01.01.2015 Views

Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater

Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater

Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEES<br />

REPORT TO:<br />

STILLWATER UTILITIES AUTHORITY No. <strong>SUA</strong>-<strong>13</strong>-<strong>02</strong><br />

ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER - STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA<br />

Date of Meeting: January 7, 20<strong>13</strong><br />

Subject: <strong>Bid</strong> Recommendation: <strong>Kinzie</strong> Substation Power <strong>Transformer</strong> - <strong>SUA</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> #15-12/<strong>13</strong><br />

Purpose of Report: To request Trustee action on a bid for purchase of a 45/60/75/84 MVA, <strong>13</strong>8 kV–<br />

69 kV power transformer for <strong>Kinzie</strong> Substation.<br />

Background: Oil samples are collected annually from all substation transformers. The results of the<br />

analysis of the oil samples are a key indicator of the health of the transformers. The most <strong>rec</strong>ent<br />

analysis of the oil sample from <strong>Kinzie</strong> substation indicated severe overheating of the oil due to<br />

internal arcing. To prevent catastrophic failure, the transformer was removed from service. The<br />

existing transformer has to be either replaced or rebuilt and because the transformer had previously<br />

been rebuilt it was determined that replacement would be the best option for the system for multiple<br />

reasons. In addition to a longer operating life and a higher probability of reliability, replacement also<br />

allows for the transformer to be increased in size to better handle the City's growing load and provide<br />

extra capacity to our transmission system during emergencies. The existing transformer had a<br />

maximum rating of 56 Megavolt-amperes (MVA). The new transformer will have a maximum rating of<br />

84 MVA.<br />

Specifications and contract documents were prepared by SEU staff and reviewed by Guernsey. A<br />

solicitation for bids was advertised and bid specifications were sent to 17 perspective bidders on<br />

November 7, 2012.<br />

Discussion: Seven bids were <strong>rec</strong>eived and opened on December 3, 2012. The bid amounts ranged<br />

from $623,650 submitted by <strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd to $850,975 submitted by ABB.<br />

The bids were evaluated in accordance with the procedures established by the City of <strong>Stillwater</strong><br />

Purchasing Manual.<br />

Power transformers convert some electrical energy to waste heat in the electric power transformation<br />

process. The waste heat, called loss, is used to evaluate the operational efficiency of the transformer<br />

and is a large part of the cost of ownership to the utility. Well designed and manufactured<br />

transformers are highly efficient and the losses are relatively small in comparison to the transformer<br />

power rating. However, the electric energy cost to supply these losses equate to a considerable sum<br />

of money when subjected to a present worth analysis over the expected life of the transformer.<br />

All bidders were required, as part of their bid, to include the transformer losses expressed in<br />

kilowatts. For evaluation purposes, all bid prices were subjected to a “cost of loss” adder to the bid<br />

price. The actual losses of the transformers are measured at the factory acceptance test. If actual<br />

losses are greater than the losses stated in the bid, the bidder must reduce their bid price based on a<br />

formula similar to that used to determine the adder. This process allows staff to determine the lowest<br />

responsible bidder by assuring that important differences in value as well as price of the product have<br />

been considered.<br />

The following table summarizes the cost related information provided in the bids. Base Price is the<br />

initial purchase amount. It is the sum of the cost of the transformer, related expenses to ship and set<br />

it on the concrete pad and purchase the spare parts the manufacturer <strong>rec</strong>ommends to keep in<br />

inventory. Losses are the value of the energy converted to waste heat over the life of the<br />

transformer. The loss calculation considers the present price of power, an assumed escalation over<br />

1


the projected 30 year transformer life and transformer loading. Evaluated Cost is the sum of the<br />

Base Price and Losses.<br />

Summary of Evaluation<br />

Manufacturer<br />

Base<br />

Evaluated<br />

Price ($) Losses ($) Cost ($)<br />

<strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd. 623,650 257,620 881,270<br />

CG Power Systems 671,400 357,116 1,<strong>02</strong>8,516<br />

Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> 695,275 354,891 1,050,116<br />

Weg 734,383 373,944 1,108,327<br />

Delta Star 849,578 336,819 1,186,397<br />

ABB 850,975 351,115 1,2<strong>02</strong>,090<br />

Howard Industries<br />

Incomplete bid packet<br />

The bid specification requires the <strong>Bid</strong>der to manufacture the transformer in the continental United<br />

States. <strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd. manufactures transformers at their facility in<br />

Ahmedabad, India so their bid does not meet the requirements in the bid specifications. CG Power<br />

Systems would manufacture the transformer at their facility in Washington, MO. However, this plant<br />

has only manufactured smaller, distribution-type transformers and has not manufactured a<br />

transformer with the capacity required in the bid specifications. Consequently, CG Power Systems<br />

does not meet the minimum qualifications for <strong>Bid</strong>der’s experience as required in the bid<br />

specifications. Based the evaluation of the bids submitted, Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> was determined to<br />

be the lowest responsible bidder.<br />

Budget Impact: Funding for the project will come from the electric rate stabilization fund and a<br />

budget of $1.1 million has been established for this project. The remaining budgeted funds after the<br />

purchase of the new transformer will be used for the installation of the new transformer, upgrading<br />

control and protection systems, and the additional equipment required in the substation to handle the<br />

added capacity.<br />

Recommendation: It is <strong>rec</strong>ommended that the Trustees award the bid for the <strong>Kinzie</strong> substation<br />

transformer to Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> in the amount of $695,275 and authorize expenditures for the<br />

purchase of the transformer in the same amount.<br />

Prepared by:<br />

Kyle Muret, Electrical Engineer Intern<br />

Reviewed by Operations Di<strong>rec</strong>tor: Lee Jackson, Engineering Manager<br />

Reviewed by Administrative Di<strong>rec</strong>tor: Dan Blankenship, <strong>SUA</strong> Di<strong>rec</strong>tor<br />

Date of Preparation: January 3, 20<strong>13</strong><br />

Submitted by:<br />

___________________________<br />

Dan Galloway<br />

City Manager

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!