Tổng hợp hạt nhân lạnh, Tesla, Năng lượng tự do = Giả khoa học ? / Cold fusion, Tesla, Free energy = Pseudo science?

What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 5
• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like...
J- When finally several mainstream ins2tu2ons start accep2ng tech validity, others
in mainstream would use another favorite: it is a tech with “controversial claims”,
and widely labeled such(as adjec8ve) by main media/NGO/gov't, K- End result:
majority stays with conven8onal energy for extra 10+yrs, Large corporate would
install LENR but not involving execu2ves officially, instead floor level people(or
make it completely unofficial: employee non disclosure agreement or even
"na2onal security" label might kick in). L- Then gradually shiQ western social
engineering mode from model β to α: i.e. transi2on to co-thriving mode.
• But this model might fail; Europe might rebels(eg AIIB+), Russia/China/BRICS might
have different preference on "reality projec2on"(BRICS Bank, GMO ban, UGRG,
Space+), There are too many official mainstream scien2st witnesses. Also Energy,
unlike medical tech, is too instantly obvious not to no2ce effects etc.
• 5- Free energy use at remote mines/marine/military/space(e.g. Boeing: Mike
Gamble), 6-Media should endorse 3-15% power save on Car/Residen8al Power
Factor Correc2on for Ac2ve Power(MP-R fuel, Kvar.com, EnergyMizer Residen>al
+)(: actual decreased use of electricity, not just Reac8ve power saving only by
decreased supply side waste electricity with conven8onal PFC device), also water
emulsion/HHO addi2ve use at gov't grant level, 7-Sell disrup2ve proprietary tech
as “slightly efficient”(Bloom, Enstroj, Keppe+), 8-Commercialize mainstream
accepted 24hr Solar Infrared Harves2ng. If too disrup2ve, allow only residen2al
use but permit unlimited net metering(power trade-in for future use). 340