineeship program.<br />

“This is a unique opportunity for farm businesses to access<br />

additional workers and be part of a pilot driven by local people to<br />

build the capacity of the local labour market,” said Jane Trindall,<br />

Catchment Programme Leader with the Cotton Catchment<br />

Communities CRC.<br />

For young people in the local Aboriginal community the<br />

traineeships offer the chance to gain skills and experience and a<br />

nationally recognised qualification in agriculture and in natural<br />

resource management, both industries with strong job demand.<br />

For trainees like George Lamb, the project has already proven<br />

to be extremely valuable.<br />

George says work in the farm sector is now definitely a career<br />

path he’d like to pursue, “By far this is the most useful and<br />

interesting course I’ve ever done.” <br />

Lyn Trindall (CEO Narrabri Aboriginal Land Council), Jane<br />

Trindall (Cotton CRC), George Lamb – front (Trainee), Blake<br />

Hilderson (Trainee), Gus Mason (Trainee), Shane Toomey<br />

(Trainee), and Verity Gett (TAFE Trainer).<br />

train young indigenous people living in towns like Narrabri, and<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 55


news & new products<br />

Crop Cruiser offers new adjustable<br />

track width<br />

Customer demand for a durable, self propelled sprayer<br />

with adjustable wheel track width to accommodate for<br />

varying cropping demands has seen GoldAcres develop a<br />

new version of its popular Crop Cruiser Evolution range.<br />

The ‘on-the-go’ wheel track adjustment system allows Crop<br />

Cruiser operators to move between different crops and cropping<br />

systems adjusting wheel track width effortlessly.<br />

Croppers or contractors can widen the wheel tracks to suit<br />

three metre centre controlled traffic programs before bringing the<br />

track width in to two metres for other applications.<br />

Adjustable wheel track width is available as an option on<br />

GoldAcres’ Crop Cruiser Evolution 2WD models.<br />

GoldAcres engineering manager, Roger Richards said the<br />

development came as a result of customer feedback – particularly<br />

from mixed croppers and contractors in northern NSW and<br />

Queensland.<br />

“Cotton growers need the wheel track width set at narrow<br />

2.0 metre spacings while cereal cropping programs are generally<br />

looking for 3.0 metre wheel track centres.<br />

“In many cases spraying contractors are switching between<br />

crops every day and the call for an adjustable axle machine was<br />

heard by GoldAcres loud and clear,” Roger said.<br />

“The technology allows the operator to set wheel track widths<br />

at either two metres, or three metres fully extended, at the press<br />

of a button without leaving the cabin,” he said.<br />

“The system is completely hydraulically controlled and<br />

functions as the sprayer is travelling, working seamlessly with the<br />

Crop Cruiser Evolution’s air bag suspension and enclosed double<br />

reduction chain drive system.<br />

“There’s no loss of operating power and operators require as<br />

little as 50 metres for a full track width change to occur on-the-go.”<br />

Fitted as an option on 2WD, two wheel steer Crop Cruiser<br />

Evolution models, the extendable wheel track system does not<br />

interfere with the Crop Cruiser’s turning circle. Available tyres<br />

sizes are 13.6R48 or 14.9R46.<br />

Adjustable track width will be welcome by farmers and<br />

contractors alike looking for an <strong>Australian</strong> built machine that is<br />

noted for its combination of durability and precision performance.<br />

“GoldAcres’ Crop Cruiser Evolution’s have been in strong<br />

demand on the back of their reliability,” Roger Richards said.<br />

“They are a heavy duty construction but with a competitive<br />

tare weight that is designed to offer a long service life whether<br />

used by contractors or farmers.<br />

“Complementing the durability is the new Euro style cabin<br />

which delivers day-long operator comfort for extended shifts and<br />

is fitted with the latest sprayer control technology.”<br />

The extendable wheel track Crop Cruiser Evolution retains<br />

all other features of the range including a 3500 litre main tank<br />

and GoldAcre’s class leading TriTech boom system which delivers<br />

increased boom stability and yaw control.<br />

The TriTech boom is available to 36 metres and delivers<br />

ultimate strength and durability with unmatched stability for<br />

precision spray application. The TriTech’s three-way suspension<br />

dampens pitch, roll and yaw forces and the boom can be fitted<br />

with options including Ultraglide, Rapidfire and Rapidflow to<br />

further improve spraying efficiency.<br />

“We’ve managed to retain all the features the Crop Cruiser<br />

Evolution mechanical drive system offers and combine it with the<br />

flexibility operators and contractors have been calling for in an<br />

extendable track width package,” Roger said.<br />

“The Crop Cruiser ultimately delivers a powerful, stable and<br />

comfortable platform to ensure spray application programs are<br />

carried out with high level efficiency.<br />

“Combined with our product service and support farmers and<br />

contractors alike can rely on GoldAcres to deliver results without<br />

risk.”<br />

For further information phone 1300 301 853 or see goldacres.com.au<br />

Crop Cruiser Evolution 5236.<br />

The extendable wheel track system.<br />

56 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Five-star deal<br />

With farm production tipped to rise another 4.2 per<br />

cent this financial year and profits expected to be<br />

positive in all States for the first time in more than 30<br />

years according to observations from the ABARES Outlook 2012<br />

conference, Case IH is making it easier for farmers considering<br />

purchasing a new Quadtrac, Steiger or Magnum tractor to get<br />

into their new machine sooner.<br />

All of these new model tractors are being offered with zero<br />

per cent finance rate fixed for five years, $5000 worth of free<br />

diesel fuel and a five-year/2500-hour REDCover Warranty for a<br />

limited time.<br />

“Lots of farmers have held off upgrading their equipment due<br />

to the recent floods we’ve seen in some states,” said Case IH<br />

Tractor Product Manager, Tim Fanning.<br />

“With conditions finally looking up, it was an ideal time for<br />

Case IH to take some of that pressure off growers by making it<br />

easier to upgrade – and just in time for seeding.<br />

“The zero per cent finance rate is fixed for five years, giving<br />

customers the peace of mind that they won’t be affected by<br />

rising interest rates. Plus there’s no balloon payment, so at the<br />

end of the five-year period, the tractor is paid off entirely.”<br />

Tim added the constantly rising cost of inputs makes the<br />

$5000 free diesel fuel offer very attractive.<br />

“In this economic climate, every little bit helps. Putting diesel<br />

in the tank is one way we can make a difference,” he said.<br />

“The addition of the five-year/2,500 hour REDCover Warranty,<br />

further ensures growers can feel completely confident that their<br />

investment in a new Case IH high horsepower tractor will return<br />

dividends.”<br />

The recently-released high horsepower tractors include five<br />

new model Magnums, 10 Steiger models and four Quadtrac<br />

models. The range includes the most powerful Case IH tractors<br />

ever offered: the Magnum 340 at 340 engine Hp (389 peak Hp)<br />

and the Steiger and Quadtrac 600 at 608 engine Hp (670 peak<br />

Hp).<br />

“In recent Nebraska tests, field days and customer Ride and<br />

Drive days, the Quadtrac, Steiger and Magnum tractors have<br />

proven they are the ideal workhorses for <strong>Australian</strong> conditions,<br />

standing head and shoulders above the rest,” said Tim.<br />

The new Quadtrac 600, is among the range of Quadtrac,<br />

Steiger and Magnum tractors being offered with zero per<br />

cent fixed finance rate for five years, five-years REDCover<br />

Warranty and $5000 free diesel fuel.<br />

news & new products<br />

Covering round<br />

bale problems<br />

After listening to cotton growers and cotton gin<br />

managers, Polytex has come up with another innovation<br />

that is needed by all cotton growers and cotton ginning<br />

companies who are producing and processing round bales.<br />

Many will have experienced the problems of handling a<br />

round bale when the initial film cover starts giving way. This may<br />

happen in the handling either in the field or at the gin.<br />

For the grower in the field, once the cover gives way<br />

completely it is an arduous process to hand feed the loose cotton<br />

back through the picker. The Polytex emergency Ratch-e-tarp<br />

for round bales can be used by the grower only when there is a<br />

problem with the initial film cover. The round bale Ratch-e-tarp is<br />

placed over the bale before the split or damaged film can let go<br />

and is ratcheted up tight, holding the cotton in place so the bale<br />

can be transported to the gin without further problem.<br />

For the gin manager the same applies. Damage can happen<br />

to the round bale film at the gin site, again creating a major<br />

problem of handling the bales.<br />

For the gin site, covers are available to suit single bales or four<br />

in a row which is needed when there are splits in a bale within a<br />

row.<br />

The emergency cover not only retains the shape of a split<br />

cover but also protects the cotton in the event of rain.<br />

As with the original Ratch-e-tarp, the round bale Ratch-e-tarp<br />

utilises webbing and ratchets to tightly tension the cover in place.<br />

Ratch-e-tarps are available from the manufacturer Polytex.<br />

Climate science<br />

for the paddock<br />

Advisors and grain growers who want information on<br />

climate and agriculture research and news now have it<br />

in one place – Australia’s first climate and agriculture<br />

blog, Agri Climate Culture, www.agriclimateculture.com.au<br />

Climate variability increasingly challenges the agricultural sector<br />

in Australia. The Agri Climate Culture blog brings together the<br />

latest research, news and discussions on a single site.<br />

“This blog is another tool for growers to manage their<br />

farm resources and stay profitable,” says John Harvey, GRDC<br />

Managing Director. “As the climate becomes more variable,<br />

we’re working with growers to give them tools to stay dynamic<br />

and build their knowledge.” Launched by the Grains Research<br />

and Development Corporation, Agri Climate Culture features<br />

new research and research updates from GRDC, CSIRO, DAFF<br />

and other research organisations.<br />

It also features local and international news stories, videos,<br />

proposal calls for adaptation and mitigation projects, and updates<br />

on the Climate Champion farmer program.<br />

Users are encouraged to share their views and comments on<br />

the site as part of an ongoing discussion between other<br />

farmers, advisors and researchers. <br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 57


Bender160<br />

released for<br />

centre pivots<br />

Valley Irrigation, the leader in precision irrigation,<br />

continues to offer growers more options that will help<br />

them be more profitable with the land they already have.<br />

Valley recently released the Bender160 product for centre pivots<br />

to the international marketplace.<br />

For an economical cost, the Bender160 can increase the<br />

number of irrigated hectares in a field. With the Bender160, a<br />

grower can easily avoid a tree, building, or other obstacle in the<br />

field, allowing for maximum irrigated land.<br />

The Valley Bender160 easily retrofits to existing centre pivots,<br />

though minor structural changes to the centre pivot are required.<br />

More than one Bender160 unit, as well as in combination with<br />

the Bender30, can be installed in multiple locations on the same<br />

centre pivot.<br />

“The Bender160 is designed to provide growers with flexibility<br />

to maximise their irrigated hectares in oddly shaped fields<br />

with obstacles,” explained Wade Sikkink, Equipment Product<br />

Manager. “The innovative design of the Bender160 allows for<br />

continual monitoring of the machine angle while bending, which<br />

enables growers to control auxiliary functions and end guns.<br />

This exclusive feature from Valley Irrigation gives growers more<br />

options to make sure they are getting the most out of their land<br />

and investment in centre pivot irrigation.”<br />

“This product is yet another example of the choices Valley<br />

Irrigation offers to growers,” said Scott Mauseth, International<br />

Product Manager. “The Bender160 will allow growers in the<br />

international markets to irrigate areas that were not always<br />

reachable with a standard centre pivot.”<br />

With the focus on precision irrigation, Valley Irrigation<br />

continues to outperform the competition by offering an exclusive<br />

speed-up timer function, which comes standard with both the<br />

Bender30 and Bender160. This feature improves a centre<br />

pivot’s water application while bending.<br />

news & new products<br />

A year to<br />

remember<br />

National recycling program drumMUSTER continues to<br />

shatter its own records, with two million agvet chemical<br />

containers disposed of in the past year.<br />

This is an unprecedented milestone for the container<br />

management stewardship program that works in partnership<br />

with more than 750 shire councils around Australia. National<br />

Program Manager Allan McGann said the achievement was a real<br />

testament to the hard work put in by all of its program partners<br />

and those involved with the program.<br />

“We are delighted to have collected our two millionth<br />

container in the past year,” he said.<br />

“We have been keeping a close eye on our returns tally and<br />

to achieve this just a few months after collecting our 18 millionth<br />

container since the program started back in 1998 makes it even<br />

more satisfying. It’s all down to the dedication of our program<br />

users around the nation and the terrific work done by all of our<br />

program representatives.”<br />

Since the service first formed in late 1998, it has helped keep<br />

well over 23,000 tonnes of potentially-hazardous materials out<br />

of landfill and hopes are high that the 20 millionth container<br />

milestone will be reached by the end of 2012. Once the plastic<br />

or steel containers are brought in, they are transformed into<br />

practical items such as wheelie bins, road signs and park benches.<br />

Manufacturers nation-wide have also embraced the initiative,<br />

with 93 companies now on board with drumMUSTER.<br />

Most pleasing for Allan is the significant improvement in<br />

return rates and the increased number of deliveries, providing<br />

further proof that the program is providing an essential and<br />

valued service to the rural industry.<br />

“Our return rates are looking great, the figures indicate we<br />

have collected around 120,000 more containers than at the same<br />

time last year. It’s a really pleasing result and it’s extremely fitting<br />

that it’s been achieved in this, the <strong>Australian</strong> Year of the Farmer!”<br />

To find your nearest drumMUSTER collection site, call 1800 008 707 or<br />

head online at www.drummuster.com.au<br />

The Bender160 can increase the number of irrigated hectares<br />

in a field.<br />

58 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Southern Europe/Mediterranean (Aug–Sep)<br />

2012<br />

Farm<br />

Study<br />

Tours<br />

Canada (Calgary Stampede)/New England (USA) (July)<br />

Africa and Argentina Four Nations Rugby<br />

(September/October)<br />

For more than 19 years <strong>Greenmount</strong><br />

Travellers have criss-crossed the globe<br />

visiting amazing agricultural, geographical<br />

and cultural destinations in China, Russia,<br />

South & North Americas, Canada, India,<br />

Tibet, Africa, Eastern & Western Europe,<br />

Scandinavia, United Kingdom, SE Asia,<br />

Japan, The Kimberleys and Nuigini.<br />

We know where to go – and have<br />

established excellent farming and<br />

agribusiness contacts. We also have<br />

valuable experience in dealing with the<br />

unique challenges ‘out of the square’ travel<br />

presents. This ensures our tours are well<br />

organised and are expertly guided by local,<br />

trusted operators and our own experienced<br />

<strong>Greenmount</strong> Travel guides.<br />

Asian Odyssey – Indochina/China/Tibet (Jul–Aug)<br />

Express your interest by giving us a call<br />

on 07 4659 3555 or<br />

email travel@greenmountpress.com.au<br />

or visit www.greenmounttravel.com.au<br />

Licence No. ABN 57085 828011<br />

TAG 1608 IATA 96-804831<br />

Ph: 07 4659 3555<br />

www.greenmounttravel.com.au<br />

E: travel@greenmountpress.com.au<br />

Fax: 07 4638 4520


District Reports…<br />

Central Queensland<br />

Picking is well underway across Central Queensland. With the<br />

Dawson/Callide about 50 per cent through picking and Central<br />

Highlands almost three quarters finished, the irrigated crops are<br />

again looking at a bit of a mixed bag finish.<br />

Central Highlands picking commenced in earnest in mid<br />

March with about half the crop picked before more than 150<br />

mm of rain over five days caused some flooding, cut roads, and<br />

held up picking until just before Easter.<br />

Despite extended periods of wet and cloudy conditions in late<br />

January and February, average yields in this early picked cotton<br />

were about 7.5 to 8.6 bales per hectare (3–3.5 bales per acre) with<br />

reports that a couple of fields have gone in excess of 9.5 bales per<br />

hectare. But estimated yields are highly variable, as some crops<br />

appear to have been more affected by this early weather. Yield and<br />

quality are likely to have been further affected by this latest rain.<br />

The Dawson/Callide managed to escape some of the heavy<br />

rain, and early yields are coming in between 8.6–9.9 bales per<br />

hectare (3.5–4 bales per acre). Quality grades are holding up,<br />

even despite the rain. Yields across all areas have been helped<br />

along by turnouts of as high as 46 per cent, and averaging just<br />

above 40 per cent.<br />

Dryland cotton has also been a mixed result for Central<br />

Queensland. Despite another wet season, some farms missed<br />

the storm rain before Christmas and had to spray their dryland<br />

cotton out. Flooding, particularly along the Mackenzie, also<br />

further affected some dryland. Phenoxy spray drift continues to<br />

be a concern across Central Queensland and a number of crops<br />

were unfortunately affected.<br />

Despite these issues, the wet finish has meant there is some<br />

extremely good looking dryland crops around. After a break from<br />

cotton of more than 10 years, some farms are now looking at<br />

possibly a second outstanding cotton crop in as many years.<br />

Susan Maas<br />

April 10, 2012<br />

St George and Dirranbandi<br />

I sit here rugged up in three jumpers and jackets trying to stay<br />

warm due to a howling southerly and the fact that my wife has<br />

turned into a carbon tax dictator with responses such as “you<br />

don’t need the heater on think of the extra carbon tax you’ll be<br />

paying in a couple of months!” All this considering two days ago<br />

on Easter Sunday we were water skiing and enjoying 33ºC days.<br />

How quickly the seasons change!<br />

Talking of changing seasons, although this season has been<br />

very similar to the previous 2010–11 season, the end result has<br />

been completely different. Unfortunately it is shaping up as one<br />

growers will most likely prefer to forget.<br />

The heavy rains and floods during late November and<br />

early December certainly inflicted some yield losses from the<br />

lower crop but by January crops appeared to be back on track<br />

for a moderate to high yield with large numbers of squares<br />

accumulating. The rain and a cooler summer meant that we were<br />

about two weeks behind an average season on day degrees.<br />

Crops by early January were carrying a heavy load of fruit<br />

and certainly had the potential to compensate for the earlier<br />

losses. Insect activity had been very low with most farms this year<br />

averaging one spray for mirids and generally one for mites and<br />

aphids. The cooler, wet summer ensured that whitefly were not<br />

an issue this season with few farms having to treat for this pest.<br />

From talking to Phil Glover, the “Admiral Mountain” still retains a<br />

reasonable height and size.<br />

As mentioned, fields appeared to be on track for a reasonably<br />

high yield until the flooding (literally) rains and 10 days of cool,<br />

overcast, cloudy weather struck on January 28. Within days the<br />

tail drains of fields were swollen with squares and small bolls as<br />

the plant aborted as much fruit as possible. It was quite common<br />

to find 3 to 4 nodes of fruit missing near the top of the plant.<br />

Another symptom caused by the rain and floods was that a<br />

number of crops cut out prematurely and then in late February<br />

discovered a pile of nitrogen further down in the profile. So we<br />

now have a large number of fields that have about 40 cm of<br />

regrowth on the top of the plant which appears as a dirty brown<br />

stem with the white cotton hidden well below.<br />

Obviously this has impacted yields. Last year we were<br />

fortunate to have a dry January, February, March and April<br />

which allowed the crops to be irrigated on time and grow a high<br />

yielding finish. Where last year’s yields averaged between 4.3 and<br />

5.3 with farm averages of 4.8, this year is shaping up to be very<br />

different. As I type, Dirranbandi is approximately 50–60 per cent<br />

picked whilst St George is a little later at 20–25 per cent picked<br />

with the bulk of the St George crop starting this week.<br />

Considering the gins are only just starting, ginned yields are<br />

still unknown but indications are that yields will range from 3.5<br />

bales per acre to 4.5 bales per acre with anything around the 4<br />

bale mark being very pleasing.<br />

As one grower whose glass is obviously half full commented,<br />

“at least we have water for another two seasons.” With fields<br />

already being slashed, mulched and centre busted it’s probably<br />

best to look forward to the next season and a few quite beers at<br />

the Cotton Conference.<br />

Dallas King<br />

April 10, 2012<br />

District Reports<br />

are proudly supported by<br />

60 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


Border Rivers<br />

We’re starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel as the<br />

first farms in the district get defoliated. As we look at crops in<br />

the mid-stages of boll opening it becomes painfully obvious that<br />

the cloudy, wet period from late January to mid-February has<br />

reduced the yield potential of all crops and synchronised a lot<br />

of the maturity which is going to be logistically challenging for<br />

harvest.<br />

The cloudy, wet conditions in early February provided ideal<br />

conditions for sclerotinia in crops in the Texas and Bonshsw<br />

area.<br />

District Reports…<br />

Since the clouds disappeared in mid-February, we have<br />

had about five weeks of mostly ideal growing conditions. We<br />

expected crops would compensate from all the fruit they shed<br />

during this time by loading on a good top crop, but generally this<br />

has not been the case with the plant continuing to abort bolls,<br />

and many of those that stuck were parrot-beaked or small.<br />

Later-planted crops suffered more from this period – and<br />

now have a large window through the normally productive midsection<br />

of the crop. Earlier planted crops had generally set a good<br />

early crop and lost some of the top bolls.<br />

Dryland crops look particularly good this year with some with<br />

the potential to reach four to five bales per hectare.<br />

This season has thrown up a couple of new issues. In late<br />

January we started observing broad mites in the occasional crop<br />

and by early February they were at treatable levels in areas.<br />

Where control was delayed, they caused heavy leaf distortion and<br />

more worryingly, the failure to set young bolls on the affected<br />

branches.<br />

The cloudy and wet weather in January brought on high levels<br />

of Sclerotinia to crops in the Texas and Bonshaw area. It started<br />

in the first flowers and when the petals dropped on lower parts<br />

of the plant it infected bottom branches and moved from there.<br />

In the worst cases it resulted in the loss of the bottom five nodes<br />

of bolls and the death of plants from ring-barking. Initially it was<br />

more common in fields with a legume history but in the end, it<br />

was found in almost all fields.<br />

Generally the problem was worst in tall sections of fields. It<br />

took several weeks of warm weather and reduced irrigation to<br />

halt the disease but it has reduced yield and delayed maturity in<br />

many crops.<br />

Verticillium wilt became apparent in several crops during the<br />

cool weather in late January.<br />

Pest-wise, green vegetable bug have been problematic in the<br />

eastern end of the region with the lack of selective insecticides<br />

for their control being a real frustration. Mites generally have<br />

been common post-Christmas, particularly on the eastern end<br />

of the area. In several crops there were two-spotted mite, brown<br />

bean mite and broad mites all jostling for positions on the same<br />

leaf. Aphids have built up late in the season across the whole<br />

district and have required control.<br />

Whitefly increased rapidly in mid February after the rain<br />

stopped but mostly only reached treatable levels in the western<br />

part of the district.<br />

Defoliation of the first blocks only started in mid-March so we<br />

will be lucky if there’s much picking done during March. These<br />

early blocks are few and far between. At best guess, the bulk of<br />

crops will be ready for harvest in the last two weeks of April and<br />

the first week of May which will be a challenge for contractors<br />

and those relying on them.<br />

At this early stage, there won’t be any record-breaking<br />

irrigated yields – the cloud in January making sure of this. The<br />

dryland results will be worth waiting for as there are some<br />

outstanding crops out there.<br />

David Kelly<br />

March 23, 2012<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 61


District Reports…<br />

Darling Downs<br />

Weather conditions on the Downs leading into harvest have<br />

been close to ideal. Dry warm weather has helped finish the late<br />

crop and allowed growers to desiccate early crops in a timely<br />

manner.<br />

Good crops and spraying conditions combined with some<br />

premature senescence has resulted in excellent desiccation and<br />

clean picking. Quality looks very good, the colour is bright and<br />

trash content is low. Ginning hadn’t started when writing this<br />

report so it is too early to report turnout and quality results at this<br />

stage.<br />

Picking of the dryland crop is well underway and a general<br />

comment from several consultants and growers is that the<br />

yields are, if anything, slightly better than expected. Early yield<br />

estimates indicate that most crops are averaging between 1.5 to<br />

2.0 bales per acre.<br />

It appears that the southern Downs yields are lower, with<br />

some crops yielding around one bale per acre. Given the dry<br />

condition through a large proportion of the season this was to be<br />

expected. On the other hand, yields in the high twos have been<br />

reported. The irrigated crop is a few weeks behind the dryland<br />

crop and there have only been a few early crops picked at this<br />

stage.<br />

The annual Cecil Plains grower group field walk held on March<br />

24 was well attended by many growers and service providers.<br />

Growers were able to look at a variety of crops, trials and<br />

production systems. Guest speakers covered a number of issues<br />

including Fusarium, cotton bunchy top, crop nutrition issues,<br />

soil compaction and subsoil constraints, 80 inch limited irrigated<br />

cotton, variety trials and soybean rotation crops. Growers have<br />

received a copy of the new Cotton Symptoms Guide, a glove<br />

box size, easy to read publication, produced by the Cotton CRC<br />

which assists growers and consultants identify problems within a<br />

cotton crop based on visual symptoms<br />

Duncan Weir<br />

April 11, 2012<br />

Gwydir Valley<br />

The Gwydir valley growers and consultants are finally starting<br />

to put to bed the 2011–12 cotton crop, with the first defoliation<br />

starting in the second and third week of March. Picking will likely<br />

commence in April but there may be a few crops ready to go<br />

prior to this. The majority of the crop will be picked late April and<br />

into May with some stragglers pushing out further into the year.<br />

Recovery from the flood has been encouraging. Crops have<br />

responded well to near average conditions and have been able<br />

to put some late fruit on. It will be interesting to see how long<br />

the good conditions persist to finish of some of this late fruit. But<br />

it would have been nice to have a couple more months of kind<br />

weather to take advantage of this late spurt in crop growth.<br />

Across the valley there is going to be quite a wide range in<br />

yields. There are some crops which look extremely good at this<br />

stage of the season, while flood water has played havoc with<br />

others and these fields are being kept to salvage whatever is<br />

possible before turning them around for next season.<br />

Post flood there was quite a spike of whitefly infestations<br />

on all crops, including dryland. Such a rapid buildup was<br />

quite unexpected, as it is contrary to the climatic conditions<br />

experienced and our knowledge of whitefly life cycles. It<br />

is surmised that there was a large population out in the<br />

surrounding countryside which migrated into cotton fields as<br />

flood water inundated areas outside levees.<br />

Apart from the high whitefly numbers, heliothis pressure has<br />

been light, but aphids and green vegetable bugs have been a<br />

persistent thorn in many sides all season.<br />

As crops have started to fill bolls there has been a marked<br />

increase in the incidence of Verticillium and Fusarium wilt in<br />

crops. It has been a very good year for disease, with a cool start<br />

favouring black root rot and other seedling diseases, stressed<br />

crops through waterlogging and a very mild summer adding to<br />

problems right across the valley.<br />

Dryland crops unaffected by flooding inundation look<br />

extremely good and are expected to yield very well.<br />

James Quinn<br />

March 24, 2012<br />

Namoi Valley<br />

The crop in the Namoi is still running about two weeks later<br />

than normal. Defoliation of a few early crops has begun but<br />

the bulk of the crop will not be ready for defoliation before<br />

mid April. Mild late season conditions have helped irrigated<br />

crops recover a bit of yield but the lack of rain in most parts of<br />

the Namoi has reduced dryland crop yields by up to a bale per<br />

hectare. Picking should be in full swing by late April.<br />

As we move into autumn the weather has settled into a<br />

typical pattern of warm days and cool nights. We will need this<br />

sort of weather for the next few months to get the crop off.<br />

It’s too early to predict yields accurately. Crops have reasonable<br />

boll numbers but the bolls are smaller this year. I expect the valley<br />

average irrigated yield will be about 3.6 bales per acre in the<br />

lower Namoi and 3.5 in the upper Namoi. Dryland yields are well<br />

above average and should range from 1.3 bales per acre through<br />

to a few exceeding 3.5 in the upper Namoi.<br />

Late season insect numbers increased quite a bit from a very<br />

quiet start. Mirids, green vegetable bugs, aphids and mites all<br />

increased in number and generally required one or two sprays<br />

to control them. Whitefly numbers also increased significantly<br />

during February and March. Most of the population appeared to<br />

fly in from neighbouring pastures and weedy fallows rather than<br />

building up on the cotton itself. About 20 per cent of the crop<br />

has received a spray for whitefly. Late season Spodotera were<br />

also present in a few crops. Heliothis numbers have remained<br />

quite low right to the end of the season.<br />

The 2011–12 season has been the year of disease. Verticillium<br />

has devastated a few crops and is present in nearly all Namoi<br />

crops that have a history of growing cotton. Other diseases that<br />

have rarely been seen in cotton such as Sclerotinia and botrytis<br />

have caused severe but isolated damage, particularly under<br />

centre pivots in the upper Namoi. Hot dry conditions over the<br />

past month have put disease on hold but individual losses are<br />

significant.<br />

Water supplies for next season are very good. Keepit is still<br />

over 98 per cent full and Split Rock is over 80 per cent full.<br />

Ground water extractions have been much lower than normal<br />

62 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012


District Reports…<br />

Many crops are being defoliated by ground rigs in order to get<br />

coverage and penetration of thick canopies using higher water<br />

volumes.<br />

Spraying for green vegetable bugs continues as they are still<br />

causing damage to bolls.<br />

Day degrees are behind average due to cool and cloudy<br />

conditions over most of the summer period.<br />

Disease issues have been a real concern. Sclerotinia boll rot<br />

has been identified and has required treatment in some fields.<br />

It has been a symptom of the cool moist conditions within<br />

the canopy. There were delays with getting mepiquat chloride<br />

applied due to bad weather and this caused excessive canopy<br />

growth which has added to the incidence of disease.<br />

The Macquarie field day was due to be held on March 8 but<br />

had to be postponed due to the wet weather. It is now on April<br />

12 in the Warren area.<br />

Water releases from Burrendong are now being reduced to<br />

around 5000 ML per day after being as high as 19,000 ML per<br />

day. The dam is now at 103 per cent of capacity and water is being<br />

released to get it to 100 per cent of capacity. The amount being<br />

released will be reduced as the dam level gets lower. There have<br />

been flooding issues with roads and low lying areas along the river.<br />

At Dinner Plain the<br />

pace is easy going...<br />

David Ronald, ‘The Point’, Spring Ridge – winner of the Upper<br />

Namoi dryland cotton competition.<br />

so carry over water will be available for most bore users. Fallow<br />

moisture levels are very good throughout the valley, setting up<br />

a good year for winter crops and dryland cotton. An irrigated<br />

cotton area of about 80,000 hectares is anticipated in the Namoi<br />

next season. The dryland area is also expected to expand up to<br />

55,000 hectares.<br />

All we need now is eight weeks of fine weather to pick the<br />

crop!<br />

Congratulations to Tom Swain, ‘Glencoe’, winner of the Upper<br />

Namoi irrigated crop competition and David Ronald, ‘The Point’,<br />

Spring Ridge, who took out the dryland competition. Andrew<br />

Watson from Boggabri was also awarded the Cotton Grower of<br />

the Year Award for the Upper Namoi.<br />

Robert Eveleigh<br />

April 1, 2012<br />

Macquarie Valley<br />

The season continues with defoliation almost in full swing for<br />

the majority of crops in the Narromine region. Some crops further<br />

downstream around Warren have been picked but it is too<br />

early to comment on yields. Recent warm weather has helped<br />

somewhat towards achieving respectable yields as possibly more<br />

of the later fruit will make it through to picking.<br />

Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />

be together by the fireside or miles apart<br />

exploring the cross-country trail network.<br />

Where you stroll the treelined streets<br />

simply for the sights or to meet<br />

friends for a restaurant dinner or<br />

drinks at the bar. The village itself<br />

helps set the community<br />

atmosphere, natural building<br />

materials and earthy tones blur<br />

the line between man made and<br />

alpine environment. Over 200<br />

lodges and chalets with all the<br />

conveniences of a modern resort.<br />

Dinner Plain is the place<br />

for your next holiday.<br />

Explore our website at<br />

www.dinnerplain.com<br />

or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />

or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />

April–May 2012 The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> — 63


District Reports…<br />

All water accounts have now been reset to 100 per cent after<br />

the dam spilling. There have also been some supplementary<br />

water events. This augers well for a large cotton area for next<br />

season.<br />

All growers are now looking for a dry pick and then rain for<br />

the winter cropping program.<br />

Craig McDonald<br />

April 10, 2012<br />

areas, requiring control – mainly in fields adjacent to soybeans,<br />

corn or native vegetation.<br />

Despite the fact that much of the region received more than<br />

it’s average annual rainfall in one week, the crops appear to be<br />

back on track. The finish has been very favourable with good<br />

warm days over the past few weeks, with temperatures in the<br />

high twenties and low thirties. This has resulted in many crops<br />

receiving their first defoliation pass in the last week of March,<br />

indicating that picking should start mid April.<br />

James Hill<br />

April 10, 2012<br />

Southern NSW<br />

The crops in southern NSW are looking very good, considering<br />

the cool season and recent extreme rainfall events. There have<br />

been localised areas of crop inundation, yet the proportion of<br />

area with severe damage overall is low. In terms of timing, we<br />

were fortunate that the crop was quite mature at the time of<br />

flooding, therefore resulting in less significant damage. Some<br />

crops were affected by overland flows from the initial heavy rain<br />

and run off.<br />

A number of these areas are situated on the Murrumbidgee<br />

River and the Mirrool Creek region west of Griffith, where<br />

the water backed up as it tried to enter the Blackbox Swamp.<br />

Considering the volume of overland flow, significant crop<br />

damage occurred in only a few small areas.<br />

Fortunately there has been very little late season insect<br />

pressure with only a small percentage of crops hosting mites and<br />

aphids. Green vegetable bug numbers spiked in small localised<br />

Answer to Ian’s Mystery<br />

Tractor Quiz<br />

The tractor is a 1936 International W 30, possibly the top selling<br />

grain farm tractor of the period. (IMJ collection)<br />

Murrumbidgee floodplain west of Hay.<br />

Aquatech Consulting....................28<br />

Austral Rope & Cordage...............19<br />

Barmac........................................31<br />

Bayer.................................... 12, 13<br />

Cargill Cotton...............................34<br />

Case IH........................................ 11<br />

Charlton........................................8<br />

Convey-All.....................................6<br />

Cotton Grower Services............... IFC<br />

Cotton Outlook............................IBC<br />

CSD...............................................5<br />

Countryco Training.......................20<br />

Cruiser R&D Fund........................39<br />

Dinner Plain............................1, 63<br />

drumMUSTER...............................20<br />

Ecom Commodities.......................37<br />

Ergon............................................3<br />

1st Class......................................22<br />

Advertiser’s Index<br />

Goldacres Trading..........................9<br />

Howard Australia.........................17<br />

Lindsay Irrigation........................21<br />

Moree Real Estate........................34<br />

Namoi Cotton...............................43<br />

Neils Parts...................................41<br />

New Holland..................................7<br />

Omnistar.....................................23<br />

Pivot Irrigation............................47<br />

Polytex........................................41<br />

Precision Cropping Technologies...26<br />

Queensland Cotton.......................35<br />

SMK Consultants............................2<br />

Study Tours..................................61<br />

Sumitomo................................. OBC<br />

The Appointments Group................2<br />

Tractorman..................................45<br />

Valmont.......................................29<br />

64 — The <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Cottongrower</strong> April–May 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!