nanotechnology oversight - Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies
nanotechnology oversight - Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies
nanotechnology oversight - Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28<br />
APPENDIX C: PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE CHANGES IN TSCA<br />
(Detailed c<strong>on</strong>forming provisi<strong>on</strong>s are omitted.)<br />
1. Include nanomaterials as new chemicals.<br />
Add to secti<strong>on</strong> 3(2)(A) the following: “(iii) any<br />
material produced in a form where <strong>on</strong>e or more<br />
dimensi<strong>on</strong>s is less than 100 nanometers and where<br />
physical, chemical, or biological properties differ<br />
significantly from similar materials with the same<br />
chemical identity due to its nanometer structure,<br />
even if such material has the same molecular identity<br />
as a chemical already <strong>on</strong> the inventory, unless a<br />
substantially identical nanomaterial is already <strong>on</strong><br />
the inventory.”<br />
2. Allow EPA to obtain informati<strong>on</strong> to determine<br />
the risk of new chemicals.<br />
Delete secti<strong>on</strong> 5(e)(1)(A)(ii).<br />
Delete secti<strong>on</strong> 5 (e)(1)(C).<br />
3. Remove unrealistic c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong> EPA’s rulemaking<br />
ability.<br />
At the end of the first paragraph of secti<strong>on</strong> 6(a)<br />
delete “using the least burdensome requirements.”<br />
Delete sec<strong>on</strong>d paragraph of secti<strong>on</strong> 6(c)(1) (“If<br />
the Administrator determines that a risk of injury<br />
to health or the envir<strong>on</strong>ment could be eliminated<br />
or reduced to a sufficient extent by acti<strong>on</strong>s taken<br />
under another Federal law … ”).<br />
Delete secti<strong>on</strong> 9 (“Relati<strong>on</strong>ship to Other<br />
Federal Laws”).<br />
Modify the procedural requirements of secti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
6(c)(2) and (3).<br />
Delete secti<strong>on</strong> 19 (c)(B) ( “substantial evidence<br />
in the rulemaking record”).<br />
4. Modify the c<strong>on</strong>straints imposed by the CBI provisi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Add to secti<strong>on</strong> 14(a) a new paragraph: “(5) may<br />
be disclosed to any state government, foreign<br />
nati<strong>on</strong>, or internati<strong>on</strong>al governmental organizati<strong>on</strong><br />
provided that it has safeguards deemed by the<br />
Administrator to be adequate for the protecti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
the informati<strong>on</strong> and subject to such other c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />
as the Administrator may impose.”<br />
Amend secti<strong>on</strong> 14 to require that informati<strong>on</strong><br />
labeled CBI be accompanied by a certificati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
signed by a resp<strong>on</strong>sible official of the submitting<br />
firm, that the c<strong>on</strong>fidentiality is necessary and justifiable<br />
and setting forth the specific and particular<br />
reas<strong>on</strong>s for the c<strong>on</strong>fidentiality.