26.12.2014 Views

a comparative analysis of louis durey and francis poulenc's settings ...

a comparative analysis of louis durey and francis poulenc's settings ...

a comparative analysis of louis durey and francis poulenc's settings ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

43<br />

The vocal line begins in a line descending by half-steps as if to gesture downward<br />

to the “fine” grasshopper itself. Although the accompaniment is consistent in that every<br />

other measure is uniform, there seem to be two distinct sections in the vocal line: the first<br />

two lines <strong>of</strong> poetry discuss the significance <strong>of</strong> the grasshopper <strong>and</strong> the last two lines<br />

express the poet’s desires to produce substantial/significant poetic output. Pierre Bernac<br />

suggests that the accompanist <strong>and</strong> singer take “an expressive breath after the second bar”<br />

in order to accommodate the contrast. 71<br />

“La Sauterelle” is a very quiet, almost muffled piece. The singer <strong>and</strong> accompanist<br />

begin at a piano dynamic in measures one <strong>and</strong> two. The accompaniment remains at piano<br />

in measures three <strong>and</strong> four while the singer decreases her dynamic to pianissimo. This<br />

effectively imparts a sense <strong>of</strong> hushed intimacy to convey the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the poet’s<br />

aspiration. In the same way, the whispered dynamic serves to convey the humility <strong>and</strong><br />

privacy <strong>of</strong> the poet in divulging his “l<strong>of</strong>ty aspirations.”<br />

























































<br />

71 Pierre Bernac, The Interpretation <strong>of</strong> French Song (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1970), 278.


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!