view PDF - American Association of Neurological Surgeons

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The talk on Capitol Hill is that the House of Representatives may take up this issue again sometime this summer and the Senate may revisit medical liability reform before the November campaign season gets into full swing. These materials are free of charge and will be shipped directly to your office once the order is placed. Neurosurgeons are encouraged to get an outreach kit and help spread the word about the crisis and our campaign for reform. With your help, DMLR will continue to build its grassroots network, educate patients, and put a stop to medical lawsuit abuse. DMLR also will continue to keep neurosurgeons informed and involved through regular e-mail messages. In addition, neurosurgeons are encouraged to watch for new information and campaign updates on the Protect Patients Now Web site, www.protectpatientsnow.org. Remember, this is a marathon, not a sprint, and all neurosurgeons must get involved and continue to stay involved until we succeed at passing reform legislation. 3 Katie O. Orrico, JD, is director of the AANS/CNS Washington Office, (202) 628-2072, korrico@neurosurgery.org. For Further Information 3 How They Voted: S. 22, Medical Care Access Protection Act of 2006, and S. 23 Healthy Mothers and Healthy Babies Access to Care Act, www.senate.gov > Votes > Roll Call Tables 2006 (109th, 2nd) > Votes 00115 and 00116 3 DMLR’s Patient Outreach Kit, www.pro tectpatientsnow.org > Physicians > Patient Outreach Kit 3 Texas Teaches That Tort Reform Works, page 34 Vol. 15, No. 2 • 2006 • AANS Bulletin 27
C ODING C ORNER G REGORY J. PRZYBYLSKI, M D Concurrent Spinal Procedures Coding Frequently Changes for Established Procedures, Too The increase in spinal fusion procedures during the past decade has drawn scrutiny from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and third party payers, resulting in coverage limitations for some of these procedures. Recent CMS coverage decisions for established, concurrent spinal procedures will be examined in this Coding Corner. Coding for Decompression and Arthrodesis for Spondylolisthesis A common procedure for lumbar spondylolisthesis involves decompression of the nerve roots and a lumbar arthrodesis. A variety of procedures exist for decompression including laminectomy for lateral recess stenosis (63047) or for Gill fragment removal (63012), and discectomy for posterolateral herniation (63030), for far lateral disc herniation (63056), or for re-exploration of a disc herniation (63042). Several years ago, the Current Procedural Terminology Editorial Panel approved an editorial change to posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis (22630) that includes laminectomy and discectomy work other than that needed for decompression. However, the National Correct Coding Initiative of the CMS excluded coding of 22630 concurrently with the decompression codes under ordinary circumstances. The vignette describing posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis identifies a patient with mechanical back pain after prior discectomy and failed posterolateral fusion who undergoes a laminectomy, discectomy and interbody arthrodesis. Since the described patient does not have radiculopathy, a decompression above and beyond what is required to perform the posterior interbody fusion is not included in the vignette. However, the vignette does describe mobilization of nerve roots and dural sac as well as dissection of scar tissue necessary to perform the fusion. It may be difficult when coding to differentiate the incidental decompression that occurs during the laminectomy and discectomy approach for the interbody fusion from the additional decompression that may be warranted because of neurological symptoms from compressive lesions. Correct coding for interbody fusion is further complicated when a unilateral approach using a transforaminal technique is performed because code 22630 describes a bilateral procedure. In either instance, if a decompression procedure is performed beyond what is required for the interbody exposure, then the decompression should be appended with the –59 modifier (unusual procedural services) to acknowledge this as separately identifiable additional work, and it is critical for the neurosurgeon to document the separate location of compression that is being treated. Another recent limitation imposed by the CMS is for concurrent performance of a posterior arthrodesis and a posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The authors of the lumbar fusion guidelines, published in June 2005, concluded that complications and costs were higher and without an observed benefit when a posterior fusion is performed in addition to an interbody fusion. This year, CMS payment policy precludes payment for a posterior fusion when an interbody fusion is performed. The various surgical societies representing spinal surgery are reviewing the guidelines and their implications before preparing a response to the CMS decision. Coding for Revision Spinal Surgery Additional difficulties in proper coding are encountered when revision spinal surgery is performed. For example, a revision of a prior fusion may include procedures such as exploration of a fusion (22830), removal (22852), reinsertion (22849), or placement of spinal instrumentation (22840-22844), and performance of a fusion at the same or adjacent levels (22612, 22614, 22630, 22632). The CMS has used National Correct Coding Initiative edits for years to preclude payment for an exploration of fusion with arthrodesis, despite introductory language in CPT that specifically identifies arthrodesis and instrumentation as separate physician work. Although an exploration of fusion and arthrodesis at the same level should be considered inclusive, arthrodesis at adjacent levels is separately identifiable and the arthrodesis code should be appended with the –59 modifier. If spinal instrumentation is removed and replaced at the same levels, only code 22849 should be used, rather than a removal code and an insertion code. When spinal instrumentation is removed and then replaced with instrumentation extended to additional levels, one must balance the lesser work of replacing fixation in sites that have been prepared previously with the new work of exposing and placing fixation at new levels. An insertion code that describes the entire span of instrumentation (both revised and new) would reflect the physician work under most circumstances because the work of removal and replacement at an individual level is similar to work of preparation and insertion at a new level. The neurosurgeon should be aware that the removal and reinsertion of instrumentation codes are 90-day global codes to which the multiple procedure modifier –51 applies, whereas the insertion codes are ZZZ global codes and are not subject to a 50 percent payment reduction when used with other stand-alone codes. The area of spinal coding and reimbursement is frequently changing. Therefore, it behooves neurosurgeons to keep abreast of these changes annually. 3 Gregory J. Przybylski, MD, is professor and director of neurosurgery at JFK Medical Center in Edison, N.J. He is chair of the AANS/CNS Coding and Reimbursement Committee and a member of the CMS Practicing Physicians Advisory Council, and he chairs and instructs coding courses for the AANS and the North American Spine Society. 28 Vol. 15, No. 2 • 2006 • AANS Bulletin
Page 1 and 2: A M E R I C A N A S S O C I A T I O
Page 3 and 4: C ONTENTS DEPARTMENTS 38 | Advancin
Page 5 and 6: P RESIDENT’ S M ESSAGE Continued
Page 7 and 8: P ERSONAL P ERSPECTIVE W ILLIAM T .
Page 9 and 10: PICTURE ER Coverage Neurosurgeons A
Page 11 and 12: KEY FINDINGS: AANS 2006 WORKFORCE S
Page 13 and 14: Acute Care Surgery Longing for Coop
Page 15 and 16: Regionalization of Emergency Specia
Page 17 and 18: CME: A Main Attraction A major attr
Page 19 and 20: Developing Science Poster Chair Tim
Page 21 and 22: P RACTICEM ANAGEMENT N ICK G REEN E
Page 23 and 24: Epiphanies have no regrets. There i
Page 25: W ASHINGTONU PDATE K ATIE O. ORRICO
Page 29 and 30: is due in part to the prevailing ju
Page 31 and 32: E DUCATION J ONI L. SHULMAN Collabo
Page 33 and 34: L ETTERS Editor: I read this partic
Page 35 and 36: pression of the right C5, C6 and C7
Page 37 and 38: Neurosurgery - Roanoke, Virginia -A
Page 39 and 40: Spinal Surgery Fellowship July 2007
Page 41 and 42: NERVES Releases Results of Second A

view PDF - American Association of Neurological Surgeons

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?