Assessing delinquent attributions and planning interventions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Differences between low-risk and high-risk delinquents LOW-RISK HIGH-RISK ANTISOCIAL TENDENCIES THOUGHTLESSNESS SITUATON PERSONAL FRUSTRATION ANTISOCIAL PEERS POVERTY AND MATERIAL GAIN DRUGS ALCOHOL
LEVEL OF RISK DELINQUENT ATTRIBUTIONS HIGH-RISK Commit various criminal offences, from small delicts to serious criminal acts (a lot of risk behaviour, property and violence offences and drug offences). MODERATE-RISK Commit small delicts, different risk behaviours and property offences. LOW-RISK Commit only small delicts and risk behaviour. 1. Drugs 2. Antisocial tendencies 3. Poverty and material gain 4. Antisocial peers 5. Alcohol 6. Personal frustration 1. Thoughtlessness 2. Antisocial tendencies 3. Antisocial peers 4. Personal frustration 5. Situation 1. Poor family relationships 2. Alcohol 3. Situation
Page 1 and 2: Assessing delinquent attributions a
Page 3 and 4: Risk/Need Factors: The Central Eigh
Page 5 and 6: Delinquent Attribution Scale DAS-J
Page 7 and 8: Weiner’s attribution theory • W
Page 9 and 10: Weiner’s attribution theory INTER
Page 11 and 12: 2nd step - Generating item pool 1.
Page 13 and 14: 4th step - Item reduction steps 1.
Page 15 and 16: Sample • N=335 male juvenile deli
Page 17 and 18: Delinquent Attribution Scale Factor
Page 19 and 20: Differences in delinquent attributi
Page 21: Differences in delinquent attributi
Page 25 and 26: Implications for planning intervent

Assessing delinquent attributions and planning interventions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?