24.11.2014 Views

June 2010 - NHBC Home

June 2010 - NHBC Home

June 2010 - NHBC Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Standards<br />

Extra<br />

Regulation Changes<br />

It is now a requirement to submit<br />

Target CO 2<br />

emission rates (TER),<br />

Dwelling/Building CO 2<br />

emission rates<br />

(DER/BER) for the building, and a list of<br />

specifications used in the calculations<br />

to the Building Control Body before<br />

works start on site.<br />

Main Changes<br />

So what are the implications of the<br />

recommendations contained within<br />

Part L <strong>2010</strong>, and how will they impact<br />

on the design and construction phases?<br />

1. Air permeability andpressure<br />

testing<br />

Essentially the amount of on-site<br />

testing is likely to at least double.<br />

Either three units or 50% of each<br />

dwelling type should be tested on each<br />

site, whichever is the lesser. Blocks of<br />

flats are treated as separate sites, even<br />

if there are multiple blocks within the<br />

same development.<br />

The specific dwellings to make up the<br />

test sample should be selected by the<br />

Building Control Body in consultation<br />

with the appointed pressure testing<br />

body. Early appointment of the testing<br />

body could be beneficial here.<br />

The other significant change is the<br />

relevant information to include in<br />

the DER calculation. Where pressure<br />

tested, this specific figure should be<br />

used. For non-tested dwellings, the<br />

DER figure should be the average<br />

test results achieved for the same<br />

dwelling type +2.0m 3 /(h.m 2 ) at 50Pa.<br />

This in basic terms means that design<br />

air permeability will be nearer 8.0m 3 /<br />

(h.m 2 ) to achieve compliance with the<br />

maximum value of 10.0.<br />

2. Requirement to submit information<br />

With the introduction of Regulation<br />

20D, it is now a requirement to<br />

submit TER and DER information<br />

and calculations in full, including the<br />

specifications used to achieve the<br />

design CO 2<br />

emissions, to the Building<br />

Control Body prior to works starting<br />

on site.<br />

The current requirement to submit<br />

DER achieved alongside the TER<br />

information, together with information<br />

pertaining to changes in specifications<br />

to reflect the as-built dwelling, within<br />

five days of completion remains.<br />

An EPC is also required for all new<br />

dwellings and non-domestic buildings.<br />

3. Improved limiting U-values<br />

New limiting U-values have been<br />

introduced for the building fabric,<br />

and are as follows:<br />

External Walls 0.3 W/m 2 .K<br />

Roofs 0.2 W/m 2 .K<br />

Party Walls 0.2 W/m 2 .K<br />

Floors 0.25 W/m 2 .K<br />

Windows 2.0 W/m 2 .K<br />

A significant change for Part L <strong>2010</strong> is<br />

the notional dwelling used for the TER<br />

assumes a party wall U-value of 0.0<br />

W/m 2 .K. The above limiting U-values<br />

require inclusion of party walls in the<br />

overall fabric insulation calculation.<br />

In reality cavity party walls will<br />

require some insulation, although<br />

of course all current robust details<br />

for acoustic performance show clear<br />

cavities to prevent sound transfer. The<br />

implications here are currently being<br />

reviewed, and we should be able to<br />

provide more detailed guidance in<br />

due course.<br />

4. SAP 2009<br />

Thermal bridges – effective U-values<br />

should now be based on the length<br />

of each junction and the relevant psi<br />

values from SAP 2009. An alternative is<br />

to use a relevant approved government<br />

accredited construction detail scheme,<br />

although details of such schemes are<br />

not yet available, so initially SAP 2009<br />

will be the option together with on-site<br />

checks during construction.<br />

Energy efficient light fittings – at<br />

least 75% of light fittings must be low<br />

energy, determined by the Domestic<br />

Building Services Compliance Guide.<br />

Providing more than 75% low energy<br />

lighting provision will help toward the<br />

DER calculation.<br />

Secondary heating – the default penalty<br />

has been removed and is now based on<br />

the actual secondary heating provided,<br />

with the exception of dwellings with a<br />

chimney but no appliance installed, in<br />

which case there is no change from the<br />

current default penalty.<br />

A preview of SAP 2009 can be viewed<br />

from www.nesltd.co.uk website.<br />

5. Shell and Core developments<br />

There is clearer guidance on the<br />

construction of shell and core units,<br />

whether stand alone or part of mixed<br />

use developments. The developer<br />

should show by the design stage<br />

TER/BER calculations how the building<br />

shell could meet energy efficiency<br />

requirements.<br />

Where certain systems are not<br />

installed, the BER will have to assume<br />

efficiencies for those services that<br />

will be installed as part of the first<br />

fit out work, and these figures and<br />

assumptions in full must be provided to<br />

the Building Control Body before the<br />

works start.<br />

Part F <strong>2010</strong> – Ventilation<br />

Introduction<br />

Part F <strong>2010</strong> includes significant<br />

revisions to align with the changes<br />

made in Part L, ensuring minimum<br />

energy efficiency levels for all<br />

ventilation systems.<br />

The use of trickle ventilation looks<br />

set to become more difficult, with<br />

additional guidance published for<br />

dwellings with design stage air<br />

permeability tighter than 5.0m 3 /(h.m 2 ),<br />

meaning approximately 50% more<br />

background ventilation is required for<br />

dwellings with intermittent or passive<br />

stack ventilation systems.<br />

This could prompt designers and<br />

builders to move towards continuous<br />

ventilation systems, which are better<br />

performing in SAP 2009, as well as<br />

simpler to standardise. Continuous<br />

ventilation systems do not require<br />

trickle vents either, which could be a<br />

significant advantage.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!