31.12.2014 Views

Tokologo Economic Profile.pdf - Arid Areas Programme

Tokologo Economic Profile.pdf - Arid Areas Programme

Tokologo Economic Profile.pdf - Arid Areas Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

over the 1996 to 2004 timeframe. Although the value for Whites remained static it can be<br />

seen that overall income inequality is steadily increasing.<br />

5.3 Human Development Index (HDI)<br />

The actual HDI values for <strong>Tokologo</strong> are as follows:<br />

Table 13: HDI values in <strong>Tokologo</strong><br />

Year Blacks Whites Coloureds Overall<br />

1996 0.32 0.82 0.36 0.42<br />

2001 0.38 0.81 0.43 0.46<br />

2004 0.38 0.80 0.42 0.46<br />

It can readily be seen that there was a sharp HDI increase for the PDI element of the<br />

populace between 1996 and 2001 which had a corresponding effect on the overall values.<br />

These values stabilized over the 2001 to 2004 period. It should be noted that a value<br />

lower than 0.50 equates to low human development.<br />

5.4 Infrastructure provision<br />

Given the explosive growth in the number of households, significant progress was made<br />

with the delivery of infrastructural services to households:<br />

Table 14: Service delivery in <strong>Tokologo</strong>, 1996-2001<br />

Households without adequate services: Percentages<br />

DBSA figures Electricity Water Sanitation Refuse Telephones Housing<br />

1996 45.4 9.6 55.1 40.9 23.3 33.8<br />

2001 26.4 4.7 67.9 46.1 23.5 21.8<br />

IDP figures<br />

(2002)<br />

36 30 75<br />

Sources: DBSA 2005:170; <strong>Tokologo</strong> IDP 2002<br />

It must be pointed out that when the statistics for service provision used in the 2002 IDP<br />

(as supplied by the municipality) are compared with the DBSA figures, anomalies arise<br />

such that it is virtually impossible to reconcile the numbers (Table 13. This could be due<br />

to a variety of factors not the least of which is deliberate under/over reporting depending<br />

on the circumstances at the time. Also, due to rapidly changing circumstances, it is likely<br />

that the figures are always relatively out of date.<br />

It is interesting to note how out of kilter the housing supply is with that of sanitation. In<br />

1996, 4381 households were ‘satisfactorily housed’. By 2001 this number had increased<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!