20.11.2014 Views

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

Journal_1_2014_final_WEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Science, Practice and Education<br />

Table 2. Treatment outcomes in the study groups (n=81; p 60<br />

Average inpatient hospital stay, days 11.0 + 2.5 23.1 + 1.5<br />

Average cost to treat one patient, EUR 785.25 1649.02<br />

a PRP clot thickness of about 1-2 mm, 45-50 ml of whole<br />

blood would be required. The volume of PRP obtained on<br />

average is 20-25% of the original volume per individual,<br />

depending on the rheological properties of the blood of<br />

each patient. The time from the moment of blood collection<br />

to wound dressing was 20-30 minutes. The PRP flat<br />

clot was covered with an atraumatic mesh dressing and<br />

a secondary dressing on top of the former. The dressing<br />

frequency was once in 7 days, allowing patient transition<br />

from inpatient to outpatient care.<br />

Thirty-seven patients in phase II of wound-healing (the<br />

reference group that included 17 men and 20 women with<br />

an average age of 69.5 ± 2.2 years with VLU (5 patients),<br />

UME (12 patients), DFS (8 patients), STU (5 patients)<br />

or DU (7 patients), with an average wound area of 79.6<br />

± 12.3 cm 2 ) received traditional topical therapy such as<br />

povidone-iodine gel, Olasol spray, Actovegin gel and modern<br />

interactive wound dressing materials.<br />

Planimetry of the wounds of all of the patients was<br />

performed every seventh day from the time the patient was<br />

enrolled in the study. After discharge from the hospital, all<br />

of the patients were followed up in an outpatient setting<br />

with a frequency of visits of once a week.<br />

Results<br />

The method that we used enabled us to obtain plasma<br />

with a platelet content of approximately 338% higher than<br />

that of whole blood. Previously, we studied the effect of<br />

PRP on the proliferative activity of human cells in vitro<br />

using M-22 human fibroblast cell culture (the study was<br />

carried out jointly with the Laboratory of Cell transplantation<br />

and Immunotyping of the Sklifosovsky Scientific<br />

Research Institute of Emergency Medicine), and we have<br />

confirmed the effectiveness of this method in terms of the<br />

PRP stimulation of regeneration processes [27-29] .<br />

At the Purulent Surgical Department of City Clinical<br />

Hospital no. 13, we conducted a randomised controlled<br />

study to evaluate the efficacy of PRP use for the treatment<br />

of chronic non-healing wounds of different aetiology.<br />

Considering the presence of wound defects mainly in<br />

the soft tissues, we used PRP in the form of a flat, gel-like<br />

clot. Results were evaluated over a 3-month period.<br />

In the study group, the average number of applications<br />

of PRP in one patient was 6.0 ± 0.6. In three patients,<br />

the large size of the wound defect after 3- 4 applications<br />

made the transplant free split the skin flap over the wound;<br />

complete epithelialisation of chronic wounds was achieved<br />

in 35 patients (85.4%) in 46.4 ± 4.3 days. The method<br />

was not effective in five patients (1 VLU, 1 UME, and 3<br />

STUs); full epithelialisation was achieved in one patient<br />

within a period of more than 90 days. In the comparison<br />

group, skin grafting was achieved in three patients, and<br />

epithelialisation of the wound up to 3 months was attained<br />

in only four patients (11.8%). Treatment failure – i.e., lack<br />

of epithelialisation of the wound within a period of 90 days<br />

– was observed in 23 patients (62.2%) in the comparison<br />

group: 2 VLUs, 9 UMEs, 6 DFSs and 6 STUs.<br />

The average duration of hospitalisation was 11.0 ± 2.5<br />

days in the study group and 23.1 ± 1.5 days in the comparison<br />

group. Importantly, the average duration of hospital<br />

treatment was 7.5 days in patients with a high content<br />

of platelets with grains in the plasma (300-600,000/ml)<br />

and 12.7 days in patients with secondary (150-290,000/<br />

ml) and low (100-130,000/ml) content of platelets on<br />

average – i.e., the efficiency of treatment with autologous<br />

PRP depends on the content of the functionally suitable<br />

platelets. The average cost of treatment for one treated<br />

patient differed by more than two fold and amounted to<br />

(at the rates of 2012) 785.25 Euros and 1649.02 Euros<br />

in the experimental and control groups, respectively. The<br />

study results are presented in Table 2.<br />

Case report<br />

Patient P., an 18-year-old male, presented to the outpatient<br />

department with a postoperative ulcerated scar and trophic<br />

ulcer in the interscapular region. In 2006, he had undergone<br />

surgical endocorrection of scoliosis using a singleplate<br />

endocorrector that was removed in 2011 due to the<br />

occurrence of multiple purulent fistulas. The wound defect<br />

was corrected by plastic repair that later resulted in scar<br />

formation and trophic ulceration. Upon primary examination,<br />

the wound defect had dimensions of 63 × 54 mm,<br />

and the wound bed was filled with sluggish granulations.<br />

No microorganisms were detected in the wound before the<br />

initiation of treatment with PRP. The PRP applications<br />

<br />

EWMA <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>2014</strong> vol 14 no 1 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!