22.11.2014 Views

Critical reflection in a TESL course: mapping conceptual change

Critical reflection in a TESL course: mapping conceptual change

Critical reflection in a TESL course: mapping conceptual change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Data collection<br />

Data analysis<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Pre-<strong>course</strong> group<br />

concept map<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the work of Fischer, Bruhn, Grasel, and Mandl (2002) who<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that <strong>in</strong> order to ensure greater ownership of the learn<strong>in</strong>g process,<br />

students should construct their own concept maps, rather than have a pre<strong>course</strong><br />

map prepared by the <strong>course</strong> <strong>in</strong>structor, the seven participants<br />

were each asked on the first day of class to construct a concept map<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g the topic (‘What does teach<strong>in</strong>g English as a second language<br />

(<strong>TESL</strong>) mean to you?’) placed <strong>in</strong>side a circle with several nodes, or spokes,<br />

emanat<strong>in</strong>g straight from that circle like a bicycle wheel. These pre-<strong>course</strong><br />

maps would be used for diagnostic purposes by the <strong>in</strong>structor to gauge the<br />

extent of the participants’ prior knowledge and beliefs. On completion of<br />

the maps, the participants were asked to share their answers dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a peer group discussion and <strong>reflection</strong> session. At the start of the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

class, and <strong>in</strong> order to clarify what they placed <strong>in</strong> their concept maps,<br />

a class group discussion was conducted where the participants were<br />

encouraged to further explore their prior experiences and beliefs about<br />

<strong>TESL</strong>.<br />

On the f<strong>in</strong>al day of class, the participants were aga<strong>in</strong> asked to construct<br />

concept maps on the same topic and follow<strong>in</strong>g the same written and<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed directions as on the first day of class. When the participants had<br />

completed their post-<strong>course</strong> maps, they were given their pre-<strong>course</strong> maps<br />

for comparison and asked to write comments about any <strong>change</strong>s they<br />

noticed between the two maps and the reasons for these <strong>change</strong>s. Each<br />

participant was also <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> order to discuss and reflect on the<br />

<strong>change</strong>s that had occurred <strong>in</strong> these maps and any further perceptions they<br />

had of the <strong>course</strong> they had just completed. In addition, I also attempted to<br />

contact each participant two years after they had taken the <strong>course</strong> to assess if<br />

they still held the same post-<strong>course</strong> beliefs about <strong>TESL</strong> (I was only able to<br />

contact two of the orig<strong>in</strong>al seven).<br />

In order to analyse the data, a keyword method was applied to the database of<br />

categories that were developed. For example, as a result of tak<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>course</strong>,<br />

onetypeofcategorythatemergedonthe concept maps <strong>in</strong>dicated that many of<br />

the participants <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>course</strong> concepts <strong>in</strong> terms of critical <strong>reflection</strong>.<br />

Keywords from this category <strong>in</strong>cluded ‘beliefs’, ‘teacher personality’, and ‘selfawareness’<br />

among others. Another <strong>in</strong>terpretation was research and theory<br />

and keywords from this category <strong>in</strong>cluded ‘theory acquisition’, ‘research’,<br />

‘corrective feedback’, and ‘l<strong>in</strong>k theory to practice’, among others. Each<br />

participant’smapwasanalysedasfollows:eachkeywordwasnumberedand<br />

a frequency count was noted along with any connections made to other<br />

concepts. The number of keywords from the seven <strong>in</strong>dividual maps was<br />

totalled and a pre-<strong>course</strong> group concept map was constructed after the first<br />

class and a post-<strong>course</strong> group map was constructed after the last class <strong>in</strong><br />

order to provide a visual of what the participants as a whole said they believed<br />

about <strong>TESL</strong>. In order to check for reliability of my cod<strong>in</strong>g of categories,<br />

I tra<strong>in</strong>ed two other coders and we had an <strong>in</strong>tercoder reliability of about<br />

85 per cent.<br />

The pre-<strong>course</strong> group map is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. This illustrates the issues<br />

(<strong>in</strong> order of frequency) as follows: Teach<strong>in</strong>g theory/methods (6), Language<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g/acquisition (5), Culture (4), Professional development (3), Motivation<br />

<strong>Critical</strong> <strong>reflection</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>TESL</strong> <strong>course</strong> 223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!