23.11.2014 Views

Volume 49 • Number 4 • August 2012 - 192.38.112.111

Volume 49 • Number 4 • August 2012 - 192.38.112.111

Volume 49 • Number 4 • August 2012 - 192.38.112.111

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284<br />

285<br />

Dispersal<br />

286<br />

287<br />

288<br />

289<br />

290<br />

291<br />

292<br />

293<br />

294<br />

Data on movements of marked birds were used to estimate annual dispersal. Available<br />

information suggests that approximately 73% of birds leave the general natal area annually<br />

and 23% of these leave the wider flock region, so c. 17% of birds disperse annually<br />

(Southgate 2002; Mooney & Pedler 2005). Dispersers moved an average of 44 km and up to<br />

78 km (Southgate 2002). This high rate of dispersal supports our use of mark-recapturederived<br />

survival estimates even though only a portion of the island is covered by the markrecapture<br />

surveys. Our dispersal function had 17% of birds dispersing ≥28 km annually and<br />

1% of the population (4 birds) dispersing 78 km annually (Fig. S1). We modelled dispersal as<br />

a function of the distance between the centres of suitable habitat patches.<br />

295<br />

dispersal ~ a = 0.8, b = 16.5, c = 1<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!