Full 46.1 - Royal Institution of Surveyors Malaysia
Full 46.1 - Royal Institution of Surveyors Malaysia
Full 46.1 - Royal Institution of Surveyors Malaysia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE MALAYSIAN SURVEYOR | Vol.46 | No.1 | 2011<br />
In early years, Land <strong>Surveyors</strong> seemed to be more in<br />
numbers as compared to Quantity <strong>Surveyors</strong> and<br />
Valuation <strong>Surveyors</strong>, with the result that sometimes the<br />
Council had to look around for someone from the QS and<br />
the GP sections to take up the challenge as President <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Institution</strong>, as from day one, the <strong>Institution</strong> honoured<br />
its gentleman agreement <strong>of</strong> electing their President by<br />
rotation among all disciplines <strong>of</strong> its members.<br />
How different is ISM today as compared to<br />
when it was first established?<br />
The main difference is that the Secretary-General would<br />
normally remain in the position for a few years. This was<br />
important to ensure continuity and safekeeping <strong>of</strong><br />
records and allowed for the following through <strong>of</strong> Council<br />
policies and decisions. For instance, I was the Secretary-<br />
General for four years, P.P. Sr A.B.Marbeck for four to five<br />
years, P.P. Sr Datuk Das also for a number <strong>of</strong> years. This<br />
was found necessary simply because the <strong>Institution</strong> did<br />
not have a permanent Secretariat. This is in contrast with<br />
the arrangement now whereby the Secretary-General<br />
tends to change hand every year.<br />
How was the land <strong>of</strong> the current ISM Building<br />
obtained?<br />
The idea to have an ISM Building was first mooted by a<br />
group <strong>of</strong> surveyors i.e. P.P. Sr Kok Swee Tuck, P.P. Sr Dr.<br />
Khoo Boo Khean, P.P. Sr Dr. Marbeck and Sr Nicholas<br />
Cheong. In the early days, meetings <strong>of</strong> ISM were <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
held at government departments and records <strong>of</strong> ISM<br />
were also kept at these places. The group felt that there<br />
was a need to have a permanent building where ISM<br />
activities could be conducted in its own place.<br />
I was then the Chief Surveyor <strong>of</strong> PKNS and received news<br />
about the availability <strong>of</strong> six plots <strong>of</strong> PKNS land in Section<br />
52, Petaling Jaya available for institutional use. During<br />
that time, two pieces <strong>of</strong> the land had already been<br />
allocated to IEM, and another three plots <strong>of</strong> land have<br />
been allocated to PAM. There was only one remaining<br />
plot in between them. However, PAM was not keen in<br />
owning and developing a new building on the three<br />
allocated plots. I took the<br />
opportunity to negotiate and<br />
successfully obtained the<br />
agreement <strong>of</strong> PAM to forego the<br />
allotment <strong>of</strong> one lot so that ISM<br />
together with the one lot left<br />
behind would have two shop<br />
lots adjacent to each other.<br />
Applying through the Pengurus<br />
Besar <strong>of</strong> PKNS and with the<br />
consent <strong>of</strong> the State government,<br />
the land was successfully bought<br />
by ISM for RM85,000.<br />
ISM had just enough reserve to pay for the land but was<br />
short <strong>of</strong> funds for the construction <strong>of</strong> the building. The<br />
ISM Building Committee had to find ways and means to<br />
raise funds for the construction <strong>of</strong> its building. There was<br />
a plan to solicit contributions from the well to do<br />
members particularly the well established surveying firms<br />
to contribute towards the building fund, but the proposal<br />
was defeated at an AGM. Subsequently, the building subcommittee<br />
received the approval from the general body<br />
to levy a building fund from all members at a rate <strong>of</strong>: a<br />
Fellow to pay RM600 and Members RM400; payable by<br />
24 instalments. I remembered I paid RM16.67 a month<br />
towards the building fund.<br />
With the gradual contributions by members, the building<br />
sub-committee was confident to proceed with the<br />
institution building and fortunately at that time, we had a<br />
young but enthusiastic Valuation Surveyor P.P. Dato’ Sr<br />
Rahim who was drafted in the building sub-committee<br />
and he managed to secure a loan <strong>of</strong> RM400,000 from<br />
Bank Bumiputra to help us realise our dream. No doubt<br />
the original estimation for the building cost was around<br />
RM180,000 but the escalating cost <strong>of</strong> construction during<br />
that period <strong>of</strong> time, the <strong>Institution</strong> had ultimately come<br />
out with almost half a million to complete the building.<br />
The building sub-committee had the foresight <strong>of</strong> putting<br />
up a building bigger than what we needed at that time,<br />
as the extra space was there to bring in handsome rental<br />
income, which helped the <strong>Institution</strong> in the expansion <strong>of</strong><br />
its services and activities.<br />
Was the ISM Building renovated?<br />
Yes. After some years, the ISM Building had suffered from<br />
depredation and obsolescence whilst the surrounding<br />
buildings have improved themselves, so the Council<br />
decided that the ISM Building be upgraded so that it<br />
could continue to attract and retain its tenants. The<br />
renovation involved the putting up a lift and expansion <strong>of</strong><br />
the Penthouse for the ISM Secretariat.<br />
What were the difficulties<br />
faced when the ISM<br />
Building was under<br />
construction?<br />
18