02.01.2015 Views

abstracts of oral and poster presentations - Pacific Seabird Group

abstracts of oral and poster presentations - Pacific Seabird Group

abstracts of oral and poster presentations - Pacific Seabird Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JAPAN; 3 U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service, Portl<strong>and</strong>, OR USA; 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Honolulu, HI<br />

USA<br />

All North <strong>Pacific</strong> albatrosses are listed as threatened by the IUCN; therefore, detection <strong>of</strong> changes in<br />

their populations is critical. We analyzed colony surveys <strong>of</strong> these species across their range for the period <strong>of</strong><br />

1976 to the present. The population <strong>of</strong> Short-tailed Albatrosses (Phoebastria albatrus) currently consists <strong>of</strong><br />

2,000 birds, is distributed between the Senkaku <strong>and</strong> Torishima breeding colonies, <strong>and</strong> is growing at 7.5%/year.<br />

The Black-footed Albatross (P. nigripes) population contains 290,000 birds, with 95% <strong>of</strong> the pairs nesting in<br />

Hawaii <strong>and</strong> the remainder on Japanese isl<strong>and</strong>s. In Hawaii, Black-footed Albatross populations appear to be<br />

declining slightly, while, on Torishima, the population is growing at 8.5%/year. The Laysan Albatross (P.<br />

immutabilis) population consists <strong>of</strong> 3.1 million birds, nests primarily in the Hawaiian Isl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> appears to be<br />

increasing slightly. We project population changes for all three albatross species under several scenarios <strong>of</strong> agespecific<br />

survival <strong>and</strong> fecundity.<br />

PROTECTING PENGUINS WITH CREATIVE OCEAN ZONING IN THE SW ATLANTIC<br />

Elizabeth Skewes* (skewes@u.washington.edu) <strong>and</strong> P. Dee Boersma; Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Washington, Seattle, WA USA<br />

Less than 0.5% <strong>of</strong> the oceans are protected (compared with 11.5% <strong>of</strong> the Earth’s l<strong>and</strong> surface), <strong>and</strong> the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> many marine species continues to deteriorate. Strong political <strong>and</strong> economic forces oppose the creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> protected areas that would restrict exploitation <strong>of</strong> marine resources. In the SW Atlantic, human activities<br />

such as fishing, shipping, oil exploration <strong>and</strong> transport, <strong>and</strong> pollution are putting increasing pressure on marine<br />

ecosystems. Most Magellanic Penguins migrate north from their colonies along the Atlantic coast during the<br />

austral winter, following a “highway” along the coast from May to July. We document that few marine areas<br />

around Magellanic Penguin breeding colonies are currently protected <strong>and</strong> that the penguin migration route has<br />

no protection. Because the birds remain for the most part inside the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) <strong>of</strong> coastal<br />

nations, penguin protection can be implemented at a national level. We propose the designation <strong>of</strong> a national<br />

park with temp<strong>oral</strong> zones to protect penguins <strong>and</strong> their prey sources during migration <strong>and</strong> wintering. This novel<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> having a spatial <strong>and</strong> temp<strong>oral</strong> protected area for a few months <strong>of</strong> the year could minimize conflicts<br />

between people <strong>and</strong> penguins, with little impact on human economic activities.<br />

WHERE TO FISH FORAGING ECOLOGY AND HABITAT USE OF JUAN FERNANDEZ PETRELS<br />

DURING CHICK REARING<br />

Jo Smith* (josmith@u.washington.edu); University <strong>of</strong> Washington, Seattle, WA USA<br />

During chick-rearing, long-lived pelagic birds must balance adult body condition against the flow <strong>of</strong><br />

energy to chicks. Some groups, in particular procellariiforms, use alternating short- <strong>and</strong> long-duration trips to<br />

meet these dem<strong>and</strong>s. I am interested in the linkages between adult behaviours, the use <strong>of</strong> oceanic habitats, <strong>and</strong><br />

ultimately, chick growth or survival. Using a combination <strong>of</strong> data from bird-borne archival data loggers,<br />

remotely sensed (satellite) data, <strong>and</strong> colony studies during early <strong>and</strong> late chick rearing, I am studying the<br />

foraging ecology <strong>of</strong> Juan Fernández Petrels (Pterodroma externa), an endemic seabird <strong>of</strong> the Robinson Crusoe<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>s, Chile. In 2004, foraging trips lasted between 1 <strong>and</strong> 18 days (mean 4.1; n = 87 trips), with both short (1–<br />

3 d) <strong>and</strong> long (4–18 d) trips observed in marked birds. One-third <strong>of</strong> all chicks were fed on any given night, <strong>and</strong><br />

individually marked adults (n = 53) made 1 to 3 provisioning trips (n = 24 nights; 18 Feb–13 Mar). Adults<br />

traveled to oceanic habitats characterised by minimal sea-surface temperatures ranging from 10° to 20°C (n = 16<br />

trips), placing them in the Subtropical Zone, coastal-upwelling areas (Humboldt Current), or Subantarctic Zone.<br />

Cold water masses (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!