25.11.2014 Views

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY | ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2010</strong> - <strong>2011</strong>


Foreword by the Mayor<br />

The primary purpose of the Annual Report <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> is to provide an<br />

audited account of the performance of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

and the management of the budget. The Annual Report also<br />

provides a valuable opportunity to inform readers about the priorities and activities<br />

of the municipality, the progress it is making and the challenges it has to<br />

confront.<br />

On behalf of all the councillors I would like to express appreciation for the guidance<br />

and support provided by our management. In this regard strategic goals<br />

were informed by the objectives set out by previous year strategic planning. To<br />

attain these goals the municipality focused attention and resources on implementing<br />

the key priorities.<br />

As a level of the individual citizen, the priority is for the municipality to have<br />

processes, people and places that are efficient, responsive to people’s needs. This<br />

Annual Report provides a direct account of how far the municipality has achieved goals and the challenges that<br />

still need to be addressed.<br />

The municipality plays a key role in the management of bettering the lives of its communities which forms part<br />

of rest of the world. The Annual Report indicates how the municipality is responding to those serious challenges<br />

of service delivery. The Annual Report also focuses on the transformation of the <strong>Municipality</strong> as the organisation,<br />

its systems, and structure. The municipality has prioritised the improvement of the financial management and<br />

controls.<br />

Massive progress has been made in this and other areas, as indicated in the Annual Report. The senior management<br />

and staff have shown that it is capable of driving operations effectively and to respond strategically to challenges.<br />

In conclusion, I would like to thank the previous council for their contribution prior to their retirement.<br />

……………………<br />

K VIMBAYO<br />

HON MAYOR<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 3


FOREWORD BY THE<br />

MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is one of the municipalities in the Chris<br />

Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> whose function is the bettering lives of communities<br />

by provision of water and sanitation, construction of access roads<br />

and to generally bring service delivery to people. Despite the historical challenges<br />

posed by the vastness and the geographical terrain of the area as well as<br />

service delivery backlogs that are now systematically being attended, progress<br />

has been achieved in the year under review <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> compared to the previous<br />

year.<br />

The municipality has established solid relations with National and Provincial<br />

Departments of Public Works and Local Government who have assisted the<br />

municipality immensely in its efforts to change the lives of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> communities.<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is very conscious about what is expected<br />

of it in connection to service delivery issues and the improvement of the<br />

quality of the life of the communities and job creation.<br />

The municipality has focussed on areas of urgent need as identification of its service delivery plan (SDBIP) and<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed periodically in compliance with the relevant legislation. Whilst the municipality is mainly dependent on<br />

grants as the main source of funding, there has been concerted effort in improving revenue collection by the way<br />

being aggressive in revenue collection for service rendered by the municipality to those that are not indigent.<br />

As a result of the above efforts the municipality’s service delivery has improved tremendously and furthermore,<br />

through the EPWP programme, jobs have been created.<br />

Priority areas for the coming year would be to continue the intensification of the provision of services particularly<br />

water and sanitation and to improve on revenue collection and creation of jobs and job opportunities through local<br />

economic development within the municipality area.<br />

……………………<br />

Z SHASHA<br />

MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 4


The Vision:<br />

“A people centred, developmentally focused rural local municipality in which all of its inhabitants have access to<br />

quality service delivery and participate in vibrant and well-balanced social and economic development”.<br />

The Mission:<br />

“Endeavours to advance its developmental local government mandate through a sustained focus onsound and accountable<br />

governance, physical and social infrastructure appropriate for sustainable development in our Municipal<br />

area”.<br />

Principles and Values of IYLM<br />

IYLM adopts the “Batho Pele Principles”, together with other underlying principles aligned to this value<br />

framework, which include the following: Democracy, as realised through consultation, transparency, and accountability;<br />

Respect & Courtesy; Responsiveness; Quality Services; Redress; and Value for Money.<br />

The IYLM in consultation with its local communities, as part of its Council and IDP representative processes,<br />

adopted the following set of values, in line with the above. These values are to guide how the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

performs its mandate, as well as how it interacts with those who remain the owners of development (i.e. its<br />

inhabitants as the beneficiaries of development and service delivery).<br />

To be responsive to the needs of citizens and partner-local municipalities.<br />

To be transparent, accountable and participative in our dealings with each other and our partners.<br />

To cultivate a work ethic focused on performance, achievement and results.<br />

To promote and pursue key National, Provincial and local development goals.<br />

To ensure a representative organisation.<br />

To be democratic in the pursuance of our objectives.<br />

To show mutual respect, trust and ensure high levels of co-operation and discipline in our dealing with<br />

one another.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 5


Lokishini - C<br />

3<br />

Mtwaku - B<br />

Mtwaku - A<br />

Dayimani - D<br />

Lalini - L<br />

Esiqikini - A<br />

Dlakavu<br />

Matyeni - E<br />

Esigxeni<br />

Kuholi<br />

Dudumashe - C<br />

Nyongwana<br />

Kwandungwane - C<br />

Dudumashe - A<br />

Mbinzana<br />

Bilatye<br />

Tyelerha<br />

Maya - C<br />

Damane<br />

Lalini - K<br />

Ntlakwefolo<br />

Sihlabeni<br />

4<br />

Farmer - A<br />

Upper Lanti<br />

Sawulana - A<br />

Ngqanga<br />

Emkhukhwini<br />

Mtshingeni<br />

Kwantsinga<br />

Lubisi<br />

Cube - A<br />

Zwelitsha - cc<br />

Township<br />

2<br />

Mangweni - B<br />

Sabalele -A<br />

20<br />

Mthonjeni - F<br />

Tshatshu - BB<br />

Ngxwashu - A<br />

Bhukhwana<br />

Ndulini<br />

Kusabalele<br />

Bhencuthi<br />

Cungcwana<br />

Landport<br />

Qungu<br />

Lanti - A<br />

Kwagcina - A<br />

Eluqolweni - B<br />

Nyongwane - B<br />

Mgongxo - B<br />

Mgongxo - A<br />

Ngxwashu - B<br />

Nyamankulu<br />

Mmangweni - J<br />

Mdange<br />

Sidwadweni - B Zingquthu<br />

Matshona - A<br />

Ncambalala<br />

5<br />

Jokwe<br />

Cube - B<br />

Sdubi point Tafeni - A<br />

Camama Forest<br />

Ntshintshi<br />

Tafeni - B<br />

Canama<br />

Hoita<br />

Liqolo<br />

Hoyana<br />

Endwashini<br />

Dekes Hill<br />

Banzi - A<br />

Sentile<br />

Mphakathini<br />

Bomplas - B<br />

19<br />

Cambalala<br />

Magwala - B<br />

Mkobeni - A<br />

Mtimbini<br />

Tunzini - B<br />

Kwamnqanqeni Mqanqeni<br />

Magwala - D<br />

Jamani - A<br />

Maqwatini - A<br />

Khayamandi - B<br />

Emkobeni<br />

Ngxingweni - A<br />

Khayamandi - A<br />

Wodehouse<br />

Magwala<br />

Diphini - D<br />

Magwala - A<br />

Qolweni - A<br />

Maqwathini - C Mtingwevu<br />

15<br />

Tyhawana<br />

1<br />

Nququ<br />

Hoyana<br />

Chamama - B<br />

Kwandlangisa<br />

Exeni - B<br />

Nquqhu - B<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

14<br />

Hala - BB<br />

Gcina - K<br />

21<br />

Ngxabangu<br />

16<br />

Tshamazimba<br />

Nonqonqwama<br />

Dipini - A<br />

Chris Hani<br />

Mlenze<br />

Sikhobeni - A<br />

Mahlubini - E<br />

Kwanyoka<br />

Mtingwevu - C<br />

Mtingwevu Mission<br />

Nquqhu - A<br />

Bolana - B<br />

Bolana - A<br />

Kwandungwane - D<br />

Mtshanyana - A Mtshanyana - B<br />

Sijula<br />

Mahlubini - B<br />

Kwandungwane - E<br />

Mpunga<br />

Taiwan<br />

Mahlatini - A<br />

7<br />

Qutse<br />

Qutsa<br />

Nxelesa<br />

Qolweni - B<br />

Mtyangwe<br />

Lower Qutsa<br />

Qombolo - G<br />

Mdeni - AC<br />

Banti<br />

Komkhulu - O<br />

Endensa<br />

Ntsela<br />

Mbulu<br />

Gongqo<br />

Ngcacha<br />

Ntlakwevenkile<br />

Mbojweni<br />

Maxambeni<br />

Mission - G<br />

Entlini<br />

Ncwane<br />

Kwebulana<br />

Mission - F<br />

Mankane<br />

Ajoliwe<br />

Ngudle<br />

Jojweni - N<br />

Qwili<br />

Nqumakala Nomadamba<br />

Kwamzola<br />

Kwangali<br />

Ngceza - A<br />

Gxwalibomvu - A<br />

Elwalweni<br />

Endenxa - A<br />

Lujilo - A<br />

Mbulu<br />

Ncora Irrigation<br />

Gasini - A<br />

Nomadambe<br />

Gesini<br />

Kwachotha<br />

Kwazulu - A<br />

Cubeni<br />

Qombolo - B<br />

Mafengwini<br />

Eluqolweni - BB<br />

13<br />

Ngceza - B Qombolo - E<br />

Khwebulana - A<br />

Qombolo - H<br />

Mxobozweni<br />

Komkhulu - P<br />

Qombolo - F<br />

Kwahange<br />

Mantanjeni - A<br />

Gwadela<br />

Xeni - A<br />

Mtsheko - A<br />

Kwamlondleni - B<br />

Kwamlondleni - A<br />

Esikolweni - A<br />

Mahlungulu - A<br />

Mvumelwano - A<br />

Mdeni - R<br />

Galali - A<br />

18<br />

Malangwane<br />

Mkuthukeni<br />

Khwebulana - B<br />

Ncora School<br />

Mahlungulu - C<br />

Mdeni/ezantsi<br />

Gushed<br />

Emrhotshozweni<br />

Luthuli<br />

Lutuli<br />

Kwadukatole Goloza<br />

Komkhulu - RR Mbulukhweza - A<br />

6<br />

Mbulukhweza - B<br />

Komkhulu - T<br />

Mbulukweza<br />

8<br />

Willow - B<br />

Mbulu mission<br />

Hange - B<br />

Lower Ncora<br />

10<br />

Kwalumandi<br />

Mgwenyana<br />

Gcingca<br />

Jojweni - S<br />

Kwa Mbaxa<br />

Gcibhala - B<br />

Lahlangubo - D<br />

Mtshabe<br />

Mission - H<br />

Lurshabeni<br />

Matafeni - B<br />

Mhlahlane - F<br />

Mkhwinti<br />

Ebusini<br />

Mission - C<br />

Home<br />

Luqoleneni<br />

Ezantsi - C<br />

Mdeni - T<br />

Eqolweni - A<br />

Zawukana<br />

Khalana<br />

Mdunjeni Marhawuleni<br />

Ngdumenya<br />

Longqayi<br />

Matafeni - A<br />

Bhotani - B<br />

Melika<br />

Gasini - B<br />

Mhlahlane - E<br />

Sobotini<br />

Tsomo<br />

Esigangeni - A<br />

Pesikeni<br />

Mgqwazini<br />

Ntsongeni - A<br />

Fraser's Garage<br />

Jara - A<br />

Tshayelela<br />

Bololitye Store<br />

Luqolweni - D<br />

Gugwini - B<br />

Ngxongweni - A<br />

Ngcongcolorha - A<br />

Ngcongcolorha - B<br />

Ndenxe - A<br />

Mgababa - A<br />

Luqolweni - F<br />

Ngingqini - A<br />

Jerusalem - A<br />

17<br />

Kwazulu - B<br />

Ngwemnyama - G<br />

Komkhulu - Q<br />

Mbombela<br />

Daza<br />

Bhotani - A<br />

Nobhokhwe - A<br />

Mahlubini - D Mahlubini - C<br />

Majwareni - B<br />

Nyhebe<br />

Nobhokhwe - B<br />

Mangobonlu Mahlubini - A<br />

Emahlubini - A<br />

East Bank<br />

Tenza - B<br />

Zolo<br />

Nongqothi<br />

Matolanyile - A<br />

Matolanyile - B<br />

12<br />

Nobokwe - B<br />

Vrystad<br />

Ngqwaru<br />

Kwamaduma<br />

Chifini<br />

Makhwababa<br />

Besi<br />

Komkhulu - M<br />

Ngojini - I<br />

Mdeni - V<br />

Mabhentseni<br />

Kwandungwana - A<br />

Tshatshu - C<br />

Layitini<br />

11<br />

Halalani<br />

Mdibaniso<br />

Sixhotyeni - A<br />

Ezidulini<br />

Qitsi<br />

Eqitsi<br />

Ndlunkulu - A<br />

Ndwashini<br />

Magqoleni<br />

Sodom<br />

Ncatsheni<br />

Qwebeqwebe<br />

Main<br />

Mkhwezweni -B<br />

9<br />

Jwqyi<br />

Emandlaneni<br />

Nyathi - A<br />

Ngwevana - C<br />

Kwandaba<br />

Xonya - B<br />

Cwecweni - A<br />

Matyabomvu<br />

Etoleni<br />

Magezimeni<br />

Nxamalele - A<br />

1<br />

Nxamalele Store<br />

Chaba - D<br />

Nxamalele - B<br />

Eluxeni - C<br />

Manuneni<br />

Mziwini<br />

2<br />

Emmangweni -A<br />

Chaba - E<br />

Emaqakamzini<br />

Emaqomeni - B<br />

Elalini - C<br />

Mqonci - A<br />

Sikhobeni - B<br />

Kuchaba<br />

Libiza<br />

Mqonu<br />

Nqutura<br />

Esikobeni - B<br />

Makhambi<br />

Sgubudwini<br />

Nabileyo - B<br />

Emazizini - A<br />

Khethi - A<br />

Nabileyo - A<br />

Kofu<br />

Lalini - AA<br />

Engasa<br />

Khethi - B<br />

Kwasofika<br />

Esiqikini - b<br />

Ntshingeni - A<br />

Manxiweni - C<br />

Emqonci<br />

Komkhulu - CA<br />

Mqonci - B<br />

Zundwana<br />

Kuntonga<br />

Overview of the Report<br />

The Annual Report <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> aims to convey to the reader what the municipality has<br />

achieved during the financial year of <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong>. Drawing the municipal strategic plan, its<br />

highlights both the achievements as well as the challenges facing the Municipal Departments<br />

during the <strong>report</strong>ing period. In order to meet the requirements set by the Easter Cape<br />

Treasury Department, the Annual Report is structured into four main parts.<br />

Part 1<br />

General information<br />

• Introduction and Overview<br />

• Foreword by the Mayor<br />

• Foreword by the Municipal Manager<br />

• Executive Summary<br />

Part 2<br />

Key Performance Achievement Reports<br />

Part 3<br />

Audited Statements and other financial information<br />

Part 4<br />

Good Governance<br />

CHRIS HANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY (DC 13)<br />

Eastern Cape Province<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

Contact Details<br />

Joseph Jankie<br />

Tel : 045 808 4742<br />

Fax : 045 838 5959<br />

Email : jjankie@chrishanidm.co.za<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> in no way accepts resposibility for<br />

the accuracy or completeness of the data presented on this map,<br />

and will not be held liable for damages, including loss of profits or<br />

consequential damage, arising out of the use of this information.<br />

.<br />

Produced by : CHDM GIS Unit<br />

Projection : Transverse Mercator<br />

Sphere :<br />

Datum : WGS84<br />

File Name : Water Service Delivery<br />

File Path : C:/GISDB/Water Service Delivery<br />

Revision No. : 3<br />

Scale1:130 000<br />

Date : 22 April 2008<br />

0 4.5 9 18 27 36<br />

Kilometers<br />

Legend<br />

Road Network<br />

National Road<br />

Ward Boundaries<br />

New LM Boundary<br />

Settlements<br />

Old LM Boundary<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 6


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The population of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> is estimated to be 194 246 people living in 44 768<br />

households. This population size also implies that 22% of the Chris Hani district<br />

population resides in <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>. The average household size in the municipality<br />

is 4 people per household.<br />

There are still major challenges ahead given that over two thirds (76%) of the population<br />

is indigent with unemployment estimated over 50%. About 53% of our population is<br />

females while males account for only 47%.<br />

About 60% of our population is children in the school going age group (0-19 years).<br />

About 7% falls within the pension age group. Only 33% are in working age group (20<br />

– 64 years). This means that there is a high dependency ratio as 67 % of the population<br />

depends on the 33% workforce in the area.<br />

OVERVIEW OF THE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is a democratic elected category B municipality made up of<br />

the representative councilors and administration staff. It is one of the eight local municipalities<br />

found within the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong>. The municipality is purely rural with a<br />

population of about 194 000. <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> practices its duties through its communities<br />

from all 21 wards. The councilors of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> form part of the local<br />

allocated government working directly with the local people. The municipality excises its duties<br />

through its constituent communities. Under the municipality’s jurisdiction is:<br />

• Cofimvaba<br />

• Tsomo<br />

Unemployment and poverty affects a large number of people within the municipal areas. The<br />

council forms part of the local sphere of government, closely located to the people. The <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> exercises its duties and functions through its constituent areas.<br />

Africans represent the largest population group in the Municipal area. Mini farming is the biggest<br />

source of livelihood in the area. The area of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> offer a diverse range of opportunities<br />

in industries linked to agriculture and other industries.<br />

Key features of the Local Economy<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Farming: grain, poultry and dried fruit<br />

Growing tourism sector<br />

Livestock improvement Tourism has been added to the economic base of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>. Slowly the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> is becoming more noticeable on tourism maps due to its rich history and culture.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 7


MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE<br />

COMMITTEE<br />

Hon Mayor: Councilor K Vimbayo<br />

SPU Portfolio Head: Councillor N Stata<br />

Local Economic Development and Planning: Councillor William Mdwayingana<br />

Infrastructure Development and Planning: Councillor Myathaza<br />

Community Services Department: Councillor N A Tshangana – Nkota<br />

Corporate Services Department: Councillor N Ntsaluba<br />

Water Services: Councillor K Mdleleni<br />

Six managers of departments<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Municipal Manager: Mr Z Shasha<br />

LED: Mr K Maceba<br />

Infrastructure Plan & Dev: Mr S Koyo<br />

Community Services: Ms Y Mniki<br />

Corporate Services: Ms Nkuhlu<br />

Budget and Treasury: Mr M Dyushu<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Water n Sanitation:<br />

Cllr K Mdleleni<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Corporate Services:<br />

Cllr N Ntsaluba<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Special Programmes<br />

Unit: Cllr N Stata<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Infrastructure & Planning:<br />

Cllr S Myataza<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Budget & Treasury:<br />

Cllr J Cengani<br />

Portfolio Head for Local Economic<br />

Development and Planning:<br />

Cllr W Mdwayingana<br />

Portfolio Head for<br />

Community Services:<br />

Cllr N Tshangana – Nkota<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 8


CHAPTER ONE<br />

Human resource and other organization management – KPA 1<br />

Human Resources and Other Organisation Management<br />

• Total number of approved posts; 193<br />

• The total number of vacant posts in the entire institution: 12<br />

• Six Performance Agreements were submitted.<br />

1.2 Staff development initiatives during the Financial Year<br />

See attached list.<br />

1.3 Key HR statistics per functional area<br />

1.<br />

a.<br />

Full time staff complement per functional area (examples are given below)<br />

MM/Section 57 and Line Managers<br />

Approved positions (e.g. MM – S57 etc…)<br />

Number of approved and<br />

budgeted posts per position<br />

Filled posts<br />

Vacant posts<br />

1 Municipal Manager’s Office 10 09 01<br />

2 Corporate Services Department 29 26 01<br />

3 Budget and Treasury Department 29 25 04<br />

4 Community Services Department 83 77 6<br />

5 LED and Planning Department 9 9 -<br />

6 Technical Services Department 46 40 06<br />

2.<br />

Technical staff registered with professional bodies<br />

Technical<br />

Service: Water<br />

Services<br />

Total number of<br />

technical service<br />

managers<br />

Total number<br />

pending registration<br />

in the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

Total number pending<br />

registration confirmation<br />

in the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

5 4 1 -<br />

Total number not<br />

yet registered in<br />

the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

3.<br />

Level of education and skills<br />

Total number of Staff<br />

Number of staff without<br />

Grade 12<br />

Number of staff with<br />

Senior Certificate only<br />

Number of staff with Tertiary/<br />

accredited professional training<br />

207 93 30 80<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 10


4.<br />

Trends on total personnel expenditure<br />

Financial Years<br />

Total number of staff<br />

Total approved<br />

operating Budget<br />

2006-2007<br />

2007-2008 50 550 663 30 097 425<br />

2008-2009 63 840 937 34 097 695<br />

2009-<strong>2010</strong> 118 891 631 42 486 563<br />

Personnel expenditure<br />

(salary and salary<br />

related)<br />

Percentage of<br />

expenditure<br />

5.<br />

List of pension and medical aids to whom employees belong (please add if necessary)<br />

Names of pension fund<br />

Number of<br />

members<br />

Names of medical Aids<br />

Number of members<br />

Cape Joint 159 Bonitas 85<br />

Samwu Provident Fund 10 Discovery LA Health 16<br />

Eastern Cape Group Scheme 5 Samwu Med. 21<br />

Hosmed 8<br />

1.4 Senior officials’ wages and benefits;<br />

Municipal Manager: R 745 253<br />

Managers <strong>report</strong>ing directly to the Municipal Manager: R 670 892<br />

1.5 Implementation of the Performance Management System (PMS):<br />

Both individual and institutional PMS are fully implemented, individual at the level of senior managers only.<br />

1.6 Annual performance as per key performance indicators in municipal transformation and organizational<br />

development<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Total number of<br />

people (planned for<br />

) during the year<br />

under review<br />

Achievement<br />

level during the<br />

year under review<br />

Achievement<br />

percentage during<br />

the year<br />

1<br />

Vacancy rate for all<br />

approved and budgeted<br />

posts;<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Percentage of appointment<br />

in strategic<br />

positions (Municipal<br />

Manager and Section 57<br />

Managers)<br />

Percentage of Section<br />

57 Managers including<br />

Municipal Managers<br />

who attended at least 1<br />

skill development training<br />

course within the FY<br />

6 6 100%<br />

6 6 100%<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 11


4<br />

5<br />

6.<br />

7<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Percentage of Managers<br />

in Technical Services<br />

with a professional<br />

qualification<br />

Percentage of municipalities<br />

within the<br />

district area that have a<br />

fully functional Performance<br />

Management<br />

System (DM only)<br />

Percentage of staff that<br />

have undergone a skills<br />

audit (including competency<br />

profiles) within the<br />

current 5 years term<br />

Percentage of councilors<br />

who attended a skill<br />

development training<br />

within the current 5 year<br />

term<br />

Percentage of staff<br />

complement with disability<br />

Percentage of female<br />

employees<br />

Percentage of employees<br />

that are aged 35 or<br />

younger<br />

Total number of<br />

people (planned for<br />

) during the year<br />

under review<br />

Achievement<br />

level during the<br />

year under review<br />

1 1 100%<br />

46 46 100%<br />

207 2 3,9%<br />

207 80 41%<br />

207 89 46%<br />

Achievement<br />

percentage during<br />

the year<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> won the Most Improved Work Place award in <strong>2010</strong>. The awards were provincial LGSITA<br />

Awards which were held in East London. The award means that the municipality is keen on skills development and that will<br />

have a good impact on issues of service delivery. The award was comprised of a trophy and R15 000 check.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

• Training & Development Policies<br />

• Records Management and lack of space for registry function<br />

REMEDIAL ACTIONS<br />

• Two training & development policies have been developed.<br />

• Workshops on record management have been attended by key officials<br />

• Filing cabinets have been purchased though we have space challenges<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 12


Chapter TWO<br />

Basic Service delivery performance highlights – KPA 2<br />

Annual performance as per key performance indicators in Electricity services<br />

Indicator name<br />

Total number of household/customer<br />

expected to<br />

benefit<br />

Estimated backlogs (actual<br />

numbers)<br />

1<br />

Percentage of households with access<br />

to electricity services<br />

14 304 35 128<br />

2<br />

4<br />

Percentage of indigent households<br />

with access to basic electricity services<br />

Percentage of indigent households<br />

with access to free alternative energy<br />

sources<br />

3879 71.7<br />

6113<br />

The major challenges are<br />

• Resource constraints<br />

• Skills shortage<br />

• Escalating costs<br />

• Way-leave problems<br />

• Settlement densities<br />

• Ground conditions<br />

• Contractual challenges (contractors)<br />

• Inadequate funding<br />

• Economic condition impact<br />

• Non-standard material<br />

These problem can be address by training youth on the skills that are needed.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 14


Road maintenance<br />

The municipality is responsible for the construction, maintenance and upgrading of local access roads and stormwater<br />

infrastructure. The DR (district roads) are under the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> and there is an R61<br />

road which is under SANRAL.<br />

Level and standards in road maintenance services<br />

The entire road network of mainly gravel roads is generally in poor condition and in need of upgrading and maintenance.<br />

There is a target of 70 km of roads to be maintained of which 45% is done. Of the tarred roads length<br />

about 7 km are urban access roads running within towns of Cofimvaba and Tsomo. The most of these access<br />

roads need the construction of bridges and storm water.<br />

Annual performance as per key performance indicators in road maintenance services<br />

1<br />

2<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Indicator name<br />

Percentage of households without<br />

access to gravel or graded roads<br />

Percentage of road infrastructure<br />

requiring upgrade<br />

Percentage of planned new road<br />

infrastructure actually constructed<br />

Percentage of capital budget reserved<br />

for road upgrading and maintenance<br />

effectively used.<br />

Total number of<br />

household/customer<br />

expected to benefit<br />

60<br />

70 60<br />

30<br />

Estimated backlogs (actual<br />

numbers)<br />

Major challenges in road maintenance services and remedial actions<br />

Bridges are the major challenge in the access roads. However lack of funding for maintenance tended to<br />

determine the gains and work done in this area as most gravel roads have fallen victim to terrestrial rains.<br />

Waste management<br />

Waste management services delivery strategy and main role-players<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> employs a two pronged approach in terms of waste management by promoting<br />

cleanliness as well as alleviation of poverty. The street cleaning is done by casual workers recruited from<br />

the different wards on a three month rotational basis. This project is funded through the Extended Public<br />

Works Programme. Awareness campaigns are conducted <strong>annual</strong>ly at both units (Tsomo & Cofimvaba).<br />

Households within the CBD have been supplied with industrial wheelie bins and 200 litre bin liners. Waste<br />

collection is done once a week per area and the densely populated areas have also been supplied with skip bins<br />

and steel bins which are collected once a week.<br />

The municipality has a partnership with Buyisa e bag which has supplied bailing machines for both the transfer<br />

and landfill sites. Waste is sorted at the site by sorters trained by Buyisa e bag and other sorters have been<br />

deployed at Boxer supermarkets to sort at the source. This is done to minimise waste that goes to the cell.<br />

The Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs is supporting the municipality also<br />

in terms of forming a Waste Management Co-operative.<br />

The Integrated Waste Management Plan (IWMP) is being reviewed as circumstances have changed since 2005<br />

when it was drafted. The IWMP is drafted by the District <strong>Municipality</strong> in consultation with local municipalities<br />

and is therefore adopted at the District and implemented by the local municipalities. Implementation is done<br />

as follows:<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 15


• Implementation of current legislation<br />

• Implementation of waste minimisation strategies e.g. sorting of waste at source and site<br />

• Compliance with DWAF landfill requirementsWaste disposal processes<br />

• Waste collection & transportation<br />

• Waste disposal<br />

• Sorting<br />

• Public private partnerships (Injabulo <strong>Yethu</strong> & Buyisa e-bag)<br />

• Waste volumes recording<br />

1.<br />

Community and social services function’s performance<br />

Function: Community and Social Services<br />

Sub Function: All inclusive<br />

Reporting Level Detail Total<br />

Overview:<br />

Includes all activities associated with the provision of<br />

community and social services<br />

Description of the<br />

Activity:<br />

The function of provision of various community and<br />

social services within the municipality is administered<br />

as follows and includes:<br />

<br />

These services extend to include , but<br />

do not take account of which resides<br />

within the jurisdiction of government. The municipality has a<br />

mandate to:<br />

<br />

The strategic objectives of this function are to:<br />

<br />

The key issues for 200X/0Y are:<br />

<br />

Analysis of the<br />

Function:<br />

<br />

1 Nature and extent of facilities provided:<br />

no of facilities:<br />

no of users:<br />

- Library services 01 1000<br />

- Museums and art galleries 0 <br />

- Other community halls/facilities 15 3000<br />

- Cemeteries and crematoriums 02 5000<br />

- Child care (including crèches etc) 03 500<br />

- Aged care (including aged homes, home help) 01 100<br />

- Schools <br />

- Sporting facilities (specify) 03 2500<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 16


Reporting Level Detail Total<br />

- Parks 0 <br />

Note: the facilities figure should agree with the assets<br />

register<br />

2<br />

Number and cost to employer of all personnel associated<br />

with each community services function:<br />

R(000s)<br />

- Library services <br />

- Museums and art galleries <br />

- Other community halls/facilities <br />

- Cemeteries and crematoriums 03 R160 000.00<br />

- Child care <br />

- Aged care <br />

- Schools <br />

- Sporting facilities <br />

- Parks <br />

Note: total number to be calculated on full-time<br />

equivalent (FTE) basis, total cost to include total salary<br />

package<br />

6<br />

Total operating cost of community and social services<br />

function<br />

R (000s)<br />

Key Performance<br />

Area<br />

Performance During the Year, Performance Targets<br />

Against Actual Achieved and Plans to Improve<br />

Performance<br />

Current<br />

Target<br />

• Approved HIV/<br />

AIDS strategy;<br />

• Approved Disaster<br />

management policy<br />

frameworks and<br />

plans (Metro and<br />

DM)<br />

< List here the actual performance achieved over the financial<br />

year, and the variance between performance planned and actual<br />

performance, providing an explanation of the variance. Also<br />

provide details of any improvements planned for next year.<br />

Water services<br />

Water services delivery strategy and main role-players:<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is acting on behalf of the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> as a water services provider,<br />

dealing with day to day operations and maintenance of water services. The role players in this are the District <strong>Municipality</strong>,<br />

Department of Water Affairs, CBO’s, CSP’s and the Local <strong>Municipality</strong> with its communities.<br />

Levels and standards in water services:<br />

The service standard ranges from a basic (RDP) one to a moderate standard mostly in the urban centres. Targeting<br />

in terms of the provision is done by the Water Services Authority which is Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 17


CHAPTER THREE<br />

MUNICIPAL LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK- (KPA 3)<br />

In response to pervasive poverty, under-development and high rate of unemployment of its people, <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> developed its Local Economic Development Strategy (LED Strategy), as a tool that will<br />

guide and inform its growth and development initiatives within the municipality.<br />

The primary goal of the local economic development strategy is to ensure the rejuvenation of the local economy,<br />

facilitate the competitiveness of sectors in which the municipality has a comparative advantage and ensure sustained<br />

economic growth that creates jobs and improve <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> and improves the quality of life of all residents.<br />

The strategy identifies the following sectors; Agriculture, Tourism, Forestry and SMME as critical in transforming<br />

the local economy of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. In essence, the thrust of IYM strategy is underpinned by the following<br />

strategic pillars;<br />

• Coherent agrarian system that promotes agro-processing,<br />

• Institutional innovation and good governance that is complimentary to economic growth and development.<br />

• Promotion of SMME development biased towards rural industrialisation and<br />

• Increased forestry productivity and creation of processing hubs.<br />

Setting of LED unit and the availability of LED expertise<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> LED unit is existing and fully functional. It is composed of qualified staff of Manager: LED<br />

and Planning, Secretary, LED Coordinator, Programme Managers (Agric & Forestry, SMME), Tourism Officer,<br />

LED Support Clerk and Tourism Intern.<br />

LED stakeholder forum functionality<br />

The LED Forum is yet to be established, but plans are at an advanced stage to have one at <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>.<br />

Funding opportunities of LED activities<br />

The municipality alone cannot achieve its strategic intent and the strategy therefore has been crafted to accommodate<br />

inputs in the form of funding, skills development and resources from external funders or partners.<br />

Progress towards achieving the LED key objectives<br />

Improve public and market confidence<br />

Progress towards achieving the LED key objectives<br />

(a) Improve public and market confidence<br />

SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK<br />

In terms of Section 26(e) of the Municipal Systems Act (Act No. 32 of 2000) the Spatial Development Framework<br />

(SDF) is a legally required component of the <strong>Municipality</strong>’s Integrated Development Framework (IDP) to provide<br />

basic guidelines for a land use management system of the municipality.<br />

The current SDF of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> dates back to 2006. In order to ensure that development will take<br />

place in an integrated and sustainable manner, the IDP’s and SDF’s of local and district municipalities authorities<br />

have to be updated and aligned with the goals.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 19


The “Spatial Development Framework” (SDF) consists of the following components:<br />

A review of the institutional capacity of the <strong>Municipality</strong> to deal with development applications, with par-<br />

ticular reference to current procedures, which are used to assess development applications. Procedures for<br />

dealing with non compliance and illegal land use activities should be included within this review<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Current land use patterns of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

Growth/Demands/ Needs<br />

Spatial imbalances in current land use patterns in the municipality<br />

Analysis of vacant land in the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Land availability/suitability for future development<br />

Existing infrastructure and capacity implications<br />

Capital expenditure programme for implementing the Spatial Development Framework<br />

Illustrated plan of the desired spatial form<br />

Basic guidelines for land management<br />

Earmark restricted development zone<br />

Heritage sites<br />

Wetland Game and natural reserves<br />

Steep slopes of greater than 1:6<br />

Major river banks<br />

1:50 yrs flood line<br />

Settlement hierarchy<br />

Flexibility (Land use management<br />

Accessibility<br />

Spatial Integration – bringing together previously separate development<br />

Cluster approach<br />

List all projects at a particular location and indicate by arrows<br />

Trends and issues from analysis. Indicate by arrow where development is currently taking place<br />

Any localised land use management principle/guidelines<br />

Project location<br />

Maps<br />

Complete natural environment and biodiversity of the municipal area<br />

A strategic environmental assessment to determine areas where no development should take place<br />

Cadastral and jurisdictional<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 20


The key issues relating to IYM spatial development are as follows:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Dispersed Settlement Pattern: Pockets of developed urban centres surrounded by scattered undeveloped<br />

rural villages, which implies great costs to fulfil every basic human right to basic infrastructure and<br />

services<br />

Fragmentation: - There is a high need to systematically address the fragmented nature of development<br />

to promote the integration of urban and rural areas over time (phased development approach which will<br />

optimise on existing capacity and resources to generate the most spin-offs effects from investment).<br />

A strategic approach is required, which enables geographic areas to be prioritised for different levels of<br />

investment to ensure ongoing sustainable development and which will have the most spin-off effects for<br />

continued economic growth in the IYM area.<br />

Limited economic activity outside of urban centres<br />

Need to build on the agricultural and tourism potential of the area and target investment to other LED<br />

related initiatives and programmes taking place outside of the urban centres that have potential for growth<br />

and to generate economic spin – off.<br />

The IYM has many sensitive and conservative worthy areas within its region. The landscape is primarily characterised<br />

by irregular topography with mountain ranges, rolling grassland and various dams and rivers. This special and<br />

multi-faceted environment also presents, many opportunities for the social and economic development of the area.<br />

Land use patterns consist of medium and low residential areas, both formal and informal, light industrial areas and<br />

agricultural areas to a very large extent. The municipality is characterised by a high unemployment rate in all prime<br />

economic sectors. The role of local government is to act as an economic development agent, it is therefore critical<br />

and in order to guide any proposed development and land use management system.<br />

The objectives of our SDF are as follows:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

To provide a strategic, indicative and flexible forward planning instrument to guide decisions on land<br />

development.<br />

To provide a set of policies, principles and directives for spatial development<br />

To provide a clear and logical framework for private and public sector investment<br />

To promote sustainable development in terms of the natural and built environment<br />

To facilitate social, economic and environmental sustainability<br />

To provide a framework for dealing with key issues such as natural resources management, land reform<br />

and land use management.<br />

To facilitate the development of aesthetic urban form and landscape.<br />

Updating and refinement of the current SDF document in order to comply with legal requirements and<br />

be conversant with recent developments within the region<br />

Amendment and expansion of the existing documentation based on the NSDP, PGDP, Eastern Cape<br />

Spatial Development Framework, Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF and IDP (CHDM IDP and IYM<br />

IDP) in order to ensure proper alignment.<br />

Incorporation and alignment of all relevant information and proposals of IYM<br />

Ensuring public and governmental participation of the concerned stakeholders in the planning process,<br />

namely (inter alia) the communities concerned CHDM, EC Province, sector departments, parastatals and<br />

business institutions<br />

Creating a strategic framework to facilitate the development of an appropriate land use system<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 21


The main objective is to produce an SDF, including the following:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Display of the circumstances and realities of IYM.<br />

Land Use Guidelines and maps about:-<br />

• Desired patterns of the land use in IYM<br />

• Spatial reconstruction of the municipal landscape, including<br />

• Correction of spatial imbalances and spatial disintegration<br />

• Desired directions of growth<br />

• Movements networks<br />

• Conservation of natural and built environment<br />

• Identification of areas in which particular types of land use should be encouraged or<br />

discouraged<br />

• Areas in which intensity of land developments should be increased or reduced<br />

• Preferential focal areas for certain of land uses of housing<br />

Strategic framework to facilitate the development of an appropriate land use management system.<br />

A chapter on the Land Reform and Settlement Plan, giving an updated summary and indicating the im-<br />

plications<br />

Maps visually indicating, or where appropriate describing the desire spatial form of the municipal area.<br />

Strategic framework and basic guidelines for a land use management system in the municipal area<br />

A Capital Expenditure Framework for the municipality’s development programmes and budget process<br />

A strategic assessment for the environment impact of the SDF<br />

Executive Summary.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Comparative and Competitive advantage of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

An analysis of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> economy indicates that is has high levels of concentration with high dependency on<br />

community services. The analysis of the local economy indicates that sectors with a comparative advantage at<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> are community services, agriculture, trade and construction. These are the sectors the strategy has<br />

identified as key to unlocking the economic potential of the municipality. In addition to these sectors, tourism has<br />

been identified as having potential for growth.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 22


Intensify Enterprise support and business development<br />

• The type of business development services (BDS) provided to SMME’s<br />

‣ The SMMES across the district have been organised into a business chamber. The purpose is to give them<br />

a voice and to enable them to participate meaningfully to local economic development initiatives of <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong>. Secondly, to lobby and influence the municipality and other government sectors and external<br />

donors in areas of their interest.<br />

‣ Training has also been to members of the chamber on various aspects, e.g. business management<br />

• Public and private partnerships established<br />

The partnerships established with strategic partners in 2008/9 are as follows;<br />

‣ Ruliv<br />

‣ Department of Minerals and Energy<br />

‣ Development Bank of South Africa<br />

• Number of new formal SMME established within the municipality<br />

The new formal LED Support structures that were established in are as follows;<br />

‣ Local Tourism Organisation<br />

‣ Chamber<br />

‣ Cooperatives<br />

• Number of new employment opportunities through Expanded Public Works Programs and Public<br />

and Private Partnerships.<br />

The Lapesi project has continued<br />

3.3 Annual performance as per key performance indicators in LED<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Indicator name<br />

Percentage of LED Budget spent on<br />

LED related activities.<br />

Number of LED stakeholder forum<br />

held<br />

Percentage of SMME that have<br />

benefited from a SMME support<br />

program<br />

Number of job opportunities created<br />

through EPWP<br />

Number of job opportunities created<br />

through PPP<br />

Target set for<br />

the year<br />

R5 191<br />

659.00<br />

Achievement level<br />

during the year<br />

(absolute figure)<br />

R4 672<br />

493.10<br />

Achievement percentage<br />

during the<br />

year<br />

90%<br />

nil nil Nil<br />

250 133 53%<br />

2500 1584 63%<br />

nil nil nil<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 23


3.4 Challenges regarding LED strategy implementation<br />

The success of the strategy rests on two main pillars:<br />

a) Buy in and support by all stakeholders identified in the strategy and<br />

b) Resource allocation (people & money) and commitment to implement;<br />

The serious challenge to the implementation of the LED strategy is under-funding. The budget allocated<br />

to LED department is pittance, trivial to an extent that it is a mockery to the very same concept /notion<br />

of local economic development of the area. The solution is simple, more money should be put in the<br />

LED department in a more or less the same level that the Infrastructure department is being funded. The<br />

economic sectors or sector departments should endeavour to plough more money on the strategic programmes<br />

and projects as identified in our LED Strategy.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 24


In order to come out with spatial development proposals for the area, it is essential to come out with the spatial<br />

objectives and strategies as follows:<br />

Objective and Strategies<br />

CHAPTER FOUR<br />

SPATIAL OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES<br />

Key Spatial Dev.<br />

Issue<br />

Uneven development<br />

in the area (between<br />

rural and urban<br />

areas).<br />

Fragmented nature<br />

of development in<br />

the area<br />

Untapped development<br />

potential in the<br />

area<br />

Lack of effective<br />

and efficient land use<br />

management system<br />

in the area<br />

Objectives<br />

Encourage urban and regional integration<br />

and rectification of past imbalances.<br />

Provision of appropriate level of services<br />

to meet the needs of the communities in<br />

the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, that is, provision<br />

of basic services based on constitutional<br />

rights.<br />

Prioritised public sector investment in areas<br />

of growth and opportunity.<br />

Target strategic investment in development<br />

zones (focus areas) that have development<br />

potential<br />

Promote the integration of urban and rural<br />

areas in a phased programme.<br />

Promote regional connectivity.<br />

Support local economic opportunities<br />

in the municipal area for local economic<br />

development.<br />

Encourage land reform towards more intensive<br />

land uses.<br />

Protect the natural systems in the area.<br />

Manage dev<br />

Strategies<br />

Establish a clear hierarchy of settlement.<br />

Identify Special Development Areas,<br />

that is, areas of particular development<br />

potential or areas where priority spending<br />

is required (special need areas) – nodal<br />

centres, development corridors, special<br />

development areas.<br />

Develop a settlement pattern which<br />

conforms to the approved zonal policy<br />

of CHDM Land Reform and Settlement<br />

Plan that meets the particular requirements<br />

of the municipality.<br />

Create sustainable human settlement with<br />

quality physical, economic and social<br />

environments.<br />

Planning for densification /infill and<br />

careful expansion of existing settlements<br />

on productive agricultural resources.<br />

Promote integration of spatial development<br />

by means of efficient transport<br />

network system.<br />

Identify and prioritise economic opportunity<br />

areas.<br />

Identify and prioritise strategic economic<br />

linkages<br />

Develop a sustainable local Land Use<br />

Management System to promote co-ordinated,<br />

harmonious and environmentally<br />

sustainable development.


OUTCOMES<br />

The outcome of the above objectives and strategies are indicated in the Table below.<br />

Outcome<br />

Sustainable Environment Accessible <strong>Municipality</strong> An Efficient Community<br />

The responsible use of natural<br />

resources.<br />

A sustainable rates base.<br />

Focused investment.<br />

Sustained economic growth.<br />

Sustainable settlements.<br />

Cultural heritage<br />

A physical urban structure that<br />

promotes accessibility.<br />

Equity within the urban and<br />

rural system<br />

Diversity within urban system.<br />

Form and structure that lead to greater<br />

efficiency.<br />

Protection of existing investments<br />

Open space system<br />

Focus activities and investment.<br />

Infrastructure viability.<br />

Managed growth<br />

SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS<br />

KEY SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FEATURES<br />

The Spatial Development Framework is influenced by the following factors:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

Cofimvaba and Tsomo will remain the primary commercial economic hub of the <strong>Municipality</strong> where<br />

the majority of work opportunities will be established.<br />

The other settlements will serve as service centres with economic growth potentials focusing on tourism<br />

and providing a service to the agricultural community.<br />

An effective road network (although in poor conditions) exists in the study area.<br />

Tourism Potential: The area has significant tourism potential, especially, the natural beauty of the<br />

area including the dams, the spectacular landscape, the cultural heritage and other natural and cultural<br />

resources in the area. The development, marketing and intensive exploitation of the existing tourism<br />

sector should be supported to contribute to future economic growth.<br />

Agricultural Sector: The agricultural sector of the entire <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> is extremely prominent. Future<br />

economic growth in the agricultural sector exists when considering small scale processing industries<br />

and intensive farming activities.<br />

Based on the above factors, the following key development features/ structuring elements have been identified<br />

for <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF.<br />

SPATIAL STRUCTURING ELEMENTS<br />

The SDF needs to be indicative and therefore the need to adopt a set of structuring elements that can guide the<br />

future structure of the urban and rural form of the municipal area must be identified. The following spatial structuring<br />

elements have been identified, namely:<br />

• Development Nodes (informed by settlement hierarchy).<br />

• Development Corridors<br />

• Special Priority Development Areas<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 27


• Strategic Development Zones<br />

• Environmental Management Areas<br />

Development Nodes<br />

These are areas where development (facilities, services and economic opportunities) tends to concentrate. Different<br />

types of nodes can be distinguished, such as, urban nodes, development nodes, social nodes, rural nodes (villages)<br />

and transportation distribution hubs).<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> study therefore identifies certain nodes and settlements in line with the levels of<br />

investment and hierarchy (see Map 2.2) but in determining the settlement hierarchy; the following guidelines were<br />

used:<br />

• Settlements with significant economic and physical growth potentials<br />

• Settlement with unique character<br />

• Population<br />

• Functions performed<br />

• Availability of services<br />

• Location characteristics (accessibility and centrality of settlements- transport links, etc)<br />

In line with the CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review (2009/<strong>2010</strong>), the following urban and rural<br />

nodes, based on the settlement hierarchy, have been identified.<br />

Proposed Settlement Hierarchy<br />

Urban Nodes<br />

Node Type Settlement Spatial Development Priorities<br />

Level 2<br />

Major Service Centre<br />

(Regional Service<br />

Centre)<br />

Level 2<br />

Minor Service Centre<br />

(Sub-Regional<br />

Service Centre)<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

(An existing mixed land<br />

uses and key urban node<br />

and a regional centre in<br />

the study area)<br />

Tsomo<br />

(An existing mixed land<br />

use node and a sub- regional<br />

centre).<br />

Land Use Management and Administration<br />

CBD Revitalization and Renewal<br />

Sustainable Human Settlement Programme.<br />

Public-funded Housing Development<br />

Infrastructure and Social Facilities provision and upgrade<br />

Limited urbanization<br />

Urban aesthetics and land use management<br />

Environmental Management (Tourism)<br />

Sustainable Human Settlement Programme.<br />

Public-funded Housing Development<br />

Infrastructure and Social Facilities provision, maintenance<br />

and upgrade<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 28


Rural Nodes<br />

Node Type Settlement Spatial Development Priorities<br />

Level 2<br />

Rural Node<br />

(Rural<br />

Service Centre)<br />

Level 2 – Rural<br />

Villages<br />

Ncora, Qamata/Bilatye<br />

Mtshingeni<br />

Lubisi<br />

Sabalele<br />

All other existing villages<br />

Areas where medium order community facilities can be bundled<br />

in order to ensure that a greater number of rural residents<br />

are served in a more efficient and effective way.<br />

Ideally, these and future rural service centres are located in<br />

close proximity to public transport routes to ensure maximum<br />

accessibility to facilities<br />

Local planning to maximize use of resources<br />

Local land use schemes to be negotiated<br />

Basic level of service extension.<br />

Local planning to maximize use of resources<br />

Local land use schemes to be negotiated<br />

Extracted from CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review (2009/<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Development Corridors<br />

Development corridors are characterized by higher order ribbon-like development along routes that would otherwise<br />

be classified as movement corridors. These occur on various levels, from local development corridors along<br />

the main streets of the towns or even along rivers to regional and provincial corridors. Different types of corridors<br />

can be distinguished such as development corridors, movement corridors and activity corridors.<br />

The R61 from Queenstown through Cofimvaba, Ngcobo to Mthatha has been identified as the East Corridor,<br />

one of the four major development corridors in the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 29


However, this study has identified an additional corridor, Tsomo–Ndabakazi Development Corridor.<br />

Fig. Map 2.2: Development Corridor Strategy<br />

SPECIAL (PRIORITY) DEVELOPMENT AREAS<br />

The Special Development Areas as identified by the CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review<br />

(2009/<strong>2010</strong>) and this study include the following:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

Priority Basic Need Areas.<br />

Targeted Focus Areas as proposed by the CHDM Land Reform and Settlement Plan (2005).<br />

Strategic Development Zones, that is, areas with LED potentials, such as, Agriculture and Forestry<br />

Sectors, Tourism Sector and Manufacturing Sector.<br />

Others – Infrastructure, Housing, Social Services, etc.<br />

Priority Basic Need Areas<br />

These are areas of greatest need, requiring special need for investment to upgrade levels of service (water supply,<br />

sanitation, access roads, electricity, etc) and social facilities (schools, health, community facilities, etc) to the accepted<br />

minimum level to improve the level of well being of communities.<br />

It should involve the investment of basic infrastructure as well as poverty alleviation programmes and projects<br />

such as community gardens, tourism, street trading and other SMME initiatives in <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. It<br />

should be indicated that <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Municipal area falls within the priority basic need areas within the CHDM.<br />

Targeted Focus Areas (Proposed Development Zones)<br />

Six development zones (see Map 2.3) have been identified in the Chris Hani District Land Reform and Settlement<br />

Plan (LR & SP) within which specific land reform and/or settlement planning (spatial planning) and land use management<br />

actions are necessary or desirable. These targeted areas coincide with the proposed settlement hierarchy<br />

(nodal) proposals outlined above. These zones are indicated in the table below.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 30


Land use management:<br />

Number Property Application Applicant Update<br />

1.<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Revitilisation of<br />

Subdivision<br />

Mrs Yengwa<br />

Awaiting Council Resolution<br />

2.<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Subdivision<br />

Eskom TSC<br />

Awaiting Council Resolution<br />

3.<br />

Erf 143, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

Sakawuli’s Properties<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

4. Erf 24, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mr. Njamela<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

5.<br />

Erf 147, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

6. Erf 90, Tsomo Rezoning<br />

Sakawuli’s Properties<br />

Mr. Sibulele Khweba<br />

Approved on the<br />

04/07/2008<br />

Approved on the<br />

19/02/2007<br />

7. Erf 14, Cofimvaba Rezoning Zamani Wholesalers<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

8.<br />

Erf 265, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

Mrs Nophelo Nongwevu<br />

Approved<br />

9. Erf 49, Cofimvaba Rezoning Ms X M Martins Approved<br />

10. Erf 89, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mzingisi Hlanjwa<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

Erf 265, Cofimvaba<br />

Erf 144, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning Mrs N. Nongwevu Approved<br />

Rezoning Mr.N.R.Golifili Approved<br />

13. Erf 94, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mr Somzi<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

14. Erf 42, Tsomo Rezoning<br />

Mr.<br />

M.M.Mkhunyana<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

15.<br />

Erf 131-Erf 134,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Consolidation and<br />

then Subdivision<br />

Lundi – Luvu Business<br />

Ventures<br />

Approved<br />

16. Erf 79, Cofimvaba Rezoning<br />

17 Erf 30, Cofimvaba Rezoning<br />

Sibiya Jacob Gouman<br />

HDM CON-<br />

STRUCTION<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 31


Number Property Application Applicant Update<br />

18<br />

Erf 186, Cofimvaba<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Design Stage<br />

19 Thabo Village<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

Surveyed awaiting approval<br />

from LUMB<br />

20 Ext 4 Tsomo<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

Surveyed awaiting<br />

approved by LUMB,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

Surveyor General<br />

21<br />

Section C, Ext 4<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Pemro<br />

Submitted to LUMB<br />

22<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning, Subdivision<br />

and Consolidation<br />

Eris Property<br />

Group, Mhlaba<br />

Group<br />

Awaiting approval from<br />

DFA Tribunal<br />

23 Joe Slovo<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Setplan<br />

Awaiting Land Transfer<br />

24 Nyanisweni<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Complan<br />

Complete<br />

25 St Marks 500<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Sektor<br />

Complete<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/<br />

total number of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

90192 R31,468,729<br />

49% R31,468,729<br />

68% R31,468,729 R21,398,735<br />

R590430.00 R401492.40<br />

R91,693,529 R62753092.10<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

Electricity backlogs<br />

(30KWH/month)<br />

R26000000<br />

R23000000<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 32


Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 30 June 200..<br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual required budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

139,923.180 139,923.80 139,923.80 139,923.80<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

4024 1100<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

139,923.180<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

Sanitation backlogs<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

112280 R60,224,800 R52265.311<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

61% R60,224,800 R52265.311<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

R52265.311<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

R500000.00<br />

R91693.529<br />

R4000000.00<br />

Road maintenance backlogs<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

1050 km R25.5m 1195 km R968.950m R2.875m R2.875m<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 33


Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 30 June 200..<br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual required budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

87.9% 2.6% 0.3% 0.3%<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

R75m R34m R34m R120m R25.935m 25.935m<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

R15m R2.5m R2.5m R15m R2.875m R2.875m<br />

Key Performance<br />

Area<br />

Performance During the Year, Performance Targets Against<br />

Actual Achieved and Plans to Improve Performance<br />

Current<br />

Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

1.Water treatment.<br />

During the <strong>2010</strong>/11 Financial year, we managed to spend 88% of the<br />

budgeted amount of R26000000.00.<br />

100%<br />

2.Sewage treatment.<br />

Our target for the <strong>2011</strong>/2012 financial year is 100% of the budgeted<br />

amount of R30000000.00 because there has been an improvement in<br />

our systems and new staff members have been employed.<br />

3.water reticulation.<br />

4.Human resource<br />

Management.<br />

5.Financial Management<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 34


1.<br />

Water distribution function’s performance<br />

Function:<br />

Sub<br />

Function:<br />

Water<br />

Water Distribution<br />

Reporting Level Detail Total Cost<br />

Overview: Includes the bulk purchase and distribution of water<br />

Description of<br />

the Activity:<br />

Water distribution<br />

is<br />

When the<br />

communities<br />

are served with<br />

water from<br />

the plant to<br />

the reservoirs<br />

and from the<br />

reservoirs to the<br />

houses or Businesses.<br />

The water purchase and distribution functions of the municipality<br />

are administered as follows and include:<br />

Raw water from dam or river is bought from the department of<br />

water affairs. It is then transported through pipes to the water treatment<br />

plant. From there it is treated with Chemicals and pumped to<br />

the reservoirs.<br />

< The <strong>Municipality</strong> buys raw water from DWA and it is piped to the<br />

water treatment plant. Chemicals which the <strong>Municipality</strong> buys from<br />

the Private sector are added to the water and pumped to the reservoirs.<br />

The cost of water,chemicals and labour are then added to arrive at<br />

the price of treated water.<br />

The mandate of the <strong>Municipality</strong> is to provide water and is not to be<br />

a water services authority.<br />

<br />

The strategic objectives of this function are to:<br />

< To provide clean drinking water and sanitation to the communities<br />

at a minimal cost.<br />

The key issues for <strong>2010</strong>/11 are:<br />

< Fixing of damaged water infrastructure and the target is to get a<br />

blue drop award.<br />

` <br />

1 Number and cost to employer of all personnel associated with the<br />

R (000s)<br />

water distribution function:<br />

- Professional (Engineers/Consultants)<br />

- Field (Supervisors/Foremen) 4 R104000.00<br />

- Office (Clerical/Administration) 3 R442000.00<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 35


Reporting Level Detail Total Cost<br />

- Non-professional (blue collar, outside workforce) 43 R2064000.00<br />

- Temporary <br />

- Contract <br />

Note: total number to be calculated on full-time equivalent (FTE)<br />

basis, total cost to include total salary package.<br />

2 Percentage of total water usage per month<br />

77.8% 32.96Ml<br />

Note: this will therefore highlight percentage of total water stock<br />

used per month<br />

3 Total volume and cost of bulk water purchases in kilolitres and rand,<br />

R (000s)<br />

by category of consumer<br />

- Category 1 42.3Ml R6768.00<br />

- Category 2 <br />

- Category 3 <br />

- Category 4 <br />

4 Total volume and receipts for bulk water sales in kilolitres and rand,<br />

R (000s)<br />

by category of consumer:<br />

- Category 1 ) 395.6Ml R1978000.00<br />

- Category 2 (total number of households) <br />

- Category 3 (total number of households) <br />

- Category 4 (total number of households) <br />

5 Total year-to-date water losses in kilolitres and rand R (000s)<br />

200m from dwelling same <br />

- Borehole 174862 <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: if other types of services are available, please provide details<br />

7 Number and cost of new connections: R (000s)<br />

3681 <br />

8 Number and cost of disconnections and reconnections: R (000s)<br />

<br />

9 Number and total value of water projects planned and current: R (000s)<br />

- Current (financial year after year <strong>report</strong>ed on) 17 31,468,729<br />

- Planned (future years) `<br />

Note: provide total project and project value as per initial or revised<br />

budget<br />

10 Anticipated expansion of water service: R (000s)<br />

- Piped water inside dwelling <br />

- Piped water inside yard <br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 36


- Piped water on community stand: distance < 200m from dwelling <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance > 200m from dwelling <br />

- Borehole <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: provide total number of households anticipated to benefit and<br />

total additional operating cost per year to the municipality<br />

11 Estimated backlog in number (and cost to provide) water connection: R (000s)<br />

- Piped water inside dwelling <br />

- Piped water inside yard <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance < 200m from dwelling 90192 <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance > 200m from dwelling <br />

- Borehole <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: total number should appear in IDP, and cost in future budgeted<br />

capital housing programmes<br />

12 Free Basic Service Provision:<br />

- Quantity (number of households affected) 180384<br />

- Quantum (value to each household) <br />

Note: Provide details of how many households receive the FBS<br />

provision, and the average value it means per household. Describe in<br />

detail the level of Free Basic Services provided.<br />

13 Type and number of grants and subsidies received: R (000s)<br />


ROLE PLAYERS Roles RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

• Municipal Council<br />

To deliver houses<br />

Prioritise housing project.<br />

Identification of the need or demand<br />

for housing .<br />

Ensure that the housing sector<br />

plan is in place.<br />

• Municipal Officials<br />

Register beneficiaries<br />

Ensuring the demand is a chapter<br />

in the IDP.<br />

• Communities<br />

• Traditional leaders<br />

• Town Planners<br />

• Surveyors<br />

• Conveyances<br />

Agree on the land to be utilised<br />

Approve land for development<br />

Produce an approved layout<br />

plans for the identified area<br />

To provide an approved SG diagram<br />

To register the township and<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Categorise the communities according<br />

to their housing needs<br />

and income levels, in order to<br />

provide for them accordingly.<br />

Ensure that you obtain well<br />

located land for the different levels<br />

of the communities.<br />

Ensure that the land belongs to<br />

the municipality.<br />

Engage planners to prepare layout<br />

plans and lodge the layout plans to<br />

the land use board. After approval<br />

Surveys must be made and lodged<br />

with the surveyor general<br />

Apply for funding<br />

Provincial Department<br />

National Department of Human Settlements<br />

Receive the Business plan and<br />

forward it to the National Department<br />

for funding.<br />

Make approval of the Township<br />

submission.<br />

On approval of the funds .It has<br />

to ensure that the supply chain<br />

processes are followed and the<br />

contractor is introduced to the<br />

municipality<br />

Funding housing programs<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 38


LEVELS & STANDARDS IN HOUSING & TOWN PLANNING SERVICES<br />

LEVELS Standards Town Planning services<br />

Low cost housing<br />

Middle income housing<br />

The complete project has high<br />

standard as it was a pilot for even<br />

the Provincial Govt.<br />

No delivery yet but provisions<br />

are underway. Thabo Village will<br />

be our show case that will be an<br />

integration of both the middle<br />

income housing, CRU and social<br />

housing<br />

They met the standards though<br />

they were outsourced<br />

The project is in the stage of approval<br />

from the land use board as<br />

well as consolidation of even for<br />

CRUs<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Total Number of<br />

households/customers<br />

Estimated<br />

backlog(Actual<br />

Number)<br />

Target for<br />

the following<br />

yr<br />

No. of<br />

Households<br />

% of<br />

Achievement<br />

during the<br />

yr.<br />

% of the households<br />

living in<br />

informals<br />

1.3%<br />

% of informal<br />

settlements that<br />

have been provided<br />

with basic services<br />

% of households<br />

informal housing<br />

that conforms to<br />

the minimum building<br />

standards for<br />

residential Houses<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 39


1.27 SPATIAL PLANNING<br />

PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF SDF PROCESSES<br />

Dissemination strategy: SDF is obtainable from the municipal website<br />

In an electronic Version obtainable in the municipal office<br />

In a hard copy in the municipal offices<br />

Community involvement in developing the SDF document<br />

Implementation: Reference is made to the SDF for any spatial provision<br />

It assists in explaining the different nodes as planned.<br />

It is used as a guiding document in any project.<br />

All projects are in line with the SDF.<br />

SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS<br />

Rezoning Sub-Division Consent Use Removal Of Restrictions<br />

6 2 0 0 1<br />

Township<br />

Establishments<br />

MAJOR CHALLLENGES IN SPATIAL PLANNING SERVICES AND REMEDIAL<br />

ACTIONS<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

Suitable and surveyed areas are invaded<br />

Communities do not want to comply with legislative requirements such as registering land, submitting building<br />

plans etc.<br />

REMEDIAL ACTION<br />

Evictions<br />

Law enforcement<br />

Awareness on impact of invasion<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

Overview of the executive and council functions and achievements<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is governed by a council of 46 members and an Executive Committee of 9<br />

members including the mayor. A number of members of the Executive Committee preside over specific portfolio<br />

committees; this ensures active participation by councillors. The function of Council and the Executive Committee<br />

are:<br />

The Council<br />

The Speaker is responsible for the legislative function of the council. The legislative functions of the council<br />

include:<br />

-<br />

-<br />

The passing of by-laws and formulation of policies<br />

The oversight of the executive and administration<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 40


-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

The approval and amendment of rates and other taxes, levies, and duties<br />

The approval or amendment of the municipality Integrated Development Plan<br />

The setting of tariff charges<br />

The entering into <strong>Municipality</strong> Service Partnerships and the appointment of the section of section 57<br />

manager<br />

The Executive Committee<br />

The Executive Committee is responsible for the overall management, coordination, monitoring the performance<br />

of administration programmes, prioritisation and drafting of policies and by-laws. The municipality has 5 standing<br />

committees. The municipality has established these committees according to the Municipal Structures Act.<br />

Public participation and consultation<br />

During the Mayoral Imbizo’s the municipality utilises a local radio station (Vukani FM) and local newspaper<br />

(Skawara News) as a means of consulting and mobilising its communities, as it is very paramount for them to have<br />

a say in council decisions and service delivery.<br />

The Ward Councillors together with Community Development workers and Ward Committees also played a vital<br />

role as they serve as the close link between the communities and the municipality in mobilising for such occasions.<br />

When there is a public hearing, proper communications are made through announcements in community radio i.e.<br />

Vukani Community Radio. Public Hearings also publicised by two way communication that is in between the ward<br />

councillor and the residents at large and also the CDW’s. The municipality has also enhanced the way of conveying<br />

the message when there will be public hearing and imbizo’s through the tool of loud hailing to its communities.<br />

Customer Satisfaction Surveys: English and Xhosa questionnaires are established and made available to measure<br />

the satisfaction of the public/ commuters. These questionnaires distributed and then collected quarterly to all 23<br />

wards of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> municipality as the way of getting feedback from the public.<br />

Ward committees’ establishment and functionality<br />

As the Handbook of Ward Committees outlines that during the sitting of the meetings of the ward committee<br />

members, the ward councillor of that particular ward is regarded as chairperson. According to the <strong>report</strong>s forwarded<br />

by the ward councillor to the Speaker’s Office that are furnished by credential lists shown a good attendance of<br />

the committee members into wards meetings.<br />

As the ward committee members are ward based and their meetings are convened and held in their respective<br />

wards, the minutes are written and filled by committee secretaries and some copies are forwarded to their ward<br />

councillors.<br />

Availability of ward committee activity <strong>report</strong>s: each and every ward had its own program of action where each<br />

committee member performs his/her tasks and in turn <strong>report</strong>s to his/her ward councillor.<br />

Community Development Workers performance monitoring<br />

To try and monitor the Community Development Work, the municipality has purchased a prefab which will be<br />

utilised as offices by CDW’s. That will make it easy for the municipality to work and monitor the CDW’s. A full<br />

time municipal official was made available for coordinate CDW’s. The municipality has made sits available for<br />

CDW’s in the council meeting to make it easy for issues for the CDW’s to follow and understand matters of local<br />

government and development.<br />

The municipality is in the process of coordinating the <strong>report</strong>s of the CDW’s and assist where necessary before<br />

they are forwarded to the province.<br />

As we all know that the CDWs are ward based and regarded as the foot soldiers for service delivery, they compile<br />

<strong>report</strong>s based on their findings in their wards. The monthly <strong>report</strong>s are handed over to the speaker’s office and<br />

to the Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 41


A vast number of cases are identified and <strong>report</strong>ed in almost all the 23 wards of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> jurisdiction each and<br />

every month. Interventions by Government Departments in these cases are required.<br />

CDWs also play a prominent role as publicity and mobilising tool for municipal and government sector gatherings<br />

in their wards.<br />

Communication Strategy<br />

The strategy is guided by the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) which seeks to achieve the prescriptions of our<br />

vision and mission, the Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP), Public Participation Framework 2005.<br />

The National Government Communications Plan and the SALGA National Communications Conference Resolutions<br />

(May 2006).<br />

The municipality has completed the development of the Communication Strategy. This strategy is reviewed on a<br />

yearly basis. This programme was spear headed by the Department of Corporate Services. The strategy is to work<br />

towards achieving the goals of the Institution.<br />

Objectives<br />

To encourage meaningful public participation through promotion of government programmes.<br />

To promote and articulate <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> plans policies and achievements.<br />

To facilitate proactive communication on matters of disaster risk management, health and environmental issues.<br />

To strengthen and improve internal communication systems.<br />

To reinforce intergovernmental relations through coordination of communication programmes and activities<br />

amongst the three spheres of government<br />

To create and maintain sound relations with the media houses<br />

The document was presented to Executive Committee off the municipality and it was approved and it still waiting<br />

for approval of the Council.<br />

There is one communication official responsible for the section of communication. The office does have enough<br />

infrastructure to utilise when participating in communication activities.<br />

Anti-Corruption Strategy<br />

The municipality utilises an anti-corruption strategy document that was developed by the Department of Local<br />

Government through a service provider. The municipality in the process of implementing the strategy.<br />

Inter-governmental Relations<br />

An Inter-governmental Forum sits on quarterly basis during the financial year.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 42


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 43


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

ASSETS<br />

Current assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 1 24 931 734 24 458 515<br />

Trade receivables from exchange transactions 3 309 186 1 201 570<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions 4 621 802 1 215 487<br />

Other receivables from exchange transactions 5 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

Investments 6 2 856 693 2 315 274<br />

VAT receivable 10 1 825 693 10 308 984<br />

Non-current assets<br />

Investments 7 - 208 995<br />

Property, plant and equipment 8 28 601 130 -<br />

Total assets 69 022 705 44 994 917<br />

LIABILITIES<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 9 11 064 350 3 733 534<br />

Current portion of borrowings 12 121 795 192 051<br />

Non-current liabilities<br />

Non-current borrowings 12 3 524 429 3 680 911<br />

Total liabilities 14 710 574 7 606 497<br />

Net assets 54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

NET ASSETS<br />

Accumulated surplus / (deficit) 54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

Total net assets<br />

54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 44


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE<br />

for the year ending 30 June<br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

Revenue<br />

Property rates 15 1 617 990 1 074 372<br />

Service charges 16 273 498 292 861<br />

Rental of facilities and equipment 17 668 323 607 880<br />

Interest earned - external investments 18 1 552 789 2 385 883<br />

Interest earned - outstanding receivables 19 90 896 126 608<br />

Fines 70 910 27 133<br />

Licences and permits 667 617 504 054<br />

Government grants and subsidies 20 81 116 840 67 658 106<br />

Other income 21 2 608 123 393 549<br />

Total revenue 88 666 985 73 070 446<br />

Expenses<br />

Employee related costs 22 30 655 009 21 465 921<br />

Remuneration of councillors 23 10 269 294 9 639 112<br />

Bad debts 2 819 204 -<br />

Repairs and maintenance 3 004 345 1 474 703<br />

Finance costs 24 - 80 036<br />

Bulk purchases 25 - -<br />

Contracted services 26 113 229 188 486<br />

General expenses 27 24 881 959 27 901 139<br />

Total expenses 71 743 039 60 749 397<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 16 923 946 12 321 049<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 45


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated<br />

Surplus/(Deficit)<br />

Total: Net<br />

Assets<br />

Note R R<br />

Balance at 30 June 2008 37 471 253 37 471 253<br />

Changes in accounting policy 31 (18 327 664) (18 327 664)<br />

Correction of prior period error 6 062 188 6 062 188<br />

Restated balance 25 205 777 19 143 589<br />

Correction of prior period error 32 (138 406) (138 406)<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 12 321 049 12 321 049<br />

Balance at 30 June 2009 37 388 420 31 326 232<br />

c 32 (236) (236)<br />

Restated balance 37 388 184 37 388 184<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 16 923 946 16 923 946<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2010</strong> 54 312 131 54 312 131<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 46


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

CASH FLOW STATEMENT<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES<br />

Cash receipts from ratepayers, government and others 92 420 560 66 281 904<br />

Cash paid to suppliers and employees (64 763 157) (54 788 780)<br />

28 27 657 402 11 493 124<br />

Interest received 1 643 684 2 512 491<br />

Interest paid - (80 036)<br />

Net cash flows from operating activities 29 301 087 13 925 579<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES<br />

Purchase of fixed assets (28 601 130) (19 651 610)<br />

Proceeds from sale of investments 16 666 484<br />

Net cash flows from investing activities (28 601 130) (2 985 126)<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES<br />

Proceeds from borrowings - 3 872 962<br />

Repayment of borrowings (226 738) -<br />

Net cash flows from financing activities (226 738) 3 872 962<br />

Net increase / (decrease) in net cash and cash equivalents 473 218 14 813 415<br />

Net cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period<br />

Net cash and cash equivalents at end of<br />

period<br />

24 458 516 9 645 101<br />

29 24 931 734 24 458 516<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 47


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES<br />

for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

1 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING<br />

1.1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting and are in<br />

accordance with historical cost convention unless specified otherwise.<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Recognised<br />

Accounting Practice (GRAP), issued by the Accounting Standards Board in accordance with Section<br />

122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act, (Act No 56 of 2003).<br />

In accordance with section 122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003),<br />

the <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted Standards of GRAP and the transitional provisions as applicable as<br />

issued by the Accounting Standards Board during the financial year, which are fundamentally different<br />

to the fund accounting policies adopted in previous financial years. Comparative amounts<br />

have been restated retrospectively to the extent possible.<br />

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

Those standards of GRAP and interpretations of such standards applicable to the operations of the<br />

GRAP 1<br />

GRAP 2<br />

GRAP 3<br />

GRAP 5<br />

GRAP 6<br />

GRAP 9<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements<br />

Cash flow statements<br />

Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors<br />

Borrowing Costs<br />

Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements<br />

Revenue from Exchange Transactions<br />

GRAP 12 Inventories<br />

GRAP 13 Leases<br />

GRAP 14<br />

GRAP 16<br />

GRAP 17<br />

GRAP 19<br />

GRAP 100<br />

GRAP 102<br />

IPSAS 20<br />

IPSAS 21<br />

Events after the Reporting Date<br />

Investment Property<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment<br />

Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets<br />

Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations<br />

Intangible Assets<br />

Related Pary Disclosure<br />

Impairment of Non Cash-Generating Assets<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 48


IFRS 7<br />

IAS 19<br />

IAS 32<br />

IAS 36<br />

IAS 39<br />

IFRIC 4<br />

Financial Instruments: Disclosure<br />

Employee Benefits<br />

Financial Instruments: Presentation<br />

Impairment of Assets<br />

Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement<br />

Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease<br />

The standards prescribed are the effective Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice<br />

(GRAP), inlcuding any interpretations and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board. The<br />

impact of the mentined directives on the financial statements, specifically Directive 4 is disclosed in<br />

the various accounting policies below.<br />

Assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses have not been offset except when offsetting is required or<br />

permitted by a Standard of GRAP.<br />

The accounting policies applied are consistent with those used to present the previous year’s financial<br />

statements, unless explicitly stated. The details of any changes in accounting policies are<br />

explained in the relevant policy.<br />

1.2 PRESENTATION CURRENCY<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are presented in South African Rand, which is the functional currency<br />

of the municipality.<br />

1.3 GOING CONCERN ASSUMPTION<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the municipality will<br />

continue to operate as a going concern for at least the next 12 months.<br />

1.4 COMPARATIVE INFORMATION<br />

Budget information in accordance with GRAP 1 and 24, has been provided in the notes to these<br />

financial statements and forms part of the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

When the presentation or classification of items in the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements is amended,<br />

prior period comparative amounts are restated. The nature and reason for the reclassification is<br />

disclosed. Where accounting errors have been identified in the current year, the correction is made<br />

retrospectively as far as is practicable, and the prior year comparatives are restated accordingly.<br />

Where there has been a change in accounting policy in the current year, the adjustment is made<br />

retrospectively as far as is practicable, and the prior year comparatives are restated accordingly.<br />

1.5<br />

STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS TO STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EF-<br />

FECTIVE<br />

The following GRAP standards have been issued but are not yet effective and have not been early<br />

adopted by the municipality:<br />

GRAP 18 Segment Reporting - issued March 2005<br />

GRAP 21 Impairment of non cash generating assets - issued March 2009<br />

GRAP 23 Revenue from Non-Exchange Transactions (Taxes and Transfers) - issued February 2008<br />

GRAP 24 Presentation of Budget Information in Financial Statements - issued November 2007<br />

GRAP 25 Employee benefits - issued November 2009<br />

GRAP 26 Impairment of cash generating assets - issued March 2009<br />

GRAP 103 Heritage Assets - issued July 2008<br />

GRAP 104 Financial Instruments - issued October 2009<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 49


Application of all of the above GRAP standards will be effective from a date to be announced by<br />

the Minister of Finance. This date is not currently available.<br />

The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been issued but are<br />

not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the municipality:<br />

IAS 19 Employee Benefits - effective 1 January 2009<br />

IFRIC 17 Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners - effective 1 July 2009<br />

IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement - portions of standard effective 1 July<br />

2009<br />

IFRS 7 Financial Instrument Disclosure - issued August 2009<br />

Management has considered all of the above mentioned GRAP standards issued but not yet effective<br />

and anticipates that the adoption of these standards will not have a significant impact on the<br />

financial position, financial performance or cash flows of the municipality.<br />

2 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT<br />

2.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Property, plant and equipment are tangible non-current assets (including infrastructure assets) that<br />

are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, rental to others, or for administrative<br />

purposes, and are expected to be used during more than one year. Items of property, plant and<br />

equipment are initially recognised as assets on acquisition date and are initially recorded at cost.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is the purchase price and other costs attributable<br />

to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the<br />

manner intended by the municipality. Trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the<br />

cost. The cost also includes the necessary costs of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring<br />

the site on which it is located.<br />

When significant components of an item of property, plan and equipment have different useful lives,<br />

they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.<br />

Where an asset is acquired by the municipality for no or nominal consideration (i.e. a non-exchange<br />

transaction), the cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value of that asset on the date acquired.<br />

Where an item of property, plant and equipment is acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset<br />

or monetary assets, or a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets, the asset acquired is<br />

initially measured at fair value (the cost). If the acquired item’s fair value was not determinable, it’s<br />

deemed cost is the carrying amount of the asset(s) given up.<br />

Major spare parts and servicing equipment qualify as property, plant and equipment when the municipality<br />

expects to use them during more than one period. Similarly, if the major spare parts and<br />

servicing equipment can be used only in connection with an item of property, plant and equipment,<br />

they are accounted for as property, plant and equipment.<br />

2.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less<br />

accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Land is not depreciated as it is deemed to have<br />

an indefinite useful life.<br />

Where the municipality replaces parts of an asset, it derecognises the part of the asset being replaced<br />

and capitalises the new component. Subsequent expenditure incurred on an asset is capitalised<br />

when it increases the capacity or future economic benefits associated with the asset.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 50


2.3 DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENT<br />

Depreciation is calculated on the depreciable amount, using the straight-line method over the estimated<br />

useful lives of the assets. Depreciation only commences when the asset is available for use,<br />

unless stated otherwise. Components of assets that are significant in relation to the whole asset and<br />

that have different useful lives are depreciated separately. The <strong>annual</strong> depreciation rates are based<br />

on the following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Other<br />

Roads and Paving 10 years Buildings 30 years<br />

Sewerage 15 years Office equipment 3- 5 years<br />

Furniture and fittings<br />

10 years<br />

Bins and containers<br />

5-10 years<br />

Community Landfill sites 30 years<br />

Buildings 30 years Computer equipment 4 years<br />

Halls<br />

30 years<br />

Libraries<br />

30 years<br />

Other assets<br />

30 years<br />

The residual value, the useful life of an asset and the depreciation method is reviewed <strong>annual</strong>ly<br />

and any changes are recognised as a change in accounting estimate in the Statement of Financial<br />

Performance.<br />

The municipality tests for impairment where there is an indication that an asset may be impaired.<br />

An assessment of whether there is an indication of possible impairment is done at each <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

date. Where the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment is greater than the<br />

estimated recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount), it is written down immediately to<br />

its recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount) and an impairment loss is charged to the<br />

Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

2.4 DERECOGNITION<br />

Items of Property, plant and equipment are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when<br />

there are no further economic benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset. The<br />

gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined<br />

as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying value and is recognised in<br />

the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

2.5 TRANSITIONAL PROVISION<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure property, plant and equipment<br />

for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial<br />

adoption of the Standard of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment. The Standard of GRAP on<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment was initially adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, property,<br />

plant and equipment were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP<br />

on: Property, Plant and Equipment, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets<br />

Held for Sale and Discontinued Operation.<br />

Property, plant and equipment acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP<br />

are measured at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to property, plant<br />

and equipment since the Standard of GRAP of Property, Plant and Equipment was initially adopted<br />

are recognised at cost. No depreciation is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of<br />

the depreciation calculation could not be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 51


3 INTANGIBLE ASSETS<br />

3.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. Examples include<br />

computer software, licences, and development costs. The municipality recognises an intangible<br />

asset in its Statement of Financial Position only when it is probable that the expected future<br />

economic benefits or service potential that are attributable to the asset will flow to the municipality<br />

and the cost or fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.<br />

Internally generated intangible assets are subject to strict recognition criteria before they are capitlised.<br />

Research expenditure is never capitalised, while development expenditure is only capitalised<br />

to the extent that:<br />

• the municipality intends to complete the intangible asset for use or sale;<br />

• it is technically feasible to complete the intangible asset;<br />

• the municipality has the resources to complete the project; and<br />

• it is probable that the municipality will receive future economic benefits or service potential.<br />

Intangible assets are initially recognised at cost.<br />

Where an intangible asset is acquired by the municipality for no or nominal consideration (i.e. a<br />

non-exchange transaction), the cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value of that asset on the date<br />

acquired.<br />

Where an intangible asset is acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset or monetary assets, or<br />

a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets, the asset acquired is initially measured at fair<br />

value (the cost). If the acquired item’s fair value was not determinable, it’s deemed cost is the carrying<br />

amount of the asset(s) given up.<br />

3.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Intangible assets are subsequently carried at cost less accumulated amoritisation and impairments.<br />

The cost of an intangible asset is amortised over the useful life where that useful life is finite. Where<br />

the useful life is indefinite, the asset is not amortised but is subject to an <strong>annual</strong> impairment test.<br />

3.3 AMORTISATION AND IMPAIRMENT<br />

Amortisation is charged so as to write off the cost or valuation of intangible assets over their estimated<br />

useful lives using the straight line method. The <strong>annual</strong> amortisation rates are based on the<br />

following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Computer software<br />

3 - 5 years<br />

The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful<br />

life are reviewed at each <strong>report</strong>ing date and any changes are recognised as a change in accounting<br />

estimate in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

The municipality tests intangible assets with finite useful lives for impairment where there is an indication<br />

that an asset may be impaired. An assessment of whether there is an indication of possible<br />

impairment is done at each <strong>report</strong>ing date. Where the carrying amount of an item of an intangible<br />

asset is greater than the estimated recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount), it is written<br />

down immediately to its recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount) and an impairment<br />

loss is charged to the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 52


3.4 DERECOGNITION<br />

Intangible assets are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when there are no further economic<br />

benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset. The gain or loss arising on<br />

the disposal or retirement of an intangible asset is determined as the difference between the sales<br />

proceeds and the carrying value and is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

3.5 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure intangible assets for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the<br />

Standard of GRAP on Intangible assets. The Standard of GRAP on Intangible assets was initially adopted<br />

on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, intangible<br />

assets were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP on: Intangible<br />

assets, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued<br />

Operation.<br />

4 INVESTMENT PROPERTY<br />

Intangible assets acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP are measured<br />

at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to intangible assets since the<br />

Standard of GRAP of Intangible assets was initially adopted are recognised at cost. No depreciation<br />

is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of the depreciation calculation could not<br />

be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

4.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Investment property includes property (land or a building, or part of a building, or both land or<br />

buildings held under a finance lease) held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation, rather than<br />

held to meet service delivery objectives, the production or supply of goods or services, or the sale of<br />

an asset in the ordinary course of operations.<br />

At initial recognition, the municipality measures investment property at cost including transaction<br />

costs once it meets the definition of investment property. However, where an investment property<br />

was acquired through a non-exchange transaction (i.e. where it acquired the investment property<br />

for no or a nominal value), its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

The cost of self-constructed investment property is the cost at date of completion.<br />

4.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Investment property is measured using the cost model. Under the cost model, investment property<br />

is carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.<br />

Depreciation is calculated on the depreciable amount, using the straight-line method over the estimated<br />

useful lives of the assets. Components of assets that are significant in relation to the whole<br />

asset and that have different useful lives are depreciated separately. The <strong>annual</strong> depreciation rates<br />

are based on the following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Investment property<br />

30 years<br />

4.3 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure Investment Property for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of<br />

the Standard of GRAP on Investment property. The Standard of GRAP on Investment property was<br />

initially adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 53


Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, investment<br />

property were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP on: Investment<br />

property, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets Held for Sale and<br />

Discontinued Operation.<br />

Investment property acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP are measured<br />

at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to investment property<br />

since the Standard of GRAP of Investment property was initially adopted are recognised at cost. No<br />

depreciation is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of the depreciation calculation<br />

could not be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 20 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

5 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS<br />

5.1 CLASSIFICATION<br />

The classification of financial assets and liabilities into categories, is based on judgement by management.<br />

The municipality classifies financial assets and financial liabilities into the following categories:<br />

The municipality has various types of financial instruments and these can be broadly categorised as<br />

either financial assets or financial liabilities.<br />

A financial asset is any asset that a cash or contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset<br />

or equity. The municipality has the following types of financial assets:<br />

- Investments in fixed deposits (banking institutions)<br />

- Consumer debtors<br />

- Certain other debtors<br />

- Short-term investment deposits<br />

- Bank balances and cash<br />

The financial assets of the municipality are classified as follows into the four categories allowed:<br />

Type of financial asset Classification in terms of IAS 39.09<br />

Short-term investment deposits Held-to-maturity investments<br />

Bank balances and cash Loans and receivables<br />

Consumer debtors Loans and receivables<br />

Other debtors Loans and receivables<br />

Investments in fixed deposits Held-to-maturity investments<br />

Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that<br />

are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater<br />

than 12 months, which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are recognised<br />

initially at cost which represents fair value. After initial recognition financial assets are measured at<br />

amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method less a provision for impairment.<br />

Held-to-maturity investments are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed<br />

maturity where the municipality has the positive intent and ability to hold the investment to maturity.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 54


Cash includes cash on hand (including petty cash) and cash with banks (including call deposits). Cash<br />

equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments, readily convertible into known amounts of<br />

cash, that are held with registered banking institutions with maturities of three months or less and<br />

are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. For the purposes of the cash flow statement,<br />

cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, net of bank<br />

overdrafts.<br />

The municipality categorises cash and cash equivalents as financial asset: loans and receivables.<br />

A financial liability is a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another<br />

entity. The municipality has the following types of financial liabilities:<br />

- Long-term liabilities<br />

- Certain other creditors<br />

- Short-term loans<br />

- Current portion of long-term liabilities<br />

There are two main categories of financial liabilities, the classification determining how they are<br />

measured. Financial liabilities may be measured as:<br />

- Fair value through profit or loss; or<br />

- Other financial liabilities<br />

Financial liabilities that are measured at fair value through profit or loss are financial liabilities that<br />

are essentially held for trading (i.e. purchased with the intention to sell or repurchase in the short<br />

term; derivatives other than hedging instruments or are part of a portfolio of financial instruments<br />

where there is recent actual evidence of short-term profiteering or are derivatives). Financial liabilities<br />

that are measured at fair value through profit or loss are stated at fair value, with any resulting<br />

gain or loss recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

Any other financial liabilities are classified as “other financial liabilities” and are initially measured at<br />

amortised cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognised on an effective<br />

yield basis.<br />

In accordance with IAS 39.09 the financial liabilities of the municipality are all classified as “other<br />

financial liabilities”.<br />

Classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were obtained / incurred<br />

and takes place at initial recognition. Classification is re-assessed on an <strong>annual</strong> basis, except for derivatives<br />

and financial assets designated as at fair value through surplus or deficit, which shall not be<br />

classified out of the fair value through surplus or deficit category.<br />

5.2 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value.<br />

5.3 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT<br />

Financial Assets are categorised according to their nature as either financial assets at fair value<br />

through profit or loss, held-to maturity, loans and receivables, or available for sale. Financial liabilities<br />

are categorised as either at fair value through profit or loss or financial liabilities carried at<br />

amortised cost (“other”). The subsequent measurement of financial assets and liabilities depends<br />

on this categorisation and, in the absence of an approved GRAP Standard on Financial Instruments,<br />

is in accordance with IAS 39.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 55


5.3.1 INVESTMENTS<br />

Investments, which include listed government bonds, unlisted municipal bonds, fixed deposits and<br />

short-term deposits invested in registered commercial banks, are categorised as either held-tomaturity<br />

where the criteria for that categorisation are met, or as loans and receivables, and are<br />

measured at amortised cost. Where investments have been impaired, the carrying value is adjusted<br />

by the impairment loss, which is recognised as an expense in the period that the impairment is<br />

identified. Impairments are calculated as being the difference between the carrying amount and<br />

the present value of the expected future cash flows flowing from the instrument. On disposal of an<br />

investment, the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount is charged<br />

or credited to the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

5.3.2 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES<br />

Trade and other receivables are categorised as financial assets: loans and receivables and are initially<br />

recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost. Amortised cost refers to<br />

the initial carrying amount, plus interest, less repayments and impairments. An estimate is made for<br />

doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year-end. Significant financial<br />

difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation,<br />

and default or delinquency in payments (more than 30 days overdue) are considered indicators<br />

that the trade receivable is impaired. Impairments are determined by discounting expected future<br />

cash flows to their present value. Amounts that are receivable within 12 months from the <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

date are classified as current.<br />

An impairment of trade receivables is accounted for by reducing the carrying amount of trade receivables<br />

through the use of an allowance account, and the amount of the loss is recognised in<br />

the Statement of Financial Performance within operating expenses. When a trade receivable is uncollectible,<br />

it is written off. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited<br />

against operating expenses in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

5.3.3 TRADE PAYABLES AND BORROWINGS<br />

Financial liabilities consist of trade payables and borrowings. They are categorised as financial liabilities<br />

held at amortised cost, are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at<br />

amortised cost which is the initial carrying amount, less repayments, plus interest.<br />

5.3.4 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS<br />

Cash includes cash on hand (including petty cash) and cash with banks (including call deposits).<br />

Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments, readily convertible into known amounts<br />

of cash, that are held with registered banking institutions with maturities of three months or less<br />

and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. For the purposes of the cash flow statement,<br />

cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, net of<br />

bank overdrafts. The municipality categorises cash and cash equivalents as financial assets: loans<br />

and receivables.<br />

Bank overdrafts are recorded based on the facility utilised. Finance charges on bank overdraft are<br />

expensed as incurred. Amounts owing in respect of bank overdrafts are categorised as financial liabilities:<br />

other financial liabilities carried at amortised cost.<br />

6 UNAUTHORISED EXPENDITURE<br />

7 IRREGULAR EXPENDITURE<br />

Unauthorised expenditure is expenditure that has not been budgeted, expenditure that is not in<br />

terms of the conditions of an allocation received from another sphere of government, municipality<br />

or organ of state and expenditure in the form of a grant that is not permitted in terms of the Municipal<br />

Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003). Unauthorised expenditure is accounted for<br />

as an expense in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently<br />

accounted for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

Irregular expenditure is expenditure that is contrary to the Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

(Act No.56 of 2003), the Municipal Systems Act (Act No.32 of 2000), the Public Office Bearers Act<br />

(Act No. 20 of 1998) or is in contravention of the <strong>Municipality</strong>’s supply chain management policy.<br />

Irregular expenditure excludes unauthorised expenditure. Irregular expenditure is accounted for as<br />

expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted<br />

for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 56


Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is expenditure that was made in vain and would have been<br />

avoided had reasonable care been exercised. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is accounted for<br />

as expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently<br />

accounted for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

9 PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES<br />

Provisions are recognised when the municipality has a present or constructive obligation as a result<br />

of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be<br />

required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the provision can be made. Provisions<br />

are reviewed at <strong>report</strong>ing date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. Where the effect is<br />

material, non-current provisions are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate<br />

that reflects the market’s current assessment of the time value of money, adjusted for risks specific<br />

to the liability.<br />

The municipality does not recognise a contingent liability or contingent asset. A contingent liability<br />

is disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.<br />

A contingent asset is disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.<br />

Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation are reflected in the<br />

amount of a provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur. Gains from<br />

the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account in measuring a provision. Provisions are<br />

not recognised for future operating losses. The present obligation under an onerous contract is recognised<br />

and measured as a provision.<br />

10 LEASES<br />

A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the following<br />

criteria over and above the recognition criteria of a provision have been met<br />

: (a) The municipality has a detailed formal plan<br />

for the restructuring identifying at least:<br />

- the business or part of a business<br />

concerned;<br />

- the principal locations affected;<br />

- the location, function,<br />

and approximate number of employees who will be compensated for terminating their services;<br />

- the expenditures that will be undertaken; an<br />

d<br />

- when the plan will be implemented; an<br />

d<br />

(b) The municipality has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring<br />

by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by<br />

it.<br />

10.1 MUNICIPALITY AS LESSEE<br />

Leases are classified as finance leases where substantially all the risks and rewards associated with<br />

ownership of an asset are transferred to the municipality. Property, plant and equipment or intangible<br />

assets subject to finance lease agreements are initially recognised at the lower of the asset’s<br />

fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liabilities are<br />

initially recognised at the inception of the lease and are measured as the sum of the minimum lease<br />

payments due in terms of the lease agreement, discounted for the effect of interest. In discounting<br />

the lease payments, the municipality uses the interest rate that exactly discounts the lease payments<br />

and unguaranteed residual value to the fair value of the asset plus any direct costs incurred.<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, the leased assets are accounted for in accordance with the stated<br />

accounting policies applicable to property, plant, equipment or intangibles. The lease liability is reduced<br />

by the lease payments, which are allocated between the lease finance cost and the capital repayment<br />

using the effective interest rate method. Lease finance costs are expensed when incurred.<br />

The accounting policies relating to derecognition of financial instruments are applied to lease payables.<br />

The lease asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or the lease term.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 57


Operating leases are those leases that do not fall within the scope of the above definition. Operating<br />

lease rentals are accrued on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

10.2 MUNICIPALITY AS LESSOR<br />

Under a finance lease, the municipality recognises the lease payments to be received in terms of<br />

a lease agreement as an asset (receivable). The receivable is calculated as the sum of all the minimum<br />

lease payments to be received, plus any unguaranteed residual accruing to the municipality,<br />

discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease. The receivable is reduced by the capital portion<br />

of the lease instalments received, with the interest portion being recognised as interest revenue<br />

on a time proportionate basis. The accounting policies relating to derecognition and impairment of<br />

financial instruments are applied to lease receivables.<br />

Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant<br />

lease.<br />

11 REVENUE<br />

11.1 REVENUE FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Revenue from exchange transactions refers to revenue that accrued to the municipality directly<br />

in return for services rendered / goods sold, the value of which approximates the consideration<br />

received or receivable.<br />

Service charges relating to water are based on consumption. Meters are read on a monthly basis<br />

and are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Provisional estimates of consumption are made<br />

monthly when meter readings have not been performed. The provisional estimates of consumption<br />

are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Adjustments to provisional estimates of consumption are<br />

made in the invoicing period in which meters have been read. These adjustments are recognised as<br />

revenue in the invoicing period. The estimates of consumption between meter readings are based<br />

on the previous three months average usage.<br />

Service charges relating to refuse removal are recognised on a monthly basis in arrears by applying<br />

the approved tariff to each property that has improvements.<br />

Service charges from sewerage and sanitation are based on the number of sewerage connections on<br />

each developed property using the tariffs approved from Council and are levied monthly.<br />

Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportion basis.<br />

Revenue from the rental of facilities and equipment is recognised on a straight-line basis over the<br />

term of the lease agreement.<br />

Dividends are recognised on the date that the <strong>Municipality</strong> becomes entitled to receive the dividend.<br />

Revenue arising from the application of the approved tariff of charges is recognised when the relevant<br />

service is rendered by applying the relevant gazetted tariff. This includes the issuing of licences<br />

and permits.<br />

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when substantially all the risks and rewards in those<br />

goods is passed to the consumer.<br />

Revenue arising out of situations where the municipality acts as an agent on behalf of another entity<br />

(the principal) is limited to the amount of any fee or commission payable to the municipality as<br />

compensation for executing the agreed services.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 58


11.2 REVENUE FROM NON-EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions refers to transactions where the municipality received<br />

revenue from another entity without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange. Revenue<br />

from non-exchange transactions is generally recognised to the extent that the related receipt<br />

or receivable qualifies for recognition as an asset and there is no liability to repay the amount.<br />

Revenue from property rates is recognised when the legal entitlement to this revenue arises. Penalty<br />

interest on unpaid rates is recognised on a time proportionate basis.<br />

Fines constitute both spot fines and summonses. Revenue from spot fines and summonses is recognised<br />

when payment is received, together with an estimate of spot fines and summonses that will<br />

be received based on past experience of amounts collected.<br />

Revenue from public contributions and donations is recognised when all conditions associated with<br />

the contribution have been met or where the contribution is to finance property, plant and equipment,<br />

when such items of property, plant and equipment qualifies for recognition and first becomes<br />

available for use by the municipality. Where public contributions have been received but the municipality<br />

has not met the related conditions, a deferred income (liability) is recognised.<br />

Contributed property, plant and equipment is recognised when such items of property, plant and<br />

equipment qualifies for recognition and become available for use by the municipality.<br />

Revenue from the recovery of unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure is based on<br />

legislated procedures, including those set out in the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56<br />

of 2003) and is recognised when the recovery thereof from the responsible councillors or officials<br />

is virtually certain.<br />

11.3 GRANTS, TRANSFERS AND DONATIONS<br />

Grants, transfers and donations received or receivable are recognised when the resources that have<br />

been transferred meet the criteria for recognition as an asset. A corresponding liability is raised to<br />

the extent that the grant, transfer or donation is conditional. The liability is transferred to revenue<br />

as and when the conditions attached to the grant are met. Grants without any conditions attached<br />

are recognised as revenue when the asset is recognised.<br />

12 BORROWING COSTS<br />

Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying<br />

assets are capitalised to the cost of that asset unless it is inappropriate to do so. The municipality<br />

ceases the capitalisation of borrowing costs when substantially all the activities to prepare<br />

the asset for its intended use or sale are complete. It is considered inappropriate to capitalise borrowing<br />

costs where the link between the funds borrowed and the capital asset acquired cannot be<br />

adequately established. Borrowing costs incurred other than on qualifying assets are recognised as<br />

an expense in surplus or deficit when incurred.<br />

13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS<br />

13.1 SHORT TERM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS<br />

Remuneration to employees is recognised in the Statement of financial performance as the services<br />

are rendered, except for non-accumulating benefits, which are only recognised when the specific<br />

event occurs.<br />

The municipality has opted to treat its provision for leave pay as a provision.<br />

The costs of all short-term employee benefits such as leave pay, are recognised during the period in<br />

which the employee renders the related services. The liability for leave pay is based on the total accrued<br />

leave days at year end and is shown as a provision. The municipality recognised the expected<br />

cost of performance bonuses only when the municipality has a present legal or constructive obligation<br />

to make such payment and a reliable estimate can be made.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 59


13.2 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS<br />

A defined contribution plan is a plan under which the municipality pays fixed contributions into a<br />

separate entity. The municipality has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions<br />

if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to service in the<br />

current or prior period.<br />

The municipality’s contributions to the defined contribution funds are established in terms of the<br />

rules governing those plans. Contributions are recognised in the Statement of financial performance<br />

in the period in which the service is rendered by the relevant employees. The municipality has not<br />

further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.<br />

14 IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS<br />

14.1 IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS<br />

The municipality assesses at each <strong>report</strong>ing date whether there is any indication that an asset may<br />

be impaired. If any such indication exists, the municipality estimates the recoverable service amount<br />

of the asset.<br />

Irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, the municipality also:<br />

- tests intangible assets with an indefinite useful life or intangible assets not yet available for use for<br />

impairment <strong>annual</strong>ly by comparing its carrying amount with its recoverable amount. This impairment<br />

test is performed during the <strong>annual</strong> period and at the same time every period.<br />

If there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, the recoverable service amount is estimated<br />

for the individual asset. If it is not possible to estimate the recoverable service amount of the individual<br />

asset, the recoverable service amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs<br />

is determined.<br />

The recoverable service amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value<br />

less costs to sell and its value in use.<br />

If the recoverable service amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of<br />

the asset is reduced to its recoverable service amount. That reduction is an impairment loss.<br />

An impairment loss of assets carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation or amortisation is<br />

recognised immediately in surplus or deficit. Any impairment loss of a revalued asset is treated as<br />

a revaluation decrease.<br />

An impairment loss is recognised for cash-generating units if the recoverable service amount of the<br />

unit is less than the carrying amount of the unit. The impairment loss is allocated to reduce the carrying<br />

amount of the assets of the unit as follows:<br />

- to the assets of the unit, pro rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit.<br />

A municipality assesses at each <strong>report</strong>ing date whether there is any indication that an impairment<br />

loss recognised in prior periods for assets may no longer exist or may have decreased. If any such<br />

indication exists, the recoverable service amounts of those assets are estimated.<br />

The increased carrying amount of an asset attributable to a reversal of an impairment loss does not<br />

exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised<br />

for the asset in prior periods.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 60


A reversal of an impairment loss of assets carried at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortisation<br />

is recognised immediately in surplus or deficit. Any reversal of an impairment loss of a revalued<br />

asset is treated as a revaluation increase.<br />

14.2 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure Property, plant and equipment,<br />

Intangible assets and Investment Property for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a date within<br />

three years following the date of initial adoption of the relevant Standard of GRAP. The Standard<br />

of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment, Intangible assets and Investment Property was initially<br />

adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, the municipality<br />

have not assess impairment.<br />

15 VALUE ADDED TAX<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> accounts for Value Added Tax on the payment basis.<br />

16 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has taken advantage of the transitional provisions for Medium and Low Capacity<br />

Municipalities as set out in Directive 4 paragraph .63 to .70 (Investment property), .73 to .83 (Property,<br />

plant and equipment) and .110 to .118 (Intangible assets) issued by the Accounting Standards<br />

Board. This further brings into effect paragraph .94E of Directive 4 which indicates that municipalities<br />

are not required to recognise provisions (which form part of the cost of an asset) in their financial<br />

statements as a result of applying the transitional provisions in other Standards of GRAP and<br />

are required to apply the disclosure requirements about the provisions related to those assets in<br />

accordance with the relevant GRAP standard.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 61


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

1 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS<br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:<br />

Cash at bank 24 930 850 24 457 632<br />

24 930 850 24 457 632<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has the following bank accounts: -<br />

Current Account (Primary Bank Account)<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Num-<br />

Cash book balance at beginning of year 14 162 708 9 645 101<br />

Cash book balance at end of year 17 485 092 14 162 708<br />

Bank statement balance at beginning of year 15 583 139 18 197 593<br />

Bank statement balance at end of year 17 586 189 15 583 139<br />

Current Account (Other Account)<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62101651398<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62090678320<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62022332316<br />

Cash book balance at beginning of year 10 294 923 7 807 935<br />

Cash book balance at end of year 7 445 758 10 294 923<br />

Bank statement balance at beginning of year 10 695 880 2 410 157<br />

Bank statement balance at end of year 7 680 392 10 695 880<br />

Cash on hand 884 884<br />

Total cash and cash equivalents 24 931 734 24 458 515<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 62


2 CONSUMER DEBTORS<br />

Gross Balances<br />

Provision for<br />

Doubtful Debts<br />

Net Balance<br />

Trade receivables R R R<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Service debtors<br />

Rates 3 777 547 (3 155 745) 621 802<br />

Refuse 624 181 (449 520) 174 661<br />

Other services 496 733 (362 208) 134 525<br />

Total 4 898 461 (3 967 473) 930 988<br />

as at 30 June 2009<br />

Service debtors<br />

Rates 2 363 756 (793 223) 1 215 487<br />

Water 791 041 (223 848) 791 041<br />

Sewerage 95 428 (27 004) 95 428<br />

Refuse 315 101 (104 194) 315 101<br />

Total 3 565 326 (1 148 269) 2 417 057<br />

Rates: Ageing<br />

Current (0 – 30 days) 125 485 78 521<br />

31 - 60 Days 117 616 73 597<br />

61 - 90 Days 108 034 67 601<br />

91 - 120 Days 3 426 412 2 144 037<br />

Total 3 777 547 2 363 756<br />

Electricity, Water, Sewerage and Refuse: Ageing<br />

31 - 60 Days 129 081 97 209<br />

61 - 90 Days 916 116 880 022<br />

91 - 120 Days 75 718 224 339<br />

Total 1 120 915 1 201 570<br />

Reconciliation of the doubtful debt provision<br />

Balance at beginning of the year 1 148 269 3 753 753<br />

Contributions to provision 2 819 204 1 148 269<br />

Doubtful debts written off against provision - (3 753 753)<br />

Balance at end of year 3 967 473 1 148 269<br />

Trade receivables impaired<br />

As of 30 June <strong>2010</strong>, trade receivables of R 2,8 million<br />

(2009: R 1,1 million) were impaired and provided for.<br />

The amount of the provision was R 3,9 million as of 30<br />

June <strong>2010</strong> (2009: R 1,1 million).<br />

The fair value of trade and other receivables approximates<br />

their carrying amounts.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 63


3 TRADE RECEIVABLES FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Trade debtors 309 186 1 201 570<br />

309 186 1 201 570<br />

Credit quality of trade and other receivables<br />

Trade and other receivables consists of:<br />

Trade receivables<br />

Amounts included under trade receivables from exchange<br />

transactions<br />

Amounts included under other receivables from nonexchange<br />

transactions<br />

309 186 1 201 570<br />

621 802 1 215 487<br />

930 988 2 417 057<br />

The following represents information on the credit quality<br />

of trade receivables that are neither past due nor<br />

impaired:<br />

Trade receivables<br />

Counterparties with external credit rating<br />

A (Government accounts) 139 648<br />

B (Businesses) 316 536<br />

C (Domestic and other) 474 804<br />

930 988<br />

Analysis of table:<br />

A - The debtors are of good credit quality and no default<br />

in payment is expected.<br />

B - The debtors are usual good payers, but there is a<br />

possibility that the debtor may not be able to pay on<br />

time.<br />

C - These debtors usually pay, but have previously paid<br />

late and therefore there is a possibility that these debtors<br />

will not be recoverable.<br />

Trade and other receivables past due but not impaired<br />

The ageing of amounts past due but not impaired is as<br />

follows:<br />

Trade receivables 930 988 2 417 057<br />

1-30 days past due - -<br />

31-60 days past due 246 697 170 806<br />

61 - 90 days past due 684 291 2 246 251<br />

930 988 2 417 057<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 64


4<br />

OTHER RECEIVABLES FROM NON-EXCHANGE<br />

TRANSACTIONS<br />

Assessment rate debtors 621 802 1 215 487<br />

621 802 1 215 487<br />

5 OTHER RECEIVABLES FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Other debtors 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

Total Other Debtors 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

6 INVESTMENTS<br />

Deposits - -<br />

Call investments 838 775 590 138<br />

Other investments 2 017 918 1 725 136<br />

2 856 693 2 315 274<br />

7 NON CURRENT INVESTMENTS<br />

Financial Instruments<br />

Other investments - 208 995<br />

- 208 995<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 65


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

8<br />

PROPERTY, PLANT AND<br />

EQUIPMENT<br />

8.1<br />

Reconciliation of Carrying<br />

Value<br />

Land Buildings Infrastructure Community Other Assets Total<br />

R R R R R R<br />

as at 1 July 2009<br />

Cost/Revaluation<br />

- -<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Acquisitions 537 739 8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

Capital under Construction<br />

- 2 313 315 719 575 57 046 - 3 089 936<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong> 537 739 8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

Cost/Revaluation<br />

Accumulated depreciation<br />

and impairment<br />

losses<br />

537 739<br />

8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

Refer to Appendix B for more detail on property,<br />

plant and equipment<br />

8.2 Other information<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has<br />

taken advantage of the<br />

transitional provisions<br />

for Medium and Low<br />

Capacity Municipalities<br />

as set out in Directive<br />

4 paragraph .73 to .83<br />

issued by the Accounting<br />

Standards Board.<br />

Municipalities who take<br />

advantage of the transitional<br />

provisions are<br />

not required to measure<br />

property, plant and<br />

equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or<br />

after a date within three<br />

years following the date<br />

of initial adoption of<br />

the Standard of GRAP<br />

on Property, Plant and<br />

Equipment.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 66


APPENDIX A<br />

SCHEDULE OF EXTERNAL LOANS<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

EXTERNAL LOANS Loan number Redeemable Date<br />

Balance at 30<br />

June 2009<br />

Received during<br />

the period<br />

Redeemed /<br />

written off during<br />

the period<br />

Balance at 30<br />

June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Carrying Value of<br />

Property, Plant &<br />

Equipment<br />

R R R R R R<br />

Other Costs in<br />

accordance with<br />

MFMA<br />

GOVERNMENT LOANS<br />

- DBSA @ 5% EC102527 30/09/2028 3 872 962 - (226 738) 3 646 224 3 792 927 -<br />

Total Government Loans<br />

TOTAL EXTERNAL LOANS<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 67


Planning by Reviewed Performed by Final review<br />

Client details<br />

Client name: <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Year end: 30 June <strong>2011</strong>


INTSIKA YETHU MUNICIPALITY<br />

Annual Financial Statements<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

General Information<br />

Legal form of entity<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mayoral committee Before 18 May <strong>2011</strong> After 18 May <strong>2011</strong><br />

Executive Mayor Mr SD Plata K Vimbayo<br />

Speaker Mr M Sokujika AZ Mbotholoshi<br />

Chief Wip Mr AZ Mbotholoshi S Myataza<br />

Councillors K Vimbayo Elected Executive Mayor<br />

WN Mdwayingana WN Mdwayingana<br />

N Tshangana<br />

N Tshangana - Nkota<br />

S Myataza<br />

Elected Chief Whip<br />

N Boyana<br />

KF Mdleleni<br />

N Berana<br />

J Cengani<br />

K Ntsaluba<br />

K Ntsaluba<br />

HM Hewu<br />

HM Hewu<br />

N Magaga<br />

N Magaga<br />

N Tsomo<br />

MM Mbebe<br />

MM Mbebe<br />

ML Papiyana<br />

ML Papiyana<br />

Z Qayiya<br />

Z Qayiya<br />

D Kapsile<br />

D Kapsile<br />

NE Stata<br />

NE Stata<br />

P Nqandela<br />

P Nqandela<br />

MN Mkhumbuzi<br />

M Mahali<br />

M Mahali<br />

NS Mafanya<br />

NS Mafanya<br />

LN Ntshanka -<br />

L Mbambiso -<br />

TSN Bizana -<br />

NT Tayitile -<br />

FN Dangazele<br />

FN Dangazele<br />

MN Rigala<br />

M Yamile<br />

M Yamile<br />

N Giyose -<br />

Z Jabanga -<br />

NF Kopman -<br />

M Kolofana -<br />

MG Kuse -<br />

VG Matomela<br />

VG Matomela<br />

B Mboniswa<br />

B Mboniswa<br />

J Mdekazi -<br />

NE Mdlungu -<br />

N Mteli -<br />

MG Ntshinka -<br />

JN Peter -<br />

M Shasha<br />

M Shasha<br />

MT Shugu -<br />

S Tame<br />

S Tame<br />

PN Tukwayo -<br />

V Tyhulu -<br />

M Yotsi -<br />

1


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

General Information<br />

Grading of local authority Grade 2<br />

- N Ntloko<br />

- ZS Matshikiza<br />

- N Bani<br />

- N Jada<br />

- NH Mgodeli<br />

- NA Somdyala<br />

- M Zulu<br />

- HM Nobongoza<br />

- NP Gadeni<br />

- MA Mbotshane<br />

- MI Bititsha<br />

- Z Mxi<br />

- S Mkunyana<br />

- M Gulubela<br />

- AN Rotyi<br />

- N Mto<br />

- NV Hexana<br />

- NG Futiso<br />

Chief Finance Officer (CFO)<br />

Mr M Dyushu<br />

Accounting Officer<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Business address Building No. 201<br />

Main Street<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

5380<br />

Postal address Private Bag X 1251<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

5380<br />

Bankers<br />

Auditors<br />

First National Bank<br />

Auditor General of South Africa<br />

2


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Index<br />

The <strong>report</strong>s and statements set out below comprise the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements presented to the provincial legislature:<br />

Index<br />

Page<br />

Accounting Officer's Responsibilities and Approval 4<br />

Audit Committee Report 5 - 6<br />

Accounting Officer's Report 9 - 10<br />

Statement of Financial Position 11<br />

Statement of Financial Performance 12<br />

Statement of Changes in Net Assets 13<br />

Statement of Cash Flows 14<br />

Accounting Policies 15 - 22<br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements 23 - 39<br />

Appendixes:<br />

Appendix A: Schedule of External loans 41<br />

Appendix E(1): Actual versus Budget (Revenue and Expenditure) 48<br />

Abbreviations<br />

DBSA<br />

SA GAAP<br />

GRAP<br />

GAMAP<br />

IMFO<br />

MFMA<br />

MIG<br />

Development Bank of South Africa<br />

South African Statements of Generally Accepted Accounting Practice<br />

Generally Recognised Accounting Practice<br />

Generally Accepted Municipal Accounting Practice<br />

Institute of Municipal Finance Officers<br />

Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

Municipal Infrastructure Grant (Previously CMIP)<br />

3


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officer's Responsibilities and Approval<br />

The accounting officer is required by the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act 56 of 2003), to maintain adequate<br />

accounting records and is responsible for the content and integrity of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and related financial<br />

information included in this <strong>report</strong>. It is the responsibility of the accounting officer to ensure that the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

fairly present the state of affairs of the municipality as at the end of the financial year and the results of its operations and cash<br />

flows for the period then ended. The external auditors are engaged to express an independent opinion on the <strong>annual</strong> financial<br />

statements and was given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting<br />

Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are based upon appropriate accounting policies consistently applied and supported by<br />

reasonable and prudent judgements and estimates.<br />

The accounting officer acknowledges that he is ultimately responsible for the system of internal financial control established by<br />

the municipality and place considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment. To enable the accounting<br />

officer to meet these responsibilities, the accounting officer sets standards for internal control aimed at reducing the risk of<br />

error or deficit in a cost effective manner. The standards include the proper delegation of responsibilities within a clearly<br />

defined framework, effective accounting procedures and adequate segregation of duties to ensure an acceptable level of risk.<br />

These controls are monitored throughout the municipality and all employees are required to maintain the highest ethical<br />

standards in ensuring the municipality’s business is conducted in a manner that in all reasonable circumstances is above<br />

reproach. The focus of risk management in the municipality is on identifying, assessing, managing and monitoring all known<br />

forms of risk across the municipality. While operating risk cannot be fully eliminated, the municipality endeavours to minimise it<br />

by ensuring that appropriate infrastructure, controls, systems and ethical behaviour are applied and managed within<br />

predetermined procedures and constraints.<br />

The accounting officer is of the opinion, based on the information and explanations given by management, that the system of<br />

internal control provides reasonable assurance that the financial records may be relied on for the preparation of the <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements. However, any system of internal financial control can provide only reasonable, and not absolute,<br />

assurance against material misstatement or deficit.<br />

The accounting officer has reviewed the municipality’s cash flow forecast for the year to 30 June 2012 and, in the light of this<br />

review and the current financial position, he is satisfied that the municipality has or has access to adequate resources to<br />

continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.<br />

The municipality is largely dependent on the grant allocated through the Division of revenue act (Dora) for continued funding of<br />

operations. The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are prepared on the basis that the municipality is a going concern and that the<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has neither the intention nor the need to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of the municipality.<br />

Although the accounting officer is primarily responsible for the financial affairs of the municipality, he is supported by the<br />

municipality's Chief Financial Officer.<br />

The Office of the Auditor General is responsible for independently reviewing and <strong>report</strong>ing on the municipality's <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements. The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been examined by the municipality's external auditors and their<br />

<strong>report</strong> is presented on page 7.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements set out on pages 9 to 39, which have been prepared on the going concern basis, were<br />

approved by the on 30 August <strong>2011</strong> and were signed on its behalf by:<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Municipal Manager<br />

4


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Audit Committee Report<br />

We are pleased to present our <strong>report</strong> for the financial year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Audit committee members and attendance<br />

The audit committee consists of the members listed hereunder and should meet 4 times per annum as per its approved terms<br />

of reference. During the current year 6 number of meetings were held.<br />

Name of member<br />

Number of meetings attended<br />

Mr Abor Yeboah (Chairperson) 6 out of 6<br />

Mrs Tracey Putzier 5 out of 6<br />

Ms Zoleka Madikazi 4 out of 6<br />

Audit committee responsibility<br />

We <strong>report</strong> that we have adopted appropriate formal terms of reference in our charter in line with the requirements of section<br />

38(10)(1) of the PFMA and Treasury Regulation 3.1. We further <strong>report</strong> that we have conducted our affairs in compliance with<br />

this internal audit charter.<br />

The effectiveness of internal control<br />

The system of internal controls applied by the municipality over financial and risk management is effective, efficient and<br />

transparent. In line with the MFMA and the King II Report on Corporate Governance requirements, Internal Audit provides<br />

the Audit Committee and management with assurance that the internal controls are appropriate and effective. This is<br />

achieved by means of the risk management process, as well as the identification of corrective actions and suggested<br />

enhancements to the controls and processes. From the various <strong>report</strong>s of the Internal Auditors, the Audit Report on the<br />

<strong>annual</strong> financial statements, and the management letter of the Auditor-General South Africa, it was noted that no matters<br />

were <strong>report</strong>ed that indicate any material deficiencies in the system of internal control or any deviations there from.<br />

Accordingly, we can <strong>report</strong> that the system of internal control over financial <strong>report</strong>ing for the period under review was<br />

efficient and effective.<br />

The quality of in year management and monthly/quarterly <strong>report</strong>s submitted in terms of the MFMA and the Division of Revenue<br />

Act.<br />

We are satisfied with the content and quality of monthly and quarterly <strong>report</strong>s prepared and issued by the auditors of the<br />

municipality during the year under review.<br />

Evaluation of <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

We have:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Reviewed and discussed the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements to be included in the <strong>annual</strong> <strong>report</strong>, with the<br />

Auditor-General and the auditors;<br />

Reviewed the Auditor-General of South Africa's management letter and management’s response thereto;<br />

Reviewed changes in accounting policies and practices;<br />

Reviewed the entities compliance with legal and regulatory provisions;<br />

Reviewed significant adjustments resulting from the audit.<br />

We concur with and accept the Auditor-General of South Africa's <strong>report</strong> the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, and are of the opinion<br />

that the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements should be accepted and read together with the <strong>report</strong> of the Auditor-General of<br />

South Africa.<br />

Internal audit<br />

We are satisfied that the internal audit function is operating effectively and that it has addressed the risks pertinent to the<br />

municipality and its audits.<br />

Auditor-General of South Africa<br />

We have met with the Auditor-General of South Africa to ensure that there are no unresolved issues.<br />

Chairperson of the Audit Committee<br />

5


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Audit Committee Report<br />

Date:<br />

6


Report of the Auditor General<br />

To the Provincial Legislature of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Report on the financial statements<br />

I have audited the accompanying <strong>annual</strong> financial statements of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> which comprise the statement of<br />

financial position as at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, statement of financial performance, statement of changes in net assets and cash flow<br />

statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes, and the<br />

[directors’ / accounting officer’s / accounting authority’s] <strong>report</strong>, as set out on pages 9 to 39.<br />

Responsibility of the for the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

The accounting officer is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements in<br />

accordance with [the applicable <strong>report</strong>ing framework/basis of accounting] [and in the manner required by the [Public Finance<br />

Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999) (PFMA)] [Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act No. 56<br />

of 2003) (MFMA)] [Auditor-General audit circular 1 of 2005] and the [Companies Act, 1973 (Act No. 61 of 1973)] [any applicable<br />

enabling legislation]. This responsibility includes:<br />

designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;<br />

selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and<br />

making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.<br />

Responsibility of the Auditor-General<br />

As required by [section 188 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 read with section 4 of the Public Audit Act,<br />

2004 (Act No. 25 of 2004) (PAA)] [and section XX of any applicable legislation], my responsibility is to express an opinion on<br />

these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements based on my audit.<br />

I conducted my audit in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that I comply with<br />

ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

are free from material misstatement.<br />

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the <strong>annual</strong> financial<br />

statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material<br />

misstatement of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor<br />

considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements in order to<br />

design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the<br />

effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.<br />

An audit also includes evaluating the:<br />

appropriateness of accounting policies used;<br />

reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management; and<br />

overall presentation of the financial statements.<br />

Paragraph 11 et seq. of the Statement of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice, GRAP 1 Presentation of Financial<br />

Statements requires that financial <strong>report</strong>ing by entities shall provide information on whether resources were obtained and used<br />

in accordance with the legally adopted budget. As the budget <strong>report</strong>ing standard is still in the process of being developed, I<br />

have determined that my audit of any disclosures made by [name of entity] in this respect will be limited to <strong>report</strong>ing on noncompliance<br />

with this disclosure requirement.<br />

I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for my audit opinion.<br />

Basis of accounting<br />

The entity’s policy is to prepare <strong>annual</strong> financial statements on [the basis of accounting determined by the National Treasury]<br />

[entity-specific basis of accounting] as set out in [accounting policy note ] [note to the financial statements].<br />

7


Report of the Auditor General<br />

In my opinion the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> as at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with<br />

[the applicable <strong>report</strong>ing framework/basis of accounting] [and in the manner required by the PFMA/MFMA (if the entity falls<br />

within the scope of the PFMA/MFMA) and Companies Act, 1973 (if the entity falls within the scope of the Companies Act) or<br />

section xx of the entity’s enabling legislation (if the entity does not fall within the scope of the PFMA/MFMA)].<br />

Without qualifying my audit opinion, I draw attention to the following matter(s):<br />

Auditor General of South Africa<br />

8


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officers Report<br />

The accounting officer submits his <strong>report</strong> for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

1. Incorporation<br />

The municipality was incorporated on 05 December 2000 and obtained its certificate to commence business on the same day.<br />

2. Review of activities<br />

Main business and operations<br />

The municipality is engaged in municipality and operates principally in South Africa.<br />

The operating results and state of affairs of the municipality are fully set out in the attached <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and<br />

do not in our opinion require any further comment.<br />

3. Going concern<br />

We draw attention to the fact that at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, the municipality had accumulated surplus of R 66 452 225 and that the<br />

municipality's total liabilities exceed its assets by R 36 074 102.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. This<br />

basis presumes that funds will be available to finance future operations and that the realisation of assets and settlement of<br />

liabilities, contingent obligations and commitments will occur in the ordinary course of business.<br />

4. Subsequent events<br />

The accounting officer is not aware of any matter or circumstance arising since the end of the financial year.<br />

5. Accounting policies<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements prepared in accordance with the South African Statements of Generally Accepted Accounting<br />

Practice (GAAP), including any interpretations of such Statements issued by the Accounting Practices Board, and in<br />

accordance with the prescribed Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practices (GRAP) issued by the Accounting<br />

Standards Board as the prescribed framework by National Treasury.<br />

6.<br />

The accounting officer of the municipality during the year and to the date of this <strong>report</strong> is as follows:<br />

Name<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Nationality<br />

South African<br />

7. Corporate governance<br />

General<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> is committed to business integrity, transparency and professionalism in all its activities. As part of this<br />

commitment, the <strong>Municipality</strong> supports the highest standards of corporate governance and the ongoing development of best<br />

practice.<br />

The municipality confirms and acknowledges its responsibility to total compliance with the Code of Corporate Practices and<br />

Conduct ("the Code") laid out in the King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2002. The <strong>Municipality</strong> discuss the<br />

responsibilities of management in this respect, at Councillors meetings and monitor the municipality's compliance with the code<br />

on a three monthly basis.<br />

The salient features of the municipality's adoption of the Code is outlined below:<br />

9


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officers Report<br />

Audit and risk committee<br />

In terms of section 166 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, each municipal entity must have an audit committee,<br />

subject to subsection (6).<br />

An audit committee is an independent advisory body which must:<br />

(a) advise the municipal council, the political office-bearers, the accounting officer and the management staff of the<br />

municipality, or the board of directors, the accounting officer and the management staff of the municipal entity.<br />

(b) review the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements to provide the council of the municipality or, in the case of a municipal entity, the<br />

council of the parent municipality and the board of directors of the entity, with an authoritative and credible view of the financial<br />

position of the municipality or municipal entity, its efficiency and effectiveness and its overall level of compliance with this Act,<br />

the <strong>annual</strong> Division of Revenue Act and any other applicable legislation.<br />

Internal audit<br />

The municipality has partailly outsourced its internal audit function to PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) to assist the Municipal<br />

in-house internal audit team. This is in compliance with the Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003.<br />

8. Bankers<br />

First National Bank<br />

Account No. 62022331003<br />

Branch Name: Cofimvaba<br />

9. Auditors<br />

Auditor General of South Africa will continue in office for the next financial period.<br />

10


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Financial Position<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 2 9 934 517 24 435 645<br />

Current Assets<br />

Investments 2 405 299 2 399 860<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions 5 11 506 873 4 883 778<br />

Trade receivables from exchange transactions 7 3 863 525 3 967 118<br />

VAT receivable 6 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

29 100 237 37 898 068<br />

Non-Current Assets<br />

Property, plant and equipment 4 61 638 497 27 280 204<br />

Intangible assets 35 58 037 -<br />

61 696 534 27 280 204<br />

Non-Current Assets 61 696 534 27 280 204<br />

Current Assets 29 100 237 37 898 068<br />

Total Assets 90 796 771 65 178 272<br />

Liabilities<br />

Current Liabilities<br />

Current portion of borrowings 36 349 092 121 795<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 9 11 517 964 5 768 199<br />

Current Provisions 8 3 134 068 2 197 285<br />

15 001 124 8 087 282<br />

Non-Current Liabilities<br />

Non-Current Borrowing 9 343 428 3 524 429<br />

Non-Current Liabilities 9 343 428 3 524 429<br />

Current Liabilities 15 001 124 8 087 282<br />

Total Liabilities 24 344 552 11 611 711<br />

Assets 90 796 771 65 178 272<br />

Liabilities (24 344 552) (11 611 711)<br />

Net Assets 66 452 219 53 566 561<br />

11


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Financial Performance<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Revenue<br />

Property rates 11 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Service charges 12 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities and equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Fines 113 025 70 910<br />

Licences and Permits 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Government grants & subsidies 13 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Receipts 9 720 473 -<br />

Interest - outstanding receivables 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

Other income 14 635 602 550 186<br />

Total Revenue 116 180 639 86 897 184<br />

Expenditure<br />

Personnel 16 (42 290 417) (30 682 830)<br />

Remuneration of councillors 17 (10 877 367) (10 269 293)<br />

Finance costs 20 (4 197) (185 388)<br />

Bad debts 18 (7 062 239) (2 819 204)<br />

Repairs and maintenance (8 422 481) (2 950 807)<br />

Bulk purchases 24 (352 225) (503 651)<br />

Contracted services 22 (218 255) (113 229)<br />

General Expenses 15 (32 962 557) (23 420 352)<br />

Total Expenditure (102 189 738) (70 944 754)<br />

Gain on disposal of assets and liabilities 23 233 87 307<br />

Revenue 116 180 639 86 897 184<br />

Expenditure (102 189 738) (70 944 754)<br />

Other 23 233 87 307<br />

Surplus for the year 14 014 134 16 039 737<br />

12


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Changes in Net Assets<br />

Figures in Rand<br />

Accumulated<br />

surplus<br />

Total net<br />

assets<br />

Opening balance as previously <strong>report</strong>ed 37 527 060 37 527 060<br />

Adjustments<br />

Prior year adjustments (235) (235)<br />

Balance at 01 July 2009 as restated 37 526 825 37 526 825<br />

Changes in net assets<br />

Surplus for the year 16 039 737 16 039 737<br />

Total changes 53 566 559 53 566 559<br />

Balance at 01 July <strong>2010</strong> 52 438 091 52 438 091<br />

Changes in net assets<br />

Surplus for the year 14 014 134 14 014 134<br />

Total changes 14 014 134 14 014 134<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 66 452 225 66 452 225<br />

13


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Cash Flows<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cash flows from operating activities<br />

Receipts<br />

Cash recieved from ratepayers, government and other 110 828 817 92 702 502<br />

Payments<br />

Cash paid to suppliers and employees (96 448 768) (66 267 944)<br />

Finance costs (4 197) (185 388)<br />

Interest received 556 400 1 147 591<br />

(95 896 565) (65 305 741)<br />

Total receipts 110 828 817 92 702 502<br />

Total payments (95 896 565) (65 305 741)<br />

Net cash flows from operating activities 25 14 932 252 27 396 761<br />

Cash flows from investing activities<br />

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 4 (34 358 293) (27 280 204)<br />

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 4 23 233 87 307<br />

Purchase of intangible assets 35 (58 037) -<br />

Purchase of an asset (43 846) -<br />

Net cash flows from investing activities (34 436 943) (27 192 897)<br />

Cash flows from financing activities<br />

Repayment of current portion of borrowings 349 092 -<br />

Repayment of Borrowings 5 735 611 (226 738)<br />

Net cash flows from financing activities 6 084 703 (226 738)<br />

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (14 501 125) (22 874)<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 24 435 642 24 458 516<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 2 9 934 517 24 435 642<br />

14


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1. Presentation of Annual Financial Statements<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the effective Standards of Generally Recognised<br />

Accounting Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards<br />

Board, in accordance with Section 122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act, (Act No 56 of 2003).<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting and are in accordance with historical<br />

cost convention unless specified otherwise. Comparative amounts have been restated retrospectively to the extent possible.<br />

They are presented in South African Rand.<br />

A summary of the significant accounting policies, which have been consistently applied, are disclosed below.<br />

These accounting policies are consistent with the previous period.<br />

1.1 Significant judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty<br />

In preparing the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the<br />

amounts represented in the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and related disclosures. Use of available information and the<br />

application of judgement is inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from these estimates<br />

which may be material to the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements. Significant judgements include:<br />

Allowance for doubtful debts<br />

On debtors an impairment loss is recognised in surplus and deficit when there is objective evidence that it is impaired. The<br />

impairment is measured as the difference between the debtors carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash<br />

flows discounted at the effective interest rate, computed at initial recognition.<br />

1.2 Investment property<br />

Investment property is property (land or a building - or part of a building - or both) held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation<br />

or both, rather than for:<br />

use in the production or supply of goods or services or for<br />

administrative purposes, or<br />

sale in the ordinary course of operations.<br />

Owner-occupied property is property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative<br />

purposes.<br />

Investment property is recognised as an asset when, it is probable that the future economic benefits or service potential that<br />

are associated with the investment property will flow to the municipality, and the cost or fair value of the investment property<br />

can be measured reliably.<br />

Investment property is initially recognised at cost including transaction costs once it meets the definition of investment property.<br />

However, where an investment property was acquired through a non-exchange transaction (i.e. where it acquired the<br />

investment property for no or a nominal value) its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition. Transaction costs are<br />

included in the initial measurement.<br />

Where investment property is acquired at no cost or for a nominal cost, its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

Costs include costs incurred initially and costs incurred subsequently to add to, or to replace a part of, or service a property. If a<br />

replacement part is recognised in the carrying amount of the investment property, the carrying amount of the replaced part is<br />

derecognised.<br />

Compensation from third parties for investment property that was impaired, lost or given up is recognised in surplus or deficit<br />

when the compensation becomes receivable.<br />

Property interests held under operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property in the following<br />

circumstances:<br />

When classification is difficult, the criteria used to distinguish investment property from owner-occupied property and from<br />

property held for sale in the ordinary course of business, are as follows:<br />

15


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.3 Property, plant and equipment<br />

Property, plant and equipment are tangible non-current assets (including infrastructure assets) that are held for use in the<br />

production or supply of goods or services, rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and are expected to be used during<br />

more than one period.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset when:<br />

it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the<br />

municipality; and<br />

the cost of the item can be measured reliably.<br />

Property, plant and equipment is initially measured at cost.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is the purchase price and other costs attributable to bring the asset to the<br />

location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Trade discounts and<br />

rebates are deducted in arriving at the cost.<br />

Where an asset is acquired at no cost, or for a nominal cost, its cost is its fair value as at date of acquisition.<br />

When significant components of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as<br />

separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.<br />

The initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located is also<br />

included in the cost of property, plant and equipment, where the entity is obligated to incur such expenditure, and where the<br />

obligation arises as a result of acquiring the asset or using it for purposes other than the production of inventories.<br />

The useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment have been assessed as follows:<br />

Item<br />

Average useful life<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Roads and Paving 10 years<br />

Sewerage 15 years<br />

Community<br />

Buildings 30 years<br />

Community Halls 30 years<br />

Libraries 30 years<br />

Others 30 years<br />

Others<br />

Buildings 30 years<br />

Office Equipment 3 - 5 years<br />

Furniture and Fittings 10 years<br />

Bins and Containers 5 - 10 years<br />

Landfill sites 30 years<br />

Computer Equipment 4 years<br />

Items of property, plant and equipment are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when there are no further economic<br />

benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset.<br />

The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is included in surplus or deficit when<br />

the item is derecognised. The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is<br />

determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item.<br />

16


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.3 Property, plant and equipment (continued)<br />

Transitional provision<br />

According to the transitional provision, the municipality is not required to measure property, plant and equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP on<br />

Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment has accordingly been recognised at provisional amounts, as<br />

disclosed in note 4. The transitional provision expires on 30 June 2012.<br />

Until such time as the measurement period expires and property, plant and equipment is recognised and measured in<br />

accordance with the requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment, the municipality need not<br />

comply with the Standards of GRAP on:<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements (GRAP 1),<br />

The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Transactions (GRAP 4),<br />

Leases (GRAP 13),<br />

Segment Reporting (GRAP 18),<br />

Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (GRAP 100)<br />

The exemption from applying the measurement requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment<br />

implies that any associated presentation and disclosure requirements need not be complied with for property, plant and<br />

equipment not measured in accordance with the requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment.<br />

1.4 Intangible assets<br />

An asset is identified as an intangible asset when it:<br />

is capable of being separated or divided from an entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged,<br />

either individually or together with a related contract, assets or liability; or<br />

arises from contractual rights or other legal rights, regardless whether those rights are transferable or separate<br />

from the municipality or from other rights and obligations.<br />

An intangible asset is recognised when:<br />

it is probable that the expected future economic benefits or service potential that are attributable to the asset will<br />

flow to the municipality; and<br />

the cost or fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.<br />

Intangible assets are initially recognised at cost.<br />

An intangible asset acquired at no or nominal cost, the cost shall be its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

Intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses.<br />

The amortisation period and the amortisation method for intangible assets are reviewed at each <strong>report</strong>ing date.<br />

Reassessing the useful life of an intangible asset with a finite useful life after it was classified as indefinite is an indicator that<br />

the asset may be impaired. As a result the asset is tested for impairment and the remaining carrying amount is amortised over<br />

its useful life.<br />

Internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in substance are not recognised as<br />

intangible assets.<br />

Amortisation is provided to write down the intangible assets, on a straight line basis, to their residual values as follows:<br />

Item<br />

Computer software<br />

Useful life<br />

3 years<br />

17


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.5 Leases<br />

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. A lease is<br />

classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership.<br />

Operating leases - lessor<br />

Under a finance lease, the municipality recognises the lease payments to be received in terms of a lease agreement as an<br />

asset (receivable). The receivable is calculated as the sum of all the minimum lease payments to be received, plus any<br />

unguaranteed residual accruing to the municipality, discounted at the interest arte implicit in the lease. The receivable is<br />

reduced by the capital portion of the lease instalments received, with the interest portion being recognised as interest revenue<br />

on a time proportionate basis. The accounting policies relating to derecognition and impairment of financial instruments are<br />

applied to lease receivables.<br />

Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

Operating leases - lessee<br />

Leases are classified as finance leases where substantially all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of an asset are<br />

transferred to the municipality. Property, plant and equipment or intangible assets subject to finance lease agreements are<br />

initially recognised at the lower of the asset's fair value and the present value of the minimum leases payments. The<br />

corresponding liabilities are initially recognised at the inception of the lease and are measured as the sum of the minimum<br />

lease payments due in the terms of the lease agreement, discounted for the effect of interest. In discounting the lease<br />

payments, the municipality uses the interest rate that exactly discounts the lease payments and unguarenteed residual value to<br />

the fair value of the asset plus any direct costs incurred.<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, the leased assets are accounted for in accordance with the stated accounting policies<br />

applicable to property, plant, equipment or intangibles. The lease liability is reduced by the leases payments, which are<br />

allocated between the lease finance costs and the capital repayment using the effective interest rate method. Lease finance<br />

costs are expensed when incurred. The accounting policies relating to derecognition of financial instruments are applied to<br />

lease payables. The lease asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life or the lease term.<br />

Operating leases are those leases that do not fall within the scope of the above definition. Operating leases rentals are accrued<br />

on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

1.6 Employee benefits<br />

Short-term employee benefits<br />

Remuneration to employees is recognised in the Statement of financial performance as the services are rendered, except for<br />

non-accumulatating benefits, which are only recognised when the specific event occurs.<br />

The municility has opted to treat its provision for leave pay as a provision.<br />

The costs of all short-term employee benefits such as leave pay, are recognised during the period in which the employee<br />

renders the related services. The liability for leave pay is based on the total accrued leave days at year end and is shown as a<br />

provision. The municipality recognised the expected cost of performance bonuses only when the municipality has a present<br />

legal or constructive obligation to make such payment and a reliable estimate can be made.<br />

Defined contribution plans<br />

A defined contribution plan is a plan under which the municipality pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The<br />

municipality has no legal or constructive obligation to pay furthuer contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to<br />

pay all employees the benefits relating to service in the current or prior period.<br />

The municipality's contributions to the defined contribution funds are established in terms of the rules governing those plans.<br />

Contributions are recognised in the Statement of financial performance in the period in which the service is rendered by the<br />

relevant employees, The municipality has not further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.<br />

18


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.7 Provisions and contingencies<br />

Provisions are recognised when the municipality has a present or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is<br />

probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable<br />

estimate of the provision can be made, Provisions are reviewed at <strong>report</strong>ing date and adjusted to reflect the current best<br />

estimate. Where the effect is material, non-current provisions are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount<br />

rate that reflects the markers current assessment of the time value of money, adjusted for risks specific to the liability.<br />

The municipality does not recognise a contigent liability or contigent asset. A contigent liability is disclosed unless the<br />

possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote. A contigent asset is disclosed where an<br />

inflow of economic benefits is probable.<br />

Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation are reflected in the amount of a provision where<br />

there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur. Gains from the expected disposal of assets are not taken into<br />

account in measuring a provision. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses. The present obligation under<br />

an onerous contract is recognised and measured as a provision.<br />

A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the following criteria over and above the recognition criteris of a<br />

provision have been met:.<br />

a) The municipality has a detailed formal plan for the restructuring identifying at least:<br />

the business or part of a business concerned<br />

the principal locations affected<br />

the location, function and approximate number of employee who will be compensated for terminating their services<br />

the expenditures that will be undertaken; and<br />

when the plan will be implemented<br />

b) The municipality has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to<br />

implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it.<br />

Contingent assets and contingent liabilities are not recognised. Contingencies are disclosed in note 30.<br />

1.8 Revenue from exchange transactions<br />

Revenue from exchange transactions refers to revenue that accrued to the municipality directly in return for services rendered/<br />

goods sold, the value of which approximates the consideration received or receivable.<br />

Services charges relating to water are based on consumption. Meters are read on a monthly basis and are recognised as<br />

revenue when invoiced. Provisional estimates of consumption are made onthly when meter readings have not been performed.<br />

The provinsional estimates of consumption are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Adjustments to provisional estimates of<br />

consumption are made in the invoicing period in which meters have been read. These adjustments are recognised as revenue<br />

in the invoicing period. The estimates of consumption between meter readings are based on the previous three months<br />

average usage.<br />

Service charges relating to refuse removal are recognised on a monthly basis in arrears by applying the approved tariff to each<br />

property that has improvements.<br />

Service charges from sewerage and sanitation are based on the number of sewerage connections on each development<br />

property using the tariffs approved from Council and are levied monthly.<br />

Revenue from the rental of facilities and equipment is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement.<br />

Revenue arising fro the application of the approved tariff of charges is recognised when the relevant service is rendered by<br />

applying the relevant gazetted tariff. This includes the issuing of licences and permits.<br />

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when substantially all the risks and rewards in those goods is passed to the<br />

consumer.<br />

Revenue arising out of situations where the municipality acts as an agent on behalf of another entity (the principal) is limited to<br />

the amount of any fee or commission payable to the municipality as compensation for executing the agreed services<br />

19


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.8 Revenue from exchange transactions (continued)<br />

Measurement<br />

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of trade discounts and volume rebates.<br />

Rendering of services<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions refers to transactions where the municipality received revenue from another entity<br />

without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange. Revenue from non-exchange transactions is generally<br />

recognised to the extent that the related receipt or receivable qualifies for recognition as an asset and there is no liability to<br />

repay the amount.<br />

Revenue from property rates is recognised when the legal entitlement to this revenue arises. Peanlty interest on unpaid rates is<br />

recognised on a time proportionate basis.<br />

Fines constitute both spot fines and summonses. Revenue from spot fines and summonses is recognised when payment is<br />

received, together with an estimate of spot fines and summonses that will be received based on past experiences of amounts<br />

collected.<br />

Revenue from public contributions and donations is recognised when all conditions associated with the contribution have been<br />

met or where the contribution is to finance property, plant and equipment, when such items of property, plant and equipment<br />

qualifies for recognition and first becomes available for use by the municipality. Where public contributions have been received<br />

but the municipality has not met the related conditions, a deferred income (liability) is recognised.<br />

Contributed property, plant and equipment is recognised when such items of property, plant and equipment qualifies for<br />

recognition and become available for use by the municipality.<br />

Revenue from the recovery of unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasterful expenditure is based on legislated procedures,<br />

including those set out in the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003) and is recognised when the recovery<br />

thereof from the responsible councillors or officials is virtually certain.<br />

Interest<br />

Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportion basis.<br />

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions<br />

Revenue comprises gross inflows of economic benefits or service potential received and receivable by an municipality, which<br />

represents an increase in net assets, other than increases relating to contributions from owners.<br />

Conditions on transferred assets are stipulations that specify that the future economic benefits or service potential embodied in<br />

the asset is required to be consumed by the recipient as specified or future economic benefits or service potential must be<br />

returned to the transferor.<br />

Control of an asset arise when the municipality can use or otherwise benefit from the asset in pursuit of its objectives and can<br />

exclude or otherwise regulate the access of others to that benefit.<br />

Exchange transactions are transactions in which one entity receives assets or services, or has liabilities extinguished, and<br />

directly gives approximately equal value (primarily in the form of cash, goods, services, or use of assets) to another entity in<br />

exchange.<br />

Expenses paid through the tax system are amounts that are available to beneficiaries regardless of whether or not they pay<br />

taxes.<br />

Fines are economic benefits or service potential received or receivable by entities, as determined by a court or other law<br />

enforcement body, as a consequence of the breach of laws or regulations.<br />

20


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions (continued)<br />

Non-exchange transactions are transactions that are not exchange transactions. In a non-exchange transaction, an<br />

municipality either receives value from another municipality without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange, or<br />

gives value to another municipality without directly receiving approximately equal value in exchange.<br />

Restrictions on transferred assets are stipulations that limit or direct the purposes for which a transferred asset may be used,<br />

but do not specify that future economic benefits or service potential is required to be returned to the transferor if not deployed<br />

as specified.<br />

Stipulations on transferred assets are terms in laws or regulation, or a binding arrangement, imposed upon the use of a<br />

transferred asset by entities external to the <strong>report</strong>ing municipality.<br />

Tax expenditures are preferential provisions of the tax law that provide certain taxpayers with concessions that are not available<br />

to others.<br />

The taxable event is the event that the government, legislature or other authority has determined will be subject to taxation.<br />

Taxes are economic benefits or service potential compulsorily paid or payable to entities, in accordance with laws and or<br />

regulations, established to provide revenue to government. Taxes do not include fines or other penalties imposed for breaches<br />

of the law.<br />

Transfers are inflows of future economic benefits or service potential from non-exchange transactions, other than taxes.<br />

Recognition<br />

An inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset is recognised as revenue, except to the extent<br />

that a liability is also recognised in respect of the same inflow.<br />

As the municipality satisfies a present obligation recognised as a liability in respect of an inflow of resources from a nonexchange<br />

transaction recognised as an asset, it reduces the carrying amount of the liability recognised and recognises an<br />

amount of revenue equal to that reduction.<br />

Measurement<br />

Revenue from a non-exchange transaction is measured at the amount of the increase in net assets recognised by the<br />

municipality.<br />

When, as a result of a non-exchange transaction, the municipality recognises an asset, it also recognises revenue equivalent<br />

to the amount of the asset measured at its fair value as at the date of acquisition, unless it is also required to recognise a<br />

liability. Where a liability is required to be recognised it will be measured as the best estimate of the amount required to settle<br />

the obligation at the <strong>report</strong>ing date, and the amount of the increase in net assets, if any, recognised as revenue. When a<br />

liability is subsequently reduced, because the taxable event occurs or a condition is satisfied, the amount of the reduction in the<br />

liability is recognised as revenue.<br />

Fines<br />

Fines are recognised as revenue when the receivable meets the definition of an asset and satisfies the criteria for recognition<br />

as an asset.<br />

Assets arising from fines are measured at the best estimate of the inflow of resources to the municipality.<br />

Where the municipality collects fines in the capacity of an agent, the fine will not be revenue of the collecting entity.<br />

Grants, Transfers and Donations<br />

Grants, transferes and donations received or receivable are recognised when the resources that have been transferred meet<br />

the criteria for recognition as an asset. A corresponding liability is raised to the extent that the grant, transfer or donation is<br />

conditional. The liability is transferred to revenue as and when the conditions attached to the grant are met. Grants without any<br />

conditions attached are recognised as revenue when the asset is recognised.<br />

21


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.10 Investment income<br />

Investment income is recognised on a time-proportion basis using the effective interest method.<br />

1.11 Borrowing costs<br />

Borrowing costs that are directly attributed to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets are capitalised<br />

to the cost of that asset unless it is inappropriate to do so. The municipality ceases the capitalisation of borrowing costs<br />

when substantially all the activities to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are complete. It is considered<br />

inappropriate to capitalise borrowing costs where the link between the funds borrowed and the capital asset acquired<br />

cannot be adequately establised. Borrowing costs incurred other than on qualifying asets are recognised as an expense in<br />

surplus or deficit when incurred.<br />

1.12 Unauthorised expenditure<br />

Unauthorised expenditure means:<br />

overspending of a vote or a main division within a vote; and<br />

expenditure not in accordance with the purpose of a vote or, in the case of a main division, not in accordance with<br />

the purpose of the main division.<br />

All expenditure relating to unauthorised expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance in<br />

the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of the expense, and<br />

where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.<br />

1.13 Fruitless and wasteful expenditure<br />

Fruitless expenditure means expenditure which was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been<br />

exercised.<br />

All expenditure relating to fruitless and wasteful expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial<br />

performance in the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of the<br />

expense, and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.<br />

1.14 Irregular expenditure<br />

(a) this Act; or<br />

(b) the State Tender Board Act, 1968 (Act No. 86 of 1968), or any regulations made in terms of the Act; or<br />

(c) any provincial legislation providing for procurement procedures in that provincial government.<br />

Irregular expenditure is expenditure that is contrar to the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No. 56 of 2003), the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Systems Act (Act No. 32 of 2000), the Public Office Bearers Act (Act No. 20 of 1998) or is in contravention of the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>'s supply chain management policy. Irregular expenditure excludes unauthorised expenditure. Irregular expenditure<br />

is accounted for as expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted<br />

for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

1.15 Investments<br />

Where the carrying amount of an investment is greater than the estimated recoverable amount, it is written down immediately<br />

to its recoverable amount and an impairment loss is charged to the statement of financial performance.<br />

22


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

2. Cash and cash equivalents<br />

Cash and cash equivalents consist of:<br />

Cash on hand 4 259 884<br />

Bank balances 9 930 258 24 434 761<br />

3. New standards and interpretations<br />

3.1 Standards and interpretations effective and adopted in the current year<br />

9 934 517 24 435 642<br />

In the current year, the municipality has adopted the following standards and interpretations that are effective for the current<br />

financial year and that are relevant to its operations:<br />

GRAP 23: Revenue from Non-exchange Transactions<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions arises when an entity receives value from another entity without directly giving<br />

approximately equal value in exchange. An asset acquired through a non-exchange transaction shall initially be measured<br />

at its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

This revenue will be measured at the amount of increase in net assets recognised by the municipality.<br />

An inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset shall be recognised as revenue, except to<br />

the extent that a liability is recognised for the same inflow. As an entity satisfies a present obligation recognised as a liability<br />

in respect of an inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset, it will reduce the carrying<br />

amount of the liability recognised as recognise an amount equal to that reduction.<br />

This Standard has been approved by the Board but its effective date has not yet been determined by the Minister of<br />

Finance. The effective date indicated is a provisional date and could change depending on the decision of the Minister of<br />

Finance.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The municipality has adopted the standard for the first time in the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

The impact of the standard is not material.<br />

3.2 Standards and interpretations issued, but not yet effective<br />

The municipality has not applied the following standards and interpretations, which have been published and are mandatory<br />

for the municipality’s accounting periods beginning on or after 01 July <strong>2011</strong> or later periods:<br />

GRAP 25: Employee benefits<br />

The objective of GRAP25 is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits. The Standard requires an<br />

municipality to recognise:<br />

a liability when an employee has provided service in exchange for employee benefits to be paid in the future; and<br />

an expense when an municipality consumes the economic benefits or service potential arising from service<br />

provided by an employee in exchange for employee benefits.<br />

GRAP25 must be applied by an employer in accounting for all employee benefits, except share based payment<br />

transactions.<br />

GRAP25 defines, amongst others, the following:<br />

Employee benefits as all forms of consideration given by an municipality in exchange for service rendered by<br />

employees;<br />

Defined contribution plans as post-employment benefit plans under which an municipality pays fixed<br />

contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further<br />

contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service<br />

in the current and prior periods;<br />

23


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

Defined benefit plans as post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans;<br />

Multi-employer plans as defined contribution plans (other than state plans and composite social security<br />

programmes) or defined benefit plans (other than state plans) that:<br />

- pool the assets contributed by various entities that are not under common control; and<br />

- use those assets to provide benefits to employees of more than one entity, on the basis that contribution<br />

and benefit levels are determined without regard to the identity of the municipality that employs the employees<br />

concerned;<br />

Other long-term employee benefits as employee benefits (other than post-employment benefits and termination<br />

benefits) that is not due to be settled within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees<br />

render the related service;<br />

Post-employment benefits as employee benefits (other than termination benefits) which are payable after the<br />

completion of employment;<br />

Post-employment benefit plans as formal or informal arrangements under which an municipality provides postemployment<br />

benefits for one or more employees;<br />

Short-term employee benefits as employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that are due to be settled<br />

within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service;<br />

State plans as plans other than composite social security programmes established by legislation which operate<br />

as if they are multi-employer plans for all entities in economic categories laid down in legislation;<br />

Termination benefits as employee benefits payable as a result of either:<br />

- an entity’s decision to terminate an employee’s employment before the normal retirement date; or<br />

- an employee’s decision to accept voluntary redundancy in exchange for those benefits;<br />

Vested employee benefits as employee benefits that are not conditional on future employment.<br />

Short-term employee benefits;<br />

- All short-term employee benefits;<br />

- Short-term compensated absences;<br />

- Bonus, incentive and performance related payments;<br />

Post-employment benefits: Defined contribution plans;<br />

Other long-term employee benefits;<br />

Termination benefits.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The municipality has early adopted the standard for the first time in the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

The impact of the standard is set out in note Changes in Accounting Policy.<br />

GRAP 104: Financial Instruments<br />

The standard prescribes recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments.<br />

Financial instruments are defined as those contracts that results in a financial asset in one municipality and a financial<br />

liability or residual interest in another municipality. A key distinguishing factor between financial assets and financial<br />

liabilities and other assets and liabilities, is that they are settled in cash or by exchanging financial instruments rather than<br />

through the provision of goods or services.<br />

One of the key considerations in initially recognising financial instruments is the distinction, by the issuers of those<br />

instruments, between financial assets, financial liabilities and residual interests. Financial assets and financial liabilities are<br />

distinguished from residual interests because they involve a contractual right or obligation to receive or pay cash or another<br />

financial instrument. Residual interests entitle an municipality to a portion of another municipality’s net assets in the event of<br />

liquidation and, to dividends or similar distributions paid at management’s discretion.<br />

In determining whether a financial instrument is a financial asset, financial liability or a residual interest, an municipality<br />

considers the substance of the contract and not just the legal form.<br />

Where a single instrument contains both a liability and a residual interest component, the issuer allocates the instrument<br />

into its component parts. The issuer recognises the liability component at its fair value and recognises the residual interest<br />

as the difference between the carrying amount of the instrument and the fair value of the liability component. No gain or<br />

loss is recognised by separating the instrument into its component parts.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value. Where an municipality subsequently measures<br />

financial assets and financial liabilities at amortised cost or cost, transactions costs are included in the cost of the asset or<br />

liability.<br />

24


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

The transaction price usually equals the fair value at initial recognition, except in certain circumstances, for example, where<br />

interest free credit is granted or where credit is granted at a below market rate of interest.<br />

Concessionary loans are loans either received by or granted to another municipality on concessionary terms, e.g. at low<br />

interest rates and flexible repayment terms. On initial recognition, the fair value of a concessionary loan is the present value<br />

of the agreed contractual cash flows, discounted using a market related rate of interest for a similar transaction. The<br />

difference between the proceeds either received or paid and the present value of the contractual cash flows is accounted<br />

for as non-exchange revenue by the recipient of a concessionary loan in accordance with Standard of GRAP on Revenue<br />

from Non-exchange Revenue Transactions (Taxes and Transfers), and using the Framework for the Preparation and<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements (usually as an expense) by the grantor of the loan.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities are subsequently measured either at fair value or, amortised cost or cost. An<br />

municipality measures a financial instrument at fair value if it is:<br />

a derivative;<br />

a combined instrument designated at fair value, i.e. an instrument that includes a derivative and a non-derivative<br />

host contract;<br />

held-for-trading;<br />

a non-derivative instrument with fixed or determinable payments that is designated at initial recognition to be<br />

measured at fair value;<br />

an investment in a residual interest for which fair value can be measured reliably; and<br />

other instruments that do not meet the definition of financial instruments at amortised cost or cost.<br />

Derivatives are measured at fair value. Combined instruments that include a derivative and non-derivative host contract are<br />

accounted for as follows:<br />

Where an embedded derivative is included in a host contract which is a financial instrument within the scope of<br />

this Standard, an entity can designate the entire contract to be measured at fair value or, it can account for the<br />

host contract and embedded derivative separately using GRAP 104. An municipality is however required to<br />

measure the entire instrument at fair value if the fair value of the derivative cannot be measured reliably.<br />

Where the host contract is not a financial instrument within the scope of this Standard, the host contract and<br />

embedded derivative are accounted for separately using GRAP 104 and the relevant Standard of GRAP.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities that are non-derivative instruments with fixed or determinable payments, for<br />

example deposits with banks, receivables and payables, are measured at amortised cost. At initial recognition, an<br />

municipality can however designate such an instrument to be measured at fair value.<br />

An municipality can only measure investments in residual interests at cost where the fair value of the interest cannot be<br />

determined reliably.<br />

Once an municipality has classified a financial asset or a financial liability either at fair value or amortised cost or cost, it is<br />

only allowed to reclassify such instruments in limited instances.<br />

An entity derecognises a financial asset, or the specifically identified cash flows of an asset, when:<br />

the cash flows from the asset expire, are settled or waived;<br />

significant risks and rewards are transferred to another party; or<br />

despite having retained significant risks and rewards, an municipality has transferred control of the asset to<br />

another municipality.<br />

An municipality derecognises a financial liability when the obligation is extinguished. Exchanges of debt instruments<br />

between a borrower and a lender are treated as the extinguishment of an existing liability and the recognition of a new<br />

financial liability. Where an municipality modifies the term of an existing financial liability, it is also treated as the<br />

extinguishment of an existing liability and the recognition of a new liability.<br />

An municipality cannot offset financial assets and financial liabilities in the statement of financial position unless a legal right<br />

of set-off exists, and the parties intend to settle on a net basis.<br />

GRAP 104 requires extensive disclosures on the significance of financial instruments for an municipality’s statement of<br />

financial position and statement of financial performance, as well as the nature and extent of the risks that an municipality is<br />

exposed to as a result of its <strong>annual</strong> financial statements. Some disclosures, for example the disclosure of fair values for<br />

instruments measured at amortised cost or cost and the preparation of a sensitivity analysis, are encouraged rather than<br />

required.<br />

25


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

GRAP 104 does not prescribe principles for hedge accounting. An municipality is permitted to apply hedge accounting, as<br />

long as the principles in IAS 39 are applied.<br />

This Standard has been approved by the Board but its effective date has not yet been determined by the Minister of<br />

Finance. The effective date indicated is a provisional date and could change depending on the decision of the Minister of<br />

Finance.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The municipality expects to adopt the standard for the first time in the 2012 <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

It is unlikely that the amendment will have a material impact on the municipality's <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

4. Property, plant and equipment<br />

Cost /<br />

Valuation<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated Carrying value Cost /<br />

depreciation<br />

Valuation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Accumulated Carrying value<br />

depreciation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Land 537 739 - 537 739 537 739 - 537 739<br />

Buildings 11 145 324 - 11 145 324 8 365 712 - 8 365 712<br />

Motor vehicles 1 289 749 - 1 289 749 - - -<br />

Office equipment 926 267 - 926 267 - - -<br />

IT equipment 185 299 - 185 299 - - -<br />

Infrastructure 39 423 816 - 39 423 816 13 396 091 - 13 396 091<br />

Community 8 130 303 - 8 130 303 3 150 214 - 3 150 214<br />

Other property, plant and<br />

equipment<br />

- - - 1 830 448 - 1 830 448<br />

Total 61 638 497 - 61 638 497 27 280 204 - 27 280 204<br />

Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment - <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

balance<br />

Land 537 739 - 537 739<br />

Buildings 8 365 712 2 779 612 11 145 324<br />

Motor vehicles - 1 289 749 1 289 749<br />

Office equipment - 926 267 926 267<br />

IT equipment - 185 299 185 299<br />

Infrastructure 13 396 091 26 027 725 39 423 816<br />

Community 3 150 214 4 980 089 8 130 303<br />

Other property, plant and equipment 1 830 448 (1 830 448) -<br />

27 280 204 34 358 293 61 638 497<br />

26


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

4. Property, plant and equipment (continued)<br />

Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment - <strong>2010</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

balance<br />

Land - 537 739 537 739<br />

Buildings - 8 365 712 8 365 712<br />

Infrastructure - 13 396 091 13 396 091<br />

Community - 3 150 214 3 150 214<br />

Other property, plant and equipment - 1 830 448 1 830 448<br />

Borrowing costs capitalised<br />

- 27 280 204 27 280 204<br />

Infrastructure 120 256 -<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has taken advantage of the transitional provisions for Medium and Low Capacity Municipalities as set out in<br />

Directive 4 paragraph .73 to.83 issued by the Accounting Standards Board. Municipalities who take advantage of the<br />

transitional provisions are not required to measure property, plant and equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a<br />

date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment.<br />

5. Other receivables from non-exchange transactions<br />

Trade debtors (4 442 794) 4 098 216<br />

Employee costs in advance - 785 562<br />

Deposits 15 949 667 -<br />

6. Value Added Tax Receivable<br />

11 506 873 4 883 778<br />

Value Added Tax 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

7. Trade and Other Receivables from Exchange Transactions<br />

Gross balances<br />

Rates 1 208 370 4 103 001<br />

Water 1 464 932 1 464 932<br />

Sewerage 280 004 280 004<br />

Refuse 408 366 624 182<br />

Housing rental 502 453 -<br />

Other (specify) (600) 1 462 472<br />

3 863 525 7 934 591<br />

Less: Provision for debt impairment<br />

Other (specify) (3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

Net balance<br />

Rates 1 208 370 4 103 001<br />

Water 1 464 932 1 464 932<br />

Sewerage 280 004 280 004<br />

Refuse 408 366 624 182<br />

Housing rental 502 453 -<br />

Other (specify) (600) (2 505 001)<br />

3 863 525 3 967 118<br />

27


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

7. Trade and Other Receivables from Exchange Transactions (continued)<br />

Rates<br />

Current (0 -30 days) (2 792 270) 125 485<br />

31 - 60 days 288 131 117 616<br />

61 - 90 days 120 500 108 034<br />

91 - 120 days 3 338 073 3 426 412<br />

954 434 3 777 547<br />

Refuse and Sewerage: Ageing<br />

Current (0 -30 days) 186 216 336 313<br />

31 - 60 days 31 806 3 044 592<br />

61 - 90 days 29 487 776 140<br />

91 - 120 days 572 835 -<br />

820 344 4 157 045<br />

Rental: Ageing<br />

Current (0 -30 days) 330 391 -<br />

31 - 60 days 32 213 -<br />

61 - 90 days 32 213 -<br />

91 - 120 days 40 490 -<br />

Summary of debtors by customer classification<br />

435 307 -<br />

Less: Provision for debt impairment<br />

Balance at beginning of the year - (1 148 269)<br />

Contributions to provision (3 406 059) (2 819 204)<br />

(3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

Reconciliation of debt impairment provision<br />

Contributions to provision (3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

8. Provisions<br />

Reconciliation of provisions - <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

Balance<br />

Leave Provision 2 197 285 727 508 2 924 793<br />

Landfill site - 209 275 209 275<br />

Legal proceedings provisions<br />

2 197 285 936 783 3 134 068<br />

A brief description of the nature of the obligation and the expected timing of any resulting outflows of economic benefits or<br />

service potential.<br />

An indication of the uncertainties about the amount or timing of those outflows. Where necessary to provide adequate<br />

information, an entity shall disclose the major assumptions made concerning future events, as addressed in paragraph .61.<br />

The amount of any expected reimbursement, stating the amount of any asset that has been recognised for that expected<br />

reimbursement.<br />

28


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

9. Trade and other payables from exchange transactions<br />

Trade payables 11 517 964 5 768 199<br />

10. Revenue<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Service charges 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities & equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Income from agency services 113 025 70 910<br />

Fines 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Government grants & subsidies 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Receipts - CHDM (WSP) 9 720 473 -<br />

Interest earned - outstanding debtors 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest earned - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

115 545 037 86 346 998<br />

The amount included in revenue arising from exchanges of goods or services<br />

are as follows:<br />

Service charges 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities & equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Income from agency services 113 025 70 910<br />

Receipts 9 720 473 -<br />

10 637 403 1 869 332<br />

The amount included in revenue arising from non-exchange transactions is as<br />

follows:<br />

Taxation revenue<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Fines 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Transfer revenue<br />

Grants and Subsidies Received 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Interest earned - outstanding receivables 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest earned - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

11. Property rates<br />

Rates received<br />

104 907 634 84 477 666<br />

Rates and taxes 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

12. Service charges<br />

Refuse removal 376 339 459 713<br />

Sale of water - 843 023<br />

376 339 1 302 736<br />

29


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

13. Government grants and subsidies<br />

Equitable share 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

MIG 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

MSIG 750 000 500 000<br />

FMG 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

LG-SETA 154 077 -<br />

CHDM Grant 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

Mass-FP LED 2 703 228 736 408<br />

Local Government (IEC) 1 630 000 -<br />

EPWP Grant - 161 100<br />

99 032 765 81 116 840<br />

Equitable share 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

MIG Grant 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

MSIG Grant 750 000 500 000<br />

FMG 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

Local Government Grants (IEC Projects) 1 630 000 -<br />

Chris Hani DM Grants 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

LED Grants 2 703 228 736 408<br />

LG Seta 154 077 -<br />

Equitable Share<br />

99 032 765 81 116 840<br />

Current-year receipts 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

No conditions as per DORA (69 276 411) (56 857 916)<br />

MIG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (17 564 000) (17 032 518)<br />

MSIG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 750 000 500 000<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (750 000) (500 000)<br />

FMG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (1 250 000) (1 000 000)<br />

Local Government Grant (St Marks and IEC Grant)<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 1 630 000 -<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (1 630 000) -<br />

Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> Grant<br />

- -<br />

30


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

13. Government grants and subsidies (continued)<br />

Current-year receipts 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (5 705 049) (4 828 898)<br />

Local Economic Development (LED) Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 2 703 228 736 408<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (2 703 228) (736 408)<br />

EPWP Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts - 161 100<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue - (161 100)<br />

Changes in level of government grants<br />

Based on the allocations set out in the Division of Revenue Act, (Act 1 of <strong>2010</strong>), no significant changes in the level of<br />

government grant funding are expected over the forthcoming 3 financial years.<br />

14. Other income<br />

- -<br />

Cemetry 6 842 5 000<br />

Agency fees - 270 368<br />

Service charges 14 255 7 806<br />

Pound Fees 106 090 100 500<br />

Pound Auction Charges 349 791 54 556<br />

Toilet fees 50 666 22 451<br />

Sports field 8 904 581<br />

Tender receipts 74 549 88 924<br />

Business Licences 4 120 -<br />

Other income - Political Party 12 203 -<br />

Equipment here 3 435 -<br />

Chair hire 4 747 -<br />

635 602 550 186<br />

31


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

15. General expenses<br />

Advertising 224 722 165 362<br />

Auditors remuneration 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

Bank charges 208 149 184 242<br />

Cleaning 156 546 14 158<br />

Consulting and professional fees 3 622 137 615 397<br />

Legal expenses 1 106 239 1 242 276<br />

Conferences and delegations 648 578 149 179<br />

Entertainment 8 708 134 950<br />

Insurance 723 929 253 555<br />

Lease rentals on operating lease 121 975 325 032<br />

Levies 617 798 23 193<br />

Subscription and publication 53 618 1 060<br />

Fuel and oil 1 244 848 1 153 367<br />

Postage and courier 3 537 5 114<br />

Printing and stationery 435 115 364 662<br />

Telephone and fax 1 404 098 1 012 444<br />

Training 1 053 054 1 158 016<br />

Travel - local 27 830 55 601<br />

Uniforms and overalls 247 830 124 445<br />

Membership fees 39 637 154<br />

Other rentals 323 083 286 810<br />

Stocks and material 35 692 68 324<br />

Other expenses 19 283 498 14 806 262<br />

32 962 557 23 420 352<br />

32


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

16. Employee related costs<br />

Employee related costs - Salaries and Wages 24 777 110 20 610 713<br />

Performance and other Bonuses 1 433 672 1 165 939<br />

Employee related costs - Contributions for UIF, Pensions and Medical aids 2 399 219 1 487 522<br />

UIF 22 487 -<br />

SDL 285 591 218 449<br />

Other payroll levies 69 650 8 051<br />

Leave pay provision charge 909 199 119 155<br />

Post-employment benefits - Pension - Defined contribution plan 3 526 128 2 875 009<br />

Travel, motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 535 910 -<br />

Overtime payments 967 863 384 141<br />

Acting allowances 2 618 599 367 440<br />

Car allowance 1 341 254 1 601 572<br />

Housing benefits and allowances 24 468 326 756<br />

Night shift allowance 322 097 1 122 481<br />

Cell phone allowance 310 390 395 602<br />

Payments for Casual Workers 2 746 780 -<br />

Remuneration of municipal manager<br />

42 290 417 30 682 830<br />

Annual Remuneration 596 202 497 083<br />

Performance Bonuses 68 687 43 512<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 192 880 244 881<br />

Remuneration of Chief Finance Officer<br />

857 769 785 476<br />

Annual Remuneration 475 457 365 841<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 -<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 173 386 234 523<br />

Remuneration of Community Services Director<br />

692 126 600 364<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 646<br />

Performance Bonus 43 283 27 979<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 139 604 127 017<br />

Remuneration of Corporate Service Director<br />

719 601 650 642<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 647<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 39 170<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 146 868 135 929<br />

Remuneration of Technical Service Director<br />

726 865 670 746<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 647<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 27 979<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 180 475 160 081<br />

Remuneration for Local Economic Development Director<br />

33<br />

760 472 683 707


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

16. Employee related costs (continued)<br />

Annual Remuneration 503 169 386 459<br />

Performance Bonuses 45 541 -<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 195 661 148 371<br />

17. Remuneration of councillors<br />

744 371 534 830<br />

Executive Council 8 561 691 7 819 192<br />

Councillors 2 315 676 2 438 049<br />

18. Debt impairment<br />

10 877 367 10 257 241<br />

Debt impairment - 1 148 260<br />

Debts impaired 3 406 059 2 819 204<br />

19. Investment revenue<br />

20. Finance costs<br />

3 406 059 3 967 464<br />

Current borrowings 4 197 185 388<br />

21. Auditors' remuneration<br />

Fees 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

22. Contracted services<br />

Red Guard Security 218 255 113 229<br />

23. Grants and subsidies paid<br />

24. Bulk purchases<br />

Electricity 352 225 420 077<br />

Water - 83 574<br />

352 225 503 651<br />

34


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

25. Cash generated from operations<br />

Surplus 13 966 795 16 039 738<br />

Adjustments for:<br />

Loss on sale of assets and liabilities (23 233) (87 307)<br />

Debt impairment 7 062 239 -<br />

Movements in provisions 936 783 1 402 264<br />

Other non-cash items - 105 895<br />

Changes in working capital:<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions (6 623 095) 402 315<br />

Consumer debtors (6 958 646) (1 550 060)<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 5 749 765 2 968 325<br />

VAT 821 644 8 097 317<br />

Unspent conditional grants and receipts - 18 274<br />

26. Related parties<br />

14 932 252 27 396 761<br />

`<br />

Relationships<br />

Councilor - Mr. WN Mdwayingana<br />

Previous Mayor - Mr. S. Plata<br />

Councilor - Mr M. Yamile<br />

Mr Z. Shasha - Municipal Manager<br />

Ms K. Vimbayo - Executive Mayor<br />

Mr. T. Totongwana - Assistant Manager Supply Chain Manager<br />

Ms Bekebu - Office Manager for the Office of the Municipal Manager<br />

Mrs N Nkuhlu - Corporate Service Manager<br />

Ms NF Kopman - Councilor<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> bought 10 sheeps to the amount of<br />

R10,000<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> sold the car that was used by the<br />

previous Mayor to Mr S. Plata at a price of R75,000<br />

(which was less than a market price of R120,000)<br />

after the Mayor's term in office had expired. Council<br />

resolution was obtained and the council approved the<br />

sale.<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> bought 10 sheeps to the amount of<br />

R10,000<br />

The following personnel share the same surname<br />

with the Municipal Manager:<br />

1. Mr M. Shasha - Councilor<br />

2. Mrs Shasha - Store controller<br />

Ms M Vimbayo - sister to the Mayor works as a<br />

security officer within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mrs S. Totongwana, Assistant Supply Chain<br />

Manager's wife works as a SCM officer within the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Ms S. Bekebu daugter to Ms Bekebu works as an<br />

Intern for the Finance department at the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mr S Mahlati a son to Mrs Nkuhlu works within the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Ms Vuyokazi Kopman works within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Compensation to accounting officer and other key management<br />

Short-term employee benefits 4 501 205 -<br />

Post-employment benefits - Pension - Defined contribution plan 2 505 117 367 440<br />

27. Irregular expenditure<br />

7 006 322 367 440<br />

Add: Irregular Expenditure - current year 1 031 617 15 600 000<br />

Less: Amounts condoned (1 031 617) (15 600 000)<br />

- -<br />

Details of irregular expenditure condoned<br />

Condoned by (condoning authority)<br />

Ntlakotlaza Travel Agency Council Resolution dated 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 1 031 617<br />

35


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

28. Deviation from supply chain management regulations<br />

Paragraph 12(1)(d)(i) of Government gazette No. 27636 issued on 30 May 2005 states that a supply chain management policy<br />

must provide for the procurement of goods and services by way of a competitive bidding process.<br />

Paragraph 36 of the same gazette states that the accounting officer may dispense with the official procurement process in<br />

certain circumstances, provided that he records the reasons for any deviations and <strong>report</strong>s them to the next meeting of the and<br />

includes a note to the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

29. Commitments<br />

Authorised capital expenditure<br />

Approved and contracted for<br />

Infrastructure 11 521 067 32 951 205<br />

Community - 4 216 533<br />

Buildings - 4 237 074<br />

Other - 3 201 360<br />

11 521 067 44 606 172<br />

Approved but not yet contracted for<br />

Infrastructure 7 819 700 1 444 181<br />

Operating leases - as lessee (expense)<br />

Minimum lease payments due<br />

- within one year 178 828 162 571<br />

- in second to fifth year inclusive 256 133 232 848<br />

434 961 395 419<br />

Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the municipality for certain of its office properties. Leases are<br />

negotiated for an average term of seven years and rentals are fixed for an average of three years. No contingent rent is<br />

payable.<br />

Operating leases - as lessor (income)<br />

Minimum lease payments due<br />

- within one year 148 830 135 300<br />

Operating Leases consists of the following:<br />

Certain of the municipality's land and building are held to generate rental income. Lease agreements are non-cancellable and<br />

have terms of 5 years. There are no contigent rents receivable.<br />

30. Contingencies<br />

Contingent Liability<br />

Claim for default 2 121 174 2 121 174<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> is being sued by the Municipal Councilors Pension Fund for the default of contribution payment. Should<br />

Council be unsuccessful in defending the claim, there is a possibility that the claim will be settled from Equitable share.<br />

36


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

31. Risk management<br />

Financial risk management<br />

The municipality’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate<br />

risk, cash flow interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.<br />

Liquidity risk<br />

The municipality’s risk to liquidity is a result of the funds available to cover future commitments. The municipality manages<br />

liquidity risk through an ongoing review of future commitments and credit facilities.<br />

The information below analyses the municipality’s financial liabilities and net-settled derivative financial liabilities into relevant<br />

maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The<br />

amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. Balances due within 12 months equal their<br />

carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.<br />

Later than one month and not later than one year (<strong>2011</strong>: R349,092) and Later than one year and not later than twenty years<br />

(<strong>2011</strong>: R9 343 428)<br />

Later than one month and not later than one year (<strong>2010</strong>: R121,795) and Later than one year and not later than twenty years<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>: R3,524,429)<br />

Interest rate risk<br />

As the municipality has no significant interest-bearing assets, the municipality's income and operating cash flows are<br />

substantially independent of changes in market interest rates.<br />

The municipality's interest rate risk arises from long term borrowings. Borrowings issued at fixed rates exposes the municipality<br />

to fair value interest rate risk.<br />

At year end, financial instruments exposed to interest rate risk were as follows:<br />

`<br />

Financial instrument <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Call deposits 2 405 299 2 399 860<br />

Development Bank of South Africa - Interest on a Loan 349 092 121 795<br />

32. Going concern<br />

We draw attention to the fact that at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, the municipality had accumulated surplus of R 14 014 134 and that the<br />

municipality's total liabilities exceed its assets by R 66 452 219.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. This<br />

basis presumes that funds will be available to finance future operations and that the realisation of assets and settlement of<br />

liabilities, contingent obligations and commitments will occur in the ordinary course of business.<br />

33. Additional disclosure in terms of Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

Contributions to organised local government<br />

Current year subscription / fee 617 798 212 435<br />

Amount paid - current year (617 798) (130 834)<br />

Audit fees<br />

- 81 601<br />

Amount paid - current year 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

37


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

33. Additional disclosure in terms of Municipal Finance Management Act (continued)<br />

PAYE and UIF<br />

Opening balance - 276 681<br />

Current year subscription / fee 2 222 905 4 273 147<br />

Amount paid - current year - (4 332 816)<br />

2 222 905 217 012<br />

The balance represents PAYE and UIF deducted from the June <strong>2011</strong> and June <strong>2010</strong> payroll. These amounts were paid during<br />

July <strong>2011</strong> and July <strong>2010</strong> respectively.<br />

Pension and Medical Aid Deductions<br />

Current year subscription / fee - (8 838 036)<br />

Amount paid - current year - 8 838 036<br />

VAT<br />

- -<br />

VAT receivable 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

VAT output payables and VAT input receivables are shown in note .<br />

All VAT returns have been submitted by the due date throughout the year.<br />

34. Utilisation of Long-term liabilities reconciliation<br />

Long-term liabilities raised 349 092 -<br />

Long-term liabilities have been utilized in accordance with the Municipal Finance Management Act. Sufficient cash has been<br />

set aside to ensure that long-term liabilities can be repaid on redemption date.<br />

35. Intangible assets<br />

Computer software, internally<br />

generated<br />

Cost /<br />

Valuation<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated Carrying value Cost /<br />

amortisation<br />

Valuation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Accumulated Carrying value<br />

amortisation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

58 037 - 58 037 - - -<br />

36. Current portion of borrowings<br />

At fair value through surplus or deficit<br />

DBSA Loan - Current portion transferred to current liability<br />

Terms and conditions<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

- -<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Fair value through surplus or deficit 349 092 121 795<br />

38


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

36. Current portion of borrowings (continued)<br />

- -<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

37. Other revenue<br />

Other income 635 602 550 186<br />

38. Reconciliation between budget and statement of financial performance<br />

Reconciliation of budget surplus/deficit with the surplus/deficit in the statement of financial performance:<br />

Adjusted for:<br />

Gain on the sale of assets 23 233 87 307<br />

Deficit / surplus of actual revenue and expenditure in comparison to budget (20 367 392) (11 327 778)<br />

Other (specify) 34 358 293 27 280 205<br />

Net surplus per approved budget 14 014 134 16 039 734<br />

39


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

40<br />

The supplementary information presented does not form part of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and is unaudited


Development Bank of South Africa 3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix A<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Schedule of external loans as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Loan<br />

Number<br />

Redeemable Balance at<br />

30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Received<br />

during the<br />

period<br />

Redeemed<br />

written off<br />

during the<br />

period<br />

Balance at<br />

30 June<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Carrying<br />

Value of<br />

Property,<br />

Plant &<br />

Equip<br />

Other Costs<br />

in<br />

accordance<br />

with the<br />

MFMA<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Loan Stock<br />

Structured loans<br />

Funding facility<br />

Development Bank of South<br />

Africa<br />

DBSA Loan EC102527 30 Sep 2028 3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

Bonds<br />

Other loans<br />

Lease liability<br />

Annuity loans<br />

Government loans<br />

Total external loans<br />

3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

Page 41


Analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated depreciation<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix B<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment loss Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Land and buildings<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Community Assets<br />

Page 42


Computers - software & programming - 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

- 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

Intangible assets - 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

- 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix B<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated depreciation<br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment loss Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Heritage assets<br />

Specialised vehicles<br />

Other assets<br />

Total property plant and equipment<br />

Agricultural/Biological assets<br />

Intangible assets<br />

Investment properties<br />

Total<br />

Page 43


Segmental analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated Depreciation<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Page 44<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix C<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment deficit Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Executive & Council/Mayor and<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Council<br />

Finance & Admin/Finance - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Planning and Development/Economic<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Development/Plan<br />

Health/Clinics - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Comm. & Social/Libraries and archives - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Housing - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Public Safety/Police - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Sport and Recreation - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Environmental Protection/Pollution<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Control<br />

Waste Water Management/Sewerage - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Road Transport/Roads - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Water/Water Distribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Other/Air Transport - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Total


- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix C<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated Depreciation<br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment deficit Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Page 45


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix D<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental Statement of Financial Performance for the year ended<br />

Prior Year<br />

Current Year<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- - - Executive & Council/Mayor and Council - - -<br />

- - - Finance & Admin/Finance - - -<br />

- - - Planning and Development/Economic<br />

- - -<br />

Development/Plan<br />

- - - Health/Clinics - - -<br />

- - - Comm. & Social/Libraries and archives - - -<br />

- - - Housing - - -<br />

- - - Public Safety/Police - - -<br />

- - - Sport and Recreation - - -<br />

- - - Environmental Protection/Pollution<br />

- - -<br />

Control<br />

- - - Waste Water Management/Sewerage - - -<br />

- - - Road Transport/Roads - - -<br />

- - - Water/Water Distribution - - -<br />

- - - Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - -<br />

- - - Other/Air Transport - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Other charges<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - <strong>Municipality</strong> - - -<br />

- - - Municipal Owned Entities - - -<br />

- - - Other charges - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Page 46


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix D<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental Statement of Financial Performance for the year ended<br />

Prior Year<br />

Current Year<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - Total - - -<br />

Page 47


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Rand Rand Rand Var<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Revenue<br />

Sale of goods - - - - (Explanations to be recorded)<br />

Sale of goods in<br />

- - - -<br />

agricultural activities<br />

Rendering of services - - - -<br />

Rendering of services in<br />

- - - -<br />

agricultural activities<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 - 3 402 286 -<br />

Service charges 376 339 - 376 339 -<br />

Levies - - - -<br />

Property rates - penalties<br />

- - - -<br />

imposed and collection<br />

charges<br />

Sales of housing - - - -<br />

Construction contracts - - - -<br />

Royalty income - - - -<br />

Rental of facilities and 427 566 - 427 566 -<br />

equipment<br />

Interest received (trading) - - - -<br />

Dividends received - - - -<br />

Income from agency 113 025 - 113 025 -<br />

services<br />

Public contributions and<br />

- - - -<br />

donations<br />

Fines 1 256 813 - 1 256 813 -<br />

Licences and permits - - - -<br />

Government grants & 99 032 765 - 99 032 765 -<br />

subsidies<br />

Municipal Revenue UD1 9 720 473 - 9 720 473 -<br />

Municipal Revenue UD2 - - - -<br />

Revenue 1 522 832 - 522 832 -<br />

Revenue 2 692 938 - 692 938 -<br />

Miscellaneous other<br />

- - - -<br />

revenue<br />

Administration and<br />

- - - -<br />

management fees<br />

received<br />

Fees earned - - - -<br />

Commissions received - - - -<br />

Royalties received - - - -<br />

Rental income - - - -<br />

Discount received - - - -<br />

Recoveries - - - -<br />

Other income 1 - - - -<br />

Other income 2 - - - -<br />

Other income 3 - - - -<br />

Other income 635 601 - 635 601 -<br />

Other farming income 1 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 2 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 3 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 4 - - - -<br />

Other farming income - - - -<br />

Government grants - - - -<br />

Interest received -<br />

investment<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 48


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Interest received - other - - - -<br />

Dividends received - - - -<br />

Expenses<br />

116 180 638 - 116 180 638 -<br />

Personnel (42 290 416) - (42 290 416) -<br />

Manufacturing -<br />

- - - -<br />

Employee costs<br />

Remuneration of (10 877 366) - (10 877 366) -<br />

councillors<br />

Administration - - - -<br />

Transfer payments - - - -<br />

Depreciation - - - -<br />

Impairment - - - -<br />

Amortisation - - - -<br />

Impairments - - - -<br />

Reversal of impairments - - - -<br />

Finance costs (4 197) - (4 197) -<br />

Debt impairment (7 062 239) - (7 062 239) -<br />

Collection costs - - - -<br />

Repairs and maintenance<br />

- - - -<br />

- Manufacturing expenses<br />

Repairs and maintenance (8 422 481) - (8 422 481) -<br />

- General<br />

Repairs and maintenance<br />

- - - -<br />

- General<br />

Bulk purchases (352 225) - (352 225) -<br />

Contracted Services (218 255) - (218 255) -<br />

Grants and subsidies paid - - - -<br />

Cost of housing sold - - - -<br />

General Expenses (32 962 560) - (32 962 560) -<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

General expenses)<br />

- - - -<br />

Other revenue and costs<br />

(102 189 739) - (102 189 739) -<br />

Gain or loss on disposal 23 233 - 23 233 -<br />

of assets and liabilities<br />

Gain or loss on exchange<br />

- - - -<br />

differences<br />

Fair value adjustments - - - -<br />

Gains or losses on<br />

- - - -<br />

biological assets and<br />

agricultural produce<br />

Income from equity<br />

accounted investments<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 49


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Gain or loss on disposal<br />

- - - -<br />

of non-current assets held<br />

for sale or disposal<br />

groups<br />

Taxation - - - -<br />

Discontinued operations - - - -<br />

23 233 - 23 233 -<br />

Net surplus/ (deficit) for<br />

the year<br />

14 014 132 - 14 014 132 -<br />

Page 50


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(2)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Budget Analysis of Capital Expenditure as at 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Additions Revised Variance Variance<br />

Budget<br />

Rand Rand Rand %<br />

Explanation of significant<br />

variances from budget<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Executive & Council/Mayor and<br />

- - - -<br />

Council<br />

Finance & Admin/Finance - - - -<br />

Planning and<br />

- - - -<br />

Development/Economic<br />

Development/Plan<br />

Health/Clinics - - - -<br />

Comm. & Social/Libraries and<br />

- - - -<br />

archives<br />

Housing - - - -<br />

Public Safety/Police - - - -<br />

Sport and Recreation - - - -<br />

Environmental Protection/Pollution - - - -<br />

Control<br />

Waste Water<br />

- - - -<br />

Management/Sewerage<br />

Road Transport/Roads - - - -<br />

Water/Water Distribution - - - -<br />

Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - - -<br />

Other/Air Transport - - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - -<br />

Other charges<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

61 159 - (61 159) -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 51


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 52 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 53 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 54 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


NOTES


NOTES


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Privave Bag X 1251 Cofimvaba 5380<br />

201 Main Street Cofimvaba<br />

Tel: 047 874 8700<br />

Fax: 047 874 0010<br />

Email:info@intsikayethu.gov.za<br />

Customer Care line: 0860 042281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!