23.12.2014 Views

Peta Hughes - The Royal Marsden

Peta Hughes - The Royal Marsden

Peta Hughes - The Royal Marsden

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Appropriateness of two week<br />

rule referrals for skin cancer<br />

<strong>Peta</strong> <strong>Hughes</strong><br />

Clinical Nurse Specialist - Skin & Melanoma<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong> NHS Foundation Trust<br />

1


2<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

An audit was undertaken at <strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

(TRM) to determine the appropriateness of two week<br />

wait referrals for a suspected skin cancer (MM/ SCC).


3<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Aims & objectives<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim of the audit was to:<br />

1. Evaluate appropriateness of referrals<br />

2. Determine the demographics of patients referred by<br />

two week rule to TRM<br />

3. Evaluate the breach rate for referrals<br />

4. Evaluate the take up/use of of SWLCN referral<br />

proforma<br />

5. Determine the pick up rate of skin cancer


4<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Method<br />

1. 20 sets of notes were identified: 10 in Fulham Rd<br />

and 10 in Sutton<br />

2. Timeframe: 6-month period from September 2011<br />

3. A piloted spreadsheet (audit proforma) was<br />

populated


5<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

To be completed with audit proformas template


6<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Results<br />

1. Appropriateness:<br />

– Appropriate: 17/20 [85%]<br />

– Inappropriate reasons: 1 benign, 2 BCC & not offering<br />

diagnosis (and no biopsy)<br />

– If no diagnosis offered = ‘inappropriate’: therefore 14/20<br />

[70%] however one of these turned out to be melanoma,<br />

therefore appropriate, two others without diagnoses were not<br />

biopsied therefore possibly ‘inappropriate’<br />

– If GPs are given benefit of doubt, appropriateness: 75-85%<br />

– Location of lesion not stated: 2/20 [10%]


7<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Results (continued)<br />

2. Demographics:<br />

– F: 7 & M: 12 (1 not identified)<br />

– Age range: 29-92<br />

3. Breach rate:<br />

– 3/20 [15%]: all due to DNA or cancellation by patient<br />

4. SWLCN proforma:<br />

– Proforma used: 7/20 [35%](TRM is excluded on one version)<br />

– Alternative forms: 3/20 [15%]<br />

– Referral letter (stating TWR): 9/20 [45%]<br />

– From private clinic: 1/20 [5%]


8<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Results (continued)<br />

5. Pick-up rate (consultant diagnostic breakdown):<br />

– SCC/ MM: 6/19 [32%] (confirmed with histology: 3/19 [16%])<br />

– BCC: 2/19 [11%] (confirmed with histology: 2/19 [11%])<br />

– Total biopsies: 11/19 [58%], showing 5 cancers [26%]<br />

– Total skin cancers (confirmed): 6/20 [30%], one was for<br />

squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma (referred from private<br />

practice and already biopsied)


9<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Conclusion<br />

1. Referral proformas for suspected skin cancers to TRM are<br />

used less than SWCLN as a whole [35% vs. 59%]<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> appropriateness of referral is not particularly high when<br />

compared with SWLCN [75-85% vs. 82-96%]<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> pick-up rate for skin cancer is relatively good [26% vs.<br />

25%]<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> breach rate for this small sample was relatively high [15%<br />

vs. 9%]


10<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Marsden</strong><br />

Action plan<br />

1. Collate available proformas and decide on most<br />

effective. Make revisions as needed (via TWG or<br />

London Alliance)<br />

2. Agree with PCTs/commissioning groups how to<br />

make best use of proformas, and the TWR service,<br />

for skin cancer (via TWG/ London Alliance)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!