Olabide Ikastola - Euskalit
Olabide Ikastola - Euskalit
Olabide Ikastola - Euskalit
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 STRATEGY strategy<br />
EFQM Excellence Award 2010 20<br />
Delivery of strategic priorities (StP) is measured using the associated<br />
CSF indicators aligned to key processes. These indicators are<br />
included in the Balanced Scorecard (BSC).<br />
Managing Risk<br />
In <strong>Olabide</strong>, SWOT analysis and strategic reflection exercises are<br />
used to understand and anticipate future scenarios and to manage<br />
strategic risk. For example, SP’s are updated on the basis of<br />
SWOT analysis, this technique was also used in 2008 to analyse<br />
the potential impact of a change to the school timetable, and as<br />
a result of SWOT analysis and MT reflection, a specific protocol<br />
has been drawn up to counteract the effects of heavy snowfall on<br />
the school transport service and class timetabling. A contingency<br />
protocol is also in place to minimise the risk of catching swine<br />
flu. With regard to financial risk, the only contingency we have<br />
against late payment of government subsidies is the availability<br />
of credit, though we very rarely use this. If government subsidies<br />
to the school were one day drastically reduced, the only options<br />
open to us would be to increase fees or to reduce the services we<br />
offer. Finally, on an academic level, the potential risk of not being<br />
able to deliver minimum pupil performance levels is addressed<br />
by deploying complementary resources such as support classes,<br />
splitting one class into two for more focused attention and customised<br />
help.<br />
Monitoring of the Strategy Plan<br />
The delivery of strategic priorities is monitored quarterly by the<br />
MT to prevent possible deviation from planned targets. To do so,<br />
the MT uses the BSC with its 54 indicators to measure delivery<br />
of the CSF listed in D1. An extract from this is shown in Fig.<br />
2c.4. Monthly monitoring provides us with sufficient time and<br />
space to bolster the activities required to deliver strategic priorities.<br />
At the end of the academic year, the MT closes the BP by<br />
analysing all relevant indicators to check whether targets have<br />
been delivered and proposing any corrective actions which may<br />
need to be taken.<br />
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09<br />
Associated CSF indicators Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target<br />
1.1. Overall degree of parent satisfaction<br />
with <strong>Olabide</strong> 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.65 7.50 7.70 7.53 7.70<br />
1.3. Degree of pupil satisfaction with the<br />
teaching in <strong>Olabide</strong> 6.96 6.70 6.84 6.75 7.03 6.80 7.22 7.12<br />
Fig. 2c.4: Extract from Balanced Scorecard<br />
Drawing up and budgeting of the Annual School Plan (ASP)<br />
At the beginning of the 3rd school term, the MT begins to plan<br />
the organisational needs of all stakeholders for the next academic<br />
year. Meetings are held to discuss and put forward proposals on<br />
operational needs, covering a wide range of areas such as staff,<br />
curricular programming, school calendar and timetabling for the<br />
different education stages, teacher timetabling, organisation of<br />
transport, canteen and child-minding services, sports and cultural<br />
activities, etc.<br />
The activities of the BP, which forms part of the ASP, are funded<br />
through the annual budget. For example, actions included in the<br />
BP to deliver the StP ‘Deeper focus on the EFQM Excellence<br />
Model’ required considerable funding, such as the services of an<br />
external consultancy and training for our people in the model.<br />
The actions required are first identified, an estimation of their<br />
cost is made and, if acceptable, the actions are included in the<br />
annual budget.<br />
Measurement, learning, refinement and improvement<br />
As explained above, delivery of the SP is measured through the<br />
different CSF indicators included in the BSC and presented in<br />
this document in the results criteria. Some of the most significant<br />
actions taken as a result of measurement and learning in this area<br />
of <strong>Olabide</strong> management include:<br />
YEAR<br />
2004-<br />
05<br />
2005-<br />
06<br />
REVIEW AND<br />
LEARNING<br />
Self- assessment<br />
Irizar EQA sub.<br />
doc.<br />
External<br />
assessment<br />
IMPROVEMENT ACTION<br />
Process system becomes an integral<br />
tool for strategic reflection, clarifying<br />
the contribution of each process to<br />
strategy.<br />
Use of matrix to improve identification<br />
of key processes.<br />
More detailed use of SWOT analysis<br />
to cover and balance <strong>Olabide</strong> needs<br />
and the needs of all stakeholders.<br />
Involvement of all <strong>Olabide</strong> people in<br />
providing input to for BP content.<br />
YEAR<br />
2006-<br />
07<br />
2007-<br />
08<br />
2008-<br />
09<br />
REVIEW AND<br />
LEARNING<br />
External<br />
assessment<br />
Self-assessment<br />
Reflection by<br />
MT<br />
Formulation of<br />
new Strategy<br />
Plan 2009-12<br />
IMPROVEMENT ACTION<br />
Explicit reference to social and<br />
environmental sustainability<br />
included in Mission and integrated<br />
into teaching syllabus and pupil<br />
values.<br />
Explicit identification of the need for<br />
the support of partners in delivering<br />
the Strategic Priorities of the BP<br />
Design of a new process to monitor<br />
former pupils, covering their<br />
integration into wider Society and<br />
their satisfaction with the values and<br />
general education received.<br />
Updating of basic documents,<br />
new Strategic Objectives derived<br />
from newly formulated Vision (see<br />
Qualification File, Dec. 2009) and<br />
drawing up of BP 2009-10.<br />
2d. Strategy and supporting policies are communicated,<br />
implemented and monitored<br />
Approach and deployment<br />
In <strong>Olabide</strong>, performance targets for the forthcoming academic<br />
year are proposed by each process owner and agreed to on a consensus<br />
basis between the process owners themselves and the QCT<br />
(comprised of the MT and the PS owners). These decisions are<br />
taken on the basis of results from previous years and, where available,<br />
comparative data on the performance of other schools.<br />
<strong>Olabide</strong> has defined a system for communicating and deploying<br />
our Strategy to those stakeholders we consider need to be informed.<br />
Given the importance of keeping stakeholders informed<br />
of the school’s strategy, we have developed a series of processes<br />
which define what needs to be communicated, to whom, how and<br />
when. Once approved, the content of the BP and other important