31.12.2014 Views

CLECAT-ESC joint press release

CLECAT-ESC joint press release

CLECAT-ESC joint press release

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRESS RELEASE<br />

24 April 2009<br />

<strong>ESC</strong> and <strong>CLECAT</strong> on the European rail freight network Plenary vote:<br />

the European Parliament looks askew at its “greening of cargo” wish-list<br />

Today in Brussels, the European Shippers’ Council and the European association for freight<br />

forwarders <strong>CLECAT</strong> ex<strong>press</strong>ed their surprise on the vote on the Commission’s “proposal for a<br />

directive concerning a European rail network for competitive freight” at the European Parliament’s<br />

plenary session which took place this week.<br />

Both <strong>CLECAT</strong> and <strong>ESC</strong> regret that the European Parliament has been reluctant to make further<br />

steps that would support the transport of freight on rail. The European Parliament has for<br />

example chosen not to take account of the necessity to give clear priority to freight on certain<br />

selected routes by disposing of the term “priority” in the proposal. This would undermine the<br />

proposal’s objective to develop an efficient and integrated freight transport network.<br />

In reaction to the plenary vote, Marco Sorgetti, Director General of <strong>CLECAT</strong>, said “concerning the<br />

decisions and measures taken by the governance bodies responsible for the freight corridors, the<br />

adopted amendment improves the original text by involving infrastructure managers and groups<br />

of railway undertakings using the corridor. However, <strong>CLECAT</strong> cannot be entirely satisfied with the<br />

position taken by MEPs as we believe that customers should also be directly involved in the<br />

governance bodies of the corridors”.<br />

Nicolette van der Jagt, Secretary General of the <strong>ESC</strong> regretted that the European Parliament has<br />

ignored some basic principles that would have enhanced the level of rail freight services: “MEPs<br />

seem to be unaware of the need for freight to be transported and delivered at times which may be<br />

considered peak periods for passenger services also. The Commission’s proposed text on that<br />

matter was better in the sense it would ensure a fair and equal balance between the needs of<br />

passenger services and freight on the strategic rail freight corridors”.<br />

<strong>CLECAT</strong> and <strong>ESC</strong> were however pleased that the European Parliament took the view to<br />

strengthen the role of Regulatory Bodies in case of conflict between applicant and Governance<br />

Bodies as this should increase competition and transparency. However, they would like to stress<br />

that these Regulatory Bodies must act in the full interests of competition on the rail and not be<br />

swayed by national politics, ideology or incumbents’ interests.<br />

Finally, whereas <strong>CLECAT</strong> and <strong>ESC</strong> welcome the decision of the European Parliament to involve<br />

applicants and customers in the establishment of corridor performance indicators, this is only<br />

seen as a first step in the good direction; the conditions of applicants defined in article 16 of<br />

Directive 2001/14/EC provide Member States with the freedom to ignore this concept if they so<br />

wish.<br />

1


For more information contact:<br />

Nicolette van der Jagt<br />

Secretary General<br />

European Shippers' Council<br />

tel + 32 2 230 2113<br />

nicolettevdjagt@europeanshippers.be<br />

www.europeanshippers.com<br />

or<br />

Mr Marco Sorgetti<br />

Director General<br />

<strong>CLECAT</strong> 1<br />

sorgetti@clecat.org<br />

http://www.clecat.org<br />

1 International Federation of Freight Forwarders Associations / Comité de Liaison Européen des Commissionnaires et<br />

Auxiliaires de Transport<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!