17.11.2014 Views

Case study property - Greenmount Press

Case study property - Greenmount Press

Case study property - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Print Post Approved Publication No. PP 424022/1583<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011<br />

www.cottongrower.com.au<br />

The Australian Cottongrower<br />

P.O. Box 766, Toowoomba, 4350.<br />

Ph: (07) 4659 3555. Fax (07) 4638 4520.<br />

Email: cotton@greenmountpress.com.au<br />

Website: www.cottongrower.com.au<br />

DELIVERIES: 120 Herries St, Toowoomba, Qld. 4350.<br />

EDITOR:<br />

David Dowling<br />

ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Lloyd O’Connell<br />

GROUP SALES MANAGER: Norm Neeld<br />

PRODUCTION MANAGER: Mick Allan<br />

OFFICE MANAGER: Catherine O’Connell<br />

ADVERTISING: Norm Neeld<br />

Ph: (07) 5450 1720<br />

Fax: (07) 5450 1102<br />

Mobile: 0428 794 801<br />

CONTENTS OF ADVERTISEMENTS are the responsibility of the<br />

advertisers. All statements and opinions expressed in The Australian<br />

Cottongrower are published after due consideration of information<br />

gained from sources believed to be authentic. The following of advice<br />

given is at the reader’s own risk, and no responsibility is accepted for the<br />

accuracy of the matter published herein. No portion in whole or part may<br />

be reproduced without permission of the publisher. Copyright 2011.<br />

Published by Berekua Pty. Ltd., 40 Creek Street, Brisbane. Registered<br />

by Australia Post Print Post Approved Publication number<br />

PP 405518/00026. ISSN 1442–5289.<br />

PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY, APRIL, JUNE, AUGUST, OCTOBER,<br />

DECEMBER. COTTON YEARBOOK PUBLISHED IN SEPTEMBER.<br />

Divine Dinner Plain...<br />

Bring the family,<br />

enjoy the<br />

wonderful<br />

snow that is<br />

still falling,<br />

it’s perfect!<br />

Skiing, boarding,<br />

cross country<br />

skiing or just<br />

enjoy the<br />

fantastic<br />

At Dinner Plain atmosphere the that<br />

At Dinner Plain the<br />

is Dinner Plain<br />

pace is<br />

pace<br />

easy<br />

is easy going...<br />

Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />

be together by the fireside or miles apart<br />

Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />

exploring the cross-country trail network.<br />

be together Where by the you Where fireside stroll you stroll the or the snow miles treelined covered apart streets<br />

simply for the sights to meet<br />

exploring the tree cross-country lined streets trail simply network. for the<br />

friends for a restaurant dinner or<br />

sights or to meet friends for a<br />

Where you stroll drinks the at treelined the bar. The village streets itself<br />

restaurant dinner helps or set the drinks community at the<br />

simply bar. The for village the<br />

atmosphere,<br />

sights itself or helps natural<br />

to<br />

building<br />

meet set the<br />

friends community for a materials restaurant atmosphere, and earthy dinner tones cosy blur or<br />

the line between man made and<br />

drinks lights at the sparkle bar. and<br />

alpine The entice<br />

environment. village you<br />

Over itself into<br />

200<br />

their warmth.<br />

helps<br />

lodges Snow<br />

set the<br />

and chalets lined,<br />

community<br />

with natural all the<br />

buildings and conveniences earthy of tones a modern blur resort. the<br />

line atmosphere, between man natural made building and alpine<br />

Dinner Plain is the place<br />

environment. materials and for Over earthy your 200 next tones lodges holiday. blur and<br />

the chalets line between with all the man conveniences made and of<br />

Explore our website at<br />

a modern resort.<br />

alpine environment. www.dinnerplain.com Over 200<br />

or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />

lodges and chalets with all the<br />

or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />

conveniences of a modern resort.<br />

What are you waiting for...<br />

contents<br />

8 Cotton bunchy top threat to high yielding cotton<br />

10 2011 Cotton Trade Show wrapup<br />

14 The impact of early defoliation on textile performance<br />

19 Saluting finalists in the Cotton Awards<br />

22 Scheme offers irrigators funding to improve water efficiency<br />

24 Queensland producers invest in Healthy HeadWaters<br />

Water Matters<br />

25 <strong>Case</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>property</strong>: ‘Long Meadows’, Bourke<br />

ginning & fibre quality series<br />

36 Quarantine treatments on the physical properties of<br />

cotton – Part 2<br />

42 Is mite pest-resistant cotton a little closer?<br />

43 Change in cotton production lecturer<br />

44 Assessment of cotton soils essential<br />

45 CottonSafe guide tops the charts<br />

regular features<br />

2 Editorial<br />

4 Cotton Research Roundup<br />

marketing<br />

28 World Commodity Watch<br />

30 The World Cotton Market<br />

32 What is fair value for the 2011–12 cotton crop?<br />

39 Classic Tractor Tales: The 1930s<br />

46 Germinating Ideas<br />

48 News & New Products<br />

51 District Reports<br />

front cover<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011<br />

Volume 32, No.3 $6.60<br />

Dinner Plain is the place<br />

for your next holiday.<br />

Explore our website at<br />

www.dinnerplain.com<br />

or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />

or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />

j/24d01072/270808<br />

INSIDE<br />

CBT threat to<br />

high yielding<br />

cotton<br />

Impact of early Saluting<br />

defoliation finalists in<br />

on textile the Cotton<br />

performance Awards<br />

Gordon and David Brownhill are finalists<br />

in the Australian Cotton Industry Awards<br />

to be presented at a dinner in Narrabri<br />

on August 10. For full story and details of<br />

all the finalists see page 19.<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 1


Professional Recruiters<br />

of Agribusiness<br />

Professionals<br />

SYDNEY<br />

Susan Leslie Lucy Purcell<br />

Tim Vidler Suzie Ward<br />

Al Kellaway<br />

02 9223 9944<br />

BRISBANE<br />

Dominica Carolan – 07 3832 9866<br />

MELBOURNE<br />

David Reid – 03 9866 6133<br />

Agribusiness Recruiters –<br />

LEADING THE WAY SINCE 1979<br />

www.agri.com.au<br />

U78496<br />

Editorial…<br />

David Dowling, Editor<br />

How refreshing it is to be part of a cotton industry which is<br />

surging back after a hibernation which has lasted for the past<br />

six years or more. It has taken 10 years to match and exceed<br />

the previous record cotton crop, even though the season<br />

just past has not been kind to everyone – and a downright<br />

disaster for some. But assuming we can finally get this never-ending crop to<br />

the gin before spring, next season could be anything.<br />

It is probably the best set-up for a season for the past 20 years. Water<br />

is available for irrigators and most areas also have decent subsoil moisture.<br />

Prices are still at historically high levels and better than other competitive<br />

crops. And the La Niña weather influence that created such havoc last season<br />

has finished, so we can possibly look forward to a season with slightly<br />

fewer deluges. On the negative side, much more of the crop will be planted<br />

in back-to-back situations this season after limited preparation, which could<br />

put pressure on yields.<br />

The new mood of optimism is best exemplified by the plan to build a gin<br />

in southern NSW, the first new gin in Australia for many years, to be backed<br />

up by an expected 40,000 hectares or more of cotton next season. Back in<br />

the boom times of the 1980s and 90s, there weren’t many years that went<br />

by without a new gin opening, and they were often pretty elaborate affairs.<br />

The ginners were competing for cotton while up to a dozen merchants<br />

were out there buying aggressively. At the same time there were probably<br />

20 chemical companies of one form or another and many of them had a<br />

rep in just about every cotton town. The cotton farms themselves often had<br />

a number of staff and teams of bug checkers, cotton chippers, aerial operators<br />

and spray markers made a living from the industry. In many ways the<br />

industry was much more visible because of the large number of service staff<br />

employed.<br />

No doubt things are more efficient now. Bollgard, Roundup Ready and<br />

now round bales have made a big difference. We grew a record crop last year<br />

with many, many fewer people than would have been needed 20 years ago.<br />

The cost of that efficiency is a reduction in the ‘social life’ of the industry, but<br />

that’s progress, I guess.<br />

SMK CONSULTANTS PTY. LTD.<br />

surveying – irrigation – environmental<br />

• Irrigation Layout • IRRIgatION & DRAInagE ManagEMENT PLANS<br />

• Grid Surveys • LAND & WATER ManagEMENT PLANS<br />

• EM SurvEYS<br />

• IRRIgatION EFFICIENCY EVALuatION<br />

• FARM PLANS • BEELINE PROCESSIng • ENVIronMEntaL SERVICES<br />

SERVING NORTHERN NSW AND CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND<br />

MOREE<br />

39 Frome Street, PO Box 774, Moree NSW 2400<br />

Ph (02) 6752 1640; Fax (02) 6752 5070<br />

Contact: Paul Covell, Peter Taylor<br />

Email: ptaylor@smk.com.au<br />

GOONDIWINDI<br />

130 Marshall St, PO Box 422, Goondiwindi Qld 4390<br />

Ph (07) 4671 2445; Fax (07) 4671 2561<br />

Contact Ralph Kinsella, Mike Henderson<br />

Email: qld@smk.com.au<br />

2 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


In this issue...<br />

CBT threat<br />

The recent Cotton<br />

Australia General Meeting<br />

in Moree confirmed that<br />

growers across most valleys<br />

are very concerned about<br />

the high prevalence of<br />

cotton bunchy top (CBT)<br />

this past season.<br />

See story............................ Page 8<br />

Impact of early<br />

defoliation<br />

Immature cotton<br />

fibres have less cell wall<br />

thickening with more<br />

hollow space and are<br />

often associated with low<br />

micronaire (less than 3.8). Immature fibre<br />

is undesirable for textile manufacture<br />

because it does not take up dye as<br />

effectively as mature fibres.<br />

See story.......................... Page 14<br />

Saluting finalists<br />

In a salute to the<br />

drivers of the Australian<br />

cotton industry, finalists<br />

were announced in the<br />

2011 Australian Cotton<br />

Industry Awards at the Cotton Trade<br />

Show in Moree, heart of cotton country.<br />

With the cotton industry in resurgence, a<br />

strong field of candidates was nominated<br />

across all cotton valleys.<br />

See story.......................... Page 19<br />

Healthy HeadWaters<br />

Producers interested in water use<br />

efficiency technology are encouraged to<br />

contact the DEEDI Healthy HeadWaters<br />

project team to discuss the latest decision<br />

support tools and project updates. Round<br />

2 of the DERM run Healthy Headwaters<br />

Infrastructure Program opened on May 3<br />

and will close at the end of July.<br />

See story.......................... Page 24<br />

Mite pest-resistant<br />

cotton?<br />

While managing major<br />

pests such as Helicoverpa<br />

has been the most<br />

significant focus of cotton industry R&D<br />

in the past 20 years, CSIRO has also<br />

been devoting resources and expertise<br />

towards managing other pests that affect<br />

cotton. One pest that can potentially<br />

decrease yield and cause quality losses in<br />

cotton is the two-spotted spider mite.<br />

See story.......................... Page 42<br />

The 1930s<br />

Planet Earth was a<br />

very disturbed place<br />

in the 1930s. As the financial world<br />

struggled to pull itself out of The Great<br />

Depression, shocked and impoverished<br />

Wall Street bankers continued leaping out<br />

of skyscraper windows.<br />

See story.......................... Page 39<br />

HARVEST WITH<br />

CUTTING EDGE<br />

PRECISION<br />

Consistently accurate and reliable, OmniSTAR is essential for<br />

controlled machine guidance in precision farming.<br />

www.omnistar.com.au | 1800 062 221 | sales@omnistar.com.au<br />

A D I V I S I O N O F T R I M B L E<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 3


COTTON COTTON COTTON<br />

RESEARCH ROUNDUP<br />

BRUCE PYKE<br />

BRUCE FINNEY<br />

Industry bunchytop specialists, Murray Sharman and Susan Maas of QDEEDI are<br />

recommending all farmers eliminate ratoon and volunteer cotton in and around farms<br />

over winter to halt the spread of bunchytop virus infestations.<br />

Bunchytop threat means<br />

winter clean-up is essential<br />

Industry biosecurity and pest experts<br />

are reinforcing the need for good farm<br />

hygiene over winter to avoid a renewed<br />

threat from the yield-sapping bunchytop<br />

virus spread by aphids.<br />

“We‘re extremely concerned about Cotton<br />

Bunchy Top (CBT),” says industry Biosecurity<br />

Specialist Susan Maas.<br />

“We have seen CBT go from some isolated<br />

incidences to become widespread.<br />

Some fields in both NSW and QLD recorded<br />

greater than 70 per cent of plants<br />

infested late in the season. Bunchytop virus<br />

resulted in serious yield loss in the affected<br />

fields.<br />

“This virus can only survive in living<br />

plants so we have a critical opportunity<br />

over winter to break the disease cycle by<br />

controlling hosts, in particular volunteer<br />

and ratoon cotton. If we have a wet spring<br />

we have the potential to see CBT worse<br />

than in 1998–99 when CBT reduced<br />

yields by 25 per cent on 21 per cent of<br />

the growing area, which equates to a 5.2<br />

per cent loss across the whole industry at a<br />

cost of $140 per hectare.”<br />

Weeds and rogue cotton provide the<br />

‘green bridge’ for pests to survive over<br />

winter and then infest the following cotton<br />

crop.<br />

According to industry Development and<br />

Delivery (D&D) Pest Management Specialist<br />

Sally Ceeney, of all the weeds, volunteer<br />

and ratoon cotton is the largest problem.<br />

It is a host for cotton insect pests, is difficult<br />

to control and is also a host for disease<br />

and potential biosecurity risk.<br />

“Allowing volunteer and ratoon cotton<br />

to survive over winter also carries a risk for<br />

Bollgard II resistance,” Sally warns.<br />

“By having weeds on your farm hosting<br />

insects you are effectively increasing the<br />

base population of pests at the start of the<br />

next season.<br />

“At the grower level this can be costly as<br />

it may lead to having to control these pests<br />

early in the season, and potentially numerous<br />

times during the season.<br />

“At an industry level, weeds hosting insect<br />

pests can increase chances of insecticide<br />

resistance developing. For example,<br />

after spraying aphids in-crop last season<br />

the survivors may be resistant individuals.”<br />

CRDC Board meets highland<br />

growers<br />

The CRDC Board held its mid-year<br />

meeting in Emerald in the first week of<br />

June. The meeting also provided valuable<br />

opportunites for growers and the Central<br />

Highlands CGA to host CRDC on-farm<br />

visits. The open discussions held in the<br />

field proved useful for all parties to jointly<br />

explore the role of R&D investments<br />

specifically tailored to secure improved<br />

productivity and sustainability across the<br />

central Queensland region.<br />

The field trips were designed by the<br />

cotton industry development and delivery<br />

specialist, Susan Maas of QDEEDI with<br />

the assistance of the CGA. Topics of interest<br />

were farmer responses to repeated<br />

Field discussions between the CRDC Board and Central Highlands growers in June.<br />

4 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Big new tractor. Little fuel.<br />

New Holland’s ECOBlue SCR technology is the most fuel-effi cient agricultural energy system in<br />

Australia. With SCR, the engine breathes clean, fresh air, instead of dirty, recirculated smog, to ensure<br />

optimal combustion conditions. And because no energy is wasted cooling exhaust gas, it can all be<br />

directed towards the primary working functions of the machine, resulting in more power and torque,<br />

better fuel economy and lower emissions. To find out more about ECOBlue SCR technology and<br />

how it can save you money, just go to www.thecleanenergyleader.com or contact you local dealer.<br />

Own a bright future


flood events and how those events created<br />

further issues of disease and on-farm biosecurity.<br />

Brad and Renee Anderson, and Andrew<br />

and Julie Geddes hosted the CRDC Board<br />

on their farms.<br />

New web tool for SLW<br />

decisions<br />

CSIRO Plant Industry as part of the<br />

Cotton Catchment Communities CRC has<br />

recently developed a web tool to make silverleaf<br />

whitefly (SLW) management easier<br />

and more predictable.<br />

The SLW Matrix web tool allows users<br />

to enter regular sampling information to<br />

track the development of SLW populations<br />

over time. The tool then compares<br />

these populations with the control thresholds,<br />

which are based on the pest population<br />

size, day degrees and crop stage.<br />

The development of this SLW Matrix<br />

tool has been the combined effort of<br />

web developer Loretta Clancy, development<br />

specialist Sandra Williams, both of<br />

CSIRO, Emerald based QLD DEEDI SLW<br />

researcher Richard Sequeria and Industry<br />

Development and Delivery Biosecurity<br />

Specialist Susan Maas.<br />

“This is a fantastic development and a<br />

huge step forward because it reduces a<br />

multi-dimensional whitefly spray decision<br />

and takes the process down to a simple<br />

and practical exercise that any crop manager<br />

will be able to use with confidence<br />

and ease,” Richard said.<br />

The SLW threshold matrix tool can be accessed<br />

through www.cottassist.crc.org.au.<br />

Once you have set-up farms and crops,<br />

the only required information is SLW sample<br />

data.<br />

The recommendation page presents<br />

the industry’s threshold matrix with your<br />

whitefly population data overlayed. In addition<br />

to this is a full explanation of the<br />

threshold that applies to your current SLW<br />

population and crop stage.<br />

Know energy use in order<br />

to reduce it<br />

Research into energy use is increasing<br />

our understanding of the range, costs and<br />

contributions of energy use to cotton production<br />

and greenhouse gas emissions.<br />

The research, undertaken by the National<br />

Centre for Engineering in Agriculture<br />

(NCEA), and funded by the CRDC, is<br />

enlisting growers to further the <strong>study</strong>.<br />

NCEA Deputy Director, Craig Baillie<br />

said on the average irrigated cotton farm,<br />

the main energy uses were irrigated water<br />

pumping, heavy tillage operations and<br />

harvesting.<br />

But there are significant opportunities<br />

for irrigators to reduce energy use and<br />

costs.<br />

The NCEA is developing a methodology<br />

to evaluate on-farm energy use. It involves<br />

three levels of assessment:<br />

The NCEA’s methodology is supported<br />

by EnergyCalc (www.kmsi.ncea.biz), a<br />

web-based tool that assesses direct onfarm<br />

energy use, costs and greenhouse gas<br />

emissions associated with the consumption<br />

of diesel, petrol, LPG and electricity.<br />

The NCEA has made some changes to<br />

the EnergyCalc software, such as automatic<br />

report generation (in PDF format)<br />

that includes summaries of machinery inputs<br />

and on farm energy use within the<br />

farming system, and performance indicators<br />

for benchmarking on-farm energy use.<br />

Other developments include an exporting<br />

feature that allows the user to manipulate<br />

data in an Excel spreadsheet format.<br />

By undertaking the multi-level assessment<br />

process and using the supporting<br />

tools (ie EnergyCalc), Craig said that farmers<br />

would discover plenty of areas to start<br />

saving energy and money.<br />

Email to: craig.baillie@usq.edu.au or visit<br />

EnergyCalc – http://www.kmsi.ncea.biz<br />

Look into space to save<br />

water<br />

Griffith-based researcher with CSIRO<br />

Land & Water, Dr John Hornbuckle, has<br />

been trialling a system that monitors irrigated<br />

crops using satellite imagery and<br />

on-ground measurements of evapotranspiration.<br />

This ongoing project funded by<br />

CRDC and Industry & Investment NSW<br />

could change the way Australian cotton<br />

growers schedule irrigation.<br />

John has been delivering the service to<br />

horticultural growers in southern Australia<br />

for the past two years. Last cotton season,<br />

he trialled the service with 10 consultants<br />

in the Gwydir region.<br />

For growers, the biggest benefit of this<br />

system is hoped to be its low cost. While<br />

the price has yet to be determined, John<br />

said that they hoped to commercialise the<br />

service within the next two seasons. The<br />

satellite data applied is free.<br />

A further benefit is that the system detects<br />

spatial variability across the farm,<br />

which ties in well with existing technology<br />

like soil moisture probes. According to<br />

John, if you only have 10 (soil moisture)<br />

probes, but you’ve got 50 paddocks, this<br />

approach could be used to fill the gaps in<br />

those paddocks that are not being measured<br />

by the probes.<br />

At this stage, the project is mostly operating<br />

at the feasibility level in cotton, but<br />

independent benefit–cost ratios completed<br />

for the Grape & Wine Research Development<br />

Corporation for the wine grape industry<br />

were good. John said this indicated<br />

that similar benefits could be achieved in<br />

other crops and other irrigation areas.<br />

Barb puts cotton on<br />

women’s agenda<br />

Mungindi cotton grower Barb Grey has<br />

been named the Rural Industries Research<br />

and Development Corporation (RIRDC)<br />

Australian Rural Women’s Award runnerup.<br />

Barb was named the 2011 Queensland<br />

RIRDC Rural Women’s Winner earlier this<br />

year before going on to compete for the<br />

national title, with the winners announced<br />

at a ceremony in the Great Hall, Parliament<br />

House on May 24.<br />

“To implement a pilot education program<br />

to empower aspiring rural and regional<br />

women leaders by giving them a<br />

better understanding of the political process<br />

and government decision making“ is<br />

Barb’s mission statement.<br />

“This would collectively and individually<br />

build a stronger, more effective voice for<br />

rural industries and regional communities,<br />

which I am passionate about,“ Barb said.<br />

“I will use the award bursary to build my<br />

skills in project facilitation to give me the<br />

competencies to deliver on this pilot program.<br />

If successful, I believe this could be<br />

replicated and become a regular training initiative<br />

for rural and regional women.”<br />

Mungindi’s Barb Grey, recognised<br />

nationally through the Rural Industries<br />

Research and Development Corporation<br />

(RIRDC) Australian Rural Women’s Award,<br />

is presented with the award by Mike Kelly,<br />

Parliamentary Secretary for Agriculture,<br />

Fisheries and Forestry.<br />

6 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


We’re with you<br />

from the beginning<br />

For over 40 years, Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD)<br />

has had a proud heritage of supporting Australian<br />

Cotton Growers.<br />

Being grower owned and controlled, no one knows<br />

the needs of the Australian Cotton Grower like CSD.<br />

CSD actively invests in local research and breeding<br />

to ensure the Australian Cotton Growers are leaders<br />

in the field in a competitive global market.<br />

Experience, integrity and local knowledge, CSD<br />

delivers what Australian Cotton Growers need.<br />

For more information on CSD visit www.csd.net.au or phone (02) 6795 0000


Cotton bunchy top threat to<br />

high yielding cotton<br />

By Greg Kauter, Cotton Australia<br />

The recent Cotton Australia General<br />

Meeting in Moree confirmed that<br />

growers across most valleys are very<br />

concerned about the high prevalence of<br />

cotton bunchy top (CBT) this past season.<br />

A recent tour with QDEEDI’s Emerald<br />

based cotton extension officer Susan Maas<br />

and the cotton industry pathology survey<br />

also helped identify that current levels of<br />

the disease are now a cause of concern<br />

for next season. The crop consultants association<br />

has gone so far as to state that<br />

“cotton bunchy top is currently the greatest<br />

threat to high yielding cotton production<br />

in Australia.”<br />

CBT symptoms were visible in almost<br />

half of the fields inspected as part of the<br />

industry’s disease survey this year, with<br />

some problematic patches. On some fields<br />

on the Downs for example, up to 70 per<br />

cent of plants were affected and significant<br />

yield impacts are likely. This is an industrywide<br />

problem requiring an industry-wide<br />

response, and Cotton Australia has taken<br />

a coordinating role.<br />

Cotton bunchy top is a viral disease<br />

spread by cotton aphids, with the last big<br />

outbreak back in the 1998–99 season. It<br />

causes stunting in cotton including reduced<br />

leaf and fruit size and reduced internode<br />

and petiole length, all having significant<br />

impacts on yield. Symptoms include leaves<br />

having pale green angular patterns around<br />

the margins, darker green centres and a<br />

leathery texture.<br />

In response to this issue, Cotton Australia<br />

is working with the CRC Extension<br />

Team to ensure up to date research and<br />

best practice information is shared with<br />

growers and is also advising CRDC on the<br />

research needs of growers in this area.<br />

The TIMS Committee, led by Cotton<br />

Australia, is also in the process of consulting<br />

with industry on the development of<br />

the Insect Resistance Management Strategy<br />

for 2011–12, with CBT set to be addressed<br />

by this plan.<br />

CSIRO Program Leader Dr Greg Constable<br />

addressed the Cotton Australia General<br />

Meeting on the CBT issue, updating members<br />

on the research program’s efforts to<br />

address it. The meeting expressed a clear<br />

desire for new varieties that are resistant to<br />

the disease, with Greg Constable informing<br />

Greg Kauter.<br />

the group that commercialisation of such<br />

varieties is about two years away.<br />

Because this technology is still in the<br />

pipeline, growers need to be on top of<br />

aphid control, and have strategies in place<br />

well ahead of next season.<br />

According to Crop Consultants Australia,<br />

“Cotton bunchy top cannot be prevented<br />

by controlling aphids” and growers<br />

should not rely on this. Not only are there<br />

limited insecticide options for aphid control,<br />

but their management has become<br />

particularly challenging in recent years due<br />

to growing resistance issues.<br />

Host management during winter is crucial<br />

in minimising the number of severely<br />

impacted fields next year. A number of<br />

broadleaf weeds such as marshmallow<br />

CBT could be a major threat next season.<br />

weeds can be hosts, but the biggest problem<br />

is volunteer and ratoon cotton as they<br />

provide the ‘green bridge’ that allows<br />

aphids to survive season to season. If these<br />

are not controlled, CBT can fast become<br />

an area-wide problem.<br />

Adding to the problem is the fact that<br />

volunteer and ratoon cotton can appear<br />

symptomless, because there is a latent period<br />

from initial infection to the presence<br />

of visual symptoms. The best rule of thumb<br />

is to remove any weeds, volunteer and ratoon<br />

cotton from the farm over winter and<br />

to not leave it until after cotton planting. If<br />

left too late, growers run the risk of CBTcarrying<br />

aphids leaving these host plants,<br />

resulting in sudden and widespread crop<br />

infestation and the risk of high yield loss.<br />

Ten reasons why ratoon and volunteer<br />

cotton must go:<br />

• Mealybugs survive from one season to<br />

the next on these food sources, infesting<br />

crops early in the following season.<br />

• Cotton aphids with resistance to neonicotinoids<br />

survive between seasons on<br />

these plants, reducing insecticide effectiveness.<br />

• Cotton bunchy top can be transmitted<br />

by cotton aphids from infected ratoons<br />

to new cotton crops.<br />

• Silverleaf whitefly survive between seasons<br />

on these plants, resulting in earlier<br />

infestation in the following season.<br />

• They provide a winter host for pale cotton<br />

stainers and Solenopsis mealybugs.<br />

• Inoculum of soil-borne diseases such as<br />

black root rot, Fusarium and Verticillium<br />

builds up in ratoons.<br />

• Ratoon plants place extra selection<br />

pressure on Bt.<br />

• Fields with ratoons from Bt cotton are<br />

unsuitable for planting refuge crops, as<br />

the refuges cannot be effective if contaminated<br />

with Bt cotton plants.<br />

• Removing ratoons may be a costly exercise,<br />

but cheaper than the costs of problems<br />

resulting from not removing them.<br />

• They are a biosecurity risk. Ratoons<br />

harbour pests and are a potential point<br />

of establishment for exotic pests.<br />

For further information, please contact your<br />

nearest CRC Extension Officer for a copy of the<br />

April On Farm Disease Update that takes<br />

a closer look at control of Cotton Bunchy Top.<br />

8 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Cotton Choices <br />

Y O U ’ R E I N C O N T R O L .<br />

w w w . c o t t o n c h o i c e s . c o m . a u


2011 Cotton Trade Show wrapup<br />

The mood was good at the Cotton<br />

Trade Show and that was a very<br />

pleasant and long awaited change for<br />

all in the industry.<br />

The signs were encouraging with the<br />

level of exhibitor interest leading up to the<br />

event. Not only did we have the regular<br />

supporters who, along with the growers,<br />

have weathered a few too many difficult<br />

seasons – we had many new faces. In racing<br />

parlance – these included maiden starters<br />

and those returning from a long spell.<br />

This was most noticeable amongst the<br />

major machinery exhibitors – numbers<br />

were up by 50 per cent on what we had<br />

seen for at least four trade shows. And this<br />

year most had new products on display!<br />

The growers and their staff on site also<br />

included a lot of ‘maidens’. Among the<br />

1000 or so who turned up over the two<br />

days we had visitors from as far afield as<br />

Western Australia, Victoria, Tasmania, Far<br />

North Queensland and all the more traditional<br />

growing regions.<br />

I’m not sure about the guys from Tassie<br />

– they must have been on the look out for<br />

some very short season varieties and those<br />

from up past Cairns are perhaps keen to<br />

do some seed multiplication – they would<br />

have the water and the heat units for four<br />

or five crops a year, surely?<br />

The post-show feedback largely<br />

matched the mood on the day – most<br />

were happy. The growers showed interest<br />

in anything new on offer and all were<br />

busy catching up with suppliers and fellow<br />

producers. The ‘newer’ growers – both<br />

dryland and irrigated – from areas like<br />

southern NSW and the Downs were there<br />

in numbers and keen to see the technology.<br />

Some expressed disappointment that<br />

there were no pickers on site. Not just the<br />

new picker/module builders, but pickers of<br />

any sort.<br />

We would have liked a few too but they<br />

were busy bringing in 4,000,000 plus<br />

bales. I’m sure we could all put up with no<br />

pickers on display every year if it meant<br />

that they were always hard at work on a<br />

crop this size!<br />

Excel Agriculture national sales manager Brian Moran,<br />

Toowoomba, shows the features of an Excel Penetrator to Marc<br />

O’Brien, Mallawa, and John Ellis, Carinda.<br />

Countrywide Industries director Rodney Carr, Dubbo, chats with<br />

cotton grower Mark Ricketts, Moree, and Andrew Madden,<br />

Keytah, Moree.<br />

Benchmarking<br />

2010-11 Cotton<br />

“The 2 main benefits of benchmarking with Agripath is the accuracy of<br />

the Data and the practical knowledge they have in farming systems. It<br />

is rare and makes Agripath, in my opinion a cut above the rest.”<br />

– Phil Christie, Bellata, NSW<br />

➊ Whole farm performance based on<br />

production year<br />

➋ Individual enterprise gross margin analysis<br />

➌ Crop rotation & enterprise mix comparison<br />

➍ Machinery & labour analysis by individual<br />

enterprise & farm<br />

➎ Experienced advisors who<br />

understand farming<br />

➏ Regional based groups<br />

Northern/Central/Southern<br />

➐ CONFIDENTIAL COMPARISON WITH TOP 20%<br />

Contact:<br />

Christopher McCormack on 0427 253 362<br />

agripath@bigpond.net.au<br />

10 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


0% FINANCE *<br />

ON MAGNUM AND STEIGER<br />

<strong>Case</strong> IH’s Magnum and Steiger tractors can help you make a good season great – and for a very<br />

limited time, they’re available at 0% finance for five years.<br />

With current models ranging from 225hp (165kW) up to 535hp (246kW), they are the tractors<br />

of choice for growers who demand drawbar power, hitch strength and incredible durability.<br />

And of course, when you buy <strong>Case</strong> IH, you get more than a machine – you get a nationwide network<br />

of knowledgeable dealers, the best service technicians and access to a huge parts inventory.<br />

Finance offer extended until 30 June 2011. Contact your dealer or visit www.caseih.com today!<br />

*30% deposit, 60 month term, annual repayments, GST month four. Offer is available<br />

to business customers only and subject to credit approval. 0% Finance is based on<br />

each annual repayment being paid by the due date. Default interest may be applied<br />

to late payments. See Terms and Conditions. Contact your local dealership for full<br />

details. Offer ends 30 June 2011.


New cotton seed treatment<br />

SEED TREATMENTS that control a range of insect<br />

pests in early season cotton are delivering signifi cant<br />

productivity benefi ts while greatly reducing occupational<br />

safety and environmental worries.<br />

Cotton Seed Distributors senior extension and<br />

development agronomist, Robert Eveleigh, has been<br />

trialling Syngenta’s CRUISER and CRUISER EXTREME †<br />

seed treatments during the past three years.<br />

Both products provide robust control of thrips, aphids<br />

and wireworms in the convenience and fl exibility<br />

of a seed treatment.<br />

In effect, they protect seedlings from germination<br />

right through to stand establishment, allowing plants<br />

to express their full genetic and yield potential.<br />

Robert Eveleigh says the withdrawal of the in-furrow<br />

granular insecticide, Temik*, from the market will trigger<br />

strong growth in seed treatment use by cotton growers.<br />

“Temik was probably the treatment of choice for a lot<br />

of cotton growers, as it had been around for 20 or 30<br />

years,” he says.<br />

“CRUISER gives us<br />

a healthy start, even<br />

emergence and vigorous<br />

seedlings while being<br />

very soft on benefi cials.<br />

There’s no way I’d go<br />

back to an in-furrow<br />

granular insecticide.”<br />

Jeff Hamblin<br />

“Riverway”<br />

Pilliga, NSW<br />

“It gave excellent control of early season insects.<br />

“CRUISER EXTREME gives comparable protection<br />

against early stage insects but is far more user-friendly<br />

than in-furrow granules – you just pour the treated seed<br />

in your planter and out it goes.<br />

“When you’re sowing with in-furrow granules, you have to<br />

worry about what’s happening in your seeds box as well<br />

as the granules box.<br />

“The more even the plant stand and<br />

the more vigorous the seedlings, the<br />

more likely you are to have an even,<br />

healthy, high-yielding crop at picking.<br />

CRUISER gives us several weeks<br />

protection after emergence, cutting<br />

the need for two or three sprays to<br />

control thrips..”<br />

“CRUISER is a critical management<br />

input for insect control at emergence.<br />

Anything that improves the uniformity<br />

and plant stand average is highly<br />

valuable because it reduces the risk<br />

of re-planting.”<br />

Chris Humphries<br />

“Caroale”<br />

Moree, NSW<br />

Howard Rother<br />

“Howard’s Place”<br />

Cecil Plains, Qld


educes in-furrow woes<br />

“CRUISER is a good<br />

product with an even<br />

application. It’s just a lot<br />

easier than the in-furrow<br />

granular alternative.”<br />

Mike Pearce<br />

“Karminya”<br />

Cecil Plains, Qld<br />

“While the operator has a seed fl ow monitor,<br />

he normally doesn’t have a clue if there’s a<br />

blockage in the granules box as it’s diffi cult<br />

to monitor.”<br />

Robert says convenience is becoming<br />

increasingly important due to a shortage of<br />

experienced labour in the cotton sector.<br />

“The long drought in the cotton industry saw<br />

a lot of experienced farm workers move on<br />

to seek alternative employment outside the<br />

industry,” Robert says.<br />

“Now they are being replaced by workers who<br />

perhaps lack the close level of training required<br />

to safely handle in-furrow granular treatments.<br />

“There are a lot of people out there who will<br />

need training in the use of granular treatments<br />

before they could safely use the product.”<br />

He predicts CRUISER and CRUISER<br />

EXTREME will play an increasingly important<br />

role in providing early season pest control<br />

throughout all Australia’s major cotton valleys.<br />

“Growers can enjoy the convenience of a<br />

commercially-applied seed treatment and<br />

have confi dence that their seed is well<br />

protected,” he says.<br />

“CRUISER is a robust seed treatment in<br />

its own right that works very well in regions<br />

of the Namoi, Gwydir, Macintyre and<br />

Darling Downs.<br />

“CRUISER EXTREME is best formulated<br />

for conditions in eastern and southern<br />

cotton growing regions where extra control<br />

is required.”<br />

Both treatments are available as options on<br />

all CSD varieties in 2011 and are compatible<br />

with DYNASTY COMPLETE to provide<br />

complete protection against disease and<br />

insect pests.<br />

“We switched to a seed<br />

treatment for safety<br />

reasons. CRUISER gets<br />

us through that early crop<br />

stage and gets the cotton<br />

off to a good start, very<br />

important, especially in<br />

marginal country like this.”<br />

Ryan Hanes<br />

“Myalla”<br />

Wee Waa, NSW<br />

For more information please contact your local Territory Sales Manager,<br />

call the Syngenta Advice Line on 1800 067 108 or visit www.syngenta.com.au<br />

†APVMA registration pending. ®Registered trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Trademark of a Syngenta<br />

Group Company. All products written in uppercase are registered trademarks of a Syngenta Group Company.<br />

*Registered trademark. SYN2271 ED 11/167 R


The impact of early defoliation on<br />

textile performance<br />

By Robert Long 1 and Michael Bange 1<br />

At a glance…<br />

Defoliation earlier than 60 per cent open bolls can result in increased amounts of<br />

immature fibre (low maturity ratio and micronaire). (Photo: CSIRO)<br />

Immature cotton fibres have less cell wall<br />

thickening with more hollow space and<br />

are often associated with low micronaire<br />

(less than 3.8). Immature fibre is undesirable<br />

for textile manufacture because<br />

it does not take up dye as effectively as<br />

mature fibres and will often appear lighter<br />

in colour. Immature fibre will also entangle<br />

more easily and form neps (knots) which<br />

can appear as ‘white specks’ or flecks on<br />

finished fabric.<br />

Immature fibre and neps even in small<br />

amounts are undesirable as they decrease<br />

mill processing efficiency and ruin the<br />

appearance of finished yarns and fabrics<br />

and can negatively affect an industry’s<br />

reputation when cotton arrives at spinning<br />

mills. The number of immature bolls<br />

with immature fibre in a crop at harvest<br />

can increase as a result of actively growing<br />

crops experiencing an abrupt end to<br />

the season caused by cold temperatures<br />

and/or premature applications of defoliants<br />

or boll openers that force immature<br />

bolls to open. Both situations may increase<br />

chances of immature fibre and neps once<br />

cotton is harvested and ginned.<br />

In a previous article (see The Australian<br />

Cottongrower vol. 31(4) August–September<br />

2010, pages 39–41) the results of<br />

the effects of differences in the timing of<br />

harvest aids on maturing cotton crops (defoliants<br />

and boll openers) on yield and fibre<br />

quality were reported. This article reports<br />

on the same studies, but with an emphasis<br />

on textile performance. This information<br />

Significant amounts of immature fibre in ginned cotton will affect textile quality and thus<br />

can affect Australia’s reputation for high quality. A <strong>study</strong> conducted in three seasons varied<br />

the timing of defoliation to determine what per cent of open bolls at the time of application<br />

contribute to differences in the amount of immature fibre leading to differences in the<br />

quality of yarn and fabric. Although early defoliation treatments produced less mature<br />

fibre, both yarn and fabric strength was not affected.<br />

Interestingly, less mature cotton from a cooler growing season produced stronger yarn<br />

which was attributed to the smaller ribbon width of this fibre which increased fibre packing<br />

density (that is more fibres in a given volume of yarn). Yarns made from more immature<br />

cotton in this season also contained more neps.<br />

Percent open bolls at the time of harvest aid application related well to changes in the<br />

colour of blue dyed fabric, with the earlier defoliation treatments having lighter coloured<br />

fabric. While there were gradual improvements in fabric colour with later defoliations there<br />

were only distinct changes in colour to the visible eye when there was less than 26 per<br />

cent open bolls at the time of treatment application.<br />

This work supports the current recommendation of applying harvest aids at greater<br />

than 60 per cent open bolls, and the information generated in this <strong>study</strong> may be used to<br />

predict the quality of yarn and fabric generated from cotton varying in maturity.<br />

will be valuable in refining crop monitoring<br />

and harvest preparation strategies that aim<br />

to optimise both lint yield and fibre quality.<br />

This will optimise returns to growers and<br />

help to improve the quality and reputation<br />

of cotton delivered to overseas spinning<br />

mills.<br />

Methods<br />

Defoliation timing field experiments<br />

were conducted over three seasons at<br />

the Australian Cotton Research Institute<br />

(ACRI) at Narrabri from 2005 to 2008.<br />

Replicated experiments (four reps per<br />

experiment) consisted of five to seven defoliation<br />

application dates with a control<br />

which allowed all bolls to fully mature.<br />

A mixture of leaf defoliant (0.2 L/ha<br />

Dropp Liquid) and a boll opener (3 L/ha<br />

Prep 720) with 2 L/ha D-C Tron was applied<br />

at approximately 5 day intervals in<br />

2005–06 (Sicot 71BR), 2006–07 (Sicot<br />

71BR), and 7 day intervals in 2007–08<br />

(Sicot 71) from low to high per cent open<br />

bolls. Initiation of defoliant treatments was<br />

targeted to generate treatments with increased<br />

immature fibre, so the first defoliant<br />

treatment was at five per cent to 20<br />

per cent open bolls. To establish crop condition<br />

when defoliant treatments were applied,<br />

per cent open bolls were recorded<br />

on control plots.<br />

14 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


the way forward<br />

Lint was collected from machine picked<br />

samples used to measure Cnr Buckland yield. & Yaldwyn Samples Sts<br />

were ginned and Toowoomba HVI tested Qld at 4350 CSIRO<br />

Narrabri and then Phone: subjected 07 4635 to fibre 9872qual-<br />

parameters (yarn strength and yarn nep<br />

content). Yarns were then knitted into fabric<br />

and dyed with a standard Cibacron blue<br />

reactive dye.<br />

the naked eye. Fabric samples for the control<br />

(or latest) defoliant timing treatment<br />

were compared to each previously applied<br />

defoliant treatment. Dyed fabric samples<br />

ity testing at CSIRO Fax: 07 Geelong 4635 6633 using the Reflectance colorimetric measurements were also tested for strength.<br />

CSIRO instrument www.excelagr.com.au<br />

Brian Moran Sirolan-Laserscan to were taken on fabrics using a spectrophotometer.<br />

The appearance of dyed fabric<br />

Results and Outcomes<br />

measure fibre diameter Brian Moran (ribbon 0427 width). 722 925<br />

Enough cotton was Dan collected Ryan 0427 from 700 each 779 samples were assessed in terms of delta E. Fibre quality<br />

plot to enable yarn to be spun (20 tex This Millennium describes the mathematical Planter distance In each<br />

Rolling<br />

season the timing<br />

Cultivator<br />

of defoliation<br />

treatments ✓ Construct affected and refine the maturity seed-beds of prior to pla<br />

A DIVISION OF<br />

yarn with a twist factor of 798 turns per between<br />

✓ Utilising<br />

two colours.<br />

the world<br />

When<br />

renowned<br />

Delta<br />

John<br />

E values<br />

Deere<br />

metering system for superior seed placement for enhanced seeding vigor<br />

metre) and fabric manufactured. One Australian yarn made are<br />

✓<br />

near<br />

Designed<br />

or greater<br />

by Australian<br />

than one<br />

farmers<br />

between<br />

to reduce<br />

any<br />

down<br />

the fibre<br />

✓<br />

with<br />

Incorporate<br />

earlier<br />

pre<br />

treatment<br />

and post-emergence<br />

applications<br />

generally for fast causing knockdown harvested and essential fibre to weed con<br />

chemi<br />

and owned<br />

bobbin Dan per Ryanplot was tested for yarn quality two fabrics time and they boost would yields appear different to<br />

✓ Designed for dryland irrigation, contour<br />

✓ Cultivate serious weeds while preserving se<br />

Agriculture<br />

following or Tram Trak needs<br />

growth and crop root systems<br />

✓Twin 16” disc opener with walking depth gauge ✓Aerate the soil, aiding water penetration and<br />

wheels for greater reliability and accuracy<br />

retention for young plants<br />

Excellent product. Excellent service. ✓ Full range of planter options available<br />

✓ Help control soil and water losses from ero<br />

whilst managing residue retention<br />

Fertiliser Rigs<br />

✔ Up to 3 tonne capacity with exceptional stability and ease<br />

of lifting<br />

✔ New low draft shank and clamp assembly for simplistic reliable<br />

operation<br />

✔ Offering an unrivalled 770mm of underframe clearance for<br />

brilliant trash flow<br />

✔ Proven stainless steel metering units for corrosion resistance<br />

✔ Variable rate technology available<br />

✔ Can apply gas at same time as fertilisers<br />

Stubble Warrior<br />

✔ Plant wheat back into cotton hills<br />

✔ Double disc<br />

✔ Single disc<br />

✔ Gassing and/or fertilising<br />

E X C E L C U LT I VAT O R<br />

Excel Penetrator<br />

✔ 4, 6, 8 row<br />

✔ Side busting/centre busting capabilities<br />

✔ Adaptable for gassing, dry fertiliser using<br />

Excel’s new rig mounted fertiliser boxes<br />

✔ 5 / 8” inline sheer bolts<br />

✔ Unrivalled trash clearance<br />

Also available:<br />

✔ Rubber Tyred Roller<br />

✔ Lilleston Rig<br />

Call now — our components fit most implements<br />

A DIVISION OF GREAT WESTERN CORPORATION PTY LTD (ABN 91 064 434 475)<br />

Australian made and owned<br />

Cultipacker<br />

✔ Machine can be pulled one way for aggressive soil<br />

breakdown and the other way for refining the soil<br />

before planting<br />

Excel<br />

also stock a<br />

wide range of<br />

spare parts<br />

74–92 Buckland Street,<br />

PO Box 665, Toowoomba Qld 4350<br />

PH: 07 4636 9100<br />

FAX: 07 4636 9140 — www.excelagr.com.au<br />

Brian Moran 0427 722 925 – Graeme Easy (NSW) 0427 700 779<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 15


e lower in micronaire (Figure 1). Direct<br />

measurements of fibre maturity also confirmed<br />

that earlier treatments were less<br />

mature (Figure 2).<br />

Ribbon width was not affected by the<br />

timing of application of harvest aids. In<br />

the 2007–08 season fibre was less mature<br />

(substantially lower micronaire) and had<br />

a smaller ribbon width. This season was<br />

markedly cooler resulting in a delayed crop<br />

with more immature bolls.<br />

Yarn<br />

The lack of differences in yarn strength<br />

between treatments was unexpected; as<br />

more immature fibres would have been<br />

needed in a yarn cross section to make the<br />

specified mass per unit length of yarn, this<br />

should have increased yarn strength. But<br />

lack of improvement in yarn strength with<br />

more immature fibre from early defoliation<br />

treatments was most likely due to shorter<br />

fibres in these treatments. There were no<br />

differences between treatments for ribbon<br />

width which suggested that there were little<br />

differences in the fibre packing density<br />

of yarns (fibres per yarn volume).<br />

Figure 1: Micronaire of collected lint samples from defoliation<br />

treatments applied at various per cent open bolls over three<br />

seasons<br />

Figure 2: Electron microscope images of yarn cross sections<br />

taken from the earliest and latest defoliation treatments in<br />

each season (a µm is one millionth of a metre)<br />

Interestingly for the markedly less mature<br />

fibre for the 2007–08 season, yarns<br />

were stronger (on average stronger by approximately<br />

3 cN/tex) (Figure 3) and the<br />

ribbon width was smaller. So yarns made<br />

from this fibre either had a smaller fibre<br />

perimeter, or the very low fibre maturity<br />

caused fibres to collapse more and fold up<br />

on themselves.<br />

This is an avenue for more in depth<br />

work examining the methods of measuring<br />

ribbon width, how ribbon width contributes<br />

to the mechanics of yarn strength,<br />

as well as how the factors maturity and<br />

perimeter affect ribbon width.<br />

Although the level of fibre neps was<br />

significantly greater for earlier harvest aid<br />

treatments, this did not translate into increases<br />

in yarn neps. It is most likely that<br />

the two carding processes prior to spinning<br />

removed a significant proportion of<br />

these neps.<br />

Carding is the process where fibre in the<br />

mill is blended and cleaned before being<br />

condensed into a single strand of overlapping<br />

fibres called a ‘sliver’. But more neps<br />

would have increased the waste coming<br />

from the carding process which is less acceptable<br />

in the mill.<br />

But differences in the amount of neps<br />

were found between seasons. In the<br />

2007–2008 season, approximately 100<br />

more neps occurred in yarns and was associated<br />

with this very immature fibre (Figure<br />

3).<br />

Fabric<br />

Earlier harvest aid application treatments<br />

resulted in lighter coloured fabrics<br />

and they were significantly different in appearance<br />

(delta E values greater than 1)<br />

compared with fabrics taken from later<br />

harvests. These changes were strongly related<br />

to micronaire and the maturity of the<br />

fibre used for production.<br />

Per cent open bolls at the time of defoliation<br />

harvest aid application related well<br />

to changes in fabric colour when the three<br />

seasons were assessed collectively (Figure<br />

4). While there were improvements in colour<br />

(dye uptake) with defoliation occurring<br />

later, distinct fabric colour changes occurred<br />

when there was less than 26 per<br />

cent open bolls (which equates to approximately<br />

seven nodes above cracked boll).<br />

For fabric strength, there was no significant<br />

difference among treatments for the<br />

three seasons. But across seasons, fabric<br />

from the 2007–2008 season was stronger<br />

than fabric produced from the first two<br />

seasons which were not different to each<br />

other (Figure 5).<br />

16 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


T8. The all round better all-rounder<br />

Better power management<br />

With an enhanced power management system, the all-new T8 from New Holland<br />

has the power to perform in any task. Together with a vastly improved turning<br />

circle and the longest wheelbase of any tractor on the market, giving it increased<br />

stability at high speeds, more effi cient tillage capacity, and improved traction,<br />

the T8 is custom built for hard work. All-rounders don’t get better than this.<br />

So visit www.newholland.com or get in touch with your local New Holland dealer today.<br />

Own a bright future


Figure 3: Yarn strength and neps between seasons measured in this <strong>study</strong> – there were no<br />

differences between defoliation treatments in any season<br />

Outcomes<br />

On the basis of textile performance the<br />

results here support the current recommendation<br />

of applying defoliants at 60<br />

per cent open bolls or around 4 NACB in<br />

uniformly maturing cotton crops. But this<br />

is dependent on seasonal conditions and<br />

management practices.<br />

Research is currently being undertaken<br />

to refine the boll cutting technique to determine<br />

the status of a crop prior to applying<br />

harvest aids that may allow cotton<br />

producers to better predict final quality and<br />

ensure the best time for defoliation to optimise<br />

quality.<br />

Such information will also help the supply<br />

chain in general to pre-empt some of<br />

the processing performance issues of harvested<br />

fibre and improve fibre processing,<br />

e.g. ensure lay downs are more consistent.<br />

1<br />

CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering<br />

(Geelong) and CSIRO Plant Industry (Narrabri)<br />

Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative<br />

Research Centre. Narrabri.<br />

Further details on issues affecting cotton textile<br />

production are detailed in FIBREpak which can<br />

be ordered online at the Cotton CRC’s website<br />

www.cottoncrc.org.au/content/Industry/<br />

Publications/Fibre_Quality/FIBREpak/<br />

Or you may also wish to read the full peer<br />

reviewed articles associated with this work:<br />

Long, R.L., Bange, M.P. (2011) Consequences of<br />

immature fiber on the processing performance<br />

of Upland cotton. Field Crops Research 121,<br />

401-407.<br />

Bange, M.P., Long, R.L. (2011) Optimizing<br />

timing of chemical harvest aid application<br />

in cotton by predicting its influence on fiber<br />

quality. Agronomy Journal 103, 390-395.<br />

Acknowledgments: Thanks to J. Caton, D.<br />

Hodgson, R. Giles, Mark Freijah, Fred Horne,<br />

Sue Horne, and Margaret Pate for technical<br />

assistance. The CRDC and the Cotton CRC both<br />

provided financial support for this work. We<br />

also thank Cotton Seed Distributors for<br />

provision of planting seed.<br />

Figure 4: The influence of the timing of defoliation on fabric<br />

colour<br />

Delta E values greater than 1 mean that colour changes are visible to the naked eye.<br />

Figure 5: Fabric strength between seasons measured in<br />

this <strong>study</strong> – there were no differences between defoliation<br />

treatments within any season<br />

18 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Saluting finalists in the<br />

Cotton Awards<br />

In a salute to the drivers of the Australian<br />

cotton industry, finalists were today<br />

announced in the 2011 Australian Cotton<br />

Industry Awards at the Cotton Trade<br />

Show in Moree, heart of cotton country.<br />

With the cotton industry in resurgence,<br />

a strong field of candidates was nominated<br />

across all cotton valleys, with 12 finalists<br />

picked across five categories.<br />

According to Cotton Australia CEO<br />

Adam Kay, who made the announcement,<br />

the Awards are not so much a contest but<br />

a celebration of the industry’s innovation<br />

and progress.<br />

“All of our finalists are talented people<br />

– researchers, growers, agronomists and<br />

young stars of the future – who contribute<br />

to our industry not only through their work<br />

but through an enormous personal commitment,”<br />

Adam said.<br />

“The Awards are an opportunity to<br />

showcase this commitment and to share<br />

the visions and innovations of our highest<br />

achievers in order to strengthen the industry<br />

as a whole.<br />

CSD’s Steve Ainsworth and Cotton Australia’s Adam Kay discuss the Cotton Awards<br />

poster display at the Australian Cotton Trade Show.<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 19


“Our finalists are always optimistic, dedicated<br />

and passionate about their work as<br />

well as major contributors to the broader<br />

industry and their cotton communities.<br />

The Australian Cotton Industry Awards<br />

showcase our exciting and dynamic industry,<br />

and point to a healthy future for the<br />

cotton sector,” he said.<br />

“I want to congratulate all of the finalists<br />

and wish them well for the final rounds of<br />

judging over the next month.” Adam said.<br />

Top honours will be announced during<br />

the Australian Cotton Industry Awards dinner<br />

and presentation night in Narrabri at<br />

the Crossing Theatre on Wednesday, August<br />

10, 2011. Tickets for this event will<br />

go on sale at the end of June.<br />

Monsanto<br />

Grower of the Year and<br />

AgriRisk<br />

Innovative Grower Award<br />

Hamish Johnstone<br />

Hamish Johnstone manages the<br />

Primeag Australia properties ‘Macintyre<br />

Downs’, ‘Wirrindi’ and ‘Riverview’ on the<br />

Macintyre River at Goondiwindi producing<br />

cotton, seed sorghum and winter cereals<br />

on an irrigated and dryland mixed cropping<br />

and grazing enterprise.<br />

Craig and Sharron Saunders<br />

Conducting an irrigated cotton, dryland<br />

wheat and grazing enterprise on three<br />

properties in the St.George Irrigation area.<br />

Craig has developed an innovative irrigation<br />

system with pipes through the banks<br />

which have adjustable flow rates. The system<br />

has resulted in a 20 per cent water<br />

saving and significant yield increases.<br />

Donald and Douglas Crothers<br />

‘Booligar’ is an irrigated cotton and dryland<br />

farming and grazing enterprise at Dirranbandi<br />

in the Lower Balonne region.<br />

Ed Willis and Von Warner<br />

The Bullamon Plains Pastoral Co operated<br />

by Ed and Bill Willis and Von Warner<br />

conduct an irrigated and dryland farming<br />

and grazing enterprise at Thallon in<br />

Queensland.<br />

Gordon and David Brownhill<br />

Merrilong Pastoral Co is an irrigated<br />

and dryland farming and grazing business<br />

at Spring Ridge NSW. The team has established<br />

a no-till controlled traffic system<br />

since 1995 growing winter and summer<br />

grain crops and has commenced growing<br />

irrigated and dryland cotton in the current<br />

season.<br />

Maxine and Stuart Armitage<br />

The Armitage’s conduct an irrigation<br />

cropping enterprise at ‘Wamara’, Cecil<br />

Plains on the Darling Downs. Some<br />

200–250 hectares of irrigated cotton are<br />

grown annually on the 600 hectare <strong>property</strong>.<br />

Crops are grown in long fallow rotations<br />

with opportunity crops of sorghum<br />

produced in a no till system with stubble<br />

retention.<br />

20 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Cotton Seed Distributors<br />

Researcher of the Year<br />

Award<br />

enthusiasm and passion for the cotton industry,<br />

being president of her local grower<br />

association and leading by example in<br />

what has been a tough period for all growers<br />

in the Dawson Valley.<br />

Kristen Knight,<br />

Monsanto Australia Entomologist,<br />

Toowoomba, Qld<br />

Kristen leads the Monsanto Australia<br />

insect resistance management program<br />

in addition to managing the company’s<br />

research efforts into allele frequency, field<br />

survival on Bollgard II cotton, alternative<br />

refuges and the entomological assessment<br />

of new traits.<br />

Dr Warwick Stiller,<br />

CSIRO Plant Industry, Narrabri<br />

NSW<br />

Warwick is a cotton breeder employed<br />

by CSIRO Plant Industry to develop new<br />

cotton varieties adapted to Australian<br />

management and conditions. As an important<br />

member of this team, Warwick has<br />

delivered new varieties for all production<br />

regions with higher yield, better disease<br />

resistance and with fibre properties sought<br />

by spinners.<br />

Chris Lehmann Trust<br />

Young Achiever of the<br />

Year Award, sponsored<br />

by Bayer CropScience<br />

Nick Gillingham,<br />

NG Agronomic Consultancy, Moree<br />

NSW<br />

Nick was appointed to the position of<br />

farm agronomist in July 2005 and currently<br />

holds the role of cropping manager<br />

at ‘Keytah’, in the Gwydir Valley. Nick is<br />

part of the next cotton generation, taking<br />

on more responsibility each year and getting<br />

involved in industry activities at every<br />

opportunity.<br />

Dr Sharon Downes,<br />

Senior Research Scientist, CSIRO,<br />

Narrabri NSW<br />

Sharon has made an outstanding contribution,<br />

over a relatively short timeframe,<br />

to the monitoring of resistance to the Cry<br />

proteins in Bollgard II. She has made important<br />

scientific contributions to this research,<br />

for example identifying the value<br />

of and implementing the F2 and F1 tests.<br />

Fleur Anderson,<br />

Cahoots Communications,<br />

Theodore Qld<br />

Fleur’s involvement in the community<br />

and industry has demonstrated her natural<br />

leadership abilities. She has an obvious<br />

Dr Rose Brodrick,<br />

CSIRO Plant Industry, Narrabri<br />

NSW<br />

Rose has been involved with the cotton<br />

industry for over 10 years, starting as a<br />

PHD student and now as a scientist with<br />

CSIRO Plant Industry. Her research into<br />

physiology and management has helped<br />

to change the way cotton is grown with<br />

row configurations to improve water use<br />

efficiency.<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 21


Scheme offers irrigators funding to<br />

improve water efficiency<br />

By Rosie Hannah, Project Officer, Healthy HeadWaters Water Use Efficiency Project<br />

The Healthy HeadWaters Water Use<br />

Efficiency (HHWUE) Project will<br />

help irrigators across the Queensland<br />

Murray-Darling Basin to improve efficiency<br />

of water use.<br />

Overseen by the Department of Environment<br />

and Resource Management<br />

(DERM) with funding from the Australian<br />

Government’s Water for the Future initiative,<br />

the HHWUE Project is supported by<br />

a range of projects to help irrigators make<br />

informed decisions about improved infrastructure,<br />

and ultimately to participate in<br />

the project.<br />

Infrastructure project<br />

Under round two of the HHWUE<br />

Project, $20 million is available for irrigators<br />

to upgrade irrigation infrastructure,<br />

saving water while also returning a share<br />

to the basin’s rivers, wetlands and floodplains.<br />

Ten applications totaling over $35 million<br />

have been approved ranging from<br />

$300,000 to $5.9 million under round<br />

one of the project. The water saved is approximately<br />

15,541 ML – more than half<br />

of which is returned to the environment<br />

and the rest is returned to irrigators.<br />

Applications cover a range of on-ground<br />

works including raising embankment<br />

heights of on-farm storages, optimising<br />

surface irrigation and converting from furrow<br />

irrigation to lateral move and centre<br />

pivot irrigation systems.<br />

Applications for round two close on 29<br />

July 2011. The round is open to the holders<br />

of tradable surface water entitlements<br />

in all catchments of the Queensland Murray-Darling<br />

Basin.<br />

Supporting Projects<br />

The HHWUE project is complemented<br />

by a range of measures to help irrigators<br />

across the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin<br />

catchments improve the efficiency of<br />

their water use and assess potential irrigation<br />

modernisation mechanisms.<br />

In addition, the Department of Employment,<br />

Economic Development and Innovation<br />

(DEEDI) is also providing officers<br />

in St George, Goondiwindi and on the<br />

Darling Downs to advise and educate irrigators,<br />

industry specialists and communities<br />

about on-farm water saving practices.<br />

Officers will also help irrigators compare<br />

the efficiency of their existing systems to<br />

the new technologies available under the<br />

project.<br />

Various projects to help irrigators make<br />

informed decisions about potential water<br />

savings are also being conducted including<br />

irrigation benchmarking on centre pivot<br />

and lateral move (CPLM) machines, a review<br />

of CPLM machines to determine the<br />

lessons learnt from installations over the<br />

past 10 years, storage efficiency options<br />

and quantification of on-farm water losses<br />

and training of irrigation professionals.<br />

In recognition of the number of irrigation<br />

professionals who may not hold irrigation<br />

certifications, but who can offer<br />

considerable experience and expertise,<br />

training in Irrigation Australia Limited<br />

(IAL) certifications to improve the skill base<br />

through formal training and assessment<br />

are also being offered.<br />

Training is available in the following IAL<br />

certifications:<br />

• Irrigation designer;<br />

• Irrigation agronomist;<br />

• Irrigation operator;<br />

• Irrigation contractor;<br />

• Irrigation installer; and,<br />

• Irrigation manager.<br />

Information on the supporting projects is<br />

available at www.derm.qld.gov.au. Application<br />

forms can be obtained by calling 4688 1185<br />

or by emailing HHWUE@derm.qld.gov.au<br />

Training is an important component of<br />

Healthy HeadWaters.<br />

Storage efficiency options are being studied.<br />

Conversion to CPLM systems is a feature of some applications.<br />

22 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


HEART BEAT<br />

OF RURAL AUSTRALIA<br />

Everything the Volvo organisation does is dedicated to safety. Now Volvo Penta can keep your<br />

crops safe and save your livelihood with a range of agricultural engines from 60-672hp that will<br />

never say die.<br />

In a tough, dry land like Australia, reliable water supply is the lifeblood of your crops.<br />

Relentless testing by Volvo Penta has perfected a range of pumping engines to supply the<br />

water flow you need. Day in, day out. They’re smoother, quieter and engineered for longer<br />

life and excellent fuel economy.<br />

Volvo Penta’s reputation spans 100 years and<br />

today there are over a million engines operating in<br />

130 markets worldwide. You’ll find dedicated Volvo<br />

Penta support around Australia at 80 locations. Keep<br />

the heartbeat of your farm pumping by talking to<br />

Volvo Penta soon.<br />

Imported and distributed in Australia by: Volvo Penta Oceania, 29 Industrial Avenue, Wacol QLD 4076. PO Box 1047 Sumner Park QLD 4074 Australia.<br />

For information and dealers throughout Australia, PNG, Solomon Islands Vanuatu. Tel 61 (0)7 3726 1500 Fax 61 (0)7 3271 1549<br />

www.volvopenta.com.au<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 23


Queensland producers invest in<br />

Healthy HeadWaters<br />

Producers interested in water use<br />

efficiency technology are encouraged<br />

to contact the DEEDI Healthy<br />

HeadWaters project team to discuss the<br />

latest decision support tools and project<br />

updates. Round 2 of the Department of<br />

Environment and Resource Management<br />

(DERM) run Healthy Headwaters Infrastructure<br />

Program opened on May 3 and<br />

will close at the end of July. This program<br />

is open to all surface irrigators with a<br />

tradeable water licence in the Queensland<br />

Murray Darling Basin.<br />

Two Healthy HeadWaters Investment<br />

Tool workshops, held in Goondiwindi and<br />

St George in March, were well attended<br />

with participants from a variety of backgrounds.<br />

The workshops were part of the<br />

DERM’s Healthy HeadWaters Water<br />

Use Efficiency project, which is federally<br />

funded under the Water for the Future Initiative.<br />

The extension and support project<br />

is delivered by the Department of Employment,<br />

Economic Development and Innovation<br />

(DEEDI).<br />

DEEDI Goondiwindi’s irrigation development<br />

extension officer, Bec Raymond,<br />

said the workshops were designed for irrigators<br />

who were considering being involved<br />

in the project and for producers<br />

wanting to make a more informed decision<br />

when considering investment in water<br />

use efficiency technology.<br />

“For anyone considering upgrading<br />

their infrastructure this workshop is a great<br />

place to identify a suitable process to follow<br />

and tools to assist you.”<br />

The half-day workshop provides an<br />

overview of the Healthy HeadWaters<br />

project, the investment decision process<br />

including financial and taxation considerations<br />

and the Investment Tool spreadsheet.<br />

The workshops are presented by DEEDI<br />

Economist Mary Philp and extension staff<br />

Bec Raymond, Jenelle Hare, Graham<br />

Harris and Nikki Pilcher.<br />

“Workshops already held flowed well<br />

with a high amount of interaction from the<br />

groups and great feedback received,” says<br />

Nikki.<br />

DEEDI officers are planning future<br />

workshops to coincide with subsequent<br />

funding opportunities, or on an as requested<br />

basis. If this could be of interest<br />

to irrigators in your region don’t hesitate<br />

to contact the More Profit per Drop team<br />

for more information, or head to the blog<br />

moreprofitperdrop.wordpress.com<br />

For further information contact one of the team<br />

members:<br />

Graham Harris 07 4688 1559<br />

Bec Raymond 07 4671 6711<br />

Nikki Pilcher 07 4620 8109<br />

Jenelle Hare 07 4669 0825<br />

Mary Philp 07 4688 1211<br />

Guide process<br />

Guide decision process for involvement<br />

in Healthy HeadWaters Infrastructure<br />

Program:<br />

• Step 1. Pre-planning.<br />

• Step 2. Determine current losses.<br />

• Step 3. Determine potential water savings.<br />

• Step 4. Assess cost of water savings.<br />

• Step 5. Determine on-farm benefits.<br />

• Step 6. Finance assessment.<br />

• Step 7. Tax implications.<br />

• Step 8. Economic analysis.<br />

• Step 9. Decide on participation.<br />

• Step 10. Comnplete application form (if<br />

applicable).<br />

Healthy HeadWaters Investment Tool workshops were held in Goondiwindi and<br />

St George in March.<br />

TACKLE • BAIT • ICE<br />

AT CHARLTONS FISHING YOU’RE<br />

IN THE BEST COMPANY...<br />

Minnkota<br />

18 Kerwick Street Redbank Q 4301 Ph: 3818 1677 www.charltonsfishing.com.au<br />

Charltons GrnMnt<strong>Press</strong>.indd 1<br />

Daiwa<br />

Humminbird<br />

Shimano<br />

Abu Garcia<br />

G-loomis<br />

Penn<br />

Jackall<br />

MAIL<br />

ORDER<br />

WELCOME<br />

1/09/2010 11:54:49 PM<br />

24 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Water Matters<br />

<strong>Case</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>property</strong>:<br />

‘Long Meadows’, Bourke<br />

By David Wiggington, NCEA<br />

In 2003 Clyde Agriculture had access to<br />

a Broons Impact Roller and decided to<br />

compact several storage floors and to<br />

repair the damage caused to storage walls<br />

due to wash. The decision to renovate was<br />

opportunistic – there had not been any<br />

significant seepage issues observed.<br />

The Long Meadows storage (cell 1) was<br />

one of the storages that was renovated in<br />

2003. The storage has a capacity of 4700<br />

megalitres and covers an area of approximately<br />

137 hectares. The wall height is 4.5<br />

metres, with a water storage depth of 3.5<br />

metres and originally a three in one batter.<br />

The storage was constructed in 1990<br />

and soil tests were undertaken at that time.<br />

The Problem<br />

By 2003 the wash from the prevailing<br />

winds had started to significantly damage<br />

the downwind storage walls. It had removed<br />

a significant amount of soil from<br />

the walls. A cliff face was starting to form<br />

and storage capacity was being lost. Additionally<br />

the road around the storage wall<br />

was being affected.<br />

There may also have been some seepage<br />

from the storage floor, but there were<br />

no accurate measure of how much was<br />

possibly being lost. Some moisture had<br />

been observed outside the storage, which<br />

may have been due to seepage.<br />

The Solution<br />

The work focused primarily on the<br />

downwind storage wall where the wash<br />

damage was most significant. The original<br />

batter had been three in one. The renovations<br />

adjusted this so that the top two<br />

metres of the wall had a batter of five in<br />

one. The lower two metres had a batter<br />

of three in one. This was done to create<br />

more of a beach like effect. Soil needed to<br />

make these adjustments was sourced from<br />

the centre of the storage.<br />

Precision Irrigation Made Easy<br />

CENTRE PIVOT and<br />

LATERAL MOVE IRRIGATION<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 25


MAKE MORE MONEY<br />

WHILE WE HAVE<br />

WATER<br />

Get the very best from your water with<br />

qualified experienced advice on:<br />

- existing system performance<br />

- whole farm water balance<br />

- system upgrades and alterations<br />

- full system design<br />

- flood studies<br />

- environmental studies<br />

- water management plans<br />

<br />

NARRABRI<br />

Ph: 02 6792 1265<br />

Fax: 02 6792 4570<br />

WARREN<br />

Ph: 02 6847 3446<br />

Fax: 02 6847 3392<br />

<br />

www.aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />

office@aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />

Water Matters<br />

The Broons Impact Roller was used<br />

across the entire storage floor. After the<br />

initial passes, holes were dug with an excavator<br />

in a grid like pattern. These holes<br />

were used to assess the effect of the roller<br />

passes and were focused primarily on the<br />

areas where Clyde Agriculture’s Mitch<br />

Abbo expected losses could have been occurring.<br />

These locations correlated with<br />

where seepage had been observed in isolated<br />

points outside the storage.<br />

The storage walls were not compacted<br />

because it was felt that there was not a lot<br />

to be gained by compacting a completed<br />

wall. They could not justify rebuilding the<br />

walls and compacting the core, as this may<br />

have created more issues and was not cost<br />

effective.<br />

The Outcome<br />

In 2004 the storage was filled to capacity.<br />

It remained with water in it until 2006.<br />

There was no seepage observed during<br />

this time, although no specific measurements<br />

were taken.<br />

The storage was dry again for two years<br />

during 2007 and into 2008. During this<br />

dry cycle there was considerable cracking<br />

with cracks to a depth of at least one metre<br />

observed. The storage floor formed a<br />

block like structure. The blocks were quite<br />

well compacted but were broken by deep<br />

expansion cracks. There was an expectation<br />

for a reasonable amount of seepage.<br />

In 2009 the storage was dry again. During<br />

this most recent dry cycle Clyde Agriculture<br />

sourced funding from the Western<br />

Catchment Management Authority. The<br />

funding was designed to do water balance<br />

calculations on farms. Additionally there<br />

was investment in metering equipment and<br />

information collected on the suitability of<br />

different soil types for storage construction.<br />

During 2009 there were quite a number<br />

of measurements taken. There was an EM<br />

survey conducted by Terrabyte Services.<br />

Core samples were taken of the areas<br />

identified in the EM survey as suspect.<br />

Additional to this a Geo Tech engineer<br />

used the EM survey as a basis to select sites<br />

for excavator pits. These pits were used to<br />

assess soil types, infiltration characteristics<br />

and the feasibility of increasing wall height<br />

and hence stored water depth. Soil samples<br />

were collected and soil analysis completed<br />

at each of the pits.<br />

The 2009 funding provided for Irrimate<br />

Seepage and Evaporation meters, storage<br />

volume meters and Mace meters for inlets<br />

and outlets.<br />

The storage was again filled in late<br />

2009. The seepage and evaporation readings<br />

indicate that seepage is very low (


onserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve<br />

Conserve Water with Valley<br />

onserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water.<br />

®<br />

Conserve Water. Conserve<br />

Valley ®<br />

center pivots and linears make precision irrigation easy with our ability to efficiently manage water.<br />

Contact us to see how you can realize efficiencies up to 95%!<br />

Conserve Water with Valley ®<br />

For Precision Irrigation Made Easy, choose Valley.<br />

Valley ®<br />

center pivots and linears make precision irrigation easy with our ability to efficiently manage water.<br />

Contact us to see how you can realize efficiencies up to 95%!<br />

For Precision Irrigation Made Easy, choose Valley.<br />

VALMONT AUSTRALIA<br />

Please send a Product Catalogue<br />

PO BOX 225 Carole Park NAME:.....................................................................<br />

QLD 4300<br />

ADDRESS:..............................................................<br />

PH 07 3879 3622<br />

VALMONT AUSTRALIA<br />

Please send a Product Catalogue<br />

Fax 07 3879 3655<br />

STATE:......................P/CODE:.................................<br />

PO JUNE–JULY BOX 225 2011 Carole Park NAME:..................................................................... THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 27<br />

www.valleyirrigation.com<br />

QLD 4300<br />

PHONE NUMBER:...................................................


World COMModity Watch<br />

US<br />

USDA have US crop pitched at 17 mb<br />

(reduction of 1.1mb YOY), however<br />

internal estimates believe crop will be<br />

not much bigger than 15 million bales –<br />

clearly a lot of downside left in the USDA<br />

numbers. The crop is now virtually 100%<br />

planted as growers scrambled to get the<br />

seed planted before the 15 June insurance<br />

cut-off date. Due to ongoing drought<br />

conditions in West Texas with no reprieve<br />

in sight, the crop conditions are not<br />

encouraging with the most recent report<br />

showing 10% as being rated very poor,<br />

17% poor, 38% fair, 20% good and only<br />

1% excellent.<br />

Yarn Market<br />

Yarn prices, although still soft, are not<br />

coming off as heavily as they were 3-4<br />

weeks ago. Lack of demand in the yarn<br />

market has forced yarn spinners to reduce<br />

their prices to lower inventory. With yarn<br />

inventories bulging, cloth prices sinking,<br />

and downstream demand wavering,<br />

Chinese fabric manufacturers are showing<br />

little interest right now in procuring more<br />

domestic cotton yarns and even less in<br />

sourcing yarns from abroad. At $1.91 per<br />

pound, the average landed cost of cotton<br />

yarns still trails the $2.14/lb. average cost<br />

of cotton last month.<br />

New Crop Supply<br />

While the total 2011–12 production number remains to be seen, the general consensus<br />

is global production will be at least 120 million bales, some 5 million bales more<br />

cotton than the 2010–11 market year. Obviously the large unknowns are the 3<br />

biggest producers – China, India and the US – however generally speaking, the world<br />

will produce more cotton due to larger crops in Australia, Brasil and Pakistan, and<br />

improving yield technology in India.<br />

Export Sales<br />

We have now had 11 consecutive weeks of negative export sales reports confirming<br />

ongoing concerns that demand destruction is still prevalent. Looking at US export<br />

sales, 5.4 million bales of 2011–12 (new crop) have already been committed for export.<br />

If you consider that the US started this current crop marketing year with 21 mb of<br />

supply (18.1 mb production + 2.95 mb beginning stocks), less the 15.4 mb already<br />

committed and the 3.8 mb to be consumed domestically, you can see how stocks are<br />

tight. Furthermore, from this 1.8 mb stock number, if you consider that 5.4 mb of new<br />

crop have already been sold, some for August shipment, you can see how quickly the<br />

US can climb into negative stocks – almost making a case for the need for sale contract<br />

cancellations.<br />

New York cotton futures<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

US cents/lb<br />

205<br />

190<br />

175<br />

160<br />

145<br />

130<br />

115<br />

100<br />

85<br />

70<br />

55<br />

40<br />

2009 2010<br />

Australian dollar vs US dollar<br />

$AUD vs $USD<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

1.1<br />

1.05<br />

1<br />

0.95<br />

0.9<br />

0.85<br />

0.8<br />

0.75<br />

0.7<br />

0.65<br />

2009 2010<br />

From the field to t<br />

Queensland Cotto<br />

Queensland Cotton has the longest supply


World COMModity Watch<br />

Demand<br />

Despite ongoing demand destruction, global consumption numbers year-on-year<br />

are still positive, with USDA estimating the world to consume 118.95 million bales<br />

of cotton, up from 115.51 mb in the 2010–11 marketing year. This number will be<br />

impacted greatly by macro-conditions in China and its GDP, and the textile industry in<br />

both China and Bangladesh, assuming it picks up from current conditions. Mills are<br />

reportedly still sitting on reasonably high levels of high-price cotton stocks. As a result<br />

of ongoing demand destruction, value in basis has eroded, as shown in the movements<br />

of the A Index. Current crop A Index has been withdrawn as there are only 3 growths<br />

available for offer.<br />

China<br />

Planting of cotton in China is winding<br />

up and conditions have been generally<br />

favourable. Crop size in China is not<br />

forecast to change dramatically year-onyear,<br />

and remains estimated at 33 million<br />

bales. Conditions in Northern Xinjiang<br />

(largest producing region in china –<br />

approx 25% of total production) have<br />

been generally favourable since planting<br />

(April/May). Although slightly cooler than<br />

desirable, at this stage it is not forecast to<br />

impact yield. The crop along the Yangtze<br />

River is currently receiving heavy rainfall<br />

which is forecast to continue for the next<br />

week or so. Whilst mostly welcomed,<br />

fears of torrential downpours may cause<br />

landslides, presenting a threat to the<br />

cotton that has been planted in this area.<br />

Australian cotton price*<br />

$AUD per bale<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

950<br />

900<br />

850<br />

800<br />

750<br />

700<br />

650<br />

600<br />

550<br />

500<br />

450<br />

400<br />

350<br />

2009 2010<br />

Australian basis*<br />

US cents/lb<br />

Source: Queensland Cotton<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

-12<br />

2009 2010<br />

India<br />

Planting in India is being accelerated by<br />

the prospects of monsoonal rains. To date,<br />

over 2 million hectares have been planted,<br />

approx 40% more than this time last year.<br />

Year-on-year, the Indian crop is expected<br />

to increase dramatically to an estimated<br />

27 million bales (up from USDA’s 24 mb<br />

in 2010–11). Crops are not yet effected by<br />

monsoon, and is providing a good start to<br />

the crop.<br />

Indian Government<br />

Export Policy<br />

The Indian Government finally announced<br />

last week they will be releasing an<br />

additional 1 million bales of Indian<br />

cotton to the export market. Timing of<br />

this export registration process remains<br />

unannounced, however there are reports<br />

of Indian shippers already making offers<br />

in the market.<br />

* Ex-gin price bids and basis for<br />

middling 1 1/8 inch cotton<br />

he shirt you wear,<br />

n is at every step.<br />

chain in the Australian cotton industry.<br />

55 Wyandra Street, Newstead<br />

Queensland Australia 4006,<br />

Tel: 61 7 3250 3300<br />

Fax: 61 7 3852 1600


marketing<br />

The World Cotton Market<br />

By Michael Edwards, Cotton Outlook<br />

The period since we last contributed<br />

to The Australian Cottongrower, in<br />

late March, has seen a rapid deterioration<br />

in trading conditions on the international<br />

raw cotton market. A glance at the<br />

accompanying graph illustrates the astonishing<br />

speed with which prices have fallen.<br />

From the all-time high of 243.65 cents<br />

per lb attained on March 8, the 2010–11<br />

Cotlook A Index has collapsed to the mid-<br />

160’s at the time of writing.<br />

The loss of roughly one third of the<br />

value of the Index has coincided with a<br />

‘perfect storm’ of negative influences: resale<br />

of existing contracts (including some<br />

of Australian cotton) to trade sellers, virtual<br />

paralysis of demand for both raw cotton<br />

and cotton yarn, building stocks of unsold<br />

cotton yarn, growing financial pressures<br />

on some spinning mills, and fears for the<br />

integrity of existing, high-priced raw cotton<br />

sales contracts.<br />

Of course, few observers of the market<br />

anticipated that prices above two dollars<br />

would be sustainable for long. But the<br />

speed of the downturn was spectacular,<br />

FIGURE 1: A Index and July 11 New York<br />

and the almost total absence of demand<br />

as the market has moved lower during<br />

April and May has also taken many by<br />

Cargill’s Cotton Division –<br />

specialising in buying cotton bales<br />

Phil Sloan<br />

PO Box 1203<br />

GOONDIWINDI Qld 4390<br />

Ph: (07) 4671 0222<br />

Fax: (07) 4671 3833<br />

AGENTS:<br />

Pete Johnson<br />

Left Field Solutions<br />

Mob: 0409 893 139<br />

Paul Kelly<br />

Moree Real Estate<br />

Moree<br />

Ph: (02) 6751 1100<br />

David Dugan<br />

Trangie<br />

Ph: (02) 6888 7122<br />

Roger McCumstie<br />

Brisbane<br />

Ph: (07) 3367 2629<br />

cotton_aust@cargill.com<br />

www.cargill.com.au<br />

Specialists in the<br />

Sale and Valuation<br />

of Rural Properties<br />

• Rural Properties • Cargill Cotton Agents<br />

• Town Sales<br />

• Registered Valuers<br />

• Property Management • Auctions<br />

• Clearing Sales<br />

MOREE REAL ESTATE<br />

www.moreerealestate.com.au<br />

Phone: 02 7651 1100<br />

Fax: 02 6751 1766<br />

After Hours:<br />

Paul Kelly 0428 281 428<br />

Cliff Brown 02 6752 3970<br />

Allan Gobbert 0428 523 375<br />

30 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


marketing<br />

FIGURE 2: Apparent changes in world stocks<br />

surprise. Given the scale of the decline, it<br />

seems probable that it is by now not the<br />

absolute level of prices per se that is the<br />

principal factor behind the current hiatus<br />

in demand, but rather the sudden absence<br />

of a stable relationship between raw cotton<br />

replacement costs and cotton yarn selling<br />

rates.<br />

As prices have weakened progressively<br />

in recent weeks, buying confidence has<br />

deserted prospective customers for cotton<br />

yarn. Many spinners – especially those<br />

who bought (or fixed on-call purchases)<br />

at the top of the market, have thus been<br />

placed in the invidious position of holding<br />

high-priced raw cotton stocks during a period<br />

in which the prices obtainable for cotton<br />

yarn have been progressively revised<br />

downward, and demand has all but disappeared.<br />

The exceptional behaviour of cotton<br />

prices over the past several months has<br />

meant that weavers and knitters have been<br />

<strong>study</strong>ing the international market as never<br />

before. They will not have been unaware<br />

of the disparity between the prices quoted<br />

for cotton for what remains of the 2010–<br />

11 crops, and those for new crop cotton,<br />

available from the main Northern Hemisphere<br />

crops, from around October/November<br />

onward. Although much reduced,<br />

at the time of writing the July/December<br />

spread in New York still amounts to a not<br />

insubstantial 23.00 cents per lb or so,<br />

while the difference between the Cotlook<br />

Current and Forward Indices is closer to<br />

20.00 cents. The transition between the<br />

two seasons – which is far from complete<br />

– is proving every bit as hazardous as<br />

many had feared.<br />

Thus, in recent weeks, contract performance<br />

has clearly displaced the generation<br />

of new sales as the international<br />

trade’s paramount priority. The integrity<br />

of some two-dollar plus contracts is now<br />

clearly in jeopardy, prompting the International<br />

Cotton Association to issue a<br />

circular in late May, reminding contracting<br />

parties of their obligations, and of the<br />

crucial importance of contract sanctity to<br />

the longer-term stability of the world cotton<br />

market.<br />

Given the immediate difficulties facing<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 31


marketing<br />

the various market participants, the supply<br />

and demand outlook for next season<br />

has perhaps received less attention than<br />

might otherwise have been the case.<br />

Cotton Outlook’s figures continue to indicate<br />

that world cotton production will<br />

set a new record in 2011–12, surpassing<br />

27,000,000 tonnes for the first time<br />

in history. The United States Department<br />

of Agriculture’s initial forecast, released on<br />

May 11, takes a broadly similar view.<br />

That cotton producers around the world<br />

should have responded positively to record<br />

high prices was of course predictable. But<br />

planting is not yet complete in the Northern<br />

Hemisphere, and nature may yet have<br />

a part to play in determining the season’s<br />

eventual output. In the United States, the<br />

weather has already conspired to dispel<br />

thoughts of a major expansion of output.<br />

At the time of writing, conditions in West<br />

Texas dryland areas remain far too dry,<br />

whereas in the Mississippi Delta, the impact<br />

on cotton of the disastrous flooding<br />

that occurred in late April is still being assessed.<br />

USDA’s initial view is that output<br />

will be of similar proportions to last season.<br />

But if export commitments for next season<br />

are taken into account, as well as the needs<br />

of the domestic spinning industry, roughly<br />

half of that crop is already sold.<br />

On the demand side, we take the admittedly<br />

optimistic view that an easier<br />

supply position, accompanied by a return<br />

of some measure of stability to both<br />

raw cotton and cotton yarn markets, will<br />

allow spinning activity to regain momentum<br />

during 2011–12. Our current forecast<br />

of world consumption also implies a<br />

new record next season, though at around<br />

26,350,000 tonnes, the figure is not dramatically<br />

higher than the levels estimated<br />

immediately prior to the financial crisis of<br />

2008–09.<br />

Our current figures indicate only a<br />

partial net recovery of world stocks next<br />

season, equivalent to less than one third<br />

of the volume we estimate will have been<br />

added during the 2009–10 and 2010–11<br />

campaigns.<br />

A setback to production in one or more<br />

major producing countries could radically<br />

alter that picture, with potentially bullish<br />

consequences.<br />

What is fair value for the<br />

2011–12 cotton crop?<br />

It is, perhaps, a question many growers<br />

have asked themselves more than<br />

once this year, and which still remains<br />

unanswered for some. This is not surprising<br />

given 2010–11 pricing action and the<br />

mix of complex factors that impact prices<br />

offered to Australian farmers today.<br />

One can become easily confused with<br />

the market’s volatility. Sensitivity to both<br />

market fundamentals and outside influences<br />

can result in no action while waiting<br />

for a clear market signal or pricing at<br />

lower levels. With such volatility, it is more<br />

important to stay focused on the key factors<br />

that you feel will drive the price direction<br />

and ensure your market intelligence is<br />

right and timely.<br />

When you consider the majority of Australian<br />

growers sell in AUD/bale, they are<br />

knowingly or unknowingly accepting the<br />

futures, basis and currency levels offered<br />

in the market that day. Or in other words,<br />

they accept the AUD/bale price is fair<br />

value. So, in an attempt to answer ‘what<br />

is fair value’ we will consider the outlook<br />

for basis, futures and currency given the<br />

current market outlook and identify a short<br />

term price target.<br />

Basis<br />

Basis, in its simplest definition is ‘a reflection<br />

of demand’. Although its weighting<br />

is currently less than 10 per cent of<br />

By Cambel Ball, IMAC Ltd<br />

the overall AUD/bale price, it cannot be<br />

directly distorted by speculators, and is<br />

instead directly determined by industry<br />

participants (merchants and mill demand).<br />

It is therefore a window into the physical<br />

business being undertaken each day and<br />

also the trade’s outlook into the future and<br />

should be considered alongside the futures<br />

market when forming a market view.<br />

Although basis does not have the volatility<br />

of futures (and currency), which is<br />

welcomed in today’s market, it can, over<br />

time strengthen or soften according to<br />

market demand, and gains and losses can<br />

be large. The chart below represents the<br />

Australian indicative basis versus May-12<br />

futures for the previous 12 months.<br />

Clearly the 2012 basis firmed when<br />

mill buying activity peaked in February/<br />

March 2011 as forward cover was sought<br />

to avoid the same lack of supply and high<br />

prices occurring for a possible second<br />

time. While the bidding basis peaked at<br />

around 900–1000 points on May-12 (or<br />

about AUD$50.00/bale) it has since been<br />

pressured lower as mill demand has basically<br />

ceased.<br />

As mill demand came to a standstill in<br />

April, merchants began to encounter counterparty<br />

risk as futures collapsed, followed<br />

by concerns over selling remaining stocks<br />

on hand in a falling market. At the time of<br />

writing the bidding basis level appears to<br />

FIGURE 1: Australian Quoted Basis and Cash Prices<br />

32 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


3100% Australian Cotton<br />

3100% Australian Owned<br />

Wee Waa Trangie Moree Goondiwindi Toowoomba<br />

Ph: 02 6790 3000 Ph: 02 6888 9611 Ph: 02 6752 5599 Ph: 07 4671 6900 Ph: 07 4631 6100<br />

Fax: 02 6795 4036 Fax: 02 6888 9678 Fax: 02 6752 5357 Fax: 07 4671 6999 Fax: 07 4631 6190<br />

www.namoicotton.com.au<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 33


marketing<br />

have consolidated for the moment around<br />

300–400 on May-12 but had reached<br />

‘evens’ May-12, and in the process wiping<br />

all the AUD$50.00/bale basis gains since<br />

March 2011.<br />

The outlook for basis in the longer term<br />

is mixed as the northern hemisphere crop<br />

is only just getting established and, like the<br />

past year, much can happen to world crops<br />

in the late third and early fourth quarters.<br />

On the other hand current mill demand is<br />

virtually non-existent and mill managers<br />

are clearly pessimistic about the short term<br />

outlook. But with the world estimated to<br />

produce a record crop of 123.77 million<br />

bales for the year ahead, about 9.5 million<br />

bales more than the current season, we<br />

expect the basis to track back to historical<br />

levels.<br />

That is not to say that basis cannot<br />

rally. Today US merchants are concerned<br />

about not being able to supply high grades<br />

against sales made to date, let alone offering<br />

additional high grades. With potentially<br />

no more US high grades being offered,<br />

mills will turn to Australia, West African,<br />

Uzbekistan and India with no guarantees<br />

that weather, strikes or government action<br />

will not being repeated again this year.<br />

This is particularly true for India where<br />

regular government intervention means<br />

merchants and mills will have to price in<br />

a risk discount.<br />

Even when we take into account that<br />

mills need to cover a significant amount<br />

of cotton for later this year, this will more<br />

than likely just lead to a short term basis<br />

spike. In addition, Australian merchants<br />

for the first time in a number of seasons<br />

will have carryover stocks to meet forward<br />

demand, while significant hedging costs<br />

will need to be factored into the basis levels<br />

offered. Given this, any opportunity<br />

to lock in a basis close to or above 750<br />

on May-12 should be considered, unless<br />

you feel global ending stocks are over estimated<br />

today.<br />

Futures<br />

As much as basis levels are directly determined<br />

by merchants and mills, the recent<br />

rally in futures has indirectly impacted<br />

basis levels, particularly foreign basis levels<br />

(including Australia) as the futures rally has<br />

been largely due to the current crop issues<br />

in the US.<br />

Since February, May-12 futures have<br />

traded within a large range from 105.00c/<br />

lb to 125.00c/lb or around AUD$100/<br />

bale – which has been reflected in cash bidding<br />

levels peaking at around AUD$660<br />

and bottoming closer to AUD$560. But it<br />

has been Dec-11 where IMAC has focused<br />

its attention given it has the greater liquidity<br />

which allows it to push and pull May-<br />

12 for the time being. Dec-11 during this<br />

time has traded in a wider range between<br />

113.00c/lb and 144.00c/lb or around<br />

AUD$150/bale.<br />

Given Dec-11 has traded in a wide ranging,<br />

mildly bullish channel, it indicates that<br />

it is too early to assume the 2011–12 crop<br />

will reach or exceed 123.77 million bales.<br />

Additionally it is likely the US will run out of<br />

bales at some point in September and new<br />

crop issues are already being witnessed.<br />

Texas and Georgia, which represent about<br />

60 percent of the planted acreage in the<br />

US, currently have 81 per cent and 55 per<br />

cent of their states respectively classed as<br />

being in extreme drought. If both states do<br />

not see significant rain before June 30, US<br />

crop estimates will have to be scaled back<br />

yet again.<br />

Worst case, the US crop could fall below<br />

16.0 million bales and possibly as low<br />

as 15.0 million bales which would at least<br />

support the market around current levels,<br />

if not propel the market higher. To offset<br />

any shortage in the US will be a smaller<br />

foreign production gap estimated at 8.4<br />

million bales for the 2011–12-season.<br />

This indicates that outside of the US, global<br />

crops are large when you consider the<br />

2009–10 season had a foreign production<br />

gap of 25.75 million bales.<br />

For the moment the market will remain<br />

focused on the US crop as we enter the<br />

critical crop establishment stage ahead of<br />

the June 30 USDA Planted Acreage Report.<br />

Thereafter, futures will require additional<br />

bullish news to maintain any upside<br />

momentum and the focus will turn to the<br />

progress of foreign crops and signs of global<br />

consumption.<br />

Additional bullish news may not necessarily<br />

come from the cotton world. Outside<br />

commodities such as corn are likely to offer<br />

broad support to agricultural commodities<br />

given the US’s historically low ending<br />

stocks while managed money currently favours<br />

commodities.<br />

We need to be aware that managed<br />

money flows can abruptly pull money out<br />

of cotton as testified by Goldman Sachs’<br />

recent efforts to reduce exposure in commodities.<br />

At the same time we have the<br />

ongoing European debt and US growth<br />

concerns keeping investors highly cautious.<br />

So if Dec-11 nears 140.00c/lb,<br />

IMAC would consider hedging May-12 futures<br />

at the corresponding level given the<br />

current market outlook and the inability of<br />

Dec-11 to hold these levels previously.<br />

Currency<br />

Our focus when considering the AUD<br />

direction has been largely driven by our<br />

view of the USD, in particular the USD<br />

Index (a measure of the value of the USD<br />

relative to a basket of foreign currencies).<br />

Australia has the highest interest rates in<br />

any of the G10 nations, and will continue<br />

to attract investors. US interest rates, on<br />

the other hand, are forecast to remain<br />

near-zero as ‘quantitative easing’ (money<br />

printing) can be expected to continue for<br />

an extended period.<br />

With US public debt at 14.5 trillion dol-<br />

34 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


marketing<br />

FIGURE 2: USD Index<br />

lars (growing by about 1.7 trillion dollars<br />

annually) and household debt measuring<br />

11.5 trillion dollars, the US government<br />

and Federal Reserve are running out of<br />

options. The most desirable course of<br />

action would be economic growth, from<br />

which debt could be serviced and eventually<br />

be repaid. But the US economy is<br />

moribund and it currently takes over six<br />

dollars of new credit (= debt) to create one<br />

dollar of GDP.<br />

Another option would be for the US to<br />

default on some treasury debt by forcing<br />

investors to take a ‘haircut’. This is not a<br />

viable option either as the US is too proud<br />

to join the ranks of Argentina and Greece.<br />

This leaves only the third option, which<br />

is the same we have been seeing in years<br />

past, namely to print money and to engineer<br />

a controlled devaluation of the US<br />

dollar. Since the US dollar is the world’s<br />

reserve currency and its counterpart, the<br />

Euro, is also in a state of disarray, the Federal<br />

Reserve has so far managed to let the<br />

US dollar sink in an orderly manner. Currencies<br />

with better fundamentals, such as<br />

the Swiss Franc, the Singapore Dollar, the<br />

Brazilian Real and the Australian Dollar<br />

have become attractive alternatives to the<br />

US dollar and the Euro, and this is likely to<br />

continue in the future.<br />

Conclusion<br />

If we consider only the period from February,<br />

then the average value of Australian<br />

2012 crop has been just under AUD$600/<br />

bale. But we should not confuse average<br />

value with fair value. After considering<br />

each pricing component we can conclude<br />

that basis and currency levels are not likely<br />

to offer long term upside pricing opportunities<br />

given the current market outlook.<br />

It is more likely they will offer short<br />

term opportunities that are not likely to<br />

last for extended periods. So futures offer<br />

the greatest opportunity for upside pricing<br />

but are also subject to the greatest volatility<br />

and have a large weighting of the overall<br />

AUD/bale price.<br />

From a mathematical point of view, if<br />

Dec-11 moves into the 135.00-140.00c/<br />

lb range and assuming a 15.00c/lb<br />

spread to May-12 (125.00c/lb), and a<br />

basis around 300 on, and spot currency<br />

at around 1.0650 and forwards at -450<br />

points (1.020 delivered May 2012),<br />

fair value equates to AUD$620/bale to<br />

AUD$630/bale. But fair value also depends<br />

on your current hedge position,<br />

budgeted levels and your attitude to risk.<br />

In summary, ensure you have access to<br />

a well researched market view that is also<br />

able to change as market factors change,<br />

consider in advance all hedging strategies<br />

and consider strategies that take advantage<br />

of market volatility. The alternative<br />

to AUD/bale hedging is to hedge each<br />

pricing component separately (and often<br />

at different times) which has often been<br />

viewed as a higher risk hedging strategy.<br />

In reality, hedging each component separately<br />

reduces your exposure to the market<br />

and your dependence on all three components<br />

aligning at the same time. But how<br />

you hedge each leg is the risk which often<br />

deters growers and where education and<br />

expert advice is required.<br />

The above report is IMAC’s opinion and for<br />

general advice only. IMAC does not take any<br />

responsibility for its accuracy or otherwise. For<br />

specific advice or any queries on any of the above<br />

please contact Cambel Ball at IMAC on<br />

0407 645 675 or cambel@imacqld.com.au<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 35


Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />

Quarantine treatments on the<br />

physical properties of cotton – Part 2<br />

By Marinus H.J van der Sluijs 1<br />

In Part 1 of this <strong>study</strong>, published in a previous edition of The<br />

Australian Cotton Grower we showed that the sanitary treatments<br />

prescribed by AQIS do have an effect on the quality of<br />

both Upland and Extra Long Staple (ELS) cotton lint. The fumigation<br />

treatments by either ethylene oxide or methyl bromide<br />

had little or no significant effect on the physical properties of the<br />

cotton fibre.<br />

But gamma irradiation, even at the lower dosages (21 and 29<br />

kGray), did have an effect on the physical properties of the fibre,<br />

with these effects becoming more apparent and significant as the<br />

dosage strength increased (57 and 74 kGy). Results showed that<br />

the physical fibre properties of the cotton such as strength, elongation,<br />

length uniformity, short fibre and to a lesser extent length<br />

and colour are affected by gamma irradiation.<br />

In Part 2 of this <strong>study</strong> we will report on what the effects are<br />

of gamma irradiation on the textile processing performance of<br />

cotton lint.<br />

Yarn Production<br />

In order to determine textile performance of the cotton samples,<br />

a hybrid system was used which consists of a re-furbished<br />

‘Shirley’ miniature spinning plant manufactured by the Platt Company<br />

of the UK. This system allows for the processing of small<br />

quantities of fibre and consists of a miniature card and draw frame<br />

to produce slivers, which are then transferred to a full-scale spinning<br />

system for further processing through a further draw frame<br />

passage and the production of roving prior to spinning. Draft and<br />

twist was optimised for each sample to deliver a 20 Tex (30 Ne)<br />

FIGURE 1: Yarn strength of the untreated (NT)<br />

and treated cotton<br />

FIGURE 2: Yarn elongation of the untreated<br />

(NT) and treated cotton<br />

carded yarn with a twist factor of αe 3.7 (792 turns per metre).<br />

One yarn bobbin per irradiation dosage was tested for quality parameters.<br />

Spun yarns were conditioned under standard laboratory conditions<br />

for 24 hours and tested for linear density (count) and twist.<br />

Evenness, hairiness and imperfections were determined using an<br />

Uster Technologies 4-SX Evenness tester. Tensile properties, such<br />

as yarn strength and elongation, were determined using the Uster<br />

Technologies Tensorapid 3. The average results of these tests are<br />

shown in the forthcoming figures with error bars representing<br />

one standard deviation giving an indication of the variation in the<br />

samples.<br />

Yarn RESULTS<br />

There were no real significant differences in the evenness and<br />

imperfection values between the untreated and treated fibre samples<br />

and so these are not reported. But as can be seen in Figure<br />

1, the yarn strength significantly decreases as the irradiation dosage<br />

strength increases, with the results typically following the fibre<br />

strength and elongation results.<br />

The yarn strength, for both the Upland and ELS cotton, did not<br />

reduce significantly from the untreated (NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated<br />

cotton. But there was a significant reduction in yarn strength<br />

with an irradiation dosage of 29 kGy. In the case of the Upland<br />

cotton the yarn strength reduced by almost 5 cN/tex, from the<br />

untreated yarn to 10.8 cN/tex.<br />

This yarn strength would make this yarn impossible to process<br />

into fabric by the weaving and also the knitting process. With an<br />

Ginning & Fibre Quality<br />

proudly brought to you with the support of…<br />

A tradition of service since 1849<br />

36 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />

irradiation dosage of 57 and 74 kGy the yarn strength decreased<br />

even further to below 10 cN/tex. In the case of the ELS cotton the<br />

yarn strength reduced by almost 6.5 cN/tex from the untreated<br />

yarn to 18.7cN/tex. This yarn strength would make processing of<br />

fabric on high speed weaving impossible. The yarn strength was<br />

further reduced to 14.8 cN/tex with an irradiation dosage of 57<br />

kGy and 74 kGy.<br />

As can be seen in Figure 2, this decrease in yarn strength corresponded<br />

with a gradual decrease in yarn elongation. As was the<br />

case with the yarn strength there was no significant difference in<br />

yarn elongation between the untreated Upland and ELS cotton<br />

and the 21 kGy radiated cotton. But there was a significant reduction<br />

in yarn elongation between the untreated Upland and ELS<br />

cotton and the 29 kGy irradiated cotton.<br />

In the case of the Upland cotton the yarn elongation dropped<br />

from 6.6 per cent to 5.0 per cent with a dosage of 57 kGy<br />

providing similar results. A dosage of 74 kGy almost reduced the<br />

yarn elongation by half when compared to the untreated cotton<br />

(6.6 per cent to 3.7 per cent). In the case of the ELS cotton the<br />

yarn elongation dropped from 6.2 per cent to 5.4 per cent with<br />

a dosage of 29 kGy with a dosage of 57 kGy providing similar<br />

results. A dosage of 74 kGy reduced the yarn elongation by 1.5<br />

per cent when compared to the untreated cotton (6.2 per cent to<br />

4.8 per cent).<br />

This reduction in yarn elongation together with the loss in yarn<br />

strength will make it virtually impossible to convert these yarns<br />

into fabrics without processing performance and subsequent quality<br />

issues.<br />

Fabric Production<br />

To determine the processing performance and subsequent quality,<br />

the yarns were waxed and wound using a Schlafhorst 238 RM<br />

winder. Wound yarns were then knitted on a Lawson Hemphill<br />

25.4cm (10 inch) F.A.K. circular knitting machine, using a cover<br />

factor of 1.37 to produce a fabric weight of 153 g/m 2 . The resultant<br />

knitted fabric was then scoured and dyed with Cibacron red<br />

LS6G (1 per cent) reactive dye.<br />

Fabric RESULTS<br />

The dyed fabric was conditioned under standard laboratory conditions<br />

for 24 hours and tested for mass per unit area and for fabric<br />

strength by determining the bursting strength in kilopascal (kPa).<br />

As can be seen in Figure 3, the fabric bursting strength significantly<br />

decreases as the dosage strength increases, indicating that<br />

the fabric strength decreases as the irradiation dosages increases;<br />

typically following the yarn strength results in Figure 1. Fabrics<br />

Figure 3: Fabric Bursting Strength of the<br />

untreated (NT) and treated cotton<br />

A tradition of<br />

service since 1849<br />

Cotton Trader -<br />

Matthew Bradd<br />

Ecom Commodities Pty Ltd<br />

GPO Box 29<br />

Sydney NSW 2001<br />

02 9223 3631<br />

Agents<br />

Namoi, Gwydir, Riverina,<br />

MacIntryre Valley and<br />

Macquarie Valley<br />

Steve Dalton, Luke Kirkby<br />

and Jean Cottam<br />

AgVantage Commodities Pty Ltd<br />

P 02 6792 2962<br />

Darling Downs<br />

Simon Donaldson<br />

Gebar Farming<br />

P 0428 636 924<br />

St George & Dirranbandi<br />

Kelvin Bella<br />

OUR-TEK PTY LTD<br />

P 0428 717 284<br />

Central Queensland<br />

& Dawson - Callide<br />

Don Cooper<br />

Cooper Consulting<br />

P 0428 794 698<br />

www.ecomtrading.com<br />

www.ecomcommodities.com.au<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 37


Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />

became significantly weaker with each irradiation dosage. In the<br />

case of Upland cotton there was a decrease in fabric strength of<br />

163 kPa from the untreated (NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated cotton.<br />

The fabric strength decreased by a further 90 kPa with a 29<br />

kGy dosage and a further 107 kPa with a 57 kGy dosage.<br />

There was a slight reduction in fabric strength between the 57<br />

and 74 kGy irradiated cotton. In the case of the ELS cotton, there<br />

was a decrease in fabric strength of 170 kPa from the untreated<br />

(NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated cotton. The fabric strength decreased<br />

by a further 94 kPa with a 29 kGy dosage, a further 65<br />

kPa with a 57 kGy dosage and a further 60 kPa with a 74 kGy<br />

dosage.<br />

Conclusion<br />

As highlighted in Part 1 of this <strong>study</strong>, fumigation treatments by<br />

either ethylene oxide or methyl bromide have little or no significant<br />

effect on the physical properties of cotton fibre. But gamma<br />

irradiation does have an effect on the physical properties of the<br />

fibre, with these effects becoming more apparent and significant<br />

as the dosage strength increases.<br />

In Part 2 of this <strong>study</strong> we looked at what affect the various dosages<br />

of gamma irradiation applied to the cotton fibre has on its<br />

textile processing performance. The yarn results show that the<br />

various irradiation dosages did not have a significant impact on the<br />

evenness and imperfection values.<br />

But gamma irradiation had a significant effect on the yarn<br />

strength and elongation results of both the Upland and ELS cotton,<br />

with the results typically following the fibre strength and elongation<br />

results reported in Part 1. The fabric results also show that<br />

gamma irradiation does have a significant effect on fabric strength<br />

for both the Upland and ELS cotton, with the results typically following<br />

the yarn strength results.<br />

The message from these two studies is quite clear; if any cotton<br />

lint needs to be imported into Australia, for whatever reason, one<br />

must insist on chemical (fumigation) by either ethylene oxide or<br />

methyl bromide as gamma irradiation, even at low dosages, severely<br />

damages the physical properties of cotton lint. These physical<br />

damages can cause major issues if the cotton lint is to be used<br />

either to calibrate fibre testing instruments, used to benchmark<br />

Australian cotton or for commercial processing.<br />

1<br />

CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Geelong.<br />

Acknowledgements: The author gratefully acknowledges the financial<br />

support of the Cotton Research and Development Corporation and CSIRO<br />

Materials Science and Engineering. He also acknowledges the assistance<br />

of Fred Horne, Mark Freijah, Phil Henry, Peter Herwig and<br />

Colin Brackley for processing the fibre through to fabric.<br />

38 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


CLASSIC TRACTOR TALES<br />

The 1930s<br />

By Ian M. Johnston<br />

THE TROUBLED WORLD<br />

Planet Earth was a very disturbed place<br />

in the 1930s. During the early part of the<br />

decade, as the financial world struggled<br />

to pull itself out of The Great Depression,<br />

shocked and impoverished Wall Street<br />

bankers continued leaping out of skyscraper<br />

windows. In the meantime, Europe<br />

watched with trepidation as Adolf Hitler<br />

strutted around waving Mein Kampf,<br />

whilst the rotund Herrman Wilhelm Goering<br />

assembled his legions of ‘sporting’<br />

Messerschmitt pilots. Prime Minister Neville<br />

Chamberlain returned to London from<br />

Germany saying ‘There will be peace<br />

in our time’. (Oh well, that’ll be all right<br />

then!!)<br />

General Franco pre-empted World War<br />

II by plunging Spain into a horrendous<br />

civil war. Marshal Joseph Stalin held social<br />

shooting parties throughout the USSR<br />

most weekends – his targets being anyone<br />

who happened to oppose his maniacal<br />

iron fisted doctrine. Japanese General<br />

Tojo raped, burned and pillaged Manchuria,<br />

whilst he sipped green tea.<br />

Yes, there was no shortage of ‘exciting’<br />

material for the media during the 1930s!<br />

But as always, no matter what mayhem<br />

the world’s political leaders could dream<br />

up, the good old farmers could be relied<br />

upon to continue providing food and fibre.<br />

What would the world do without them?<br />

So did anything good emerge during the<br />

tumultuous 1930s? (I am tempted to say<br />

‘me’ – but I won’t. Modesty, you know). A<br />

new generation of tractors was unveiled,<br />

which from an engineering point of view,<br />

elevated agricultural tractors for the first<br />

time into becoming thoroughly reliable<br />

and capable units. They replaced the cantankerous<br />

and often dangerous machinery<br />

of the 1920s. (But to be fair, it has to be<br />

remembered that during the 1920s, tractors<br />

had only been around for just over two<br />

decades).<br />

HENRY’S TOOL BOXES<br />

Even Henry Ford, in the interests of<br />

safety, extended the rear mudguards of his<br />

Fordsons down to nearly ground level in<br />

an endeavour to reduce the tedious habit<br />

of the tractors rearing over backwards,<br />

should the plough strike an immovable object.<br />

Being stubborn by nature, he refused<br />

to acknowledge that there was a problem,<br />

clearly evident to others by the growing<br />

number of Fordson widows. His excuse for<br />

extending the mudguards was to accommodate<br />

a tool box.<br />

The reason why the Fordsons had this<br />

dangerous trait was the design of the phosphor<br />

bronze worm gear in the differential.<br />

Should a plough or other dragged implement<br />

come to a sudden stop, thus putting<br />

an immense load on the drive train, the<br />

tractor tended to climb or wind around<br />

the differential. The hazard was increased<br />

if the implement hitch was located higher<br />

than half way up the differential and particularly<br />

if the tractor was equipped with<br />

steel wheels and lugs.<br />

So maybe Henry’s tool boxes did save<br />

a few lives by acting as a prop if a Fordson<br />

reared. But probably the real problem<br />

was the fact that many tractor drivers of<br />

the 1930s had grown up walking behind<br />

the sweaty rear ends of a horse team and<br />

then were suddenly put into the unyielding<br />

seat of a tractor, without the advantage of<br />

any real training. Exchanging a set of reins<br />

for the complication of things like steering<br />

wheels, clutches and, worse of all, the<br />

complexity of gear changes, could prove a<br />

formidable challenge indeed!<br />

INTERNATIONAL W30<br />

Of all the North American tractors introduced<br />

in the1930s, one of the most<br />

outstanding was International Harvester’s<br />

W30. Considered a medium to heavy<br />

weight, it was an excellent grain farmer<br />

tractor capable of pulling the largest of<br />

the then available broadacre ploughs and<br />

scarifiers. Australian farmers loved it, to<br />

the extent it reputedly outsold all other<br />

similarly powered units.<br />

It should be stated though, the W30<br />

could be quite a handful to drive. The<br />

steering was heavy, as was the clutch, and<br />

selecting gears was not the smoothest of<br />

operations. But it was reliable and its consumption<br />

of low priced kerosene fuel considered<br />

reasonable.<br />

A restored Fordson Model F belonging to Mal Brinkman. Note<br />

the extended rear mudguard with the tool box built into the tail.<br />

Although a 1920s model a few remaining old stock were sold in<br />

1930–31. (Photo IMJ)<br />

A 1936 International W30 (sold under the McCormick-Deering<br />

logo) restored by the author. (Photo IMJ)<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 39


A well presented Allis Chalmers Model U – part of the extensive<br />

Shaw collection at Westbury, Tasmania. (Photo IMJ)<br />

Its four cylinder, 284 cubic inches engine<br />

developed an easy 31 belt hp at a<br />

leisurely 1150 rpm. By today’s standards<br />

1150 rpm is barely above idling speed. But<br />

internal combustion engine development<br />

was still in its early stages in the 1930s<br />

and slow revs in a tractor engine equated<br />

to reliability and a reasonably long life.<br />

Released in 1932, the W30 was originally<br />

coloured an unimaginative dull grey<br />

and featured only a three forward speed<br />

gearbox. Around 1936, a four speed box<br />

was introduced to cater for the higher<br />

speeds being achieved with pneumatic<br />

tyres, now being increasingly demanded<br />

by the more enlightened farmers in place<br />

of the original clattering, teeth jarring and<br />

less efficient steel lugged wheels. At the<br />

same time the colour was changed to International<br />

Red.<br />

Like most tractors, the W30 had a<br />

straight through exhaust pipe. Accordingly<br />

the constant roar of the exhaust note decibels<br />

proved wearisome in the extreme and<br />

indeed detrimental to health in the long<br />

term. In the 1930s ear muffs for tractor<br />

drivers were not contemplated, and if they<br />

had been they would undoubtedly have<br />

been considered sissy!<br />

WHEEL EQUIPMENT<br />

Steel wheels with their aggressive looking<br />

lugs, were still very much the norm,<br />

particularly in the early 1930s. Allis<br />

Chalmers was the first American tractor<br />

manufacturer to promote pneumatic<br />

tyres. In order to convince farmers of the<br />

safety and durability of the tyres, famous<br />

American race car driver Barney Oldfield<br />

was hired to conduct hair raising tractor<br />

race meetings at speedway circuits around<br />

the Midwest grain belts. On September<br />

17, 1933, driving a stock standard Allis<br />

Chalmers Model U, but equipped with<br />

special gears, Oldfield established a world<br />

tractor speed record of 64.28 mph.<br />

As the decade progressed an increasing<br />

number of tractor buyers stipulated pneumatics.<br />

It is a common misconception that<br />

steel lugged wheels must obtain a more<br />

efficient grip when compared with pneumatics.<br />

Well, I mean they look as if they<br />

would, but such is definitely not the case.<br />

The evidence can be found when comparisons<br />

are made of the draw bar pulls and<br />

related speeds of identical tractors fitted<br />

with the different wheel types.<br />

For example a <strong>Case</strong> Model L was<br />

tested, on both pneumatic tyres and steel<br />

lugged wheels, at the world renowned University<br />

of Nebraska Tractor Test Facility in<br />

October 1938. The results indicated that<br />

while the tyred unit showed only a minor<br />

increase in the maximum drawbar pull,<br />

it achieved this at a significantly higher<br />

speed.<br />

In wet sticky clay soils, steel wheels habitually<br />

packed up with clay, often requiring<br />

laborious frequent time wasting stops<br />

to remove the build up using a crowbar.<br />

Also, because of their non-resilient nature,<br />

steel wheels restricted tractor speed to a<br />

maximum of around four mph.<br />

JOHN DEERE MODEL D<br />

Today, Deere and Company remains<br />

the world’s longest established tractor<br />

manufacturer, as a result of never having<br />

succumbed to a corporate take over. Back<br />

in 1939, although not a new model, a<br />

revamped version of the legendary green<br />

and gold John Deere Model D was unveiled.<br />

First released in 1923, the twin cylinder<br />

petrol/kero fuelled Model D had the<br />

longest production run of any tractor and<br />

was not discontinued until 1953. By that<br />

time around 160,000 had been built!<br />

In a break from tradition, the 1939<br />

An excellent example of a John Deere Model D, restored by Brian<br />

Sainsbury, a well known collector in the ACT. (Photo IMJ)<br />

model was restyled by the famous American<br />

vehicle stylist Henry Dreyfuss and<br />

given a pleasing modern appearance. Its<br />

horizontal parallel two cylinders had a cubic<br />

capacity of 501 cubic inches and developed<br />

42.1 belt hp at 900 rpm The 5270<br />

lbs. tractor featured a three forward speed<br />

gear box and a chain driven final drive.<br />

As with all models of John Deere tractors,<br />

the simplicity and economy of their<br />

twin cylinder engines attracted a dedicated<br />

following of farmers, where ever they were<br />

sold. Affectionately they were known as<br />

Johnny Poppers, on account of the distinctive<br />

two cylinder exhaust note.<br />

MASSEY HARRIS 25<br />

Yet another North American tractor<br />

of the 1930s popular in Australia, which<br />

performed with distinction was the Massey<br />

Harris 25, a product of the giant Canadian<br />

tractor and farm machinery manufacturer<br />

of the same name. Modern day tractor<br />

enthusiasts often mistake the 25 for the<br />

smaller, but more frequently seen, Massey<br />

Harris Pacemaker.<br />

Introduced in 1933, the 25 was originally<br />

entitled the MH 3-4 Plough. The big<br />

ohv four cylinder petrol/kero engine had<br />

a capacity of 346 cu. ins. and produced<br />

48.5 belt hp at 1200 rpm This resulted in<br />

a drawbar pull of a respectable 4501 lbs.<br />

at 2.2 mph. It received a styling face lift<br />

and a colour change from green to red in<br />

1938 and was discontinued in 1939.<br />

The Massey Harris 25 excelled over<br />

most of its competitors in the region of<br />

ease of operation. It was actually quite<br />

silky to drive and at the completion of a<br />

12 hour shift an operator would be less<br />

weary than had he been driving almost any<br />

other tractor, including the International<br />

W30 and the John Deere Model D. Notice<br />

I state ‘less’ weary!<br />

40 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


This 1938 Massey Harris 25, equipped with steel wheels, has<br />

been restored by the author. (Photo IMJ)<br />

IN CONCLUSION<br />

In addition to the North American units<br />

mentioned above, there was a bewildering<br />

array of tractors available to Australian<br />

farmers in the 1930s. They came<br />

from Britain. Germany, France, Italy, etc.,<br />

and of course there were the Australian<br />

indigenous tractors including McDonald,<br />

Howard and Ronaldson Tippett.<br />

There were the good, and there were<br />

the not so good, but certainly they were all<br />

better than the models that preceded them<br />

in the 1920s.<br />

Despite the advance of tractor designs,<br />

farming in Australia during the 1930s<br />

plodded on in a manner little changed<br />

from the practices which had persisted<br />

since Federation. But all that was about<br />

to change. World War II was looming over<br />

This fine <strong>Case</strong> Model L is to be found at The Wheatlands Museum,<br />

Warracknabeal, Vic. and is but one of scores of classic tractors on<br />

display. (Photo IMJ)<br />

the horizon, the aftermath of which would<br />

change the face of agriculture irrevocably,<br />

particularly in the areas of farm mechanisation,<br />

irrigation and the results of scientific<br />

crop research.<br />

THE PERFECT GIFT – OR SIMPLY FOR YOURSELF<br />

Ian’s Mystery<br />

Tractor QUIZ<br />

Question: Can you please explain<br />

what I am doing here?<br />

Clue: I am not repairing the steering<br />

box!<br />

Degree of difficulty: Simple!<br />

Answer: See page 56.<br />

Hard cover, 320 pages, liberally<br />

illustrated.<br />

Order your autographed copy of ‘TRACTORS KALASHNIKOVS and GREEN TEA’ now<br />

NAME:<br />

ADDRESS:<br />

TELEPHONE:............................................................<br />

NO. OF COPIES……@ $39.50 each. Cost: $………… Plus postage (total) $ 9.50<br />

TOTAL REMITTANCE: Cheque or postal money order (sorry – no card facility) $…………<br />

Please send order form with remittance to: IAN M. JOHNSTON, PO BOX 322, TUNCURRY, NSW, 2428.<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 41


Is mite pest-resistant cotton<br />

a little closer?<br />

While managing major pests such<br />

as Helicoverpa has been the<br />

most significant focus of cotton<br />

industry R&D in the past 20 years, CSIRO<br />

has also been devoting resources and expertise<br />

towards managing other pests that<br />

affect cotton. One pest that can potentially<br />

decrease yield and cause quality losses<br />

in cotton is the two-spotted spider mite.<br />

Two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus<br />

urticae) affect cotton plants by sucking out<br />

the cellular contents and causing a loss of<br />

plant vigour, photosynthetic capacity and<br />

subsequently reduced yield and poorer<br />

quality fibre.<br />

Spider mites can be difficult to control<br />

with normal pesticide application and<br />

over-reliance on pesticides for their control<br />

has led to pesticide resistance. Widely<br />

adopted genetic traits such as Bt have no<br />

effect on mites or other sucking pests, so<br />

researchers are evaluating other methods<br />

of non-pesticide control.<br />

CSIRO scientist Dr Junji Miyazaki evaluated<br />

a range of cotton varieties and found<br />

that some are much more resistant to<br />

mites. In field experiments, the susceptible<br />

varieties clearly showed distinct bronzing<br />

of leaves as mite populations increased,<br />

while resistant varieties alongside remained<br />

healthy and productive. Junji found that<br />

spider mites took longer to reach maturity<br />

and that fewer females survived on the resistant<br />

varieties.<br />

Importantly, these resistant varieties<br />

Dr Junji Miyazaki.<br />

showed an increase in a naturally-occurring<br />

compound called jasmonic acid, which is<br />

associated with defence responses in many<br />

plants. Resistant varieties tended to show<br />

greater levels of this compound which suggests<br />

it may be involved in defending the<br />

plants against pest population build up.<br />

If breeders could find a way to develop<br />

varieties that incorporate these resistance<br />

characteristics, this may grant growers the<br />

best of both worlds in securing yield as well<br />

as being able to reduce chemical pesticide<br />

use further.<br />

Future work aims to further uncover<br />

how this defence response results in lower<br />

pest damage and to breed cotton that<br />

uses this natural defence response against<br />

mites, as well as to evaluate further varieties<br />

for resistance against other important<br />

pests such as, whiteflies and mirids.<br />

This project was supported with funding by<br />

Cotton Breeding Australia, a joint venture<br />

between CSIRO Plant Industry and Cotton Seed<br />

Distributors Ltd.<br />

More information:<br />

www.csiro.au/people/Junji.Miyazaki.html<br />

www.csiro.au/science/Sustainable-Cotton-<br />

Industry.html<br />

www.csiro.au/places/ACRI.html<br />

Field screening for mite resistance.<br />

42 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Change in cotton production lecturer<br />

Want a Better Built Auger?<br />

In May of this year Brendan Griffiths<br />

took over the role of lecturer in cotton<br />

production at the University of New<br />

England. The previous lecturer Dr John<br />

Stanley has decided to take on a post doctoral<br />

fellowship with the CRC for Spatial<br />

Information, based at UNE.<br />

Brendan has been an agronomist in the<br />

cotton industry for the past 20 years and<br />

has operated as an independent consultant<br />

based in Goondiwindi for the past 12<br />

years. For the past four years he has also<br />

been a PhD student at UNE, with a Cotton<br />

Catchment Communities CRC funded<br />

project looking at high yielding wheats in<br />

the cotton farming system.<br />

Brendan hopes to able to retain the high<br />

standard of presentation of content in the<br />

course by his predecessors, and add value<br />

as a result of years of practical experience<br />

at field level.<br />

The cotton course has been going since<br />

1994 and is the only industry funded<br />

course focussing on cotton production at<br />

the tertiary level. The course has been a<br />

flagship project throughout the three iterations<br />

of the Cotton Catchments Communities<br />

CRC. Not all CRCs embed courses<br />

in their education program, but it is a testimony<br />

to the cotton course that several<br />

other CRCs are now emulating.<br />

Students can <strong>study</strong> at various levels<br />

achieving a diploma in cotton production<br />

at undergraduate level, or at the postgraduate<br />

level, a grad-certificate or even Masters<br />

degree in Agriculture.<br />

This year enrolments have risen sharply<br />

as a result of renewed interest in the cotton<br />

sector. The drought has caused a large<br />

gap in the entry of agronomists and other<br />

young professionals into the industry for<br />

some time.<br />

Brendan believes the role of the course<br />

is to address this skills deficit in the industry<br />

and provide new industry personnel with<br />

the knowledge and skills necessary to hit<br />

the ground running, or to answer some of<br />

the questions raised after a couple of years<br />

working in the industry.<br />

Brendan will be based in Goondiwindi<br />

and will continue his work in the field, adding<br />

value to the course and being able to<br />

answer real questions being faced in the<br />

field.<br />

CAPACITY<br />

UP TO<br />

250 TONNES<br />

For information on the cotton production<br />

subjects Brendan can be contacted at<br />

bgriffi2@une.edu.au.<br />

Brendan Griffiths.<br />

MULTI PURPOSE<br />

W H E E L L O A D E R S<br />

PER HOUR<br />

from the NAME you’ve GROWN to trust<br />

WESTFIELD<br />

Being the leading global auger lengths, diameters and drive styles that<br />

manufacturer for over 50 years we’ve give you more size and capacity options<br />

become pretty good at it.<br />

than any other auger.<br />

Each and every Westfield auger is “Job Available in 4, 8, 10 or 13” diameters<br />

Sized” – engineered, designed and built in lengths from 26 to 111 feet with a<br />

from the ground up so components choice of PTO, engine or electric drives<br />

get heavier and stronger as the auger Why choose Westfield Augers?<br />

gets bigger. That means each and every • 28 years continuous business in<br />

model offers superior performance and Australia<br />

durability which adds to more value • Established dealer network<br />

for you.<br />

• Spare parts supply for new & old<br />

From our smallest to our mighty Westfields<br />

MK130 PLUS, you find you get more What are you waiting for? Call now for<br />

for your money.<br />

your nearest dealer!<br />

And Westfield offers a combination of Visit us online: www.grainaugers.com<br />

WESTFIELD AUGERS<br />

(AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD<br />

Contact Roland Schmelzer on<br />

PH: 07 3878 9338 or free call 1800 635 199<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 43


Assessment of cotton soils essential<br />

A<br />

leading soil scientist has recommended<br />

cotton growers carefully<br />

assess their fields for soil structural<br />

damage after the 2010–11 crop, in preparation<br />

for the large planting in 2011.<br />

Speaking on CSD’s Web on Wednesday<br />

broadcast, Dr Pat Hulme from Sustainable<br />

Soils Management, said many fields across<br />

cotton growing regions had sustained a lot<br />

of damage due to tillage and wheel traffic<br />

in the wetter than normal spring period.<br />

“It was done when the soil was wet so<br />

it’s caused some compaction, but because<br />

of the controlled traffic farming system<br />

we’ve got, the compaction is mainly restricted<br />

to the area underneath the wheel<br />

track while the structure beneath the plant<br />

lines is pretty good,” he said.<br />

Pat said soil pits are a good way of assessing<br />

a whole soil profile, but digging a<br />

smaller trench with a spade was also useful<br />

and the Cotton CRC publication SOILpak<br />

was an excellent reference on how to do<br />

this.<br />

“You need to review in your mind the<br />

functions of each part of the field, or soil<br />

profile. The top of the hill in the plant<br />

line is your seed bed and you want it to<br />

be relatively fine so you get good seed-soil<br />

contact.<br />

“You want the root zone to be a good<br />

medium for root growth to allow water, air<br />

and roots to move in and out to store the<br />

nutrients.<br />

“You want your wheel track areas to act<br />

as a roadway – to support the machinery<br />

so you want that to be compacted, but<br />

ideally you’d like the soil to have enough<br />

holes in it that the roots could still explore<br />

the zone beneath the road way. You want<br />

your soil surface to be able to take in water<br />

– particularly the non-trafficked furrows.”<br />

He noted that If the shoulders of the<br />

hills are compacted then the decision as to<br />

the type of tillage needs to bear in mind a<br />

number of factors.<br />

“The ideal moisture content for tilling<br />

the soil is when it’s slightly dryer than the<br />

plastic limit – where you can roll the soil<br />

into a three mm diameter rod in your hand.<br />

If the soil is really dry, the products of tillage<br />

will be large and you’ll be left with the<br />

challenge of making them into a seed bed.<br />

“It’s also going to depend a lot on how<br />

long until you’re going to be planting your<br />

next crop, and the third thing is to decide<br />

whether you can just live with the compacted<br />

nature of the soil by nursing the next<br />

crop and fixing the problem next year.”<br />

Pat said nursing the crop involves more<br />

Soil scientist Dr Pat Hulme says cotton growers should be assessing the state of their soils<br />

before preparing fields for the 2011 plant.<br />

frequent irrigation than in soils with better<br />

structure, and higher fertiliser rates.<br />

“You’re just walking a tightrope – there’s<br />

less room for error in a compacted soil,”<br />

he said.<br />

Soil tests or a nutrient budget are<br />

important<br />

According to Pat, soil tests or a nutrient<br />

budget are important, particularly for<br />

growers planting cotton on fields that had<br />

crops in last summer.<br />

“I believe it is important to have a history<br />

of soil testing and to use a nutrient<br />

budget to work out, firstly, whether the soil<br />

nutrient levels are adequate, and secondly,<br />

whether you’re supplying sufficient nutrients<br />

to replace the major nutrients that<br />

have been exported by the crops.<br />

“With repeated measurements you can<br />

see the increase or the decline – you can<br />

see if you’re winning or losing,” he said.<br />

For farmers who had fields flooded during<br />

the 2010–11 summer, Pat said they<br />

should not expect major changes in their<br />

soil chemistry apart from some denitrification<br />

– the loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere<br />

under waterlogged conditions.<br />

“The silt that’s deposited during the<br />

flooding process is likely to have nutrients<br />

and it’s likely you could be improving the<br />

soil a little bit – that’s the way a majority of<br />

the soil that we farm in the cotton industry<br />

was built, by deposition by flooding.<br />

“The material that’s being deposited to<br />

form the soil that we farm has a high clay<br />

content because it’s been deposited in the<br />

back plains away from the streams.<br />

“Because of the high clay content, that<br />

soil shrinks and swells, which allows it to<br />

rebuild its structure that is damaged by the<br />

trafficking, but what we’re seeing is that<br />

the structure of the soil beneath the plant<br />

line is generally in good condition.<br />

“The goal for soil management at this<br />

stage would be to have a look, work out<br />

how much or how little tillage needs to be<br />

done, get in and do it early while there’s<br />

still some months to get your seed bed<br />

happening at the top of the bed.”<br />

The SOILpak manual is available from the<br />

NSW Department of Primary Industries website<br />

http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/<br />

resources/soils/guides/soilpak/cotton<br />

Watch the full interview.<br />

http://www.csd.net.au/wow/show/1529<br />

Further Information: Dr Pat Hulme, Sustainable<br />

Soils Management, Warren.<br />

Ph 0268 473367 pat@soilman.com.au<br />

44 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


CottonSafe Guide tops the charts<br />

Delivering farm safety information<br />

directly where it is most needed,<br />

has been the inspiration behind<br />

Cotton Australia’s latest safety initiative,<br />

the CottonSafe Guide wall chart, which<br />

has been mailed out to all cotton growers.<br />

The CottonSafe Guide wall chart has<br />

been styled and designed to go straight up<br />

on the wall in workshops, farm sheds and<br />

lunchrooms, providing a range of occupational<br />

health and safety messages, specifically<br />

targeted to those working in the<br />

cotton industry.<br />

Cotton Australia Regional Manager<br />

James Houlahan says the CottonSafe<br />

Guide wall chart is an important tool to<br />

raise the level of OHS awareness in the<br />

cotton industry, while promoting an improved<br />

safety culture. Production and<br />

distribution of the CottonSafe Guide wall<br />

chart has been assisted by ProVisual.<br />

James says that overall a culture of<br />

safety means giving everyone who works<br />

on cotton farms some ownership over accident<br />

prevention, where everyone from<br />

farm manager to the supervisor and the<br />

newest farm worker accepts that safety is<br />

James Houlahan and Cleave Rogan.<br />

both an individual and a shared responsibility.<br />

James Houlahan says with a national<br />

uniform occupational health and safety<br />

model being introduced by legislation<br />

across all States and Territories from January<br />

1, 2012, Cotton Australia has been<br />

leading the way with a pro-active and targeted<br />

focus on OHS in the cotton industry.<br />

“Under the CottonSafe banner, Cotton<br />

Australia will continue to deliver growers<br />

with up-to-date evidence based guidelines,<br />

tools and other resources like the Cotton-<br />

Safe Guide wall chart to effectively manage<br />

their OHS responsibilities and mitigate potential<br />

injury, legal and financial risks from<br />

poor OHS performance,” James said.<br />

“The CottonSafe Guide wall chart will<br />

fit comfortably alongside a range of practical<br />

tools and resources now in production<br />

by Cotton Australia to help growers and<br />

cotton farm workers manage safety as an<br />

integral part of their farm businesses and<br />

in their day to day work activities.”<br />

The CottonSafe Guide wall chart contains<br />

detailed and reliable information on<br />

OHS risk management, risk assessment<br />

and safe procedures as well as emergency<br />

preparedness. The wall chart also lists<br />

some practical safety tips about working<br />

with tractors, ATV’s, chemicals and<br />

around irrigation pump machinery.<br />

Additional copies of the CottonSafe Guide wall<br />

chart are available by contacting<br />

Cotton Australia on 02 9669 5222.<br />

CHEMICAL ACCREDITATION &<br />

ACDC COURSES<br />

Dalby 29/8, St George 31/8, Dirranbandi 1/9, Toowoomba 11/8,<br />

Mungindi 2/9, Goondiwindi 5/9, Moree 6/9, Narrabri 8/9,<br />

Wee Waa 9/9, Gunnedah 7/10, Warren 29/9, Narromine 27/9,<br />

Trangie 28/9, Biloela 22/7, Theodore 20/7, Emerald 26/7, Moura 21/7<br />

If dates/location do not suit please advise of your<br />

requirements to enable future planning<br />

Accreditation is valid for 5 years – New & Update courses available<br />

Supervision SkILLS COURSE<br />

Moree/Goondiwindi 31/8 & 1/9<br />

Formal management training for managers, supervisors,<br />

leading hands or foremen<br />

Key Topics:<br />

Time Management, Delegation, Establishing people as “People<br />

Managers”, Developing “results-oriented” employees, How to develop<br />

team work, Coaching & Counselling, Disciplining, Praising, Conducting<br />

Staff Appraisals, Occupational Health & Safety, Setting Objectives<br />

In-house courses can be arranged<br />

* Please call for updated information on course schedules *<br />

* Courses can be arranged elsewhere if required *<br />

Inquiries and Bookings:<br />

Geoff Paton 1800 626 681<br />

Countryco Training Pty Ltd<br />

FOR SALE<br />

2010 JOHN DEERE 7760<br />

286/252 hrs, 6 row 40”<br />

Excellent condition<br />

$650,000 plus GST<br />

0401 261 818<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 45


Germinating<br />

ideas<br />

By CSD Extension and Development<br />

Team<br />

In this edition of Germinating Ideas we<br />

examine a few of the key considerations<br />

that influence crop establishment,<br />

and also how we can combat some of the<br />

cotton diseases to maintain good plant<br />

stands by using new seed treatments that<br />

will be available for this coming season.<br />

The 2010–11 season has seen some of<br />

the worst cases of seedling disease and major<br />

diseases of cotton such as Fusarium wilt<br />

and Verticillium wilt. Additionally, cotton<br />

bunchy top was evident in most valleys this<br />

season, with concerns about the potential<br />

for an outbreak of this disorder next season.<br />

There was around eight per cent replant<br />

in the industry this season, across<br />

most valleys. Most of the early season<br />

damage was caused by Rhizoctonia and<br />

Pythium. Black root rot was evident in the<br />

major valleys and caused significant delays<br />

in maturity.<br />

The worst valleys for replant were<br />

the Murrumbidgee at 18 per cent, Hillston<br />

at 11 per cent, Namoi at eight per<br />

cent and the Macquarie at 10 per cent.<br />

This replanting comes at a cost of up to<br />

$120 per hectare and there is not a lot<br />

that can be done, because much of the<br />

disease is brought on by climatic events.<br />

But by having a well prepared seed bed,<br />

proper seeding depth and good soil contact,<br />

the emerging seedling has the best<br />

chance of establishing successfully. It was<br />

a tough start to the season in many of the<br />

cotton valleys and particularly the southern<br />

regions as cool wet conditions existed<br />

at planting and continued into November<br />

and December.<br />

FIGURE 1: Percentage seedling mortality estimated from<br />

commercial cotton crops across NSW and Queensland<br />

Source: Cotton Pathology 2004–09; Allen, Anderson, Lonergan, McNamara, Swan & Smith.<br />

FIGURE 2: Disease incidence and severity over two seasons<br />

over 10 sites in NSW<br />

Cotton Pathology 2008-2010; Allen, Anderson, Lonergan, McNamara, Swan & Smith.<br />

If we look back at history we find similar<br />

trends occurring in years when it is cool<br />

during or just after planting, with seedling<br />

disease rampant, causing significant losses<br />

in plant stands.<br />

Over this five year period the average<br />

seedling mortality rates were around 21<br />

per cent for the Emerald, St George and<br />

Downs region; about 27 per cent for the<br />

MacIntyre, Gwydir and Namoi; around 32<br />

per cent for the Macquarie and Lachlan<br />

regions; and towards 40 per cent for the<br />

Murrumbidgee. Certain years stand out as<br />

being worse. For instance in the 2006–07<br />

season in the southern cotton growing regions<br />

there was high mortality, while in the<br />

2004–05 season the northern regions had<br />

higher than normal levels of plant death.<br />

The main cause of seedling death overall<br />

is plant disease. Dr Steven Allen, Plant<br />

Pathologist based at ACRI in Narrabri has<br />

shown over a number of years that significant<br />

disease levels exist, starting usually<br />

with black root rot that doesn’t actually kill<br />

the plant, but decreases its ability to grow<br />

on during cooler conditions. This allows<br />

other secondary diseases such as Pythium<br />

and Rhizoctonia to attack the plant and in<br />

many cases kill it.<br />

46 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


We know that black root rot slows plant<br />

growth and overall maturity. For plants<br />

that make it through this period without<br />

secondary diseases killing them, the disease<br />

has a delayed effect of increasing<br />

time for plant maturity.<br />

This is a major problem in the southern<br />

growing regions as the seasons are typically<br />

shorter and so the slower plant growth extends<br />

the crop maturation into the cooler<br />

months of May and June. We are seeing<br />

some of this occur this season as growers<br />

attempt to defoliate crops into May. This is<br />

not entirely due to seedling disease, as some<br />

growers planted late as water become available<br />

and the price continued to rally.<br />

Similarly we have seen increases in<br />

Fusarium through Qld and NSW both from<br />

an incidence and severity point of view.<br />

Plants stands were drastically affected in<br />

November and December as conditions<br />

were ideal for the disease. Dr Steven Allen<br />

has shown over a number of years that<br />

with wet conditions in October and November,<br />

the disease usually flourishes.<br />

More rain through these months means<br />

less plants survive in fields with Fusarium<br />

wilt present.<br />

New Improved Seed<br />

TREATMENTS<br />

This season CSD will release two new<br />

seed treatments, one being an advanced<br />

fungicide formulation treatment, Dynasty<br />

Complete and the second being a premium<br />

insecticidal treatment, Cruiser Extreme.<br />

Dynasty complete is a Syngenta product<br />

that has been developed in conjunction<br />

with CSD and particularly with technical<br />

input from Dr Stephen Allen based<br />

at ACRI in Narrabri. The product is formulated<br />

to include a three way fungicide<br />

treatment plus the plant activator acibinzolar-s-methyl<br />

which is the major active in<br />

the previous seed treatment Bion.<br />

The product will offer suppression of<br />

the major cotton seedling disease black<br />

root rot which in turn will help reduce the<br />

effects of both Rhizoctonia and Pythium.<br />

Furthermore, it will help bolster plant defences<br />

from the onslaught of Fusarium<br />

Wilt by stimulating the plant’s natural defence<br />

mechanisms against this disease.<br />

Steve has shown with trials conducted<br />

with acibinzolar-s-methyl that the product<br />

shows good suppression of both black root<br />

rot and Fusarium wilt (see Figure 4).<br />

In most cases, Acibinzolar-s-methyl reduced<br />

the incidence of both black root rot<br />

and Fusarium in large scale trials.<br />

This season we saw Bion (Acibinzolars-methyl)<br />

in commercial field trials carried<br />

out by a number of growers. The following<br />

grower trial (Figure 5) was conducted by<br />

Michael Josh, head Agronomist for P & J<br />

Harris & Sons.<br />

In these photos there was a defined line<br />

between Bion treated and the non Bion<br />

treated areas in this field.<br />

According to Steve Allen, “Dynasty<br />

Complete will offer another string in a<br />

growers’ bow in the fight against Fusarium<br />

wilt and black root rot and will allow seedlings<br />

the best start possible. This, in combination<br />

with high Fusarium rank varieties<br />

and diligent management from farmers<br />

will go a long way to not only reducing the<br />

impact of these major diseases, but also<br />

help with the bottom line too.”<br />

FIGURE 3: Percentage survival of cotton with October/<br />

November rainfall<br />

FIGURE 4: Trials conducted on black root rot and Fusarium wilt<br />

with Acibinzolar-s-methyl<br />

FIGURE 5: Bion versus non-bion grower trial<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 47


Dynasty Complete will become CSD’s<br />

standard cotton seed treatment in 2011<br />

and will be available on all varieties.<br />

The other new product available this<br />

season is Cruiser Extreme. This new insecticidal<br />

seed treatment from Syngenta will<br />

provide longevity in early season insect<br />

control which is important for establishing<br />

cotton seedlings. In trial work over the past<br />

two seasons Cruiser Extreme is showing<br />

comparable results with the granular in furrow<br />

insecticides against the main seedling<br />

cotton pests of aphids, thrips and wireworm<br />

(see Figure 6).<br />

One of the major benefits of Cruiser Extreme<br />

is the extra seedling vigour that is<br />

seen with use of this product. The photo<br />

in Figure 7 was taken at the above trial<br />

and shows a vegetative advantage over the<br />

control treatment.<br />

Important benefits of this product include<br />

the improved operator safety profile<br />

combined with the application convenience<br />

only offered as a seed treatment. We<br />

understand that Schedule 6 granular insecticide<br />

products may have a limited commercial<br />

availability with the product Temik<br />

already withdrawn from the market. The<br />

launch of Cruiser Extreme is very timely<br />

and will offer growers an effective alternative<br />

to granular insecticides. It is very easy<br />

to use and only requires the grower to<br />

place his treated seed into the planter box<br />

and your ready to plant.<br />

Further information on these or related topics<br />

can be found on the CSD website<br />

(www.csd.net.au). Results of trials and seed<br />

treatment performance will be provided at<br />

the CSD information Tour starting in June.<br />

FIGURE 6: Cruiser Extreme performance on Thrips versus Temik<br />

FIGURE 7: Extra vigour with Cruiser Extreme (CSD seed<br />

treatment trials)<br />

Barcoo…<br />

Enjoy a cool holiday this<br />

year, and at a great rate<br />

Barcoo is a superbly appointed lodge at Dinner Plain in the heart of Victoria’s<br />

high country. This year round playground offers trout fishing, magnificent<br />

scenery, great restaurants, peace & quiet and other cool activities.<br />

• 4 bedrooms (all with queen size beds) • Fully equipped with all mod cons<br />

• 3 bathrooms • Spa pool • Sleeps up to 16<br />

GREAT VALUE FOR LARGE OR FAMILY GROUPS<br />

Further details phone 1800 670 019 or www.dinnerplain.com<br />

48 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


news & new products<br />

drumMUSTER makes good<br />

growing sense<br />

While winter cropping may be<br />

priority number one for cotton<br />

growers at the moment, it is<br />

comforting to know that there is help at<br />

hand to make the process easier.<br />

After all the hard work is complete,<br />

the clean-up begins and the drumMUS-<br />

TER service can ensure growers’ farms<br />

are free of the hazards of empty chemical<br />

containers. An industry stewardship<br />

program funded by a levy paid on eligible<br />

products, drumMUSTER has been around<br />

since late 1998 and works with local shire<br />

councils nation-wide to collect and recycle<br />

eligible, pre-cleaned containers. This is no<br />

small operation and since its inception, the<br />

service has disposed of nearly 17 million<br />

containers safely and securely.<br />

Northern New South Wales Regional<br />

Consultant Phil Tucker was in the thick of<br />

the action at the recent Australian Cotton<br />

Trade Show in Moree, where he helped<br />

spread the drumMUSTER word.<br />

“I was actually at the Cotton Trade<br />

Show quite recently and the turn-out there<br />

was very good!” he said.<br />

“I’ve talked to a lot of growers and<br />

the main focus now is getting the cotton<br />

in the ground ready for winter cropping.<br />

From my point of view, we have collected<br />

something like 70,000 containers in this<br />

Northern NSW region since about February<br />

and the aim is, with good moisture and<br />

a good price, that we can hopefully expect<br />

an even bigger crop next year.”<br />

While these are excellent return figures,<br />

Phil knows that there is scope for plenty<br />

more containers to come in for disposal<br />

as users look to ramp up their post-harvest<br />

clean-ups.<br />

“It’s a really good time now, with harvest<br />

over and planting under way, to clean<br />

up the farm by using the drumMUSTER<br />

program,” he said.<br />

“You can also ask about our on-farm<br />

collection service, which is often available<br />

when you have a large quantity of containers.<br />

drumMUSTER is great for the environment,<br />

it’s good ‘My Best Management<br />

Practice’ so run your containers in or give<br />

me a call to find out any further information<br />

and to get involved!”<br />

To find your nearest collection site, log onto<br />

www.drummuster.com.au or you can call Phil<br />

Tucker on 0427 925 274. Further information<br />

about Best Management Practice can also<br />

be found at www.bmpcotton.com.au.<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 49


news & new products<br />

Dow tops up farmer fund with<br />

$300,000 for flood rebuilding<br />

Queensland farming families rebuilding<br />

their livelihoods after<br />

flooding have received a<br />

USD$300,000 boost from agrochemical<br />

and bio-technology company Dow Agro-<br />

Sciences, in a generous donation which<br />

doubles the Queensland Farmers Appeal,<br />

set up by state farm group AgForce and<br />

rural charity Aussie Helpers in January.<br />

The Dow AgroSciences donation was<br />

made through its philanthropic affiliate<br />

The Dow Chemical Company Foundation,<br />

with Dow Chemical Asia Pacific President,<br />

Pat Dawson, on hand to present the<br />

cheque to AgForce president Brent Finlay<br />

and Aussie Helpers founder Brian Egan.<br />

Brent said it was inspiring to see such<br />

a commitment from the wider agricultural<br />

community to help farmers get back on<br />

track after the devastation across Queensland.<br />

“Since January, Aussie Helpers has<br />

channelled thousands of dollars of donated<br />

goods and services to where it is needed<br />

most. In April alone, Aussie Helpers connected<br />

more than 90 volunteers who delivered<br />

1800 hours across 18 farms from<br />

Moura to Kilcoy to Oakey to Roma,”<br />

Brent said.<br />

“Hundreds of individuals and businesses<br />

have donated money and volunteered<br />

their time to help repair fences, retrieve<br />

displaced livestock, clean flooded houses<br />

and, most importantly, provide a supportive<br />

ear to producers as they work through<br />

the emotional challenges of this natural<br />

disaster.<br />

This donation to the Queensland Farmers<br />

Appeal follows Dow AgroSciences’<br />

earlier USD$200,000 donation to the Premier’s<br />

Flood Appeal. Dow AgroSciences<br />

Marketing Manager George Saville said<br />

the company wanted to do whatever it<br />

could to support the farming sector.<br />

“Many of those affected by the floods<br />

are our customers and employees. As we<br />

watched the catastrophic weather events<br />

unfold we knew we had to do something<br />

that could make a difference,” Mr Saville<br />

said.<br />

Can you help?<br />

With many months of hard work still<br />

ahead for flooded farmers, AgForce and<br />

Aussie Helpers still need donations, equipment<br />

and volunteers to get rural Queensland<br />

back on its feet. To volunteer: contact<br />

Aussie Helpers on 1300 665 232. To<br />

donate to the Queensland Farmers Flood<br />

Appeal: ‘Flood Appeal – Suncorp’, BSB:<br />

484 799, account number 015147867<br />

or post to PO Box 405, Charleville Qld<br />

4470.<br />

Presentation of the Dow $300,000 cheque.<br />

50 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


Central Queensland<br />

While the bulk of cotton in Central Queensland has<br />

been picked, in what seems to be a never ending season,<br />

some of the flooded cotton has only just had its first<br />

defoliation.<br />

Picking was held up again and again with regular fortnightly<br />

rainfall from February right through until May.<br />

The La Niña system also delivered another cruel blow on<br />

the Dawson flood plain, with more major flooding in late<br />

April. Late planted conventional and mungbean crops<br />

planted since the previous flood were affected.<br />

Given the challenging year, it is not surprising that<br />

yields are coming off well below district average. With a<br />

lot of cotton still to be ginned, and some still in the field,<br />

it is really too early to call acurately, but district average<br />

should be around 6.6 bales per hectare (2.7 bales<br />

per acre). Unfortunately the rainfall has also led to many<br />

quality issues, with the average discount expected to be<br />

somewhere around $50 per bale (with some individual<br />

farms averaging more than $80 per bale discounts).<br />

The extreme wet weather has also seen springs pop<br />

up all over Central Queensland. This not only resulted<br />

in lots of bogged pickers, but has also prevented some<br />

patches of cotton from being picked. One northern<br />

highlands grower commented that he was unable to<br />

plant winter crop, as one third of the paddock he had<br />

put aside was affected by springs.<br />

district<br />

It was a great year in Central Queensland to give dryland<br />

cotton farming a go. Most crops look like they’ll<br />

yield around 2.5 bales per hectare (1.0 bale per acre).<br />

Dryland crops that survived flooding, also look very impressive,<br />

and some of these crops are up there with the<br />

best. With minimal input costs, dryland has been the<br />

shining light for CQ cotton. Given the current interest, if<br />

there is planting rain in November, I anticipate that the<br />

dryland planting will be bigger again next year.<br />

Susan Maas<br />

June 6, 2011<br />

St George<br />

Dirranbandi<br />

Unlike the Darling Downs which is experiencing a<br />

horror season that they would know doubt prefer to forget,<br />

the Lower Balonne region has indeed been blessed<br />

with a very rewarding year. Having driven through the<br />

Downs during the past few weeks it is very easy to understand<br />

how frustrating and disappointing it is to have<br />

the rain events come though almost on a weekly basis.<br />

In the case of Dirranbandi, St George and Thallon we<br />

have just received a small rain event with growers averaging<br />

25–40 mm. Considering we haven’t had decent<br />

rain since Christmas this latest fall has certainly been<br />

most welcome not just for wheat plant but also because<br />

quite a lot of fields since centre/side busting have come<br />

up with clods the size of Besser bricks. A number of<br />

growers had decided to wait until some rain before applying<br />

fertiliser due to the lack of fine tilth.<br />

Ginning continues on, as it will no doubt for quite a<br />

few more months. Classing generally seems quite good<br />

with very few quality issues although there has been<br />

some high mic in some of the Sicot 74. Considering the<br />

season was the second coolest on record this has been<br />

difficult to understand.<br />

Overall yields remain positive with fields which had<br />

pre plant fertiliser averaging 4.4 to 5 bales per acre and<br />

fields that didn’t have any pre-plant fertiliser lower at 3.9<br />

to 4.2 bales per acre.<br />

At this stage the outlook for next season looks posi-<br />

reports<br />

District Reports<br />

are proudly supported by<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 51


district<br />

reports<br />

tive with full water and high prices. The major concern<br />

looming on the horizon is the potential problem with<br />

cotton bunchy top. Considering the St George, Dirranbandi<br />

and Thallon areas will have 140,000 acres of back<br />

to back country the need to be vigilant on ratoon cotton<br />

and volunteers has never been greater. Control now is<br />

the most effective way to ensure we break the green<br />

bridge!<br />

Dallas King<br />

June 15, 2011<br />

Border Rivers<br />

The Macintyre valley is nearing the end of what has<br />

been a long, slow harvest which will continue well into<br />

June. While there have not been large volumes of general<br />

rainfall during April and May, several small events,<br />

coupled with cool conditions have slowed harvest down<br />

and caused some problems with fibre quality.<br />

Defoliation, particularly in the later crops has been a<br />

real challenge with many crops receiving three applications<br />

and still not producing a great result. The upshot<br />

of this has been a higher proportion of bales with 4 leaf<br />

and 41 colour.<br />

Picking started in the western parts of the district in<br />

early April with the peak activity happening in the last<br />

Cotton Seed Treatments<br />

Just got a whole lot better!<br />

A lack of Mycorrhizal Fungi development can affect<br />

the uptake of P and Zn and slow the growth of cotton<br />

seedlings (On Farm Magazine, July 2008).<br />

Nutri-Life Platform is a high performance, cost<br />

effective blend of Mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma<br />

for less than $10/ha (in a liquid inject formulation).<br />

Product sizes: 200 g & 1 kg<br />

Product code: NLPLAT<br />

Contact NTS for application rates, pricing and details of<br />

your local NTS Distributor.<br />

Phone: (07) 5472 9900 or Email: info@nutri-tech.com.au<br />

www.nutri-tech.com.au<br />

two weeks of that month. While the bulk was finished by<br />

the second week of May there were still quite a few late<br />

fields to finish, mainly those later planted or regrown<br />

after flood or hail.<br />

Irrigated yields have mostly been good, although<br />

generally down on the very good results from the previous<br />

season. Many have been in the 10 to 11 bale per<br />

hectare range. Yields have suffered particularly where<br />

crops have been planted into under-prepared fields and<br />

in-season fertiliser has been applied late or mid-season<br />

irrigations weren’t done on time.<br />

Irrigated fibre quality has been good except for the<br />

colour and leaf.<br />

Dryland yields have been pleasing despite a less than<br />

perfect finish. Many of the district’s crops have been in<br />

the 2.5 to 3.5 bale per hectare range. Fibre quality has<br />

generally been base grade although there have been reports<br />

of some short staple in some western crops that<br />

ran dry and leaf and colour have caused some problems<br />

also.<br />

Most people are now in the process of preparing<br />

for a big 2011 plant – hilling up and applying fertiliser.<br />

With the district’s water storages full and many on-farm<br />

dams well topped up, it promises to be close to a full<br />

plant. Early indications are that the dryland area will be<br />

slightly larger than this past season with some new growers<br />

looking to grow the crop and others increasing their<br />

acreage.<br />

David Kelly<br />

May 31, 2011<br />

Darling Downs<br />

At the time of writing this report we are well into June<br />

and the harvest should have been all but finished. Unfortunately<br />

with the continued cool, wet weather a significant<br />

proportion of the crop is yet to be picked. Even<br />

more concerning is that it could be many more weeks<br />

before the harvest will be completed.<br />

The northern Downs has had a reasonable run, with a<br />

majority of the area having been picked. There are however,<br />

areas still yet to be fully desiccated and well away<br />

from being picked. Yields have been extremely variable<br />

but on the whole very disappointing. Expectations this<br />

season were always low given the season when taking<br />

into account the impact of the flooding and long periods<br />

of waterlogging. Unfortunately the impact has been a<br />

lot greater than expected or hoped for. Quality has been<br />

acceptable to this point but following heavy frosts and<br />

the ongoing rain and cool weather, quality is starting to<br />

be effected.<br />

The situation on the southern Downs is much more<br />

concerning. Large areas are yet to be fully desiccated<br />

let alone picked. Severe frosting in mid May and ongoing<br />

cool rainy weather is dramatically restricting harvest<br />

activities. Early indications are that yields are also well<br />

below expectations but quality is still acceptable.<br />

52 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


The 2010–11 season has been extremely tough for<br />

growers across the Downs. One positive as planning<br />

starts for the 2011–12 season, is that all the water storages<br />

are full and there is good soil moisture profiles.<br />

With cotton prices remaining high, next season looks<br />

very promising.<br />

Duncan Weir<br />

June 10, 2011<br />

Gwydir Valley<br />

At the end of May approximately 85 per cent of the<br />

Gwydir Valley cotton crop has been picked. Many gin<br />

yards are full and chewing through the back log of cotton<br />

as fast as they can. Yields are still variable but I think the<br />

valley average will be around 10 bales per hectare in irrigated<br />

and just around 2.2 bales per hectare in dryland.<br />

An issue which has surfaced once ginning and classing<br />

came into full swing was the lower colour and leaf<br />

grades. The gins are finding it hard to clean up cotton<br />

presented with high moisture content and high leaf material<br />

in the sample. Defoliation conditions in April were<br />

difficult with many fields requiring a third pass and still<br />

not achieving desired results.<br />

The region hosted the Cotton Trade Show in May,<br />

which has been hailed as a success by organisers which<br />

is fantastic. In conjunction with the trade show, the Gwydir<br />

Valley Cotton Growers also hosted their annual fund<br />

raising dinner which raises money to support the medical<br />

scholarship program as well as raise money for the<br />

Westpac Rescue Helicopter.<br />

This was a great night, attended by 240 people which<br />

raised some much needed donations for both worthy<br />

causes.<br />

Many growers will be busy in the next couple of<br />

months trying to plant some winter crop, controlling<br />

fallow weeds, finishing off cotton pick and knock some<br />

shape back into irrigation fields before planting the<br />

2011–12 crop.<br />

James Quinn<br />

May 31, 2011<br />

Namoi Valley<br />

Although picking was about 90 per cent complete by<br />

early June there are still quite a few late crops that will be<br />

picked during winter. Despite all the fears of a wet pick<br />

it has been quite dry and picking has had only a very few<br />

minor interruptions.<br />

Irrigated yields have been extremely variable. Generdistrict<br />

reports<br />

JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 53


district<br />

reports<br />

ally yields in the western areas have been very good.<br />

Walgett has had a particularly good season, except for<br />

a small percentage of crops that were flood damaged.<br />

A few crops achieved yields over five bales per acre.<br />

Further east the yields were much more variable, and<br />

in some cases disappointing. The average in the lower<br />

Namoi is about 3.7 bales per acre and the average in the<br />

upper Namoi is about 3.4. Dryland yields have generally<br />

been well below average. Average yields in the upper<br />

Namoi of 1.5 bales per acre, despite the second driest<br />

summer on record have cemented dryland cotton into<br />

farmers future rotations.<br />

Overall fibre quality from irrigated crops has also been<br />

very good. Although there has been a significant number<br />

of 41s, which is hard to explain given the dry picking<br />

conditions. Many of the dryland crops have had some<br />

short staple.<br />

Sicot 74BRF performed well throughout the Namoi<br />

this year, and is expected to become the most popular<br />

variety in the coming season. Siokra 24BRF was a little<br />

disappointing but should still be considered a key dryland<br />

choice in 2011.<br />

Planting of winter rotation crops is well under way,<br />

however more rain is required to ensure the full area is<br />

sown. Chickpea rotations have dropped out of favour<br />

this year following extreme disease pressure last season.<br />

Some of the cereal stubble paddocks normally planted to<br />

peas will be planted to cotton later in the year.<br />

Prospects for the coming season are very good. Keepit<br />

dam is about 92 per cent full and is expected to be full<br />

by planting time. Split rock remains at 20 per cent capacity<br />

despite the wet early summer conditions. Ground<br />

water supplies are good as many growers did not use<br />

their full allocation last year due to timely summer rain.<br />

Some of this unused water can be carried forward. Most<br />

Walgett growers on the Barwon have plenty of water in<br />

their storages following good late season flows. Irrigated<br />

area prospects are about 18,000 hectares in the upper<br />

Namoi and 55,000 in the lower Namoi. The dryland<br />

area could be as high as 60,000 hectares in the Namoi<br />

region.<br />

It should be a big year in 2011–12.<br />

Robert Eveleigh<br />

June 1, 2011<br />

Macquarie Valley<br />

Picking is now around 80 per cent completed with<br />

some late planted crops still to be harvested. These crops<br />

have encountered frosts and recent rain and inclement<br />

weather. The earliest crop picked in the Narromine area<br />

was started on April 12.<br />

Quality and yields have generally been very good so<br />

far. Isolated fields have gone up to 15 bales per hectare.<br />

This is despite the very slow and wet start with flooding<br />

in December.<br />

There has been some light spotting and 4 leaf but<br />

generally quality has been very good with micronaire,<br />

length and strength mostly within the desired range.<br />

Ginning is proceeding well with throughput well up on<br />

the past few seasons. Gin out turns have been good.<br />

Cotton is being transported from southern regions to<br />

be ginned here. Gins will be running well into July to<br />

complete this year’s crop.<br />

The lack of suitable staff for both ginning and farming<br />

has been an issue. This will only get worse with a<br />

large expansion in area planned for this and most other<br />

regions nest season.<br />

There is a great deal of optimism looking towards<br />

the 2011–12 cotton season in the Macquarie region.<br />

Forecasts are for around 40,000 hectares to be planted.<br />

Burrendong Dam continues to float around 90 per cent<br />

of capacity.<br />

There will be many new growers joining the industry<br />

as well as many growers returning to the fold.<br />

The local growers association has been quite busy. The<br />

date for the Macquarie cotton awards dinner is Friday,<br />

August 19 at the Lazy River Estate in Dubbo. It promises<br />

to be an excellent night to celebrate the successes of<br />

the cotton industry in the Valley. The Macquarie Cotton<br />

Growers Association is sponsoring the local football<br />

teams at Warren, Trangie and Narromine and is holding<br />

sponsor days at the various venues. The association is<br />

also planning to hold an Occupational Health and Safety<br />

training day available to all growers.<br />

Craig McDonald<br />

May 31, 2011<br />

Southern NSW<br />

Picking has been very slow to get underway yet is progressing<br />

quite well now. Harvest started early in May<br />

with only a couple of crops yet now most of the northern<br />

areas of the region around Hillston and west of Griffith<br />

are well underway with pickers only just keeping up<br />

with the crop maturity. The majority of the crops will be<br />

ready in the next seven to 10 days. The area has been<br />

very lucky in terms of rain with only a couple of small<br />

rain patterns passing through. The early crops yields<br />

have been quite promising so it will be interesting to see<br />

what the final average will be.<br />

The main issue has been the temperature with several<br />

frosts being experienced in the area. The frosts have<br />

helped the more mature crops in terms of boll opening<br />

yet defoliation has been very slow. To date picking<br />

capacity has not been a real issue yet this will change<br />

as more crops come in together. The area still needs a<br />

good few weeks of fine weather to enable harvest to be<br />

completed and to give the late crops every chance of<br />

maturing.<br />

This month the Commins Family hosted the Wincott<br />

Tour of the Murray Darling Basin. This provided<br />

a good opportunity for the visitors to learn more about<br />

the Commins operation and the Murrumbidgee area in<br />

54 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011


2011 FARM STUDY TOURS<br />

• Scandinavia (Aug-Sep)<br />

– Travel through Northern Germany to Denmark, Sweden and spectacular Norway with an optional<br />

cruise to the Arctic Circle, Global Seed Vaults and polar bears.<br />

• South America (Jul-Aug)<br />

– From the beautiful lakes of Chile to rugged Patagonia, the Argentine Pampas, Iguassu Falls,<br />

incredible farm developments in Brazil and through to the excitement of pulsating Rio. Then onto<br />

Bolivia and Peru (think Macchu Pichu). Plus options to the Amazon, Galapagos, Easter Islands etc.<br />

• Southern Africa (Sep-Oct)<br />

– Go on safari to South Africa, Victoria Falls, Zambia, Tanzania and Kenya. Catch up with the<br />

greatest migration on Earth as the wildebeest and zebra roam the Masai Mara and Serengeti.<br />

For more information contact:<br />

David Dowling 0417 703 169 :: Lloyd O’Connell 0428 724 615<br />

travel@greenmountpress.com.au :: www.greenmounttravel.com.au


district<br />

reports<br />

Wincott group with Leeann Commins on the right.<br />

general. Cotton Australia chair, Andrew Watson, was<br />

also travelling with this group and it gave him a chance<br />

to experience the operation first hand.<br />

As reported previously ginning capacity was going to<br />

be the main barrier for industry expansion as there is<br />

Answer to Ian’s<br />

MYSTERY Tractor Quiz<br />

On a KL or Lanz Bulldog the steering wheel<br />

serves two purposes. The first is to steer the<br />

tractor and second is to start the engine,<br />

having first heated the hot bulb portion of<br />

the cylinder head with a blowlamp. The<br />

shaft of the steering wheel engages a dog in<br />

the end of the crankshaft. When rotated in<br />

a pendulum motion, the giant single piston<br />

builds compression until the crude oil fuel<br />

ignites, when BANG and all hell breaks loose.<br />

The engine is now running – hopefully not<br />

backwards! Like I said – Simple!<br />

currently only one gin that is located at Hillston where<br />

historically the majority of cotton has been grown. Next<br />

season with a combination of high prices and full water<br />

allocation the area could expand beyond 40,000 hectares<br />

with most growth occurring south of Griffith on<br />

the Murrumbidgee. There has been confirmation that a<br />

new four stand gin will be built by a new company called<br />

Southern Cotton Pty Ltd between Whitton and Darlington<br />

Point. This announcement has meant that growers<br />

can now continue to prepare country for next season, as<br />

without this gin cotton would not be an option.<br />

James Hill<br />

May 31, 2011<br />

Advertiser’s Index<br />

1st Class.................................38<br />

Agripath................................. 10<br />

Aquatech Consulting...............26<br />

Barcoo....................................48<br />

Cargill Cotton..........................30<br />

<strong>Case</strong> IH................................... 11<br />

Charlton........................... 24, 54<br />

Cotton Grower Services.......... IFC<br />

Cotton Outlook....................... IBC<br />

Countryco Training..................45<br />

CSD..........................................7<br />

Dinner Plain.............................1<br />

drumMUSTER..........................53<br />

Ecom......................................37<br />

Ergon..................................... 19<br />

Excel Ag.................................. 15<br />

Global Machinery Traders.......45<br />

Landquip................................43<br />

Monsanto.................................9<br />

Moree Real Estate...................30<br />

Namoi Cotton..........................33<br />

Neils Parts.............................. 10<br />

New Holland....................... 5, 17<br />

Nutri-Tech...............................52<br />

Omnistar..................................3<br />

Queensland Cotton.................. 31<br />

SMK Consultants.......................2<br />

Study Tours.............................56<br />

Sumitomo.............................OBC<br />

Syngenta.......................... 12, 13<br />

The Appointments Group...........2<br />

Valmont..................................27<br />

Volvo Penta Oceania...............23<br />

Westfield Augers.....................43<br />

56 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!