24.11.2014 Views

June 2010 - NHBC Home

June 2010 - NHBC Home

June 2010 - NHBC Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Issue 47<br />

<strong>June</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Contaminated Land - New Soil Guideline Values<br />

Soil Guideline Values (SGV’s) were<br />

originally introduced by DEFRA<br />

in March 2002 for a range of<br />

contaminants that may be found in<br />

the ground on brownfield land or<br />

previously developed sites. The SGV’s<br />

were specifically developed for use<br />

in assessing the risk to human health<br />

from contamination in soils as part<br />

of the Contaminated Land Exposure<br />

Assessment (CLEA) framework for<br />

use in the UK.<br />

The CLEA framework and SGV’s were<br />

developed to provide authoritative<br />

guidance in support of the<br />

implementation of Part 2A of the<br />

Environmental Protection Act 1990<br />

that laid down the new regulatory<br />

role for Local Authorities dealing<br />

with land contaminated and also to<br />

provide a more robust and scientific<br />

method of assessment to replace<br />

the previous guidance: 1987 ICRCL<br />

(Interdepartmental Committee on<br />

the Redevelopment of Contaminated<br />

Land) recommendations for action and<br />

trigger levels for contaminants in soils.<br />

However, since the original publication<br />

in 2002 further detailed scientific<br />

reviews together with extensive<br />

consultations with stakeholders in<br />

the contaminated land industry have<br />

resulted in a number of fundamental<br />

revisions to the contaminated land<br />

framework and the model known as<br />

CLEA UK used to produce SGV’s.<br />

As a result, in July 2008, the 2002<br />

SGV’s were withdrawn as they no<br />

longer reflected the updated UK<br />

approach to human health risk<br />

assessments.<br />

From late spring 2009, new SGV’s<br />

have been produced and published<br />

for a variety of contaminants using an<br />

updated framework and model now<br />

known as CLEA 1.06. These revised<br />

SGV’s are recognised in the UK as<br />

being authoritative and scientific. They<br />

should be used as a tool to aid the<br />

evaluation of whether a concentration<br />

of a contaminant in near surface soils is<br />

‘acceptable’ in the assessment of long<br />

term risks to human health for various<br />

land uses including residential.<br />

SGV’s are intended only to assess<br />

long term risks to human health from<br />

contaminants in soils and they do not<br />

take into account other issues such as:<br />

• Risks for short term exposure<br />

• Other types of risk to humans, such<br />

as fire, suffocation and explosion<br />

• Non-human receptors, for instance<br />

ecological, controlled waters,<br />

property, domestic produce or<br />

domestic pets<br />

• Contaminant sources arising from<br />

and to controlled waters (ground<br />

water)<br />

• Free phase products in soils or<br />

groundwater beneath the site (e.g.<br />

hydrocarbons such as oils, diesel,<br />

petrol).<br />

DEFRA has an ongoing programme<br />

for publishing SGV’s for potential<br />

contaminants in soils and during<br />

2009 values have been released<br />

for the following; Benzene, Toluene,<br />

Ethylbenzane, Xylene (Hydrocarbon),<br />

ACTION<br />

Mercury, Selenium, Arsenic, Nickel,<br />

Phenol, Cadmium and Dioxin’s including<br />

PCB’s.<br />

When assessing contamination<br />

on a site, representative site soil<br />

concentrations at or below an SGV<br />

indicate that it is unlikely that there<br />

is a significant possibility of harm<br />

to human health and the site can be<br />

considered safe for development. When<br />

concentrations exceed an SGV, there<br />

may be a potential risk to human health<br />

and further risk assessment is required<br />

to determine whether remediation is<br />

necessary.<br />

Due to the complex nature of contamination, it is recommended by<br />

the <strong>NHBC</strong> that a suitably qualified person/consultant should always<br />

be used to investigate the site, assess the risks and develop any<br />

remediation strategy as necessary.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!