How to Use and Complete the Uniform Exhibit Evaluation Form

More documents

Recommendations

Info

During the Judges’ Critique • Specific areas for improvement should be related to the relative weights of the “Big 4” Criteria. • Try to keep suggestions to those that are truly helpful and cost very little: • Improving the organization, using a plan, developing a proper conclusion, using chapter headings, etc. • Documenting philatelic knowledge, highlighting new information developed by the Exhibitor, etc. • Indicating or highlighting rarities, explaining items, etc. January 2011 22
During the Judges’ Critique • Presentation issues should be documented on the UEEF, but they rarely affect a medal level by themselves, so these things are rarely covered in the Critique. • Importance as an attribute of the exhibit is evaluated at the frames. Relative Importance of one subject over another in USA practice is usually sorted out in considering the special awards. January 2011 23
Page 1 and 2: APS Committee on Accreditation of N
Page 3 and 4: Criteria used on the UEEF From the
Page 5 and 6: The APS UEEF May 2010 Version • I
Page 7 and 8: At the Frames • Use of the UEEF a
Page 9 and 10: At the Frames: 2 Approaches Bottoms
Page 11 and 12: At the Frames: 2 Approaches Bottoms
Page 13 and 14: Preparing for the Judges’ Critiqu
Page 15 and 16: Examples: Main problem - Treatment
Page 17 and 18: Examples: Gold Medal exhibits, espe
Page 19 and 20: Examples from Class Participants
Page 21: During the Judges’ Critique • W
Page 25: What are your thoughts . . . . . .

How to Use and Complete the Uniform Exhibit Evaluation Form

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?