22.11.2014 Views

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

ALBERTA RULES OF COURT PROJECT Enforcement of Judgments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elating to contempt, attachment orders, the seizure and sale <strong>of</strong> a residence or where<br />

the court orders otherwise.<br />

2. Rules 74(2), 151 and 155(b), which require leave <strong>of</strong> the court before<br />

enforcement can be commenced, should be repealed – We earlier argued that, once<br />

a litigant has obtained a judgment, the remedies necessary to enforce that judgment<br />

should be immediately available without leave. Rules 74(2), 151 and 155(b) violate<br />

this principle for no good reason and should be repealed. The unsuccessful litigant can<br />

still ask the court to stay enforcement in the judgment or later in a stay <strong>of</strong> enforcement<br />

order. In our view, this is sufficient protection without a blanket prohibition <strong>of</strong><br />

enforcement.<br />

3. The present rules regarding enforcement against a partnership and its<br />

partners should be amended to follow Rules 8.01 to 8.06 <strong>of</strong> the Ontario, Rules <strong>of</strong><br />

Civil Procedure [Ontario Rules].<br />

4. The time limits on the enforcement <strong>of</strong> money and non-money judgments<br />

should be clarified, and Rules 331, 347 and 357 should be amended – The<br />

Limitations Act or the new Alberta rules should create a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years from the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> any money or non-money judgment or order for any enforcement<br />

process to be initiated. After the elapse <strong>of</strong> the 10 year period, an enforcement process<br />

cannot be launched at all unless the applicant has obtained a new judgment by action<br />

or under Rule 331. Rules 347 and 357 will need to be reconsidered in the light <strong>of</strong> this<br />

proposal. Rule 331, which permits people with judgments or orders to extend the time<br />

for enforcement, should be rewritten to make it clear that (1) the rule applies to money<br />

and non-money judgments and orders and to all enforcement processes, not just writs<br />

<strong>of</strong> enforcement and (2) a master as well as a judge has jurisdiction to hear and decide<br />

the application. Wherever possible, the Rule 331 process should be made less<br />

technical and difficult.<br />

5. The rules regarding replevin (Rules 427-436), interpleader (Rules 442-460),<br />

receivers (Rules 463-464), preservation orders in part (Rules 467-469) and stop<br />

orders (Rule 494) should be moved to a new part <strong>of</strong> the Alberta rules entitled<br />

“Preservation <strong>of</strong> Rights in Pending Litigation” and located before the rules on<br />

xvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!