AMBIENCE LIMITED - Cmlinks.com
AMBIENCE LIMITED - Cmlinks.com
AMBIENCE LIMITED - Cmlinks.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTION II: RISK FACTORS<br />
An investment in equity shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider all the information<br />
in this Draft Red Herring Prospectus, including the risks and uncertainties described below, before making an<br />
investment in our Equity Shares. You should read this section in conjunction with the sections titled “Our<br />
Business” and “Management‘s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”<br />
on pages 92 and 254, respectively, as well as the other financial and statistical information contained in this<br />
Draft Red Herring Prospectus. Unless otherwise stated in the risk factors set forth below, we are not in a<br />
position to quantify the financial or other risks mentioned therein. If any one, or some <strong>com</strong>bination, of the<br />
following risks were to occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be seriously<br />
harmed, the trading price of the Equity Shares could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.<br />
The risks described below are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that<br />
we currently believe to be immaterial could also have a material adverse effect on our business, results of<br />
operations and financial condition.<br />
Internal Risk Factors and Risks Relating to our Business<br />
1. Our Promoter, Mr. Raj Singh Gehlot and certain of our Directors are involved in criminal<br />
proceedings.<br />
Our promoter, Mr. Raj Singh Gehlot and our Directors, Mr. Dayanand Singh and Mr. Mohan Singh, are<br />
involved in certain criminal proceedings. Following the filing and registration of a first information report, the<br />
State of Delhi filed a charge report before the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi against Mr. Raj Singh<br />
Gehlot, Mr. Dayanand Singh and others alleging the <strong>com</strong>mission of offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1890,<br />
specifically, the fabrication of conveyance documents concerning property no. C-7, Haus Khas Enclave, New<br />
Delhi. The Magistrate, through his order dated July 5, 2007, has framed charges against the accused persons.<br />
The matter is now listed for further proceedings on December 8, 2009. For details see “Outstanding Litigation<br />
and Material Developments” on page 287.<br />
There are also four other criminal proceedings involving Mr. Raj Singh Gehlot. These proceedings <strong>com</strong>prise a<br />
claim for alleged threat to peace and tranquility which has been brought by a private party in relation to a<br />
dispute regarding the ownership of a room at 2/21, Sarvapriya Vihar, New Delhi and claims alleging the<br />
<strong>com</strong>mission of offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1890 relating to cancellation of allotment of spaces at<br />
Ambience Mall, Gurgaon and Ambience Mall, Vasant Kunj. Further, the State of Delhi has registered two first<br />
information reports (“FIRs”) against Mr. Mohan Singh alleging the <strong>com</strong>mission of offences under the Indian<br />
Penal Code, 1890 in relation to a dispute that arose with his neighbor and an accident involving a labourer at the<br />
Ambience Mall, Vasant Kunj. For details see “Outstanding Litigation and Material Developments” on page<br />
287. Any adverse order could have could have an adverse effect on our Company‟s business.<br />
2. Our Company and certain of its Subsidiaries, Promoters and Directors were subjected to search and<br />
seizure operations conducted by the Indian in<strong>com</strong>e tax authorities.<br />
Our Company, certain Subsidiaries, our Promoters (including some individuals constituting our Promoter<br />
Group), certain Group Entities, and certain Directors (namely Mr. Dayanand Singh and Mr. Mohan Singh) (each<br />
a “Person”, and collectively referred to as the “Persons”) were subject to a search operation dated October 10,<br />
2007 by the Deputy Director of In<strong>com</strong>e Tax (“DDIT”) at their respective registered/corporate offices and<br />
residential premises wherein documents, cash and jewellery owned by the Persons were seized. After<br />
<strong>com</strong>pletion of the investigation, each Person has received six notices dated February 2, 2009 from the Deputy<br />
Commissioner of In<strong>com</strong>e Tax (“DCIT”), under section 153A of the IT Act, wherein they were required, within<br />
15 days of service of the notice, to prepare true and correct in <strong>com</strong>e tax returns in respect of assessment years<br />
2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 (including the undisclosed in<strong>com</strong>e). In responses<br />
dated March 12, 2009, each Person replied to the DCIT stating that the returns were in process and requesting a<br />
filing extension in respect thereof. The extension request was denied in a letter from the Assistant Commissioner<br />
of In<strong>com</strong>e Tax (“ACIT”) dated July 7, 2009, and the ACIT issued six additional notices to each Persons<br />
requiring them to furnish the returns for the assessment years mentioned above on or before July 20, 2009.<br />
Accordingly, each Person filed a reply dated July 22, 2009 furnishing the required in<strong>com</strong>e tax returns.<br />
10