25.11.2014 Views

Fibre orientation and related head-box optimization systems

Fibre orientation and related head-box optimization systems

Fibre orientation and related head-box optimization systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation <strong>and</strong> Related<br />

Head<strong>box</strong> Optimization Systems<br />

Jari Hämäläinen<br />

Centre of Computational ti Engineering i <strong>and</strong> Integrated t Design (CEID)<br />

Lappeenranta University of Technology (LUT)<br />

Lappeenranta, Finl<strong>and</strong>


<strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

Basic fibrous structure of the paper sheet is<br />

formed at the wet end of a paper machine -<br />

<strong>head</strong><strong>box</strong> <strong>and</strong> forming section<br />

<strong>Fibre</strong> <strong>orientation</strong> (angle <strong>and</strong> anisotropy)<br />

determines the dimensional stability of the paper<br />

Velocity gradients align fibres whereas turbulence<br />

makes <strong>orientation</strong> more r<strong>and</strong>om<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

2


<strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation, its Anisotropy<br />

<strong>and</strong> dCDA Angle Profile<br />

−<br />

<strong>Fibre</strong> <strong>orientation</strong> distribution in each location<br />

−<br />

The average fibre <strong>orientation</strong> angle profile in cross<br />

direction (CD) of a paper machine<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

3


Modelling of <strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation<br />

Probability bilit Distribution ib ti (FOPD)<br />

J/W=0.9<br />

(drag)<br />

J/W=1.0<br />

(“tasaperä”)<br />

J/W=1.1<br />

1<br />

(rush)<br />

J=Jet speed<br />

W=wire speed<br />

Niskanen, Hämäläinen (2011), NPPRJ (in press)<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid 4


CFD-based Optimization for<br />

<strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation ti Angle Profiles<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

Optimal shape design of the tapered <strong>head</strong>er to get<br />

even flow distribution<br />

Optimal control of the slice opening to avoid CD<br />

velocities in the jet<br />

Based on depth-averaged NS equations<br />

Software tools developed to industry<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

5


HOC Software<br />

Step 1. Identification<br />

Step 2. Correction<br />

Input:<br />

Measured fiber<br />

<strong>orientation</strong> profile<br />

Result:<br />

Optimized<br />

fiber <strong>orientation</strong><br />

HOC correction:<br />

Slice opening<br />

correction<br />

HOC identification:<br />

The corresponding<br />

flow conditions<br />

Input:<br />

The flow conditions<br />

from Step 1.<br />

Tammenoja (2009), Results Pulp&Paper (Metso publication)<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

6


HOC Software<br />

Et Extremely Fast tCFDMdl<br />

Model<br />

Step 1: identification<br />

Step 2: correction<br />

CFD model inside HOC software:<br />

− 2D, laminar, depth-averaged<br />

− 5 000 elements (stabilized FEM)<br />

− CPU time is 5 seconds<br />

3D CFD (ANSYS-CFX):<br />

− 3D, turbulent, free jet<br />

− 2-3 million cells<br />

− CPU time is 1 hour<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

7


HOC Software<br />

Mill Example A<br />

[°]<br />

Orienta ation angle<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

-2.0<br />

-4.0<br />

-6.0<br />

-8.0 80<br />

-10.0<br />

-12.0<br />

Before <strong>optimization</strong><br />

After <strong>optimization</strong><br />

CD position<br />

• Max‐Min <strong>orientation</strong> range = 20 degrees before <strong>optimization</strong><br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

8


HOC Software<br />

Mill example B<br />

8,0<br />

Before <strong>optimization</strong><br />

After <strong>optimization</strong><br />

6,0<br />

Orientation<br />

n angle [° °]<br />

40 4,0<br />

2,0<br />

0,0<br />

-2,0<br />

-4,0<br />

-6,0<br />

-8,0<br />

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1<br />

Normalized CD position<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

9


More than 50 paper machine<br />

<strong>head</strong><strong>box</strong>es optimized i so far<br />

Avikainen, Hämäläinen, Tarvainen (2010), NPPRJ, 25(4)<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

10


Mod del complexity<br />

Conclusion: Different Modelling<br />

Approaches for Different Purposes<br />

<strong>Fibre</strong><br />

<strong>orientation</strong><br />

− One-phase model (pure water)<br />

− Meter-scale phenomena in<br />

<strong>head</strong><strong>box</strong><br />

− Routine CFD analyses<br />

Flocculation<br />

− Rheological model (effective medium)<br />

− Head losses in pipes, stock<br />

preparation processes, MC,..<br />

− No large concentration variations<br />

−<br />

−<br />

Passive scalar (one-way coupling)<br />

− Dilute suspensions<br />

− <strong>Fibre</strong> <strong>orientation</strong> probability distr.<br />

Two-phase flow (two-way coupling)<br />

− Carrying phase (water) <strong>and</strong><br />

dispersed phase (fibres or flocs)<br />

h<strong>and</strong>led separately<br />

− Concentration variations, slip<br />

velocity between the phases,...<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid 11<br />

"Model reality"


References e e <strong>and</strong> Acknowledgements<br />

e −<br />

−<br />

−<br />

<strong>Fibre</strong> Orientation Probability Distribution (FOPD) modelling<br />

− Doctoral theses by T. Hämäläinen (2008) <strong>and</strong> H. Niskanen (2011)<br />

− Niskanen et al., IJMF (2011)<br />

− Hämäläinen et al., J.Eng.Math. (2011)<br />

− Niskanen, Hämäläinen, NPPRJ (in press)<br />

− Other authors from KTH, UBC, etc.<br />

CFD-based Optimization<br />

− Hämäläinen et al. in “Optimization <strong>and</strong> Computational Fluid<br />

Dynamics”, Thevenin, Janiga (2008)<br />

− Avikainen et al., NPPRJ (2010)<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

− CFD-based <strong>optimization</strong> software tools have been developed since<br />

1995 at University of Jyväskylä, VTT, Metso (Valmet) <strong>and</strong> Numerola<br />

− Thanks to Paper Physics Group at University of Eastern Finl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

Kuopio for the results of FOPD modelling in 2004-20112011<br />

Nancy, 13-14 October, 2011 www.lut.fi/ceid<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!