29.12.2014 Views

Substance Abuse and Nurses - the New Mexico Board of Nursing

Substance Abuse and Nurses - the New Mexico Board of Nursing

Substance Abuse and Nurses - the New Mexico Board of Nursing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Substance</strong> <strong>Abuse</strong>, <strong>Nurses</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Diversion Program<br />

Nancy Darbro, PhD, APRN, CNS<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Mexico</strong><br />

Diversion Program Coordinator


Introduction<br />

• Theories <strong>of</strong> Addiction<br />

• Disease concept<br />

• Barriers to identification <strong>and</strong> intervention<br />

• Impairment<br />

• Prevalence<br />

• Identification: signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms<br />

• Risk factors<br />

• DP monitoring, recovery <strong>and</strong> relapse


Theories <strong>of</strong> addictions (43 in 1980,<br />

Letteri, Sayers & Parson, 1980)<br />

• Psychoanalytic <strong>the</strong>ory (inadequate,<br />

dependent personality)<br />

• Cognitive-behavioral <strong>the</strong>ory (learned<br />

behavior <strong>and</strong> conditioned responses)<br />

• Interpersonal <strong>the</strong>ory (social environment<br />

<strong>of</strong> family <strong>and</strong> peer groups)<br />

• Neurobiologic <strong>the</strong>ory (brain biochemistry<br />

leads to tolerance, craving =brain disease)


Multifactorial Model <strong>of</strong> Addiction<br />

• Complexity <strong>of</strong> addiction supports a<br />

multifactorial approach<br />

• Inclusive vs. exclusive<br />

• Research supports multiple causes<br />

• Addiction is more than a personality<br />

deficit, behavioral problem, genetic<br />

disorder, family dysfunction or product <strong>of</strong><br />

culture. It is a combination <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se.


Disease Concept <strong>of</strong> Addiction:<br />

DSM IV Definition<br />

• <strong>Abuse</strong>: any use <strong>of</strong> drugs that causes physical,<br />

psychological, economic, legal or social harm to <strong>the</strong><br />

individual user or to o<strong>the</strong>rs affected by <strong>the</strong> drug user’s<br />

behavior.<br />

• 1. recurrent substance use resulting in failure to fulfill<br />

major role obligations at work, school or home<br />

• 2. recurrent substance use in situations in which it is<br />

physically hazardous, (driving, neglect <strong>of</strong> children,<br />

providing care while impaired)<br />

• 3. recurrent substance related legal problems ( arrests,<br />

child support arrears)


Disease Concept <strong>of</strong> Addiction<br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> Dependence: DSM IV<br />

1. Tolerance<br />

2. Withdrawal<br />

3. Taken in larger amounts <strong>and</strong> over longer<br />

period than intended<br />

4. Persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut<br />

down or control use<br />

5. Preoccupation in obtaining substance<br />

6. Neglect <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r activities<br />

7. Continued use despite harmful consequences


Disease Concept <strong>of</strong> Addiction<br />

1. Primary- genetic predisposition, brain<br />

disease<br />

2. Progressive- ongoing deterioration,<br />

marked by early, middle <strong>and</strong> late stage<br />

3. Chronic- relapsing medical condition<br />

4. Fatal-accidental or medical complications


Primary<br />

• Twin studies<br />

• Family genetics<br />

• Brain research-neurobiological changes<br />

• Males <strong>of</strong> alcoholic fa<strong>the</strong>rs have<br />

constitutional differences in effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

elimination <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />

• Genetic factors account for 40%-60% <strong>of</strong><br />

vulnerability to addiction (NIDA, 2007)


Progressive<br />

• Review <strong>of</strong> Jellinik chart h<strong>and</strong>out<br />

• Applies to addictive process, not abuse<br />

• Progressive deterioration<br />

• Defense mechanisms are unconscious<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> insight is perplexing to outsiders<br />

• Physiological changes/brain changes due to<br />

neurotransmitters <strong>and</strong> receptor sites<br />

• Recovery is progressive too


Chronic<br />

• Neurobiology <strong>of</strong> addiction<br />

• Use for pleasurable effect (reward) or positive<br />

reinforcement<br />

• Continued seeking <strong>of</strong> pleasure/reward<br />

• Sensitization or adaptation to reward (tolerance)<br />

• Use to avoid adverse effects (withdrawal) or negative<br />

reinforcement<br />

• Rewarded behavior is reinforcing behavior (operant<br />

conditioning)<br />

• Changes in brain chemistry can be permanent<br />

• Helps explain inability to reduce/control use <strong>and</strong> relapse<br />

after abstinence (Koob & Le Moal, 2008)


Fatal<br />

• History <strong>of</strong> physical/sexual abuse<br />

• Increased morbidity-78% (Winick, 1992)<br />

• Suicide attempts 4 times higher (Blume,<br />

1998)<br />

• Mortality rates 2-4 times higher (Lex,<br />

1994)<br />

• 4 out <strong>of</strong> 10 U.S. aids deaths are related to<br />

drug abuse (NIDA,2007)


Barriers to Identification<br />

• Stigma resulting from:<br />

• 1. Moral model<br />

• 2. “Addictive” personality model<br />

• 3. “Us vs. <strong>the</strong>m” model (family class,<br />

socioeconomic, cultural)<br />

• 4. Personality deficit model (narcissistic,<br />

passive-dependent, impulsive, weak ego)


Stereotypes about addiction:<br />

Alcoholics <strong>and</strong> addicts:<br />

• Negative attitudes <strong>and</strong> behaviors lead to<br />

resilience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> skid row stereotype<br />

• Leads nurses to avoid detection at all<br />

costs to avoid <strong>the</strong> stigma<br />

• Leads nurses to avoid revealing <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

recovery to avoid stigma as well<br />

• (Chappel, 1992, Grover & Floyd, 1998).


Stereotypes about addiction:<br />

Alcoholics <strong>and</strong> Addicts Are…….<br />

1. Bums<br />

2. Liars<br />

3. Jerks<br />

4. Lazy<br />

5. Poor<br />

6. Untrustworthy<br />

7. Dirty<br />

8. Selfish<br />

9. Undependable


Stereotypes about health care<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional addicts <strong>and</strong> alcoholics..<br />

1. Dangerous<br />

2. Uncaring <strong>and</strong> careless<br />

3. Unpr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

4. Sloppy <strong>and</strong> unkempt<br />

5. Unreliable<br />

6. Poor practitioner<br />

Stigma & Stereotypes = Denial & Resistance


O<strong>the</strong>r Barriers to Recognition<br />

• Conspiracy <strong>of</strong> silence, pr<strong>of</strong>essional immunity<br />

• Pharmacological optimism<br />

• Caretaker mentality = “Malignant Denial”<br />

• Self Diagnosis & Self Medication<br />

• Identity shaped by career/licensure<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> education<br />

• Underground culture <strong>of</strong> mistreatment


Problem <strong>of</strong> Addiction:<br />

• Winick (1980) : <strong>Substance</strong> abuse will be high<br />

in groups where <strong>the</strong>re is…<br />

1. Access to dependence producing substances<br />

2. Freedom from negative proscriptions against<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir use<br />

3. Role strain or role deprivation<br />

(Veterans, college students, musicians…..<br />

physicians <strong>and</strong> nurses)


General risk factors<br />

(SAMHSA, 1998)<br />

• Family history <strong>of</strong> alcoholism<br />

• Family history <strong>of</strong> criminality or antisocial<br />

behavior<br />

• Poor parental guidance or disicpline<br />

• Parental use & positive attitudes towards<br />

use<br />

• Age <strong>of</strong> first use. Use before <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> 15<br />

increases <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> later addiction


Occupations with highest risk<br />

for substance abuse share 8 work<br />

related factors:<br />

1. Availability <strong>of</strong> alcohol<br />

2. Social pressure to drink<br />

3. Working away from home<br />

4. Freedom from supervision<br />

5. Very low or high income<br />

6. Collusion by colleagues to protect misuser<br />

7. Occupational stress<br />

8. Selection <strong>of</strong> predisposed people<br />

(Simoneau & Bergeron, 2000).


Impairment<br />

Inability to carry out pr<strong>of</strong>essional duties <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibilities to acceptable st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

1. Impaired cognitive ability <strong>and</strong> memory<br />

2. Altered motor skills<br />

3. Difficulty making decisions<br />

4. Diminished alertness<br />

5. Poor judgment<br />

6. Inability to cope with stressful events<br />

7. Violations <strong>of</strong> NPA under unpr<strong>of</strong>essional conduct<br />

<strong>and</strong> incompetence


Impairment<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> report that although <strong>the</strong>y demonstrated<br />

symptoms <strong>of</strong> impairment at work, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

symptoms were not addressed by colleagues<br />

• Symptoms are <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked until <strong>the</strong>y<br />

become obvious<br />

• Work is usually last place symptoms show up<br />

• Most impaired nurses are not identified<br />

• Most impaired nurses are not reported<br />

(Frances & Miller, 1998).


Impairment <strong>and</strong> abuse are underreported<br />

<strong>and</strong> overlooked<br />

• The primary method for identifying impaired<br />

nurses is coworkers<br />

• 37% <strong>of</strong> nurses working with an impaired<br />

colleague would not report <strong>the</strong>m (Beckstead,<br />

2002)<br />

• Coworkers least likely to report impairment due<br />

to alcohol (Beckstead, 2005)<br />

• Most admissions into alternative programs come<br />

via workplace complaints (NM DP annual report)


Impairment <strong>and</strong> abuse<br />

• USA has a higher use <strong>of</strong> alcohol <strong>and</strong> drugs<br />

than any o<strong>the</strong>r country (Winick, 1992)<br />

• 15% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s adults have serious<br />

substance abuse problems (NIH, 1998)<br />

• 2/3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se adults abuse alcohol, 1/3<br />

abuse o<strong>the</strong>r substances (NIH, 1998)<br />

• 50% <strong>of</strong> automobile fatalities involve<br />

alcohol impaired drivers (NIH, 1998)


Impairment <strong>and</strong> abuse<br />

5 substances account for 96% <strong>of</strong> admissions<br />

into treatment (SAMHSA, 2008)<br />

1. 40% alcohol<br />

2. 18% opiates, primarily heroin<br />

3. 16% pot & hashish<br />

4. 14% cocaine<br />

5. 8% stimulates, primarily meth


Prevalence:<br />

• <strong>Abuse</strong> <strong>and</strong> addiction difficult to distinguish<br />

• Both can lead to impairment & are underreported,<br />

under-researched & overlooked<br />

• Alcohol use: 72%, disorders = 13.5%<br />

• Drug use: 37%, disorders = 6.2%<br />

(SAMHSA)<br />

• Alcohol most commonly abused drug<br />

• Marijuana second most commonly abused


Prevalence: Women (Blume, 1998,<br />

Lex, 1994).<br />

• Women drink <strong>and</strong> use drugs less than men<br />

• Use prescription drugs more than men<br />

• Have telescoping <strong>of</strong> symptoms: get sicker faster<br />

with more virulent course <strong>of</strong> disease<br />

• Start substance abuse later in life<br />

• <strong>Abuse</strong> fewer substances, yet present with more<br />

severe physical symptoms in treatment<br />

• Seek help for physical complaints related to<br />

abuse ie insomnia, nervousness, depression<br />

• Often undetected by medical pr<strong>of</strong>essionals


Prevalence : Women: cont.<br />

• Triple Stigmatization (social stigma, moral<br />

stigma, sexual stigma)<br />

• Can date onset <strong>of</strong> abuse to a stressful life event<br />

or loss<br />

• Positive family history <strong>of</strong> addiction<br />

• Early history <strong>of</strong> physical & sexual abuse<br />

• Higher rates <strong>of</strong> co-morbid psychiatric dx, usually<br />

depression <strong>and</strong> anxiety<br />

• Higher rate <strong>of</strong> suicide attempts<br />

• Higher rate <strong>of</strong> mortality


Prevalence: <strong>Nurses</strong><br />

• Previously thought to be higher in nurses<br />

• Current research indicates similar to general<br />

population: 8-20% (Storr, Trink<strong>of</strong>f & Hughes,<br />

2000).<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> <strong>and</strong> doctors use prescription drugs <strong>and</strong><br />

alcohol at a higher rate<br />

• Binge drinking elevated for psychiatric, critical<br />

care <strong>and</strong> nurse administrators<br />

• Highest in nurse anes<strong>the</strong>tists = 15%


Identification: signs &<br />

symptoms cont.<br />

• Missing drugs, interest in patients pain control,<br />

<strong>and</strong> use <strong>of</strong> narcotics<br />

• Frequent complaints <strong>of</strong> accidents & problems<br />

• Slurred speech, shakiness, tremors<br />

• Diaphoresis, runny nose<br />

• Watery eyes, dilated/constricted pupils<br />

• Carelessness about personal appearance<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> long sleeved clothing<br />

• Appearance on unit on days <strong>of</strong>f


Identification: signs &<br />

symptoms<br />

• Increasing isolation<br />

• Frequent complaints <strong>of</strong> personal problems<br />

• Mood swings, irritability, depression<br />

• Frequent BR trips, unexplained absences<br />

• Poor documentation, sloppy charting<br />

• Episodes <strong>of</strong> poor judgment<br />

• Elaborate excuses for being absent or tardy<br />

• Frequent illnesses <strong>and</strong> changes to schedule


Risk Factors for <strong>Nurses</strong><br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> abuse is an “Occupational Hazard” for<br />

nurses & doctors (Naegle, 1988).<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional reluctance to “see” abuse: direct<br />

observations <strong>of</strong>ten ignored<br />

• Avoidance <strong>of</strong> “addressing” abuse: transferred,<br />

promoted, terminated<br />

• Avoidance <strong>of</strong> “reporting” abuse: seen as work<br />

performance issue, not unpr<strong>of</strong>essional practice<br />

• Resistance factors <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

• Malignant denial <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (Hankes &<br />

Bissell, 1992).


Risk Factors: The Big 4<br />

Attitude<br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> use seen as acceptable means <strong>of</strong><br />

coping with life problems<br />

• Developing faith in drugs to promote physiologic<br />

& psychological healing (pharmacological<br />

optimism)<br />

• Sense <strong>of</strong> entitlement <strong>and</strong> rationalization<br />

• Status <strong>of</strong> health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals as being<br />

invulnerable to illnesses<br />

• Permissive attitude toward self-diagnosing <strong>and</strong><br />

self prescribing<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> education about addiction


Risk Factors: The Big 4<br />

Attitude continued ….<br />

• Familiarity <strong>and</strong> training in administration <strong>of</strong><br />

drugs leads to increased risk<br />

• Rationales for self-medication: Fatigue, physical<br />

ailments, loss <strong>of</strong> family relationships, quarrels,<br />

insomnia, ambivalence<br />

• Social norms favorably influence diversion<br />

• Negative attitude & behavior toward substance<br />

abusers leads to resilience <strong>of</strong> stigma &<br />

avoidance <strong>of</strong> identification


Risk Factors: The Big 4<br />

Access<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> institutional controls in storing <strong>and</strong><br />

distributing narcotics<br />

• Physician prescribing practices, easily obtained<br />

hallway & o<strong>the</strong>r prescriptions<br />

• Access <strong>and</strong> familiarity with drugs increases risk<br />

• Administering drugs to o<strong>the</strong>rs increases<br />

willingness to self medicate<br />

• Drugs are <strong>the</strong> “panacea” for ailments


Risk Factors: The big 4<br />

Access continued ….<br />

• Critical care areas with easy access have<br />

increased risk, CCU, ICU, Oncology, ER<br />

• Perceived availability, frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

administration & degree <strong>of</strong> control over<br />

drugs equal increased risk<br />

• Social drinking is sanctioned as a stress<br />

reliever


Risk Factors: The Big 4<br />

Stress<br />

• Caring for need <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ill<br />

• Frequent emergencies<br />

• Responsibility for life <strong>and</strong> death situations<br />

• Irregular <strong>and</strong> extended hours<br />

• Frequent shift changes<br />

• Staffing difficulties<br />

• Work overload<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> report greater on job stress than<br />

physicians <strong>and</strong> pharmacists


Risk Factors: The big 4<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

• Schools <strong>of</strong> nursing lack education on<br />

addiction<br />

• Employers do not support proactive<br />

policies for addressing symptoms<br />

• Employers do not implement identification<br />

<strong>and</strong> intervention training for staff<br />

• Stigma & Denial still stronger than<br />

education <strong>and</strong> information


Summary <strong>of</strong> Risk Factors:<br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> abuse is an “Occupational Hazard” for nurses<br />

& doctors (Naegle, 1988).<br />

• Pr<strong>of</strong>essional reluctance to “see” abuse: direct<br />

observations <strong>of</strong>ten ignored<br />

• Avoidance <strong>of</strong> “addressing” abuse: nurses are transferred,<br />

promoted, terminated<br />

• Avoidance <strong>of</strong> “reporting” abuse: seen as work<br />

performance issue, not unpr<strong>of</strong>essional practice<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> receive hasher sanctions (Shaw, et al,2004)<br />

• “Malignant denial” <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (Hankes & Bissell,<br />

1992).


Intervention: Worst thing is to<br />

do nothing!<br />

• Anyone can express a statement <strong>of</strong> concern<br />

• Observation<br />

• Documentation<br />

• Use factual <strong>and</strong> objective data(date, time<br />

incident)<br />

• Report to supervisor/charge nurse & follow up<br />

• Review <strong>and</strong> know your P & P<br />

• With any violation <strong>of</strong> NPA, file a complaint


Intervention: What do I do<br />

• Don’t ignore<br />

• Don’t overlook<br />

• Don’t excuse<br />

• Do pay attention<br />

• Do document<br />

• Do report


Why alternative to discipline<br />

programs<br />

• 67-70% <strong>of</strong> disciplinary action for <strong>Board</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Nursing</strong> are related to alcohol or substance<br />

abuse (Smith & Hughes, 1996)<br />

• 56% <strong>of</strong> complaints received <strong>New</strong> <strong>Mexico</strong> in 2007<br />

• NCSBN <strong>and</strong> ANA both called for discipline<br />

alternatives for nurses in <strong>the</strong> 1980’s<br />

• Alternative programs were developed to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

rehabilitation prior to discipline.<br />

• Alternative programs bypass high costs <strong>of</strong><br />

investigation <strong>and</strong> disciplinary hearings


Assumptions <strong>of</strong> programs<br />

• Reporting <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> nurses with impaired<br />

practice will increase if <strong>the</strong>re is an alternative to<br />

discipline option (Hood & Duphorne,1995)<br />

• Eliminates loophole <strong>of</strong> impaired practice from complaint<br />

until investigation <strong>and</strong> hearing<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> are provided an opportunity for rehabilitation<br />

prior to discipline.<br />

• The public is protected via close supervision <strong>and</strong><br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> practice<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> who are non compliant will be identified,<br />

reported <strong>and</strong> removed from practice quickly


3 general types <strong>of</strong> programs<br />

#1: Alternative to discipline with statutory<br />

authority under BON<br />

#2: Peer assistance programs under state<br />

nursing associations<br />

#3: Discipline with consent order or<br />

voluntary surrender <strong>of</strong> license


Need for regulation<br />

• Health care is <strong>the</strong> largest industry<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> are <strong>the</strong> largest group <strong>of</strong> health<br />

care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> abuse is <strong>the</strong> #1 health care<br />

problem across <strong>the</strong> population<br />

• <strong>Substance</strong> dependency is <strong>the</strong> #1<br />

preventable health problem


Purpose <strong>of</strong> Regulation<br />

• Protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public<br />

• Responsibility to monitor <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

• Accountability for safe practices<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> best practices<br />

• Responsibility for quality assurance <strong>of</strong><br />

education/practice


NM BON complaint process<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> who have a complaint alleging use<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or abuse <strong>of</strong> drugs/alcohol shall be<br />

given an opportunity to be admitted to <strong>the</strong><br />

DP<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> must submit written request for<br />

admission into DP<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> must admit to an addiction or<br />

problem with substance abuse.


M<strong>and</strong>atory compliance with DP<br />

• DP nurses are monitored by written<br />

records <strong>and</strong> face to face evaluations<br />

• Violations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DP contract are reported<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nursing</strong><br />

• DP nurses break <strong>the</strong>ir own anonymity<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y violate conditions <strong>of</strong> contract<br />

• Any disciplinary action resulting from<br />

formal hearings is public


Monitoring: DP Requirements<br />

• Five year contract<br />

• Treatment for addiction<br />

• Abstinence<br />

• Admission <strong>of</strong> chemical dependency<br />

• Regular, r<strong>and</strong>om drug screens<br />

• Attend <strong>and</strong> verify support group meetings<br />

• Regular, written self report<br />

• Supervisor & Counselor reports<br />

• Face to face evaluations quarterly<br />

• Practice stipulations


Benefits <strong>of</strong> DP<br />

• Opportunity for recovery in lieu <strong>of</strong> discipline<br />

• Structure for recovery<br />

• Support <strong>of</strong> peers<br />

• Paper trail<br />

• Maintenance <strong>of</strong> license <strong>and</strong> work<br />

• Protection <strong>of</strong> public<br />

• Non-public until violations reported to BON<br />

• Education <strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> IP<br />

• Earlier ID, intervention, referral <strong>and</strong> reentry


Are alternative programs<br />

successful<br />

• Public protection from impaired practice<br />

• Early identification/intervention/treatment<br />

• Quick entry into recovery monitoring<br />

• Cost savings <strong>of</strong> monitoring vs. discipline<br />

• Intense scrutiny <strong>of</strong> compliance<br />

• Early detection <strong>of</strong> relapse/noncompliance<br />

• Ongoing monitoring through discipline/<br />

or removal from practice<br />

• <strong>Nurses</strong> report <strong>the</strong>y are better nurses after treatment <strong>and</strong><br />

recovery (Darbro, 2005)


Why do individuals relapse<br />

• Withdrawal/negative affect stage leads to:<br />

• Chronic irritability<br />

• Emotional pain<br />

• Fatigue<br />

• Depression/Mood swings<br />

• Loss <strong>of</strong> motivation for natural rewards<br />

• All contribute to craving <strong>and</strong> relapse


Relapse rates <strong>of</strong> chronic illnesses<br />

(McLellan et al, 2000)<br />

• Drug addiction: 40%-60%<br />

• Type 1 diabetes: 30%-50%<br />

• Hypertension 50%-70%<br />

• Asthma 50%-70%<br />

• Relapse is part <strong>of</strong> any chronic disease, but<br />

most stigmatized in addictive disease


Relapse: Depends as much on<br />

environment as anything<br />

(Vaillant, 1998).<br />

• Highest risk in <strong>the</strong> first two years<br />

• Highest rate in first year<br />

• 75% in general population<br />

• 45% in health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals


Relapse: Slip vs Relapse<br />

• Slip not seen as a treatment failure<br />

• Brief time <strong>of</strong> use<br />

• Immediate confession<br />

• Discussion in group meetings<br />

• Speaking to sponsor<br />

• Reporting to caseworker<br />

• Acceptance <strong>of</strong> consequences<br />

• Can result in stronger recovery


Relapse: Slip vs Relapse<br />

• Relapse is also not a treatment failure <strong>and</strong><br />

only seen as one in addiction recovery<br />

• Consistent <strong>and</strong> continued use<br />

• Refusal to admit symptoms <strong>and</strong> impact<br />

• Disruption in personal <strong>and</strong> family support<br />

• Refusal to join <strong>and</strong> use self help groups<br />

• Negative impact on private, pr<strong>of</strong>essional,<br />

social <strong>and</strong> legal aspects <strong>of</strong> life


Risk factors for relapse in health<br />

care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

• Use <strong>of</strong> major opioid<br />

• Dual diagnosis<br />

• Positive family history <strong>of</strong> substance abuse<br />

(Domino, et al, 2005)<br />

• Delay in entering alternative program<br />

• Termination from job<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> support (Tipton, 2005)


Recovery: A difficult, full time<br />

job<br />

• Is a process, not an event<br />

• Like addiction, marked by stages <strong>of</strong> early, middle<br />

<strong>and</strong> late<br />

• Tasks <strong>of</strong> recovery<br />

• 1. Recognition <strong>of</strong> addiction as life-threatening<br />

disease<br />

• 2. Ability to maintain abstinence<br />

• 3. Develop a structure to provide social <strong>and</strong><br />

practical support to stay sober


Recovery: 6 markers (Valliant,<br />

1998)<br />

• 1. Occurs over <strong>the</strong> long term, years not months<br />

• 2. Occurs in a community structure<br />

• 3. Supported by compulsory supervision &<br />

application <strong>of</strong> negative consequences related to<br />

substance use<br />

• 4. Supported by a substitute, positive<br />

dependency to compete with use<br />

• 5. Results from a guilt free <strong>and</strong> drug free social<br />

network<br />

• 6. Involves membership in an inspirational selfhelp<br />

group


Recovery<br />

• 85-90% <strong>of</strong> health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who<br />

get treatment have successful recovery<br />

• Fewer than 10% <strong>of</strong> people <strong>and</strong> health<br />

care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who need treatment for<br />

substance abuse get it


Who is <strong>the</strong> impaired nurse<br />

(Bissell & Jones, 1981).<br />

• Graduated in top 1/3 <strong>of</strong> class<br />

• Holds advanced degrees<br />

• Has responsible, dem<strong>and</strong>ing position<br />

• Greatly respected by peers <strong>and</strong> bosses<br />

• High pressure & stressful jobs<br />

• Often promoted<br />

• Ambitious <strong>and</strong> achievement oriented<br />

• One or both parents abused substances


Conclusions<br />

• Drug addiction is a treatable brain disease<br />

• Addiction is a developmental disease<br />

• All drugs <strong>of</strong> abuse hijack <strong>the</strong> brain’s<br />

reward system & change neurobiology<br />

• Drugs are more addictive than natural<br />

rewards<br />

• Drug use is an epidemic<br />

• Addiction need not be a life sentence


Conclusions<br />

• Addiction is <strong>the</strong> single most disabling<br />

condition for health care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

(Coombs, 1997;Talbott & Wright, 1987)<br />

• Treatment <strong>and</strong> monitoring works (Ganley,<br />

et al, 2005;NIDA, 1999)<br />

• 80-90% <strong>of</strong> nurses are successful in<br />

recovery (Graham & Schultz, 1998; Shaw,<br />

et al, 2004)


QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS


CONTACT:<br />

• www.bon.state.nm.us<br />

• All forms can be downloaded from website<br />

• nancy.darbro@state.nm.us<br />

• DP direct line: 505-841-8345

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!