22.11.2014 Views

Quintessence Journals - Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Quintessence Journals - Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Quintessence Journals - Sandra Kalil Bussadori

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Copyright<br />

Influence of Cavity Lining and Remaining Dentin<br />

Thickness on the Occurrence of Postoperative<br />

Hypersensitivity of Composite Restorations<br />

Not for Publication<br />

<strong>Quintessence</strong><br />

for<br />

Not<br />

by<br />

Florian Wegehaupt a /Herbert Betke b /Nicole Solloch c /Ulrike Musch a,b /Annette Wiegand a,b /<br />

Thomas Attin d,e<br />

Purpose: To investigate the influence of the remaining dentin thickness after cavity preparation, calcium hydroxide<br />

lining, and two restorative systems on the occurrence of postoperative pain or hypersensitivity.<br />

Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-three fillings were placed in 123 healthy patients. The remaining<br />

dentin thickness after caries excavation was measured with the Prepometer device at the deepest area of the cavity.<br />

The cavities were allocated to three different groups (shallow, medium, and deep) on the basis of the Prepometer results.<br />

The decision to use a calcium hydroxide liner or not was made by tossing a coin. Cavities which were to be later<br />

treated with an indirect restoration were restored with a buildup material. The other cavities were treated with a hybrid<br />

composite. After 6 months, the patients were re-examined and interviewed concerning postoperative pain incidents<br />

or hypersensitivity. A logistic regression was performed for the statistical analysis.<br />

Results: Logistic regression showed no statistically significant influence of any of the three different variables “cavity<br />

depth”, “calcium hydroxide liner” and “restorative material” on the occurrence of pain or hypersensitivity.<br />

Conclusion: The occurrence of pain or hypersensitivity does not depend on the remaining dentin thickness, calcium<br />

hydroxide lining, or the restorative system used in the present study.<br />

Keywords: dentin thickness, calcium hydroxide liner, postoperative pain, hypersensitivity, composite, adhesive.<br />

J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 137-141. Submitted for publication: 14.12.07; accepted for publication: 05.03.08.<br />

In the last 50 years, different studies have shown that<br />

caries-linked dental hard tissue loss is directly related to<br />

the presence and fermentation processes of oral bacteria.<br />

15,25 The aim of caries treatment is the removal of bacteria<br />

and softened hard tissue. When caries has progressed<br />

a Assistant Professor, Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology,<br />

University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.<br />

b Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry<br />

and Periodontology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.<br />

c Dentist in Private Practice; Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive<br />

Dentistry and Periodontology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen,<br />

Germany.<br />

d Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Preventive Dentistry and Periodontology,<br />

Georg August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.<br />

e Professor and Chair, Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology,<br />

University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.<br />

Correspondence: Dr. F. Wegehaupt, Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology<br />

and Cariology, University of Zürich, Plattenstr. 11, CH-8032 Zürich,<br />

Switzerland. Tel: +41-44-634-3439, Fax: +41-44-634-4308. e-mail:<br />

florian.wegehaupt@zzmk.uzh.ch<br />

into deep dentin areas, the remaining dentin thickness after<br />

excavation can be distinctly reduced. The remaining<br />

dentin thickness estimated to be necessary for protection of<br />

the dental pulp against injury or inflammation has changed<br />

over the years. Stanley 31 suggested that the remaining<br />

dentin under the cavity preparation should be at least 2 mm<br />

thick to guarantee protection of the pulp. Other investigations<br />

found a minimum thickness of 1 mm or even 0.5 mm<br />

to be necessary for pulp protection. 21,26 During treatment,<br />

it is often difficult for the dentist to decide how much dentin<br />

is left over the pulp. The dentist can perform only a rough estimation<br />

of the remaining dentin thickness, since the variability<br />

of different teeth and different calcification degrees<br />

of the pulp chambers render a clear estimation difficult. 22,28<br />

Hypersensitivity after adhesive restorations is observed<br />

with a frequency of 5% to 26%. 5 This phenomenon might<br />

be caused by penetration of components of the adhesive<br />

systems into the pulp, or by micro-/nanoleakage, allowing<br />

movement of the dentin liquid in those dentin areas where<br />

optimal adhesion and sealing of the dentin was not accomplished.<br />

It can also be speculated that parts of the adhesive<br />

systems might enter the pulp via a thin dentin<br />

Vol 11, No 2, 2009 137


Wegehaupt et al<br />

Table 1 Application protocols for the two kinds of adhesives and restorative materials<br />

used in the study<br />

Definitive filling:<br />

Prime & Bond NT and Spectrum<br />

Buildup filling:<br />

Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and LuxaCore<br />

Not for Publication<br />

Copyright<br />

<strong>Quintessence</strong><br />

for<br />

Not<br />

by<br />

Enamel etching for 40 s, dentin etching<br />

for 20 s with 37% phosphoric acid<br />

↓<br />

Rinsing with water for 30 s and<br />

gently drying with oil-free air<br />

↓<br />

Application of Prime&Bond NT<br />

on the cavity surface for 20 s<br />

↓<br />

Gentle air drying for 5 s<br />

↓<br />

Light curing of the adhesive for 20 s<br />

↓<br />

Application of small increments<br />

of Spectrum<br />

↓<br />

Light curing of the composite for 20 s<br />

each increment<br />

Mixing primer liquid A+B<br />

↓<br />

Application of the primer liquid mixture for<br />

30 s on the cavity surface<br />

↓<br />

Gentle air drying for 30 s<br />

↓<br />

Mixing bond liquid A+B<br />

↓<br />

Application of the bond liquid mixture on<br />

the cavity surface and gentle air drying<br />

↓<br />

Light curing for 20 s<br />

↓<br />

Filling of cavities with LuxaCore in bulk technique<br />

bridge, 29,36 thus provoking some postoperative pain sensations.<br />

To avoid penetration of components of adhesive<br />

systems into the pulp, a calcium hydroxide liner can be<br />

placed onto the dentin at the deepest points of the cavity.<br />

This procedure was previously recommended especially<br />

for nonadhesive restoration and was referred to as indirect<br />

pulp capping. Thus, a calcium hydroxide liner may prove<br />

effective in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity occurring<br />

after application of an adhesive restoration.<br />

Various formulations of calcium hydroxide have been investigated<br />

over the years. 4,30 Calcium hydroxide has<br />

demonstrated its potential for inducing pulp healing and<br />

dentin bridging. Despite a certain degree of controversy,<br />

some recent studies have also reported the possibility of<br />

pulp healing and dentin bridging by the use of adhesive<br />

systems for pulp capping. 1,10<br />

Thus, the aim of the present study was to identify the<br />

influence of the use of a calcium hydroxide liner in cavities<br />

with different remaining dentin thicknesses and two different<br />

adhesive restorative materials on the occurrence of<br />

pain or postoperative hypersensitivity.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Approval (No. 5/11/02) was issued prior to the study by<br />

the Ethics Committee of the University of Göttingen. A total<br />

of 123 fillings was placed in 123 patients, after they<br />

signed an informed consent form prior to their participation<br />

in the study. Exclusion criteria were: patients under 18<br />

years, pregnancy, breastfeeding, immunosuppressed or<br />

addicted patients.<br />

Only teeth fulfilling the following criteria were included<br />

in the study: caries media or caries profunda (according to<br />

bitewing radiographs), insufficient fillings, positive reaction<br />

to a vitality test (cold test), no signs of pulp inflammation,<br />

no spontaneous pain attacks before treatment, only premolars<br />

and molars, only one filling per tooth, and a minimum<br />

extension of the cavity of 1 mm in width. This cavity<br />

size was necessary, since the probe of the Prepometer device<br />

(Hager & Werken; Duisburg, Germany) described<br />

below has a diameter of 1 mm.<br />

Treatment was performed under local anesthesia (Ultracain<br />

D-S, Hoechst Marion Roussel Deutschland; Frankfurt<br />

am Main, Germany) and the use of rubber-dam. Caries removal<br />

was performed with tungsten burs until CariesDetector<br />

(Kuraray Dental; Frankfurt am Main, Germany)<br />

induced no further staining of the cavity. After total caries<br />

removal, the cavity was rinsed with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution.<br />

After cavity preparation, the remaining dentin thickness<br />

in the deepest cavity area was measured with a remaining<br />

dentin thickness measuring device, hereafter referred to<br />

as RDTMD (Prepometer, Hager & Werken). Before measuring,<br />

the RDTMD was calibrated by touching the dentin surface<br />

with the calibration and sensor electrode at the same<br />

time. During measurement, the reference electrode was<br />

placed in the buccal vestibule. For measuring the remaining<br />

dentin thickness, the sensor electrode was gently<br />

moved over the cavity floor.<br />

138 The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry


Copyright<br />

Table 2 Number of teeth according to allocation to the different cavity depth groups, the use of<br />

calcium hydroxide liner, and the kind of restorative material<br />

Calcium hydroxide liner Restorative material Cavity depth group<br />

shallow medium deep<br />

Not for Publication<br />

Wegehaupt et al<br />

<strong>Quintessence</strong><br />

for<br />

Not<br />

by<br />

Yes buildup 6 8 9<br />

definitive filling 14 21 17<br />

No buildup 5 5 7<br />

definitive filling 16 5 10<br />

Table 3 Percentages (absolute number) of pain incidence or hypersensitivity of the buildup and definitive<br />

restorations placed in either shallow, medium or deep cavities after use of a calcium hydroxide lining<br />

or not<br />

Calcium hydroxide liner Restorative material Cavity depth group<br />

shallow medium deep<br />

yes buildup 17% (1) 0% (0) 11% (1)<br />

definitive filling 14% (2) 14% (3) 11% (2)<br />

no buildup 40% (2) 0% (0) 29% (2)<br />

definitive filling 13% (2) 40% (2) 40% (4)<br />

On the basis of the RDTMD results, the cavities were divided<br />

into three different groups (shallow, medium, or<br />

deep cavity) of 40 teeth each. Cavities with RDTMD scores<br />

1 to 5 (1.5 to 3.0 mm, green or yellow LEDs) were allocated<br />

to group “shallow”, cavity scores 6 and 7 (0.9 to 1.5<br />

mm, orange LEDs) were allocated to group “medium”, and<br />

with results 8 to 10 (< 0.9 mm, red LEDs) to group “deep”.<br />

In each group, cavities were treated either with or without<br />

use of calcium hydroxide liner (Kerr Life, KerrHawe; Bioggio,<br />

Switzerland). The decision to use a calcium hydroxide<br />

liner or not was made by tossing a coin. This resulted in<br />

20 liners being placed in the shallow group, 29 in the<br />

medium-depth group, and 26 in the group of deep cavities<br />

(Table 2).<br />

To make the calcium hydroxide liner, a small drop of<br />

Kerr Life was placed on the deepest part of the cavity and<br />

allowed to set until its surface was hard upon probing.<br />

The restoration of the teeth was performed either with a<br />

buildup composite (n = 40) (LuxaCore, DMG; Hamburg,<br />

Germany) or a hybrid composite (n = 83) (Spectrum,<br />

Dentsply DeTrey; Konstanz, Germany). For the buildup<br />

composite restorations, a self-etching nonrinse adhesive<br />

system was used (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, Kuraray Dental).<br />

The buildup composite was used when a large amount of<br />

dental hard tissue was lost and an indirect restoration was<br />

required (crown or partial crown) later to stabilize the integrity<br />

of the tooth or when the cervical margin was located<br />

subgingivally. An etch-and-rinse adhesive<br />

(Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply) was used in the remaining cavities<br />

that were restored with the hybrid composite Spectrum.<br />

These were Class I and II restorations (O, OM/OD,<br />

and MOD) with the cervical margin located para- or<br />

supragingivally. During the restoration, steel matrices were<br />

used and fixed with wooden wedges. The hybrid composite<br />

for the definitive restorations was applied in the cavities in<br />

small horizontal increments with a maximum height of 1<br />

mm. Application protocols for the two kinds of adhesives<br />

and restorative materials are given in Table 1.<br />

The patients were not told to which cavity-depth group<br />

their tooth was allocated and if calcium hydroxide was<br />

used or not. The patients were asked to record whether<br />

any hypersensitivity, pain, or discomfort occurred following<br />

treatment.<br />

During a second appointment 6 months later, the patients<br />

were re-examined by one dentist evaluating the following<br />

criteria:<br />

• Vitality test (yes/no): vitality testing was performed with<br />

a cold foam pellet pressed on the buccal surface of the<br />

tooth. The patients were asked to report whether they<br />

felt the cold.<br />

• Occurrence of hypersensitivity (yes/no): the patients<br />

were asked if they had noticed any pain, hypersensitivity,<br />

or discomfort in the teeth after the application of<br />

the filling.<br />

Reacting negative to the vitality test and reported pain<br />

or hypersensitivity were ranked as failure.<br />

To evaluate the influence of the three different variables<br />

“cavity depth”, “calcium hydroxide liner”, and “resto-<br />

Vol 11, No 2, 2009 139


Copyright<br />

Wegehaupt et al<br />

ration material” a logistic regression was carried out. The<br />

significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.<br />

The allocation of the tooth to the cavity groups, use of<br />

calcium hydroxide lining, and the kind of restorative material<br />

is shown in Table 2.<br />

RESULTS<br />

All patients were re-examined after 6 months; all 123 fillings<br />

were still in situ. No fractures or any other distinctive<br />

features were visible in the clinical examination. All teeth<br />

exhibited a positive reaction in the vitality test. Percentage<br />

distribution of pain incidents or hypersensitivity according<br />

to the cavity groups, calcium hydroxide lining use, and the<br />

kind of restorative material are shown in Table 3.<br />

The logistic regression showed no statistically significant<br />

influence of any of the three different variables “cavity<br />

depth” (p = 0.65), “calcium hydroxide liner” (p = 0.086),<br />

and “restoration material” (p = 0.71) on the occurrence of<br />

pain or hypersensitivity.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The present study aimed to investigate the influence of different<br />

thickness of remaining dentin on pain occurrence of<br />

adhesively luted restorations under in vivo conditions.<br />

Since the treated teeth were not extracted afterwards, no<br />

histological examination was possible to determine dentin<br />

thickness. Thus, for determining dentin thickness and to<br />

allow the allocation of the teeth to different categories of<br />

remaining dentin thickness, the RDTMD was used. The<br />

measurement with the RDTMD depends on the electrical<br />

resistance of the dentin. 14<br />

Studies performing histological examination of restored<br />

teeth mostly use teeth planned to be extracted for orthodontic<br />

reasons. 6,21 This procedure has the disadvantage<br />

that these teeth are often free of caries, thus not mirroring<br />

the usual clinical situation. An advantage of using the<br />

RDTMD in the present study was that teeth with clinically<br />

common carious lesions could be included in the study.<br />

However, the use of the RDTMD for allocation of the teeth<br />

to different categories of remaining dentin thickness is a<br />

topic of some discussion. Gente 13 observed a higher electrical<br />

resistance with longer dentin tubules and greater<br />

remaining dentin thickness. 12,14 The same author 13<br />

reported the remaining dentin thickness as being 2.1 to<br />

3.0 mm for the green LEDs, 1.5 to 2.1 mm for the yellow<br />

LEDs, 0.9 to 1.5 mm for the orange LEDs, and less than<br />

0.9 mm for the red LEDs. Thus, our definition of shallow,<br />

medium, and deep corresponds to 1.5 to 3.0 mm, 0.9 to<br />

1.5 mm, and less than 0.9 mm remaining dentin thickness,<br />

respectively. In contrast, Tielemans et al 32 found the<br />

use of RDTMD to be reproducible, but in their study, the<br />

electrical resistance showed no statistically significant correlation<br />

with the histologically determined dentin<br />

thickness. It should be mentioned that in the study by<br />

Tielemans et al, 32 only two patients with a total of 12<br />

teeth were examined. Moreover, the present study using<br />

Not for Publication<br />

<strong>Quintessence</strong><br />

the RDTMD was started before the discrepant findings by<br />

Tielemans et al 32 were published. To clarify the contradictory<br />

findings regarding the RDTMD, a comprehensive in<br />

vivo study with an appropriate number of test teeth must<br />

be performed.<br />

In the present study, two different kinds of restorative<br />

materials were used to reflect different treatment requirements.<br />

The definitive fillings were made with the hybrid<br />

composite in an incremental technique. This material has<br />

shown good clinical performance in various previous clinical<br />

studies. 18,27,33,34 The buildup composite in combination<br />

with the self-etching adhesive system was applied in<br />

bulk in the cavities with greater extension. This procedure<br />

presents a fast, economical, and less technique-sensitive<br />

approach, and is often used to build up teeth prior to indirect<br />

restorations.<br />

The overall occurrence of postoperative pain in the present<br />

study amounted to 17%. This corresponds well with<br />

the findings of another recent study, 5 showing postoperative<br />

pain incidence of 5% to 26% after adhesive restorations<br />

with different cavity sizes.<br />

Our finding that there was no statistically significant influence<br />

of use of a calcium hydroxide liner on hypersensitivity<br />

corresponded with the results of Whitworth et al. 35<br />

They also found no difference in the protection of the pulp<br />

by calcium hydroxide lining or conditioning and sealing<br />

with adhesive resins only. This might be explained with the<br />

precipitation of crystalline salts in the dentin tubules after<br />

the use of calcium hydroxide liner 19 or the sealing of the<br />

dentin with light- or self-curing resin after the use of a hydrophilic<br />

adhesive, creating a continuous resin-dentin hybrid<br />

layer. 23 Both may lead to a reduction of the dentin<br />

permeability for potential cytotoxic components of restorative<br />

materials or bacteria, 8 thus protecting the pulp tissue.<br />

Moreover, with respect to the hydrodynamic theory of<br />

Brännström, 3 which states that movement of dentinal liquid<br />

is responsible for hypersensitivity, both precipitation of<br />

calcium salts and formation of the hybrid layer might be<br />

able to counteract hypersensitivity.<br />

In the present study, no statistically significant influence<br />

of the cavity depth on the occurrence of pain was observed.<br />

Murray et al 21 also did not find the remaining<br />

dentin thickness to be statistically correlated to signs of<br />

pulp inflammation as histologically proven. In contrast,<br />

Whitworth et al 35 estimated the residual dentin thickness<br />

to be a key determinant for the pulp reaction. It should be<br />

mentioned that in that study, 35 teeth with pulp exposure<br />

were also included in the group of deep cavities; furthermore,<br />

there was no requirement for the dentists to use<br />

rubber-dam during treatment. The use of rubber-dam<br />

might have an impact on the pulp response after cavity<br />

preparation, as shown by Camps et al 6 , who found remaining<br />

dentin thickness to be of only minor importance in the<br />

reaction of the pulp, as compared to bacteria left in the<br />

cavity prior to filling. It might be assumed that lesser<br />

amounts of bacteria are still present on the cavity walls<br />

when rubber-dam is used during treatment.<br />

The effect of restorative materials on the vitality of the<br />

pulp and the occurrence of postoperative pain is a contentious<br />

issue in the literature. 9,16,24,37 In the present<br />

for<br />

Not<br />

by<br />

140 The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry


Copyright<br />

study, no statistically significant influence of the restorative<br />

material was found. This finding agrees with prior findings<br />

that even a thin layer of residual dentin may protect<br />

the pulp against both material and bonding system toxicity,<br />

2,20 so that different restorative materials or adhesives<br />

will not have a significant influence on the pulp tissue. 24<br />

Cox 7 also showed the restorative materials to have a minimal<br />

influence on postoperative pulp reactions. In contrast<br />

to these findings, a recent study by Whitworth et al 35 observed<br />

a correlation between restorative materials and<br />

pulp breakdown only in the deep cavities and cavities with<br />

pulp exposure. This finding may be explained with previous<br />

investigations which showed that odontoblasts are already<br />

injured by cavity preparations with a depth close to or into<br />

the pulp tissue, 11,17 which may lead to pulp inflammation<br />

and pulp breakdown.<br />

We suggest that the layer formed by the adhesive systems<br />

acts as a barrier to filling material contents reaching<br />

the pulp. Similar to our finding that the materials used<br />

here had no influence on the pulp vitality, Nayyar et al 24<br />

also observed no difference in the pulp response between<br />

a self-etching adhesive and an etch-and-rinse adhesive.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The results of the present study showed that neither the<br />

thickness of the remaining dentin, the use of calcium hydroxide<br />

liner, nor the adhesive and restorative system<br />

used in the study have an impact on the incidence of postoperative<br />

pain.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, Suzuki S, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Cox CF. Biocompatibility<br />

of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on nonexposed<br />

and exposed primate teeth. <strong>Quintessence</strong> Int 1998;29:177-188.<br />

2. Bergenholtz G. Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses<br />

in resin-based dental restorations. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med<br />

2000;11:467-480.<br />

3. Brännström M, Linden LA, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dental<br />

tubule and of pulp fluid. A discussion of its significance in relation to dentinal<br />

sensitivity. Caries Res 1967;1:310-317.<br />

4. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and<br />

the inner surface of Concise enamel bond. Composite fillings in etched<br />

and unetched cavities. J Dent Res 1978;57:3-10.<br />

5. Briso ALF, Mestrener SR, Delicio G, Sundfeld RH, Bedran-Russo AK. Clinical<br />

assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations.<br />

Oper Dent 2007;32:421-426.<br />

6. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response<br />

to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 2000;16:432-440.<br />

7. Cox CF. Effects of adhesive resins and various dental cements on the pulp.<br />

Oper Dent 1992;(suppl 5):165-176.<br />

8. Cox CF. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Am J Dent<br />

1994;7:293-295.<br />

9. Cox CF, Felton D, Bergenholtz G. Histopathological response of infected<br />

cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents. Am J<br />

Dent 1988;1(special issue):189-194.<br />

10 . Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility<br />

of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed<br />

pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998;11(special<br />

issue):S55-63.<br />

11. Darvell BW. Effect of dentine thickness on pulpal changes beneath restorative<br />

materials. Aust Dent J 1981;26:80-81.<br />

12. Gente M. Begrenzung der Präparationstiefe durch elektrische Widerstandsmessungen.<br />

Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995;50:658-660.<br />

Not for Publication<br />

Wegehaupt et al<br />

<strong>Quintessence</strong><br />

13. Gente M. Untersuchung zur Begrenzung der Präparationstiefe bei der Kronenpräparation<br />

durch elektrische Widerstandsmessung. Marburg, Germany:<br />

Thesis, 1992<br />

14. Gente M, Becker-Detert D. Studies on the specific electric resistance of the<br />

dentin of human teeth [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:803-806.<br />

15. Keyes PH. The infectious and transmissible nature of experimental dental<br />

caries. Findings and implications. Arch Oral Biol 1960;1:304-320.<br />

16. Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Papadimitriou S, Tziafas D. Pulpal responses after<br />

application of current adhesive systems to deep cavities. Clin Oral Investig<br />

2007;11:313-320.<br />

17. Lee SJ, Walton RE, Osborne JW. Pulp response to bases and cavity depths.<br />

Am J Dent 1992;5:64-68.<br />

18. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL. 3-Year clinical<br />

evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil<br />

2006;33:144-151.<br />

19. Mjör IA, Ferrari M. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions<br />

to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive<br />

techniques. <strong>Quintessence</strong> Int 2002;33:35-63.<br />

20. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation<br />

associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater<br />

2002;18:470-478.<br />

21. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, Mjör IA. Remaining dentine thickness<br />

and human pulp responses. Int Endod J 2003;36:33-43.<br />

22. Murray PE, Stanley HR, Matthews JB, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Age-related odontometric<br />

changes of human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol<br />

Endod 2002;93:474-482.<br />

23. Nakabayashi N. Importance of mini-dumbbell specimen to access tensile<br />

strength of restored dentine: historical background and the future perspective<br />

in dentistry. J Dent 2004;32:431-442.<br />

24. Nayyar S, Tewari S, Arora B. Comparison of human pulp response to totaletch<br />

and self-etch bonding agents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol<br />

Endod 2007;104:45-52.<br />

25. Orland FJ, Blayney JR, Harrison RW, Reyniers JA, Trexler PC, Ervin RF, Gordon<br />

HA, Wagner M. Experimental caries in germfree rats inoculated with<br />

enterococci. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;50:259-272.<br />

26. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR, Ecker G. Biocompatibility of a glass ionomer luting<br />

agent. 2. Crown cementation. Am J Dent 1991;4:134-141.<br />

27. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical<br />

evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent<br />

teeth. Gen Dent 1997;45:344-349.<br />

28. Polansky R, Reichhold C, Lorenzoni M. Die Topographie der Pulpa im<br />

Seitenzahnbereich nach Stufenpräparation für Vollkeramische Kronen.<br />

Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;53:643-647.<br />

29. Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Nunez LJ, Stoll J, Weis K. Permeability characteristics<br />

of bovine and human dentin under different pretreatment conditions. J<br />

Endod 2001;27:23-30.<br />

30. Snuggs HM, Cox CF, Powell CS, White KC. Pulpal healing and dentinal<br />

bridge formation in an acidic environment. <strong>Quintessence</strong> Int 1993;24:501-<br />

510.<br />

31. Stanley HR. Dental iatrogenesis. Int Dent J 1994;44:3-18.<br />

32. Tielemans S, Bergmans L, Duyck J, Naert I. Evaluation of a preparation<br />

depth controlling device: a pilot study. <strong>Quintessence</strong> Int 2007;38:135-142.<br />

33. Türkün LS, Aktener BO. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different<br />

posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:196-203.<br />

34. Wendt SLJ, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite:<br />

3-year results. Am J Dent 1994;7:207-211.<br />

35. Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Endodontic complications<br />

after plastic restorations in general practice. Int Endod J<br />

2005;38:409-416.<br />

36. Wiegand A, Caspar C, Becker K, Werner C, Attin T. In vitro cytotoxicity of different<br />

self-etching dental adhesive systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed<br />

2006;116:614-621.<br />

37. Wisithphrom K, Murray PE, About I, Windsor LJ. Interactions between cavity<br />

preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality. Int J<br />

Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:596-605.<br />

for<br />

Clinical relevance: Neither the thickness of the remaining<br />

dentin, the use of calcium hydroxide liner, or the adhesive<br />

and restorative systems have an impact on the<br />

incidence of postoperative pain.<br />

Not<br />

by<br />

Vol 11, No 2, 2009 141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!