26.12.2014 Views

The global financial centres index (GFCI) 3 - Z/Yen

The global financial centres index (GFCI) 3 - Z/Yen

The global financial centres index (GFCI) 3 - Z/Yen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Global Financial Centres Index<br />

Foreword<br />

Michael Snyder<br />

Chairman, Policy and Resources Committee, City of London<br />

<strong>The</strong> Global Financial Centres Index 3 (<strong>GFCI</strong> 3) is the third report produced by the<br />

Z/<strong>Yen</strong> Group for the City of London which ranks <strong>financial</strong> <strong>centres</strong> based on external<br />

benchmarking data and current perceptions of competitiveness. Previous <strong>GFCI</strong><br />

reports, and other City of London commissioned research, such as <strong>The</strong> Impact of<br />

Taxation on Financial Services Business Location Decisions, show that international<br />

<strong>financial</strong> services firms, and the talented staff that they employ, are both highly<br />

mobile and responsive to a range of both market and non-market factors. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

factors are important to policy makers looking to maintain or improve the<br />

competitiveness of their markets.<br />

<strong>GFCI</strong> 3 shows that, as in the case of <strong>GFCI</strong> 1 and <strong>GFCI</strong> 2, London and New York are the<br />

leading <strong>global</strong> <strong>financial</strong> <strong>centres</strong>, with London continuing to be ahead but by a smaller<br />

margin than in the previous report. This reflects as before the excellent access of<br />

London to markets, skilled staff and a proportionate regulatory regime. With the<br />

Financial Services Action Plan being rolled out across Europe we are seeing a<br />

progressive and welcome reduction in market barriers to international <strong>financial</strong><br />

services. In this context, infrastructure and taxation are likely to be even higher on the<br />

list of competitive factors influencing the perceptions of individuals employed in <strong>global</strong><br />

firms. On these measures London’s lead is being squeezed and there is no room for<br />

complacency if we are to safeguard and improve the resilience and competitiveness<br />

of this <strong>financial</strong> centre.<br />

Since the publication of <strong>GFCI</strong> 2, the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market in the<br />

US, the subsequent write down of US mortgage-backed <strong>financial</strong> products, and the<br />

dissemination of the associated credit shock and liquidity crisis through the <strong>global</strong><br />

<strong>financial</strong> system via securitised debt products have shown that international <strong>financial</strong><br />

markets are highly interdependent and strongly linked to the real economy. In this<br />

connection it is also worth noting the increased attention that is being paid to the role<br />

of the emerging markets of China, India and Brazil.<br />

As in previous reports, the evidence gathered in <strong>GFCI</strong> 3 reflects the inputs by <strong>financial</strong><br />

services respondents and I would encourage professionals around the globe to<br />

participate in the ongoing survey at www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/<strong>GFCI</strong><br />

Michael Snyder<br />

City of London<br />

March 2008<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!