Case study property - Greenmount Press
Case study property - Greenmount Press
Case study property - Greenmount Press
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Print Post Approved Publication No. PP 424022/1583<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011<br />
www.cottongrower.com.au<br />
The Australian Cottongrower<br />
P.O. Box 766, Toowoomba, 4350.<br />
Ph: (07) 4659 3555. Fax (07) 4638 4520.<br />
Email: cotton@greenmountpress.com.au<br />
Website: www.cottongrower.com.au<br />
DELIVERIES: 120 Herries St, Toowoomba, Qld. 4350.<br />
EDITOR:<br />
David Dowling<br />
ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Lloyd O’Connell<br />
GROUP SALES MANAGER: Norm Neeld<br />
PRODUCTION MANAGER: Mick Allan<br />
OFFICE MANAGER: Catherine O’Connell<br />
ADVERTISING: Norm Neeld<br />
Ph: (07) 5450 1720<br />
Fax: (07) 5450 1102<br />
Mobile: 0428 794 801<br />
CONTENTS OF ADVERTISEMENTS are the responsibility of the<br />
advertisers. All statements and opinions expressed in The Australian<br />
Cottongrower are published after due consideration of information<br />
gained from sources believed to be authentic. The following of advice<br />
given is at the reader’s own risk, and no responsibility is accepted for the<br />
accuracy of the matter published herein. No portion in whole or part may<br />
be reproduced without permission of the publisher. Copyright 2011.<br />
Published by Berekua Pty. Ltd., 40 Creek Street, Brisbane. Registered<br />
by Australia Post Print Post Approved Publication number<br />
PP 405518/00026. ISSN 1442–5289.<br />
PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY, APRIL, JUNE, AUGUST, OCTOBER,<br />
DECEMBER. COTTON YEARBOOK PUBLISHED IN SEPTEMBER.<br />
Divine Dinner Plain...<br />
Bring the family,<br />
enjoy the<br />
wonderful<br />
snow that is<br />
still falling,<br />
it’s perfect!<br />
Skiing, boarding,<br />
cross country<br />
skiing or just<br />
enjoy the<br />
fantastic<br />
At Dinner Plain atmosphere the that<br />
At Dinner Plain the<br />
is Dinner Plain<br />
pace is<br />
pace<br />
easy<br />
is easy going...<br />
Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />
be together by the fireside or miles apart<br />
Dinner Plain is the place where the family can<br />
exploring the cross-country trail network.<br />
be together Where by the you Where fireside stroll you stroll the or the snow miles treelined covered apart streets<br />
simply for the sights to meet<br />
exploring the tree cross-country lined streets trail simply network. for the<br />
friends for a restaurant dinner or<br />
sights or to meet friends for a<br />
Where you stroll drinks the at treelined the bar. The village streets itself<br />
restaurant dinner helps or set the drinks community at the<br />
simply bar. The for village the<br />
atmosphere,<br />
sights itself or helps natural<br />
to<br />
building<br />
meet set the<br />
friends community for a materials restaurant atmosphere, and earthy dinner tones cosy blur or<br />
the line between man made and<br />
drinks lights at the sparkle bar. and<br />
alpine The entice<br />
environment. village you<br />
Over itself into<br />
200<br />
their warmth.<br />
helps<br />
lodges Snow<br />
set the<br />
and chalets lined,<br />
community<br />
with natural all the<br />
buildings and conveniences earthy of tones a modern blur resort. the<br />
line atmosphere, between man natural made building and alpine<br />
Dinner Plain is the place<br />
environment. materials and for Over earthy your 200 next tones lodges holiday. blur and<br />
the chalets line between with all the man conveniences made and of<br />
Explore our website at<br />
a modern resort.<br />
alpine environment. www.dinnerplain.com Over 200<br />
or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />
lodges and chalets with all the<br />
or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />
conveniences of a modern resort.<br />
What are you waiting for...<br />
contents<br />
8 Cotton bunchy top threat to high yielding cotton<br />
10 2011 Cotton Trade Show wrapup<br />
14 The impact of early defoliation on textile performance<br />
19 Saluting finalists in the Cotton Awards<br />
22 Scheme offers irrigators funding to improve water efficiency<br />
24 Queensland producers invest in Healthy HeadWaters<br />
Water Matters<br />
25 <strong>Case</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>property</strong>: ‘Long Meadows’, Bourke<br />
ginning & fibre quality series<br />
36 Quarantine treatments on the physical properties of<br />
cotton – Part 2<br />
42 Is mite pest-resistant cotton a little closer?<br />
43 Change in cotton production lecturer<br />
44 Assessment of cotton soils essential<br />
45 CottonSafe guide tops the charts<br />
regular features<br />
2 Editorial<br />
4 Cotton Research Roundup<br />
marketing<br />
28 World Commodity Watch<br />
30 The World Cotton Market<br />
32 What is fair value for the 2011–12 cotton crop?<br />
39 Classic Tractor Tales: The 1930s<br />
46 Germinating Ideas<br />
48 News & New Products<br />
51 District Reports<br />
front cover<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011<br />
Volume 32, No.3 $6.60<br />
Dinner Plain is the place<br />
for your next holiday.<br />
Explore our website at<br />
www.dinnerplain.com<br />
or call our info number 1300 734 365<br />
or email to info@dinnerplain.com<br />
j/24d01072/270808<br />
INSIDE<br />
CBT threat to<br />
high yielding<br />
cotton<br />
Impact of early Saluting<br />
defoliation finalists in<br />
on textile the Cotton<br />
performance Awards<br />
Gordon and David Brownhill are finalists<br />
in the Australian Cotton Industry Awards<br />
to be presented at a dinner in Narrabri<br />
on August 10. For full story and details of<br />
all the finalists see page 19.<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 1
Professional Recruiters<br />
of Agribusiness<br />
Professionals<br />
SYDNEY<br />
Susan Leslie Lucy Purcell<br />
Tim Vidler Suzie Ward<br />
Al Kellaway<br />
02 9223 9944<br />
BRISBANE<br />
Dominica Carolan – 07 3832 9866<br />
MELBOURNE<br />
David Reid – 03 9866 6133<br />
Agribusiness Recruiters –<br />
LEADING THE WAY SINCE 1979<br />
www.agri.com.au<br />
U78496<br />
Editorial…<br />
David Dowling, Editor<br />
How refreshing it is to be part of a cotton industry which is<br />
surging back after a hibernation which has lasted for the past<br />
six years or more. It has taken 10 years to match and exceed<br />
the previous record cotton crop, even though the season<br />
just past has not been kind to everyone – and a downright<br />
disaster for some. But assuming we can finally get this never-ending crop to<br />
the gin before spring, next season could be anything.<br />
It is probably the best set-up for a season for the past 20 years. Water<br />
is available for irrigators and most areas also have decent subsoil moisture.<br />
Prices are still at historically high levels and better than other competitive<br />
crops. And the La Niña weather influence that created such havoc last season<br />
has finished, so we can possibly look forward to a season with slightly<br />
fewer deluges. On the negative side, much more of the crop will be planted<br />
in back-to-back situations this season after limited preparation, which could<br />
put pressure on yields.<br />
The new mood of optimism is best exemplified by the plan to build a gin<br />
in southern NSW, the first new gin in Australia for many years, to be backed<br />
up by an expected 40,000 hectares or more of cotton next season. Back in<br />
the boom times of the 1980s and 90s, there weren’t many years that went<br />
by without a new gin opening, and they were often pretty elaborate affairs.<br />
The ginners were competing for cotton while up to a dozen merchants<br />
were out there buying aggressively. At the same time there were probably<br />
20 chemical companies of one form or another and many of them had a<br />
rep in just about every cotton town. The cotton farms themselves often had<br />
a number of staff and teams of bug checkers, cotton chippers, aerial operators<br />
and spray markers made a living from the industry. In many ways the<br />
industry was much more visible because of the large number of service staff<br />
employed.<br />
No doubt things are more efficient now. Bollgard, Roundup Ready and<br />
now round bales have made a big difference. We grew a record crop last year<br />
with many, many fewer people than would have been needed 20 years ago.<br />
The cost of that efficiency is a reduction in the ‘social life’ of the industry, but<br />
that’s progress, I guess.<br />
SMK CONSULTANTS PTY. LTD.<br />
surveying – irrigation – environmental<br />
• Irrigation Layout • IRRIgatION & DRAInagE ManagEMENT PLANS<br />
• Grid Surveys • LAND & WATER ManagEMENT PLANS<br />
• EM SurvEYS<br />
• IRRIgatION EFFICIENCY EVALuatION<br />
• FARM PLANS • BEELINE PROCESSIng • ENVIronMEntaL SERVICES<br />
SERVING NORTHERN NSW AND CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND<br />
MOREE<br />
39 Frome Street, PO Box 774, Moree NSW 2400<br />
Ph (02) 6752 1640; Fax (02) 6752 5070<br />
Contact: Paul Covell, Peter Taylor<br />
Email: ptaylor@smk.com.au<br />
GOONDIWINDI<br />
130 Marshall St, PO Box 422, Goondiwindi Qld 4390<br />
Ph (07) 4671 2445; Fax (07) 4671 2561<br />
Contact Ralph Kinsella, Mike Henderson<br />
Email: qld@smk.com.au<br />
2 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
In this issue...<br />
CBT threat<br />
The recent Cotton<br />
Australia General Meeting<br />
in Moree confirmed that<br />
growers across most valleys<br />
are very concerned about<br />
the high prevalence of<br />
cotton bunchy top (CBT)<br />
this past season.<br />
See story............................ Page 8<br />
Impact of early<br />
defoliation<br />
Immature cotton<br />
fibres have less cell wall<br />
thickening with more<br />
hollow space and are<br />
often associated with low<br />
micronaire (less than 3.8). Immature fibre<br />
is undesirable for textile manufacture<br />
because it does not take up dye as<br />
effectively as mature fibres.<br />
See story.......................... Page 14<br />
Saluting finalists<br />
In a salute to the<br />
drivers of the Australian<br />
cotton industry, finalists<br />
were announced in the<br />
2011 Australian Cotton<br />
Industry Awards at the Cotton Trade<br />
Show in Moree, heart of cotton country.<br />
With the cotton industry in resurgence, a<br />
strong field of candidates was nominated<br />
across all cotton valleys.<br />
See story.......................... Page 19<br />
Healthy HeadWaters<br />
Producers interested in water use<br />
efficiency technology are encouraged to<br />
contact the DEEDI Healthy HeadWaters<br />
project team to discuss the latest decision<br />
support tools and project updates. Round<br />
2 of the DERM run Healthy Headwaters<br />
Infrastructure Program opened on May 3<br />
and will close at the end of July.<br />
See story.......................... Page 24<br />
Mite pest-resistant<br />
cotton?<br />
While managing major<br />
pests such as Helicoverpa<br />
has been the most<br />
significant focus of cotton industry R&D<br />
in the past 20 years, CSIRO has also<br />
been devoting resources and expertise<br />
towards managing other pests that affect<br />
cotton. One pest that can potentially<br />
decrease yield and cause quality losses in<br />
cotton is the two-spotted spider mite.<br />
See story.......................... Page 42<br />
The 1930s<br />
Planet Earth was a<br />
very disturbed place<br />
in the 1930s. As the financial world<br />
struggled to pull itself out of The Great<br />
Depression, shocked and impoverished<br />
Wall Street bankers continued leaping out<br />
of skyscraper windows.<br />
See story.......................... Page 39<br />
HARVEST WITH<br />
CUTTING EDGE<br />
PRECISION<br />
Consistently accurate and reliable, OmniSTAR is essential for<br />
controlled machine guidance in precision farming.<br />
www.omnistar.com.au | 1800 062 221 | sales@omnistar.com.au<br />
A D I V I S I O N O F T R I M B L E<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 3
COTTON COTTON COTTON<br />
RESEARCH ROUNDUP<br />
BRUCE PYKE<br />
BRUCE FINNEY<br />
Industry bunchytop specialists, Murray Sharman and Susan Maas of QDEEDI are<br />
recommending all farmers eliminate ratoon and volunteer cotton in and around farms<br />
over winter to halt the spread of bunchytop virus infestations.<br />
Bunchytop threat means<br />
winter clean-up is essential<br />
Industry biosecurity and pest experts<br />
are reinforcing the need for good farm<br />
hygiene over winter to avoid a renewed<br />
threat from the yield-sapping bunchytop<br />
virus spread by aphids.<br />
“We‘re extremely concerned about Cotton<br />
Bunchy Top (CBT),” says industry Biosecurity<br />
Specialist Susan Maas.<br />
“We have seen CBT go from some isolated<br />
incidences to become widespread.<br />
Some fields in both NSW and QLD recorded<br />
greater than 70 per cent of plants<br />
infested late in the season. Bunchytop virus<br />
resulted in serious yield loss in the affected<br />
fields.<br />
“This virus can only survive in living<br />
plants so we have a critical opportunity<br />
over winter to break the disease cycle by<br />
controlling hosts, in particular volunteer<br />
and ratoon cotton. If we have a wet spring<br />
we have the potential to see CBT worse<br />
than in 1998–99 when CBT reduced<br />
yields by 25 per cent on 21 per cent of<br />
the growing area, which equates to a 5.2<br />
per cent loss across the whole industry at a<br />
cost of $140 per hectare.”<br />
Weeds and rogue cotton provide the<br />
‘green bridge’ for pests to survive over<br />
winter and then infest the following cotton<br />
crop.<br />
According to industry Development and<br />
Delivery (D&D) Pest Management Specialist<br />
Sally Ceeney, of all the weeds, volunteer<br />
and ratoon cotton is the largest problem.<br />
It is a host for cotton insect pests, is difficult<br />
to control and is also a host for disease<br />
and potential biosecurity risk.<br />
“Allowing volunteer and ratoon cotton<br />
to survive over winter also carries a risk for<br />
Bollgard II resistance,” Sally warns.<br />
“By having weeds on your farm hosting<br />
insects you are effectively increasing the<br />
base population of pests at the start of the<br />
next season.<br />
“At the grower level this can be costly as<br />
it may lead to having to control these pests<br />
early in the season, and potentially numerous<br />
times during the season.<br />
“At an industry level, weeds hosting insect<br />
pests can increase chances of insecticide<br />
resistance developing. For example,<br />
after spraying aphids in-crop last season<br />
the survivors may be resistant individuals.”<br />
CRDC Board meets highland<br />
growers<br />
The CRDC Board held its mid-year<br />
meeting in Emerald in the first week of<br />
June. The meeting also provided valuable<br />
opportunites for growers and the Central<br />
Highlands CGA to host CRDC on-farm<br />
visits. The open discussions held in the<br />
field proved useful for all parties to jointly<br />
explore the role of R&D investments<br />
specifically tailored to secure improved<br />
productivity and sustainability across the<br />
central Queensland region.<br />
The field trips were designed by the<br />
cotton industry development and delivery<br />
specialist, Susan Maas of QDEEDI with<br />
the assistance of the CGA. Topics of interest<br />
were farmer responses to repeated<br />
Field discussions between the CRDC Board and Central Highlands growers in June.<br />
4 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Big new tractor. Little fuel.<br />
New Holland’s ECOBlue SCR technology is the most fuel-effi cient agricultural energy system in<br />
Australia. With SCR, the engine breathes clean, fresh air, instead of dirty, recirculated smog, to ensure<br />
optimal combustion conditions. And because no energy is wasted cooling exhaust gas, it can all be<br />
directed towards the primary working functions of the machine, resulting in more power and torque,<br />
better fuel economy and lower emissions. To find out more about ECOBlue SCR technology and<br />
how it can save you money, just go to www.thecleanenergyleader.com or contact you local dealer.<br />
Own a bright future
flood events and how those events created<br />
further issues of disease and on-farm biosecurity.<br />
Brad and Renee Anderson, and Andrew<br />
and Julie Geddes hosted the CRDC Board<br />
on their farms.<br />
New web tool for SLW<br />
decisions<br />
CSIRO Plant Industry as part of the<br />
Cotton Catchment Communities CRC has<br />
recently developed a web tool to make silverleaf<br />
whitefly (SLW) management easier<br />
and more predictable.<br />
The SLW Matrix web tool allows users<br />
to enter regular sampling information to<br />
track the development of SLW populations<br />
over time. The tool then compares<br />
these populations with the control thresholds,<br />
which are based on the pest population<br />
size, day degrees and crop stage.<br />
The development of this SLW Matrix<br />
tool has been the combined effort of<br />
web developer Loretta Clancy, development<br />
specialist Sandra Williams, both of<br />
CSIRO, Emerald based QLD DEEDI SLW<br />
researcher Richard Sequeria and Industry<br />
Development and Delivery Biosecurity<br />
Specialist Susan Maas.<br />
“This is a fantastic development and a<br />
huge step forward because it reduces a<br />
multi-dimensional whitefly spray decision<br />
and takes the process down to a simple<br />
and practical exercise that any crop manager<br />
will be able to use with confidence<br />
and ease,” Richard said.<br />
The SLW threshold matrix tool can be accessed<br />
through www.cottassist.crc.org.au.<br />
Once you have set-up farms and crops,<br />
the only required information is SLW sample<br />
data.<br />
The recommendation page presents<br />
the industry’s threshold matrix with your<br />
whitefly population data overlayed. In addition<br />
to this is a full explanation of the<br />
threshold that applies to your current SLW<br />
population and crop stage.<br />
Know energy use in order<br />
to reduce it<br />
Research into energy use is increasing<br />
our understanding of the range, costs and<br />
contributions of energy use to cotton production<br />
and greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
The research, undertaken by the National<br />
Centre for Engineering in Agriculture<br />
(NCEA), and funded by the CRDC, is<br />
enlisting growers to further the <strong>study</strong>.<br />
NCEA Deputy Director, Craig Baillie<br />
said on the average irrigated cotton farm,<br />
the main energy uses were irrigated water<br />
pumping, heavy tillage operations and<br />
harvesting.<br />
But there are significant opportunities<br />
for irrigators to reduce energy use and<br />
costs.<br />
The NCEA is developing a methodology<br />
to evaluate on-farm energy use. It involves<br />
three levels of assessment:<br />
The NCEA’s methodology is supported<br />
by EnergyCalc (www.kmsi.ncea.biz), a<br />
web-based tool that assesses direct onfarm<br />
energy use, costs and greenhouse gas<br />
emissions associated with the consumption<br />
of diesel, petrol, LPG and electricity.<br />
The NCEA has made some changes to<br />
the EnergyCalc software, such as automatic<br />
report generation (in PDF format)<br />
that includes summaries of machinery inputs<br />
and on farm energy use within the<br />
farming system, and performance indicators<br />
for benchmarking on-farm energy use.<br />
Other developments include an exporting<br />
feature that allows the user to manipulate<br />
data in an Excel spreadsheet format.<br />
By undertaking the multi-level assessment<br />
process and using the supporting<br />
tools (ie EnergyCalc), Craig said that farmers<br />
would discover plenty of areas to start<br />
saving energy and money.<br />
Email to: craig.baillie@usq.edu.au or visit<br />
EnergyCalc – http://www.kmsi.ncea.biz<br />
Look into space to save<br />
water<br />
Griffith-based researcher with CSIRO<br />
Land & Water, Dr John Hornbuckle, has<br />
been trialling a system that monitors irrigated<br />
crops using satellite imagery and<br />
on-ground measurements of evapotranspiration.<br />
This ongoing project funded by<br />
CRDC and Industry & Investment NSW<br />
could change the way Australian cotton<br />
growers schedule irrigation.<br />
John has been delivering the service to<br />
horticultural growers in southern Australia<br />
for the past two years. Last cotton season,<br />
he trialled the service with 10 consultants<br />
in the Gwydir region.<br />
For growers, the biggest benefit of this<br />
system is hoped to be its low cost. While<br />
the price has yet to be determined, John<br />
said that they hoped to commercialise the<br />
service within the next two seasons. The<br />
satellite data applied is free.<br />
A further benefit is that the system detects<br />
spatial variability across the farm,<br />
which ties in well with existing technology<br />
like soil moisture probes. According to<br />
John, if you only have 10 (soil moisture)<br />
probes, but you’ve got 50 paddocks, this<br />
approach could be used to fill the gaps in<br />
those paddocks that are not being measured<br />
by the probes.<br />
At this stage, the project is mostly operating<br />
at the feasibility level in cotton, but<br />
independent benefit–cost ratios completed<br />
for the Grape & Wine Research Development<br />
Corporation for the wine grape industry<br />
were good. John said this indicated<br />
that similar benefits could be achieved in<br />
other crops and other irrigation areas.<br />
Barb puts cotton on<br />
women’s agenda<br />
Mungindi cotton grower Barb Grey has<br />
been named the Rural Industries Research<br />
and Development Corporation (RIRDC)<br />
Australian Rural Women’s Award runnerup.<br />
Barb was named the 2011 Queensland<br />
RIRDC Rural Women’s Winner earlier this<br />
year before going on to compete for the<br />
national title, with the winners announced<br />
at a ceremony in the Great Hall, Parliament<br />
House on May 24.<br />
“To implement a pilot education program<br />
to empower aspiring rural and regional<br />
women leaders by giving them a<br />
better understanding of the political process<br />
and government decision making“ is<br />
Barb’s mission statement.<br />
“This would collectively and individually<br />
build a stronger, more effective voice for<br />
rural industries and regional communities,<br />
which I am passionate about,“ Barb said.<br />
“I will use the award bursary to build my<br />
skills in project facilitation to give me the<br />
competencies to deliver on this pilot program.<br />
If successful, I believe this could be<br />
replicated and become a regular training initiative<br />
for rural and regional women.”<br />
Mungindi’s Barb Grey, recognised<br />
nationally through the Rural Industries<br />
Research and Development Corporation<br />
(RIRDC) Australian Rural Women’s Award,<br />
is presented with the award by Mike Kelly,<br />
Parliamentary Secretary for Agriculture,<br />
Fisheries and Forestry.<br />
6 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
We’re with you<br />
from the beginning<br />
For over 40 years, Cotton Seed Distributors (CSD)<br />
has had a proud heritage of supporting Australian<br />
Cotton Growers.<br />
Being grower owned and controlled, no one knows<br />
the needs of the Australian Cotton Grower like CSD.<br />
CSD actively invests in local research and breeding<br />
to ensure the Australian Cotton Growers are leaders<br />
in the field in a competitive global market.<br />
Experience, integrity and local knowledge, CSD<br />
delivers what Australian Cotton Growers need.<br />
For more information on CSD visit www.csd.net.au or phone (02) 6795 0000
Cotton bunchy top threat to<br />
high yielding cotton<br />
By Greg Kauter, Cotton Australia<br />
The recent Cotton Australia General<br />
Meeting in Moree confirmed that<br />
growers across most valleys are very<br />
concerned about the high prevalence of<br />
cotton bunchy top (CBT) this past season.<br />
A recent tour with QDEEDI’s Emerald<br />
based cotton extension officer Susan Maas<br />
and the cotton industry pathology survey<br />
also helped identify that current levels of<br />
the disease are now a cause of concern<br />
for next season. The crop consultants association<br />
has gone so far as to state that<br />
“cotton bunchy top is currently the greatest<br />
threat to high yielding cotton production<br />
in Australia.”<br />
CBT symptoms were visible in almost<br />
half of the fields inspected as part of the<br />
industry’s disease survey this year, with<br />
some problematic patches. On some fields<br />
on the Downs for example, up to 70 per<br />
cent of plants were affected and significant<br />
yield impacts are likely. This is an industrywide<br />
problem requiring an industry-wide<br />
response, and Cotton Australia has taken<br />
a coordinating role.<br />
Cotton bunchy top is a viral disease<br />
spread by cotton aphids, with the last big<br />
outbreak back in the 1998–99 season. It<br />
causes stunting in cotton including reduced<br />
leaf and fruit size and reduced internode<br />
and petiole length, all having significant<br />
impacts on yield. Symptoms include leaves<br />
having pale green angular patterns around<br />
the margins, darker green centres and a<br />
leathery texture.<br />
In response to this issue, Cotton Australia<br />
is working with the CRC Extension<br />
Team to ensure up to date research and<br />
best practice information is shared with<br />
growers and is also advising CRDC on the<br />
research needs of growers in this area.<br />
The TIMS Committee, led by Cotton<br />
Australia, is also in the process of consulting<br />
with industry on the development of<br />
the Insect Resistance Management Strategy<br />
for 2011–12, with CBT set to be addressed<br />
by this plan.<br />
CSIRO Program Leader Dr Greg Constable<br />
addressed the Cotton Australia General<br />
Meeting on the CBT issue, updating members<br />
on the research program’s efforts to<br />
address it. The meeting expressed a clear<br />
desire for new varieties that are resistant to<br />
the disease, with Greg Constable informing<br />
Greg Kauter.<br />
the group that commercialisation of such<br />
varieties is about two years away.<br />
Because this technology is still in the<br />
pipeline, growers need to be on top of<br />
aphid control, and have strategies in place<br />
well ahead of next season.<br />
According to Crop Consultants Australia,<br />
“Cotton bunchy top cannot be prevented<br />
by controlling aphids” and growers<br />
should not rely on this. Not only are there<br />
limited insecticide options for aphid control,<br />
but their management has become<br />
particularly challenging in recent years due<br />
to growing resistance issues.<br />
Host management during winter is crucial<br />
in minimising the number of severely<br />
impacted fields next year. A number of<br />
broadleaf weeds such as marshmallow<br />
CBT could be a major threat next season.<br />
weeds can be hosts, but the biggest problem<br />
is volunteer and ratoon cotton as they<br />
provide the ‘green bridge’ that allows<br />
aphids to survive season to season. If these<br />
are not controlled, CBT can fast become<br />
an area-wide problem.<br />
Adding to the problem is the fact that<br />
volunteer and ratoon cotton can appear<br />
symptomless, because there is a latent period<br />
from initial infection to the presence<br />
of visual symptoms. The best rule of thumb<br />
is to remove any weeds, volunteer and ratoon<br />
cotton from the farm over winter and<br />
to not leave it until after cotton planting. If<br />
left too late, growers run the risk of CBTcarrying<br />
aphids leaving these host plants,<br />
resulting in sudden and widespread crop<br />
infestation and the risk of high yield loss.<br />
Ten reasons why ratoon and volunteer<br />
cotton must go:<br />
• Mealybugs survive from one season to<br />
the next on these food sources, infesting<br />
crops early in the following season.<br />
• Cotton aphids with resistance to neonicotinoids<br />
survive between seasons on<br />
these plants, reducing insecticide effectiveness.<br />
• Cotton bunchy top can be transmitted<br />
by cotton aphids from infected ratoons<br />
to new cotton crops.<br />
• Silverleaf whitefly survive between seasons<br />
on these plants, resulting in earlier<br />
infestation in the following season.<br />
• They provide a winter host for pale cotton<br />
stainers and Solenopsis mealybugs.<br />
• Inoculum of soil-borne diseases such as<br />
black root rot, Fusarium and Verticillium<br />
builds up in ratoons.<br />
• Ratoon plants place extra selection<br />
pressure on Bt.<br />
• Fields with ratoons from Bt cotton are<br />
unsuitable for planting refuge crops, as<br />
the refuges cannot be effective if contaminated<br />
with Bt cotton plants.<br />
• Removing ratoons may be a costly exercise,<br />
but cheaper than the costs of problems<br />
resulting from not removing them.<br />
• They are a biosecurity risk. Ratoons<br />
harbour pests and are a potential point<br />
of establishment for exotic pests.<br />
For further information, please contact your<br />
nearest CRC Extension Officer for a copy of the<br />
April On Farm Disease Update that takes<br />
a closer look at control of Cotton Bunchy Top.<br />
8 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Cotton Choices <br />
Y O U ’ R E I N C O N T R O L .<br />
w w w . c o t t o n c h o i c e s . c o m . a u
2011 Cotton Trade Show wrapup<br />
The mood was good at the Cotton<br />
Trade Show and that was a very<br />
pleasant and long awaited change for<br />
all in the industry.<br />
The signs were encouraging with the<br />
level of exhibitor interest leading up to the<br />
event. Not only did we have the regular<br />
supporters who, along with the growers,<br />
have weathered a few too many difficult<br />
seasons – we had many new faces. In racing<br />
parlance – these included maiden starters<br />
and those returning from a long spell.<br />
This was most noticeable amongst the<br />
major machinery exhibitors – numbers<br />
were up by 50 per cent on what we had<br />
seen for at least four trade shows. And this<br />
year most had new products on display!<br />
The growers and their staff on site also<br />
included a lot of ‘maidens’. Among the<br />
1000 or so who turned up over the two<br />
days we had visitors from as far afield as<br />
Western Australia, Victoria, Tasmania, Far<br />
North Queensland and all the more traditional<br />
growing regions.<br />
I’m not sure about the guys from Tassie<br />
– they must have been on the look out for<br />
some very short season varieties and those<br />
from up past Cairns are perhaps keen to<br />
do some seed multiplication – they would<br />
have the water and the heat units for four<br />
or five crops a year, surely?<br />
The post-show feedback largely<br />
matched the mood on the day – most<br />
were happy. The growers showed interest<br />
in anything new on offer and all were<br />
busy catching up with suppliers and fellow<br />
producers. The ‘newer’ growers – both<br />
dryland and irrigated – from areas like<br />
southern NSW and the Downs were there<br />
in numbers and keen to see the technology.<br />
Some expressed disappointment that<br />
there were no pickers on site. Not just the<br />
new picker/module builders, but pickers of<br />
any sort.<br />
We would have liked a few too but they<br />
were busy bringing in 4,000,000 plus<br />
bales. I’m sure we could all put up with no<br />
pickers on display every year if it meant<br />
that they were always hard at work on a<br />
crop this size!<br />
Excel Agriculture national sales manager Brian Moran,<br />
Toowoomba, shows the features of an Excel Penetrator to Marc<br />
O’Brien, Mallawa, and John Ellis, Carinda.<br />
Countrywide Industries director Rodney Carr, Dubbo, chats with<br />
cotton grower Mark Ricketts, Moree, and Andrew Madden,<br />
Keytah, Moree.<br />
Benchmarking<br />
2010-11 Cotton<br />
“The 2 main benefits of benchmarking with Agripath is the accuracy of<br />
the Data and the practical knowledge they have in farming systems. It<br />
is rare and makes Agripath, in my opinion a cut above the rest.”<br />
– Phil Christie, Bellata, NSW<br />
➊ Whole farm performance based on<br />
production year<br />
➋ Individual enterprise gross margin analysis<br />
➌ Crop rotation & enterprise mix comparison<br />
➍ Machinery & labour analysis by individual<br />
enterprise & farm<br />
➎ Experienced advisors who<br />
understand farming<br />
➏ Regional based groups<br />
Northern/Central/Southern<br />
➐ CONFIDENTIAL COMPARISON WITH TOP 20%<br />
Contact:<br />
Christopher McCormack on 0427 253 362<br />
agripath@bigpond.net.au<br />
10 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
0% FINANCE *<br />
ON MAGNUM AND STEIGER<br />
<strong>Case</strong> IH’s Magnum and Steiger tractors can help you make a good season great – and for a very<br />
limited time, they’re available at 0% finance for five years.<br />
With current models ranging from 225hp (165kW) up to 535hp (246kW), they are the tractors<br />
of choice for growers who demand drawbar power, hitch strength and incredible durability.<br />
And of course, when you buy <strong>Case</strong> IH, you get more than a machine – you get a nationwide network<br />
of knowledgeable dealers, the best service technicians and access to a huge parts inventory.<br />
Finance offer extended until 30 June 2011. Contact your dealer or visit www.caseih.com today!<br />
*30% deposit, 60 month term, annual repayments, GST month four. Offer is available<br />
to business customers only and subject to credit approval. 0% Finance is based on<br />
each annual repayment being paid by the due date. Default interest may be applied<br />
to late payments. See Terms and Conditions. Contact your local dealership for full<br />
details. Offer ends 30 June 2011.
New cotton seed treatment<br />
SEED TREATMENTS that control a range of insect<br />
pests in early season cotton are delivering signifi cant<br />
productivity benefi ts while greatly reducing occupational<br />
safety and environmental worries.<br />
Cotton Seed Distributors senior extension and<br />
development agronomist, Robert Eveleigh, has been<br />
trialling Syngenta’s CRUISER and CRUISER EXTREME †<br />
seed treatments during the past three years.<br />
Both products provide robust control of thrips, aphids<br />
and wireworms in the convenience and fl exibility<br />
of a seed treatment.<br />
In effect, they protect seedlings from germination<br />
right through to stand establishment, allowing plants<br />
to express their full genetic and yield potential.<br />
Robert Eveleigh says the withdrawal of the in-furrow<br />
granular insecticide, Temik*, from the market will trigger<br />
strong growth in seed treatment use by cotton growers.<br />
“Temik was probably the treatment of choice for a lot<br />
of cotton growers, as it had been around for 20 or 30<br />
years,” he says.<br />
“CRUISER gives us<br />
a healthy start, even<br />
emergence and vigorous<br />
seedlings while being<br />
very soft on benefi cials.<br />
There’s no way I’d go<br />
back to an in-furrow<br />
granular insecticide.”<br />
Jeff Hamblin<br />
“Riverway”<br />
Pilliga, NSW<br />
“It gave excellent control of early season insects.<br />
“CRUISER EXTREME gives comparable protection<br />
against early stage insects but is far more user-friendly<br />
than in-furrow granules – you just pour the treated seed<br />
in your planter and out it goes.<br />
“When you’re sowing with in-furrow granules, you have to<br />
worry about what’s happening in your seeds box as well<br />
as the granules box.<br />
“The more even the plant stand and<br />
the more vigorous the seedlings, the<br />
more likely you are to have an even,<br />
healthy, high-yielding crop at picking.<br />
CRUISER gives us several weeks<br />
protection after emergence, cutting<br />
the need for two or three sprays to<br />
control thrips..”<br />
“CRUISER is a critical management<br />
input for insect control at emergence.<br />
Anything that improves the uniformity<br />
and plant stand average is highly<br />
valuable because it reduces the risk<br />
of re-planting.”<br />
Chris Humphries<br />
“Caroale”<br />
Moree, NSW<br />
Howard Rother<br />
“Howard’s Place”<br />
Cecil Plains, Qld
educes in-furrow woes<br />
“CRUISER is a good<br />
product with an even<br />
application. It’s just a lot<br />
easier than the in-furrow<br />
granular alternative.”<br />
Mike Pearce<br />
“Karminya”<br />
Cecil Plains, Qld<br />
“While the operator has a seed fl ow monitor,<br />
he normally doesn’t have a clue if there’s a<br />
blockage in the granules box as it’s diffi cult<br />
to monitor.”<br />
Robert says convenience is becoming<br />
increasingly important due to a shortage of<br />
experienced labour in the cotton sector.<br />
“The long drought in the cotton industry saw<br />
a lot of experienced farm workers move on<br />
to seek alternative employment outside the<br />
industry,” Robert says.<br />
“Now they are being replaced by workers who<br />
perhaps lack the close level of training required<br />
to safely handle in-furrow granular treatments.<br />
“There are a lot of people out there who will<br />
need training in the use of granular treatments<br />
before they could safely use the product.”<br />
He predicts CRUISER and CRUISER<br />
EXTREME will play an increasingly important<br />
role in providing early season pest control<br />
throughout all Australia’s major cotton valleys.<br />
“Growers can enjoy the convenience of a<br />
commercially-applied seed treatment and<br />
have confi dence that their seed is well<br />
protected,” he says.<br />
“CRUISER is a robust seed treatment in<br />
its own right that works very well in regions<br />
of the Namoi, Gwydir, Macintyre and<br />
Darling Downs.<br />
“CRUISER EXTREME is best formulated<br />
for conditions in eastern and southern<br />
cotton growing regions where extra control<br />
is required.”<br />
Both treatments are available as options on<br />
all CSD varieties in 2011 and are compatible<br />
with DYNASTY COMPLETE to provide<br />
complete protection against disease and<br />
insect pests.<br />
“We switched to a seed<br />
treatment for safety<br />
reasons. CRUISER gets<br />
us through that early crop<br />
stage and gets the cotton<br />
off to a good start, very<br />
important, especially in<br />
marginal country like this.”<br />
Ryan Hanes<br />
“Myalla”<br />
Wee Waa, NSW<br />
For more information please contact your local Territory Sales Manager,<br />
call the Syngenta Advice Line on 1800 067 108 or visit www.syngenta.com.au<br />
†APVMA registration pending. ®Registered trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Trademark of a Syngenta<br />
Group Company. All products written in uppercase are registered trademarks of a Syngenta Group Company.<br />
*Registered trademark. SYN2271 ED 11/167 R
The impact of early defoliation on<br />
textile performance<br />
By Robert Long 1 and Michael Bange 1<br />
At a glance…<br />
Defoliation earlier than 60 per cent open bolls can result in increased amounts of<br />
immature fibre (low maturity ratio and micronaire). (Photo: CSIRO)<br />
Immature cotton fibres have less cell wall<br />
thickening with more hollow space and<br />
are often associated with low micronaire<br />
(less than 3.8). Immature fibre is undesirable<br />
for textile manufacture because<br />
it does not take up dye as effectively as<br />
mature fibres and will often appear lighter<br />
in colour. Immature fibre will also entangle<br />
more easily and form neps (knots) which<br />
can appear as ‘white specks’ or flecks on<br />
finished fabric.<br />
Immature fibre and neps even in small<br />
amounts are undesirable as they decrease<br />
mill processing efficiency and ruin the<br />
appearance of finished yarns and fabrics<br />
and can negatively affect an industry’s<br />
reputation when cotton arrives at spinning<br />
mills. The number of immature bolls<br />
with immature fibre in a crop at harvest<br />
can increase as a result of actively growing<br />
crops experiencing an abrupt end to<br />
the season caused by cold temperatures<br />
and/or premature applications of defoliants<br />
or boll openers that force immature<br />
bolls to open. Both situations may increase<br />
chances of immature fibre and neps once<br />
cotton is harvested and ginned.<br />
In a previous article (see The Australian<br />
Cottongrower vol. 31(4) August–September<br />
2010, pages 39–41) the results of<br />
the effects of differences in the timing of<br />
harvest aids on maturing cotton crops (defoliants<br />
and boll openers) on yield and fibre<br />
quality were reported. This article reports<br />
on the same studies, but with an emphasis<br />
on textile performance. This information<br />
Significant amounts of immature fibre in ginned cotton will affect textile quality and thus<br />
can affect Australia’s reputation for high quality. A <strong>study</strong> conducted in three seasons varied<br />
the timing of defoliation to determine what per cent of open bolls at the time of application<br />
contribute to differences in the amount of immature fibre leading to differences in the<br />
quality of yarn and fabric. Although early defoliation treatments produced less mature<br />
fibre, both yarn and fabric strength was not affected.<br />
Interestingly, less mature cotton from a cooler growing season produced stronger yarn<br />
which was attributed to the smaller ribbon width of this fibre which increased fibre packing<br />
density (that is more fibres in a given volume of yarn). Yarns made from more immature<br />
cotton in this season also contained more neps.<br />
Percent open bolls at the time of harvest aid application related well to changes in the<br />
colour of blue dyed fabric, with the earlier defoliation treatments having lighter coloured<br />
fabric. While there were gradual improvements in fabric colour with later defoliations there<br />
were only distinct changes in colour to the visible eye when there was less than 26 per<br />
cent open bolls at the time of treatment application.<br />
This work supports the current recommendation of applying harvest aids at greater<br />
than 60 per cent open bolls, and the information generated in this <strong>study</strong> may be used to<br />
predict the quality of yarn and fabric generated from cotton varying in maturity.<br />
will be valuable in refining crop monitoring<br />
and harvest preparation strategies that aim<br />
to optimise both lint yield and fibre quality.<br />
This will optimise returns to growers and<br />
help to improve the quality and reputation<br />
of cotton delivered to overseas spinning<br />
mills.<br />
Methods<br />
Defoliation timing field experiments<br />
were conducted over three seasons at<br />
the Australian Cotton Research Institute<br />
(ACRI) at Narrabri from 2005 to 2008.<br />
Replicated experiments (four reps per<br />
experiment) consisted of five to seven defoliation<br />
application dates with a control<br />
which allowed all bolls to fully mature.<br />
A mixture of leaf defoliant (0.2 L/ha<br />
Dropp Liquid) and a boll opener (3 L/ha<br />
Prep 720) with 2 L/ha D-C Tron was applied<br />
at approximately 5 day intervals in<br />
2005–06 (Sicot 71BR), 2006–07 (Sicot<br />
71BR), and 7 day intervals in 2007–08<br />
(Sicot 71) from low to high per cent open<br />
bolls. Initiation of defoliant treatments was<br />
targeted to generate treatments with increased<br />
immature fibre, so the first defoliant<br />
treatment was at five per cent to 20<br />
per cent open bolls. To establish crop condition<br />
when defoliant treatments were applied,<br />
per cent open bolls were recorded<br />
on control plots.<br />
14 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
the way forward<br />
Lint was collected from machine picked<br />
samples used to measure Cnr Buckland yield. & Yaldwyn Samples Sts<br />
were ginned and Toowoomba HVI tested Qld at 4350 CSIRO<br />
Narrabri and then Phone: subjected 07 4635 to fibre 9872qual-<br />
parameters (yarn strength and yarn nep<br />
content). Yarns were then knitted into fabric<br />
and dyed with a standard Cibacron blue<br />
reactive dye.<br />
the naked eye. Fabric samples for the control<br />
(or latest) defoliant timing treatment<br />
were compared to each previously applied<br />
defoliant treatment. Dyed fabric samples<br />
ity testing at CSIRO Fax: 07 Geelong 4635 6633 using the Reflectance colorimetric measurements were also tested for strength.<br />
CSIRO instrument www.excelagr.com.au<br />
Brian Moran Sirolan-Laserscan to were taken on fabrics using a spectrophotometer.<br />
The appearance of dyed fabric<br />
Results and Outcomes<br />
measure fibre diameter Brian Moran (ribbon 0427 width). 722 925<br />
Enough cotton was Dan collected Ryan 0427 from 700 each 779 samples were assessed in terms of delta E. Fibre quality<br />
plot to enable yarn to be spun (20 tex This Millennium describes the mathematical Planter distance In each<br />
Rolling<br />
season the timing<br />
Cultivator<br />
of defoliation<br />
treatments ✓ Construct affected and refine the maturity seed-beds of prior to pla<br />
A DIVISION OF<br />
yarn with a twist factor of 798 turns per between<br />
✓ Utilising<br />
two colours.<br />
the world<br />
When<br />
renowned<br />
Delta<br />
John<br />
E values<br />
Deere<br />
metering system for superior seed placement for enhanced seeding vigor<br />
metre) and fabric manufactured. One Australian yarn made are<br />
✓<br />
near<br />
Designed<br />
or greater<br />
by Australian<br />
than one<br />
farmers<br />
between<br />
to reduce<br />
any<br />
down<br />
the fibre<br />
✓<br />
with<br />
Incorporate<br />
earlier<br />
pre<br />
treatment<br />
and post-emergence<br />
applications<br />
generally for fast causing knockdown harvested and essential fibre to weed con<br />
chemi<br />
and owned<br />
bobbin Dan per Ryanplot was tested for yarn quality two fabrics time and they boost would yields appear different to<br />
✓ Designed for dryland irrigation, contour<br />
✓ Cultivate serious weeds while preserving se<br />
Agriculture<br />
following or Tram Trak needs<br />
growth and crop root systems<br />
✓Twin 16” disc opener with walking depth gauge ✓Aerate the soil, aiding water penetration and<br />
wheels for greater reliability and accuracy<br />
retention for young plants<br />
Excellent product. Excellent service. ✓ Full range of planter options available<br />
✓ Help control soil and water losses from ero<br />
whilst managing residue retention<br />
Fertiliser Rigs<br />
✔ Up to 3 tonne capacity with exceptional stability and ease<br />
of lifting<br />
✔ New low draft shank and clamp assembly for simplistic reliable<br />
operation<br />
✔ Offering an unrivalled 770mm of underframe clearance for<br />
brilliant trash flow<br />
✔ Proven stainless steel metering units for corrosion resistance<br />
✔ Variable rate technology available<br />
✔ Can apply gas at same time as fertilisers<br />
Stubble Warrior<br />
✔ Plant wheat back into cotton hills<br />
✔ Double disc<br />
✔ Single disc<br />
✔ Gassing and/or fertilising<br />
E X C E L C U LT I VAT O R<br />
Excel Penetrator<br />
✔ 4, 6, 8 row<br />
✔ Side busting/centre busting capabilities<br />
✔ Adaptable for gassing, dry fertiliser using<br />
Excel’s new rig mounted fertiliser boxes<br />
✔ 5 / 8” inline sheer bolts<br />
✔ Unrivalled trash clearance<br />
Also available:<br />
✔ Rubber Tyred Roller<br />
✔ Lilleston Rig<br />
Call now — our components fit most implements<br />
A DIVISION OF GREAT WESTERN CORPORATION PTY LTD (ABN 91 064 434 475)<br />
Australian made and owned<br />
Cultipacker<br />
✔ Machine can be pulled one way for aggressive soil<br />
breakdown and the other way for refining the soil<br />
before planting<br />
Excel<br />
also stock a<br />
wide range of<br />
spare parts<br />
74–92 Buckland Street,<br />
PO Box 665, Toowoomba Qld 4350<br />
PH: 07 4636 9100<br />
FAX: 07 4636 9140 — www.excelagr.com.au<br />
Brian Moran 0427 722 925 – Graeme Easy (NSW) 0427 700 779<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 15
e lower in micronaire (Figure 1). Direct<br />
measurements of fibre maturity also confirmed<br />
that earlier treatments were less<br />
mature (Figure 2).<br />
Ribbon width was not affected by the<br />
timing of application of harvest aids. In<br />
the 2007–08 season fibre was less mature<br />
(substantially lower micronaire) and had<br />
a smaller ribbon width. This season was<br />
markedly cooler resulting in a delayed crop<br />
with more immature bolls.<br />
Yarn<br />
The lack of differences in yarn strength<br />
between treatments was unexpected; as<br />
more immature fibres would have been<br />
needed in a yarn cross section to make the<br />
specified mass per unit length of yarn, this<br />
should have increased yarn strength. But<br />
lack of improvement in yarn strength with<br />
more immature fibre from early defoliation<br />
treatments was most likely due to shorter<br />
fibres in these treatments. There were no<br />
differences between treatments for ribbon<br />
width which suggested that there were little<br />
differences in the fibre packing density<br />
of yarns (fibres per yarn volume).<br />
Figure 1: Micronaire of collected lint samples from defoliation<br />
treatments applied at various per cent open bolls over three<br />
seasons<br />
Figure 2: Electron microscope images of yarn cross sections<br />
taken from the earliest and latest defoliation treatments in<br />
each season (a µm is one millionth of a metre)<br />
Interestingly for the markedly less mature<br />
fibre for the 2007–08 season, yarns<br />
were stronger (on average stronger by approximately<br />
3 cN/tex) (Figure 3) and the<br />
ribbon width was smaller. So yarns made<br />
from this fibre either had a smaller fibre<br />
perimeter, or the very low fibre maturity<br />
caused fibres to collapse more and fold up<br />
on themselves.<br />
This is an avenue for more in depth<br />
work examining the methods of measuring<br />
ribbon width, how ribbon width contributes<br />
to the mechanics of yarn strength,<br />
as well as how the factors maturity and<br />
perimeter affect ribbon width.<br />
Although the level of fibre neps was<br />
significantly greater for earlier harvest aid<br />
treatments, this did not translate into increases<br />
in yarn neps. It is most likely that<br />
the two carding processes prior to spinning<br />
removed a significant proportion of<br />
these neps.<br />
Carding is the process where fibre in the<br />
mill is blended and cleaned before being<br />
condensed into a single strand of overlapping<br />
fibres called a ‘sliver’. But more neps<br />
would have increased the waste coming<br />
from the carding process which is less acceptable<br />
in the mill.<br />
But differences in the amount of neps<br />
were found between seasons. In the<br />
2007–2008 season, approximately 100<br />
more neps occurred in yarns and was associated<br />
with this very immature fibre (Figure<br />
3).<br />
Fabric<br />
Earlier harvest aid application treatments<br />
resulted in lighter coloured fabrics<br />
and they were significantly different in appearance<br />
(delta E values greater than 1)<br />
compared with fabrics taken from later<br />
harvests. These changes were strongly related<br />
to micronaire and the maturity of the<br />
fibre used for production.<br />
Per cent open bolls at the time of defoliation<br />
harvest aid application related well<br />
to changes in fabric colour when the three<br />
seasons were assessed collectively (Figure<br />
4). While there were improvements in colour<br />
(dye uptake) with defoliation occurring<br />
later, distinct fabric colour changes occurred<br />
when there was less than 26 per<br />
cent open bolls (which equates to approximately<br />
seven nodes above cracked boll).<br />
For fabric strength, there was no significant<br />
difference among treatments for the<br />
three seasons. But across seasons, fabric<br />
from the 2007–2008 season was stronger<br />
than fabric produced from the first two<br />
seasons which were not different to each<br />
other (Figure 5).<br />
16 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
T8. The all round better all-rounder<br />
Better power management<br />
With an enhanced power management system, the all-new T8 from New Holland<br />
has the power to perform in any task. Together with a vastly improved turning<br />
circle and the longest wheelbase of any tractor on the market, giving it increased<br />
stability at high speeds, more effi cient tillage capacity, and improved traction,<br />
the T8 is custom built for hard work. All-rounders don’t get better than this.<br />
So visit www.newholland.com or get in touch with your local New Holland dealer today.<br />
Own a bright future
Figure 3: Yarn strength and neps between seasons measured in this <strong>study</strong> – there were no<br />
differences between defoliation treatments in any season<br />
Outcomes<br />
On the basis of textile performance the<br />
results here support the current recommendation<br />
of applying defoliants at 60<br />
per cent open bolls or around 4 NACB in<br />
uniformly maturing cotton crops. But this<br />
is dependent on seasonal conditions and<br />
management practices.<br />
Research is currently being undertaken<br />
to refine the boll cutting technique to determine<br />
the status of a crop prior to applying<br />
harvest aids that may allow cotton<br />
producers to better predict final quality and<br />
ensure the best time for defoliation to optimise<br />
quality.<br />
Such information will also help the supply<br />
chain in general to pre-empt some of<br />
the processing performance issues of harvested<br />
fibre and improve fibre processing,<br />
e.g. ensure lay downs are more consistent.<br />
1<br />
CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering<br />
(Geelong) and CSIRO Plant Industry (Narrabri)<br />
Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative<br />
Research Centre. Narrabri.<br />
Further details on issues affecting cotton textile<br />
production are detailed in FIBREpak which can<br />
be ordered online at the Cotton CRC’s website<br />
www.cottoncrc.org.au/content/Industry/<br />
Publications/Fibre_Quality/FIBREpak/<br />
Or you may also wish to read the full peer<br />
reviewed articles associated with this work:<br />
Long, R.L., Bange, M.P. (2011) Consequences of<br />
immature fiber on the processing performance<br />
of Upland cotton. Field Crops Research 121,<br />
401-407.<br />
Bange, M.P., Long, R.L. (2011) Optimizing<br />
timing of chemical harvest aid application<br />
in cotton by predicting its influence on fiber<br />
quality. Agronomy Journal 103, 390-395.<br />
Acknowledgments: Thanks to J. Caton, D.<br />
Hodgson, R. Giles, Mark Freijah, Fred Horne,<br />
Sue Horne, and Margaret Pate for technical<br />
assistance. The CRDC and the Cotton CRC both<br />
provided financial support for this work. We<br />
also thank Cotton Seed Distributors for<br />
provision of planting seed.<br />
Figure 4: The influence of the timing of defoliation on fabric<br />
colour<br />
Delta E values greater than 1 mean that colour changes are visible to the naked eye.<br />
Figure 5: Fabric strength between seasons measured in<br />
this <strong>study</strong> – there were no differences between defoliation<br />
treatments within any season<br />
18 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Saluting finalists in the<br />
Cotton Awards<br />
In a salute to the drivers of the Australian<br />
cotton industry, finalists were today<br />
announced in the 2011 Australian Cotton<br />
Industry Awards at the Cotton Trade<br />
Show in Moree, heart of cotton country.<br />
With the cotton industry in resurgence,<br />
a strong field of candidates was nominated<br />
across all cotton valleys, with 12 finalists<br />
picked across five categories.<br />
According to Cotton Australia CEO<br />
Adam Kay, who made the announcement,<br />
the Awards are not so much a contest but<br />
a celebration of the industry’s innovation<br />
and progress.<br />
“All of our finalists are talented people<br />
– researchers, growers, agronomists and<br />
young stars of the future – who contribute<br />
to our industry not only through their work<br />
but through an enormous personal commitment,”<br />
Adam said.<br />
“The Awards are an opportunity to<br />
showcase this commitment and to share<br />
the visions and innovations of our highest<br />
achievers in order to strengthen the industry<br />
as a whole.<br />
CSD’s Steve Ainsworth and Cotton Australia’s Adam Kay discuss the Cotton Awards<br />
poster display at the Australian Cotton Trade Show.<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 19
“Our finalists are always optimistic, dedicated<br />
and passionate about their work as<br />
well as major contributors to the broader<br />
industry and their cotton communities.<br />
The Australian Cotton Industry Awards<br />
showcase our exciting and dynamic industry,<br />
and point to a healthy future for the<br />
cotton sector,” he said.<br />
“I want to congratulate all of the finalists<br />
and wish them well for the final rounds of<br />
judging over the next month.” Adam said.<br />
Top honours will be announced during<br />
the Australian Cotton Industry Awards dinner<br />
and presentation night in Narrabri at<br />
the Crossing Theatre on Wednesday, August<br />
10, 2011. Tickets for this event will<br />
go on sale at the end of June.<br />
Monsanto<br />
Grower of the Year and<br />
AgriRisk<br />
Innovative Grower Award<br />
Hamish Johnstone<br />
Hamish Johnstone manages the<br />
Primeag Australia properties ‘Macintyre<br />
Downs’, ‘Wirrindi’ and ‘Riverview’ on the<br />
Macintyre River at Goondiwindi producing<br />
cotton, seed sorghum and winter cereals<br />
on an irrigated and dryland mixed cropping<br />
and grazing enterprise.<br />
Craig and Sharron Saunders<br />
Conducting an irrigated cotton, dryland<br />
wheat and grazing enterprise on three<br />
properties in the St.George Irrigation area.<br />
Craig has developed an innovative irrigation<br />
system with pipes through the banks<br />
which have adjustable flow rates. The system<br />
has resulted in a 20 per cent water<br />
saving and significant yield increases.<br />
Donald and Douglas Crothers<br />
‘Booligar’ is an irrigated cotton and dryland<br />
farming and grazing enterprise at Dirranbandi<br />
in the Lower Balonne region.<br />
Ed Willis and Von Warner<br />
The Bullamon Plains Pastoral Co operated<br />
by Ed and Bill Willis and Von Warner<br />
conduct an irrigated and dryland farming<br />
and grazing enterprise at Thallon in<br />
Queensland.<br />
Gordon and David Brownhill<br />
Merrilong Pastoral Co is an irrigated<br />
and dryland farming and grazing business<br />
at Spring Ridge NSW. The team has established<br />
a no-till controlled traffic system<br />
since 1995 growing winter and summer<br />
grain crops and has commenced growing<br />
irrigated and dryland cotton in the current<br />
season.<br />
Maxine and Stuart Armitage<br />
The Armitage’s conduct an irrigation<br />
cropping enterprise at ‘Wamara’, Cecil<br />
Plains on the Darling Downs. Some<br />
200–250 hectares of irrigated cotton are<br />
grown annually on the 600 hectare <strong>property</strong>.<br />
Crops are grown in long fallow rotations<br />
with opportunity crops of sorghum<br />
produced in a no till system with stubble<br />
retention.<br />
20 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Cotton Seed Distributors<br />
Researcher of the Year<br />
Award<br />
enthusiasm and passion for the cotton industry,<br />
being president of her local grower<br />
association and leading by example in<br />
what has been a tough period for all growers<br />
in the Dawson Valley.<br />
Kristen Knight,<br />
Monsanto Australia Entomologist,<br />
Toowoomba, Qld<br />
Kristen leads the Monsanto Australia<br />
insect resistance management program<br />
in addition to managing the company’s<br />
research efforts into allele frequency, field<br />
survival on Bollgard II cotton, alternative<br />
refuges and the entomological assessment<br />
of new traits.<br />
Dr Warwick Stiller,<br />
CSIRO Plant Industry, Narrabri<br />
NSW<br />
Warwick is a cotton breeder employed<br />
by CSIRO Plant Industry to develop new<br />
cotton varieties adapted to Australian<br />
management and conditions. As an important<br />
member of this team, Warwick has<br />
delivered new varieties for all production<br />
regions with higher yield, better disease<br />
resistance and with fibre properties sought<br />
by spinners.<br />
Chris Lehmann Trust<br />
Young Achiever of the<br />
Year Award, sponsored<br />
by Bayer CropScience<br />
Nick Gillingham,<br />
NG Agronomic Consultancy, Moree<br />
NSW<br />
Nick was appointed to the position of<br />
farm agronomist in July 2005 and currently<br />
holds the role of cropping manager<br />
at ‘Keytah’, in the Gwydir Valley. Nick is<br />
part of the next cotton generation, taking<br />
on more responsibility each year and getting<br />
involved in industry activities at every<br />
opportunity.<br />
Dr Sharon Downes,<br />
Senior Research Scientist, CSIRO,<br />
Narrabri NSW<br />
Sharon has made an outstanding contribution,<br />
over a relatively short timeframe,<br />
to the monitoring of resistance to the Cry<br />
proteins in Bollgard II. She has made important<br />
scientific contributions to this research,<br />
for example identifying the value<br />
of and implementing the F2 and F1 tests.<br />
Fleur Anderson,<br />
Cahoots Communications,<br />
Theodore Qld<br />
Fleur’s involvement in the community<br />
and industry has demonstrated her natural<br />
leadership abilities. She has an obvious<br />
Dr Rose Brodrick,<br />
CSIRO Plant Industry, Narrabri<br />
NSW<br />
Rose has been involved with the cotton<br />
industry for over 10 years, starting as a<br />
PHD student and now as a scientist with<br />
CSIRO Plant Industry. Her research into<br />
physiology and management has helped<br />
to change the way cotton is grown with<br />
row configurations to improve water use<br />
efficiency.<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 21
Scheme offers irrigators funding to<br />
improve water efficiency<br />
By Rosie Hannah, Project Officer, Healthy HeadWaters Water Use Efficiency Project<br />
The Healthy HeadWaters Water Use<br />
Efficiency (HHWUE) Project will<br />
help irrigators across the Queensland<br />
Murray-Darling Basin to improve efficiency<br />
of water use.<br />
Overseen by the Department of Environment<br />
and Resource Management<br />
(DERM) with funding from the Australian<br />
Government’s Water for the Future initiative,<br />
the HHWUE Project is supported by<br />
a range of projects to help irrigators make<br />
informed decisions about improved infrastructure,<br />
and ultimately to participate in<br />
the project.<br />
Infrastructure project<br />
Under round two of the HHWUE<br />
Project, $20 million is available for irrigators<br />
to upgrade irrigation infrastructure,<br />
saving water while also returning a share<br />
to the basin’s rivers, wetlands and floodplains.<br />
Ten applications totaling over $35 million<br />
have been approved ranging from<br />
$300,000 to $5.9 million under round<br />
one of the project. The water saved is approximately<br />
15,541 ML – more than half<br />
of which is returned to the environment<br />
and the rest is returned to irrigators.<br />
Applications cover a range of on-ground<br />
works including raising embankment<br />
heights of on-farm storages, optimising<br />
surface irrigation and converting from furrow<br />
irrigation to lateral move and centre<br />
pivot irrigation systems.<br />
Applications for round two close on 29<br />
July 2011. The round is open to the holders<br />
of tradable surface water entitlements<br />
in all catchments of the Queensland Murray-Darling<br />
Basin.<br />
Supporting Projects<br />
The HHWUE project is complemented<br />
by a range of measures to help irrigators<br />
across the Queensland Murray-Darling Basin<br />
catchments improve the efficiency of<br />
their water use and assess potential irrigation<br />
modernisation mechanisms.<br />
In addition, the Department of Employment,<br />
Economic Development and Innovation<br />
(DEEDI) is also providing officers<br />
in St George, Goondiwindi and on the<br />
Darling Downs to advise and educate irrigators,<br />
industry specialists and communities<br />
about on-farm water saving practices.<br />
Officers will also help irrigators compare<br />
the efficiency of their existing systems to<br />
the new technologies available under the<br />
project.<br />
Various projects to help irrigators make<br />
informed decisions about potential water<br />
savings are also being conducted including<br />
irrigation benchmarking on centre pivot<br />
and lateral move (CPLM) machines, a review<br />
of CPLM machines to determine the<br />
lessons learnt from installations over the<br />
past 10 years, storage efficiency options<br />
and quantification of on-farm water losses<br />
and training of irrigation professionals.<br />
In recognition of the number of irrigation<br />
professionals who may not hold irrigation<br />
certifications, but who can offer<br />
considerable experience and expertise,<br />
training in Irrigation Australia Limited<br />
(IAL) certifications to improve the skill base<br />
through formal training and assessment<br />
are also being offered.<br />
Training is available in the following IAL<br />
certifications:<br />
• Irrigation designer;<br />
• Irrigation agronomist;<br />
• Irrigation operator;<br />
• Irrigation contractor;<br />
• Irrigation installer; and,<br />
• Irrigation manager.<br />
Information on the supporting projects is<br />
available at www.derm.qld.gov.au. Application<br />
forms can be obtained by calling 4688 1185<br />
or by emailing HHWUE@derm.qld.gov.au<br />
Training is an important component of<br />
Healthy HeadWaters.<br />
Storage efficiency options are being studied.<br />
Conversion to CPLM systems is a feature of some applications.<br />
22 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
HEART BEAT<br />
OF RURAL AUSTRALIA<br />
Everything the Volvo organisation does is dedicated to safety. Now Volvo Penta can keep your<br />
crops safe and save your livelihood with a range of agricultural engines from 60-672hp that will<br />
never say die.<br />
In a tough, dry land like Australia, reliable water supply is the lifeblood of your crops.<br />
Relentless testing by Volvo Penta has perfected a range of pumping engines to supply the<br />
water flow you need. Day in, day out. They’re smoother, quieter and engineered for longer<br />
life and excellent fuel economy.<br />
Volvo Penta’s reputation spans 100 years and<br />
today there are over a million engines operating in<br />
130 markets worldwide. You’ll find dedicated Volvo<br />
Penta support around Australia at 80 locations. Keep<br />
the heartbeat of your farm pumping by talking to<br />
Volvo Penta soon.<br />
Imported and distributed in Australia by: Volvo Penta Oceania, 29 Industrial Avenue, Wacol QLD 4076. PO Box 1047 Sumner Park QLD 4074 Australia.<br />
For information and dealers throughout Australia, PNG, Solomon Islands Vanuatu. Tel 61 (0)7 3726 1500 Fax 61 (0)7 3271 1549<br />
www.volvopenta.com.au<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 23
Queensland producers invest in<br />
Healthy HeadWaters<br />
Producers interested in water use<br />
efficiency technology are encouraged<br />
to contact the DEEDI Healthy<br />
HeadWaters project team to discuss the<br />
latest decision support tools and project<br />
updates. Round 2 of the Department of<br />
Environment and Resource Management<br />
(DERM) run Healthy Headwaters Infrastructure<br />
Program opened on May 3 and<br />
will close at the end of July. This program<br />
is open to all surface irrigators with a<br />
tradeable water licence in the Queensland<br />
Murray Darling Basin.<br />
Two Healthy HeadWaters Investment<br />
Tool workshops, held in Goondiwindi and<br />
St George in March, were well attended<br />
with participants from a variety of backgrounds.<br />
The workshops were part of the<br />
DERM’s Healthy HeadWaters Water<br />
Use Efficiency project, which is federally<br />
funded under the Water for the Future Initiative.<br />
The extension and support project<br />
is delivered by the Department of Employment,<br />
Economic Development and Innovation<br />
(DEEDI).<br />
DEEDI Goondiwindi’s irrigation development<br />
extension officer, Bec Raymond,<br />
said the workshops were designed for irrigators<br />
who were considering being involved<br />
in the project and for producers<br />
wanting to make a more informed decision<br />
when considering investment in water<br />
use efficiency technology.<br />
“For anyone considering upgrading<br />
their infrastructure this workshop is a great<br />
place to identify a suitable process to follow<br />
and tools to assist you.”<br />
The half-day workshop provides an<br />
overview of the Healthy HeadWaters<br />
project, the investment decision process<br />
including financial and taxation considerations<br />
and the Investment Tool spreadsheet.<br />
The workshops are presented by DEEDI<br />
Economist Mary Philp and extension staff<br />
Bec Raymond, Jenelle Hare, Graham<br />
Harris and Nikki Pilcher.<br />
“Workshops already held flowed well<br />
with a high amount of interaction from the<br />
groups and great feedback received,” says<br />
Nikki.<br />
DEEDI officers are planning future<br />
workshops to coincide with subsequent<br />
funding opportunities, or on an as requested<br />
basis. If this could be of interest<br />
to irrigators in your region don’t hesitate<br />
to contact the More Profit per Drop team<br />
for more information, or head to the blog<br />
moreprofitperdrop.wordpress.com<br />
For further information contact one of the team<br />
members:<br />
Graham Harris 07 4688 1559<br />
Bec Raymond 07 4671 6711<br />
Nikki Pilcher 07 4620 8109<br />
Jenelle Hare 07 4669 0825<br />
Mary Philp 07 4688 1211<br />
Guide process<br />
Guide decision process for involvement<br />
in Healthy HeadWaters Infrastructure<br />
Program:<br />
• Step 1. Pre-planning.<br />
• Step 2. Determine current losses.<br />
• Step 3. Determine potential water savings.<br />
• Step 4. Assess cost of water savings.<br />
• Step 5. Determine on-farm benefits.<br />
• Step 6. Finance assessment.<br />
• Step 7. Tax implications.<br />
• Step 8. Economic analysis.<br />
• Step 9. Decide on participation.<br />
• Step 10. Comnplete application form (if<br />
applicable).<br />
Healthy HeadWaters Investment Tool workshops were held in Goondiwindi and<br />
St George in March.<br />
TACKLE • BAIT • ICE<br />
AT CHARLTONS FISHING YOU’RE<br />
IN THE BEST COMPANY...<br />
Minnkota<br />
18 Kerwick Street Redbank Q 4301 Ph: 3818 1677 www.charltonsfishing.com.au<br />
Charltons GrnMnt<strong>Press</strong>.indd 1<br />
Daiwa<br />
Humminbird<br />
Shimano<br />
Abu Garcia<br />
G-loomis<br />
Penn<br />
Jackall<br />
MAIL<br />
ORDER<br />
WELCOME<br />
1/09/2010 11:54:49 PM<br />
24 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Water Matters<br />
<strong>Case</strong> <strong>study</strong> <strong>property</strong>:<br />
‘Long Meadows’, Bourke<br />
By David Wiggington, NCEA<br />
In 2003 Clyde Agriculture had access to<br />
a Broons Impact Roller and decided to<br />
compact several storage floors and to<br />
repair the damage caused to storage walls<br />
due to wash. The decision to renovate was<br />
opportunistic – there had not been any<br />
significant seepage issues observed.<br />
The Long Meadows storage (cell 1) was<br />
one of the storages that was renovated in<br />
2003. The storage has a capacity of 4700<br />
megalitres and covers an area of approximately<br />
137 hectares. The wall height is 4.5<br />
metres, with a water storage depth of 3.5<br />
metres and originally a three in one batter.<br />
The storage was constructed in 1990<br />
and soil tests were undertaken at that time.<br />
The Problem<br />
By 2003 the wash from the prevailing<br />
winds had started to significantly damage<br />
the downwind storage walls. It had removed<br />
a significant amount of soil from<br />
the walls. A cliff face was starting to form<br />
and storage capacity was being lost. Additionally<br />
the road around the storage wall<br />
was being affected.<br />
There may also have been some seepage<br />
from the storage floor, but there were<br />
no accurate measure of how much was<br />
possibly being lost. Some moisture had<br />
been observed outside the storage, which<br />
may have been due to seepage.<br />
The Solution<br />
The work focused primarily on the<br />
downwind storage wall where the wash<br />
damage was most significant. The original<br />
batter had been three in one. The renovations<br />
adjusted this so that the top two<br />
metres of the wall had a batter of five in<br />
one. The lower two metres had a batter<br />
of three in one. This was done to create<br />
more of a beach like effect. Soil needed to<br />
make these adjustments was sourced from<br />
the centre of the storage.<br />
Precision Irrigation Made Easy<br />
CENTRE PIVOT and<br />
LATERAL MOVE IRRIGATION<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 25
MAKE MORE MONEY<br />
WHILE WE HAVE<br />
WATER<br />
Get the very best from your water with<br />
qualified experienced advice on:<br />
- existing system performance<br />
- whole farm water balance<br />
- system upgrades and alterations<br />
- full system design<br />
- flood studies<br />
- environmental studies<br />
- water management plans<br />
<br />
NARRABRI<br />
Ph: 02 6792 1265<br />
Fax: 02 6792 4570<br />
WARREN<br />
Ph: 02 6847 3446<br />
Fax: 02 6847 3392<br />
<br />
www.aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />
office@aquatechconsulting.com.au<br />
Water Matters<br />
The Broons Impact Roller was used<br />
across the entire storage floor. After the<br />
initial passes, holes were dug with an excavator<br />
in a grid like pattern. These holes<br />
were used to assess the effect of the roller<br />
passes and were focused primarily on the<br />
areas where Clyde Agriculture’s Mitch<br />
Abbo expected losses could have been occurring.<br />
These locations correlated with<br />
where seepage had been observed in isolated<br />
points outside the storage.<br />
The storage walls were not compacted<br />
because it was felt that there was not a lot<br />
to be gained by compacting a completed<br />
wall. They could not justify rebuilding the<br />
walls and compacting the core, as this may<br />
have created more issues and was not cost<br />
effective.<br />
The Outcome<br />
In 2004 the storage was filled to capacity.<br />
It remained with water in it until 2006.<br />
There was no seepage observed during<br />
this time, although no specific measurements<br />
were taken.<br />
The storage was dry again for two years<br />
during 2007 and into 2008. During this<br />
dry cycle there was considerable cracking<br />
with cracks to a depth of at least one metre<br />
observed. The storage floor formed a<br />
block like structure. The blocks were quite<br />
well compacted but were broken by deep<br />
expansion cracks. There was an expectation<br />
for a reasonable amount of seepage.<br />
In 2009 the storage was dry again. During<br />
this most recent dry cycle Clyde Agriculture<br />
sourced funding from the Western<br />
Catchment Management Authority. The<br />
funding was designed to do water balance<br />
calculations on farms. Additionally there<br />
was investment in metering equipment and<br />
information collected on the suitability of<br />
different soil types for storage construction.<br />
During 2009 there were quite a number<br />
of measurements taken. There was an EM<br />
survey conducted by Terrabyte Services.<br />
Core samples were taken of the areas<br />
identified in the EM survey as suspect.<br />
Additional to this a Geo Tech engineer<br />
used the EM survey as a basis to select sites<br />
for excavator pits. These pits were used to<br />
assess soil types, infiltration characteristics<br />
and the feasibility of increasing wall height<br />
and hence stored water depth. Soil samples<br />
were collected and soil analysis completed<br />
at each of the pits.<br />
The 2009 funding provided for Irrimate<br />
Seepage and Evaporation meters, storage<br />
volume meters and Mace meters for inlets<br />
and outlets.<br />
The storage was again filled in late<br />
2009. The seepage and evaporation readings<br />
indicate that seepage is very low (
onserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve<br />
Conserve Water with Valley<br />
onserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water. Conserve Water.<br />
®<br />
Conserve Water. Conserve<br />
Valley ®<br />
center pivots and linears make precision irrigation easy with our ability to efficiently manage water.<br />
Contact us to see how you can realize efficiencies up to 95%!<br />
Conserve Water with Valley ®<br />
For Precision Irrigation Made Easy, choose Valley.<br />
Valley ®<br />
center pivots and linears make precision irrigation easy with our ability to efficiently manage water.<br />
Contact us to see how you can realize efficiencies up to 95%!<br />
For Precision Irrigation Made Easy, choose Valley.<br />
VALMONT AUSTRALIA<br />
Please send a Product Catalogue<br />
PO BOX 225 Carole Park NAME:.....................................................................<br />
QLD 4300<br />
ADDRESS:..............................................................<br />
PH 07 3879 3622<br />
VALMONT AUSTRALIA<br />
Please send a Product Catalogue<br />
Fax 07 3879 3655<br />
STATE:......................P/CODE:.................................<br />
PO JUNE–JULY BOX 225 2011 Carole Park NAME:..................................................................... THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 27<br />
www.valleyirrigation.com<br />
QLD 4300<br />
PHONE NUMBER:...................................................
World COMModity Watch<br />
US<br />
USDA have US crop pitched at 17 mb<br />
(reduction of 1.1mb YOY), however<br />
internal estimates believe crop will be<br />
not much bigger than 15 million bales –<br />
clearly a lot of downside left in the USDA<br />
numbers. The crop is now virtually 100%<br />
planted as growers scrambled to get the<br />
seed planted before the 15 June insurance<br />
cut-off date. Due to ongoing drought<br />
conditions in West Texas with no reprieve<br />
in sight, the crop conditions are not<br />
encouraging with the most recent report<br />
showing 10% as being rated very poor,<br />
17% poor, 38% fair, 20% good and only<br />
1% excellent.<br />
Yarn Market<br />
Yarn prices, although still soft, are not<br />
coming off as heavily as they were 3-4<br />
weeks ago. Lack of demand in the yarn<br />
market has forced yarn spinners to reduce<br />
their prices to lower inventory. With yarn<br />
inventories bulging, cloth prices sinking,<br />
and downstream demand wavering,<br />
Chinese fabric manufacturers are showing<br />
little interest right now in procuring more<br />
domestic cotton yarns and even less in<br />
sourcing yarns from abroad. At $1.91 per<br />
pound, the average landed cost of cotton<br />
yarns still trails the $2.14/lb. average cost<br />
of cotton last month.<br />
New Crop Supply<br />
While the total 2011–12 production number remains to be seen, the general consensus<br />
is global production will be at least 120 million bales, some 5 million bales more<br />
cotton than the 2010–11 market year. Obviously the large unknowns are the 3<br />
biggest producers – China, India and the US – however generally speaking, the world<br />
will produce more cotton due to larger crops in Australia, Brasil and Pakistan, and<br />
improving yield technology in India.<br />
Export Sales<br />
We have now had 11 consecutive weeks of negative export sales reports confirming<br />
ongoing concerns that demand destruction is still prevalent. Looking at US export<br />
sales, 5.4 million bales of 2011–12 (new crop) have already been committed for export.<br />
If you consider that the US started this current crop marketing year with 21 mb of<br />
supply (18.1 mb production + 2.95 mb beginning stocks), less the 15.4 mb already<br />
committed and the 3.8 mb to be consumed domestically, you can see how stocks are<br />
tight. Furthermore, from this 1.8 mb stock number, if you consider that 5.4 mb of new<br />
crop have already been sold, some for August shipment, you can see how quickly the<br />
US can climb into negative stocks – almost making a case for the need for sale contract<br />
cancellations.<br />
New York cotton futures<br />
Source: Queensland Cotton<br />
US cents/lb<br />
205<br />
190<br />
175<br />
160<br />
145<br />
130<br />
115<br />
100<br />
85<br />
70<br />
55<br />
40<br />
2009 2010<br />
Australian dollar vs US dollar<br />
$AUD vs $USD<br />
Source: Queensland Cotton<br />
1.1<br />
1.05<br />
1<br />
0.95<br />
0.9<br />
0.85<br />
0.8<br />
0.75<br />
0.7<br />
0.65<br />
2009 2010<br />
From the field to t<br />
Queensland Cotto<br />
Queensland Cotton has the longest supply
World COMModity Watch<br />
Demand<br />
Despite ongoing demand destruction, global consumption numbers year-on-year<br />
are still positive, with USDA estimating the world to consume 118.95 million bales<br />
of cotton, up from 115.51 mb in the 2010–11 marketing year. This number will be<br />
impacted greatly by macro-conditions in China and its GDP, and the textile industry in<br />
both China and Bangladesh, assuming it picks up from current conditions. Mills are<br />
reportedly still sitting on reasonably high levels of high-price cotton stocks. As a result<br />
of ongoing demand destruction, value in basis has eroded, as shown in the movements<br />
of the A Index. Current crop A Index has been withdrawn as there are only 3 growths<br />
available for offer.<br />
China<br />
Planting of cotton in China is winding<br />
up and conditions have been generally<br />
favourable. Crop size in China is not<br />
forecast to change dramatically year-onyear,<br />
and remains estimated at 33 million<br />
bales. Conditions in Northern Xinjiang<br />
(largest producing region in china –<br />
approx 25% of total production) have<br />
been generally favourable since planting<br />
(April/May). Although slightly cooler than<br />
desirable, at this stage it is not forecast to<br />
impact yield. The crop along the Yangtze<br />
River is currently receiving heavy rainfall<br />
which is forecast to continue for the next<br />
week or so. Whilst mostly welcomed,<br />
fears of torrential downpours may cause<br />
landslides, presenting a threat to the<br />
cotton that has been planted in this area.<br />
Australian cotton price*<br />
$AUD per bale<br />
Source: Queensland Cotton<br />
950<br />
900<br />
850<br />
800<br />
750<br />
700<br />
650<br />
600<br />
550<br />
500<br />
450<br />
400<br />
350<br />
2009 2010<br />
Australian basis*<br />
US cents/lb<br />
Source: Queensland Cotton<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
-2<br />
-4<br />
-6<br />
-8<br />
-10<br />
-12<br />
2009 2010<br />
India<br />
Planting in India is being accelerated by<br />
the prospects of monsoonal rains. To date,<br />
over 2 million hectares have been planted,<br />
approx 40% more than this time last year.<br />
Year-on-year, the Indian crop is expected<br />
to increase dramatically to an estimated<br />
27 million bales (up from USDA’s 24 mb<br />
in 2010–11). Crops are not yet effected by<br />
monsoon, and is providing a good start to<br />
the crop.<br />
Indian Government<br />
Export Policy<br />
The Indian Government finally announced<br />
last week they will be releasing an<br />
additional 1 million bales of Indian<br />
cotton to the export market. Timing of<br />
this export registration process remains<br />
unannounced, however there are reports<br />
of Indian shippers already making offers<br />
in the market.<br />
* Ex-gin price bids and basis for<br />
middling 1 1/8 inch cotton<br />
he shirt you wear,<br />
n is at every step.<br />
chain in the Australian cotton industry.<br />
55 Wyandra Street, Newstead<br />
Queensland Australia 4006,<br />
Tel: 61 7 3250 3300<br />
Fax: 61 7 3852 1600
marketing<br />
The World Cotton Market<br />
By Michael Edwards, Cotton Outlook<br />
The period since we last contributed<br />
to The Australian Cottongrower, in<br />
late March, has seen a rapid deterioration<br />
in trading conditions on the international<br />
raw cotton market. A glance at the<br />
accompanying graph illustrates the astonishing<br />
speed with which prices have fallen.<br />
From the all-time high of 243.65 cents<br />
per lb attained on March 8, the 2010–11<br />
Cotlook A Index has collapsed to the mid-<br />
160’s at the time of writing.<br />
The loss of roughly one third of the<br />
value of the Index has coincided with a<br />
‘perfect storm’ of negative influences: resale<br />
of existing contracts (including some<br />
of Australian cotton) to trade sellers, virtual<br />
paralysis of demand for both raw cotton<br />
and cotton yarn, building stocks of unsold<br />
cotton yarn, growing financial pressures<br />
on some spinning mills, and fears for the<br />
integrity of existing, high-priced raw cotton<br />
sales contracts.<br />
Of course, few observers of the market<br />
anticipated that prices above two dollars<br />
would be sustainable for long. But the<br />
speed of the downturn was spectacular,<br />
FIGURE 1: A Index and July 11 New York<br />
and the almost total absence of demand<br />
as the market has moved lower during<br />
April and May has also taken many by<br />
Cargill’s Cotton Division –<br />
specialising in buying cotton bales<br />
Phil Sloan<br />
PO Box 1203<br />
GOONDIWINDI Qld 4390<br />
Ph: (07) 4671 0222<br />
Fax: (07) 4671 3833<br />
AGENTS:<br />
Pete Johnson<br />
Left Field Solutions<br />
Mob: 0409 893 139<br />
Paul Kelly<br />
Moree Real Estate<br />
Moree<br />
Ph: (02) 6751 1100<br />
David Dugan<br />
Trangie<br />
Ph: (02) 6888 7122<br />
Roger McCumstie<br />
Brisbane<br />
Ph: (07) 3367 2629<br />
cotton_aust@cargill.com<br />
www.cargill.com.au<br />
Specialists in the<br />
Sale and Valuation<br />
of Rural Properties<br />
• Rural Properties • Cargill Cotton Agents<br />
• Town Sales<br />
• Registered Valuers<br />
• Property Management • Auctions<br />
• Clearing Sales<br />
MOREE REAL ESTATE<br />
www.moreerealestate.com.au<br />
Phone: 02 7651 1100<br />
Fax: 02 6751 1766<br />
After Hours:<br />
Paul Kelly 0428 281 428<br />
Cliff Brown 02 6752 3970<br />
Allan Gobbert 0428 523 375<br />
30 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
marketing<br />
FIGURE 2: Apparent changes in world stocks<br />
surprise. Given the scale of the decline, it<br />
seems probable that it is by now not the<br />
absolute level of prices per se that is the<br />
principal factor behind the current hiatus<br />
in demand, but rather the sudden absence<br />
of a stable relationship between raw cotton<br />
replacement costs and cotton yarn selling<br />
rates.<br />
As prices have weakened progressively<br />
in recent weeks, buying confidence has<br />
deserted prospective customers for cotton<br />
yarn. Many spinners – especially those<br />
who bought (or fixed on-call purchases)<br />
at the top of the market, have thus been<br />
placed in the invidious position of holding<br />
high-priced raw cotton stocks during a period<br />
in which the prices obtainable for cotton<br />
yarn have been progressively revised<br />
downward, and demand has all but disappeared.<br />
The exceptional behaviour of cotton<br />
prices over the past several months has<br />
meant that weavers and knitters have been<br />
<strong>study</strong>ing the international market as never<br />
before. They will not have been unaware<br />
of the disparity between the prices quoted<br />
for cotton for what remains of the 2010–<br />
11 crops, and those for new crop cotton,<br />
available from the main Northern Hemisphere<br />
crops, from around October/November<br />
onward. Although much reduced,<br />
at the time of writing the July/December<br />
spread in New York still amounts to a not<br />
insubstantial 23.00 cents per lb or so,<br />
while the difference between the Cotlook<br />
Current and Forward Indices is closer to<br />
20.00 cents. The transition between the<br />
two seasons – which is far from complete<br />
– is proving every bit as hazardous as<br />
many had feared.<br />
Thus, in recent weeks, contract performance<br />
has clearly displaced the generation<br />
of new sales as the international<br />
trade’s paramount priority. The integrity<br />
of some two-dollar plus contracts is now<br />
clearly in jeopardy, prompting the International<br />
Cotton Association to issue a<br />
circular in late May, reminding contracting<br />
parties of their obligations, and of the<br />
crucial importance of contract sanctity to<br />
the longer-term stability of the world cotton<br />
market.<br />
Given the immediate difficulties facing<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 31
marketing<br />
the various market participants, the supply<br />
and demand outlook for next season<br />
has perhaps received less attention than<br />
might otherwise have been the case.<br />
Cotton Outlook’s figures continue to indicate<br />
that world cotton production will<br />
set a new record in 2011–12, surpassing<br />
27,000,000 tonnes for the first time<br />
in history. The United States Department<br />
of Agriculture’s initial forecast, released on<br />
May 11, takes a broadly similar view.<br />
That cotton producers around the world<br />
should have responded positively to record<br />
high prices was of course predictable. But<br />
planting is not yet complete in the Northern<br />
Hemisphere, and nature may yet have<br />
a part to play in determining the season’s<br />
eventual output. In the United States, the<br />
weather has already conspired to dispel<br />
thoughts of a major expansion of output.<br />
At the time of writing, conditions in West<br />
Texas dryland areas remain far too dry,<br />
whereas in the Mississippi Delta, the impact<br />
on cotton of the disastrous flooding<br />
that occurred in late April is still being assessed.<br />
USDA’s initial view is that output<br />
will be of similar proportions to last season.<br />
But if export commitments for next season<br />
are taken into account, as well as the needs<br />
of the domestic spinning industry, roughly<br />
half of that crop is already sold.<br />
On the demand side, we take the admittedly<br />
optimistic view that an easier<br />
supply position, accompanied by a return<br />
of some measure of stability to both<br />
raw cotton and cotton yarn markets, will<br />
allow spinning activity to regain momentum<br />
during 2011–12. Our current forecast<br />
of world consumption also implies a<br />
new record next season, though at around<br />
26,350,000 tonnes, the figure is not dramatically<br />
higher than the levels estimated<br />
immediately prior to the financial crisis of<br />
2008–09.<br />
Our current figures indicate only a<br />
partial net recovery of world stocks next<br />
season, equivalent to less than one third<br />
of the volume we estimate will have been<br />
added during the 2009–10 and 2010–11<br />
campaigns.<br />
A setback to production in one or more<br />
major producing countries could radically<br />
alter that picture, with potentially bullish<br />
consequences.<br />
What is fair value for the<br />
2011–12 cotton crop?<br />
It is, perhaps, a question many growers<br />
have asked themselves more than<br />
once this year, and which still remains<br />
unanswered for some. This is not surprising<br />
given 2010–11 pricing action and the<br />
mix of complex factors that impact prices<br />
offered to Australian farmers today.<br />
One can become easily confused with<br />
the market’s volatility. Sensitivity to both<br />
market fundamentals and outside influences<br />
can result in no action while waiting<br />
for a clear market signal or pricing at<br />
lower levels. With such volatility, it is more<br />
important to stay focused on the key factors<br />
that you feel will drive the price direction<br />
and ensure your market intelligence is<br />
right and timely.<br />
When you consider the majority of Australian<br />
growers sell in AUD/bale, they are<br />
knowingly or unknowingly accepting the<br />
futures, basis and currency levels offered<br />
in the market that day. Or in other words,<br />
they accept the AUD/bale price is fair<br />
value. So, in an attempt to answer ‘what<br />
is fair value’ we will consider the outlook<br />
for basis, futures and currency given the<br />
current market outlook and identify a short<br />
term price target.<br />
Basis<br />
Basis, in its simplest definition is ‘a reflection<br />
of demand’. Although its weighting<br />
is currently less than 10 per cent of<br />
By Cambel Ball, IMAC Ltd<br />
the overall AUD/bale price, it cannot be<br />
directly distorted by speculators, and is<br />
instead directly determined by industry<br />
participants (merchants and mill demand).<br />
It is therefore a window into the physical<br />
business being undertaken each day and<br />
also the trade’s outlook into the future and<br />
should be considered alongside the futures<br />
market when forming a market view.<br />
Although basis does not have the volatility<br />
of futures (and currency), which is<br />
welcomed in today’s market, it can, over<br />
time strengthen or soften according to<br />
market demand, and gains and losses can<br />
be large. The chart below represents the<br />
Australian indicative basis versus May-12<br />
futures for the previous 12 months.<br />
Clearly the 2012 basis firmed when<br />
mill buying activity peaked in February/<br />
March 2011 as forward cover was sought<br />
to avoid the same lack of supply and high<br />
prices occurring for a possible second<br />
time. While the bidding basis peaked at<br />
around 900–1000 points on May-12 (or<br />
about AUD$50.00/bale) it has since been<br />
pressured lower as mill demand has basically<br />
ceased.<br />
As mill demand came to a standstill in<br />
April, merchants began to encounter counterparty<br />
risk as futures collapsed, followed<br />
by concerns over selling remaining stocks<br />
on hand in a falling market. At the time of<br />
writing the bidding basis level appears to<br />
FIGURE 1: Australian Quoted Basis and Cash Prices<br />
32 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
3100% Australian Cotton<br />
3100% Australian Owned<br />
Wee Waa Trangie Moree Goondiwindi Toowoomba<br />
Ph: 02 6790 3000 Ph: 02 6888 9611 Ph: 02 6752 5599 Ph: 07 4671 6900 Ph: 07 4631 6100<br />
Fax: 02 6795 4036 Fax: 02 6888 9678 Fax: 02 6752 5357 Fax: 07 4671 6999 Fax: 07 4631 6190<br />
www.namoicotton.com.au<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 33
marketing<br />
have consolidated for the moment around<br />
300–400 on May-12 but had reached<br />
‘evens’ May-12, and in the process wiping<br />
all the AUD$50.00/bale basis gains since<br />
March 2011.<br />
The outlook for basis in the longer term<br />
is mixed as the northern hemisphere crop<br />
is only just getting established and, like the<br />
past year, much can happen to world crops<br />
in the late third and early fourth quarters.<br />
On the other hand current mill demand is<br />
virtually non-existent and mill managers<br />
are clearly pessimistic about the short term<br />
outlook. But with the world estimated to<br />
produce a record crop of 123.77 million<br />
bales for the year ahead, about 9.5 million<br />
bales more than the current season, we<br />
expect the basis to track back to historical<br />
levels.<br />
That is not to say that basis cannot<br />
rally. Today US merchants are concerned<br />
about not being able to supply high grades<br />
against sales made to date, let alone offering<br />
additional high grades. With potentially<br />
no more US high grades being offered,<br />
mills will turn to Australia, West African,<br />
Uzbekistan and India with no guarantees<br />
that weather, strikes or government action<br />
will not being repeated again this year.<br />
This is particularly true for India where<br />
regular government intervention means<br />
merchants and mills will have to price in<br />
a risk discount.<br />
Even when we take into account that<br />
mills need to cover a significant amount<br />
of cotton for later this year, this will more<br />
than likely just lead to a short term basis<br />
spike. In addition, Australian merchants<br />
for the first time in a number of seasons<br />
will have carryover stocks to meet forward<br />
demand, while significant hedging costs<br />
will need to be factored into the basis levels<br />
offered. Given this, any opportunity<br />
to lock in a basis close to or above 750<br />
on May-12 should be considered, unless<br />
you feel global ending stocks are over estimated<br />
today.<br />
Futures<br />
As much as basis levels are directly determined<br />
by merchants and mills, the recent<br />
rally in futures has indirectly impacted<br />
basis levels, particularly foreign basis levels<br />
(including Australia) as the futures rally has<br />
been largely due to the current crop issues<br />
in the US.<br />
Since February, May-12 futures have<br />
traded within a large range from 105.00c/<br />
lb to 125.00c/lb or around AUD$100/<br />
bale – which has been reflected in cash bidding<br />
levels peaking at around AUD$660<br />
and bottoming closer to AUD$560. But it<br />
has been Dec-11 where IMAC has focused<br />
its attention given it has the greater liquidity<br />
which allows it to push and pull May-<br />
12 for the time being. Dec-11 during this<br />
time has traded in a wider range between<br />
113.00c/lb and 144.00c/lb or around<br />
AUD$150/bale.<br />
Given Dec-11 has traded in a wide ranging,<br />
mildly bullish channel, it indicates that<br />
it is too early to assume the 2011–12 crop<br />
will reach or exceed 123.77 million bales.<br />
Additionally it is likely the US will run out of<br />
bales at some point in September and new<br />
crop issues are already being witnessed.<br />
Texas and Georgia, which represent about<br />
60 percent of the planted acreage in the<br />
US, currently have 81 per cent and 55 per<br />
cent of their states respectively classed as<br />
being in extreme drought. If both states do<br />
not see significant rain before June 30, US<br />
crop estimates will have to be scaled back<br />
yet again.<br />
Worst case, the US crop could fall below<br />
16.0 million bales and possibly as low<br />
as 15.0 million bales which would at least<br />
support the market around current levels,<br />
if not propel the market higher. To offset<br />
any shortage in the US will be a smaller<br />
foreign production gap estimated at 8.4<br />
million bales for the 2011–12-season.<br />
This indicates that outside of the US, global<br />
crops are large when you consider the<br />
2009–10 season had a foreign production<br />
gap of 25.75 million bales.<br />
For the moment the market will remain<br />
focused on the US crop as we enter the<br />
critical crop establishment stage ahead of<br />
the June 30 USDA Planted Acreage Report.<br />
Thereafter, futures will require additional<br />
bullish news to maintain any upside<br />
momentum and the focus will turn to the<br />
progress of foreign crops and signs of global<br />
consumption.<br />
Additional bullish news may not necessarily<br />
come from the cotton world. Outside<br />
commodities such as corn are likely to offer<br />
broad support to agricultural commodities<br />
given the US’s historically low ending<br />
stocks while managed money currently favours<br />
commodities.<br />
We need to be aware that managed<br />
money flows can abruptly pull money out<br />
of cotton as testified by Goldman Sachs’<br />
recent efforts to reduce exposure in commodities.<br />
At the same time we have the<br />
ongoing European debt and US growth<br />
concerns keeping investors highly cautious.<br />
So if Dec-11 nears 140.00c/lb,<br />
IMAC would consider hedging May-12 futures<br />
at the corresponding level given the<br />
current market outlook and the inability of<br />
Dec-11 to hold these levels previously.<br />
Currency<br />
Our focus when considering the AUD<br />
direction has been largely driven by our<br />
view of the USD, in particular the USD<br />
Index (a measure of the value of the USD<br />
relative to a basket of foreign currencies).<br />
Australia has the highest interest rates in<br />
any of the G10 nations, and will continue<br />
to attract investors. US interest rates, on<br />
the other hand, are forecast to remain<br />
near-zero as ‘quantitative easing’ (money<br />
printing) can be expected to continue for<br />
an extended period.<br />
With US public debt at 14.5 trillion dol-<br />
34 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
marketing<br />
FIGURE 2: USD Index<br />
lars (growing by about 1.7 trillion dollars<br />
annually) and household debt measuring<br />
11.5 trillion dollars, the US government<br />
and Federal Reserve are running out of<br />
options. The most desirable course of<br />
action would be economic growth, from<br />
which debt could be serviced and eventually<br />
be repaid. But the US economy is<br />
moribund and it currently takes over six<br />
dollars of new credit (= debt) to create one<br />
dollar of GDP.<br />
Another option would be for the US to<br />
default on some treasury debt by forcing<br />
investors to take a ‘haircut’. This is not a<br />
viable option either as the US is too proud<br />
to join the ranks of Argentina and Greece.<br />
This leaves only the third option, which<br />
is the same we have been seeing in years<br />
past, namely to print money and to engineer<br />
a controlled devaluation of the US<br />
dollar. Since the US dollar is the world’s<br />
reserve currency and its counterpart, the<br />
Euro, is also in a state of disarray, the Federal<br />
Reserve has so far managed to let the<br />
US dollar sink in an orderly manner. Currencies<br />
with better fundamentals, such as<br />
the Swiss Franc, the Singapore Dollar, the<br />
Brazilian Real and the Australian Dollar<br />
have become attractive alternatives to the<br />
US dollar and the Euro, and this is likely to<br />
continue in the future.<br />
Conclusion<br />
If we consider only the period from February,<br />
then the average value of Australian<br />
2012 crop has been just under AUD$600/<br />
bale. But we should not confuse average<br />
value with fair value. After considering<br />
each pricing component we can conclude<br />
that basis and currency levels are not likely<br />
to offer long term upside pricing opportunities<br />
given the current market outlook.<br />
It is more likely they will offer short<br />
term opportunities that are not likely to<br />
last for extended periods. So futures offer<br />
the greatest opportunity for upside pricing<br />
but are also subject to the greatest volatility<br />
and have a large weighting of the overall<br />
AUD/bale price.<br />
From a mathematical point of view, if<br />
Dec-11 moves into the 135.00-140.00c/<br />
lb range and assuming a 15.00c/lb<br />
spread to May-12 (125.00c/lb), and a<br />
basis around 300 on, and spot currency<br />
at around 1.0650 and forwards at -450<br />
points (1.020 delivered May 2012),<br />
fair value equates to AUD$620/bale to<br />
AUD$630/bale. But fair value also depends<br />
on your current hedge position,<br />
budgeted levels and your attitude to risk.<br />
In summary, ensure you have access to<br />
a well researched market view that is also<br />
able to change as market factors change,<br />
consider in advance all hedging strategies<br />
and consider strategies that take advantage<br />
of market volatility. The alternative<br />
to AUD/bale hedging is to hedge each<br />
pricing component separately (and often<br />
at different times) which has often been<br />
viewed as a higher risk hedging strategy.<br />
In reality, hedging each component separately<br />
reduces your exposure to the market<br />
and your dependence on all three components<br />
aligning at the same time. But how<br />
you hedge each leg is the risk which often<br />
deters growers and where education and<br />
expert advice is required.<br />
The above report is IMAC’s opinion and for<br />
general advice only. IMAC does not take any<br />
responsibility for its accuracy or otherwise. For<br />
specific advice or any queries on any of the above<br />
please contact Cambel Ball at IMAC on<br />
0407 645 675 or cambel@imacqld.com.au<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 35
Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />
Quarantine treatments on the<br />
physical properties of cotton – Part 2<br />
By Marinus H.J van der Sluijs 1<br />
In Part 1 of this <strong>study</strong>, published in a previous edition of The<br />
Australian Cotton Grower we showed that the sanitary treatments<br />
prescribed by AQIS do have an effect on the quality of<br />
both Upland and Extra Long Staple (ELS) cotton lint. The fumigation<br />
treatments by either ethylene oxide or methyl bromide<br />
had little or no significant effect on the physical properties of the<br />
cotton fibre.<br />
But gamma irradiation, even at the lower dosages (21 and 29<br />
kGray), did have an effect on the physical properties of the fibre,<br />
with these effects becoming more apparent and significant as the<br />
dosage strength increased (57 and 74 kGy). Results showed that<br />
the physical fibre properties of the cotton such as strength, elongation,<br />
length uniformity, short fibre and to a lesser extent length<br />
and colour are affected by gamma irradiation.<br />
In Part 2 of this <strong>study</strong> we will report on what the effects are<br />
of gamma irradiation on the textile processing performance of<br />
cotton lint.<br />
Yarn Production<br />
In order to determine textile performance of the cotton samples,<br />
a hybrid system was used which consists of a re-furbished<br />
‘Shirley’ miniature spinning plant manufactured by the Platt Company<br />
of the UK. This system allows for the processing of small<br />
quantities of fibre and consists of a miniature card and draw frame<br />
to produce slivers, which are then transferred to a full-scale spinning<br />
system for further processing through a further draw frame<br />
passage and the production of roving prior to spinning. Draft and<br />
twist was optimised for each sample to deliver a 20 Tex (30 Ne)<br />
FIGURE 1: Yarn strength of the untreated (NT)<br />
and treated cotton<br />
FIGURE 2: Yarn elongation of the untreated<br />
(NT) and treated cotton<br />
carded yarn with a twist factor of αe 3.7 (792 turns per metre).<br />
One yarn bobbin per irradiation dosage was tested for quality parameters.<br />
Spun yarns were conditioned under standard laboratory conditions<br />
for 24 hours and tested for linear density (count) and twist.<br />
Evenness, hairiness and imperfections were determined using an<br />
Uster Technologies 4-SX Evenness tester. Tensile properties, such<br />
as yarn strength and elongation, were determined using the Uster<br />
Technologies Tensorapid 3. The average results of these tests are<br />
shown in the forthcoming figures with error bars representing<br />
one standard deviation giving an indication of the variation in the<br />
samples.<br />
Yarn RESULTS<br />
There were no real significant differences in the evenness and<br />
imperfection values between the untreated and treated fibre samples<br />
and so these are not reported. But as can be seen in Figure<br />
1, the yarn strength significantly decreases as the irradiation dosage<br />
strength increases, with the results typically following the fibre<br />
strength and elongation results.<br />
The yarn strength, for both the Upland and ELS cotton, did not<br />
reduce significantly from the untreated (NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated<br />
cotton. But there was a significant reduction in yarn strength<br />
with an irradiation dosage of 29 kGy. In the case of the Upland<br />
cotton the yarn strength reduced by almost 5 cN/tex, from the<br />
untreated yarn to 10.8 cN/tex.<br />
This yarn strength would make this yarn impossible to process<br />
into fabric by the weaving and also the knitting process. With an<br />
Ginning & Fibre Quality<br />
proudly brought to you with the support of…<br />
A tradition of service since 1849<br />
36 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />
irradiation dosage of 57 and 74 kGy the yarn strength decreased<br />
even further to below 10 cN/tex. In the case of the ELS cotton the<br />
yarn strength reduced by almost 6.5 cN/tex from the untreated<br />
yarn to 18.7cN/tex. This yarn strength would make processing of<br />
fabric on high speed weaving impossible. The yarn strength was<br />
further reduced to 14.8 cN/tex with an irradiation dosage of 57<br />
kGy and 74 kGy.<br />
As can be seen in Figure 2, this decrease in yarn strength corresponded<br />
with a gradual decrease in yarn elongation. As was the<br />
case with the yarn strength there was no significant difference in<br />
yarn elongation between the untreated Upland and ELS cotton<br />
and the 21 kGy radiated cotton. But there was a significant reduction<br />
in yarn elongation between the untreated Upland and ELS<br />
cotton and the 29 kGy irradiated cotton.<br />
In the case of the Upland cotton the yarn elongation dropped<br />
from 6.6 per cent to 5.0 per cent with a dosage of 57 kGy<br />
providing similar results. A dosage of 74 kGy almost reduced the<br />
yarn elongation by half when compared to the untreated cotton<br />
(6.6 per cent to 3.7 per cent). In the case of the ELS cotton the<br />
yarn elongation dropped from 6.2 per cent to 5.4 per cent with<br />
a dosage of 29 kGy with a dosage of 57 kGy providing similar<br />
results. A dosage of 74 kGy reduced the yarn elongation by 1.5<br />
per cent when compared to the untreated cotton (6.2 per cent to<br />
4.8 per cent).<br />
This reduction in yarn elongation together with the loss in yarn<br />
strength will make it virtually impossible to convert these yarns<br />
into fabrics without processing performance and subsequent quality<br />
issues.<br />
Fabric Production<br />
To determine the processing performance and subsequent quality,<br />
the yarns were waxed and wound using a Schlafhorst 238 RM<br />
winder. Wound yarns were then knitted on a Lawson Hemphill<br />
25.4cm (10 inch) F.A.K. circular knitting machine, using a cover<br />
factor of 1.37 to produce a fabric weight of 153 g/m 2 . The resultant<br />
knitted fabric was then scoured and dyed with Cibacron red<br />
LS6G (1 per cent) reactive dye.<br />
Fabric RESULTS<br />
The dyed fabric was conditioned under standard laboratory conditions<br />
for 24 hours and tested for mass per unit area and for fabric<br />
strength by determining the bursting strength in kilopascal (kPa).<br />
As can be seen in Figure 3, the fabric bursting strength significantly<br />
decreases as the dosage strength increases, indicating that<br />
the fabric strength decreases as the irradiation dosages increases;<br />
typically following the yarn strength results in Figure 1. Fabrics<br />
Figure 3: Fabric Bursting Strength of the<br />
untreated (NT) and treated cotton<br />
A tradition of<br />
service since 1849<br />
Cotton Trader -<br />
Matthew Bradd<br />
Ecom Commodities Pty Ltd<br />
GPO Box 29<br />
Sydney NSW 2001<br />
02 9223 3631<br />
Agents<br />
Namoi, Gwydir, Riverina,<br />
MacIntryre Valley and<br />
Macquarie Valley<br />
Steve Dalton, Luke Kirkby<br />
and Jean Cottam<br />
AgVantage Commodities Pty Ltd<br />
P 02 6792 2962<br />
Darling Downs<br />
Simon Donaldson<br />
Gebar Farming<br />
P 0428 636 924<br />
St George & Dirranbandi<br />
Kelvin Bella<br />
OUR-TEK PTY LTD<br />
P 0428 717 284<br />
Central Queensland<br />
& Dawson - Callide<br />
Don Cooper<br />
Cooper Consulting<br />
P 0428 794 698<br />
www.ecomtrading.com<br />
www.ecomcommodities.com.au<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 37
Ginning & Fibre Quality Series<br />
became significantly weaker with each irradiation dosage. In the<br />
case of Upland cotton there was a decrease in fabric strength of<br />
163 kPa from the untreated (NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated cotton.<br />
The fabric strength decreased by a further 90 kPa with a 29<br />
kGy dosage and a further 107 kPa with a 57 kGy dosage.<br />
There was a slight reduction in fabric strength between the 57<br />
and 74 kGy irradiated cotton. In the case of the ELS cotton, there<br />
was a decrease in fabric strength of 170 kPa from the untreated<br />
(NT) and the 21 kGy irradiated cotton. The fabric strength decreased<br />
by a further 94 kPa with a 29 kGy dosage, a further 65<br />
kPa with a 57 kGy dosage and a further 60 kPa with a 74 kGy<br />
dosage.<br />
Conclusion<br />
As highlighted in Part 1 of this <strong>study</strong>, fumigation treatments by<br />
either ethylene oxide or methyl bromide have little or no significant<br />
effect on the physical properties of cotton fibre. But gamma<br />
irradiation does have an effect on the physical properties of the<br />
fibre, with these effects becoming more apparent and significant<br />
as the dosage strength increases.<br />
In Part 2 of this <strong>study</strong> we looked at what affect the various dosages<br />
of gamma irradiation applied to the cotton fibre has on its<br />
textile processing performance. The yarn results show that the<br />
various irradiation dosages did not have a significant impact on the<br />
evenness and imperfection values.<br />
But gamma irradiation had a significant effect on the yarn<br />
strength and elongation results of both the Upland and ELS cotton,<br />
with the results typically following the fibre strength and elongation<br />
results reported in Part 1. The fabric results also show that<br />
gamma irradiation does have a significant effect on fabric strength<br />
for both the Upland and ELS cotton, with the results typically following<br />
the yarn strength results.<br />
The message from these two studies is quite clear; if any cotton<br />
lint needs to be imported into Australia, for whatever reason, one<br />
must insist on chemical (fumigation) by either ethylene oxide or<br />
methyl bromide as gamma irradiation, even at low dosages, severely<br />
damages the physical properties of cotton lint. These physical<br />
damages can cause major issues if the cotton lint is to be used<br />
either to calibrate fibre testing instruments, used to benchmark<br />
Australian cotton or for commercial processing.<br />
1<br />
CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering, Geelong.<br />
Acknowledgements: The author gratefully acknowledges the financial<br />
support of the Cotton Research and Development Corporation and CSIRO<br />
Materials Science and Engineering. He also acknowledges the assistance<br />
of Fred Horne, Mark Freijah, Phil Henry, Peter Herwig and<br />
Colin Brackley for processing the fibre through to fabric.<br />
38 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
CLASSIC TRACTOR TALES<br />
The 1930s<br />
By Ian M. Johnston<br />
THE TROUBLED WORLD<br />
Planet Earth was a very disturbed place<br />
in the 1930s. During the early part of the<br />
decade, as the financial world struggled<br />
to pull itself out of The Great Depression,<br />
shocked and impoverished Wall Street<br />
bankers continued leaping out of skyscraper<br />
windows. In the meantime, Europe<br />
watched with trepidation as Adolf Hitler<br />
strutted around waving Mein Kampf,<br />
whilst the rotund Herrman Wilhelm Goering<br />
assembled his legions of ‘sporting’<br />
Messerschmitt pilots. Prime Minister Neville<br />
Chamberlain returned to London from<br />
Germany saying ‘There will be peace<br />
in our time’. (Oh well, that’ll be all right<br />
then!!)<br />
General Franco pre-empted World War<br />
II by plunging Spain into a horrendous<br />
civil war. Marshal Joseph Stalin held social<br />
shooting parties throughout the USSR<br />
most weekends – his targets being anyone<br />
who happened to oppose his maniacal<br />
iron fisted doctrine. Japanese General<br />
Tojo raped, burned and pillaged Manchuria,<br />
whilst he sipped green tea.<br />
Yes, there was no shortage of ‘exciting’<br />
material for the media during the 1930s!<br />
But as always, no matter what mayhem<br />
the world’s political leaders could dream<br />
up, the good old farmers could be relied<br />
upon to continue providing food and fibre.<br />
What would the world do without them?<br />
So did anything good emerge during the<br />
tumultuous 1930s? (I am tempted to say<br />
‘me’ – but I won’t. Modesty, you know). A<br />
new generation of tractors was unveiled,<br />
which from an engineering point of view,<br />
elevated agricultural tractors for the first<br />
time into becoming thoroughly reliable<br />
and capable units. They replaced the cantankerous<br />
and often dangerous machinery<br />
of the 1920s. (But to be fair, it has to be<br />
remembered that during the 1920s, tractors<br />
had only been around for just over two<br />
decades).<br />
HENRY’S TOOL BOXES<br />
Even Henry Ford, in the interests of<br />
safety, extended the rear mudguards of his<br />
Fordsons down to nearly ground level in<br />
an endeavour to reduce the tedious habit<br />
of the tractors rearing over backwards,<br />
should the plough strike an immovable object.<br />
Being stubborn by nature, he refused<br />
to acknowledge that there was a problem,<br />
clearly evident to others by the growing<br />
number of Fordson widows. His excuse for<br />
extending the mudguards was to accommodate<br />
a tool box.<br />
The reason why the Fordsons had this<br />
dangerous trait was the design of the phosphor<br />
bronze worm gear in the differential.<br />
Should a plough or other dragged implement<br />
come to a sudden stop, thus putting<br />
an immense load on the drive train, the<br />
tractor tended to climb or wind around<br />
the differential. The hazard was increased<br />
if the implement hitch was located higher<br />
than half way up the differential and particularly<br />
if the tractor was equipped with<br />
steel wheels and lugs.<br />
So maybe Henry’s tool boxes did save<br />
a few lives by acting as a prop if a Fordson<br />
reared. But probably the real problem<br />
was the fact that many tractor drivers of<br />
the 1930s had grown up walking behind<br />
the sweaty rear ends of a horse team and<br />
then were suddenly put into the unyielding<br />
seat of a tractor, without the advantage of<br />
any real training. Exchanging a set of reins<br />
for the complication of things like steering<br />
wheels, clutches and, worse of all, the<br />
complexity of gear changes, could prove a<br />
formidable challenge indeed!<br />
INTERNATIONAL W30<br />
Of all the North American tractors introduced<br />
in the1930s, one of the most<br />
outstanding was International Harvester’s<br />
W30. Considered a medium to heavy<br />
weight, it was an excellent grain farmer<br />
tractor capable of pulling the largest of<br />
the then available broadacre ploughs and<br />
scarifiers. Australian farmers loved it, to<br />
the extent it reputedly outsold all other<br />
similarly powered units.<br />
It should be stated though, the W30<br />
could be quite a handful to drive. The<br />
steering was heavy, as was the clutch, and<br />
selecting gears was not the smoothest of<br />
operations. But it was reliable and its consumption<br />
of low priced kerosene fuel considered<br />
reasonable.<br />
A restored Fordson Model F belonging to Mal Brinkman. Note<br />
the extended rear mudguard with the tool box built into the tail.<br />
Although a 1920s model a few remaining old stock were sold in<br />
1930–31. (Photo IMJ)<br />
A 1936 International W30 (sold under the McCormick-Deering<br />
logo) restored by the author. (Photo IMJ)<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 39
A well presented Allis Chalmers Model U – part of the extensive<br />
Shaw collection at Westbury, Tasmania. (Photo IMJ)<br />
Its four cylinder, 284 cubic inches engine<br />
developed an easy 31 belt hp at a<br />
leisurely 1150 rpm. By today’s standards<br />
1150 rpm is barely above idling speed. But<br />
internal combustion engine development<br />
was still in its early stages in the 1930s<br />
and slow revs in a tractor engine equated<br />
to reliability and a reasonably long life.<br />
Released in 1932, the W30 was originally<br />
coloured an unimaginative dull grey<br />
and featured only a three forward speed<br />
gearbox. Around 1936, a four speed box<br />
was introduced to cater for the higher<br />
speeds being achieved with pneumatic<br />
tyres, now being increasingly demanded<br />
by the more enlightened farmers in place<br />
of the original clattering, teeth jarring and<br />
less efficient steel lugged wheels. At the<br />
same time the colour was changed to International<br />
Red.<br />
Like most tractors, the W30 had a<br />
straight through exhaust pipe. Accordingly<br />
the constant roar of the exhaust note decibels<br />
proved wearisome in the extreme and<br />
indeed detrimental to health in the long<br />
term. In the 1930s ear muffs for tractor<br />
drivers were not contemplated, and if they<br />
had been they would undoubtedly have<br />
been considered sissy!<br />
WHEEL EQUIPMENT<br />
Steel wheels with their aggressive looking<br />
lugs, were still very much the norm,<br />
particularly in the early 1930s. Allis<br />
Chalmers was the first American tractor<br />
manufacturer to promote pneumatic<br />
tyres. In order to convince farmers of the<br />
safety and durability of the tyres, famous<br />
American race car driver Barney Oldfield<br />
was hired to conduct hair raising tractor<br />
race meetings at speedway circuits around<br />
the Midwest grain belts. On September<br />
17, 1933, driving a stock standard Allis<br />
Chalmers Model U, but equipped with<br />
special gears, Oldfield established a world<br />
tractor speed record of 64.28 mph.<br />
As the decade progressed an increasing<br />
number of tractor buyers stipulated pneumatics.<br />
It is a common misconception that<br />
steel lugged wheels must obtain a more<br />
efficient grip when compared with pneumatics.<br />
Well, I mean they look as if they<br />
would, but such is definitely not the case.<br />
The evidence can be found when comparisons<br />
are made of the draw bar pulls and<br />
related speeds of identical tractors fitted<br />
with the different wheel types.<br />
For example a <strong>Case</strong> Model L was<br />
tested, on both pneumatic tyres and steel<br />
lugged wheels, at the world renowned University<br />
of Nebraska Tractor Test Facility in<br />
October 1938. The results indicated that<br />
while the tyred unit showed only a minor<br />
increase in the maximum drawbar pull,<br />
it achieved this at a significantly higher<br />
speed.<br />
In wet sticky clay soils, steel wheels habitually<br />
packed up with clay, often requiring<br />
laborious frequent time wasting stops<br />
to remove the build up using a crowbar.<br />
Also, because of their non-resilient nature,<br />
steel wheels restricted tractor speed to a<br />
maximum of around four mph.<br />
JOHN DEERE MODEL D<br />
Today, Deere and Company remains<br />
the world’s longest established tractor<br />
manufacturer, as a result of never having<br />
succumbed to a corporate take over. Back<br />
in 1939, although not a new model, a<br />
revamped version of the legendary green<br />
and gold John Deere Model D was unveiled.<br />
First released in 1923, the twin cylinder<br />
petrol/kero fuelled Model D had the<br />
longest production run of any tractor and<br />
was not discontinued until 1953. By that<br />
time around 160,000 had been built!<br />
In a break from tradition, the 1939<br />
An excellent example of a John Deere Model D, restored by Brian<br />
Sainsbury, a well known collector in the ACT. (Photo IMJ)<br />
model was restyled by the famous American<br />
vehicle stylist Henry Dreyfuss and<br />
given a pleasing modern appearance. Its<br />
horizontal parallel two cylinders had a cubic<br />
capacity of 501 cubic inches and developed<br />
42.1 belt hp at 900 rpm The 5270<br />
lbs. tractor featured a three forward speed<br />
gear box and a chain driven final drive.<br />
As with all models of John Deere tractors,<br />
the simplicity and economy of their<br />
twin cylinder engines attracted a dedicated<br />
following of farmers, where ever they were<br />
sold. Affectionately they were known as<br />
Johnny Poppers, on account of the distinctive<br />
two cylinder exhaust note.<br />
MASSEY HARRIS 25<br />
Yet another North American tractor<br />
of the 1930s popular in Australia, which<br />
performed with distinction was the Massey<br />
Harris 25, a product of the giant Canadian<br />
tractor and farm machinery manufacturer<br />
of the same name. Modern day tractor<br />
enthusiasts often mistake the 25 for the<br />
smaller, but more frequently seen, Massey<br />
Harris Pacemaker.<br />
Introduced in 1933, the 25 was originally<br />
entitled the MH 3-4 Plough. The big<br />
ohv four cylinder petrol/kero engine had<br />
a capacity of 346 cu. ins. and produced<br />
48.5 belt hp at 1200 rpm This resulted in<br />
a drawbar pull of a respectable 4501 lbs.<br />
at 2.2 mph. It received a styling face lift<br />
and a colour change from green to red in<br />
1938 and was discontinued in 1939.<br />
The Massey Harris 25 excelled over<br />
most of its competitors in the region of<br />
ease of operation. It was actually quite<br />
silky to drive and at the completion of a<br />
12 hour shift an operator would be less<br />
weary than had he been driving almost any<br />
other tractor, including the International<br />
W30 and the John Deere Model D. Notice<br />
I state ‘less’ weary!<br />
40 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
This 1938 Massey Harris 25, equipped with steel wheels, has<br />
been restored by the author. (Photo IMJ)<br />
IN CONCLUSION<br />
In addition to the North American units<br />
mentioned above, there was a bewildering<br />
array of tractors available to Australian<br />
farmers in the 1930s. They came<br />
from Britain. Germany, France, Italy, etc.,<br />
and of course there were the Australian<br />
indigenous tractors including McDonald,<br />
Howard and Ronaldson Tippett.<br />
There were the good, and there were<br />
the not so good, but certainly they were all<br />
better than the models that preceded them<br />
in the 1920s.<br />
Despite the advance of tractor designs,<br />
farming in Australia during the 1930s<br />
plodded on in a manner little changed<br />
from the practices which had persisted<br />
since Federation. But all that was about<br />
to change. World War II was looming over<br />
This fine <strong>Case</strong> Model L is to be found at The Wheatlands Museum,<br />
Warracknabeal, Vic. and is but one of scores of classic tractors on<br />
display. (Photo IMJ)<br />
the horizon, the aftermath of which would<br />
change the face of agriculture irrevocably,<br />
particularly in the areas of farm mechanisation,<br />
irrigation and the results of scientific<br />
crop research.<br />
THE PERFECT GIFT – OR SIMPLY FOR YOURSELF<br />
Ian’s Mystery<br />
Tractor QUIZ<br />
Question: Can you please explain<br />
what I am doing here?<br />
Clue: I am not repairing the steering<br />
box!<br />
Degree of difficulty: Simple!<br />
Answer: See page 56.<br />
Hard cover, 320 pages, liberally<br />
illustrated.<br />
Order your autographed copy of ‘TRACTORS KALASHNIKOVS and GREEN TEA’ now<br />
NAME:<br />
ADDRESS:<br />
TELEPHONE:............................................................<br />
NO. OF COPIES……@ $39.50 each. Cost: $………… Plus postage (total) $ 9.50<br />
TOTAL REMITTANCE: Cheque or postal money order (sorry – no card facility) $…………<br />
Please send order form with remittance to: IAN M. JOHNSTON, PO BOX 322, TUNCURRY, NSW, 2428.<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 41
Is mite pest-resistant cotton<br />
a little closer?<br />
While managing major pests such<br />
as Helicoverpa has been the<br />
most significant focus of cotton<br />
industry R&D in the past 20 years, CSIRO<br />
has also been devoting resources and expertise<br />
towards managing other pests that<br />
affect cotton. One pest that can potentially<br />
decrease yield and cause quality losses<br />
in cotton is the two-spotted spider mite.<br />
Two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus<br />
urticae) affect cotton plants by sucking out<br />
the cellular contents and causing a loss of<br />
plant vigour, photosynthetic capacity and<br />
subsequently reduced yield and poorer<br />
quality fibre.<br />
Spider mites can be difficult to control<br />
with normal pesticide application and<br />
over-reliance on pesticides for their control<br />
has led to pesticide resistance. Widely<br />
adopted genetic traits such as Bt have no<br />
effect on mites or other sucking pests, so<br />
researchers are evaluating other methods<br />
of non-pesticide control.<br />
CSIRO scientist Dr Junji Miyazaki evaluated<br />
a range of cotton varieties and found<br />
that some are much more resistant to<br />
mites. In field experiments, the susceptible<br />
varieties clearly showed distinct bronzing<br />
of leaves as mite populations increased,<br />
while resistant varieties alongside remained<br />
healthy and productive. Junji found that<br />
spider mites took longer to reach maturity<br />
and that fewer females survived on the resistant<br />
varieties.<br />
Importantly, these resistant varieties<br />
Dr Junji Miyazaki.<br />
showed an increase in a naturally-occurring<br />
compound called jasmonic acid, which is<br />
associated with defence responses in many<br />
plants. Resistant varieties tended to show<br />
greater levels of this compound which suggests<br />
it may be involved in defending the<br />
plants against pest population build up.<br />
If breeders could find a way to develop<br />
varieties that incorporate these resistance<br />
characteristics, this may grant growers the<br />
best of both worlds in securing yield as well<br />
as being able to reduce chemical pesticide<br />
use further.<br />
Future work aims to further uncover<br />
how this defence response results in lower<br />
pest damage and to breed cotton that<br />
uses this natural defence response against<br />
mites, as well as to evaluate further varieties<br />
for resistance against other important<br />
pests such as, whiteflies and mirids.<br />
This project was supported with funding by<br />
Cotton Breeding Australia, a joint venture<br />
between CSIRO Plant Industry and Cotton Seed<br />
Distributors Ltd.<br />
More information:<br />
www.csiro.au/people/Junji.Miyazaki.html<br />
www.csiro.au/science/Sustainable-Cotton-<br />
Industry.html<br />
www.csiro.au/places/ACRI.html<br />
Field screening for mite resistance.<br />
42 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Change in cotton production lecturer<br />
Want a Better Built Auger?<br />
In May of this year Brendan Griffiths<br />
took over the role of lecturer in cotton<br />
production at the University of New<br />
England. The previous lecturer Dr John<br />
Stanley has decided to take on a post doctoral<br />
fellowship with the CRC for Spatial<br />
Information, based at UNE.<br />
Brendan has been an agronomist in the<br />
cotton industry for the past 20 years and<br />
has operated as an independent consultant<br />
based in Goondiwindi for the past 12<br />
years. For the past four years he has also<br />
been a PhD student at UNE, with a Cotton<br />
Catchment Communities CRC funded<br />
project looking at high yielding wheats in<br />
the cotton farming system.<br />
Brendan hopes to able to retain the high<br />
standard of presentation of content in the<br />
course by his predecessors, and add value<br />
as a result of years of practical experience<br />
at field level.<br />
The cotton course has been going since<br />
1994 and is the only industry funded<br />
course focussing on cotton production at<br />
the tertiary level. The course has been a<br />
flagship project throughout the three iterations<br />
of the Cotton Catchments Communities<br />
CRC. Not all CRCs embed courses<br />
in their education program, but it is a testimony<br />
to the cotton course that several<br />
other CRCs are now emulating.<br />
Students can <strong>study</strong> at various levels<br />
achieving a diploma in cotton production<br />
at undergraduate level, or at the postgraduate<br />
level, a grad-certificate or even Masters<br />
degree in Agriculture.<br />
This year enrolments have risen sharply<br />
as a result of renewed interest in the cotton<br />
sector. The drought has caused a large<br />
gap in the entry of agronomists and other<br />
young professionals into the industry for<br />
some time.<br />
Brendan believes the role of the course<br />
is to address this skills deficit in the industry<br />
and provide new industry personnel with<br />
the knowledge and skills necessary to hit<br />
the ground running, or to answer some of<br />
the questions raised after a couple of years<br />
working in the industry.<br />
Brendan will be based in Goondiwindi<br />
and will continue his work in the field, adding<br />
value to the course and being able to<br />
answer real questions being faced in the<br />
field.<br />
CAPACITY<br />
UP TO<br />
250 TONNES<br />
For information on the cotton production<br />
subjects Brendan can be contacted at<br />
bgriffi2@une.edu.au.<br />
Brendan Griffiths.<br />
MULTI PURPOSE<br />
W H E E L L O A D E R S<br />
PER HOUR<br />
from the NAME you’ve GROWN to trust<br />
WESTFIELD<br />
Being the leading global auger lengths, diameters and drive styles that<br />
manufacturer for over 50 years we’ve give you more size and capacity options<br />
become pretty good at it.<br />
than any other auger.<br />
Each and every Westfield auger is “Job Available in 4, 8, 10 or 13” diameters<br />
Sized” – engineered, designed and built in lengths from 26 to 111 feet with a<br />
from the ground up so components choice of PTO, engine or electric drives<br />
get heavier and stronger as the auger Why choose Westfield Augers?<br />
gets bigger. That means each and every • 28 years continuous business in<br />
model offers superior performance and Australia<br />
durability which adds to more value • Established dealer network<br />
for you.<br />
• Spare parts supply for new & old<br />
From our smallest to our mighty Westfields<br />
MK130 PLUS, you find you get more What are you waiting for? Call now for<br />
for your money.<br />
your nearest dealer!<br />
And Westfield offers a combination of Visit us online: www.grainaugers.com<br />
WESTFIELD AUGERS<br />
(AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD<br />
Contact Roland Schmelzer on<br />
PH: 07 3878 9338 or free call 1800 635 199<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 43
Assessment of cotton soils essential<br />
A<br />
leading soil scientist has recommended<br />
cotton growers carefully<br />
assess their fields for soil structural<br />
damage after the 2010–11 crop, in preparation<br />
for the large planting in 2011.<br />
Speaking on CSD’s Web on Wednesday<br />
broadcast, Dr Pat Hulme from Sustainable<br />
Soils Management, said many fields across<br />
cotton growing regions had sustained a lot<br />
of damage due to tillage and wheel traffic<br />
in the wetter than normal spring period.<br />
“It was done when the soil was wet so<br />
it’s caused some compaction, but because<br />
of the controlled traffic farming system<br />
we’ve got, the compaction is mainly restricted<br />
to the area underneath the wheel<br />
track while the structure beneath the plant<br />
lines is pretty good,” he said.<br />
Pat said soil pits are a good way of assessing<br />
a whole soil profile, but digging a<br />
smaller trench with a spade was also useful<br />
and the Cotton CRC publication SOILpak<br />
was an excellent reference on how to do<br />
this.<br />
“You need to review in your mind the<br />
functions of each part of the field, or soil<br />
profile. The top of the hill in the plant<br />
line is your seed bed and you want it to<br />
be relatively fine so you get good seed-soil<br />
contact.<br />
“You want the root zone to be a good<br />
medium for root growth to allow water, air<br />
and roots to move in and out to store the<br />
nutrients.<br />
“You want your wheel track areas to act<br />
as a roadway – to support the machinery<br />
so you want that to be compacted, but<br />
ideally you’d like the soil to have enough<br />
holes in it that the roots could still explore<br />
the zone beneath the road way. You want<br />
your soil surface to be able to take in water<br />
– particularly the non-trafficked furrows.”<br />
He noted that If the shoulders of the<br />
hills are compacted then the decision as to<br />
the type of tillage needs to bear in mind a<br />
number of factors.<br />
“The ideal moisture content for tilling<br />
the soil is when it’s slightly dryer than the<br />
plastic limit – where you can roll the soil<br />
into a three mm diameter rod in your hand.<br />
If the soil is really dry, the products of tillage<br />
will be large and you’ll be left with the<br />
challenge of making them into a seed bed.<br />
“It’s also going to depend a lot on how<br />
long until you’re going to be planting your<br />
next crop, and the third thing is to decide<br />
whether you can just live with the compacted<br />
nature of the soil by nursing the next<br />
crop and fixing the problem next year.”<br />
Pat said nursing the crop involves more<br />
Soil scientist Dr Pat Hulme says cotton growers should be assessing the state of their soils<br />
before preparing fields for the 2011 plant.<br />
frequent irrigation than in soils with better<br />
structure, and higher fertiliser rates.<br />
“You’re just walking a tightrope – there’s<br />
less room for error in a compacted soil,”<br />
he said.<br />
Soil tests or a nutrient budget are<br />
important<br />
According to Pat, soil tests or a nutrient<br />
budget are important, particularly for<br />
growers planting cotton on fields that had<br />
crops in last summer.<br />
“I believe it is important to have a history<br />
of soil testing and to use a nutrient<br />
budget to work out, firstly, whether the soil<br />
nutrient levels are adequate, and secondly,<br />
whether you’re supplying sufficient nutrients<br />
to replace the major nutrients that<br />
have been exported by the crops.<br />
“With repeated measurements you can<br />
see the increase or the decline – you can<br />
see if you’re winning or losing,” he said.<br />
For farmers who had fields flooded during<br />
the 2010–11 summer, Pat said they<br />
should not expect major changes in their<br />
soil chemistry apart from some denitrification<br />
– the loss of nitrogen to the atmosphere<br />
under waterlogged conditions.<br />
“The silt that’s deposited during the<br />
flooding process is likely to have nutrients<br />
and it’s likely you could be improving the<br />
soil a little bit – that’s the way a majority of<br />
the soil that we farm in the cotton industry<br />
was built, by deposition by flooding.<br />
“The material that’s being deposited to<br />
form the soil that we farm has a high clay<br />
content because it’s been deposited in the<br />
back plains away from the streams.<br />
“Because of the high clay content, that<br />
soil shrinks and swells, which allows it to<br />
rebuild its structure that is damaged by the<br />
trafficking, but what we’re seeing is that<br />
the structure of the soil beneath the plant<br />
line is generally in good condition.<br />
“The goal for soil management at this<br />
stage would be to have a look, work out<br />
how much or how little tillage needs to be<br />
done, get in and do it early while there’s<br />
still some months to get your seed bed<br />
happening at the top of the bed.”<br />
The SOILpak manual is available from the<br />
NSW Department of Primary Industries website<br />
http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/<br />
resources/soils/guides/soilpak/cotton<br />
Watch the full interview.<br />
http://www.csd.net.au/wow/show/1529<br />
Further Information: Dr Pat Hulme, Sustainable<br />
Soils Management, Warren.<br />
Ph 0268 473367 pat@soilman.com.au<br />
44 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
CottonSafe Guide tops the charts<br />
Delivering farm safety information<br />
directly where it is most needed,<br />
has been the inspiration behind<br />
Cotton Australia’s latest safety initiative,<br />
the CottonSafe Guide wall chart, which<br />
has been mailed out to all cotton growers.<br />
The CottonSafe Guide wall chart has<br />
been styled and designed to go straight up<br />
on the wall in workshops, farm sheds and<br />
lunchrooms, providing a range of occupational<br />
health and safety messages, specifically<br />
targeted to those working in the<br />
cotton industry.<br />
Cotton Australia Regional Manager<br />
James Houlahan says the CottonSafe<br />
Guide wall chart is an important tool to<br />
raise the level of OHS awareness in the<br />
cotton industry, while promoting an improved<br />
safety culture. Production and<br />
distribution of the CottonSafe Guide wall<br />
chart has been assisted by ProVisual.<br />
James says that overall a culture of<br />
safety means giving everyone who works<br />
on cotton farms some ownership over accident<br />
prevention, where everyone from<br />
farm manager to the supervisor and the<br />
newest farm worker accepts that safety is<br />
James Houlahan and Cleave Rogan.<br />
both an individual and a shared responsibility.<br />
James Houlahan says with a national<br />
uniform occupational health and safety<br />
model being introduced by legislation<br />
across all States and Territories from January<br />
1, 2012, Cotton Australia has been<br />
leading the way with a pro-active and targeted<br />
focus on OHS in the cotton industry.<br />
“Under the CottonSafe banner, Cotton<br />
Australia will continue to deliver growers<br />
with up-to-date evidence based guidelines,<br />
tools and other resources like the Cotton-<br />
Safe Guide wall chart to effectively manage<br />
their OHS responsibilities and mitigate potential<br />
injury, legal and financial risks from<br />
poor OHS performance,” James said.<br />
“The CottonSafe Guide wall chart will<br />
fit comfortably alongside a range of practical<br />
tools and resources now in production<br />
by Cotton Australia to help growers and<br />
cotton farm workers manage safety as an<br />
integral part of their farm businesses and<br />
in their day to day work activities.”<br />
The CottonSafe Guide wall chart contains<br />
detailed and reliable information on<br />
OHS risk management, risk assessment<br />
and safe procedures as well as emergency<br />
preparedness. The wall chart also lists<br />
some practical safety tips about working<br />
with tractors, ATV’s, chemicals and<br />
around irrigation pump machinery.<br />
Additional copies of the CottonSafe Guide wall<br />
chart are available by contacting<br />
Cotton Australia on 02 9669 5222.<br />
CHEMICAL ACCREDITATION &<br />
ACDC COURSES<br />
Dalby 29/8, St George 31/8, Dirranbandi 1/9, Toowoomba 11/8,<br />
Mungindi 2/9, Goondiwindi 5/9, Moree 6/9, Narrabri 8/9,<br />
Wee Waa 9/9, Gunnedah 7/10, Warren 29/9, Narromine 27/9,<br />
Trangie 28/9, Biloela 22/7, Theodore 20/7, Emerald 26/7, Moura 21/7<br />
If dates/location do not suit please advise of your<br />
requirements to enable future planning<br />
Accreditation is valid for 5 years – New & Update courses available<br />
Supervision SkILLS COURSE<br />
Moree/Goondiwindi 31/8 & 1/9<br />
Formal management training for managers, supervisors,<br />
leading hands or foremen<br />
Key Topics:<br />
Time Management, Delegation, Establishing people as “People<br />
Managers”, Developing “results-oriented” employees, How to develop<br />
team work, Coaching & Counselling, Disciplining, Praising, Conducting<br />
Staff Appraisals, Occupational Health & Safety, Setting Objectives<br />
In-house courses can be arranged<br />
* Please call for updated information on course schedules *<br />
* Courses can be arranged elsewhere if required *<br />
Inquiries and Bookings:<br />
Geoff Paton 1800 626 681<br />
Countryco Training Pty Ltd<br />
FOR SALE<br />
2010 JOHN DEERE 7760<br />
286/252 hrs, 6 row 40”<br />
Excellent condition<br />
$650,000 plus GST<br />
0401 261 818<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 45
Germinating<br />
ideas<br />
By CSD Extension and Development<br />
Team<br />
In this edition of Germinating Ideas we<br />
examine a few of the key considerations<br />
that influence crop establishment,<br />
and also how we can combat some of the<br />
cotton diseases to maintain good plant<br />
stands by using new seed treatments that<br />
will be available for this coming season.<br />
The 2010–11 season has seen some of<br />
the worst cases of seedling disease and major<br />
diseases of cotton such as Fusarium wilt<br />
and Verticillium wilt. Additionally, cotton<br />
bunchy top was evident in most valleys this<br />
season, with concerns about the potential<br />
for an outbreak of this disorder next season.<br />
There was around eight per cent replant<br />
in the industry this season, across<br />
most valleys. Most of the early season<br />
damage was caused by Rhizoctonia and<br />
Pythium. Black root rot was evident in the<br />
major valleys and caused significant delays<br />
in maturity.<br />
The worst valleys for replant were<br />
the Murrumbidgee at 18 per cent, Hillston<br />
at 11 per cent, Namoi at eight per<br />
cent and the Macquarie at 10 per cent.<br />
This replanting comes at a cost of up to<br />
$120 per hectare and there is not a lot<br />
that can be done, because much of the<br />
disease is brought on by climatic events.<br />
But by having a well prepared seed bed,<br />
proper seeding depth and good soil contact,<br />
the emerging seedling has the best<br />
chance of establishing successfully. It was<br />
a tough start to the season in many of the<br />
cotton valleys and particularly the southern<br />
regions as cool wet conditions existed<br />
at planting and continued into November<br />
and December.<br />
FIGURE 1: Percentage seedling mortality estimated from<br />
commercial cotton crops across NSW and Queensland<br />
Source: Cotton Pathology 2004–09; Allen, Anderson, Lonergan, McNamara, Swan & Smith.<br />
FIGURE 2: Disease incidence and severity over two seasons<br />
over 10 sites in NSW<br />
Cotton Pathology 2008-2010; Allen, Anderson, Lonergan, McNamara, Swan & Smith.<br />
If we look back at history we find similar<br />
trends occurring in years when it is cool<br />
during or just after planting, with seedling<br />
disease rampant, causing significant losses<br />
in plant stands.<br />
Over this five year period the average<br />
seedling mortality rates were around 21<br />
per cent for the Emerald, St George and<br />
Downs region; about 27 per cent for the<br />
MacIntyre, Gwydir and Namoi; around 32<br />
per cent for the Macquarie and Lachlan<br />
regions; and towards 40 per cent for the<br />
Murrumbidgee. Certain years stand out as<br />
being worse. For instance in the 2006–07<br />
season in the southern cotton growing regions<br />
there was high mortality, while in the<br />
2004–05 season the northern regions had<br />
higher than normal levels of plant death.<br />
The main cause of seedling death overall<br />
is plant disease. Dr Steven Allen, Plant<br />
Pathologist based at ACRI in Narrabri has<br />
shown over a number of years that significant<br />
disease levels exist, starting usually<br />
with black root rot that doesn’t actually kill<br />
the plant, but decreases its ability to grow<br />
on during cooler conditions. This allows<br />
other secondary diseases such as Pythium<br />
and Rhizoctonia to attack the plant and in<br />
many cases kill it.<br />
46 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
We know that black root rot slows plant<br />
growth and overall maturity. For plants<br />
that make it through this period without<br />
secondary diseases killing them, the disease<br />
has a delayed effect of increasing<br />
time for plant maturity.<br />
This is a major problem in the southern<br />
growing regions as the seasons are typically<br />
shorter and so the slower plant growth extends<br />
the crop maturation into the cooler<br />
months of May and June. We are seeing<br />
some of this occur this season as growers<br />
attempt to defoliate crops into May. This is<br />
not entirely due to seedling disease, as some<br />
growers planted late as water become available<br />
and the price continued to rally.<br />
Similarly we have seen increases in<br />
Fusarium through Qld and NSW both from<br />
an incidence and severity point of view.<br />
Plants stands were drastically affected in<br />
November and December as conditions<br />
were ideal for the disease. Dr Steven Allen<br />
has shown over a number of years that<br />
with wet conditions in October and November,<br />
the disease usually flourishes.<br />
More rain through these months means<br />
less plants survive in fields with Fusarium<br />
wilt present.<br />
New Improved Seed<br />
TREATMENTS<br />
This season CSD will release two new<br />
seed treatments, one being an advanced<br />
fungicide formulation treatment, Dynasty<br />
Complete and the second being a premium<br />
insecticidal treatment, Cruiser Extreme.<br />
Dynasty complete is a Syngenta product<br />
that has been developed in conjunction<br />
with CSD and particularly with technical<br />
input from Dr Stephen Allen based<br />
at ACRI in Narrabri. The product is formulated<br />
to include a three way fungicide<br />
treatment plus the plant activator acibinzolar-s-methyl<br />
which is the major active in<br />
the previous seed treatment Bion.<br />
The product will offer suppression of<br />
the major cotton seedling disease black<br />
root rot which in turn will help reduce the<br />
effects of both Rhizoctonia and Pythium.<br />
Furthermore, it will help bolster plant defences<br />
from the onslaught of Fusarium<br />
Wilt by stimulating the plant’s natural defence<br />
mechanisms against this disease.<br />
Steve has shown with trials conducted<br />
with acibinzolar-s-methyl that the product<br />
shows good suppression of both black root<br />
rot and Fusarium wilt (see Figure 4).<br />
In most cases, Acibinzolar-s-methyl reduced<br />
the incidence of both black root rot<br />
and Fusarium in large scale trials.<br />
This season we saw Bion (Acibinzolars-methyl)<br />
in commercial field trials carried<br />
out by a number of growers. The following<br />
grower trial (Figure 5) was conducted by<br />
Michael Josh, head Agronomist for P & J<br />
Harris & Sons.<br />
In these photos there was a defined line<br />
between Bion treated and the non Bion<br />
treated areas in this field.<br />
According to Steve Allen, “Dynasty<br />
Complete will offer another string in a<br />
growers’ bow in the fight against Fusarium<br />
wilt and black root rot and will allow seedlings<br />
the best start possible. This, in combination<br />
with high Fusarium rank varieties<br />
and diligent management from farmers<br />
will go a long way to not only reducing the<br />
impact of these major diseases, but also<br />
help with the bottom line too.”<br />
FIGURE 3: Percentage survival of cotton with October/<br />
November rainfall<br />
FIGURE 4: Trials conducted on black root rot and Fusarium wilt<br />
with Acibinzolar-s-methyl<br />
FIGURE 5: Bion versus non-bion grower trial<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 47
Dynasty Complete will become CSD’s<br />
standard cotton seed treatment in 2011<br />
and will be available on all varieties.<br />
The other new product available this<br />
season is Cruiser Extreme. This new insecticidal<br />
seed treatment from Syngenta will<br />
provide longevity in early season insect<br />
control which is important for establishing<br />
cotton seedlings. In trial work over the past<br />
two seasons Cruiser Extreme is showing<br />
comparable results with the granular in furrow<br />
insecticides against the main seedling<br />
cotton pests of aphids, thrips and wireworm<br />
(see Figure 6).<br />
One of the major benefits of Cruiser Extreme<br />
is the extra seedling vigour that is<br />
seen with use of this product. The photo<br />
in Figure 7 was taken at the above trial<br />
and shows a vegetative advantage over the<br />
control treatment.<br />
Important benefits of this product include<br />
the improved operator safety profile<br />
combined with the application convenience<br />
only offered as a seed treatment. We<br />
understand that Schedule 6 granular insecticide<br />
products may have a limited commercial<br />
availability with the product Temik<br />
already withdrawn from the market. The<br />
launch of Cruiser Extreme is very timely<br />
and will offer growers an effective alternative<br />
to granular insecticides. It is very easy<br />
to use and only requires the grower to<br />
place his treated seed into the planter box<br />
and your ready to plant.<br />
Further information on these or related topics<br />
can be found on the CSD website<br />
(www.csd.net.au). Results of trials and seed<br />
treatment performance will be provided at<br />
the CSD information Tour starting in June.<br />
FIGURE 6: Cruiser Extreme performance on Thrips versus Temik<br />
FIGURE 7: Extra vigour with Cruiser Extreme (CSD seed<br />
treatment trials)<br />
Barcoo…<br />
Enjoy a cool holiday this<br />
year, and at a great rate<br />
Barcoo is a superbly appointed lodge at Dinner Plain in the heart of Victoria’s<br />
high country. This year round playground offers trout fishing, magnificent<br />
scenery, great restaurants, peace & quiet and other cool activities.<br />
• 4 bedrooms (all with queen size beds) • Fully equipped with all mod cons<br />
• 3 bathrooms • Spa pool • Sleeps up to 16<br />
GREAT VALUE FOR LARGE OR FAMILY GROUPS<br />
Further details phone 1800 670 019 or www.dinnerplain.com<br />
48 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
news & new products<br />
drumMUSTER makes good<br />
growing sense<br />
While winter cropping may be<br />
priority number one for cotton<br />
growers at the moment, it is<br />
comforting to know that there is help at<br />
hand to make the process easier.<br />
After all the hard work is complete,<br />
the clean-up begins and the drumMUS-<br />
TER service can ensure growers’ farms<br />
are free of the hazards of empty chemical<br />
containers. An industry stewardship<br />
program funded by a levy paid on eligible<br />
products, drumMUSTER has been around<br />
since late 1998 and works with local shire<br />
councils nation-wide to collect and recycle<br />
eligible, pre-cleaned containers. This is no<br />
small operation and since its inception, the<br />
service has disposed of nearly 17 million<br />
containers safely and securely.<br />
Northern New South Wales Regional<br />
Consultant Phil Tucker was in the thick of<br />
the action at the recent Australian Cotton<br />
Trade Show in Moree, where he helped<br />
spread the drumMUSTER word.<br />
“I was actually at the Cotton Trade<br />
Show quite recently and the turn-out there<br />
was very good!” he said.<br />
“I’ve talked to a lot of growers and<br />
the main focus now is getting the cotton<br />
in the ground ready for winter cropping.<br />
From my point of view, we have collected<br />
something like 70,000 containers in this<br />
Northern NSW region since about February<br />
and the aim is, with good moisture and<br />
a good price, that we can hopefully expect<br />
an even bigger crop next year.”<br />
While these are excellent return figures,<br />
Phil knows that there is scope for plenty<br />
more containers to come in for disposal<br />
as users look to ramp up their post-harvest<br />
clean-ups.<br />
“It’s a really good time now, with harvest<br />
over and planting under way, to clean<br />
up the farm by using the drumMUSTER<br />
program,” he said.<br />
“You can also ask about our on-farm<br />
collection service, which is often available<br />
when you have a large quantity of containers.<br />
drumMUSTER is great for the environment,<br />
it’s good ‘My Best Management<br />
Practice’ so run your containers in or give<br />
me a call to find out any further information<br />
and to get involved!”<br />
To find your nearest collection site, log onto<br />
www.drummuster.com.au or you can call Phil<br />
Tucker on 0427 925 274. Further information<br />
about Best Management Practice can also<br />
be found at www.bmpcotton.com.au.<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 49
news & new products<br />
Dow tops up farmer fund with<br />
$300,000 for flood rebuilding<br />
Queensland farming families rebuilding<br />
their livelihoods after<br />
flooding have received a<br />
USD$300,000 boost from agrochemical<br />
and bio-technology company Dow Agro-<br />
Sciences, in a generous donation which<br />
doubles the Queensland Farmers Appeal,<br />
set up by state farm group AgForce and<br />
rural charity Aussie Helpers in January.<br />
The Dow AgroSciences donation was<br />
made through its philanthropic affiliate<br />
The Dow Chemical Company Foundation,<br />
with Dow Chemical Asia Pacific President,<br />
Pat Dawson, on hand to present the<br />
cheque to AgForce president Brent Finlay<br />
and Aussie Helpers founder Brian Egan.<br />
Brent said it was inspiring to see such<br />
a commitment from the wider agricultural<br />
community to help farmers get back on<br />
track after the devastation across Queensland.<br />
“Since January, Aussie Helpers has<br />
channelled thousands of dollars of donated<br />
goods and services to where it is needed<br />
most. In April alone, Aussie Helpers connected<br />
more than 90 volunteers who delivered<br />
1800 hours across 18 farms from<br />
Moura to Kilcoy to Oakey to Roma,”<br />
Brent said.<br />
“Hundreds of individuals and businesses<br />
have donated money and volunteered<br />
their time to help repair fences, retrieve<br />
displaced livestock, clean flooded houses<br />
and, most importantly, provide a supportive<br />
ear to producers as they work through<br />
the emotional challenges of this natural<br />
disaster.<br />
This donation to the Queensland Farmers<br />
Appeal follows Dow AgroSciences’<br />
earlier USD$200,000 donation to the Premier’s<br />
Flood Appeal. Dow AgroSciences<br />
Marketing Manager George Saville said<br />
the company wanted to do whatever it<br />
could to support the farming sector.<br />
“Many of those affected by the floods<br />
are our customers and employees. As we<br />
watched the catastrophic weather events<br />
unfold we knew we had to do something<br />
that could make a difference,” Mr Saville<br />
said.<br />
Can you help?<br />
With many months of hard work still<br />
ahead for flooded farmers, AgForce and<br />
Aussie Helpers still need donations, equipment<br />
and volunteers to get rural Queensland<br />
back on its feet. To volunteer: contact<br />
Aussie Helpers on 1300 665 232. To<br />
donate to the Queensland Farmers Flood<br />
Appeal: ‘Flood Appeal – Suncorp’, BSB:<br />
484 799, account number 015147867<br />
or post to PO Box 405, Charleville Qld<br />
4470.<br />
Presentation of the Dow $300,000 cheque.<br />
50 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
Central Queensland<br />
While the bulk of cotton in Central Queensland has<br />
been picked, in what seems to be a never ending season,<br />
some of the flooded cotton has only just had its first<br />
defoliation.<br />
Picking was held up again and again with regular fortnightly<br />
rainfall from February right through until May.<br />
The La Niña system also delivered another cruel blow on<br />
the Dawson flood plain, with more major flooding in late<br />
April. Late planted conventional and mungbean crops<br />
planted since the previous flood were affected.<br />
Given the challenging year, it is not surprising that<br />
yields are coming off well below district average. With a<br />
lot of cotton still to be ginned, and some still in the field,<br />
it is really too early to call acurately, but district average<br />
should be around 6.6 bales per hectare (2.7 bales<br />
per acre). Unfortunately the rainfall has also led to many<br />
quality issues, with the average discount expected to be<br />
somewhere around $50 per bale (with some individual<br />
farms averaging more than $80 per bale discounts).<br />
The extreme wet weather has also seen springs pop<br />
up all over Central Queensland. This not only resulted<br />
in lots of bogged pickers, but has also prevented some<br />
patches of cotton from being picked. One northern<br />
highlands grower commented that he was unable to<br />
plant winter crop, as one third of the paddock he had<br />
put aside was affected by springs.<br />
district<br />
It was a great year in Central Queensland to give dryland<br />
cotton farming a go. Most crops look like they’ll<br />
yield around 2.5 bales per hectare (1.0 bale per acre).<br />
Dryland crops that survived flooding, also look very impressive,<br />
and some of these crops are up there with the<br />
best. With minimal input costs, dryland has been the<br />
shining light for CQ cotton. Given the current interest, if<br />
there is planting rain in November, I anticipate that the<br />
dryland planting will be bigger again next year.<br />
Susan Maas<br />
June 6, 2011<br />
St George<br />
Dirranbandi<br />
Unlike the Darling Downs which is experiencing a<br />
horror season that they would know doubt prefer to forget,<br />
the Lower Balonne region has indeed been blessed<br />
with a very rewarding year. Having driven through the<br />
Downs during the past few weeks it is very easy to understand<br />
how frustrating and disappointing it is to have<br />
the rain events come though almost on a weekly basis.<br />
In the case of Dirranbandi, St George and Thallon we<br />
have just received a small rain event with growers averaging<br />
25–40 mm. Considering we haven’t had decent<br />
rain since Christmas this latest fall has certainly been<br />
most welcome not just for wheat plant but also because<br />
quite a lot of fields since centre/side busting have come<br />
up with clods the size of Besser bricks. A number of<br />
growers had decided to wait until some rain before applying<br />
fertiliser due to the lack of fine tilth.<br />
Ginning continues on, as it will no doubt for quite a<br />
few more months. Classing generally seems quite good<br />
with very few quality issues although there has been<br />
some high mic in some of the Sicot 74. Considering the<br />
season was the second coolest on record this has been<br />
difficult to understand.<br />
Overall yields remain positive with fields which had<br />
pre plant fertiliser averaging 4.4 to 5 bales per acre and<br />
fields that didn’t have any pre-plant fertiliser lower at 3.9<br />
to 4.2 bales per acre.<br />
At this stage the outlook for next season looks posi-<br />
reports<br />
District Reports<br />
are proudly supported by<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 51
district<br />
reports<br />
tive with full water and high prices. The major concern<br />
looming on the horizon is the potential problem with<br />
cotton bunchy top. Considering the St George, Dirranbandi<br />
and Thallon areas will have 140,000 acres of back<br />
to back country the need to be vigilant on ratoon cotton<br />
and volunteers has never been greater. Control now is<br />
the most effective way to ensure we break the green<br />
bridge!<br />
Dallas King<br />
June 15, 2011<br />
Border Rivers<br />
The Macintyre valley is nearing the end of what has<br />
been a long, slow harvest which will continue well into<br />
June. While there have not been large volumes of general<br />
rainfall during April and May, several small events,<br />
coupled with cool conditions have slowed harvest down<br />
and caused some problems with fibre quality.<br />
Defoliation, particularly in the later crops has been a<br />
real challenge with many crops receiving three applications<br />
and still not producing a great result. The upshot<br />
of this has been a higher proportion of bales with 4 leaf<br />
and 41 colour.<br />
Picking started in the western parts of the district in<br />
early April with the peak activity happening in the last<br />
Cotton Seed Treatments<br />
Just got a whole lot better!<br />
A lack of Mycorrhizal Fungi development can affect<br />
the uptake of P and Zn and slow the growth of cotton<br />
seedlings (On Farm Magazine, July 2008).<br />
Nutri-Life Platform is a high performance, cost<br />
effective blend of Mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma<br />
for less than $10/ha (in a liquid inject formulation).<br />
Product sizes: 200 g & 1 kg<br />
Product code: NLPLAT<br />
Contact NTS for application rates, pricing and details of<br />
your local NTS Distributor.<br />
Phone: (07) 5472 9900 or Email: info@nutri-tech.com.au<br />
www.nutri-tech.com.au<br />
two weeks of that month. While the bulk was finished by<br />
the second week of May there were still quite a few late<br />
fields to finish, mainly those later planted or regrown<br />
after flood or hail.<br />
Irrigated yields have mostly been good, although<br />
generally down on the very good results from the previous<br />
season. Many have been in the 10 to 11 bale per<br />
hectare range. Yields have suffered particularly where<br />
crops have been planted into under-prepared fields and<br />
in-season fertiliser has been applied late or mid-season<br />
irrigations weren’t done on time.<br />
Irrigated fibre quality has been good except for the<br />
colour and leaf.<br />
Dryland yields have been pleasing despite a less than<br />
perfect finish. Many of the district’s crops have been in<br />
the 2.5 to 3.5 bale per hectare range. Fibre quality has<br />
generally been base grade although there have been reports<br />
of some short staple in some western crops that<br />
ran dry and leaf and colour have caused some problems<br />
also.<br />
Most people are now in the process of preparing<br />
for a big 2011 plant – hilling up and applying fertiliser.<br />
With the district’s water storages full and many on-farm<br />
dams well topped up, it promises to be close to a full<br />
plant. Early indications are that the dryland area will be<br />
slightly larger than this past season with some new growers<br />
looking to grow the crop and others increasing their<br />
acreage.<br />
David Kelly<br />
May 31, 2011<br />
Darling Downs<br />
At the time of writing this report we are well into June<br />
and the harvest should have been all but finished. Unfortunately<br />
with the continued cool, wet weather a significant<br />
proportion of the crop is yet to be picked. Even<br />
more concerning is that it could be many more weeks<br />
before the harvest will be completed.<br />
The northern Downs has had a reasonable run, with a<br />
majority of the area having been picked. There are however,<br />
areas still yet to be fully desiccated and well away<br />
from being picked. Yields have been extremely variable<br />
but on the whole very disappointing. Expectations this<br />
season were always low given the season when taking<br />
into account the impact of the flooding and long periods<br />
of waterlogging. Unfortunately the impact has been a<br />
lot greater than expected or hoped for. Quality has been<br />
acceptable to this point but following heavy frosts and<br />
the ongoing rain and cool weather, quality is starting to<br />
be effected.<br />
The situation on the southern Downs is much more<br />
concerning. Large areas are yet to be fully desiccated<br />
let alone picked. Severe frosting in mid May and ongoing<br />
cool rainy weather is dramatically restricting harvest<br />
activities. Early indications are that yields are also well<br />
below expectations but quality is still acceptable.<br />
52 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
The 2010–11 season has been extremely tough for<br />
growers across the Downs. One positive as planning<br />
starts for the 2011–12 season, is that all the water storages<br />
are full and there is good soil moisture profiles.<br />
With cotton prices remaining high, next season looks<br />
very promising.<br />
Duncan Weir<br />
June 10, 2011<br />
Gwydir Valley<br />
At the end of May approximately 85 per cent of the<br />
Gwydir Valley cotton crop has been picked. Many gin<br />
yards are full and chewing through the back log of cotton<br />
as fast as they can. Yields are still variable but I think the<br />
valley average will be around 10 bales per hectare in irrigated<br />
and just around 2.2 bales per hectare in dryland.<br />
An issue which has surfaced once ginning and classing<br />
came into full swing was the lower colour and leaf<br />
grades. The gins are finding it hard to clean up cotton<br />
presented with high moisture content and high leaf material<br />
in the sample. Defoliation conditions in April were<br />
difficult with many fields requiring a third pass and still<br />
not achieving desired results.<br />
The region hosted the Cotton Trade Show in May,<br />
which has been hailed as a success by organisers which<br />
is fantastic. In conjunction with the trade show, the Gwydir<br />
Valley Cotton Growers also hosted their annual fund<br />
raising dinner which raises money to support the medical<br />
scholarship program as well as raise money for the<br />
Westpac Rescue Helicopter.<br />
This was a great night, attended by 240 people which<br />
raised some much needed donations for both worthy<br />
causes.<br />
Many growers will be busy in the next couple of<br />
months trying to plant some winter crop, controlling<br />
fallow weeds, finishing off cotton pick and knock some<br />
shape back into irrigation fields before planting the<br />
2011–12 crop.<br />
James Quinn<br />
May 31, 2011<br />
Namoi Valley<br />
Although picking was about 90 per cent complete by<br />
early June there are still quite a few late crops that will be<br />
picked during winter. Despite all the fears of a wet pick<br />
it has been quite dry and picking has had only a very few<br />
minor interruptions.<br />
Irrigated yields have been extremely variable. Generdistrict<br />
reports<br />
JUNE–JULY 2011 THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER — 53
district<br />
reports<br />
ally yields in the western areas have been very good.<br />
Walgett has had a particularly good season, except for<br />
a small percentage of crops that were flood damaged.<br />
A few crops achieved yields over five bales per acre.<br />
Further east the yields were much more variable, and<br />
in some cases disappointing. The average in the lower<br />
Namoi is about 3.7 bales per acre and the average in the<br />
upper Namoi is about 3.4. Dryland yields have generally<br />
been well below average. Average yields in the upper<br />
Namoi of 1.5 bales per acre, despite the second driest<br />
summer on record have cemented dryland cotton into<br />
farmers future rotations.<br />
Overall fibre quality from irrigated crops has also been<br />
very good. Although there has been a significant number<br />
of 41s, which is hard to explain given the dry picking<br />
conditions. Many of the dryland crops have had some<br />
short staple.<br />
Sicot 74BRF performed well throughout the Namoi<br />
this year, and is expected to become the most popular<br />
variety in the coming season. Siokra 24BRF was a little<br />
disappointing but should still be considered a key dryland<br />
choice in 2011.<br />
Planting of winter rotation crops is well under way,<br />
however more rain is required to ensure the full area is<br />
sown. Chickpea rotations have dropped out of favour<br />
this year following extreme disease pressure last season.<br />
Some of the cereal stubble paddocks normally planted to<br />
peas will be planted to cotton later in the year.<br />
Prospects for the coming season are very good. Keepit<br />
dam is about 92 per cent full and is expected to be full<br />
by planting time. Split rock remains at 20 per cent capacity<br />
despite the wet early summer conditions. Ground<br />
water supplies are good as many growers did not use<br />
their full allocation last year due to timely summer rain.<br />
Some of this unused water can be carried forward. Most<br />
Walgett growers on the Barwon have plenty of water in<br />
their storages following good late season flows. Irrigated<br />
area prospects are about 18,000 hectares in the upper<br />
Namoi and 55,000 in the lower Namoi. The dryland<br />
area could be as high as 60,000 hectares in the Namoi<br />
region.<br />
It should be a big year in 2011–12.<br />
Robert Eveleigh<br />
June 1, 2011<br />
Macquarie Valley<br />
Picking is now around 80 per cent completed with<br />
some late planted crops still to be harvested. These crops<br />
have encountered frosts and recent rain and inclement<br />
weather. The earliest crop picked in the Narromine area<br />
was started on April 12.<br />
Quality and yields have generally been very good so<br />
far. Isolated fields have gone up to 15 bales per hectare.<br />
This is despite the very slow and wet start with flooding<br />
in December.<br />
There has been some light spotting and 4 leaf but<br />
generally quality has been very good with micronaire,<br />
length and strength mostly within the desired range.<br />
Ginning is proceeding well with throughput well up on<br />
the past few seasons. Gin out turns have been good.<br />
Cotton is being transported from southern regions to<br />
be ginned here. Gins will be running well into July to<br />
complete this year’s crop.<br />
The lack of suitable staff for both ginning and farming<br />
has been an issue. This will only get worse with a<br />
large expansion in area planned for this and most other<br />
regions nest season.<br />
There is a great deal of optimism looking towards<br />
the 2011–12 cotton season in the Macquarie region.<br />
Forecasts are for around 40,000 hectares to be planted.<br />
Burrendong Dam continues to float around 90 per cent<br />
of capacity.<br />
There will be many new growers joining the industry<br />
as well as many growers returning to the fold.<br />
The local growers association has been quite busy. The<br />
date for the Macquarie cotton awards dinner is Friday,<br />
August 19 at the Lazy River Estate in Dubbo. It promises<br />
to be an excellent night to celebrate the successes of<br />
the cotton industry in the Valley. The Macquarie Cotton<br />
Growers Association is sponsoring the local football<br />
teams at Warren, Trangie and Narromine and is holding<br />
sponsor days at the various venues. The association is<br />
also planning to hold an Occupational Health and Safety<br />
training day available to all growers.<br />
Craig McDonald<br />
May 31, 2011<br />
Southern NSW<br />
Picking has been very slow to get underway yet is progressing<br />
quite well now. Harvest started early in May<br />
with only a couple of crops yet now most of the northern<br />
areas of the region around Hillston and west of Griffith<br />
are well underway with pickers only just keeping up<br />
with the crop maturity. The majority of the crops will be<br />
ready in the next seven to 10 days. The area has been<br />
very lucky in terms of rain with only a couple of small<br />
rain patterns passing through. The early crops yields<br />
have been quite promising so it will be interesting to see<br />
what the final average will be.<br />
The main issue has been the temperature with several<br />
frosts being experienced in the area. The frosts have<br />
helped the more mature crops in terms of boll opening<br />
yet defoliation has been very slow. To date picking<br />
capacity has not been a real issue yet this will change<br />
as more crops come in together. The area still needs a<br />
good few weeks of fine weather to enable harvest to be<br />
completed and to give the late crops every chance of<br />
maturing.<br />
This month the Commins Family hosted the Wincott<br />
Tour of the Murray Darling Basin. This provided<br />
a good opportunity for the visitors to learn more about<br />
the Commins operation and the Murrumbidgee area in<br />
54 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011
2011 FARM STUDY TOURS<br />
• Scandinavia (Aug-Sep)<br />
– Travel through Northern Germany to Denmark, Sweden and spectacular Norway with an optional<br />
cruise to the Arctic Circle, Global Seed Vaults and polar bears.<br />
• South America (Jul-Aug)<br />
– From the beautiful lakes of Chile to rugged Patagonia, the Argentine Pampas, Iguassu Falls,<br />
incredible farm developments in Brazil and through to the excitement of pulsating Rio. Then onto<br />
Bolivia and Peru (think Macchu Pichu). Plus options to the Amazon, Galapagos, Easter Islands etc.<br />
• Southern Africa (Sep-Oct)<br />
– Go on safari to South Africa, Victoria Falls, Zambia, Tanzania and Kenya. Catch up with the<br />
greatest migration on Earth as the wildebeest and zebra roam the Masai Mara and Serengeti.<br />
For more information contact:<br />
David Dowling 0417 703 169 :: Lloyd O’Connell 0428 724 615<br />
travel@greenmountpress.com.au :: www.greenmounttravel.com.au
district<br />
reports<br />
Wincott group with Leeann Commins on the right.<br />
general. Cotton Australia chair, Andrew Watson, was<br />
also travelling with this group and it gave him a chance<br />
to experience the operation first hand.<br />
As reported previously ginning capacity was going to<br />
be the main barrier for industry expansion as there is<br />
Answer to Ian’s<br />
MYSTERY Tractor Quiz<br />
On a KL or Lanz Bulldog the steering wheel<br />
serves two purposes. The first is to steer the<br />
tractor and second is to start the engine,<br />
having first heated the hot bulb portion of<br />
the cylinder head with a blowlamp. The<br />
shaft of the steering wheel engages a dog in<br />
the end of the crankshaft. When rotated in<br />
a pendulum motion, the giant single piston<br />
builds compression until the crude oil fuel<br />
ignites, when BANG and all hell breaks loose.<br />
The engine is now running – hopefully not<br />
backwards! Like I said – Simple!<br />
currently only one gin that is located at Hillston where<br />
historically the majority of cotton has been grown. Next<br />
season with a combination of high prices and full water<br />
allocation the area could expand beyond 40,000 hectares<br />
with most growth occurring south of Griffith on<br />
the Murrumbidgee. There has been confirmation that a<br />
new four stand gin will be built by a new company called<br />
Southern Cotton Pty Ltd between Whitton and Darlington<br />
Point. This announcement has meant that growers<br />
can now continue to prepare country for next season, as<br />
without this gin cotton would not be an option.<br />
James Hill<br />
May 31, 2011<br />
Advertiser’s Index<br />
1st Class.................................38<br />
Agripath................................. 10<br />
Aquatech Consulting...............26<br />
Barcoo....................................48<br />
Cargill Cotton..........................30<br />
<strong>Case</strong> IH................................... 11<br />
Charlton........................... 24, 54<br />
Cotton Grower Services.......... IFC<br />
Cotton Outlook....................... IBC<br />
Countryco Training..................45<br />
CSD..........................................7<br />
Dinner Plain.............................1<br />
drumMUSTER..........................53<br />
Ecom......................................37<br />
Ergon..................................... 19<br />
Excel Ag.................................. 15<br />
Global Machinery Traders.......45<br />
Landquip................................43<br />
Monsanto.................................9<br />
Moree Real Estate...................30<br />
Namoi Cotton..........................33<br />
Neils Parts.............................. 10<br />
New Holland....................... 5, 17<br />
Nutri-Tech...............................52<br />
Omnistar..................................3<br />
Queensland Cotton.................. 31<br />
SMK Consultants.......................2<br />
Study Tours.............................56<br />
Sumitomo.............................OBC<br />
Syngenta.......................... 12, 13<br />
The Appointments Group...........2<br />
Valmont..................................27<br />
Volvo Penta Oceania...............23<br />
Westfield Augers.....................43<br />
56 — THE AUSTRALIAN COTTONGROWER JUNE–JULY 2011