30.12.2014 Views

Update on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Update on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Update on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Update</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> N<strong>on</strong>-<strong>Alcoholic</strong> <strong>Fatty</strong><br />

<strong>Liver</strong> <strong>Disease</strong><br />

Kathleen E Corey, MD, MPH<br />

Gastrointestinal Unit, MGH


Outline<br />

What are steatosis and NASH<br />

Why should you care about NASH<br />

How is NASH diagnosed<br />

Treating NASH


Case Presentati<strong>on</strong><br />

• AM is a 63M with obesity and hyperlipidemia<br />

who presents for evaluati<strong>on</strong> of abnormal LFTs.<br />

• AST 57, ALT 52, AP 80, TB 0.4<br />

• No history of alcohol use, no risk factors for viral<br />

hepatitis


Case Presentati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Viral serologies, ir<strong>on</strong> studies, AIAT, celiac<br />

studies, TSH normal<br />

• ANA positive at 1:40, ASMA positive at<br />

1:80<br />

• US shows fatty infiltrati<strong>on</strong>, no ascites,<br />

splenomegaly or abdominal varices


Case Presentati<strong>on</strong>: What is<br />

the diagnosis<br />

• Autoimmune hepatitis<br />

• Viral hepatitis<br />

• NAFLD<br />

• Celiac disease


What is the next step<br />

• Weight loss and exercise<br />

• Watchful waiting – repeat LFTs in 1 year<br />

• Start Vitamin E<br />

• <strong>Liver</strong> Biopsy


Case Presentati<strong>on</strong><br />

• <strong>Liver</strong> biopsy<br />

– 33-66% steatosis<br />

– Diffuse lobular<br />

inflammati<strong>on</strong> with<br />

glycogenated nuclei<br />

– Hepatocyte ballo<strong>on</strong>ing<br />

– Fibrosis stage 4 of 4<br />

c/w cirrhosis


NAFLD<br />

Spectrum of Hepatic Pathology<br />

Steatohepatitis<br />

Steatosis<br />

Cirrhosis<br />

Hepatocellula<br />

r carcinoma


N<strong>on</strong>-<strong>Alcoholic</strong> <strong>Fatty</strong> <strong>Liver</strong> (NAFL)<br />

Steatosis<br />

<strong>Fatty</strong> hepatocytes<br />

Intracellular<br />

fat depositi<strong>on</strong>


N<strong>on</strong>-<strong>Alcoholic</strong> SteatoHepatitis<br />

(NASH)<br />

Intracellular<br />

fat depositi<strong>on</strong><br />

Necrosis<br />

Fibrosis<br />

Fat deposits<br />

Inflammati<strong>on</strong><br />

Fibrosis with necrosis


Cirrhosis<br />

Regenerati<br />

ve nodule<br />

Fibrosis<br />

Nodules<br />

surrounded by<br />

fibrosis


How Many Americans Have<br />

NAFLD<br />

• 10%<br />

• 25%<br />

• 40%<br />

• 60%<br />

• 75%


Impact of NAFLD<br />

Wanless IR Hepatology 1990<br />

Thursz. EASL Berlin 2011


NAFLD Prevalence Dallas<br />

Heart Study<br />

(~1100 African Americans, 700 Caucasians, 400 Hispanics)<br />

No risk factors<br />

(n = 375)<br />

Assess risk factors<br />

for fatty liver<br />

H 1 -NMR spectroscopy<br />

Define normal<br />

liver fat c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />

Assess prevalence of increased liver fat (steatosis)<br />

in entire populati<strong>on</strong> & ethnic subgroups


Dallas Heart Study Results<br />

<strong>Liver</strong> fat<br />

< 5.5%<br />

<strong>Liver</strong> fat<br />

> 5.5%<br />

Steatosis = 31%<br />

<strong>Liver</strong> enzymes NORMAL in most (79%) with steatosis


Prevalence of Hepatic Steatosis: Varies with Ethnicity<br />

Prevalence of Hepatic Steatosis<br />

Varies with Ethnicity<br />

<strong>Fatty</strong> liver<br />

45%<br />

33%<br />

24%<br />

Hispanics Whites Blacks


NAFLD in High-Risk Populati<strong>on</strong>s: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus<br />

NAFLD in High-Risk Populati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus<br />

• 50% prevalence <strong>on</strong> ultrasound<br />

•NASH unusually comm<strong>on</strong><br />

• Steatosis: 12%<br />

• NASH: 87%<br />

•Fibrosis or cirrhosis documented in 20%<br />

Gupter et al. J Gastro Hepatol 2004;19:854-859<br />

Tolman et al. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:946-956


What percentage of NASH<br />

patients have cirrhosis<br />

• 1.5%<br />

• 3%<br />

• 20%<br />

• 33%<br />

• 55%


Neuschwander-Tetri Hepatology 2010<br />

Impact of NAFLD<br />

• Cirrhosis complicates 1% of patients with<br />

steatosis, up to 33% of NASH<br />

• NASH is associated with increased risk of<br />

HCC<br />

• NASH cirrhosis will be the leading<br />

indicati<strong>on</strong> for OLT by 2020<br />

Dam-Larsen Gut 2007


Prognostic Implicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of NASH + Fibrosis<br />

• More c<strong>on</strong>sistent and rapid progressi<strong>on</strong><br />

to cirrhosis than NASH al<strong>on</strong>e<br />

NASH<br />

> 10 years<br />

Cirrhosis<br />

3%<br />

NASH +<br />

fibrosis<br />

5-10 years<br />

Cirrhosis<br />

35%<br />

Matte<strong>on</strong>i Gastroenterology 1999


Impact of NAFLD<br />

• NAFLD is associated with an increased all<br />

cause mortality<br />

• NAFLD is associated with increased risk of<br />

cardiovascular disease in diabetic and<br />

n<strong>on</strong>-diabetic patients<br />

Tarher Diabetes Care 2007<br />

Ekstedt M Hepatolgy 2006


Diagnostic Goals<br />

• Goal #1: Determine the etiology of liver<br />

disease as NAFLD<br />

• Goal #2: Determine the type of NAFLD<br />

• Goal #3: Determine the severity of<br />

NAFLD


Goal #1: Determine the<br />

Etiology<br />

• Who might have NAFLD<br />

– Any<strong>on</strong>e with an elevated AST or ALT<br />

– Any<strong>on</strong>e with the Metabolic Syndrome<br />

– Any<strong>on</strong>e with fatty liver <strong>on</strong> imaging<br />

– Any<strong>on</strong>e with cryptogenic cirrhosis


Goal #1: Determine the<br />

Etiology<br />

• Exclude other causes of abnormal LFTs<br />

– Alcohol use<br />

– Viral hepatitis<br />

– Autoimmune liver disease (PBC, PSC, AIH)<br />

– Celiac disease<br />

– Thyroid disease<br />

– Ir<strong>on</strong> depositi<strong>on</strong> disease<br />

• Evaluate for presence of metabolic<br />

syndrome


Goal #1: Determine the<br />

Etiology<br />

• AST and ALT


Goal #1Determine the<br />

Etiology<br />

• Imaging for NAFLD<br />

– US, MRI and CT can<br />

assess for fat<br />

– Other liver disease<br />

can cause steatosis<br />

– Absence of fat does<br />

not exclude NAFLD<br />

especially in setting of<br />

advanced fibrosis


Goal #1: Determine the<br />

Etiology<br />

• Distinguish <strong>Alcoholic</strong> <strong>Liver</strong> <strong>Disease</strong> from<br />

NAFLD<br />

– NAFLD Implies no EtOH or “safe” EtOH levels<br />

– 2 drink or less per day for women, 3 drinks or<br />

less per day for men<br />

– This is a recent increase in allowable alcohol<br />

use from the AASLD<br />

Chalasani et al Hepatology 2012


Sec<strong>on</strong>dary Causes of<br />

NAFLD<br />

• Hepatitis C<br />

• Wils<strong>on</strong>s <strong>Disease</strong><br />

• Disorders of lipid<br />

metabolism<br />

– Abetalipoproteinemia<br />

– Hypobetalipoproteinemia<br />

– Andersen’s disease<br />

– Weber-Christian syndrome<br />

• Total parenteral nutriti<strong>on</strong><br />

• Severe weight loss<br />

• Celiac disease<br />

• Medicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– Amiodar<strong>on</strong>e<br />

– Diltiazem<br />

– Tamoxifen<br />

– Steroids<br />

– Highly active antiretroviral<br />

therapy


Goal #2: Determine the<br />

Type of NAFLD<br />

• <strong>Liver</strong> functi<strong>on</strong> tests are insufficient to distinguish<br />

steatosis and NASH<br />

• In a cohort of diabetics 86% of both steatosis and NASH had normal<br />

LFTs<br />

• ALT is not a reliable marker to differentiate steatosis from NASH<br />

Tarher Diabetes Care 2007


Goal #2: Determine the Type<br />

of NAFLD<br />

• Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of<br />

NASH<br />

• Elevated Ferritin level suggests increased risk for NASH<br />

• Biopsy is the <strong>on</strong>ly definitive way to differentiate steatosis<br />

and NASH<br />

Tarher Diabetes Care 2007


Goal #3: Determine the<br />

Severity of <strong>Disease</strong><br />

• Goal is to identify patients with advanced<br />

fibrosis or cirrhosis<br />

• The absence of signs of cirrhosis of<br />

physical exam, labs suggesting synthetic<br />

dysfuncti<strong>on</strong> or PHTN or imaging<br />

suggesting cirrhosis are not sufficient to<br />

exclude cirrhosis<br />

• <strong>Liver</strong> biopsy is needed


Goal #3: Determine the Severity<br />

of <strong>Disease</strong><br />

• Risk Factors for Cirrhosis<br />

• Age > 45-50 years<br />

• Obesity<br />

• Diabetes<br />

• 66% prevalence of bridging fibrosis if<br />

age > 50 years and patient obese or<br />

diabetic<br />

• NAFLD fibrosis score


<strong>Liver</strong> Biopsy<br />

<strong>Liver</strong> Biopsy


Risks of <strong>Liver</strong> Biopsy<br />

• Post-procedure RUQ pain<br />

• Bleeding<br />

• Organ perforati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Bile perit<strong>on</strong>itis


• NASH<br />

– Fat<br />

Is there NASH <strong>on</strong> <strong>Liver</strong><br />

– Lobular<br />

inflammati<strong>on</strong><br />

– Ballo<strong>on</strong>ing<br />

degenerati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Fibrosis<br />

– Stage 3 or 4 (out of<br />

4) is advanced<br />

fibrosis = cirrhosis<br />

Biopsy


Weight Loss & Exercise are<br />

Cornerst<strong>on</strong>es of Therapy<br />

• Weight loss<br />

– 3-5% weight loss improves steatosis<br />

– 7-10 % weight loss has been associated with a significant<br />

reducti<strong>on</strong> in NAS<br />

• Weight loss surgery<br />

– 69% had complete resoluti<strong>on</strong> of NASH<br />

– 65% had partial or complete improvement in fibrosis<br />

• Exercise in absence of weight loss decreases steatosis<br />

Ekstedt J of Hepatology 2007 (statin)<br />

Mummadi CGH 2008<br />

Pomrat Hepatology 2010 (7%)


Pioglitaz<strong>on</strong>e Improves<br />

Inflammati<strong>on</strong> in NASH<br />

• Pioglitaz<strong>on</strong>e 30- 45mg daily for 48-96<br />

weeks<br />

• Necroinflammati<strong>on</strong> and steatosis improved<br />

c<strong>on</strong>siderable in pioglitaz<strong>on</strong>e group<br />

• No improvement in fibrosis seen<br />

Belfort NEJM 2006<br />

Sanyal NEJM 2010


Vitamin E Improves<br />

Steatosis & Inflammati<strong>on</strong><br />

• RTC of 247 patients with biopsy proven NASH<br />

without DM<br />

• Vitamin E 800 units daily<br />

• Vitamin E lobular inflammati<strong>on</strong> and steatosis<br />

• No change in fibrosis was seen<br />

Sanyal NEJM 2010


Vitamin E and Prostate<br />

Cancer<br />

• 35 533 men randomized to selenium, vitamin E or both<br />

agents, or both matched placebos for 7- 12 years.<br />

• Compared with placebo, the absolute increase in risk of<br />

prostate cancer per 1000 pers<strong>on</strong>- years was 1.6 for<br />

vitamin E, 0.8 for selenium, and 0.4 for the combinati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

• Use vitamin E with cauti<strong>on</strong> in men with NASH<br />

EA Klein et al., JAMA 2011


Pharmacotherapy Under<br />

Investigati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Alpha lipoic acid<br />

• Linagliptin<br />

• PUFA<br />

• ARB/ACEi<br />

• Metformin<br />

• OKT3<br />

• HMG CoA reductase<br />

inhibitors<br />

• Ezetimibe<br />

Basu AASLD 2011 #1658<br />

Takeshita AASLD 2011 #1599


Advanced Fibrosis - Refer<br />

to Hepatology<br />

• Advanced fibrosis = cirrhosis<br />

• Patients need<br />

– EGD for variceal screening<br />

– Q6m<strong>on</strong>ths US or MRI for HCC screening<br />

– MELD labs (INR, Cr, total bilirubin)<br />

– M<strong>on</strong>itoring for the complicati<strong>on</strong>s of advanced liver<br />

disease


Take Home Messages<br />

NASH is the form of NAFLD that can progress<br />

NASH leads to cirrhosis and HCC<br />

Biopsy is needed for<br />

NASH Diagnosis<br />

Weight loss and<br />

pharmacotherapy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!