A Generation Adrift - The Communication Trust
A Generation Adrift - The Communication Trust
A Generation Adrift - The Communication Trust
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A <strong>Generation</strong><br />
<strong>Adrift</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> case for speech, language and<br />
communication to take a central<br />
role in schools’ policy and practice
A <strong>Generation</strong><br />
<strong>Adrift</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong> case for speech, language and<br />
communication to take a central<br />
role in schools’ policy and practice<br />
Introduction.............................................................................................. 5<br />
<strong>The</strong> good news ........................................................................................ 6<br />
<strong>The</strong> context .............................................................................................. 9<br />
So, what’s the problem? .....................................................................10<br />
Falling behind matters ........................................................................12<br />
Missed, misinterpreted, misunderstood .........................................14<br />
What’s going wrong? ...........................................................................16<br />
What’s needed? ....................................................................................18<br />
Making it happen ..................................................................................26<br />
References ..............................................................................................28
Introduction<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> is at the core of what<br />
we do in business, education and<br />
socially. Never before in our history<br />
have we been able to communicate<br />
as quickly and widely as we can<br />
today. <strong>The</strong>re’s no doubt we know<br />
good communication when we see<br />
it; individuals who can articulate their<br />
thoughts and ideas, can use their<br />
language to explain new concepts<br />
or describe their experiences. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
can really listen and understand<br />
other perspectives and can hold an<br />
audience, regardless of who and how<br />
many.<br />
At the foundation of all<br />
communication is language – words,<br />
which are made up of sounds,<br />
constructed and combined into<br />
sentences with meaning and used<br />
to interact with those around us. This<br />
is the same whether we are talking,<br />
listening, writing, reading, texting,<br />
e-mailing or sharing information<br />
on Twitter or Facebook. In essence,<br />
communication is being able to listen<br />
and talk to each other in order to<br />
connect; to structure our thoughts<br />
and transform them into a medium<br />
that allows them to be shared. <strong>The</strong><br />
foundation of all communication is<br />
human language and although it’s<br />
easily taken for granted, it’s the most<br />
complex skill we will ever learn.<br />
Bearing in mind the importance of<br />
communication in today’s society,<br />
surely we want our young people<br />
to develop the stongest language<br />
and communication skills they are<br />
capable of?<br />
<strong>The</strong> foundation of all communication<br />
is human language and although it’s<br />
easily taken for granted, it’s the most<br />
complex skill we will ever learn.<br />
<strong>The</strong> sad reality is this isn’t happening.<br />
According to employers, even our<br />
graduates lack the communication<br />
skills needed for the workplace<br />
and at the other end of the scale<br />
too many children are struggling<br />
to develop basic language and<br />
communication as they progress<br />
through their educational journey.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se children have speech, language<br />
and communication needs (SLCN).<br />
Currently they aren’t being identified<br />
early or well enough and aren’t<br />
being supported to develop their<br />
communication skills - impacting on<br />
progress and prospects.<br />
<strong>The</strong> long term impact of SLCN<br />
is well documented; impact on<br />
attainment, progression and wider<br />
social, behavioural and emotional<br />
outcomes. We know for example,<br />
children with SLCN are at higher risk<br />
of exclusion from school 1 and that<br />
60-90% of young people in the youth<br />
justice system have SLCN, many<br />
of which aren’t identified before<br />
offending. 2 3<br />
Language is complex; multifaceted<br />
and multilayered and children can be<br />
very good at hiding their language<br />
difficulties, showing other ‘symptoms’<br />
that are more tangible, recognisable<br />
or easier to understand – poor<br />
literacy, poor behaviour, low self<br />
esteem and few friendships.<br />
Supporting language and knowing<br />
when children are struggling is not<br />
hugely difficult; often it’s a ‘tweak’<br />
to good practice, meshed with basic<br />
knowledge of language development.<br />
It’s the questions we ask ourselves<br />
about why children are struggling<br />
combined with the reflective practice<br />
common to all good practitioners.<br />
We need to understand the language<br />
we can expect at different ages and<br />
stages and we need to know how<br />
we can adapt our own language to<br />
ensure children and young people<br />
are understanding what’s being<br />
said, to show them how to use their<br />
language for learning and to ensure<br />
we are identifying and supporting all<br />
those children who are struggling.<br />
This paper aims to bring together<br />
the evidence around why we must<br />
focus on speech, language and<br />
communication skills, which are<br />
important in their own right and as a<br />
vehicle for learning, social interaction,<br />
inclusion and independence, for<br />
all children and young people and<br />
particularly for those who have SLCN.<br />
It also highlights the fact that these<br />
skills can be supported and aims to<br />
provide a call to action to achieve this<br />
with practical, evidenced solutions.<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 5
<strong>The</strong> good news<br />
‘…talk – at home, in school, among peers – is education at its most elemental and<br />
potent. It is the aspect of teaching which has arguably the greatest influence on<br />
learning.’ Cambridge Primary Review, 2009<br />
In many schools, the majority<br />
of children (around 90%) come<br />
into school with well developed<br />
language and communication<br />
skills. Before starting school, they<br />
have experienced good quality<br />
and quantity of talk from the<br />
adults around them. <strong>The</strong>y’ve had<br />
opportunities for lots of practice to<br />
talk, listen and understand, to hone<br />
their language and communication<br />
skills.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se children usually have clear<br />
speech, a good vocabulary, age<br />
appropriate grammar and narrative<br />
skills. <strong>The</strong>y can have conversations<br />
and are able to listen well and<br />
understand what’s said to them<br />
by both peers and teachers. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
can interact both to socialise and<br />
to facilitate and develop their own<br />
learning and can communicate what<br />
they know and don’t know. <strong>The</strong>y can<br />
use their language to think and can<br />
express their ideas clearly, confidently<br />
and courteously.<br />
In some UK classrooms, teachers<br />
capitalise on these skills. <strong>The</strong>y use<br />
good quality and quantity of talk in a<br />
way that models more sophisticated<br />
language for learning and scaffolds<br />
children’s language (building on<br />
children’s language from their<br />
starting point). <strong>The</strong>y weave talking<br />
and listening opportunities into<br />
the fabric of their lessons, they ask<br />
‘why’ and shift their language to<br />
accommodate the most and least<br />
able children in the class.<br />
In these classrooms, children<br />
with speech, language and<br />
communication needs (SLCN) can<br />
access learning at their level, the<br />
language used by the teacher acts<br />
as a route to learning, rather than<br />
a barrier. Teachers who take this<br />
approach know the language level at<br />
which their pupils are functioning and<br />
take responsibility for ensuring they<br />
understand what they are taught.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se teachers have clear<br />
expectations of what they want<br />
children to learn. <strong>The</strong>y teach children<br />
how to listen, attend and focus on<br />
key information; they consistently<br />
highlight and revisit key vocabulary<br />
and ensure children understand; they<br />
create a learning environment where<br />
seeking clarification is valued and<br />
celebrated. <strong>The</strong>y give clear structures<br />
for spoken language contributions;<br />
they model what it looks like to think<br />
and to reason in order to learn; to<br />
use language for solving problems; to<br />
interact in groups; they make thought<br />
processes explicit to the children<br />
and show how conclusions can be<br />
reached. <strong>The</strong>y are aware of their<br />
pupils’ levels of language and adapt<br />
their own language accordingly.<br />
All children and young people<br />
would benefit from talk being an<br />
integral element occupying a prime<br />
position in teaching and learning<br />
across subjects and throughout<br />
the curriculum. A focus on talk in<br />
the classroom can significantly<br />
enhance the way all children respond<br />
to schooling, in all subjects. 4 Talk<br />
is the vehicle for all learning and<br />
the gateway to literacy skills – if<br />
children can’t say a sentence or<br />
explain a concept, they will struggle<br />
to understand or express it through<br />
reading or writing.<br />
We also know much about what<br />
supports children who are struggling<br />
and the barriers that prevent them<br />
getting that support. <strong>The</strong> recent<br />
landmark Better <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Research Programme (BCRP) was<br />
able to highlight interventions and<br />
approaches that are effective for<br />
children and young people with SLCN. 5<br />
Adults in educational settings play a<br />
key role in supporting spoken language<br />
and the development of a classroom<br />
learning environment which fosters<br />
language for thinking and learning. 6<br />
Strong and knowledgeable school<br />
leaders can make a real difference<br />
to children as they progress through<br />
school.<br />
A focus on talk in the classroom can<br />
significantly enhance the way all<br />
children respond to schooling, in all<br />
subjects.<br />
6 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
8 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
<strong>The</strong> context<br />
‘It is a skill which has to be taught, honed and nurtured. Yet… children’s ability to<br />
communicate, to speak and understand [is] taken for granted’<br />
Bercow Report, 2008 7<br />
<strong>The</strong>re have been some positive<br />
changes since John Bercow MP carried<br />
out his review in 2008 which found a<br />
fundamental lack of understanding of<br />
communication, alongside a national<br />
inequity of provision and support for<br />
children with speech, language and<br />
communication needs (SLCN).<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> has a growing<br />
presence in national policy,<br />
particularly in education policy:<br />
D Language and communication is<br />
now one of the three core strands<br />
of the early years foundation<br />
stage 8<br />
D Recommendations made by<br />
the Nutbrown Review of early<br />
years education, highlighted<br />
the importance of a qualified<br />
workforce in the early years who<br />
understand how to develop<br />
young children’s language skills 9<br />
D Both the Allen Review of Early<br />
Intervention 10 and the Field’s<br />
Review of the Foundation Years 11<br />
made made clear that language<br />
and communication development<br />
at age 3 was one of the major<br />
National Life Chances Indicators<br />
for children<br />
D <strong>Communication</strong> has a strong<br />
position in the new Ofsted<br />
inspection framework, both in<br />
relation to teaching and learning<br />
and with a focus on those children<br />
who don’t attain well<br />
D <strong>The</strong> Education Select Committee<br />
on Behaviour and Discipline in<br />
Schools made very powerful<br />
recommendations around the link<br />
between SLCN and behaviour<br />
D <strong>The</strong> Primary National Curriculum<br />
Expert Panel concluded that<br />
spoken language should be<br />
a strong feature of any new<br />
National Curriculum and<br />
dedicated a chapter of their report<br />
to it<br />
D <strong>The</strong> secondary curriculum<br />
now includes elements of<br />
communication within specific<br />
subject areas, as well as English<br />
D <strong>The</strong>re is a focus on language in<br />
the Department of Health Healthy<br />
Child Programme and 2 year<br />
check<br />
However, there continues to be a way<br />
to go to ensure policy reflects other<br />
necessary changes:<br />
D Systematic initial and continued<br />
professional development for<br />
teachers to support knowledge<br />
and skills of speech, language and<br />
communication and SLCN<br />
D Continued need for a graduated<br />
response to support all<br />
children’s speech, language and<br />
communication<br />
D Accurate profiling and careful<br />
monitoring of progression for<br />
children with SLCN in schools<br />
D Integrated service provision of<br />
speech and language therapy<br />
services<br />
D Real joined up policy for children<br />
with SLCN / Special Educational<br />
Needs as outlined in the<br />
forthcoming Children and Families<br />
Bill<br />
Through Hello, the national year<br />
of communication (2011), 12 there<br />
has been a shift in awareness<br />
of communication. <strong>The</strong> national<br />
campaign, with support from<br />
more than 200 local co-ordinators,<br />
supported parents, teachers and<br />
other professionals to gain a greater<br />
understanding of the issue. <strong>The</strong> Hello<br />
evaluation demonstrated positive<br />
changes in the understanding of the<br />
issue, though there remains a long<br />
way to go. 13<br />
<strong>The</strong>re remains a need to translate<br />
the positive changes seen in national<br />
policy to equal shifts in local practice<br />
as currently there is a very large gap<br />
between the two. Both research<br />
and anecdotal feedback from grass<br />
roots professionals stress the huge<br />
challenges that remain in ensuring<br />
children with SLCN are identified<br />
and supported through local service<br />
provision.<br />
<strong>Communication</strong><br />
has a strong<br />
position in the<br />
new Ofsted<br />
inspection<br />
framework.<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 9
So, what’s the problem?<br />
‘<strong>Communication</strong> disorders will be a major public health concern for the 21st<br />
century because, untreated, they adversely affect the economic well-being of a<br />
communication-age society.’ Ruber, 2000 14<br />
In some areas of<br />
deprivation, more than<br />
50% of children start<br />
school with SLCN.<br />
10% of all children have<br />
long-term SLCN.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are shockingly large numbers<br />
of children in the UK struggling to<br />
acquire language. Many of these<br />
children aren’t being accurately<br />
identified or supported. Identification<br />
is key across all phases of education.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se children can be difficult to<br />
identify and may have complex<br />
needs, so an ongoing focus is<br />
absolutely imperative. <strong>The</strong> impact of<br />
SLCN cuts across the whole of their<br />
development; learning, attainment,<br />
behaviour, self esteem, inclusion,<br />
independence and long term life<br />
prospects.<br />
We know from national figures that<br />
by the time they reach five years<br />
of age, (the end of the Early Years<br />
Foundation Stage) more than a third<br />
of children are not working securely<br />
in communication, language and<br />
literacy. In deprived areas, this<br />
number rises to more than four in<br />
ten. 15<br />
We know that 50% 16 of children in<br />
areas of social disadvantage start<br />
school with poor language, with<br />
language that isn’t adequate for the<br />
next stage of learning, for thinking,<br />
reasoning and communicating<br />
effectively with adults and peers.<br />
For example, children from low<br />
income families lag behind by<br />
nearly one year in vocabulary at<br />
school entry, with gaps in language<br />
much larger than gaps in other<br />
cognitive skills. 17 <strong>The</strong>se children<br />
are at a disadvantage from the<br />
start and without the right support<br />
don’t catch up with their peers. 18 A<br />
recent CBI report highlighted that<br />
children who are failing to achieve<br />
adequate standards in primary<br />
education come disproportionately<br />
from disadvantaged backgrounds. 19<br />
Children need language to learn.<br />
10 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
7% of all children have<br />
a specific language<br />
impairment.<br />
1% of all children have<br />
severe and complex<br />
SLCN.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re’s a significant group of children<br />
who have a rich communication<br />
experience, with lots of support<br />
from parents, though despite<br />
this will have a specific language<br />
impairment. 20 7% of all children have<br />
a specific language impairment;<br />
it’s the most prevalent childhood<br />
disability, but a condition that<br />
is much misunderstood. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
children also start school without<br />
the language they need in order to<br />
learn and are disadvantaged from<br />
the start. Children within this group<br />
have differing needs, dependent<br />
on the nature and severity of their<br />
difficulties. <strong>The</strong>y need specialist<br />
support in order to learn and<br />
communicate to the very best of their<br />
ability.<br />
At least 3% of all children have<br />
SLCN linked with other impairments,<br />
including those with hearing<br />
impairment, autistic spectrum<br />
disorders, specific learning difficulties,<br />
such as dyslexia and general learning<br />
needs. In fact, the majority of<br />
children with SEN have some degree<br />
of SLCN. <strong>The</strong>y too need support in<br />
order to learn and to communicate to<br />
the very best of their ability.<br />
So, the problem is the scale of the<br />
issue, both in quantity of children and<br />
the impact of SLCN; most children<br />
with SEN have SLCN, some children<br />
have specific language imapairments<br />
and around half of the children in<br />
areas of social disadvantage can have<br />
SLCN. Language difficulties impact<br />
across all areas of development and<br />
on longer term prospects. Children<br />
need language to learn, socialise, to<br />
manage their behaviour and develop<br />
emotionally.<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 11
Falling behind matters<br />
Language has critical importance for<br />
learning and wider development, 21<br />
however, many children are starting<br />
school already behind, with evidence<br />
to suggest that without the right<br />
support, they don’t catch up. Falling<br />
behind really does matter; it can<br />
affect self-esteem, behaviour and<br />
engagement with education. 22<br />
Good spoken language skills are<br />
strong predictors of later academic<br />
success. Children with poor language<br />
and literacy development at 5<br />
years are at substantial risk of<br />
low achievement at 7 years 23 and<br />
beyond. 24 Good spoken language<br />
25 26<br />
predicates reading and writing,<br />
with literacy gaps often widening as<br />
children progress through school. 27<br />
Research tells us that early<br />
vocabulary and concept development<br />
is especially critical for children<br />
from low and moderate income<br />
homes, 28 with vocabulary at age 5 a<br />
strong predictor of the qualifications<br />
achieved at school leaving age and<br />
beyond. 29 Major recent research<br />
shows language impairment as<br />
a risk factor for low achievement,<br />
with language difficulties important<br />
factors for predicting attainment<br />
on Key Stage 1 and 2 English and<br />
Maths national curriculum tests. 30<br />
Research has also shown older pupils<br />
experiencing greater levels of need<br />
than those identified at younger<br />
ages. 31 At the end of Key Stage<br />
4, the ‘attainment gap’ between<br />
children with speech, language and<br />
communication needs (SLCN) and<br />
their peers is marked. Just 15% of<br />
young people with SLCN achieve 5<br />
GCSE A*- C or equivalent compared<br />
to 57% of all young people. 32 As the<br />
most prevalent childhood disability,<br />
this adds up to a lot of children.<br />
Falling behind really does matter; it<br />
can affect self-esteem, behaviour<br />
and engagement with education.<br />
However, language plays more than<br />
just an underpinning role for the<br />
acquisition of literacy and academic<br />
attainment. It’s also important for<br />
the wider outcomes we want for<br />
our young people. Talk and social<br />
interaction play a key role in all<br />
children’s social development. 33<br />
Language is the vehicle for organising,<br />
problem-solving, managing and<br />
evaluating experiences, influencing<br />
and informing; all crucial skills for the<br />
classroom and beyond. 34<br />
Language ability can also impact<br />
massively on behavioural and<br />
emotional development; 35 even in<br />
early development, language levels<br />
directly impact on self-regulation<br />
skills of children and therefore on<br />
their behaviour. 36 We know many<br />
children with SLCN have significant<br />
behavioural difficulties, some of<br />
which mask underlying impairments<br />
in language. 37 Others are withdrawn,<br />
which means they’re less likely to<br />
start conversations, are more likely<br />
to play alone and research suggests<br />
they’re less liked by others in their<br />
class. <strong>The</strong>se social, emotional and<br />
behavioural components can impact<br />
massively on children and young<br />
people, meaning poorer long term<br />
social outcomes. 38<br />
<strong>The</strong> good news is that we know many<br />
approaches that work in supporting<br />
children with SLCN, mitigating<br />
against the long term impact of not<br />
understanding or being understood.<br />
We know from evidenced approaches<br />
and interventions what can make a<br />
difference. However, there remains<br />
some way to go in translating this<br />
knowledge into every day practice.<br />
12 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 13
Missed, misinterpreted,<br />
misunderstood…<br />
Missed<br />
Although numbers of children and young people identified in schools<br />
with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) as their<br />
primary need has increased by around 70% over the last 6 years,<br />
there remain true challenges. 39 Despite internationally accepted<br />
prevalence figures of 7%, only 3% of the school population is ever<br />
identified as having SLCN. 40 Children are being missed.<br />
Identification of SLCN still challenges professionals, with continued<br />
variability in age and process of identification continuing<br />
throughout the school years. 41 Research found parent concern<br />
alone or even in combination with professional screening<br />
insufficiently reliable as an indicator of need. 42 43 Exacerbating this<br />
issue is the fact that the terminology used to describe, diagnose or<br />
categorise children is often used inconsistently across disciplines<br />
and services and there remains a lack of clarity about what’s<br />
meant by SLCN.<br />
Despite committed and experienced staff, current policy and<br />
practice isn’t enabling consistent identification of all children with<br />
SLCN, far from it. In <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Talk of the Town<br />
programme, an average of around 40% of children were not being<br />
identified; most difficult to spot were older students, students who<br />
had difficulties with vocabulary (45% not identified), those who<br />
struggled with formulating sentences (52% not identified) and<br />
children with difficulties understanding (29% not identified). 48%<br />
in Key Stage 3 were not identified. This, despite a highly committed<br />
staff team. 44<br />
Misinterpreted<br />
Children and young people with SLCN often have academic,<br />
emotional and behavioural difficulties that pose a challenge<br />
to the professionals working with them. 45 SLCN can be difficult<br />
to spot and the nature of the difficulties can change over time,<br />
often becoming more complex. 46<br />
Ofsted have also reported examples of children’s SLCN being<br />
misinterpreted; some children and young people ‘were allocated<br />
support for their behaviour when, in fact, they had specific<br />
communication needs.’ 47<br />
Case study<br />
James was referred to speech and<br />
language therapy when he was 10<br />
years old. <strong>The</strong> school believed he<br />
was either dyslexic or had learning<br />
difficulties. He was a quiet, hard<br />
working member of the class; he<br />
could read fluently and accurately, but<br />
couldn’t understand what he had read.<br />
His language assessment showed<br />
his understanding of vocabulary and<br />
grammar to be on the first percentile;<br />
his understanding of language was<br />
extremely poor. James was extremely<br />
bright and had become adept at hiding<br />
his significant language impairment.<br />
14 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
Misunderstood<br />
<strong>The</strong> Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme (BCRP) research<br />
indicates strongly that national curriculum data and/or establishing<br />
a pupil’s primary need provides insufficient information to plan<br />
services and differentiate the curriculum. <strong>The</strong> research highlights<br />
the fundamental importance of profiling and monitoring children’s<br />
needs, rather than providing support by diagnosis or category,<br />
which can result in challenges of identification and issues regarding<br />
meeting the changing nature of children and young people’s<br />
48 49<br />
needs.<br />
‘<strong>The</strong> best people, they understand<br />
the nature of my condition - I’d<br />
say that was the most important<br />
thing.’<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 15
What’s going wrong?<br />
‘…there is grossly inadequate recognition across society of the importance of<br />
communication development, let alone the active steps needed to facilitate it.’<br />
Bercow Report, 2008 50<br />
High quality classroom talk is a key<br />
factor in improving pupil engagement<br />
and outcomes. 51 We know that<br />
just the way in which teachers<br />
talk to children and young people<br />
can influence learning, memory,<br />
understanding and the motivation<br />
to learn. 52 Research has shown that<br />
the quality of spoken dialogue in<br />
primary classrooms can significantly<br />
improve children’s educational<br />
attainment, from increasing SAT<br />
scores in Maths and Science, to<br />
improving reading comprehension,<br />
writing and reasoning skills. 53<br />
Despite this strong raft of evidence,<br />
high quality classroom talk is not<br />
the norm. A criticism in the recent<br />
Crossroads report is that talk is rarely<br />
planned and developed explicitly in<br />
classrooms. 54 Language continues to<br />
have a low profile in our schools and<br />
education policy. Why is this?<br />
Language isn’t immediately tangible.<br />
It’s the least taught and trained for,<br />
yet is the most used skill. Although<br />
a truly cross curricular vehicle for<br />
learning, spoken language currently<br />
sits predominantly in the Literacy<br />
curriculum, though is given less focus<br />
than the written word, both within<br />
the curriculum and with the training<br />
and development of teachers and<br />
other professionals. A recent report<br />
by the Centre for Social Justice<br />
recommended a key performance<br />
indicator should be introduced for<br />
communication competency in<br />
primary schools. 55<br />
Terminology<br />
<strong>The</strong> term speech, language and<br />
communication needs (SLCN) is<br />
defined and used in different ways<br />
by different people; i.e. schools’ plasc<br />
data use SLCN to refer to children<br />
with primary speech, language<br />
and communication needs – those<br />
with specific language impairment.<br />
Conversely, <strong>The</strong> Bercow Review<br />
uses SLCN as an umbrella term to<br />
include all and any children with<br />
SLCN, including children with other<br />
impairments or learning needs. In<br />
practice, specialist and generalist<br />
practitioners use the terms in<br />
different ways.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re can be miscommunication<br />
and inconsistency of services as<br />
a result; currently services tend<br />
to be diagnosis led, which raises<br />
challenges when diagnostic labels<br />
are misunderstood and inconsistently<br />
used.<br />
In current policy, varied terms<br />
are used that relate to speech,<br />
language and communication skills;<br />
for example, articulacy, 56 oracy 57<br />
and communication skills. 58 Whilst<br />
they may be essentially referring<br />
to the same skills, these different<br />
terms are open to a wide range of<br />
interpretation, which could lead to<br />
inconsistency and confusion and<br />
dilute the potential for transforming<br />
the way that pupils’ communication<br />
skills are developed in schools.<br />
High quality<br />
classroom talk<br />
is a key factor in<br />
improving pupil<br />
engagement and<br />
outcomes.<br />
16 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
Workforce development<br />
Children with SLCN need support at<br />
all levels, in the classroom as well as<br />
by specialists. Children are very clear<br />
about what works for them – other<br />
people’s behaviour and understanding<br />
is paramount. 59 However, there’s a<br />
need for workforce development,<br />
both in initial training and as continual<br />
professional development (CPD) as<br />
children with SLCN can and do fall<br />
through the gaps in professional<br />
knowledge and in the system.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re remain huge challenges for<br />
teachers and other practitioners in<br />
effectively identifying and supporting<br />
children and young people with SLCN.<br />
Particular challenges for teachers<br />
are in changing classroom practice,<br />
with research showing the need for<br />
systematic professional development.<br />
Teachers themselves express a lack<br />
of confidence in knowing how to<br />
support children and young people<br />
with SLCN. 60<br />
Often, lessons are dominated by<br />
teacher talk which rarely improves<br />
spoken language or enhances<br />
learning. 61 Four decades ago, the<br />
Bullock Report 62 calculated that<br />
pupils had on average a 20 second<br />
window to each contribute verbally in<br />
a 45-minute lesson. Recent research<br />
suggests things have not greatly<br />
improved. One survey of secondary<br />
schools in an inner city identified<br />
adults talking for up to 90% of the<br />
time 63 and more recent research<br />
put the average length of a pupil’s<br />
contribution to class discussion at just<br />
four words. 64 Research has indicated<br />
that variations in the quality and<br />
quantity of the language that children<br />
experience in their homes 65 and<br />
educational environments 66 strongly<br />
influence individual differences in the<br />
rate of children’s language growth<br />
and later language outcomes.<br />
In a recent report, Ofsted found<br />
new teachers didn’t have a solid<br />
knowledge of language development<br />
and struggled to adapt their own<br />
language for those children with<br />
poor language skills. <strong>The</strong> need for<br />
high quality training during initial<br />
teacher education in these areas was<br />
highlighted as important in order to<br />
support teachers to do this. 67<br />
Case study<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> has<br />
developed Let’s Talk About<br />
It, an information booklet<br />
available to all initial teacher<br />
trainees, available from www.<br />
thecommunicationtrust.<br />
org.uk/resources. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
has worked with a group of<br />
universities to embed speech<br />
and language information into<br />
initial teacher training and is<br />
currently working on a project<br />
with a university and a primary<br />
school within a co-operative<br />
learning trust, using a targeted<br />
intervention programme to<br />
embed changes in practice of<br />
initial teacher trainees.<br />
Services and support<br />
Children and young people with<br />
SLCN not only fall through the gaps<br />
in professional expertise but also in<br />
how support is paid for and delivered.<br />
Prevention and early identification<br />
need as much consideration as<br />
specialist services for those children<br />
and young people with identified<br />
SLCN. Health and education need<br />
to work together to design and<br />
commission needs-led local services<br />
considering universal as well as<br />
targeted and specialist approaches.<br />
However, there remain challenges<br />
in joint planning locally for children<br />
and young people with SLCN due to<br />
increasing evidence of significant cuts<br />
to front line speech and language<br />
therapy services 68 and to the<br />
specialist advisory teaching services. 69<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 17
What’s needed?<br />
‘Schools which ‘turn the dial’ on language and communication are able to turn the<br />
dial on a number of key school improvement priorities, from raising attainment to<br />
narrowing the gap and improving behaviour’.<br />
Jean Gross, <strong>Communication</strong> Champion, 2011 70<br />
We know that communication is<br />
paramount for our children, we<br />
know that there is much room for<br />
improvement, but we also know<br />
what we need and have examples of<br />
excellence in practice.<br />
School leadership<br />
Time and time again, evidence shows<br />
the impact having ‘top level’ support<br />
has for any programme running in<br />
schools, in particular the backing<br />
of the headteacher and senior<br />
leadership team. 71 <strong>The</strong> importance<br />
of leadership in spearheading<br />
language policy across a school is<br />
shown in recent Ofsted reports. <strong>The</strong><br />
reports have identified the role of the<br />
headteacher and the establishment<br />
of a whole school approach as key<br />
principles for success. 72<br />
Effective practice in speaking<br />
and listening has regularly been<br />
highlighted as a key feature of<br />
outstanding schools in a number of<br />
national reports: ‘A common feature<br />
of the most successful schools in the<br />
survey was the attention they gave to<br />
developing speaking and listening.’ 73<br />
Case study<br />
Peacehaven Community<br />
School is a specialist science,<br />
maths and training school<br />
for pupils aged 11-16. <strong>The</strong><br />
senior management team has<br />
prioritised speech, language<br />
and communication in the<br />
School Improvement Plan.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y won the Shine A Light<br />
award for Secondary School of<br />
the Year in 2012.<br />
Workforce development<br />
<strong>The</strong> Expert Panel for the National<br />
Curriculum Review acknowledges<br />
the need for professional<br />
development in order to ensure<br />
effective implementation of oracy<br />
in the classroom 74 with teachers<br />
themselves acknowledging the<br />
same for children with speech,<br />
language and communication needs<br />
(SLCN). 75 Research also points to the<br />
need for more training in order for<br />
teachers to support language, given<br />
the wide range of SLCN issues that<br />
they typically face in mainstream<br />
schools. 76 In addition, there needs<br />
to be careful consideration of the<br />
professional development of teaching<br />
assistants who are four times more<br />
likely to support speech and language<br />
therapists in delivering interventions<br />
than to teachers. 77<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are a number of initiatives<br />
available to schools that support<br />
teaching staff to develop their<br />
pupil’s speech, language and<br />
communication skills and better<br />
identify and support pupils with SLCN;<br />
staff can identify their professional<br />
strengths and needs and be<br />
signposted to appropriate continued<br />
professional development. 78<br />
Case study<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Speech, Language<br />
and <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Framework (SLCF) is a tool<br />
designed for the children’s<br />
workforce. Teachers and other<br />
practitioners can complete<br />
an audit of their knowledge<br />
and skills. <strong>The</strong>y’re then given<br />
a profile of their strengths<br />
and areas they may want<br />
to develop, with practical<br />
solutions. Many of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s<br />
Consortium members offer<br />
short and accredited courses<br />
and consultation services to<br />
support schools. 79<br />
More than 10,000 people have<br />
used the SLCF, almost 8,000 of<br />
which were universal staff. For<br />
more information please go to<br />
www.talkingpoint.org.uk/slcf<br />
Ensuring high quality language<br />
teaching and learning should<br />
reduce the numbers of children<br />
and young people who require<br />
specialist language support. Where<br />
individual children fail to respond<br />
to systematic and regular exposure<br />
to evidence based oral language<br />
interactions, additional assessments<br />
of individual children may be needed<br />
and interventions, if appropriate,<br />
embedded within the educational<br />
context to meet the child’s needs. 80<br />
18 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
Conversations between adults and<br />
children that are characterised<br />
by high quality language learning<br />
interactions should be the core of the<br />
classroom.<br />
20 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
Language in the curriculum<br />
Experts have long argued that<br />
language is so fundamental to<br />
learning that it deserves a higher<br />
profile across the whole curriculum<br />
rather than being ‘marooned’ in<br />
the English curriculum, 81 as the<br />
‘poor relation’ to written language.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Expert Panel for the National<br />
Curriculum Review devotes a<br />
whole chapter to the issue of ‘Oral<br />
Language and its Development<br />
within the National Curriculum’<br />
noting the connection between oral<br />
development, cognitive development<br />
and educational attainment. 82<br />
Speaking and listening can often be<br />
seen as less formal and therefore a<br />
less important element of children’s<br />
learning. However research suggests<br />
the opposite, reading difficulties can<br />
be compounded if children are taught<br />
written language before their spoken<br />
language skills are developed enough<br />
to access this teaching. 83<br />
Case study<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Talk of the Town<br />
programme aims to embed<br />
language in the curriculum for<br />
all children, through building<br />
on current practice. <strong>The</strong><br />
project was piloted in a school<br />
federation in Wythenshawe<br />
where whole class strategies<br />
have been embedded to<br />
support teachers.<br />
This included daily activities to<br />
promote talk, including ‘talk<br />
boxes’ in every primary<br />
classroom and the<br />
development of communication<br />
notice boards for the secondary<br />
school. In addition, a range of<br />
interventions were used to<br />
support those children who<br />
were falling behind. For more<br />
information please go to<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.<br />
org.uk/talkofthetown<br />
Classroom environment<br />
Effective talk in the classroom has<br />
reported positive effects on subject<br />
learning, attainment, understanding,<br />
students’ control over their own<br />
learning, emotional development,<br />
confidence and self-esteem. 84 Social<br />
interaction and class-based activities<br />
such as working to achieve joint<br />
goals, explaining thinking, discussing<br />
different points of view and forging<br />
consensus, promote both learning<br />
and understanding. 85 Conversations<br />
between adults and children<br />
characterised by high quality language<br />
learning interactions should be the<br />
core of the classroom. A classroom<br />
may have an exemplary physical<br />
environment and a deliberate provision<br />
of daily language activities; however,<br />
without adult-child interactions of<br />
sufficiently high quality and sensitivity,<br />
these efforts are unlikely to result in<br />
the desired child outcomes. A number<br />
of studies suggest these language<br />
learning interactions occur less<br />
86 87<br />
frequently than is needed.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research<br />
Programme (BCRP) have developed<br />
a tool to support communication in<br />
the classroom. 88 Activities to scaffold<br />
language development need to be<br />
provided in a regular and deliberate<br />
manner. <strong>The</strong>se should include the<br />
language learning interactions that<br />
have been shown to develop oral<br />
language, including grammatical<br />
skills, vocabulary and narrative. For<br />
example, vocabulary instructions<br />
integrated into classroom routines 89<br />
and building working vocabularies<br />
and conceptual development<br />
through social interactions. 90 All<br />
school staff should fully understand,<br />
appreciate and develop quality use<br />
of a full range of language learning<br />
interaction techniques. 91<br />
Effective talk needs to be properly<br />
planned and designed by teachers,<br />
with students supported and<br />
facilitated and the teachers modeling<br />
how to interact in group discussions. 92<br />
93<br />
However the BCRP research has<br />
shown changing classroom pedagogy<br />
to support speech, language and<br />
communication is challenging for<br />
teachers. 94<br />
Case study<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are a range of tools<br />
available to support schools<br />
to identify strengths and<br />
areas for progress. Different<br />
approaches to supporting<br />
changes in policy and practice<br />
are available, through<br />
systematic approaches,<br />
workforce development and a<br />
graduated approach through<br />
interventions and support.<br />
Many of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Consortium<br />
members offer ways to audit<br />
current practice and to build<br />
communication into the<br />
whole school environment.<br />
For more information about<br />
what services and resources<br />
members provide for schools<br />
please go to<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.<br />
org.uk/consortiumcatalogue<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 21
Recent research<br />
concludes<br />
that teachers<br />
would benefit<br />
from more<br />
knowledge of<br />
children’s speech,<br />
language and<br />
communication<br />
development, as<br />
well as training<br />
in how to assess<br />
and measure<br />
these skills in<br />
young children<br />
appropriately.<br />
22 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong><br />
Early intervention/prevention<br />
Knowledge of typical development<br />
and the component elements of<br />
language is crucial. Recent research<br />
concludes that teachers would<br />
benefit from more knowledge of<br />
children’s speech, language and<br />
communication development, as<br />
well as training in how to assess<br />
and measure these skills in young<br />
children appropriately. 95 <strong>The</strong> BCRP<br />
has identified a number of factors<br />
to consider in supporting early<br />
identification. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong><br />
<strong>Trust</strong> has also produced a number<br />
of resources to support early<br />
identification for use in schools 96 ,<br />
which have been evidenced as<br />
being effective in reducing underidentification.<br />
97<br />
Case study<br />
Wallands County Primary<br />
School is a Shine a Light award<br />
winner with a dedicated<br />
speech and language unit. <strong>The</strong><br />
unit supports teachers to learn<br />
how to identify and support<br />
children with SLCN. Reception<br />
class children are assessed<br />
on entry, which highlights<br />
children who need further<br />
investigation by a speech and<br />
language therapist. Within the<br />
school, children with SLCN are<br />
prioritised for early intervention<br />
and specific programmes of<br />
support are given by dedicated<br />
specialist teaching assistants.<br />
Universal, targeted and<br />
specialist<br />
A graduated response is seen as<br />
being important to support children<br />
with SLCN; one which encompasses<br />
universal quality teaching, catchup<br />
programmes of support for<br />
children with delayed language,<br />
and more specialist support for<br />
those with more severe difficulties.<br />
For the best outcomes, this model<br />
would sit within a communication<br />
friendly environment and with the<br />
elements of leadership, workforce<br />
and parents embedded throughout.<br />
We have examples of models used<br />
to implement this approach 98 and<br />
through BCRP evidence of what<br />
interventions are most effective for<br />
children with SLCN across all levels of<br />
this graduated model. 99<br />
Case study<br />
<strong>The</strong> What Works website<br />
gives examples of a range<br />
of interventions that work<br />
across universal, targeted and<br />
specialist levels. A systematic<br />
framework for embedding<br />
these approaches alongside<br />
workforce development and<br />
strategic leadership, such as<br />
used in <strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Talk of the<br />
Town programme, is key. For<br />
more information please go to<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.<br />
org.uk/whatworks<br />
<strong>The</strong> importance of<br />
interventions<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a growing number of<br />
evidenced interventions available to<br />
support children’s speech, language<br />
and communication. Interventions<br />
at all levels are absolutely essential<br />
to support children who can catch<br />
up to do so and those with longer<br />
term difficulties to communicate<br />
to the very best of their ability. <strong>The</strong><br />
BCRP highlights the importance<br />
of a personalised approach to<br />
teaching and learning, reflecting an<br />
understanding of a pupil’s language<br />
learning and literacy needs, social<br />
and communication difficulties and<br />
100 101<br />
academic progression.
Case study<br />
Evidenced interventions are<br />
available in the What Works<br />
website to support a whole<br />
range of SLCN. For example,<br />
phonological awareness skills<br />
essential for reading, programmes<br />
demonstrating significant language<br />
improvement in those children who<br />
are delayed and programmes to<br />
support language in those children<br />
with the most complex needs. For<br />
more information please go to<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.<br />
uk/whatworks
Profiling<br />
<strong>The</strong> BCRP strongly recommended<br />
profiling and monitoring children’s<br />
needs, in order to support effective<br />
identification and support. 102 103 <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Trust</strong> has tested ways of profiling<br />
children’s needs through simple<br />
tools and techniques within schools,<br />
which have enabled identification of<br />
children and the ability to signpost<br />
different approaches of support,<br />
dependent on the child’s profile. 104<br />
Progression Tools<br />
Progression tools have been<br />
developed to support<br />
identification and profiling of<br />
children’s language and<br />
communication. Used in <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Trust</strong>’s Talk of the Town<br />
programme, alongside<br />
Universally Speaking booklets<br />
and training for staff, they<br />
contributed to identification of<br />
children with SLCN and<br />
enabled staff to ensure<br />
appropriate approaches and<br />
monitoring of progress.<br />
Talk of the Town 2012<br />
Levels of under identification<br />
pre-Talk of the Town<br />
Nursery<br />
D 50% under identified<br />
Primary<br />
D 31% under identified<br />
Levels of under identification<br />
post-Talk of the Town<br />
Nursery<br />
D Fell to 15%<br />
Primary<br />
D Fell to between 5% and 10%
Specialist support services<br />
Speech and language therapists<br />
(SLTs) have a crucial role to play in<br />
supporting children and young people<br />
with SLCN. Collaborative working<br />
between education and health<br />
is advocated as best practice for<br />
children with SLCN. 105 106 <strong>The</strong> recent<br />
BCRP recommends SLT support for<br />
children with SLCN to be in schools.<br />
Parents<br />
Case study<br />
One example of such practice<br />
is another Shine a Light award<br />
winner; Preston Manor School.<br />
<strong>The</strong>ir speech and language<br />
base teamed up with the<br />
English Department to deliver<br />
a curriculum project to a<br />
target group of Year 7 pupils.<br />
<strong>The</strong>ir goal was to create an<br />
opportunity to develop a<br />
more inclusive approach to<br />
delivering the curriculum while<br />
promoting effective speaking<br />
and listening skills. Pupils were<br />
given a lesson exploring what<br />
it means to have a voice. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
created speech bubbles, which<br />
were displayed on the board,<br />
for example, one pupil said ‘My<br />
voice is my identity and that’s<br />
proof of my existence.’<br />
<strong>The</strong> evidence base regarding<br />
the role of parents in supporting<br />
and developing early language,<br />
thinking and emotional skills is well<br />
107 108 109<br />
documented.<br />
Parents of children with SLCN face<br />
additional challenges as often their<br />
child’s needs aren’t completely<br />
understood by the professionals<br />
around them. Parents often reported<br />
challenges in knowing where to go for<br />
information, both at the point of their<br />
first concerns and then throughout<br />
their child’s development.<br />
Parents have a crucial role to play<br />
in supporting their child with SLCN.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y know their child best and<br />
understand how they communicate<br />
and their areas of interest, often key<br />
to facilitating positive outcomes.<br />
Research has also shown that parents<br />
play a prominent role in supporting<br />
SLTs to deliver interventions to their<br />
children 110 and can act as advocates<br />
for their children in school.<br />
Parents of children with SLCN<br />
report wanting key people<br />
surrounding their child to become<br />
more knowledgeable, tolerant<br />
and supportive of their needs. 111<br />
Parents valued outcomes related<br />
to attainment, though this in<br />
itself this was not enough. More<br />
importantly they recognised the need<br />
for increasing independence and<br />
inclusion of their children and the<br />
vital role that communication skills<br />
play in the achievement of these<br />
outcomes. 112<br />
Case study<br />
Watercliffe Meadow School<br />
in Sheffield, a Shine a Light<br />
award winner, has a strategic<br />
vision which emphasises<br />
‘getting things right from<br />
the start’. Engaging parents<br />
and carers is a high priority<br />
with over 75% of new<br />
parents attending workshops<br />
including guidance about early<br />
language development and<br />
the importance of developing<br />
language skills through play.<br />
At the workshop the parents<br />
work alongside their child on<br />
practical activities to support<br />
their learning. <strong>The</strong>n they take<br />
home a piece of learning to do<br />
together which feeds into the<br />
next session.<br />
Children and young people<br />
Children and young people value<br />
communication skills in their own<br />
right and for the opportunities good<br />
communication brings. Children and<br />
young people with SLCN reported that<br />
what made the biggest difference to<br />
them was when people understood<br />
the nature of their condition. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
wanted teachers to ‘understand<br />
pupils and what helps them.’ 113<br />
More recently, the BCRP gathered<br />
extensive views from children<br />
with SLCN. <strong>The</strong>y found they were<br />
particularly vulnerable to social<br />
acceptance and with emotional<br />
well-being. Children and young<br />
people valued the help they received<br />
to support their language needs but<br />
felt the targets highlighted for them<br />
at school weren’t reflective of their<br />
areas of interest. 114 In response to a<br />
question about what aspects of other<br />
people’s behaviour that they would<br />
like to see change, interrupting,<br />
shouting and teasing were the most<br />
frequently mentioned. Children and<br />
young people were very clear about<br />
the importance of other peoples’<br />
understanding and behaviour<br />
towards them and the difference it<br />
makes.<br />
Case study<br />
Jack, 17, spent years avoiding<br />
situations where he would<br />
have to speak to people<br />
because his stammer made<br />
communication difficult. He<br />
suffered from low self-esteem<br />
and was bullied as a result of<br />
his difficulty with speaking. In<br />
2009, he attended a residential<br />
course, which enabled him to<br />
learn skills for controlling his<br />
stammer and communicating<br />
effectively. Jack now mentors<br />
other young people who have<br />
similar difficulties; he makes a<br />
big difference to them as they<br />
see him as someone who really<br />
understands their experiences<br />
and communication needs.<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 25
Making it happen<br />
We believe that communication skills should be at<br />
the heart of schools policy in order that every child<br />
can achieve their potential academically, socially,<br />
emotionally and in their future career.<br />
If we want all our young people to<br />
be able to communicate to the best<br />
of their ability, there needs to be a<br />
continued shift in policy and practice<br />
to support the way we are using<br />
and developing communication in<br />
the classroom. This also includes<br />
how we are currently identifying<br />
and supporting children who are<br />
struggling with these skills.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> works to<br />
ensure that every child and young<br />
person is enabled to communicate<br />
to the very best of their ability.<br />
We recognise the centrality of<br />
schools in delivering this vision<br />
and are committed to working<br />
with Government, local areas and<br />
schools themselves in order to<br />
achieve this.<br />
D National policy<br />
We will work with Government<br />
and national agencies to ensure<br />
that policy reflects the specific<br />
needs of children and young<br />
people with SLCN and supports the<br />
communication needs of all young<br />
people. We work collaboratively<br />
with our partners to offer expert,<br />
evidenced solutions. Our website<br />
contains updates on our latest<br />
policy work 115 and our newsletter<br />
gives updates on the latest<br />
developments 116 .<br />
D Local policy and practice<br />
We will ensure that speech,<br />
language and communication<br />
and SLCN are issues that those<br />
who develop local policy and<br />
service frameworks understand<br />
and address in their policies and<br />
services. Within the changing<br />
landscape, we will provide practical<br />
tools to support local authorities,<br />
health commissioners and others<br />
to ensure that children and young<br />
people with SLCN receive the best<br />
local services possible.<br />
In order to achieve this we’re asking<br />
schools to take our <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Commitment.<br />
26 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong>
D <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> Commitment<br />
We will provide individual schools,<br />
federations and academy chains<br />
with a user-friendly route to the<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Commitment, to<br />
enable them to develop a whole<br />
school approach to communication.<br />
This approach will take schools<br />
through a number of steps,<br />
assessing their needs in relation to<br />
communication and SLCN, helping<br />
them to prioritise what they should<br />
address to ensure the best possible<br />
teaching and learning, and then<br />
sign posting them to suitable and<br />
effective resources and approaches<br />
from the <strong>Trust</strong> and our Consortium.<br />
This will focus on five areas:<br />
1. School leadership<br />
2. Staff development<br />
3. <strong>Communication</strong> friendly schools<br />
4. Identifying evidence-based<br />
interventions to support children<br />
and young people with SLCN<br />
5. Engagement with parents,<br />
families and employers<br />
Making these necessary changes<br />
in practise will enable schools to<br />
make a commitment to address<br />
communication and will support<br />
them on their journey to create a<br />
generation of great communicators.<br />
To find out about this resource as<br />
soon as it is launched, please email<br />
enquiries@thecommunicationtrust.<br />
org.uk<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 27
References<br />
1<br />
Clegg, J. (2004) Language and Behaviour: an<br />
exploratory study of pupils in an exclusion unit.<br />
Proceedings of the British Psychological Society<br />
Developmental Section Annual Conference,<br />
Leeds, September.<br />
2<br />
Bryan, K., Freer, J., and Furlong, C. (2007)<br />
Language and communication difficulties in<br />
juvenile offenders. International Journal of<br />
Language & <strong>Communication</strong> Disorders, Vol. 42,<br />
No. 5, Pages 505-520).<br />
3<br />
Davies, K. et al (2004) An Evaluation of the<br />
Literacy Demands of General Offending<br />
Behaviour Programmes. Home Office Findings<br />
233.<br />
4<br />
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007) Dialogue<br />
and the Development of Children’s Thinking.<br />
London: Routledge.<br />
5<br />
Roulstone, S., Wren, Y., Bakopoulou, I. and<br />
Lindsay, G. (2012) Exploring interventions<br />
for children and young people with speech,<br />
language and communication needs: A study<br />
of practice. Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research<br />
Programme, Department for Education.<br />
6 <br />
Dockrell, J., Bakopoulou, I., Law J., Spencer,<br />
S. and Lindsay, G. (2012) Developing a<br />
communication supporting classrooms<br />
observation tool. Better <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Research Programme, Department for<br />
Education.<br />
7<br />
Bercow, J. (2008) <strong>The</strong> Bercow Report: A Review<br />
of Services for Children and Young People (0–19)<br />
with Speech, Language and <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Needs, Department for Education.<br />
8 <br />
Tickell, C. (2011) <strong>The</strong> Early Years: Foundations<br />
for life, health and learning. An Independent<br />
Report on the Early Years Foundation Stage to<br />
Her Majesty’s Government.<br />
9<br />
Nutbrown, C. (2012) Foundations for quality -<br />
<strong>The</strong> independent review of early education and<br />
childcare qualifications.<br />
10<br />
Allen, G. (2011) Early intervention: the next<br />
steps – An Independent Report to Her<br />
Majesty’s Government.<br />
11 <br />
Field, F. (2010) <strong>The</strong> foundation years:<br />
preventing poor children becoming poor adults.<br />
<strong>The</strong> report of the Independent Review on<br />
Poverty and Life Chances.<br />
12<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> (2012) Goodbye,<br />
Hello http://www.thecommunicationtrust.org.<br />
uk/media/27944/helloevaluationreport_-_<br />
final.pdf<br />
13<br />
ibid<br />
14<br />
Ruben R. J., Redefining the survival of the<br />
fittest: <strong>Communication</strong> Disorders in the 21st<br />
Century, 2000.<br />
15<br />
Ofsted (2012) <strong>The</strong> report of Her Majesty’s Chief<br />
Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and<br />
Skills: Schools.<br />
16<br />
Locke, E., Ginsborg, J., and Peers, I. (2002)<br />
Development and Disadvantage: implications<br />
for early years. International Journal of<br />
Language & <strong>Communication</strong> Disorders. 27 (1).<br />
P.3 -15.<br />
17<br />
Waldfogel, J. and Washbrook, E. (2010) Low<br />
income and early cognitive development in the<br />
28 A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong><br />
U.K. London: Sutton <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />
18<br />
Gregory, S. (2012) Investing in their future: how<br />
do we ensure our children get the good quality<br />
early years provision they need if they and the<br />
country are to succeed in the future? Ofsted<br />
Early Years Annual Lecture.<br />
19<br />
CBI (2012) First Steps: A new approach for our<br />
schools CBI. http://www.cbi.org.uk/campaigns/<br />
education-campaign-ambition-for-all/newapproach-for-schools-infographic<br />
20<br />
Specific language impairment (SLI) is a<br />
developmental disorder where language<br />
difficulties are out of line with a child’s<br />
other abilities and with no obvious cause or<br />
impairment.<br />
21<br />
Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. (2007) Children’s<br />
Cognitive Development and Learning (Primary<br />
Review Research Survey 2/1a) Cambridge:<br />
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education<br />
and literacy.<br />
22<br />
Eastman, A. (2011) No excuses: A review of<br />
educational exclusion. Centre for Social Justice.<br />
23<br />
Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Bailey, A. M.,<br />
Stothard, S. and Lindsay, G. (2011) Language<br />
and Literacy Attainment of Pupils during<br />
Early Years and through KS2: Does teacher<br />
assessment at five provide a valid measure<br />
of children’s current and future educational<br />
attainments? Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research<br />
Programme. Department for Education.<br />
24<br />
Gross, J. (2011) <strong>The</strong> contribution of oral<br />
language skills to school improvement and<br />
outcomes for children and young people.<br />
Office of the <strong>Communication</strong> Champion.<br />
25<br />
Snowling, M., and Stackhouse, J. (2006)<br />
Dyslexia, Speech and Language: A Practitioners<br />
Handbook. Dyslexia Series. Chichister: Whurr<br />
Publishers Ltd.<br />
26<br />
Hartshorne, M. (2006) Speech, Language and<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Needs and Literacy Difficulties.<br />
I CAN Talk Series, Issue 1.<br />
27<br />
Hirsch (1996) <strong>The</strong> Effects of Weaknesses in<br />
Oral Language on Reading Comprehension<br />
Growth. cited in Torgesen, J. (2004) Current<br />
issues in assessment and intervention for<br />
younger and older students. Paper presented<br />
at NASP Workshop.<br />
28<br />
Snow, C. E. (1999) Why the home is so<br />
important in learning to read. Paper presented<br />
at the George Graham Lecture in Reading,<br />
Charlottesville, VA.<br />
29<br />
Feinstein, L., and Duckworth, K. (2006)<br />
Development in the early years: Its importance<br />
for school performance and adult outcomes<br />
(20) London: Centre for Research on the Wider<br />
Benefits of Learning.<br />
30<br />
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,<br />
T., and Lindsay, G., (2012) Profiles of need<br />
and provision for children with language<br />
impairments and autism spectrum disorders<br />
in mainstream schools: A prospective study.<br />
Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme.<br />
31<br />
Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme.<br />
32<br />
ibid<br />
33<br />
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) Children’s<br />
Social Development, Peer Interaction and<br />
Classroom Learning. Primary Review Research<br />
Survey 2/1b. Cambridge: University of<br />
Cambridge Faculty of Education.<br />
34<br />
Durkin, K. (1995) Developmental Social<br />
Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.<br />
35<br />
St Clair, M., Pickles, A., Durkin, K., and Conti-<br />
Ramsden, G. (2011) A longitudinal study of<br />
behavioral, emotional and social difficulties in<br />
individuals with a history of specific language<br />
impairment (SLI). Journal of <strong>Communication</strong><br />
Disorders. 44 (2). p. 186–199.<br />
36<br />
Vallotton, C., and Ayoub, C. (2011) Use<br />
your words: <strong>The</strong> role of language in the<br />
development of toddlers’ self-regulation.<br />
Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 26 (2). p.<br />
169–181.<br />
37<br />
Clegg, J. (2004) Language and behaviour: an<br />
explanatory study of pupils in an exclusion unit.<br />
British Psychological Society Development<br />
Section Annual Conference, Leeds.<br />
38<br />
Arnold, D. H., Kupersmidt, J. B., Voegler-Lee, M.<br />
E., and Marshall, N. A. (2012) <strong>The</strong> association<br />
between preschool children’s social<br />
functioning and their emergent academic<br />
skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 27<br />
(3). p. 376–386.<br />
39<br />
Strand and Lindsay (2012)<br />
40<br />
Meschi, E., Micklewright J., Vignoles, A<br />
and Lindsay, G. (2012) <strong>The</strong> transitions<br />
between categories of special educational<br />
needs of pupils with Speech, Language and<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Needs (SLCN) and Autism<br />
Spectrum Disorder (ASD) as they progress<br />
through the education system. Better<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme.<br />
41<br />
Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme.<br />
42<br />
Klee, T. (2007) Screening 3-year-olds for<br />
language delay using selected parent-report<br />
measures: the jury is still out., Evidence-<br />
Based <strong>Communication</strong> Assessment and<br />
Intervention. 1(2). p. 58-59.<br />
43<br />
Laing, G. J., Law, J., Levin, A., and Logan,<br />
S. (2002) Evaluation of a structured test<br />
and a parent led method for screening for<br />
speech and language problems: Prospective<br />
population based study. British Medical<br />
Journal. p. 325 (1152).<br />
44<br />
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation<br />
report. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />
45<br />
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,<br />
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
46<br />
Conti-Ramsden, G., Simkin, Z., and Botting,<br />
N. (2006) <strong>The</strong> prevalence of autistic spectrum<br />
disorders in adolescents with a history of<br />
specific language impairment. Journal of Child<br />
Psychology and Psychiatry. 47 (6).<br />
47<br />
Ofsted, (2010) A statement is not enough -<br />
<strong>The</strong> special educational needs and disability<br />
review.<br />
48<br />
McLaughlin, M. J., Dyson, A., Nagle, K.,<br />
Thurlow, M., Rouse, M., Hardman, M., Norwich,<br />
B., Burke. P. J., and Perlin, M. (2006) Crosscultural<br />
perspectives on the classification of
children with disabilities: Part II Implementing<br />
classification systems in schools. Journal of<br />
Special Education. 40 (1). P. 46-58.<br />
49<br />
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,<br />
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
50<br />
Bercow, J. (2008) See endnote 7 for the full<br />
reference.<br />
51<br />
Ofsted Annual report 2009/2010<br />
52<br />
Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. (2007) See<br />
endnote 21 for the full reference.<br />
53<br />
Mercer, N. and Littleton, K. (2007) See endnote<br />
4 for the full reference.<br />
54<br />
Ofsted (2009) English at the Crossroads: An<br />
Evaluation of English in primary and secondary<br />
schools 2005/8.<br />
55<br />
Eastman, A. (2011) See endnote 22 for the full<br />
reference.<br />
56<br />
https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/<br />
eOrderingDownload/teachers%20standards.<br />
pdf<br />
57<br />
<strong>The</strong> Framework for the National Curriculum - A<br />
report by the Expert Panel for the National<br />
Curriculum review (2011) https://www.<br />
education.gov.uk/publications/standard/<br />
publicationDetail/Page1/DFE-00135-2011<br />
58<br />
Ofsted, (2012) <strong>The</strong> framework for school<br />
inspection http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/<br />
resources/framework-for-school-inspection<br />
59<br />
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) <strong>The</strong><br />
perspectives of children and young people who<br />
have speech, language and communication<br />
needs, and their parents. Department for<br />
Education<br />
60<br />
YouGov/<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> survey,<br />
June 2007.<br />
61<br />
Ofsted (2009) See endnote 54 for the full<br />
reference.<br />
62<br />
<strong>The</strong> Bullock Report (1975) A language for life.<br />
Report of the Committee of Enquiry appointed<br />
by the Secretary of State for Education and<br />
Science under the Chairmanship of Sir Alan<br />
Bullock FBA http://www.educationengland.<br />
org.uk/documents/bullock/bullock01.html<br />
63<br />
Sage, R. (2005) Communicating with students<br />
who have learning and behaviour difficulties:<br />
A continuing professional development<br />
programme. Emotional and Behavioural<br />
Difficulties. 10 (4) cited in I CAN Talk secondary<br />
paper.<br />
64<br />
National Literacy <strong>Trust</strong>, 2011<br />
65<br />
Baumwell, Tamis-LeMonda & Bornstein, 1997;<br />
Hoff, 2003; Landry, Miller-Loncar, Smith &<br />
Swank, 1997<br />
66<br />
Girolametto & Weitzman, 2002<br />
67<br />
Ofsted (2012) From training to teaching early<br />
language and literacy: <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of<br />
training to teach language and literacy in<br />
primary schools.<br />
68<br />
RCSLT survey 2013.<br />
69<br />
Gross, J. (2011) Two Years On: final report of<br />
the <strong>Communication</strong> Champion for children.<br />
Office of the <strong>Communication</strong> Champion.<br />
70<br />
Gross, J. (2011) See endnote 24 for the full<br />
reference.<br />
71<br />
Stackhouse J., and Wright J. A. (2011)<br />
Introduction: Children’s Language and<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Needs: Evaluating Intervention<br />
and Service Provision in Schools. Child<br />
Language Teaching and Learning. 27 (2).<br />
72<br />
ibid.<br />
73<br />
Ofsted (2010) See endnote 70 for the full<br />
reference.<br />
74<br />
Department for Education (2011) <strong>The</strong><br />
Framework for the National Curriculum. A<br />
report by the Expert Panel for the National<br />
Curriculum review. London: Department for<br />
Education.<br />
75<br />
Ayre, A., and Roulstone, S. (2009) Transition<br />
to secondary school: supporting pupils with<br />
speech, language and communication needs.<br />
Report to <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>.<br />
76<br />
Stackhouse J., Wright J. A. (2011) See endnote<br />
71 for the full reference.<br />
78<br />
Lindsay, G., Wren, Y., Bakapoulou, I., Goodlad,<br />
S., and Roulstone, S. (2012) Interventions<br />
for Children with Speech, Language And<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Needs (SLCN) in England: A<br />
Survey Of Speech And Language <strong>The</strong>rapists.<br />
Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme:<br />
2nd interim report. Department for Education.<br />
79<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong>’s Consortium<br />
Catalogue, www.thecommunicationtrust.org.<br />
uk/consortiumcatalogue.<br />
80<br />
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,<br />
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) Developing a<br />
communication supporting classrooms<br />
observation tool. London: Department for<br />
Education.<br />
81<br />
This view has been proposed historically by<br />
many, from <strong>The</strong> Bullock Report (1975) through<br />
to the most recent National Curriculum Expert<br />
Group.<br />
82<br />
Department for Education (2011) See endnote<br />
74 for the full reference.<br />
83<br />
Locke, E., Ginsborg, J., and Peers, I. (2002)<br />
Development and Disadvantage: implications<br />
for early years. International Journal of<br />
Language & <strong>Communication</strong> Disorders. 27 (1).<br />
P.3 -15.<br />
84<br />
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority<br />
(2008) Curriculum Evidence Probe 2 Report<br />
Dialogue and Curriculum Development.<br />
85<br />
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) See endnote<br />
33 for the full reference.<br />
86<br />
(Girolametto, Hoaken, Weitzman, & van<br />
Leishout, 2000)<br />
87<br />
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,<br />
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 80 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
88<br />
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,<br />
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 80 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
89<br />
Xue, Y., and Meisels, S. J. (2004) Early literacy<br />
instruction and learning in kindergarten.<br />
American Educational Research Journal. 41<br />
(1). p. 191-229.<br />
90<br />
Winters, R. (2004) Vocabulary anchors: Building<br />
conceptual connections with young readers.<br />
Reading instruction: Putting the National<br />
Reading Pane Report into Practice. 130.<br />
91<br />
Dockrell, J. E., Bakopoulou, I., Law, J., Spencer,<br />
S., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 78 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
92<br />
Howe, C. and Mercer, N. (2007) See endnote<br />
33 for the full reference.<br />
93<br />
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority<br />
(2008) See endnote 84 for the full reference.<br />
94<br />
Better <strong>Communication</strong> Research Programme.<br />
95<br />
Hutchinson J., and Clegg J. (2011) Education<br />
practitioner-led intervention to facilitate<br />
language learning in young children: An<br />
effectiveness study. Child Language Teaching<br />
and Learning. 27 (2). p. 151 – 164.<br />
96<br />
Lee. W, (2011) Universally Speaking series. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
97<br />
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation<br />
report. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
98<br />
Lee, W. (2013) Talk of the Town evaluation<br />
report. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
99<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk/<br />
whatworks<br />
100<br />
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,<br />
T., and Lindsay, G. (2012) See endnote 30 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
101<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk<br />
102<br />
McLaughlin, M.J., Dyson, A., Nagle, K.,<br />
Thurlow, M., Rouse, M., Hardman, M., Norwich,<br />
B., Burke. P.J., and Perlin, M. (2006) Crosscultural<br />
perspectives on the classification of<br />
children with disabilities: Part II Implementing<br />
classification systems in schools. Journal of<br />
Special Education. 40 (1), p. 46-58.<br />
103<br />
Dockrell, J., Ricketts, J., Palikara, O., Charman,<br />
T., and Lindsay, G., (2012) See endnote 30 for<br />
the full reference.<br />
104<br />
Lee, W. (2012) Speech, language and<br />
communication progression tools. <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
105<br />
Gascoigne, M. (2006) Supporting Children with<br />
Speech, Language and <strong>Communication</strong> needs<br />
within integrated children’s services. RCSLT<br />
Position Paper. London: RCSLT.<br />
106<br />
Stackhouse J., Wright J. A. (2011) See<br />
endnote 71 for the full reference.<br />
107<br />
Hart, B., and Risley, T. (2003) <strong>The</strong> early<br />
catastrophe: <strong>The</strong> 30 million word gap by 3.<br />
American Educator. 27 (1). p. 4-9.<br />
108<br />
Blanden, J. (2006) ‘Bucking the trend’: what<br />
enables those who are disadvantaged in<br />
childhood to succeed later in life? Department<br />
for Work and Pensions.<br />
109<br />
OECD (2011) What can parents do to help<br />
their children succeed in school? PISA IN<br />
FOCUS OECD.<br />
110<br />
Lindsay, G., Wren, Y., Bakapoulou, I., Goodlad,<br />
S., and Roulstone, S. (2012) See endnote 78<br />
for the full reference.<br />
111<br />
Roulstone, S., Coad, J., Hambly, H., and<br />
Ayre, A., (2010) Preferred outcomes. Better<br />
<strong>Communication</strong> Research Group: 1st Interim<br />
Report. Department for Education.<br />
112<br />
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) see<br />
endnote 59 for full reference.<br />
113<br />
Lee, W. (2009) What do children and young<br />
people think about speech, language and<br />
communication skills? <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong><br />
<strong>Trust</strong>.<br />
114<br />
Roulstone, S., and Lindsay, G. (2010) See<br />
endnote 59 for the full reference.<br />
115<br />
Visit <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> Policy Pages<br />
at www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk/policy<br />
116<br />
Sign up to <strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
newsletter at our website www.<br />
thecommunicationtrust.org.uk<br />
A <strong>Generation</strong> <strong>Adrift</strong> 29
Recent research concludes that teachers would benefit<br />
from more knowledge of children’s speech, language<br />
and communication development, as well as training<br />
in how to assess and measure these skills in young<br />
children appropriately.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> is a coalition of nearly 50 voluntary and community<br />
organisations with expertise in speech, language and communication. We<br />
harness our collective expertise to support the children’s workforce and<br />
commissioners to support all children and young people’s communication<br />
skills, particularly those with speech, language and communication needs<br />
(SLCN).<br />
We do this by raising awareness, providing information and workforce<br />
development opportunities, influencing policy, promoting best practice among<br />
the children’s workforce and commissioning work from our members.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Trust</strong> was founded in 2007 by children’s charities Afasic and I CAN<br />
together with BT and the Council for Disabled Children.<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk<br />
This paper was written by Wendy Lee, Professional Director at<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
Published January 2013<br />
Design and photography: deborahripley.com
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Trust</strong><br />
8 Wakley Street,<br />
London EC1V 7QE<br />
020 7843 2526<br />
www.thecommunicationtrust.org.uk