03.01.2015 Views

Ecoflex® 400 Sustrate Support Mat (PDF) - Unifrax

Ecoflex® 400 Sustrate Support Mat (PDF) - Unifrax

Ecoflex® 400 Sustrate Support Mat (PDF) - Unifrax

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Canning Performance<br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> is typically installed at a nominal gap bulk density (GBD) of 0.40 g/cm 3 . The room temperature<br />

compression behavior of Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> is shown in Figure 1. The GBD range for each specific application will be<br />

defined according to the requirements for holding force and substrate strength.<br />

Pressure [kPa]<br />

1<strong>400</strong><br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

<strong>400</strong><br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> – Peak<br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> – Residual<br />

Ecoflex 200FL – Peak<br />

Ecoflex 200FL – Residual<br />

Typical Cold Compression Curve<br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> Substrate <strong>Support</strong> <strong>Mat</strong><br />

200<br />

0<br />

0.30 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.46 0.50<br />

GBD [g/cm 3 ]<br />

Figure 1: Typical Cold Compression Curve for Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> support mat.<br />

Erosion Resistance<br />

<strong>Support</strong> mat erosion may occur as a result of improper support mat installation or due to lack of holding force of<br />

the fiber matrix. Different types of support mat are more susceptible to erosion than others. Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> has been<br />

designed specifically to present a low erosion profile. Figure 2 presents comparative erosion resistance for different<br />

support mat types as a function of GBD.<br />

Volume Loss [cc]<br />

0.40<br />

0.35<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

Comparative Erosion Performance<br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> Substrate <strong>Support</strong> <strong>Mat</strong> vs. Exoflex 200FL Substrate <strong>Support</strong> <strong>Mat</strong><br />

Ecoflex <strong>400</strong><br />

Ecoflex 200FL<br />

0.00<br />

0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0.40<br />

GBD [g/cm 3 ]<br />

Figure 2: Comparative erosion data for Ecoflex <strong>400</strong> support mat.<br />

Form C-3139<br />

Effective 6/13<br />

© 2013, <strong>Unifrax</strong> I LLC<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

Printed in USA<br />

Page 2 of 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!