Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater
Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater
Bid rec Kinzie Transformer SUA-13-02 - Stillwater
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TO THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEES<br />
REPORT TO:<br />
STILLWATER UTILITIES AUTHORITY No. <strong>SUA</strong>-<strong>13</strong>-<strong>02</strong><br />
ISSUED BY THE CITY MANAGER - STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA<br />
Date of Meeting: January 7, 20<strong>13</strong><br />
Subject: <strong>Bid</strong> Recommendation: <strong>Kinzie</strong> Substation Power <strong>Transformer</strong> - <strong>SUA</strong> <strong>Bid</strong> #15-12/<strong>13</strong><br />
Purpose of Report: To request Trustee action on a bid for purchase of a 45/60/75/84 MVA, <strong>13</strong>8 kV–<br />
69 kV power transformer for <strong>Kinzie</strong> Substation.<br />
Background: Oil samples are collected annually from all substation transformers. The results of the<br />
analysis of the oil samples are a key indicator of the health of the transformers. The most <strong>rec</strong>ent<br />
analysis of the oil sample from <strong>Kinzie</strong> substation indicated severe overheating of the oil due to<br />
internal arcing. To prevent catastrophic failure, the transformer was removed from service. The<br />
existing transformer has to be either replaced or rebuilt and because the transformer had previously<br />
been rebuilt it was determined that replacement would be the best option for the system for multiple<br />
reasons. In addition to a longer operating life and a higher probability of reliability, replacement also<br />
allows for the transformer to be increased in size to better handle the City's growing load and provide<br />
extra capacity to our transmission system during emergencies. The existing transformer had a<br />
maximum rating of 56 Megavolt-amperes (MVA). The new transformer will have a maximum rating of<br />
84 MVA.<br />
Specifications and contract documents were prepared by SEU staff and reviewed by Guernsey. A<br />
solicitation for bids was advertised and bid specifications were sent to 17 perspective bidders on<br />
November 7, 2012.<br />
Discussion: Seven bids were <strong>rec</strong>eived and opened on December 3, 2012. The bid amounts ranged<br />
from $623,650 submitted by <strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd to $850,975 submitted by ABB.<br />
The bids were evaluated in accordance with the procedures established by the City of <strong>Stillwater</strong><br />
Purchasing Manual.<br />
Power transformers convert some electrical energy to waste heat in the electric power transformation<br />
process. The waste heat, called loss, is used to evaluate the operational efficiency of the transformer<br />
and is a large part of the cost of ownership to the utility. Well designed and manufactured<br />
transformers are highly efficient and the losses are relatively small in comparison to the transformer<br />
power rating. However, the electric energy cost to supply these losses equate to a considerable sum<br />
of money when subjected to a present worth analysis over the expected life of the transformer.<br />
All bidders were required, as part of their bid, to include the transformer losses expressed in<br />
kilowatts. For evaluation purposes, all bid prices were subjected to a “cost of loss” adder to the bid<br />
price. The actual losses of the transformers are measured at the factory acceptance test. If actual<br />
losses are greater than the losses stated in the bid, the bidder must reduce their bid price based on a<br />
formula similar to that used to determine the adder. This process allows staff to determine the lowest<br />
responsible bidder by assuring that important differences in value as well as price of the product have<br />
been considered.<br />
The following table summarizes the cost related information provided in the bids. Base Price is the<br />
initial purchase amount. It is the sum of the cost of the transformer, related expenses to ship and set<br />
it on the concrete pad and purchase the spare parts the manufacturer <strong>rec</strong>ommends to keep in<br />
inventory. Losses are the value of the energy converted to waste heat over the life of the<br />
transformer. The loss calculation considers the present price of power, an assumed escalation over<br />
1
the projected 30 year transformer life and transformer loading. Evaluated Cost is the sum of the<br />
Base Price and Losses.<br />
Summary of Evaluation<br />
Manufacturer<br />
Base<br />
Evaluated<br />
Price ($) Losses ($) Cost ($)<br />
<strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd. 623,650 257,620 881,270<br />
CG Power Systems 671,400 357,116 1,<strong>02</strong>8,516<br />
Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> 695,275 354,891 1,050,116<br />
Weg 734,383 373,944 1,108,327<br />
Delta Star 849,578 336,819 1,186,397<br />
ABB 850,975 351,115 1,2<strong>02</strong>,090<br />
Howard Industries<br />
Incomplete bid packet<br />
The bid specification requires the <strong>Bid</strong>der to manufacture the transformer in the continental United<br />
States. <strong>Transformer</strong>s and Rectifiers (India) Ltd. manufactures transformers at their facility in<br />
Ahmedabad, India so their bid does not meet the requirements in the bid specifications. CG Power<br />
Systems would manufacture the transformer at their facility in Washington, MO. However, this plant<br />
has only manufactured smaller, distribution-type transformers and has not manufactured a<br />
transformer with the capacity required in the bid specifications. Consequently, CG Power Systems<br />
does not meet the minimum qualifications for <strong>Bid</strong>der’s experience as required in the bid<br />
specifications. Based the evaluation of the bids submitted, Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> was determined to<br />
be the lowest responsible bidder.<br />
Budget Impact: Funding for the project will come from the electric rate stabilization fund and a<br />
budget of $1.1 million has been established for this project. The remaining budgeted funds after the<br />
purchase of the new transformer will be used for the installation of the new transformer, upgrading<br />
control and protection systems, and the additional equipment required in the substation to handle the<br />
added capacity.<br />
Recommendation: It is <strong>rec</strong>ommended that the Trustees award the bid for the <strong>Kinzie</strong> substation<br />
transformer to Virginia <strong>Transformer</strong> in the amount of $695,275 and authorize expenditures for the<br />
purchase of the transformer in the same amount.<br />
Prepared by:<br />
Kyle Muret, Electrical Engineer Intern<br />
Reviewed by Operations Di<strong>rec</strong>tor: Lee Jackson, Engineering Manager<br />
Reviewed by Administrative Di<strong>rec</strong>tor: Dan Blankenship, <strong>SUA</strong> Di<strong>rec</strong>tor<br />
Date of Preparation: January 3, 20<strong>13</strong><br />
Submitted by:<br />
___________________________<br />
Dan Galloway<br />
City Manager