21.11.2014 Views

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 THE UNIVERSITY OF mE DISTRICf OF COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW<br />

1. The Act begins with a statement that it is the declared policy of the District<br />

of Columbia that persons and groups have a First Amendment right to conduct<br />

demonstrations "near the object of their protest." The Act requires the MPD "to<br />

recognize and implement" this policy (sections 103, 104(a), 107(a)).<br />

2. The Act substitutes for the existing permit system a notice system under<br />

which demonstrators need not seek permission to demonstrate, but merely have<br />

to provide advance notice. The M.P.O. may then impose reasonable time, place<br />

and manner restrictions by issuing an "Approval of Plan" for the demonstration.<br />

The demonstrators may negotiate with the M.P.O. or appeal to the Mayor regarding<br />

any provisions in the plan to which they object (sections 104(b), 105,<br />

106).<br />

3. No notice is required of a group that plans to remain on sidewalks and obey<br />

traffic lights, or of a group of less than 50 persons (section 105(d)).<br />

*4. The police may not disperse or arrest demonstrators solely for failing to<br />

give advance notice, but shall accommodate such demonstrations if possible (section<br />

107(f)(1)-(2)). Abbate does the same (Abbate Settlement Agreement, Objective<br />

(b»).<br />

*5. The police may not disperse a demonstration unless a "significant number<br />

or percentage of the assembly participants" violate "or are about to" violate the<br />

law; otherwise only those in the group who are actually violating the law may be<br />

dispersed or arrested. The clear and present danger standard is articulated as "an<br />

imminent likelihood of violence endangering persons or threatening to cause significant<br />

property damage" (sections 104(b)(2)(C), 107). Abbate urges but does<br />

not require such an approach (Objective (b».<br />

*6. Dispersals must be preceded by clear and audible notices with adequate<br />

amplification, and an opportunity to leave (section 107(e). Abbate Objective<br />

(b).<br />

7. Police may not encircle demonstrators unless there is "probable cause" for<br />

and an intention to make specific arrests of a "significant number or percentage"<br />

of the participants, or to provide for the safety of the demonstrators (section<br />

lOB).<br />

*B. Police officers must wear identifying badges and name plates, and, while<br />

policing demonstrations, must wear "enhanced" identification "even· if wearing<br />

riot gear" (sections 109, 321). Abbate Objective (c).<br />

*9. The police must contemporaneously record every arrest, and the Chief of<br />

Police must account in writing for any failure to do so (section 110). Abbate<br />

Objective (a).<br />

*10. Restraints, including handcuffs, may be placed on those arrested only if<br />

necessary, and not in any manner that causes pain (section 111). Abbate Objectives<br />

(i), 0), and (k).<br />

*11. The M.P.O. must have adequate staff and processing systems to "ensure"<br />

that persons arrested in a demonstration are promptly processed for release or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!