03.01.2015 Views

1u7kf0g

1u7kf0g

1u7kf0g

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

findings in the toxicology studies. Furthermore, “muscle events/myopathy with and without concurrent<br />

statin use” were currently included as an important potential risk in the RMP due to previous<br />

observation of myalgia in studies in healthy volunteers.<br />

Given this information the PRAC agreed that there was sufficient evidence to suggest a causal<br />

association between the event reported and vildagliptin and that the product information should be<br />

updated accordingly.<br />

Summary of recommendation(s)<br />

<br />

The MAH for Marketing Authorisation Holder (MAH) for Galvus (vildagliptin) and Eucreas<br />

(vildagliptin/metformin) should submit to the EMA, within 60 days, a variation to include<br />

‘rhabdomyolysis’ in the product information 4 and include further information as requested by<br />

the PRAC.<br />

For the full PRAC recommendations, see EMA/PRAC/337405/2014 published on the EMA website.<br />

4.2. New signals detected from other sources<br />

4.2.1. Chlorhexidine (NAP)<br />

<br />

Signal of risk of chemical injury including burns when used in skin disinfection in premature<br />

infants<br />

Regulatory details:<br />

PRAC Rapporteur: Julie Williams (UK)<br />

Administrative details:<br />

EPITT 18000 – New signal<br />

Leading MS: UK<br />

MAH(s): various<br />

Background<br />

Chlorhexidine is an antiseptic and products containing various compositions of chlorhexidine (various<br />

strengths, aqueous and alcohol based) are widely used for skin disinfection prior to invasive<br />

procedures in the paediatric population including for central vascular catheter insertion, in order to<br />

avoid neonatal sepsis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).<br />

A signal of chemical injury including burns when used in skin disinfection in premature infants was<br />

identified by the UK, based on 13 serious cases reported in the United Kingdom some with fatal<br />

outcome. UK confirmed that the signal needed initial analysis and prioritisation by the PRAC.<br />

Discussion<br />

The PRAC discussed the information on the cases reported and noted the severity of the reactions,<br />

which ranged from severe erythema without skin breakdown to severe chemical burns with or without<br />

skin loss. Severe comorbidities associated with prematurity might have contributed to the outcome in<br />

the fatal cases reported. Both aqueous and alcohol based solutions were involved and the most severe<br />

cases occurred when solutions were allowed to pool around the umbilicus or under the infant during<br />

umbilical catheterisation.<br />

The PRAC also discussed an analysis of cases reported in the literature and information collected from<br />

the Member States by means of an NUI and noted that there was no consensus on which solution<br />

4 SmPC Section 4.8<br />

Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC)<br />

EMA/PRAC/438418/2014 Page 16/75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!