20.11.2014 Views

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Volume 14<br />

Number 1<br />

May <strong>2014</strong><br />

Published by<br />

European<br />

Wound Management<br />

Association<br />

INNOVATION,<br />

KNOW-HOW<br />

AND<br />

TECHNOLOGY IN<br />

WOUND CARE


The EWMA <strong>Journal</strong><br />

ISSN number: 1609-2759<br />

Volume 14, No 1, April, <strong>2014</strong><br />

The <strong>Journal</strong> of the European<br />

Wound Management Association<br />

Published twice a year<br />

Editorial Board<br />

Sue Bale, UK, Editor<br />

Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />

Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />

Georgina Gethin, Ireland<br />

Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />

Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />

Rita Gaspar Videira, Portugal<br />

EWMA<br />

Council<br />

Gerrolt Jukema<br />

Scientific Recorder<br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

President<br />

Dubravko Huljev<br />

Secretary<br />

Jan Apelqvist<br />

Immediate Past President<br />

José Verdú Soriano<br />

Treasurer<br />

EWMA web site<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

Editorial Office<br />

please contact:<br />

EWMA Secretariat<br />

Nordre Fasanvej 113<br />

2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark<br />

Tel: (+45) 7020 0305<br />

Fax: (+45) 7020 0315<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

Paulo Alves<br />

Sue Bale<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> Editor<br />

Mark Collier<br />

Javorka Delic<br />

Ann-Mari Fagerdahl<br />

Georgina Gethin<br />

Layout:<br />

Birgitte Clematide<br />

Cover:<br />

Nils Hartmann, Open design/advertising<br />

Magdalena Annersten<br />

Gershater<br />

Luc Gryson<br />

Arkadiusz Jawien<br />

Nada Kecelj-Leskovec<br />

Martin Koschnick<br />

Knut Kröger<br />

Printed by:<br />

CS Grafisk A/S, Denmark<br />

Copies printed: 11.000<br />

Prices:<br />

The EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> is distributed<br />

in hard copies to members<br />

as part of their EWMA membership.<br />

EWMA also shares the vision of<br />

an “open access” philosophy,<br />

which means that the journal is<br />

freely available online.<br />

Individual subscription per issue: 7.50€<br />

Libraries and institutions per issue: 25€<br />

The next issue will be published<br />

in October <strong>2014</strong>. Prospective material for<br />

publication must be with the<br />

EWMA Secretariat as soon as possible<br />

and no later than August 15th <strong>2014</strong>.<br />

The contents of articles and letters in<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> do not necessarily reflect<br />

the opinions of the Editors or the<br />

European Wound Management Association.<br />

All scientific articles are peer reviewed by<br />

EWMA Scientific Review Panel.<br />

Copyright of published material<br />

and illustrations is the property of<br />

the European Wound Management<br />

Association. However, provided prior<br />

written consent for their reproduction,<br />

including parallel publishing<br />

(e.g. via repository), obtained from EWMA<br />

via the Editorial Board of the <strong>Journal</strong>,<br />

and proper acknowledgement,<br />

such permission will normally<br />

be readily granted. Requests to<br />

reproduce material should state<br />

where material is to be published,<br />

and, if it is abstracted, summarised,<br />

or abbreviated, then the proposed<br />

new text should be sent to the<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> Editor for <strong>final</strong> approval.<br />

2<br />

All issues of EWMA <strong>Journal</strong><br />

are CINAHL listed.<br />

Severin Läuchli<br />

COOPERATING ORGANISATIONS’ BOARD<br />

Esther Armans Moreno, AEEVH<br />

Christian Thyse, AFISCeP.be<br />

Tommaso Bianchi, AISLeC<br />

Roberto Cassino, AIUC<br />

Ana-Maria Iuonut, AMP Romania<br />

Aníbal Justiniano, APTFeridas<br />

Gilbert Hämmerle, AWA<br />

Jan Vandeputte, BEFEWO<br />

Vladislav Hristov, BWA<br />

Els Jonckheere, CNC<br />

Lenka Veverková, CSLR<br />

Ivana Vranjkovic, CWA<br />

Arne Buss, DGfW<br />

Bo Jørgensen, DSFS<br />

Heidi Castrén, FWCS<br />

Pedro Pacheco, GAIF<br />

Sebastian Probst<br />

EWMA JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC REVIEW PANEL<br />

Paulo Jorge Pereira Alves, Portugal<br />

Caroline Amery, UK<br />

Jan Apelqvist, Sweden<br />

Sue Bale, UK<br />

B.E. d.Boogert-Ruimschotel, The Netherlands<br />

Michelle Briggs, UK<br />

Stephen Britland, UK<br />

Mark Collier, UK<br />

Rose Cooper, UK<br />

Javorka Delic, Serbia<br />

Corrado Durante, Italy<br />

Bulent Erdogan, Turkey<br />

Ann-Mari Fagerdahl, Sweden<br />

Madeleine Flanagan, UK<br />

Milada Franců, Czech Republic<br />

Peter Franks, UK<br />

Francisco P. García-Fernández, Spain<br />

Elia Ricci<br />

J. Javier Soldevilla, GNEAUPP<br />

Georgios Vasilopoulos, HSWH<br />

Christian Münter, ICW<br />

Aleksandra Kuspelo, LBAA<br />

Susan Knight, LUF<br />

Loreta Pilipaityte, LWMA<br />

Corinne Ward, MASC<br />

Hunyadi János, MSKT<br />

Suzana Nikolovska, MWMA<br />

Linda Primmer, NATVNS<br />

Øystein Karlsen, NIFS<br />

Louk van Doorn, NOVW<br />

Arkadiusz Jawień, PWMA<br />

Severin Läuchli, SAfW (DE)<br />

Hubert Vuagnat, SAfW (FR)<br />

Goran D. Lazovic, SAWMA<br />

Mária Hok, SEBINKO<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

Magdalena Annersten Gershater, Sweden<br />

Georgina Gethin, Ireland<br />

Luc Gryson, Belgium<br />

Eskild W. Henneberg, Denmark<br />

Alison Hopkins, UK<br />

Gabriela Hösl, Austria<br />

Dubravko Huljev, Croatia<br />

Arkadiusz Jawien, Poland<br />

Gerrolt Jukema, Netherlands<br />

Nada Kecelj, Slovenia<br />

Klaus Kirketerp-Møller, Denmark<br />

Zoltán Kökény, Hungary<br />

Martin Koschnick, Germany<br />

Knut Kröger, Germany<br />

Severin Läuchli, Schwitzerland<br />

Maarten J. Lubbers, Netherlands<br />

Sylvie Meaume, France<br />

Robert Strohal<br />

F. Xavier Santos Heredero, SEHER<br />

Sylvie Meaume, SFFPC<br />

Susanne Dufva, SSIS<br />

Jozefa Košková, SSOOR<br />

Leonid Rubanov, STW (Belarus)<br />

Guðbjörg Pálsdóttir, SUMS<br />

Cedomir Vucetic, SWHS Serbia<br />

Magnus Löndahl, SWHS Sweden<br />

Tina Chambers, TVS<br />

Jasmina Begić-Rahić, URuBiH<br />

Zoya Ishkova, UWTO<br />

Barbara E. den Boogert-Ruimschotel, V&VN<br />

Caroline McIntosh, WMAI<br />

Skender Zatriqi, WMAK<br />

Nada Kecelj Leskovec, WMAS<br />

Mustafa Deveci, WMAT<br />

Zena Moore, Ireland<br />

Christian Münter, Germany<br />

Andrea Nelson, UK<br />

Pedro L. Pancorbo-Hidalgo, Spain<br />

Hugo Partsch, Austria<br />

Patricia Price, UK<br />

Sebastian Probst, Schwitzerland<br />

Elia Ricci, Italy<br />

Rytis Rimdeika, Lithuania<br />

Zbigniew Rybak, Poland<br />

Salla Seppänen, Finland<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Spain<br />

Robert Strohal, Austria<br />

Richard White, UK<br />

Carolyn Wyndham-White, Switzerland<br />

Gerald Zöch, Austria


BeneHold TASA <br />

The future of<br />

wound care is clear<br />

(Thin Absorbent Skin Adhesive) <br />

Exceptionally transparent, thinner than any other<br />

generation of absorbent skin adhesive, and surprisingly<br />

absorbent for it’s size, BeneHold TASA provides an<br />

innovative window into the healing process.<br />

Visit the Vancive booth #10A10 of the<br />

European Wound Management Association’s<br />

annual exhibition, May 14-16th.<br />

Join us at our symposium on May 15th at<br />

15:40-16:40 in conference room N111+N112.<br />

Learn more at vancive.averydennison.com/benehold<br />

An Avery Dennison business<br />

© <strong>2014</strong> Avery Dennison Corporation. All rights reserved.<br />

Avery Dennison, Vancive Medical Technologies, Vancive, BeneHold, TASA, Thin Absorbent<br />

Skin Adhesive, Design “V” Logo, are trademarks of Avery Dennison Corporation.


6 Editorial<br />

Make a difference<br />

in clinical practice<br />

Become a Member of EWMA<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

9 Prevalence of Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Patients in Germany<br />

Heidi Heinhold, Andreas Westerfellhaus, Knut Kröger<br />

17 Excess use of antibiotics in patients with non-healing ulcers<br />

Marcus Gürgen<br />

25 Regenerative medicine in burn wound healing:<br />

Aiming for the perfect skin<br />

Magda MW Ulrich<br />

31 Promising effects of arginine-enriched oral nutritional supplements<br />

on wound healing<br />

Jos M.G.A. Schols<br />

37 Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic wounds<br />

Vladimir N. Obolenskiy, Darya A. Ermolova, Leonid A. Laberko,<br />

Tatiana V. Semenova<br />

Scientific Communication<br />

Benefits of your EWMA Membership:<br />

n You make a difference in clinical practice within<br />

wound management in Europe<br />

n Right to vote and stand for EWMA Council<br />

n EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> sent directly to you two times a year<br />

n EWMA news and statements sent directly to you<br />

n A discount on your registration fee for<br />

EWMA Conferences<br />

n Right to apply for EWMA travel grants<br />

n Yearly membership fee € 25<br />

n Yearly membership fee for members of<br />

cooperating organisations € 10<br />

Please register as a EWMA member at<br />

WWW.EWMA.ORG<br />

26TH CONFERENCE OF<br />

THE EUROPEAN WOUND MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION<br />

EWMA 2016<br />

11-13 MAY 2016 · BREMEN, GERMANY<br />

In collaboration with<br />

WUND-D.A.CH and ICW (Chronic Wounds Initiative)<br />

4<br />

43 Results from the world’s largest telemedicine project<br />

Kristian Kidholm, Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig, Knud B. Yderstraede,<br />

Birthe Dinesen, Benjamin Schnack Rasmussen<br />

51 Nutrition and chronic wounds<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Estrella Perdomo Pérez<br />

54 The biofilm challenge<br />

Maria Alhede, Morten Alhede<br />

Innovation, know how and technolgy<br />

60 National wound care innovation centre launched in the UK<br />

Peter Vowden<br />

63 Development of tools for home monitoring in wound care<br />

Marco Romanelli, Marie Muller<br />

66 <strong>2014</strong> Education Activities<br />

Ana Maria d’Auchamp<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

71 Abstracts of recent Cochrane reviews<br />

Sally Bell-Syer<br />

EWMA<br />

78 EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> previous issues and other journals<br />

80 EWMA GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> in Madrid<br />

Javier Soldevilla Agreda, Gerrolt Jukema<br />

84 Advocacy Activities update<br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

86 Christina Lindholm – Honorary Speaker at EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

88 EWMA’s commitment to fighting antimicrobial resistance<br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

90 Home Care-Wound Care<br />

Sebastian Probst<br />

92 Nordic Diabetic Foot Task Force: Status and Future Activities<br />

Magnus Løndahl, Klaus Kirketerp Møller<br />

94 Developing a Diabetic Foot Treatment Programme in Austria<br />

Gerald Zöch, Peter Kurz, Stefan Krasnik<br />

96 EWMA Participation in the first UEMS meeting for<br />

European Scientific Societies<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

99 Managing Wounds as a Team<br />

Zena Moore<br />

Organisations<br />

100 EWMA Corporate Sponsors<br />

101 Conference Calendar<br />

102 AAWC News<br />

Robert J. Snyder<br />

104 EB-CLINET – Clinical Network of EB Centres and Experts<br />

Gabriela Pohla-Gubo<br />

106 The Korean Wound Management Society<br />

Jong Won Rhie<br />

108 WAWLC update<br />

David Keast<br />

110 EWMA Cooperating Organisations


24th Conference of the European Wound Management Association<br />

Bilingual<br />

English & Spanish<br />

EWMA<br />

n<br />

GNEAUPP<br />

14-16 May<br />

<strong>2014</strong><br />

adrid · Spain · España<br />

Innovation, know-how and technology in wound care<br />

European Wound<br />

Management Association<br />

Asociatión Europea para<br />

el manejo de las heridas<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento<br />

en Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas<br />

Spanish Group for the study<br />

and advice on pressure ulcers<br />

and chronic wounds<br />

Grupo Nacional para el Estudio<br />

y Asesoramiento en Úlceras<br />

por Presión y Heridas Crónicas<br />

fundación<br />

sergio juán<br />

jordán para la<br />

Investigación y el<br />

estudio de las<br />

heridas crónicas<br />

Sergio Juán Jordán Foundation<br />

for investigation and<br />

study on chronic wounds<br />

Fundación Sergio Juán Jordán<br />

para la Investigación y el Estudio<br />

de las Heridas Crónicas<br />

Technical Secretariat<br />

gneaupp<strong>2014</strong>ewma@bocemtium.com<br />

www.ewma<strong>2014</strong>.org<br />

www.gneaupp.org


Editorial<br />

Innovation and collaboration:<br />

two of the leading forces that drive EWMA<br />

Fourteen years ago, EWMA held a conference in<br />

Stockholm, at which the partnership structure<br />

of the EWMA Cooperating Organisations was<br />

announced.<br />

One of the creative minds behind this innovation<br />

was Christina Lindholm, who for many years has been<br />

a driving force in the EWMA Council and the EWMA<br />

Education Committee. In <strong>2014</strong>, we celebrate Christina<br />

and her many contributions to EWMA at the EWMA-<br />

GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> conference by inviting her into the<br />

group of esteemed EWMA Honorary Speakers.<br />

The EWMA Cooperating Organisations partnership has<br />

grown tremendously since its inception in 2000, and today,<br />

it includes 49 wound care associations, representing<br />

35 European countries. Representatives from many<br />

of these associations will meet during the <strong>2014</strong> EWMA<br />

conference to elect members for the EWMA Council, discuss<br />

aspects of wound care across Europe, and learn from<br />

each other’s experiences during the EWMA Cooperating<br />

Organisations Board Meeting and the Cooperating Organisations<br />

Workshop.<br />

In 2008, the EWMA Council formalised the first collaborations<br />

with associations outside of Europe through<br />

the establishment of International Partner Agreements<br />

with the Association for the Advancement of Wound<br />

Care (AAWC) of the U.S.A., initially, and subsequently<br />

with the Australian Wound Management Association<br />

(AWMA).<br />

JOINING FORCES THROUGH JOINT<br />

INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES<br />

The number of International Partners has increased<br />

to 11, and the initial collaborations with AAWC and<br />

AWMA have led to publication of the “Managing<br />

Wounds as a Team” document, which is presented on<br />

page 99. We are proud to announce that, together, these<br />

three major international associations have designed and<br />

published a joint guidance document on wound care.<br />

Furthermore, as a result of these rewarding collaborations,<br />

a recent invitation has been extended by the<br />

AAWC Board for EWMA to appoint a member for<br />

the AAWC Board for <strong>2014</strong>-2015, a position that will<br />

be held by the EWMA Immediate Past President Jan<br />

Apelqvist.<br />

INNOVATION, KNOW-HOW,<br />

AND TECHNOLOGY IN WOUND CARE<br />

Innovation, Know-how, and Technology in Wound Care is<br />

theme for the EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> Madrid conference<br />

theme. Taking place 14-16 May, the conference<br />

will explore these topics as well as other ongo-ing<br />

EWMA activities and projects.<br />

The EWMA Home Care Wound Care guidance<br />

document will also be launched at the conference. This<br />

document has been developed in collaboration with<br />

HomeCare Europe (www.homecareeurope.org), a new<br />

European partner of EWMA. For more details about<br />

this document, see page 96.<br />

The eHealth symposium, which was a newcomer at the<br />

EWMA 2013 conference, will run again this year. It<br />

is being organised in collaboration with the European<br />

Health Telematics Association (EHTEL, www.ehtel.<br />

org). EHTEL plays a pivotal role as the focal point of<br />

eHealth in Europe, and we look forward to EHTEL’s<br />

contribution in developing the EWMA eHealth symposium<br />

this year and for the EWMA 2015 London<br />

conference, at which an extension of the collaboration<br />

is already being planned.<br />

We look forward to seeing many of you in Madrid and<br />

wish you an enjoyable Spring <strong>2014</strong>.<br />

Yours sincerely,<br />

Sue Bale, Editor of the EWMA <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Salla Seppänen, EWMA President<br />

6<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


The exciting new<br />

Negative Pressure<br />

Wound Therapy solution<br />

Find out more at the Coloplast symposium,<br />

15:40-16:40, Room N103, Thursday the 15 th May<br />

www.coloplast.com/product<br />

The Coloplast logo is a registered trademark of Coloplast A/S. © <strong>2014</strong>-02 All rights reserved Coloplast A/S, 3050 Humlebaek, Denmark.


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Prevalence of Pressure Ulcers<br />

in Hospitalized Patients<br />

in Germany – Trends from 2005 to 2011<br />

Summary<br />

Objective: Based on the data of hospitalized people<br />

in Germany we aimed to determine changes<br />

in prevalence, localization of pressure ulcer (PU)<br />

and comorbidity of the affected patients in the<br />

period from 2005 to 2011.<br />

Patients and Methods: Age-adjusted prevalence<br />

and tables for gender and age distribution of pressure<br />

ulcers separately for the principal diagnosis<br />

and for additional diagnoses were provided from<br />

the Federal Statistical Office. Hospitals are legally<br />

obliged to deliver extensive data on hospital treatment,<br />

including demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities,<br />

complications, and procedures to the<br />

“Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System”<br />

which uses the data for yearly adaptation of the<br />

German Diagnosis Related Group System.<br />

Results: Total number of cases hospitalized with<br />

the principal diagnosis PU increased from 9,941<br />

in 2005 to 12,581 in 2011 (increase of 26.5 %)<br />

with a disproportional increase of PU grade<br />

4 (from 46 % in 2005 to 59 % in 2001). Total<br />

number of cases hospitalized having the additional<br />

diagnosis PU increased from 239,760 in 2005 to<br />

412,029 in 2011 (increase of 71.8 %) with a disproportional<br />

of PU grade 2 (from 39 % to 47 %).<br />

Age adjusted population based data per 100,000<br />

inhabitants show no increase in cases with the<br />

principal diagnosis, but cases with the additional<br />

diagnosis does. Comparing the distribution of<br />

PU localisation there are no relevant differences<br />

between 2005 and 2011 with the exception of<br />

a decrease of PUs of rare localisation (head, upper<br />

extremity, vertebral spin) and not specified<br />

localizations (principal diagnosis: from 25.8 % to<br />

16.5 %, additional diagnosis from 29.1 % 18.0 %).<br />

Patterns of comorbidity did not change in the<br />

period from 2005 to 2011. Urinary and faecal<br />

incontinence play a major role in those with the<br />

principal diagnosis PU whereas fracture of femur,<br />

heart failure and pneumonia are the most frequent<br />

diagnoses coded with the additional diagnosis of<br />

PU.<br />

Conclusion: In Germany the rate of cases hospitalized<br />

with the principal diagnosis PU did not<br />

increase whereas the rate of PU documented in<br />

hospitalized patients increased from 2005 to 2011.<br />

Heidi Heinhold 1<br />

<strong>Journal</strong>ist<br />

Andreas Westerfellhaus 2<br />

Introduction<br />

Pressure ulcer is a generally preventable complication<br />

of immobility 1,2,3,4 . The awareness for<br />

prevention of pressure ulcers (PU) and for early<br />

detection increased in the last decades 5,6 . The<br />

impact of these changes in awareness and in prevention<br />

on the prevalence of PU is unclear. Data<br />

from the National Center for Health Statistics<br />

and the Washington State Department of Health<br />

for the 14-year period from 1987 through 2000<br />

found no evidence that the guidelines for the prevention<br />

of PU have been effective in decreasing<br />

pressure ulcer formation in the United States 4 .<br />

As a limitation of their findings they stated that<br />

they could not exclude a more thorough man-<br />

ner of reporting pressure ulcer counteracting a<br />

decrease in the absolute number of PU. It could<br />

also be accounted for by changing demongraphics<br />

in that, the incidence of chronic disease is increasing<br />

along with increased age profile and thus one<br />

would expect a similar increase in PU, but this did<br />

not happen. So the guidelines might be effective<br />

in decreasing PU in absolute terms. The same is<br />

reported for Canada in a more recent study based<br />

on the Annual Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Census<br />

1994-2008 7 . In contrast to the somewhat constant<br />

prevalence and incidence of PE in these countries,<br />

an analysis of seven cross-sectional studies<br />

reporting point PU prevalence in 225 German<br />

<br />

Knut Kröger 3<br />

1 for the Deutsche<br />

Dekubitus Liga e.V.,<br />

2 for the Deutsche<br />

Pflegerat e.V.,<br />

3 for the Initiative<br />

Chronische Wunde e.V.,<br />

Correspondence:<br />

knut.kroeger@<br />

helios-kliniken.de<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 9


hospital found a significant decrease when nonblanchable<br />

erythema were excluded 8 . Prevalence<br />

rates decreased from 6.4 % (year 2001) to 3.9 %<br />

(year 2007) (p=0.015).<br />

Thus we analyzed prevalence of PU based<br />

on the federal statistic. With the introduction<br />

of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in 2005<br />

for reimbursement this is the most valid data<br />

base for principal and additional diagnoses for<br />

hospitalized patients in Germany. We aimed to<br />

determine changes in prevalence, localization of<br />

PU and comorbidity of the affected patients in<br />

the period from 2005 to 2011.<br />

Methods<br />

The national statistic (DRG-statistic) published<br />

by the Federal Statistical Office includes<br />

data from all hospitals in Germany that use the<br />

DRG-system. These hospitals treat almost 99 %<br />

of all patients in Germany and they are legally obliged to<br />

deliver extensive data on hospital treatment, including demographic<br />

data, diagnoses, comorbidities, complications,<br />

and procedures to the “Institute for the Hospital Remuneration<br />

System” which uses the data for yearly adaptation<br />

of the German DRG-system and transmits them to the<br />

Federal Statistical Office 9,10 . Only some private clinics do<br />

not participate in this system.<br />

For 2005 to 2011 all diagnosis were coded with the<br />

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related<br />

Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10), which was<br />

adapted for Germany by the German Institute for Medical<br />

Documentation and Information (DIMDI) as ICD-10<br />

German Modification (ICD-10-GM) version 2005 to version<br />

2011. Pressure ulcers were coded as L89.- given all 5<br />

digits of the code (Table 1). This code implies information<br />

regarding the grade of the pressure ulcers (depicting the<br />

depth) and the variety of localizations. As shown in Table 1<br />

coding changed from 2009 to 2010.<br />

Statistics<br />

Age-adjusted prevalences and tables for gender and age<br />

distribution of pressure ulcers separately for the principal<br />

diagnosis and for additional diagnoses were provided from<br />

the Federal Statistical Office. These data count pressure<br />

ulcers not inpatient cases. According to its definition, each<br />

principal diagnosis represents a single case. But, each case<br />

could suffer from several pressure ulcers which have to be<br />

coded. As consequence, inpatient cases could be included<br />

Table 1: Description of pressure ulcer coding in the German version<br />

of ICD-10 in the years 2005 to 2011.<br />

2005 -2009 2010-2011<br />

Fourth digit defines the grade of the pressure ulcers<br />

L89.1- L89.0- PU Grade1<br />

L89.2- L89.1- PU Grade2<br />

L89.3- L89.2- PU Grade3<br />

L89.4- L89.3- PU Grade4<br />

L89.9- L89.9- unknown Grade<br />

Fifth digit defines the localisation of the pressure ulcers (example grade 1)<br />

L89.10 L89.0 PU Grade1: Head<br />

L89.11 L89.01 PU Grade1: Upper Limb<br />

L89.12 L89.02 PU Grade1: Spinous Process<br />

L89.13 L89.03 PU Grade1: Iliac Crest<br />

L89.14 L89.04 PU Grade1: Sacrum<br />

L89.15 L89.05 PU Grade1: Ischium<br />

L89.16 L89.06 PU Grade1: Great Trochanter<br />

L89.17 L89.07 PU Grade1: Heel<br />

L89.18 L89.08 PU Grade1: Other Localisation at Lower Limb<br />

L89.19 L89.09 PU Grade1: Not Defined Localisation<br />

Figure 1: Total number of patients hospitalized with the principal<br />

diagnosis L89 separated by grade 1 to 4.<br />

severalfold in the statistic on additional diagnoses. Therefore,<br />

the distribution of patients with at least one pressure<br />

ulcer as additional diagnoses was provided by the federal<br />

Statistical Office additionally. Last, a single inpatient case<br />

could be count in the statistics on principal and additional<br />

diagnoses in parallel.<br />

Calculations were done using Microsoft ® Excel 2003<br />

and Microsoft ® Access 2003.<br />

10<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Table 2: Prevalence of patients with PU (ICD code L89.-) as principal diagnosis<br />

and as additional diagnosis per 100,000 population in Germany.<br />

60 - 64 65 - 69 70 - 74 75 - 79 80 - 84 85 - 89 ≥ 90<br />

Principal diagnosis pressure ulcer<br />

Males<br />

2005 15,3 20,1 30,3 43,2 65,9 102,5 125,7<br />

2011 16,9 25,2 37,2 53,2 75,9 111,5 111,3<br />

Females<br />

2005 8,1 13,2 24,0 49,1 85,9 136,8 195,7<br />

2011 10,7 18,6 28,4 52,8 93,6 150,4 206,5<br />

All<br />

2005 11,6 16,5 26,8 46,8 79,9 127,9 181,2<br />

2011 13,7 21,8 32,5 53,0 86,8 139,3 181,9<br />

Additional diagnosis pressure ulcer<br />

Males<br />

2005 364,1 560,3 956,2 1510,2 2432,7 3504,8 4028,1<br />

2011 584,0 921,9 1435,6 2396,1 3771,3 5516,0 6133,7<br />

Females<br />

2005 190,5 342,1 661,3 1238,5 2259,2 3377,9 4556,9<br />

2011 312,4 524,0 898,8 1787,4 3218,1 5162,6 6684,1<br />

All<br />

2005 275,8 446,2 794,8 1347,1 2311,8 3410,8 4445,7<br />

2011 445,9 715,4 1147,7 2051,6 3429,2 5263,0 6540,8<br />

most frequent grade (Figure 2). Its rate increased<br />

disproportionally from 39 % in 2005<br />

to 47 % in 2011.<br />

In 2005 a total of 16,071,846 cases were<br />

treated as in-patients in German hospitals.<br />

Thus 0.062 % (9,941) was referred with PU<br />

as principal diagnosis and 1.5 % (239,760)<br />

had at least one additional diagnosis PU. In<br />

2011 a total of 18.691.076 cases were treated<br />

as full in time patients in German hospitals.<br />

The rates of cases with PU as principal diagnosis<br />

were 0.067 % (12,581) and that of<br />

additional diagnosis 2.2 % (412,029).<br />

Population based data per 100,000 inhabitants<br />

are shown in Table 2. Locking at<br />

this data there is no increase in cases with the<br />

principal diagnosis PU but in cases with the<br />

additional diagnosis.<br />

Figure 2: Total number of patients hospitalized with the<br />

additional diagnosis L89 separated by grade 1 to 4.<br />

Results<br />

Prevalence of cases with PU<br />

Total number of cases hospitalized with the principal diagnosis<br />

PU increased from 9,941 in 2005 to 12,581 in<br />

2011 (increase of 26.5 %). Within this population the rate<br />

of PU grade 4 increased disproportionally from 46 % in<br />

2005 to 59 % in 2001 (Figure 1).<br />

Total number of cases hospitalized for other diseases<br />

but having the additional diagnosis PU increased from<br />

239,760 in 2005 to 412,029 in 2011 (increase of 71,8 %).<br />

Within this population the rate of PU grade 2 was the<br />

Localization of PU<br />

The most frequent localisations of PU were ischium, sacrum<br />

and heel, but there are some specific differences between<br />

the group of patients with PU as principal diagnosis<br />

or as an additional diagnosis. In 10 to 59 years old patients<br />

with the principal diagnosis PU the ischium plays a much<br />

greater role than in patients 60 to 90 years old patients<br />

(Figure 3). In older patients the relevance of the ischium<br />

as most frequent localisation diminished and the sacrum<br />

and the heel PU dominated.<br />

These differences can not be found when a PU is coded<br />

as an additional diagnosis. There is a consistent gradual increase<br />

in the frequency of sacral PU with an increasing age.<br />

Comparing the distribution of PU localization there<br />

are no relevant differences between 2005 and 2011 with<br />

the exception of a decrease of PUs of rare localization<br />

(head, upper extremity, vertebral spin) and not specified<br />

localizations. Within the cases of PU as principal diagnosis<br />

the rate decreased from 25.8 % to 16.5 % and with in the<br />

cases with PU as additional diagnosis the rate decreased<br />

from 29.1 % 18.0 %<br />

Comorbidity<br />

The comorbidity is different between those patients with<br />

pressure ulcer as the principal diagnosis and those with<br />

pressure ulcer as an additional diagnosis. Urinary and faecal<br />

incontinence play a major role in those who were referred<br />

for treatment of the pressure ulcer (Table 2). Fracture of<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 11


Figure 3: Rate of PU at different<br />

localizations separated for patients<br />

with PU as principal (left) or additional<br />

(right) diagnosis and for the years<br />

2005 (upper part) and 2011<br />

(lower part) with increasing age.<br />

femur, heart failure and pneumonia are<br />

the most frequent diagnoses coded with<br />

the additional diagnosis of pressure ulcer<br />

(Table 3). These patterns of comorbidity<br />

did not change in the period from 2005<br />

to 2011.<br />

Discussion<br />

Data from the DRG-statistic of the years<br />

2005 to 2011 present a good overview<br />

about the problem of pressure ulcers handled<br />

in acute hospitals in Germany.<br />

There is an increase in absolute numbers<br />

of PU which in part is explained by<br />

the aging population. After age-adjustment<br />

the incidence rates per 100.000 inhabitants<br />

of PU as principal diagnosis did<br />

not increase. There is a variety of possible<br />

interpretations that could be discussed.<br />

One could hypothesize, that burden of PU in out of hospital<br />

care in general remained unchanged. One can also<br />

hypothesize, that the overall strategies in prevention of PU<br />

failed as the rates did not decrease. We did not see a shift<br />

towards patients suffering from lower grades of PU, thus<br />

it can be excluded that there is trend to earlier hospitalization<br />

of affected patients. The opposite is true as the rate<br />

of patients admissed with PU grade 4 increased disproportionally.<br />

This might be in indicator for an increasing<br />

burden of PU in non-hospital settings.<br />

The rates of PU as additional diagnosis per 100.000<br />

inhabitants still increased after age-adjustment. Thus more<br />

PUs were documented in the hospitals. Again there is a<br />

variety of interpretations. As these PUs do not necessarily<br />

developed during the period of hospitalization they could<br />

have been acquired before hospitalization. As all hospitals<br />

are forced to increase their awareness after publication<br />

of the National Expert-Standard for PU Prophylaxis just<br />

more PUs could have been documented without affecting<br />

Table 3: Top five of the additional diagnosis coded in patients<br />

with the principal diagnosis PU.<br />

Order Code PU was the principal diagnosis Rate (%)<br />

1 R15 Faecal incontinence 40,8<br />

2 B962 Escherichia coli 32,8<br />

3 I100 Essential Hypertension 30,4<br />

4 R32 Urinal incontinence 26,0<br />

5 B956 Staphylococcus aureus 22,3<br />

the true number of PUs. An over documentation of each<br />

discoloured skin area as PU grade 1 (or grade 0 after the<br />

change in coding 2009) should have increased the rate of<br />

this grade. Our data showed a dysproportional increase in<br />

PU grade II (or grade 1 after the change in coding 2009),<br />

which suggests that objective findings were documented.<br />

All in all, our data do not support the results presented<br />

from Kottner et al. 2009 who analysed the results of seven<br />

point pressure ulcer prevalence studies conducted in 225<br />

12<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

tice guidelines might have improved<br />

the quality of patient care, but does not<br />

necessarily decrease the number of PU.<br />

Wilborn et al analysed the impact of the<br />

National Expert Standard Pressure Ulcer<br />

Prevention on pressure ulcer prevalence<br />

in Germany 11 . The overall pressure ulcer<br />

prevalence grade 2 - 4 was 4.7 %. Adjusted<br />

for hospital departments, survey year and<br />

individual characteristics, there was no<br />

significant difference in the prevalence of<br />

pressure ulcers between institutions that<br />

refer to the National Expert Standard<br />

Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Nursing or<br />

those referring to other sources in developing<br />

their local protocols (OR=1.14,<br />

95 % CI=0.90-1.44).<br />

Table 4: Top five of the principal diagnoses coded in patients<br />

with the additional diagnosis PU.<br />

Order Code PU was an additional diagnosis Rate (%)<br />

1 S72.- Femur fracture 6,2<br />

2 I50.- Heart insufficiency 5,8<br />

3 J18.- Pneumonia 4,6<br />

4 E11.- Diabetes mellitus Typ II 4,1<br />

5 A41.- Sepsis 2,8<br />

German hospitals and concluded that PU prevalence rates<br />

decreased from 13.9 % (year 2001) to 7.3 % (year 2007)<br />

(p


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Any patient can develop a PU dependent on its individual<br />

comorbidity, the performed procedures and the intensity<br />

of nursing care. An American analysis on changes in the<br />

percentage of licensed nursing staff in Pennsylvanian hospitals<br />

between 1991 and 1997 led to the conclusion that<br />

almost all complications are seen more often in hospitals<br />

with fewer licensed nursing staff, in particular pressure ulcers<br />

and pneumonia 14 . A Swedish group who examined the<br />

problem of pressure ulcers in intensive care wards reported<br />

that 58 % of nursing staff think lack of time was a significant<br />

factor whenever pressure ulcer risk was not properly<br />

evaluated or aid devices were employed either inadequately<br />

or not at all 15 . For Germany, our analyses indicate that a<br />

low number of full-time employees in nursing homes had<br />

an influence on the incidence of pressure ulcers both as<br />

primary and as secondary diagnosis 16 .<br />

There is no predominant principal diagnosis which is<br />

associated with a relevant number of PUs. Older people<br />

having PU documented as an additional diagnosis in Germany<br />

in 2005 had femur fracture in 6.9 %, heart failure<br />

in 5.4 % and pneumonia in 5.2 % as the most frequent<br />

principal diagnosis 4 . It remains unclear if there is a specific<br />

risk associated with these diseases if it is just a selection of<br />

old and immobile patients. In contrast in those presenting<br />

with PU as the principal diagnosis the classical risk<br />

factors faecal and urinary incontinence seem to have a<br />

relevant impact either on the development of PU or on<br />

the admission to hospital. These patterns of comorbidity<br />

did not change in the period from 2005 to 2011 as we<br />

did not expect it to change 17,18 .<br />

Limitations<br />

Although routine data in the electronic patient record are<br />

frequently used for secondary purposes, there is currently<br />

no systematic analysis of coding quality in Germany 10 .<br />

Whether coding matches reality as a prerequisite for further<br />

use of the data in medicine and health politics has<br />

to be investigated in controlled trials. Thus, we cannot<br />

estimate the rate of wrong coding of the grades or the<br />

localizations of pressure ulcers.<br />

In conclusion, in Germany the rate of cases hospitalized<br />

with the principal diagnosis PU did not increase whereas<br />

the rate of PU documented in hospitalized patients increased<br />

from 2005 to 2011. Thus, PU is still a relevant<br />

problem. This analysis pointed out some specific aspects<br />

in PU localization and comorbidity that show the multidimensional<br />

dimension of the problem. <br />

m<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

We thank Referat VIII A 1 from the Federal Statistical Office<br />

for extracting and providing the data from the DRG-Statistik.<br />

References<br />

1. Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM. The 1999 National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence<br />

Survey: a benchmarking approach. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14:297-301.<br />

2. Lahmann NA, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and<br />

acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics. Ostomy<br />

Wound Manage. 2006;52:20-33<br />

3. Scott JR, Gibran NS, Engrav LH, Mack CD, Rivara FP. Incidence and Characteristics<br />

of Hospitalized Patients with Pressure Ulcers: State of Washington, 1987 to 2000.<br />

Plast. Reconstr. Surg.2006;117:630<br />

4. Kröger K, Niebel W, Maier I, Stausberg J, Gerber V, Schwarzkopf A. Prevalence of<br />

pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients in Germany in 2005: data from the Federal<br />

Statistical Office. Gerontology. 2009;55:281-7.<br />

5. Gunningberg L, Stotts NA, Idvall E. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in two Swedish<br />

County Councils: cross-sectional data as the foundation for future quality improvement.Int<br />

Wound J. 2011;8:465-73.<br />

6. Vangilder C, Macfarlane GD, Meyer S. Results of nine international pressure ulcer<br />

prevalence surveys: 1989 to 2005. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54:40-54.<br />

7. Vandenkerkhof EG, Friedberg E, Harrison MB. Prevalence and Risk of Pressure<br />

Ulcers in Acute Care Following Implementation of Practice Guidelines: Annual<br />

Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Census 1994-2008. J Healthc Qual. 2011 Jan 11. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00127.x.<br />

8. Kottner J, Wilborn D, Dassen T, Lahmann N. The trend of pressure ulcer prevalence<br />

rates in German hospitals: results of seven cross-sectional studies. J Tissue Viability.<br />

2009;18:36-46.<br />

9. Mueller-Bergfort S, Fritze J. Diagnose- und Prozedurendaten im deutschen<br />

DRG-System. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz<br />

2007;50:1047-1054<br />

10. Stausberg J. Quality of coding in acute inpatient care. Bundesgesundheitsblatt<br />

Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007;50:1039-1046.<br />

11. Wilborn D, Grittner U, Dassen T, Kottner J. The National Expert Standard Pressure<br />

Ulcer Prevention in Nursing and pressure ulcer prevalence in German health care<br />

facilities: a multilevel analysis. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:3364-71.<br />

12. Groeneveld A, Anderson M, Allen S, Bressmer S, Golberg M, Magee B, Milner M,<br />

Young S. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in a tertiary care pediatric and adult<br />

hospital. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004;31:108-120<br />

13. Clegg A, Kring D, Plemmons J, Richbourg L. North Carolina wound nurses examine<br />

heel pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36:635-9.<br />

14. Unruh L. Licensed nurse staffing and adverse events in hospitals. Med Care 2003;<br />

41:142-52<br />

15. Strand T, Lindgren M. Knowledge, attitudes and barriers towards prevention of<br />

pressure ulcers in intensive care units: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Intensive<br />

Crit Care Nurs 201026: 335-342<br />

16. Kröger K, Becker R, Weiland D, Lax H, Priebel J, Maier I. Regional differences in the<br />

incidence of inpatients with pressure ulcers in Germany. J Public Health 2012;<br />

10.1007/s10389-012-0504-0<br />

17. Arndt KA, Dohrendorf H, Tannen A, Braumann A, Dassen T. Prevalence of urinary<br />

incontinence in hospitals and nursing homes: an underestimated problem. Pflege Z.<br />

2006;59:635-638.<br />

18. Tabali M, Kollross CM, Braumann A, Tannen A, Dassen T. Fecal incontinence – an<br />

analysis of German clinics and nursing homes: breaking the taboo. Pflege Z.<br />

2006;59:639-642.<br />

14<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Targeting bacteria<br />

NEW<br />

sorbion silver flex<br />

Effective against bacteria and fungi<br />

No discoloration of the wound<br />

Wear time up to 7 days<br />

www.sorbion.com<br />

Product availability may differ from country to country.


Visit us at<br />

EWMA<br />

<strong>2014</strong><br />

Enjoy the freedom of<br />

superior absorption<br />

The new Biatain ® Silicone dressing delivers<br />

superior absorption and a secure fi t<br />

· The new design of Biatain ® Silicone introduces a perforated, soft<br />

soft silicone adhesive wound contact layer, delivering a secure fi t<br />

without compromising superior absorption.<br />

· The unique Biatain foam conforms closely to the wound bed,<br />

ensuring superior absorption and an optimal moist wound healing<br />

environment.<br />

Visit Coloplast at EWMA <strong>2014</strong> and learn more about the new<br />

Biatain Silicone dressing.<br />

Biatain Silicone<br />

– superior absorption with<br />

soft adhesion for general<br />

purposes<br />

The Coloplast logo is a registered trademark of Coloplast A/S. © <strong>2014</strong>-02. All rights reserved Coloplast A/S, 3050 Humlebæk, Denmark.


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Excess use of antibiotics<br />

in patients with non-healing ulcers<br />

Although approximately 4 million cases of nonhealing<br />

ulcers are diagnosed annually in Europe,<br />

non-healing ulcers have been considered a negligible<br />

problem in society 1 . Since there are only a few<br />

who understand the significance of the problem,<br />

there are very few in the health profession who<br />

are updated in terms of evaluation, diagnosis, and<br />

treatment of such wounds. In addition, many ulcers<br />

are never diagnosed, a fact that reflects both a<br />

lack of knowledge and also a low quality of care.<br />

One problem among patients with non-healing<br />

ulcers is an excess usage of antibiotics. As early<br />

as 1998, Tammelin et al. reported that 60.1% of<br />

all ulcer patients were treated with at least one<br />

antibiotic within a six-month period. 2 However,<br />

the indication for antibiotics was considered unfounded<br />

in most cases.<br />

The bacterial environment in ulcers has been<br />

found to be more complicated than previously<br />

assumed. Based on new knowledge about the microbiology<br />

of non-healing ulcers, antibiotics may<br />

not be the most effective choice as a treatment<br />

strategy. Recently, there has been an increased focus<br />

on the formation of so-called “biofilms” on<br />

ulcers. Therefore, a paradigm shift in the treatment<br />

of non-healing ulcers is needed, especially<br />

among primary health services, to focus on better<br />

diagnoses and treatment of the underlying cause<br />

of the ulcer that reduces the incidence of unnecessary<br />

antibiotic therapy.<br />

This article presents the results from an investigation<br />

on the use of antibiotics in ulcer patients<br />

who were referred to the wound healing unit at<br />

the Flekkefjord Hospital in Sørland from primary<br />

health services.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The present investigation was performed as a<br />

prospective observational study from 1 January<br />

2008 to 11 December 2008. The medical records<br />

for all patients with non-healing ulcers referred<br />

to Sørlandet Hospital Flekkefjord were obtained<br />

from doctors in the primary health services (e.g.,<br />

on-duty doctors, personal physicians, and nursing<br />

home physicians). For cases that lacked the<br />

information needed for the investigation, questionnaires<br />

were mailed to the family doctor. Data<br />

from 105 of a total of 110 patients were evaluated<br />

in this investigation.<br />

In addition to this investigation, a non-systematic<br />

literature search was conducted in PubMed.<br />

Results<br />

The average age of the patients was 68.6 years (age<br />

range: 2-98). The average age of the ulcers was 7.1<br />

months (1-36 months). Figure 1 shows a distribution<br />

of the ulcer diagnoses among these patients.<br />

Figure 1: Overview of ulcer diagnoses<br />

60 (75.1%) patients received treatment with<br />

antibiotics before they were referred to the Wound<br />

healing unit.<br />

56 (53.3%) patients were treated with systemic<br />

antibiotics and 9 (8.6%) patients were treated<br />

with local antibiotics. Two or more antibiotic<br />

treatments had been prescribed in 14 (13.3%)<br />

patients.<br />

<br />

Marcus Gürgen,<br />

Medical Superintendent/<br />

Department Manager,<br />

Dept. Of Surgery, Sørlandet<br />

Hospital HF, Flekkefjord,<br />

Norway<br />

Correspondence:<br />

marcus.gurgen@sshf.no<br />

This article was first<br />

published in Saar,<br />

Sept. 2012<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

venous ulcers<br />

traumatic/postoperative wounds<br />

pressure ulcers,<br />

arterial ulcers<br />

diabetic foot ulcers<br />

hydrostatic ulcers<br />

skin disease<br />

cancer<br />

ulcers caused by radiation<br />

vasculitis<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 17


30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Figure 2:<br />

Number of patients<br />

treated with antibiotics<br />

per ulcer diagnosis.<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

number of patients<br />

per diagnosis<br />

number treated<br />

with antibiotics<br />

Antibiotic treatments were administered in 78.3%<br />

of patients with traumatic or postoperative ulcers,<br />

66.6% of patients with venous ulcers of the legs,<br />

36.4% of patients with pressure ulcers, and 30%<br />

of patients with arterial ulcers (Figure 2).<br />

A bacteriological examination was conducted in<br />

33 (31.4%) of patients. Staphylococcus aureus was<br />

found in 43% of these patients. Normal skin flora<br />

was found in 13% of these patients (Figure 3).<br />

VLU<br />

TRAUMA / POST<br />

PRESSURE<br />

ARTERIAL<br />

HYDROSTATIC<br />

DIABETIC FOOT<br />

CANCER<br />

MIXED ULCER<br />

RADIATION BURN<br />

SKIN DISEASE<br />

VASCULITIS<br />

OTHER<br />

STAPH. AUREUS<br />

STREPTO<br />

GRAM NEG. MIXTURE<br />

GRAM NEG RODS<br />

PROTEUS<br />

Antibiotics were administered in 84.5% of the<br />

cases in which bacteriological samples had been<br />

taken. Dicloxacillin, which is a beta-lactamaseresistant<br />

penicillin, was prescribed in 41% of these<br />

cases (Figure 4).<br />

Figure 3: Detected isolates from ulcers<br />

PSEUDOMONAS<br />

ENTERCOCCI<br />

E. COLI<br />

NORMAL SKIN FLORA<br />

NO GROWTH<br />

The personnel at the wound healing unit agreed<br />

with the indication for antibiotic therapy in only<br />

one case (0.9%). However, the Wound healing<br />

unit identified a need for systemic antimicrobial<br />

therapy in 6 (5.4%) patients who had not received<br />

this treatment from primary health services. Five<br />

of these 6 patients (83.3%) had an undiscovered<br />

and untreated cases of either osteitis or osteomyelitis,<br />

which is a clear indication for antibiotic<br />

treatment.<br />

Discussion<br />

Microbiology of chronic ulcers<br />

Conditions such as chronic venous insufficiency,<br />

arterial insufficiency, and pressure over time, can<br />

lead to the reduced reparation capacity of skin<br />

injuries, which can lead to non-healing ulcers.<br />

A non-healing ulcer, however, should not be regarded<br />

as a disease, but rather as a symptom of<br />

an underlying state. Bacteria will colonize within<br />

the ulcer if the protective barrier of the skin is<br />

broken. Therefore, the appearance of a chronic<br />

ulcer depends on several factors (Table 1). These<br />

Figure 4: Antibiotics prescribed for ulcer treatment<br />

18<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Table 1. Factors that enhance the risk of development of ulcer infections<br />

Systemic factors<br />

n Metabolic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus<br />

n Systemic diseases, such as rheumatic diseases<br />

n Other forms of chronic disease, such as HIV infection<br />

n Old age<br />

n Malnutrition / poor diet<br />

n Alcohol / narcotics abuse<br />

n Medicines, such as steroids, oestrogens, and vitamin K antagonists<br />

n Smoking<br />

Local factors<br />

n Size of the ulcer<br />

n Age of the ulcer<br />

n Location of the ulcer<br />

n Local circulation<br />

n Necrosis<br />

n Suppuration and maceration<br />

n Edema<br />

n Exposed bones or capsules<br />

factors also contribute to the development of infections<br />

in the ulcer. 3 As Louis Pasteur (1822-1895), the father of<br />

modern microbiology, said: “The germ is nothing. It is the<br />

terrain in which it is found that is everything.”<br />

There are various hypotheses regarding the interactions<br />

between ulcers and bacteria. The contamination–infection<br />

continuum hypothesis is based on the fact that chronic<br />

ulcers are contaminated or colonized by planktonics, i.e.,<br />

free bacteria. 4 In such situations, the healing of an ulcer<br />

takes place undisturbed, despite the fact that bacteria are<br />

present. Critical colonization, however, occurs when microorganisms<br />

begin to negatively affect the healing process.<br />

In such cases, subtle signs of infection can be observed,<br />

such as friable granulation tissue, lack of epithelial growth,<br />

and increased suppuration. 5 Infection is present when at<br />

least three of the following classical signs of infection have<br />

been observed clinically:<br />

n Redness (due to vasodilation)<br />

n Local heat (due to vasodilation)<br />

n Pain (due to the stimulation of nociceptive<br />

nerve fibres by cytokines)<br />

n Swelling (due to increased vascular permeability)<br />

This contamination-infection continuum hypothesis<br />

adequately explains the inflammation observed in acute<br />

ulcers, e.g., in cases of postoperative infection.<br />

Bacteria are always found in chronic ulcers. There are<br />

often multiple types of bacteria observed within a single ulcer.<br />

For example, the flora usually found in cases of venous<br />

ulcers of the legs include Staphylococcus aureus (90.5%),<br />

Enterococcus faecalis (71.7%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

(52.2%). 6 The bacterial flora found in a non-healing ulcer<br />

change as the ulcer ages. Staphylococci and streptococci<br />

bacteria are normally found in new ulcers, while gramnegative<br />

mixed flora are often found in older ulcers. In<br />

addition, different types of ulcers are influenced by different<br />

types of bacteria. For example, a clinical infection<br />

will develop in 60% of diabetic foot ulcers but only 20%<br />

of venous leg ulcers that are colonized by Staphylococcus<br />

aureus. 12 Other systemic and local factors also influence<br />

the development of an ulcer infection.<br />

Between 1.6 and 4.4 species of bacteria are found per<br />

ulcer by conventional culturing methods 7 . However, molecular<br />

biological methods suggest that even more species<br />

of bacteria are present in the average ulcer. 8 The number<br />

of ulcers with anaerobic bacterial growth is estimated to<br />

be between 25% and 82%. The most common anaerobic<br />

bacterial species are Peptostreptococcus and Prevotalla. 9,10,11<br />

However, many ulcers heal despite the fact the presence of<br />

these microorganisms. The presence of anaerobic bacteria<br />

is therefore not necessarily a sign of an ulcer infection.<br />

Recent research has indicated that the presence of bacterial<br />

biofilm contributes to the development of chronic<br />

ulcers. Biofilm, which is a well-known cause of periodontitis,<br />

has also been observed in cases of infection that involve<br />

medical implants and catheters. Studies performed<br />

by James et al. have shown that biofilm is present in 60%<br />

of chronic ulcers but only 6% of acute ulcers. 13 This supports<br />

the view that biofilm probably plays an important<br />

role in the formation of chronic ulcerations.<br />

In contrast to planktonic, i.e., free bacteria, the bacteria in<br />

biofilm are organized into a layer that consists of proteins,<br />

nucleic acids, and polysaccharides. The biofilm is affixed<br />

to the surface of the ulcer. 14 The physical properties of the<br />

biofilm protect the bacteria against most forms of chemical,<br />

biological, and physical stress. These properties also<br />

protect the bacteria against antibiotics and the immune<br />

response (e.g., neutrophil granulocytes). In addition, the<br />

biofilm assures the maintenance of a chronic inflammation<br />

in the ulcer. The bacteria in the biofilm release proteases.<br />

These proteases contribute to the breakdown of growth<br />

factors and tissue proteins that are responsible for repair<br />

processes in the tissue. The breakdown and decomposition<br />

products from the neutrophil granulocytes Killed by<br />

bacteria play a role in the inhibition of the “search and<br />

destroy” capabilities of the macrophages. This breakdown<br />

and decomposition also leads to the destruction of tissue<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 19


Figure 5.<br />

Ulcers on the forehead<br />

following skin transplantation<br />

after the removal of a basal cell<br />

carcinoma. Several clinical<br />

findings (e.g., hypergranulation,<br />

absent epithelial growth,<br />

suppuration) suggested that this<br />

ulcer was covered by a biofilm.<br />

as well as an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.<br />

Together, these processes contribute to the chronic<br />

inflammatory state of the ulcer. 4<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a microorganism whose<br />

ability to form biofilm has been well studied. When<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is organized into a biofilm, it<br />

releases virulence factors that are capable of eliminating<br />

polymorphonucleated neutrophil granulocytes. Instead<br />

of removing bacteria and tissue residues, the leukocytes<br />

are dissolved and proteolytic enzymes are released. Some<br />

of these enzymes are so-called metalloproteases, which<br />

break down the extracellular matrix, including collagen<br />

and growth factors. Together with an increase in free radicals,<br />

the breakdown of the extracellular matrix prevents the<br />

initiation of the normal repair processes. A high level of<br />

harmful enzymes in combination with the breakdown of<br />

tissue, however, stimulates the immune system and constantly<br />

attracts new polymorphonucleated granulocytes.<br />

The immune system is maximally stimulated, which starts<br />

a vicious cycle that can be counteracted with antibiotics.<br />

In such a situation, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is prepared<br />

to “kidnap” the immune response of the host to create a<br />

bacteria-friendly environment. The maximally stimulated<br />

immune system brings an increased supply of blood to the<br />

injured area, which provides the bacteria with sufficient<br />

nutrients. Anaerobic bacteria are attracted to this site due<br />

to the consumption of oxygen around the biofilm. An<br />

oxygen gradient has also been demonstrated inside the<br />

biofilm, which means that the anaerobic bacteria are able<br />

to penetrate into deeper tissue 15,16 These observations<br />

therefore suggest a synergistic interaction between ulcers<br />

and bacteria that have a greater importance than the isolated<br />

presence of any other pathogen.<br />

A biofilm in an ulcer often appears as a membrane. Other<br />

characteristics include hypergranulated tissue that bleeds<br />

easily on contact, the absence of epithelial growth from<br />

the edges, suppuration, cyanotic discoloration due to<br />

oxygen deficiency, and a distinct odor from the ulcer site<br />

(Figure 5).<br />

The results from our investigation on the use of antibiotics<br />

in patients with non-healing ulcers demonstrate that<br />

antimicrobial medications were administered in 84.5% of<br />

the cases in which microbiological samples had been examined.<br />

These results also suggest that the detection of bacteria<br />

provides an indication for antibiotic treatment. Figure<br />

2 report the proportion of antibiotic-treated ulcers relative<br />

to the absolute number of ulcers. For example, 66.6% of<br />

all patients with venous ulcers of the leg (i.e., ulcus cruris<br />

venosum; UCV) had received antibiotics. However,<br />

venous ulcers of the leg have an inflammatory cause such<br />

that antibiotic treatment will not be effective. There may<br />

be either a lack of knowledge among primary care doctors<br />

about the aetiology of venous ulcers or a misinterpretation<br />

of the symptoms of inflammation as symptoms of infection<br />

that causes the doctor to analyse a microbiological<br />

sample. The current study was not designed to tease out<br />

the reasons why a doctor may order such a bacterial test.<br />

An investigation performed by Kirketerp-Møller et al.<br />

showed discrepancies between ordinary cultures and genetic<br />

analyses (i.e., peptide nuclear acid fluorized in situ<br />

hybridization – PAN-FISH) from ulcers. 17 Conventional<br />

laboratory methods to detect bacteria favor Staphylococcus<br />

aureus, which may explain why Staphylococcus aureus are<br />

observed in the majority of non-healing ulcers.<br />

20<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

The occurrence of highly virulent organisms, such as<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is underestimated by conventional<br />

culturing methods. 8 Dowd et al. used genetic methods<br />

to demonstrate that obligate anaerobes are present in 62%<br />

of chronic ulcers. This study concluded that bacterial cultures<br />

from ulcers rarely reflect the true bacterial population<br />

of the ulcer.<br />

There are several indications that conventional microbiological<br />

methods reveal only organisms that grow<br />

relatively rapidly and are simple to detect in the culture<br />

medium. Importantly, biofilm cannot be detected by these<br />

methods. 18 Therefore, better microbiological methods are<br />

needed to understand the bacterial environment of the<br />

ulcer. In clinical practice, samples from ulcers should be<br />

taken only in cases in which there is an indication for<br />

infection that could benefit from antibiotic therapy. Indications<br />

for systemic antibiotic treatment are shown in<br />

Table 2. As outlined in Table 2, there is a low threshold<br />

for administering antibiotics in patients with diabetic foot<br />

ulcers and in patients who are on immunosuppressive<br />

medications. However, an ulcer will never be sterilized by<br />

antibiotics. The assessment of the results provided by the<br />

microbiologist should focus on the correct choice of antibiotic<br />

that reduces the risk for resistant strains to develop.<br />

Systematic reviews have not shown that antibiotics are an<br />

effective treatment for chronic ulcers. 19,20 Clinical experience<br />

demonstrates that ulcers treated with antibiotics<br />

may improve over brief periods, but deteriorate after the<br />

antibiotic has been withdrawn. The results of the current<br />

study suggest that 13.3% of patients received repeated<br />

“cures” with antibiotics. However, the assumption based<br />

on current evidence is that, although the bacterial flora<br />

within an ulcer may be reduced over a brief period during<br />

antibiotic treatment, the polymicrobial flora return when<br />

the medication is stopped. 8<br />

Table 2. Indications for use of antibiotic therapy in ulcer infections<br />

n At least 3 of the following clinical signs of infection:<br />

– Local heat<br />

– Redness that spreads more than 2 cm around the ulcer<br />

– Pain<br />

– Swelling<br />

n Contact with bone (osteomyelitis/osteitis)<br />

n Progression of the ulcer with the formation of satellite ulcers<br />

n Clinical signs of infection by streptococci group A (erysipelas)<br />

n Diabetic foot ulcers<br />

n Patients with immunosuppression<br />

The excess use of antibiotics in ulcer patients was studied<br />

as early as 1998 by Tammelin et al. in Sweden. Their investigation<br />

showed that 60.1% of patients had received<br />

an antibiotic treatment over an observation period of 6<br />

months. Their investigation also found resistant Staphylococcus<br />

aureus in 12.5% of these cases. 2 The risk of developing<br />

methicillin resistance increases with the administration<br />

of systematic antimicrobial therapy 7.<br />

Local antibiotic treatment of ulcers is not recommended<br />

because of the rapid development of resistance and<br />

the risk of allergic reactions. Nevertheless, the results of<br />

the current study indicate that local antibiotic treatment<br />

is widely prescribed. Several studies have suggested that<br />

products containing silver, honey, or iodine are recommended<br />

if local antibiotic treatment is necessary.<br />

7,19,21, 22<br />

Secretions from blowfly larvae have also been shown to kill<br />

bacteria. 23 These larvae have also been used to eradicate<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from<br />

ulcers 24. Ulcer rinsing agents or bandages that contain<br />

betaine and polyhexamide have also been shown to be<br />

effective treatments to reduce bacteria in ulcers. 25,26<br />

A total of 80-90% of antibiotic use takes place outside<br />

of the hospital. 27 An English study of antibiotic use<br />

among ulcer patients reported that more than 2 out of 3<br />

patients with non-healing ulcers received prescriptions<br />

for antibiotics from their family doctor over the course<br />

of 1 year. For comparison, only 1 out of 3 patients with<br />

other diagnoses (not related to non-healing wounds) were<br />

prescribed antibiotics. 28 This study also showed that antibiotics<br />

were administered over a longer period of time in<br />

ulcer patients compared with patients without ulcers. The<br />

practice of antibiotic prescription therefore seems to reflect<br />

uncertainty among physicians about how to treat ulcers.<br />

Updated Norwegian guidelines on the use of antibiotics<br />

can be found in both hospitals and primary health services.<br />

29,30,31,32 An article by Berild and Haug confirms that<br />

chronic ulcers of the legs are most frequently colonized<br />

by non-dangerous bacterial flora and that good local ulcer<br />

treatment without antibiotics is sufficient. The guidelines<br />

suggest that caution should be taken with respect to the<br />

use of antibiotics in ulcers, except in diabetic ulcers of<br />

the foot or cases of demonstrated streptococci, and indicate<br />

that topical antibiotics are contraindicated. 30 Other<br />

guidelines on the use of antibiotics in primary health services<br />

describe conditions such as erysipelas, diabetic foot<br />

ulcers, and impetigo as examples of skin and soft tissue<br />

infections. These guidelines also caution against the use<br />

of antibiotics. 29,31,32 However, these publications do not<br />

mention guidelines for common types of chronic ulcers,<br />

such as venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, and postopera-<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 21


Science, Practice and Education<br />

tive infections. This lack of information about chronic<br />

ulcers may contribute to the uncertainty among physicians<br />

regarding the use of antibiotic therapy in these cases. The<br />

National Guidelines for antibiotics issued by the Norwegian<br />

Health Directory for primary health services, which<br />

is assumed to be the primary reference point for doctors<br />

who are faced with a clinical uncertainty, should therefore<br />

provide further guidance about when the prescription of<br />

antibiotics is contraindicated.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The results of the current study suggest a significant excess<br />

use of antibiotics in patients with non-healing ulcers.<br />

Mounting evidence suggests that the use of antibiotics<br />

should be reduced significantly among this population<br />

because antibiotics do not treat the underlying cause of<br />

the ulcer. A reduction of antibiotic use among this patient<br />

population will significantly reduce antibiotic resistance<br />

and health care costs associated with the side effects of<br />

antibiotics.<br />

Although the guidelines for antibiotic use should be<br />

updated and improved for use by doctors in the primary<br />

health services, research suggests that the guidelines are<br />

not read or utilized. 33 This fact argues in favour of the<br />

creation of several specialized wound healing units in<br />

Norway. A rapid referral of ulcer patients to specialists<br />

will undoubtedly raise the standards in the diagnosis and<br />

treatment of non-healing ulcers and reduce the use of<br />

antibiotics.<br />

The primary message<br />

All non-healing ulcers will be influenced to various degrees by<br />

bacteria. There is therefore no reason to take routine bacteria<br />

samples from chronic ulcers. It is most important to find out<br />

the underlying cause of the ulcer and focus on its treatment.<br />

Table 1 provides an overview of the indications for antibiotic<br />

treatment of non-healing ulcers. In such situations, bacteria<br />

samples should be taken from the ulcer. In most cases, empirical<br />

treatment will be necessary and narrow-spectrum antibiotics<br />

should be utilized to the greatest possible degree. The knowledge<br />

of the bacterial flora in different types of non-healing ulcers is<br />

therefore highly decisive. The treatment may have to be adjusted<br />

when resistance is determined.<br />

References<br />

1. Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, et al. The resource impact of wounds on<br />

health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care 2009;18(4):154.<br />

2. Tammelin A, Lindholm C, Hambraeus A. Chronic ulcers and antibiotic treatment.<br />

J Wound Care 1998;7:435-7.<br />

3. Edwards R, Harding KG. Bacteria and wound healing. Curr Opin Infect Sis<br />

2004;17:91-6.<br />

4. Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects<br />

with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care 2008;4:145-55.<br />

5. Cutting K, Cert E, White RJ. Criteria for identifying wound infection – revisited.<br />

Ostomy Wound Manage 2005;51:28-34.<br />

6. Gjødsbol K, Christensen JJ, Karlsmark T, et al. Multiple bacterial species reside in<br />

chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int Wound J 2006;3:225-31.<br />

7. Howell-Jones RS, Wilson MJ, Hill KE, et al. A review of the microbiology, antibiotic<br />

usage and resistance in chronic skin wounds. J Antimicrobial Chemotherapy<br />

2005;55:143-9.<br />

8. Hill KE, Davies CE, Wilson MJ, et al. Molecular analysis of the microflora in chronic<br />

venous leg ulceration. J Medical Microbiology 2003;52:365-69.<br />

9. Bowler PG, Davies BJ. The microbiology of infected and noninfected leg ulcers.<br />

Int J Dermatol 1999;38:573-578.<br />

10. Trengrove NJ, Stacey MC, McGechie, et al.Qualitative bacteriology and leg ulcer<br />

healing. J Wound Care 1996;5:277-80.<br />

11. Ge Y, MacDonald D, Hait H, et al. Microbiological profile of infected diabetic foot<br />

ulcers. Diab Med 2002;19:1032-5.<br />

12. Schmidt K, Debus ES, Jessberger S, et al. Bacterial population of chronic crural<br />

ulcers: is there a difference between the diabetic, the venous and the arterial ulcer?<br />

VASA 2000;29:62-70.<br />

13. James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds.<br />

Wound Repair Regen 2008;16:37-44.<br />

14. Cooper R, Okhiria O. Biofilms, wound infection and the issue of control.<br />

Wounds UK 2006;2:48-57.<br />

15. Kirketerp-Møller, Gottrup F. Bacterial biofilms in chronic wounds. Ugeskr Læger<br />

2009;171:1097.<br />

16. Sun Y, Smith E, Wolcott R, et al. Propagation of anaerobic bacteria within<br />

an aerobic multi-species chronic wound biofilm model.<br />

J Wound Care 2009;18: 426-31.<br />

17. Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, Fazli M, et al. Distribution, organization, and ecology<br />

of bacteria in chronic wounds. J Clinical Microbiology 2008;46:2717-22.<br />

18. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, et al. Survey of bacterial diversity inn chronic wounds<br />

using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing.<br />

BMC Microbiol 2008;8:43.<br />

19. O’Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ovington LG. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous ulcers.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23:CD003557.<br />

20. O’Meara SM, Cullum NA, Majid N, et al. Systematic reviews of wound care management<br />

(3= antimicrobial agents for chronic wounds; (4) diabetic foot ulceration.<br />

Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-238.<br />

21. Percival SL, Woods E, Nutekpor M, et al. Prevalence of silver resistance in bacteria<br />

isolated from diabetic foot ulcers and efficacy of silver containing wound dressings.<br />

Ostomy Wound Manage 2008;54:30-40.<br />

22. Merckoll P, Jonassen TØ, Vad ME, et al. Bacteria, biofilm and honey: a study of the<br />

effects of honey on “planctonic” an biofilm-embedded chronic wound bacteria.<br />

Scand J Infect Dis 2009;41:341-7.<br />

23. Jaklic D, Lapanje A, Zupancic K, et al. Selective antimicrobial activity of maggots<br />

against pathogenic bacteria. J Medical Microbiology 2008;57:617-25.<br />

24. Bowling FL, Salgami EV, Boulton AJ. Larval therapy: a novel treatment in eliminating<br />

methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus from diabetic foot ulcers. Diab Care<br />

2007;30:370-1.<br />

25. Cutting KF. Addressing the challenge of wound cleansing in the modern era.<br />

Br J Nurs 2010;19(Suppl.):S24-S29.<br />

26. Horrocks A. Prontosan wound irrigation and gel: management of chronic wounds.<br />

Br J Nurs 2006;15:1224-8.<br />

27. Leaper D. European Union antibiotic awareness day relevance for wound care<br />

practitioners. Int Wound J 2010;7:314-5.<br />

28. Howell-Jones RS, Price PE, Howard AJ, et al. Antibiotic prescribing for chronic skin<br />

wounds in primary care. Wound Rep Regen 2006;14:387-93.<br />

29. Eliassen KE, Fetveit A, Hjortdal P, et al. Nye retningslinjer for antibiotikabruk i<br />

primærhelsetjenesten [New guidelines for antibiotic use in primary health service].<br />

Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2008;128:2330-34.<br />

30. Berild D, Haug JB. Fornuftig bruk av antibiotika i sykehus. [Beneficial usage of<br />

antibiotics in hospitals] Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2008;128:2335-39.<br />

31. Berild D. Hvordan få til riktigere bruk av antibiotika i allmennpraksis. [How to obtain<br />

more correct use of antibiotics in general practice] Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen<br />

1998;118:1172.<br />

32. Helsedirektoratet. Nasjonale faglige retningslinjer for antibiotikabruk i primærhelsetjenesten<br />

[The Health Directorate, National daily guidelines for antibiotic use in<br />

the Primary Health Service]. www.helsedirektoratet.no/vp/multimedia/archive/00078/<br />

Nasjonal_faglig_retn_78639a. (04.01.2010)<br />

33. Treweek S, Flottorp S, Fretheim A, et al. Retningslinjer for allmennpraksis – blir de<br />

lest og blir de brukt? [Guidelines for general practice – are they red and are they<br />

used?] Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2005;125:300-3.<br />

22<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Get pressure ulcers<br />

under control.<br />

See you at<br />

EWMA 14 – 16 May<br />

Caring for foot ulcerations with a clinically approved therapy programme.<br />

www.heelift.com<br />

www.darco.de<br />

www.molliter.it<br />

e.g. Heelift® Glide<br />

PREVENTIVE & ACUTE CARE<br />

PREVENTIVE CARE<br />

e.g. Claudio<br />

e.g. WCS<br />

e.g. OPTIMA Diab<br />

ACUTE CARE<br />

www.darco.de


* At smith&nephew we fully support healthcare<br />

professionals to address the true costs of wound care.<br />

Sponsored by Smith & Nephew Wound Management<br />

The Wound Care Iceberg<br />

Satellite Symposium at EWMA <strong>2014</strong>, Thursday 15th May, 13:15-14:15, Room N104<br />

It’s the hidden costs of wound care that affect healthcare resources the most.<br />

At Smith & Nephew we are passionate about reducing the human and economic cost<br />

of wounds. In the Smith & Nephew symposium, we will examine some of the real and<br />

hidden costs involved in wound care, how they affect you, and how we can help reduce<br />

them. We will demonstrate this with some exciting studies featuring ALLEVYN Life<br />

advanced wound dressing and PICO negative pressure wound therapy, which show how<br />

costs associated with nursing time and dressing changes may be decreased.<br />

We look forward to seeing you in Madrid!<br />

Visit us at the<br />

Smith & Nephew<br />

booth: 10D11<br />

For patients. For budgets. For today.<br />

Wound Management Smith & Nephew, Medical Ltd, 101 Hessle Road, Hull, HU3 2BN, UK<br />

T +44 (0)1482 225181 - F +44 (0)1482 328326 - www.smith-nephew.com/wound<br />

Trademark of Smith & Nephew<br />

© Smith & Nephew March <strong>2014</strong><br />

48467


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Regenerative medicine<br />

in burn wound healing:<br />

Aiming for the perfect skin<br />

Summary<br />

The healing of full thickness wounds such<br />

as burn wounds remains complicated by<br />

hypertrophic scar formation and contraction.<br />

The standard treatment is transplantation<br />

with autologous split thickness skin<br />

grafts. For extensive burns, these grafts are<br />

widely meshed due to limited donor sites,<br />

which often results in a poor functional and<br />

cosmetic outcome. The application of cultured<br />

autologous keratinocytes may enhance<br />

wound closure and improve scars.<br />

The first epidermal substitute, a confluent<br />

epithelial sheet, was developed in 1979.<br />

These cultured epidermal autografts (CEA)<br />

have been used in burn patients with variable<br />

success. Due to the variation in the efficacy<br />

of CEAs, however, new strategies have<br />

been employed. Currently, the application<br />

of preconfluent proliferating keratinocytes is<br />

considered a better strategy for burn wound<br />

treatment.<br />

In addition to improvements in epidermal<br />

grafts, the healing outcome may improve<br />

with the application of dermal substitutes.<br />

Over the past several decades, several scaffolds<br />

have been developed to mimic the dermis.<br />

These substitutes can be supplemented<br />

with growth factors and cells. In particular,<br />

the application of mesenchymal stem cells<br />

(MSCs) is thought to be a promising perspective<br />

for cell-based tissue engineering.<br />

Dermal substitution<br />

Although transplantation with a meshed split thickness<br />

autograft is the gold standard, healing of the transplanted<br />

burn wound is not optimal and results in scar<br />

formation, which is thought to be due to the lack of<br />

sufficient dermal material in the thin autograft and a<br />

delayed re-epithelialisation of the wound. The interstices<br />

of the meshed graft especially are prone to hypertrophic<br />

scarring. Several skin substitutes have been<br />

explored over the past several decades to improve the<br />

healing process. These substitutes comprise epidermal,<br />

dermal, or full skin constructs.<br />

Epidermal substitutes consist mainly of cultured<br />

keratinocytes, which can be supported by a carrier<br />

system. The main component of the dermis is the extracellular<br />

matrix (ECM), which provides support for<br />

different cell types and skin appendages such as hair,<br />

sebaceous glands, and sweat glands. The ECM plays an<br />

important role in the regulation of the different cells in<br />

the dermis. The lack of dermal ECM in full-thickness<br />

burn wounds is thought, therefore, to be an important<br />

cause of scar formation. Several scaffolds have been<br />

developed to create an environment that mimics the<br />

dermal ECM. Many of these constructs are based on<br />

the natural components of the dermal ECM, with collagen<br />

as the most abundant component of the skin as<br />

a base.<br />

One of the first skin substitutes used in burn patients<br />

was an acellular bilayered construct that consists<br />

of a collagen matrix with a silicon top layer to mimic<br />

the epidermis 1 . In addition to collagen, this scaffold<br />

also contains chondroitin 6-sulfate, a glycosaminoglycan<br />

(GAG), which provides more elasticity and better<br />

tensile strength to the scaffold and protects the scaffold<br />

against fast biodegradation. The porous structure<br />

of the collagen/GAG scaffold allows the migration of<br />

various cell types and structures such as blood vessels<br />

into the substitute. This construct, which is currently<br />

available as Integra ® , is used in a two-step procedure.<br />

During the first operation, the burn wound is excised<br />

and the skin substitute is applied. In a second operation<br />

<br />

Magda MW Ulrich<br />

MD, PhD<br />

Association of Dutch<br />

Burn Centres, Beverwijk,<br />

the Netherlands<br />

Correspondence:<br />

mulrich@burns.nl<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 25


after revascularization of the collagen matrix, the silicon<br />

top layer is removed and an autologous meshed split skin<br />

autograft is applied on top of the substitute. This two-step<br />

procedure is the main drawback of this material, which<br />

has led to the development of a skin substitute that can<br />

be applied in a one-step procedure where application of<br />

the dermal substitute and the meshed split skin autograft<br />

occurs during the same operating procedure. Matriderm ®<br />

is one of these products. This scaffold is also composed<br />

of porous collagen sponge, which is supplemented with<br />

elastin hydrolysate. The elastin coating of the collagen<br />

has been shown to improve scaffold stability and reduce<br />

granulation tissue formation as well as fibrosis and contraction<br />

and stimulate collagen deposition by fibroblasts 2 .<br />

Although the take rate of the autologous meshed skin<br />

graft was somewhat diminished, a statistically significant<br />

improvement in scar elasticity was observed at the<br />

3-month follow-up in patients undergoing scar reconstructive<br />

surgery. Furthermore, although the differences did<br />

not reach significance at the 12-month follow-up, most<br />

patients considered the scars of the substituted sides as<br />

better 3 . In a 12-year follow-up, a significant improvement<br />

was observed in elasticity, especially in patients in which<br />

a large extension of the autograft was used 4 . In this latter<br />

study, surface roughness also was evaluated, and this<br />

study reported that the substituted wounds were smoother<br />

than wounds in which the standard treatment with an<br />

autograft alone was applied. In a more recent multicentre<br />

clinical trial, the treatment of acute burns with a skin<br />

substitute was combined with topical negative pressure<br />

(TNP) therapy with the aim of improving the graft take<br />

rate. Although the latter goal was not accomplished, the<br />

application of TNP did improve elasticity 5 .<br />

Epidermal substitution<br />

The first cellular substitute was the cultured epidermal<br />

autograft (CEA), which is an in vitro cultured and differentiated<br />

epidermis. The first clinical application of<br />

this construct for burn wounds was performed during<br />

the 1980s 6-8 . Although the results appeared promising at<br />

first, problems with the use of this technique became apparent<br />

over the years. Unpredictable take rates, the fragility<br />

of cell sheets 9 , and long culture times quickly reduced the<br />

enthusiasm towards this product. Blistering often occurred<br />

due to the destruction of anchoring molecules from the<br />

tissue culture disc during the CEA harvesting procedure.<br />

In addition, the wounds remained open for a long period<br />

due to the long culture time, which increased the risk of<br />

infection and sometimes led to the inability to transplant<br />

the cultured keratinocytes back to the patient 10 .<br />

New methods have been developed in more recent<br />

years. These new techniques make use of proliferating keratinocytes.<br />

After transplantation to the wound bed, these<br />

cells start to differentiate and form an epidermis in vivo.<br />

This technique has the advantage that the culture times are<br />

reduced and that anchoring molecules are not destroyed<br />

during the process, which results in a better take rate 11 .<br />

The cultured cells can be applied either to the wound<br />

bed on a carrier or sprayed as a suspension 12-14 . Several<br />

clinical studies have been performed and show promising<br />

results. However, although these new techniques restore<br />

most of the disadvantages of the CEAs, the product may<br />

still be improved. For example, the culturing conditions<br />

of keratinocytes often include animal (xenobiotic) products,<br />

which potentially increase the risk of transmission<br />

of animal-derived disease components such as viruses or<br />

prions to the patient.<br />

Cellular dermal substitutes<br />

Although the clinical requirements for the function of<br />

dermal substitutes have been defined, the translation of<br />

these requirements into physical and mechano-biological<br />

properties of scaffolds is difficult. The materials should<br />

not only provide the correct mechanical properties of the<br />

dermis, such as tensile strength and flexibility, but also<br />

provide a template for cells. The materials also should create<br />

a molecular microenvironment in which the different<br />

cell types migrate, grow, and acquire the proper phenotype<br />

to allow the regeneration of a new dermis.<br />

References<br />

1. Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WC, Jr., Bondoc CC,<br />

Jung WK. Successful use of a physiologically<br />

acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive<br />

burn injury. Ann Surg. 1981;194(4):413-28. Epub<br />

1981/10/01.<br />

2. van der Veen VC, van der Wal MB, van Leeuwen MC,<br />

Ulrich MM, Middelkoop E. Biological background of<br />

dermal substitutes. Burns. 2010;36(3):305-21.<br />

3. van Zuijlen PPM, Vloemans JF, van Trier AJ, Suijker<br />

MH, van Unen E, Groenevelt F, et al. Dermal<br />

substitution in acute burns and reconstructive<br />

surgery: a subjective and objective long-term<br />

follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):1938-<br />

46.<br />

4. Bloemen MC, van Leeuwen MC, van Vucht NE, van<br />

Zuijlen PP, Middelkoop E. Dermal substitution in<br />

acute burns and reconstructive surgery: a 12-year<br />

follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(5):1450-9.<br />

5. Bloemen MC, van der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD,<br />

Nieuwenhuis MK, van Baar ME, van Zuijlen PP, et al.<br />

Clinical effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns<br />

by topical negative pressure: A multicenter randomized<br />

controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen.<br />

2012;20(6):797-805.<br />

6. O’Connor N, Mulliken J, Banks-Schlegel S, Kehinde<br />

O, Green H. Grafting of burns with cultured<br />

epithelium prepared from autologous epidermal cells.<br />

The Lancet. 1981;317(8211):75-8.<br />

7. Gallico GG, III, O’Connor NE, Compton CC, Kehinde<br />

O, Green H. Permanent coverage of large burn<br />

wounds with autologous cultured human epithelium.<br />

NEnglJMed. 1984;311(7):448-51.<br />

8. Cuono C, Langdon R, McGuire J. Use of cultured epidermal<br />

autografts and dermal allografts as skin<br />

replacement after burn injury. Lancet.<br />

1986;1(8490):1123-4.<br />

9. Reid MJ, Currie LJ, James SE, Sharpe JR. Effect of<br />

artificial dermal substitute, cultured keratinocytes and<br />

split thickness skin graft on wound contraction.<br />

WoundRepair Regen. 2007;15(6):889-96.<br />

10. Chester DL, Balderson DS, Papini RP. A review of<br />

keratinocyte delivery to the wound bed. JBurn Care<br />

Rehabil. 2004;25(3):266-75.<br />

26<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Scaffolds such as the products Integra ® and Matriderm<br />

® are typically based on biomolecules present in the<br />

dermis, such as collagen, elastin, and GAGs. However,<br />

although the clinical use of these scaffolds shows promising<br />

results, healing is still not optimal.<br />

To further improve the healing process, cells have been<br />

included in the scaffolds. Several skin substitutes that use<br />

allogeneic or autologous fibroblasts and keratinocytes (e.g.,<br />

Tiscover ® , Apligraf ® , and OrCel ® ) have been described.<br />

Their limited clinical use worldwide, however, is probably<br />

due to the high expenses for production of these constructs<br />

as well as possible immunological reactions to the allogeneic<br />

cells and the long production time for autologous cell<br />

constructs.<br />

Recently, interest in the field has shifted to the use of<br />

mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in skin substitutes. MSCs<br />

are thought to play an important role in tissue homeostasis<br />

and in the facilitation of the repair of damaged tissue to<br />

restore the function of injured organs. Over the past several<br />

decades, stem cells have been isolated from various tissues.<br />

Stem cells are considered to be promising for tissue engineering<br />

purposes due to their multi-lineage differentiation<br />

capacity as well as their immune-modulating effects.<br />

Mesenchymal stem cells for skin<br />

regeneration<br />

MSCs have been shown to improve healing in different<br />

wound models 15, 16 . The exact mechanism by which this<br />

improvement in healing is accomplished is not known.<br />

Initially, it was thought that MSCs were incorporated into<br />

damaged tissues and differentiated into tissue-specific cells.<br />

However, it is now becoming clear that these cells exert<br />

their main therapeutic effect through paracrine actions and<br />

their immune regulatory features, and to a lesser extent<br />

through their incorporation into damaged tissue.<br />

Several studies have shown that MSCs reduce fibrosis.<br />

MSCs are able to reduce the immune response by suppressing<br />

the activation of T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells<br />

via a reduction in the maturation of dendritic cells. MSCs<br />

reduce the expression levels of MHC class I and II molecules,<br />

and they do not express co-stimulatory molecules<br />

(CD80, CD86, and CD40) 17 . Due to these features, the<br />

MSCs are immune privileged and therefore can be used in<br />

an allogeneic setting, which is a major benefit that allows<br />

MSCs to be used as an off-the-shelf product.<br />

There remain concerns with the use of MSCs. For<br />

example, MSCs may lose their immune suppressive and<br />

immune privileged status during differentiation 18 . MSCs<br />

also may differentiate into the incorrect phenotype. MSCs<br />

also have the potential to differentiate into tumour cells<br />

due to their high capacity for self-renewal.<br />

Despite the criteria postulated by the International Society<br />

for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) for defining multipotent<br />

mesenchymal stromal or stem cells 19 , real discriminating<br />

markers for MSCs are missing. The criteria formulated by<br />

the ISCT state that these cells have to express a specific<br />

CD marker pattern in which they are positive (> 95%)<br />

for CD73, CD90, and CD105 and negative (< 2%) for<br />

CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79a or CD19, and<br />

HLA-DR. These criteria suggest that the cell isolates represent<br />

a homogeneous cell population. The MSC populations<br />

from various tissues, however, are a very heterogeneous<br />

population of cells, of which only a small percentage<br />

possess multi-lineage differentiation potential 20 . Until<br />

proper discriminating markers have been found to identify<br />

MSCs and other cell types, it is unknown what the different<br />

cell types in these populations contribute to the healing<br />

process. Currently, most papers that describe MSCs<br />

confine their characterization of the cell population to<br />

the different markers that have been defined by the ISCT.<br />

Only a few studies have shown that the cell population<br />

containing stem cells also contains alpha smooth muscle<br />

actin (-SMA) positive cells. It is unclear whether the<br />

MSCs themselves express -SMA or whether these cells<br />

are differentiated myofibroblasts, which is the cell type<br />

responsible for scar formation and fibrosis.<br />

Recently, we have shown that MSCs migrate into the<br />

wound during the first 10-14 days post-burn 21 . We hypothesized<br />

that these cells contribute to scar formation.<br />

The microenvironment created by these myofibroblast-like<br />

<br />

11. Harris PA, Leigh IM, Navsaria HA. Pre-confluent<br />

keratinocyte grafting: the future for cultured skin<br />

replacements? Burns. 1998;24(7):591-3.<br />

12. Pellegrini G, Ranno R, Stracuzzi G, Bondanza S,<br />

Guerra L, Zambruno G, et al. The control of<br />

epidermal stem cells (holoclones) in the treatment of<br />

massive full-thickness burns with autologous<br />

keratinocytes cultured on fibrin. Transplantation.<br />

1999;68(6):868-79.<br />

13. van den Bogaerdt AJ, Ulrich MM, van Galen MJ,<br />

Reijnen L, Verkerk M, Pieper J, et al. Upside-down<br />

transfer of porcine keratinocytes from a porous,<br />

synthetic dressing to experimental full-thickness<br />

wounds. Wound Rep Reg. 2004;12(2):225-34.<br />

14. Navarro FA, Stoner ML, Park CS, Huertas JC, Lee<br />

HB, Wood FM, et al. Sprayed keratinocyte suspensions<br />

accelerate epidermal coverage in a porcine<br />

microwound model. J Burn Care Rehabil.<br />

2000;21(6):513-8.<br />

15. Stoff A, Rivera AA, Sanjib Banerjee N, Moore ST,<br />

Michael Numnum T, Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros A, et<br />

al. Promotion of incisional wound repair by human<br />

mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Exp<br />

Dermatol. 2009;18(4):362-9.<br />

16. Rasulov MF, Vasilenko VT, Zaidenov VA, Onishchenko<br />

NA. Cell transplantation inhibits inflammatory<br />

reaction and stimulates repair processes in burn<br />

wound. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2006;142(1):112-5.<br />

17. Bassi EJ, Aita CA, Camara NO. Immune regulatory<br />

properties of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells:<br />

Where do we stand? World journal of stem cells.<br />

2011;3(1):1-8. Epub 2011/05/25.<br />

18. Technau A, Froelich K, Hagen R, Kleinsasser N.<br />

Adipose tissue-derived stem cells show both<br />

immunogenic and immunosuppressive properties<br />

after chondrogenic differentiation. Cytotherapy.<br />

2011;13(3):310-7. Epub 2010/08/28.<br />

19. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach<br />

I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for<br />

defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The<br />

International Society for Cellular Therapy position<br />

statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 27


12th Scientific Meeting of the<br />

Diabetic Foot<br />

Study Group<br />

of the EASD<br />

12-14 September <strong>2014</strong><br />

Bratislava, Slovakia<br />

Conference theme:<br />

Advancement<br />

of knowledge<br />

on all aspects of<br />

diabetic foot care<br />

Main subjects during conference:<br />

Epidemiology<br />

Basic and clinical science<br />

Diagnostics<br />

Classification<br />

Foot clinics<br />

Biomechanics, Osteoarthropathy<br />

Orthopaedic surgery<br />

Infection<br />

Revascularisation<br />

Uraemia<br />

Wound healing/outcome<br />

www.dfsg.org<br />

cells is distinctly different from normal dermal tissue, and<br />

because cell function and tissue performance is largely<br />

dependent on the cellular microenvironment, the healing<br />

process is trapped in a vicious circle. Ideally, tissue engineering<br />

could play an important role in the development<br />

of a scaffold that is able to guide the stem cells into the<br />

proper phenotype. Although various preclinical (animal)<br />

studies have been performed and show promising results,<br />

translation into clinical trials remains limited (reviewed<br />

in 22 ).<br />

Future perspectives<br />

Despite the substantial progress in skin tissue engineering<br />

over the past several decades, the regeneration of fully<br />

functional skin following a burn wound still has not been<br />

achieved. Elucidating the signals that are required to guide<br />

the cells into the desired phenotype and away from the<br />

myofibroblast phenotype will be useful for scaffold design.<br />

Such scaffolds should create the microenvironment<br />

necessary for skin regeneration instead of scar formation.<br />

In addition to the aesthetic problems and functional<br />

impairments due to diminished joint mobility of scars,<br />

other problems may occur from scarring as a result of<br />

the absence of skin appendages. For example, the lack of<br />

sweat glands may impair the thermoregulatory function<br />

of the skin. In addition, scars often lack hair follicles and<br />

sebaceous glands. Hair transplantation and skin expansion<br />

techniques have been used to restore the lack of hair follicles<br />

in scars 23, 24 . In vitro and in vivo experiments have<br />

shown that a tissue engineering approach may be successful<br />

to reconstitute hair follicles 25 . The use of stem cells in<br />

skin substitutes have also shown promising results with<br />

respect to hair follicle induction 26 . Further research to<br />

elucidate the mechanisms involved in the development<br />

of sebaceous glands and sweat glands is needed to address<br />

the lack of these structures in the healing wound. m<br />

20. Jurgens WJ, Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, Helder MN, Zandiehdoulabi B, Schouten TE,<br />

Kuik DJ, et al. Effect of tissue-harvesting site on yield of stem cells derived from<br />

adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Cell Tissue Res.<br />

2008;332(3):415-26.<br />

21. van der Veen VC, Vlig M, van Milligen FJ, de Vries SI, Middelkoop E, Ulrich MM.<br />

Stem Cells in Burn Eschar. Cell Transplant. 2012. Epub 2011/09/29.<br />

22. Jackson WM, Nesti LJ, Tuan RS. Concise review: clinical translation of wound<br />

healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells translational<br />

medicine. 2012;1(1):44-50.<br />

23. Oh SJ, Koh SH, Lee JW, Jang YC. Expanded flap and hair follicle transplantation for<br />

reconstruction of postburn scalp alopecia. JCraniofacSurg. 2010;21(6):1737-40.<br />

24. Gho CG, Martino Neumann HA. Donor hair follicle preservation by partial follicular<br />

unit extraction. A method to optimize hair transplantation. JDermatologTreat.<br />

2010;21(6):337-49.<br />

25. Sriwiriyanont P, Lynch KA, McFarland KL, Supp DM, Boyce ST. Characterization of<br />

hair follicle development in engineered skin substitutes. PLoSOne.<br />

2013;8(6):e65664.<br />

26. Liang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Tse HF, Lian Q. Paracrine mechanisms of Mesenchymal<br />

Stem cell-based therapy: Current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant. 2013.


EWMA <strong>2014</strong> MADRID<br />

VISIT US AT BOOTH N° 10B06<br />

Flaminal ®<br />

Your peace of mind<br />

Flaminal ® , a total approach for every wound and<br />

a convenient solution for you and your patient.<br />

SYMPOSIUM on multidisciplinary wound care:<br />

HOW TO INCREASE your added value as a wound care nurse?<br />

15.05.14 from 15:40-16:40 in room N105/106<br />

www.flenpharma.com I info@flenpharma.com


Wound healing has always had villains.<br />

Now it has a hero.<br />

EXUDATE INFECTION BIOFILM<br />

Our breakthrough new dressing attacks the key local barriers to wound healing, even biofilm.<br />

TWO POWERFUL TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Our proven Hydrofiber Technology absorbs and retains excess exudate to help create an ideal<br />

healing environment.* 1-5 And now our revolutionary new Ag+ Technology<br />

destroys biofilm and kills infection-causing bacteria.* 6-8<br />

See how it helps you save the day at www.convatec.com.<br />

No dressing does more.^<br />

*As demonstrated in vitro<br />

^Defined as the ability to manage exudate, infection and biofilm, as demonstrated in vitro<br />

1. Newman GR, Walker M, Hobot JA, Bowler PG, 2006. Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bacterial activity within hydrating Hydrober wound dressings. Biomaterials; 27: 1129-1139. 2. Walker<br />

M, Hobot JA, Newman GR, Bowler PG, 2003. Scanning electron microscopic examination of bacterial immobilization in a carboxymethyl cellulose (AQUACEL) and alginate dressing. Biomaterials;<br />

24: 883-890. 3. Bowler PG, Jones SA, Davies BJ, Coyle E, 1999. Infection control properties of some wound dressings. J. Wound Care; 8: 499-502. 4. Walker M, Bowler PG, Cochrane CA, 2007. In vitro<br />

studies to show sequestration of matrix metalloproteinases by silver-containing wound care products. Ostomy/Wound Management. 2007; 53: 18-25. 5. Assessment of the in vitro Physical Properties<br />

of AQUACEL EXTRA, AQUACEL Ag EXTRA and AQUACEL Ag+ EXTRA dressings. Scientific background report. WHRIA3817 TA297, 2013, Data on file, ConvaTec Inc. 6. Physical Disruption of Biofilm by<br />

AQUACEL® Ag+ Wound Dressing. Scientific Background Report. WHRI3850 MA232, 2013, Data on file, ConvaTec Inc. 7. Antimicrobial activity and prevention of biofilm reformation by AQUACEL Ag+<br />

EXTRA dressing. Scientific Background Report. WHRI3857 MA236, 2013, Data on file, ConvaTec Inc. 8. Antimicrobial activity against CA-MRSA and prevention of biofilm reformation by AQUACEL Ag+<br />

EXTRA dressing. Scientific Background Report. WHRI3875 MA239, 2013, Data on file, ConvaTec Inc.<br />

®/ Indicates trademarks of ConvaTec Inc. ©<strong>2014</strong> ConvaTec Inc. AP-014181-MM


Promising effects of<br />

arginine-enriched oral nutritional<br />

supplements on wound healing<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Introduction<br />

Nobody would argue against the<br />

importance of adequate nutrition<br />

to preserve skin and tissue viability<br />

and to promote tissue repair processes<br />

such as wound healing. A good<br />

nutritional status generally reflects<br />

a healthy condition and adequate<br />

body power. However, there is little<br />

scientific evidence about the relationship<br />

between nutrition or nutritional<br />

intervention and wound healing,<br />

and most studies that have been<br />

performed to date are related to the<br />

problem of pressure ulcers (PUs). 1<br />

This article first addresses the assumed<br />

role of nutrients in wound<br />

healing, and then relevant aspects of<br />

the nutritional cycle. Finally, some<br />

recent studies with an arginine-enriched<br />

oral nutritional supplement in<br />

PU healing will be described because<br />

they represent important nutritional<br />

research in this area.<br />

Basic aspects of wound healing and the<br />

assumed role of nutrients<br />

The wound healing process involves several stages, including<br />

phases of blood coagulation, inflammation, migration and<br />

proliferation of defence and repair cells, remodelling of tissue<br />

structure, and scar formation and maturation. Several endogenous<br />

factors play an important role in promoting this process,<br />

for example the power of the body to generate adequate inflammation<br />

as well as the defence response to deal adequately<br />

with the bacterial burden of the wound. Nutrients also play<br />

a relevant and important role in this process. Carbohydrate,<br />

protein, and fat provide the energy source (kilocalories) for the<br />

body. The provision and consumption of adequate kilocalories<br />

supports collagen and nitrogen synthesis and promotes<br />

anabolism by sparing body protein from being used as an<br />

energy source. 1<br />

Fat<br />

Fat is the most concentrated source of kilocalories, transports<br />

the fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K), and provides insulation<br />

under the skin and padding to bony prominences. Moreover,<br />

fat is an essential component of cellular membranes, which are<br />

also important for preserving tissue viability and for wound<br />

repair processes. Meats, eggs, dairy products, and vegetable<br />

oils represent dietary sources of fat. 1<br />

Jos M.G.A. Schols<br />

Prof. MD, PhD.<br />

Department of Family<br />

Medicine and Department<br />

of Health Services<br />

Research,<br />

Maastricht University,<br />

Maastricht,<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Correspondence:<br />

jos.schols@<br />

maastrichtuniversity.nl<br />

Protein and Amino Acids<br />

Protein is composed of amino acids and is the only nutrient<br />

containing nitrogen. Protein is important for tissue perfusion,<br />

preservation of immune function, repair and synthesis<br />

of enzymes involved in wound healing, cell multiplication,<br />

and collagen and connective tissue synthesis. 2<br />

Foods that provide all essential amino acids, such as meat,<br />

poultry, fish, eggs, milk products, and soybeans, are considered<br />

complete proteins. The body requires an adequate supply of<br />

the essential amino acids plus enough nitrogen and energy to<br />

synthesise the other amino acids. Legumes, grains, and vegetables<br />

provide nonessential proteins.<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 31


During period of stress or trauma such as injury and<br />

wound healing, certain amino acids, such as arginine and<br />

glutamine, become conditionally essential.<br />

L-Arginine is composed of 32% nitrogen and has been<br />

shown to increase the concentration of hydroxyproline,<br />

an indicator of collagen deposition and protein, at the<br />

wound site. 3,4 Faster wound healing has been described<br />

in non-malnourished patients with stage III-IV PUs who<br />

received an oral nutritional supplement (ONS) containing<br />

arginine, protein, zinc, ascorbic acid, and vitamin E. 5<br />

Water<br />

Water is distributed throughout the body in intracellular,<br />

interstitial, and intravascular compartments and serves as<br />

the transport medium for moving nutrients to the cells and<br />

removing waste products. Fluids are solvents for minerals,<br />

vitamins, amino acids, glucose, and other small molecules,<br />

thus enabling them to diffuse into and out of cells. Individuals<br />

with draining wounds, diarrhoea, elevated temperature,<br />

or increased perspiration require additional fluids to<br />

replace the fluid lost. 6 Water constitutes 60% of an adult’s<br />

body. The elderly individual generally has an increase in<br />

body fat and a decrease in lean body mass, resulting in a<br />

decrease in the percentage of water stored. This decrease<br />

in body water, coupled with a diminished sense of thirst,<br />

places the elderly at particular risk for dehydration. 7 Hydration<br />

needs are met from liquids plus the water content<br />

of food, which accounts for 19% to 27% of the total fluid<br />

intake of healthy adults. 8<br />

Vitamins and Minerals<br />

The role of micronutrients in promoting wound healing<br />

is debatable. 1<br />

Ascorbic acid (vitamin C), a water-soluble vitamin,<br />

is a cofactor with iron during the hydroxylation of proline<br />

and lysine in the production of collagen. Therefore,<br />

a deficiency of vitamin C may prolong the healing time<br />

and contribute to decreased resistance to infection. 9 The<br />

required daily intake of vitamin C is achieved through<br />

the consumption of fruits and vegetables. Mega doses of<br />

ascorbic acid have not resulted in accelerated pressure ulcer<br />

healing. 10<br />

Vitamin A and Vitamin E are fat-soluble vitamins and<br />

dietary intake of these vitamins comes from a variety of<br />

foods. Vitamin A acts as a stimulant during the wound<br />

healing process to increase collagen formation and promote<br />

epithelisation. High doses of Vitamin A are not<br />

recommended without consultation with a physician.<br />

Vitamin E acts as an anti-oxidant and the required intake<br />

can easily be met with food and/or a multivitamin unless<br />

a deficiency is confirmed.<br />

Zinc, a cofactor for collagen formation, also enhances<br />

metabolism of protein, liberates vitamin A from storage<br />

in the liver, and assists in immune function. Unless a deficiency<br />

is confirmed, elemental zinc supplementation is<br />

not recommended for individuals with wounds such as<br />

pressure ulcers. 11,12 Copper is a mineral that is essential<br />

for collagen cross-linking. Zinc and copper compete for<br />

the same biding site on the albumin molecule, thus high<br />

serum zinc levels interfere with copper metabolism and can<br />

induce copper deficiency. 13,14 If deficiencies are suspected,<br />

a multivitamin with minerals may be appropriate.<br />

The nutritional cycle<br />

Screening and assessment of nutritional status followed<br />

by adequate nutritional intervention should be part of<br />

the prevention and treatment plan for patients at risk for<br />

(chronic) wounds. 1<br />

Pressure ulcers are a representative example of such<br />

wounds.<br />

The ‘why’ of this statement is clearly revealed by the<br />

literature related to PUs, which are used as an example<br />

here. The essentials, however, also apply to other types<br />

of wound such as chronic venous leg ulcers, arterial leg<br />

ulcers, and diabetic foot ulcers, in which nutritional care<br />

is additional to other disease-specific interventions.<br />

Nutritional status and PUs<br />

Whether a patient develops a PU depends on both extrinsic<br />

and intrinsic factors. Important extrinsic factors<br />

(coming from outside the patient) are pressure, friction,<br />

and shear forces. 15<br />

Intrinsic (patient-related) factors affect tissue viability<br />

and therefore the tissue response to mechanical loading.<br />

A number of intrinsic factors have been described in<br />

the literature. An adequate nutritional status is one of the<br />

most important intrinsic factors, and also one that can be<br />

readily influenced. 16,17<br />

Poor nutritional intake and poor nutritional status have<br />

both been identified as key risk factors for pressure ulcer<br />

development and protracted wound healing. Notwithstanding<br />

methodological shortcomings, cross-sectional<br />

and prospective studies suggest a fairly strong correlation<br />

between undernutrition and pressure ulcer development.<br />

18-21 Moreover, it appears that many acutely or<br />

chronically ill patients and elderly patients who are at risk<br />

of pressure ulcer development or have established pressure<br />

ulcers suffer from undesired weight loss. 22-26<br />

32<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Nutrition Screening<br />

Unless the patient has a terminal illness, undernutrition is<br />

a reversible risk factor for pressure ulcer development and<br />

early identification and management is therefore critical.<br />

Individuals at risk for wounds like pressure ulcers are often<br />

also in danger of undernutrition, so nutritional screening<br />

should be completed in such cases. 2,27 Healthcare<br />

organisations should have a policy on nutrition screening<br />

and its frequency. Since individuals frequently move from<br />

one health care setting to another, the screening results<br />

must be documented and communicated from one care<br />

setting to another. 2,28 Screening tools should be quick,<br />

easy to use, validated, and reliable for the patient population<br />

served. 29 Validated screening tools are widely used in<br />

Europe. In a cross-sectional study by Langkamp-Henken<br />

et al., the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and the<br />

MNA short form (SF) were noted to have an advantage<br />

over the use of visceral protein when screening and assessing<br />

nutritional status. 30,31 The MNA-SF, which was<br />

revised to six questions and re-validated for adults 65 and<br />

older, has 80% sensitivity and specificity and 97% positive<br />

predictive value according to clinical status. 32 The Malnutrition<br />

Screening Tool (MUST) has been validated in<br />

acute care, long-term care, and the community setting,<br />

and identifies individuals who are underweight or at risk<br />

for undernutrition. 33<br />

When the screening tool indicates nutritional deficits,<br />

timely referral to the appropriate professionals is critical.<br />

The nutrition assessment should be completed by a<br />

registered dietician who collaborates and communicates<br />

with other members of the healthcare team, including the<br />

speech therapist who is responsible for screening, evaluating,<br />

and treating swallowing problems; the occupational<br />

therapist who works to strengthen the patient’s ability to<br />

feed themselves; and the nursing staff, whose responsibilities<br />

include monitoring the patient’s acceptance of nutrition.<br />

The physician is responsible for the overall care of<br />

the patient and ordering any treatments recommended<br />

by the team.<br />

Nutrition Assessment<br />

The in-depth nutrition assessment that is performed in<br />

individuals with a screening result that points towards<br />

undernutrition is a methodical process of obtaining and<br />

interpreting data in order to make decisions about the<br />

basis of nutrition-related problems. The assessment includes<br />

interpretation and analysis of medical, nutritional,<br />

and biochemical data and food-medication interactions;<br />

obtaining anthropometric measurements; and evaluation<br />

of visual signs of poor nutrition, such as oral status, chewing/swallowing<br />

ability, and/or diminished ability to eat<br />

independently. 1<br />

Diet History: The diet history includes consultation with<br />

the patient and/or caregivers to determine the type, quantity,<br />

and frequency of food normally consumed by the<br />

patient. One should consider any factors that may influence<br />

the patients’ decision about nutrition.<br />

Nutrition-Focused Clinical Examination: The interdisciplinary<br />

team, including the dietician, should examine the<br />

individual for physical signs of undernutrition and protein<br />

depletion, as evidenced by changes in the hair, skin, or<br />

nails such as thin, dry hair, cracked lips, or brittle nails.<br />

Individuals with missing or decayed teeth or ill-fitting<br />

dentures often reduce their intake of protein foods that are<br />

difficult to chew, thus restricting their caloric intake and<br />

increasing the chance for weight loss. Moreover, individuals<br />

with swallowing problems or dysphagia may become<br />

dehydrated, lose weight, and develop pressure ulcers. Loss<br />

of dexterity and/or the ability to self-feed is a risk factor<br />

that often results in poor oral intake. All of these conditions<br />

negatively affect wound healing.<br />

Anthropometrics: Anthropometric measurements include<br />

height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Obtaining<br />

an accurate height and weight is important, because these<br />

values are the basis for calculating body mass index (BMI)<br />

and caloric requirements.<br />

Individuals should be weighed on a calibrated scale, at<br />

the same time of the day, and wearing the same amount of<br />

clothing. Specialty beds often are equipped with a device<br />

to weigh an immobile individual. Significant weight loss<br />

places an individual at increased nutritional risk and has<br />

a negative effect on wound healing. Several studies support<br />

the theory that unintentional weight loss of 5% in<br />

30 days or 10% in 180 days is a predictor of mortality in<br />

the elderly. 34-37 Moreover, an obese patient is also at risk<br />

for PU development and healing may also be delayed in<br />

such patients when the diet consumed is inadequate in<br />

nutrients including protein.<br />

Biochemical Data: Analysis of current laboratory values<br />

is one component of the nutrition assessment, but not a<br />

very important one. Biochemical assessment data must be<br />

used with caution because values can be affected by hydration,<br />

medication, and changes in metabolism. There is no<br />

single specific laboratory test that can expressly determine<br />

an individual’s nutritional status. Serum levels of hepatic<br />

proteins including albumin, prealbumin (transthyretin),<br />

and transferrin may not correlate with the clinical observation<br />

of nutritional status. 38 In fact, studies indicate that<br />

hepatic proteins correlate with the severity of illness rather<br />

than with nutritional status. 39-41<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 33


Nutrition Intervention<br />

Ultimately, the nutrition assessment will lead to a nutrition<br />

diagnosis, followed by the necessary nutritional support.<br />

Early nutrition intervention and subsequent monitoring<br />

of the nutrition plan can reverse poor outcomes associated<br />

with undernutrition and promote healing. Caloric,<br />

protein, and fluid requirements should be individualised<br />

and either increased or decreased, depending on the assessed<br />

requirements of each patient. Furthermore it should<br />

be determined when fortified foods and/or ONS should<br />

be incorporated into the treatment plan. Fortified foods<br />

include commercial products, such as cereal, soup, cookies,<br />

or dairy products enriched with additional calories and<br />

protein, or enriched menu items.<br />

Of course, the nutritional intervention strategy always<br />

tries to focus first on improving normal oral nutritional<br />

intake. However, despite many daily efforts towards this<br />

goal, for example by taking into account individual preferences<br />

for foods and drinks and improving mealtime<br />

ambiance, it is known that many patients with chronic<br />

wounds like PUs cannot meet their nutritional demands<br />

via normal intake only.<br />

When normal oral intake is inadequate to promote<br />

healing, enteral or parenteral nutrition is considered if it<br />

is consistent with the individual’s goal. When the gut is<br />

functioning, enteral feeding via oral nutritional supplements<br />

in addition to the diet or total tube feeding is the<br />

preferred route.<br />

Research supports the theory of providing ONS to reverse<br />

undernutrition, prevent PU occurrence, and promote<br />

PU healing. 42-44 ONS given in addition to the regular diet<br />

should be preferably consumed between meals so that it<br />

does not negatively affect normal intake.<br />

Arginine-enriched oral nutritional<br />

supplements and pressure ulcer healing<br />

– what’s known?<br />

Considering nutritional intervention and the prevention of<br />

PUs, adequate nutrition, meaning the intake of adequate<br />

amounts of protein and energy, seems to reverse the common<br />

underfed status of PU-prone patients and protect<br />

against ulcer formation. 24,44 With regard to nutrition and<br />

healing of PUs, there is a gradual accumulation of evidence<br />

indicating that meeting the patient’s calorie and protein<br />

requirements improves the rate of wound healing. Intake<br />

of supplements or tube feeding with a high content of<br />

protein has been described to improve the rate of wound<br />

healing. 45,46,47<br />

34<br />

Particularly interesting are studies performed with arginine-enriched<br />

nutritional supplements. Benati et al. tested<br />

a PU-specific nutritional supplement that was high in energy<br />

and protein and enriched with arginine, vitamin C,<br />

and zinc, and found a positive effect on wound healing. 48<br />

Subsequently, these findings were confirmed in an open<br />

multicentre study conducted in Belgium and Luxembourg<br />

(n=245 patients) and in a small randomised controlled trial<br />

(n=28 patients) including several tube-fed patients. 49,50<br />

In the CUBE study, a randomised controlled trial (n=<br />

43 patients), van Anholt et al. observed significantly faster<br />

wound healing in non-malnourished patients (aged between<br />

18 and 90, with a normal BMI and no undesired<br />

weight loss) with stage III or stage IV pressure ulcers who<br />

received the same oral nutrition as controls, but supplemented<br />

with arginine, protein, zinc, ascorbic acid, and<br />

vitamin E. 5<br />

Robust evidence for the independent role of these specific<br />

micronutrients within a high-calorie, high-protein<br />

oral nutritional support came recently from the large<br />

(n=157), randomised, and controlled OligoElement Sore<br />

Trial (OEST). In this multicentre study, Cereda and collaborators<br />

found that, in malnourished patients with stage<br />

III or stage IV pressure ulcers, an 8-week supplementation<br />

with an oral formula enriched with arginine, zinc,<br />

and antioxidants resulted in faster healing (increased by<br />

20%) than an isocaloric-isonitrogenous control nutritional<br />

support. 51 Both the CUBE study and the OEST trial additionally<br />

found a positive cost effect, because in both<br />

studies significantly fewer wound dressings were used in<br />

the intervention group with less overall nursing time required<br />

for dressing changes. This finding is very relevant<br />

at a time when awareness of the costs of health care has<br />

become increasingly important.<br />

Arginine enriched oral nutritional<br />

supplements and healing of other types<br />

of chronic wounds – what’s known?<br />

Arginine-enriched nutritional supplements may also have<br />

a positive effect on the healing of other types of chronic<br />

wounds, such as venous leg ulcers, arterial leg ulcers, and<br />

diabetic foot ulcers. However, at the present time there are<br />

only case reports on these applications. 52 Therefore, more<br />

research in this field should be performed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Nutrition is a key element in the prevention and treatment<br />

of patients with (chronic) wounds such as pressure ulcers.<br />

Nutritional care has to be incorporated into integrated and<br />

multidisciplinary wound care performed by a dedicated<br />

professional team. <br />

m<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

References:<br />

1. Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M. Disease-related malnutrition:<br />

an evidence-based approach to treatment.<br />

CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, 2003. (This book with<br />

824 pages may be considered as a ‘nutritional<br />

bible’).<br />

2. Kirk SJ, Hurson M, Regan MC, Holt DR, Wasserkrug<br />

HL, Barbul A. Arginine stimulates wound healing and<br />

immune function in elderly human beings. Surgery<br />

1993;114:155-60.<br />

3. Barbul A, Lazarou SA, Efron DT, Wasserkrug HL,<br />

Efron G. Arginine enhances wound healing and<br />

lymphocyte immune response in humans. Surgery<br />

1990;108:331-7.<br />

4. Desneves K J, Todorovic B E, Cassar A, & Crowe T C.<br />

Treatment with supplementary arginine, vitamin C<br />

and zinc in patients with pressure ulcers: a randomised<br />

controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2005<br />

Dec;24(6):979-87.<br />

5. van Anholt RD, Sobotka L, Meijer EP, Heyman H,<br />

Groen HW, Topinková E, van Leen M, Schols JMGA.<br />

Specific nutritional support accelerates pressure ulcer<br />

healing and reduces wound care intensity in<br />

non-malnourished patients. Nutrition. 2010<br />

Sep;26(9):867-72.<br />

6. Thomas DR, Cote TR, Lawhorne L, et al. Understanding<br />

clinical dehydration and its treatment. J Am<br />

Med Dir Assoc 2008;9:292-301.<br />

7. Schols JMGA, De Groot CP, van der Cammen TJ,<br />

Olde Rikkert MG. Preventing and treating dehydration<br />

in the elderly during periods of illness and warm<br />

weather. J Nutr Health Aging 2009 Feb;13(2):150-7.<br />

8. Institute of Medicine. National Academy of Sciences<br />

(NAS): Dietary Reference Intakes for Water,<br />

Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington,<br />

DC: NAS; 2004. http://www.iom.<br />

edu/?id=54343. Last accessed June 5, 2010.<br />

9. Ronchetti IP, Quaglino D, Bergamini G. Ascorbic<br />

Acid and Connective Tissue. Subcellular Biochemistry,<br />

Volume 25: Ascorbic Acid: Biochemistry and<br />

Biomedical Cell Biology. Plenum Press, New York,<br />

1996<br />

10. Ter Riet G, Kessels A G, & Knipschild P G. Randomized<br />

clinical trial of ascorbic acid in the treatment<br />

of pressure ulcers. J Clin Epidemiol 1195; 48(12),<br />

1453-1460.<br />

11. Institute of Medicine. National Academy of Sciences<br />

(NAS): Dietary Reference Intakes: the essential guide<br />

to nutrient requirements. Washington, DC, 2006.<br />

12. Cataldo CB, DeBruyne LK, Whitney EN. Nutrition<br />

and Diet Therapy, Principles and Practice. Belmonth,<br />

CA: Wadsworth; 2003.<br />

13. Reed BR, Clark RA. Cutaneous tissue repair: practical<br />

implications of current knowledge. J Amer Acad<br />

Dermatol 1985;13:919-41.<br />

14. Goode HF, Burns E, Walker BE. Vitamin C depletion<br />

and pressure sores in elderly patients with femoral<br />

neck fracture. BMJ 1992;305:925-27.<br />

15. Bouten CV, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, Bader DL.<br />

The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle<br />

bound? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(4): 616-9.<br />

16. Guenter P, Malyszek R, Bliss DZ, Steffe T, O’Hara D,<br />

LaVan F, Monteiro D. Survey of nutritional status in<br />

newly hospitalized patients with stage III or stage IV<br />

pressure ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000; 13(4 Pt<br />

1): 164-8.<br />

17. Green CJ. Existence, causes and consequences of<br />

disease-related malnutrition in the hospital and the<br />

community and clinical and financial benefits of<br />

nutritional intervention. Clin Nutr 1999;<br />

18 (suppl. 2): 3-28.<br />

18. Pinchcofsky-Devin GD, Kaminski MV Jr. Correlation<br />

of pressure sores and nutritional status. J Am Geriatr<br />

Soc. 1986; 34(6):435–40.<br />

19. Thomas DR. The role of nutrition in prevention and<br />

healing of pressure ulcers. Clin Geriatr Med.<br />

1997;13(3):497–511.<br />

20. Berlowitz DR, Wilking SV. Risk factors for pressure<br />

sores. A comparison of cross-sectional and cohortderived<br />

data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37(11):1043–<br />

50.<br />

21. Green SM, Winterberg H, Franks PJ, Moffatt CJ,<br />

Eberhardie C, McLaren S. Nutritional intake in<br />

community patients with pressure ulcers. J Wound<br />

Care. 1999;8(7):325–30.<br />

22. Thomas DR, Verdery RB, Gardner L, Kant A, Lindsay<br />

J. A prospective study of outcome from proteinenergy<br />

malnutrition in nursing home residents. JPEN<br />

/ J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1991;15(4):400-4.<br />

23. Mathus-Vliegen EMH. Clinical observations:<br />

nutritional status, nutrition, and pressure ulcers.<br />

Nutr Clin Pract. 2001;16:286–91.<br />

24. Ek AC, Unosson M, Larsson J, Von Schenck H,<br />

Bjurulf P. The development and healing of pressure<br />

sores related to the nutritional state. Clin Nutr.<br />

1991;10(5):245-50.<br />

25. Kerstetter JE, Holthausen BA, Fitz PA. Malnutrition in<br />

the institutionalized older adult. J Am Diet Assoc.<br />

1992;92(9):1109–16.<br />

26. Shahin ES, Meijers JM, Schols JM, Tannen A,<br />

Halfens RJ, Dassen T. The relationship between<br />

malnutrition parameters and pressure ulcers in<br />

hospitals and nursing homes. Nutrition.<br />

2010;26(9):886–9.<br />

27. Elia M, Zellipour L, Stratton RJ. To screen or not to<br />

screen for adult malnutrition? Clin Nutr 2005;<br />

24(6):867-84.<br />

28. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M.<br />

ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002.<br />

Clin Nutr 2003;22(4):415-21.<br />

29. Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M. Development<br />

of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening<br />

tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition<br />

1999;15:458-64.<br />

30. Langkamp-Henken B, Hudgens J, Stechmiller J K, &<br />

Herrlinger-Garcia K A. Mini nutritional assessment<br />

and screening scores are associated with nutritional<br />

indicators in elderly people with pressure ulcers.<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> of The American Dietetic Association<br />

2005;105(10 (Print)):1590-96.<br />

31. Hudgens, J, Langkamp-Henken B, Stechmiller, JK,<br />

Herrlinger-Garcia KA, & Nieves C. Immune function<br />

is impaired with a mini nutritional assessment score<br />

indicative of malnutrition in nursing home elders with<br />

pressure ulcers. JPEN/ <strong>Journal</strong> Of Parenteral And<br />

Enteral Nutrition 2004 28(6):416-22<br />

32. Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, et al; MNA<br />

– International Group. Validation of the Mini<br />

Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF):<br />

a practical tool for identification of nutritional status.<br />

J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:782-8.<br />

33. BAPEN (British Association of Parenteral and Enteral<br />

Nutrition) Malnutrition Advisory Group, The MUST<br />

Report, Nutritional screening of adults: a multidisciplinary<br />

responsibility. (2008). <strong>Journal</strong>. Retrieved from<br />

www.bapen.org.uk/must_tool.html.<br />

34. Landi F, Onder G, Gambassi G, Pedone C, Carbonin<br />

P, Bernabei R. Body mass index and mortality among<br />

hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med<br />

2000;160:2641-4.<br />

35. Ryan C, Bryant E, Eleazer P, Rhodes A, Guest K.<br />

Unintentional weight loss in long-term care: predictor<br />

of mortality in the elderly. South Med J 1995;88:721-<br />

4.<br />

36. Sullivan DH, Johnson LE, Bopp MM, Roberson PK.<br />

Prognostic significance of monthly weight fluctuations<br />

among older nursing home residents. J Gerontol<br />

A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59:M633-9.<br />

37. Murden RA, Ainslie NK. Recent weight loss is related<br />

to short-term mortality in nursing homes. J Gen<br />

Intern Med 1994;9:648-50.<br />

38. Myron Johnson A, Merlini G, Sheldon J, & Ichihara K.<br />

(2007). Clinical indications for plasma protein assays:<br />

transthyretin (prealbumin) in inflammation and<br />

malnutrition. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory<br />

Medicine: CCLM / FESCC, 45(3), 419-26.<br />

39. Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S, eds. Krauses’s Food,<br />

Nutrition, and Diet Therapy. St Louis, MO: WB<br />

Saunders (Elsevier); 2008.<br />

40. Shenkin A. Serum prealbumin: Is it a marker of<br />

nutritional status or of risk of malnutrition. Clin Chem<br />

2006 Dec;52(12):2281-5; PMID: 17068165. Clinical<br />

Chemistry 2006; 52(12):2177-9.<br />

41. Lim SH, Lee JS, Chae SH, Ahn BS, Chang DJ, Shin<br />

CS. Prealbumin is not a sensitive indicator of nutrition<br />

and prognosis in critical ill patients. Yonsei Medical<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> 2005;46(1):21-6.<br />

42. Horn SD, Bender SA, Ferguson ML, et al. The<br />

National Pressure Ulcer Long-term Care Study:<br />

pressure ulcer development in long-term care<br />

residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:359-67.<br />

43. Bergstrom N, Horn SD, Smout RJ, et al. The National<br />

Pressure Ulcer Long-term Care Study: outcomes of<br />

pressure ulcer treatments in long-term care. J Am<br />

Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1721-9.<br />

44. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Barateau M, Rondeau V,<br />

Dequae-Merchadou L, Salles-Montaudon N, Emeriau<br />

JP, et al. A multi-center trial of the effects of oral<br />

nutritional supplementation in critically ill older<br />

inpatients. Nutrition 2000;16(1):1-5.<br />

45. Chernoff RS, Milton KY, Lipschitz DA. The effect of a<br />

high protein formula (Replete) on decubitus ulcer<br />

healing in long-term tube fed institutionalized<br />

patients. J Am Diet assoc 1990; 90: A130.<br />

46. Breslow RA, Halfrisch J, Goldberg AP. Malnutrition in<br />

tube fed nursing home patients with pressure sores.<br />

JPEN 1992; 15: 663-8.<br />

47. Cereda E., Klersy C, Rondanelli M, Caccialanza R.<br />

Energy balance in patients with pressure ulcers: a<br />

systematic review and meta-analysis of observational<br />

studies. J Am Diet Assoc 2011 Dec;111(12):1868-<br />

1876.<br />

48. Benati G, Delvecchio S, Cilla D, Pedone V. Impact on<br />

pressure ulcer healing of an arginine-enriched<br />

nutritional solution in patients with severe cognitive<br />

impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2001; 33 (suppl<br />

7): 43-7.<br />

49. Heyman H, Van De Looverbosch DE, Meijer EP,<br />

Schols JM. Benefits of an oral nutritional supplement<br />

on pressure lcer healing in long-term care residents.<br />

J Wound Care. 2008 Nov;17(11):476-80.<br />

50. Cereda E, Gini A, Pedrolli C, Vanotti A. Diseasespecific,<br />

versus standard, nutritional support for the<br />

treatment of pressure ulcers in institutionalized older<br />

adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr<br />

Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1395-402. Epub 2009 Jun 25.<br />

51. Cereda E, Klersy C, Crespi A, D’Andrea F; OligoElement<br />

Sore Trial (OEST) Study Group. Disease-specific<br />

nutritional support in malnourished pressure ulcer<br />

patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Nutr<br />

2013; 32 (Suppl 1): 14<br />

52. Neyens J, Rondas A, van Leen M, Schols JMGA.<br />

Effects of a specific arginine-enriched oral nutritional<br />

supplement on the healing of chronic wounds in<br />

non-malnourished patients; a multicenter case study<br />

in The Netherlands. EWMA journal 2013; 13(1;<br />

suppl):37.<br />

Additional references on nutrition and<br />

wounds in general:<br />

A. Sobotka L. et al. (ed). Basics in clinical nutrition, 4th<br />

edition. ESPEN Society, Galen Publishing House,<br />

2011.<br />

B. Romanelli et al. (ed). Science and practice management<br />

of pressure ulcer management. Springer, 2006,<br />

London.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 35


NO ONE IMAGINED<br />

WOUND THERAPY<br />

COULD GET ANY<br />

BETTER… WE DID<br />

more granulation<br />

Lessing MC, et al. Negative Pressure<br />

Wound Therapy With Controlled Saline<br />

Instillation (NPWTi): Dressing Properties<br />

and Granulation Response In Vivo.<br />

Wounds 2011;23:309-319.<br />

V.A.C.Ulta Negative Pressure<br />

Wound Therapy System:<br />

TWO THERAPIES, ONE SYSTEM.<br />

V.A.C. ® Therapy and V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy<br />

can help Cleanse, Treat and Heal<br />

www.kci-medical.com<br />

*Results have not yet been confirmed in humans.<br />

NOTE: Specific indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and<br />

safety information exist for KCI products and therapies. Please consult a<br />

physician and product instructions for use prior to application.<br />

©2012 KCI Licensing, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks designated herein are<br />

proprietary to KCI Licensing, Inc., its affiliates and/or licensors. These materials are<br />

intended for healthcare professionals only. DSL#14-0073.EMEA.H (Rev. 3/14)<br />

All yoU CoUlD WISH FoR<br />

IN A SIlICoNE CoNTACT lAyER<br />

ADAPTIC TOUCH® can be used under<br />

negative pressure wound therapy<br />

(NPWT) to benefit patients with<br />

a range of wound types 1 .<br />

Scan the QR code for your free sample!<br />

Scan the code<br />

or visit<br />

www.systagenix.com/AB-ADAPTIC-TOUCH-sample<br />

ADAPTIC TOUCH ®<br />

3402/SYS/GLO/1213/PRBC1460<br />

www.systagenix.com<br />

References:<br />

1. International case series: Using ADAPTIC TOUCH® Non-Adhering Silicone Dressing: Case Studies. London: Wounds International, 2013.<br />

© Systagenix Wound Management 2013. Brands marked with ® or are trademarks of Systagenix. All other products referenced herein are acknowledged to be trademarks of their respective owners. C1685 November 2013.


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Efficacy of platelet-rich<br />

plasma for the treatment of<br />

chronic wounds<br />

Abstract<br />

Aim: To assess the efficacy of platelet-rich<br />

plasma for the treatment of patients with<br />

chronic wounds of various aetiologies.<br />

Methods. We analysed the treatment outcomes<br />

in 81 patients with chronic wounds<br />

of various aetiologies. For the treatment of<br />

44 patients (experimental group), we used<br />

platelet-rich plasma flat clot therapy starting<br />

from phase II of the wound healing process.<br />

The frequency of dressing changes was once<br />

in 7 days, an interval that allowed patient<br />

transfer to outpatient care. For the treatment<br />

of 37 patients (control group), traditional<br />

topical agents were used.<br />

Results. In three patients, owing to a large<br />

area of chronic wounds, 3-4 autodermoplastic<br />

closures of the wound were performed;<br />

85.4% of patients achieved complete wound<br />

re-epithelialisation within 46.4 ± 4.3 days. In<br />

the control group, the autodermoplastics operation<br />

was performed in three patients, and<br />

only 11.8% of patients achieved wound reepithelialisation<br />

within 3 months. The mean<br />

inpatient hospital duration was 11.0 ± 2.5<br />

days in the experimental group and 23.1 ±<br />

1.5 days in the control group. The mean cost<br />

of treatment was 785.25 Euros and 1649.02<br />

Euros per patient in the experimental and<br />

control groups, respectively.<br />

Conclusions. The treatment of patients with<br />

chronic wounds using platelet-rich plasma is<br />

safe, clinically beneficial and cost effective.<br />

Introduction<br />

The treatment of chronic wounds of different aetiologies<br />

is a topical issue of modern medicine. The acceleration<br />

of reparation processes and tissue regeneration<br />

entails not only clinical but also economical and social<br />

effects.<br />

In the late 1990s, Robert E. Marx described the<br />

method of obtaining platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and<br />

its use as a gel in dentistry [1] . In 1994, Eduardo Anitua<br />

demonstrated that the PRP gel helps to accelerate<br />

bone regeneration and confirmed the presence of specific<br />

platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFs)<br />

in the bone tissue [2] . In 2001, Russian scientists R.R.<br />

Akhmerov and R.F. Zarudiy developed the Plasmolifting<br />

TM technique that included the production and use<br />

of PRP injections in dentistry and dermatocosmetology<br />

[3,4] .<br />

PRP is a platelet suspension in plasma derived from<br />

human blood. The platelet concentration in PRP is<br />

2- to 6-fold higher than that in total blood and may<br />

reach 1000 × 10 9 /L [5] . Platelets contain growth factors<br />

that are attracted locally to damaged progenitor<br />

cells to stimulate their proliferative activity and<br />

improve wound healing via autocrine and paracrine<br />

mechanisms. Platelet growth factors include PDGF,<br />

platelet-derived angiogenesis factor (PDAF), transforming<br />

growth factor-b (TGFb), insulin-like growth<br />

factor (IGF), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth<br />

factor (PD-ECGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF),<br />

fibroblast growth factor (FGF), thrombospondin and<br />

osteonectin [6] .<br />

PDGF plays a particular role in tissue reparation<br />

and regeneration. PDGF was shown to stimulate the<br />

proliferative, secretory and migratory activity of mesenchymal<br />

cells [7] and is a co-factor for other growth factors<br />

– e.g., the angiogenic vascular endothelial growth<br />

factor (VEGF) [8] . Growth factors are released after human<br />

platelet activation. Once activated, the platelets<br />

release approximately 70% of their stored growth factors<br />

within the first 10 minutes. Complete release of<br />

platelet growth factors is accomplished within 1 hour.<br />

Therefore, it is recommended to activate platelets immediately<br />

before using PRP [9-11] .<br />

<br />

Vladimir N. Obolenskiy,<br />

PhD, Ass. Professor 1,2<br />

Darya A. Ermolova,<br />

PhD 2<br />

Leonid A. Laberko,<br />

MD, Professor 2<br />

Tatiana V. Semenova,<br />

PhD 2<br />

1)<br />

SBHI City hospital<br />

no.13, Moscow<br />

2)<br />

Department of General<br />

Surgery, Medical Faculty<br />

of Russian National-<br />

Research Medical<br />

University named after<br />

N.I. Pirogov, Moscow<br />

Correspondence:<br />

Vladimir N. Obolenskiy,<br />

gkb13@mail.ru<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 37


Apart from the growth factors, activated platelets<br />

release large amounts of substances that<br />

contribute to primary homeostasis, including<br />

serotonin, catecholamines, fibrinogen, fibronectin,<br />

factor V, factor 8 (von Willebrand<br />

factor), thromboxane A 2 and calcium [9-13] .<br />

As a result, platelet aggregates (clots) are formed, causing<br />

platelet stabilisation by cross-linked fibrin and sticky<br />

glycoproteins. The fibrin matrix formed promotes normal<br />

cell infiltration with monocytes, fibroblasts and other cells<br />

that play an important role in wound healing.<br />

The current use of PRP for the acceleration of bone<br />

repair and soft tissue growth has become a true breakthrough<br />

in dentistry, traumatology, sports medicine, cosmetology<br />

and surgery. PRP has already proven to be useful<br />

in tissue engineering and cellular therapy [9,10,14,15] . PRP<br />

is most widely used for the filling of large bone defects in<br />

maxillofacial surgery [1,11,16] . PRP can be used along with<br />

bone material (the patient’s own or bone substitute), applied<br />

to the implant site before the use of bone material,<br />

placed atop of the bone material or used as a biological<br />

membrane [6,11,16] . PRP has proven to be effective in accelerating<br />

soft-tissue healing and epithelialisation [6] . PRP is<br />

indicated for use in free connective tissue graft procedures,<br />

manipulations with mucoperiosteal flaps and soft tissue<br />

augmentation for cosmetic purposes in dentistry [17,18] .<br />

Following the implementation of PRP therapy in dentistry,<br />

the treatment began to be used in orthopaedics and<br />

traumatology. PRP technology is most widely used in the<br />

management of acute injury for the stimulation of osteogenesis<br />

in combination with osteosynthesis and in the<br />

treatment of arthrosis [19] . A method for the stimulation<br />

of neoangiogenesis in the ischaemic tissues of the lower<br />

extremities using PRP has been developed [20] .<br />

Currently, several papers have been published on PRP<br />

use for the management of chronic venous stasis leg ulcers<br />

developed against the backdrop of chronic arterial or<br />

chronic venous insufficiency. The results of these studies<br />

allowed the conclusion that the use of PRP in the combination<br />

treatment of stasis ulcers provides a wide range<br />

of local therapeutic effects, improves treatment results,<br />

enables considerable reduction of the length of treatment<br />

and increases patient quality of life that is also of economic<br />

importance [20-25] .<br />

Table 1. Microbiological characteristics of the pathological focus<br />

(day 1 of treatment)<br />

Pathogen<br />

Study group<br />

n=44<br />

Reference group<br />

n=37<br />

St. aureus MSSA 6 (13.6%) 6 (16.2%)<br />

MRSA 3 (6.8%) -<br />

Enterococcus spp. 4 (23.5%) 1 (2.7%)<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8 (18.2%) 1 (2.7%)<br />

Acinetobacter baumannii – 2 (5.4%)<br />

Klebsiella pneumoniae 2 (4.5%) 2 (5.4%)<br />

Escherichia coli 4 (9.1%) 5 (13.5%)<br />

Proteus spp. 2 (4.5%) 7 (18.9%)<br />

Microbial association 9 (20.5%) 8 (21.6%)<br />

Microbial growth not revealed 6 (13.6%) 5 (13.5%)<br />

Average bacterial load in the wound 106 106<br />

Methods<br />

We analysed the treatment results of 81 patients with<br />

chronic wounds of different aetiology –namely, venous<br />

leg ulcers (VLUs): 8 patients; ulcers of mixed aetiology<br />

(UMEs): 20 patients; leg ulcers with underlying diabetic<br />

foot syndrome (DFS): 20 patients; post-traumatic and<br />

postoperative ulcerated scars and trophic ulcers (STUs):<br />

19 patients; and decubital ulcers (DUs): 14 patients.<br />

The exclusion criteria were as follows: suspicion of ulcer<br />

malignisation, presence of systemic vasculitis, oncologic<br />

condition or haematologic disorder, or low adherence<br />

of patients to their treatment.<br />

Following the bacteriological testing, all of the patients<br />

were administered treatment against the main disease and<br />

topical treatment aimed at bacterial clearance and decontamination<br />

of the wound. The microbial landscape at<br />

baseline is presented in Table 1.<br />

All of the patients were divided randomly into two<br />

groups at admission. Patients who did not meet the inclusion<br />

and exclusion criteria were excluded from the study.<br />

Forty-four patients in phase II of wound healing (i.e.,<br />

the study group that included 17 men and 27 women with<br />

an average age of 56.0 ± 3.1 years and VLU (3 patients),<br />

UME (8 patients), DFS (12 patients), STU (14 patients)<br />

or DU (7 patients), with an average wound area of 90.2<br />

± 14.1 cm 2 ) received PRP flat clot applications. Different<br />

methods for PRP preparation have been described (e.g.,<br />

double- or single-spin centrifuge harvesting). However,<br />

a common algorithm exists for PRP preparation that<br />

comprises three stages: blood collection, PRP isolation<br />

from whole blood using centrifugation and activation of<br />

platelets contained in the PRP [26] . We used the method<br />

described by Eduardo Anitua and BTI equipment (Spain)<br />

to obtain PRP in the form of a gel (flat clot) [23] . The volume<br />

of blood drawn depends on the size of the wound<br />

and is approximately half of the wound area in cm 2 . For<br />

example, with a wound area of approximately 100 cm 2 and<br />

38<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Table 2. Treatment outcomes in the study groups (n=81; p 60<br />

Average inpatient hospital stay, days 11.0 + 2.5 23.1 + 1.5<br />

Average cost to treat one patient, EUR 785.25 1649.02<br />

a PRP clot thickness of about 1-2 mm, 45-50 ml of whole<br />

blood would be required. The volume of PRP obtained on<br />

average is 20-25% of the original volume per individual,<br />

depending on the rheological properties of the blood of<br />

each patient. The time from the moment of blood collection<br />

to wound dressing was 20-30 minutes. The PRP flat<br />

clot was covered with an atraumatic mesh dressing and<br />

a secondary dressing on top of the former. The dressing<br />

frequency was once in 7 days, allowing patient transition<br />

from inpatient to outpatient care.<br />

Thirty-seven patients in phase II of wound-healing (the<br />

reference group that included 17 men and 20 women with<br />

an average age of 69.5 ± 2.2 years with VLU (5 patients),<br />

UME (12 patients), DFS (8 patients), STU (5 patients)<br />

or DU (7 patients), with an average wound area of 79.6<br />

± 12.3 cm 2 ) received traditional topical therapy such as<br />

povidone-iodine gel, Olasol spray, Actovegin gel and modern<br />

interactive wound dressing materials.<br />

Planimetry of the wounds of all of the patients was<br />

performed every seventh day from the time the patient was<br />

enrolled in the study. After discharge from the hospital, all<br />

of the patients were followed up in an outpatient setting<br />

with a frequency of visits of once a week.<br />

Results<br />

The method that we used enabled us to obtain plasma<br />

with a platelet content of approximately 338% higher than<br />

that of whole blood. Previously, we studied the effect of<br />

PRP on the proliferative activity of human cells in vitro<br />

using M-22 human fibroblast cell culture (the study was<br />

carried out jointly with the Laboratory of Cell transplantation<br />

and Immunotyping of the Sklifosovsky Scientific<br />

Research Institute of Emergency Medicine), and we have<br />

confirmed the effectiveness of this method in terms of the<br />

PRP stimulation of regeneration processes [27-29] .<br />

At the Purulent Surgical Department of City Clinical<br />

Hospital no. 13, we conducted a randomised controlled<br />

study to evaluate the efficacy of PRP use for the treatment<br />

of chronic non-healing wounds of different aetiology.<br />

Considering the presence of wound defects mainly in<br />

the soft tissues, we used PRP in the form of a flat, gel-like<br />

clot. Results were evaluated over a 3-month period.<br />

In the study group, the average number of applications<br />

of PRP in one patient was 6.0 ± 0.6. In three patients,<br />

the large size of the wound defect after 3- 4 applications<br />

made the transplant free split the skin flap over the wound;<br />

complete epithelialisation of chronic wounds was achieved<br />

in 35 patients (85.4%) in 46.4 ± 4.3 days. The method<br />

was not effective in five patients (1 VLU, 1 UME, and 3<br />

STUs); full epithelialisation was achieved in one patient<br />

within a period of more than 90 days. In the comparison<br />

group, skin grafting was achieved in three patients, and<br />

epithelialisation of the wound up to 3 months was attained<br />

in only four patients (11.8%). Treatment failure – i.e., lack<br />

of epithelialisation of the wound within a period of 90 days<br />

– was observed in 23 patients (62.2%) in the comparison<br />

group: 2 VLUs, 9 UMEs, 6 DFSs and 6 STUs.<br />

The average duration of hospitalisation was 11.0 ± 2.5<br />

days in the study group and 23.1 ± 1.5 days in the comparison<br />

group. Importantly, the average duration of hospital<br />

treatment was 7.5 days in patients with a high content<br />

of platelets with grains in the plasma (300-600,000/ml)<br />

and 12.7 days in patients with secondary (150-290,000/<br />

ml) and low (100-130,000/ml) content of platelets on<br />

average – i.e., the efficiency of treatment with autologous<br />

PRP depends on the content of the functionally suitable<br />

platelets. The average cost of treatment for one treated<br />

patient differed by more than two fold and amounted to<br />

(at the rates of 2012) 785.25 Euros and 1649.02 Euros<br />

in the experimental and control groups, respectively. The<br />

study results are presented in Table 2.<br />

Case report<br />

Patient P., an 18-year-old male, presented to the outpatient<br />

department with a postoperative ulcerated scar and trophic<br />

ulcer in the interscapular region. In 2006, he had undergone<br />

surgical endocorrection of scoliosis using a singleplate<br />

endocorrector that was removed in 2011 due to the<br />

occurrence of multiple purulent fistulas. The wound defect<br />

was corrected by plastic repair that later resulted in scar<br />

formation and trophic ulceration. Upon primary examination,<br />

the wound defect had dimensions of 63 × 54 mm,<br />

and the wound bed was filled with sluggish granulations.<br />

No microorganisms were detected in the wound before the<br />

initiation of treatment with PRP. The PRP applications<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 39


Science, Practice and Education<br />

Figure 1:<br />

a) Ulcer appearance at baseline;<br />

b) plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF)-membrane;<br />

c) wound appearance after 3 weeks of treatment;<br />

d) wound appearance after 4 weeks of treatment.<br />

a<br />

b<br />

and wound dressings were carried out with 7-day intervals.<br />

During wound dressing, the PRP clot was covered<br />

with atraumatic Atrauman Ag silver-impregnated wound<br />

dressing and gauze pads. The duration of treatment was<br />

21 days and included three dressings using PRP. Treatment<br />

resulted in complete re-epithelialisation of the ulcer by day<br />

28 of the treatment (Fig. 1).<br />

Discussion<br />

PRP therapy is the preferable treatment option in patients<br />

with chronic non-healing wounds of different aetiology<br />

and localisation, particularly when other more conventional<br />

therapies lack evidence of effectiveness or when radical<br />

surgical treatment is not possible or contraindicated.<br />

The use of PRP not only reduces the duration and<br />

cost of treatment but also decreases the number of dressings,<br />

shortens the inpatient hospital stay (because most<br />

of the patients can be followed up on an outpatient basis<br />

with intervals between dressing changes of 6-8 days) and<br />

improves the patients’ quality of life. Notably, all of the<br />

patients demonstrated reduced sensitivity to pain after the<br />

PRP treatment had started.<br />

The advantages of using an autologous PRP include<br />

no risk of disease transmission, introduction of growth<br />

factors and cytokines directly into the wound, restoration<br />

of metabolic processes, neoangiogenesis, improvement of<br />

cellular metabolism and activation of local immunity [30-32] .<br />

<br />

m<br />

c<br />

d<br />

References<br />

1. Marx R.E. Radiation injury to tissue. // Kindwall E.R. (ed.)<br />

Hyperbaric Medicine Practice. Flagstaff, AZ: Best Publishing<br />

Company. – 1994. – P.447-504.<br />

2. Anitua E. Plasma rich in growth factors: Preliminary results of<br />

use in the preparation of future sites for implants. // Int J Oral<br />

Maxillofac Implants. – 1999. – # 14. – P.529-535.<br />

3. Akhmerov R.R., Zarudiy R.F., Bochkova O.I., (Korotkova),<br />

Rychkova N.N. Plasmolifting («Plasmolifting TM ») in the<br />

treatment of age-related skin atrophy using the platelet-rich<br />

autoplasma. // Aesthetic medicine (Russian), vol. X. – 2011.<br />

– no. 2. – P.181-187.<br />

4. Plasmolifting («Plasmolifting TM ») technique – a guidebook for<br />

physicians. / R.R. Akhmerov, R.F. Zarudiy, Eds. (Russian).<br />

– M. – 2012. – 23 pp.<br />

5. Marx R.E., DDS. Platelet-reach plasma (PRP): what is PRP<br />

and what is not PRP? // Implantdentistry. - 2001. - Vol.10,<br />

No.4. – P.225-228.<br />

6. Chekalina E.N. Role of platelet concentrate in tissue<br />

reparation and regeneration. // «Dental South» (Russian). –<br />

2005. - no. 3(32). – P.23.<br />

7. Caplan A.I., Correa D. J. PDGF in Bone Formation and<br />

Regeneration: New Insights into a Novel Mechanism<br />

Involving MSCs. // Orthop Res. – 2011. – Vol. 29, no. 12. -<br />

P.1795-1803.<br />

8. De la Riva B., Sánchez E., Hernández A., Reyes R., Tamimi F.,<br />

López-Cabarcos E., Delgado A., Evora C. Local controlled<br />

release of VEGF and PDGF from a combined brushitechitosan<br />

system enhances bone regeneration. // J Control<br />

Release. - 2010. - Vol. 143, no. 1. - P.45-52.<br />

9. Committee on Research, Science, and Therapy of the<br />

American Academy of Periodontology. The potential role of<br />

growth and differentiation factors in periodontal regeneration.<br />

// Periodontol. – 1996. - no. 67. – P.545-553.<br />

10. Dennison DK, Vallone DR, Pinero GJ, et al. Differential effect<br />

of TGF-Bland PDGF on prolife ration of periodontal ligament<br />

cells and gin-giva l fibroblasts. // Periodontol. – 1994. - no.<br />

65. – P.641-648.<br />

40<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


11. Marx R.E., Carlson E.R., Eichstaedt R.M., et al. Plateletrich<br />

plasma. Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts.<br />

// Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod. –<br />

1998. - no. 85. – P.638-646.<br />

12. Marx R.E. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use.<br />

// J Oral Maxillofac Surg. - 2004. - 62:489-496.<br />

13. Marx R.E., Garg A.K. Bone Graft Physiology with Use of<br />

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyperbaric Oxygen. // The Sinus<br />

Bone Graft. Jensen O. – Chicago. - Quintessence<br />

Publishing. – 1998. - P.183-189.<br />

14. Kalmykova N.V., Skorobogataya E.V., Berestovoy M.A.,<br />

Kruglyakov P.V., Estrina M.A., Afanasiev B.V., Polyntsev<br />

D.G. A comparative characterization of platelet lysates<br />

obtained from different donors. // Cellular technologies in<br />

biology and medicine (Russian). – 2011. – no. 2. – P.114-<br />

117.<br />

15. Mazurov A.V. Platelet physiology and pathology (Russian).<br />

M.: Littera. – 2011. – P. 10-56.<br />

16. Anitua E., Andia I., Ardanza B., Nurden P., Nurden AT.<br />

Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing<br />

and tissue regeneration. // Thromb. Haemost. – 2004. -<br />

91(1). – P. 4-15.<br />

17. Loshkarev V.P., Bauchenkova E.V. A comparative<br />

characterization of long-term results of the bioplant and<br />

colapol-KPZ use and the management of the bone wound<br />

beneath blood clot in surgical treatment of chronic<br />

periodontitis and peri-apical cysts. // «Stomatologia»<br />

(Russian). – 2000. – no. 6. – P.23–26.<br />

18. Pertungaro P.S. Use of platelet-rich plasma enriched with<br />

growth factors (autogenic platelet gel). // Dental-Market.<br />

– 2002. – no. 6. – P.26-29.<br />

19. Samodai V.G., Brechov V.L., Gaidukov V.E., Rylkov M.I.,<br />

Fedorischev A.V.<br />

Use of platelet-rich autoplasma in surgical treatment of<br />

bone tissue defects accompanied by the loss of bone<br />

continuity. // Systemic analysis and management in<br />

biomedical systems (Russian). – 2007. – V.6. – no. 2. –<br />

P.493-495.<br />

20. Dragunov A.G., Alexandrov Yu.V., Polyakov S.V., Grigoriev<br />

V.M., Porfirieva M.V., Maslennikova M.V. Use of plateletrich<br />

plasma in the treatment of ischemic lower extremities.<br />

// Angiology and vascular surgery (Russian). – 2008. – no.<br />

4. – P.17-19.<br />

21. Adda F. High fibrin content platelets. Fabien Adda.<br />

Clinical dentistry. – 2003. – no. 1 – P. 67-69.<br />

22. Obolenskiy V. PRP in treating patients with chronic<br />

wounds. // Bone Marrow Transplantation. – Vol. 47. –<br />

Suppl. 1. – April 2012. – P. S308 - S309.<br />

23. Obolenskiy V.N., Ermolova D.A. Use odifferent etiologyf<br />

platelet growth factors and collagen preparations in the<br />

treatment of patients with chronic trophic ulcers of<br />

different etiology. // Surgery (Russian). – 2012. - no. 5<br />

(42). – P.42-47.<br />

24. Obolenskiy V., Ermolova D. Use of biological medications<br />

in the treatment of chronic wounds of different etiology. //<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong>. – Vol. 12. – # 2. – May 2012. – P.196.<br />

25. Obolenskiy V., Ermolova D. Platelet-rich plasma and<br />

collagen preparation in treating patients with nonhealing<br />

wounds. // 4th International Congress on Stem Cells and<br />

Tissue Formation. – Dresden. – 2012. – P.184.<br />

26. Yurchenko M.Yu., Shumsky A.V. A review of equipment<br />

and methods used to obtain an autogenic plateletenriched<br />

plasma in dentistry. // Dentistry News (Russian).<br />

– 2003. – no.7. – P. 46-47.<br />

27. Makarov M.S., Borovkova N.V., Vysochin I.V., Kobzeva<br />

E.N., Khvatov V.B. CA method for evaluation of morphologic<br />

and functional status of human platelets and its use<br />

in clinical practice. // Medical Alphabet. Modern Laboratory<br />

(Russian). – 2012. – no.3. – P. 32-34.<br />

28. Makarov M.S., Storozheva M.V., Konushko O.I., Borovkova<br />

N.V., Khvatov V.B. The effect of platelet growth factor<br />

concentration on the proliferative activity of human<br />

fibroblasts. // Cellular technologies in biology and medicine<br />

(Russian). – 2013. – no.2. – P. 111-115.<br />

29. Obolenskiy V., Ermolova D., Laberko L., Makarov M.,<br />

Borovkova N. Experimental justification for clinical use of<br />

platelet-rich plasma. // EWMA <strong>Journal</strong>. –- Vol. 13. – # 1.<br />

– April 2013. – P.136.<br />

30. Greenlagh D.G. The role of growth factors in wound<br />

healing. // J Trauma. – 1996. – no. 41. – P.159-167.<br />

31. Haynesworth S.E., Gostima O., Goldberg V.M., Caplan A.I.<br />

Characterization of cells with osteogenic potential from<br />

human marrow. // Bone. – 1992. – no. 13 (1). – P.81-88.<br />

32. Hussain M.Z., LaVan F., Hunt T.K. Wound microenvironment.<br />

// Cohen I.K., Diegelman R. (ed.) Wound Healing:<br />

Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. – Philadelphia:<br />

Saunders. – 1991. – P.162-196.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1<br />

THE EWMA<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

CONFERENCE<br />

MODEL (UCM)<br />

in Madrid<br />

At the EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> Conference students of wound<br />

management from six institutions of higher education will be attending<br />

the UCM activities, planned to take place during the conference.<br />

The UCM programme in Madrid offers networking opportunities between<br />

students from many countries, a UCM Lecture as well as assignments<br />

and workshops arranged specifically for the UCM students.<br />

EWMA strongly encourages teaching institutions and students from<br />

all countries to benefit from the international networking and access<br />

to lectures by international wound management experts that the<br />

UCM programme offers.<br />

Participation in EWMA UCM is available to all teaching institutions<br />

that offer wound management courses for health professionals.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

Dubravko Huljev<br />

Chair of the Education Committee<br />

UCM Activities <strong>2014</strong>:<br />

Wednesday 14 th May:<br />

08:45-09:15 Room N115: Official Welcome by the Chair of the<br />

EWMA Education Committee<br />

15:30-17:00 Room N115: Article Critiquing Exercise<br />

Thursday 15 th May:<br />

12:15-13:15 Room N115: International Practice Development<br />

13:15-14:15 Room N115: Symposia Review<br />

Donau Universität Krems<br />

Austria<br />

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences<br />

Lithuania<br />

Haute École de Santé<br />

Geneva, Switzerland<br />

University of Hertfordshire<br />

United Kingdom<br />

For further information about the EWMA UCM, please visit<br />

the Education section of the EWMA website www.ewma.org<br />

or contact the EWMA Secretariat at ewma@ewma.org<br />

adrid · Spain<br />

EWMA n GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Friday 16 th May<br />

08:00-09:30 Room N113: EWMA UCM Lecture, “Seeking and finding<br />

the evidence” by G. McCabe<br />

09:30-10:00 Room N113: Student Feedback Session<br />

HUB Brussels<br />

Belgium<br />

Universidade Católica Portuguesa<br />

Porto, Portugal


Leading the way<br />

SETTING THE STANDARD FOR INNOVATION & EVIDENCE<br />

PRO EN<br />

PREVENTION<br />

Can you afford the impact of not<br />

using our proven prevention?<br />

✔ The only dressing supported by results<br />

of randomised controlled trials 1,2<br />

✔ Significant reduction in pressure ulcer incidence 3,4,5,*<br />

✔ Substantial cost savings 4,6,*<br />

✔ Combats 4 extrinsic causes of pressure ulcers 7,8,9,*<br />

Find out more<br />

www.molnlycke.com/puprevention<br />

References: 1. Kalowes P. et al. Use of a soft silicone, self-adherent, bordered foam dressing to reduce pressure ulcer formation in high risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. Poster presentation at Symposium on Advanced Wound Care Fall, Baltimore,<br />

Maryland, United States of America. 2012. 2. Santamaria N. et al. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the<br />

border trial. International Wound <strong>Journal</strong> 2013; doi: 10.1111/iwj.12101. 3. Brindle C.T. and Wegelin J.A. Prophylactic dressing application to reduce pressure ulcer formation in cardiac surgery patients. <strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing. 2012;<br />

39(2):133-142. 4. Cherry C. and Midyette P. The Pressure Ulcer Prevention Care Bundle: a collaborative approach to preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Poster presentation at Magnet Research Day, Alabama, United States of America. 2010. 5.<br />

Chaiken N. Reduction of sacral pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit using a silicone border foam dressing. <strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing 2012;39(2):143-145. 6. Padula W. et al. Improving the Quality of Pressure Ulcer Care With<br />

Prevention, A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Medical Care. 2011; 49(4). 7. Call, E. Pederson, J., Bill, B.Craig Oberg PhD, Martin Ferguson- Pell PhD, Wounds -2013, 25(4):94-103. 8. Call, E. Pederson, J., Bill, B. In vitro comparison of the prophylactic properties<br />

of two leading commercially available wound dressings. Poster presentation at Symposium on Advanced Wound Care Fall, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. 2012. 9. Call, E. Black J., Clark M. ,Alves P., Brindle T., Dealey C. Santa Maria, N<br />

International Panel Studies Creation of Guidance on Dressing Use in Prevention of Pressure Ulcers poster presentation SAWC spring 2012.<br />

*In addition to current prevention protocols.


Scientific Communication<br />

Results from the world’s<br />

largest telemedicine project<br />

– the Whole System Demonstrator<br />

Summary<br />

Telemedicine is highlighted as a solution to future healthcare challenges, but<br />

currently extant research is criticized for not being sufficient and of poor quality<br />

The Whole System Demonstrator (WSD) is the largest and most comprehensive<br />

research project performed to date, that evaluated telemedicine effectiveness<br />

and costs in patients with chronic diseases including lung disease, heart disease,<br />

and diabetes. The trial was initiated in 2008 as a cluster randomized study<br />

including 3,230 patients from 179 general practices from three regions in the<br />

UK. The objective of the present review is to summarize the results from the<br />

WSD based on study data published to date. Results from five publications<br />

show that telehealth reduces mortality (odds ratio 0.54), the number of hospital<br />

admissions during a 12-month observation period, and patient use of secondary<br />

care. However, it is not yet clearly established which specific patient groups will<br />

realize these benefits, nor is it known what the underlying mechanisms of these<br />

advantageous effects are. The savings achieved by reducing hospital costs are,<br />

at least for now, less than the extra costs incurred by using telehealth, which<br />

increased overall net healthcare costs by 15%. There remains a strong need<br />

to expand focused research into telemedicine technology and applications to<br />

enhance the well-being, health outcomes, and quality-of-life of individuals in<br />

our rapidly ageing population.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Telemedicine is applied to a number of patient groups on a global level and,<br />

among other applications, is used in diagnosing and treating wounds 1 . Politicians<br />

and policy makers generally welcome telemedicine as one solution to<br />

the challenges imposed by the changing demographics in the western world.<br />

However, evidence regarding the clinical outcomes is scarce and more knowledge<br />

on patient perception and the organizational and economic consequences of<br />

telemedicine is needed.<br />

One systematic review showed that clinical outcomes have been included in less<br />

than 5% of over 1,300 trials studying telemedicine 2 . Another review also states<br />

that there is a severe lack of randomized controlled studies that have focused<br />

on telemedicine 3 . Further, it has been demonstrated that studies on telemedicine<br />

use in general do not follow recognized standards for reporting scientific<br />

results 4 . A Danish review comprising individuals suffering from chronic lung<br />

disease that are treated via telemedicine underlines the need for larger studies<br />

of higher quality 5 . Another recent review of 141 randomized studies using<br />

tele medicine across several specialties (i.e., asthma, chronic lung disease, heart<br />

<br />

Kristian Kidholm 1 Birthe Dinesen 2<br />

Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig 3 Benjamin Schnack<br />

Rasmussen 4<br />

Knud B. Yderstraede 4<br />

Conflict of interest:<br />

None declared.<br />

ICMJE formulars<br />

from the authors are<br />

available on request.<br />

The article was<br />

originally published<br />

in Danish.<br />

For the publication in<br />

EWMA, journal-specific<br />

references to<br />

wound care have<br />

been included.<br />

Orig. publ; Ugeskr<br />

Læger <strong>2014</strong>;176:<br />

V05130299<br />

1 Center for Innovative<br />

Medical Technology,<br />

Odense University Hospital,<br />

Odense, Denmark<br />

2 Integrative Neuroscience<br />

Research Group, Centre for<br />

Senses and Motor interaction,<br />

Institute of Medical<br />

and Health Technology,<br />

Faculty of Health,<br />

Aalborg University,<br />

Aalborg, Denmark<br />

3 Institute of Health<br />

Research, University of<br />

Southern Denmark,<br />

Odense, Denmark.<br />

4 Department of Medical<br />

Endocrinology and<br />

University Centre for<br />

Wound Healing,<br />

Odense University Hospital<br />

and University of Southern<br />

Denmark, Odense,<br />

Denmark<br />

Correspondence:<br />

kristian.kidholm@rsyd.dk<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 43


Table 1. Survey on included studies referring to Whole System Demonstrator<br />

Reference Effect measure N Follow-up, mdr. Recruitment<br />

Steventon et al,<br />

2012 [8]<br />

Use of secondary care and mortality 3,230<br />

individuals<br />

12 Cluster-randomization<br />

from 179<br />

general practices in Newham,<br />

Kent, and Cornwall<br />

Cartwright et al,<br />

2013 [9]<br />

Quality-of-life (SF-36 and EQ-5D)<br />

Fear (Brief STAI)<br />

Depressive symptoms (CESD-10)<br />

1,573<br />

individuals<br />

12 Randomized<br />

subgroup from [8]<br />

Henderson et al,<br />

2013 [10]<br />

Costs and cost-effectiveness 965<br />

individuals<br />

3 (9-12 months<br />

of the trial)<br />

Randomized<br />

subgroup from [8]<br />

Hendy et al,<br />

2012 [11]<br />

Challenges in implementation 115<br />

Health care<br />

professionals<br />

Causes for not taking part in study 22 individuals<br />

–<br />

Health care professionals and<br />

leaders in Health care<br />

Sanders et al,<br />

2012 [12]<br />

–<br />

Subgroup from [8]<br />

CESD=Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CHF=Coronary Heart Failure; EQ-5D=EuroQoL-5 Dimensions;<br />

COPD=Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; SF=Short Form; STAI=State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.<br />

disease, and hypertension) found that in only 65 of the<br />

studies a statistically significant effect was found on primary<br />

outcomes 6 . A further 43 studies showed significant<br />

effects on secondary outcomes. Very few studies have addressed<br />

the issue of telemedicine cost-effectiveness. Thus,<br />

evidence for using telemedicine to treat individuals with<br />

chronic diseases is weak and contradictory. In response to<br />

this scarce and scattered evidence on telemedicine effects,<br />

the U.K. Department of Health launched a high-quality<br />

study of telemedicine in 2008 – the Whole System Demonstrator<br />

(WSD). This study was planned to include 6,000<br />

individuals and has been called the world’s largest study<br />

of telemedicine, 7 .<br />

Due to the large sample size and high-quality study design,<br />

the WSD results will most likely serve as the basis<br />

for developing and assessing telemedicine use guidelines<br />

in the coming years. It is therefore important to create an<br />

overview of the many WSD publications and analyses to<br />

create a solid basis for the discussing the results and the<br />

implications of telemedicine in chronic disease management,<br />

including wound care. Thus the aim of this article<br />

is to summarize the results from the WSD and to assess<br />

the study internal validity and the consequences for the<br />

future development of telemedicine-based health care systems<br />

worldwide.<br />

In the WSD, researchers from six universities evaluated<br />

the effects of telehealth and telecare. Telehealth involves<br />

the remote exchange of data between patients and health<br />

care professionals to assist in diagnosing and managing<br />

diverse diseases. The term telecare is used to describe remote,<br />

automatic, and passive monitoring of changes in an<br />

individual’s condition or lifestyle (including emergencies)<br />

in order to manage the risks of independent living. In this<br />

article we focus on the study of telehealth. The internal<br />

validity of the WSD was assessed by means of the Risk of<br />

Bias-tool 8 . A level of significance of 5% was used.<br />

Aim<br />

The aim of the WSD was to evaluate whether telehealth<br />

for people with chronic diseases can provide cost-effective<br />

care to improve health outcomes, maintain independence,<br />

achieve significant gains in quality-of-life, and reduce unnecessary<br />

acute hospital use and costs. At the same time,<br />

the goal was to carry out a large-scale, pragmatic assessment<br />

of the impact of a broad range of telemonitoring<br />

technologies in the context of routine delivery of NHS<br />

care. Table 1 describes the studies in more detail.<br />

44<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Scientific Communication<br />

Inclusion and exclusion criteria<br />

Inclusion<br />

Patients >18 yrs-old suffering from at<br />

least one of three chronic diseases:<br />

COPD, diabetes, or CHF<br />

Patients having cognitive limitations<br />

took part with help from relatives<br />

Exclusion<br />

Non-English-speaking patients<br />

Patients without telephone access<br />

Comorbidity was not an exclusion criteria<br />

Inclusion<br />

Patients willing to take part in supplemental<br />

questionnaires in addition to the above<br />

criteria [8]<br />

Exclusion<br />

As above [8]<br />

Inclusion<br />

Patients willing to take part in supplemental<br />

questionnaires in addition to the above<br />

criteria [8]<br />

Exclusion<br />

Patients with cognitive limitations;<br />

otherwise, as above criteria [8]<br />

Patient characteristics<br />

at study start<br />

Telemedicine<br />

n=1,625<br />

Average age=70.9 yrs<br />

Control group<br />

n=1,605<br />

Average age=69.7 yrs<br />

Patients with COPD=48%<br />

Patients with diabetes=24%<br />

Patients with CHF=28%<br />

Telemedicine<br />

n=845<br />

Average age=70.1 yrs<br />

Control group<br />

n=728<br />

Average age=70.6 yrs<br />

Telemedicine<br />

n=534<br />

Average age=70.0 yrs<br />

Control group<br />

n=431<br />

Average age=70.1 yrs<br />

– –<br />

Inclusion<br />

Patients who did not want to partake [8]<br />

Average age=71 yrs<br />

Randomization<br />

The WSD was designed as a cluster-randomized study.<br />

Every general practice (N=238) in three UK regions were<br />

requested to take part and 179 of these (75.2%) accepted.<br />

Randomization of the general practices was performed<br />

centrally using an algorithm that ensured an equal distribution<br />

according to practice size, geographic area, deprivation<br />

index, proportion of non-white patients, and<br />

prevalence of the major chronic diseases (i.e., chronic lung<br />

disease, chronic heart disease, and diabetes).<br />

Intervention<br />

Patients in the control group were offered usual treatment,<br />

while patients in the intervention group were additionally<br />

offered telehealth. Telehealth includes a broad class of<br />

technologies, but all patients had a base unit and tools to<br />

measure weight (heart failure), pulse oximetry (COPD),<br />

and blood glucose (diabetes). The patients performed<br />

measurements up to 5 days per week. Questions regarding<br />

symptoms and information concerning patient education<br />

were forwarded to all participating individuals. Data from<br />

these measurements were sent to monitoring centres and<br />

handled by specially educated nurses. Each region was<br />

supplied with different technologies and service models 9 .<br />

Risk of bias<br />

In existent papers on clinical and economic consequences<br />

of telemedicine 9-11 , the randomization sequence is<br />

described, data completeness is detailed, and results descriptions<br />

are based on the protocol. However, patient<br />

allocation is not hidden to investigators and statisticians,<br />

and the patients are not blinded to their treatment group.<br />

Clinical effects<br />

In the study addressing use of secondary care and mortality,<br />

the primary endpoint was the number of patients<br />

admitted to hospital during a 12-month period 9 . Sample<br />

size was calculated from an expected admission reduction<br />

of 17.5%, and the study was based on registry data.<br />

Between May 2008 and December 2009 a total of 3,230<br />

individuals were recruited. No statistically significant differences<br />

among patients in these two groups were found<br />

at baseline.<br />

The use of hospital services was generally lower in intervention<br />

group versus control group patients (Table 2). The<br />

number of admitted patients accordingly was found to be<br />

<br />

Table 2. Hospital use and mortality after 12 months a<br />

Control group<br />

(n=1,584)<br />

Intervention<br />

group<br />

(n=1,570)<br />

Percentage<br />

difference<br />

(95% CI)<br />

Admission proportion 48.2% 42.9% -10.8 (-18.0-3.7)<br />

Mortality 8.3% 4.6% -44.5 (-65.3-23.8)<br />

Emergency admissions/person 0.68 0.54 -20.6 (-33.8-7.4)<br />

Elective admissions/person 0.49 0.42 -14.3 (-30.6-2.0)<br />

Outpatient attendances/person 4.68 4.76 +1.7 (-8.3-11.8)<br />

Emergency department visits/person 0.75 0.64 -14.7 (-28.0-1.3)<br />

Bed days/person 5.68 4.87 -14.3 (-32.4-3.9)<br />

DRG Tariff costs/person 2448b 2260 DKK -7.7 (-19.4-4.0)<br />

CI=Confidence interval. a Based on [9, Table 3]. bPrice level 2009: 1 GBP=8.232 DKK.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 45


10.8% lower (statistically significant) in the intervention<br />

group, corresponding to an odds ratio of 0.82. The difference<br />

could be ascribed to the number of patients admitted<br />

to hospital within the first 3 months of the study period.<br />

Correction for differences in baseline data and patient useof-services<br />

in the 3 years before enrollment did not change<br />

the conclusion. Overall mortality in the control group<br />

was 8.3% and in the intervention group 4.6% which is<br />

a statistically significant difference, corresponding to an<br />

odds ratio of 0.5.<br />

Effect on health-related quality-of-life<br />

In the study examining health-related quality-of-life,<br />

the sample size was calculated on the basis of detecting<br />

an improvement of 0.3-fold of the standardized average<br />

of the effect variables, and included a total of 1,650 patients<br />

10 . Health-related quality-of-life was measured with<br />

the Health Survey Short Form SF-36 v2. Data were<br />

collected by personal interview at the time of baseline<br />

measurement acquisition and also by postal questionnaires<br />

after 4 and 12 months of enrollment. A total of 1,573<br />

patients took part in the measurements at inclusion. After<br />

12 months 62% returned the questionnaire.<br />

The trial showed that patients using telemedicine had no<br />

statistically significant better effect on quality-of-life, fear,<br />

or depression. The authors concluded that the study did<br />

not demonstrate any detrimental effect of using telemedicine<br />

on patient health-related quality-of-life.<br />

Economic effects<br />

The purpose of the economic analysis was to estimate<br />

the costs and cost-effectiveness of telehealth. Data from<br />

questionnaires to patients and health professionals taking<br />

part in the study were used 11 . The study adopted a health<br />

and social services perspective including use of hospitals,<br />

primary care clinics, and other sources of community care.<br />

Concerning the costs of the intervention, the following<br />

were assessed: Telemedicine equipment, licenses, mounting<br />

of equipment and its maintenance, and personnel<br />

used in the telehealth monitoring teams. The drop-out<br />

rate from questionnaire return to investigators was 38%.<br />

The authors estimated that the groups were comparable<br />

overall even though there were some statistically significant<br />

differences. For example the proportion of patients with<br />

heart failure was higher in the usual care group whereas<br />

the proportion of patients with COPD was higher in the<br />

telemedicine group. Table 3 shows that the costs per patient<br />

in the telehealth group were 15% higher compared<br />

to the control group (during a 3-month period before<br />

Table 3. Average costs per patient ± SEM during the period<br />

from months 9-12 a . Numbers in 2009 GBP<br />

Type of cost Control group Telemedicine group<br />

Hospital costs 666.2 ± 74.9 518.7 ± 67.8<br />

Primary care costs 244.2 ± 21.4 211.0 ± 17.1<br />

Care home respite costs 1.5 ± 1.5 1.7 ± 1.7<br />

Community care costs 193.0 ± 39.6 140.3 ± 29.6<br />

Mental healthcare costs 8.4 ± 4.5 5.8 ± 2.6<br />

Day care costs 42.7 ± 11.4 28.2 ± 9.6<br />

Adaptations costs 1.9 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.5<br />

Equipment costs 0.4 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.2<br />

Medication costs 222 ± 7.4 230.4 ± 7.1<br />

Total costs excluding telehealth<br />

delivery and equipment<br />

1380.3 ± 102.4 1138.6 ± 88.6<br />

Total costs including telehealth<br />

delivery and equipment<br />

1389.7 ± 102.6 1596.1 ± 88.6<br />

SEM = standard error of the mean. a Based on [11, Table 2]<br />

the 12-month study enrollment). The main reason is that<br />

the average annual cost per participant for the telehealth<br />

equipment and support was £1,847 per patient for whom<br />

cost data were available at the 12-month <strong>final</strong> follow-up.<br />

These costs more than outweighed the savings in hospital<br />

costs. However, none of these results were significantly<br />

different between the two patient groups.<br />

Two sensitivity analyses were performed on the consequences<br />

of an 80% reduction of telehealth equipment<br />

costs and an assumption of full utilization of equipment<br />

capacity 11 . Both scenarios show a reduction in the costs per<br />

patients using telehealth by 7–8%, but the costs remained<br />

higher than in the control group. The authors calculated<br />

the incremental costs per gained quality-adjusted life-year<br />

to be £92,000 and concluded that telehealth is not costeffective<br />

when used as an add-on to standard patient support<br />

and treatment.<br />

Organizational effects<br />

An evaluation of the organizational factors having an impact<br />

on telehealth implementation was performed in parallel<br />

to the randomized study 12 , as a longitudinal case-study.<br />

Data collection was performed by triangulating data from<br />

interviews with health personnel and administrator, from<br />

observations during implementation, and from document<br />

analysis. This evaluation showed that the implementation<br />

lessons and organizational learning amongst the trial sites<br />

were hindered by the requirements of the randomized trial<br />

design. An example of this includes the possible lack of<br />

directed intervention to patients with special needs and<br />

the lack of experienced-based adjustment during the trial<br />

among the healthcare professionals. The full organizational<br />

potential is thus not expected to be achieved.<br />

46<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Scientific Communication<br />

Barriers to patient<br />

As part of the WSD, interviews were performed with patients<br />

who declined to participate in the intervention 13 . In<br />

the WSD, 36.7% of invited individuals did not want to<br />

take part after receiving a home visit and being provided<br />

information on study goals and inclusion requirements.<br />

Of the patients that declined to participate in the study<br />

only 22 of 61 patients accepted to go through an interview<br />

regarding their reasons for not taking part in the trial. The<br />

answers obtained from the interview can be categorized<br />

into the following:<br />

Requirements for technical competence and operation<br />

of equipment.<br />

Some patients declined because they felt that they were<br />

unable to operate equipment in a satisfactory manner. As<br />

an example some found it difficult to get the equipment<br />

to work and others had problems with false alarms due<br />

to faulty readings.<br />

Threats to identity, independence, and self-care.<br />

Some patients felt that the required medical equipment<br />

contributed to a feeling of morbidity, and furthermore,<br />

thought that the equipment should be used by sicker individuals.<br />

Some patients also found that the regular measurements<br />

required posed a threat to their independence.<br />

Expectations of and experienced disruptions to health<br />

and social care services.<br />

Some patients were quite satisfied with their current treatment<br />

approaches and health care professionals, and they<br />

did not want to make any changes to these arrangements.<br />

The authors concluded that forthcoming projects related<br />

to telemedicine must assure that intervention does not<br />

threaten patient self-perception of independence, their<br />

ability to use required equipment, or inadvertently cause<br />

individuals feel sicker than they actually are. Also, time<br />

should be spent on thoroughly introducing and clarifying<br />

of all potential sources of uncertainty among the patients.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The WSD trial has demonstrated reduced mortality from<br />

8.3 to 4.6% by using telemedicine to manage chronic diseases<br />

(i.e., chronic lung disease, chronic heart disease, and<br />

diabetes). The number of hospital admissions was reduced<br />

by 11% during a 12-month period. Patient health-related<br />

quality-of-life remained unchanged. The achieved savings<br />

however, were less than the costs related to establishing<br />

and implementing telehealth approaches, and overall costs<br />

per patient was increased by 15%.<br />

Central to interpreting the methodology and results of<br />

the WSD is the choice of patient sample, which included<br />

a heterogeneous group of individuals with either of three<br />

chronic diseases, i.e., diabetes, chronic obstructive lung<br />

disease, or chronic heart disease. So far, the WSD study<br />

organizers have published the effects of telehealth on the<br />

group as a whole (9 , and uncertainty remains on diseasespecific<br />

outcomes within the specific patient subgroups.<br />

Important issues have thus not yet been addressed in the<br />

primary articles.<br />

The WSD was criticized in a BMJ commentary 14 for not<br />

being precise in describing the influence caused by the<br />

sponsor (i.e., the Department of Health). Also, criticism<br />

has been raised that the Ministry of Health presented preliminary<br />

study data in a fairly positive manner before these<br />

data underwent rigorous peer-review and publication. Although<br />

the randomized design can secure the study design<br />

internal validity, it can also be potentially problematic 15 .<br />

There is a danger that organizational gains are overlooked<br />

because improvements of the organization were not allowed<br />

during the trial. A lack of blinding of information<br />

on participating patients and healthcare professionals can<br />

additionally lead to bias in favor of telemedicine benefits.<br />

If an á priori expectation is that telemedicine will contribute<br />

strongly in solving imminent demographic challenges<br />

in the healthcare system, the results from WSD are disappointing.<br />

The study did not show an overall reduction in<br />

costs per patient; nor did it show cost-effectiveness of using<br />

telemedicine. On the other hand, the study demonstrated<br />

a health gain by a significant reduction in patient mortality<br />

in the telemedicine group versus conventionally treated patients.<br />

Therefore, more clinical trials are needed before we<br />

can definitively assess the potential of telemedicine use for<br />

special patient subgroups, and to increase our knowledge<br />

of specific telemedicine mechanisms that govern health<br />

outcomes. Furthermore, it is important to stress that the<br />

technologies studied in the WSD are fairly old, having<br />

been selected for this project in May of 2008.<br />

The WSD thus fits nicely into the overall picture of<br />

telemedicine that was clarified in a review from 2012 6 .<br />

Telemedicine may have positive clinical impact, but only<br />

rarely will it, in its current format, reduce overall healthcare<br />

costs. Should we overtly reject the idea of telemedicine<br />

being a possible solution for the future problems of<br />

healthcare delivery in an increasingly elderly population?<br />

Should we simply discount the initiatives for testing new<br />

telemedicine solutions for people suffering from chronic<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 47


Scientific Communication<br />

heart disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes, or chronic<br />

wounds? We think not. From observing the evolution<br />

of other kinds of technologies, it is clear that technical<br />

development experiences often follow a “hype cycle” 16 .<br />

That is, an initial phase that provides great expectations<br />

of a new technology typically is followed by a period of<br />

disillusionment when it becomes clear that not all goals<br />

can be reached in a satisfactory manner, or as rapidly as<br />

first envisioned. This phase is then substituted by a period<br />

in which more accumulated knowledge and re-evaluated<br />

approaches provide novel insight to improving the costeffectiveness,<br />

and overall outcomes, of that technology.<br />

In this particular scenario, we have substantiated the need<br />

for performing more research into integrating telemedicine<br />

into the healthcare system, including the importance of<br />

identifying patients that will most benefit from telemedical<br />

technology. Along these lines, a Danish study (i.e., TEL-<br />

EKAT) showed that a group of patients with chronic lung<br />

disease found that home monitoring was a “pseudo” setup<br />

that had negligible impact on their perceived rehabilitative<br />

benefits 17 . In the Southern Denmark region, we are<br />

<strong>final</strong>izing a study on diabetic foot ulcers that will provide<br />

us with information on the utility of telemedicine in the<br />

treatment and follow-up of this patient group. Ulcers of<br />

any type would á priori seem to be an obvious target for a<br />

telemedicine setup, and as of January <strong>2014</strong> telemedicine<br />

wound treatment has been disseminated to all regions in<br />

Denmark. We expect that this study will allow us to better<br />

qualify the technologies that are most suitable to managing<br />

this severe ulcer type.<br />

As of today we have solutions that work from a technical<br />

point of view. However, we need to adjust the whole organization<br />

and the workflows to optimize the telemedicine<br />

approach to improving healthcare outcomes. Furthermore,<br />

we need to develop new technologies that minimize costs<br />

per patient, and make sure that these cost savings (e.g.,<br />

caused by reducing the number of readmissions) are not<br />

completely spent on technical equipment costs.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Critically assessing the existent WSD studies shows that,<br />

although applied telemedicine technology appears to have<br />

a major effect on decreasing mortality, this major beneficial<br />

effect is confounded by other less-positive results. Overall,<br />

the implemented technology and the organization behind<br />

telemedicine systems are not yet cost-effective. We require<br />

a steady supply of additional studies that implement newer<br />

telehealth technologies with well-defined patient populations.<br />

The WSD studies contain fine examples of how to<br />

evaluate telemedicine in a design that secures high internal<br />

validity. We deem these approaches to be highly relevant<br />

for the wound society members and we advocate initiating<br />

clinical randomized studies using a comparable multidisciplinary<br />

setup as, for example, the Model for Assessment<br />

of Telemedicine applications – MAST 18 . m<br />

Literature<br />

1. Chanussot-Deprez, C. and J. Contreras-Ruiz .<br />

Telemedicine in wound care: a review. Adv Skin<br />

Wound Care 2013; 26(2): 78-82.<br />

2. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of<br />

evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed<br />

Telecare 2002;14(suppl 1):1-7.<br />

3. Durrani H, Khoja S. A systematic review of the use of<br />

telehealth in Asian countries. J Telemed Telecare<br />

2009;15:175-81.<br />

4. Barlow J. Building an evidence base for successful<br />

telecare implementation – updated report of the<br />

Evidence Working Group of the Telecare Policy<br />

Collaborative chaired by James Barlow. http://ssia.<br />

wlga.gov.uk/media/pdf/f/4/APPENDIX_B_CSIP_<br />

Tele care (26. april 2013).<br />

5. Jakobsen AS, Laursen LC, Schou L et al. Vekslende<br />

effekt af telemedicin ved behandling af kronisk<br />

obstruktiv lungesygdom. Ugeskr Læger<br />

2012;174:936-42.<br />

6. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic<br />

disease management – an evidence synthesis. J<br />

Telemed Telecare 2012;18:211-20.<br />

7. Bower P, Cartwright M, Hirani SP et al. A comprehensive<br />

evaluation of the impact of telemonitoring in<br />

patients with long-term conditions and social care<br />

needs: protocol for the whole system demonstrator<br />

cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res<br />

2011;11:184.<br />

8. JPT Higgins JPT, Green S (edt.) Cochrane Handbook<br />

for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0.<br />

Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/ (3. apr<br />

2013).<br />

9. Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J et al. Whole<br />

System Demonstrator Evaluation Team. Effect of<br />

telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality:<br />

findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster<br />

randomised trial. BMJ 2012;344: e3874 (Published<br />

21 June 2012).<br />

10. Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L et al. Effect of<br />

telehealth on quality of life and psychological<br />

outcomes over 12 months (Whole System Demonstrator<br />

Telehealth Questionnaire Study): nested study<br />

of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster<br />

randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346:f653 doi:<br />

10.1136/bmj.f653 (Published 26 February 2013).<br />

11. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández JL et al. Whole<br />

System Demonstrator Evaluation Team. Cost<br />

effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term<br />

conditions (Whole System Demonstrator telehealth<br />

questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in<br />

a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ<br />

2013;346: f1035 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1035 (Published<br />

22 March 2013).<br />

12. Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J et al. An<br />

organisational analysis of the implementation of<br />

telecare and telehealth: the whole system demonstrator.<br />

BMC Health Serv Res 2012:15:403.<br />

13. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R et al. Exploring<br />

barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth<br />

and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator<br />

Trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res<br />

2012;12:220.<br />

14. Greenhalgh T. Whole System Demonstrator Trial:<br />

policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ<br />

2012;345:e5280.<br />

15. Liu JLY, Wyatt JC. The case for randomized<br />

controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical<br />

information system. J Am Med Inform Assoc<br />

2011;18:173-80.<br />

16. O’Leary DE. Gartner’s hype cycle and information<br />

system research issues.<br />

Int J Account Inform Syst 2008;9:240-52.<br />

17. Dinesen B, Huniche L, Toft E. Attitudes of COPD<br />

patients towards tele-rehabilitation: a cross-sector<br />

case study. Int J Enviroment Res Pub Health<br />

2013;10:6184-98.<br />

18. Kidholm K, Ekeland AG, Jensen LK et al. A model for<br />

assessment of telemedicine applications: MAST. Int J<br />

Technol Assess Health Care 2012, Jan; 28(1):44-51.<br />

48<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Vivano®<br />

Safety. And Simplicity.<br />

The VivanoTec negative pressure unit by HARTMANN is the central component of the Vivano system<br />

for successful negative pressure treatment of wounds. Its low weight means it can be used either<br />

on the move or in hospitals. Thanks to its intuitive menu navigation, the VivanoTec negative pressure<br />

unit combines easy usage with highly precise treatment settings and the necessary reliability, thus<br />

guaranteeing a high level of safety and user-friendly handling.


Scientific Communication<br />

Nutrition and chronic wounds<br />

Series (no. 12) of Technical Documents<br />

of the GNEAUPP (National Advisory<br />

Group for the Study of Pressure Ulcers<br />

and Chronic Wounds). Logroño, 2011.<br />

This technical document was based on a<br />

comprehensive and systematic review of<br />

the literature. It was submitted for consensus<br />

agreement by the National Advisory Group<br />

for the Study of Pressure Ulcers and Chronic<br />

Wounds (GNEAUPP). The result was a 68-page<br />

document that included 201 bibliographic references<br />

with two appendices of nutritional screening<br />

tools.<br />

The document is divided into four (4) sections:<br />

1. Introduction. This section defines the concept<br />

of wounds and wound variants as well as different<br />

treatment modalities, including the concepts of<br />

food, nutrition, and how they affect treatment.<br />

It also defines the broader concept of malnutrition,<br />

which is caused by unhealthy diets that may<br />

have an excess or deficit of food energy. Thus,<br />

malnutrition can occur in obese or underweight<br />

individuals, and in both cases, results in deficiencies<br />

of essential nutrients.<br />

2. Current state of knowledge. This section reviews<br />

current knowledge on nutrition, pressure<br />

ulcers, and wound prevention and treatment.<br />

The first subsection refers to epidemiology and<br />

existing reports published in the literature on nutritional<br />

status and chronic wounds. Specifically,<br />

it focuses on the epidemiology of malnutrition<br />

and wounds, and their relationship according to<br />

wound aetiology. A distinction is made between<br />

nutritional status and pressure ulcers (the type<br />

of wound most referenced in the literature and<br />

related to nutrition), and nutritional status and leg<br />

ulcers. Here, there are few references in the literature.<br />

This subsection concludes with an exploration<br />

of nutritional status and wound dehiscence.<br />

Scientific evidence, obtained primarily from observational<br />

studies, links malnutrition directly<br />

to pressure ulcer severity and incidence. Regarding<br />

diabetic foot ulcers, good glycaemic control<br />

is thought to be important in neuropathic ulcer<br />

healing; however, little evidence exists to support<br />

this idea. Regarding ulcers of venous aetiology,<br />

few studies have investigated the role of nutrition<br />

in healing. One study reported that people<br />

with this pathology have lower levels of vitamins<br />

A and E, carotenes, and zinc; however, to date, no<br />

evidence has been presented to confirm that supplementation<br />

with these micronutrients improves<br />

healing. Regarding wound dehiscence, it is known<br />

that this complication is 8 times more common<br />

in vitamin C-deficient patients than in patients<br />

with normal vitamin C levels. In addition, obese<br />

patients are thought to have more infections and<br />

delayed wound healing, as well as a greater incidence<br />

of dehiscence.<br />

The second subsection deals with the assessment,<br />

screening, and diagnosis of malnutrition, with special<br />

emphasis on nutritional screening and assessment<br />

tools. A description is provided of steps to<br />

follow in nutritional assessment, as recommended<br />

in the guidelines of leading societies dedicated to<br />

nutrition science. Regarding nutritional assessment<br />

and screening, recommendations are made<br />

about the collection of clinicometric data for the<br />

various instruments and tools, which are validated<br />

and based on research.<br />

Assessment consists of two parts: nutritional<br />

screening and the nutritional assessment itself. The<br />

purpose of screening is to identify malnourished<br />

individuals or those at nutritional risk. For these<br />

individuals, a complete assessment is required.<br />

The guidelines of the European Society for Clinical<br />

Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) for nutritional<br />

screening recommend a series of steps that<br />

must be considered for all hospitalised patients:<br />

<br />

José Verdú Soriano<br />

PhD, MSc Nurse<br />

The University of<br />

Alicante, Spain<br />

Estrella Perdomo Pérez<br />

MSc Nurse<br />

Miller Bajo Health Center<br />

Las Palmas, Spain<br />

Correspondence:<br />

pepe.verdu@ua.es<br />

www.gneaupp.es<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 51


Scientific Communication<br />

i. Upon admission, a simple nutritional screening<br />

method must be used to identify patients at nutritional<br />

risk.<br />

ii. Patients identified as being at nutritional risk<br />

require a complete nutritional assessment.<br />

iii. The patient’s individual nutritional requirements<br />

should be evaluated, and patient care and nutritional<br />

therapy should be planned.<br />

iv. The monitoring and definition of targeted outcomes<br />

should be determined.<br />

v. Finally, screening results, full assessment, planning,<br />

and monitoring should be communicated to<br />

the other professionals involved, especially when the<br />

patient is transferred to the community or to another<br />

institution.<br />

Rasmussen et al. recommend a series of steps for assessing<br />

nutritional risk and detecting malnutrition:<br />

Detection: The purpose of nutritional screening<br />

This step is to identify patients at risk of malnutrition so<br />

that nutritional interventions can be considered. Identification<br />

of an altered nutritional state enables the adjustment<br />

of patient care so that nutrition can be optimized.<br />

Assessment: the screening methodology<br />

The screening can be performed using various available<br />

methods. The ideal test is one that has high sensitivity (i.e.<br />

if it tests positive in patients with the condition) and high<br />

specificity (i.e. if it tests negative in patients without the<br />

condition), but it is also important that the tool has a positive<br />

predictive value (which would avoid overdiagnosis).<br />

In short, the method used should offer the best validity<br />

and reliability at the lowest cost possible, i.e. it should be<br />

easy and fast to do.<br />

EWMA values your opinion and would like to<br />

invite all readers to participate in shaping<br />

the organisation.<br />

Please submit possible topics for future<br />

conference sessions.<br />

EWMA is also interested in receiving book reviews,<br />

articles etc.<br />

Please contact the EWMA Secretariat at<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

ESPEN has developed guidelines for screening tools<br />

Screening tools should detect caloric and protein malnutrition<br />

and/or predict the likelihood of malnutrition<br />

developing or worsening of the patient’s condition. From<br />

this perspective, it should meet four principles:<br />

i. What is the patient’s current condition? Body<br />

mass index (BMI) can provide important information<br />

about nutritional status, although this measure<br />

may be less useful for children, adolescents, and elderly<br />

individuals. Weight and height can be used to<br />

calculate BMI. Alternatively, the mid-portion of the<br />

upper arm (between the acromion and the olecranon)<br />

can be measured and compared with a table of<br />

percentiles for a particular population according to<br />

age and sex.<br />

ii. Is the patient’s condition stable? Obtain information<br />

about the patient’s history of weight loss by<br />

asking the patient directly or, if possible, consulting<br />

medical records. Unintentional weight loss greater<br />

than 5% of total body weight over 3 months is considered<br />

significant. This approach may be helpful<br />

when malnutrition cannot be identified by calculating<br />

BMI, e.g. weight loss in obese people. Furthermore,<br />

weight loss may be predictive of subsequent<br />

nutritional deterioration.<br />

iii. Will the patient’s condition worsen? This question<br />

could be answered by determining whether food intake<br />

has recently decreased, and if so, approximately<br />

how much and for how long. This can be confirmed<br />

by measuring the food intake of hospitalised patients<br />

or through use of a diet diary. If it is determined<br />

that food intake is lower than typically required to<br />

maintain normal weight, then weight loss will likely<br />

occur.<br />

iv. Will the condition of nutritional deterioration accelerate?<br />

In addition to decreased appetite, the<br />

patient’s nutritional requirements may increase<br />

because of metabolic stress associated with severe<br />

illness. For example, major surgery, sepsis, or<br />

multiple traumas, which may be accompanied by<br />

chronic wounds, may cause nutritional status to<br />

worsen quickly or may result in malnutrition.<br />

Nutritional screening tools<br />

In recent years, various tools to assess nutritional status<br />

have been developed, validated, and implemented, although<br />

not all are available in Spanish. The following<br />

tools were developed specifically for elderly people: the<br />

Payette instrument; Nutrition Risk Score; Nutritional Risk<br />

Index; Sadness, Cholesterol, Albumin, Loss of Weight,<br />

52<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Eating problems, Shopping and Cooking problems<br />

(SCALES); Global Subjective Assessment; Malnutrition<br />

Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutritional<br />

Assessment (MNA); and Nutrition Risk<br />

Screening 2002 (NRS 2002).<br />

The NRS 2002 is recommended for use in hospitals,<br />

whereas the MUST tool is intended for general use.<br />

The MNA is the only tool validated in Spanish.<br />

The third subsection presents key scientific evidence<br />

for the role of nutrition in chronic wound prevention<br />

and treatment, examining mechanisms underlying<br />

physiological and metabolic processes. Topics<br />

include energy intake; protein and/or specific amino<br />

acid intake and fatty acid intake and their potential<br />

immunomodulatory effects; liquid intake; and<br />

intake of micronutrients (zinc, iron, copper, alpha<br />

lipoic acid, and vitamins A, C, K, and E). A section<br />

focuses on nutritional interventions and their role<br />

in wound prevention and treatment.<br />

The conclusion highlights the important role of<br />

nutrition in wound care, emphasising that nutritional<br />

screening and assessment have been, thus far,<br />

overlooked in the field of wound research. Although<br />

substantial scientific evidence is beginning to appear<br />

in this field, further research is needed.<br />

3. Recommendations for clinical practice. Recommendations<br />

are presented with the level of supporting<br />

evidence based on the Grading of Recommendations<br />

Assessment, Development and Evaluation<br />

(GRADE) Working Group guidelines. Recommendations<br />

take into account questions that clinicians<br />

should ask such as: When should nutritional status<br />

be assessed? Who should assess nutritional status?<br />

How should nutritional risk be assessed? Which nutritional<br />

interventions can prevent and treat chronic<br />

wounds?<br />

4. Recommendations for researchers. Recommendations<br />

are presented to provide researchers<br />

with guidance in fields for which further research<br />

is needed.<br />

This document therefore provides a broad analysis<br />

of this topic and identifies existing gaps in knowledge<br />

of the relationships among nutritional status,<br />

nutritional interventions, and wound management.<br />

<br />

m<br />

WOUND CARE<br />

IN THE ONE<br />

HEALTH PERSPECTIVE<br />

Symposium<br />

on Veterinary<br />

Wound Management<br />

and Antimicrobial<br />

Resistance<br />

EWMA n GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> Conference<br />

Madrid, Spain<br />

14 May <strong>2014</strong> · 13:00 -17:30<br />

n What can veterinary wound care learn from<br />

human wound care and vice versa?<br />

n How can modern wound care contribute to<br />

combatting the increasingly urgent problem of<br />

antimicrobial resistance?<br />

These are some of the questions that will be<br />

debated at the 1st Symposium on Veterinary<br />

Wound Management and Antimicrobial<br />

Resistance.<br />

This symposium is relevant for practitioners,<br />

researchers and other health professionals<br />

from the veterinary and human health sectors.<br />

We are looking forward to seeing you!<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


The biofilm challenge<br />

Maria Alhede,<br />

M.Sc., Ph.D<br />

Morten Alhede,<br />

M.Sc., Ph.D<br />

Biofilm Test Facility<br />

University of Copenhagen
<br />

Department of International<br />

Health, Immunology<br />

and Microbiology
<br />

Blegdamsvej 3B,<br />

Bldg. 24.1.22,<br />

DK-2200 Copenhagen<br />

Denmark<br />

http://biofilmtestfacility.<br />

ku.dk<br />

Correspondence:<br />

malhede@sund.ku.dk<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

Abstract<br />

The concept of biofilms has emerged in the<br />

clinical setting during the last decade. Infections<br />

involving biofilms have been documented in all<br />

parts of the human body, and it is currently believed<br />

that the presence of biofilm-forming bacteria<br />

is equivalent to chronic infection. A quick<br />

Pubmed search reveals the significance of biofilms,<br />

as evidenced by a dramatic increase in scientific<br />

publications on the topic, as well as in publications<br />

concerning wounds with biofilms, which<br />

reached 600 publications in 2013.<br />

Judged from the number of publications, it<br />

appears that biofilms play a significant role in<br />

wounds. However, the impact of biofilms is often<br />

debated, because infected wounds were also<br />

treated before the concept of biofilms was coined.<br />

In this short review, we will address the significance<br />

of biofilms and their role in wounds, and<br />

discuss the future tasks of the biofilm challenge.<br />

Biofilms in short<br />

Bacteria are found in at least two distinct states<br />

– planktonic and sessile cells. Planktonic cells are<br />

classically defined as “free flowing bacteria in suspension”<br />

as opposed to the sessile biofilm state,<br />

which is defined as “a structured community of<br />

bacterial cells enclosed in a self-produced polymeric<br />

matrix and adherent to an inert or living surface” 1 .<br />

Figure 1. Total biofilm publications on<br />

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/<br />

Until the last decade, microbiologists have focused<br />

and emphasized the planktonic state over the biofilm<br />

state. However, the importance of the biofilm<br />

mode of growth is becoming increasingly evident<br />

with the availability of improved methods to study<br />

sessile bacteria; hence the subsequent accumulation<br />

of evidence for its widespread presence 2,3 .<br />

Biofilms were discovered by one of the first<br />

microbiologists, the Dutch scientist Antoine van<br />

Leeuwenhoek, in the 1650s, but the actual breakthrough<br />

regarding this phenomenon occurred<br />

328 years later when Costerton and colleagues<br />

published their work on “How Bacteria Stick” in<br />

1978 4 . Since 1978, research on biofilm bacteria<br />

has exploded (Figure 1).<br />

It has now been established that most biofilmgrowing<br />

bacteria cause chronic infections 5 , which<br />

are characterized by persistent inflammation and<br />

tissue damage 6 . These chronic infections, including<br />

wound and foreign body infections, are<br />

infections that “1) persist in spite of antibiotic<br />

therapy and the innate and adaptive immune and<br />

inflammatory response of the host and 2) which,<br />

in contrast to colonization, are characterized by<br />

the immune response and persisting pathology” 7 .<br />

Traditionally, biofilms were considered as being attached<br />

to a surface. However, in situ hybridization<br />

(FISH) and confocal laser scanning microscopy<br />

(CLSM) of different infection sites have shown<br />

that the bacteria do not need to be attached to<br />

surfaces to establish a chronic infection. Instead,<br />

bacteria generate non-attached microcolonies by<br />

aggregating with their fellow bacteria through matrix<br />

components, and they appear to put up an<br />

impenetrable barrier to host immune cells (e.g.,<br />

phagocytic cells) 6,8-10 .<br />

The challenge faced with regard to biofilms in<br />

chronic infections lies in their significant tolerance<br />

to treatment with antibiotics and to the host’s<br />

immune response 11 . The antibiotic tolerance of<br />

the biofilm has been investigated in numerous in<br />

vitro models; these studies show that the biofilm<br />

can withstand treatment with very high dosages of<br />

antibiotics that are up to 1000 times the minimal<br />

inhibitory concentration 12 .<br />

54<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Scientific Communication<br />

As mentioned above, probably the most important trait<br />

of the biofilm is its innate tolerance to antimicrobials and<br />

antiseptics. Here, slow growth and matrix molecules are of<br />

the utmost significance. The biofilm matrix is composed<br />

of macromolecules such as proteins, extracellular DNA,<br />

and polysaccharides. This matrix surrounding the bacteria<br />

in the biofilm has been shown to reduce penetration and<br />

bind protruding antibiotics 13-20 .<br />

In addition to the matrix, it appears that the biofilm<br />

population consists of bacteria with different physiologies,<br />

e.g., some are dormant and some are actively growing.<br />

With this knowledge, treatment regimens with combinations<br />

of different antibiotics have successfully been designed<br />

to target these different sub-populations 21 . The<br />

administration of such combinations to patients has been<br />

successful to some extent and seems to suppress biofilm<br />

infection; however, in most cases, the eradication of biofilm<br />

infections has proven impossible and the infection<br />

recurs when treatment is stopped 22,23 .<br />

For wound care, antiseptics are preferred over antibiotics.<br />

In our hands, most antiseptics (including silver and<br />

PHMB) are very effective against planktonic bacteria and<br />

immature biofilms 24,25 . However, when applied on mature<br />

biofilms (i.e., those older than 24 hours) with low growth<br />

rates and a solid matrix, they can only inhibit further<br />

growth and prevent bacteria from spreading beyond the<br />

biofilm (unpublished observations), and do not resolve<br />

the infection. This increasing tolerance with age has also<br />

been reported for traditional antibiotics 26,27 .<br />

Biofilm tolerance to the host immune response is also<br />

characteristic of chronic infections. Polymorphonuclear<br />

leukocytes (PMNs) are normally the first cells appearing<br />

at the site of infection, and their role is to phagocytize<br />

microorganisms and foreign materials 28 . Despite being<br />

part of the acute inflammatory response, PMNs are still<br />

seen in chronic infections often surrounding the biofilm 29 .<br />

Investigations of P. aeruginosa biofilms have shown that<br />

these PMNs are either paralyzed or killed (lysed) by a virulence<br />

factor produced by P. aeruginosa, called rhamnolipids<br />

30,31 . The lysis of PMNs causes further inflammation<br />

and attracts additional PMNs, and this cycle contributes<br />

to chronic P. aeruginosa infection 32 .<br />

As mentioned, the cells of a biofilm have been shown<br />

to be embedded in a self-produced matrix consisting of<br />

polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA. The matrix also plays<br />

a role in the tolerance of the biofilm by decreasing the<br />

penetration of PMNs and antibiotics. Interestingly, DNA<br />

released from dead PMNs has been shown to enhance<br />

initial biofilm development, thereby enhancing the biofilm<br />

fortress 33 .<br />

Biofilms in wounds<br />

Wounds are disposed to infection, as the loss of skin integrity<br />

provides a wet, warm, and often nutrient-rich setting<br />

that is beneficial for microbial colonization. Bacterial infections<br />

have been shown to prevent wound healing. Data<br />

suggest that the presence of certain bacteria (e.g., P. aeruginosa)<br />

in these ulcers can induce ulcer enlargement and<br />

delayed healing 34 . Recent analyses from chronic wounds<br />

have identified the presence of biofilm-growing bacteria,<br />

thereby explaining why these wounds persist 8,9,35 .<br />

Publications regarding biofilms and wounds reached a total<br />

of 600 last year. This number is impressive and indicates<br />

that biofilms play an important role in wound healing<br />

(Figure 2). However, it is unclear whether the delay in<br />

wound healing is caused by bacteria present in biofilms<br />

in the slough at the surface of the wound or if bacteria<br />

situated deeper cause this effect 36 . Hurlow et al. concluded<br />

from a small series of cases that the appearance of biofilms<br />

in wounds is quite different from the slough and requires<br />

different management strategies for its control 36 . In 2009,<br />

Fazli et al. found that the distance of the P. aeruginosa<br />

biofilm from the wound surface was significantly greater<br />

than that of S. aureus biofilms, suggesting that the distribution<br />

of the biofilms in wounds is non-random and<br />

that important biofilms are situated deeper in the wound<br />

bed. It was thus suggested that biofilms (i.e., P. aeruginosa)<br />

located in the deeper regions of the wound might play a<br />

role in arresting the wound at a stage dominated by inflammatory<br />

processes 9 . Bjarnsholt et al. have proposed that<br />

these biofilms keep the wound in a chronic inflammatory<br />

state, which corresponds to findings showing that a persistent<br />

influx of PMNs, elevated matrix metalloproteases,<br />

and imbalances in several cytokines are found in chronic<br />

Figure 2. Total wound biofilm publications on<br />

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 55


wounds 35 . Wolcott and colleagues showed in 2008 that an<br />

intensive biofilm-based wound-care strategy significantly<br />

improved healing frequency. The findings demonstrate<br />

that effectively targeting bacteria in chronic wounds is<br />

an important component of transforming ‘non-healable’<br />

wounds into healable wounds 37 .<br />

The challenging biofilm<br />

From the above studies it appears that biofilms are evident<br />

in wounds. Biofilms were also addressed in the 2013<br />

EWMA document “Antimicrobials and Non-healing<br />

Wounds Evidence, controversies and suggestions”. The<br />

conclusions in the document were that further studies<br />

elucidating the precise role of biofilms are urgently needed<br />

since the nature of biofilms make their study very difficult<br />

and therefore their impact a little controversial.<br />

Diagnosing biofilm infections is extremely difficul t38 , and<br />

therefore evaluating the impact of biofilms and novel antibiofilm<br />

treatments is equally difficult. The difficulties in<br />

diagnosing biofilms are in large part due to their very small<br />

size. A recent literature study showed that biofilms that<br />

cause inflammation rarely grow to sizes larger than 100<br />

μm 39 . When considering that the spatial distribution of<br />

such small biofilms is highly heterogeneous in a wound<br />

(9,40 , one can imagine that the chance of finding and detecting<br />

the bacteria are small. In addition to the low chance<br />

of ‘hitting’ a biofilm when sampling from a wound, the<br />

bacteria also need to be released from the matrix. In addition<br />

to these difficulties, the method of detection might<br />

also influence the diagnosis. Culturing bacteria has been<br />

the gold standard, but many wound pathogens are very<br />

difficult to culture (even if grown anaerobically) and persistent<br />

cells from the biofilm might even be impossible to culture<br />

41,42 . Molecular methods are generally more sensitive if<br />

used with care; however, they also have their limitations 40<br />

and the detection of 16s rRNA has also proved difficult in<br />

non-growing biofilms (unpublished data).<br />

Due to the above complications, in vitro biofilm studies<br />

have widely been applied in the study of anti-biofilm treatment<br />

strategies as an obvious alternative to clinical trials.<br />

Such studies are much needed and yield much important<br />

information if used with care. Until recently, such treatment<br />

strategies have been tested on fast growing bacteria<br />

in shaking cultures; these studies did not therefore involve<br />

biofilm-growing bacteria. Now, the use of biofilm models<br />

is becoming more common. The downside of in vitro<br />

models is that it is impossible to mimic a clinical biofilm;<br />

nevertheless, the lack or addition of host components such<br />

as proteins and immune cells should always be considered.<br />

Another challenge researchers should be aware of<br />

is the false dogma stating that surface attachment per se<br />

makes the biofilm tolerant. This is not true, because young<br />

surface-attached biofilms still have high growth rates and<br />

only a limited matrix shield and are therefore highly susceptible<br />

to most antimicrobials. In our hands, biofilms<br />

across species and models become tolerant between 20<br />

hours and 48 hours after inoculation, but continue to<br />

develop this tolerance 26 .<br />

Rethinking diagnosis and treatment<br />

Despite the above difficulties in the study of biofilms, it<br />

appears that tolerant biofilms do impact wound healing<br />

as they impact other chronic infections 35-37 . As suggested<br />

for other biofilm infections, there is an urgent need to rethink<br />

both the diagnosis and treatment strategies. Wound<br />

expert Keith Cutting wrote a review on the challenge of<br />

wound cleansing, in which he proposed that we need to<br />

rethink our approach to wound cleansing: he suggested<br />

more reflection on individual needs and thereby a reflection<br />

of the need to use anti-biofilm treatment strategies 43 .<br />

When studying the impact of biofilms and their treatment<br />

in patients, it is important to combine several methods<br />

of detection to avoid false negatives 38 . Studying the<br />

healing of chronic wounds is further complicated by the<br />

challenge and longevity of non-healing wounds.<br />

As mentioned above, eradicating biofilm-forming<br />

bacteria is almost impossible, and the best option is to<br />

remove the infected area if possible 7 . Infected implants<br />

and catheters can be removed, infected lungs of cystic<br />

fibrosis patients can be explanted, and wounds can be<br />

debrided 7,8,23,44 ; however, even in these cases, biofilms<br />

seem to recur, and hence it is very important to find and<br />

develop new strategies to combat bacteria in wounds.<br />

Much research is ongoing within anti-biofilm strategies,<br />

and a number of patents on single compounds are pending<br />

(www.faqs.org/patents/).<br />

In our hands, one of the most promising strategies<br />

across all biofilm-related infections is biofilm disruption<br />

combined with an antimicrobial agent. Biofilm disruption<br />

and dispersal experiments suggest that biofilm tolerance<br />

is readily reversible, whereas classic resistance due to mutations<br />

is not 26 . Upon physical disruption the biofilm,<br />

the bacteria inside the biofilm suddenly find themselves<br />

outside of the protective matrix with fresh access to nutrients<br />

and oxygen, which might induce growth. Thus, a<br />

potential anti-biofilm strategy could be either mechanical<br />

or enzymatic disruption of the wound biofilm. Several patent<br />

applications are already pending on the anti-biofilm<br />

effects of a biofilm destabilizing compound used together<br />

with common antimicrobials in wound dressings (www.<br />

faqs.org/patents/).<br />

Furthermore, a good fraction of the latest wound biofilm<br />

publications have been focused on novel treatment<br />

56<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Scientific Communication<br />

strategies and novel models of wound infection involving<br />

disruption of the biofilm alone or in combination with<br />

antimicrobial agents.<br />

Disruption of biofilms has been demonstrated with<br />

ultrasound waves. Although the endpoint of most studies<br />

has been surface release from young biofilms (i.e., not<br />

necessarily equal to a reduced infection); some studies have<br />

managed to prove that ultrasound waves can effectively enhance<br />

the efficacy of antimicrobials (45-50 . Clinical studies<br />

of ultrasound wound debridement have also shown good<br />

effects 51,52 ; however, the decrease in bacterial counts were<br />

not significant 51 . This non-significant decrease in bacterial<br />

burden could be explained by the difficulties in detecting<br />

biofilms, but it has also been suggested that the positive<br />

effect arises from a multitude of factors such as cellular<br />

recruitment and stimulation, collagen synthesis, angiogenesis,<br />

and fibrinolysis (53,54 . However, non-published data<br />

from our laboratory and the recent knowledge of biofilms<br />

in non-healing wounds has led to the hypothesis that ultrasound,<br />

in addition to the above mentioned parameters,<br />

aids biofilm disruption and thereby wound healing 55 .<br />

Maggot debridement therapy of non-healing wounds<br />

was approved in 2004 by the FDA and has been shown to<br />

possess an antibacterial effect in combination with other<br />

wound healing properties 56-59 . An interesting study has<br />

recently shown that larvae actually combine physical<br />

disruption with enzymatic destabilization of wound biofilms<br />

60 . As mentioned in the introduction, DNA stabilizes<br />

all biofilms. Apparently, in addition to physically grazing,<br />

the biofilm larvae secrete DNases that degrade DNA and<br />

thereby further weaken the biofilm structure. As with the<br />

ultrasound, larvae also have secondary positive effects on<br />

wound healing immunomodulation, angiogenesis, and<br />

tissue remodelling and regeneration, and this may explain<br />

their beneficial effects on wound healing. Another<br />

example of combining disruption of biofilms with positive<br />

secondary effects is negative pressure therapy 61-63 . The<br />

authors found that negative pressure disrupted the matrix<br />

of biofilms on porcine skin implants, making them more<br />

susceptible to antiseptics 61 .<br />

As observed with other biofilm infections, targeting<br />

several factors in wound biofilms seems to be a solid strategy<br />

worth investigating. In the case of wound healing, the<br />

secondary effects as discussed above might even be more<br />

pronounced and thus constitute a promising strategy.<br />

The tasks<br />

From the above discussion of the impact of biofilms, it is<br />

clear that we have a number of tasks to solve. First of all,<br />

in order to prove that biofilm plays the role it is believed<br />

to do, we need to improve diagnostic methods. This task<br />

is also paramount when evaluating anti-biofilm strategies<br />

in vivo. Secondly, the study of possible treatment strategies<br />

for biofilm infections needs to be expanded and the<br />

in vitro models need to be aligned to simulate the wound<br />

in the best possible way.<br />

For these tasks to be solved, it is important that scientists,<br />

doctors, and wound healing specialists communicate<br />

and share their thoughts and concerns on the issue. If<br />

we combine the knowledge of wound care professionals<br />

and basic scientists, we can hopefully take a giant leap<br />

towards turning non-healing wounds into healing wounds.<br />

Such multidisciplinary communication between doctors<br />

and biofilm researchers has contributed significantly to<br />

the treatment of chronic lung infections in patients with<br />

the genetic disorder cystic fibrosis 64,65 . Communication<br />

through research journals is significant; however, it is our<br />

experience that the most fruitful results and collaborations<br />

come from live discussions and consensus debates at conferences.<br />

At the EWMA conference in 2013, the topic of<br />

biofilms was for the first time denoted in an EWMA document;<br />

furthermore, a number of abstracts dealt with biofilms<br />

in addition to the popular workshop. In particular,<br />

at the workshop, we had a great discussion on the future<br />

of biofilm research. It is our hope that even more people,<br />

from all branches of wound care, will attend the biofilm<br />

workshops at EWMA GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> in Madrid, so<br />

we can discuss the best approach to finding better ways<br />

to study, diagnose, and treat biofilm-infected wounds.m<br />

References<br />

1. Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg.<br />

1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of<br />

persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322.<br />

2. Costerton, J. W., K. J. Cheng, G. G. Geesey, T. I.<br />

Ladd, J. C. Nickel, M. Dasgupta, and T. J. Marrie.<br />

1987. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.<br />

ANNU REV MICROBIOL 41:435-464.<br />

3. Davey, M. E., and A. O’Toole G. 2000. Microbial<br />

biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.<br />

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:847-867.<br />

4. Costerton, J. W., G. G. Geesey, and K. J. Cheng.<br />

1978. How bacteria stick. Sci Am 238:86-95.<br />

5. Costerton, W., R. Veeh, M. Shirtliff, M. Pasmore, C.<br />

Post, and G. Ehrlich. 2003. The application of<br />

biofilm science to the study and control of chronic<br />

bacterial infections. J Clin Invest 112:1466-1477.<br />

6. Bjarnsholt, T., P. Ø. Jensen, M. J. Fiandaca,<br />

J. Pedersen, C. R. Hansen, C. B. Andersen, T.<br />

Pressler, M. Givskov, and N. Høiby. 2009. Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract<br />

of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 44:547-<br />

558.<br />

7. Høiby, N., T. Bjarnsholt, M. Givskov, S. Molin, and<br />

O. Ciofu. 2010. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial<br />

biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35:322-332.<br />

8. Kirketerp-Møller, K., P. Ø. Jensen, M. Fazli, K. G.<br />

Madsen, J. Pedersen, C. Moser, T. Tolker-Nielsen,<br />

N. Høiby, M. Givskov, and T. Bjarnsholt. 2008.<br />

Distribution, organization, and ecology of bacteria in<br />

chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 46:2717-2722.<br />

9. Fazli, M., T. Bjarnsholt, K. Kirketerp-Moller, B.<br />

Jorgensen, A. S. Andersen, K. A. Krogfelt, M.<br />

Givskov, and T. Tolker-Nielsen. 2009. Nonrandom<br />

distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and<br />

Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin<br />

Microbiol 47:4084-4089.<br />

10. Bjarnsholt, T., T. Tolker-Nielsen, M. Givskov, M.<br />

Janssen, and L. H. Christensen. 2009. Detection of<br />

bacteria by fluorescence in situ hybridization in<br />

culture-negative soft tissue filler lesions. Dermatol<br />

Surg 35 Suppl 2:1620-1624.<br />

11. Høiby, N., O. Ciofu, and T. Bjarnsholt. 2010.<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis.<br />

Future microbiology 5:1663-1674.<br />

12. Nickel, J. C., I. Ruseska, J. B. Wright, and J. W.<br />

Costerton. 1985. Tobramycin resistance of<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm<br />

on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob Agents<br />

Chemother 27:619-624.<br />

13. Whitchurch, C. B., T. Tolker-Nielsen, P. C. Ragas,<br />

and J. S. Mattick. 2002. Extracellular DNA required<br />

for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295:1487.<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 57


Scientific Communication<br />

14. Billings, N., M. Millan, M. Caldara, R. Rusconi, Y.<br />

Tarasova, R. Stocker, and K. Ribbeck. 2013. The<br />

extracellular matrix Component Psl provides<br />

fast-acting antibiotic defense in Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003526.<br />

15. Allesen-Holm, M., K. B. Barken, L. Yang, M.<br />

Klausen, J. S. Webb, S. Kjelleberg, S. Molin, M.<br />

Givskov, and T. Tolker-Nielsen. 2006. A characterization<br />

of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

cultures and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1114-1128.<br />

16. Chiang, W. C., M. Nilsson, P. Ø. Jensen, N. Høiby,<br />

T. E. Nielsen, M. Givskov, and T. Tolker-Nielsen.<br />

2013. Extracellular DNA shields against aminoglycosides<br />

in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob<br />

Agents Chemother.<br />

17. Mulcahy, H., L. Charron-Mazenod, and S. Lewenza.<br />

2008. Extracellular DNA chelates cations and<br />

induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000213.<br />

18. Walker, T. S., K. L. Tomlin, G. S. Worthen, K. R.<br />

Poch, J. G. Lieber, M. T. Saavedra, M. B. Fessler, K.<br />

C. Malcolm, M. L. Vasil, and J. A. Nick. 2005.<br />

Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm<br />

development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect.<br />

Immun. 73:3693-3701.<br />

19. Chiang, W. C., M. Nilsson, P. O. Jensen, N. Hoiby,<br />

T. E. Nielsen, M. Givskov, and T. Tolker-Nielsen.<br />

2013. Extracellular DNA shields against aminoglycosides<br />

in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob<br />

Agents Chemother 57:2352-2361.<br />

20. Purdy Drew, K. R., L. K. Sanders, Z. W. Culumber,<br />

O. Zribi, and G. C. Wong. 2009. Cationic amphiphiles<br />

increase activity of aminoglycoside antibiotic<br />

tobramycin in the presence of airway polyelectrolytes.<br />

J Am Chem Soc 131:486-493.<br />

21. Pamp, S. J., M. Gjermansen, H. K. Johansen, and T.<br />

Tolker-Nielsen. 2008. Tolerance to the antimicrobial<br />

peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms<br />

is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on<br />

the pmr and mexAB-oprM genes. Mol Microbiol<br />

68:223-240.<br />

22. Høiby, N. 2011. Recent advances in the treatment of<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis.<br />

BMC medicine 9:32.<br />

23. Zimmerli, W., and C. Moser. 2012. Pathogenesis<br />

and treatment concepts of orthopaedic biofilm<br />

infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65:158-<br />

168.<br />

24. Bjarnsholt, T., K. Kirketerp-Møller, S. Kristiansen,<br />

R. Phipps, A. K. Nielsen, P. Ø. Jensen, N. Høiby,<br />

and M. Givskov. 2007. Silver against Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa biofilms. APMIS 115:921-928.<br />

25. Castellano, J. J., S. M. Shafii, F. Ko, G. Donate, T.<br />

E. Wright, R. J. Mannari, W. G. Payne, D. J. Smith,<br />

and M. C. Robson. 2007. Comparative evaluation of<br />

silver-containing antimicrobial dressings and drugs.<br />

Int Wound J 4:114-122.<br />

26. Alhede, M., K. N. Kragh, K. Qvortrup, M. Allesen-<br />

Holm, M. van Gennip, L. D. Christensen, P. O.<br />

Jensen, A. K. Nielsen, M. Parsek, D. Wozniak, S.<br />

Molin, T. Tolker-Nielsen, N. Hoiby, M. Givskov, and<br />

T. Bjarnsholt. 2011. Phenotypes of non-attached<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates resemble<br />

surface attached biofilm. PLoS One 6:e27943.<br />

27. Alhede, M., O. Er, S. Eickhardt, K. Kragh, M.<br />

Alhede, L. D. Christensen, S. S. Poulsen, M.<br />

Givskov, L. H. Christensen, N. Hoiby, M. Tvede, and<br />

T. Bjarnsholt. <strong>2014</strong>. Bacterial biofilm formation and<br />

treatment in soft tissue fillers. Pathogens and disease.<br />

28. Nathan, C. 2006. Neutrophils and immunity:<br />

challenges and opportunities. Nature reviews.<br />

Immunology 6:173-182.<br />

29. Bjarnsholt, T., M. Alhede, M. Alhede, S. R.<br />

Eickhardt-Sorensen, C. Moser, M. Kuhl, P. Ø.<br />

Jensen, and N. Høiby. 2013. The in vivo biofilm.<br />

Trends Microbiol 21:466-474.<br />

30. Bjarnsholt, T., P. Ø. Jensen, M. Burmølle, M.<br />

Hentzer, J. A. Haagensen, H. P. Hougen, H. Calum,<br />

K. G. Madsen, C. Moser, S. Molin, N. Høiby, and M.<br />

Givskov. 2005. Pseudomonas aeruginosa tolerance<br />

to tobramycin, hydrogen peroxide and polymorphonuclear<br />

leukocytes is quorum-sensing dependent.<br />

Microbiology 151:373-383.<br />

31. Jensen, P. Ø., T. Bjarnsholt, R. Phipps, T. B.<br />

Rasmussen, H. Calum, L. Christoffersen, C. Moser,<br />

P. Williams, T. Pressler, M. Givskov, and N. Høiby.<br />

2007. Rapid necrotic killing of polymorphonuclear<br />

leukocytes is caused by quorum-sensing-controlled<br />

production of rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa. Microbiology 153:1329-1338.<br />

32. Alhede, M., T. Bjarnsholt, M. Givskov, and M.<br />

Alhede. <strong>2014</strong>. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms:<br />

Mechanisms of Immune Evasion. Advances in<br />

applied microbiology 86:1-40.<br />

33. Walker, T. S., K. L. Tomlin, G. S. Worthen, K. R.<br />

Poch, J. G. Lieber, M. T. Saavedra, M. B. Fessler, K.<br />

C. Malcolm, M. L. Vasil, and J. A. Nick. 2005.<br />

Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm<br />

development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect<br />

Immun 73:3693-3701.<br />

34. Gjodsbol, K., J. J. Christensen, T. Karlsmark, B.<br />

Jorgensen, B. M. Klein, and K. A. Krogfelt. 2006.<br />

Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a<br />

longitudinal study. Int Wound J 3:225-231.<br />

35. Bjarnsholt, T., K. Kirketerp-Møller, P. Ø. Jensen, K.<br />

G. Madsen, R. Phipps, K. Krogfelt, N. Høiby, and<br />

M. Givskov. 2008. Why chronic wounds will not heal:<br />

a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen 16:2-10.<br />

36. Hurlow, J., and P. G. Bowler. 2009. Clinical<br />

experience with wound biofilm and management: a<br />

case series. Ostomy Wound Manage 55:38-49.<br />

37. Wolcott, R. D., and D. D. Rhoads. 2008. A study of<br />

biofilm-based wound management in subjects with<br />

critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care 17:145-148,<br />

150-142, 154-145.<br />

38. Hall-Stoodley, L., P. Stoodley, S. Kathju, N. Hoiby,<br />

C. Moser, J. W. Costerton, A. Moter, and T.<br />

Bjarnsholt. 2012. Towards diagnostic guidelines for<br />

biofilm-associated infections. FEMS Immunol Med<br />

Microbiol 65:127-145.<br />

39. Bjarnsholt, T., M. Alhede, M. Alhede, S. R.<br />

Eickhardt-Sorensen, C. Moser, M. Kuhl, P. O.<br />

Jensen, and N. Hoiby. 2013. The in vivo biofilm.<br />

Trends Microbiol.<br />

40. Thomsen, T. R., M. S. Aasholm, V. B. Rudkjobing,<br />

A. M. Saunders, T. Bjarnsholt, M. Givskov, K.<br />

Kirketerp-Moller, and P. H. Nielsen. 2010. The<br />

bacteriology of chronic venous leg ulcer examined by<br />

culture-independent molecular methods. Wound<br />

Repair Regen 18:38-49.<br />

41. Zandri, G., S. Pasquaroli, C. Vignaroli, S. Talevi, E.<br />

Manso, G. Donelli, and F. Biavasco. 2012.<br />

Detection of viable but non-culturable staphylococci<br />

in biofilms from central venous catheters negative on<br />

standard microbiological assays. Clin Microbiol Infect<br />

18:E259-261.<br />

42. Pasquaroli, S., G. Zandri, C. Vignaroli, C. Vuotto, G.<br />

Donelli, and F. Biavasco. 2013. Antibiotic pressure<br />

can induce the viable but non-culturable state in<br />

Staphylococcus aureus growing in biofilms. J<br />

Antimicrob Chemother 68:1812-1817.<br />

43. Cutting, K. F. 2010. Addressing the challenge of<br />

wound cleansing in the modern era. Br J Nurs<br />

19:S24, S26-29.<br />

44. Rudkjobing, V. B., T. R. Thomsen, M. Alhede, K. N.<br />

Kragh, P. H. Nielsen, U. R. Johansen, M. Givskov,<br />

N. Hoiby, and T. Bjarnsholt. 2012. The microorganisms<br />

in chronically infected end-stage and non-endstage<br />

cystic fibrosis patients. FEMS immunology and<br />

medical microbiology 65:236-244.<br />

45. Qian, Z., P. Stoodley, and W. G. Pitt. 1996. Effect of<br />

low-intensity ultrasound upon biofilm structure from<br />

confocal scanning laser microscopy observation.<br />

Biomaterials 17:1975-1980.<br />

46. Qian, Z., R. D. Sagers, and W. G. Pitt. 1999.<br />

Investigation of the mechanism of the bioacoustic<br />

effect. J Biomed Mater Res 44:198-205.<br />

47. Karau, M. J., K. E. Piper, J. M. Steckelberg, S. J.<br />

Kavros, and R. Patel. 2010. In vitro activity of the<br />

Qoustic Wound Therapy System against planktonic<br />

and biofilm bacteria. Advances in skin & wound care<br />

23:316-320.<br />

48. Dong, Y., S. Chen, Z. Wang, N. Peng, and J. Yu.<br />

2013. Synergy of ultrasound microbubbles and<br />

vancomycin against Staphylococcus epidermidis<br />

biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:816-826.<br />

49. Nishikori, T., M. Ochi, Y. Uchio, S. Maniwa, H.<br />

Kataoka, K. Kawasaki, K. Katsube, and M.<br />

Kuriwaka. 2002. Effects of low-intensity pulsed<br />

ultrasound on proliferation and chondroitin sulfate<br />

synthesis of cultured chondrocytes embedded in<br />

Atelocollagen gel. J Biomed Mater Res 59:201-206.<br />

50. Nishikawa, T., A. Yoshida, A. Khanal, M. Habu, I.<br />

Yoshioka, K. Toyoshima, T. Takehara, T. Nishihara,<br />

K. Tachibana, and K. Tominaga. 2010. A study of<br />

the efficacy of ultrasonic waves in removing biofilms.<br />

Gerodontology 27:199-206.<br />

51. Escandon, J., A. C. Vivas, R. Perez, R. Kirsner, and<br />

S. Davis. 2012. A prospective pilot study of<br />

ultrasound therapy effectiveness in refractory venous<br />

leg ulcers. Int Wound J 9:570-578.<br />

52. Maher, S. F., J. Halverson, R. Misiewicz, T.<br />

Reckling, O. Smart, C. Benton, and D. Schoenherr.<br />

<strong>2014</strong>. Low-frequency Ultrasound for Patients With<br />

Lower Leg Ulcers Due to Chronic Venous Insufficiency:<br />

A Report of Two Cases. Ostomy Wound<br />

Manage 60:52-61.<br />

53. Vicenti, F. A., J. L. Laus, J. M. Costa Neto, I. C.<br />

Talieri, C. F. Campos, A. T. Jorge, A. L. Ferreira,<br />

and A. P. Fantinatti. 2003. Effects of low-intensity<br />

pulsed ultrasound on wound healing in corneas of<br />

dogs following keratoplasty. Veterinary ophthalmology<br />

6:255-263.<br />

54. Hess, C. L., M. A. Howard, and C. E. Attinger.<br />

2003. A review of mechanical adjuncts in wound<br />

healing: hydrotherapy, ultrasound, negative pressure<br />

therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, and electrostimulation.<br />

Annals of plastic surgery 51:210-218.<br />

55. Butcher, G., and L. Pinnuck. 2013. Wound bed<br />

preparation: ultrasonic-assisted debridement. Br J<br />

Nurs 22:S36, S38-43.<br />

56. Bexfield, A., A. E. Bond, E. C. Roberts, E. Dudley, Y.<br />

Nigam, S. Thomas, R. P. Newton, and N. A.<br />

Ratcliffe. 2008. The antibacterial activity against<br />

MRSA strains and other bacteria of a


BIOFILM COURSES <strong>2014</strong><br />

m MADRID, SPAIN 13 MAY <strong>2014</strong><br />

Full-day course in Biofilm<br />

Learning objectives:<br />

The importance of the bacterial biofilm mode of growth is becoming increasingly<br />

renowned as improved methods to study sessile bacteria have become available.<br />

The course will focus on the impact of biofilms in wounds, and implant associated<br />

areas, as well as addressing difficulties in diagnosis and treatment.<br />

Lectures:<br />

n Brief introduction to bacterial biofilm and its characteristics<br />

n Impact of biofilms in wounds and on implants<br />

n Pitfalls and guidelines in diagnosis of biofilm infections<br />

n Treatment strategies of biofilm infections in wounds and implants<br />

n Future treatment strategies<br />

m COPENHAGEN, DENMARK 4-5 JUNE <strong>2014</strong><br />

2nd practical course in Biofilm Procedures<br />

The biofilm course will introduce the participants to the topic of biofilm and its huge<br />

impact on chronic infections. Through lectures and a full day of hands on experiments,<br />

the participants will gain a vast understanding of biofilms and usable knowledge of how<br />

and why to implement biofilms into their research or product portfolio.<br />

The biofilm groups and the Biofilm Test Facility at the University of Copenhagen and<br />

Rigshospitalet have been investigating bacterial biofilms for 15 years and are regarded<br />

as leading pioneers in the field.<br />

FACULTY OF HEALTH<br />

AND MEDICAL SCIENCES<br />

UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN<br />

For registration and more information<br />

on both courses, please see<br />

WWW.BIOFILMCOURSES.EU<br />

Contact<br />

Biofilm Course Secretariat:<br />

EWMA Secretariat/CAP Partner<br />

Nordre Fasanvej 113, 2.<br />

DK-2000 Frederiksberg<br />

Tel.: +45 70 20 03 05<br />

info@cap-partner.eu


National wound care<br />

innovation centre launched in<br />

the United Kingdom<br />

Peter Vowden,<br />

Professor<br />

Clinical Director,<br />

NIHR Bradford Wound<br />

Prevention and Treatment<br />

Healthcare Technology<br />

Co-operative, the United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Correspondence:<br />

peter.vowden@<br />

bthft.nhs.uk<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

In January 2013, the United Kingdom’s National<br />

Institute for Health Research (NIHR)<br />

established eight new Healthcare Technology<br />

Co-operatives (HTCs) to act as centres of expertise<br />

to focus on clinical areas or themes of high<br />

morbidity and unmet needs of National Health<br />

Service (NHS) patients with the aim of fostering<br />

innovation in these areas. Working collaboratively<br />

with industry, the HTCs aim to develop<br />

new medical devices, healthcare technologies, or<br />

technology-dependent interventions, which improve<br />

patient treatment and quality of life.<br />

The eight HTCs cover a diverse array of<br />

clinical problems ranging from mental health to<br />

cardiovascular disease management. One of the<br />

key areas to benefit from the NIHR’s recognition<br />

of unmet need was wound care, with Bradford<br />

Teaching Hospital’s NHS Foundation Trust designated<br />

as the host organisation for the NIHR<br />

Wound Prevention and Treatment HTC (NIHR<br />

WoundTec HTC).<br />

Table 1: Strategic partners in the NIHR WoundTec HTC<br />

Bradford Teaching Hospital’s NHS Foundation Trust,<br />

led by Professor Peter Vowden<br />

Specialises in: Industry links, patient focus, clinical trial delivery, clinical care,<br />

and education.<br />

King’s College London,<br />

led by Dr. Patricia Grocott and Professor Glen Robert<br />

Specialises in: Clinical data capture, identification of unmet needs, co-design<br />

of novel medical devices with users and manufacturers, and proof-of-concept<br />

testing.<br />

University of Southampton, led by Professor Dan Bader<br />

Specialises in: Sensor development, device and support system assessment,<br />

and end-user evaluation.<br />

University of Leeds, led by Professors A Nelson and J Nixon<br />

Specialises in: Evidence review and clinical trial design and evaluation.<br />

University Hospital Birmingham’s NHS Foundation Trust,<br />

led by Dr. Carol Dealey, Lt Col Steven Jeffery, and Professor Sir Keith Porter<br />

Specialises in: Acute and chronic wound management, clinical trial and care<br />

evaluation, and horizon scanning.<br />

University of Bradford, led by Professors Stephen Britland (currently at<br />

University of Wolverhamptom) and Des Tobin<br />

Specialises in: Laboratory and cellular research to understand the biological<br />

action of devices.<br />

The NIHR WoundTec HTC is led by Professor<br />

Peter Vowden, the HTC’s Clinical Director,<br />

and builds on an established strategic partnership<br />

between wound care experts in King’s College<br />

Hospital London, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital<br />

Birmingham, and the universities of Leeds,<br />

Bradford, Wolverhampton, and Southampton<br />

(Table 1). Together, these experienced clinicians<br />

and academics have a proven track record<br />

in wound prevention and treatment, acute and<br />

chronic wound management, patient-focused<br />

care, patient-led device design, and clinical trial<br />

management.<br />

Towards cost-effective<br />

wound care<br />

The management and prevention of skin breakdown<br />

is a major cost burden for health care<br />

providers and a common area for litigation, yet<br />

wound prevention and treatment can often be<br />

an area of relatively unregulated clinical practice<br />

with a poor evidence base for practice. Variation in<br />

clinical outcome across a wide spectrum of health<br />

care providers and within diverse national health<br />

care systems are well recognised and have led to<br />

the adoption of pressure ulcer prevention standards<br />

and wound healing rates as quality indicators<br />

for clinical care provision.<br />

Funding constraints within all health care systems<br />

have led to increasing recognition of cost, in<br />

addition quality, as a driver for change in practice.<br />

Wound care products form a major subsector of<br />

the medical devices industry, and along with staff<br />

costs, constitute a major cost burden for healthcare<br />

providers. It is therefore understandable that development<br />

of new, “advanced”, and more effective<br />

medical devices aimed at improved wound care<br />

provision is desirable but must be achieved within<br />

the constraints of cost effectiveness. In order to<br />

aid in the understanding of current wound care<br />

60<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Innovation, know how and technolgy in wound care<br />

practice within the United Kingdom, WoundTec HTC has<br />

commissioned, largely through funding obtained from the<br />

wound care medical device industry, a health economic<br />

and outcome project, which aims to assess the current<br />

“real-life” cost and outcome of wound care delivered to<br />

a randomly selected population within the United Kingdom.<br />

This data will hopefully assist in informing future<br />

wound care developments and policies.<br />

Aim of WoundTec HTC<br />

The successful NIHR HTC model has already raised the<br />

profile of wound care within the United Kingdom and<br />

now provides the opportunity for healthcare professionals<br />

to propel forward a patient-focused, centralised, and<br />

coordinated wound care strategy supported by relevant<br />

research. The aim of NIHR WoundTec HTC is to be<br />

inclusive and encourage participation; with wider input<br />

and ideas for innovation, it is more likely to succeed in<br />

its goal of advancing the cause and improving the quality<br />

of life of patients with wounds, accelerating innovation,<br />

development, adoption, and diffusion of wound-related<br />

medical devices within healthcare systems.<br />

WoundTec HTC is already working with patients<br />

and staff to identify unmet needs within wound care and<br />

translate these needs into innovations relevant to NHS<br />

and the wider healthcare community. Wound care has<br />

often lacked an effective voice and a logical implementation<br />

strategy; this development will seek to rectify this by<br />

fostering and coordinating device and system development<br />

led by patient and clinician needs rather than being largely<br />

industry pushed.<br />

WoundTec HTC will:<br />

n Identify patient and clinical needs<br />

n Act as a platform for innovation<br />

n Identify and develop promising concepts for medical<br />

devices derived from an established network of<br />

patients, clinicians, academics, and industry<br />

n Provide theoretical, methodological, and design<br />

expertise, as well as a clinical base to develop these<br />

concepts into testable interventions and devices<br />

n Offer advice on testing the feasibility, effectiveness,<br />

cost effectiveness, and acceptability of proposed<br />

innovations in NHS settings and various care<br />

pathways and promote the spread of best practice<br />

n Work with industry to foster need-driven product<br />

innovation<br />

Involving the end users<br />

Securing greater patient and public involvement in healthcare<br />

service delivery and research is a central theme of<br />

health policy in many countries and are key areas for all<br />

of the HTCs. A model developed by the University of<br />

Leeds and piloted in Bradford with patients with chronic<br />

leg ulcers demonstrated that a patient-led approach to<br />

innovation is valuable to industry, health providers, and<br />

higher education as it can help identify new market opportunities<br />

(McNichol 2012, Elberse 2012).<br />

Through adoption of these principles, NIHR Wound-<br />

Tec HTC has already supported a number of successful<br />

innovative grant applications, taken areas of need identified<br />

by patients to academics, established working relationships<br />

with industry, and established partnership arrangements<br />

with two other NIHR HTCs (Devices for<br />

Dignity (Sheffield) and Trauma management (Birmingham)).<br />

Opportunities for co-operation with similarly<br />

focused European-based national organisations utilising<br />

the infrastructure support of pan-European groups such<br />

as the European Wound Management Association will<br />

allow access to additional funding streams, including Horizon<br />

2020 for wound-related research and medical device<br />

development. The themes for <strong>2014</strong> within the Horizon<br />

2020 are outlined in Table 2 and provide scope to develop<br />

wound-related projects.<br />

For further information on the NIHR Wound Prevention<br />

and Treatment HTC, visit our web site or contact<br />

Emma Martin (e.martin@medilink.co.uk). m<br />

Table 2: Seven themes for Horizon 2020<br />

n Understanding health, aging, and disease<br />

n Effective health promotion, disease prevention,<br />

preparedness, and screening<br />

n Improving diagnosis<br />

n Innovative treatments and technologies<br />

n Advancing active and healthy aging<br />

n Integrated, suitable, citizen-centred care<br />

n Improving health information and data exploitation,<br />

and providing an evidence base for health policies<br />

and regulations<br />

References<br />

McNichol, E. Patient-led innovation in healthcare: The value of the<br />

‘user’ perspective. International <strong>Journal</strong> of Healthcare Management.<br />

2012; 5(4): 216-222.<br />

Elberse JE, Pittens CA, de Cock Buning T, Broerse JE. Patient<br />

involvement in a scientific advisory process: setting the research<br />

agenda for medical products. Health Policy. 2012; 107(2-3):<br />

231-242.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 61


“ An integrated part of<br />

wound management.”<br />

Debrisoft ®<br />

removes debris effectively in a quick and easy way<br />

stimulates wound healing by protecting<br />

newly formed tissue<br />

improves quality of life being<br />

almost painless<br />

2000215 0913 e


Innovation, know how and technolgy in wound care<br />

Development of tools<br />

for home monitoring<br />

in wound care<br />

Introduction<br />

In recent years there has been an increased focus<br />

on getting patients out of the hospital and back<br />

into their own homes as soon as possible. To reach<br />

these goals, technologies that enable and assist this<br />

transfer have been developed.<br />

In the case of wound care, some patients with<br />

complicated hard-to-heal ulcers end up needing<br />

hospitalisation for their condition. There are<br />

many reasons for hospitalisation; however, some<br />

patients who require negative pressure wound<br />

therapy (NPWT) are hospitalised simply because<br />

they require constant monitoring and immediate<br />

access to wound care specialists. This means that<br />

the total health care costs for the application of<br />

NPWT in this particular group of patients are<br />

relatively high despite decreasing prices of the<br />

NPTW systems themselves. Recently, portable<br />

NPWT systems have been developed and commercialised,<br />

providing several advantages for the<br />

patients such as discreteness and ease of operation.<br />

With the ever-increasing trend to allow patients to<br />

leave the hospital environment as soon as possible,<br />

smaller, simpler, and more patient-friendly devices<br />

have been developed over the last few years.<br />

However, these devices still only offer the single<br />

service of negative pressure on the wound and<br />

basic vacuum control.<br />

SWAN-iCare project<br />

To enable monitoring and treatment of patients in<br />

their own home environment or long term care,<br />

the SWAN-iCare project aims to develop a Smart<br />

Negative Pressure Device (SNPD) (Figure 1). This<br />

device will integrate non-invasive sensors that allow<br />

objective, continuous, real-time monitoring<br />

of critical parameters with personalised therapy<br />

tailored to supporting the patient’s wound condition.<br />

In addition, the device will have the potential<br />

to remotely release active agents to assist in<br />

the wound healing process. To facilitate distant<br />

monitoring and support provided by centralised<br />

specialists to patients being cared for outside of the<br />

hospital environment, the device will be equipped<br />

with information and communication technologies<br />

(ICT).<br />

The SWAN-iCare device will:<br />

n Collect data and monitor several wound<br />

parameters via non-invasive integrated<br />

micro-sensors<br />

n Offer the opportunity to provide innovative<br />

personalised therapy in combination with<br />

the negative pressure wound therapy<br />

n Allow health care providers to be remotely<br />

aware of the patient’s condition and receive<br />

alerts highlighting situations that require<br />

direct actions<br />

Target Groups for SWAN-iCare NPWT<br />

The device is expected to be used primarily by patients<br />

with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) or venous<br />

leg ulcers (VLU).<br />

Marco Romanelli,<br />

MD PhD<br />

Assistant Professor<br />

Dept. of Dermatology<br />

University of Pisa, Italy<br />

Marie Muller, MD<br />

Dpt. of Diabetology<br />

Grenoble University<br />

Hospital, France<br />

www.swan-icare.eu<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

Chronic ulcerative skin lesions affect approximately 1.5% of the<br />

population and represent a considerable medical and social problem.<br />

The patient affected by this pathology is generally geriatric<br />

and likely to suffer from concomitant illnesses. Chronic ulcers<br />

have different causes and can be divided into the following main<br />

categories: vascular ulcers (venous, arterial, mixed), diabetic foot<br />

ulcers, pressure ulcers, and ulcers of different aetiology. The above<br />

pathologies refer to chronic and invalidating conditions that profoundly<br />

affect the patients’ quality of life and often lead to psychological<br />

disorders such as depression.<br />

New treatments for these pathologies have led to improvements<br />

in lesion management and in the quality of assistance provided by<br />

medical and paramedical staff, but methodologies for monitoring<br />

lesions have not kept pace with this progress.<br />

Effective and accurate monitoring of skin lesions should be<br />

performed by measuring the complete status and evolution of the<br />

skin lesion in an objective, precise, and reproducible way. The<br />

main goal of the SWAN-iCare project is to design a system that<br />

can monitor the qualitative and quantitative evolution of a skin<br />

lesion with an easy-to-use technological system.<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 63


Server<br />

Clinical Back-end<br />

- Data Base<br />

- Resource Management<br />

- Data Fusion<br />

Mobile Application<br />

- Smartphone<br />

- Web Browser<br />

Internet <br />

Client<br />

Client<br />

Client<br />

Caregiver<br />

Outside <br />

Healthcare<br />

professionals<br />

Administrator<br />

Clinical se'ng <br />

NPWT<br />

Experts<br />

Technicians<br />

HUB<br />

- Data Transfer<br />

- WPAN Communication<br />

- WWLAN Communication<br />

Commercial Off-­‐The-­‐Shelf <br />

Wireless Communica=on with HUB <br />

Smart Negative Pressure Device<br />

- User interface<br />

- Wound Pressure Control<br />

- WWLAN Communication (GPRS)<br />

- Canister<br />

- …<br />

Medical Devices<br />

- Infrared thermometer<br />

- Glucometer<br />

- Oximeter<br />

Docking station<br />

- Battery recharge<br />

- Device automatic control<br />

Wireless communica=on with HUB <br />

Rechargeable Devices <br />

(Contactless Energy Transfer) <br />

Dressing<br />

- Lipidots/Collagen Scaffolds<br />

- pH<br />

- CRP<br />

- TNF-alpha<br />

- MMPS<br />

- Temperature matrix<br />

- …<br />

External Devices<br />

- Trans Epidermal Water Loss<br />

- Wound Surface Impedance<br />

- Bacteria Quantification & Identification<br />

Wearable Devices<br />

- Insole Pressure<br />

- Dorsiflexion<br />

Internal Sensors<br />

- In wound sensors<br />

Home se'ng <br />

64<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Innovation, know how and technolgy in wound care<br />

Only a small proportion of patients with chronic ulcers<br />

are currently being treated by NPWT. This number is<br />

expected to grow in the next few years as the cost of<br />

NPWT decreases. The SWAN-iCare device will offer an<br />

optimised NPWT treatment for chronic ulcers characterised<br />

as “hard-to-heal”, allowing distant monitoring of<br />

the wound healing process in specific situations where<br />

the healing is expected to be more uncertain and more<br />

challenging.<br />

Expected benefits<br />

The development of products with sensors and ICT that<br />

allow remote monitoring of wound conditions may lead to<br />

benefits for patients and medical support teams at numerous<br />

different points along the patient’s treatment pathway.<br />

The expected benefits can be summarised as follows:<br />

Improved clinical outcomes:<br />

n Earlier identification of wound infections and<br />

wound deterioration, encouraging hope of a lower<br />

amputation rate<br />

n Better control and monitoring of exudate and compression<br />

n Access to detailed real-time quantitative data will<br />

contribute to evaluation of treatment effectiveness<br />

and wound healing progress and allow for individualised<br />

and fine-tuned treatment regimes<br />

More efficient use of resources<br />

n Reduced healthcare costs as a consequence of fewer<br />

complications and faster healing<br />

n Reduced healthcare costs as a consequence of a reduced<br />

need for hospitalisation and fewer visits to<br />

specialist wound centres through remote monitoring<br />

n Reduced time spent on dressing changes during<br />

nursing visits, allowing more time to be focused on<br />

other medical needs<br />

n Less potential waste of dressing materials as a result<br />

of a reduction in “unnecessary” dressing changes<br />

n Reduced cost to the social system and minimised loss<br />

of productivity associated with the patient returning<br />

to work earlier due to an improved wound management<br />

process<br />

Increased patient satisfaction and quality of life<br />

n Reduced disturbance to the patient’s life and possible<br />

reduced need for hospitalisation due to early identification<br />

of wound deterioration and faster healing<br />

n Personalised treatment adjusted on a daily basis to<br />

meet each patient’s individual needs<br />

n Patients can stay out of hospital while receiving<br />

treatment and thus feel more comfortable while at<br />

the same time being reassured that their condition<br />

is being safely and remotely monitored by specialist<br />

carers<br />

n Less dependency on clinical visits will reduce time<br />

and resources spent on transportation to specialist<br />

care units<br />

Better monitoring and documentation<br />

n Detailed and continuous data collection on central<br />

parameters important for wound healing will<br />

increase the level of knowledge and competence<br />

among the different service providers involved in<br />

wound care<br />

n A research dimension will be integrated into the<br />

project to develop a deeper understanding of wound<br />

healing through correlation and analysis of multiple<br />

wound parameter measurements<br />

How far are we from realising<br />

these goals<br />

By the end of the project period a clinically proven prototype<br />

SNPD will have been developed. However, as with<br />

other eHealth services, the technological development is<br />

itself only one part of the challenge of getting these types<br />

of systems integrated into routine care provision.<br />

Large-scale deployment and real-market uptake requires<br />

additional work to understand how implementation<br />

of these ICT systems will affect current workflows<br />

and any potential changes to the roles and responsibilities<br />

of staff involved in service provision throughout the treatment<br />

pathway. If this is not understood and accounted<br />

for, implementation could be hindered simply because<br />

organisations and staff are not ready to transform the way<br />

routine care is being provided.<br />

Another aspect is the business model. Clarification of<br />

where the reimbursement of such a system is to come<br />

from in different health care settings is a challenge that<br />

has hampered the uptake of similar products. For patients<br />

that end up receiving treatment and care from multiple<br />

sectors, the impact on budget for all the different levels of<br />

service providers will not be easy to establish. It may not<br />

always be obvious that the ones bearing the costs are the<br />

ones benefitting from the savings generated.<br />

To meet these challenges, part of the project deliverables<br />

will be to establish detailed stakeholder analysis as well<br />

as impact and cost effectiveness analyses that will lead to<br />

different roadmaps for adoption strategies based on the<br />

customers’ needs and expectations. <br />

m<br />

PROJECT FACTS<br />

Funding program: Seventh framework program:<br />

Large scale Integrating project proposal –<br />

ICT call 8 (FP7-ICT-20118)<br />

Project period: 01.09.2012 - 01.09.2016 (4 years)<br />

For more information see: www.swan-icare.eu/<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 65


<strong>2014</strong> EDUCATION ACTIVITIES<br />

Taking the users on board<br />

Ana Maria d’Auchamp,<br />

Innovation Consultant<br />

Division Business &<br />

Society<br />

Danish Technological<br />

Institute, Denmark<br />

Correspondence:<br />

amap@teknologisk.dk<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

Introduction<br />

To spur and support the active involvement of<br />

users in design and innovation processes EWMA<br />

in collaboration with the Danish Technological<br />

Institute are launching two training activities focusing<br />

on user driven innovation.<br />

The activities compromise:<br />

n 2 day course, Autumn <strong>2014</strong>, Copenhagen<br />

n Workshop, EWMA conference May <strong>2014</strong>,<br />

Madrid<br />

The activities can be joined independently<br />

of each other.<br />

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES<br />

The involvement of end users has become increasingly<br />

important during the process of inventing<br />

and designing new products and service delivery<br />

models. By systematically involving end users in<br />

innovation processes, there are good chances of<br />

developing products and services that meet real<br />

needs and make real impact. New products and<br />

services that are developed by a user-driven approach<br />

are likely to achieve rapid and widespread<br />

market uptake and customer engagement. Despite<br />

the increasing focus on user involvement, many<br />

companies still lack the proper methodology for<br />

integrating this approach into routine product and<br />

service development procedures. The objectives of<br />

this course are to inspire and update all industry<br />

partners on the newest trends within user-driven<br />

innovation processes, especially those who are involved<br />

in critical aspects of product and service<br />

innovation.<br />

TARGET GROUP<br />

The course targets clinicians and industry representatives<br />

who want to learn more about userdriven<br />

product design, as well as the development<br />

and implementation of new service delivery models.<br />

Both experienced and less-experienced employees<br />

are invited to attend, especially those who<br />

are involved in R&D, marketing, and/or business<br />

development. For some modules, the group will<br />

be divided by the level of experience.<br />

2 day COURSE in CopenHagen<br />

– OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM<br />

Title: Innovation for future healthcare:<br />

Participation, collaboration, and value creation.<br />

Course Objectives: The goals of the course are<br />

to present and discuss different aspects of innovation,<br />

from the involvement of different partners to<br />

value creation and business model development.<br />

Through a series of modules, participants will be<br />

introduced to the barriers and benefits of different<br />

approaches to product and service development,<br />

as well as practical experience and cases. Hands-on<br />

exercises will be used to illustrate the presented<br />

concepts. In these exercises, the participants will<br />

work in groups to develop concrete solutions<br />

based on different cases from both industry and<br />

applied R&D projects. This methodology will<br />

allow participants to be able to lay the ground<br />

for future work with innovation in the context<br />

of their own company. The course is intended to<br />

provide updates on the latest developments within<br />

the field of user-driven innovation, and it will<br />

also discuss subjects that are related to new trends<br />

within the healthcare sector.<br />

Course content: Each module will comprise of<br />

theories, hands-on exercises, and case examples.<br />

The course will be delivered by the Danish Technological<br />

Institute and invited experts in wound<br />

innovation.<br />

Duration: 2 Days<br />

Date: 3-4 September <strong>2014</strong><br />

Place: Denmark, Copenhagen (Venue tbc.)<br />

Registration open: 15 April <strong>2014</strong><br />

Registration deadline: 15 June <strong>2014</strong><br />

Registration fee: 1.995 EUR<br />

Language: English<br />

Maximum of 40 participants<br />

For more information:<br />

www.userdriveninnovationcourse.org<br />

Entitlements: Registration fee include<br />

course literature (compendium),<br />

coffee breaks, and lunch<br />

66<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Innovation, know how and technolgy in wound care<br />

<strong>2014</strong> EDUCATION ACTIVITIES<br />

Industry Course in Copenhagen<br />

MODULE 1: User-driven innovation<br />

Module 1: Introduction (for all participants)<br />

n Rapid innovation: Participants will engage in the<br />

product development process and try all steps of a<br />

generic process, from user interviews to the prototype/model<br />

building of their solution.<br />

Module 1a: User-driven innovation –the basics (for participants<br />

who are new to user-driven innovation)<br />

Participants will be introduced to the following aspects of<br />

user-driven innovation:<br />

n What is user-driven innovation? (Basic concepts:<br />

process and methods)<br />

n Why should we care about user-driven innovation?<br />

n What are the types of user-driven innovation and<br />

their characteristics, including product design and<br />

the development/implementation of service delivery<br />

models?<br />

Module 1b: User-driven innovation – new approaches<br />

(for participants with previous practical experience in userdriven<br />

innovation)<br />

Participants will be presented with the newest trends<br />

regarding user involvement:<br />

n What are the types of user-driven innovation and<br />

their characteristics, including product design and<br />

the development/implementation of service delivery<br />

models?<br />

n How can users be involved in new approaches, such<br />

as community-based innovation, online development<br />

forums, and need-based focus processes, in<br />

existing networks?<br />

MODULE 3: Organisational and work-practice<br />

challenges in the implementation of user-driven<br />

innovation processes<br />

Implementing new innovation methods into everyday<br />

R&D can lead to the development of new work practices<br />

and the training of employees.<br />

n How do we integrate new innovation methods into<br />

established work practices?<br />

n Why must user-driven innovation be an integrated<br />

part of corporate strategy and philosophy instead of<br />

isolated projects?<br />

MODULE 4: Generation of a business model<br />

that is focused on collaboration and value creation<br />

Opening up to new innovation methods can create new<br />

ways to see one’s company and develop how business models<br />

should be created for new solutions. The involvement<br />

of external partners can help identify new ways to define<br />

revenue structures, share expenses, and invite input to<br />

service delivery. However, navigating the complex constellation<br />

of private and public partners can present many<br />

challenges.<br />

n How do we involve partners when we are setting<br />

up our business model? (examples from the field of<br />

eHealth, e.g., telemedicine and exchange of patient<br />

data)<br />

n What tools for business model generation can have<br />

sustainable and long-term effects?<br />

n How can we establish collaborative innovation between<br />

public and private sectors using telemedicine<br />

ecosystems?<br />

MODULE 2: From needs to value creation<br />

One side of user-driven innovation is identifying the users’<br />

unmet needs. However, translating these needs to ideas<br />

that create value for the end users is another key area of<br />

expertise that requires training and experience.<br />

n How can unmet needs be converted into innovation?<br />

(examples within wound care)<br />

n Who are we creating value for in an innovation process?<br />

n Who should be involved in the development process,<br />

and when should it be done? (for example, end users<br />

and industry)<br />

MODULE 5: Trends in healthcare development:<br />

eHealth, telemedicine, and all that jazz<br />

New trends appearing within the healthcare sector involve<br />

telemedicine and independent living technologies. The<br />

traditional roles of healthcare partners are being challenged,<br />

and the demands from users continuously change.<br />

Therefore, it will be important to keep up with developmental<br />

trends in order to always stay one step ahead.<br />

n How can the industry become an active player in<br />

creating patient empowerment for chronic patients?<br />

n What is an example of innovation in service delivery?<br />

(case: Telemedicine in wound care)<br />

n What are the new trends and development paths in<br />

the regulatory field?<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 67


Innovation, know how and technolgy in wound care<br />

<strong>2014</strong> EDUCATION ACTIVITIES<br />

Taking the users on board<br />

Workshop, EWMA <strong>2014</strong> conference, Madrid<br />

Join the workshop on user driven innovation at the<br />

EWMA conference in Madrid to get an introduction<br />

to the topic of user driven innovation in product development<br />

and get a flavour of what the 2 day course in<br />

Copenhagen has to offer.<br />

Title: Innovation for user value creation – Trends in collaboration,<br />

empowerment and technological development.<br />

Workshop objective: Join this workshop to learn more<br />

about how different types of innovation within the healthcare<br />

sector can answer future development challenges.<br />

Whether this means user involvement or implementation<br />

of new technologies and approaches to service delivery<br />

such as assistive living technologies or eHealth, collaboration<br />

and value creation is the key for success. The workshop<br />

will answer questions as to why, when and how user<br />

driven design can add value to innovation processes and<br />

introduce different innovation models. Also the workshop<br />

will focus on how new partnerships can create new solutions<br />

to everyday challenges. The workshop will in addi-<br />

Stay informed by visiting the conference website,<br />

www.ewma<strong>2014</strong>.org, to see registration opportunities<br />

or obtain further information about the programme.<br />

You can also get your updates on EWMA’s<br />

social media platforms:<br />

tion to theoretical presentations also include case example<br />

presented by invited experts. The workshop will also give<br />

a short introduction to the two-day course on the same<br />

topic offered by EWMA and the Danish Technological Institute,<br />

September <strong>2014</strong>. The course offers more in-depth<br />

knowledge about the topics presented at the workshop and<br />

will in addition to theoretical presentations also include<br />

case examples and hands-on exercises.<br />

The session includes contributions from Peter Vowden,<br />

Clinical Director, NIHR Bradford Wound Prevention and<br />

Treatment Health Care co-operative and Rod Hulme Customer<br />

Insights Specialist, Advanced Wound Management<br />

Smith&Nephew.<br />

Duration: 1½ H<br />

Date: Thursday 15 May, 08:00-09:30<br />

Place: At the EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> Conference in Madrid<br />

Hosted by: Danish Technological Institute<br />

and invited wound innovation experts<br />

For detailed update on the workshop program<br />

please visit www.ewma<strong>2014</strong>.org<br />

www.facebook.com/EWMA.Wound<br />

www.linkedin.com/company/<br />

european-wound-management-association<br />

The Danish Technological Institute has over 100 employees<br />

working with healthcare innovation in various areas, such as<br />

technology development, organisational development, user<br />

training in new technologies, user studies, idea generation with<br />

users (both patients and healthcare professionals), technology<br />

foresights, and product development. These training activities<br />

are led by the Business and Society Division, which works specifically<br />

with user-driven innovation projects. The team of design<br />

engineers, anthropologists, and project managers is highly experienced<br />

in technology management, occupational health, social<br />

science, design engineering, safety, and risk management in<br />

emerging health technologies.<br />

Twitter: @ewmatweet<br />

68<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


With Polymem,<br />

®<br />

finger and toe injuries<br />

don’t have to slow you down.<br />

Save time with PolyMem Finger/Toe dressings, which are easy<br />

to apply – even for patients themselves – and often require<br />

fewer dressing changes thanks to their unique design. Simply<br />

roll the dressing onto the injured digit and let PolyMem do the<br />

work. PolyMem dressings help reduce edema, bruising, pain<br />

and inflammation when applied to open or closed injuries.<br />

the ideal choice for managing:<br />

• Sprains • Lacerations<br />

• Strains • Burns<br />

• Contusions • Ulcers<br />

• Abrasions • Matricectomies<br />

neW, Bigger sizes available – ideal for large toes!<br />

Ferris Mfg. Corp. 5133 Northeast Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76106 USA • +1 817-900-1301 • www.polymem.eu<br />

Unless otherwise indicated, all trademarks are owned by or licensed to Ferris. © 2013, Ferris Mfg. Corp., Fort Worth, TX 76106 USA<br />

MKL-619, REV-1, 0913


C<br />

Surgery<br />

Prescribing<br />

ANNUAL CONFERENCE<br />

AND EXHIBITION<br />

Education<br />

& Training<br />

Annual Conference<br />

Leadership<br />

13-15 November <strong>2014</strong><br />

Bournemouth International Centre<br />

NEW SPEAKERS CONFIRMED!<br />

The conference committee are very excited to announce that the opening<br />

plenary session on Thursday morning will feature Dr Phil Hammond, GP<br />

and Private Eye’s medical correspondent, although you may know him<br />

better from appearing in numerous TV and radio productions including<br />

Trust Me, I’m a Doctor, The Music Group, Have I Got News For You, The<br />

News Quiz, The Now Show as well as having sell-out shows at Edinburgh<br />

Fringe and author of three best-selling books.<br />

Other confirmed keynote speakers include:<br />

O Dr David De Berker, Consultant Dermatologist, Bristol Royal Infirmary<br />

Dr Phil Hammond<br />

O Professor Hylton Menz, Senior Research Fellow, National Health and Medical Research Council, Leader of the<br />

Lower Extremity and Gait Studies Program, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia<br />

O Professor Mark Nixon, Professor of Computer Vision, University of Southampton<br />

O Dr Michael Turner, former Chief Medical Advisor to the British Horseracing Authority<br />

O Dr David Coppini, Consultant Diabetologist, Poole Hospital<br />

O Debbie Sharman, Consultant Podiatrist and Visiting Lecturer, University of Southampton<br />

O Dr Tony Berendt, Deputy Medical Director, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford; and Consultant<br />

in Infectious Diseases, Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, OUH, Oxford<br />

O Professor Chris Bunker, Consultant Dermatologist, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation<br />

Trust and President, British Association of Dermatology<br />

Special offer!<br />

Despite being on the South Coast, Bournemouth is extremely easy to get to, even from the very<br />

North of the UK! South West Trains offer three direct services an hour from London Waterloo<br />

arriving in under two hours.<br />

For some delegates, flying may be the better option and we are delighted that Flybe are offering<br />

delegates a 20% discount on flights to Southampton Airport from Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle,<br />

Belfast, Aberdeen, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Inverness and Dublin. Southampton Airport boasts<br />

its own train station with direct services to Bournemouth in under 40 minutes. Further<br />

details of how to claim your discount will be available soon.<br />

Call for papers - deadline reminder<br />

This high profile opportunity to present your work at Europe's largest podiatry conference should not be missed.<br />

Submissions of scientific research, case studies or general practice for oral or poster presentation are welcomed<br />

from all areas of podiatric practice.<br />

Submission deadlines:<br />

Oral presentations – 27 April <strong>2014</strong> • Poster presentations – 7 September <strong>2014</strong><br />

For further information visit www.scpconference.com, call +44(0)20 3725 5840<br />

or email scp@profileproductions.co.uk


Cochrane Reviews<br />

ABSTRACTS OF RECENT<br />

COCHRANE REVIEWS<br />

Dressings and topical agents for<br />

preventing pressure ulcers<br />

Zena EH Moore, Joan Webster<br />

Moore ZEH, Webster J. Dressings and topical agents<br />

for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of<br />

Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.:<br />

CD009362. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.<br />

pub2.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration.<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Pressure ulcers, which are localised injury<br />

to the skin, or underlying tissue or both, occur when<br />

people are unable to reposition themselves to relieve<br />

pressure on bony prominences. Pressure ulcers are<br />

often difficult to heal, painful and impact negatively on<br />

the individual’s quality of life. The cost implications of<br />

pressure ulcer treatment are considerable, compounding<br />

the challenges in providing cost effective, efficient<br />

health services. Efforts to prevent the development of<br />

pressure ulcers have focused on nutritional support,<br />

pressure redistributing devices, turning regimes and the<br />

application of various topical agents and dressings<br />

designed to maintain healthy skin, relieve pressure and<br />

prevent shearing forces. Although products aimed at<br />

preventing pressure ulcers are widely used, it remains<br />

unclear which, if any, of these approaches are effective<br />

in preventing the development of pressure ulcers.<br />

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of dressings and<br />

topical agents on the prevention of pressure ulcers, in<br />

people of any age without existing pressure ulcers, but<br />

considered to be at risk of developing a pressure ulcer,<br />

in any healthcare setting.<br />

Search methods: In February 2013 we searched the<br />

following electronic databases to identify reports of relevant<br />

randomised clinical trials (RCTs): the Cochrane<br />

Wounds Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane<br />

Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)<br />

(The Cochrane Library); Database of ABSTRACTs of<br />

Reviews of Effects (The Cochrane Library);<br />

Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other<br />

Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO<br />

CINAHL.<br />

Selection criteria: We included RCTs evaluating the<br />

use of dressings, topical agents, or topical agents with<br />

dressings, compared with a different dressing, topical<br />

agent, or combined topical agent and dressing, or no<br />

intervention or standard care, with the aim of preventing<br />

the development of a pressure ulcer.<br />

Data collection and analysis: We assessed trials for<br />

their appropriateness for inclusion and for their risk of<br />

bias. This was done by two review authors working<br />

independently, using pre-determined inclusion and<br />

quality criteria.<br />

Main results: Five trials (940 participants) of unclear or<br />

high risk of bias compared a topical agent with a placebo.<br />

Four of these trials randomised by individual and<br />

one by cluster. When results from the five trials were<br />

combined, the risk ratio (RR) was 0.78 (95% CI 0.47<br />

to 1.31; P value 0.35) indicating no overall beneficial<br />

effect of the topical agents. When the cluster randomised<br />

trial was omitted from the analysis, use of topical<br />

agents reduced the pressure ulcer incidence by<br />

36%; RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.83; P value 0.0008).<br />

Four trials (561 participants), all of which were of high<br />

or unclear risk of bias, showed that dressings applied<br />

over bony prominences reduced pressure ulcer incidence;<br />

RR 0.21 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.51; P value<br />

0.0006).<br />

Authors’ conclusions: There is insufficient evidence<br />

from RCTs to support or refute the use of topical<br />

agents applied over bony prominences to prevent pressure<br />

ulcers. Although the incidence of pressure ulcers<br />

was reduced when dressings were used to protect the<br />

skin, results were compromised by the low quality of<br />

the included trials. These trials contained substantial<br />

risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity (variations in<br />

populations and interventions); consequently, results<br />

should be interpreted as inconclusive. Further well<br />

designed trials addressing important clinical, quality of<br />

life and economic outcomes are justified, based on the<br />

incidence of the problem and the high costs associated<br />

with pressure ulcer management.<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Dressings or topical agents for preventing pressure<br />

ulcers<br />

Pressure ulcers, sometimes known as bedsores or pressure<br />

sores, commonly occur in people who cannot, or<br />

find it difficult to, move themselves. Pressure ulcers are<br />

hard to heal, so it is important to try to prevent them<br />

from occurring in the first place. Various cream and<br />

lotions (topical agents) have been used for this purpose;<br />

the idea is that pressure ulcers are less likely to<br />

occur when the skin is healthy and nourished. A number<br />

of different types of dressings are also used to pro-<br />

<br />

Sally Bell-Syer, MSc<br />

Managing Editor<br />

Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Department of<br />

Health Sciences<br />

University of York<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Correspondence:<br />

sally.bell-syer@york.ac.uk<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 71


tect the skin from damage. We reviewed studies that compared<br />

topical agents or dressings with other methods for preventing<br />

pressure ulcers. We found nine trials that investigated these that<br />

included 1501 people. These showed that the evidence concerning<br />

the use of topical agents or dressings for preventing pressure<br />

ulcers is not clear. The reason why the evidence is not clear is<br />

because the quality of trials was low and most had manufacturer<br />

sponsorship, which introduces potential biases, such as overestimating<br />

the effectiveness of the product. Consequently, further<br />

trials are needed to confirm results of this review.<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 9, 2013<br />

Early versus delayed dressing removal after<br />

primary closure of clean and clean- contaminated<br />

surgical wounds<br />

Clare D Toon, Rajarajan Ramamoorthy, Brian R Davidson,<br />

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy<br />

Toon CD, Ramamoorthy R, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Early<br />

versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean<br />

and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database<br />

of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD010259. DOI:<br />

10.1002/14651858.CD010259.pub2.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Most surgical procedures involve a cut in the skin<br />

that allows the surgeon to gain access to the deeper tissues or<br />

organs. Most surgical wounds are closed fully at the end of the<br />

procedure (primary closure). The surgeon covers the closed surgical<br />

wound with either a dressing or adhesive tape. The dressing<br />

can act as a physical barrier to protect the wound until the<br />

continuity of the skin is restored (within about 48 hours) and to<br />

absorb exudate from the wound, keeping it dry and clean, and<br />

preventing bacterial contamination from the external environment.<br />

Some studies have found that the moist environment<br />

created by some dressings accelerates wound healing, although<br />

others believe that the moist environment can be a disadvantage,<br />

as excessive exudate can cause maceration (softening and<br />

deterioration) of the wound and the surrounding healthy tissue.<br />

The utility of dressing surgical wounds beyond 48 hours of<br />

surgery is, therefore, controversial.<br />

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and risks of removing a<br />

dressing covering a closed surgical incision site within 48 hours<br />

permanently (early dressing removal) or beyond 48 hours of<br />

surgery permanently with interim dressing changes allowed<br />

(delayed dressing removal), on surgical site infection.<br />

Search methods: In July 2013 we searched the following electronic<br />

databases: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised<br />

Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials<br />

(CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Database of ABSTRACTs of<br />

Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MED-<br />

LINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations);<br />

Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. We also searched<br />

the references of included trials to identify further potentiallyrelevant<br />

trials.<br />

Selection criteria: Two review authors independently identified<br />

studies for inclusion. We included all randomised clinical trials<br />

(RCTs) conducted with people of any age and sex, undergoing a<br />

surgical procedure, who had their wound closed and a dressing<br />

applied. We included only trials that compared early versus<br />

delayed dressing removal. We excluded trials that included people<br />

with contaminated or dirty wounds. We also excluded quasirandomised<br />

studies, and other study designs.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

extracted data on the characteristics of the trial participants, risk<br />

of bias in the trials and outcomes for each trial. We calculated<br />

risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes<br />

and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous<br />

outcomes. We used RevMan 5 software to perform these calculations.<br />

Main results: Four trials were identified for inclusion in this<br />

review. All the trials were at high risk of bias. Three trials provided<br />

information for this review. Overall, this review included<br />

280 people undergoing planned surgery. Participants were randomised<br />

to early dressing removal (removal of the wound dressing<br />

within the 48 hours following surgery) (n = 140) or delayed<br />

dressing removal (continued dressing of the wound beyond 48<br />

hours) (n = 140) in the three trials. There were no statistically<br />

significant differences between the early dressing removal group<br />

and delayed dressing removal group in the proportion of people<br />

who developed superficial surgical site infection within 30 days<br />

(RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.32 to 1.28), superficial wound dehiscence<br />

within 30 days (RR 2.00; 95% CI 0.19 to 21.16) or serious<br />

adverse events within 30 days (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.28 to 2.51).<br />

No deep wound infection or deep wound dehiscence occurred in<br />

any of the participants in the trials that reported this outcome.<br />

None of the trials reported quality of life. The hospital stay was<br />

significantly shorter (MD -2.00 days; 95% CI -2.82 to -1.18) and<br />

the total cost of treatment significantly less (MD EUR -36.00;<br />

95% CI -59.81 to -12.19) in the early dressing removal group<br />

than in the delayed dressing removal group in the only trial that<br />

reported these outcomes.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: The early removal of dressings from clean<br />

or clean contaminated surgical wounds appears to have no detrimental<br />

effect on outcomes. However, it should be noted that<br />

the point estimate supporting this statement is based on very low<br />

quality evidence from three small randomised controlled trials,<br />

and the confidence intervals around this estimate were wide.<br />

Early dressing removal may result in a significantly shorter hospital<br />

stay, and significantly reduced costs, than covering the surgical<br />

wound with wound dressings beyond the first 48 hours after<br />

surgery, according to very low quality evidence from one small<br />

randomised controlled trial. Further randomised controlled trials<br />

of low risk of bias are necessary to investigate whether dressings<br />

are necessary after 48 hours in different types of surgery and levels<br />

of contamination and investigate whether antibiotic therapy<br />

influences the outcome<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Early versus delayed dressing removal for people with<br />

surgical wounds<br />

Most surgical procedures involve a cut in the skin that allows the<br />

surgeon to gain access to the deeper tissues or organs. Most<br />

surgical wounds are closed fully at the end of the procedure.The<br />

surgeon covers the closed surgical wound with either a dressing<br />

72<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Cochrane Reviews<br />

or adhesive tape.The dressing can act as a physical barrier to<br />

protect the wound until the continuity of the skin in restored<br />

(within about 48 hours). It can also absorb exudate from the<br />

wound, keeping it dry and clean, and preventing bacterial contamination<br />

from the external environment. Some studies have<br />

found that the moist environment created by some dressings<br />

accelerates wound healing, although others believe that it is a<br />

disadvantage, as excessive exudate can cause softening and<br />

deterioration of the wound and surrounding healthy tissue.<br />

We reviewed the medical literature up to July 2013 and identified<br />

four randomised controlled trials that investigated early (permanent<br />

removal of dressings within 48 hours of surgery) versus<br />

delayed removal of dressings (permanent removal of dressings<br />

after 48 hours of surgery with interim changes of dressing<br />

allowed) in people with surgical wounds. The levels of bias<br />

across the studies were mostly high or unclear, i.e. flaws in the<br />

conduct of these trials could have resulted in the production of<br />

incorrect results. A total of 280 people undergoing planned surgery<br />

were included in this review. One-hundred and forty people<br />

had their dressings removed within 48 hours following surgery<br />

and 140 people had their wounds dressed beyond 48 hours.<br />

The choice of whether the dressing was removed early (within<br />

48 hours) or retained for more 48 hours was made randomly by<br />

a method similar to the toss of a coin. No significant differences<br />

were reported between the two groups in terms of superficial<br />

surgical site infection (infection of the wound), superficial wound<br />

dehiscence (partial disruption of the wound that results in it reopening<br />

at the skin surface) or the number of people experiencing<br />

serious adverse events. There were no deep wound infections or<br />

complete wound dehiscence (complete disruption of wound<br />

healing, when the wound reopens completely) in the studies that<br />

reported these complications. However, the studies were not<br />

large enough to identify small differences in complication rates.<br />

None of the studies reported quality of life. Participants in the<br />

group that had early removal of dressings had significantly<br />

shorter hospital stays and incurred significantly lower treatment<br />

costs than those in the delayed removal of dressings group, but<br />

these results were based on very low quality evidence from one<br />

small randomised controlled trial. We recommend further randomised<br />

controlled trials are performed to investigate whether<br />

dressing of wounds beyond 48 hours after surgery is necessary,<br />

since the current evidence is based on very low quality evidence<br />

from three small randomised controlled trials.<br />

Interventions for helping people adhere to compression<br />

treatments for venous leg ulceration<br />

Carolina D Weller, Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston<br />

Weller CD, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV. Interventions for helping<br />

people adhere to compression treatments for venous leg ulceration.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9.<br />

Art. No.: CD008378. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008378.<br />

pub2.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Chronic venous ulcer healing is a complex clinical<br />

problem that requires intervention from skilled, costly, multidisciplinary<br />

wound-care teams. Compression therapy has been<br />

shown to help heal venous ulcers and to reduce the risk of recurrence.<br />

It is not known which interventions help people adhere to<br />

compression treatments.<br />

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of interventions<br />

designed to help people adhere to venous leg ulcer compression<br />

therapy, and thus improve healing of venous leg ulcers and prevent<br />

their recurrence after healing.<br />

Search methods: In May 2013 we searched The Cochrane<br />

Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central<br />

Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library);<br />

Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-<br />

Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; EBSCO CINAHL; trial registries,<br />

and reference lists of relevant publications for published<br />

and ongoing trials. There were no language or publication date<br />

restrictions.<br />

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials<br />

(RCTs) of interventions that help people with venous leg ulcers<br />

adhere to compression treatments compared with usual care, or<br />

no intervention, or another active intervention. Our main outcomes<br />

were number of people with ulcers healed, recurrence,<br />

time to complete healing, quality of life, pain, adherence to<br />

compression therapy and number of people with adverse events.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed the risk of<br />

bias of each included trial, and assessed overall quality of evidence<br />

for the main outcomes in ‘Summary of findings’ tables.<br />

Main results: Low quality evidence from one trial (67 participants)<br />

indicates that, compared with home-based care, a community-based<br />

Leg Club ® clinic that provided mechanisms for<br />

peer-support, assistance with goal setting and social interaction<br />

did not result in superior healing rates at three months (12/28<br />

people healed in Leg Club clinic group versus 7/28 in homebased<br />

care group; risk ratio (RR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval<br />

(CI) 0.79 to 3.71); or six months (15/33 healed in Leg Club<br />

group versus 10/34 in home-based care group; RR 1.55, 95%<br />

CI 0.81 to 2.93); or in improved quality of life outcomes at six<br />

months (MD 0.85 points, 95% CI -0.13 to 1.83; 0 to 10 point<br />

scale). However, the Leg Club resulted in a statistically significant<br />

reduction in pain at six months (MD -12.75 points, 95%<br />

CI -24.79, -0.71; 0 to 100 point scale), although this was not<br />

considered a clinically important difference. Time to complete<br />

healing, recurrence of ulcers, adherence and adverse events<br />

were not reported.<br />

Low quality evidence from another trial (184 participants)<br />

indicates that, compared with usual care in a wound clinic, a<br />

community-based and nurse-led self-management programme<br />

of six months’ duration promoting physical activity (walking and<br />

leg exercises) and adherence to compression therapy via counselling<br />

and behaviour modification (Lively Legs ® ) may not result<br />

in superior healing rates at 18 months (51/92 healed in Lively<br />

Legs group versus 41/92 in usual care group; RR 1.24 (95% CI<br />

0.93 to 1.67)); may not result in reduced rates of recurrence of<br />

venous leg ulcers at 18 months (32/69 with recurrence in Lively<br />

Legs group versus 38/67 in usual care group; RR 0.82 (95% CI<br />

0.59 to 1.14)); and may not result in superior adherence to<br />

compression therapy at 18 months (42/92 people fully adherent<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 73


in Lively Legs group versus 41/92 in usual care group; RR 1.02<br />

(95% CI 0.74 to 1.41)). Time to complete healing, quality of life,<br />

pain and adverse events were not reported. We found no studies<br />

that investigated other interventions to promote adherence to<br />

compression therapy.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: There is a paucity of trials of interventions<br />

that promote adherence to compression therapy for venous<br />

ulcers. Low quality evidence from two trials was identified: one<br />

promoting adherence via socialisation and support (Leg Club ® ),<br />

and the other promoting adherence to compression, leg exercises<br />

and walking via counselling and behaviour modification<br />

(Lively Legs ® ).These trials did not reveal a benefit of communitybased<br />

clinics over usual care in terms of healing rates, prevention<br />

of recurrence of venous leg ulcers, or quality of life. One<br />

trial indicated a small, but possibly clinically unimportant, reduction<br />

in pain, while adverse events were not reported. The small<br />

number of participants may have a hidden real benefit, or an<br />

increase in harm. Due to the lack of reliable evidence, at present<br />

it is not possible either to recommend or discourage nurse clinic<br />

care interventions over standard care.<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Interventions for helping people adhere to compression<br />

bandages to aid healing of venous leg ulcers<br />

Venous leg ulcers take weeks – or months – to heal, cause distress,<br />

and are very costly for health services. Although compression,<br />

using bandages or stockings, helps healing and prevents<br />

recurrence, many people do not adhere to compression therapy.<br />

Therefore, interventions that promote the wearing of compression<br />

should improve healing, and prevent recurrence of venous<br />

ulcers.<br />

We found two studies of low quality evidence, so further<br />

studies may change the review findings.<br />

Leg Club ® , a community-based clinic, may not significantly<br />

improve healing of venous leg ulcers or quality of life more than<br />

nurse home-visit care does, but probably results in less pain after<br />

six months. Seventeen more people out of 100 were healed after<br />

participating in Leg Club (46/100 people in Leg Club healed<br />

compared with 29/100 people having usual home care). Leg<br />

Club participants rated their quality of life 0.85 points better<br />

than those receiving home care, assessed on a 10 point scale.<br />

Leg Club participants rated their pain at six months 12.75 points<br />

lower than the home care group, assessed on a 100 point scale.<br />

This trial did not report whether Leg Club clinics improve adherence<br />

to compression, time to healing, or prevent recurrence<br />

more than home care.<br />

Lively Legs ® , a community-based self-management programme,<br />

may not significantly improve healing of ulcers or<br />

decrease recurrence after 18 months any more than usual care<br />

in a wound clinic. Ten more people out of 100 were healed at<br />

18 months after participating in Lively Legs (55/100 Lively Legs<br />

participants healed versus 45/100 people having usual care).<br />

Ten fewer people out of 100 had a recurrent leg ulcer 18<br />

months after participating in Lively Legs (47/100 Lively Legs participants<br />

had recurrence compared with ¬57/100 people having<br />

usual care). The same number of people adhered to compression<br />

therapy after participating in Lively Legs (45/100 participants<br />

in both groups). The trial did not report whether the Lively<br />

Legs self-management programme clinics improve time to healing<br />

of ulcers, reduce pain, or improve quality of life any more<br />

than usual care in a wound clinic.<br />

We found no studies investigating other potential interventions,<br />

such as education programs. We know that compression therapy<br />

is effective, but do not know which interventions improve adherence<br />

to compression therapy.<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 10, 2013<br />

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating<br />

foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus<br />

Jo C Dumville, Robert J Hinchliffe, Nicky Cullum, Fran Game,<br />

Nikki Stubbs, Michael Sweeting, Frank Peinemann<br />

Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, Cullum N, Game F, Stubbs N, Sweeting<br />

M, Peinemann F. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating<br />

foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane<br />

Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10. Art. No.:<br />

CD010318. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub2.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus (DM)<br />

are a common and serious global health issue. Negative pressure<br />

wound therapy can be used to treat these wounds and a<br />

clear and current overview of current evidence is required to<br />

facilitate decision-making regarding its use.<br />

Objectives: To assess the effects of negative pressure wound<br />

therapy compared with standard care or other adjuvant therapies<br />

in the healing of foot wounds in people with DM.<br />

Search methods: In July 2013, we searched the following databases<br />

to identify reports of relevant randomised controlled trials<br />

(RCTs): Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The<br />

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); The<br />

Database of ABSTRACTs of Reviews of Effects (DARE); The<br />

NHS Economic Evaluation Database; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid<br />

MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid<br />

EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL.<br />

Selection criteria: Published or unpublished RCTs that evaluate<br />

the effects of any brand of negative pressure wound therapy in<br />

the treatment of foot wounds in people with diabetes, irrespective<br />

of publication date or language of publication. Particular<br />

effort was made to identify unpublished studies.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently<br />

performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data<br />

extraction.<br />

Main results: We included five studies in this review randomising<br />

605 participants. Two studies (total of 502 participants) compared<br />

negative pressure wound therapy with standard moist<br />

wound dressings. The first of these was conducted in people with<br />

DM and post-amputation wounds and reported that significantly<br />

more people healed in the negative pressure wound therapy<br />

group compared with the moist dressing group: (risk ratio 1.44;<br />

95% CI 1.03 to 2.01). The second study, conducted in people<br />

with debrided foot ulcers, also reported a statistically significant<br />

increase in the proportion of ulcers healed in the negative pressure<br />

wound therapy group compared with the moist dressing<br />

group: (risk ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.01). However, these<br />

74<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Cochrane Reviews<br />

studies were noted to be at risk of performance bias, so caution<br />

is required in their interpretation. Findings from the remaining<br />

three studies provided limited data, as they were small, with limited<br />

reporting, as well as being at unclear risk of bias.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: There is some evidence to suggest that<br />

negative pressure wound therapy is more effective in healing<br />

post-operative foot wounds and ulcers of the foot in people with<br />

DM compared with moist wound dressings. However, these findings<br />

are uncertain due to the possible risk of bias in the original<br />

studies. The limitations in current RCT evidence suggests that<br />

further trials are required to reduce uncertainty around decision<br />

making regarding the use of NPWT to treat foot wounds in people<br />

with DM.<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in<br />

people with diabetes mellitus<br />

Diabetes mellitus is a common condition that leads to high<br />

blood glucose concentrations, with around 2.8 million people<br />

affected in the UK (approximately 4.3% of the population).<br />

Some people with diabetes can develop ulcers on their feet.<br />

These wounds can take a long time to heal, be painful and<br />

become infected. Ulceration of the foot in people with diabetes<br />

can also lead to a higher risk of amputation of parts of the foot<br />

or leg. Generally, people with diabetes are at a higher risk of<br />

lower-limb amputation than people without diabetes. Negative<br />

pressure wound therapy is a wound treatment which involves<br />

applying suction to a wound; it is used increasingly around the<br />

world but it is not clear how effective it is. It also expensive compared<br />

with treatments such as dressings. We found five randomised<br />

controlled trials that compared negative pressure<br />

wound therapy with other treatments. We found some preliminary<br />

evidence that negative pressure wound therapy increases<br />

the healing of foot wounds on people with diabetes compared<br />

with other treatments. However, the findings are not conclusive<br />

and more, better quality randomised controlled trials are<br />

required.<br />

Early versus delayed post-operative bathing or<br />

showering to prevent wound complications<br />

Clare D Toon, Sidhartha Sinha, Brian R Davidson,<br />

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy<br />

Toon CD, Sinha S, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Early versus<br />

delayed post-operative bathing or showering to prevent wound<br />

complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013,<br />

Issue 10. Art. No.: CD010075. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.<br />

CD010075.pub2.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Many people undergo surgical operations during<br />

their life-time, which result in surgical wounds. After an operation<br />

the incision is closed using stiches, staples, steri-strips or an<br />

adhesive glue. Usually, towards the end of the surgical procedure<br />

and before the patient leaves the operating theatre, the<br />

surgeon covers the closed surgical wound using gauze and<br />

adhesive tape or an adhesive tape containing a pad (a wound<br />

dressing) that covers the surgical wound. There is currently no<br />

guidance about when the wound can be made wet by post-operative<br />

bathing or showering. Early bathing may encourage early<br />

mobilisation of the patient, which is good after most types of<br />

operation. Avoiding post-operative bathing or showering for two<br />

to three days may result in accumulation of sweat and dirt on<br />

the body. Conversely, early washing of the surgical wound may<br />

have an adverse effect on healing, for example by irritating or<br />

macerating the wound, and disturbing the healing environment.<br />

Objectives: To compare the benefits (such as potential improvements<br />

to quality of life) and harms (potentially increased woundrelated<br />

morbidity) of early post-operative bathing or showering<br />

(i.e. within 48 hours after surgery, the period during which epithelialisation<br />

of the wound occurs) compared with delayed postoperative<br />

bathing or showering (i.e. no bathing or showering for<br />

over 48 hours after surgery) in patients with closed surgical<br />

wounds.<br />

Search methods: We searched The Cochrane Wounds Group<br />

Specialised Register;The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled<br />

Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); The Database<br />

of ABSTRACTs of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane<br />

Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other<br />

Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE; EBSCO CINAHL; the<br />

metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and the International<br />

Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).<br />

Selection criteria: We considered all randomised trials conducted<br />

in patients who had undergone any surgical procedure<br />

and had surgical closure of their wounds, irrespective of the<br />

location of the wound and whether or not the wound was<br />

dressed. We excluded trials if they included patients with contaminated,<br />

dirty or infected wounds and those that included<br />

open wounds. We also excluded quasi-randomised trials, cohort<br />

studies and case-control studies.<br />

Data collection and analysis: We extracted data on the characteristics<br />

of the patients included in the trials, risk of bias in the<br />

trials and outcomes from each trial. For binary outcomes, we<br />

calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).<br />

For continuous variables we planned to calculate the mean difference<br />

(MD), or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95%<br />

CI. For count data outcomes, we planned to calculate the rate<br />

ratio (RaR) with 95% CI. We used RevMan 5 software for performing<br />

these calculations.<br />

Main results: Only one trial was identified for inclusion in this<br />

review. This trial was at a high risk of bias. This trial included<br />

857 patients undergoing minor skin excision surgery in the primary<br />

care setting. The wounds were sutured after the excision.<br />

Patients were randomised to early post-operative bathing (dressing<br />

to be removed after 12 hours and normal bathing resumed)<br />

(n = 415) or delayed post-operative bathing (dressing to be<br />

retained for at least 48 hours before removal and resumption of<br />

normal bathing) (n = 442). The only outcome of interest<br />

reported in this trial was surgical site infection (SSI). There was<br />

no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients<br />

who developed SSIs between the two groups (857 patients; RR<br />

0.96; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.48). The proportions of patients who<br />

developed SSIs were 8.5% in the early bathing group and 8.8%<br />

in the delayed bathing group.<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 75


Authors’ conclusions: There is currently no conclusive evidence<br />

available from randomised trials regarding the benefits or harms<br />

of early versus delayed post-operative showering or bathing for<br />

the prevention of wound complications, as the confidence intervals<br />

around the point estimate are wide, and, therefore, a clinically<br />

significant increase or decrease in SSI by early post-operative<br />

bathing cannot be ruled out. We recommend running further<br />

randomised controlled trials to compare early versus<br />

delayed post-operative showering or bathing.<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Post-operative bathing and showering to prevent wound<br />

complications<br />

Many people undergo surgical operations during their life-time.<br />

After an operation the surgical wound is closed using stitches,<br />

staples, tape (steri-strips) or an adhesive glue. Usually, towards<br />

the end of the surgical procedure and before the person leaves<br />

the operating theatre, the surgeon covers the closed surgical<br />

wound using gauze and adhesive tape, or an adhesive tape containing<br />

a pad that covers the surgical wound. This is called a<br />

wound dressing. There is currently no guidance about when<br />

wounds can be made wet by bathing or showering post-operatively.<br />

Early bathing may encourage the person to move about,<br />

which is good after most types of surgery. Avoiding post-operative<br />

bathing or showering for two to three days may result in the<br />

accumulation of sweat and dirt on the body, but early washing<br />

of the wound may have a bad effect on healing by irritating the<br />

wound and disturbing the healing environment. We reviewed all<br />

the available evidence from the medical literature (up to July<br />

2013) on this issue. In particular, we sought information from<br />

randomised controlled trials, which, if conducted well, provide<br />

the most accurate information.<br />

We identified only one randomised controlled trial. This trial<br />

was at high risk of bias, i.e. there were flaws in the way it was<br />

conducted that could have given incorrect results. This trial<br />

included 857 people undergoing minor skin operations performed<br />

at a General Practitioner (GP) surgery. No steri-strips<br />

were used in this trial, as the wounds were stitched. The people<br />

running the trial used a method similar to the toss of a coin to<br />

decide which group participants went into. One group of 415<br />

people was advised to remove the dressing 12 hours after surgery<br />

and then to bathe normally, while the other group of 442<br />

people was advised to keep the dressing on for at least 48 hours<br />

and then to bathe normally. The only outcome of interest<br />

reported in this trial was wound infection. The authors reported<br />

no statistically significant difference in the proportion of people<br />

who developed wound infection in the two groups (8.5% in the<br />

early bathing group and 8.8% in the delayed bathing group).<br />

There is currently no conclusive evidence available from randomised<br />

trials about the benefits, or harms, with regard to<br />

wound complications of early or delayed post-operative showering<br />

or bathing. We recommend further randomised controlled<br />

trials to compare early versus delayed post-operative showering<br />

or bathing.<br />

Publication in The Cochrane Library Issue 12, 2013<br />

Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers<br />

Susan O’Meara, Deyaa Al-Kurdi, Yemisi Ologun,<br />

Liza G Ovington, Marrissa Martyn-St James,<br />

Rachel Richardson<br />

O’Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ologun Y, Ovington LG, Martyn-St<br />

James M, Richardson R. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous<br />

leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews <strong>2014</strong>,<br />

Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003557. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.<br />

CD003557.pub5.<br />

Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by<br />

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Background: Venous leg ulcers are a type of chronic wound<br />

affecting up to 1% of adults in developed countries at some<br />

point during their lives. Many of these wounds are colonised by<br />

bacteria or show signs of clinical infection. The presence of<br />

infection may delay ulcer healing. Two main strategies are used<br />

to prevent and treat clinical infection in venous leg ulcers: systemic<br />

antibiotics and topical antibiotics or antiseptics.<br />

Objectives: The objective of this review was to determine the<br />

effects of systemic antibiotics and topical antibiotics and antiseptics<br />

on the healing of venous ulcers; review authors also examined<br />

the effects of these interventions on clinical infection, bacterial<br />

flora, bacterial resistance, ulcer recurrence, adverse<br />

effects, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life and<br />

costs.<br />

Search methods: In May 2013, for this second update, we<br />

searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register<br />

(searched 24 May 2013); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled<br />

Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 4); Ovid MEDLINE (1948<br />

to Week 3 May 2013); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Nonindexed<br />

Citations, 22 May 2013); Ovid EMBASE (1980 to Week<br />

20 2013); and EBSCO CINAHL (1982 to 17 May 2013). No<br />

language or publication date restrictions were applied.<br />

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting<br />

people with venous leg ulceration, evaluating at least one systemic<br />

antibiotic, topical antibiotic or topical antiseptic that<br />

reported an objective assessment of wound healing (e.g. time to<br />

complete healing, frequency of complete healing, change in<br />

ulcer surface area) were eligible for inclusion. Selection decisions<br />

were made by two review authors while working independently.<br />

Data collection and analysis: Information on the characteristics<br />

of participants, interventions and outcomes was recorded on a<br />

standardised data extraction form. In addition, aspects of trial<br />

methods were extracted, including randomisation, allocation<br />

concealment, blinding of participants and outcome assessors,<br />

incomplete outcome data and study group comparability at<br />

baseline. Data extraction and validity assessment were conducted<br />

by one review author and were checked by a second.<br />

Data were pooled when appropriate.<br />

Main results: Forty-five RCTs reporting 53 comparisons and<br />

recruiting a total of 4486 participants were included, Many RCTs<br />

were small, and most were at high or unclear risk of bias. Ulcer<br />

76<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Cochrane Reviews<br />

infection status at baseline and duration of follow-up varied<br />

across RCTs. Five RCTs reported eight comparisons of systemic<br />

antibiotics, and the remainder evaluated topical preparations:<br />

cadexomer iodine (11 RCTs reporting 12 comparisons); povidone-iodine<br />

(six RCTs reporting seven comparisons); peroxidebased<br />

preparations (four RCTs reporting four comparisons);<br />

honey-based preparations (two RCTs reporting two comparisons);<br />

silver-based preparations (12 RCTs reporting 13 comparisons);<br />

other topical antibiotics (three RCTs reporting five comparisons);<br />

and other topical antiseptics (two RCTs reporting two<br />

comparisons). Few RCTs provided a reliable estimate of time to<br />

healing; most reported the proportion of participants with complete<br />

healing during the trial period.<br />

Systemic antibiotics: More participants were healed when they<br />

were prescribed levamisole (normally used to treat roundworm<br />

infection) compared with placebo: risk ratio (RR) 1.31 (95% CI<br />

1.06 to 1.62). No between-group differences were detected in<br />

terms of complete healing for other comparisons: antibiotics<br />

given according to antibiogram versus usual care; ciprofloxacin<br />

versus standard care/placebo; trimethoprim versus placebo; ciprofloxacin<br />

versus trimethoprim; and amoxicillin versus topical<br />

povidone-iodine.<br />

Topical antibiotics and antiseptics: Cadexomer iodine: more<br />

participants were healed when given cadexomer iodine compared<br />

with standard care. The pooled estimate from four RCTs<br />

for complete healing at four to 12 weeks was RR 2.17 (95% CI<br />

1.30 to 3.60). No between-group differences in complete healing<br />

were detected when cadexomer iodine was compared with<br />

the following: hydrocolloid dressing; paraffin gauze dressing;<br />

dextranomer; and silver-impregnated dressings.<br />

Povidone iodine: no between-group differences in complete<br />

healing were detected when povidone-iodine was compared with<br />

the following: hydrocolloid; moist or foam dressings according to<br />

wound status; and growth factor. Time to healing estimates for<br />

povidone-iodine versus dextranomer, and for povidone-iodine<br />

versus hydrocolloid, were likely to be unreliable.<br />

Peroxide-based preparations: four RCTs reported findings in<br />

favour of peroxide-based preparations when compared with<br />

usual care for surrogate healing outcomes (change in ulcer<br />

area). There was no report of complete healing.<br />

Honey-based preparations: no between-group difference in<br />

time to healing or complete healing was detected for honeybased<br />

products when compared with usual care.<br />

Silver-based preparations: no between-group differences in<br />

complete healing were detected when 1% silver sulphadiazine<br />

ointment was compared with standard care/placebo and tripeptide<br />

copper complex; or when different brands of silver-impregnated<br />

dressings were compared; or when silver-impregnated<br />

dressings were compared with non-antimicrobial dressings.<br />

Other topical antibiotics: data from one RCT suggested that<br />

more participants healed at four weeks when treated with an<br />

enzymatic cleanser (a non-antibiotic preparation) compared with<br />

a chloramphenicol-containing ointment (additional active ingredients<br />

also included in the ointment): RR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to<br />

0.99). No between-group differences in complete healing were<br />

detected for framycetin sulphate ointment versus enzymatic<br />

cleanser; chloramphenicol ointment versus framycetin sulphate<br />

ointment; mupirocin ointment versus vehicle; and topical antibiotics<br />

given according to antibiogram versus an herbal ointment.<br />

Other topical antiseptics: data from one RCT suggested that<br />

more participants receiving an antiseptic ointment (ethacridine<br />

lactate) had responsive ulcers (defined as > 20% reduction in<br />

area) at four weeks when compared with placebo: RR 1.45<br />

(95% CI 1.21 to 1.73). Complete healing was not reported. No<br />

between-group difference was detected between chlorhexidine<br />

solution and usual care.<br />

Authors’ conclusions: At present, no evidence is available to<br />

support the routine use of systemic antibiotics in promoting healing<br />

of venous leg ulcers. However, the lack of reliable evidence<br />

means that it is not possible to recommend the discontinuation<br />

of any of the agents reviewed. In terms of topical preparations,<br />

some evidence supports the use of cadexomer iodine. Current<br />

evidence does not support the routine use of honey- or silverbased<br />

products. Further good quality research is required before<br />

definitive conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of<br />

povidone-iodine, peroxide-based preparations, ethacridine lactate,<br />

chloramphenicol, framycetin, mupirocin, ethacridine or<br />

chlorhexidine in healing venous leg ulceration. In light of the<br />

increasing problem of bacterial resistance to antibiotics, current<br />

prescribing guidelines recommend that antibacterial preparations<br />

should be used only in cases of clinical infection, not for<br />

bacterial colonisation.<br />

Plain language summary:<br />

Antibiotics and antiseptics to help healing venous leg ulcers<br />

Venous leg ulcers are a type of wound that can take a long time<br />

to heal. These ulcers can become infected, and this might cause<br />

further delay to healing. Two types of treatment are available to<br />

treat infection: systemic antibiotics (i.e. antibiotics taken by<br />

mouth or by injection) and topical preparations (i.e. treatments<br />

applied directly to the wound). Whether systemic or topical preparations<br />

are used, patients will also usually have a wound dressing<br />

and bandage over the wound. This review was undertaken to<br />

find out whether using antibiotics and antiseptics works better<br />

than usual care in healing venous leg ulcers, and if so, to find<br />

out which antibiotic and antiseptic preparations are better than<br />

others. In terms of topical preparations, some evidence is available<br />

to support the use of cadexomer iodine (a topical agent<br />

thought to have cleansing and antibacterial effects). Current evidence<br />

does not support the use of honey- or silver-based products.<br />

Further good quality research is required before definitive<br />

conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of antibiotic<br />

tablets and topical agents such as povidone-iodine, peroxidebased<br />

products and other topical antibiotics and antiseptics in<br />

healing venous leg ulceration.<br />

m<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 77


EWMA <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Previous Issues<br />

Volume 13, no 2, October 2013<br />

Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers in intensive care<br />

units: A systematic review with meta-analysis<br />

F. P. García-Fernández et al.<br />

Pressure-time integral of elastic versus inelastic bandages<br />

H. Partsch, G. Mosti<br />

VERUM – A European approach for successful venous leg ulcer<br />

healing<br />

R. Brambilla et al.<br />

Effect of topical haemoglobin on venous leg ulcer healing<br />

M. Arenbergerova et al.<br />

The effects of an arginine-enriched oral nutritional supplement<br />

on chronic wound healing in non-malnourished patients<br />

J. Schols et al.<br />

Efficacy of honey gel in the treatment of chronic lower leg<br />

ulcers<br />

O. Tellechea et al.<br />

Volume 13, no 1, April 2013<br />

The Biofilm-forming capacity of staphylococcus aureus<br />

from chronic wounds can be useful for determining Wound-Bed<br />

Preparation methods<br />

Y. Yarets, L. Rubanov, I. Novikova, N. Shevchenko<br />

In vitro efficacy of various topical antimicrobial agents against<br />

multidrug-resistant bacteria<br />

M. Hajská, L. Slobodníková, H. Hupková, J. Koller<br />

The mTOR inhibitors and the skin wound healing<br />

F. Benhadou, V. del Marmol<br />

A Review of Evidence for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />

(NPWT) use Post Spinal Surgery<br />

R. A. Atkinson, K. J. Ousey, S. Lui, J. B. Williamson<br />

A randomized study on the effectiveness of a new pressurerelieving<br />

mattress overlay for the prevention of pressure ulcers<br />

in elderly patients at risk<br />

E. Ricci, C. Roberto, A. Ippolito, A. Bianco, M. T. Scalise<br />

Motorcycle ride position, venous return, and symptoms of<br />

chronic venous insufficiency<br />

Ellie Lindsay, P. Vowden, K. Vowden, J. Megson<br />

Archagathus – History’s first wound expert<br />

E. Ricci<br />

Volume 12, no 3, October 2012<br />

Therapeutic strategies for diabetic foot ulceration<br />

RJ Hinchliffe, JRW Brownrigg<br />

Offloading the diabetic foot: Evidence and clinical decision<br />

making<br />

S.A. Bus<br />

Soft-tissue complications during treatment of children<br />

with congenital clubfoot<br />

A. Baindurashvili, V. Kenis, Y. Stepanova<br />

An evolution in Medical Tapes: From Latex to Acrylic<br />

L. Gryson<br />

Bacteria and fungus binding mesh in negative pressure<br />

wound therapy – A review of the biological effects in<br />

the wound bed<br />

M. Malmsjö, S. Lindstedt, R. Ingemansson, L. Gustafsson<br />

Volume 12, no 2, May 2012<br />

A structured approach to surgical treatment in deep infection<br />

in diabetic foot<br />

Cedomir S Vucetic, et.al.<br />

Endothelial progenitor cells, a unipotent stem cell, involved in<br />

neovascularization of wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer<br />

Jacqueline Chor Wing Tama, et.al.<br />

Bacteriophages for the treatment of severe infections:<br />

– a ‘new’ option for the future?<br />

Daniel De Vos, et.al.<br />

Developing evidence-based ways of working:<br />

– Employing interdisciplinary team working to improve patient<br />

outcomes in diabetic foot ulceration – our experience<br />

Kristien Van Acker<br />

Exploring the characteristics of a venous leg ulcer that<br />

contribute to the emotional distress experienced by patients<br />

Jessica Walburn, et.al.<br />

The EWMA <strong>Journal</strong>s can be downloaded free of charge from www.ewma.org<br />

Other <strong>Journal</strong>s<br />

EWMA wishes to facilitate the exchange of information<br />

on wound healing in a broad perspective with<br />

this section on International <strong>Journal</strong>s.<br />

Italian<br />

English<br />

Finnish<br />

Spanish<br />

Acta Vulnologica, vol. 11, no 4, 2013<br />

www.vulnologia.it<br />

Gel aminoacido versus idrogel: qual è il debrider più<br />

rapido?<br />

Cassino R., Ippolito A. M.<br />

Gangrena di Fournier: algoritmo di trattamento ad una<br />

tipologia di lesione complessa<br />

Scalise A., Tartaglione C., Bottoni M., Torresetti M.,<br />

Gioacchini M., Pierangeli M., Grassetti L., Di Benedetto G.<br />

Infezioni associate a ulcere da pressione. Nota I: condizioni<br />

generali<br />

Palazzi L., Giuliani G. C.<br />

Trattamento dei bordi lesionali sottominati: esperienze<br />

personali<br />

Gallarini A.<br />

Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 27, no 3, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.aswcjournal.com<br />

Innovative Use of Povidone-Iodine to Guide Burn Wound<br />

Debridement and Predict the Success of Biobrane as a<br />

Definitive Treatment for Burns<br />

Yu Sin Lau, Peter Brooks<br />

Human Fibroblast-like Cultures in the Presence of<br />

Platelet-rich Plasma as a Single Growth Factor Source:<br />

Clinical Implications<br />

Javier Ramos-Torrecillas, et al.<br />

Features of Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Older Adults<br />

Hülya Eskiizmirli Aygör,et al.<br />

A Hydrosurgery System (Versajet) with and without<br />

Hydrogen Peroxide Solutions for the Debridement of<br />

Subacute and Chronic Wounds: A Comparative Study<br />

with Hydrodebridement<br />

Saime Irkoren, Nazan Sivrioglu<br />

Haava, no. 1, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.shhy.fi<br />

Wound Care Nurse in Community<br />

Ulla Dunder<br />

The Model for Wound Care in Town of Heinola<br />

Pirjo Elfvengrén, Tiina Lastikka, Maria Nevalainen<br />

Closing of Wound is Possible to do by Several Methods<br />

Ansa Iivanainen, Mikko Tuuliranta<br />

Operating Safar in Kenia<br />

Kielo Turtiainen<br />

I Shall Treat Your Wounds Until The End – A Case Report<br />

Arja Korhonen<br />

How The Hand Hygienia Is Implemented In Daily Care?<br />

Ansa Iivanainen, Piia Grek-Stjernberg, Heli Kallio, Arja<br />

Korhonen, Tiina Pukki<br />

The Weaknesses In Implementation of Hand Hygienia<br />

Anne Kosonen, Sari Puhakainen<br />

Health Promotion In The Care of Wound Patient<br />

Eeva Häkkinen<br />

Wound Care in Gipsy Family<br />

Salme Annala<br />

Discharge of Wound Patient<br />

Piia Grek-Stjernberg<br />

Do You Pay Attention to Feet of Wound Patient?<br />

– A Case Report<br />

Sirpa Arvonen<br />

Helcos, vol. 24, no. 3, 2013<br />

Continuous improvement plan and prevention treatment<br />

by pressure ulcers deming cycle<br />

Fernando Patón-Villar et al.<br />

Nursing management on emergency wounds<br />

R. Fernando García-Gonzalez et al.<br />

Diversity and universality in response to patient diabetic<br />

foot pakistani with type 2 diabetes mellitus from primary<br />

care<br />

Montserrat Brugada Faura et al.<br />

78<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


EWMA<br />

English<br />

English<br />

Polish<br />

Lithuanian<br />

Int. <strong>Journal</strong> of Lower Extremity Wounds vol. 12, no 4, 2013<br />

http://ijlew.sagepub.com<br />

ITranslation and Validation of the Chinese Cardiff Wound Impact<br />

Schedule<br />

Yao Huang, et al.<br />

Effect of Daptomycin on Local Interleukin-6, Matrix Metalloproteinase-9,<br />

and Metallopeptidase Inhibitor 1 in Patients With MRSA-<br />

Infected Diabetic Foot<br />

Andreas Ambrosch, et al.<br />

Clinical Characteristics and Medical Costs in Patients With<br />

Diabetic Amputation and Nondiabetic Patients With Nonacute<br />

Amputation in Central Urban Hospitals in China<br />

Aihong Wang, zhangrong xu, Yiming Mu, Linong Ji<br />

Reducing Major Lower Extremity Amputations After the Introduction<br />

of a Multidisciplinary Team for the Diabetic Foot<br />

José Antonio Rubio, et al.<br />

The Influence of the Length of the First Metatarsal on the Risk of<br />

Reulceration in the Feet of Patients With Diabetes<br />

Raúl Juan Molines-Barroso, et al.<br />

Outcomes After 294 Transtibial Amputations With the Posterior<br />

Myocutaneous Flap<br />

Benjamin Jacob Brown, et al.<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Care, vol. 23, no 3, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.journalofwoundcare.com<br />

Inhibition of biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Medihoney<br />

in vitro<br />

R. Cooper, L. Jenkins, S. Hooper<br />

Evaluation of two fibrous wound dressings for the management<br />

of leg ulcers: Results of a European<br />

randomised controlled trial (EARTH RCT)<br />

S. Meaume, et al.<br />

Laboratory evaluation of Drawtex Hydroconductive<br />

Dressing with LevaFiber technology<br />

V. Edwards-Jones, V. Vishnyakov, P. Spruce<br />

Do ready-made compression stockings fit the anatomy of the<br />

venous leg ulcer patient?<br />

S. Nørregaard, S. Bermark, F. Gottrup<br />

A clinical algorithm for wound biofilm identification<br />

D.G. Metcalf, P. Bowler, J. Hurlow<br />

Photographic assessment of burn size and depth: reliability<br />

and validity<br />

M.J. Hop, et al.<br />

Novel materials for moist wound management: Alginate-psyllium<br />

hybrid fibres<br />

R. Mahsood, M. Miraftab<br />

Leczenie Ran vol. 10, no 4, 2013<br />

The value of clinical nutrition in the wound healing<br />

Stanisław Kłek<br />

Reflectance confocal microscopy – a new diagnostic method<br />

Kamila Białek-Galas, Dorota Wielowieyska-Szybinska,<br />

Anna Wojas-Pelc<br />

The treatment and the nursing of decubital wounds at the unconscious<br />

patient in the department of the intensive health care<br />

Joanna Rudek, Anna Majda, Joanna Zalewska-Puchała<br />

Effect of different methods of compression on blood viscosity in<br />

patients with chronic venous disease<br />

Monika Han, Krzysztof Paruzel, Marek Kucharzewski,<br />

Karol Monkos, Ludmiła Słowinska-Łozynska<br />

Wounds as the cause of death of Polish rulers<br />

Katarzyna Wilemska-Kucharzewska, Marek Kucharzewski,<br />

Magdalena Potempa, Paweł Jonczyk, Michał Janerka<br />

Lietuvos chirurgija, no 2, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.chirurgija.lt<br />

Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical<br />

cancer<br />

Daukantiene L, Valuckas KP, Aleknavicius E, Pipiriene-Želviene T.<br />

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal<br />

polyps: single institution experience<br />

Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE, Kuma Gupta R<br />

Treatment methods of prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy.<br />

Current treatment alternatives and our clinical experience<br />

Ulys A, Veželis A, Ivanauskas A, Snicorius M.<br />

Clinical outcomes of 154 hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for<br />

left sided colon and rectal cancer: single center experience<br />

Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE, Kumar Gupta R, Kazanavicius D,<br />

Petrulis K, Lunevicius R.<br />

Early loop ileostomy closure: should we do it routinely?<br />

Žukauskiene V, Samalavicius NE.<br />

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for early rectal cancer:<br />

single center experience<br />

Samalavicius NE, Ambrazevicius M, Kilius A, Petrulis K.<br />

Dutch<br />

German<br />

English<br />

Scandinavian<br />

German<br />

NTVW vol. 9, no 2, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.ntvw.nl<br />

Interview: Wendy Roelofs: ‘Bussineslike approache gives<br />

solide structure to woundcare’<br />

Interview: New chair Woundcare Platform iris van Bennekom:<br />

‘We must look for common interest‘<br />

Interview: Maud Curvers: ‘Make sure to choose the<br />

right dressing afther hipsurgery’<br />

Interview: Emmy Stoof, Paul van der Weerd: Multidisciplinary<br />

cooperation in Care Chain to improve woundcare.<br />

Hyperbaric oxygen and the prevention of amputation<br />

Dirk Ubbink<br />

Comedo Senilis<br />

Kasia Huisman<br />

Phlebologie, no 1, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.schattauer.de<br />

Compression therapy during pregnancy: bane or boon?<br />

A. Adamczyk, M. Krug, S. Schnabl, H.-M. Häfner<br />

Thromboembolic complications and the importance of<br />

thrombophilia in pregnancy<br />

L. Gonser, A. Strölin<br />

Diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism<br />

during pregnancy and the postpartum period<br />

E. Randrianarisoa, H. Abele; B. Balletshofer<br />

Therapy of pudendal varicosities with sclerotherapy<br />

M. Stücker, M. Dörler<br />

Interventional therapy of a descending ilio-femoral deep<br />

vein thrombosis in a young women<br />

W. Blättler, J. Largiadèr, H. Altenkämper<br />

The recalcitrant venous leg ulcer – a never ending story?<br />

S. W. I. Reeder, et al.<br />

Leg venous ulcer healing process after application of<br />

membranous dressing with silver ions<br />

M. Kucharzewski, et al.<br />

Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 22, no 1, <strong>2014</strong><br />

www.wiley.com<br />

Perspective Articles<br />

Altered TGF-b signaling in fetal fibroblasts: What is known<br />

about the underlying mechanisms?<br />

Mariëlle Walraven, et al.<br />

The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: Acute phase 14<br />

Shahriar Shahrokhi, et al.<br />

Erythropoietin, a novel repurposed drug: An innovative treatment<br />

for wound healing in patients with diabetes mellitus<br />

Saher Hamed, et al.<br />

Chronic venous leg ulcer treatment: Future research needs<br />

Gerald Lazarus, et al.<br />

A randomized controlled trial of larval therapy for the debridement<br />

of leg ulcers: Results of a multicenter, randomized,<br />

controlled, open, observer blind, parallel group study<br />

Elizabeth Mudge, et al.<br />

Wounds (SÅR) vol. 21, no 4, 2013<br />

www.saar.dk<br />

Offering nationwide telemedicine wound assessment of<br />

patients with cancer wounds<br />

Betina Lund-Nielsen<br />

Clothing and hygiene when healing wounds and in nursing<br />

Maria Plaschke<br />

Illness, normality and self-care: diabetic foot ulcers and the<br />

logic of freedom of choice<br />

Signe Lindgård Andersen, Vibeke Steffen<br />

The pH of skin care products in the area of skin nuisances<br />

and wounds<br />

Magne Skjervheim<br />

First experiences with Optima pH 4 gel<br />

Bodo Günther<br />

Wund Management, vol. 8, no 2, <strong>2014</strong><br />

English abstracts are available from www.mhp-verlag.de<br />

Zur Sauerstoffpartialdruckmessung bei chronischen<br />

Wunden<br />

Major-Amputationen in Deutschland<br />

Standard für die Publikation von Fallstudien<br />

Sich Kümmern und interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit –<br />

Ein Fallbeispiel aus der Hausarztpraxis<br />

Das ICW e. V. Wundsiegel – Zertifzierung von Wundbehandlungseinrichtungen<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 79


EWMA<br />

n<br />

GNEAUPP<br />

adrid · Spain<br />

14-16 May <strong>2014</strong><br />

Grupo Nacional para el Estudio y Asesoramiento<br />

en Úlceras por Presión y Heridas Crónicas<br />

Javier Soldevilla Agreda<br />

GNEAUPP Director<br />

EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Conference in Madrid, Spain<br />

The 24th Conference of the European Wound<br />

Management Association (EWMA-GNEAUPP<br />

<strong>2014</strong>) will be a historic event in many ways. The<br />

scientific programme has expanded significantly<br />

and will consist of varied key sessions, workshops,<br />

lectures, full-day streams, and satellite symposia,<br />

with scientists from Europe as well as the rest<br />

of the world. The <strong>2014</strong> conference is organised<br />

in cooperation with the Spanish Group for the<br />

Study and Advise on Pressure Ulcers and Chronic<br />

Wounds (GNEAUPP).<br />

Gerrolt Jukema<br />

EWMA Scientific Recorder<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma<strong>2014</strong>.org<br />

www.gneaupp.es<br />

Expectations for this conference are high, as<br />

more than 1,050 abstracts have been submitted,<br />

of which 148 have been invited as oral presentations<br />

in the free paper sessions, and 754 for poster<br />

presentations. In total, there will be more than<br />

320 oral presentations, and over 1,130 scientific<br />

presentations by international key speakers, free<br />

paper presenters, poster presenters, workshops<br />

facilitators, and speakers in satellite symposia. A<br />

record number of participants are expected and<br />

the exhibition is likely to be the largest in the<br />

history of EWMA.<br />

PROGRAMME HIGHLIGHTS<br />

Key sessions<br />

• Innovation, Know-How, and Technology<br />

• Interdisciplinary Perspectives<br />

• Wound Care in Home Care<br />

• Health and New Technologies<br />

• The Infected Diabetic Foot<br />

• Clinical Evidence<br />

• Implementation of New Pressure Ulcer Knowledge<br />

• Infection<br />

• Surgical Site Infection<br />

• Trauma Wounds<br />

• Oxygen and Hypoxia<br />

• Vascular Wounds<br />

• Patient Perspectives<br />

This year, the programme will have three simultaneous<br />

key sessions on clinical, evidence, and<br />

organisational topics. Furthermore, two separate<br />

workshop streams are integrated into the<br />

programme structure; one focused on practical<br />

“hands on” approaches and another dedicated<br />

to theoretical approaches. This will accommodate<br />

both the organisational and clinical topics,<br />

providing a better fit for the growing number of<br />

participants and satisfying the diverse interests in<br />

EWMA.<br />

The conference theme, Innovation, know-how, and<br />

technology in wound care, reflects both the technological<br />

and organisational need for high-quality<br />

services with the limited resources available for<br />

wound care. Health care systems throughout Europe<br />

must address the challenges of aging populations,<br />

and of more people living with chronic<br />

conditions, which have created a growing demand<br />

for optimising wound care with the help of innovative<br />

procedures and practises. The theme will<br />

be reflected in the opening plenary session as well<br />

as in a number of workshops and other sessions<br />

throughout the conference.<br />

In addition, a special session this year will be the<br />

Honorary Session in which Professor Christina<br />

Lindholm will be celebrated for her long-standing<br />

work and achievements in wound management.<br />

80<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


EWMA<br />

MADRID<br />

A city where you will find everything,<br />

Madrid is home to cutting-edge facilities,<br />

devoted professionals, and modern<br />

infrastructure, allowing you to easily adhere<br />

to the most demanding standards of quality.<br />

Furthermore, you will find a booming<br />

culture, a thriving lifestyle, and warm, friendly,<br />

passionate people. Madrid is a thriving cosmopolitan<br />

city in which a perfect balance has been struck between<br />

entertainment and business. Thanks to all this, the<br />

EWMA <strong>2014</strong> conference promises to be a unique<br />

experience.<br />

The <strong>2014</strong> programme will offer guest sessions from several<br />

organisations active in thematic issues related to wound<br />

healing and management. Guest sessions include, among<br />

others, a joint session between the European Pressure Ulcer<br />

Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and EWMA, as well as sessions<br />

by the Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association<br />

(DEBRA), the European Society for Clinical<br />

Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), the European Tissue<br />

Repair Society (ETRS), and the Ibero-Latin American<br />

Society of Ulcers and Wounds (SILAUHE).<br />

The full-day streams are extremely popular among EWMA<br />

conference delegates and will offer more in-depth presentations<br />

and discussions within particular fields of knowledge.<br />

At the EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> full-day symposia, the<br />

topics will be Diabetic Foot/Pie Diabetico Day, e-Health<br />

Day, and Veterinary Wound Healing. In addition, a Spanish<br />

Symposium will be offered at the conference.<br />

DIABETIC FOOT DAY/PIE DIABETICO SYMPOSIUM<br />

A key diabetic foot activity is the 1-day symposium scheduled<br />

for Thursday, 15 May <strong>2014</strong>. Current diagnostic and<br />

intervention strategies for diabetic foot ulcers and amputation<br />

prevention in Spain, which has one of the highest<br />

amputation rates in people with diabetes, will be presented<br />

and discussed. Multidisciplinary care by specialized units<br />

has proved useful in preventing major amputations in<br />

patients with complicated foot ulcers. However, major<br />

challenges remain in establishing this model in Spain,<br />

and some of these obstacles will be discussed at the symposium.<br />

The symposium also offers the opportunity to<br />

review state-of-the-art concepts and techniques within the<br />

field of saving the diabetic foot through achieving better<br />

treatment outcomes and health economic savings in<br />

multidisciplinary treatment structures, as recommended<br />

in the international consensus guidelines. On this occasion,<br />

central stakeholders from the International Working<br />

Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF), Spanish and international<br />

diabetes organisations, as well as policymakers<br />

and politicians, will participate in panel discussions and<br />

presentations to discuss how current treatment plans are<br />

conducted and to identify future strategies toward achieving<br />

better standards of care for diabetic foot patients.<br />

eHEALTH SYMPOSIUM – eHealth in wound care –<br />

From pilot projects to routine care<br />

More and more often, eHealth is being introduced as an<br />

important means to solve the future challenges our health<br />

care systems are facing. eHealth solutions are perceived as<br />

essential tools to enable more care to be provided outside<br />

of hospitals and to facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration<br />

and communication across units and sectors to optimise<br />

continuity of care. The hope is that using these technologies<br />

will lead to responsive care of higher quality at lower<br />

WORKSHOPS<br />

• Russian workshops<br />

• Debridement<br />

• Pain Management<br />

• Challenges in Diagnosis<br />

• Paediatric Patients<br />

• Nutrition<br />

• Maggot Therapy<br />

• Diabetic Foot Wounds<br />

• Biofilms<br />

• Use of Information Technology<br />

• Skin Complications<br />

• Pressure Redistribution Devices<br />

• Innovation with and for User Value Creation<br />

• Trends in Healthcare<br />

• Clinical Photography in Wounds<br />

• Optimising the Performance of Postural Changes<br />

• Lawsuits for Pressure Ulcers<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 81


EWMA<br />

PUBLICATIONS <strong>2014</strong><br />

Document by AAWC, AWMA & EWMA:<br />

Managing Wounds as a Team<br />

The document provides a universal model for the<br />

adoption of a team approach to wound care.<br />

Publication: April <strong>2014</strong><br />

EWMA Document:<br />

Home Care-Wound Care<br />

The document uncovers the preconditions that<br />

are necessary to provide safe, high-quality care for<br />

wound patients in a home care setting.<br />

Publication: May <strong>2014</strong><br />

EWMA<br />

Study Recommendations<br />

Study recommendations for clinical investigations<br />

in leg ulcers and wound care. An easy-to-use<br />

guidance document for the novice researcher in<br />

wound care.<br />

Publication: May <strong>2014</strong><br />

82<br />

costs. What we see now is rapid development of available<br />

technologies with ever-increasing examples of regions and<br />

countries where eHealth is already part of routine care.<br />

eHealth is here to stay and will forever change the way<br />

care is delivered.<br />

As these changes and developments will also affect<br />

wound care provision, EWMA finds it exceedingly important<br />

to, for the second time, address this topic with a<br />

full-day symposium.<br />

The symposium will delve into current trends and developments<br />

at the policy level, the current implementation<br />

status of telemedicine in wound care, and recent technological<br />

developments. The symposium will conclude with<br />

a key session exploring the barriers and facilitators related<br />

to large-scale implementation of eHealth and discuss the<br />

challenges related to generating evidence on clinical effectiveness<br />

and cost efficiency.<br />

EWMA has invited some of Europe’s leading experts,<br />

researchers, and experienced practitioners within the field<br />

of eHealth and wound care to guide the audience through<br />

these topics. The eHealth symposium at this years conference<br />

is one of the activities that EWMA and The European<br />

Health Telematics Association (EHTEL) have committed<br />

to deliver as consortium partners in the EU funded project,<br />

United4Health.<br />

VETERINARY WOUND MANAGEMENT AND<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE SYMPOSIUM<br />

We are proud to announce the launch of this new symposium<br />

organised in association with the Veterinary Wound<br />

Healing Association (VWHA). The symposium is based<br />

on the One Health Approach and will include talks from<br />

leading veterinary practitioners, researchers, and health<br />

professionals with expertise in antimicrobial resistance.<br />

The objectives of the EWMA/VWHA symposium are to<br />

provide a unique platform from which scientists and other<br />

experts from veterinary and human wound management<br />

and public health can share new knowledge, to identify<br />

interfaces between veterinary and human wound research<br />

and management and build the capacity to draw on their<br />

synergies, and to build an interdisciplinary, international<br />

network with a multidimensional perspective on wound<br />

management.<br />

Let’s join forces in bringing together the European wound<br />

healing community in its mission to raise awareness of<br />

wound management and drive the wound management<br />

agenda forward across Europe. We look forward to welcoming<br />

you in Madrid!<br />

m<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Strong when wet 1,2<br />

Gentle on the budget 3<br />

Clean one-piece removal – high wet strength 1,2<br />

High absorbency – up to 7-day wear time 1,2<br />

Minimal dressing shrinkage – may help sustained coverage 1,4<br />

Minimal lateral wicking – may help to reduce the risk of<br />

peri-wound maceration 2,5 References: 1. DOF DS/10/056/R1. 2. Case Series Evaluation: The Use of DURAFIBER on Exuding Wounds. Wounds UK 2012, Vol 8, No 3.<br />

Wound Management<br />

Smith & Nephew<br />

Medical Ltd<br />

101 Hessle Road<br />

Hull HU3 2BN<br />

UK<br />

T +44 (0) 1482 225181<br />

F +44 (0) 1482 328326<br />

Trademark of Smith & Nephew<br />

© Smith & Nephew February <strong>2014</strong><br />

48169<br />

3. DOF DS/014/051/R. 4. DOF DS/11/187. 5. DOF DS/10/042/RI.<br />

For patients. For budgets. For today. All references relate to in vitro testing excluding 2.


EWMA<br />

ADVOCACY ACTIVITIES UPDATE<br />

THE PATIENT SAFETY AND PRESSURE ULCERS PREVENTION AGENDA<br />

Salla Seppänen,<br />

EWMA President<br />

and Chair of the<br />

EWMA Advocacy Group<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

EWMA plays an important role in the continuous<br />

effort to raise awareness about<br />

wound prevention and effective wound<br />

care within relevant EU institutions such as the<br />

European Parliament and the European Commission.<br />

Since the latest update in October 2013<br />

about EWMA’s advocacy activities, I am happy<br />

to announce an important achievement regarding<br />

the Patient Safety and Pressure Ulcers prevention<br />

agenda, which EWMA has been pursuing<br />

in collaboration with the Eucomed Advanced<br />

Wound Care Sector (AWCS) group.<br />

Furthermore, EWMA has now joined the<br />

newly initiated Joint Action on Chronic Disease<br />

(CHRODIS-JA) programme of the European<br />

Commission.<br />

Multidisciplinary wound care and pressure<br />

ulcer prevention mentioned in the European<br />

Parliament report 1<br />

In October 2013, the European Parliament (EP)<br />

adopted the own-initiative report by MEP Oreste<br />

Rossi on “Patient Safety including the prevention<br />

and control of healthcare associated infections” 1 .<br />

The report specifically mentions multidisciplinary<br />

wound care and prevention of pressure ulcers, and<br />

urges member states to implement or increase<br />

measures to support multidisciplinary wound care<br />

and pressure ulcer prevention.<br />

EWMA has actively contributed to the work<br />

process that has led to the adoption of MEP Rossi’s<br />

own-initiative report. Earlier in 2013, a EWMA<br />

policy paper on Patient Safety and Pressure Ulcers<br />

(which is available for download at www.ewma.<br />

org) was elaborated by previous EWMA President<br />

Prof. Zena Moore, who also presented on<br />

the Prevention of Healthcare Associated Infections<br />

in a May 2013 workshop hosted by the EP<br />

and MEP Rossi. Materials from this meeting are<br />

available at www.europarl.europa.eu/document/...<br />

T66710EN.pdf<br />

1. This report is a reaction to the 2009 European Commission recommendation<br />

on “Patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare<br />

associated infections” and how this recommendation has been implemented<br />

by the Member States. The full text of the repor is available at<br />

www.europarl.europa.eu/...=EN&ring=A7-2013-0320<br />

EWMA recognises that the adoption of the<br />

report by the EP sends a strong signal of support<br />

and increased awareness of these matters to the<br />

Member States.<br />

European Chronic Disease Collaboration<br />

launched in January <strong>2014</strong><br />

The Joint Action on Chronic Disease (CHRO-<br />

DIS-JA) programme of the European Commission<br />

(EC) was initiated at a kick-off meeting in<br />

Madrid 29-30 January <strong>2014</strong>. EWMA has been<br />

invited to join the programme as a Collaborating<br />

Partner Organisation, and has accepted this invitation<br />

with the objective to advocate for increased<br />

focus on diabetes complications, in particular diabetic<br />

foot ulcers.<br />

The CHRODIS-JA integrates a large number<br />

of European health care partners, including national<br />

authorities, European associations, and research<br />

institutions. EWMA expects to join forces<br />

with these other associations to advocate for actions<br />

to improve the prevention and treatment of<br />

the major complications of diabetes.<br />

Continued participation in the Innovation<br />

Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing<br />

EWMA continues to participate in the European<br />

Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy<br />

Ageing (EIP-AHA). EWMA has been a partner<br />

of the action group on Integrated Care since the<br />

beginning of 2012.<br />

Interest in the EIP-AHA has grown tremendously,<br />

and the partnership now includes several<br />

hundred representatives from regional development<br />

organisations, health care authorities, research<br />

institutions, and non-governmental associations.<br />

Activities are divided into several working<br />

groups, of which EWMA continues to follow<br />

those of the Workforce Development and Care<br />

Pathways.<br />

During the spring of <strong>2014</strong>, EWMA will continue<br />

its networking activities within the EIP-<br />

AHA. Amongst other activities, the <strong>final</strong> versions<br />

of the two documents on “Home Care Wound<br />

Care” and “Managing Wounds as a Team” will<br />

be shared with the working groups. m<br />

84<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Now available –<br />

DURAFIBER Ag with<br />

antimicrobial silver<br />

Strong when wet 1–3<br />

Gentle on the budget 4<br />

Sustained antimicrobial activity (in vitro) – for up to 7 days<br />

against a broad spectrum of pathogens 5–7<br />

Clean one-piece removal – high wet strength 1–3<br />

High absorbency – up to 7-day wear time 1–3<br />

Minimal dressing shrinkage – may help sustained coverage 1<br />

Request a free sample at: www.tryDURAFIBERAg.com<br />

Wound Management<br />

Smith & Nephew<br />

Medical Ltd<br />

101 Hessle Road<br />

Hull HU3 2BN<br />

UK<br />

T +44 (0) 1482 225181<br />

F +44 (0) 1482 328326<br />

Trademark of Smith & Nephew<br />

© Smith & Nephew February <strong>2014</strong><br />

48171<br />

References: 1. DOF DS/10/060/R1. 2. OR-DOF/28. 3. DS/12/093/DOF.<br />

4. DOF DS/014/051/R. 5. DOF 1004007. 6. DOF 1009011. 7. DOF 1009012.<br />

For patients. For budgets. For today. All references relate to in vitro testing excluding 2.


EWMA<br />

Christina Lindholm – Honorary Speaker at<br />

Salla Seppänen,<br />

EWMA President<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

Christina has inspired those<br />

around her with her gentle,<br />

passionate, unassuming, and yet<br />

powerful, way of being. It is said that<br />

in the quiet you are enabled to hear the<br />

dreams of others. Christina exemplifies<br />

this saying in her unique ability to listen<br />

to those around her, enabling her to fully<br />

understand their experiences and help<br />

guide them through their clinical and<br />

professional practice more effectively.<br />

With her enormous energy, Christina<br />

has pushed the boundaries of research<br />

and practice, trail blazing her way towards<br />

improving clinical practice for the<br />

benefit of patients in Sweden and be-<br />

yond. Indeed, Christina co-authored a ground-breaking<br />

research paper that changed the perception of how painful<br />

leg ulcers are for patients. Through this work, Christina<br />

stressed the importance of clinicians understanding the<br />

patients’ experience, thereby bringing to the fore the significance<br />

of adopting a “human” approach to wound care.<br />

Christina is an internationally acclaimed professor of<br />

nursing and former research chief at the Karolinska<br />

University Hospital in Sweden. Her PhD in 1993 comprised<br />

five studies on leg ulcer epidemiology, treatment,<br />

health economics, and quality of life. Her later research<br />

has focused on wound infections, infection control, and<br />

pressure ulcers.<br />

In leading and influencing at an international level,<br />

Christina has been at the centre of a broad range of international<br />

ventures. She was the editor-in-chief of the<br />

THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME AN HONORARY LECTURER<br />

HAS BEEN APPOINTED BY EWMA.<br />

previously published Swedish Wound <strong>Journal</strong> “Sår”,<br />

a council member (and first president) of the Swedish<br />

Association of Tissue Viabilty Nurses (SSiS), one of the<br />

founders of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

(EPUAP) and a member of the EWMA Council from<br />

1994-2008. During her years in the EWMA Council,<br />

Christina made significant contributions to the activities<br />

and development of EWMA. In 2000, she was responsible<br />

for a very successful EWMA Conference, held in Stockholm,<br />

Sweden. This conference became the starting point<br />

for the development of the EWMA Cooperating Organisations<br />

programme. Christina played a crucial role in this<br />

and has subsequently contributed to the development of<br />

multidisciplinary wound management organisations in<br />

the Balcans and the Baltic States.<br />

In <strong>2014</strong>, Christina is hosting another European wound<br />

conference in Stockholm, the 17th Annual Meeting of<br />

EPUAP held 27-29 August.<br />

EWMA 2000 STOCKHOLM<br />

Throughout the years, Christina has ensured a good collaboration<br />

between EWMA and EPUAP with the objective<br />

to promote high quality wound management. Her work<br />

on “Stop Pressure Ulcer Day” has yielded particular success<br />

in raising awareness of pressure ulcers and highlighting<br />

the real difference that collaborative work can make in<br />

achieving successful reduction in both the prevalence and<br />

incidence of pressure ulcers.<br />

86<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


EWMA n GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Christina Lindholm is a registered nurse, PhD in<br />

Medicine (Dermatology & Surgery), senior professor<br />

at Sophiahemmet University, and a wound consultant<br />

to the Karolinska University Hospital and Dalen<br />

Geriatric hospital. She is a member of the executive<br />

board of European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

(EPUAP). Christina has published more than 70<br />

scientific papers and 10 scientific reports on wound<br />

management and received several scientific awards.<br />

She has published the Scandinavian textbook on<br />

wounds, and several chapters in national and international<br />

textbooks. She is a well-recognised international<br />

lecturer. Her main scientific interest is pressure<br />

ulcers and wound microbiology.<br />

EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

HONORARY LECTURE THURSDAY 15 MAY, 14:30-15:10<br />

During her long engagement in EWMA and the EWMA<br />

Education Committee, Christina has contributed significantly<br />

to the educational activities and has given numerous<br />

presentations and lectures at the EWMA conferences. She<br />

has also written the leading schoolbook “Sår” (Wounds)<br />

that is used in all nursing education and wound education<br />

in Sweden.<br />

Christina is a credit to the nursing profession and an inspirational<br />

leader. She was Director of Research and Development<br />

in Nursing at Uppsala University Hospital, a<br />

director of research in Caring Sciences at the Karolinska<br />

University Hospital, and held a professorial chair at the<br />

University of Kristianstad. Christina has supervised five<br />

PhD students, and is presently supervising an additional<br />

three. She is an expert nurse in the International Council<br />

of Nurses and a consultant to the National Institute of<br />

Health and Social Society in Sweden. In addition, she<br />

is a member of the editorial committee of the <strong>Journal</strong> of<br />

Wound Care and frequently reviews papers for many other<br />

scientific journals. Christina lectures on pressure ulcers<br />

and wound management worldwide and is currently a<br />

professor at Högskolan Kristianstad University in Sweden.<br />

Aristotle once wrote: “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence,<br />

then, is not an act, but a habit.” This quotation truly<br />

captures the essence of Christina Lindholm. m<br />

EPUAP <strong>2014</strong><br />

17th Annual Meeting of<br />

the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

27 -29 August <strong>2014</strong> · Stockholm, Sweden<br />

PRESSURE ULCERS<br />

FROM BIRTH<br />

TO DEATH<br />

Prevention, Treatment<br />

and Rehabilitation<br />

Organised by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

in cooperation with<br />

the Swedish Association of Tissue Viability Nurses SSiS<br />

and Sophiahemmet University<br />

www.epuap<strong>2014</strong>.org<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


EWMA<br />

EWMA’s commitment to<br />

FIGHTING<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE<br />

Salla Seppänen,<br />

EWMA President<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

Infection is one of the most frequent complications<br />

in wound care. Consequently, both<br />

antibiotics and non-antibiotic antimicrobial<br />

agents are readily used in the treatment of wounds.<br />

However, the remarkable healing power of antibiotics<br />

in particular has invited widespread and<br />

often inappropriate use. This misuse and overuse<br />

of antibiotics has led to resistance among bacteria<br />

and consequent treatment complications,<br />

increased healthcare costs, and general concern<br />

for the societal healthcare consequences.<br />

EWMA believes that advanced modern wound<br />

care can complement antibiotic treatment. Therefore,<br />

we are actively advocating prudent and appropriate<br />

use of antibiotics in wound care. We also<br />

advocate that a clear discrimination between the<br />

use of antibiotics and non-antibiotic antimicrobial<br />

agents should be made.<br />

Last year, EWMA made a sizeable contribution<br />

to the resistance debate by publishing the position<br />

document Antimicrobials and Non-healing<br />

Wounds. In this document, leading wound experts<br />

described the controversies surrounding the<br />

use of both antibiotics and non-antibiotic antimicrobial<br />

agents in wound management and aimed<br />

to raise interest in how to solve these problems for<br />

future use of antimicrobials.<br />

However, publishing Antimicrobials and Nonhealing<br />

Wounds is not the end of EWMA’s activities<br />

in the field of antimicrobials. As discussed<br />

below, EWMA is committed to ending the inappropriate<br />

use of antibiotics and defusing the ticking<br />

time bomb of antimicrobial resistance.<br />

Promoting THe Appropriate use<br />

of Antimicrobials in Wound<br />

Management<br />

The World Health Organisation has identified<br />

the following key factors that contribute to the<br />

general misuse of antimicrobials: diagnostic uncertainty,<br />

lack of skills and failure to properly<br />

utilise clinical guidelines. As a clinical discipline,<br />

wound management comprises all of these factors.<br />

Healthcare professionals need guidance and<br />

education regarding structured management of<br />

antimicrobial treatment in wound care. They<br />

need to understand that, to be effective, antimicrobial<br />

treatment should be targeted to both the<br />

appropriate wound and the appropriate patient.<br />

Guidelines for the management of specific wound<br />

types do exist. However, a guidance tool with a<br />

key focus on treatment with antibiotics and nonantibiotic<br />

antimicrobial agents is lacking but<br />

much sought after by health professionals.<br />

These issues are addressed in a new EWMA<br />

project that sets sail this year. The overall aim of<br />

the project is to develop a clinical decision support<br />

tool that will facilitate the appropriate use of antimicrobials<br />

in wound management. Although it<br />

is expected to aid in clinical decision-making, the<br />

tool will also present an outline of identified best<br />

practices of treatment with antibiotics and nonantibiotic<br />

antimicrobial agents. EWMA believes<br />

that providing this approach can reduce mistakes<br />

in those hectic moments when decisions are made.<br />

In support of this viewpoint, our goal is to make<br />

the tool as hands-on as possible and to offer health<br />

professional decision support at the bedside. The<br />

first step is to make a ‘pocket guide’ (flowchart),<br />

but the possibility of a software application for<br />

smart phones and tablet computers will also be<br />

investigated.<br />

The One Health Approach<br />

Focusing on antimicrobial use in humans alone is<br />

not adequate. EWMA believes that the challenge<br />

of antimicrobial resistance must be faced using<br />

the One Health Approach. Only through the collaborative<br />

effort of multiple disciplines—working<br />

locally and globally—will there be a chance to<br />

combat the rise and spread of antimicrobial resistance.<br />

In support of this viewpoint, EWMA is now<br />

working to build alliances with veterinary wound<br />

initiatives and other interdisciplinary initiatives<br />

concerning antimicrobial resistance.<br />

Therefore, we are very proud to welcome you<br />

to the Symposium on Veterinary Wound Management<br />

and Antimicrobial Resistance, which<br />

88<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


will be held at this year’s EWMA Conference in Madrid.<br />

The symposium is a collaborative initiative between the Veterinary<br />

Wound Healing Association and EWMA who share the<br />

goal of promoting education and research into the scientific<br />

basis and clinical management of wounds. The objective of the<br />

symposium is to provide a unique platform from which scientists<br />

and other experts in the veterinary and human wound<br />

management disciplines, as well as public health professionals,<br />

can share knowledge, identify interfaces and build the capacity<br />

to draw on the synergies.<br />

EWMA’s EU Advocacy activities related to<br />

antimicrobial resistance<br />

Even within the European Union, scientific policies on the use<br />

of antimicrobial agents vary greatly and result in diverse practices<br />

in the local healthcare systems. Thus, both political incentives<br />

and scientific strategies are needed to stimulate changes<br />

in practice. To facilitate change, the EU is now calling upon<br />

its member states to develop and ensure awareness among<br />

public and health professionals of the threat of antimicrobial<br />

resistance and measures available to counter the problem.<br />

In February, EWMA responded to a public consultation<br />

regarding the use of nanosilver. The public consultation was<br />

launched by the European Commission’s Scientific Committee<br />

on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).<br />

In the response, it was expressed that EWMA believe in the<br />

use of non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents as the first line<br />

of defence against topical infections and that this approach<br />

could help save valuable antibiotics for urgent and last-resort<br />

treatment of life-threatening conditions. However, to improve<br />

the evidence base, large-scale clinical studies to investigate the<br />

clinical efficacy of non-antibiotic antimicrobial agents (antiseptics),<br />

including silver, are needed and should be encouraged<br />

and incentivised.<br />

EWMA is continuously contributing to the EU’s commitment<br />

to face the challenges of antimicrobial resistance. Read<br />

more about the advocacy activities of EWMA in this issue.<br />

Biofilm courses<br />

Last year, EWMA offered its first practical course on biofilm.<br />

The cause was developed in association with the University of<br />

Copenhagen. It was a great success; for <strong>2014</strong>, two courses are<br />

planned that would include even more individual hands-on<br />

experiments in the laboratories. The biofilm courses introduce<br />

the participants to the topic of biofilms and their huge impact<br />

on chronic infections. Through lectures and a full day of<br />

hands-on experiments, the participants gain an understanding<br />

of biofilms and useable knowledge of how and why to implement<br />

biofilms into their research or product portfolio. m<br />

UPCOMING INITIATIVES<br />

IN <strong>2014</strong> -2015<br />

EWMA leg ulcer recommendations<br />

The objective of this project is to produce a practical<br />

guidance document on leg ulcer treatment, that may<br />

be applicable within the different clinical settings for<br />

leg ulcer treatment in Europe.<br />

EWMA recommendations on Negative<br />

Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)<br />

These recommendations will describe the available<br />

NPWT devices (including their application and use),<br />

the health economic aspects of use of NPWT technology<br />

and the eHealth perspectives on the use of<br />

NPWT technology.<br />

Promoting Appropriate Use of Antibiotics<br />

and Non-Antibiotic Antimicrobial Agents<br />

in Wound Care<br />

The goal of this project is to develop a clinical decision<br />

support tool. The tool will facilitate appropriate<br />

use of antibiotics and non-antibiotic antimicrobial<br />

agents in wound management.<br />

Wound survey Germany<br />

The objective of the survey will be to identify the<br />

number and type of wounds under treatment, and<br />

provide an estimate of the resource consumption<br />

directly attributable to wound care at an organisational<br />

level.<br />

This will be carried out in collaboration with the German<br />

Wound Organisation ICW.<br />

Home Care-Wound Care UK<br />

A guideline for wound care within the UK home care<br />

services will be developed, based on the recommendations<br />

provided by the EWMA Home Care - Wound<br />

Care document. This will be done in collaboration<br />

with relevant organisations in the UK.<br />

EWMA recommendations for nurse education<br />

The recommendations will define learning outcomes<br />

related to the different levels of education. The<br />

objective is to eliminate inconsistencies in wound<br />

care education within European nurse education<br />

programmes.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 89


EWMA<br />

Home Care-Wound Care<br />

Sebastian Probst<br />

Chair of the EWMA<br />

Home Care Wound Care<br />

Author group<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

At the EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> Conference<br />

in Madrid (14-16 May), EWMA<br />

is launching a new document that will<br />

highlight the challenges of managing and providing<br />

modern, advanced wound care outside the<br />

controlled clinical environment in patients’ own<br />

homes. The Home Care-Wound Care document<br />

will be presented at a key session on Friday 16<br />

May, 08:00-09:30.<br />

With this document EWMA aims to generate<br />

critical discussion and debate regarding the<br />

prerequisites, conditions, and knowledge/skills of<br />

healthcare practitioners that are required to manage<br />

wounds at home. In addition, the document<br />

provides specific recommendations for wound care<br />

at home. These recommendations are presented<br />

from the organisational, patients’, and health care<br />

professionals’ points of view.<br />

The background for Home Care-Wound Care is<br />

the dramatic shift in location of health care delivery<br />

from hospital towards the home care setting<br />

that has taken place during the past decade. Because<br />

health economic considerations have lead to<br />

an earlier discharge of hospitalised patients 1 , more<br />

patients with a complex pathological picture (including<br />

wounds) are being treated at home 2 . The<br />

challenges of providing wound care in the home<br />

care setting is underscored by patient chronicity:<br />

76% of patients with chronic wounds have three<br />

or more comorbid conditions including hypertension,<br />

vascular disease, and arthritis and up to 46%<br />

have diabetes 3 . Furthermore, evidence suggests<br />

that many patients receiving health care services<br />

at home never receive a diagnosis of wound aetiology<br />

2,4 .<br />

EWMA has recognised that there is a paucity<br />

of research focusing on the subject of home care<br />

wound care from a clinical perspective 2,4-7 . This<br />

gap can best be illustrated by the fact that there are<br />

no guidelines or recommendations of minimum<br />

requirements for providing best care to patients<br />

with wounds and their families in the home care<br />

setting.<br />

With this background in mind, EWMA initiated<br />

the development of the Home Care-Wound<br />

Care document. To provide a multi-country perspective<br />

on the provision of home care wound<br />

care across Europe, we collaborated with the German<br />

Wound Association, Initiative Chronische<br />

Wunden e.V. (ICW), and British Tissue Viability<br />

Society (TVS), with support from the non-profit<br />

organisation HomeCare Europe.<br />

The authors are:<br />

n Sebastian Probst, Zurich University of<br />

Applied Sciences ZHAW, Department of<br />

Health, Winterthur, Switzerland<br />

n Salla Seppänen, Senior Lecturer, Mikkeli<br />

University of Applied Sciences, Department<br />

of Health Care, Mikkeli, Finland<br />

n Veronika Gerber, Initiative Chronische<br />

Wunden e.V, Spelle, Germany<br />

n Georgina Gethin, Senior Lecturer, School<br />

of Nursing & Midwifery, NUI Galway,<br />

Galway, Ireland<br />

n Alison Hopkins, Tissue Viability Society,<br />

CEO Accelerate CIC, Mile End Hospital,<br />

London, UK<br />

n Rytis Rimdeika, Kaunas University Hospital,<br />

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive<br />

Surgery, Kaunas, Lithuania <br />

m<br />

1. Bartkowski, R., [Length of hospital stay due to DRG reimbursement].<br />

Ther Umsch 2012; 69: 1, 15-21.<br />

2. Bliss, D.Z., Westra, B.L., Savik, K., et al., Effectiveness of wound, ostomy<br />

and continence-certified nurses on individual patient outcomes in home<br />

health care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2013; 40: 2, 135-42.<br />

3. Friedberg, E., Harrison, M.B.,Graham, I.D., Current home care<br />

expenditures for persons with leg ulcers. <strong>Journal</strong> wound ostomy<br />

continence nursing 2002; 29: 4, 186-192.<br />

4. Westra, B.L., Bliss, D.Z., Savik, K., et al., Effectiveness of wound, ostomy,<br />

and continence nurses on agency-level wound and incontinence<br />

outcomes in home care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2013; 40: 1,<br />

25-53.<br />

5. Pieper, B., Templin, T., Dobal, M., et al., Home care nurses’ ratings of<br />

appropriateness of wound treatments and wound healing. <strong>Journal</strong> wound<br />

ostomy continence nursing 2002; 29: 1, 20-28.<br />

6. Pieper, B., Templin, T., Dobal, M., et al., Wound prevalence, types, and<br />

treatments in home care. Adv Wound Care 1999; 12: 3, 117 - 126.<br />

7. Jorgensen, S.F., Nygaard, R.,Posnett, J., Meeting the challenges of<br />

wound care in Danish home care. J Wound Care 2013; 22: 10, 540-5.<br />

90<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Submit your next paper to<br />

Phlebologie<br />

Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phlebologie<br />

Organ der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für<br />

Phlebologie, Bulletin de la Société Suisse de<br />

Phlébologie<br />

Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische<br />

Angiologie der Deutschen Dermatologischen<br />

Gesellschaft<br />

Organ des Berufsverbandes der Phlebologen e.V.<br />

Als Forum für die europäische phlebologische Wissenschaft<br />

widmet sich die CME-zertifizierte Zeitschrift allen<br />

relevanten phlebologischen Themen in Forschung und<br />

Praxis: Neue diagnostische Verfahren, präventivmedizinische<br />

Fragen sowie therapeutische Maßnahmen<br />

werden in Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten diskutiert.<br />

Die offiziellen Mitteilungen und Leitlinien der Deutschen<br />

Gesellschaft für Phlebologie werden regelmäßig<br />

publiziert, verschiedene Foren bieten Gelegenheit zum<br />

Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Klinik und Praxis.<br />

redaktion@phlebologieonline.de<br />

www.phlebologieonline.de


EWMA<br />

Nordic Diabetic Foot Task Force:<br />

Status and Future Activities<br />

Magnus Løndahl, MD,<br />

Consultant Endocrinologist<br />

Department of Endocrinology<br />

and Reproductive<br />

Medicine<br />

Skånes University Hospital<br />

Sweden<br />

Klaus Kirketerp Møller,<br />

MD,<br />

Orthopedic Consultant<br />

Department of Orthopaedics,<br />

Research Unit for<br />

Amputations and Wounds<br />

Hvidovre Hospital<br />

Denmark<br />

www.<br />

nordicdiabeticfoot.org<br />

Aim of the Nordic<br />

Diabetic Foot Task Force<br />

The Nordic Diabetic Foot (NDF) Task Force is a<br />

network of national and international health care<br />

clinicians with different disciplinary backgrounds<br />

with the aim of promoting the systematic implementation<br />

of guidelines for diabetic foot care in<br />

Nordic countries.<br />

Planned activities<br />

To reach its aim, the NDF Task Force will initiate<br />

and support various activities at the national<br />

level that highlight the gap between recommended<br />

guidelines and actual clinical practice for diabetic<br />

foot care. These activities will be undertaken by<br />

national working groups in each country. Findings<br />

from these activities will be used to engage local<br />

health authorities and national-level policy makers<br />

and to push for initiatives that support the further<br />

implementation of best practices. The NDF Task<br />

Force will also host a biennial NDF symposium<br />

to actively promote and support the systematic<br />

implementation of best practices in diabetic foot<br />

care in Nordic countries.<br />

Network structure<br />

The overall strategic planning and prioritization<br />

of the NDF project will be undertaken by the<br />

steering group of the NDF Task Force. National<br />

working groups in each Nordic country will develop<br />

and manage project activities (figure 1). These<br />

groups will be composed of individuals with clinical<br />

expertise in orthopaedic surgery, cardiovascular<br />

Steering Group members. From left to right:<br />

Klaus Kirketerp Møller (DK), Magnus Löndahl (SWE),<br />

Tore Julsrud Berg (NO) and Vesa Juutilainen (FIN).<br />

surgery, plastic surgery, general surgery, endocrinology,<br />

and diabetology as well as wound care<br />

specialists and podiatrists. Policy makers, health<br />

care administrators, and industry representatives<br />

will also be involved as dialogue partners.<br />

Steering group meeting<br />

The steering group met in Copenhagen on February<br />

14, <strong>2014</strong>. This was the first formal meeting<br />

since the launch of the initiative at last year’s<br />

EWMA conference. The meeting was very productive,<br />

with members agreeing and deciding<br />

upon how to proceed toward the establishment of<br />

national working groups and more detailed planning<br />

of the upcoming NDF symposium.<br />

Figure 1. Network structure<br />

Steering Committee<br />

Nordic Diabetic Foot<br />

Task Force<br />

Organising Committee<br />

Nordic Diabetic Foot<br />

Symposium<br />

Swedish<br />

Working Group<br />

Norwegian<br />

Working Group<br />

Finnish<br />

Working Group<br />

Danish<br />

Working Group<br />

92<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Nordic Diabetic Foot<br />

Symposium <strong>2014</strong><br />

Establishment of national working<br />

groups<br />

One of the main priorities in the near future is the establishment<br />

of national working groups. An initial step is to<br />

map and describe the current diabetic foot care situation<br />

in each Nordic country. Although these descriptions may<br />

be similar across countries, they are also expected to reveal<br />

national variations in how diabetic foot care is organised<br />

and provided. The next step will be to develop advocacy<br />

strategies for moving toward implementing nationwide<br />

best practices in diabetic foot care as described by clinical<br />

guidelines for each Nordic country.<br />

Symposium<br />

At the steering group meeting, a draft program was created<br />

for the NDF symposium, which is planned for November<br />

5-6, <strong>2014</strong>.<br />

Specifically, the symposium will:<br />

1) Offer up-to-date educational information on current<br />

best practices in various aspects of diabetic foot treatment,<br />

and<br />

2) Set an agenda for moving toward implementing best<br />

practices in diabetic foot care in Nordic countries.<br />

This symposium is a unique opportunity to gather clinicians<br />

with different disciplinary backgrounds who have an<br />

interest in actively developing the organisation and quality<br />

of care for diabetic foot patients in their regions and municipalities.<br />

Primary target groups for the symposium are:<br />

n Representatives of multidisciplinary foot care teams<br />

at diabetic foot centers and/or hospital units responsible<br />

for diabetic foot treatment,<br />

n Doctors and nurses in orthopaedic surgery, cardiovascular<br />

surgery, plastic surgery, endocrinology, and<br />

diabetology as well as wound care specialists and podiatrists,<br />

n Representatives from general practice organisations,<br />

n Policy makers and health care administrators, and<br />

n Industry representatives.<br />

After invitation of speakers and <strong>final</strong> revision, the program<br />

will be announced at www.nordicdiabeticfoot.org/. Those<br />

who sign up to receive newsletters will be notified when<br />

the program is available.<br />

For further information, please contact the NDF Conference<br />

Secretariat at info@cap-partner.eu. <br />

m<br />

Join us to take an active role<br />

in implementing Best Practice<br />

Diabetic Foot Care in<br />

the Nordic countries<br />

5-6 November <strong>2014</strong> Malmö, Sweden<br />

The program will cover a mix of;<br />

n Traditional presentations<br />

n Interactive session with centre presentations<br />

based on submitted contribution<br />

n Hands on workshops<br />

n Meet the expert sessions<br />

– addressing best practice treatment regimes<br />

n Concluding panel debate defining strategies<br />

to pursue implementation of Guidelines<br />

Examples of topics to be covered;<br />

n Basic pathophysiology of diabetic foot problems<br />

n Introduction to IWGDF guidelines<br />

n Overview of current situation of care in<br />

the Nordic Countries<br />

n Screening<br />

n Diagnosing neuropathy<br />

n Diagnosing and treating charcoot foot<br />

n Vascular Assessment<br />

n Debridement<br />

n Surgery and use of flaps<br />

n Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy<br />

n Choice of dressings<br />

n Offloading<br />

n Amputation and rehabilitation<br />

n Role of podiatry<br />

n Organisation of diabetic foot teams<br />

n Quality control and registers<br />

n Patient education and compliance<br />

Venue<br />

Symposium dates<br />

Stadionmässan, Malmö 5-6 November <strong>2014</strong><br />

Workshops<br />

Registration and information<br />

7 November <strong>2014</strong> www.nordicdiabeticfoot.org<br />

Supported by<br />

Nordic Diabetic Foot Task Force & Symposium <strong>2014</strong> Sponsor:<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1<br />

www.nordicdiabeticfoot.org


EWMA<br />

Developing a Diabetic Foot Treatment<br />

– Progress and Perspectives<br />

Gerald Zöch,<br />

Professor of<br />

plastical surgery<br />

Peter Kurz,<br />

CEO, Nurse<br />

WPM Wund Pflege<br />

Management GmbH<br />

Stefan Krasnik<br />

Head of Scientific<br />

Department<br />

WPM Wund Pflege<br />

Management GmbH.<br />

Nursing scientist<br />

Correspondence:<br />

peter.kurz@w-p-m.at<br />

Conflict of interest: none<br />

Introduction<br />

A comparison of international prevalence rates<br />

of diabetic foot issues reveals that Austria has a<br />

tremendous need for improvement. The Austrian<br />

amputation rate of 19/100.000 patients compared<br />

to international levels of 3/100.000 indicates that<br />

systemic changes are urgently needed to effectively<br />

treat diabetic foot patients. Such changes will reduce<br />

the risk of limb loss in individual patients. International<br />

data also indicates that enormous cost<br />

savings can be achieved by reducing the numbers<br />

diabetic foot ulcers and major amputations. To reduce<br />

the Austrian amputation rate, long-standing<br />

members of the Austrian Wound Association have<br />

launched a strategy with five aims, each designed<br />

to address a specific intervention area.<br />

Aim 1 – Prevention<br />

Reduce the risk of diabetic foot syndrome by periodic<br />

screening.<br />

General practitioners currently treat 80 % of Austria’s<br />

diabetic patients. Unfortunately, the national<br />

health insurance company does not reimburse<br />

physicians for the costs of performing neuropathy<br />

and blood flow screenings. A small disease management<br />

programme in Austria achieved a rapid<br />

decrease in the number of diabetic foot ulcers by<br />

paying for screening and educating practitioners.<br />

Therefore, reimbursed screening is the first step<br />

toward reducing the number of diabetic foot syndromes<br />

in Austria. Based on current international<br />

evidence, paid screening and intensive staff training<br />

on screening methods, diagnosis, and diabetic<br />

food treatment can reduce the diabetes foot syndrome<br />

rate. Assuming that every major amputation<br />

costs approximately 50.000 €, the Austrian<br />

health system could save about 120 Mio € by<br />

implanting proper preventive measures. 1<br />

Aim 2 – Increase awareness<br />

Enhance patient education regarding<br />

“living with diabetes” and risk management<br />

to reduce diabetic foot problems.<br />

Despite the strong efforts of several national and<br />

international institutions, the consequences of<br />

diabetes are not well known in Austrian society.<br />

To address this problem, further awareness campaigns<br />

have to be organised.<br />

To this end, Austria’s ministry of health recently<br />

founded a working group focused on enhancing<br />

patient education.<br />

Aim 3 – Organisation of treatment<br />

Improve the treatment of diabetic foot patients<br />

by reorganising.<br />

Only a few diabetes centres are established<br />

throughout the country, making it difficult to<br />

provide comprehensive treatment according<br />

to international standards. The planned <strong>2014</strong><br />

restructuring of the Austrian Health Care System<br />

will also reorganise diabetic foot treatment.<br />

Based on international projects, the treatment<br />

should work on three levels.<br />

n Level 1: Basic treatment of diabetic foot syndrome<br />

by general practitioners and diabetes<br />

nurses<br />

n Level 2: Advanced treatment in specialised<br />

diabetes centres by specialised staff (e.g.<br />

wound experts, podologists, etc.)<br />

n Level 3: Special treatment in hospitals by a<br />

group of medical specialists<br />

Although the screening methods are not very<br />

time consuming, the treatment of diabetic patients<br />

requires a special environment and trained,<br />

qualified staff (nurses), and these are not available<br />

throughout Austria.<br />

Aim 4 – Education<br />

Implement international educational curricula<br />

to prevent diabetic foot syndrome.<br />

There is a lack of courses specialised in handling<br />

patients with diabetes in Austria. In addition,<br />

podology is not defined as an Austria specialty.<br />

For situations like this, the IWGDF (International<br />

Working Group for Diabetic Foot) provides a curriculum<br />

for countries with weak or no diabetic<br />

foot treatment concepts. For the first time in<br />

Austria, this curriculum will be implemented as<br />

the “Diabetic Foot Care Assistant” course; it will<br />

start in mid <strong>2014</strong> and provide basic information<br />

on how to treat diabetic patients’ feet.<br />

94<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Programme in Austria<br />

25th Conference of the<br />

European Wound Management Association<br />

Aim 5 – Analysing register data<br />

Analyse nationally collected data to improve access<br />

to information. (Austrian Impatient Quality Indicators)<br />

Austria’s government recently announced the beginning<br />

of a widespread analysis of standardised national data to<br />

define and visualise quality criteria concerning several<br />

health topics. These Austrian Inpatient Quality Indicators<br />

(A-IQI) are designed to measure health-care quality based<br />

on ICD and individual treatment. They enable the health<br />

system to define and test quality against general data.<br />

Therefore implementation of the A-IQI should provide<br />

an objective view of quality of care concerning diabetes.<br />

The A-IQI will facilitate evaluation of the major amputation<br />

registry and will elucidate the lack of quality information<br />

regarding diabetic foot treatment.<br />

The first results should be available in <strong>2014</strong>/15.<br />

Discussion<br />

After long medical discussions and intensive lobbying<br />

work by members of AWA (Austrian Wound Association)<br />

and the ÖDG (Austrian Society for Diabetes), the “diabetic<br />

foot” problem has <strong>final</strong>ly become a political issue in<br />

Austria. Some very important changes have been scheduled<br />

within the planned restructuring of the health care<br />

system to prevent complications in patients with diabetes<br />

and improve the treatment of diabetic feet. For four out<br />

of five aims set out in the intervention strategy defined<br />

by the AWA, initial steps towards improvement have been<br />

taken. However, this is only the start. Reimbursement for<br />

preventive services in primary care remains to be defined.<br />

Within areas where improvement are already taking place,<br />

AWA will continue to advocate for political and economic<br />

support for initiatives that contribute to further improvement<br />

of diabetic foot care in Austria. <br />

m<br />

EWMA 2015<br />

LONDON · UK<br />

13-15 MAY 2015<br />

WOUND CARE<br />

– SHAPING THE FUTURE<br />

A PATIENT, PROFESSIONAL, PROVIDER<br />

AND PAYER PERSPECTIVE<br />

Dr Gerald Zöch will provide additional information<br />

concerning this topic at the annual <strong>2014</strong> EWMA Congress<br />

in Madrid, Spain.(15th May, 13:15-14:15, “<br />

International perspectives on implementation”)<br />

Literature:<br />

(1) Apelqvist J, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Larsson J, Persson U.: Long-term costs for foot<br />

ulcers in diabetic patients in a multidisciplinary setting; Foot Ankle Int. 1995<br />

Jul;16(7):388-94.<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1<br />

WWW.EWMA2015.ORG<br />

WWW.EWMA.ORG<br />

WWW.TVS.ORG.UK


EWMA<br />

EWMA Participation in the first<br />

UEMS meeting for European Scientific<br />

Societies<br />

Rytis Rimdeika,<br />

MD, Ph.D.<br />

Clinical Director for<br />

Surgery, Head of Department<br />

of Plastic and<br />

Reconstructive Surgery<br />

EWMA Council memeber<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

On March 1, <strong>2014</strong> the European Union<br />

of Medical Specialists (UEMS) invited<br />

EWMA to the first meeting for European<br />

Scientific Societies. The objective was to<br />

uncover areas and activities of mutual interest<br />

between participating societies and the UEMS.<br />

EWMA Council member Rytis Rimdeika represented<br />

EWMA at the meeting. In this article, he<br />

reports his reflections from the meeting.<br />

European Reference Networks<br />

From the perspective of the UEMS, the primary<br />

objective of the meeting was to discuss a proposal<br />

from the UEMS to establish a number of European<br />

Reference Networks. The initiative was<br />

presented by Dr. Andrzej Rys, Director, and Dr<br />

Enrique Terol, Policy Officer and Directorate<br />

General for Health and Consumers, of the European<br />

Commission.<br />

These networks should secure high-quality<br />

treatment of rare diseases (defined as a prevalence<br />

of ≤5/10,000) for all EU citizens. The establishment<br />

of these networks is an initiative related to<br />

the EU Directive 2011/24 on the application of<br />

patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. The<br />

UEMS and the European Scientific Societies have<br />

been requested to provide their input with respect<br />

to this directive. Specifically, input was requested<br />

on the identification of domains and groups of<br />

diseases, ways to establish networks with a multidisciplinary<br />

and multi-speciality approach, and<br />

selection criteria for European Reference network<br />

About the European Union of Medical Specialists<br />

UEMS is the representative organisation of the National Associations<br />

of Medical Specialists in Europe. The UEMS Council is working through<br />

39 Specialist Sections and their European Boards. They address topics<br />

related to continuing medical education and professional development,<br />

the harmonisation of postgraduate training, and the organisation of<br />

European examinations. Through this collaboration, the UEMS sets<br />

the standards for high-quality healthcare practice and transmits<br />

recommendations to the Authorities and Institutions of the EU and<br />

the National Medical Associations.<br />

centres. In addition to rare diseases, there is a focus<br />

on complex and cost-intensive treatment that<br />

requires a particular concentration of expertise.<br />

The networks are also intended as focal points for<br />

medical training and research, registries, information<br />

dissemination, and evaluation. The directive<br />

lists six basic criteria for defining reference centres,<br />

as follows:<br />

n Have knowledge and expertise in diagnostics,<br />

follow up, and patient management<br />

(documented via evidence and good<br />

outcomes);<br />

n Follow a multidisciplinary approach;<br />

n Offer a high level of expertise and have the<br />

capacity to produce good practice guidelines<br />

and implement outcome measures and<br />

quality control;<br />

n Make a contribution to research;<br />

n Organise teaching and training activities;<br />

n Collaborate closely with centres of expertise<br />

as well as national and international<br />

networks.<br />

Inclusion of wound specialists may be relevant to<br />

some of these networks. EWMA will therefore follow<br />

the continued work and propose involvement<br />

wherever relevant.<br />

Further EWMA perspectives on the<br />

UEMS collaboration<br />

Through this meeting, EWMA has initiated a<br />

more formal contact with the UEMS. UEMS is<br />

primarily composed of single-specialty sections<br />

(e.g., surgery) and sub-speciality subdivisions<br />

(e.g., surgical oncology). However, the organisation<br />

also includes Multidisciplinary Joint Committees<br />

and Thematic Federations that include<br />

several specialities. A list of specialities and committees<br />

can be found at the UEMS website:<br />

www.uems.eu/about-us/medical-specialties. The<br />

EWMA Council will discuss the opportunity to<br />

suggest establishment of a multidisciplinary joint<br />

committee on wounds within the UEMS organisation.<br />

<br />

m<br />

96<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS 2013<br />

SPECIAL EWMA<br />

MEMBERS OFFER<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Care (JWC) is the leading<br />

source of tissue viability research and<br />

information. JWC is essential reading for all<br />

specialists who wish to enhance their practice<br />

and stay ahead of developments<br />

in wound management and tissue viability.<br />

The journal is internationally renowned for its<br />

cutting edge and state-of-the-art research<br />

and clinical articles, as well as its coverage of<br />

management, education and novel therapies.<br />

©<br />

THOMSON<br />

REUTERS<br />

2012<br />

IMPACT FACTOR<br />

JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS 2013<br />

1.906©<br />

THOMSON<br />

REUTERS<br />

2012<br />

IMPACT FACTOR<br />

© THOMSON REUTERS<br />

1.906<br />

© THOMSON REUTERS<br />

j o u rnal of w o u nd ca r e<br />

C<br />

W C<br />

? ?<br />

volume 23. number 1. january <strong>2014</strong><br />

? ? ?<br />

JWC has been associated with an Impact Factor<br />

(IF) of 1.906 for 2012, corresponding to a total<br />

number of citations of 1327.<br />

The journal is indexed on Medline, Scopus, CINAHL<br />

and the Thomson Reuters’ Science Citation Index-<br />

Expanded and Current Contents/Clinical Medicine<br />

“The <strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Care is an<br />

extremely valuable resource that contains<br />

a wealth of peer-reviewed papers detailing<br />

the latest advances in wound care research.<br />

A must read for clinicians, academics and<br />

researchers who want to advance their<br />

own knowledge/practice and keep abreast<br />

of the wound care literature.”<br />

Caroline McIntosh, Head of Podiatry,<br />

National University of Ireland<br />

NPWT for sternal wound infections following<br />

congenital heart surgery<br />

W.A.R. scores in patients with chronic leg ulcers: results of a multicentre study<br />

Evaluating the reasons underlying treatment nonadherence in VLU patients: Part 1 of 2<br />

Venous leg ulcers: What about well-being?<br />

Physiological and appearance characteristics of skin maceration in elderly women<br />

with incontinence<br />

JWC_23_01_Cover.indd 1 02/01/<strong>2014</strong> 14:25<br />

SAVE 10% – SUBSCRIBE TODAY<br />

Obtain access to the online archive containing all content<br />

published in JWC since 1999 with an online subscription † .<br />

EWMA members quote EWMA14 to receive your discount *<br />

† Online archive accessible only via a online only OR print and online subscription. *Promotional code required<br />

Visit: www.magsubscriptions.com/jwc<br />

or call us on: +44 (0) 1722 716 997<br />

Join us for debate and discussion:<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> of Wound Care


The power of the<br />

WOuNDPROFESSIONAL<br />

The Dutch organisation for<br />

Wound Professionals aims at improving<br />

cooperation and organisation in woundcare<br />

to archieve optimal multidisciplinary<br />

structured woundcare.<br />

This will advance all levels<br />

of care, to benefit both practitioners<br />

and patients<br />

The organisation for<br />

Wound Professionals<br />

with a<br />

multidisciplinairy<br />

approach<br />

Multidisciplinairy cooperation:<br />

The nessecity and challenge<br />

to achive<br />

Our new name: Dutch Organisation for Wound Professionals<br />

Dutch organisations for Wound Professionals, Schoolstraat 13A, Nijkerkerveen, +31332453208 - info@novw.org - www.novw.org


EWMA<br />

Managing Wounds as a Team<br />

– Exploring the concept of a<br />

Team Approach to Wound Care<br />

A joint Position Document of the:<br />

Association for the Advancement of Wound Care (AAWC) USA<br />

Australian Wound Management Association (AWMA) Australia<br />

European Wound Management Association (EWMA) Europe<br />

Zena Moore<br />

Chair of the Interdisciplinary<br />

Document<br />

Author group<br />

The World Health Organisation argues that<br />

a group of professionals who actively bring<br />

the skills of different individuals together<br />

with the aim of clearly addressing the health care<br />

needs of patients and the community will strengthen<br />

the health system and lead to improved clinical<br />

and health-related outcomes. Indeed, a number of<br />

systematic reviews have noted a positive impact<br />

from the use of interdisciplinary interventions for<br />

chronic diseases such as heart failure or mental illness,<br />

and in individuals at risk of poor nutrition.<br />

However, when it comes to wound care, available<br />

evidence for the team approach is fragmented.<br />

This project, which explores the concept of a team<br />

approach to wound care, was conceptualised in<br />

the context of this background.<br />

Key Session at EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Conference<br />

This spring, the author group will be busy presenting<br />

their work and they are proud to invite you to<br />

take part in a Key Session that is entirely focused<br />

on the team approach to wound care, during<br />

which the findings of the project will be presented.<br />

The Key Session will be held on Thursday 15 May,<br />

16:55-17:55 at the EWMA-GNEAUPP Conference<br />

in Madrid.<br />

In addition, the document will be presented at<br />

several other international conferences including<br />

ICIC 14, Brussels. Belgium; AAWC Spring, Orlando,<br />

USA; AWMA <strong>2014</strong>, Gold Coast, Australia;<br />

and EFFORT <strong>2014</strong>, London, UK. m<br />

ewma@ewma.org<br />

www.ewma.org<br />

In this document, AAWC, AWMA, and EWMA<br />

focus on the development of a universal model<br />

for the adoption of a team approach to wound<br />

care. To achieve this goal the document explores<br />

existing evidence for the team approach to wound<br />

care and discusses the barriers and facilitators for<br />

a successful team approach to wound care.<br />

“Managing Wounds as a Team” is for everyone<br />

involved in wound care – from carers to decision<br />

makers.<br />

NOW AVAILABLE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD VIA:<br />

WWW.JOURNALOFWOUNDCARE.COM<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 99


EWMA<br />

Corporate A<br />

Corporate Sponsors<br />

BSN medical GmbH<br />

www.bsnmedical.com<br />

www.cutimed.com<br />

Paul Hartmann AG<br />

www.hartmann.info<br />

Ferris Mfg. Corp.<br />

www.PolyMem.eu<br />

Coloplast<br />

www.coloplast.com<br />

A KCI Company<br />

KCI Europe Holding B.V.<br />

www.kci-medical.com<br />

A KCI Company<br />

Wound Management<br />

Smith & Nephew Medical Ltd<br />

www.smith-nephew.com/wound<br />

ConvaTec Europe<br />

www.convatec.com<br />

Lohmann & Rauscher<br />

www.lohmann-rauscher.com<br />

Sorbion AG<br />

www.sorbion.com<br />

Flen Pharma NV<br />

www.flenpharma.com<br />

Mölnlycke Health Care Ab<br />

www.molnlycke.com<br />

Corporate B<br />

3M Health Care<br />

www.mmm.com<br />

ArjoHuntleigh<br />

www.ArjoHuntleigh.com<br />

DryMax<br />

www.absorbest.se/<br />

drymax-woundcare<br />

Söring Gmb<br />

www.soering.com<br />

Abbott Nutrition<br />

www.abbottnutrition.com<br />

B. Braun Medical<br />

www.bbraun.com<br />

MediWound Ltd.<br />

www.mediwound.com<br />

Stryker<br />

www.stryker.com<br />

Chemviron<br />

www.chemvironcarbon.com<br />

Nutricia Advanced<br />

Medical Nutrition<br />

www.nutricia.com<br />

Laboratoires Urgo<br />

www.urgo.com<br />

ABIGO Medical AB<br />

www.abigo.se<br />

Curea Medical GmbH<br />

www.curea-medical.de<br />

SastoMed<br />

www.sastomed.com<br />

PROTECTING PEOPLE, CARING FOR NATURE<br />

Welcare Industries SPA<br />

www.welcaremedical.com<br />

AOTI Ltd.<br />

www.aotinc.net<br />

Drawtex<br />

www.drawtex.com<br />

SOFAR S.p.A.<br />

www.sofarfarm.it<br />

100<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Organisations<br />

Conference Calendar<br />

Conferences <strong>2014</strong> Theme Month Days City Country<br />

Annual Conference of the Tissue Viability Society (TVS) Apr 1-2 York United Kingdom<br />

Spring Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Wound<br />

Healing Society (SAWC)<br />

Apr 23-27 Florida USA<br />

Deutscher Pflegekongress /Deutscher Wundkongress May 7-8 Bremen Germany<br />

<strong>2014</strong> Conference of the Leg Ulcer Forum May 8 Harben United Kingdom<br />

10th National Conference of the Australian<br />

A gold standard:<br />

May 7-10 Queensland Australia<br />

Wound Management Association (AWMA)<br />

Research and clinical practice<br />

24th Conference of the European Wound Management<br />

May 14-16 Madrid Spain<br />

Association (EWMA)<br />

11th European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology<br />

May 22-25 Belgrade Serbia<br />

(EADV) Spring Symposium<br />

2nd Practical Course in Biofilm Procedures<br />

in collaboration with the<br />

Jun 4-5 Copenhagen Denmark<br />

University of Copenhagen<br />

15th European Federation of National Associations of<br />

Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) Congress<br />

Jun 4-6 London United Kingdom<br />

XXVI National Congress of Vascular Nursing and Wounds<br />

Jun 5-6 Madrid Spain<br />

(AEEVH)<br />

<strong>2014</strong> International Lymphoedema Framework (ILF) Conference Jun 5-7 Glasgow Scotland<br />

17. Jahreskongress (DGfW) Jun 27-28 Bochum Germany<br />

The 2nd International course on the Neuropathic<br />

Osteoarthropathic Foot<br />

Charcot Foot Course Jul 3-5 Rheine Germany<br />

3rd Euro-Asian Forum (The Association for Wound<br />

management in Bosnia & Herzegovina (URuBiH),<br />

in cooperation with Doctors Chamber of Canton Sarajevo)<br />

Traditional and Western Medicine<br />

in the service of human well-being<br />

Aug 18-22 Sarajevo Bosnia and<br />

Herzegovina<br />

17th Annual European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Meeting (EPUAP) Aug 26-29 Stockholm Sweden<br />

User Driven Innovation Course<br />

in collaboration with the<br />

Sep 3-4 Copenhagen Denmark<br />

Danish Technological Institute<br />

33rd annual meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) Sep 11-13 Utrecht The Netherlands<br />

24th European Tissue Repair Society Annual Meeting (ETRS) Sep 11-13 Edinburgh Scotland<br />

Conference on Science and Training of the Polish Wound<br />

Sep 11-13 Mikołajki Poland<br />

Healing Society (PWMA)<br />

Diabetic Foot Study Group (DFSG) <strong>2014</strong> Sep 12-14 Bratislava Slovakia<br />

16. Jahrestagung of the Austrian Wound Association (AWA) Sep 19-20 Graz Austria<br />

DEBRA International Annual Congress Sep 19-21 Paris France<br />

1st Joint Conference of the Swiss Wound Care Societies (SAfW) Sep 24-25 Biel-Benne Switzerland<br />

<strong>2014</strong> Lindsay Leg Club Conference Sep 24-25 Worcester UK<br />

Rugby Club<br />

Pisa International Diabetic Foot Courses <strong>2014</strong> Oct 1-4 Pisa Italy<br />

National multidisciplinary Conference for Wound Professionals Wound Ecology Oct 7 Ede The Netherlands<br />

(NOVW)<br />

23rd European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Building Bridges Oct 8-12 Amsterdam The Netherlands<br />

(EADV) Congress<br />

Fall Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Wound Healing<br />

Oct 16-18 Las Vegas USA<br />

Society (SAWC)<br />

II Congress for Chronic Wounds Management of the<br />

Oct 24-25 Belgrade Serbia<br />

Serbian Wound Healing Society (SWHS)<br />

Conference of the Canadian Association<br />

Action <strong>2014</strong>:<br />

Oct 30 Toronto Canada<br />

of Wound Care (CAWC)<br />

Skin Health For Canada<br />

Nov 2<br />

Nordic Diabetic Foot Symposium Nov 5-6 Malmö Sweden<br />

VII Ibero-Latin American Congress about Ulcers and Wounds<br />

Nov 5-8 Tucuman Argentina<br />

(SILAUHE)<br />

Annual meeting of the Danish Wound Healing Society Nov 20-21 Kolding Denmark<br />

Conferences 2015<br />

25th Conference of the<br />

Wound Care – Shaping the Future May 13-15 London United Kingdom<br />

European Wound Management Association (EWMA)<br />

7th International Symposium on the Diabetic Foot (ISDF) May 20-23 The Hague The Netherlands<br />

For web addresses please visit www.ewma.org<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 101


Organisations<br />

AAWC NEWS<br />

AAWC<br />

Association for<br />

the Advancement<br />

of Wound Care<br />

Robert J. Snyder,<br />

DPM, MSc, CWS<br />

President, AAWC<br />

ABOUT AAWC<br />

As the leading interprofessional<br />

organisation in the<br />

United States dedicated to<br />

advancing the care of<br />

people with and at risk for<br />

wounds, AAWC provides<br />

a whole year of valuable<br />

benefits! Be sure to join us<br />

for near daily updates and<br />

alerts on Facebook<br />

and LinkedIn.<br />

www.aawconline.org<br />

Thank you for the opportunity to provide the<br />

readers of the EWMA journal with updated news<br />

about the Association for the Advancement of<br />

Wound Care (AAWC). As my term as President<br />

comes to an end this April, I am pleased to note<br />

that we have concentrated on the escalating epidemic<br />

of diabetic foot complications over the last<br />

two years. In an effort to foster amputation prevention,<br />

two new guidelines are under development<br />

for wound infection and diabetic foot ulcers.<br />

We are honored to be partnered with EWMA and<br />

the Australian Wound Management Association<br />

(AWMA) to soon <strong>final</strong>ize a paper on the multidisciplinary<br />

approach to wound care. Further, we<br />

continue our partnership with Health Volunteers<br />

Overseas (HVO) to provide wound and lymphedema<br />

education in Haiti, Peru, Cambodia and India.<br />

We continue to work with US-based organisations<br />

such as National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

(NPUAP) and the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders.<br />

These opportunities strengthen dialogue<br />

and cohesiveness among professional organisations<br />

and societies involved in the wound care space.<br />

Made possible by an unrestricted grant from Shire,<br />

the Association for the Advancement of Wound<br />

Care (AAWC) is pleased to award two $50,000<br />

fellowship support grants for the <strong>2014</strong>-2015 academic<br />

year. The grants will provide salary and benefit<br />

support for two (2) physician fellows (MD, DO,<br />

DPM) who will conduct research in settings that are<br />

dedicated to the multidisciplinary approach to<br />

wound care. Winners will be announced at the<br />

SAWC Spring Opening Ceremony opening<br />

ceremony on April 24th.<br />

Among our strategic objectives is to educate the<br />

generalist practitioner. In coordination with AAWC’s<br />

Corporate Advisory Panel (CAP), AAWC is developing<br />

an “access portal” where the public can obtain<br />

wound care accredited education. This education is<br />

intended to help new wound care practitioners and<br />

non-wound care specialists learn the most current,<br />

evidence-based practices in wound care. Based on<br />

a wound care pathway, the educational links can<br />

be accessed at www.aawconline.org / education- forthe-generalist.<br />

Help AAWC “WIN” the fight against<br />

chronic wounds!<br />

AAWC is offering this 11x17 inch patient-focused,<br />

educational poster (shown to the left) for free from<br />

the AAWC online store. A small shipping / handling<br />

fee is all that is required. Order your poster today at<br />

www.aawconline.org and help your patients “take<br />

part” in their wound prevention and care.<br />

Last but not least, AAWC is proud to announce a<br />

tremendous increase in membership over the last<br />

two years. With nearly 2300 members, our commitment<br />

to community, collaboration and equal partnership<br />

is still paramount. AAWC provides numerous<br />

educational benefits to our professional and<br />

patient/lay-caregiver members. Unique benefits<br />

apply to both groups and can be viewed at<br />

www.aawconline.org.<br />

Thank you so much for allowing me to share<br />

our current activities and projects with our<br />

global partners.<br />

Invitation from the<br />

Association for the Advancement of<br />

Wound Care (AAWC) to EWMA<br />

The AAWC and EWMA have collaborated on<br />

wound care activities since 2009. The most<br />

recent collaborative activity is the elaboration<br />

and publishing together with the Australian<br />

Wound Management Association (AWMA) of<br />

the document “Managing Wounds as a Team”,<br />

which provides an update on the use of interdisciplinary<br />

teams in wound care.<br />

AAWC and EWMA will extend collaboration<br />

in <strong>2014</strong>-2015 by having a member from<br />

EWMA’s board on the board of AAWC directors.<br />

The EWMA Council has agreed to appoint<br />

Jan Apelqvist, EWMA Immediate Past President<br />

and chair of the EWMA Patient Outcome Group<br />

for this position.<br />

EWMA looks forward to a further year for the<br />

collaboration with AAWC.<br />

EWMA international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

102<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Organisations<br />

EB-CLINET<br />

– Clinical<br />

Network of<br />

EB Centres<br />

and Experts<br />

Dr. Gabriela Pohla-Gubo,<br />

EB-CLINET project leader<br />

Member of the Executive<br />

Committee of DEBRA<br />

Austria and Executive<br />

Manager of the Academy at<br />

the EB House Austria<br />

www.debra.org.uk<br />

EB-CLINET<br />

– Clinical Network of EB Centres and Experts<br />

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a severe and rare<br />

skin disease. EB-CLINET was launched in 2011 to<br />

establish a clinical network of EB centres and<br />

experts across all European countries and beyond.<br />

Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB)<br />

Approximately 30,000 people in Europe live with<br />

EB. The symptoms of EB include blisters, wounds,<br />

and scars that form not only on the skin but also on<br />

the mucous membranes, including those of the<br />

mouth, eyes, and gastrointestinal tract, from the<br />

slightest mechanical stress. Complications associated<br />

with EB include pain, itching, scarring, the fusion<br />

of fingers and toes, tooth decay and tooth loss,<br />

nutritional and digestive problems, and in some<br />

cases, aggressive skin tumours. Life with EB is a tremendous<br />

challenge for patients and their families.<br />

The disorder does not yet have a cure.<br />

DEBRA Austria & EB House Austria<br />

DEBRA Austria was founded in 1995 as a patient<br />

support group for those who suffer from EB. In<br />

cooperation with the Department of Dermatology in<br />

Salzburg, Austria (General Hospital, Paracelsus<br />

Medical University), DEBRA Austria set up the EB<br />

House Austria in November 2005 with private<br />

donations and a one-time subsidy granted by the<br />

Austrian government.<br />

EB-CLINET<br />

To date, more than 400 patients with EB from<br />

24 countries in Europe and beyond have been diagnosed<br />

and/or treated at the EB House Austria. The<br />

expertise should travel, however, rather than the<br />

patient. EB-CLINET therefore intends to strengthen<br />

the collaboration between clinicians and medical<br />

centres already specialised in EB. Moreover, EB-<br />

CLINET aims to support the development of new<br />

EB centres in countries without such services.<br />

At present, EB-CLINET has 52 affiliated partners in<br />

43 countries (including 25 of the 28 EU member<br />

states, 6 additional European countries, and 12<br />

countries from outside of Europe). By cross-linking<br />

its partners, this network offers the opportunity to<br />

work collaboratively on a number of projects,<br />

including a global EB register, professional training,<br />

and elaboration of clinical practice guidelines.<br />

Moreover, EB-CLINET serves as an information<br />

channel to share and exchange relevant news<br />

about treatment or research in EB. Online information<br />

is distributed via the website (www.eb-clinet.<br />

org) and EB-CLINET eNews. Personal exchange is<br />

assured through regular workshops, trainings, and<br />

conferences, including the two EB-CLINET Conferences<br />

in 2012 and 2013, respectively.<br />

EWMA international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

The EB House Austria is a centre for cutting-edge<br />

medical treatment and targeted research. Its three<br />

units (Outpatient Clinic, Research Laboratory, Academy)<br />

meet the EU-recommended criteria for a Centre<br />

of Expertise (CE). Operation costs continue to be<br />

paid by private donations to DEBRA Austria.<br />

See www.debra-austria.org and www.eb-haus.org<br />

for more details.<br />

Encouraging research results that relate to alleviation<br />

and a causative cure of this disabling skin disease<br />

are on the horizon. EB-CLINET will be able to<br />

support the recruitment of patients for upcoming<br />

clinical trials and provide these patients with the<br />

chance to receive one of the treatment options.<br />

In this way, EB-CLINET hopes to significantly<br />

improve the quality of life for patients with EB.<br />

EB-CLINET has 52 affiliated<br />

partners in 43 countries<br />

(including 25 of the<br />

28 EU member states,<br />

6 additional European countries,<br />

and 12 countries from outside<br />

of Europe)<br />

For more details on EB-CLINET<br />

see www.eb-clinet.org.<br />

104<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


PPM-Fisteladapter<br />

TM<br />

- patented -<br />

-Set<br />

A new therapeutic option for managing<br />

open abdomen complicated by atmospheric fistulae.<br />

The fistula adapter ensures the separation<br />

of the suction from the fistula<br />

and enables an undisturbed granulation<br />

of the wound surface as well as a<br />

enterocontrolled<br />

drainage of the fistula secretions.<br />

The technique supports coverage of<br />

wound surface with mesh graft.<br />

Please visit us on our<br />

exhibition booth 10B11<br />

at the EWMA Congress<br />

14 - 16 May <strong>2014</strong>,<br />

Madrid<br />

www.phametra.de<br />

<br />

exclusive distribution


Organisations<br />

The Korean Wound Management Society<br />

KWMS<br />

Korean Wound<br />

Management<br />

Society<br />

Jong Won Rhie,<br />

MD, PhD, President<br />

www.woundcare.or.kr<br />

The Korean Wound Management Society was<br />

established in 2002 at its inaugural meeting, with<br />

a vision of integrating all realms of wound care to<br />

become a leader in wound management. The<br />

Society has grown to become the large organisation<br />

that it is now, with about 1,500 diverse members<br />

ranging from nurses and doctors to engineers,<br />

researchers and industrial members. Medical personnel<br />

come from diverse backgrounds and include<br />

nurses working in acute care hospitals, home care,<br />

intensive care units and wound care, as well as<br />

orthopaedic surgeons, burn specialists, physicians<br />

working in rehabilitation medicine, dermatologists<br />

and emergency department doctors.<br />

The Society sponsors a diverse array of academic<br />

symposia and forums. In just the past year, the<br />

Society held seven seminars and meetings. Doctors<br />

Gerit D. Mulder and David G. Armstrong spoke<br />

about diabetic foot care and management at the<br />

annual spring seminar in March. The Honam<br />

regional meeting assembled in April, and the<br />

multinational participants by converting to an international<br />

program. The Society also sponsors the<br />

Korean Wound Academy and annual forums dealing<br />

with pressure sores, wound dressing and wound<br />

education. Issues and controversies regarding<br />

patient care are discussed, and individualised care<br />

principles and treatment algorithms are developed<br />

at the Society’s gatherings. The Society publishes<br />

its conference proceedings and the <strong>Journal</strong> of the<br />

Korean Wound Management Society, a bi-monthly<br />

issue that addresses relevant topics.<br />

Along with the aforementioned conferences, interdisciplinary<br />

education is one of the Korean Wound<br />

Management Society’s main focuses. Educational<br />

programs are based on the simple and realistic<br />

notion that no single person can be an expert in all<br />

components of wound care, and thus, the Society<br />

encourages inter-professional communication.<br />

We are also intent on spreading the most practical<br />

knowledge to healthcare personnel; therefore, we<br />

work on integrating evidence-based knowledge into<br />

realistic wound management practice guidelines.<br />

Hands-on lectures at the Korean Wound Academy<br />

Voluntary activities at facilities for the homeless<br />

EWMA<br />

International Partner<br />

Organisation<br />

Korean Wound Academy met every Saturday from<br />

August 31st to September 14th. In October, the<br />

Busan regional meeting was convened and was<br />

followed by several symposia held with industrial<br />

support. Last but not least, the Education Symposium<br />

was opened in November.<br />

After its first seminar in 2003, the Society began<br />

hosting an annual seminar, usually in the spring.<br />

This meeting welcomes all those interested in<br />

wound care and is planning to open its doors to<br />

For example, the Korean Wound Academy, which is<br />

held twice a year, provides various hands-on lectures.<br />

These include the most basic principles, such as<br />

methods for wound debridement and application of<br />

negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Advanced<br />

dressing materials are being introduced to medical<br />

personnel at a rapid pace, and a large part of our<br />

educational program focuses on adequate incorporation<br />

of new dressing materials into wound care. These<br />

academies are open to all wound care personnel.<br />

106<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Collaboration with nursing groups is also an important<br />

aspect of the Society’s mission. The WOCN (Wound, Ostomy,<br />

Continence Nurse) group is very active in Korea, their<br />

motto being “Place your care in the hands of an expert.” The<br />

Society is working to provide continuous educational courses<br />

for WOCNs, standardise wound care procedures and issue<br />

certificates for these courses.<br />

Although the quality of wound care has greatly improved<br />

thanks to the many dedicated medical personnel and continued<br />

educational opportunities available to them, there are<br />

still many in need. The Society has an outreach program in<br />

which members make charity visits to those in need of wound<br />

care that are unable to reach adequate medical help. In collaboration<br />

with nursing groups, we visit local prisons and<br />

facilities for the homeless and supply care for many minor<br />

wounds.<br />

This is how life feels<br />

to people with EB.<br />

Their skin is as fragile as a butterfly’s<br />

wing. They have Epidermolysis Bullosa,<br />

a painful and currently incurable skin<br />

blistering condition.<br />

www.debra-international.org<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> of the<br />

Korean Wound<br />

Management Society<br />

We are currently welcoming international communication<br />

and collaboration. Approximately 40 members participated<br />

in the 4th Congress of the World Union of Wound Healing<br />

Societies (WUWHS) in September, 2012, and 13 members<br />

participated as stream planners. Most members actively participate<br />

in associated conferences and congresses internationally.<br />

One of the Society’s many plans is to host the Congress<br />

of the WUWHS in the near future.<br />

Through these conferences, educational meetings, and collaborations,<br />

the Society aims to provide standardised guidelines<br />

for the care of all types of wounds. Universal prevention<br />

and treatment guidelines are introduced, but the Society also<br />

wishes to provide realistic practice guidelines for different situations.<br />

For instance, care of a patient in the intensive care<br />

unit cannot be the same as care at the home of a financially<br />

compromised, bedridden, paraplegic patient, but each<br />

should receive adequate management based on the same<br />

universal principles.<br />

Wounds are inevitable and may be found anywhere there are<br />

people. However, through its educational and academic programs,<br />

the Society hopes to decrease the incidence of<br />

wounds and enable medical personnel to effectively manage<br />

each wound based on evidence-based treatment algorithms<br />

in order to significantly improve the quality of life for humankind.<br />

m<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1<br />

International.


Organisations<br />

UPDATE<br />

WAWLC<br />

World Alliance<br />

for Wound and<br />

Lymphoedema<br />

Care<br />

David Keast<br />

President of WAWLC<br />

www.WAWLC.org<br />

EWMA international<br />

Partner Organisation<br />

The World Alliance for Wound and Lymphoedema<br />

Care (WAWLC) continues the hard work on<br />

advancing sustainable prevention and care of<br />

wounds & lymphoedema in settings with limited<br />

resources.<br />

The annual executive board meeting of the<br />

WAWLC took place in Geneva in November 2013.<br />

The coordination and organisation of future initiatives<br />

and activities of the WALWC were discussed at<br />

the meeting.<br />

Development of a dressing kit<br />

Since 2012 the World Alliance for Wound and Lymphoedema<br />

Care (WAWLC) has been in the process<br />

of developing a dressing kit for use in limited<br />

resource settings. This kit will be a dynamic tool<br />

and help in providing the basic equipment for<br />

standardised wound treatment of patients in emergency<br />

situations.<br />

The first step in elaborating this kit was a Delphi<br />

like consultation launched at the end of 2012. As a<br />

second step, the material from this consultation<br />

was discussed by field and scientific experts during<br />

a WAWLC Workshop at the EWMA Conference in<br />

May 2013 in Copenhagen. Here it was discussed<br />

what minimum material is needed to constitute a<br />

standard wound kit.<br />

WAWLC Workshop at EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

During the EWMA-GNEAUPP Conference in<br />

Madrid, the third step will be elaborated at a<br />

WAWLC workshop where a revised standard kit will<br />

be presented for debate and input.<br />

This workshop will bring together experts in wound<br />

care and actors of humanitarian contexts. Bringing<br />

together these different experiences should help to<br />

define the rest of the essential wound care material<br />

that is needed to <strong>final</strong>ise the standard wound kit.<br />

A list of the material decided on during the two first<br />

steps will be circulated before the workshop.<br />

The workshop will take place on<br />

Wednesday 14 May <strong>2014</strong> at 16:45 -19:10.<br />

Annual WAWLC Symposium at CAWC,<br />

Toronto October <strong>2014</strong><br />

A <strong>final</strong> consolidation of the dressing kit will be presented<br />

at the annual WAWLC Symposium which<br />

will take place at the Canadian Association of<br />

Wound Care (CAWC) Conference from October 30<br />

- November 2, <strong>2014</strong> in Toronto, Canada. The <strong>final</strong><br />

version of the dressing kit will be circulated to<br />

wound care companies in order to have their proposal<br />

on concrete products to be included in the kit.<br />

Wound Course in West Africa<br />

In <strong>2014</strong>, a course on Chronic Wounds will be held<br />

in Cameroon in cooperation between the Faculty of<br />

Medicine and Biomedical Scienes at Yaoundé University,<br />

Cameroon and the Geneva University Hospital<br />

(HUG), Switzerland. The course includes both<br />

theory and practice and is intended for doctors and<br />

nurses as post-graduate training.<br />

Since 2002, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Switzerland,<br />

has supported the BU programme of the<br />

district hospital, Akonolinga in Cameroon. This projects<br />

falls within the now more than 30 years old<br />

fruitful exchanges between Yaoundé’s University<br />

and the HUG.<br />

Clinic in Leogane, Haiti<br />

On 25th of January – 1st of February <strong>2014</strong>, Heather<br />

Hettrick from Nova South eastern University<br />

(NSU) in Fort Lauderdale and Robyn Bjork from the<br />

International Lymphedema & Wound Care Training<br />

Institute were in Leogane, Haiti, where they provided<br />

training and logistical support for clinical staff,<br />

under the direction of WAWLC Secretariat Dr. John<br />

Macdonald. The treatment results were impressive.<br />

Dr. John Macdonald has actively pursued the reopening<br />

of the lymphedema treatment branch of<br />

the Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) Clinic at the St. Croix<br />

Hospital in Leogane, Haiti. This vision is one step<br />

away from full realization. The next steps include<br />

procuring funding for the clinic, which will serve as<br />

an epicenter for training and treatment of<br />

lymphedema secondary to LF.<br />

m<br />

INFO ON WAWLC<br />

WAWLC started as a working group in 2007 and was<br />

officially launched as a global partnership in 2009.<br />

Read more about WAWLC and current projects on the website:<br />

www.wawlc.org.<br />

108<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


SPECIAL EWMA<br />

MEMBERS OFFER<br />

INCLUDES<br />

4 FREE TISSUE<br />

VIABILITY<br />

SUPPLEMENTS<br />

British <strong>Journal</strong> of Nursing (BJN)<br />

contains the latest clinical developments,<br />

original research and evidence-based practice.<br />

Highly regarded by practitioners in the field,<br />

BJN has been called ‘the most up-to-date<br />

clinically focused journal available’ and an<br />

‘essential companion to my studies’ by our readers.<br />

Articles are written by nurses and subject to peer<br />

review by leading authorities in the profession,<br />

ensuring that only the best clinical papers and<br />

original research appear in the journal, making<br />

essential reading for all nurses whether students<br />

or specialists.<br />

With an annual subscription to BJN, you will<br />

receive 22 issues with the latest on:<br />

• Patient safety and care<br />

• Healthcare policy<br />

• Clinical practice<br />

• Education and training<br />

BJN also features supplements with a dedicated<br />

focus on areas such as, tissue viability, stoma care<br />

and oncology, offering support and assistance<br />

with your professional development.<br />

BJN Volume 23 Number 1: 1 – 68 • 9 January <strong>2014</strong> – 22 January <strong>2014</strong> British <strong>Journal</strong> of Nursing<br />

JOBS INSIDE<br />

THE ONLY FORTNIGHTLY JOURNAL FOR CLINICAL NURSES<br />

British <strong>Journal</strong> of Nursing<br />

Clinical focus:<br />

Diabetes<br />

Developments in neonatal care<br />

and nursing responses<br />

the role and development<br />

of consultancy in nursing practice<br />

9 January <strong>2014</strong><br />

£4.99<br />

Volume 23 Number 1<br />

rory’s Values s patieNt safety s professioNal issues<br />

BJON_<strong>2014</strong>_23_1_1_cover.indd 1 18/12/2013 15:33<br />

SAVE 10% – SUBSCRIBE TODAY<br />

Let BJN bring you closer to the forefront of nursing practice<br />

EWMA members quote EWMA14 to receive your discount*<br />

*Promotional code required<br />

Visit: www.magsubscriptions.com/bjn<br />

or call us on: +44 (0)1722 716 997<br />

Follow us on Twitter<br />

@BJNursing


Cooperating Organisations<br />

AEEVH<br />

Spanish Association of Vascular Nursing and Wounds<br />

www.aeevh.es<br />

AFIScep.be<br />

French Nurses’ Association in Stoma Therapy, Wound<br />

Healing and Wounds<br />

www.afiscep.be<br />

AISLeC<br />

Italian Nurses’ Cutaneous Wounds Association<br />

www.aislec.it<br />

AIUC<br />

Italian Association for the study of Cutaneous Ulcers<br />

www.aiuc.it<br />

AMP Romania<br />

Wound Management Association Romania<br />

www.ampromania.ro<br />

APTFeridas<br />

Portuguese Association for the Treatment of Wounds<br />

www.aptferidas.com<br />

AWA<br />

Austrian Wound Association<br />

www.a-w-a.at<br />

BEFEWO<br />

Belgian Federation of Woundcare<br />

www.befewo.org<br />

BWA<br />

Bulgarian Wound Association<br />

www.woundbulgaria.org<br />

CNC<br />

Clinical Nursing Consulting – Wondzorg<br />

www.wondzorg.be<br />

CSLR<br />

Czech Wound Management Society<br />

www.cslr.cz<br />

Danish Wound<br />

Healing Society<br />

CWA<br />

Croatian Wound Association<br />

www.huzr.hr<br />

DGfW<br />

German Wound Healing Society<br />

www.dgfw.de<br />

DSFS<br />

Danish Wound Healing Society<br />

www.saar.dk<br />

FWCS<br />

Finnish Wound Care Society<br />

www.suomenhaavanhoitoyhdistys.fi<br />

GAIF<br />

Associated Group of Research in Wounds<br />

www.gaif.net<br />

GNEAUPP<br />

National Advisory Group for the Study of Pressure<br />

Ulcers and Chronic Wounds<br />

www.gneaupp.org<br />

HSWH<br />

Hellenic Society of Wound Healing and Chronic Ulcers<br />

www.hswh.gr<br />

ICW<br />

Chronic Wounds Initiative<br />

www.ic-wunden.de<br />

LBAA<br />

Latvian Wound Treating Organisation<br />

LUF<br />

The Leg Ulcer Forum<br />

www.legulcerforum.org<br />

LWMA<br />

Lithuanian Wound Management Association<br />

www.lzga.lt<br />

MASC<br />

Maltese Association of Skin and Wound Care<br />

www.mwcf.madv.org.mt/<br />

International Partner Organisations<br />

Associated Organisations<br />

110<br />

AWMA<br />

Australian Wound Management Association<br />

www.awma.com.au<br />

AAWC<br />

Association for the Advancement<br />

of Wound Care<br />

www.aawconline.org<br />

CAWC<br />

Canadian Association of Wound Care<br />

www.cawc.net<br />

Debra International<br />

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa<br />

Research Association<br />

www.debra.org.uk<br />

EFORT<br />

European Federation of National Associations<br />

of Orthopaedics and Traumatology<br />

www.efort.org<br />

ILF<br />

International Lymphoedema<br />

Framework<br />

www.lympho.org<br />

KWMS<br />

Korean Wound Management Society<br />

www.woundcare.or.kr/eng<br />

NZWCS<br />

New Zealand Wound Care Society<br />

www.nzwcs.org.nz<br />

SILAUHE<br />

Iberolatinoamerican Society of<br />

Ulcers and Wounds<br />

www.silauhe.org<br />

SOBENFeE<br />

Brazilian Wound Management<br />

Association<br />

www.sobenfee.org.br<br />

WAWLC<br />

World Alliance for Wound and<br />

Lymphedema Care<br />

www.wawlc.org<br />

Leg Club<br />

Lindsay Leg Club Foundation<br />

www.legclub.org<br />

LSN<br />

The Lymphoedema<br />

Support Network<br />

www.lymphoedema.org/lsn<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1


Organisations<br />

MSKT<br />

Hungarian Wound Care Society<br />

www.euuzlet.hu/mskt/<br />

MWMA<br />

Macedonian Wound Management Association<br />

NATVNS<br />

National Association of Tissue Viability Nurses, Scotland<br />

NIFS<br />

Norwegian Wound Healing Association<br />

www.nifs-saar.no<br />

NOVW<br />

Dutch Organisation of Wound Care Nurses<br />

www.novw.org<br />

PWMA<br />

Polish Wound Management Association<br />

www.ptlr.pl<br />

SAfW<br />

Swiss Association for Wound Care (German section)<br />

www.safw.ch<br />

SAfW<br />

Swiss Association for Wound Care (French section)<br />

www.safw-romande.ch<br />

SAWMA<br />

Serbian Advanced Wound Management Association<br />

www.lecenjerana.com<br />

SEBINKO<br />

Hungarian Association for the Improvement in Care of<br />

Chronic Wounds and Incontinentia<br />

www.sebinko.hu<br />

SEHER<br />

The Spanish Society of Wounds<br />

www.sociedadespanolaheridas.es<br />

SFFPC<br />

The French and Francophone Society<br />

f Wounds and Wound Healing<br />

www.sffpc.org<br />

SSiS<br />

Swedish Wound Care Nurses Association<br />

www.sarsjukskoterskor.se<br />

SSOOR<br />

Slovak Wound Care Association<br />

www.ssoor.sk<br />

STW Belarus<br />

Society for the Treatment of Wounds<br />

(Gomel, Belarus)<br />

www.burnplast.gomel.by<br />

SUMS<br />

Icelandic Wound Healing Society<br />

www.sums-is.org<br />

SWHS<br />

Serbian Wound Healing Society<br />

www.lecenjerana.com<br />

SWHS<br />

Swedish Wound Healing Society<br />

www.sarlakning.se<br />

TVS<br />

Tissue Viability Society<br />

www.tvs.org.uk<br />

URuBiH<br />

Association for Wound Management<br />

of Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

www.urubih.ba<br />

UWTO<br />

Ukrainian Wound Treatment Organisation<br />

www.uwto.org.ua<br />

V&VN<br />

Decubitus and Wound Consultants, Netherlands<br />

www.venvn.nl<br />

WMAI<br />

Wound Management Association of Ireland<br />

www.wmai.ie<br />

WMAK<br />

Wound Management Association of Kosova<br />

WMAS<br />

Wound Management Association Slovenia<br />

www.dors.si<br />

WMAT<br />

Wound Management Association Turkey<br />

www.yaradernegi.net<br />

Other Collaborators<br />

ETRS<br />

DFSG<br />

Diabetic Foot Study Group<br />

www.dfsg.org<br />

EADV<br />

European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology<br />

www.eadv.org<br />

EPUAP<br />

European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel<br />

www.epuap.org<br />

ETRS<br />

European Tissue Repair Society<br />

www.etrs.org<br />

Eucomed<br />

Eucomed Advanced Wound Care Sector Group<br />

www.eucomed.org<br />

Home Care Europe<br />

ICC<br />

International Compression Club<br />

www.icc-compressionclub.com<br />

MSF<br />

Médecins Sans Frontières<br />

www.msf.org<br />

WUWHS<br />

The World Union of Wound Healing Societies<br />

www.wuwhs.org<br />

For more information about<br />

EWMA’s Cooperating Organisations<br />

please visit www.ewma.org<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 111


6 Editorial<br />

Science, Practice and Education<br />

9 Prevalence of Pressure Ulcers in Hospitalized Patients in Germany<br />

Heidi Heinhold, Andreas Westerfellhaus, Knut Kröger<br />

17 Excess use of antibiotics in patients with non-healing ulcers<br />

Marcus Gürgen<br />

25 Regenerative medicine in burn wound healing:<br />

Aiming for the perfect skin<br />

Magda MW Ulrich<br />

31 Promising effects of arginine-enriched oral nutritional supplements<br />

on wound healing<br />

Jos M.G.A. Schols<br />

37 Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic wounds<br />

Vladimir N. Obolenskiy, Darya A. Ermolova, Leonid A. Laberko,<br />

Tatiana V. Semenova<br />

Scientific Communication<br />

43 Results from the world’s largest telemedicine project<br />

Kristian Kidholm, Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig, Knud B. Yderstraede,<br />

Birthe Dinesen, Benjamin Schnack Rasmussen<br />

51 Nutrition and chronic wounds<br />

José Verdú Soriano, Estrella Perdomo Pérez<br />

54 The biofilm challenge<br />

Maria Alhede, Morten Alhede<br />

Innovation, know how and technolgy<br />

60 National wound care innovation centre launched in the UK<br />

Peter Vowden<br />

63 Development of tools for home monitoring in wound care<br />

Marco Romanelli, Marie Muller<br />

66 <strong>2014</strong> Education Activities<br />

Ana Maria d’Auchamp<br />

A KCI Company<br />

A KCI Company<br />

Cochrane Reviews<br />

71 Abstracts of recent Cochrane reviews<br />

Sally Bell-Syer<br />

EWMA<br />

78 EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> previous issues and other journals<br />

80 EWMA GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong> in Madrid<br />

Javier Soldevilla Agreda, Gerrolt Jukema<br />

84 Advocacy Activities update<br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

86 Christina Lindholm – Honorary Speaker at EWMA-GNEAUPP <strong>2014</strong><br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

88 EWMA’s commitment to fighting antimicrobial resistance<br />

Salla Seppänen<br />

90 Home Care-Wound Care<br />

Sebastian Probst<br />

92 Nordic Diabetic Foot Task Force: Status and Future Activities<br />

Magnus Løndahl, Klaus Kirketerp Møller<br />

94 Developing a Diabetic Foot Treatment Programme in Austria<br />

Gerald Zöch, Peter Kurz, Stefan Krasnik<br />

96 EWMA Participation in the first UEMS meeting for<br />

European Scientific Societies<br />

Rytis Rimdeika<br />

99 Managing Wounds as a Team<br />

Zena Moore<br />

Organisations<br />

PROTECTING PEOPLE, CARING FOR NATURE<br />

100 EWMA Corporate Sponsors<br />

101 Conference Calendar<br />

102 AAWC News<br />

Robert J. Snyder<br />

104 EB-CLINET – Clinical Network of EB Centres and Experts<br />

Gabriela Pohla-Gubo<br />

106 The Korean Wound Management Society<br />

Jong Won Rhie<br />

108 WAWLC update<br />

David Keast<br />

110 EWMA Cooperating Organisations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!