19.11.2014 Views

(WHO) Patient Safety Curriculum Guide - CAIPE

(WHO) Patient Safety Curriculum Guide - CAIPE

(WHO) Patient Safety Curriculum Guide - CAIPE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. additional searching for content and<br />

assignment of knowledge, skills, behaviours<br />

and attitudes;<br />

3. development of performance-based format.<br />

Since the publication of the Australian <strong>Patient</strong><br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Education Framework in 2005, Canada<br />

released a framework entitled ‘The <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Competencies- Enhancing patient safety across<br />

the health professions’ in 2009 [2]. Similar<br />

to the Australian approach, it provides an<br />

interprofessional, practical and useful patient<br />

safety framework that identifies the knowledge,<br />

skills, and attitudes required by all health-care<br />

professionals.<br />

Figure A.2.2. The Canadian Framework<br />

The <strong>Safety</strong> Competencies – Enhancing patient safety across the health professions<br />

Domain 1<br />

Contribute to a Culture<br />

of <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Domain 2<br />

Work in<br />

Teams<br />

for <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Domain 3<br />

Communicate Effectively<br />

for <strong>Patient</strong> Sqfety<br />

Domain 4<br />

Manage<br />

<strong>Safety</strong> Risks<br />

Domain 5<br />

Optimize Human<br />

and Environmental<br />

Factors<br />

Domain 6<br />

Recognize,<br />

Respond to and<br />

Disclose Adverse<br />

Events<br />

Source: The <strong>Safety</strong> Competencies, Canadian <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Institute, 2009 [2].<br />

Stage 1–Review of knowledge and development<br />

of the Australian Framework outline<br />

A search was conducted to identify the current<br />

body of knowledge relating to patient safety<br />

(as described in the next section). The literature,<br />

books, reports, curricula and web sites collected<br />

were then reviewed to identify the major activities<br />

associated with patient safety that had a positive<br />

effect on quality and safety. These activities were<br />

then grouped into categories termed “learning<br />

areas”. Each learning area was analysed and<br />

further broken down into major subject areas,<br />

termed “learning topics”. See below for details<br />

of the literature review process and the<br />

Framework content structure.<br />

The rationale for the inclusion of each learning<br />

area and topic has been articulated in the body<br />

of the Framework and is summarized below.<br />

Stage 2–Additional searching for content<br />

and assignment of knowledge, skills, behaviours<br />

and attitudes<br />

Each learning topic formed the basis for a more<br />

extensive search, including additional terms<br />

such as education, programmes, training,<br />

adverse events, errors, mistakes, and organization<br />

/institution/health facility/health service.<br />

All the activities (knowledge, skills, behaviours<br />

and attitudes) for each topic were listed until<br />

no more activities were forthcoming and<br />

the sources exhausted. This list was then<br />

culled for duplication, practicality and<br />

redundancy. The activities were then categorized<br />

into the domains of knowledge, skills or<br />

behaviours.<br />

The final step in this stage was to allocate each<br />

activity to the appropriate level corresponding<br />

27 Part A 2. How were the <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> topics selected?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!