Engaging men on their use of sexual violence as a power and ...

financial costs
family law
engaging <strong>men</strong> on
sexual violence
Winter / 2011
.45
newsletter

inside
1 editorial
2 clearinghouse update
3 issues in good practice
engaging <strong>men</strong> on their use of sexual violence
as a power and control tactic
5 national update
recent develop<strong>men</strong>ts in family law
8 feature
working with the media: a new tool
9 fast facts
the financial cost of domestic and family
violence
10 new research
12 new initiatives and resources
14 review
AVERT family violence: collaborative
responses in the family law system
16 recent additions to the research
and resources database
17 practice notes
Contributions
The Clearinghouse welcomes submissions from service workers, researchers
and individuals. If you wish to submit an article or review, please email a one
paragraph outline to the address below. We will provide you with feedback and
discuss a deadline for submission.
Subscriptions
For a free subscription to the Clearinghouse Newsletter or our other publications,
please phone, fax or email us, or subscribe online at www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/
subscribe.html
For more information contact the Clearinghouse at –
Email: clearinghouse@unsw.edu
Ph: (02) 9385 2990
Fax: (02) 9385 2993
Publication Information
ISSN print: 1443 7236
ISSN online: 1838-7101
© 2011
Design/Printing: Print Post Plus (P3)
The views expressed in this Newsletter do not necessarily represent the views
of the Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse or the Australian
Govern<strong>men</strong>t. While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this
publication, no liability is assumed for any errors or omissions. The Australian
Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse is funded by the Australian
Govern<strong>men</strong>t Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Families, Housing, Community Services and
Indigenous Affairs. The Clearinghouse is linked to the Centre for Gender-Related
Violence Studies, based in the University of New South Wales, School of Social
Sciences and International Studies.

editorial
Welcome to the
45th issue of the
Clearinghouse
Newsletter.
protection orders and divorce. Judge Kulger discussed
operational issues for these courts and their expansion
to address emerging issues, such as to allow same-sex
partners to obtain civil orders of protection.
It is that time again
when we consult you,
our users, to find out
what you think of our
services and how we
can make them more
relevant and useful
to you. Our survey
is open until the end
of July, so go online to www.surveymonkey.com/s/
ClearinghouseSurveyJuly2011 to have your say. This
information is invaluable to us in planning and business
develop<strong>men</strong>t, and we appreciate your input.
The Clearinghouse staff have been very busy over the past
couple of months with our project work, running a forum on
domestic violence deaths, writing submissions and papers,
all which you can read about in the Clearinghouse Update
on page 2 of this Newsletter.
In May, I made a lightening visit to the United States and
Canada. The primary reason for the trip was to attend
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> – Complex Realities and New
Issues in a Changing World, an international conference
held in Quebec, Canada. The conference heard from a
diverse range of speakers on many interesting topics and
I will provide a more detailed report in the next issue of the
Newsletter. For now, I will just <strong>men</strong>tion three of the keynote
speakers.
Well known researcher Dr Michael Johnson has written
extensively on typologies of intimate partner violence. At
this conference, he spoke about differences between
three major types of violence (intimate terrorism, violent
resistance and situational couple violence) in terms of their
causes, their effects on individuals and couples, and their
responsiveness to intervention. He argued persuasively for
a differentiated approach in dealing with violent <strong>men</strong>, while
emphasising the need to recognise that common couple
violence is as significant and dangerous as controlling
violence.
Judy Harris Kluger is the Chief of Policy and Planning in
New York State’s unified court system. She spoke about
the growing number of integrated domestic violence courts
in the state and how their operation is increasing access
to justice for victims. In these integrated courts, a single
judge will deal with a criminal domestic violence case and
all its related family issues, such as custody, visitation, civil
The third speaker was Dr Floya Anthias, a professor
of sociology at Roehampton University in the United
Kingdom. She argued for a more differentiated
understanding of wo<strong>men</strong> in terms of complex inequalities,
in order to understand and better address their experience
of violence and their needs. She called for more
collaboration between different sectors in order to address
wo<strong>men</strong>’s complex lives. Her paper then discussed a range
of issues around gender and violence; for example, around
the growth of migration, ‘diversity’, transnationalism and
global labour markets.
As well as attending the conference, I was also able to
visit two peak organisations in the United States: the
National Network to End Domestic Violence in Washington
and the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence
in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. I was impressed with the
significant resourcing of these organisations through
govern<strong>men</strong>t funding to support the work of the practicebased
sector. They provide training, knowledge transfer,
technical support and resource develop<strong>men</strong>t, as well as
representation to and advocacy with govern<strong>men</strong>t. The
level of support and advocacy that these organisations
can lend to domestic violence services and workers is
something we would love to see replicated in Australia,
with a peak organisation situated in each state and territory
carrying out this work.
Having the opportunity to hear eminent practitioners
and academics from around the world, learn about
new approaches and forge international links was an
invigorating experience and the learnings from this trip will
inform our work at the Clearinghouse into the future. While
it was great to learn about develop<strong>men</strong>ts going on around
the world, it was also heartening to have acknowledged
that our Clearinghouse is also spearheading innovation
and investigation, for example, through our domestic
violence workplace project and financial security research.
In this issue of the Newsletter, you will read about
engaging <strong>men</strong> on their use of sexual violence as a power
and control tactic (pp. 3-4), read a summary of recent
develop<strong>men</strong>ts in family law (pp. 5-7) and a review of the
AVERT family violence resource (pp. 14-15), as well as find
out about a new resource for working with the media (p. 8).
I hope you enjoy this issue of the Newsletter.
Gaby Marcus
Director
1
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

clearinghouse update
2
newsletter .45
Have your say in our latest user survey
To have your say about the delivery of Clearinghouse
services, please go online and fill in our user survey.
The survey takes ten to fifteen minutes to complete and
helps us plan better services for you. The survey will be
available until Sunday, 31 July 2011.
www.surveymonkey.com/s/ClearinghouseSurveyJuly2011
ALRC submissions
Over the past three months, the Clearinghouse has
responded to the Australian Law Reform Commission’s
(ALRC) inquiry into the treat<strong>men</strong>t of family/domestic
violence in Commonwealth laws. All Clearinghouse
submissions on the four Issues Papers released by the
ALRC are available on our web site.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/submissions.htm
Financial security project update
Following the publication of our report, Seeking security:
promoting wo<strong>men</strong>’s economic wellbeing following domestic
violence in March this year, we have sought to follow up on
a number of the research recom<strong>men</strong>dations. During the
last four months, we have:
à àwritten to Minister Tanya Plibersek and Minister Chris
Bowen
à àprovided input to the federal Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Human
Services’ review on service delivery to clients affected
by family violence
à àmet with two major banks
à àliaised with Financial Counselling Australia and the
Association of Financial Advisers
à àwritten to the Chair of the Federation of Ethnic
Communities Council in Australia
à àcontributed to the ALRC inquiry into the treat<strong>men</strong>t of
family/domestic violence in Commonwealth laws.
We have also promoted the findings of the research at:
ààa meeting of govern<strong>men</strong>t and non-govern<strong>men</strong>t
representatives in Darwin, 4 May
ààMeeting the Needs of Victims of Crime conference in
Sydney, 18-19 May.
We will be meeting with one of the Prime Minister’s
advisors to discuss some of the project recom<strong>men</strong>dations.
Updates on the project and copies of recent conference
presentations are available on the Clearinghouse web site.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/projects.htm
Workplace rights and entitle<strong>men</strong>ts
project update
This edition of the Newsletter is being mailed out together
with a bulletin on our workplace rights and entitle<strong>men</strong>ts
project. If you are reading the Newsletter online, you
can access the bulletin on our web site. Updates on the
project are also regularly posted on the web site.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/dv_workplace_rights_
entitle<strong>men</strong>ts_project.htm
Domestic violence homicide forum and
workshop
On 20 May in Sydney, around 100 participants attended
the Clearinghouse forum, Domestic Violence Deaths: Risk,
Responsibility and Review. The three forum speakers
gave diverse and stimulating presentations on the issue of
domestic violence related deaths.
Lyndal Bugeja, Team Leader of the Intentional Death
Investigation Team at the Coroners Prevention Unit Victoria,
gave an account of Victoria’s domestic violence death
investigation process, set up in 2009.
Dr Rochelle Braaf, Clearinghouse Senior Research Officer,
presented evidence linking sexual violence by intimate
partners with homicide risk. Rochelle discussed the
difficulties of responding to this risk when there are strong
tendencies for wo<strong>men</strong> not to disclose, <strong>men</strong> to deny their
behaviour and workers not to ask.
Associate Professor Jane Ursel, Director of Research and
Education for Solutions to Violence and Abuse (RESOLVE)
at the University of Manitoba, spoke about progress made
in reducing the number of domestic violence-related
homicides in Manitoba, Canada. Jane suggested that
these reductions have been achieved through changes in
the criminal justice system including: legislative and policy
change; gathering, monitoring and responding to trends
in data; better policing of breaches; the introduction of
specialist domestic violence courts; and police monitoring
of high risk offenders.
Following the forum, researchers from the Centre for
Gender Related Violence Studies at the University of New
South Wales, in partnership with Relationships Australia
South Australia (RASA), ran a workshop entitled Thinking
About Homicide Risk – A Framework for Counsellors.
Dr Kerrie James, Dr Jan Breckenridge and Claire Ralfs
presented this framework to a group of experienced
domestic violence workers from different agency contexts
and sectors.
Slides of the presentations are available on the
Clearinghouse web site and podcasts of the event will be
uploaded in the coming weeks.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/conference_proceedings.htm
Clearinghouse staff presentations
Clearinghouse staff have presented papers at a number
of recent forums. See the back page of this Newsletter for
details.

issues in good practice
ENGAGING MEN ON THEIR USE OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AS A POWER AND
CONTROL TACTIC BY RODNEY VLAIS, ACTING EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NO TO VIOLENCE
MALE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION ASSOCIATION
The nature of male family violence
Intimate partner abuse by <strong>men</strong> is an expression of male
power and control in the context of a male dominated society.
No To Violence (NTV) believes that all work to engage <strong>men</strong>
must be located within an awareness of the social context of
male family violence. Men use family violence as a deliberate
tactic to exert power and control and maintain gender-based
privileges to which they feel entitled. In the process, they
ignore the wishes of the other person.
Although <strong>men</strong> need to be held responsible and
accountable for their own violence, we must acknowledge
that male violence is embedded in the structures and
collective unconscious of Australia’s patriarchal society.
Ending gender-based inequalities is, therefore, essential
to the long-term prevention of male family violence.
Violence is a choice for which each man is responsible.
Although a man might have been socialised to believe
he has a right to control wo<strong>men</strong> and children, he can still
choose to take responsibility to learn and use non-violent
ways of relating.
In this context, <strong>men</strong>’s use of intimate partner sexual
violence can serve at least two functions. First, sexual
violence can be used as deliberate tactic to create fear
and subordination and to enforce control. Second, sexual
violence may serve as an expression of <strong>men</strong>’s unearned
gender-based privilege, based on a belief that they are
entitled to sexual gratification and are being ‘victimised’
when wo<strong>men</strong> ‘withhold’ sex from them.
Funda<strong>men</strong>tal aim of engaging <strong>men</strong>
The funda<strong>men</strong>tal aim of engaging male users of family
violence is to support the safety needs of wo<strong>men</strong> and
children. This might seem obvious but, in our experience,
it is possible for <strong>men</strong>’s services to lose sight of this aim.
This can occur where services operate primarily from a
<strong>men</strong>’s health framework, rather than as part of an integrated
family violence service system, and when they have weak
accountability processes to wo<strong>men</strong> and wo<strong>men</strong>’s services.
There has been very little research on the effectiveness
of <strong>men</strong>’s behaviour change programs in Australia. The
evidence for the long-term effectiveness of United States
programs in stopping <strong>men</strong>’s use of family violence is not
strong either. While most reviewers in this field acknowledge
the major methodological problems and limitations
associated with evaluating effectiveness, it is uncertain
whether there is sufficient evidence to justify working with
<strong>men</strong> for the sole purpose of long-term behaviour change.
Importantly, however, creating behaviour change is not
the only pathway through which <strong>men</strong>’s programs support
the safety of wo<strong>men</strong> and children. A second key pathway
is to provide partners of <strong>men</strong> who participate in programs
with access to safety planning, referrals, direct support
and other outcomes or processes that stem through
partner contact work. Indeed, many wo<strong>men</strong> who engage
in partner contact work have not previously accessed a
family violence service.
Sometimes work with <strong>men</strong> who do not or are not likely to
make long-term changes can still support the work with
wo<strong>men</strong>. Some of these <strong>men</strong> might make some temporary
changes to some aspects of their behaviour through
participation in the program, which might provide their
partners with a degree of ‘breathing space’ through which
to discover more of their own agency, find small but
important opportunities to regain a sense of dignity, revise
safety plans and make decisions. Furthermore, partners’
unsuccessful or partly successful participation in the
program might help wo<strong>men</strong> to face the reality of the likely
future trajectory of violence.
Finally, male family violence services can report breaches of
intervention orders and provide feedback to referrers such
as police and courts, thereby supporting law enforce<strong>men</strong>t
and judicial systems to impose appropriate sanctions.
Addressing intimate partner sexual
violence
NTV acknowledges that, taken as a whole, the male family
violence sector needs to do more to address intimate
partner sexual violence. While <strong>men</strong> who abuse their
partners are ordinarily very hesitant to take responsibility
for their behaviour and use a variety of strategies to deny
and minimise it, this problem is even more pronounced
in relation to sexual violence. Often <strong>men</strong> in programs
have a very narrow definition of sexual violence. They
are unlikely to spontaneously talk about their sense of
entitle<strong>men</strong>t to obtain sexual gratification or the effects of
sexually objectifying wo<strong>men</strong>.
Practitioners and facilitators in the <strong>men</strong>’s behaviour
change field generally find addressing sexual violence
difficult work. As a result, workers have searched for
Key practice points
àà
àà
àà
Men are often very hesitant to discuss intimate
partner sexual violence in <strong>men</strong>’s behaviour change
programs addressing family violence.
Program providers are trying innovative and creative
ways to open up discussion and to encourage <strong>men</strong>
to reflect on their and society’s sexual objectification
of wo<strong>men</strong>.
These approaches include deconstructing and
exploring the notion of ‘make up’ sex after violence,
the sexual objectification of wo<strong>men</strong> in the media
and male peer cultures, healthy sexual relating and
<strong>men</strong>’s use of pornography.
3
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

4
innovative and creative approaches and activities to
open up discussion around sexual violence and related
issues. Some approaches being trialled across the <strong>men</strong>’s
behaviour change sector are outlined below. Together
they demonstrate the potential for this sector to work
harder and more creatively to respond to intimate partner
sexual violence.
Cycle of violence
The ‘cycle of violence’ model has long been debated
within the domestic violence sector in terms of how
accurately it encompasses the experiences of wo<strong>men</strong>
and how aptly it portrays <strong>men</strong>’s ongoing strategic and
tactical use of violence. It is, however, used in the
psycho-educational aspects of a number of <strong>men</strong>’s
programs, as it is a model to which many participants
relate. It can provide opportunities for in-depth spinoff
discussions on issues ranging from the difference
between self-centred and other-centred remorse to
‘safety’ planning enabling <strong>men</strong> to identify their own ‘build
ups’ to violence.
In this way the cycle of violence can be used to spark
discussions about sexual violence and consent. It
becomes an entry point for <strong>men</strong> to talk about the role
that ‘make-up sex’ has in the ‘remorse’ and ‘honeymoon’
phases (i.e. the use of sex to feel better after violence and
to try to keep the relationship together). Group facilitators
can encourage <strong>men</strong> to consider how their partner might
be feeling about sexual relating, in the days or weeks
after a significant episode of violence, and whether <strong>men</strong>
are using a (significant) degree of coercion to engage
in make-up sex which their partner does not want. This
dialogue can open up spaces for discussion about active
consent and the difference between ‘self-centred’ and
‘other-centred’ perspectives.
This approach engages with the widely recognised and
used phrase ‘make-up sex’, reframing it based on <strong>men</strong>’s
explorations and understandings of the cycle of violence
model. By beginning a discussion of whether ‘make-up’ sex
is experienced in the same way by wo<strong>men</strong>, space can be
created for <strong>men</strong> to explore issues of coercion and consent.
Sexual objectification of wo<strong>men</strong> in the media and
male peer cultures
Another approach some programs use to engage <strong>men</strong> on
their use of sexual violence is through a focus on media
representations of wo<strong>men</strong>. At least one program provider
engages <strong>men</strong> in a series of exercises over time to explore
issues of consent in sexual relating in the context of the
sexual objectification of wo<strong>men</strong> in the media and in male
peer cultures. These exercises include:
à àsome initial explorations with <strong>men</strong> around the definition
of and issues of consent in sexual relating, a concept
which is then revisited in future sessions once
understanding deepens
a historical analysis, through art, where <strong>men</strong> view
particular paintings and are invited to consider how
they represent <strong>men</strong> and wo<strong>men</strong> (these paintings
portray the intergenerational concepts of wo<strong>men</strong>
‘tempting’ <strong>men</strong> and that <strong>men</strong> ‘cannot help themselves’)
an analysis of the names and words used to describe
wo<strong>men</strong>, which are still embedded within male peer
cultures (and society more generally)
a presentation and critical discussion of advertising
images depicting wo<strong>men</strong> in sexually objectifying and
demeaning ways, encouraging <strong>men</strong> to reflect on their
reactions and what messages are communicated about
wo<strong>men</strong> and sexual respect.
à à
à à
à à
Healthy sexual relating and active consent
Another approach is to com<strong>men</strong>ce conversations about
sexual violence with a focus on what <strong>men</strong> believe is
required to nurture an intimate, healthy, satisfying sexual
relationship. After <strong>men</strong> outline the positive aspects and
necessary conditions for intimate sexual relating with one’s
partner, the discussion can then move towards <strong>men</strong>’s
behaviours that sabotage or prevent what they really want
out of their sexual relationships. From here, the facilitator
can lead participants into a discussion of their use of
coercion and control as undermining and destroying an
intimate relationship with their partner. Such approaches
assume that many <strong>men</strong> in behaviour change programs
have a desire to work towards positive sexual relating.
Pornography
A further approach explores <strong>men</strong>’s use of pornography
and the effects that it has on sexual relating. This
approach not only involves providing information on the
structural gender inequities inherent in pornography
industries but also the distortion that pornography use
creates for <strong>men</strong>’s expectations about sexual relating.
Given that mainstream and accessible pornography has
become increasingly violent and degrading towards
wo<strong>men</strong> over the past ten to fifteen years, <strong>men</strong> who use
pornography can develop demeaning and inappropriate
expectations of what their partner should be receptive
to or participate in during sex. The effects of these
inappropriate expectations on wo<strong>men</strong> and <strong>men</strong>’s intimate
relationships can then be explored.
Conclusion
The suggestions above provide a starting point for male
family violence workers to introduce discussion of sexual
abuse in their work with <strong>men</strong>. Male family violence
workers are aware that <strong>men</strong> can hide more than they will
reveal in group and individual discussions. Finding new
ways to obtain and deconstruct the full picture of abuse
and control will help to promote a safer community.
newsletter .45
GOOD PRACTICE HOTLINE
The Clearinghouse Good Practice Hotline is available
on Mondays 2-4pm (Eastern Standard Time) on
(02) 9385 3843.
For more information: visit the No to Violence web
site at www.ntv.org.au or contact Not to Violence at
(03) 9428 3536.

national update
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FAMILY LAW BY KareN WILCOX, CLeariNGHouSE GooD
PraCtiCE OFFICer
This year has seen some significant changes in the family
law arena, both in legislation and in service practices. This
national update looks at some of the key develop<strong>men</strong>ts
across the country, including the introduction of the Family
Law A<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t (Family Violence & Other Measures)
Bill 2011, and increased engage<strong>men</strong>t and collaboration
between the family violence and family law sectors.
Family law a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts introduced to
Parlia<strong>men</strong>t
The Commonwealth Govern<strong>men</strong>t this year proposed longawaited,
safety-focused a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts to the Family Law Act
1975 (Cth). The Family Law A<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t (Family Violence
& Other Measures) Bill 2011 was introduced to Parlia<strong>men</strong>t
on 24 March, following the wide circulation of a consultation
draft by the Commonwealth Attorney-General, the Hon.
Robert McClelland. The Bill was passed by the House of
Representatives, without changes, on 30 May.
These a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts follow a series of reviews of the Family
Law Act 1975 commissioned by the govern<strong>men</strong>t. The Bill
recognises the widespread concern put to govern<strong>men</strong>t
about the impact of the a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts introduced in 2006
by the previous Liberal Govern<strong>men</strong>t, particularly in relation
to wo<strong>men</strong>’s and children’s safety and wellbeing following
separation. High profile homicides by domestic abusers,
including the tragic Darcey Freeman murder, also prompted
community outrage and calls for reform.
The proposed a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts address the following issues
arising from the expert reviews:
Determining children’s ‘best interests’
Where there is an inconsistency between the right of the
child to have a ‘meaningful relationship’ and the right of
the child to be protected from family violence and abuse,
the latter will have priority as a primary consideration in
determining children’s best interests. This a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t
means that the so-called ‘twin pillars’ in the Act which are
used to determine children’s ‘best interests’ will instead be
weighted, with the right to safety taking precedence where
domestic violence or child abuse is an issue.
Widening the definition of child abuse
The definition of child abuse will be widened to cover:
causing serious psychological harm to a child, including
when the child is subjected or exposed to family violence
(i.e. sees, hears or experiences the effects of family
violence); and neglect. Given the reform to the ‘twin
pillars’ noted above, this is likely to enhance the capacity
of the courts to find safety-based solutions to parenting
arrange<strong>men</strong>ts.
Widening of the definition of family violence
Similarly, the definition of family violence will be widened
to focus on fear, coercion and control, rather than what
the courts might consider ‘reasonable’. Examples in the
Bill incorporate recent changes to state protection order
definitions (such as in Victoria and South Australia) and
include:
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
repeated derogatory taunts
intentionally causing death or injury to an animal
unreasonably denying the family member the financial
autonomy that he or she would otherwise have had
unreasonably withholding financial support needed
to meet the reasonable living expenses of the family
member, or his or her child, at a time when the family
member is entirely or predominantly dependent on the
person for financial support
preventing the family member from making or keeping
connections with his or her family, friends or culture
unlawfully depriving the family member, or any member
of their family, of his or her liberty.
Inclusion of international obligations
A further a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t adds the International Convention on
the Rights of the Child in the objects and principles of the
Family Law Act 1975. This convention includes reference to
a country’s obligation to:
àà
à à
à à
ensure children ‘be provided the opportunity to be
heard in any judicial and administrative proceedings
affecting the child, either directly, or through a
representative or an appropriate body’ (Article 12)
‘take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social
and educational measures to protect the child from
all forms of physical or <strong>men</strong>tal violence, injury or
abuse, neglect or negligent treat<strong>men</strong>t, maltreat<strong>men</strong>t or
exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care
of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who
has the care of the child’ (Article 19)
‘take all appropriate measures to promote physical
and psychological recovery and social reintegration of
a child victim of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or
abuse; torture or any other form of cruel, inhuman or
degrading treat<strong>men</strong>t or punish<strong>men</strong>t’ (Article 39).
Repeal of the ‘friendly parent’ provisions
The Bill will repeal the ‘friendly parent’ provisions (s 60CC
(4)), which many have argued prevented wo<strong>men</strong> attempting
to protect their children from violence from raising issues,
for fear of being viewed as obstructive of the relationship
between children and the other (abusive) parent.
Other a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts
Further a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts included in the Bill:
à àensure that consideration is given to interim and
uncontested state/territory protection orders, as well as
final orders
5
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

6
The Attorney-General announces the introduction of the Bill
à à
à à
direct family lawyers and counsellors to focus more on
the effects of family violence in their advice to their clients
repeal the specific ‘false allegations of domestic
violence’ cost order provisions (s 117AB).
The Bill does not alter the presumption of shared parental
responsibility or the linking of shared parental responsibility
with equal, substantial and significant time spent with the
other parent. As a result, victims of domestic violence
will still be required to provide what courts (and particular
judicial officers) might consider sufficient evidence to rebut
this presumption, if they are seeking limited, supervised or
no contact between their children and their abuser.
Following its reading in Parlia<strong>men</strong>t the Bill was referred
to a Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee.
Organisations and interested parties were invited to make
submissions to this committee, in addition to those they had
previously made to the Attorney-General in relation to the
draft Bill. Over 190 submissions to this Committee were
received at closing, including twelve separate submissions
from <strong>men</strong>’s lobby groups and over sixty confidential/namewithheld
individual submissions. This additional process
ensures that community consultation around these reforms
will be extensive.
With the passing of the Bill in the lower house, it is likely
that the Senate will debate the Bill in the spring session,
following the submission of the report of the Senate
Committee’s Inquiry. The final form of the Bill may be
subject to further a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>ts in the Senate.
Details of the Bill, as well as links to the commissioned
expert reviews can be viewed at: www.ag.gov.au/www/
agd/agd.nsf/Page/Families_Familyviolence
Cross-disciplinary events have been held
in several regions. A recent highlight was
the annual Greater Sydney Family Law
Pathways Network’s educational workshop
and dinner. Sydney family law, child
protection and domestic violence service
professionals came together in autumn
to hear contributions by expert speakers
including Professor Hilary Astor (New
South Wales Law Reform Commission),
Kate Alexander (Statewide Services,
New South Wales Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Community Services) and
Her Hon. Justice Ainslie-Wallace (Family Court of Australia).
Speakers and participants outlined the failure of systems in
protecting children where there has been family violence;
the difficulties in retaining, skilling and supporting the child
protection workforce; and models of good practice overseas
in Hackney (United Kingdom), Minnesota (United States) and
Norway.
A recurrent theme in discussions was the need for better
information sharing and collaboration across sectors
working with children living with family violence – a view
strongly supported by the Clearinghouse. Nonetheless,
many family law professionals continued to express support
for practices of early ‘triaging’ of families, through schemes
which differentiate between types of violence. ‘Parental
alienation’ theories also maintain some currency in the
family law sector, with some professionals believing that this
concept explains the behaviour of children who express that
they do not wish to spend time with a parent.
These cross-disciplinary events demonstrate the ongoing
importance of discussions and cross-sectoral training
between the family law and domestic violence sectors. The
Clearinghouse supports the workers in both sectors who are
moving to engage, find common ground and collaborate in
their work with victims of domestic and family violence.
newsletter .45
Collaborative relationships and crossfertilisation:
the family violence and
family law sectors
While legislative reform is essential to ensure the safety
of wo<strong>men</strong> and children affected by domestic violence,
greater collaboration between the family violence and family
law sectors is also needed to challenge practices which
undermine this safety. During the last year, several Family
Law Pathways Networks have developed or enhanced
linkages with domestic and family violence professionals in
their regions. Their work, and the work of many domestic
violence services and peaks, has paved the way for
increased engage<strong>men</strong>t across the sectors, with the potential
for enhanced professional understanding of the dynamics
of domestic violence and greater cooperation in working for
wo<strong>men</strong>’s and children’s safety post-separation.
Workshop attendees (from left to right): Sue Davies and
Beverley Dobie (YWCA Nowra); Claire Martin and Rosanna
Court (Newport Law); and Nicky Miller (Family Services
Illawarra)
Campaigns for safety in family law
Several campaigns for a safety-focused family law system
have emerged or gained mo<strong>men</strong>tum in tandem with the
legal and cross-agency develop<strong>men</strong>ts noted above. The
Rally for Children’s Safety, held in Canberra, and the
Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Legal Services Australia web campaign are
highlights of this impetus for change within the various
professions working with wo<strong>men</strong> and children affected by
family and domestic violence.

Rally for Children’s Safety
On 25 May 2011, hundreds of supporters turned out for the
Rally for Children’s Safety to improve the family law system.
The date coincided with the introduction of debate on the
govern<strong>men</strong>t’s a<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t Bill. The rally was organised
by the Alliance for Children’s Safety, an initiative of four
organisations (NSW Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Refuge Move<strong>men</strong>t, the
Benevolent Society, Justice for Children and the National
Council for Children Post-Separation) who are campaigning
to better protect children and primary carers from ongoing
violence, post-separation. The Alliance for Children’s Safety
calls for a Family Law Act that:
à àputs children’s safety first
à àassesses children’s safety on a case-by-case basis
à àprotects the safety of primary carers, to make children
safer.
The rally heard presentations by family violence survivors,
including those who had experienced outcomes from
family court processes that increased their risk of harm and
undermined their children’s safety and wellbeing. Helen
Cummings, the author of Blood vows (2011), reported how
dangerous the changes to family law since 2006 would
have been for her family, given her ex-partner’s subsequent
murder of his next family.
Other speakers included University of Sydney researcher Dr
Lesley Laing and Richard Spencer, CEO of the Benevolent
Society, who stressed that the most important consideration
of family law should be the protection of children, especially
if there are allegations of violence or abuse. Spencer noted
the staggering fact that in 70-80% of cases where domestic
violence or abuse was alleged by one partner, shared care
was still the outcome, according to the Australian Institute of
Family Studies’ evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms.
The alliance invites organisations and individuals to read more
about and endorse its campaign, through its web site at:
www.safetyforchildrenalliance.org
Put Safety First in Family Law
Put Safety First in Family Law is Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Legal Services
Australia’s campaign calling for the Australian Commonwealth
Govern<strong>men</strong>t to reform family law to make sure it works to
keep wo<strong>men</strong> and children safe. The campaign is endorsed
by the National Association of Community Legal Centres. The
campaign includes a web site equipped with easy-to-access
information, links, campaign resources and background
material to support community action for the changes
necessary to ensure safety for victims of domestic violence,
post-separation. It can be accessed at:
safetyinfamilylaw.com
Other develop<strong>men</strong>ts
Other develop<strong>men</strong>ts assisting to promote safe outcomes
following family law system engage<strong>men</strong>t include:
à àthe Commonwealth Govern<strong>men</strong>t’s pilot of Coordinated
Family Dispute Resolution, which allows family
members who are experiencing family violence (or
have experienced it in the past) to access a safe family
dispute resolution process. The pilot, developed
by Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Legal Service Queensland, brings
together family dispute resolution practitioners, legal
practitioners, domestic violence services and <strong>men</strong>’s
support services to assist separating parents to make
parenting arrange<strong>men</strong>ts
à àthe release of the AVERT multidisciplinary training
package (see the Review in this Newsletter)
à àthe Commonwealth Govern<strong>men</strong>t’s recent calls to tender
for the develop<strong>men</strong>t of a common risk assess<strong>men</strong>t
framework in family law.
Conclusion
The develop<strong>men</strong>ts noted in this update show the
commit<strong>men</strong>t of a wide range of services and individuals to
promoting the safety of wo<strong>men</strong> and children, in view of the
evidence base that highlights the detri<strong>men</strong>tal impact on
domestic violence victims of changes to family law made
in the last decade. It is hoped that policy and law reform
in this area will address the issues which undermine other
efforts across Australia to reduce and prevent domestic and
family violence.
Acknowledge<strong>men</strong>ts
Thanks to Carolin Wenzel (the Benevolent Society) for
providing information and photographs of the rally and to
Edwina MacDonald (Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Legal Services NSW) for
updates on the parlia<strong>men</strong>tary process.
REFERENCES
Wilcox K 2010, ‘Connecting systems, protecting victims:
towards vertical coordination of Australia’s response to
domestic and family violence’, University of New South
Wales Law Journal, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1013-1037
7
Family law: a Clearinghouse priority
The impact of family law on domestic violence responses is one of the priority concerns of the Clearinghouse. In
2010, we made submissions to the Australian and New South Wales Law Reform Commissions’ Family Violence
Inquiry, as well as to the Attorney-General on the consultation draft of the Family Law A<strong>men</strong>d<strong>men</strong>t (Family Violence)
Bill 2010. Staff have also been involved in the develop<strong>men</strong>t of training modules and program develop<strong>men</strong>t.
We have enhanced our networks with family law sector professionals and explored pointers to good practice in
this field. Newsletter articles and our online research and resources and good practice databases include more
resources on family violence for family court practitioners.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

feature
WORKING WITH THE MEDIA: A NEW TOOL BY VICKI LEE THOMAS, SENIOR RESEARCH
AND PROJECT WORKER, PACT COMMUNITY SUPPORT, AND CO-AUTHOR
8
newsletter .45
On 10 June, the Victorian Minister
for Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Affairs, the Hon. Mary
Wooldridge MP, and Sally Nicholes, of
Nicholes Family Lawyers, announced
the recipients of the Victorian
Eliminating Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong>
(EVA) Media Awards. Recipients
were congratulated for presenting
their stories ‘in a reasonable,
non-sensational manner’ and for
playing ‘a pivotal role in challenging
and changing attitudes towards
violence against wo<strong>men</strong>’. The goal
of the recently updated Family
violence in the news: a media toolkit
is to promote high standards of
reporting about family violence by all
journalists.
The toolkit was originally published
in 2005, with the aim of promoting
a better understanding of family
violence in the community through
accurate and informed coverage
in the media. In the six years since
the toolkit was published, there
have been changes to Victorian
legislation and the Police Code
of Practice for the Investigation of
Family Violence, publication of new
research and updated statistics, and
further strategic approaches to family
violence developed at both state and
Commonwealth levels. The second
edition of the toolkit reflects this new
material.
Although the toolkit was developed as
a resource for journalists, it is a more
powerful instru<strong>men</strong>t when linked to
a broader strategic framework that
supports the family violence sector
to work effectively with media. In
Victoria, a framework was developed
as one component of the broader
suite of projects falling under the
banner of Family violence in the news.
Funded by the Helen Macpherson
Smith Trust, the partnership project
between Child and Family Services
Ballarat Inc. and Pact Community
Support was undertaken in 2006-
07. Project leaders Kate Owen and
Vicki Lee Thomas consulted with and
were assisted by specialist family
and domestic violence services and
peak bodies, member organisations
of the Statewide Steering Committee
to Reduce Family Violence and media
professionals in Victoria.
The framework was completed in
April 2007 and endorsed by Domestic
Violence Victoria, Domestic Violence
and Incest Resource Centre (now
the Domestic Violence Resource
Centre Victoria) and No To Violence
– Victoria’s peak bodies for the
family violence sector. The four
main strategic areas defined in the
framework are:
à àbuilding capacity
à àfamily violence sector to work
directly with media
à à
events
à àresearch reporting of family
violence.
The toolkit comple<strong>men</strong>ts the
framework in a number of ways.
It promotes capacity building by
providing a resource to support
both media reporting about
family violence, and professional
develop<strong>men</strong>t and educational
activities in the family violence,
media and university sectors. It
assists the family violence sector
with their direct work with media; for
example, in supporting wo<strong>men</strong> who
have experienced family violence
to tell their stories. In addition, the
toolkit helps family violence sector
stakeholders to better focus their
events with a view to attracting
media coverage. Finally, the toolkit
is an easily accessible source of
information on statistics and current
literature on family violence.
Following the publication of the
original toolkit in 2005, a series of
workshops were conducted with
newspaper outlets and Victoria Police
Family Violence Advisors. The Media
Entertain<strong>men</strong>t and Arts Alliance
and Dart Center for Journalism
and Trauma were introduced to the
resource and were interested in its
potential as both a reference tool and
training resource.
Despite the original toolkit being
well regarded by both media and
family violence sector stakeholders,
its full potential was not realised.
The lack of funding for updates,
communication and promotion,
and facilitation of training events
dampened mo<strong>men</strong>tum.
Hopefully, that will change. The
Victorian Office of Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Policy
funding for the second edition update
has come about in the context of
imple<strong>men</strong>ting two govern<strong>men</strong>t
frameworks – A Right to Safety and
Justice: Strategic Framework to
Guide Continuing Family Violence
Reform in Victoria 2010-2020 and
A Right to Respect: Victoria’s Plan
to Prevent Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong>
2010-2020 – as well as in preparing
for the EVA Media Awards. These
new develop<strong>men</strong>ts suggest that
the links between prevention of and
responses to family violence and
effective relationships with media are
now better understood and valued.
The second edition of Family
violence in the news: a media
toolkit was launched at the EVA
Media Awards ceremony. It
is available as an electronic
publication only and will be
accessible on the Clearinghouse
web site, as well as on the
web sites of Child and Family
Services, Ballarat (www.cafs.
org.au), Pact Community
Support (www.pactcs.org.au)
and Grampians Integrated Family
Violence Committee (www.
grampiansfamilyviolence.
com.au).
For further information, contact
Vicki Lee Thomas at vlt@pactcs.
org.au or on (03) 5309 1900.

fast facts
THE FINANCIAL COST OF DOMESTIC AND FAMILY VIOLENCE BY ROSA CAMPBELL,
CLEARINGHOUSE RESEARCH ASSISTANT
Domestic and family violence can have a grave financial impact on victims and society generally. The two
Australian reports most often cited in regards to these financial costs are: The cost of domestic violence to the
Australian economy: parts 1 & 2, by Access Economics (2004), and The cost of violence against wo<strong>men</strong> and their
children, by the National Council to Reduce Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their Children (2009). Key statistics
from these and other reports are cited below.
Cost to Australia
Domestic and family violence imposes
a huge financial cost on the Australian
economy:
à àAccess Economics (2004, p. vii)
estimated that domestic violence
cost Australia $8.1 billion in 2002-
03.
à àThe National Council to Reduce
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their
Children (2009, p. 66) has more
recently projected that domestic
violence will cost Australia $9.9
billion in the year 2021-22, if
appropriate action is not taken.
Cost to victims
Victims themselves bear a large
proportion of the costs of abuse:
à àAccess Economics (2004, p. vii)
concluded that victims bear the
largest cost burden of domestic
violence, estimated at $4.05
billion out of a total $8.1 billion in
2002-03.
à àThe National Council to Reduce
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their
Children (2009, p. 8) found that
victims bear over half the costs of
domestic violence. It projected
the costs to victims to rise to $8.1
billion in 2021-22.
ààThe costs to victims include
homelessness (Australian Institute
of Health and Welfare 2007), loss
of income due to unemploy<strong>men</strong>t
(Braaf & Barrett Meyering 2011;
Moe & Bell 2004) and healthrelated
expenses (Fishman et al.
2010; VicHealth 2004).
Cost to Australian
business
Domestic and family violence also
creates costs for Australian business:
à àAccess Economics (2004, p.
43) estimated that in 2002-03,
domestic violence cost Australian
businesses $175.2 million.
à àThe National Council to Reduce
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their
Children (2009, p. 8) estimated
that if appropriate action is not
taken, domestic violence will cost
Australian employers $456 million
in 2021-22.
REFERENCES
Access Economics 2004, The cost of
domestic violence to the Australian
economy: part I, Office of the Status of
Wo<strong>men</strong>, Canberra
Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare 2007, Homeless people in
SAAP: SAAP National Data Collection
annual report 2005-06 Australia, cat.
no. HOU 156, AIHW, Canberra
Braaf R & Barrett Meyering I 2011,
Seeking security: promoting wo<strong>men</strong>’s
economic wellbeing following
domestic violence, Australian
Domestic and Family Violence
Clearinghouse, Sydney
Cadilhac DA, Magnus A, Cumming
T, Sheppard L, Pearce D & Carter
R 2009, The health and economic
benefits of reducing disease risk
factors, VicHealth, Melbourne.
Fishman PA, Bonomi AE, Anderson
ML, Reid RJ & Rivara FP 2010,
‘Changes in health care costs over
Costs and benefits of
prevention
The prevention of domestic and family
violence is of enormous social and
economic benefit to all Australians:
à àThe National Council to Reduce
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their
Children (2009, p. 4) concluded
that reducing all forms of violence
against wo<strong>men</strong> by 10% by 2021-
22 could amount to $1.6 billion in
savings.
ààAccording to VicHealth, eliminating
intimate partner violence would
save the health sector $207 million
dollars per year and save $1.8
billion in production and leisure
costs annually (Cadilhac et al.
2009, p. 64).
time following the cessation of
intimate partner violence’, Journal
of General Internal Medicine, vol.
25, n. 9, pp. 920-925
Moe A & Bell M 2004, ‘Abject
economics: the effects of battering
and violence on wo<strong>men</strong>’s work and
employability’, Violence Against
Wo<strong>men</strong>, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29-55
National Council to Reduce
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and
their Children 2009, The cost of
violence against wo<strong>men</strong> and their
children, Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Families,
Housing, Community Services and
Indigenous Affairs, Canberra
Victorian Health Promotion
Foundation 2004, The health costs
of violence: measuring the burden
of disease caused by intimate
partner violence: a summary of
findings, VicHealth, Melbourne.
9
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

new research
10
newsletter .45
PARTICIPANTS SOUGHT FOR
RESEARCH
Wo<strong>men</strong> and housing affordability survey
The Institute for Social Research at Swinburne University
of Technology, in conjunction with the Salvation Army, is
conducting a survey of single wo<strong>men</strong>, aged 40 and over
(with or without children) who do not expect to own their
home outright before they retire. The data obtained from
the survey will assist in developing a housing model to fit
the needs of wo<strong>men</strong> in these circumstances. The survey
closes at 10pm on Sunday, 14 August 2011.
The survey can be completed online at opinio.online.
swin.edu.au/ss=10098 or contact Andrea Sharam on
(03) 9214 5465 or at asharam@swin.edu.au to request a
paper copy.
Measuring crime victims’ paths to justice
Dr Rita Shackel from the University of Sydney Law School
is working collaboratively with Tilburg University and
the International Institute of Victimology (INTERVICT) in
the Netherlands on a study titled ‘Measuring access to
justice’ (MA2J). This research aims to test the validity of a
measuring tool (survey) specifically developed to assess
victims’ experiences with the criminal justice process in a
comprehensive and systematic way.
If you are interested in completing the MA2J survey,
distributing it to clients or want to find out more about the
study please either:
à à
à à
à à
go to a2j.uvt.nl/index.
phpsid=91726%E3%80%88=en and complete and
directly submit the survey online
go to sydney.edu.au/law/subjects/survey/shackel_
survey.pdf and complete the survey online and email
or print a hardcopy to send back to the researchers
contact Dr Rita Shackel at rita.shackel@sydney.
edu.au or on (02) 9351 0368 or Noleen Grogan at
nkgrogan@iinet.net.au
If you work with wo<strong>men</strong> affected by domestic violence,
please consider posting this notice in your work area or
directing clients to this survey.
Don’t forget our web site!
You can view the latest news from the sector on our
What’s New page, download Clearinghouse papers
from the Publications and Submissions page, look for
upcoming forums on the Conferences and Events
page, and search our databases for research and
good practice.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au
RECENTLY PUBLISHED RESEARCH
AIFS releases new research reports from its
evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms
Two new reports from the Families project component of
the Australian Institute of Family Studies’ evaluation of the
2006 family law reforms are now available:
à à
à à
Parenting dynamics after separation – a follow-up study
of parents who separated after the 2006 family law
reforms
Views of adolescents in separated families – a study of
adolescents’ experiences after the 2006 reforms to the
family law system.
The evaluation was
commissioned in 2006 by
the Commonwealth Attorney-
General’s Depart<strong>men</strong>t and
the Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Families,
Housing, Community
Services and Indigenous
Affairs.
The reports examine the
behaviour and experiences
of parents and adolescents
from families that have separated since the 2006 family
law reforms. They highlight that inter-parental conflict,
fear, abuse and safety concerns remain prevalent for a
significant number of parents following separation.
The reports are based on AIFS’ Longitudinal Study of
Separated Families, which tracked the experiences of
over 7000 separated parents. One in five parents in
the study reported that they had safety concerns for
themselves or their child as
a result of ongoing contact
with the other parent. Most
parents who reported recent
Views of adolescents in
separated families
experiences of being harmed
A study of adolescents’ experiences after
the 2006 reforms to the family law system
physically indicated that
Jodie Lodge and Michael Alexander
December 2010
their children had witnessed
violence or abuse.
The Commonwealth Attorney-
General’s media release on
the reports is available online
at:
www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/www/ministers/
mcclelland.nsf/page/MediaReleases_2011_
SecondQuarter_25May2011-Newresearchhighlightsnee
dtoaddressfamilyviolence
The reports can be downloaded at:
Parenting dynamics after separation
A follow-up study of parents who separated after
the 2006 family law reforms
Lixia Qu & Ruth Weston
December 2010
www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Families_
FamilyRelationshipServicesOverviewofPrograms_
Evaluationofthe2006FamilyLawReforms

Bsafe program evaluation, Victoria
Bsafe is a personal alarm system for high-risk wo<strong>men</strong> and
children escaping family violence and/or sexual assault
who want to remain in their home. When activated, it alerts
a twenty-four-hour Vital Call response centre and police are
contacted. Trialled in the Hume Region in Victoria for the
past three years, the final report on the program indicated
that it has been successful in reducing physical assaults
and intervention order breaches. Although the program
received an Australian Crime and Violence Prevention
Award in 2010, funding for the program has not yet been
renewed.
Since its imple<strong>men</strong>tation, seventy-two wo<strong>men</strong> and 143
accompanying children have participated in the Bsafe
program. The wo<strong>men</strong> ranged in age from late teens to
early seventies. All but three wo<strong>men</strong> in the program were
escaping violence by an intimate partner.
It was initially expected that wo<strong>men</strong> would access Bsafe
for three to six months, during the immediate postseparation
period. However, many wo<strong>men</strong> in the program
used Bsafe for a much longer period, in some cases for the
entire three years. The report emphasised the importance
of meeting wo<strong>men</strong>’s long-term support needs, especially
where they are involved in extended family law or criminal
proceedings.
Importantly, wo<strong>men</strong> who accessed the program were
considered to be at high risk of violence. According to the
report, of the seventy-two wo<strong>men</strong> who used Bsafe:
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
84% had been stalked post-separation
81% had received death threats
over three-quarters had experienced strangulation
over two-thirds said the perpetrator had threatened or
attempted suicide
two-thirds said the perpetrator had access to weapons
57% said the perpetrator had harmed or threatened to
harm or kill their children
43% had been sexually assaulted
40% said the perpetrator had harmed or threatened to
harm or kill pets
a quarter were pregnant or had recently given birth.
The results of the program evaluation indicated that Bsafe
was effective in improving the safety of wo<strong>men</strong> and their
children. One component of the evaluation was a series
of voluntary questionnaires completed by wo<strong>men</strong> three
months and six months after first accessing the program
and again on exiting the program. Of the thirty-six wo<strong>men</strong>
who completed questionnaires:
à à
à à
à à
à à
twenty-seven wo<strong>men</strong> reported a decrease in
intervention order breaches, of whom sixteen reported
breaches had ceased completely
68% had been able to stay in their own home and a
further 20% had relocated but remained in the same
community; however, 5% remained homeless
50% said Bsafe had assisted them to maintain their
connections with family, friends and social support
networks and a further 18% said it had allowed them to
increase their connections
19% felt ‘very safe’ and 39% felt ‘safe’ as a result of
using Bsafe.
The final report also demonstrated that Bsafe is a
cost effective option. For a woman with three children
accessing specialist housing support in the Hume
region, the report estimated that the costs associated
with accessing refuge or crisis accommodation and then
returning to their home with the support of Bsafe was
$3755.12. By comparison, the costs associated with
accessing crisis accommodation, a refuge, transitional
housing and then exiting into private rental was estimated
at $10 195.90 (not including the cost of replacing
belongings and household goods, storage, lost income
from work and failure to make debt repay<strong>men</strong>ts).
The report is available online at:
www.whealth.com.au/work_bsafe.html#bsafe_final
For further information: contact Rachael MacKay from
the Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Health Goulburn North East at
r.mackay@whealth.com.au or on (03) 5722 3009.
LOOKING FOR A RESEARCHER
Find Australian researchers working in the field of
domestic and family violence on the Clearinghouse
Researchers Database. You can search for
researchers by name, their research area, institution
or by keywords.
In the coming months, the Clearinghouse will
be contacting researchers already listed on the
database, asking them to update their contact and
research details.
If you want to be listed on the Clearinghouse
Researchers Database, please contact us at:
clearinghouse@unsw.edu.au
11
LATEST NEWS FROM THE SECTOR – e-news
If you are looking to keep up to date with the latest news from the sector, subscribe to our monthly e-news service.
Email clearinghouse@unsw.edu.au, call us on (02) 9385 2990 or subscribe online at www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/
subscribe.html to receive updates on conferences and events, grants, research and resources, good practice
and more.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

new initiatives
and resources
12
newsletter .45
AUSTRALIAN INITIATIVES
Audit of the NSW Police Force handling of domestic
and family violence complaints
The NSW Ombudsman has published a report on
its audit of the NSW Police Force’s handling of 289
complaints made in 2008 in relation to domestic violence
matters. Complaints were raised regarding a number
of issues, including alleged poor customer service,
failure to investigate incidents or to investigate incidents
adequately, and failure to identify the primary aggressor.
The audit found that overall police responded well to
complaints but that some were poorly handled. This report
presents the findings of the audit and makes nineteen
recom<strong>men</strong>dations.
www.ombo.nsw.gov.au/publication/PDF/specialreport/
Audit%20of%20NSW%20Police%20Force%20
handling%20of%20domestic%20and%20family%20
violence%20complaints.pdf
New web site for Secretariat of National Aboriginal
and Islander Child Care
The Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child
Care (SNAICC) has launched a new web site, featuring
resources, news and key policy pages, with content
organised around SNAICC’s priorities. SNAICC’s new look
e-bulletin is also available on the web site. You can follow
SNAICC on Facebook and Twitter.
www.snaicc.asn.au
Radio plays on domestic
violence in multiple
languages
NSW Immigrant Wo<strong>men</strong>’s
Speakout Association has
developed three new radio
plays about domestic violence
in Arabic, Dari, Dinka, Krio,
Mandarin, Somali and
Sudanese Arabic. The plays
are available as a pack of nine
languages or in single language packs.
speakoutradio.wordpress.com/about
Snapshot report on Victorian <strong>men</strong>’s behaviour
change programs
No To Violence Male Family Violence Prevention
Association has published a new report, Men’s behaviour
change programs in Victoria – a sector snapshot. The
report summarises findings from a 2010 survey of Victorian
<strong>men</strong>’s behaviour change program providers on demand for
their services.
For more information: contact No To Violence on
(03) 9428 3536 or via their web site
www.ntv.org.au/pages/contact-us.php
Latest crime statistics released
New data on trends in crime, including domestic and family
violence, are available from four Australian sources.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics has recently released
data on crime victimisation in the year 2009-10. Data on
personal crime (including physical assault and sexual
assault), household crime and social disorder were
compiled from the national Crime Victimisation Survey,
conducted between July 2009 and June 2010. Results are
compared against the previous year’s Crime Victimisation
Survey.
www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4530.0
In Australian crime: facts & figures 2010, the Australian
Institute of Criminology (AIC) summarises the latest trends
in crime and criminal justice. Compiled from a range of
administrative datasets and surveys, including the records
of police, corrections agencies and criminal courts, and
crime victimisation surveys, it is a useful reference point
on categories and locations of crime, victim and offender
characteristics, and criminal justice responses.
www.aic.gov.au/en/publications/current%20series/
facts/1-0/2010.aspx
An interactive tool which allows users to analyse and
compare crime statistics from the Australian crime: facts &
figures series is also available on the AIC website.
data.aic.gov.au/aic16
The NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research has
released a report on the latest trends in NSW recorded
crime statistics. The bureau has compiled data on crime
reported to or uncovered by NSW police between January
1995 and December 2010, with a focus on the final two
years.
www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/bocsar/ll_bocsar.nsf/
vwFiles/RCS2010.pdf/$file/RCS2010.pdf
Aboriginal Family Violence Prevention and Legal
Service Victoria policy papers
The Aboriginal Family Violence Prevention and Legal
Service Victoria has produced three policy papers aimed
at improving access to justice outcomes and service
provision for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander victims/
survivors of family violence and sexual assault. The
three papers separately discuss national policy issues,
strengthening on-the-ground service provision and
improving accessibility of the legal system.
The papers can be accessed at www.fvpls.org or by
emailing information@fvpls.org

INTERNATIONAL INTIATIVES
Council of Europe adopts new convention on
violence against wo<strong>men</strong>
The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and
Combating Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and Domestic
Violence has been signed by thirteen countries since it
was adopted by the Committee of Ministers in April 2011.
The convention defines and criminalises various forms of
violence against wo<strong>men</strong>, including forced marriage, female
genital mutilation, stalking, physical and psychological
violence and sexual violence.
www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/violence/
default_en.asp
Family justice review interim report released in the
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Justice, the Depart<strong>men</strong>t
for Education and the Welsh Assembly Govern<strong>men</strong>t
commissioned a review of the family justice system,
starting in 2010. The interim report from the Family Justice
Review panel was released in March 2011.
www.justice.gov.uk/publications/family-justice-review.htm
New Zealand Govern<strong>men</strong>t announces review of the
Family Court
In April 2011, New Zealand Justice Minister Simon Power
released the terms of reference for the review of the Family
Court. The review will examine the court’s sustainability,
efficiency, cost effectiveness and responsiveness to the
needs of users.
www.justice.govt.nz/policy/justice-systemimprove<strong>men</strong>ts/family-court-review
Sultana F with Nair S 2011, Purple dandelion: a
Muslim woman’s struggle against violence and
oppression, Exisle, Auckland
This book is based on the true
story of author Farida Sultana,
who has lived in Bangladesh,
Iran, the United Kingdom and
New Zealand. In 1995, Farida
established the Shakti Asian
Wo<strong>men</strong>’s Support Group, now
the Shakti Community Council,
the largest ethnic community
organisation in New Zealand.
Co-author Shila Nair has been
working for Shakti since 2002.
Both wo<strong>men</strong> are survivors of domestic violence.
WHO training resources on violence and injury
prevention available online
The Depart<strong>men</strong>t of Violence and Injury Prevention and
Disability at the World Health Organization (WHO) has
developed a series of short courses, available for free
online. The courses provide a complete training resource
for facilitators around the world. Designed to be delivered
over two to five days, each course covers a specific injury or
violence area.
Each short course contains: a facilitator’s guide; training
modules, including PowerPoint presentations; and
supporting resources, such as handouts and case studies.
www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/
capacitybuilding/courses/en/index.html
13
Update on programs for children
Closure of Peek-A-Boo Club
and Addressing Family Violence
Programs
The renowned Melbourne Royal
Children’s Hospital Addressing
Family Violence Programs have
been forced to close due to
lack of ongoing funding. These
programs include the Peek-a-Boo
Club, an infant/mother family
violence group; PARKAS (Parents
Accepting Responsibility Kids Are
Safe); Dads on Board for fathers
completing a <strong>men</strong>’s behaviour
change program and their infants;
and BuBs on Board for infants and
their mothers living in refuge. The
service also provided training in
family violence work addressing
children’s therapeutic and support
needs, which had been taken up
by workers from across the nation.
The programs ended on 30 June
2011.
The Royal Children’s Hospital
programs, run by the team led
by Wendy Bunston, were well
respected within the domestic
violence sector as good practice
models in working with children
affected by domestic violence.
They have won several <strong>men</strong>tal
health program awards and have
been the subject of scholarly and
practitioner publications.
The Clearinghouse calls on the
Victorian and Commonwealth
Govern<strong>men</strong>ts to establish secure
and ongoing funding for these
programs and to acknowledge
their role in promoting both family
wellbeing and improved <strong>men</strong>tal
health outcomes for children and
wo<strong>men</strong> who have lived with family
violence.
Safe from the Start now national
The Tasmanian Safe from the Start
program has recently expanded
to provide national coverage for
its ‘train the trainer’ workshops,
which aim to raise awareness of
the impacts of domestic violence on
children. The workshops have been
promoted at several Australian and
international conferences, and are
based on developing knowledge
from the field of neuroscience about
brain develop<strong>men</strong>t in children.
The Safe from the Start program
also provides resources and tools
for work with children, including
books, activities, puppets and visual
materials.
Safe from the Start is a project of
the Salvation Army. Resources can
be purchased by emailing:
nell.kuilenburg@
aus.salvationarmy.org
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

eview
AVert FAMILY VioLENCE: COLLaboratiVE reSPONSES IN THE FAMILY LAW SYSteM
REVIEW BY LIBBY WATSON, CLEARINGHOUSE GOOD PRACTICE OFFICER
Australian Institute of Social Relations & Relationships Australia South Australia & Australian Govern<strong>men</strong>t
Attorney-General’s Depart<strong>men</strong>t Family Law Branch 2010, AVERT family violence: collaborative responses in the
family law system, Attorney-General’s Depart<strong>men</strong>t, Canberra
In March 2011, the Commonwealth Attorney-General
launched AVERT, a multi-disciplinary training package
for professionals working in the family law system. The
package was produced by Relationships Australia South
Australia (RASA).
The AVERT package aims to provide the user with
resources to design training that will give professionals in
the family law system an understanding of family violence
and, importantly, practical strategies to respond to family
violence. A second aim of the package is the promotion
of multi-disciplinary collaboration between professionals
working in the family law system.
14
newsletter .45
Throughout AVERT, it is made clear that family violence is a
complex issue and that it is not solely the responsibility of
particular groups of ‘specialists’ to respond to risk. Rather,
safety is the business of all professionals involved in the
system. AVERT is underpinned by the philosophy that
violence is gendered and that perpetrators of violence are
responsible for their behaviour.
AVERT lists its target professions as follows: legal
practitioners, judicial officers, counsellors, psychologists,
social workers, legal advisers, court staff (including family
report writers), family dispute resolution practitioners and
child contact service workers. This wide-ranging, multidisciplinary
audience means that the package has to cover
much ground, from basic legal issues and family violence
facts to children’s needs and good practice examples.
There is a wealth of material to be found in this resource.
The topics addressed include:
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
di<strong>men</strong>sions, dynamics and impacts of family violence
legal frameworks
screening, risk assess<strong>men</strong>t and safety
responding to cultural diversity
engaging people who use violence.
Multi-disciplinary collaborative practice underpins the
package and is encouraged throughout.
The AVERT package is presented as a pack of five DVD-
ROMs or it can be accessed online (see below). The
‘How to use the AVERT training package’ link (found
in DVD-ROM 1) provides a thorough overview of the
resources, including descriptions of the videos, and
explains how the package has been designed to be used.
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/au/legalcode
The package includes sample training programs, fact
sheets, PowerPoint slides, discussion papers and course
evaluation forms. There are a number of training exercises
and video resources (such as dramatised scenarios,
opinion pieces, expert discussions and testimonials). An
additional feature is the ‘online classroom’ which is a family
violence ‘employee induction program’. The classroom is
self-paced and can be completed in approximately three
hours.
Also included is a formal assess<strong>men</strong>t booklet for the
Multidisciplinary Skills Five Day Training Program. This
recom<strong>men</strong>ded program has been aligned to competencies
within the Australian Qualifications framework.
AVERT does not set out a definitive training program.
Rather, it provides several example programs, ranging from
two-hour sessions to a five-day intensive workshop, with
a number of different resources for trainers to design their
own program around the topics. Sample training programs
for various professional groups are included.
AVERT’s flexibility allows a trainer to design their own
program with access to an excellent range of resources
available at the ‘click of a button’. It should be noted,
however, that although the authors of AVERT give the
trainer a lot of scope to devise their own package, in the
introduction they are clear about what constitutes best
practice and their expectations of trainers who use the
AVERT resources.

Using AVERT in the classroom
From a trainer’s perspective, the resources contained
within AVERT are exciting and there are many potential
uses for them. The training exercises are relevant and
interesting, while the video testimonials and dramatisations
are powerful. The video dramatisations fill an important
gap, as there is a lack of local, current and well-acted
material available.
Examples include clients’ interviews with their lawyers
(‘Jaber and Zahra’s story’) and a family dispute resolution
practitioner’s initial interviews with both parties, in ‘Tony
and Jessica’s story’. In the latter example, AVERT
effectively conveys how risks can be identified where no
physical violence in the relationship is depicted and the
client does not herself identify the family violence. Here,
the family dispute resolution practitioner is shown taking
this case to supervision, along with her subsequent
interview with ‘Jessica’.
Each of the dramatisations is followed by two or three
professional com<strong>men</strong>taries, which give weight to the issues
covered in the scenarios and highlight what is important
for different professionals involved in the same case. This
gives viewers an opportunity to learn about the focus of the
different professionals in the system and also highlights that
there are many ways of considering the same scenario.
Future improve<strong>men</strong>ts of the package might include the
addition of a sample training program for family dispute
resolution practitioners. While sample programs for other
professional groups are included, this sector, arguably
one of the key professions that could benefit from good
practice-focused family violence training, has been
omitted. Certainly there are plenty of good resources in
the package to plan training for family dispute resolution
practitioners but it would be interesting to see how the
authors of AVERT would approach this task and what they
might suggest.
AVERT is based on sound adult learning principles. For
those who facilitate family violence training, especially within
the family law system, it is worth spending some time to
become familiar with all AVERT has to offer. AVERT is free
of charge, highly accessible and, in the long run, using this
package could save trainers much time and energy, with so
many quality resources and ideas in one place.
AVERT is available for download at
www.avertfamilyviolence.com.au
15
The AVERT package features opinion pieces, expert discussions, testimonials and dramatised scenarios, followed by professional
com<strong>men</strong>taries on the scenarios
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
The Clearinghouse is running a survey to find out what our users think of our services and publications. Your
feedback is very important to us.
The survey is available online until Sunday, 31 July 2011 and should take about ten to fifteen minutes to complete.
Your answers are anonymous and confidential.
To fill in the survey, go to: www.surveymonkey.com/s/ClearinghouseSurveyJuly2011
If you have any questions about the survey, please contact us at clearinghouse@unsw.edu.au or (02) 9385 2990.
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

ecent additions to the
research and resources database
Search our database of over 5000 articles, reports, books and other resources on domestic and family violence:
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/research.html
16
ARTICLES
Belknap J & McDonald C 2010, ‘Judges’ attitudes
about and experiences with sentencing circles in
intimate-partner abuse cases’, Canadian Journal
of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue
canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale,
vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 369-395
This article reports on a study interviewing twenty-seven
judges in Canada about their attitudes and experiences
with the use of restorative justice in intimate partner
violence cases in 1998, prior to significant legislative
changes. The authors particularly focus on the application
of restorative justice to Aboriginal and First Nations
peoples.
Hopkins A & Easteal P 2010, ‘Walking in her shoes:
battered wo<strong>men</strong> who kill in Queensland, Victoria and
Western Australia’, Alternative Law Journal,
vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 132-137
This article examines legislative reforms which require
judges and jurors in the common law application of selfdefence
to consider the experiences of an abused woman
who has killed her partner.
Miller E, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Tancredi
DJ, Levenson RR, Waldman J, Schoenwald P &
Silverman JG 2010, ‘Pregnancy coercion, intimate
partner violence and unintended pregnancy’,
Contraception, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 316-322
This article reports the findings from a United States study
that surveyed 1278 wo<strong>men</strong> accessing family planning
services about their experiences with physical and sexual
partner violence and male partners’ attempts to control
their reproductive choices. The authors found that 53%
of wo<strong>men</strong> reported physical or sexual partner violence,
19% reported pregnancy coercion and 15% reported
birth control sabotage. They discuss implications and
recom<strong>men</strong>dations for health provider screening.
Sutherland MA 2011, ‘Implications for violence in
adolescent dating experiences’, JOGNN: Journal of
Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, vol. 40,
no. 2, pp. 225-234
This article explores issues associated with violence in
adolescent dating experiences including the definition of
dating violence, forms of violence and associated health
consequences. The author provides assess<strong>men</strong>t tools
and techniques useful for nurses in the clinical setting.
Strategies for intervening in situations of adolescent dating
violence are also offered.
REPORTS
Rawsthorne M, Chivell A & Smith A 2010, Aboriginal
wo<strong>men</strong> against violence project: evaluation report,
University of Sydney, Sydney
This report summarises the evaluation of the Aboriginal
Wo<strong>men</strong> Against Violence Project, which was based in
the Sydney suburbs of Liverpool and Campbelltown.
The evaluation used a mixed methods approach
using questionnaires, focus groups, artwork, written
feedback and key informant interviews. The report
includes a discussion of the challenges and approaches
to conducting a program evaluation using culturally
appropriate methods.
RESOURCES
PATH 2010, Monitoring and evaluation of initiatives
on violence against wo<strong>men</strong> and girls, UNIFEM, New
York
The United Nations Develop<strong>men</strong>t Fund for Wo<strong>men</strong>
(UNIFEM) has established a knowledge centre on issues
of violence against wo<strong>men</strong> and girls. This guide from the
knowledge centre includes definitions and advice on how
to conduct monitoring and evaluation. The guide includes
case studies.
newsletter .45
Miller SL & Smolter NL 2011, ‘“Paper abuse”: when
all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking’,
Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong>, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 637-650
Using data from in-depth interviews with wo<strong>men</strong> who have
left violent relationships, attorneys and practitioners/policy
specialists, this research note explores the continuation
of control as wo<strong>men</strong> encounter ‘paper abuse’. It explores
how the barrage of <strong>men</strong>’s frivolous lawsuits, false reports
of child abuse and other system-related manipulations
exerts power, forces contact and financially burdens their
ex-partners.
CAN’T FIND A PUBLICATION
The Clearinghouse can provide you with an
electronic or photocopied version of publications
on our database that are not publicly available.
Contact the Research and Information Officer at
clearinghouse@unsw.edu.au or on (02) 9385 2990
or 1800 753 382.

practice notes
LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE: THE FUTURE PARENTS PROGRAM BY MEGAN SETY,
CLEARINGHOUSE RESEARCH AND INFORMATION OFFICER
This year saw the Mackay-based Centre for Domestic and
Family Violence Research’s annual Indigenous Family Violence
Prevention Forum alternate from a national to a regional
Queensland focus. Plenary sessions and yarning circles
gave attendees opportunities to hear and ask questions
about innovative programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander families. Throughout the conference, presentations
and discussions highlighted opportunities and challenges
in primary prevention and early intervention for children and
young people.
Save the Children Australia’s Future Parents Program was
one of the longer running programs featured at the forum.
This early intervention model seeks to assist young people
in creating safer environ<strong>men</strong>ts for children within their
community. The program increases young people’s capacity
to identify dangerous situations for children and develops their
awareness of strategies to keep themselves and children safe.
Delivered through a twenty-hour fun and interactive course,
the program is designed for young people aged thirteen to
nineteen. It addresses safe and positive childcare practices,
healthy relationships, problem solving and conflict negotiation.
The program increases young people’s access to support
services through the strategic inclusion of relevant community
connections.
The Future Parents Program was developed in 1989 and
Save the Children currently delivers courses to young people
in Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Western
Australia and the Northern Territory. Originally designed as
a general program for young people, it has been adapted for
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people and each
course is specifically tailored for individual communities.
communities. In addition to maintaining the core structure
and ‘not changing what works’, Leanne and Terri-Anne felt
that clear and sustainable objectives, a commit<strong>men</strong>t to
building strong partnerships, quality evaluation tools, initial
and ongoing quality training and a flexible approach were
essential to the program’s success. They also emphasised the
need to respect and incorporate feedback from young people
wherever possible.
At an individual level, passion, commit<strong>men</strong>t, self-care,
knowledge of the program and respect for the community
made the difference in sustainable work. Respect for
the community surfaced as a theme in many of their
recom<strong>men</strong>dations around networking and successful
partnerships, including holding pre-planning meetings to
tailor the program, knowing and acknowledging community
protocols, aiming to meet the needs of the target group and
keeping your focus to avoid politics. When starting out,
Leanne and Terri-Anne emphasised the need to be confident
in knowing your program and to be able to see a future for
the program based on clear objectives and a sustainable
approach.
Although I have only highlighted one program here, the
conference featured presentations on many other programs
which offer ideas and models for developing future work.
From art therapy to trauma-informed practice frameworks,
from school-based programs to interventions with violent <strong>men</strong>,
programs covered the full spectrum of community-based
initiatives needed to prevent and reduce family violence.
For more information on the Future Parents Program,
contact Leanne Smith on (07) 3844 2699.
17
Attending the conference to speak about the Future Parents
Program were Leanne Smith (Program Coordinator) and
Terri-Anne Goodreid (Program Facilitator) from Queensland’s
arm of Save the Children. With increasing focus on respectful
relationships and associated funding under the National Plan
to Reduce Violence Against Wo<strong>men</strong> and their Children, I was
interested to know what they felt others could learn from the
experience of the Future Parents Program. I asked them what
made the program successful and whether they had any tips
for others starting out.
Leanne and Terri-Anne attributed the program’s long running
success and expansion to a variety of individual, program
and community factors. The program itself has changed
little over time, with two key exceptions: first, content on
domestic and family violence has been added; and second,
the program has been adapted for specific groups, including
young <strong>men</strong>, young parents and young people from Aboriginal
For the conference program, speakers’ presentations
and forum report, visit the Queensland Centre for
Domestic and Family Violence Research web site at
www.notviolence.com.au
The Clearinghouse’s Good Practice database
also contains a growing collection of examples of
Australian domestic violence-related programs,
services and responses which reflect ele<strong>men</strong>ts of
good practice: www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/good_
practice.html
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au

latest clearinghouse
publications
See all Clearinghouse publications at: www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/publications.html
You can be notified when Clearinghouse papers are published on our web site. Just contact us
on (02) 9385 2990 or subscribe online: www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/subscribe.html
Research papers
Issue Papers
à à
.45
newsletter
Hovane V & Cox D 2011, ‘Closing the gap on family violence: driving prevention and intervention through health
policy’, Issues Paper 21
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/issues_Papers.htm
Other resources
Conference Papers
à à
à à
à à
à à
à à
Barrett Meyering I 2011 ‘Compensating domestic violence victims: how do the states and territories compare’,
Meeting the Needs of Victims of Crime Conference, Sydney, 18-19 May
Braaf R 2011, ‘Preventing domestic violence death – is intimate partner sexual assault a risk factor’, Domestic
Violence Deaths: Risks, Responsibility and Review, Sydney, 20 May
Braaf R 2011, ‘Fostering abused wo<strong>men</strong>’s safety through financial independence: the empowering role that
services and agencies can play’, Meeting the Needs of Victims of Crime Conference, Sydney, 18-19 May
Marcus G 2011, ‘Integrated responses to domestic and family violence: what, how, when and why’, Meeting the
Needs of Victims of Crime Conference, Sydney, 18-19 May
McFerran L 2011, Panel session: ‘Aged care and homelessness’, Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS)
2011 National Conference, Melbourne, 29-30 March
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/other_publications.htm
Fast Facts
à à
Campbell R 2011, The financial cost of domestic and family violence, Fast Facts 3
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/fast_facts.htm
Special Collections
à à
Refugees and domestic and family violence (updated)
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/specialcollectionsrefugees.htm
Web Pages
àà
àà
Domestic Violence Deaths: Risk, Responsibility and Review forum podcasts (forthcoming)
Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: Best Practice Responses forum and training podcasts (forthcoming)
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/conference_proceedings.htm
Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse
The University of New South Wales, NSW Australia 2052
T +61 2 9385 2990 freecall 1800 753 382
F +61 2 9385 2993 E clearinghouse@unsw.edu.au
www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au