List of Case Studies on Strategy - Case Catalogue IV
List of Case Studies on Strategy - Case Catalogue IV
List of Case Studies on Strategy - Case Catalogue IV
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
36<br />
Restructuring estructuring T TTurnaround<br />
T urnaround Strategies<br />
Strategies<br />
Alliance; AT Kearney and Tower Perrin;<br />
Loss-making mega c<strong>on</strong>tracts; Incompetent<br />
managers and poor decisi<strong>on</strong>s; General<br />
Motors; Structural problems and cultural<br />
clashes; Computer services and s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tware;<br />
Turnaround specialist divestments and spin<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fs.<br />
Siemens: The Challenges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Leadership Change<br />
After 12 years at the helm <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> affairs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Siemens AG, Heinrich v<strong>on</strong> Pierer, who was<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Germany’s top managers<br />
and was credited with transforming the<br />
157-year-old electr<strong>on</strong>ics and electrical<br />
engineering c<strong>on</strong>glomerate into a powerful<br />
global player, stepped down from the chief<br />
executive positi<strong>on</strong> in January 2005. In<br />
place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Heinrich v<strong>on</strong> Pierer, Klaus<br />
Kleinfeld, CEO (Chief Executive Officer)<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Siemens’ US unit, was appointed as the<br />
new CEO <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the company. Though the<br />
company was in a good financial state,<br />
some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its prominent business units like<br />
the mobile handset unit and Siemens<br />
Transportati<strong>on</strong> Systems were incurring<br />
heavy losses.<br />
Pedagogical Objectives<br />
• To understand the leadership styles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Heinrich v<strong>on</strong> Pierer and Klaus Kleinfeld<br />
• To discuss as to which approach would<br />
be adopted by Kleinfeld, the ‘American’<br />
approach or the c<strong>on</strong>sensus-driven<br />
German management style in turning<br />
around Siemens AG.<br />
Industry Not Applicable<br />
Reference No. RTS0058<br />
Year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pub. 2005<br />
Teaching Note Not Available<br />
Struc.Assig. Not Available<br />
keywords<br />
Siemens; Klaus Kleinfeld; Heinrich v<strong>on</strong><br />
Pierer; ‘Top’ or ‘time-optimised<br />
processes’; 10-point Programme; Siemens<br />
under Heinrich v<strong>on</strong> Pierer; Operati<strong>on</strong><br />
2003; Siemens Management System; USmanagement<br />
style; Siemens Transportati<strong>on</strong><br />
Systems; Telecommunicati<strong>on</strong>s unit;<br />
Medical soluti<strong>on</strong>s; Leadership change;<br />
American leadership style; Challenges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
leadership change.<br />
Sara Lee Corporati<strong>on</strong>: Brenda C<br />
Barnes’ Restructuring Strategies<br />
Sara Lee is a global manufacturer and<br />
marketer <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> high-quality, high-pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ile<br />
branded c<strong>on</strong>sumer products. But the<br />
company had been recording flat growth<br />
since the early 1990s. C<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />
restructuring to revive its fortunes had<br />
failed. In February 2005, its new CEO<br />
www.ibscdc.org<br />
(Chief Executive Officer) Brenda Barnes<br />
announced a major restructuring strategy.<br />
Pedagogical Objectives<br />
• To highlight the diversificati<strong>on</strong><br />
strategies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sara Lee, by shifting<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sumer preference towards low price<br />
and low-calorie foods, and increasing the<br />
trend <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> private label brands<br />
• To understand the reas<strong>on</strong>s for the failure<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sara Lee’s previous restructurings and<br />
its future challenges.<br />
Industry Food and Apparel<br />
Reference No. RTS0057<br />
Year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pub. 2005<br />
Teaching Note Not Available<br />
Struc.Assig. Not Available<br />
keywords<br />
Sara Lee Corporati<strong>on</strong>; Restructuring<br />
strategies; Diversificati<strong>on</strong> strategies;<br />
Brenda C Barnes; Branding strategies;<br />
Brand portfolio; Brand extensi<strong>on</strong>; Apparel<br />
industry; Food and beverage industry; Loss<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> focus <strong>on</strong> key brands; Huge portfolio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
brands; C<strong>on</strong>sumer behaviour; Global<br />
c<strong>on</strong>glomerate; High-quality branded<br />
products; C<strong>on</strong>tinuous restructuring<br />
programmes.<br />
Southwest Airlines: The Changing<br />
Cost Structure and Corporate<br />
Culture<br />
Southwest Airlines, the largest domestic<br />
passenger airline with the highest market<br />
capitalisati<strong>on</strong> in the US airline industry,<br />
has been the <strong>on</strong>ly airline in American<br />
history to have recorded pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>its for 32<br />
c<strong>on</strong>secutive years since its incepti<strong>on</strong> in<br />
1971. Southwest relied <strong>on</strong> a unique business<br />
model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘low cost – no frills – high<br />
customer service’ and leveraged its human<br />
resources effectively to achieve<br />
extraordinary success. Southwest had been<br />
in the top ten list <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> FORTUNE’s Most<br />
Admired Companies every year since 1998.<br />
Southwest had sustained the success and its<br />
positi<strong>on</strong> even when the whole airline<br />
industry plunged into losses after the 9/11<br />
terrorist attacks and also withstood the<br />
competiti<strong>on</strong> from a horde <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> airlines, which<br />
tried to replicate its strategies and business<br />
model. But since 2002, Southwest also had<br />
been caught up with the general troubles<br />
associated with the other airlines – higher<br />
cost structure, changing c<strong>on</strong>sumer attitude,<br />
infrastructure bottlenecks, and changing<br />
corporate culture.<br />
Pedagogical Objectives<br />
• To understand (1) the evoluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Southwest as successful airline in<br />
America (2) The business model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Southwest Airlines (3) the strategic and<br />
competitive advantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Southwest<br />
Airlines (4) the leadership <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Herb<br />
Kelleher (5) and the employee<br />
empowerment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Southwest Airlines in<br />
achieving success in the highly<br />
competitive Airlines industry<br />
• To discuss the changing cost structure<br />
and corporate culture <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Southwest<br />
Airlines.<br />
Industry Airlines<br />
Reference No. RTS0056<br />
Year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pub. 2005<br />
Teaching Note Available<br />
Struc.Assig. Available<br />
keywords<br />
Southwest Airlines; Leading low-cost<br />
airline; FORTUNE’s most admired<br />
companies; ‘Triple Crown’ award; Herb<br />
Kelleher; Strategic advantages; Business<br />
model; Hub-and-spoke system; Point-topoint<br />
airline network; Corporate culture;<br />
The Southwest Airlines way; Competitive<br />
advantage; Lowest cost structure; LUV<br />
airline; Changing employee attitude.<br />
NVIDIA: The Graphic<br />
Chipmaker’s Turnaround<br />
<strong>Strategy</strong><br />
NVIDIA Corporati<strong>on</strong> (NVIDIA), a global<br />
leader in manufacturing graphic<br />
processors, failed to deliver its most<br />
ambitious graphic processing unit, ‘NV30’,<br />
to the market as per schedule in 2002.<br />
Besides, NVIDIA’s tussle with Micros<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t<br />
and an accusati<strong>on</strong> against NVIDIA’s<br />
employees <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> insider trading added to the<br />
company’s woes. From $11 billi<strong>on</strong> in<br />
January 2002, NVIDIA’s market value fell<br />
to $1 billi<strong>on</strong> by October 2002. However,<br />
having learnt from its mistakes and with a<br />
focused turnaround plan, NVIDIA was back<br />
into its leadership status by early 2005.<br />
Pedagogical Objective<br />
• To highlight NVDIA’s turnaround<br />
strategy to emerge as a leader in the<br />
global chip market.<br />
Industry Graphics, Video Chips and<br />
Boards<br />
Reference No. RTS0055<br />
Year <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pub. 2005<br />
Teaching Note Not Available<br />
Struc.Assig. Not Available<br />
keywords<br />
NVIDIA; NVIDIA’s GPU (Graphic<br />
Processing Unit); NVIDIA’s product cycle;<br />
Worldwide graphic chip market;<br />
Micros<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t’s Xbox; NVIDIA’s price dispute<br />
with Micros<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t; NVIDIA’s challenges;<br />
NVIDIA’s turnaround plan; Jen-Hsun<br />
Huang; NVIDIA’s competitors; NVIDIA’s<br />
market share; Insider trading.