1u7kf0g
1u7kf0g
1u7kf0g
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Administrative details:<br />
EPITT 17760 – Follow-up February 2014<br />
MAH(s): Roche Registration Ltd<br />
Background<br />
For background information, see PRAC minutes of 3-6 February 2014.<br />
The MAH replied to the request for information on the signal of bronchiectasis and<br />
hypogammaglobulinaemia and the responses were assessed by the Rapporteur.<br />
Discussion<br />
The PRAC discussed the assessment of the review of the suspected cases of both bronchiectasis and<br />
hypogammaglobulinaemia (occurring both individually and concurrently) reported in association with<br />
mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). There were several cases of bronchiectasis in patients receiving an<br />
MMF-containing immunosuppressive regimen for which a causal relationship was likely. The majority of<br />
these were published cases (Boddana et al, Pijnenburg et al, Rook et al), which provide particularly<br />
strong evidence of a causal association. Three retrospective studies of renal transplant patients who<br />
received an MMF-containing regimen (n= 93, 96 and 289) found that an unusually high percentage (2–<br />
5%) of them subsequently developed bronchiectasis. There were no cases of bronchiectasis in patients<br />
who had not received MMF; although it was recognised that the retrospective nature of these three<br />
studies may have under-estimated the true incidence in these patients.<br />
The review identified several cases where hypogammaglobulinaemia was likely to be causally related to<br />
MMF given in combination with other immunosuppressants (including MMF combined with ciclosporin<br />
and corticosteroids). The direct effect of MMF on B lymphocytes (as well T cells) seemed to provide a<br />
plausible biological mechanism to explain the reaction. Also, studies showed that the addition of MMF<br />
to prednisolone and ciclosporin profoundly decreased humoral (IgG) responsiveness in renal transplant<br />
recipients (Rentenaar et al 2002; Smith et al 1998).<br />
Based on the evidence presented, the PRAC agreed that there was a reasonable possibility that MMF,<br />
as part of an immunosuppression regimen, was causally related to bronchiectasis. This should be<br />
reflected in the product information so that clinicians and patients are aware of this risk and, more<br />
importantly, can detect it at an early stage. Similarly, PRAC concluded that use of MMF, in combination<br />
with other immunosuppressants, was causally related to hypogammaglobulinaemia. As with<br />
bronchiectasis, the product information should be updated so that clinicians are aware of this risk and<br />
advised to test for it in patients with recurrent infections. Appropriate communications should be<br />
issued to inform prescribers of these changes.<br />
Summary of recommendation(s)<br />
<br />
The MAH for the centrally authorised 14 mycophenolate mofetil containing medicines should be<br />
requested to submit to the EMA within 60 days a variation to include information on<br />
bronchiectasis and hypogammaglobulinaemia in the product information 15 and include a Direct<br />
Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC) as an additional risk minimisation measure.<br />
14 In line with Article 16(3) of Regulation No (EU) 726/2004 and Article 23(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC, the marketing<br />
authorisation holder shall ensure that the product information is kept up to date with the current scientific knowledge<br />
including the conclusions of the assessment and recommendations made public by means of the European medicines webportal<br />
established in accordance with Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (EMA website). For nationally authorised<br />
medicines, it is the responsibility of the National Competent Authorities of the Member States to oversee that these<br />
recommendations are adhered to<br />
15 Section 4.4 and 4.8 of the Summary of Product Characteristics and package leaflet.<br />
Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC)<br />
EMA/PRAC/438418/2014 Page 22/75