Edition One - February - Australian University Sport

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STUDENT GUILD PAGE 030 STUDENT GUILD SPORTING SCHOLARSHIPS 2013 The Student Guild offers up to 10 Sporting Scholarships annually to assist Griffith University Gold Coast students who excel in their chosen sport or within their club on campus. Successful scholarship recipients are expected to promote GUGC sport through club participation and representing the university at Australian University Sport events. Scholarship recipients receive: - One year gym & group exercise membership at Unifitness Health Centre - 100% subsidy for entry fee, accommodation, travel & uniforms for Northern & Australian University Games or Championships in your chosen sport Nominations Due Friday 22 March 2013 See the Student Guild for nomination forms or contact the Sport, Recreation & Clubs Officer p:5552 8450 or e: michelle.brown@griffith.edu.au
CULTURE PAGE 031 Idiots Guide to Rational Debating Skeptics are famous (or perhaps notorious) for meeting in pubs; it just so happens that the idea for this article was first discussed in a pub, with someone I had only just met. I had explained that I was a skeptic but no, I didn’t believe the moon landing was a hoax. No, I didn’t believe that aliens have visited and have abducted people (although I do think, statistically speaking, it is likely that there is a form of intelligent life in our universe – but possibly not in our Milky Way galaxy... but that’s another topic). No, atheism is not a religion – for the record, atheism is like a religion like bald is a hair colour (or atheism is like a religion like abstinence is a sex position *snigger*). No, I am not a climate change skeptic or a Holocaust denier or... well you get the idea. I then explained that about the only thing all us ‘Skeptics’ can agree on, is our distaste for homeopathy. Otherwise, we’re a mix of secularists, agnostics, humanists, atheists, and even the occasional deists. About 2 years ago, I didn’t even know what these terms meant - so don’t worry if I’ve lost you. The point is the next question that arose: If these people are all different, how do you get along The answer is simple: we have rules about how we discuss/ debate our ideas. So next time you want to engage in a discussion with someone, whether it be contentious topic, politics or religion (or something less cliché, like whether naturopathy is harmless or do humans have ethereal souls) – here are some ideas to keep the conversation as mature, unheated and objective as possible. Rule #1: No ad hominem. (This should be a principal rule in relationships too!) • Ad hominem: attacking your opponent’s character or personal traits instead of engaging with their argument. The ad hominem logical fallacy happens so frequently with our politicians that they should be ashamed. When we get emotional in an argument, especially if we know the person well, it can be so tempting to disregard/dismiss what they are saying based on some character flaw. Remember that undermining their argument, does not devalue them as a person. Be specific; your problem is the structure or nature of their argument, and not with them as an individual. This enables diverse people to be friends; or in some cases, meet under the common umbrella as ‘Skeptics’. www.yourlogicalfallacyis.com has examples of this and other fallacies (some of which I discuss later) for those aspiring to be master debaters. Rule #2: Define words during the discussion. • Those with experience in debating know there is nothing worse than the ‘definition debate’. First year university I was subjected to several fake debates in one of my tutorials: all hail group-work... the one that sticks in my memory was the debate regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). It was clear that the group had split into teams early and had not discussed their arguments with the other team, thus: the affirmative team went on about how safe ECT is today, using pictures of hygienic hospital wards and showing results of recent studies with positive improvements in very select cases. The negative team played a video clip from the iconic 1975 film (hint: cuckoo’s nest)... This anecdote is one of my favourites because it describes the fundamental absurdity of arguing using the same term, but each party having a different meaning in mind. During this particular debate, it became clear that the teams actually agreed: old ECT = bad, new ECT = good in select cases. Many times debates arise because people assume the other person understands what they’re arguing about. Never assume. Organised debates often start with a definition of the topic – in the real world, defining the topic is just the tip of the iceberg. Be sure the words you are using are being understood. Rule #3: If there is nothing (no evidence, no idea, no new information) that can change your mind; you haven’t formed an opinion you’ve formed a prejudice. • Science has few fundamental rules, for example; correlation does not imply causation, replication of experiments is essential to theory confirmation, etc. The relevant one here is: science changes and adapts when new technology and ideas provide new evidence. New evidence can change what we know and how we view the world; from the geocentric to heliocentric theory of planets for example. As Skeptics, we have confidence in the process of science in seeking truth – but you don’t need to be a scientist to realise that having a discussion with someone, who insists their view is absolutely right and nothing you (or anyone) could possibly say or do could change their mind, is futile. More futile than resisting the Borg. Instead of being assimilated, you will simply become annoyed with them and they with you. Opinion: A judgment or evaluation based on special knowledge and (usually) given by an expert. Prejudice: preconceived preference or idea OR judgment or evaluation formed beforehand or without knowledge or examination of the facts. Before you get into a discussion with someone, be clear on whether or not they know (or are willing to look at) the facts. Rule #4: Yes, you can agree to disagree. • Opinions differ because our subjective interpretation of the facts will differ. In many cases, Skeptics endlessly debate the ‘grey’ areas where there is ‘no right answer’. In these cases, be prepared to agree to disagree. You aren’t out to ‘convert’ anyone to your way of thinking; you simply want to open the dialogue. As Skeptics, we are willing to share not just our opinion, but the process we engaged in to reach it; the ‘why’ and the ‘how’, rather than just the ‘what’. I personally find it far more interesting to know how you reached your conclusion, than the conclusion itself. Partly because if someone reached their conclusion without much thought or investigation, it’s technically a prejudice (as above). Partly because I deem conclusions following rigorous application of the scientific method as more robust. However, this one doesn’t require you to be a scientist or a Skeptic: it’s just good old common sense. Rule #5: Be a respectful opponent. • The fallacy fallacy: Presuming that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that it is necessarily wrong. Some people are good at debating, and some people aren’t. This doesn’t mean their point of view is necessarily wrong, it simply means they aren’t able to articulate it at that point in tim
Page 1 and 2: GETAMUNGSTIT O’Week Edition Campu
Page 3 and 4: PAGE 03 O’WEEK edition 2013 FROM
Page 5 and 6: Board Members PAGE 05 Kate Delaforc
Page 7 and 8: PAGE 07 3 FEB 18-22 THURSDAY FEB 21
Page 9 and 10: Would you like to share in over $10
Page 11 and 12: PAGE 011 Clean Up Day Sunday 3 Marc
Page 13 and 14: PAGE 013 After all, if you don’t
Page 15 and 16: Your Say PAGE 015 Gillard Suffers D
Page 17 and 18: Student Guild Intercampus Bus Gold
Page 19 and 20: Staff Member Profile JAYIA VIDAL Du
Page 21 and 22: The Student Guild in conjunction wi
Page 23 and 24: PAGE 023 Introducing your new Stude
Page 25 and 26: PAGE 025 NORTHERN UNIGAMES BRISBANE
Page 27 and 28: PAGE Club Sign-on Days 027 MARCH TU
Page 29: PAGE 029 ROWING The Griffith Univer
Page 33 and 34: PAGE 033 POLE FIT A full body worko
Page 35 and 36: LES MILLS PAGE 035 MEGA LAUNCH CLAS
Page 37 and 38: Mind Body Soul PAGE 037 How free br
Page 39 and 40: Buy your books from the Campus Book
Page 41 and 42: Money Saving Tips PAGE 041 Nathan E
Page 43 and 44: PAGE 043 George Mintizis New Campus
Page 45 and 46: What’s HOT - According to Polly P
Page 47 and 48: Recipes Try something different.. J
Page 49 and 50: Movie Tickets ONLY $9.00 AVAILABLE
Page 51 and 52: PAGE 051

Edition One - February - Australian University Sport

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?