Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Qualitative Research in Practice : Stories From the Field - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Qualitative</strong> research <strong>in</strong> practice<br />
The role <strong>the</strong> adult observer takes vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> child will be a<br />
powerful shaper of <strong>the</strong> research, and of what children will allow <strong>the</strong><br />
observer to see and/or to participate <strong>in</strong>. While some suggest that<br />
<strong>the</strong> adult observer can divest <strong>the</strong>mselves of <strong>the</strong>ir ‘adultness’ and<br />
so <strong>in</strong>teract with children as an equal (Goode, 1986), or <strong>in</strong> a leastadult<br />
way (Mandell, 1988), F<strong>in</strong>e and Sandstrom recommend <strong>the</strong><br />
researcher take <strong>the</strong> middle ground, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> role of an adult friend:<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>al major type of participant observation role, and <strong>the</strong> one<br />
emphasised <strong>in</strong> this book, is to become a friend to one’s subjects and<br />
<strong>in</strong>teract with <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most trusted way possible—without hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />
any explicit authority role. As <strong>in</strong>dicated above, <strong>in</strong> our view, this will<br />
always be an ideal type because of <strong>the</strong> demographic and power<br />
differences <strong>in</strong>volved ...We believe <strong>the</strong>re is a methodological value <strong>in</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> differences between sociologists and children—a<br />
feature of <strong>in</strong>teraction that permits <strong>the</strong> researcher to behave <strong>in</strong><br />
certa<strong>in</strong> ‘nonkid’ ways—such as ask<strong>in</strong>g ‘ignorant’ questions (F<strong>in</strong>e &<br />
Sandstrom, 1988, p. 17).<br />
In a participant observation study of pre-schoolers’ peer behaviour,<br />
Corsaro (1985) chose a ‘reactive’ approach to engag<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong><br />
children. He was present and available <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> children’s activity<br />
areas, but waited for <strong>the</strong>m to make <strong>the</strong> first moves. After some<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial tentative advances from a couple of children, <strong>the</strong>y gradually<br />
seemed to accept his presence and <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir activities.<br />
While clearly not ‘one of <strong>the</strong>m’, <strong>the</strong> children also did not regard him<br />
as a formal authority figure, respond<strong>in</strong>g to his occasional attempts<br />
to control <strong>the</strong>ir behaviour with ‘You’re not a teacher’ or ‘You can’t<br />
tell us what to do’ (1985, p. 31).<br />
Even so, any adult will <strong>in</strong>evitably be seen to some extent as<br />
an authority figure, and issues of children’s reactivity to an adult<br />
presence need to be taken <strong>in</strong>to account (F<strong>in</strong>e & Sandstrom, 1988). It<br />
is important that <strong>the</strong> adult participant–observer has some reason for<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>re that is understood and accepted by <strong>the</strong> children, as a<br />
first step to develop<strong>in</strong>g a relationship with <strong>the</strong>m. The researcher’s<br />
presence and where <strong>the</strong>y fit <strong>in</strong> needs to make sense to <strong>the</strong> children.<br />
Establish<strong>in</strong>g rapport with adult authorities or caregivers is also<br />
essential, especially where <strong>the</strong> researcher holds no formal authority<br />
<strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> children.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>e and Sandstrom suggest that observation is possible<br />
with children from age three, when ‘<strong>the</strong> child beg<strong>in</strong>s to belong to a<br />
group that is mean<strong>in</strong>gful to him or her, and, as a consequence,<br />
group relations can be studied’ (1988, p. 36). While consent for<br />
100