01.01.2015 Views

PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION AND HELICOPTERS : - ABAG

PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION AND HELICOPTERS : - ABAG

PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION AND HELICOPTERS : - ABAG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SERVICES | <strong>NAVIGATION</strong><br />

<strong>PERFORMANCE</strong>-<strong>BASED</strong><br />

<strong>NAVIGATION</strong><br />

<strong>AND</strong> <strong>HELICOPTERS</strong> :<br />

HOW THEY FIT<br />

PBN promises smaller separation intervals, more direct flight<br />

paths and more flexible landing/takeoff routing and other<br />

advantages. But is it going to work for helicopter operations<br />

Map overlay image courtesy of Sagem<br />

30 ROTOR & WING MAGAZINE | MAY 2010 W W W. R O T O R A N D W I N G . C O M


PBN Promise<br />

By James Careless<br />

Performance-based navigation (PBN) is a<br />

new form of aerial navigation currently<br />

being deployed by the FAA, ICAO and other<br />

aviation regulators worldwide. The reason is<br />

PBN supports smaller separation intervals, more direct<br />

flight paths and more flexible landing/takeoff routing<br />

for fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft alike. It does this<br />

using GPS and WAAS (wide area augmentation system)<br />

satellite signals, and advanced onboard navigation systems<br />

like the Garmin GNS-530W or Universal UNS-1FW.<br />

For helicopter pilots and operators, PBN offers many<br />

potential advantages. These include being able to develop<br />

helicopter-specific flight paths that avoid fixed-wing traffic;<br />

reducing time and fuel spent flying circuitous IFRbased<br />

patterns, and being able to fly more of the unique<br />

vertical approaches and departures that helicopters<br />

are suited for. This said, not everyone is convinced<br />

that PBN goes far enough in supporting optimal<br />

helicopter navigation.<br />

PBN Defined<br />

“At its simplest level, performance-based<br />

navigation gets down to the concept that<br />

the navigation system installed on each<br />

aircraft has its own standard of possible<br />

performance,” explains Chad Cundiff,<br />

Honeywell’s vice president of crew<br />

interface products. “PBN is designed to<br />

take advantage of these capabilities, by<br />

coming up with navigation rules that<br />

reflect this fact on a case-by-case basis.”<br />

For instance, a pilot f lying an<br />

AgustaWestland AW139 equipped<br />

with a Honeywell Primus Epic GPS/<br />

inertial system can fly within relatively<br />

tight flight and obstacle<br />

avoidance paths. But a pilot flying<br />

a helicopter with a less precise<br />

GPS-only system backed up by<br />

ground-based navigation beacons<br />

will have to leave more separation<br />

space.<br />

“In theory, an advanced PBN<br />

system would let you fly safely<br />

down a skyscraper canyon,<br />

by keeping you nicely positioned<br />

between the buildings<br />

on either side,”<br />

Cundiff notes.<br />

Why PBN<br />

Helicopters have the ability to take off vertically, level off at an<br />

appropriate altitude (i.e., avoiding cool moist air where icing<br />

can be a danger), and land vertically as they please.<br />

In a perfect world, helicopter pilots would be able to use<br />

this ability to its fullest. However, in reality the rules of aerial<br />

navigation have been dictated by the needs of fixed-wing<br />

aircraft. If helicopters are powerboats, fixed-wing aircraft are<br />

lumbering oil tankers. They need lots of space to takeoff, fly<br />

and land without hitting each other. This is why the world’s<br />

air corridors are so tightly monitored and why the growing<br />

amount of fixed-wing traffic within these corridors has<br />

regulators so concerned. It is this concern that has pushed the<br />

FAA and other regulators into implementing PBN.<br />

With PBN technology, aircraft fly closer together and<br />

employ more creative, three-dimensional takeoff and landing<br />

approaches.<br />

PBN’s capabilities are good news for the FAA, which is<br />

grappling with the relentless growth of air travel. “In 2005,<br />

passenger demand grew rapidly, with enplanements up 7<br />

percent from the previous year to 738.6 million and revenue<br />

passenger miles increasing 8 percent to 775.3 billion,” says<br />

the 2006 version of the FAA’s Roadmap for Performance-<br />

Based Navigation. “Passenger demand for air transportation<br />

is projected to increase an average of 3.4 percent each year<br />

between 2005 and 2017. By 2017, U.S. commercial air carriers<br />

are predicted to transport a total of about one billion passengers,<br />

flying over 1.25 trillion passenger miles.”<br />

The FAA is currently deploying advanced PBN systems<br />

at the country’s airports, and establishing PBN air corridors<br />

to serve busy air routes. The goal is to convert U.S. general<br />

aviation to PBN operation by 2025. Other countries are following<br />

suit.<br />

“We want to extend PBN to helicopters, such that helicopters<br />

get their own air corridors where possible; have less<br />

interaction with air traffic control simply because they spend<br />

less time in fixed-wing airspace; and have easy access to heliports<br />

and other designated landing areas,” says Mike Webb, of<br />

the FAA’s AFS-420 Flight Procedure Standards Branch. He is<br />

currently developing PBN-compliant helicopter instrument<br />

procedures. “With the help of highly accurate GPS/WAAS<br />

satellite signals and onboard navigation systems, helicopter<br />

pilots will be able to use much more of their aircraft’s maneuverability<br />

in obstacle-rich urban environments.”<br />

“Our goal is to move helicopter navigation away from its<br />

fixed-wing roots,” adds Erwin Lassooji, ICAO’s PBN program<br />

manager. “We are currently developing helicopter-specific<br />

PBN standards for all phases of flight, not just approach and<br />

takeoff. We anticipate updating these standards officially by<br />

March 2011.”<br />

W W W. R O T O R A N D W I N G . C O M<br />

MAY 2010 | ROTOR & WING MAGAZINE<br />

31


SERVICES | <strong>NAVIGATION</strong><br />

Honeywell<br />

Performance-based navigation will allow helicopter pilots to use their aircraft’s avionics capabilities more, especially when approaching airports. It will<br />

allow pilots to come up with new and more relevant approaches that better meet their company’s needs. This can translate into less fuel burn and savings.<br />

PBN Helo Advantages<br />

Performance-based navigation will allow<br />

helicopter pilots to use their aircraft’s avionics<br />

capabilities more, especially when<br />

approaching airports. Like their fixedwing<br />

cousins, such helicopters will be<br />

allowed to fly tighter, closer and more<br />

varied approaches, using curves and even<br />

spirals where such approaches make sense.<br />

This flexibility translates into less fuel<br />

burned and less time aloft, thus increasing<br />

the number of flights a helicopter can<br />

make before being grounded for regular<br />

maintenance. But PBN does more than<br />

just save money. It allows pilots to come up<br />

with new and more relevant approaches<br />

that better meet company needs.<br />

“With PBN, you can work out fuel-efficient<br />

approaches to heliports, hospitals and<br />

other regular landing sites that stay clear of<br />

fixed-wing traffic,” Cundiff says. “This<br />

means that you can count on being cleared<br />

by local air traffic control, even when fixedwing<br />

traffic is heavy in your area.”<br />

PBN also offers improved, more precise<br />

IFR flight for helicopters. For some<br />

pilots, this will change the point at which<br />

to decide to go from VFR to IFR; simply<br />

because going to instruments won’t necessarily<br />

mean submitting to air traffic control<br />

and its delays, holding patterns and circuitous<br />

routes.<br />

Dissent<br />

Compared to the old radio beacons that<br />

it replaces, PBN is a real advance for helicopter<br />

aviation. But Stephen Hickok does<br />

not think PBN goes far enough. In fact, he<br />

believes that the FAA doesn’t really understand<br />

rotary-wing flight, and that its ‘NextGen’<br />

air traffic strategy is far too tied to<br />

traditional fixed-wing thinking. “The FAA’s<br />

PBN strategy is built upon a ‘one-size-fitsall’<br />

approach that does not truly recognize<br />

the unique capabilities and needs of helicopters,”<br />

Hickok tells Rotor & Wing. “It is<br />

designed for aircraft that rely on runways,<br />

and helicopters don’t need runways. If anything,<br />

our runway is the sky.”<br />

Hickok has the credentials to stand as a<br />

credible critic. He is president of Hickok &<br />

Associates of Orange Beach, Ala., a company<br />

that designs airspace and instrument<br />

approach procedures. According to his<br />

website (www.hickokgpsifr.com), Hickok<br />

managed the FAA’s helicopter GPS flight<br />

testing, “which led to the origination of<br />

the very policies and criteria used for the<br />

development of today’s IFR procedures.”<br />

Hickok has served as an ICAO advisor, and<br />

has been both chairman of HAI’s Flight<br />

Operations Committee, and chairman of<br />

the Vertical Flight Working Group to FAA’s<br />

Performance-Based Aviation Rulemaking<br />

Committee.<br />

If that’s not enough credibility, consider<br />

this: On April 1, 2009, the FAA approved<br />

the first helicopter WAAS Localizer Performance<br />

with Vertical Guidance (LPV)<br />

Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs).<br />

Hickok’s company developed this first<br />

IFP—actually three IFPs—for California<br />

Shock/Trauma Air Rescue (CALSTAR).<br />

When it comes to PBN, Hickok’s concern<br />

about the FAA is that “they are still in<br />

a fixed-wing mindset.” As such, the FAA’s<br />

PBN rules do not allow pilots “to use our<br />

helicopters and their avionics to their fullest<br />

advantage,” he says.<br />

From Hickok’s perspective, the FAA’s<br />

PBN rules group high-capability helicopters<br />

together with their lower-performing<br />

counterparts, with the limits on missed<br />

approaches and other elements being<br />

32 ROTOR & WING MAGAZINE | MAY 2010 W W W. R O T O R A N D W I N G . C O M


PBN Promise<br />

Sagem’s analysis ground station software allows<br />

for the recreation of flight trajectories. These<br />

trajectories can then be examined and PBN<br />

approaches, departures and flight planning can<br />

be developed.<br />

set to the lowest common denominator.<br />

“We need to do better than just reverseengineering<br />

fixed-wing criteria,” Hickok<br />

observes. “We need helicopter-specific<br />

PBN, that matches a range of helicopter<br />

capabilities.”<br />

Bell’s PBN Research<br />

Despite his criticism, Hickok is aiding<br />

the FAA in adapting PBN for helicopters,<br />

specifically by helping Bell Helicopter with<br />

its PBN research. Specifically, the FAA<br />

has contracted Bell to collect PBN-related<br />

measurements using a Bell 429 equipped<br />

with WAAS-enabled Garmin GNS 430W<br />

and GNS 530W avionics units (one each).<br />

“Steve Hickok developed the profiles<br />

that we are using to collect PBN approach<br />

data,” says David Downey, Bell’s vice president<br />

of flight operations/safety and certification.<br />

“Our goal is to create a series of<br />

operating procedures ranging from pointin-space<br />

to landing and departure.”<br />

The Bell 429 is a single-pilot IFR helicopter,<br />

making it an ideal testbed for EMSfocused<br />

PBN procedures. “70 percent of all<br />

EMS flight are hospital-to-hospital,” says<br />

Downey. “Imagine that you could go to<br />

work by getting in your car, pushing a button,<br />

and having your car execute the necessary<br />

turns and speeds. An EMS-based<br />

PBN solution could do that for hospital-tohospital<br />

transfers.<br />

Not only would this make flights safe<br />

in all weather conditions, but air traffic<br />

control would always know where the<br />

EMS helicopters were, simply because they<br />

would be following this predefined flight<br />

profile. That’s the kind of things we are<br />

working on for the FAA.”<br />

Preparing for PBN<br />

For helicopter pilots and operators, trying<br />

to decide where PBN fits into your operation<br />

can be confusing.<br />

The best place to start is by looking<br />

over your avionics equipment to see just<br />

what capabilities it does and does not support.<br />

Such evaluations are a key part of the<br />

PBN approach: The FAA recognizes that<br />

not every aircraft is PBN-capable, let alone<br />

compliant.<br />

Should you find your current avionics<br />

lacking, then now is the time “to start<br />

imaging the fuel/maintenance savings<br />

and enhanced safety you could achieve<br />

by upgrading your avionics suite,” Honeywell’s<br />

Cundiff says. For instance, his company’s<br />

Primus Epic couples GPS/WAAS<br />

with an onboard inertial guidance system;<br />

providing key redundancy if something<br />

(i.e., strong solar flares) should knock out<br />

GPS/WAAS satellite signals. It makes<br />

your helicopter truly PBN-capable.<br />

Sagem Avionics also supports helicopter/PBN<br />

deployments. “To enable<br />

performance-based navigation, operators<br />

must collect data and perform routine<br />

analysis of this data to design [their] PBN,”<br />

explains company spokesperson Emmy<br />

Ansinelli. “Sagem’s AGS (Analysis Ground<br />

Station) software allows for the recreation<br />

of trajectories. These trajectories are then<br />

examined and PBN approaches, departures<br />

and flight planning can be developed<br />

for each aircraft type within the operator’s<br />

organization.”<br />

“The aim of performance-based navigation<br />

is primarily to reduce risks and<br />

costs [i.e., fuel burn] to the operator,”<br />

Ansinelli adds. “To make sure that PBN<br />

implementation is successful, Sagem’s<br />

AGS can be used to continuously perform<br />

post flight routine analysis. As the flight<br />

data is analyzed, the operators can measure<br />

the PBN’s efficacy; for example, is the<br />

aircraft burning less fuel”<br />

Final Verdicts<br />

Performance-based navigation is undeniably<br />

the way of the future. In the years<br />

to come, helicopter pilots will be able<br />

to fly more precise, shorter and tighter<br />

approaches to their targets, with the added<br />

benefit of spending more time outside of<br />

air traffic controlled airspace.<br />

Will this aid speciality operators, such<br />

as EMS single pilots flying IFR approaches<br />

“I don’t really think anybody knows,” replies<br />

Hickok. “PBN is primarily concerned<br />

with the space around airports, which is<br />

not where EMS pilots make most of their<br />

approaches.”<br />

Dave Downey is more optimistic. “We<br />

believe that, by contracting Bell to do PBN<br />

research, the FAA is saying, ‘we probably<br />

didn’t pay as much attention as we should<br />

have to rotary-wing when we came up<br />

with PBN initially, and now we want to<br />

fix that,’” he says. “Frankly, I think we have<br />

a tremendous opportunity to prove how<br />

well helicopter-based PBN can complement<br />

what’s being put in place for fixedwing.”<br />

Wherever they stand, all helicopter<br />

pilots and operators would be well-advised<br />

to learn more about PBN through the<br />

FAA (www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/<br />

news_story.cfmnewsId=8768) and ICAO<br />

(www2.icao.int/en/pbn/Pages/default.<br />

aspx). Love it or not, PBN is coming!<br />

Map overlay image courtesy of Sagem<br />

W W W. R O T O R A N D W I N G . C O M<br />

MAY 2010 | ROTOR & WING MAGAZINE<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!