Tổng hợp hạt nhân lạnh, Tesla, Năng lượng tự do = Giả khoa học ? / Cold fusion, Tesla, Free energy = Pseudo science?

Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Meet Academic
Protocol 3: Peer Review System
• ■ Reduced chance for grant/promotion if contradicts above root
assumptions even though unrelated to research theme, it is particularly
important to endorse man made exclusive catastrophic CO2 global
warming no matter what the research is(this automatically cuts out funding
from good portion of torsion field/electric weather influence, cosmic ray -
troposphere relation, general global climate research area), Differs in nonwestern
nations(Russia, Brazil+, eg China’s Montagnier funding), or military
or space agency in West(seems usually classified)
• • Self-endorsed circular logic; underfunded experimental research success &
theory, even validated by many "fringe groups" & non mainstream journal
peer reviews, is blocked from mainstream peer review without Western
corporate-NGO/media/gov’ back up, but mainstream rejects it, reasoning “it
lacks peer review”,
• • This combines with occasional selective failure only peer reviews when
claims are “proven false” & claimers lose funding/job, by only based on
replication failures & ignored all successes(Mi Schiff+). This stops most
researches, but even failure process itself is dubious; eg. Firmly alleged data
change to block LENR funding(Mallove+)
192
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada