25.11.2014 Views

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

annual report 2010 - 2011 - Intsika Yethu Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY | ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2010</strong> - <strong>2011</strong>


Foreword by the Mayor<br />

The primary purpose of the Annual Report <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> is to provide an<br />

audited account of the performance of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

and the management of the budget. The Annual Report also<br />

provides a valuable opportunity to inform readers about the priorities and activities<br />

of the municipality, the progress it is making and the challenges it has to<br />

confront.<br />

On behalf of all the councillors I would like to express appreciation for the guidance<br />

and support provided by our management. In this regard strategic goals<br />

were informed by the objectives set out by previous year strategic planning. To<br />

attain these goals the municipality focused attention and resources on implementing<br />

the key priorities.<br />

As a level of the individual citizen, the priority is for the municipality to have<br />

processes, people and places that are efficient, responsive to people’s needs. This<br />

Annual Report provides a direct account of how far the municipality has achieved goals and the challenges that<br />

still need to be addressed.<br />

The municipality plays a key role in the management of bettering the lives of its communities which forms part<br />

of rest of the world. The Annual Report indicates how the municipality is responding to those serious challenges<br />

of service delivery. The Annual Report also focuses on the transformation of the <strong>Municipality</strong> as the organisation,<br />

its systems, and structure. The municipality has prioritised the improvement of the financial management and<br />

controls.<br />

Massive progress has been made in this and other areas, as indicated in the Annual Report. The senior management<br />

and staff have shown that it is capable of driving operations effectively and to respond strategically to challenges.<br />

In conclusion, I would like to thank the previous council for their contribution prior to their retirement.<br />

……………………<br />

K VIMBAYO<br />

HON MAYOR<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 3


FOREWORD BY THE<br />

MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is one of the municipalities in the Chris<br />

Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> whose function is the bettering lives of communities<br />

by provision of water and sanitation, construction of access roads<br />

and to generally bring service delivery to people. Despite the historical challenges<br />

posed by the vastness and the geographical terrain of the area as well as<br />

service delivery backlogs that are now systematically being attended, progress<br />

has been achieved in the year under review <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> compared to the previous<br />

year.<br />

The municipality has established solid relations with National and Provincial<br />

Departments of Public Works and Local Government who have assisted the<br />

municipality immensely in its efforts to change the lives of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> communities.<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is very conscious about what is expected<br />

of it in connection to service delivery issues and the improvement of the<br />

quality of the life of the communities and job creation.<br />

The municipality has focussed on areas of urgent need as identification of its service delivery plan (SDBIP) and<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed periodically in compliance with the relevant legislation. Whilst the municipality is mainly dependent on<br />

grants as the main source of funding, there has been concerted effort in improving revenue collection by the way<br />

being aggressive in revenue collection for service rendered by the municipality to those that are not indigent.<br />

As a result of the above efforts the municipality’s service delivery has improved tremendously and furthermore,<br />

through the EPWP programme, jobs have been created.<br />

Priority areas for the coming year would be to continue the intensification of the provision of services particularly<br />

water and sanitation and to improve on revenue collection and creation of jobs and job opportunities through local<br />

economic development within the municipality area.<br />

……………………<br />

Z SHASHA<br />

MUNICIPAL MANAGER<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 4


The Vision:<br />

“A people centred, developmentally focused rural local municipality in which all of its inhabitants have access to<br />

quality service delivery and participate in vibrant and well-balanced social and economic development”.<br />

The Mission:<br />

“Endeavours to advance its developmental local government mandate through a sustained focus onsound and accountable<br />

governance, physical and social infrastructure appropriate for sustainable development in our Municipal<br />

area”.<br />

Principles and Values of IYLM<br />

IYLM adopts the “Batho Pele Principles”, together with other underlying principles aligned to this value<br />

framework, which include the following: Democracy, as realised through consultation, transparency, and accountability;<br />

Respect & Courtesy; Responsiveness; Quality Services; Redress; and Value for Money.<br />

The IYLM in consultation with its local communities, as part of its Council and IDP representative processes,<br />

adopted the following set of values, in line with the above. These values are to guide how the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

performs its mandate, as well as how it interacts with those who remain the owners of development (i.e. its<br />

inhabitants as the beneficiaries of development and service delivery).<br />

To be responsive to the needs of citizens and partner-local municipalities.<br />

To be transparent, accountable and participative in our dealings with each other and our partners.<br />

To cultivate a work ethic focused on performance, achievement and results.<br />

To promote and pursue key National, Provincial and local development goals.<br />

To ensure a representative organisation.<br />

To be democratic in the pursuance of our objectives.<br />

To show mutual respect, trust and ensure high levels of co-operation and discipline in our dealing with<br />

one another.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 5


Lokishini - C<br />

3<br />

Mtwaku - B<br />

Mtwaku - A<br />

Dayimani - D<br />

Lalini - L<br />

Esiqikini - A<br />

Dlakavu<br />

Matyeni - E<br />

Esigxeni<br />

Kuholi<br />

Dudumashe - C<br />

Nyongwana<br />

Kwandungwane - C<br />

Dudumashe - A<br />

Mbinzana<br />

Bilatye<br />

Tyelerha<br />

Maya - C<br />

Damane<br />

Lalini - K<br />

Ntlakwefolo<br />

Sihlabeni<br />

4<br />

Farmer - A<br />

Upper Lanti<br />

Sawulana - A<br />

Ngqanga<br />

Emkhukhwini<br />

Mtshingeni<br />

Kwantsinga<br />

Lubisi<br />

Cube - A<br />

Zwelitsha - cc<br />

Township<br />

2<br />

Mangweni - B<br />

Sabalele -A<br />

20<br />

Mthonjeni - F<br />

Tshatshu - BB<br />

Ngxwashu - A<br />

Bhukhwana<br />

Ndulini<br />

Kusabalele<br />

Bhencuthi<br />

Cungcwana<br />

Landport<br />

Qungu<br />

Lanti - A<br />

Kwagcina - A<br />

Eluqolweni - B<br />

Nyongwane - B<br />

Mgongxo - B<br />

Mgongxo - A<br />

Ngxwashu - B<br />

Nyamankulu<br />

Mmangweni - J<br />

Mdange<br />

Sidwadweni - B Zingquthu<br />

Matshona - A<br />

Ncambalala<br />

5<br />

Jokwe<br />

Cube - B<br />

Sdubi point Tafeni - A<br />

Camama Forest<br />

Ntshintshi<br />

Tafeni - B<br />

Canama<br />

Hoita<br />

Liqolo<br />

Hoyana<br />

Endwashini<br />

Dekes Hill<br />

Banzi - A<br />

Sentile<br />

Mphakathini<br />

Bomplas - B<br />

19<br />

Cambalala<br />

Magwala - B<br />

Mkobeni - A<br />

Mtimbini<br />

Tunzini - B<br />

Kwamnqanqeni Mqanqeni<br />

Magwala - D<br />

Jamani - A<br />

Maqwatini - A<br />

Khayamandi - B<br />

Emkobeni<br />

Ngxingweni - A<br />

Khayamandi - A<br />

Wodehouse<br />

Magwala<br />

Diphini - D<br />

Magwala - A<br />

Qolweni - A<br />

Maqwathini - C Mtingwevu<br />

15<br />

Tyhawana<br />

1<br />

Nququ<br />

Hoyana<br />

Chamama - B<br />

Kwandlangisa<br />

Exeni - B<br />

Nquqhu - B<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

14<br />

Hala - BB<br />

Gcina - K<br />

21<br />

Ngxabangu<br />

16<br />

Tshamazimba<br />

Nonqonqwama<br />

Dipini - A<br />

Chris Hani<br />

Mlenze<br />

Sikhobeni - A<br />

Mahlubini - E<br />

Kwanyoka<br />

Mtingwevu - C<br />

Mtingwevu Mission<br />

Nquqhu - A<br />

Bolana - B<br />

Bolana - A<br />

Kwandungwane - D<br />

Mtshanyana - A Mtshanyana - B<br />

Sijula<br />

Mahlubini - B<br />

Kwandungwane - E<br />

Mpunga<br />

Taiwan<br />

Mahlatini - A<br />

7<br />

Qutse<br />

Qutsa<br />

Nxelesa<br />

Qolweni - B<br />

Mtyangwe<br />

Lower Qutsa<br />

Qombolo - G<br />

Mdeni - AC<br />

Banti<br />

Komkhulu - O<br />

Endensa<br />

Ntsela<br />

Mbulu<br />

Gongqo<br />

Ngcacha<br />

Ntlakwevenkile<br />

Mbojweni<br />

Maxambeni<br />

Mission - G<br />

Entlini<br />

Ncwane<br />

Kwebulana<br />

Mission - F<br />

Mankane<br />

Ajoliwe<br />

Ngudle<br />

Jojweni - N<br />

Qwili<br />

Nqumakala Nomadamba<br />

Kwamzola<br />

Kwangali<br />

Ngceza - A<br />

Gxwalibomvu - A<br />

Elwalweni<br />

Endenxa - A<br />

Lujilo - A<br />

Mbulu<br />

Ncora Irrigation<br />

Gasini - A<br />

Nomadambe<br />

Gesini<br />

Kwachotha<br />

Kwazulu - A<br />

Cubeni<br />

Qombolo - B<br />

Mafengwini<br />

Eluqolweni - BB<br />

13<br />

Ngceza - B Qombolo - E<br />

Khwebulana - A<br />

Qombolo - H<br />

Mxobozweni<br />

Komkhulu - P<br />

Qombolo - F<br />

Kwahange<br />

Mantanjeni - A<br />

Gwadela<br />

Xeni - A<br />

Mtsheko - A<br />

Kwamlondleni - B<br />

Kwamlondleni - A<br />

Esikolweni - A<br />

Mahlungulu - A<br />

Mvumelwano - A<br />

Mdeni - R<br />

Galali - A<br />

18<br />

Malangwane<br />

Mkuthukeni<br />

Khwebulana - B<br />

Ncora School<br />

Mahlungulu - C<br />

Mdeni/ezantsi<br />

Gushed<br />

Emrhotshozweni<br />

Luthuli<br />

Lutuli<br />

Kwadukatole Goloza<br />

Komkhulu - RR Mbulukhweza - A<br />

6<br />

Mbulukhweza - B<br />

Komkhulu - T<br />

Mbulukweza<br />

8<br />

Willow - B<br />

Mbulu mission<br />

Hange - B<br />

Lower Ncora<br />

10<br />

Kwalumandi<br />

Mgwenyana<br />

Gcingca<br />

Jojweni - S<br />

Kwa Mbaxa<br />

Gcibhala - B<br />

Lahlangubo - D<br />

Mtshabe<br />

Mission - H<br />

Lurshabeni<br />

Matafeni - B<br />

Mhlahlane - F<br />

Mkhwinti<br />

Ebusini<br />

Mission - C<br />

Home<br />

Luqoleneni<br />

Ezantsi - C<br />

Mdeni - T<br />

Eqolweni - A<br />

Zawukana<br />

Khalana<br />

Mdunjeni Marhawuleni<br />

Ngdumenya<br />

Longqayi<br />

Matafeni - A<br />

Bhotani - B<br />

Melika<br />

Gasini - B<br />

Mhlahlane - E<br />

Sobotini<br />

Tsomo<br />

Esigangeni - A<br />

Pesikeni<br />

Mgqwazini<br />

Ntsongeni - A<br />

Fraser's Garage<br />

Jara - A<br />

Tshayelela<br />

Bololitye Store<br />

Luqolweni - D<br />

Gugwini - B<br />

Ngxongweni - A<br />

Ngcongcolorha - A<br />

Ngcongcolorha - B<br />

Ndenxe - A<br />

Mgababa - A<br />

Luqolweni - F<br />

Ngingqini - A<br />

Jerusalem - A<br />

17<br />

Kwazulu - B<br />

Ngwemnyama - G<br />

Komkhulu - Q<br />

Mbombela<br />

Daza<br />

Bhotani - A<br />

Nobhokhwe - A<br />

Mahlubini - D Mahlubini - C<br />

Majwareni - B<br />

Nyhebe<br />

Nobhokhwe - B<br />

Mangobonlu Mahlubini - A<br />

Emahlubini - A<br />

East Bank<br />

Tenza - B<br />

Zolo<br />

Nongqothi<br />

Matolanyile - A<br />

Matolanyile - B<br />

12<br />

Nobokwe - B<br />

Vrystad<br />

Ngqwaru<br />

Kwamaduma<br />

Chifini<br />

Makhwababa<br />

Besi<br />

Komkhulu - M<br />

Ngojini - I<br />

Mdeni - V<br />

Mabhentseni<br />

Kwandungwana - A<br />

Tshatshu - C<br />

Layitini<br />

11<br />

Halalani<br />

Mdibaniso<br />

Sixhotyeni - A<br />

Ezidulini<br />

Qitsi<br />

Eqitsi<br />

Ndlunkulu - A<br />

Ndwashini<br />

Magqoleni<br />

Sodom<br />

Ncatsheni<br />

Qwebeqwebe<br />

Main<br />

Mkhwezweni -B<br />

9<br />

Jwqyi<br />

Emandlaneni<br />

Nyathi - A<br />

Ngwevana - C<br />

Kwandaba<br />

Xonya - B<br />

Cwecweni - A<br />

Matyabomvu<br />

Etoleni<br />

Magezimeni<br />

Nxamalele - A<br />

1<br />

Nxamalele Store<br />

Chaba - D<br />

Nxamalele - B<br />

Eluxeni - C<br />

Manuneni<br />

Mziwini<br />

2<br />

Emmangweni -A<br />

Chaba - E<br />

Emaqakamzini<br />

Emaqomeni - B<br />

Elalini - C<br />

Mqonci - A<br />

Sikhobeni - B<br />

Kuchaba<br />

Libiza<br />

Mqonu<br />

Nqutura<br />

Esikobeni - B<br />

Makhambi<br />

Sgubudwini<br />

Nabileyo - B<br />

Emazizini - A<br />

Khethi - A<br />

Nabileyo - A<br />

Kofu<br />

Lalini - AA<br />

Engasa<br />

Khethi - B<br />

Kwasofika<br />

Esiqikini - b<br />

Ntshingeni - A<br />

Manxiweni - C<br />

Emqonci<br />

Komkhulu - CA<br />

Mqonci - B<br />

Zundwana<br />

Kuntonga<br />

Overview of the Report<br />

The Annual Report <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong> aims to convey to the reader what the municipality has<br />

achieved during the financial year of <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>2011</strong>. Drawing the municipal strategic plan, its<br />

highlights both the achievements as well as the challenges facing the Municipal Departments<br />

during the <strong>report</strong>ing period. In order to meet the requirements set by the Easter Cape<br />

Treasury Department, the Annual Report is structured into four main parts.<br />

Part 1<br />

General information<br />

• Introduction and Overview<br />

• Foreword by the Mayor<br />

• Foreword by the Municipal Manager<br />

• Executive Summary<br />

Part 2<br />

Key Performance Achievement Reports<br />

Part 3<br />

Audited Statements and other financial information<br />

Part 4<br />

Good Governance<br />

CHRIS HANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY (DC 13)<br />

Eastern Cape Province<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

Contact Details<br />

Joseph Jankie<br />

Tel : 045 808 4742<br />

Fax : 045 838 5959<br />

Email : jjankie@chrishanidm.co.za<br />

Disclaimer<br />

Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> in no way accepts resposibility for<br />

the accuracy or completeness of the data presented on this map,<br />

and will not be held liable for damages, including loss of profits or<br />

consequential damage, arising out of the use of this information.<br />

.<br />

Produced by : CHDM GIS Unit<br />

Projection : Transverse Mercator<br />

Sphere :<br />

Datum : WGS84<br />

File Name : Water Service Delivery<br />

File Path : C:/GISDB/Water Service Delivery<br />

Revision No. : 3<br />

Scale1:130 000<br />

Date : 22 April 2008<br />

0 4.5 9 18 27 36<br />

Kilometers<br />

Legend<br />

Road Network<br />

National Road<br />

Ward Boundaries<br />

New LM Boundary<br />

Settlements<br />

Old LM Boundary<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 6


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The population of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> is estimated to be 194 246 people living in 44 768<br />

households. This population size also implies that 22% of the Chris Hani district<br />

population resides in <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>. The average household size in the municipality<br />

is 4 people per household.<br />

There are still major challenges ahead given that over two thirds (76%) of the population<br />

is indigent with unemployment estimated over 50%. About 53% of our population is<br />

females while males account for only 47%.<br />

About 60% of our population is children in the school going age group (0-19 years).<br />

About 7% falls within the pension age group. Only 33% are in working age group (20<br />

– 64 years). This means that there is a high dependency ratio as 67 % of the population<br />

depends on the 33% workforce in the area.<br />

OVERVIEW OF THE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is a democratic elected category B municipality made up of<br />

the representative councilors and administration staff. It is one of the eight local municipalities<br />

found within the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong>. The municipality is purely rural with a<br />

population of about 194 000. <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> practices its duties through its communities<br />

from all 21 wards. The councilors of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> form part of the local<br />

allocated government working directly with the local people. The municipality excises its duties<br />

through its constituent communities. Under the municipality’s jurisdiction is:<br />

• Cofimvaba<br />

• Tsomo<br />

Unemployment and poverty affects a large number of people within the municipal areas. The<br />

council forms part of the local sphere of government, closely located to the people. The <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> exercises its duties and functions through its constituent areas.<br />

Africans represent the largest population group in the Municipal area. Mini farming is the biggest<br />

source of livelihood in the area. The area of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> offer a diverse range of opportunities<br />

in industries linked to agriculture and other industries.<br />

Key features of the Local Economy<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Farming: grain, poultry and dried fruit<br />

Growing tourism sector<br />

Livestock improvement Tourism has been added to the economic base of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>. Slowly the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> is becoming more noticeable on tourism maps due to its rich history and culture.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 7


MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE<br />

COMMITTEE<br />

Hon Mayor: Councilor K Vimbayo<br />

SPU Portfolio Head: Councillor N Stata<br />

Local Economic Development and Planning: Councillor William Mdwayingana<br />

Infrastructure Development and Planning: Councillor Myathaza<br />

Community Services Department: Councillor N A Tshangana – Nkota<br />

Corporate Services Department: Councillor N Ntsaluba<br />

Water Services: Councillor K Mdleleni<br />

Six managers of departments<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Municipal Manager: Mr Z Shasha<br />

LED: Mr K Maceba<br />

Infrastructure Plan & Dev: Mr S Koyo<br />

Community Services: Ms Y Mniki<br />

Corporate Services: Ms Nkuhlu<br />

Budget and Treasury: Mr M Dyushu<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Water n Sanitation:<br />

Cllr K Mdleleni<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Corporate Services:<br />

Cllr N Ntsaluba<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Special Programmes<br />

Unit: Cllr N Stata<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Infrastructure & Planning:<br />

Cllr S Myataza<br />

Portfolio Head:<br />

Budget & Treasury:<br />

Cllr J Cengani<br />

Portfolio Head for Local Economic<br />

Development and Planning:<br />

Cllr W Mdwayingana<br />

Portfolio Head for<br />

Community Services:<br />

Cllr N Tshangana – Nkota<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 8


CHAPTER ONE<br />

Human resource and other organization management – KPA 1<br />

Human Resources and Other Organisation Management<br />

• Total number of approved posts; 193<br />

• The total number of vacant posts in the entire institution: 12<br />

• Six Performance Agreements were submitted.<br />

1.2 Staff development initiatives during the Financial Year<br />

See attached list.<br />

1.3 Key HR statistics per functional area<br />

1.<br />

a.<br />

Full time staff complement per functional area (examples are given below)<br />

MM/Section 57 and Line Managers<br />

Approved positions (e.g. MM – S57 etc…)<br />

Number of approved and<br />

budgeted posts per position<br />

Filled posts<br />

Vacant posts<br />

1 Municipal Manager’s Office 10 09 01<br />

2 Corporate Services Department 29 26 01<br />

3 Budget and Treasury Department 29 25 04<br />

4 Community Services Department 83 77 6<br />

5 LED and Planning Department 9 9 -<br />

6 Technical Services Department 46 40 06<br />

2.<br />

Technical staff registered with professional bodies<br />

Technical<br />

Service: Water<br />

Services<br />

Total number of<br />

technical service<br />

managers<br />

Total number<br />

pending registration<br />

in the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

Total number pending<br />

registration confirmation<br />

in the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

5 4 1 -<br />

Total number not<br />

yet registered in<br />

the accredited<br />

professional body<br />

3.<br />

Level of education and skills<br />

Total number of Staff<br />

Number of staff without<br />

Grade 12<br />

Number of staff with<br />

Senior Certificate only<br />

Number of staff with Tertiary/<br />

accredited professional training<br />

207 93 30 80<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 10


4.<br />

Trends on total personnel expenditure<br />

Financial Years<br />

Total number of staff<br />

Total approved<br />

operating Budget<br />

2006-2007<br />

2007-2008 50 550 663 30 097 425<br />

2008-2009 63 840 937 34 097 695<br />

2009-<strong>2010</strong> 118 891 631 42 486 563<br />

Personnel expenditure<br />

(salary and salary<br />

related)<br />

Percentage of<br />

expenditure<br />

5.<br />

List of pension and medical aids to whom employees belong (please add if necessary)<br />

Names of pension fund<br />

Number of<br />

members<br />

Names of medical Aids<br />

Number of members<br />

Cape Joint 159 Bonitas 85<br />

Samwu Provident Fund 10 Discovery LA Health 16<br />

Eastern Cape Group Scheme 5 Samwu Med. 21<br />

Hosmed 8<br />

1.4 Senior officials’ wages and benefits;<br />

Municipal Manager: R 745 253<br />

Managers <strong>report</strong>ing directly to the Municipal Manager: R 670 892<br />

1.5 Implementation of the Performance Management System (PMS):<br />

Both individual and institutional PMS are fully implemented, individual at the level of senior managers only.<br />

1.6 Annual performance as per key performance indicators in municipal transformation and organizational<br />

development<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Total number of<br />

people (planned for<br />

) during the year<br />

under review<br />

Achievement<br />

level during the<br />

year under review<br />

Achievement<br />

percentage during<br />

the year<br />

1<br />

Vacancy rate for all<br />

approved and budgeted<br />

posts;<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Percentage of appointment<br />

in strategic<br />

positions (Municipal<br />

Manager and Section 57<br />

Managers)<br />

Percentage of Section<br />

57 Managers including<br />

Municipal Managers<br />

who attended at least 1<br />

skill development training<br />

course within the FY<br />

6 6 100%<br />

6 6 100%<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 11


4<br />

5<br />

6.<br />

7<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Percentage of Managers<br />

in Technical Services<br />

with a professional<br />

qualification<br />

Percentage of municipalities<br />

within the<br />

district area that have a<br />

fully functional Performance<br />

Management<br />

System (DM only)<br />

Percentage of staff that<br />

have undergone a skills<br />

audit (including competency<br />

profiles) within the<br />

current 5 years term<br />

Percentage of councilors<br />

who attended a skill<br />

development training<br />

within the current 5 year<br />

term<br />

Percentage of staff<br />

complement with disability<br />

Percentage of female<br />

employees<br />

Percentage of employees<br />

that are aged 35 or<br />

younger<br />

Total number of<br />

people (planned for<br />

) during the year<br />

under review<br />

Achievement<br />

level during the<br />

year under review<br />

1 1 100%<br />

46 46 100%<br />

207 2 3,9%<br />

207 80 41%<br />

207 89 46%<br />

Achievement<br />

percentage during<br />

the year<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> won the Most Improved Work Place award in <strong>2010</strong>. The awards were provincial LGSITA<br />

Awards which were held in East London. The award means that the municipality is keen on skills development and that will<br />

have a good impact on issues of service delivery. The award was comprised of a trophy and R15 000 check.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

• Training & Development Policies<br />

• Records Management and lack of space for registry function<br />

REMEDIAL ACTIONS<br />

• Two training & development policies have been developed.<br />

• Workshops on record management have been attended by key officials<br />

• Filing cabinets have been purchased though we have space challenges<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 12


Chapter TWO<br />

Basic Service delivery performance highlights – KPA 2<br />

Annual performance as per key performance indicators in Electricity services<br />

Indicator name<br />

Total number of household/customer<br />

expected to<br />

benefit<br />

Estimated backlogs (actual<br />

numbers)<br />

1<br />

Percentage of households with access<br />

to electricity services<br />

14 304 35 128<br />

2<br />

4<br />

Percentage of indigent households<br />

with access to basic electricity services<br />

Percentage of indigent households<br />

with access to free alternative energy<br />

sources<br />

3879 71.7<br />

6113<br />

The major challenges are<br />

• Resource constraints<br />

• Skills shortage<br />

• Escalating costs<br />

• Way-leave problems<br />

• Settlement densities<br />

• Ground conditions<br />

• Contractual challenges (contractors)<br />

• Inadequate funding<br />

• Economic condition impact<br />

• Non-standard material<br />

These problem can be address by training youth on the skills that are needed.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 14


Road maintenance<br />

The municipality is responsible for the construction, maintenance and upgrading of local access roads and stormwater<br />

infrastructure. The DR (district roads) are under the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> and there is an R61<br />

road which is under SANRAL.<br />

Level and standards in road maintenance services<br />

The entire road network of mainly gravel roads is generally in poor condition and in need of upgrading and maintenance.<br />

There is a target of 70 km of roads to be maintained of which 45% is done. Of the tarred roads length<br />

about 7 km are urban access roads running within towns of Cofimvaba and Tsomo. The most of these access<br />

roads need the construction of bridges and storm water.<br />

Annual performance as per key performance indicators in road maintenance services<br />

1<br />

2<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Indicator name<br />

Percentage of households without<br />

access to gravel or graded roads<br />

Percentage of road infrastructure<br />

requiring upgrade<br />

Percentage of planned new road<br />

infrastructure actually constructed<br />

Percentage of capital budget reserved<br />

for road upgrading and maintenance<br />

effectively used.<br />

Total number of<br />

household/customer<br />

expected to benefit<br />

60<br />

70 60<br />

30<br />

Estimated backlogs (actual<br />

numbers)<br />

Major challenges in road maintenance services and remedial actions<br />

Bridges are the major challenge in the access roads. However lack of funding for maintenance tended to<br />

determine the gains and work done in this area as most gravel roads have fallen victim to terrestrial rains.<br />

Waste management<br />

Waste management services delivery strategy and main role-players<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> employs a two pronged approach in terms of waste management by promoting<br />

cleanliness as well as alleviation of poverty. The street cleaning is done by casual workers recruited from<br />

the different wards on a three month rotational basis. This project is funded through the Extended Public<br />

Works Programme. Awareness campaigns are conducted <strong>annual</strong>ly at both units (Tsomo & Cofimvaba).<br />

Households within the CBD have been supplied with industrial wheelie bins and 200 litre bin liners. Waste<br />

collection is done once a week per area and the densely populated areas have also been supplied with skip bins<br />

and steel bins which are collected once a week.<br />

The municipality has a partnership with Buyisa e bag which has supplied bailing machines for both the transfer<br />

and landfill sites. Waste is sorted at the site by sorters trained by Buyisa e bag and other sorters have been<br />

deployed at Boxer supermarkets to sort at the source. This is done to minimise waste that goes to the cell.<br />

The Department of Economic Development and Environmental Affairs is supporting the municipality also<br />

in terms of forming a Waste Management Co-operative.<br />

The Integrated Waste Management Plan (IWMP) is being reviewed as circumstances have changed since 2005<br />

when it was drafted. The IWMP is drafted by the District <strong>Municipality</strong> in consultation with local municipalities<br />

and is therefore adopted at the District and implemented by the local municipalities. Implementation is done<br />

as follows:<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 15


• Implementation of current legislation<br />

• Implementation of waste minimisation strategies e.g. sorting of waste at source and site<br />

• Compliance with DWAF landfill requirementsWaste disposal processes<br />

• Waste collection & transportation<br />

• Waste disposal<br />

• Sorting<br />

• Public private partnerships (Injabulo <strong>Yethu</strong> & Buyisa e-bag)<br />

• Waste volumes recording<br />

1.<br />

Community and social services function’s performance<br />

Function: Community and Social Services<br />

Sub Function: All inclusive<br />

Reporting Level Detail Total<br />

Overview:<br />

Includes all activities associated with the provision of<br />

community and social services<br />

Description of the<br />

Activity:<br />

The function of provision of various community and<br />

social services within the municipality is administered<br />

as follows and includes:<br />

<br />

These services extend to include , but<br />

do not take account of which resides<br />

within the jurisdiction of government. The municipality has a<br />

mandate to:<br />

<br />

The strategic objectives of this function are to:<br />

<br />

The key issues for 200X/0Y are:<br />

<br />

Analysis of the<br />

Function:<br />

<br />

1 Nature and extent of facilities provided:<br />

no of facilities:<br />

no of users:<br />

- Library services 01 1000<br />

- Museums and art galleries 0 <br />

- Other community halls/facilities 15 3000<br />

- Cemeteries and crematoriums 02 5000<br />

- Child care (including crèches etc) 03 500<br />

- Aged care (including aged homes, home help) 01 100<br />

- Schools <br />

- Sporting facilities (specify) 03 2500<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 16


Reporting Level Detail Total<br />

- Parks 0 <br />

Note: the facilities figure should agree with the assets<br />

register<br />

2<br />

Number and cost to employer of all personnel associated<br />

with each community services function:<br />

R(000s)<br />

- Library services <br />

- Museums and art galleries <br />

- Other community halls/facilities <br />

- Cemeteries and crematoriums 03 R160 000.00<br />

- Child care <br />

- Aged care <br />

- Schools <br />

- Sporting facilities <br />

- Parks <br />

Note: total number to be calculated on full-time<br />

equivalent (FTE) basis, total cost to include total salary<br />

package<br />

6<br />

Total operating cost of community and social services<br />

function<br />

R (000s)<br />

Key Performance<br />

Area<br />

Performance During the Year, Performance Targets<br />

Against Actual Achieved and Plans to Improve<br />

Performance<br />

Current<br />

Target<br />

• Approved HIV/<br />

AIDS strategy;<br />

• Approved Disaster<br />

management policy<br />

frameworks and<br />

plans (Metro and<br />

DM)<br />

< List here the actual performance achieved over the financial<br />

year, and the variance between performance planned and actual<br />

performance, providing an explanation of the variance. Also<br />

provide details of any improvements planned for next year.<br />

Water services<br />

Water services delivery strategy and main role-players:<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> is acting on behalf of the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> as a water services provider,<br />

dealing with day to day operations and maintenance of water services. The role players in this are the District <strong>Municipality</strong>,<br />

Department of Water Affairs, CBO’s, CSP’s and the Local <strong>Municipality</strong> with its communities.<br />

Levels and standards in water services:<br />

The service standard ranges from a basic (RDP) one to a moderate standard mostly in the urban centres. Targeting<br />

in terms of the provision is done by the Water Services Authority which is Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong>.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 17


CHAPTER THREE<br />

MUNICIPAL LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK- (KPA 3)<br />

In response to pervasive poverty, under-development and high rate of unemployment of its people, <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> developed its Local Economic Development Strategy (LED Strategy), as a tool that will<br />

guide and inform its growth and development initiatives within the municipality.<br />

The primary goal of the local economic development strategy is to ensure the rejuvenation of the local economy,<br />

facilitate the competitiveness of sectors in which the municipality has a comparative advantage and ensure sustained<br />

economic growth that creates jobs and improve <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> and improves the quality of life of all residents.<br />

The strategy identifies the following sectors; Agriculture, Tourism, Forestry and SMME as critical in transforming<br />

the local economy of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. In essence, the thrust of IYM strategy is underpinned by the following<br />

strategic pillars;<br />

• Coherent agrarian system that promotes agro-processing,<br />

• Institutional innovation and good governance that is complimentary to economic growth and development.<br />

• Promotion of SMME development biased towards rural industrialisation and<br />

• Increased forestry productivity and creation of processing hubs.<br />

Setting of LED unit and the availability of LED expertise<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> LED unit is existing and fully functional. It is composed of qualified staff of Manager: LED<br />

and Planning, Secretary, LED Coordinator, Programme Managers (Agric & Forestry, SMME), Tourism Officer,<br />

LED Support Clerk and Tourism Intern.<br />

LED stakeholder forum functionality<br />

The LED Forum is yet to be established, but plans are at an advanced stage to have one at <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong>.<br />

Funding opportunities of LED activities<br />

The municipality alone cannot achieve its strategic intent and the strategy therefore has been crafted to accommodate<br />

inputs in the form of funding, skills development and resources from external funders or partners.<br />

Progress towards achieving the LED key objectives<br />

Improve public and market confidence<br />

Progress towards achieving the LED key objectives<br />

(a) Improve public and market confidence<br />

SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK<br />

In terms of Section 26(e) of the Municipal Systems Act (Act No. 32 of 2000) the Spatial Development Framework<br />

(SDF) is a legally required component of the <strong>Municipality</strong>’s Integrated Development Framework (IDP) to provide<br />

basic guidelines for a land use management system of the municipality.<br />

The current SDF of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> dates back to 2006. In order to ensure that development will take<br />

place in an integrated and sustainable manner, the IDP’s and SDF’s of local and district municipalities authorities<br />

have to be updated and aligned with the goals.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 19


The “Spatial Development Framework” (SDF) consists of the following components:<br />

A review of the institutional capacity of the <strong>Municipality</strong> to deal with development applications, with par-<br />

ticular reference to current procedures, which are used to assess development applications. Procedures for<br />

dealing with non compliance and illegal land use activities should be included within this review<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Current land use patterns of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

Growth/Demands/ Needs<br />

Spatial imbalances in current land use patterns in the municipality<br />

Analysis of vacant land in the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Land availability/suitability for future development<br />

Existing infrastructure and capacity implications<br />

Capital expenditure programme for implementing the Spatial Development Framework<br />

Illustrated plan of the desired spatial form<br />

Basic guidelines for land management<br />

Earmark restricted development zone<br />

Heritage sites<br />

Wetland Game and natural reserves<br />

Steep slopes of greater than 1:6<br />

Major river banks<br />

1:50 yrs flood line<br />

Settlement hierarchy<br />

Flexibility (Land use management<br />

Accessibility<br />

Spatial Integration – bringing together previously separate development<br />

Cluster approach<br />

List all projects at a particular location and indicate by arrows<br />

Trends and issues from analysis. Indicate by arrow where development is currently taking place<br />

Any localised land use management principle/guidelines<br />

Project location<br />

Maps<br />

Complete natural environment and biodiversity of the municipal area<br />

A strategic environmental assessment to determine areas where no development should take place<br />

Cadastral and jurisdictional<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 20


The key issues relating to IYM spatial development are as follows:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Dispersed Settlement Pattern: Pockets of developed urban centres surrounded by scattered undeveloped<br />

rural villages, which implies great costs to fulfil every basic human right to basic infrastructure and<br />

services<br />

Fragmentation: - There is a high need to systematically address the fragmented nature of development<br />

to promote the integration of urban and rural areas over time (phased development approach which will<br />

optimise on existing capacity and resources to generate the most spin-offs effects from investment).<br />

A strategic approach is required, which enables geographic areas to be prioritised for different levels of<br />

investment to ensure ongoing sustainable development and which will have the most spin-off effects for<br />

continued economic growth in the IYM area.<br />

Limited economic activity outside of urban centres<br />

Need to build on the agricultural and tourism potential of the area and target investment to other LED<br />

related initiatives and programmes taking place outside of the urban centres that have potential for growth<br />

and to generate economic spin – off.<br />

The IYM has many sensitive and conservative worthy areas within its region. The landscape is primarily characterised<br />

by irregular topography with mountain ranges, rolling grassland and various dams and rivers. This special and<br />

multi-faceted environment also presents, many opportunities for the social and economic development of the area.<br />

Land use patterns consist of medium and low residential areas, both formal and informal, light industrial areas and<br />

agricultural areas to a very large extent. The municipality is characterised by a high unemployment rate in all prime<br />

economic sectors. The role of local government is to act as an economic development agent, it is therefore critical<br />

and in order to guide any proposed development and land use management system.<br />

The objectives of our SDF are as follows:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

To provide a strategic, indicative and flexible forward planning instrument to guide decisions on land<br />

development.<br />

To provide a set of policies, principles and directives for spatial development<br />

To provide a clear and logical framework for private and public sector investment<br />

To promote sustainable development in terms of the natural and built environment<br />

To facilitate social, economic and environmental sustainability<br />

To provide a framework for dealing with key issues such as natural resources management, land reform<br />

and land use management.<br />

To facilitate the development of aesthetic urban form and landscape.<br />

Updating and refinement of the current SDF document in order to comply with legal requirements and<br />

be conversant with recent developments within the region<br />

Amendment and expansion of the existing documentation based on the NSDP, PGDP, Eastern Cape<br />

Spatial Development Framework, Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF and IDP (CHDM IDP and IYM<br />

IDP) in order to ensure proper alignment.<br />

Incorporation and alignment of all relevant information and proposals of IYM<br />

Ensuring public and governmental participation of the concerned stakeholders in the planning process,<br />

namely (inter alia) the communities concerned CHDM, EC Province, sector departments, parastatals and<br />

business institutions<br />

Creating a strategic framework to facilitate the development of an appropriate land use system<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 21


The main objective is to produce an SDF, including the following:-<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Display of the circumstances and realities of IYM.<br />

Land Use Guidelines and maps about:-<br />

• Desired patterns of the land use in IYM<br />

• Spatial reconstruction of the municipal landscape, including<br />

• Correction of spatial imbalances and spatial disintegration<br />

• Desired directions of growth<br />

• Movements networks<br />

• Conservation of natural and built environment<br />

• Identification of areas in which particular types of land use should be encouraged or<br />

discouraged<br />

• Areas in which intensity of land developments should be increased or reduced<br />

• Preferential focal areas for certain of land uses of housing<br />

Strategic framework to facilitate the development of an appropriate land use management system.<br />

A chapter on the Land Reform and Settlement Plan, giving an updated summary and indicating the im-<br />

plications<br />

Maps visually indicating, or where appropriate describing the desire spatial form of the municipal area.<br />

Strategic framework and basic guidelines for a land use management system in the municipal area<br />

A Capital Expenditure Framework for the municipality’s development programmes and budget process<br />

A strategic assessment for the environment impact of the SDF<br />

Executive Summary.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Comparative and Competitive advantage of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

An analysis of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> economy indicates that is has high levels of concentration with high dependency on<br />

community services. The analysis of the local economy indicates that sectors with a comparative advantage at<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> are community services, agriculture, trade and construction. These are the sectors the strategy has<br />

identified as key to unlocking the economic potential of the municipality. In addition to these sectors, tourism has<br />

been identified as having potential for growth.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 22


Intensify Enterprise support and business development<br />

• The type of business development services (BDS) provided to SMME’s<br />

‣ The SMMES across the district have been organised into a business chamber. The purpose is to give them<br />

a voice and to enable them to participate meaningfully to local economic development initiatives of <strong>Intsika</strong><br />

<strong>Yethu</strong>. Secondly, to lobby and influence the municipality and other government sectors and external<br />

donors in areas of their interest.<br />

‣ Training has also been to members of the chamber on various aspects, e.g. business management<br />

• Public and private partnerships established<br />

The partnerships established with strategic partners in 2008/9 are as follows;<br />

‣ Ruliv<br />

‣ Department of Minerals and Energy<br />

‣ Development Bank of South Africa<br />

• Number of new formal SMME established within the municipality<br />

The new formal LED Support structures that were established in are as follows;<br />

‣ Local Tourism Organisation<br />

‣ Chamber<br />

‣ Cooperatives<br />

• Number of new employment opportunities through Expanded Public Works Programs and Public<br />

and Private Partnerships.<br />

The Lapesi project has continued<br />

3.3 Annual performance as per key performance indicators in LED<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Indicator name<br />

Percentage of LED Budget spent on<br />

LED related activities.<br />

Number of LED stakeholder forum<br />

held<br />

Percentage of SMME that have<br />

benefited from a SMME support<br />

program<br />

Number of job opportunities created<br />

through EPWP<br />

Number of job opportunities created<br />

through PPP<br />

Target set for<br />

the year<br />

R5 191<br />

659.00<br />

Achievement level<br />

during the year<br />

(absolute figure)<br />

R4 672<br />

493.10<br />

Achievement percentage<br />

during the<br />

year<br />

90%<br />

nil nil Nil<br />

250 133 53%<br />

2500 1584 63%<br />

nil nil nil<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 23


3.4 Challenges regarding LED strategy implementation<br />

The success of the strategy rests on two main pillars:<br />

a) Buy in and support by all stakeholders identified in the strategy and<br />

b) Resource allocation (people & money) and commitment to implement;<br />

The serious challenge to the implementation of the LED strategy is under-funding. The budget allocated<br />

to LED department is pittance, trivial to an extent that it is a mockery to the very same concept /notion<br />

of local economic development of the area. The solution is simple, more money should be put in the<br />

LED department in a more or less the same level that the Infrastructure department is being funded. The<br />

economic sectors or sector departments should endeavour to plough more money on the strategic programmes<br />

and projects as identified in our LED Strategy.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 24


In order to come out with spatial development proposals for the area, it is essential to come out with the spatial<br />

objectives and strategies as follows:<br />

Objective and Strategies<br />

CHAPTER FOUR<br />

SPATIAL OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES<br />

Key Spatial Dev.<br />

Issue<br />

Uneven development<br />

in the area (between<br />

rural and urban<br />

areas).<br />

Fragmented nature<br />

of development in<br />

the area<br />

Untapped development<br />

potential in the<br />

area<br />

Lack of effective<br />

and efficient land use<br />

management system<br />

in the area<br />

Objectives<br />

Encourage urban and regional integration<br />

and rectification of past imbalances.<br />

Provision of appropriate level of services<br />

to meet the needs of the communities in<br />

the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>, that is, provision<br />

of basic services based on constitutional<br />

rights.<br />

Prioritised public sector investment in areas<br />

of growth and opportunity.<br />

Target strategic investment in development<br />

zones (focus areas) that have development<br />

potential<br />

Promote the integration of urban and rural<br />

areas in a phased programme.<br />

Promote regional connectivity.<br />

Support local economic opportunities<br />

in the municipal area for local economic<br />

development.<br />

Encourage land reform towards more intensive<br />

land uses.<br />

Protect the natural systems in the area.<br />

Manage dev<br />

Strategies<br />

Establish a clear hierarchy of settlement.<br />

Identify Special Development Areas,<br />

that is, areas of particular development<br />

potential or areas where priority spending<br />

is required (special need areas) – nodal<br />

centres, development corridors, special<br />

development areas.<br />

Develop a settlement pattern which<br />

conforms to the approved zonal policy<br />

of CHDM Land Reform and Settlement<br />

Plan that meets the particular requirements<br />

of the municipality.<br />

Create sustainable human settlement with<br />

quality physical, economic and social<br />

environments.<br />

Planning for densification /infill and<br />

careful expansion of existing settlements<br />

on productive agricultural resources.<br />

Promote integration of spatial development<br />

by means of efficient transport<br />

network system.<br />

Identify and prioritise economic opportunity<br />

areas.<br />

Identify and prioritise strategic economic<br />

linkages<br />

Develop a sustainable local Land Use<br />

Management System to promote co-ordinated,<br />

harmonious and environmentally<br />

sustainable development.


OUTCOMES<br />

The outcome of the above objectives and strategies are indicated in the Table below.<br />

Outcome<br />

Sustainable Environment Accessible <strong>Municipality</strong> An Efficient Community<br />

The responsible use of natural<br />

resources.<br />

A sustainable rates base.<br />

Focused investment.<br />

Sustained economic growth.<br />

Sustainable settlements.<br />

Cultural heritage<br />

A physical urban structure that<br />

promotes accessibility.<br />

Equity within the urban and<br />

rural system<br />

Diversity within urban system.<br />

Form and structure that lead to greater<br />

efficiency.<br />

Protection of existing investments<br />

Open space system<br />

Focus activities and investment.<br />

Infrastructure viability.<br />

Managed growth<br />

SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS<br />

KEY SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FEATURES<br />

The Spatial Development Framework is influenced by the following factors:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

(v)<br />

Cofimvaba and Tsomo will remain the primary commercial economic hub of the <strong>Municipality</strong> where<br />

the majority of work opportunities will be established.<br />

The other settlements will serve as service centres with economic growth potentials focusing on tourism<br />

and providing a service to the agricultural community.<br />

An effective road network (although in poor conditions) exists in the study area.<br />

Tourism Potential: The area has significant tourism potential, especially, the natural beauty of the<br />

area including the dams, the spectacular landscape, the cultural heritage and other natural and cultural<br />

resources in the area. The development, marketing and intensive exploitation of the existing tourism<br />

sector should be supported to contribute to future economic growth.<br />

Agricultural Sector: The agricultural sector of the entire <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> is extremely prominent. Future<br />

economic growth in the agricultural sector exists when considering small scale processing industries<br />

and intensive farming activities.<br />

Based on the above factors, the following key development features/ structuring elements have been identified<br />

for <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF.<br />

SPATIAL STRUCTURING ELEMENTS<br />

The SDF needs to be indicative and therefore the need to adopt a set of structuring elements that can guide the<br />

future structure of the urban and rural form of the municipal area must be identified. The following spatial structuring<br />

elements have been identified, namely:<br />

• Development Nodes (informed by settlement hierarchy).<br />

• Development Corridors<br />

• Special Priority Development Areas<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 27


• Strategic Development Zones<br />

• Environmental Management Areas<br />

Development Nodes<br />

These are areas where development (facilities, services and economic opportunities) tends to concentrate. Different<br />

types of nodes can be distinguished, such as, urban nodes, development nodes, social nodes, rural nodes (villages)<br />

and transportation distribution hubs).<br />

The <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> study therefore identifies certain nodes and settlements in line with the levels of<br />

investment and hierarchy (see Map 2.2) but in determining the settlement hierarchy; the following guidelines were<br />

used:<br />

• Settlements with significant economic and physical growth potentials<br />

• Settlement with unique character<br />

• Population<br />

• Functions performed<br />

• Availability of services<br />

• Location characteristics (accessibility and centrality of settlements- transport links, etc)<br />

In line with the CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review (2009/<strong>2010</strong>), the following urban and rural<br />

nodes, based on the settlement hierarchy, have been identified.<br />

Proposed Settlement Hierarchy<br />

Urban Nodes<br />

Node Type Settlement Spatial Development Priorities<br />

Level 2<br />

Major Service Centre<br />

(Regional Service<br />

Centre)<br />

Level 2<br />

Minor Service Centre<br />

(Sub-Regional<br />

Service Centre)<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

(An existing mixed land<br />

uses and key urban node<br />

and a regional centre in<br />

the study area)<br />

Tsomo<br />

(An existing mixed land<br />

use node and a sub- regional<br />

centre).<br />

Land Use Management and Administration<br />

CBD Revitalization and Renewal<br />

Sustainable Human Settlement Programme.<br />

Public-funded Housing Development<br />

Infrastructure and Social Facilities provision and upgrade<br />

Limited urbanization<br />

Urban aesthetics and land use management<br />

Environmental Management (Tourism)<br />

Sustainable Human Settlement Programme.<br />

Public-funded Housing Development<br />

Infrastructure and Social Facilities provision, maintenance<br />

and upgrade<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 28


Rural Nodes<br />

Node Type Settlement Spatial Development Priorities<br />

Level 2<br />

Rural Node<br />

(Rural<br />

Service Centre)<br />

Level 2 – Rural<br />

Villages<br />

Ncora, Qamata/Bilatye<br />

Mtshingeni<br />

Lubisi<br />

Sabalele<br />

All other existing villages<br />

Areas where medium order community facilities can be bundled<br />

in order to ensure that a greater number of rural residents<br />

are served in a more efficient and effective way.<br />

Ideally, these and future rural service centres are located in<br />

close proximity to public transport routes to ensure maximum<br />

accessibility to facilities<br />

Local planning to maximize use of resources<br />

Local land use schemes to be negotiated<br />

Basic level of service extension.<br />

Local planning to maximize use of resources<br />

Local land use schemes to be negotiated<br />

Extracted from CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review (2009/<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Development Corridors<br />

Development corridors are characterized by higher order ribbon-like development along routes that would otherwise<br />

be classified as movement corridors. These occur on various levels, from local development corridors along<br />

the main streets of the towns or even along rivers to regional and provincial corridors. Different types of corridors<br />

can be distinguished such as development corridors, movement corridors and activity corridors.<br />

The R61 from Queenstown through Cofimvaba, Ngcobo to Mthatha has been identified as the East Corridor,<br />

one of the four major development corridors in the Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> SDF.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 29


However, this study has identified an additional corridor, Tsomo–Ndabakazi Development Corridor.<br />

Fig. Map 2.2: Development Corridor Strategy<br />

SPECIAL (PRIORITY) DEVELOPMENT AREAS<br />

The Special Development Areas as identified by the CHDM Spatial Development Framework Review<br />

(2009/<strong>2010</strong>) and this study include the following:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

(iv)<br />

Priority Basic Need Areas.<br />

Targeted Focus Areas as proposed by the CHDM Land Reform and Settlement Plan (2005).<br />

Strategic Development Zones, that is, areas with LED potentials, such as, Agriculture and Forestry<br />

Sectors, Tourism Sector and Manufacturing Sector.<br />

Others – Infrastructure, Housing, Social Services, etc.<br />

Priority Basic Need Areas<br />

These are areas of greatest need, requiring special need for investment to upgrade levels of service (water supply,<br />

sanitation, access roads, electricity, etc) and social facilities (schools, health, community facilities, etc) to the accepted<br />

minimum level to improve the level of well being of communities.<br />

It should involve the investment of basic infrastructure as well as poverty alleviation programmes and projects<br />

such as community gardens, tourism, street trading and other SMME initiatives in <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong>. It<br />

should be indicated that <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Municipal area falls within the priority basic need areas within the CHDM.<br />

Targeted Focus Areas (Proposed Development Zones)<br />

Six development zones (see Map 2.3) have been identified in the Chris Hani District Land Reform and Settlement<br />

Plan (LR & SP) within which specific land reform and/or settlement planning (spatial planning) and land use management<br />

actions are necessary or desirable. These targeted areas coincide with the proposed settlement hierarchy<br />

(nodal) proposals outlined above. These zones are indicated in the table below.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 30


Land use management:<br />

Number Property Application Applicant Update<br />

1.<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Revitilisation of<br />

Subdivision<br />

Mrs Yengwa<br />

Awaiting Council Resolution<br />

2.<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Subdivision<br />

Eskom TSC<br />

Awaiting Council Resolution<br />

3.<br />

Erf 143, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

Sakawuli’s Properties<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

4. Erf 24, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mr. Njamela<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

5.<br />

Erf 147, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

6. Erf 90, Tsomo Rezoning<br />

Sakawuli’s Properties<br />

Mr. Sibulele Khweba<br />

Approved on the<br />

04/07/2008<br />

Approved on the<br />

19/02/2007<br />

7. Erf 14, Cofimvaba Rezoning Zamani Wholesalers<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

8.<br />

Erf 265, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning<br />

Mrs Nophelo Nongwevu<br />

Approved<br />

9. Erf 49, Cofimvaba Rezoning Ms X M Martins Approved<br />

10. Erf 89, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mzingisi Hlanjwa<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

Erf 265, Cofimvaba<br />

Erf 144, Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning Mrs N. Nongwevu Approved<br />

Rezoning Mr.N.R.Golifili Approved<br />

13. Erf 94, Cofimvaba Rezoning Mr Somzi<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

14. Erf 42, Tsomo Rezoning<br />

Mr.<br />

M.M.Mkhunyana<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

15.<br />

Erf 131-Erf 134,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Consolidation and<br />

then Subdivision<br />

Lundi – Luvu Business<br />

Ventures<br />

Approved<br />

16. Erf 79, Cofimvaba Rezoning<br />

17 Erf 30, Cofimvaba Rezoning<br />

Sibiya Jacob Gouman<br />

HDM CON-<br />

STRUCTION<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

LUMB<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 31


Number Property Application Applicant Update<br />

18<br />

Erf 186, Cofimvaba<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Design Stage<br />

19 Thabo Village<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

Surveyed awaiting approval<br />

from LUMB<br />

20 Ext 4 Tsomo<br />

Township Establishment<br />

NPM Planning<br />

Approved by Council,<br />

Surveyed awaiting<br />

approved by LUMB,<br />

awaiting approval from<br />

Surveyor General<br />

21<br />

Section C, Ext 4<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Pemro<br />

Submitted to LUMB<br />

22<br />

Remainder Erf 1,<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

Rezoning, Subdivision<br />

and Consolidation<br />

Eris Property<br />

Group, Mhlaba<br />

Group<br />

Awaiting approval from<br />

DFA Tribunal<br />

23 Joe Slovo<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Setplan<br />

Awaiting Land Transfer<br />

24 Nyanisweni<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Complan<br />

Complete<br />

25 St Marks 500<br />

Township Establishment<br />

Sektor<br />

Complete<br />

INFRASTRUCTURE ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/<br />

total number of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

90192 R31,468,729<br />

49% R31,468,729<br />

68% R31,468,729 R21,398,735<br />

R590430.00 R401492.40<br />

R91,693,529 R62753092.10<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

Electricity backlogs<br />

(30KWH/month)<br />

R26000000<br />

R23000000<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 32


Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 30 June 200..<br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual required budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

139,923.180 139,923.80 139,923.80 139,923.80<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

4024 1100<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

139,923.180<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

Sanitation backlogs<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

112280 R60,224,800 R52265.311<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

61% R60,224,800 R52265.311<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

R52265.311<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

Total spending to eliminate<br />

backlogs (R000)<br />

Spending on maintenance to<br />

ensure no new backlogs (R000)<br />

R500000.00<br />

R91693.529<br />

R4000000.00<br />

Road maintenance backlogs<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (n0.<br />

HH not receiving the minimum<br />

standard service)<br />

1050 km R25.5m 1195 km R968.950m R2.875m R2.875m<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 33


Basic service delivery area 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 30 June 200..<br />

Water backlogs (6KL/month) Required Budgeted Actual required budgeted Actual<br />

Backlogs to be eliminated (%:<br />

total HH identified as backlog/total<br />

numb of HH in the<br />

municipality<br />

87.9% 2.6% 0.3% 0.3%<br />

Spending on new infrastructure<br />

to eliminate backlogs (R000)<br />

R75m R34m R34m R120m R25.935m 25.935m<br />

Spending on renewal of existing<br />

infrastructure to eliminate<br />

backlog (R000)<br />

R15m R2.5m R2.5m R15m R2.875m R2.875m<br />

Key Performance<br />

Area<br />

Performance During the Year, Performance Targets Against<br />

Actual Achieved and Plans to Improve Performance<br />

Current<br />

Target<br />

<strong>2010</strong>/11<br />

1.Water treatment.<br />

During the <strong>2010</strong>/11 Financial year, we managed to spend 88% of the<br />

budgeted amount of R26000000.00.<br />

100%<br />

2.Sewage treatment.<br />

Our target for the <strong>2011</strong>/2012 financial year is 100% of the budgeted<br />

amount of R30000000.00 because there has been an improvement in<br />

our systems and new staff members have been employed.<br />

3.water reticulation.<br />

4.Human resource<br />

Management.<br />

5.Financial Management<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 34


1.<br />

Water distribution function’s performance<br />

Function:<br />

Sub<br />

Function:<br />

Water<br />

Water Distribution<br />

Reporting Level Detail Total Cost<br />

Overview: Includes the bulk purchase and distribution of water<br />

Description of<br />

the Activity:<br />

Water distribution<br />

is<br />

When the<br />

communities<br />

are served with<br />

water from<br />

the plant to<br />

the reservoirs<br />

and from the<br />

reservoirs to the<br />

houses or Businesses.<br />

The water purchase and distribution functions of the municipality<br />

are administered as follows and include:<br />

Raw water from dam or river is bought from the department of<br />

water affairs. It is then transported through pipes to the water treatment<br />

plant. From there it is treated with Chemicals and pumped to<br />

the reservoirs.<br />

< The <strong>Municipality</strong> buys raw water from DWA and it is piped to the<br />

water treatment plant. Chemicals which the <strong>Municipality</strong> buys from<br />

the Private sector are added to the water and pumped to the reservoirs.<br />

The cost of water,chemicals and labour are then added to arrive at<br />

the price of treated water.<br />

The mandate of the <strong>Municipality</strong> is to provide water and is not to be<br />

a water services authority.<br />

<br />

The strategic objectives of this function are to:<br />

< To provide clean drinking water and sanitation to the communities<br />

at a minimal cost.<br />

The key issues for <strong>2010</strong>/11 are:<br />

< Fixing of damaged water infrastructure and the target is to get a<br />

blue drop award.<br />

` <br />

1 Number and cost to employer of all personnel associated with the<br />

R (000s)<br />

water distribution function:<br />

- Professional (Engineers/Consultants)<br />

- Field (Supervisors/Foremen) 4 R104000.00<br />

- Office (Clerical/Administration) 3 R442000.00<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 35


Reporting Level Detail Total Cost<br />

- Non-professional (blue collar, outside workforce) 43 R2064000.00<br />

- Temporary <br />

- Contract <br />

Note: total number to be calculated on full-time equivalent (FTE)<br />

basis, total cost to include total salary package.<br />

2 Percentage of total water usage per month<br />

77.8% 32.96Ml<br />

Note: this will therefore highlight percentage of total water stock<br />

used per month<br />

3 Total volume and cost of bulk water purchases in kilolitres and rand,<br />

R (000s)<br />

by category of consumer<br />

- Category 1 42.3Ml R6768.00<br />

- Category 2 <br />

- Category 3 <br />

- Category 4 <br />

4 Total volume and receipts for bulk water sales in kilolitres and rand,<br />

R (000s)<br />

by category of consumer:<br />

- Category 1 ) 395.6Ml R1978000.00<br />

- Category 2 (total number of households) <br />

- Category 3 (total number of households) <br />

- Category 4 (total number of households) <br />

5 Total year-to-date water losses in kilolitres and rand R (000s)<br />

200m from dwelling same <br />

- Borehole 174862 <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: if other types of services are available, please provide details<br />

7 Number and cost of new connections: R (000s)<br />

3681 <br />

8 Number and cost of disconnections and reconnections: R (000s)<br />

<br />

9 Number and total value of water projects planned and current: R (000s)<br />

- Current (financial year after year <strong>report</strong>ed on) 17 31,468,729<br />

- Planned (future years) `<br />

Note: provide total project and project value as per initial or revised<br />

budget<br />

10 Anticipated expansion of water service: R (000s)<br />

- Piped water inside dwelling <br />

- Piped water inside yard <br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 36


- Piped water on community stand: distance < 200m from dwelling <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance > 200m from dwelling <br />

- Borehole <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: provide total number of households anticipated to benefit and<br />

total additional operating cost per year to the municipality<br />

11 Estimated backlog in number (and cost to provide) water connection: R (000s)<br />

- Piped water inside dwelling <br />

- Piped water inside yard <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance < 200m from dwelling 90192 <br />

- Piped water on community stand: distance > 200m from dwelling <br />

- Borehole <br />

- Spring <br />

- Rain-water tank <br />

Note: total number should appear in IDP, and cost in future budgeted<br />

capital housing programmes<br />

12 Free Basic Service Provision:<br />

- Quantity (number of households affected) 180384<br />

- Quantum (value to each household) <br />

Note: Provide details of how many households receive the FBS<br />

provision, and the average value it means per household. Describe in<br />

detail the level of Free Basic Services provided.<br />

13 Type and number of grants and subsidies received: R (000s)<br />


ROLE PLAYERS Roles RESPONSIBILITIES<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

• Municipal Council<br />

To deliver houses<br />

Prioritise housing project.<br />

Identification of the need or demand<br />

for housing .<br />

Ensure that the housing sector<br />

plan is in place.<br />

• Municipal Officials<br />

Register beneficiaries<br />

Ensuring the demand is a chapter<br />

in the IDP.<br />

• Communities<br />

• Traditional leaders<br />

• Town Planners<br />

• Surveyors<br />

• Conveyances<br />

Agree on the land to be utilised<br />

Approve land for development<br />

Produce an approved layout<br />

plans for the identified area<br />

To provide an approved SG diagram<br />

To register the township and<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Categorise the communities according<br />

to their housing needs<br />

and income levels, in order to<br />

provide for them accordingly.<br />

Ensure that you obtain well<br />

located land for the different levels<br />

of the communities.<br />

Ensure that the land belongs to<br />

the municipality.<br />

Engage planners to prepare layout<br />

plans and lodge the layout plans to<br />

the land use board. After approval<br />

Surveys must be made and lodged<br />

with the surveyor general<br />

Apply for funding<br />

Provincial Department<br />

National Department of Human Settlements<br />

Receive the Business plan and<br />

forward it to the National Department<br />

for funding.<br />

Make approval of the Township<br />

submission.<br />

On approval of the funds .It has<br />

to ensure that the supply chain<br />

processes are followed and the<br />

contractor is introduced to the<br />

municipality<br />

Funding housing programs<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 38


LEVELS & STANDARDS IN HOUSING & TOWN PLANNING SERVICES<br />

LEVELS Standards Town Planning services<br />

Low cost housing<br />

Middle income housing<br />

The complete project has high<br />

standard as it was a pilot for even<br />

the Provincial Govt.<br />

No delivery yet but provisions<br />

are underway. Thabo Village will<br />

be our show case that will be an<br />

integration of both the middle<br />

income housing, CRU and social<br />

housing<br />

They met the standards though<br />

they were outsourced<br />

The project is in the stage of approval<br />

from the land use board as<br />

well as consolidation of even for<br />

CRUs<br />

Indicator Name<br />

Total Number of<br />

households/customers<br />

Estimated<br />

backlog(Actual<br />

Number)<br />

Target for<br />

the following<br />

yr<br />

No. of<br />

Households<br />

% of<br />

Achievement<br />

during the<br />

yr.<br />

% of the households<br />

living in<br />

informals<br />

1.3%<br />

% of informal<br />

settlements that<br />

have been provided<br />

with basic services<br />

% of households<br />

informal housing<br />

that conforms to<br />

the minimum building<br />

standards for<br />

residential Houses<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 39


1.27 SPATIAL PLANNING<br />

PREPARATION AND APPROVAL OF SDF PROCESSES<br />

Dissemination strategy: SDF is obtainable from the municipal website<br />

In an electronic Version obtainable in the municipal office<br />

In a hard copy in the municipal offices<br />

Community involvement in developing the SDF document<br />

Implementation: Reference is made to the SDF for any spatial provision<br />

It assists in explaining the different nodes as planned.<br />

It is used as a guiding document in any project.<br />

All projects are in line with the SDF.<br />

SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS<br />

Rezoning Sub-Division Consent Use Removal Of Restrictions<br />

6 2 0 0 1<br />

Township<br />

Establishments<br />

MAJOR CHALLLENGES IN SPATIAL PLANNING SERVICES AND REMEDIAL<br />

ACTIONS<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

Suitable and surveyed areas are invaded<br />

Communities do not want to comply with legislative requirements such as registering land, submitting building<br />

plans etc.<br />

REMEDIAL ACTION<br />

Evictions<br />

Law enforcement<br />

Awareness on impact of invasion<br />

GOOD GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION<br />

Overview of the executive and council functions and achievements<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> Local <strong>Municipality</strong> is governed by a council of 46 members and an Executive Committee of 9<br />

members including the mayor. A number of members of the Executive Committee preside over specific portfolio<br />

committees; this ensures active participation by councillors. The function of Council and the Executive Committee<br />

are:<br />

The Council<br />

The Speaker is responsible for the legislative function of the council. The legislative functions of the council<br />

include:<br />

-<br />

-<br />

The passing of by-laws and formulation of policies<br />

The oversight of the executive and administration<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 40


-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

The approval and amendment of rates and other taxes, levies, and duties<br />

The approval or amendment of the municipality Integrated Development Plan<br />

The setting of tariff charges<br />

The entering into <strong>Municipality</strong> Service Partnerships and the appointment of the section of section 57<br />

manager<br />

The Executive Committee<br />

The Executive Committee is responsible for the overall management, coordination, monitoring the performance<br />

of administration programmes, prioritisation and drafting of policies and by-laws. The municipality has 5 standing<br />

committees. The municipality has established these committees according to the Municipal Structures Act.<br />

Public participation and consultation<br />

During the Mayoral Imbizo’s the municipality utilises a local radio station (Vukani FM) and local newspaper<br />

(Skawara News) as a means of consulting and mobilising its communities, as it is very paramount for them to have<br />

a say in council decisions and service delivery.<br />

The Ward Councillors together with Community Development workers and Ward Committees also played a vital<br />

role as they serve as the close link between the communities and the municipality in mobilising for such occasions.<br />

When there is a public hearing, proper communications are made through announcements in community radio i.e.<br />

Vukani Community Radio. Public Hearings also publicised by two way communication that is in between the ward<br />

councillor and the residents at large and also the CDW’s. The municipality has also enhanced the way of conveying<br />

the message when there will be public hearing and imbizo’s through the tool of loud hailing to its communities.<br />

Customer Satisfaction Surveys: English and Xhosa questionnaires are established and made available to measure<br />

the satisfaction of the public/ commuters. These questionnaires distributed and then collected quarterly to all 23<br />

wards of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> municipality as the way of getting feedback from the public.<br />

Ward committees’ establishment and functionality<br />

As the Handbook of Ward Committees outlines that during the sitting of the meetings of the ward committee<br />

members, the ward councillor of that particular ward is regarded as chairperson. According to the <strong>report</strong>s forwarded<br />

by the ward councillor to the Speaker’s Office that are furnished by credential lists shown a good attendance of<br />

the committee members into wards meetings.<br />

As the ward committee members are ward based and their meetings are convened and held in their respective<br />

wards, the minutes are written and filled by committee secretaries and some copies are forwarded to their ward<br />

councillors.<br />

Availability of ward committee activity <strong>report</strong>s: each and every ward had its own program of action where each<br />

committee member performs his/her tasks and in turn <strong>report</strong>s to his/her ward councillor.<br />

Community Development Workers performance monitoring<br />

To try and monitor the Community Development Work, the municipality has purchased a prefab which will be<br />

utilised as offices by CDW’s. That will make it easy for the municipality to work and monitor the CDW’s. A full<br />

time municipal official was made available for coordinate CDW’s. The municipality has made sits available for<br />

CDW’s in the council meeting to make it easy for issues for the CDW’s to follow and understand matters of local<br />

government and development.<br />

The municipality is in the process of coordinating the <strong>report</strong>s of the CDW’s and assist where necessary before<br />

they are forwarded to the province.<br />

As we all know that the CDWs are ward based and regarded as the foot soldiers for service delivery, they compile<br />

<strong>report</strong>s based on their findings in their wards. The monthly <strong>report</strong>s are handed over to the speaker’s office and<br />

to the Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 41


A vast number of cases are identified and <strong>report</strong>ed in almost all the 23 wards of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> jurisdiction each and<br />

every month. Interventions by Government Departments in these cases are required.<br />

CDWs also play a prominent role as publicity and mobilising tool for municipal and government sector gatherings<br />

in their wards.<br />

Communication Strategy<br />

The strategy is guided by the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) which seeks to achieve the prescriptions of our<br />

vision and mission, the Provincial Growth and Development Plan (PGDP), Public Participation Framework 2005.<br />

The National Government Communications Plan and the SALGA National Communications Conference Resolutions<br />

(May 2006).<br />

The municipality has completed the development of the Communication Strategy. This strategy is reviewed on a<br />

yearly basis. This programme was spear headed by the Department of Corporate Services. The strategy is to work<br />

towards achieving the goals of the Institution.<br />

Objectives<br />

To encourage meaningful public participation through promotion of government programmes.<br />

To promote and articulate <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> plans policies and achievements.<br />

To facilitate proactive communication on matters of disaster risk management, health and environmental issues.<br />

To strengthen and improve internal communication systems.<br />

To reinforce intergovernmental relations through coordination of communication programmes and activities<br />

amongst the three spheres of government<br />

To create and maintain sound relations with the media houses<br />

The document was presented to Executive Committee off the municipality and it was approved and it still waiting<br />

for approval of the Council.<br />

There is one communication official responsible for the section of communication. The office does have enough<br />

infrastructure to utilise when participating in communication activities.<br />

Anti-Corruption Strategy<br />

The municipality utilises an anti-corruption strategy document that was developed by the Department of Local<br />

Government through a service provider. The municipality in the process of implementing the strategy.<br />

Inter-governmental Relations<br />

An Inter-governmental Forum sits on quarterly basis during the financial year.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 42


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 43


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

ASSETS<br />

Current assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 1 24 931 734 24 458 515<br />

Trade receivables from exchange transactions 3 309 186 1 201 570<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions 4 621 802 1 215 487<br />

Other receivables from exchange transactions 5 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

Investments 6 2 856 693 2 315 274<br />

VAT receivable 10 1 825 693 10 308 984<br />

Non-current assets<br />

Investments 7 - 208 995<br />

Property, plant and equipment 8 28 601 130 -<br />

Total assets 69 022 705 44 994 917<br />

LIABILITIES<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 9 11 064 350 3 733 534<br />

Current portion of borrowings 12 121 795 192 051<br />

Non-current liabilities<br />

Non-current borrowings 12 3 524 429 3 680 911<br />

Total liabilities 14 710 574 7 606 497<br />

Net assets 54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

NET ASSETS<br />

Accumulated surplus / (deficit) 54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

Total net assets<br />

54 312 131 37 388 420<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 44


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE<br />

for the year ending 30 June<br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

Revenue<br />

Property rates 15 1 617 990 1 074 372<br />

Service charges 16 273 498 292 861<br />

Rental of facilities and equipment 17 668 323 607 880<br />

Interest earned - external investments 18 1 552 789 2 385 883<br />

Interest earned - outstanding receivables 19 90 896 126 608<br />

Fines 70 910 27 133<br />

Licences and permits 667 617 504 054<br />

Government grants and subsidies 20 81 116 840 67 658 106<br />

Other income 21 2 608 123 393 549<br />

Total revenue 88 666 985 73 070 446<br />

Expenses<br />

Employee related costs 22 30 655 009 21 465 921<br />

Remuneration of councillors 23 10 269 294 9 639 112<br />

Bad debts 2 819 204 -<br />

Repairs and maintenance 3 004 345 1 474 703<br />

Finance costs 24 - 80 036<br />

Bulk purchases 25 - -<br />

Contracted services 26 113 229 188 486<br />

General expenses 27 24 881 959 27 901 139<br />

Total expenses 71 743 039 60 749 397<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 16 923 946 12 321 049<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 45


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated<br />

Surplus/(Deficit)<br />

Total: Net<br />

Assets<br />

Note R R<br />

Balance at 30 June 2008 37 471 253 37 471 253<br />

Changes in accounting policy 31 (18 327 664) (18 327 664)<br />

Correction of prior period error 6 062 188 6 062 188<br />

Restated balance 25 205 777 19 143 589<br />

Correction of prior period error 32 (138 406) (138 406)<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 12 321 049 12 321 049<br />

Balance at 30 June 2009 37 388 420 31 326 232<br />

c 32 (236) (236)<br />

Restated balance 37 388 184 37 388 184<br />

Surplus / (deficit) for the period 16 923 946 16 923 946<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2010</strong> 54 312 131 54 312 131<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 46


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

CASH FLOW STATEMENT<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES<br />

Cash receipts from ratepayers, government and others 92 420 560 66 281 904<br />

Cash paid to suppliers and employees (64 763 157) (54 788 780)<br />

28 27 657 402 11 493 124<br />

Interest received 1 643 684 2 512 491<br />

Interest paid - (80 036)<br />

Net cash flows from operating activities 29 301 087 13 925 579<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES<br />

Purchase of fixed assets (28 601 130) (19 651 610)<br />

Proceeds from sale of investments 16 666 484<br />

Net cash flows from investing activities (28 601 130) (2 985 126)<br />

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES<br />

Proceeds from borrowings - 3 872 962<br />

Repayment of borrowings (226 738) -<br />

Net cash flows from financing activities (226 738) 3 872 962<br />

Net increase / (decrease) in net cash and cash equivalents 473 218 14 813 415<br />

Net cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period<br />

Net cash and cash equivalents at end of<br />

period<br />

24 458 516 9 645 101<br />

29 24 931 734 24 458 516<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 47


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES<br />

for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

1 BASIS OF ACCOUNTING<br />

1.1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting and are in<br />

accordance with historical cost convention unless specified otherwise.<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Recognised<br />

Accounting Practice (GRAP), issued by the Accounting Standards Board in accordance with Section<br />

122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act, (Act No 56 of 2003).<br />

In accordance with section 122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003),<br />

the <strong>Municipality</strong> has adopted Standards of GRAP and the transitional provisions as applicable as<br />

issued by the Accounting Standards Board during the financial year, which are fundamentally different<br />

to the fund accounting policies adopted in previous financial years. Comparative amounts<br />

have been restated retrospectively to the extent possible.<br />

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

Those standards of GRAP and interpretations of such standards applicable to the operations of the<br />

GRAP 1<br />

GRAP 2<br />

GRAP 3<br />

GRAP 5<br />

GRAP 6<br />

GRAP 9<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements<br />

Cash flow statements<br />

Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors<br />

Borrowing Costs<br />

Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements<br />

Revenue from Exchange Transactions<br />

GRAP 12 Inventories<br />

GRAP 13 Leases<br />

GRAP 14<br />

GRAP 16<br />

GRAP 17<br />

GRAP 19<br />

GRAP 100<br />

GRAP 102<br />

IPSAS 20<br />

IPSAS 21<br />

Events after the Reporting Date<br />

Investment Property<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment<br />

Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets<br />

Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations<br />

Intangible Assets<br />

Related Pary Disclosure<br />

Impairment of Non Cash-Generating Assets<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 48


IFRS 7<br />

IAS 19<br />

IAS 32<br />

IAS 36<br />

IAS 39<br />

IFRIC 4<br />

Financial Instruments: Disclosure<br />

Employee Benefits<br />

Financial Instruments: Presentation<br />

Impairment of Assets<br />

Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement<br />

Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease<br />

The standards prescribed are the effective Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice<br />

(GRAP), inlcuding any interpretations and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board. The<br />

impact of the mentined directives on the financial statements, specifically Directive 4 is disclosed in<br />

the various accounting policies below.<br />

Assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses have not been offset except when offsetting is required or<br />

permitted by a Standard of GRAP.<br />

The accounting policies applied are consistent with those used to present the previous year’s financial<br />

statements, unless explicitly stated. The details of any changes in accounting policies are<br />

explained in the relevant policy.<br />

1.2 PRESENTATION CURRENCY<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are presented in South African Rand, which is the functional currency<br />

of the municipality.<br />

1.3 GOING CONCERN ASSUMPTION<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the municipality will<br />

continue to operate as a going concern for at least the next 12 months.<br />

1.4 COMPARATIVE INFORMATION<br />

Budget information in accordance with GRAP 1 and 24, has been provided in the notes to these<br />

financial statements and forms part of the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

When the presentation or classification of items in the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements is amended,<br />

prior period comparative amounts are restated. The nature and reason for the reclassification is<br />

disclosed. Where accounting errors have been identified in the current year, the correction is made<br />

retrospectively as far as is practicable, and the prior year comparatives are restated accordingly.<br />

Where there has been a change in accounting policy in the current year, the adjustment is made<br />

retrospectively as far as is practicable, and the prior year comparatives are restated accordingly.<br />

1.5<br />

STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS TO STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT YET EF-<br />

FECTIVE<br />

The following GRAP standards have been issued but are not yet effective and have not been early<br />

adopted by the municipality:<br />

GRAP 18 Segment Reporting - issued March 2005<br />

GRAP 21 Impairment of non cash generating assets - issued March 2009<br />

GRAP 23 Revenue from Non-Exchange Transactions (Taxes and Transfers) - issued February 2008<br />

GRAP 24 Presentation of Budget Information in Financial Statements - issued November 2007<br />

GRAP 25 Employee benefits - issued November 2009<br />

GRAP 26 Impairment of cash generating assets - issued March 2009<br />

GRAP 103 Heritage Assets - issued July 2008<br />

GRAP 104 Financial Instruments - issued October 2009<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 49


Application of all of the above GRAP standards will be effective from a date to be announced by<br />

the Minister of Finance. This date is not currently available.<br />

The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been issued but are<br />

not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the municipality:<br />

IAS 19 Employee Benefits - effective 1 January 2009<br />

IFRIC 17 Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners - effective 1 July 2009<br />

IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement - portions of standard effective 1 July<br />

2009<br />

IFRS 7 Financial Instrument Disclosure - issued August 2009<br />

Management has considered all of the above mentioned GRAP standards issued but not yet effective<br />

and anticipates that the adoption of these standards will not have a significant impact on the<br />

financial position, financial performance or cash flows of the municipality.<br />

2 PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT<br />

2.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Property, plant and equipment are tangible non-current assets (including infrastructure assets) that<br />

are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, rental to others, or for administrative<br />

purposes, and are expected to be used during more than one year. Items of property, plant and<br />

equipment are initially recognised as assets on acquisition date and are initially recorded at cost.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is the purchase price and other costs attributable<br />

to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the<br />

manner intended by the municipality. Trade discounts and rebates are deducted in arriving at the<br />

cost. The cost also includes the necessary costs of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring<br />

the site on which it is located.<br />

When significant components of an item of property, plan and equipment have different useful lives,<br />

they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.<br />

Where an asset is acquired by the municipality for no or nominal consideration (i.e. a non-exchange<br />

transaction), the cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value of that asset on the date acquired.<br />

Where an item of property, plant and equipment is acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset<br />

or monetary assets, or a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets, the asset acquired is<br />

initially measured at fair value (the cost). If the acquired item’s fair value was not determinable, it’s<br />

deemed cost is the carrying amount of the asset(s) given up.<br />

Major spare parts and servicing equipment qualify as property, plant and equipment when the municipality<br />

expects to use them during more than one period. Similarly, if the major spare parts and<br />

servicing equipment can be used only in connection with an item of property, plant and equipment,<br />

they are accounted for as property, plant and equipment.<br />

2.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less<br />

accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Land is not depreciated as it is deemed to have<br />

an indefinite useful life.<br />

Where the municipality replaces parts of an asset, it derecognises the part of the asset being replaced<br />

and capitalises the new component. Subsequent expenditure incurred on an asset is capitalised<br />

when it increases the capacity or future economic benefits associated with the asset.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 50


2.3 DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENT<br />

Depreciation is calculated on the depreciable amount, using the straight-line method over the estimated<br />

useful lives of the assets. Depreciation only commences when the asset is available for use,<br />

unless stated otherwise. Components of assets that are significant in relation to the whole asset and<br />

that have different useful lives are depreciated separately. The <strong>annual</strong> depreciation rates are based<br />

on the following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Other<br />

Roads and Paving 10 years Buildings 30 years<br />

Sewerage 15 years Office equipment 3- 5 years<br />

Furniture and fittings<br />

10 years<br />

Bins and containers<br />

5-10 years<br />

Community Landfill sites 30 years<br />

Buildings 30 years Computer equipment 4 years<br />

Halls<br />

30 years<br />

Libraries<br />

30 years<br />

Other assets<br />

30 years<br />

The residual value, the useful life of an asset and the depreciation method is reviewed <strong>annual</strong>ly<br />

and any changes are recognised as a change in accounting estimate in the Statement of Financial<br />

Performance.<br />

The municipality tests for impairment where there is an indication that an asset may be impaired.<br />

An assessment of whether there is an indication of possible impairment is done at each <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

date. Where the carrying amount of an item of property, plant and equipment is greater than the<br />

estimated recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount), it is written down immediately to<br />

its recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount) and an impairment loss is charged to the<br />

Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

2.4 DERECOGNITION<br />

Items of Property, plant and equipment are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when<br />

there are no further economic benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset. The<br />

gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined<br />

as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying value and is recognised in<br />

the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

2.5 TRANSITIONAL PROVISION<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure property, plant and equipment<br />

for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial<br />

adoption of the Standard of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment. The Standard of GRAP on<br />

Property, Plant and Equipment was initially adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, property,<br />

plant and equipment were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP<br />

on: Property, Plant and Equipment, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets<br />

Held for Sale and Discontinued Operation.<br />

Property, plant and equipment acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP<br />

are measured at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to property, plant<br />

and equipment since the Standard of GRAP of Property, Plant and Equipment was initially adopted<br />

are recognised at cost. No depreciation is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of<br />

the depreciation calculation could not be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 51


3 INTANGIBLE ASSETS<br />

3.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. Examples include<br />

computer software, licences, and development costs. The municipality recognises an intangible<br />

asset in its Statement of Financial Position only when it is probable that the expected future<br />

economic benefits or service potential that are attributable to the asset will flow to the municipality<br />

and the cost or fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.<br />

Internally generated intangible assets are subject to strict recognition criteria before they are capitlised.<br />

Research expenditure is never capitalised, while development expenditure is only capitalised<br />

to the extent that:<br />

• the municipality intends to complete the intangible asset for use or sale;<br />

• it is technically feasible to complete the intangible asset;<br />

• the municipality has the resources to complete the project; and<br />

• it is probable that the municipality will receive future economic benefits or service potential.<br />

Intangible assets are initially recognised at cost.<br />

Where an intangible asset is acquired by the municipality for no or nominal consideration (i.e. a<br />

non-exchange transaction), the cost is deemed to be equal to the fair value of that asset on the date<br />

acquired.<br />

Where an intangible asset is acquired in exchange for a non-monetary asset or monetary assets, or<br />

a combination of monetary and non-monetary assets, the asset acquired is initially measured at fair<br />

value (the cost). If the acquired item’s fair value was not determinable, it’s deemed cost is the carrying<br />

amount of the asset(s) given up.<br />

3.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Intangible assets are subsequently carried at cost less accumulated amoritisation and impairments.<br />

The cost of an intangible asset is amortised over the useful life where that useful life is finite. Where<br />

the useful life is indefinite, the asset is not amortised but is subject to an <strong>annual</strong> impairment test.<br />

3.3 AMORTISATION AND IMPAIRMENT<br />

Amortisation is charged so as to write off the cost or valuation of intangible assets over their estimated<br />

useful lives using the straight line method. The <strong>annual</strong> amortisation rates are based on the<br />

following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Computer software<br />

3 - 5 years<br />

The amortisation period and the amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful<br />

life are reviewed at each <strong>report</strong>ing date and any changes are recognised as a change in accounting<br />

estimate in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

The municipality tests intangible assets with finite useful lives for impairment where there is an indication<br />

that an asset may be impaired. An assessment of whether there is an indication of possible<br />

impairment is done at each <strong>report</strong>ing date. Where the carrying amount of an item of an intangible<br />

asset is greater than the estimated recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount), it is written<br />

down immediately to its recoverable amount (or recoverable service amount) and an impairment<br />

loss is charged to the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 52


3.4 DERECOGNITION<br />

Intangible assets are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when there are no further economic<br />

benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset. The gain or loss arising on<br />

the disposal or retirement of an intangible asset is determined as the difference between the sales<br />

proceeds and the carrying value and is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

3.5 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure intangible assets for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the<br />

Standard of GRAP on Intangible assets. The Standard of GRAP on Intangible assets was initially adopted<br />

on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, intangible<br />

assets were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP on: Intangible<br />

assets, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued<br />

Operation.<br />

4 INVESTMENT PROPERTY<br />

Intangible assets acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP are measured<br />

at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to intangible assets since the<br />

Standard of GRAP of Intangible assets was initially adopted are recognised at cost. No depreciation<br />

is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of the depreciation calculation could not<br />

be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 30 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

4.1 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Investment property includes property (land or a building, or part of a building, or both land or<br />

buildings held under a finance lease) held to earn rentals and/or for capital appreciation, rather than<br />

held to meet service delivery objectives, the production or supply of goods or services, or the sale of<br />

an asset in the ordinary course of operations.<br />

At initial recognition, the municipality measures investment property at cost including transaction<br />

costs once it meets the definition of investment property. However, where an investment property<br />

was acquired through a non-exchange transaction (i.e. where it acquired the investment property<br />

for no or a nominal value), its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

The cost of self-constructed investment property is the cost at date of completion.<br />

4.2 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT - COST MODEL<br />

Investment property is measured using the cost model. Under the cost model, investment property<br />

is carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.<br />

Depreciation is calculated on the depreciable amount, using the straight-line method over the estimated<br />

useful lives of the assets. Components of assets that are significant in relation to the whole<br />

asset and that have different useful lives are depreciated separately. The <strong>annual</strong> depreciation rates<br />

are based on the following estimated average asset lives:<br />

Investment property<br />

30 years<br />

4.3 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure Investment Property for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of<br />

the Standard of GRAP on Investment property. The Standard of GRAP on Investment property was<br />

initially adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 53


Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, investment<br />

property were not recognised and measured in accordance with the Standards of GRAP on: Investment<br />

property, the Presentation of Financial Statements and Non-current Assets Held for Sale and<br />

Discontinued Operation.<br />

Investment property acquired prior to the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP are measured<br />

at provisional amounts (Nil value) in line with Directive 4. Additions to investment property<br />

since the Standard of GRAP of Investment property was initially adopted are recognised at cost. No<br />

depreciation is recognised on these assets as all the related elements of the depreciation calculation<br />

could not be considered at year end.<br />

No measurement adjustments were made for the year ending 20 June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

5 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS<br />

5.1 CLASSIFICATION<br />

The classification of financial assets and liabilities into categories, is based on judgement by management.<br />

The municipality classifies financial assets and financial liabilities into the following categories:<br />

The municipality has various types of financial instruments and these can be broadly categorised as<br />

either financial assets or financial liabilities.<br />

A financial asset is any asset that a cash or contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset<br />

or equity. The municipality has the following types of financial assets:<br />

- Investments in fixed deposits (banking institutions)<br />

- Consumer debtors<br />

- Certain other debtors<br />

- Short-term investment deposits<br />

- Bank balances and cash<br />

The financial assets of the municipality are classified as follows into the four categories allowed:<br />

Type of financial asset Classification in terms of IAS 39.09<br />

Short-term investment deposits Held-to-maturity investments<br />

Bank balances and cash Loans and receivables<br />

Consumer debtors Loans and receivables<br />

Other debtors Loans and receivables<br />

Investments in fixed deposits Held-to-maturity investments<br />

Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that<br />

are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater<br />

than 12 months, which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are recognised<br />

initially at cost which represents fair value. After initial recognition financial assets are measured at<br />

amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method less a provision for impairment.<br />

Held-to-maturity investments are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed<br />

maturity where the municipality has the positive intent and ability to hold the investment to maturity.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 54


Cash includes cash on hand (including petty cash) and cash with banks (including call deposits). Cash<br />

equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments, readily convertible into known amounts of<br />

cash, that are held with registered banking institutions with maturities of three months or less and<br />

are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. For the purposes of the cash flow statement,<br />

cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, net of bank<br />

overdrafts.<br />

The municipality categorises cash and cash equivalents as financial asset: loans and receivables.<br />

A financial liability is a contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another<br />

entity. The municipality has the following types of financial liabilities:<br />

- Long-term liabilities<br />

- Certain other creditors<br />

- Short-term loans<br />

- Current portion of long-term liabilities<br />

There are two main categories of financial liabilities, the classification determining how they are<br />

measured. Financial liabilities may be measured as:<br />

- Fair value through profit or loss; or<br />

- Other financial liabilities<br />

Financial liabilities that are measured at fair value through profit or loss are financial liabilities that<br />

are essentially held for trading (i.e. purchased with the intention to sell or repurchase in the short<br />

term; derivatives other than hedging instruments or are part of a portfolio of financial instruments<br />

where there is recent actual evidence of short-term profiteering or are derivatives). Financial liabilities<br />

that are measured at fair value through profit or loss are stated at fair value, with any resulting<br />

gain or loss recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

Any other financial liabilities are classified as “other financial liabilities” and are initially measured at<br />

amortised cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognised on an effective<br />

yield basis.<br />

In accordance with IAS 39.09 the financial liabilities of the municipality are all classified as “other<br />

financial liabilities”.<br />

Classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were obtained / incurred<br />

and takes place at initial recognition. Classification is re-assessed on an <strong>annual</strong> basis, except for derivatives<br />

and financial assets designated as at fair value through surplus or deficit, which shall not be<br />

classified out of the fair value through surplus or deficit category.<br />

5.2 INITIAL RECOGNITION<br />

Financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value.<br />

5.3 SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT<br />

Financial Assets are categorised according to their nature as either financial assets at fair value<br />

through profit or loss, held-to maturity, loans and receivables, or available for sale. Financial liabilities<br />

are categorised as either at fair value through profit or loss or financial liabilities carried at<br />

amortised cost (“other”). The subsequent measurement of financial assets and liabilities depends<br />

on this categorisation and, in the absence of an approved GRAP Standard on Financial Instruments,<br />

is in accordance with IAS 39.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 55


5.3.1 INVESTMENTS<br />

Investments, which include listed government bonds, unlisted municipal bonds, fixed deposits and<br />

short-term deposits invested in registered commercial banks, are categorised as either held-tomaturity<br />

where the criteria for that categorisation are met, or as loans and receivables, and are<br />

measured at amortised cost. Where investments have been impaired, the carrying value is adjusted<br />

by the impairment loss, which is recognised as an expense in the period that the impairment is<br />

identified. Impairments are calculated as being the difference between the carrying amount and<br />

the present value of the expected future cash flows flowing from the instrument. On disposal of an<br />

investment, the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount is charged<br />

or credited to the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

5.3.2 TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES<br />

Trade and other receivables are categorised as financial assets: loans and receivables and are initially<br />

recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at amortised cost. Amortised cost refers to<br />

the initial carrying amount, plus interest, less repayments and impairments. An estimate is made for<br />

doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year-end. Significant financial<br />

difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganisation,<br />

and default or delinquency in payments (more than 30 days overdue) are considered indicators<br />

that the trade receivable is impaired. Impairments are determined by discounting expected future<br />

cash flows to their present value. Amounts that are receivable within 12 months from the <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

date are classified as current.<br />

An impairment of trade receivables is accounted for by reducing the carrying amount of trade receivables<br />

through the use of an allowance account, and the amount of the loss is recognised in<br />

the Statement of Financial Performance within operating expenses. When a trade receivable is uncollectible,<br />

it is written off. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited<br />

against operating expenses in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

5.3.3 TRADE PAYABLES AND BORROWINGS<br />

Financial liabilities consist of trade payables and borrowings. They are categorised as financial liabilities<br />

held at amortised cost, are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at<br />

amortised cost which is the initial carrying amount, less repayments, plus interest.<br />

5.3.4 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS<br />

Cash includes cash on hand (including petty cash) and cash with banks (including call deposits).<br />

Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments, readily convertible into known amounts<br />

of cash, that are held with registered banking institutions with maturities of three months or less<br />

and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. For the purposes of the cash flow statement,<br />

cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, net of<br />

bank overdrafts. The municipality categorises cash and cash equivalents as financial assets: loans<br />

and receivables.<br />

Bank overdrafts are recorded based on the facility utilised. Finance charges on bank overdraft are<br />

expensed as incurred. Amounts owing in respect of bank overdrafts are categorised as financial liabilities:<br />

other financial liabilities carried at amortised cost.<br />

6 UNAUTHORISED EXPENDITURE<br />

7 IRREGULAR EXPENDITURE<br />

Unauthorised expenditure is expenditure that has not been budgeted, expenditure that is not in<br />

terms of the conditions of an allocation received from another sphere of government, municipality<br />

or organ of state and expenditure in the form of a grant that is not permitted in terms of the Municipal<br />

Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003). Unauthorised expenditure is accounted for<br />

as an expense in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently<br />

accounted for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

Irregular expenditure is expenditure that is contrary to the Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

(Act No.56 of 2003), the Municipal Systems Act (Act No.32 of 2000), the Public Office Bearers Act<br />

(Act No. 20 of 1998) or is in contravention of the <strong>Municipality</strong>’s supply chain management policy.<br />

Irregular expenditure excludes unauthorised expenditure. Irregular expenditure is accounted for as<br />

expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted<br />

for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 56


Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is expenditure that was made in vain and would have been<br />

avoided had reasonable care been exercised. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure is accounted for<br />

as expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently<br />

accounted for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

9 PROVISIONS AND CONTINGENCIES<br />

Provisions are recognised when the municipality has a present or constructive obligation as a result<br />

of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be<br />

required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the provision can be made. Provisions<br />

are reviewed at <strong>report</strong>ing date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. Where the effect is<br />

material, non-current provisions are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate<br />

that reflects the market’s current assessment of the time value of money, adjusted for risks specific<br />

to the liability.<br />

The municipality does not recognise a contingent liability or contingent asset. A contingent liability<br />

is disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.<br />

A contingent asset is disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.<br />

Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation are reflected in the<br />

amount of a provision where there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur. Gains from<br />

the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account in measuring a provision. Provisions are<br />

not recognised for future operating losses. The present obligation under an onerous contract is recognised<br />

and measured as a provision.<br />

10 LEASES<br />

A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the following<br />

criteria over and above the recognition criteria of a provision have been met<br />

: (a) The municipality has a detailed formal plan<br />

for the restructuring identifying at least:<br />

- the business or part of a business<br />

concerned;<br />

- the principal locations affected;<br />

- the location, function,<br />

and approximate number of employees who will be compensated for terminating their services;<br />

- the expenditures that will be undertaken; an<br />

d<br />

- when the plan will be implemented; an<br />

d<br />

(b) The municipality has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring<br />

by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by<br />

it.<br />

10.1 MUNICIPALITY AS LESSEE<br />

Leases are classified as finance leases where substantially all the risks and rewards associated with<br />

ownership of an asset are transferred to the municipality. Property, plant and equipment or intangible<br />

assets subject to finance lease agreements are initially recognised at the lower of the asset’s<br />

fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liabilities are<br />

initially recognised at the inception of the lease and are measured as the sum of the minimum lease<br />

payments due in terms of the lease agreement, discounted for the effect of interest. In discounting<br />

the lease payments, the municipality uses the interest rate that exactly discounts the lease payments<br />

and unguaranteed residual value to the fair value of the asset plus any direct costs incurred.<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, the leased assets are accounted for in accordance with the stated<br />

accounting policies applicable to property, plant, equipment or intangibles. The lease liability is reduced<br />

by the lease payments, which are allocated between the lease finance cost and the capital repayment<br />

using the effective interest rate method. Lease finance costs are expensed when incurred.<br />

The accounting policies relating to derecognition of financial instruments are applied to lease payables.<br />

The lease asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or the lease term.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 57


Operating leases are those leases that do not fall within the scope of the above definition. Operating<br />

lease rentals are accrued on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

10.2 MUNICIPALITY AS LESSOR<br />

Under a finance lease, the municipality recognises the lease payments to be received in terms of<br />

a lease agreement as an asset (receivable). The receivable is calculated as the sum of all the minimum<br />

lease payments to be received, plus any unguaranteed residual accruing to the municipality,<br />

discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease. The receivable is reduced by the capital portion<br />

of the lease instalments received, with the interest portion being recognised as interest revenue<br />

on a time proportionate basis. The accounting policies relating to derecognition and impairment of<br />

financial instruments are applied to lease receivables.<br />

Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant<br />

lease.<br />

11 REVENUE<br />

11.1 REVENUE FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Revenue from exchange transactions refers to revenue that accrued to the municipality directly<br />

in return for services rendered / goods sold, the value of which approximates the consideration<br />

received or receivable.<br />

Service charges relating to water are based on consumption. Meters are read on a monthly basis<br />

and are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Provisional estimates of consumption are made<br />

monthly when meter readings have not been performed. The provisional estimates of consumption<br />

are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Adjustments to provisional estimates of consumption are<br />

made in the invoicing period in which meters have been read. These adjustments are recognised as<br />

revenue in the invoicing period. The estimates of consumption between meter readings are based<br />

on the previous three months average usage.<br />

Service charges relating to refuse removal are recognised on a monthly basis in arrears by applying<br />

the approved tariff to each property that has improvements.<br />

Service charges from sewerage and sanitation are based on the number of sewerage connections on<br />

each developed property using the tariffs approved from Council and are levied monthly.<br />

Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportion basis.<br />

Revenue from the rental of facilities and equipment is recognised on a straight-line basis over the<br />

term of the lease agreement.<br />

Dividends are recognised on the date that the <strong>Municipality</strong> becomes entitled to receive the dividend.<br />

Revenue arising from the application of the approved tariff of charges is recognised when the relevant<br />

service is rendered by applying the relevant gazetted tariff. This includes the issuing of licences<br />

and permits.<br />

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when substantially all the risks and rewards in those<br />

goods is passed to the consumer.<br />

Revenue arising out of situations where the municipality acts as an agent on behalf of another entity<br />

(the principal) is limited to the amount of any fee or commission payable to the municipality as<br />

compensation for executing the agreed services.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 58


11.2 REVENUE FROM NON-EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions refers to transactions where the municipality received<br />

revenue from another entity without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange. Revenue<br />

from non-exchange transactions is generally recognised to the extent that the related receipt<br />

or receivable qualifies for recognition as an asset and there is no liability to repay the amount.<br />

Revenue from property rates is recognised when the legal entitlement to this revenue arises. Penalty<br />

interest on unpaid rates is recognised on a time proportionate basis.<br />

Fines constitute both spot fines and summonses. Revenue from spot fines and summonses is recognised<br />

when payment is received, together with an estimate of spot fines and summonses that will<br />

be received based on past experience of amounts collected.<br />

Revenue from public contributions and donations is recognised when all conditions associated with<br />

the contribution have been met or where the contribution is to finance property, plant and equipment,<br />

when such items of property, plant and equipment qualifies for recognition and first becomes<br />

available for use by the municipality. Where public contributions have been received but the municipality<br />

has not met the related conditions, a deferred income (liability) is recognised.<br />

Contributed property, plant and equipment is recognised when such items of property, plant and<br />

equipment qualifies for recognition and become available for use by the municipality.<br />

Revenue from the recovery of unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure is based on<br />

legislated procedures, including those set out in the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56<br />

of 2003) and is recognised when the recovery thereof from the responsible councillors or officials<br />

is virtually certain.<br />

11.3 GRANTS, TRANSFERS AND DONATIONS<br />

Grants, transfers and donations received or receivable are recognised when the resources that have<br />

been transferred meet the criteria for recognition as an asset. A corresponding liability is raised to<br />

the extent that the grant, transfer or donation is conditional. The liability is transferred to revenue<br />

as and when the conditions attached to the grant are met. Grants without any conditions attached<br />

are recognised as revenue when the asset is recognised.<br />

12 BORROWING COSTS<br />

Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying<br />

assets are capitalised to the cost of that asset unless it is inappropriate to do so. The municipality<br />

ceases the capitalisation of borrowing costs when substantially all the activities to prepare<br />

the asset for its intended use or sale are complete. It is considered inappropriate to capitalise borrowing<br />

costs where the link between the funds borrowed and the capital asset acquired cannot be<br />

adequately established. Borrowing costs incurred other than on qualifying assets are recognised as<br />

an expense in surplus or deficit when incurred.<br />

13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS<br />

13.1 SHORT TERM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS<br />

Remuneration to employees is recognised in the Statement of financial performance as the services<br />

are rendered, except for non-accumulating benefits, which are only recognised when the specific<br />

event occurs.<br />

The municipality has opted to treat its provision for leave pay as a provision.<br />

The costs of all short-term employee benefits such as leave pay, are recognised during the period in<br />

which the employee renders the related services. The liability for leave pay is based on the total accrued<br />

leave days at year end and is shown as a provision. The municipality recognised the expected<br />

cost of performance bonuses only when the municipality has a present legal or constructive obligation<br />

to make such payment and a reliable estimate can be made.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 59


13.2 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS<br />

A defined contribution plan is a plan under which the municipality pays fixed contributions into a<br />

separate entity. The municipality has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions<br />

if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to service in the<br />

current or prior period.<br />

The municipality’s contributions to the defined contribution funds are established in terms of the<br />

rules governing those plans. Contributions are recognised in the Statement of financial performance<br />

in the period in which the service is rendered by the relevant employees. The municipality has not<br />

further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.<br />

14 IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS<br />

14.1 IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS<br />

The municipality assesses at each <strong>report</strong>ing date whether there is any indication that an asset may<br />

be impaired. If any such indication exists, the municipality estimates the recoverable service amount<br />

of the asset.<br />

Irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, the municipality also:<br />

- tests intangible assets with an indefinite useful life or intangible assets not yet available for use for<br />

impairment <strong>annual</strong>ly by comparing its carrying amount with its recoverable amount. This impairment<br />

test is performed during the <strong>annual</strong> period and at the same time every period.<br />

If there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, the recoverable service amount is estimated<br />

for the individual asset. If it is not possible to estimate the recoverable service amount of the individual<br />

asset, the recoverable service amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs<br />

is determined.<br />

The recoverable service amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value<br />

less costs to sell and its value in use.<br />

If the recoverable service amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of<br />

the asset is reduced to its recoverable service amount. That reduction is an impairment loss.<br />

An impairment loss of assets carried at cost less any accumulated depreciation or amortisation is<br />

recognised immediately in surplus or deficit. Any impairment loss of a revalued asset is treated as<br />

a revaluation decrease.<br />

An impairment loss is recognised for cash-generating units if the recoverable service amount of the<br />

unit is less than the carrying amount of the unit. The impairment loss is allocated to reduce the carrying<br />

amount of the assets of the unit as follows:<br />

- to the assets of the unit, pro rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit.<br />

A municipality assesses at each <strong>report</strong>ing date whether there is any indication that an impairment<br />

loss recognised in prior periods for assets may no longer exist or may have decreased. If any such<br />

indication exists, the recoverable service amounts of those assets are estimated.<br />

The increased carrying amount of an asset attributable to a reversal of an impairment loss does not<br />

exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised<br />

for the asset in prior periods.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 60


A reversal of an impairment loss of assets carried at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortisation<br />

is recognised immediately in surplus or deficit. Any reversal of an impairment loss of a revalued<br />

asset is treated as a revaluation increase.<br />

14.2 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

In terms of Directive 4 the municipality are not required to measure Property, plant and equipment,<br />

Intangible assets and Investment Property for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a date within<br />

three years following the date of initial adoption of the relevant Standard of GRAP. The Standard<br />

of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment, Intangible assets and Investment Property was initially<br />

adopted on 1 July 2009.<br />

Due to the fact that the municipality has taken advantage of the transitional provisions, the municipality<br />

have not assess impairment.<br />

15 VALUE ADDED TAX<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> accounts for Value Added Tax on the payment basis.<br />

16 TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has taken advantage of the transitional provisions for Medium and Low Capacity<br />

Municipalities as set out in Directive 4 paragraph .63 to .70 (Investment property), .73 to .83 (Property,<br />

plant and equipment) and .110 to .118 (Intangible assets) issued by the Accounting Standards<br />

Board. This further brings into effect paragraph .94E of Directive 4 which indicates that municipalities<br />

are not required to recognise provisions (which form part of the cost of an asset) in their financial<br />

statements as a result of applying the transitional provisions in other Standards of GRAP and<br />

are required to apply the disclosure requirements about the provisions related to those assets in<br />

accordance with the relevant GRAP standard.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 61


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

1 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS<br />

Note <strong>2010</strong> 2009<br />

R<br />

R<br />

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:<br />

Cash at bank 24 930 850 24 457 632<br />

24 930 850 24 457 632<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has the following bank accounts: -<br />

Current Account (Primary Bank Account)<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Num-<br />

Cash book balance at beginning of year 14 162 708 9 645 101<br />

Cash book balance at end of year 17 485 092 14 162 708<br />

Bank statement balance at beginning of year 15 583 139 18 197 593<br />

Bank statement balance at end of year 17 586 189 15 583 139<br />

Current Account (Other Account)<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62101651398<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62090678320<br />

First National Bank - Cofimvaba Branch: Account Number<br />

62022332316<br />

Cash book balance at beginning of year 10 294 923 7 807 935<br />

Cash book balance at end of year 7 445 758 10 294 923<br />

Bank statement balance at beginning of year 10 695 880 2 410 157<br />

Bank statement balance at end of year 7 680 392 10 695 880<br />

Cash on hand 884 884<br />

Total cash and cash equivalents 24 931 734 24 458 515<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 62


2 CONSUMER DEBTORS<br />

Gross Balances<br />

Provision for<br />

Doubtful Debts<br />

Net Balance<br />

Trade receivables R R R<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Service debtors<br />

Rates 3 777 547 (3 155 745) 621 802<br />

Refuse 624 181 (449 520) 174 661<br />

Other services 496 733 (362 208) 134 525<br />

Total 4 898 461 (3 967 473) 930 988<br />

as at 30 June 2009<br />

Service debtors<br />

Rates 2 363 756 (793 223) 1 215 487<br />

Water 791 041 (223 848) 791 041<br />

Sewerage 95 428 (27 004) 95 428<br />

Refuse 315 101 (104 194) 315 101<br />

Total 3 565 326 (1 148 269) 2 417 057<br />

Rates: Ageing<br />

Current (0 – 30 days) 125 485 78 521<br />

31 - 60 Days 117 616 73 597<br />

61 - 90 Days 108 034 67 601<br />

91 - 120 Days 3 426 412 2 144 037<br />

Total 3 777 547 2 363 756<br />

Electricity, Water, Sewerage and Refuse: Ageing<br />

31 - 60 Days 129 081 97 209<br />

61 - 90 Days 916 116 880 022<br />

91 - 120 Days 75 718 224 339<br />

Total 1 120 915 1 201 570<br />

Reconciliation of the doubtful debt provision<br />

Balance at beginning of the year 1 148 269 3 753 753<br />

Contributions to provision 2 819 204 1 148 269<br />

Doubtful debts written off against provision - (3 753 753)<br />

Balance at end of year 3 967 473 1 148 269<br />

Trade receivables impaired<br />

As of 30 June <strong>2010</strong>, trade receivables of R 2,8 million<br />

(2009: R 1,1 million) were impaired and provided for.<br />

The amount of the provision was R 3,9 million as of 30<br />

June <strong>2010</strong> (2009: R 1,1 million).<br />

The fair value of trade and other receivables approximates<br />

their carrying amounts.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 63


3 TRADE RECEIVABLES FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Trade debtors 309 186 1 201 570<br />

309 186 1 201 570<br />

Credit quality of trade and other receivables<br />

Trade and other receivables consists of:<br />

Trade receivables<br />

Amounts included under trade receivables from exchange<br />

transactions<br />

Amounts included under other receivables from nonexchange<br />

transactions<br />

309 186 1 201 570<br />

621 802 1 215 487<br />

930 988 2 417 057<br />

The following represents information on the credit quality<br />

of trade receivables that are neither past due nor<br />

impaired:<br />

Trade receivables<br />

Counterparties with external credit rating<br />

A (Government accounts) 139 648<br />

B (Businesses) 316 536<br />

C (Domestic and other) 474 804<br />

930 988<br />

Analysis of table:<br />

A - The debtors are of good credit quality and no default<br />

in payment is expected.<br />

B - The debtors are usual good payers, but there is a<br />

possibility that the debtor may not be able to pay on<br />

time.<br />

C - These debtors usually pay, but have previously paid<br />

late and therefore there is a possibility that these debtors<br />

will not be recoverable.<br />

Trade and other receivables past due but not impaired<br />

The ageing of amounts past due but not impaired is as<br />

follows:<br />

Trade receivables 930 988 2 417 057<br />

1-30 days past due - -<br />

31-60 days past due 246 697 170 806<br />

61 - 90 days past due 684 291 2 246 251<br />

930 988 2 417 057<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 64


4<br />

OTHER RECEIVABLES FROM NON-EXCHANGE<br />

TRANSACTIONS<br />

Assessment rate debtors 621 802 1 215 487<br />

621 802 1 215 487<br />

5 OTHER RECEIVABLES FROM EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS<br />

Other debtors 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

Total Other Debtors 9 876 467 5 286 093<br />

6 INVESTMENTS<br />

Deposits - -<br />

Call investments 838 775 590 138<br />

Other investments 2 017 918 1 725 136<br />

2 856 693 2 315 274<br />

7 NON CURRENT INVESTMENTS<br />

Financial Instruments<br />

Other investments - 208 995<br />

- 208 995<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 65


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

8<br />

PROPERTY, PLANT AND<br />

EQUIPMENT<br />

8.1<br />

Reconciliation of Carrying<br />

Value<br />

Land Buildings Infrastructure Community Other Assets Total<br />

R R R R R R<br />

as at 1 July 2009<br />

Cost/Revaluation<br />

- -<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Acquisitions 537 739 8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

Capital under Construction<br />

- 2 313 315 719 575 57 046 - 3 089 936<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong> 537 739 8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

Cost/Revaluation<br />

Accumulated depreciation<br />

and impairment<br />

losses<br />

537 739<br />

8 806 125 14 330 964 3 150 214 1 776 088 28 601 130<br />

- -<br />

- - - -<br />

Refer to Appendix B for more detail on property,<br />

plant and equipment<br />

8.2 Other information<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has<br />

taken advantage of the<br />

transitional provisions<br />

for Medium and Low<br />

Capacity Municipalities<br />

as set out in Directive<br />

4 paragraph .73 to .83<br />

issued by the Accounting<br />

Standards Board.<br />

Municipalities who take<br />

advantage of the transitional<br />

provisions are<br />

not required to measure<br />

property, plant and<br />

equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or<br />

after a date within three<br />

years following the date<br />

of initial adoption of<br />

the Standard of GRAP<br />

on Property, Plant and<br />

Equipment.<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 66


APPENDIX A<br />

SCHEDULE OF EXTERNAL LOANS<br />

as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

EXTERNAL LOANS Loan number Redeemable Date<br />

Balance at 30<br />

June 2009<br />

Received during<br />

the period<br />

Redeemed /<br />

written off during<br />

the period<br />

Balance at 30<br />

June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Carrying Value of<br />

Property, Plant &<br />

Equipment<br />

R R R R R R<br />

Other Costs in<br />

accordance with<br />

MFMA<br />

GOVERNMENT LOANS<br />

- DBSA @ 5% EC102527 30/09/2028 3 872 962 - (226 738) 3 646 224 3 792 927 -<br />

Total Government Loans<br />

TOTAL EXTERNAL LOANS<br />

INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY / 67


Planning by Reviewed Performed by Final review<br />

Client details<br />

Client name: <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Year end: 30 June <strong>2011</strong>


INTSIKA YETHU MUNICIPALITY<br />

Annual Financial Statements<br />

for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

General Information<br />

Legal form of entity<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mayoral committee Before 18 May <strong>2011</strong> After 18 May <strong>2011</strong><br />

Executive Mayor Mr SD Plata K Vimbayo<br />

Speaker Mr M Sokujika AZ Mbotholoshi<br />

Chief Wip Mr AZ Mbotholoshi S Myataza<br />

Councillors K Vimbayo Elected Executive Mayor<br />

WN Mdwayingana WN Mdwayingana<br />

N Tshangana<br />

N Tshangana - Nkota<br />

S Myataza<br />

Elected Chief Whip<br />

N Boyana<br />

KF Mdleleni<br />

N Berana<br />

J Cengani<br />

K Ntsaluba<br />

K Ntsaluba<br />

HM Hewu<br />

HM Hewu<br />

N Magaga<br />

N Magaga<br />

N Tsomo<br />

MM Mbebe<br />

MM Mbebe<br />

ML Papiyana<br />

ML Papiyana<br />

Z Qayiya<br />

Z Qayiya<br />

D Kapsile<br />

D Kapsile<br />

NE Stata<br />

NE Stata<br />

P Nqandela<br />

P Nqandela<br />

MN Mkhumbuzi<br />

M Mahali<br />

M Mahali<br />

NS Mafanya<br />

NS Mafanya<br />

LN Ntshanka -<br />

L Mbambiso -<br />

TSN Bizana -<br />

NT Tayitile -<br />

FN Dangazele<br />

FN Dangazele<br />

MN Rigala<br />

M Yamile<br />

M Yamile<br />

N Giyose -<br />

Z Jabanga -<br />

NF Kopman -<br />

M Kolofana -<br />

MG Kuse -<br />

VG Matomela<br />

VG Matomela<br />

B Mboniswa<br />

B Mboniswa<br />

J Mdekazi -<br />

NE Mdlungu -<br />

N Mteli -<br />

MG Ntshinka -<br />

JN Peter -<br />

M Shasha<br />

M Shasha<br />

MT Shugu -<br />

S Tame<br />

S Tame<br />

PN Tukwayo -<br />

V Tyhulu -<br />

M Yotsi -<br />

1


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

General Information<br />

Grading of local authority Grade 2<br />

- N Ntloko<br />

- ZS Matshikiza<br />

- N Bani<br />

- N Jada<br />

- NH Mgodeli<br />

- NA Somdyala<br />

- M Zulu<br />

- HM Nobongoza<br />

- NP Gadeni<br />

- MA Mbotshane<br />

- MI Bititsha<br />

- Z Mxi<br />

- S Mkunyana<br />

- M Gulubela<br />

- AN Rotyi<br />

- N Mto<br />

- NV Hexana<br />

- NG Futiso<br />

Chief Finance Officer (CFO)<br />

Mr M Dyushu<br />

Accounting Officer<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Business address Building No. 201<br />

Main Street<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

5380<br />

Postal address Private Bag X 1251<br />

Cofimvaba<br />

5380<br />

Bankers<br />

Auditors<br />

First National Bank<br />

Auditor General of South Africa<br />

2


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Index<br />

The <strong>report</strong>s and statements set out below comprise the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements presented to the provincial legislature:<br />

Index<br />

Page<br />

Accounting Officer's Responsibilities and Approval 4<br />

Audit Committee Report 5 - 6<br />

Accounting Officer's Report 9 - 10<br />

Statement of Financial Position 11<br />

Statement of Financial Performance 12<br />

Statement of Changes in Net Assets 13<br />

Statement of Cash Flows 14<br />

Accounting Policies 15 - 22<br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements 23 - 39<br />

Appendixes:<br />

Appendix A: Schedule of External loans 41<br />

Appendix E(1): Actual versus Budget (Revenue and Expenditure) 48<br />

Abbreviations<br />

DBSA<br />

SA GAAP<br />

GRAP<br />

GAMAP<br />

IMFO<br />

MFMA<br />

MIG<br />

Development Bank of South Africa<br />

South African Statements of Generally Accepted Accounting Practice<br />

Generally Recognised Accounting Practice<br />

Generally Accepted Municipal Accounting Practice<br />

Institute of Municipal Finance Officers<br />

Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

Municipal Infrastructure Grant (Previously CMIP)<br />

3


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officer's Responsibilities and Approval<br />

The accounting officer is required by the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act 56 of 2003), to maintain adequate<br />

accounting records and is responsible for the content and integrity of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and related financial<br />

information included in this <strong>report</strong>. It is the responsibility of the accounting officer to ensure that the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

fairly present the state of affairs of the municipality as at the end of the financial year and the results of its operations and cash<br />

flows for the period then ended. The external auditors are engaged to express an independent opinion on the <strong>annual</strong> financial<br />

statements and was given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting<br />

Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards Board.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are based upon appropriate accounting policies consistently applied and supported by<br />

reasonable and prudent judgements and estimates.<br />

The accounting officer acknowledges that he is ultimately responsible for the system of internal financial control established by<br />

the municipality and place considerable importance on maintaining a strong control environment. To enable the accounting<br />

officer to meet these responsibilities, the accounting officer sets standards for internal control aimed at reducing the risk of<br />

error or deficit in a cost effective manner. The standards include the proper delegation of responsibilities within a clearly<br />

defined framework, effective accounting procedures and adequate segregation of duties to ensure an acceptable level of risk.<br />

These controls are monitored throughout the municipality and all employees are required to maintain the highest ethical<br />

standards in ensuring the municipality’s business is conducted in a manner that in all reasonable circumstances is above<br />

reproach. The focus of risk management in the municipality is on identifying, assessing, managing and monitoring all known<br />

forms of risk across the municipality. While operating risk cannot be fully eliminated, the municipality endeavours to minimise it<br />

by ensuring that appropriate infrastructure, controls, systems and ethical behaviour are applied and managed within<br />

predetermined procedures and constraints.<br />

The accounting officer is of the opinion, based on the information and explanations given by management, that the system of<br />

internal control provides reasonable assurance that the financial records may be relied on for the preparation of the <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements. However, any system of internal financial control can provide only reasonable, and not absolute,<br />

assurance against material misstatement or deficit.<br />

The accounting officer has reviewed the municipality’s cash flow forecast for the year to 30 June 2012 and, in the light of this<br />

review and the current financial position, he is satisfied that the municipality has or has access to adequate resources to<br />

continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.<br />

The municipality is largely dependent on the grant allocated through the Division of revenue act (Dora) for continued funding of<br />

operations. The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements are prepared on the basis that the municipality is a going concern and that the<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> has neither the intention nor the need to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of the municipality.<br />

Although the accounting officer is primarily responsible for the financial affairs of the municipality, he is supported by the<br />

municipality's Chief Financial Officer.<br />

The Office of the Auditor General is responsible for independently reviewing and <strong>report</strong>ing on the municipality's <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements. The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been examined by the municipality's external auditors and their<br />

<strong>report</strong> is presented on page 7.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements set out on pages 9 to 39, which have been prepared on the going concern basis, were<br />

approved by the on 30 August <strong>2011</strong> and were signed on its behalf by:<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Municipal Manager<br />

4


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Audit Committee Report<br />

We are pleased to present our <strong>report</strong> for the financial year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

Audit committee members and attendance<br />

The audit committee consists of the members listed hereunder and should meet 4 times per annum as per its approved terms<br />

of reference. During the current year 6 number of meetings were held.<br />

Name of member<br />

Number of meetings attended<br />

Mr Abor Yeboah (Chairperson) 6 out of 6<br />

Mrs Tracey Putzier 5 out of 6<br />

Ms Zoleka Madikazi 4 out of 6<br />

Audit committee responsibility<br />

We <strong>report</strong> that we have adopted appropriate formal terms of reference in our charter in line with the requirements of section<br />

38(10)(1) of the PFMA and Treasury Regulation 3.1. We further <strong>report</strong> that we have conducted our affairs in compliance with<br />

this internal audit charter.<br />

The effectiveness of internal control<br />

The system of internal controls applied by the municipality over financial and risk management is effective, efficient and<br />

transparent. In line with the MFMA and the King II Report on Corporate Governance requirements, Internal Audit provides<br />

the Audit Committee and management with assurance that the internal controls are appropriate and effective. This is<br />

achieved by means of the risk management process, as well as the identification of corrective actions and suggested<br />

enhancements to the controls and processes. From the various <strong>report</strong>s of the Internal Auditors, the Audit Report on the<br />

<strong>annual</strong> financial statements, and the management letter of the Auditor-General South Africa, it was noted that no matters<br />

were <strong>report</strong>ed that indicate any material deficiencies in the system of internal control or any deviations there from.<br />

Accordingly, we can <strong>report</strong> that the system of internal control over financial <strong>report</strong>ing for the period under review was<br />

efficient and effective.<br />

The quality of in year management and monthly/quarterly <strong>report</strong>s submitted in terms of the MFMA and the Division of Revenue<br />

Act.<br />

We are satisfied with the content and quality of monthly and quarterly <strong>report</strong>s prepared and issued by the auditors of the<br />

municipality during the year under review.<br />

Evaluation of <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

We have:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Reviewed and discussed the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements to be included in the <strong>annual</strong> <strong>report</strong>, with the<br />

Auditor-General and the auditors;<br />

Reviewed the Auditor-General of South Africa's management letter and management’s response thereto;<br />

Reviewed changes in accounting policies and practices;<br />

Reviewed the entities compliance with legal and regulatory provisions;<br />

Reviewed significant adjustments resulting from the audit.<br />

We concur with and accept the Auditor-General of South Africa's <strong>report</strong> the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, and are of the opinion<br />

that the audited <strong>annual</strong> financial statements should be accepted and read together with the <strong>report</strong> of the Auditor-General of<br />

South Africa.<br />

Internal audit<br />

We are satisfied that the internal audit function is operating effectively and that it has addressed the risks pertinent to the<br />

municipality and its audits.<br />

Auditor-General of South Africa<br />

We have met with the Auditor-General of South Africa to ensure that there are no unresolved issues.<br />

Chairperson of the Audit Committee<br />

5


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Audit Committee Report<br />

Date:<br />

6


Report of the Auditor General<br />

To the Provincial Legislature of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Report on the financial statements<br />

I have audited the accompanying <strong>annual</strong> financial statements of the <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong> which comprise the statement of<br />

financial position as at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, statement of financial performance, statement of changes in net assets and cash flow<br />

statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes, and the<br />

[directors’ / accounting officer’s / accounting authority’s] <strong>report</strong>, as set out on pages 9 to 39.<br />

Responsibility of the for the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

The accounting officer is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements in<br />

accordance with [the applicable <strong>report</strong>ing framework/basis of accounting] [and in the manner required by the [Public Finance<br />

Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999) (PFMA)] [Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003 (Act No. 56<br />

of 2003) (MFMA)] [Auditor-General audit circular 1 of 2005] and the [Companies Act, 1973 (Act No. 61 of 1973)] [any applicable<br />

enabling legislation]. This responsibility includes:<br />

designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of <strong>annual</strong><br />

financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;<br />

selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and<br />

making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.<br />

Responsibility of the Auditor-General<br />

As required by [section 188 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 read with section 4 of the Public Audit Act,<br />

2004 (Act No. 25 of 2004) (PAA)] [and section XX of any applicable legislation], my responsibility is to express an opinion on<br />

these <strong>annual</strong> financial statements based on my audit.<br />

I conducted my audit in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that I comply with<br />

ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements<br />

are free from material misstatement.<br />

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the <strong>annual</strong> financial<br />

statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material<br />

misstatement of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor<br />

considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements in order to<br />

design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the<br />

effectiveness of the entity’s internal control.<br />

An audit also includes evaluating the:<br />

appropriateness of accounting policies used;<br />

reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management; and<br />

overall presentation of the financial statements.<br />

Paragraph 11 et seq. of the Statement of Generally Recognised Accounting Practice, GRAP 1 Presentation of Financial<br />

Statements requires that financial <strong>report</strong>ing by entities shall provide information on whether resources were obtained and used<br />

in accordance with the legally adopted budget. As the budget <strong>report</strong>ing standard is still in the process of being developed, I<br />

have determined that my audit of any disclosures made by [name of entity] in this respect will be limited to <strong>report</strong>ing on noncompliance<br />

with this disclosure requirement.<br />

I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for my audit opinion.<br />

Basis of accounting<br />

The entity’s policy is to prepare <strong>annual</strong> financial statements on [the basis of accounting determined by the National Treasury]<br />

[entity-specific basis of accounting] as set out in [accounting policy note ] [note to the financial statements].<br />

7


Report of the Auditor General<br />

In my opinion the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of <strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong><br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> as at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with<br />

[the applicable <strong>report</strong>ing framework/basis of accounting] [and in the manner required by the PFMA/MFMA (if the entity falls<br />

within the scope of the PFMA/MFMA) and Companies Act, 1973 (if the entity falls within the scope of the Companies Act) or<br />

section xx of the entity’s enabling legislation (if the entity does not fall within the scope of the PFMA/MFMA)].<br />

Without qualifying my audit opinion, I draw attention to the following matter(s):<br />

Auditor General of South Africa<br />

8


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officers Report<br />

The accounting officer submits his <strong>report</strong> for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

1. Incorporation<br />

The municipality was incorporated on 05 December 2000 and obtained its certificate to commence business on the same day.<br />

2. Review of activities<br />

Main business and operations<br />

The municipality is engaged in municipality and operates principally in South Africa.<br />

The operating results and state of affairs of the municipality are fully set out in the attached <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and<br />

do not in our opinion require any further comment.<br />

3. Going concern<br />

We draw attention to the fact that at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, the municipality had accumulated surplus of R 66 452 225 and that the<br />

municipality's total liabilities exceed its assets by R 36 074 102.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. This<br />

basis presumes that funds will be available to finance future operations and that the realisation of assets and settlement of<br />

liabilities, contingent obligations and commitments will occur in the ordinary course of business.<br />

4. Subsequent events<br />

The accounting officer is not aware of any matter or circumstance arising since the end of the financial year.<br />

5. Accounting policies<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements prepared in accordance with the South African Statements of Generally Accepted Accounting<br />

Practice (GAAP), including any interpretations of such Statements issued by the Accounting Practices Board, and in<br />

accordance with the prescribed Standards of Generally Recognised Accounting Practices (GRAP) issued by the Accounting<br />

Standards Board as the prescribed framework by National Treasury.<br />

6.<br />

The accounting officer of the municipality during the year and to the date of this <strong>report</strong> is as follows:<br />

Name<br />

Mr Zamuxolo Shasha<br />

Nationality<br />

South African<br />

7. Corporate governance<br />

General<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> is committed to business integrity, transparency and professionalism in all its activities. As part of this<br />

commitment, the <strong>Municipality</strong> supports the highest standards of corporate governance and the ongoing development of best<br />

practice.<br />

The municipality confirms and acknowledges its responsibility to total compliance with the Code of Corporate Practices and<br />

Conduct ("the Code") laid out in the King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2002. The <strong>Municipality</strong> discuss the<br />

responsibilities of management in this respect, at Councillors meetings and monitor the municipality's compliance with the code<br />

on a three monthly basis.<br />

The salient features of the municipality's adoption of the Code is outlined below:<br />

9


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Officers Report<br />

Audit and risk committee<br />

In terms of section 166 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, each municipal entity must have an audit committee,<br />

subject to subsection (6).<br />

An audit committee is an independent advisory body which must:<br />

(a) advise the municipal council, the political office-bearers, the accounting officer and the management staff of the<br />

municipality, or the board of directors, the accounting officer and the management staff of the municipal entity.<br />

(b) review the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements to provide the council of the municipality or, in the case of a municipal entity, the<br />

council of the parent municipality and the board of directors of the entity, with an authoritative and credible view of the financial<br />

position of the municipality or municipal entity, its efficiency and effectiveness and its overall level of compliance with this Act,<br />

the <strong>annual</strong> Division of Revenue Act and any other applicable legislation.<br />

Internal audit<br />

The municipality has partailly outsourced its internal audit function to PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) to assist the Municipal<br />

in-house internal audit team. This is in compliance with the Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003.<br />

8. Bankers<br />

First National Bank<br />

Account No. 62022331003<br />

Branch Name: Cofimvaba<br />

9. Auditors<br />

Auditor General of South Africa will continue in office for the next financial period.<br />

10


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Financial Position<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Assets<br />

Cash and cash equivalents 2 9 934 517 24 435 645<br />

Current Assets<br />

Investments 2 405 299 2 399 860<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions 5 11 506 873 4 883 778<br />

Trade receivables from exchange transactions 7 3 863 525 3 967 118<br />

VAT receivable 6 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

29 100 237 37 898 068<br />

Non-Current Assets<br />

Property, plant and equipment 4 61 638 497 27 280 204<br />

Intangible assets 35 58 037 -<br />

61 696 534 27 280 204<br />

Non-Current Assets 61 696 534 27 280 204<br />

Current Assets 29 100 237 37 898 068<br />

Total Assets 90 796 771 65 178 272<br />

Liabilities<br />

Current Liabilities<br />

Current portion of borrowings 36 349 092 121 795<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 9 11 517 964 5 768 199<br />

Current Provisions 8 3 134 068 2 197 285<br />

15 001 124 8 087 282<br />

Non-Current Liabilities<br />

Non-Current Borrowing 9 343 428 3 524 429<br />

Non-Current Liabilities 9 343 428 3 524 429<br />

Current Liabilities 15 001 124 8 087 282<br />

Total Liabilities 24 344 552 11 611 711<br />

Assets 90 796 771 65 178 272<br />

Liabilities (24 344 552) (11 611 711)<br />

Net Assets 66 452 219 53 566 561<br />

11


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Financial Performance<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Revenue<br />

Property rates 11 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Service charges 12 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities and equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Fines 113 025 70 910<br />

Licences and Permits 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Government grants & subsidies 13 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Receipts 9 720 473 -<br />

Interest - outstanding receivables 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

Other income 14 635 602 550 186<br />

Total Revenue 116 180 639 86 897 184<br />

Expenditure<br />

Personnel 16 (42 290 417) (30 682 830)<br />

Remuneration of councillors 17 (10 877 367) (10 269 293)<br />

Finance costs 20 (4 197) (185 388)<br />

Bad debts 18 (7 062 239) (2 819 204)<br />

Repairs and maintenance (8 422 481) (2 950 807)<br />

Bulk purchases 24 (352 225) (503 651)<br />

Contracted services 22 (218 255) (113 229)<br />

General Expenses 15 (32 962 557) (23 420 352)<br />

Total Expenditure (102 189 738) (70 944 754)<br />

Gain on disposal of assets and liabilities 23 233 87 307<br />

Revenue 116 180 639 86 897 184<br />

Expenditure (102 189 738) (70 944 754)<br />

Other 23 233 87 307<br />

Surplus for the year 14 014 134 16 039 737<br />

12


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Changes in Net Assets<br />

Figures in Rand<br />

Accumulated<br />

surplus<br />

Total net<br />

assets<br />

Opening balance as previously <strong>report</strong>ed 37 527 060 37 527 060<br />

Adjustments<br />

Prior year adjustments (235) (235)<br />

Balance at 01 July 2009 as restated 37 526 825 37 526 825<br />

Changes in net assets<br />

Surplus for the year 16 039 737 16 039 737<br />

Total changes 53 566 559 53 566 559<br />

Balance at 01 July <strong>2010</strong> 52 438 091 52 438 091<br />

Changes in net assets<br />

Surplus for the year 14 014 134 14 014 134<br />

Total changes 14 014 134 14 014 134<br />

Balance at 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 66 452 225 66 452 225<br />

13


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Statement of Cash Flows<br />

Figures in Rand Notes <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cash flows from operating activities<br />

Receipts<br />

Cash recieved from ratepayers, government and other 110 828 817 92 702 502<br />

Payments<br />

Cash paid to suppliers and employees (96 448 768) (66 267 944)<br />

Finance costs (4 197) (185 388)<br />

Interest received 556 400 1 147 591<br />

(95 896 565) (65 305 741)<br />

Total receipts 110 828 817 92 702 502<br />

Total payments (95 896 565) (65 305 741)<br />

Net cash flows from operating activities 25 14 932 252 27 396 761<br />

Cash flows from investing activities<br />

Purchase of property, plant and equipment 4 (34 358 293) (27 280 204)<br />

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 4 23 233 87 307<br />

Purchase of intangible assets 35 (58 037) -<br />

Purchase of an asset (43 846) -<br />

Net cash flows from investing activities (34 436 943) (27 192 897)<br />

Cash flows from financing activities<br />

Repayment of current portion of borrowings 349 092 -<br />

Repayment of Borrowings 5 735 611 (226 738)<br />

Net cash flows from financing activities 6 084 703 (226 738)<br />

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (14 501 125) (22 874)<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 24 435 642 24 458 516<br />

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 2 9 934 517 24 435 642<br />

14


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1. Presentation of Annual Financial Statements<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the effective Standards of Generally Recognised<br />

Accounting Practice (GRAP) including any interpretations, guidelines and directives issued by the Accounting Standards<br />

Board, in accordance with Section 122(3) of the Municipal Finance Management Act, (Act No 56 of 2003).<br />

These <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting and are in accordance with historical<br />

cost convention unless specified otherwise. Comparative amounts have been restated retrospectively to the extent possible.<br />

They are presented in South African Rand.<br />

A summary of the significant accounting policies, which have been consistently applied, are disclosed below.<br />

These accounting policies are consistent with the previous period.<br />

1.1 Significant judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty<br />

In preparing the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the<br />

amounts represented in the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and related disclosures. Use of available information and the<br />

application of judgement is inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from these estimates<br />

which may be material to the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements. Significant judgements include:<br />

Allowance for doubtful debts<br />

On debtors an impairment loss is recognised in surplus and deficit when there is objective evidence that it is impaired. The<br />

impairment is measured as the difference between the debtors carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash<br />

flows discounted at the effective interest rate, computed at initial recognition.<br />

1.2 Investment property<br />

Investment property is property (land or a building - or part of a building - or both) held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation<br />

or both, rather than for:<br />

use in the production or supply of goods or services or for<br />

administrative purposes, or<br />

sale in the ordinary course of operations.<br />

Owner-occupied property is property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative<br />

purposes.<br />

Investment property is recognised as an asset when, it is probable that the future economic benefits or service potential that<br />

are associated with the investment property will flow to the municipality, and the cost or fair value of the investment property<br />

can be measured reliably.<br />

Investment property is initially recognised at cost including transaction costs once it meets the definition of investment property.<br />

However, where an investment property was acquired through a non-exchange transaction (i.e. where it acquired the<br />

investment property for no or a nominal value) its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition. Transaction costs are<br />

included in the initial measurement.<br />

Where investment property is acquired at no cost or for a nominal cost, its cost is its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

Costs include costs incurred initially and costs incurred subsequently to add to, or to replace a part of, or service a property. If a<br />

replacement part is recognised in the carrying amount of the investment property, the carrying amount of the replaced part is<br />

derecognised.<br />

Compensation from third parties for investment property that was impaired, lost or given up is recognised in surplus or deficit<br />

when the compensation becomes receivable.<br />

Property interests held under operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property in the following<br />

circumstances:<br />

When classification is difficult, the criteria used to distinguish investment property from owner-occupied property and from<br />

property held for sale in the ordinary course of business, are as follows:<br />

15


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.3 Property, plant and equipment<br />

Property, plant and equipment are tangible non-current assets (including infrastructure assets) that are held for use in the<br />

production or supply of goods or services, rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and are expected to be used during<br />

more than one period.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an asset when:<br />

it is probable that future economic benefits or service potential associated with the item will flow to the<br />

municipality; and<br />

the cost of the item can be measured reliably.<br />

Property, plant and equipment is initially measured at cost.<br />

The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment is the purchase price and other costs attributable to bring the asset to the<br />

location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Trade discounts and<br />

rebates are deducted in arriving at the cost.<br />

Where an asset is acquired at no cost, or for a nominal cost, its cost is its fair value as at date of acquisition.<br />

When significant components of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as<br />

separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.<br />

The initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located is also<br />

included in the cost of property, plant and equipment, where the entity is obligated to incur such expenditure, and where the<br />

obligation arises as a result of acquiring the asset or using it for purposes other than the production of inventories.<br />

The useful lives of items of property, plant and equipment have been assessed as follows:<br />

Item<br />

Average useful life<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Roads and Paving 10 years<br />

Sewerage 15 years<br />

Community<br />

Buildings 30 years<br />

Community Halls 30 years<br />

Libraries 30 years<br />

Others 30 years<br />

Others<br />

Buildings 30 years<br />

Office Equipment 3 - 5 years<br />

Furniture and Fittings 10 years<br />

Bins and Containers 5 - 10 years<br />

Landfill sites 30 years<br />

Computer Equipment 4 years<br />

Items of property, plant and equipment are derecognised when the asset is disposed of or when there are no further economic<br />

benefits or service potential expected from the use of the asset.<br />

The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is included in surplus or deficit when<br />

the item is derecognised. The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment is<br />

determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item.<br />

16


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.3 Property, plant and equipment (continued)<br />

Transitional provision<br />

According to the transitional provision, the municipality is not required to measure property, plant and equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing<br />

periods beginning on or after a date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP on<br />

Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment has accordingly been recognised at provisional amounts, as<br />

disclosed in note 4. The transitional provision expires on 30 June 2012.<br />

Until such time as the measurement period expires and property, plant and equipment is recognised and measured in<br />

accordance with the requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment, the municipality need not<br />

comply with the Standards of GRAP on:<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements (GRAP 1),<br />

The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Transactions (GRAP 4),<br />

Leases (GRAP 13),<br />

Segment Reporting (GRAP 18),<br />

Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations (GRAP 100)<br />

The exemption from applying the measurement requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment<br />

implies that any associated presentation and disclosure requirements need not be complied with for property, plant and<br />

equipment not measured in accordance with the requirements of the Standard of GRAP on Property, plant and equipment.<br />

1.4 Intangible assets<br />

An asset is identified as an intangible asset when it:<br />

is capable of being separated or divided from an entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged,<br />

either individually or together with a related contract, assets or liability; or<br />

arises from contractual rights or other legal rights, regardless whether those rights are transferable or separate<br />

from the municipality or from other rights and obligations.<br />

An intangible asset is recognised when:<br />

it is probable that the expected future economic benefits or service potential that are attributable to the asset will<br />

flow to the municipality; and<br />

the cost or fair value of the asset can be measured reliably.<br />

Intangible assets are initially recognised at cost.<br />

An intangible asset acquired at no or nominal cost, the cost shall be its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

Intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses.<br />

The amortisation period and the amortisation method for intangible assets are reviewed at each <strong>report</strong>ing date.<br />

Reassessing the useful life of an intangible asset with a finite useful life after it was classified as indefinite is an indicator that<br />

the asset may be impaired. As a result the asset is tested for impairment and the remaining carrying amount is amortised over<br />

its useful life.<br />

Internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in substance are not recognised as<br />

intangible assets.<br />

Amortisation is provided to write down the intangible assets, on a straight line basis, to their residual values as follows:<br />

Item<br />

Computer software<br />

Useful life<br />

3 years<br />

17


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.5 Leases<br />

A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. A lease is<br />

classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership.<br />

Operating leases - lessor<br />

Under a finance lease, the municipality recognises the lease payments to be received in terms of a lease agreement as an<br />

asset (receivable). The receivable is calculated as the sum of all the minimum lease payments to be received, plus any<br />

unguaranteed residual accruing to the municipality, discounted at the interest arte implicit in the lease. The receivable is<br />

reduced by the capital portion of the lease instalments received, with the interest portion being recognised as interest revenue<br />

on a time proportionate basis. The accounting policies relating to derecognition and impairment of financial instruments are<br />

applied to lease receivables.<br />

Rental income from operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

Operating leases - lessee<br />

Leases are classified as finance leases where substantially all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of an asset are<br />

transferred to the municipality. Property, plant and equipment or intangible assets subject to finance lease agreements are<br />

initially recognised at the lower of the asset's fair value and the present value of the minimum leases payments. The<br />

corresponding liabilities are initially recognised at the inception of the lease and are measured as the sum of the minimum<br />

lease payments due in the terms of the lease agreement, discounted for the effect of interest. In discounting the lease<br />

payments, the municipality uses the interest rate that exactly discounts the lease payments and unguarenteed residual value to<br />

the fair value of the asset plus any direct costs incurred.<br />

Subsequent to initial recognition, the leased assets are accounted for in accordance with the stated accounting policies<br />

applicable to property, plant, equipment or intangibles. The lease liability is reduced by the leases payments, which are<br />

allocated between the lease finance costs and the capital repayment using the effective interest rate method. Lease finance<br />

costs are expensed when incurred. The accounting policies relating to derecognition of financial instruments are applied to<br />

lease payables. The lease asset is depreciated over the shorter of the asset's useful life or the lease term.<br />

Operating leases are those leases that do not fall within the scope of the above definition. Operating leases rentals are accrued<br />

on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.<br />

1.6 Employee benefits<br />

Short-term employee benefits<br />

Remuneration to employees is recognised in the Statement of financial performance as the services are rendered, except for<br />

non-accumulatating benefits, which are only recognised when the specific event occurs.<br />

The municility has opted to treat its provision for leave pay as a provision.<br />

The costs of all short-term employee benefits such as leave pay, are recognised during the period in which the employee<br />

renders the related services. The liability for leave pay is based on the total accrued leave days at year end and is shown as a<br />

provision. The municipality recognised the expected cost of performance bonuses only when the municipality has a present<br />

legal or constructive obligation to make such payment and a reliable estimate can be made.<br />

Defined contribution plans<br />

A defined contribution plan is a plan under which the municipality pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The<br />

municipality has no legal or constructive obligation to pay furthuer contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to<br />

pay all employees the benefits relating to service in the current or prior period.<br />

The municipality's contributions to the defined contribution funds are established in terms of the rules governing those plans.<br />

Contributions are recognised in the Statement of financial performance in the period in which the service is rendered by the<br />

relevant employees, The municipality has not further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.<br />

18


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.7 Provisions and contingencies<br />

Provisions are recognised when the municipality has a present or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is<br />

probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable<br />

estimate of the provision can be made, Provisions are reviewed at <strong>report</strong>ing date and adjusted to reflect the current best<br />

estimate. Where the effect is material, non-current provisions are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount<br />

rate that reflects the markers current assessment of the time value of money, adjusted for risks specific to the liability.<br />

The municipality does not recognise a contigent liability or contigent asset. A contigent liability is disclosed unless the<br />

possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote. A contigent asset is disclosed where an<br />

inflow of economic benefits is probable.<br />

Future events that may affect the amount required to settle an obligation are reflected in the amount of a provision where<br />

there is sufficient objective evidence that they will occur. Gains from the expected disposal of assets are not taken into<br />

account in measuring a provision. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses. The present obligation under<br />

an onerous contract is recognised and measured as a provision.<br />

A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the following criteria over and above the recognition criteris of a<br />

provision have been met:.<br />

a) The municipality has a detailed formal plan for the restructuring identifying at least:<br />

the business or part of a business concerned<br />

the principal locations affected<br />

the location, function and approximate number of employee who will be compensated for terminating their services<br />

the expenditures that will be undertaken; and<br />

when the plan will be implemented<br />

b) The municipality has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by starting to<br />

implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it.<br />

Contingent assets and contingent liabilities are not recognised. Contingencies are disclosed in note 30.<br />

1.8 Revenue from exchange transactions<br />

Revenue from exchange transactions refers to revenue that accrued to the municipality directly in return for services rendered/<br />

goods sold, the value of which approximates the consideration received or receivable.<br />

Services charges relating to water are based on consumption. Meters are read on a monthly basis and are recognised as<br />

revenue when invoiced. Provisional estimates of consumption are made onthly when meter readings have not been performed.<br />

The provinsional estimates of consumption are recognised as revenue when invoiced. Adjustments to provisional estimates of<br />

consumption are made in the invoicing period in which meters have been read. These adjustments are recognised as revenue<br />

in the invoicing period. The estimates of consumption between meter readings are based on the previous three months<br />

average usage.<br />

Service charges relating to refuse removal are recognised on a monthly basis in arrears by applying the approved tariff to each<br />

property that has improvements.<br />

Service charges from sewerage and sanitation are based on the number of sewerage connections on each development<br />

property using the tariffs approved from Council and are levied monthly.<br />

Revenue from the rental of facilities and equipment is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement.<br />

Revenue arising fro the application of the approved tariff of charges is recognised when the relevant service is rendered by<br />

applying the relevant gazetted tariff. This includes the issuing of licences and permits.<br />

Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when substantially all the risks and rewards in those goods is passed to the<br />

consumer.<br />

Revenue arising out of situations where the municipality acts as an agent on behalf of another entity (the principal) is limited to<br />

the amount of any fee or commission payable to the municipality as compensation for executing the agreed services<br />

19


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.8 Revenue from exchange transactions (continued)<br />

Measurement<br />

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of trade discounts and volume rebates.<br />

Rendering of services<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions refers to transactions where the municipality received revenue from another entity<br />

without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange. Revenue from non-exchange transactions is generally<br />

recognised to the extent that the related receipt or receivable qualifies for recognition as an asset and there is no liability to<br />

repay the amount.<br />

Revenue from property rates is recognised when the legal entitlement to this revenue arises. Peanlty interest on unpaid rates is<br />

recognised on a time proportionate basis.<br />

Fines constitute both spot fines and summonses. Revenue from spot fines and summonses is recognised when payment is<br />

received, together with an estimate of spot fines and summonses that will be received based on past experiences of amounts<br />

collected.<br />

Revenue from public contributions and donations is recognised when all conditions associated with the contribution have been<br />

met or where the contribution is to finance property, plant and equipment, when such items of property, plant and equipment<br />

qualifies for recognition and first becomes available for use by the municipality. Where public contributions have been received<br />

but the municipality has not met the related conditions, a deferred income (liability) is recognised.<br />

Contributed property, plant and equipment is recognised when such items of property, plant and equipment qualifies for<br />

recognition and become available for use by the municipality.<br />

Revenue from the recovery of unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasterful expenditure is based on legislated procedures,<br />

including those set out in the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No.56 of 2003) and is recognised when the recovery<br />

thereof from the responsible councillors or officials is virtually certain.<br />

Interest<br />

Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportion basis.<br />

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions<br />

Revenue comprises gross inflows of economic benefits or service potential received and receivable by an municipality, which<br />

represents an increase in net assets, other than increases relating to contributions from owners.<br />

Conditions on transferred assets are stipulations that specify that the future economic benefits or service potential embodied in<br />

the asset is required to be consumed by the recipient as specified or future economic benefits or service potential must be<br />

returned to the transferor.<br />

Control of an asset arise when the municipality can use or otherwise benefit from the asset in pursuit of its objectives and can<br />

exclude or otherwise regulate the access of others to that benefit.<br />

Exchange transactions are transactions in which one entity receives assets or services, or has liabilities extinguished, and<br />

directly gives approximately equal value (primarily in the form of cash, goods, services, or use of assets) to another entity in<br />

exchange.<br />

Expenses paid through the tax system are amounts that are available to beneficiaries regardless of whether or not they pay<br />

taxes.<br />

Fines are economic benefits or service potential received or receivable by entities, as determined by a court or other law<br />

enforcement body, as a consequence of the breach of laws or regulations.<br />

20


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.9 Revenue from non-exchange transactions (continued)<br />

Non-exchange transactions are transactions that are not exchange transactions. In a non-exchange transaction, an<br />

municipality either receives value from another municipality without directly giving approximately equal value in exchange, or<br />

gives value to another municipality without directly receiving approximately equal value in exchange.<br />

Restrictions on transferred assets are stipulations that limit or direct the purposes for which a transferred asset may be used,<br />

but do not specify that future economic benefits or service potential is required to be returned to the transferor if not deployed<br />

as specified.<br />

Stipulations on transferred assets are terms in laws or regulation, or a binding arrangement, imposed upon the use of a<br />

transferred asset by entities external to the <strong>report</strong>ing municipality.<br />

Tax expenditures are preferential provisions of the tax law that provide certain taxpayers with concessions that are not available<br />

to others.<br />

The taxable event is the event that the government, legislature or other authority has determined will be subject to taxation.<br />

Taxes are economic benefits or service potential compulsorily paid or payable to entities, in accordance with laws and or<br />

regulations, established to provide revenue to government. Taxes do not include fines or other penalties imposed for breaches<br />

of the law.<br />

Transfers are inflows of future economic benefits or service potential from non-exchange transactions, other than taxes.<br />

Recognition<br />

An inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset is recognised as revenue, except to the extent<br />

that a liability is also recognised in respect of the same inflow.<br />

As the municipality satisfies a present obligation recognised as a liability in respect of an inflow of resources from a nonexchange<br />

transaction recognised as an asset, it reduces the carrying amount of the liability recognised and recognises an<br />

amount of revenue equal to that reduction.<br />

Measurement<br />

Revenue from a non-exchange transaction is measured at the amount of the increase in net assets recognised by the<br />

municipality.<br />

When, as a result of a non-exchange transaction, the municipality recognises an asset, it also recognises revenue equivalent<br />

to the amount of the asset measured at its fair value as at the date of acquisition, unless it is also required to recognise a<br />

liability. Where a liability is required to be recognised it will be measured as the best estimate of the amount required to settle<br />

the obligation at the <strong>report</strong>ing date, and the amount of the increase in net assets, if any, recognised as revenue. When a<br />

liability is subsequently reduced, because the taxable event occurs or a condition is satisfied, the amount of the reduction in the<br />

liability is recognised as revenue.<br />

Fines<br />

Fines are recognised as revenue when the receivable meets the definition of an asset and satisfies the criteria for recognition<br />

as an asset.<br />

Assets arising from fines are measured at the best estimate of the inflow of resources to the municipality.<br />

Where the municipality collects fines in the capacity of an agent, the fine will not be revenue of the collecting entity.<br />

Grants, Transfers and Donations<br />

Grants, transferes and donations received or receivable are recognised when the resources that have been transferred meet<br />

the criteria for recognition as an asset. A corresponding liability is raised to the extent that the grant, transfer or donation is<br />

conditional. The liability is transferred to revenue as and when the conditions attached to the grant are met. Grants without any<br />

conditions attached are recognised as revenue when the asset is recognised.<br />

21


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Accounting Policies<br />

1.10 Investment income<br />

Investment income is recognised on a time-proportion basis using the effective interest method.<br />

1.11 Borrowing costs<br />

Borrowing costs that are directly attributed to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets are capitalised<br />

to the cost of that asset unless it is inappropriate to do so. The municipality ceases the capitalisation of borrowing costs<br />

when substantially all the activities to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are complete. It is considered<br />

inappropriate to capitalise borrowing costs where the link between the funds borrowed and the capital asset acquired<br />

cannot be adequately establised. Borrowing costs incurred other than on qualifying asets are recognised as an expense in<br />

surplus or deficit when incurred.<br />

1.12 Unauthorised expenditure<br />

Unauthorised expenditure means:<br />

overspending of a vote or a main division within a vote; and<br />

expenditure not in accordance with the purpose of a vote or, in the case of a main division, not in accordance with<br />

the purpose of the main division.<br />

All expenditure relating to unauthorised expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance in<br />

the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of the expense, and<br />

where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.<br />

1.13 Fruitless and wasteful expenditure<br />

Fruitless expenditure means expenditure which was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been<br />

exercised.<br />

All expenditure relating to fruitless and wasteful expenditure is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial<br />

performance in the year that the expenditure was incurred. The expenditure is classified in accordance with the nature of the<br />

expense, and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted for as revenue in the statement of financial performance.<br />

1.14 Irregular expenditure<br />

(a) this Act; or<br />

(b) the State Tender Board Act, 1968 (Act No. 86 of 1968), or any regulations made in terms of the Act; or<br />

(c) any provincial legislation providing for procurement procedures in that provincial government.<br />

Irregular expenditure is expenditure that is contrar to the Municipal Finance Management Act (Act No. 56 of 2003), the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> Systems Act (Act No. 32 of 2000), the Public Office Bearers Act (Act No. 20 of 1998) or is in contravention of the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong>'s supply chain management policy. Irregular expenditure excludes unauthorised expenditure. Irregular expenditure<br />

is accounted for as expenditure in the Statement of Financial Performance and where recovered, it is subsequently accounted<br />

for as revenue in the Statement of Financial Performance.<br />

1.15 Investments<br />

Where the carrying amount of an investment is greater than the estimated recoverable amount, it is written down immediately<br />

to its recoverable amount and an impairment loss is charged to the statement of financial performance.<br />

22


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

2. Cash and cash equivalents<br />

Cash and cash equivalents consist of:<br />

Cash on hand 4 259 884<br />

Bank balances 9 930 258 24 434 761<br />

3. New standards and interpretations<br />

3.1 Standards and interpretations effective and adopted in the current year<br />

9 934 517 24 435 642<br />

In the current year, the municipality has adopted the following standards and interpretations that are effective for the current<br />

financial year and that are relevant to its operations:<br />

GRAP 23: Revenue from Non-exchange Transactions<br />

Revenue from non-exchange transactions arises when an entity receives value from another entity without directly giving<br />

approximately equal value in exchange. An asset acquired through a non-exchange transaction shall initially be measured<br />

at its fair value as at the date of acquisition.<br />

This revenue will be measured at the amount of increase in net assets recognised by the municipality.<br />

An inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset shall be recognised as revenue, except to<br />

the extent that a liability is recognised for the same inflow. As an entity satisfies a present obligation recognised as a liability<br />

in respect of an inflow of resources from a non-exchange transaction recognised as an asset, it will reduce the carrying<br />

amount of the liability recognised as recognise an amount equal to that reduction.<br />

This Standard has been approved by the Board but its effective date has not yet been determined by the Minister of<br />

Finance. The effective date indicated is a provisional date and could change depending on the decision of the Minister of<br />

Finance.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The municipality has adopted the standard for the first time in the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

The impact of the standard is not material.<br />

3.2 Standards and interpretations issued, but not yet effective<br />

The municipality has not applied the following standards and interpretations, which have been published and are mandatory<br />

for the municipality’s accounting periods beginning on or after 01 July <strong>2011</strong> or later periods:<br />

GRAP 25: Employee benefits<br />

The objective of GRAP25 is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits. The Standard requires an<br />

municipality to recognise:<br />

a liability when an employee has provided service in exchange for employee benefits to be paid in the future; and<br />

an expense when an municipality consumes the economic benefits or service potential arising from service<br />

provided by an employee in exchange for employee benefits.<br />

GRAP25 must be applied by an employer in accounting for all employee benefits, except share based payment<br />

transactions.<br />

GRAP25 defines, amongst others, the following:<br />

Employee benefits as all forms of consideration given by an municipality in exchange for service rendered by<br />

employees;<br />

Defined contribution plans as post-employment benefit plans under which an municipality pays fixed<br />

contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further<br />

contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service<br />

in the current and prior periods;<br />

23


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

Defined benefit plans as post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans;<br />

Multi-employer plans as defined contribution plans (other than state plans and composite social security<br />

programmes) or defined benefit plans (other than state plans) that:<br />

- pool the assets contributed by various entities that are not under common control; and<br />

- use those assets to provide benefits to employees of more than one entity, on the basis that contribution<br />

and benefit levels are determined without regard to the identity of the municipality that employs the employees<br />

concerned;<br />

Other long-term employee benefits as employee benefits (other than post-employment benefits and termination<br />

benefits) that is not due to be settled within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees<br />

render the related service;<br />

Post-employment benefits as employee benefits (other than termination benefits) which are payable after the<br />

completion of employment;<br />

Post-employment benefit plans as formal or informal arrangements under which an municipality provides postemployment<br />

benefits for one or more employees;<br />

Short-term employee benefits as employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that are due to be settled<br />

within twelve months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service;<br />

State plans as plans other than composite social security programmes established by legislation which operate<br />

as if they are multi-employer plans for all entities in economic categories laid down in legislation;<br />

Termination benefits as employee benefits payable as a result of either:<br />

- an entity’s decision to terminate an employee’s employment before the normal retirement date; or<br />

- an employee’s decision to accept voluntary redundancy in exchange for those benefits;<br />

Vested employee benefits as employee benefits that are not conditional on future employment.<br />

Short-term employee benefits;<br />

- All short-term employee benefits;<br />

- Short-term compensated absences;<br />

- Bonus, incentive and performance related payments;<br />

Post-employment benefits: Defined contribution plans;<br />

Other long-term employee benefits;<br />

Termination benefits.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The municipality has early adopted the standard for the first time in the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

The impact of the standard is set out in note Changes in Accounting Policy.<br />

GRAP 104: Financial Instruments<br />

The standard prescribes recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments.<br />

Financial instruments are defined as those contracts that results in a financial asset in one municipality and a financial<br />

liability or residual interest in another municipality. A key distinguishing factor between financial assets and financial<br />

liabilities and other assets and liabilities, is that they are settled in cash or by exchanging financial instruments rather than<br />

through the provision of goods or services.<br />

One of the key considerations in initially recognising financial instruments is the distinction, by the issuers of those<br />

instruments, between financial assets, financial liabilities and residual interests. Financial assets and financial liabilities are<br />

distinguished from residual interests because they involve a contractual right or obligation to receive or pay cash or another<br />

financial instrument. Residual interests entitle an municipality to a portion of another municipality’s net assets in the event of<br />

liquidation and, to dividends or similar distributions paid at management’s discretion.<br />

In determining whether a financial instrument is a financial asset, financial liability or a residual interest, an municipality<br />

considers the substance of the contract and not just the legal form.<br />

Where a single instrument contains both a liability and a residual interest component, the issuer allocates the instrument<br />

into its component parts. The issuer recognises the liability component at its fair value and recognises the residual interest<br />

as the difference between the carrying amount of the instrument and the fair value of the liability component. No gain or<br />

loss is recognised by separating the instrument into its component parts.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value. Where an municipality subsequently measures<br />

financial assets and financial liabilities at amortised cost or cost, transactions costs are included in the cost of the asset or<br />

liability.<br />

24


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

The transaction price usually equals the fair value at initial recognition, except in certain circumstances, for example, where<br />

interest free credit is granted or where credit is granted at a below market rate of interest.<br />

Concessionary loans are loans either received by or granted to another municipality on concessionary terms, e.g. at low<br />

interest rates and flexible repayment terms. On initial recognition, the fair value of a concessionary loan is the present value<br />

of the agreed contractual cash flows, discounted using a market related rate of interest for a similar transaction. The<br />

difference between the proceeds either received or paid and the present value of the contractual cash flows is accounted<br />

for as non-exchange revenue by the recipient of a concessionary loan in accordance with Standard of GRAP on Revenue<br />

from Non-exchange Revenue Transactions (Taxes and Transfers), and using the Framework for the Preparation and<br />

Presentation of Financial Statements (usually as an expense) by the grantor of the loan.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities are subsequently measured either at fair value or, amortised cost or cost. An<br />

municipality measures a financial instrument at fair value if it is:<br />

a derivative;<br />

a combined instrument designated at fair value, i.e. an instrument that includes a derivative and a non-derivative<br />

host contract;<br />

held-for-trading;<br />

a non-derivative instrument with fixed or determinable payments that is designated at initial recognition to be<br />

measured at fair value;<br />

an investment in a residual interest for which fair value can be measured reliably; and<br />

other instruments that do not meet the definition of financial instruments at amortised cost or cost.<br />

Derivatives are measured at fair value. Combined instruments that include a derivative and non-derivative host contract are<br />

accounted for as follows:<br />

Where an embedded derivative is included in a host contract which is a financial instrument within the scope of<br />

this Standard, an entity can designate the entire contract to be measured at fair value or, it can account for the<br />

host contract and embedded derivative separately using GRAP 104. An municipality is however required to<br />

measure the entire instrument at fair value if the fair value of the derivative cannot be measured reliably.<br />

Where the host contract is not a financial instrument within the scope of this Standard, the host contract and<br />

embedded derivative are accounted for separately using GRAP 104 and the relevant Standard of GRAP.<br />

Financial assets and financial liabilities that are non-derivative instruments with fixed or determinable payments, for<br />

example deposits with banks, receivables and payables, are measured at amortised cost. At initial recognition, an<br />

municipality can however designate such an instrument to be measured at fair value.<br />

An municipality can only measure investments in residual interests at cost where the fair value of the interest cannot be<br />

determined reliably.<br />

Once an municipality has classified a financial asset or a financial liability either at fair value or amortised cost or cost, it is<br />

only allowed to reclassify such instruments in limited instances.<br />

An entity derecognises a financial asset, or the specifically identified cash flows of an asset, when:<br />

the cash flows from the asset expire, are settled or waived;<br />

significant risks and rewards are transferred to another party; or<br />

despite having retained significant risks and rewards, an municipality has transferred control of the asset to<br />

another municipality.<br />

An municipality derecognises a financial liability when the obligation is extinguished. Exchanges of debt instruments<br />

between a borrower and a lender are treated as the extinguishment of an existing liability and the recognition of a new<br />

financial liability. Where an municipality modifies the term of an existing financial liability, it is also treated as the<br />

extinguishment of an existing liability and the recognition of a new liability.<br />

An municipality cannot offset financial assets and financial liabilities in the statement of financial position unless a legal right<br />

of set-off exists, and the parties intend to settle on a net basis.<br />

GRAP 104 requires extensive disclosures on the significance of financial instruments for an municipality’s statement of<br />

financial position and statement of financial performance, as well as the nature and extent of the risks that an municipality is<br />

exposed to as a result of its <strong>annual</strong> financial statements. Some disclosures, for example the disclosure of fair values for<br />

instruments measured at amortised cost or cost and the preparation of a sensitivity analysis, are encouraged rather than<br />

required.<br />

25


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

3. New standards and interpretations (continued)<br />

GRAP 104 does not prescribe principles for hedge accounting. An municipality is permitted to apply hedge accounting, as<br />

long as the principles in IAS 39 are applied.<br />

This Standard has been approved by the Board but its effective date has not yet been determined by the Minister of<br />

Finance. The effective date indicated is a provisional date and could change depending on the decision of the Minister of<br />

Finance.<br />

The effective date of the standard is for years beginning on or after 01 April <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

The municipality expects to adopt the standard for the first time in the 2012 <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

It is unlikely that the amendment will have a material impact on the municipality's <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

4. Property, plant and equipment<br />

Cost /<br />

Valuation<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated Carrying value Cost /<br />

depreciation<br />

Valuation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Accumulated Carrying value<br />

depreciation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Land 537 739 - 537 739 537 739 - 537 739<br />

Buildings 11 145 324 - 11 145 324 8 365 712 - 8 365 712<br />

Motor vehicles 1 289 749 - 1 289 749 - - -<br />

Office equipment 926 267 - 926 267 - - -<br />

IT equipment 185 299 - 185 299 - - -<br />

Infrastructure 39 423 816 - 39 423 816 13 396 091 - 13 396 091<br />

Community 8 130 303 - 8 130 303 3 150 214 - 3 150 214<br />

Other property, plant and<br />

equipment<br />

- - - 1 830 448 - 1 830 448<br />

Total 61 638 497 - 61 638 497 27 280 204 - 27 280 204<br />

Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment - <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

balance<br />

Land 537 739 - 537 739<br />

Buildings 8 365 712 2 779 612 11 145 324<br />

Motor vehicles - 1 289 749 1 289 749<br />

Office equipment - 926 267 926 267<br />

IT equipment - 185 299 185 299<br />

Infrastructure 13 396 091 26 027 725 39 423 816<br />

Community 3 150 214 4 980 089 8 130 303<br />

Other property, plant and equipment 1 830 448 (1 830 448) -<br />

27 280 204 34 358 293 61 638 497<br />

26


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

4. Property, plant and equipment (continued)<br />

Reconciliation of property, plant and equipment - <strong>2010</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

balance<br />

Land - 537 739 537 739<br />

Buildings - 8 365 712 8 365 712<br />

Infrastructure - 13 396 091 13 396 091<br />

Community - 3 150 214 3 150 214<br />

Other property, plant and equipment - 1 830 448 1 830 448<br />

Borrowing costs capitalised<br />

- 27 280 204 27 280 204<br />

Infrastructure 120 256 -<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> has taken advantage of the transitional provisions for Medium and Low Capacity Municipalities as set out in<br />

Directive 4 paragraph .73 to.83 issued by the Accounting Standards Board. Municipalities who take advantage of the<br />

transitional provisions are not required to measure property, plant and equipment for <strong>report</strong>ing periods beginning on or after a<br />

date within three years following the date of initial adoption of the Standard of GRAP on Property, Plant and Equipment.<br />

5. Other receivables from non-exchange transactions<br />

Trade debtors (4 442 794) 4 098 216<br />

Employee costs in advance - 785 562<br />

Deposits 15 949 667 -<br />

6. Value Added Tax Receivable<br />

11 506 873 4 883 778<br />

Value Added Tax 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

7. Trade and Other Receivables from Exchange Transactions<br />

Gross balances<br />

Rates 1 208 370 4 103 001<br />

Water 1 464 932 1 464 932<br />

Sewerage 280 004 280 004<br />

Refuse 408 366 624 182<br />

Housing rental 502 453 -<br />

Other (specify) (600) 1 462 472<br />

3 863 525 7 934 591<br />

Less: Provision for debt impairment<br />

Other (specify) (3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

Net balance<br />

Rates 1 208 370 4 103 001<br />

Water 1 464 932 1 464 932<br />

Sewerage 280 004 280 004<br />

Refuse 408 366 624 182<br />

Housing rental 502 453 -<br />

Other (specify) (600) (2 505 001)<br />

3 863 525 3 967 118<br />

27


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

7. Trade and Other Receivables from Exchange Transactions (continued)<br />

Rates<br />

Current (0 -30 days) (2 792 270) 125 485<br />

31 - 60 days 288 131 117 616<br />

61 - 90 days 120 500 108 034<br />

91 - 120 days 3 338 073 3 426 412<br />

954 434 3 777 547<br />

Refuse and Sewerage: Ageing<br />

Current (0 -30 days) 186 216 336 313<br />

31 - 60 days 31 806 3 044 592<br />

61 - 90 days 29 487 776 140<br />

91 - 120 days 572 835 -<br />

820 344 4 157 045<br />

Rental: Ageing<br />

Current (0 -30 days) 330 391 -<br />

31 - 60 days 32 213 -<br />

61 - 90 days 32 213 -<br />

91 - 120 days 40 490 -<br />

Summary of debtors by customer classification<br />

435 307 -<br />

Less: Provision for debt impairment<br />

Balance at beginning of the year - (1 148 269)<br />

Contributions to provision (3 406 059) (2 819 204)<br />

(3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

Reconciliation of debt impairment provision<br />

Contributions to provision (3 406 059) (3 967 473)<br />

8. Provisions<br />

Reconciliation of provisions - <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Total<br />

Balance<br />

Leave Provision 2 197 285 727 508 2 924 793<br />

Landfill site - 209 275 209 275<br />

Legal proceedings provisions<br />

2 197 285 936 783 3 134 068<br />

A brief description of the nature of the obligation and the expected timing of any resulting outflows of economic benefits or<br />

service potential.<br />

An indication of the uncertainties about the amount or timing of those outflows. Where necessary to provide adequate<br />

information, an entity shall disclose the major assumptions made concerning future events, as addressed in paragraph .61.<br />

The amount of any expected reimbursement, stating the amount of any asset that has been recognised for that expected<br />

reimbursement.<br />

28


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

9. Trade and other payables from exchange transactions<br />

Trade payables 11 517 964 5 768 199<br />

10. Revenue<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Service charges 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities & equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Income from agency services 113 025 70 910<br />

Fines 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Government grants & subsidies 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Receipts - CHDM (WSP) 9 720 473 -<br />

Interest earned - outstanding debtors 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest earned - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

115 545 037 86 346 998<br />

The amount included in revenue arising from exchanges of goods or services<br />

are as follows:<br />

Service charges 376 339 1 302 736<br />

Rental of facilities & equipment 427 566 495 686<br />

Income from agency services 113 025 70 910<br />

Receipts 9 720 473 -<br />

10 637 403 1 869 332<br />

The amount included in revenue arising from non-exchange transactions is as<br />

follows:<br />

Taxation revenue<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

Fines 1 256 813 667 617<br />

Transfer revenue<br />

Grants and Subsidies Received 99 032 765 81 044 468<br />

Interest earned - outstanding receivables 522 832 90 896<br />

Interest earned - external investments 692 938 1 056 695<br />

11. Property rates<br />

Rates received<br />

104 907 634 84 477 666<br />

Rates and taxes 3 402 286 1 617 990<br />

12. Service charges<br />

Refuse removal 376 339 459 713<br />

Sale of water - 843 023<br />

376 339 1 302 736<br />

29


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

13. Government grants and subsidies<br />

Equitable share 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

MIG 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

MSIG 750 000 500 000<br />

FMG 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

LG-SETA 154 077 -<br />

CHDM Grant 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

Mass-FP LED 2 703 228 736 408<br />

Local Government (IEC) 1 630 000 -<br />

EPWP Grant - 161 100<br />

99 032 765 81 116 840<br />

Equitable share 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

MIG Grant 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

MSIG Grant 750 000 500 000<br />

FMG 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

Local Government Grants (IEC Projects) 1 630 000 -<br />

Chris Hani DM Grants 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

LED Grants 2 703 228 736 408<br />

LG Seta 154 077 -<br />

Equitable Share<br />

99 032 765 81 116 840<br />

Current-year receipts 69 276 411 56 857 916<br />

No conditions as per DORA (69 276 411) (56 857 916)<br />

MIG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 17 564 000 17 032 518<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (17 564 000) (17 032 518)<br />

MSIG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 750 000 500 000<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (750 000) (500 000)<br />

FMG Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 1 250 000 1 000 000<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (1 250 000) (1 000 000)<br />

Local Government Grant (St Marks and IEC Grant)<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 1 630 000 -<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (1 630 000) -<br />

Chris Hani District <strong>Municipality</strong> Grant<br />

- -<br />

30


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

13. Government grants and subsidies (continued)<br />

Current-year receipts 5 705 049 4 828 898<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (5 705 049) (4 828 898)<br />

Local Economic Development (LED) Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts 2 703 228 736 408<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue (2 703 228) (736 408)<br />

EPWP Grant<br />

- -<br />

Current-year receipts - 161 100<br />

Conditions met - transferred to revenue - (161 100)<br />

Changes in level of government grants<br />

Based on the allocations set out in the Division of Revenue Act, (Act 1 of <strong>2010</strong>), no significant changes in the level of<br />

government grant funding are expected over the forthcoming 3 financial years.<br />

14. Other income<br />

- -<br />

Cemetry 6 842 5 000<br />

Agency fees - 270 368<br />

Service charges 14 255 7 806<br />

Pound Fees 106 090 100 500<br />

Pound Auction Charges 349 791 54 556<br />

Toilet fees 50 666 22 451<br />

Sports field 8 904 581<br />

Tender receipts 74 549 88 924<br />

Business Licences 4 120 -<br />

Other income - Political Party 12 203 -<br />

Equipment here 3 435 -<br />

Chair hire 4 747 -<br />

635 602 550 186<br />

31


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

15. General expenses<br />

Advertising 224 722 165 362<br />

Auditors remuneration 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

Bank charges 208 149 184 242<br />

Cleaning 156 546 14 158<br />

Consulting and professional fees 3 622 137 615 397<br />

Legal expenses 1 106 239 1 242 276<br />

Conferences and delegations 648 578 149 179<br />

Entertainment 8 708 134 950<br />

Insurance 723 929 253 555<br />

Lease rentals on operating lease 121 975 325 032<br />

Levies 617 798 23 193<br />

Subscription and publication 53 618 1 060<br />

Fuel and oil 1 244 848 1 153 367<br />

Postage and courier 3 537 5 114<br />

Printing and stationery 435 115 364 662<br />

Telephone and fax 1 404 098 1 012 444<br />

Training 1 053 054 1 158 016<br />

Travel - local 27 830 55 601<br />

Uniforms and overalls 247 830 124 445<br />

Membership fees 39 637 154<br />

Other rentals 323 083 286 810<br />

Stocks and material 35 692 68 324<br />

Other expenses 19 283 498 14 806 262<br />

32 962 557 23 420 352<br />

32


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

16. Employee related costs<br />

Employee related costs - Salaries and Wages 24 777 110 20 610 713<br />

Performance and other Bonuses 1 433 672 1 165 939<br />

Employee related costs - Contributions for UIF, Pensions and Medical aids 2 399 219 1 487 522<br />

UIF 22 487 -<br />

SDL 285 591 218 449<br />

Other payroll levies 69 650 8 051<br />

Leave pay provision charge 909 199 119 155<br />

Post-employment benefits - Pension - Defined contribution plan 3 526 128 2 875 009<br />

Travel, motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 535 910 -<br />

Overtime payments 967 863 384 141<br />

Acting allowances 2 618 599 367 440<br />

Car allowance 1 341 254 1 601 572<br />

Housing benefits and allowances 24 468 326 756<br />

Night shift allowance 322 097 1 122 481<br />

Cell phone allowance 310 390 395 602<br />

Payments for Casual Workers 2 746 780 -<br />

Remuneration of municipal manager<br />

42 290 417 30 682 830<br />

Annual Remuneration 596 202 497 083<br />

Performance Bonuses 68 687 43 512<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 192 880 244 881<br />

Remuneration of Chief Finance Officer<br />

857 769 785 476<br />

Annual Remuneration 475 457 365 841<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 -<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 173 386 234 523<br />

Remuneration of Community Services Director<br />

692 126 600 364<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 646<br />

Performance Bonus 43 283 27 979<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 139 604 127 017<br />

Remuneration of Corporate Service Director<br />

719 601 650 642<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 647<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 39 170<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 146 868 135 929<br />

Remuneration of Technical Service Director<br />

726 865 670 746<br />

Annual Remuneration 536 714 495 647<br />

Performance Bonuses 43 283 27 979<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 180 475 160 081<br />

Remuneration for Local Economic Development Director<br />

33<br />

760 472 683 707


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

16. Employee related costs (continued)<br />

Annual Remuneration 503 169 386 459<br />

Performance Bonuses 45 541 -<br />

Travel,motor car, accommodation, subsistence and other allowances 195 661 148 371<br />

17. Remuneration of councillors<br />

744 371 534 830<br />

Executive Council 8 561 691 7 819 192<br />

Councillors 2 315 676 2 438 049<br />

18. Debt impairment<br />

10 877 367 10 257 241<br />

Debt impairment - 1 148 260<br />

Debts impaired 3 406 059 2 819 204<br />

19. Investment revenue<br />

20. Finance costs<br />

3 406 059 3 967 464<br />

Current borrowings 4 197 185 388<br />

21. Auditors' remuneration<br />

Fees 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

22. Contracted services<br />

Red Guard Security 218 255 113 229<br />

23. Grants and subsidies paid<br />

24. Bulk purchases<br />

Electricity 352 225 420 077<br />

Water - 83 574<br />

352 225 503 651<br />

34


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

25. Cash generated from operations<br />

Surplus 13 966 795 16 039 738<br />

Adjustments for:<br />

Loss on sale of assets and liabilities (23 233) (87 307)<br />

Debt impairment 7 062 239 -<br />

Movements in provisions 936 783 1 402 264<br />

Other non-cash items - 105 895<br />

Changes in working capital:<br />

Other receivables from non-exchange transactions (6 623 095) 402 315<br />

Consumer debtors (6 958 646) (1 550 060)<br />

Trade and other payables from exchange transactions 5 749 765 2 968 325<br />

VAT 821 644 8 097 317<br />

Unspent conditional grants and receipts - 18 274<br />

26. Related parties<br />

14 932 252 27 396 761<br />

`<br />

Relationships<br />

Councilor - Mr. WN Mdwayingana<br />

Previous Mayor - Mr. S. Plata<br />

Councilor - Mr M. Yamile<br />

Mr Z. Shasha - Municipal Manager<br />

Ms K. Vimbayo - Executive Mayor<br />

Mr. T. Totongwana - Assistant Manager Supply Chain Manager<br />

Ms Bekebu - Office Manager for the Office of the Municipal Manager<br />

Mrs N Nkuhlu - Corporate Service Manager<br />

Ms NF Kopman - Councilor<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> bought 10 sheeps to the amount of<br />

R10,000<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> sold the car that was used by the<br />

previous Mayor to Mr S. Plata at a price of R75,000<br />

(which was less than a market price of R120,000)<br />

after the Mayor's term in office had expired. Council<br />

resolution was obtained and the council approved the<br />

sale.<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> bought 10 sheeps to the amount of<br />

R10,000<br />

The following personnel share the same surname<br />

with the Municipal Manager:<br />

1. Mr M. Shasha - Councilor<br />

2. Mrs Shasha - Store controller<br />

Ms M Vimbayo - sister to the Mayor works as a<br />

security officer within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mrs S. Totongwana, Assistant Supply Chain<br />

Manager's wife works as a SCM officer within the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Ms S. Bekebu daugter to Ms Bekebu works as an<br />

Intern for the Finance department at the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Mr S Mahlati a son to Mrs Nkuhlu works within the<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Ms Vuyokazi Kopman works within the <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Compensation to accounting officer and other key management<br />

Short-term employee benefits 4 501 205 -<br />

Post-employment benefits - Pension - Defined contribution plan 2 505 117 367 440<br />

27. Irregular expenditure<br />

7 006 322 367 440<br />

Add: Irregular Expenditure - current year 1 031 617 15 600 000<br />

Less: Amounts condoned (1 031 617) (15 600 000)<br />

- -<br />

Details of irregular expenditure condoned<br />

Condoned by (condoning authority)<br />

Ntlakotlaza Travel Agency Council Resolution dated 30 June <strong>2011</strong> 1 031 617<br />

35


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

28. Deviation from supply chain management regulations<br />

Paragraph 12(1)(d)(i) of Government gazette No. 27636 issued on 30 May 2005 states that a supply chain management policy<br />

must provide for the procurement of goods and services by way of a competitive bidding process.<br />

Paragraph 36 of the same gazette states that the accounting officer may dispense with the official procurement process in<br />

certain circumstances, provided that he records the reasons for any deviations and <strong>report</strong>s them to the next meeting of the and<br />

includes a note to the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements.<br />

29. Commitments<br />

Authorised capital expenditure<br />

Approved and contracted for<br />

Infrastructure 11 521 067 32 951 205<br />

Community - 4 216 533<br />

Buildings - 4 237 074<br />

Other - 3 201 360<br />

11 521 067 44 606 172<br />

Approved but not yet contracted for<br />

Infrastructure 7 819 700 1 444 181<br />

Operating leases - as lessee (expense)<br />

Minimum lease payments due<br />

- within one year 178 828 162 571<br />

- in second to fifth year inclusive 256 133 232 848<br />

434 961 395 419<br />

Operating lease payments represent rentals payable by the municipality for certain of its office properties. Leases are<br />

negotiated for an average term of seven years and rentals are fixed for an average of three years. No contingent rent is<br />

payable.<br />

Operating leases - as lessor (income)<br />

Minimum lease payments due<br />

- within one year 148 830 135 300<br />

Operating Leases consists of the following:<br />

Certain of the municipality's land and building are held to generate rental income. Lease agreements are non-cancellable and<br />

have terms of 5 years. There are no contigent rents receivable.<br />

30. Contingencies<br />

Contingent Liability<br />

Claim for default 2 121 174 2 121 174<br />

The <strong>Municipality</strong> is being sued by the Municipal Councilors Pension Fund for the default of contribution payment. Should<br />

Council be unsuccessful in defending the claim, there is a possibility that the claim will be settled from Equitable share.<br />

36


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

31. Risk management<br />

Financial risk management<br />

The municipality’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate<br />

risk, cash flow interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.<br />

Liquidity risk<br />

The municipality’s risk to liquidity is a result of the funds available to cover future commitments. The municipality manages<br />

liquidity risk through an ongoing review of future commitments and credit facilities.<br />

The information below analyses the municipality’s financial liabilities and net-settled derivative financial liabilities into relevant<br />

maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the statement of financial position to the contractual maturity date. The<br />

amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. Balances due within 12 months equal their<br />

carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.<br />

Later than one month and not later than one year (<strong>2011</strong>: R349,092) and Later than one year and not later than twenty years<br />

(<strong>2011</strong>: R9 343 428)<br />

Later than one month and not later than one year (<strong>2010</strong>: R121,795) and Later than one year and not later than twenty years<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>: R3,524,429)<br />

Interest rate risk<br />

As the municipality has no significant interest-bearing assets, the municipality's income and operating cash flows are<br />

substantially independent of changes in market interest rates.<br />

The municipality's interest rate risk arises from long term borrowings. Borrowings issued at fixed rates exposes the municipality<br />

to fair value interest rate risk.<br />

At year end, financial instruments exposed to interest rate risk were as follows:<br />

`<br />

Financial instrument <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Call deposits 2 405 299 2 399 860<br />

Development Bank of South Africa - Interest on a Loan 349 092 121 795<br />

32. Going concern<br />

We draw attention to the fact that at 30 June <strong>2011</strong>, the municipality had accumulated surplus of R 14 014 134 and that the<br />

municipality's total liabilities exceed its assets by R 66 452 219.<br />

The <strong>annual</strong> financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting policies applicable to a going concern. This<br />

basis presumes that funds will be available to finance future operations and that the realisation of assets and settlement of<br />

liabilities, contingent obligations and commitments will occur in the ordinary course of business.<br />

33. Additional disclosure in terms of Municipal Finance Management Act<br />

Contributions to organised local government<br />

Current year subscription / fee 617 798 212 435<br />

Amount paid - current year (617 798) (130 834)<br />

Audit fees<br />

- 81 601<br />

Amount paid - current year 1 371 936 1 276 749<br />

37


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

33. Additional disclosure in terms of Municipal Finance Management Act (continued)<br />

PAYE and UIF<br />

Opening balance - 276 681<br />

Current year subscription / fee 2 222 905 4 273 147<br />

Amount paid - current year - (4 332 816)<br />

2 222 905 217 012<br />

The balance represents PAYE and UIF deducted from the June <strong>2011</strong> and June <strong>2010</strong> payroll. These amounts were paid during<br />

July <strong>2011</strong> and July <strong>2010</strong> respectively.<br />

Pension and Medical Aid Deductions<br />

Current year subscription / fee - (8 838 036)<br />

Amount paid - current year - 8 838 036<br />

VAT<br />

- -<br />

VAT receivable 1 390 023 2 211 667<br />

VAT output payables and VAT input receivables are shown in note .<br />

All VAT returns have been submitted by the due date throughout the year.<br />

34. Utilisation of Long-term liabilities reconciliation<br />

Long-term liabilities raised 349 092 -<br />

Long-term liabilities have been utilized in accordance with the Municipal Finance Management Act. Sufficient cash has been<br />

set aside to ensure that long-term liabilities can be repaid on redemption date.<br />

35. Intangible assets<br />

Computer software, internally<br />

generated<br />

Cost /<br />

Valuation<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Accumulated Carrying value Cost /<br />

amortisation<br />

Valuation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

Accumulated Carrying value<br />

amortisation<br />

and<br />

accumulated<br />

impairment<br />

58 037 - 58 037 - - -<br />

36. Current portion of borrowings<br />

At fair value through surplus or deficit<br />

DBSA Loan - Current portion transferred to current liability<br />

Terms and conditions<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

- -<br />

Current liabilities<br />

Fair value through surplus or deficit 349 092 121 795<br />

38


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Notes to the Annual Financial Statements<br />

Figures in Rand <strong>2011</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

36. Current portion of borrowings (continued)<br />

- -<br />

349 092 121 795<br />

37. Other revenue<br />

Other income 635 602 550 186<br />

38. Reconciliation between budget and statement of financial performance<br />

Reconciliation of budget surplus/deficit with the surplus/deficit in the statement of financial performance:<br />

Adjusted for:<br />

Gain on the sale of assets 23 233 87 307<br />

Deficit / surplus of actual revenue and expenditure in comparison to budget (20 367 392) (11 327 778)<br />

Other (specify) 34 358 293 27 280 205<br />

Net surplus per approved budget 14 014 134 16 039 734<br />

39


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June <strong>2011</strong><br />

40<br />

The supplementary information presented does not form part of the <strong>annual</strong> financial statements and is unaudited


Development Bank of South Africa 3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix A<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Schedule of external loans as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Loan<br />

Number<br />

Redeemable Balance at<br />

30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Received<br />

during the<br />

period<br />

Redeemed<br />

written off<br />

during the<br />

period<br />

Balance at<br />

30 June<br />

<strong>2011</strong><br />

Carrying<br />

Value of<br />

Property,<br />

Plant &<br />

Equip<br />

Other Costs<br />

in<br />

accordance<br />

with the<br />

MFMA<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Loan Stock<br />

Structured loans<br />

Funding facility<br />

Development Bank of South<br />

Africa<br />

DBSA Loan EC102527 30 Sep 2028 3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

Bonds<br />

Other loans<br />

Lease liability<br />

Annuity loans<br />

Government loans<br />

Total external loans<br />

3 646 224 6 046 296 - 9 692 520 - -<br />

Page 41


Analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated depreciation<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix B<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment loss Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Land and buildings<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Community Assets<br />

Page 42


Computers - software & programming - 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

- 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

Intangible assets - 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

- 58 - - - - 58 - - - - - - 58<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix B<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated depreciation<br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment loss Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Heritage assets<br />

Specialised vehicles<br />

Other assets<br />

Total property plant and equipment<br />

Agricultural/Biological assets<br />

Intangible assets<br />

Investment properties<br />

Total<br />

Page 43


Segmental analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated Depreciation<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Page 44<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix C<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment deficit Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Executive & Council/Mayor and<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Council<br />

Finance & Admin/Finance - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Planning and Development/Economic<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Development/Plan<br />

Health/Clinics - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Comm. & Social/Libraries and archives - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Housing - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Public Safety/Police - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Sport and Recreation - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Environmental Protection/Pollution<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Control<br />

Waste Water Management/Sewerage - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Road Transport/Roads - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Water/Water Distribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Other/Air Transport - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Total


- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix C<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental analysis of property, plant and equipment as at 30 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Cost/Revaluation Accumulated Depreciation<br />

Opening Additions Disposals Transfers Revaluations Other changes, Closing Opening Disposals Transfers Depreciation Impairment deficit Closing Carrying<br />

Balance<br />

movements Balance Balance<br />

Balance value<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

Page 45


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix D<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental Statement of Financial Performance for the year ended<br />

Prior Year<br />

Current Year<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

- - - Executive & Council/Mayor and Council - - -<br />

- - - Finance & Admin/Finance - - -<br />

- - - Planning and Development/Economic<br />

- - -<br />

Development/Plan<br />

- - - Health/Clinics - - -<br />

- - - Comm. & Social/Libraries and archives - - -<br />

- - - Housing - - -<br />

- - - Public Safety/Police - - -<br />

- - - Sport and Recreation - - -<br />

- - - Environmental Protection/Pollution<br />

- - -<br />

Control<br />

- - - Waste Water Management/Sewerage - - -<br />

- - - Road Transport/Roads - - -<br />

- - - Water/Water Distribution - - -<br />

- - - Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - -<br />

- - - Other/Air Transport - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Other charges<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - <strong>Municipality</strong> - - -<br />

- - - Municipal Owned Entities - - -<br />

- - - Other charges - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

Page 46


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix D<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Segmental Statement of Financial Performance for the year ended<br />

Prior Year<br />

Current Year<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Actual Actual Surplus<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Income Expenditure /(Deficit)<br />

Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand Rand<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - - - -<br />

- - - Total - - -<br />

Page 47


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Rand Rand Rand Var<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Revenue<br />

Sale of goods - - - - (Explanations to be recorded)<br />

Sale of goods in<br />

- - - -<br />

agricultural activities<br />

Rendering of services - - - -<br />

Rendering of services in<br />

- - - -<br />

agricultural activities<br />

Property rates 3 402 286 - 3 402 286 -<br />

Service charges 376 339 - 376 339 -<br />

Levies - - - -<br />

Property rates - penalties<br />

- - - -<br />

imposed and collection<br />

charges<br />

Sales of housing - - - -<br />

Construction contracts - - - -<br />

Royalty income - - - -<br />

Rental of facilities and 427 566 - 427 566 -<br />

equipment<br />

Interest received (trading) - - - -<br />

Dividends received - - - -<br />

Income from agency 113 025 - 113 025 -<br />

services<br />

Public contributions and<br />

- - - -<br />

donations<br />

Fines 1 256 813 - 1 256 813 -<br />

Licences and permits - - - -<br />

Government grants & 99 032 765 - 99 032 765 -<br />

subsidies<br />

Municipal Revenue UD1 9 720 473 - 9 720 473 -<br />

Municipal Revenue UD2 - - - -<br />

Revenue 1 522 832 - 522 832 -<br />

Revenue 2 692 938 - 692 938 -<br />

Miscellaneous other<br />

- - - -<br />

revenue<br />

Administration and<br />

- - - -<br />

management fees<br />

received<br />

Fees earned - - - -<br />

Commissions received - - - -<br />

Royalties received - - - -<br />

Rental income - - - -<br />

Discount received - - - -<br />

Recoveries - - - -<br />

Other income 1 - - - -<br />

Other income 2 - - - -<br />

Other income 3 - - - -<br />

Other income 635 601 - 635 601 -<br />

Other farming income 1 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 2 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 3 - - - -<br />

Other farming income 4 - - - -<br />

Other farming income - - - -<br />

Government grants - - - -<br />

Interest received -<br />

investment<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 48


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Interest received - other - - - -<br />

Dividends received - - - -<br />

Expenses<br />

116 180 638 - 116 180 638 -<br />

Personnel (42 290 416) - (42 290 416) -<br />

Manufacturing -<br />

- - - -<br />

Employee costs<br />

Remuneration of (10 877 366) - (10 877 366) -<br />

councillors<br />

Administration - - - -<br />

Transfer payments - - - -<br />

Depreciation - - - -<br />

Impairment - - - -<br />

Amortisation - - - -<br />

Impairments - - - -<br />

Reversal of impairments - - - -<br />

Finance costs (4 197) - (4 197) -<br />

Debt impairment (7 062 239) - (7 062 239) -<br />

Collection costs - - - -<br />

Repairs and maintenance<br />

- - - -<br />

- Manufacturing expenses<br />

Repairs and maintenance (8 422 481) - (8 422 481) -<br />

- General<br />

Repairs and maintenance<br />

- - - -<br />

- General<br />

Bulk purchases (352 225) - (352 225) -<br />

Contracted Services (218 255) - (218 255) -<br />

Grants and subsidies paid - - - -<br />

Cost of housing sold - - - -<br />

General Expenses (32 962 560) - (32 962 560) -<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

- - - -<br />

General expenses)<br />

Other (taken out of<br />

General expenses)<br />

- - - -<br />

Other revenue and costs<br />

(102 189 739) - (102 189 739) -<br />

Gain or loss on disposal 23 233 - 23 233 -<br />

of assets and liabilities<br />

Gain or loss on exchange<br />

- - - -<br />

differences<br />

Fair value adjustments - - - -<br />

Gains or losses on<br />

- - - -<br />

biological assets and<br />

agricultural produce<br />

Income from equity<br />

accounted investments<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 49


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(1)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Actual versus Budget(Revenue and Expenditure) for the year ended 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Current year Current year<br />

<strong>2010</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

Act. Bal. Adjusted<br />

budget<br />

Variance<br />

Explanation of Significant Variances<br />

greater than 10% versus Budget<br />

Gain or loss on disposal<br />

- - - -<br />

of non-current assets held<br />

for sale or disposal<br />

groups<br />

Taxation - - - -<br />

Discontinued operations - - - -<br />

23 233 - 23 233 -<br />

Net surplus/ (deficit) for<br />

the year<br />

14 014 132 - 14 014 132 -<br />

Page 50


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix E(2)<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Budget Analysis of Capital Expenditure as at 30 June<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Additions Revised Variance Variance<br />

Budget<br />

Rand Rand Rand %<br />

Explanation of significant<br />

variances from budget<br />

<strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Executive & Council/Mayor and<br />

- - - -<br />

Council<br />

Finance & Admin/Finance - - - -<br />

Planning and<br />

- - - -<br />

Development/Economic<br />

Development/Plan<br />

Health/Clinics - - - -<br />

Comm. & Social/Libraries and<br />

- - - -<br />

archives<br />

Housing - - - -<br />

Public Safety/Police - - - -<br />

Sport and Recreation - - - -<br />

Environmental Protection/Pollution - - - -<br />

Control<br />

Waste Water<br />

- - - -<br />

Management/Sewerage<br />

Road Transport/Roads - - - -<br />

Water/Water Distribution - - - -<br />

Electricity /Electricity Distribution - - - -<br />

Other/Air Transport - - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Municipal Owned Entities<br />

- - - -<br />

Other charges<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

61 159 - (61 159) -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

- - - -<br />

Page 51


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 52 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 53 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


Reason for<br />

delay/withholdi<br />

ng of funds<br />

Did your<br />

municipa<br />

lity comp<br />

ly with<br />

the grant<br />

condition<br />

s in<br />

terms of<br />

grant<br />

framewor<br />

k in the<br />

latest<br />

Division<br />

of<br />

Revenue<br />

Reason for<br />

noncompliance<br />

<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Appendix F<br />

Disclosures of Grants and Subsidies in terms of Section 123 MFMA, 56 of 2003<br />

June <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name of<br />

Grants<br />

Name of<br />

organ of<br />

state or<br />

municipal<br />

entity<br />

Quarterly Receipts Quarterly Expenditure Grants and Subsidies delayed /<br />

withheld<br />

Act<br />

Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Yes/ No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Note: A municipality should provide additional information on how a grant was spent per Vote. This excludes allocations from the Equitable Share.<br />

Section 5 - Page 54 - 17 June 2012 - 02:49 PM


NOTES


NOTES


<strong>Intsika</strong> <strong>Yethu</strong> <strong>Municipality</strong><br />

Privave Bag X 1251 Cofimvaba 5380<br />

201 Main Street Cofimvaba<br />

Tel: 047 874 8700<br />

Fax: 047 874 0010<br />

Email:info@intsikayethu.gov.za<br />

Customer Care line: 0860 042281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!