03.01.2015 Views

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION<br />

presence for a diagnosis is neither necessarynor sufficient. Each one of the<br />

ICD <strong>and</strong> DSM diagnostic entities is defined bythree rubrics: a) specific<br />

phenomenology, b) signs <strong>and</strong> symptoms <strong>and</strong> c) rules that exclude the<br />

diagnosis being made in certain circumstances. The DSM definition, in<br />

addition, calls for ``clinicallysignificant impairment or distress'', meaning<br />

that disruption in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning must<br />

accompanythe set of observable phenomena. While the intent of this criterion<br />

was to distinguish mental disorders from dailyexperiences of distress<br />

<strong>and</strong> broaden the clinical focus beyond symptoms, this criterion blurs the<br />

construct of functioning with the definition of mental disorder. For so-called<br />

``physical disorders'' e.g. diabetes or tuberculosis), clinical significance is<br />

not required for diagnosis. Putting ``distress'' or ``impairment in functioning''<br />

as a necessaryprerequisite for diagnosis of a mental disorder is of little<br />

use if these are not operationalized or independentlyassessed [27]. Besides,<br />

this approach has major implications for receiving treatment or services.<br />

The lack of ``distress or impairment'' would preclude a diagnosis, <strong>and</strong><br />

would disallow earlyprovision of care that could prevent the disorder<br />

worsening. It would impair research <strong>and</strong> subjects without impairment<br />

would be excluded from studies to identifythe cause or treatment of the<br />

disorder.<br />

Manypatients in primarycare settings fall into sub-threshold diagnostic<br />

categories, particularlythose with depression as noted above. In deciding<br />

when to initiate treatment, functional change maybe even more important<br />

than discrete symptom profiles. Recognizing <strong>and</strong> treating depression as a<br />

comorbid condition in patients with other medical illnesses represents an<br />

additional challenge for the primarycare physician. In anxietydisorders, it<br />

remains questionable whether the current ICD-10 diagnosis of generalized<br />

anxietydisorder, defined bya six month minimum duration <strong>and</strong> four<br />

associated symptoms, is the most appropriate option. Using this definition<br />

a substantial proportion of disabled subjects with lesser levels of anxiety,<br />

tension <strong>and</strong> worrying remain outside the diagnostic criteria, <strong>and</strong> hence may<br />

go untreated.<br />

The uncoupling of disabilityfrom diagnosis would allow the examination<br />

of the unique prognostic significance of disability<strong>and</strong> the interactive relationship<br />

<strong>and</strong> direction of change in symptomatology <strong>and</strong> functioning<br />

following interventions. It would allow the development of more rational<br />

forms of intervention, including rehabilitation strategies, which are specificallytargeted<br />

to improving functioning byaltering individual capacityor<br />

modifying the environment in which the person lives in order to improve<br />

real life performance. It would also underscore efforts to make changes at<br />

the level of health policy<strong>and</strong> the need to deal with larger social issues such<br />

as stigma in order to improve access to care <strong>and</strong> social participation of<br />

psychiatric patients.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!