28.12.2014 Views

view PDF - American Association of Neurological Surgeons

view PDF - American Association of Neurological Surgeons

view PDF - American Association of Neurological Surgeons

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPLETING THE PICTURE<br />

Compensation<br />

2006 2004<br />

Receive a Stipend 50% 33%<br />

More than $3,000 per diem 3% 2%<br />

$2,001–$3,000 per diem 7% 6%<br />

$1,501–$2,000 per diem 7% 8%<br />

$1,001–$1,500 per diem 17% 25%<br />

$751–$1,000 per diem 19% 17%<br />

$501–$750 per diem 7% 11%<br />

$500 or less per diem 13% 17%<br />

Not paid per diem; have another 26%* 16%<br />

compensation arrangement<br />

*Some respondents commented that they included their arrangements <strong>of</strong><br />

employment (such as “employed by hospital”) and salary (such as “part <strong>of</strong><br />

salary package”) in their responses. Percentages are rounded.<br />

Sources: 2006 Data, AANS 2006 Workforce Survey; 2004 Data,<br />

2004 AANS/CNS Neurosurgical Emergency and Trauma Services Survey<br />

Figure 2. Compensation for Neurosurgical On-Call Services<br />

Services Covered<br />

Cover all services 61%<br />

Cranial 48%<br />

Spinal 47%<br />

Trauma 46%<br />

Pediatric 22%<br />

Other 3%<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80<br />

PERCENT<br />

Percentages are rounded. Participants could select more than one response.<br />

Source: AANS 2006 Workforce Survey.<br />

Figure 3. Services Covered by On-Call Neurosurgeons<br />

.<br />

FACILITY TYPE<br />

. Academic Medical Center 38%<br />

.<br />

Community Hospital 59%<br />

Other 6%<br />

. .<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

AGE DISTRIBUTION<br />

35 or Younger 6%<br />

36–45 37%<br />

46–55 36%<br />

56–65 20%<br />

66 or Older 2%<br />

. .<br />

.<br />

.<br />

TRAUMA CENTER DESIGNATION<br />

Level 1 Trauma Center 40%<br />

Level 2 Trauma Center 37%<br />

Level 3 Trauma Center 10%<br />

Other 18%<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

.<br />

YEAR NEUROSURGEONS EXPECT TO<br />

STOP TAKING EMERGENCY CALL<br />

2010 or Sooner* 22%<br />

2011–2015 18%<br />

2016–2020 19%<br />

2021 or Later 19%<br />

Don't Know* 22%<br />

Figure 4. Where On-Call Neurosurgeons Are Practicing<br />

Percentages are rounded. Participants could select more than one<br />

response. Source: AANS 2006 Workforce Survey.<br />

Of the scant six percent <strong>of</strong> neurosurgeons who did not take<br />

emergency call, 48 percent selected as their reason “other,” and the<br />

great majority <strong>of</strong> these respondents specified age-related exemptions<br />

such as recent retirement or senior partner status. Other reasons this<br />

group reported for not taking call included insufficient pay for<br />

emergency services (17 percent), disruption <strong>of</strong> routine practice<br />

schedule (15 percent), lifestyle interference (13 percent), malpractice<br />

insurer’s premium discount for eliminating trauma or other emergency<br />

services (6 percent), and malpractice insurer’s discontinuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> coverage for emergency services (2 percent).<br />

Figure 5. Age Distribution and Year Expected to Stop Taking Call<br />

*Responses <strong>of</strong> those not currently taking call may have been included. Percentages<br />

are rounded. Source: AANS 2006 Workforce Survey.<br />

For neurosurgeons who said they were planning to stop taking<br />

call, the most influential factor was retirement; the great majority <strong>of</strong><br />

those planning to retire said they had intended to do so anyway, but<br />

other factors reported were excessive on-call demands and high malpractice<br />

insurance premiums. The second-ranked factor for those<br />

planning to discontinue call was lifestyle interference, followed by<br />

insufficient pay for emergency services, disruption <strong>of</strong> routine practice<br />

schedule, and “other”unspecified factors. All <strong>of</strong> these factors outranked<br />

the insurer’s elimination <strong>of</strong> malpractice insurance coverage<br />

for call services or insurance premium reduction in return for elim-<br />

10 Vol. 15, No. 2 • 2006 • AANS Bulletin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!